Slashdot Mirror


In Some Bay Area Counties, College Grads Have Higher Unemployment (mercurynews.com)

Higher education is supposed to be the ticket to employment. But in some Bay Area counties, workers with a high school diploma have lower unemployment rates than those with bachelor's degrees or higher. From a report: Experts suggested the Bay Area's backwards numbers, which run counter to the national trend, could be the result of too-few lower-wage workers, many of whom have been driven out by skyrocketing housing prices and the rising cost of living. "We have employers call us all the time (saying), 'I'm looking for low-wage, entry-level workers,'" said Kris Stadelman, director of NOVA Workforce Development in Sunnyvale. But there are few workers willing to take on those positions who don't already have jobs, she said.

In Santa Clara County, the heart of Silicon Valley, the unemployment rate for workers with a high school degree is 3.3 percent, compared to a 3.6 percent rate for workers with a bachelor's degree or higher, according to the U.S. Census Bureau's 2017 American Community Survey, which measures unemployment by educational attainment for workers between 25 and 64 years old. The same situation exists in two other Bay Area counties -- Marin and Sonoma -- where workers with at least a bachelor's degree don't have the lowest unemployment rate.

The trend is starkest in Sonoma County, where workers without a high school degree have a 0.2 percent unemployment rate compared to a 4.4 percent rate for workers with a bachelor's degree or higher. Workers with a high school diploma in that county have an unemployment rate of 2.8 percent. Statewide, workers with a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 6.2 percent, nearly double the 3.5 percent rate of those with a bachelor's or higher.

272 comments

  1. Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most college degrees have been worthless for 20 years, this is not news. Entering a trade right after high school and making money during your most productive years is MUCH better than spending that time going into six-figure debt for a worthless piece of paper. Higher education turned into a racket during the 1990's, probably before.

    1. Re:Not news. by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I make more now working in a office than I would've made as an electrician.
      Also, the hours sucked. It is brutal to work in Florida outside in the summer. Or where there is nothing to move air. Also, much higher chance of dying on the job.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    2. Re:Not news. by poet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Most" is probably the "most" inaccurate statement in the world on this.

      It is true you don't need a degree to be a fantastic Pythonista. Try getting a job as a discrete graphics engineer, nurse, teacher, or accountant without a degree. It is true that Trades are a great way to go as well but even most trades have a required educational component.

      --
      Get your PostgreSQL here: http://www.commandprompt.com/
    3. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I didn't realise we had got to the point where office workers make 250k+. Must be an exceptional office you work at. Our office workers get between 35%-60% of us EE techs

    4. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do not have a degree and I work as a graphics driver engineer at the top discreet graphics company.

      An education is vital for my role, but a slip of paper from an accredited University is not strictly necessary. My experience is that being self taught was a lower cost but more work in order to rise to a similar level of experise. If you can afford University, then go. It's a less turmoilous path than that of maverick.

    5. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it would be more realistic if they stopped calling art degrees "higher education".

    6. Re: Not news. by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Lets see.
      $10 an hour as an starting electrician.
      or
      $13 an hour for being a phone monkey.
      No contest. I still rather work at a call center than ever do that again.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    7. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most" is probably the "most" inaccurate statement in the world on this.

      It is true you don't need a degree to be a fantastic Pythonista. Try getting a job as a discrete graphics engineer, nurse, teacher, or accountant without a degree. It is true that Trades are a great way to go as well but even most trades have a required educational component.

      Plus in many areas trade apprenticeships are so limited that you need to be the "Son of a Stonecutter" to even get in.

    8. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On what planet is a starting electrician only making $10/hr?

      "In 2016, the median wage for an electrician was $52,720. The highest-paid earned $90,420, while the lowest-paid electricians earned around $31,800 that year. An apprentice usually makes between 30 percent and 50 percent less than someone who is fully trained."
      https://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/electrician/salary

      The scale varies in areas with higher cost-of-living too. Expect those wages to be much higher in Silicon Valley.

