Slashdot Mirror


AI Mistakes Ad On a Bus For an Actual CEO, Then Publicly Shames Them For 'Jaywalking' (scmp.com)

An anonymous reader quotes the South China Morning Post: Since last year, many Chinese cities have cracked down on jaywalking by investing in facial recognition systems and AI-powered surveillance cameras. Jaywalkers are identified and shamed by displaying their photographs on large public screens... Developments are also underway to engage the country's mobile network operators and social media platforms, such as Tencent Holdings' WeChat and Sina Weibo, to establish a system in which offenders will receive personal text messages as soon as they are caught violating traffic rules....

Making a compelling case for change is the recent experience of Dong Mingzhu, chairwoman of China's biggest maker of air conditioners Gree Electric Appliances, who found her face splashed on a huge screen erected along a street in the port city of Ningbo... That artificial intelligence-backed surveillance system, however, erred in capturing Dong's image on Wednesday from an advertisement on the side of a moving bus. The traffic police in Ningbo, a city in the eastern coastal province of Zhejiang, were quick to recognise the mistake, writing in a post on microblog Sina Weibo on Wednesday that it had deleted the snapshot. It also said the surveillance system would be completely upgraded to cut incidents of false recognition in future.

The article says the mistakenly-accused CEO's company later thanked the traffic police for their hard work, and "called on people to obey traffic rules to keep the streets safe."

"The Chinese government is currently working to combine the operations of more than 170 million public security cameras to strengthen its surveillance network's ability to track and monitor the country's 1.4 billion citizens. Research firm IHS Markit has estimated that the number of surveillance cameras in China could reach 450 million by 2020."

154 comments

  1. It's so obvious by Krishnoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article says the mistakenly-accused CEO's company later thanked the traffic police for their hard work, and "called on people to obey traffic rules to keep the streets safe."

    And all along I thought we couldn't have it both ways.

    1. Re:It's so obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother

    2. Re:It's so obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The traffic police in Ningbo, a city in the eastern coastal province of Zhejiang, were quick to recognise the mistake, writing in a post on microblog Sina Weibo on Wednesday that it had deleted the snapshot.

      That's not good enough. They need to issue a sincere public apology and monetary compensation for THEIR fuck up.

    3. Re:It's so obvious by Askmum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know that you're in a police state when you have to thank the police for their good work and in the process add a totally mindless "obey the rules" to it too.

    4. Re:It's so obvious by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Looks like for the average Joe, whether you're fucked by government or by corporations doesn't really make that much a difference.

      "But I can vote for another government!"

      Yeah, that's the difference. With government, you can actually choose the name of the dick that gets to fuck you.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:It's so obvious by hai_Priesty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And also thanking the police state for making you "right" again quickly after they wronged you with no due process.

    6. Re:It's so obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Concerned about your liberties being taken away? Well if we don't take them away then we can't fix global warming.

      Feel better now?

    7. Re:It's so obvious by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      You know that you're in a police state when you have to thank the police for their good work and in the process add a totally mindless "obey the rules" to it too.

      Actually you know you're not in a bat shit blame and sue crazy state when a problem arises, is solved quickly, and no one claims that they deserve mountains of money for their "finanical damages" errr I mean hurt feelings.

    8. Re:It's so obvious by sconeu · · Score: 1

      That's why, back in the 2001 CA governer recall vote*, I voted for the porn star. My theory was we were going to get fucked no matter who won, so it might as well be by someone who really knew what they were doing.

      * You voted Yes/No on the recall *AND* for whoever would be gov, if the recall succeeded. I voted no on the recall itself.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:It's so obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off commie!

    10. Re:It's so obvious by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      That's why, back in the 2001 CA governer recall vote*, I voted for the porn star. My theory was we were going to get fucked no matter who won, so it might as well be by someone who really knew what they were doing.

      Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Coleman.

      * You voted Yes/No on the recall *AND* for whoever would be gov, if the recall succeeded. I voted no on the recall itself.

      It put Democrats in a fairly bad position. Many of them, like Cruz Bustamonte, had the unenviable task of saying "Vote no on the recall! But also... vote for me for recall governor!" That ticked a number of voters off, but the politicians were screwed either way.

  2. Will Winnie The Pooh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be held to the same standards?

    1. Re: Will Winnie The Pooh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His movie did so well in the theaters

  3. D'uh by gijoel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article says the mistakenly-accused CEO's company later thanked the traffic police for their hard work, and "called on people to obey traffic rules to keep the streets safe."

    Cause your going to publicly chew out petty public officials for their half arse algorithms in China, are you? We've all been worried about 1984, when we should have been worried about Brazil.

    1. Re:D'uh by OzPeter · · Score: 2

      The article says the mistakenly-accused CEO's company later thanked the traffic police for their hard work, and "called on people to obey traffic rules to keep the streets safe."

      Cause your going to publicly chew out petty public officials for their half arse algorithms in China, are you? We've all been worried about 1984, when we should have been worried about Brazil.

      Brazil? Hell no, China's going full on Black Mirror

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:D'uh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not only China.

      We get similar scenarios in the US but with private companies.

      Data entry error at an insurance company or a bank? Good luck. If you are rich enough you might be able to get it corrected before you are homeless.
      Just be happy you don't have a name similar to that of a criminal. It is a lot harder to get data corrected from jail.