    9. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Electrician since I was 16 full time minus few years in prison. Was between jobs once tried a call center.. after 3 days of being told I was weasrimg the wrong clothes and that I had to stay seated at my "desk" I told the manager to fuck off and where to put his job and walked out. He chased me down as I was one of the productive people begging me to stay. All I can say is FUCK THAT NOISE! Excuse me while into back to terminating this panel. And fuck a desk job.

    10. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is easy To explain these numbers. If you have no degree and you can do degree-level work you will be in demand because companies try to pay you less for the same work. In any case, I doubt demographically you see such a specific line in terms of employment numbers. A lot of these higher educated people are still just families who just pay their bills and live their lives just like any HVAC technician would

    11. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turmoilous. This is your mind on "Self-Taught".

    12. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a myth. There are shortages everywhere for tradesmen: mechanics, welders, pipe-fitters. You can name almost name your price. They'll pay you around $40k/yr to learn, then double that once certified.

    13. Re: Not news. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Agreed: I worked in a call center for a major US phone co back in the 90s. I was told to write customer issues down on a paper pad, wasn't given a computer to look up customer accounts, and was told to lie that I was looking up account info despite having to capacity to do so. Got myself fired after about a week -- I ended up telling quite a few customers the whole story for fun and giggles.

    14. Re:Not news. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It isn't clear that "We have employers call us all the time (saying), 'I'm looking for low-wage, entry-level workers,'" means "skilled tradesmen wanted"; rather than "local housing prices mean that everyone as cheap as I want my labor to be has either moved away or is already working 3.5 jobs to make rent".

      This isn't to say that a BA in something that's not terribly marketable is a better idea than relevant trade experience and qualification(it often isn't); but "looking for low-wage, entry-level workers" likely rules out skilled trades as much as it does BAs looking for the bottom rung of the white collar ladder; that's somebody looking for cheap landscaping and big-box service sector peons at lowest possible cost.

    15. Re:Not news. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Problem is that welding the same fucking thing day in, day out, or plumbing, or residential electric can get boring as shit for an intelligent person after a few weeks to months. Manual labor should be a choice, but it shouldn't be a forced choice, either.

    16. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electrician since I was 16 full time minus few years in prison. Was between jobs once tried a call center.. after 3 days of being told I was weasrimg the wrong clothes and that I had to stay seated at my "desk" I told the manager to fuck off and where to put his job and walked out. He chased me down as I was one of the productive people begging me to stay. All I can say is FUCK THAT NOISE! Excuse me while into back to terminating this panel. And fuck a desk job.

      Sounds like those few years did little to adjust your attitude issues.

    17. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sure the Indians are grateful for your liberal years /s if you say it even more emphatically and with more belief in your eyes maybe just maybe they will glance your way again ... not

    18. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're not designed to.

    19. Re:Not news. by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't understand the article. What they point out is that the people who don't have college degrees have been forced out of the area due to the high cost of living. The ones that are left are in high demand because they are willing to work for lower wages. The people with college degrees are looking for higher wages and thus are likely to be unemployed. The college degreed people could take those lower wage jobs if they wanted them and be fully employed, but they are looking for something better. If you have the opportunity to go to college you should take it. Most people on the planet don't have that choice.

    20. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to break it to you but the vast majority of jobs get pretty boring after a few weeks to months, that' why its called "work". Know what makes that survivable? A very comfortable living that allows for a lifestyle you enjoy. Most of us aren't defined by our jobs or have our self-worth tied to them, they are simply a means to an end.

    21. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "experise", LOL.

    22. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only part of the story though.
      If you throw out junk degrees like "gender studies" and count those people as only having a HS diploma, the numbers are much closer to normal.
      The other issue is that if I'm looking for a store clerk or someone to detail cars, I'd rather get someone who is more likely to stick around and do the job well. I don't need another college Grad who feels the job is beneath them, looking down their noses at the customers and coworkers, who will simply no-show for their shift because some hipster venture capitalist told them they had a shot at the big time. Most of them will be back in my office in a month when rent is due, begging for their job back.

    23. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minimum wage should be $50/hr and starting engineers should make om average north of $300k/ yr. At least for toilet paper currencies like the US dollar.

    24. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to know people who worked at a telemarketing firm before the days of robocalling. One person would always mark "yes" when they called someone about signing up for a magazine subscription. At the time, people would confirm zip codes... but if you knew the town, you could tell that 555-123-xxxx will always be in a certain zip code, so you could mark it down.

      Said guy made salesperson of the year... until someone filed a lawsuit and he wound up fired.

    25. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the US, prison isn't designed to adjust attitude issues, except for the worse. The environment is designed to hopefully get inmates to get nailed on more charges, turning any sentence into a LWP sentence, or ensuring that they have zero skills in the outside world, so they boomerang right back.

      It isn't hard to get a severe prison sentence here in the US. Urinate on a wall as a school bus passes by, and that's 30-40 charges of indecency with a child, which ensures the judge will make the sentences serve consecutively, and combined with the three strikes rule, that virtually guarantees the only way out of the pen is feet first.

    26. Re: Not news. by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, when was the last time you saw an electrician (or plumber, or carpenter, or other tradesman) get his job sent overseas?

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    27. Re:Not news. by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Problem is that welding the same fucking thing day in, day out, or plumbing, or residential electric can get boring as shit for an intelligent person after a few weeks to months.

      So can web development, writing yet another database abstraction layer, designing yet another power supply, or any of the other tedious work that those of us in the tech industry find ourselves doing for a paycheck.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    28. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your dick in your pants.

    29. Re: Not news. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 0

      These stats never align with reality. There are just to many variables to peg numbers on any given trade.

      --
      You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    30. Re:Not news. by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      My wife and I have talked about it... and we've decided we would rather have our kids live with us forever and do something that makes them happy (they are amazing artists) rather than have them do a trade that will wreck their bodies and will make them bitter about life. I wouldn't want them to be plumbers, or electricians, or anything in the trades because I have seen what that work does to people.

      If welders are getting paid $150k or whatever, all the power to them; they deserve it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    31. Re:Not news. by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An yet here we have a great example of the problem. You think just because YOU find these jobs boring that other people do too. YOU think that everyone has the same values as you do. That is far from the truth.

      Odds are you have never done any of these jobs so you really know only what you have been taught about them. I have cousin that is welder. He loves his job. One month he is working on a job in New Orleans, a few months later he is welding high steel in Chicago. His job takes him all around the country.

      I have another cousin who is diesel mechanic. He drives a truck around repairing broken down 18 wheelers. He rarely travels 30 miles from his home. He loves his job. He says he wouldn't be doing anything else.

      A job, ether blue collar or white is what you make out of it. Some people just like working with their hands and wouldn't have it any other way.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    32. Re: Not news. by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, they don't get sent overseas, however they can be replaced by imported labor. In the south, carpenters, brick layers, (anything related to home building) has largely been replaced by cheaper imported labor. I would say that you wouldn't see that as much in customer-facing labor such as a plumber or electrician that you call to come to your house, but for bulk carpentry, electrical, and plumbing, it's a thing.

    33. Re:Not news. by slazzy · · Score: 2

      "Higher Education" means the size of your student loan afterwords.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    34. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why some Americans want that fucking wall on the border

    35. Re:Not news. by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the summary. In the Bay Area, there's not enough people to fill low wage entry level jobs, probably because you can't possibly hope to survive on that wage in that area. People with more education could take those jobs if they wanted, but they're choosing not to. If you look at the country wide stats you'll see that the trend reverses, and those with more education have drastically lower unemployment rates.

      Also, if the first few years immediately after high school are your most productive (zero knowledge required manual labour jobs?), your job is probably going to be automated away within the next 5-10 years if it hasn't already.

    36. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you expect a union job. There's a shortage of help in the trades in nearly every area.

    37. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I smoke pot all day long while I'm sanding floors

    38. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And those that want the wall are fucking stupid. Audit the employers and fine them for 50k per illegal on the first two offenses, and then take their business license on the third offense.

      Problem fucking solved; multi-billion dollar wall not needed.