  4. Test subject #2 by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let's see what the AI does with this.

  5. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right now there is one camera for every ten citizens.

    I was in Shanghai last month, and I saw a camera about every 100m or so. That might have been one for every 10 pedestrians on the street, but no where near one for every 10 people in the city.

    Anyway, I always though that China dealt with jaywalkers by making it legal for motorists to run over them. Even in a marked cross walk, you are often risking your life in Shanghai traffic.

  6. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you make things up and present them as if facts?

  7. Lololol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooops! Funny fail

  8. Jaywalking ? by dargaud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Europe we simply call it crossing the road, there's not even a word for it in the languages I know. Why do americans and chinese criminalise jaywalking ? WTF do they think is wrong with simply crossing a road when no cars are present ? I don't get it.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re: Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same.
      Except 1: I saw this in Germany (very low jaywalking and some public disapproval when it did happen) and 2: China is very populated and probably doesn't have a moment without some car or vehicle or bike?

    2. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Chinese people are insane. Whereas you will have dozens of them crossing the street at random while cars swerve around them.

    3. Re:Jaywalking ? by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Europe we simply call it crossing the road, there's not even a word for it in the languages I know. Why do americans and chinese criminalise jaywalking ? WTF do they think is wrong with simply crossing a road when no cars are present ? I don't get it.

      Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Serbia and Slovakia has rules against jaywalking too. But at least in Germany the fine is really symbolic, like 5-10 euro where the cop has to watch you cross and be annoyed enough about it to fine you. It's a cultural thing about rules, you wouldn't ignore a red light in a car because the coast is clear so why is the red man different? If it's there, use it. If it's there, wait for your turn. Don't set a bad example for the kids scurrying across the street at the smallest gap in traffic. It's also not so symbolic when it comes to division of fault and whether something was just an accident or reckless driving, that you were jaywalking counts against you even though the driver has a general obligation - a green light is not a license to ram. Though I prefer our system where we focus on saying it's allowed and focus on making everyone cross safely instead. But both systems works quite well.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re: Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jaywalking is frowned upon in Taiwan and Japan. It is considered a matter of public order. Visit a place with high population density and you'll see why.

    5. Re:Jaywalking ? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Much of Europe does have laws against it. It's more a matter of enforcement: Only in America (And apparently China) do police routinely issue citations or occasional arrests.

      One criticism of jaywalking laws in the US is that the crime is so common, enforcement depends largely on if the police nearby 'don't like the look of you.' Somewhat unsurprisingly, this often seems to come down to race - a very brief glance at statistics shows a suspiciously high percentage of jaywalking tickets go to blacks.

    6. Re:Jaywalking ? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Watch this short Youtube video of Adam ruins Everything. TL,DW: car manufactures made up "jaywalking" to clear the streets in the US of pedestrians and remove liability.

      At least in China they aren't using drones to hunt down "criminal street users" yet. YET.

    7. Re: Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe we simply call it crossing the road, there's not even a word for it in the languages I know. Why do americans and chinese criminalise jaywalking ? WTF do they think is wrong with simply crossing a road when no cars are present ? I don't get it.

      Jaywalking is the term used in all English speaking nations, ie, USA, UK, Canada, Australia, NZ, even countries like Singapore.

      All the west European nations I'm familiar with have a similar prohibition on illegal road crossings by pedestrians.

      I cannot understand why you don't get it

    8. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably to make people think twice before throwing themselves into traffic in hopes of getting a massive payout in court.

    9. Re:Jaywalking ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Germany too. I remember them warning us before going on a school trip.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Jaywalking ? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      WTF do they think is wrong with simply crossing a road when no cars are present ?

      It's not jaywalking if no cars are present. The definition of the word is to cross the street "without regard for approaching traffic."

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    11. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The red man is different because what the fuck is the point in standing around when there is no traffic at all at 1AM and you are standing there in the rain?

    12. Re:Jaywalking ? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      How long ago was that? Because jaywalking is absolutely normal in Germany and has been for several decades.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    13. Re:Jaywalking ? by dargaud · · Score: 1

      Then that's just 'impending the flow of traffic'. The jaywalking stories I've heard about in the US are more along the line of 'crossed the road out of the designed crosswalk'...

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    14. Re:Jaywalking ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It was when 5p coins would work as 1DM in vending machines, so not yesterday.

      From Wikipedia: "If one wants to cross the street outside the markings of traffic lights or crosswalks, one must carefully convince one's self before and during the crossing that the road is clear and wait before crossing if a vehicle approaches. A pedestrian must not interrupt the flowing traffic."

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It has to do with the history of how societies deal with homelessness and property in general. In the US, UK and Asia people without property are slaves and criminals and it's expressed through crimes like loitering, jaywalking, squatting and panhandling as well as picketing.

      To give an example, in China, people who lost their homes during a conflict would march to the palace and setup tents demanding lands and homes in recompense. The palace couldn't just send soldiers to kill them (well, most of the time) since the social contract did in fact required the Emperor to provide for the people in those circumstances so they just expanded the palace court and made it The Forbidden City where only the royal family and its aid may enter. Eventually the new normal became that you're not allowed to request anything from the government without going through official, non-transparent channels which is why the Chinese government doesn't understand why everyone is so angry with them when they run tanks over demonstrators.

      The US went through different steps as it criminalized how Native Americans migrated and didn't take permanent residence. Then when the slaves were "freed" they made a lot of laws criminalizing homelessness to make it hard for the blacks to leave to the cities. Then around the industrial revolution people were becoming homeless and unemployed and were picketing government offices and business so that had to have been made illegal too... All the way to the 60s where they started shooting down college students who were demonstrating against the war that sent their generation to die for a cause not their own.

      In Europe it was pretty much headed the same direction until WW2 rendered huge parts of the population homeless and jobless so the laws and social norms had to have been loosen. Not to worry though. With the Muslim immigrants, Europe is heading back on track and is already making new laws to legalize the very existence of the under-classes.

      TL;DR: Give it time. You'll have it too.

    16. Re:Jaywalking ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      you wouldn't ignore a red light in a car because the coast is clear

      Ever been to France or Italy? They ignore them whether the coast is clear or not.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Jaywalking ? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      In Europe we simply call it crossing the road, there's not even a word for it in the languages I know. Why do americans and chinese criminalise jaywalking ? WTF do they think is wrong with simply crossing a road when no cars are present ? I don't get it.

      Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Serbia and Slovakia has rules against jaywalking too. But at least in Germany the fine is really symbolic, like 5-10 euro where the cop has to watch you cross and be annoyed enough about it to fine you. It's a cultural thing about rules, you wouldn't ignore a red light in a car because the coast is clear so why is the red man different? If it's there, use it. If it's there, wait for your turn. Don't set a bad example for the kids scurrying across the street at the smallest gap in traffic. It's also not so symbolic when it comes to division of fault and whether something was just an accident or reckless driving, that you were jaywalking counts against you even though the driver has a general obligation - a green light is not a license to ram. Though I prefer our system where we focus on saying it's allowed and focus on making everyone cross safely instead. But both systems works quite well.

      Crossing for red isn't jay-walking. Jay-walking is crossing where there is no light.

      Also in China... Red for cars is entirely symbolic the cars DO NOT CARE... First time in Shanghai it took us a few minutes to figure out how to cross the roads as the car just kept driving while they had red and we had green, but then we so locals just step out in front of the cars, and figure we had to do the same...

    18. Re: Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UK citizen here. We do NOT call it "Jaywalking". We call it "Crossing the road".

    19. Re: Jaywalking ? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure it happens, I have never seen someone stopped by police for jaywalking in the US. Of course I am not black. I don't think it is all that common for a citation but it does give police a reason to question you.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    20. Re:Jaywalking ? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      You say that like separating cars and pedestrians is a bad thing and it's absolutely on the pedestrian not to get himself run over rather than the driver not to run you down. In the road that is.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    21. Re:Jaywalking ? by geoscodin · · Score: 1

      Technically jaywalking is crossing where there is not a crosswalk, or in a dangerous manner.
      So crossing against the red light is jaywalking. Just as it is to cross when you have the light, but choose to weave through the stopped vehicles instead of at the crosswalk, or when you risk running across the highway because you can probably beat the next car.

    22. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about absolutely normal, but it's definitely more prevalent then in the past. I blame globalization. It's taken all the fun & variety out of the world.

      That said, there's still the whole "bei Rot stehen, bei Grün gehen" thing here, especially when kids (and old people to yell at you) are around. 20-somethings in a city like Berlin probably don't give a shit, but head to the middle of Bavaria & I'll bet you ein Maß that the majority of the population will still wait for the green walk light before crossing, even at 3am in their empty little Dorf.

    23. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure China has been cracking down on jaywalking as of late, because they are trying to prepare society for driverless AI cars. Jaywalking was/is a huge problem in China, and not having to have driverless cars dodge people on the street would be huge relief.

    24. Re:Jaywalking ? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Only in America

      Not at all. It's enforced all over the world selectively. But the key is in most cases a policeman actively has to witness the "crime". I've seen it enforced in Australia, the UK, Germany, and The Netherlands as well.

    25. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because many american cities have enough traffic that there are always cars coming, and establishing controlled crossings and requiring pedestrians to use them is vastly safer than having people cross the road at random into continuous traffic.

    26. Re:Jaywalking ? by fisted · · Score: 1

      Jaywalking in Germany is only illegal if you do it in reasonable proximity (don't know if there's an exact number) of a pedestrian crossing.

      Then again, many Germans will not cross a red light even when the roads are completely empty and it's like 3am. Always makes me chuckle and cringe at the same time.

    27. Re:Jaywalking ? by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Because people in New York (generally; but this applies to most big cities in the US) are arrogant idiots. And lawyers.

      If you didn't strictly constrain people from crossing ONLY when permitted, people would be crossing the streets everywhere. If you could step out in front of a reasonably-slowly moving car and score a $1 mill lawsuit, there are lots of people that would - and already do anyway.

      Not to mention, having then to look for foot traffic literally everywhere, means drivers wouldn't get that important text sent.

      --
      -Styopa
    28. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like separating cars and pedestrians is a bad thing and it's absolutely on the pedestrian not to get himself run over rather than the driver not to run you down. In the road that is.