    39. Re:Not news. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Most college degrees have been worthless for 20 years, this is not news. Entering a trade right after high school and making money during your most productive years is MUCH better than spending that time going into six-figure debt for a worthless piece of paper.

      Yeah, bias and stupid have definitely replaced reading the summary, let alone reading the article.
       
      The shortage isn't about the trades, but rather low-skill, low-wage, entry level positions. (The trades are generally skilled, higher wage positions.) This is about laborers, retails workers, fast workers, etc... The invisible folks who don't make enough money to live in those high cost of living counties.

    40. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

      LOL Whats funny about that is I think that every time they run a "AI Stole my jerb!!!" article or "We need UBI because of AI... They tuk err jerbs!" here on slashdork. Something keeps me here though. Haven't been able to shy away from reading since 03.

    41. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct. This is why we need to protect our borders. It is not nearly as bad for electricians because few illegals that didn't do the professional in mexico or w/e they're from, make it very long. And they could damn sure never do my job. I don't fear an illegal taking my job, but I do fear them ruining my wage. Race to the bottom right...

    42. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

      And what about the businesses that have illegals with stolen credentials? They are fine right? And why do you want to have the government have to babysit every company in the country? Why not just build the wall. It would cut the issue far faster, hell they can even audit once or twice in the few years after just to make sure its doing its job, since you want them to pry into everybody's businesses. literally..

    43. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      If you knew me, let alone before prison.. You wouldn't be so judgmental..

    44. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      He's not joking. Especially in Las Vegas. The joke is "Come on Vacation, leave on prbation."

    45. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then even more of them will be draining or social services. You can't have a welfare state and an open border. Choose one.

    46. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am an artist. I weld. Plumbing and electrical work are also art.

      You aren't doing your children any favors.

    47. Re:Not news. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Then learn how to do that over a number of trucks and vans.
      Sending them all out and looking after the wages, tax, permits and brand.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    48. Re:Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Not everybody has parents that can afford that. I had to start working to help with bills... Must be rough...

    49. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bra. But we know you're full of shit. There are very few companies out there that thrive paying more for indirect labor than direct without government assistance. Those companies that do get gobbled up by competitors and those who are living high on the hog find themselves as highly educated, unemployed, and replaced by cheaper, overseas alternatives.

    50. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the construction type industries (electrical, plumber, dry way, etc etc etc).

      You get what you pay for.

      I paid a painter to paint my 2300 sqft house for about 7k. Another guy was quoting 4k.

      The 4k guy never bothered to show to any of the meetings with me and wanted me to leave the 'key in the mailbox' and he would 'take a look'. One day I drove over 100 miles to meet with the dude. He pulled a no show. Then tried to tell me I did not show up. "dude I called you 4 times that day and you did not answer or return the call for over a month".

      The 7k guy met with me 4 different times to make sure everything was 'just right'. HE setup the meetings. I did not have to do it.

      I hired the 7k guy.

      Quality you pay for. Flaky I can get on craigs.

      Always get at least 2-3 quotes. It is a pain in the ass to do. But there is so much shit work being done out there. I am willing to pay for quality. It is where I live.

    51. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bureau of Labor Statistics maintains detailed statistical data on a wide variety of occupations and locations. To claim apparently without any specific knowledge or evidence that the data is too variable to be meaningful is just ignorant. A quick web lookup for the San Jose area show the mean annual income of construction electrician is about $78000 as of May 2017.

    52. Re: Not news. by Pseudonym · · Score: 0

      You don't even need to do anything. When you have plea bargaining, elected prosecutors, and elected judges, actual innocence usually gets you off with a misdemeanor.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    53. Re:Not news. by Xenx · · Score: 2

      Patronage is a very real thing. It's not a direct comparison to a 9-5 job, but the simplification of it is that their kids' job to be artists. It just so happens that it's their parents providing the patronage.

      This doesn't mean that it cannot be bad for the kids, just that it's definitely not as bad as you imply. As long as the kids are actively working at being artists, and have the talent ascribed to them, then it may very well be in their best interest to support them.