      Oh, separating cars and pedestrians isn't necessarily bad, but in this case it was more a matter of removing pedestrians without making a suitable alternative.
      Up to this day there aren't as convenient walkways as there were before cars pushed away pedestrians from the streets.

    29. Re:Jaywalking ? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      You assume the person walking across the street is even bothering to pay attention to ANYTHING outside of the smartphone screen they are holding up to their face. ( Then again, we're also assuming the driver of the car hurtling down the street isn't doing the exact same thing. In the case of neither paying attention due to staring at their phones, I wonder who would be considered at fault here. )

      Laws are created when common sense checks fail in any significant amount of a population.

      If there is a law for something, it's because someone did something stupid in the past to warrant creating one.

    30. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a green light is not a license to ram."

      But you MUST stop for a red man with no traffic?

      Are you even listening to what you're saying?

    31. Re:Jaywalking ? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      It was invented as a "crime" in the Deep South, as a way to imprison African-Americans, who frequently could not post bail, and force labor from them.

      It still exists for the exact same reason.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    32. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch this short Youtube video of Adam ruins Everything. TL,DW: car manufactures made up "jaywalking" to clear the streets in the US of pedestrians and remove liability.

      At least in China they aren't using drones to hunt down "criminal street users" yet. YET.

      Adam ruins everything... More like "Faggot ruins gays". It's so flamboyant I can't stand it? Why is all of his stuff so gaudily flamboyant?

    33. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we so locals just step out in front of the cars

      That is true for China Town, New York City as well. Look the other way and just cross is the way to do it here.

    34. Re:Jaywalking ? by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      Much of Europe does have laws against it. It's more a matter of enforcement: Only in America (And apparently China) do police routinely issue citations or occasional arrests.

      In the US, or in many boroughs of the US, the police rely on tickets to fund their own departments. So they have a financial incentive to issue speeding tickets, jaywalking tickets, and to impound property.

      a very brief glance at statistics shows a suspiciously high percentage of jaywalking tickets go to blacks.

      Because Black (though it's more correlated to income than race) neighborhoods tend to be higher crime neighborhoods. So the police hang out there a lot more. So they see a lot more. They issue more tickets, bust more illicit behavior. And the crime stats for that neighborhood tick up, and the cycle continues.

    35. Re:Jaywalking ? by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      The rules have to be there for liability reasons in the event of an accident so someone can be held responsible.

      This is really why China has to have these systems, because they don't have the extremely strong and thousand-year old system of common law that the West does.

      In the West, if you're jaywalking and get hit by a car, the driver is not at fault unless there is some extenuating circumstance. If on the other hand you are crossing on a green or at a marked intersection, the driver will be at fault. The person who is at fault can be subject to either civil or criminal penalties.

    36. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank God there are some countries left that value freedom. It amazes me there are so many people willing to surrender their individual agency and best judgment to a dumb light bulb hanging above a road that changes color every 2.5 minutes or so.

      If it is the middle of the night, there are no cars coming, and you have a clear view of the intersection, why must you wait for the red light bulb to cycle.

      "There only thing more despicable than the desire of a tyrant to enforce his will over others is the willingness of the others to be controlled by a tyrant"
      -Kermit the Frog

    37. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great to hear they are progressing. Pretty soon they will be like us in the land of the free. If people were allowed to live like a hobos, the government would not be able to get the taxes it needs to give us all our freedom.

      Freedom isn't free. You gotta pay and pay.

    38. Re: Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not a racial issue. A hobo looking white person would be arrested for jay walking long before a well dressed black man would.

      Its all how you carry yourself. If you don't look like you just committed a crime, you are less likely to draw attention to yourself.

    39. Re:Jaywalking ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did before red light cameras. Seriously. If you can see no one is coming, and it's 1 AM do you really need to sit there until it turns green? Sorry my programming never took something about an error in illkeepmyindividuality.dll.

  9. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think it was intended as a joke. Really, though, Shanghai drivers follow rules of the road pretty well, if not as well as in the US. Certainly better than many other East Asian nations (not a high standard, but still).

  10. Good Lord by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You'd think the AI would have figured out no one has a 5-foot-tall head?

    If it's that primitive, what's to stop Chinese citizens to walk around with photographs of Mao Zedong hanging in front of their faces? It might be amusing to see the reputation score of the late, great Chairman sinking into the toilet.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Good Lord by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Typical primitive machine learning, it doesn't "figure out" anything. It goes like "Pixels... pixels... pixels.... oh! I have seen that arrangement of pixels before, looks like a 'face', better have a closer look."

      So they train it to ignore 5 foot tall faces. Then it will catch the face of a motorist making a U turn.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Good Lord by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just carry a life size poster of chairman Xi Jinping with you wherever you go. Of course only to show your support and loyalty to The Party.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Good Lord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was gonna say they should all wear Xi Jinping masks.

      Mostly because he's just that fucking sexy.

    4. Re:Good Lord by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      You'd think the AI would have figured out no one has a 5-foot-tall head?

      If it's that primitive, what's to stop Chinese citizens to walk around with photographs of Mao Zedong hanging in front of their faces? It might be amusing to see the reputation score of the late, great Chairman sinking into the toilet.

      Um, because they'd get thrown in prison, beaten, and possibly killed?

      You do know that China is a totalitarian communist state, right?

    5. Re:Good Lord by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You'd think the AI would have figured out no one has a 5-foot-tall head?

      If you went blind in one eye, how would you recognise the size of an object you're analysing if you're unable to identify the distance it is from the camera?

  11. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    He doesn't get the luxury of making shit up, pretending it's a plausible fact, presenting it as a plausible fact, and then when it's obviously ridiculous to even the casual reader having someone assume it was humor.

    If you read his history you can see why he no longer gets that plausible deniability anymore. He's been caught too many times just making shit up from pure scratch.

    And presenting it as fact. There's zero evidence of any joke here. Jokes are funny.

  12. New business opportunity by prefec2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We should sell t shirts and jackets with Xi's face on them. Even better provide a printing service for photos on clothing so people can select their enemies as age for the shirts.

    1. Re:New business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silicone Masks. Nixons face, Trump masks, Porn star masks, let also cardboard cut-outs of the town Mayor and kids.Oh Dalai Lama, and the President of Taiwan. Suddenly high tech become low-junk tech. A silk scarf is thin and printable. Doing it on an electric scooter, the getaway could be quick.

    2. Re:New business opportunity by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      the getaway could be quick.

      It better be. Here, such shenanigans might earn you at worst a trip to the police stations where the cops will turn you out after a coffee and a brief interview. In China... hope you like breaking rocks for a living.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:New business opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Winnie the Pooh's face on them right? Since that's what Xi looks like I'm told.

    4. Re:New business opportunity by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Don't wear a Xi mask, a Mao mask or anything else. But surgical masks are pretty popular in China due to "air quality" and hide a face very nicely.

  13. Some of us are worried about all dystopian plots.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hell, at the rate we're going 'Brazil' might actually take place in... wait for it... Brazil! (Also everywhere else, but it is particularly ironic if it comes to roost in the land of its namesake.)

    The tele-screen of '1984' is only steps away given modern smart TVs, and if you look at prescription drugs we already have many facets of 'A Brave New World' working their way into common society. If we continue treating billionaires, sports figures, politicians, and corporate leaders as gods we will have similar to the leadership in it as well, but based only on a certain perverted metric of meritocracy.

  14. We Have Always Been At War With EastAsia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I say, let them kill themselves in the bloodbath that is sure to ensue, ensnare, extinguish.

  15. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by vbdasc · · Score: 1

    Dude, for the Heaven's sake, please, please, PLEASE seek medical help.

  16. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Calydor · · Score: 2

    You seem to misunderstand what 'plausible fact' is. It doesn't sound very plausible that killing other civilians within your own country would ever be permitted anywhere. Instead it sounds like hyperbole, which is exactly what it is.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  17. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's c6gummer impersonating APK, just FYI there's no point feeding that nazi idiot.

  18. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    " It doesn't sound very plausible that killing other civilians within your own country would ever be permitted anywhere." -Are you trolling? Never heard of castle doctrine, for just a single example? Dozens of ways.
    That's a very odd nit for you to try to pick in defense of his bullshit.

    You also failed to review his comment history for examples of bullshit presented as fact, because either you're on his balls for real or you're too lazy to even pretend to have a look. He probably has never been to Shanghai.

    Go on, moisten his attention seeking tiny penis with your implausible outrage. Continue.

  19. Guys this is funny. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Next up, every action hero has a warrant out for their arrest in China.

  20. Re: Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah that's California and Florida, where cars can run a red light (and pedestrians) if they are turning right.

  21. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he wants to be president some day...

    Besides, why the fuck do you care? A guy can write what he wants... Freedom baby!

  22. Obviously not true by aberglas · · Score: 2

    Facial recognition to confirm an identity, or pick one out of small sample is commonplace. But to be able to identify a face and pick out one in a billion people is way beyond software ability. It is also way beyond human capability. In a billion people, there will be thousands that look almost identical.

    For the facial recognition to work, it needs to know who is nearby. Not difficult when everyone carries a mobile phone. But it is unlikely that the CEO was on the bus.

    For things like passport control into Australia, the system has people stand in an exact spot, with good lighting, and look at a particular point. Quite different from a random image from people walking on a road.

    If they did have some magic software that really could pick out one in a billion, then it would not be fooled by a bus!

    That said, the Chinese internal surveillance system is very frightening.

    1. Re:Obviously not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a billion people, there will be thousands that look almost identical.

      A bit more than that. It's China, after all.

      You were all thinking it, so fuck off.

    2. Re:Obviously not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't change anything. If there's more than a billion, there will be even more than "thousands" of look-alikes.

    3. Re:Obviously not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facial recognition to confirm an identity, or pick one out of small sample is commonplace. But to be able to identify a face and pick out one in a billion people is way beyond software ability. It is also way beyond human capability.

      The system didn't identify anyone, it just put their picture on a big screen, to shame them.

  23. It is not funny to make fun of Xi by aberglas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Chinese would dream of that. Probably would not send them in jail, but would get the marked down badly in social credit. And maybe a fine. Certainly expulsion from the Communist party if a member.

    China is not a joke. That is why people self-censor very carefully. The risks and penalties are everywhere.

  24. Fascist China by nagora · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Where, when the state causes you harm you have to thank them or find yourself checking in your "organ donor card" early.

    Don't support, buy from, sell to, or tolerate China.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    1. Re:Fascist China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you dont want to do business with states that willfully "cause harm" to their citizens, then there is no state do business with.

    2. Re:Fascist China by nagora · · Score: 3

      I didn't actually say that, although what you say is unfortunately true.

      China, however, takes it to a new level where the subjects of the Government are reduced to the level of slaves who must publicly thank their masters for a beating because it is supposedly good for their morality.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    3. Re:Fascist China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they don't, they will disappear and the supply of "donated" organs gets a slight bump.

  25. Re:It's so obvious - Compulsory body cams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What China needs is compulsory body cams for all citizens, not only the police.

  26. Well then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the one hand, this is some hilarious 1984 nonsense by the Chinese government.
    On the other hand, the Chinese public is so terrible that I can understand why this was attempted, even though it won't solve anything.

  27. Still in beta by philmarcracken · · Score: 2

    Thats a horrible error since it completely ignored the more serious charge of stealing a bus.

  28. Corporate, government? What's the difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Try to find a politician who's not a lobbyist. For some corporation whose actions (as opposed to statements, and only looking at the numbers of given to vs taken from you) show that it is your direct enemy.
    Which, if you look at the original laws and their spirit, is literally treason. A crime, so bad, you get 20 years in prison for it. But because it's "normal"... casually done every day.

    In the USA, it's the same thing. (And where I live, mostly too.)

    How there's still anyone out there, oblivious to this, is fascinating.
    (Although I can understand how I might be too much for some people, to accept.)

    Please don't spread the meme that there's a difference.
    Because that enables the hate against "the government", when "the government", in an actual democratic state, by definition must mean the people on *your* side. And hating those would make no sense. So since corporations are factually the government, the only answer is, that it's not a democracy.

  29. Re:IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus christ, use an account and people can't impersonate you, genius.

  30. What every Chinese citizen dreads by Maritz · · Score: 1

    The next series of Black Mirror. AKA "Guide to The Internet Age for the Communist Party of China"

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  31. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    You've left my hook nose out of your article AGAIN... you are poorly impersonating APK, at best...

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  32. Americans follow road rules? Since when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to Germany. Then you'll see well-trained drivers following the rules.
    It's kinda our thing though. We follow rules, period, even if it means death or genocide. Try going across a street with a red pedestrian light, with no cars for miles, but with some people seeing you, and you'll know what I man. We don't give a single shit about the actual right and wrong. All that matters is... rules, rules, above everything.

    At least we get no speed limits on (a large part of) the Autobahn (=highways).

    1. Re: Americans follow road rules? Since when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. German drivers suck just as much as any others in western nations.

      Truth is, humans aren't built for driving cars. Ethnicity plays no role here.

    2. Re:Americans follow road rules? Since when? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany is a strange country. This was never more clear than when I drove there. Large expensive cars did not cut me off. They even yeilded when I had the right of way. Quite a surprise, me in my rinkydink little car actually felt safe. Well, not on the autobahn... Doing 100 mph and even then you get overtaken by cars going significantly faster.
      Oh, and did you know BMW's in Germany actually use their blinkers? Madness!

  33. Because of car industry propaganda. Sources: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The history is, as so often, really fucked-up:

    Why Jaywalking Is A Crime -- Adam Ruins Everything

    1. Re:Because of car industry propaganda. Sources: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The history is, as so often, really fucked-up:

      Why Jaywalking Is A Crime -- Adam Ruins Everything

      More like "Faggot Ruins Gays"...

  34. Re: You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by c6gunner · · Score: 1

    People have been telling him to seek help for decades. You're wasting your breath. Peter thinks he's the only sane one here.

  35. she was lucky by sad_ · · Score: 2

    being a big CEO, she was lucky to get her picture removed quickly by the police.
    i wonder how much success the average chinese person would have in a case like this.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:she was lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer: Not very much.

      https://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=656262681

  36. tithe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the politically correct get an exemption from shaming.

  37. This sounds like a set up for a Will Smith Action by ErstO · · Score: 1

    Our hero is in China promoting his new movie and his face is plastered on buses all over China, his social score drops so low the authorities go looking for him and he has to don a disguise and go into hiding.

    Sound stupid? Of course, it’s a Will Smith action movie, it will be great!

  38. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was in Shanghai last month, and I saw a camera about every 100m or so. That might have been one for every 10 pedestrians on the street, but no where near one for every 10 people in the city.

    Yup, those were the cameras you saw. You might also ponder whether the biggest city in the world is a representative sample. (And that's not even counting all the smart phones.)

    But the important thing is to keep saying positive things about China and it's government, assuming you wan't to keep visiting. You know they're reading your posts, and you know they know who you are.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  39. double standard? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    How much do you want to bet that a random citizen would have had a MUCH harder time getting their social credit score fixed after a mistake like this?

    Also, since China still has a pretty large problem with official corruption and someone in an office was able to fix this with a few clicks of a mouse, it's only a matter of time before black market social credit buffing becomes a reality.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  40. Re:You people need to STOP BULLYING ME... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. This is honestly the most amusing and entertaining thing I've ever seen on slashdot and I've just looked at the website in passing for I don't know how many years. This is the kind of thing I've would've posted, even with the caps, to try and justify to myself that I'm as good as I think I am back when I really started to look at the internet in the '99-02 era.

    I mean, damn, you took time out to think this up. Props.

  41. "are we lame fools or foolish lamers?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If all you have to say is "Is this more like Nineteen-Eightyfour, Brave New World and/or Black Mirror?", then maybe say nothing.

    > The salvation of the world depends only on the individual whose world it is. At least, every individual must act as if the whole future of the world, of humanity itself, depends on him. Anything less is a shirking of responsibility and is itself a dehumanizing force, for anything less encourages the individual to look upon himself as a mere actor in a drama written by anonymous agents, as less than a whole person, and that is the beginning of passivity and aimlessness.

    -- Joseph Weizenbaum

    As Jacob Appelbaum's father allegedly said to him, "if there's another Holocaust it'll be your fault, because you didn't prevent it".

    You can roll your eyes and make faces all you want, virtue signallign this, smug superiority that, we all know the drill. But that doesn't remove you the wrong side of history, it just means you're on the wrong side of history and making faces.

    Stop eating popcorn, start helping to pump out the stomaches of people who just sit there eating popcorn.

    1. Re:"are we lame fools or foolish lamers?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guilt evolved as a successful way to support your genes success. Religion took it over so it could sell you indulgence (for not feeling guilty).

  42. Life is hard, find someone to blame. by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    Life is getting harder globally so we are all collectively finding someone to blame.
    We see this with Brexit, Donald Trump, Increased Chinese hunting of subversives, rise in support for terrorism, racism, and nationalism...
    We are not looking to ourselves to say to yourself "What am I, doing that are making things worse, which I can fix." We are looking at others say "They the others are making things worse" and actively try to make their lives more difficult. While they see you making their lives difficult and equate you the "other" is the cause of all the problems.

    This creates a viscous cycle, that makes things worse, because everyone is blaming everyone else for their troubles, and making the others lives more difficult.

    The only solution now takes a lot more energy and effort is to be introspective and actively try to break the cycle.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Life is hard, find someone to blame. by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Viscous cycle? Is that like when you use the really thick oil on your bike chain?

    2. Re:Life is hard, find someone to blame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a fallacy that I used to believe. Now I believe the only way to break the cycle is to look outside yourself for the answers. Introspection and blaming yourself only makes you feel worse. Now if you blame others, it makes you feel better and you give the next guy something to worry about. Also because you lay the blame firmly on others and never yourself, others will look up to you and you will be promoted. It's a win win

      It also works on a national level. Europe after the fall of Rome went through a bad period. They were able to get out of it by Declaring Islam evil, and invading the middle east.

      Nothing spurs progress and development more than an external enemy to compete against. China is definitely competing against the West. Unfortunately the West is being introspective and blaming itself for its problems. It's a crisis of confidence that can only be dealt with by finding and external scapegoat. It's either that or accept your new Chinese rulers. After all they have all the answers and know just who to blame

  43. That's a lot of cameras by turp182 · · Score: 1

    The article says there are 170 million surveillance cameras for 1.4 billion people. That's about 1 camera for every 8.2 people.

    Further, it says there could be up to 450 million cameras by 2020. Keeping the population the same, that's 1 camera for every 3.1 people.

    For a comparison, using Wikipedia, the UK has about 4.2 million cameras (500,000 in London), about 1 for every 14 people:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  44. Depends on the US city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This really depends on the US city. Take San Antonio. I wind up there on occasion for crazy-busy conventions downtown. I was surprised because people actually stop at crosswalks, street corners were for people crossing, nobody tried to play Frogger, even when the sidewalks were packed, and when a light turned yellow, people stopped. Even the people on the Bird/Limebike/Uber scooters obeyed traffic laws.

    Now, take Austin, 88 miles north. Pedestrians -have- to jaywalk, because cars don't stop at lights, and 90% of all car/ped or car/bike collisions turn into hit and runs. So, you get a choice between trying to guess which of four directions are cars coming to hit you, or you cross in the middle of the street where you just have to watch two directions. Of course, add in the scooters which will be on the sidewalk, roads, anywhere. Oh, don't forget the bums in-your-face panhandling at every street corner, and the whole downtown area smelling like piss and K2.

    Even in Berkeley, cars actually stop at pedestrian intersections.

    It really depends on the US region about how people follow traffic laws or not.

  45. death race 2020! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    death race 2020!

  46. Just wait for self driving car to make errors like by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Just wait for self driving car to make errors like this

  47. True and false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything about the modern world is a proof against itself. The CEO is being critiqued for jaywalking, when the actual danger of putting advertisements literally on the streets is a much bigger distraction than one or two pedestrians crossing illegally.

    One is wrong even though it saves time (and time is money), the other is OK because it provides some offset vs the cost of running public transportation.

  48. Dystopian futures while you wait. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    I know this sounds fucking horrible, but in someways I'm glad this dystopian future is coming to fruition somewhere so we can all collectively go "Fuck no!"
    Yes, I know credit scores are some weird form of the social score. I'm as of yet not been denied the purchase of a plane ticket and/or bus pass because my credit score is too low...

    I can only hope this is a good demonstration of tech gone awry that the world recoils from. Otherwise, I will seriously have to hollow out a hill and become a hermit... Or become a camera smashing vigiante... either way I'm sure it'll seriously impact my social score.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  49. Re:Just wait for self driving car to make errors l by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

    Just wait for self driving car to make errors like this

    And do what, stop before it hits the side of a bus?

  50. Adam Ruins Everything by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    did an episode on it.

    TL;DR; car companies wanted to take over the roads so they created the term and tied it to a disliked minority to give it a bad connotation. At least that's how it went down in America.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Adam Ruins Everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did an episode on it.

      TL;DR; car companies wanted to take over the roads so they created the term and tied it to a disliked minority to give it a bad connotation. At least that's how it went down in America.

      Adam ruins everything... More like "Faggot ruins gays". Why is his shit so fucking flamboyant? Who wants to see such gaudy flamboyancy?

  51. Re:It's so obvious - Compulsory body cams by scrout · · Score: 0

    Compulsory body cavity searches.....

  52. IMPERSONATING ME AGAIN? apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gweihir KNEW u IMPERSONATE me https://it.slashdot.org/commen... c6gunner proves it https://linux.slashdot.org/com... & forgot to SUBMIT AC & used his registered 'lusrname' (he tried to mock me both BEFORE & after I FAIRLY challenged him to show he's done better work - he had ZERO).

    I'd never "cry victim" to ne'er-do-wells (TROLLS, not all /.ers) either.

    U EVEN HELPED ME https://science.slashdot.org/c... (& then realizing it you quit trying to make me look bad via what you thought were lies on hosts as "ME" IN YOUR IMPERSONATIONS of me e.g. https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... on speculative execution attack: Hosts PREVENT 'EM, joke's on you)

    APK

    P.S.=> 2nd to last link's KILLING U THAT U HELPED ME & got me to see if hosts stop portsmash/meltdown/spectre & yes - hosts WORK on 'em - U LOSE + FAIL a PORTFILTER TEST https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...

  53. How does face recognition even work at all by Latent+Heat · · Score: 0

    in China where everyone looks alike?

    1. Re:How does face recognition even work at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously facial recognition is tailored to Chinese faces. In China you might look like any other white person to the system.

    2. Re:How does face recognition even work at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all chanks look alike, ya racist prick

    3. Re:How does face recognition even work at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It works the same way it does in any western country where all the people look alike

  54. Die retard, die! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SHUT THE FUCK UP you stupid yank piece of shit.
    I can't actually believe what a boot-licking, cock-sucking worthless sack of shit you actually are.
    No this can't be real, there can't be people like you in existence, and if there are you are yours need to be rounded up and gassed.
    Holy fucking shit.

  55. Muh freedumbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual ameriCUCKS are SO FUCKING STUPID, they just go along with it, AND call it freedom.

  56. See by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    This is the level of stupid that we have to make sure is fixed before we start handing these systems access to anything that would be considered a critical system.
    ( Banking, Stock Markets, Healthcare, Military applications, etc )

    Otherwise some future AI is going to be perusing cat pictures on the internet, go f****ng nuts and decide to end us all. :D

  57. tl;dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of the class struggle.

  58. Giant what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the headline could have been: Chinese Government Wrongly Shows Image of a CEO on a Giant Electronic Billboard?

    In either case, it's a good thing the headline used her job title, rather than her name.

  59. Only in an Asian nation... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    Only in an Asian nation would publicly shaming someone work. In a western culture someone would just wave smile and go their merry way. Or even better they would be a corporate 'influencer' and make an extra $ off the exposure. Look at me ! I'm on TV.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  60. This is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good thing for western businesses; just when it seems like China has figured out how to embrace creative endeavors, they have created a system to destroy people, and their children, who don't fit the status quo with the "social credit score" there by punishing those who operate outside the box. And the people who operate outside the box are also the ones who are the visionaries who drive development.

    Thanks China, western countries still have nothing to fear from you.

  61. Dong - Choices for Chinese Names and Romanization by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    So we still have dirty sounding translations into English like "Dong" for a name. Why? The current trend in romanizing of Chinese is to translate something that sounds like "sheh sheh" which means thank you, into "xiè xie". You have to study Chinese Mandarin in college for 6 months before you'll ever know how to pronounce this stuff now.

    I like the way they translated stuff back in the 1960s. You know, Jackie Chan can be said by anybody in an English speaking place just by looking at the name, and it is close enough. Jackie Chan born today would probably be translated to something like Jackie "Xzyingx" now. Jet Li into Jet "Kiuahz" no doubt. Yet Dong Suk probably still translates to "Dong Suk". WHY? Something to do with Zhuyin vs. Pinyin I guess. Annoys me to no end. Every other language that gets translated into English at least has some basis for picking the damn letters that are close enough in sound.

  62. Re:Ratio of cameras to citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you suffer crippling hospital and family costs for the rest of their life if you do not back up and finish them off. It really is that bad.

  63. Due process by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    This kind of mistake is precisely why we (mostly) have due process in the United States.

  64. How many non-CEOs didn't get the apology? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    This was a story because the victim was a prominent CEO. How many regular people were "caught" by this system for jaywalk on, say, sidewalks, and they just had to live with the shaming?

  65. Re:We need a good purge of the nazi faggots on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modified version of Fallout 2's death message:

    "You have died; along with everything else on the galaxy. The People's Republic of China with Xi Jinping the Evil Elemental triumphs, releasing the cross-substance virus into the space, then dies."