    54. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing that killed NetBSD was its obsession with boat anchors pulled out of dumpsters. While the other BSDs were busy implementing their vision of a modern operating system, NetBSD was more like a hobby for guys playing with obsolete gear one step away from the landfill. That was precious time and resources wasted all for naught. Time and resources squandered on woolgathering and dumpster diving was time lost forever. And as the few developers drifted away to other projects, what was left resembled someone's garage museum of abandoned computers.

    55. Re: Not news. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      $250k is fairly common for senior developers in Silicon Valley right now.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    56. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stolen credentials are not difficult to verify. Typically you test the credentials against employment records to find duplication of hiring records, particularly if the duplication takes place in geographically-distinct areas. You also look for discrepancies in sex/age vs. work: if a 60-year-old grandmother is asking to work with a drywall subcontractor, then something may be wrong.

      The goal is not to "babysit" employers, but to find and destroy utterly those that break the law. Make blood run in the streets. Make them fear ICE.

      Then you cut off social services to immigrants and viola, problem solved. They will scatter to the winds, or concentrate in those areas foolish enough to offer social services to immigrants (Cali, possibly elsewhere).

      The problem is that until Trump was in the White House, you had a scenario where the INS/ICE would raid someone's meat packing plant (or what have you) only for some "concerned citizen" to start raising hell with an influential member of the House or Senate shortly thereafter. Somehow, the ball would get rolling behind the scenes very quickly, and the INS/ICE would let up on the offending employer right away. Even with Trump, eVerify still isn't working properly, and they still aren't hitting businesses often enough or hard enough.

      But it is not surprising that so many of the immigrant movements today try to take advantage of our screwed-up "asylum" laws instead of just jumping the border. Currently the easiest way to enter the country illegally is to get a court date and then fail to appear. Enforcement has proven impossible, especially with the prison camps and in-custody deaths marring the administration's already-shaky reputation.

    57. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "teh borduh" isn't the fucking problem, it is criminal employers exploiting imported labor. People won't stay if they can't find a job, because even your average gang banger has a day job to make the rent these days.

    58. Re: Not news. by sd4f · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what it's like in the USA, but here in Australia, trades are well protected with a lot of certification requirements, tradesmen need qualifications and licenses to operate in their respective fields. Doesn't stop unqualified or licensed workers, but they're quite effectively shut out, and because a lot of the time, it's in the name of safety, a lot of companies don't want to risk it.

      Your bottom end tradesmen like painters or labourers, well yea, anyone can do that, but they're relatively low paying to begin with.

    59. Re: Not news. by fubarrr · · Score: 1

      I can say that quite the same situation is in China

    60. Re: Not news. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On what planet is a starting electrician only making $10/hr?

      Depends, before or after expenses? The only rich electricians I know are those lucky enough to get themselves a steady position at a specific industry or large building project with a fixed longer term income.

      A household sparky is lucky to be able to pay off the cost of the truck and tools he needs for the job, let alone turn a profit after travelling too and from site for one hour and then enduring the complaints from the customer who can't fathom why it cost them $60+parts to install a new power outlet.

    61. Re:Not news. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I have cousin that is welder. He loves his job. One month he is working on a job in New Orleans, a few months later he is welding high steel in Chicago. His job takes him all around the country.

      Oh man your cousin must be bored in his job. Last time I saw an American welder it was a group of 5 that we had flown in to Germany from Texas. We laughed at the number of flags on their fire retardant overalls. Apparently their next job was in France at a Total facility.

      A job, ether blue collar or white is what you make out of it.

      Aint that the truth! I look to my university colleagues. One is a family man, 3 kids, house, same job for 10 years in the same office doing back office design work. Another friend of mine is launching rockets into space for military research. Another is currently trying to get a FTIR analyser working on the worlds largest floating vessel 500km off the coast of Australia. And me... Greetings from my hotel in Egypt (okay that's a cheat I'm on holiday, but I do fly to Italy for work as soon as I get home and this holiday was free due to the accumulation of BA and Marriott points from my job).

      We all have the same degree. We are all happy.

    62. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be really funny if any of your insane right-wing doomsday scenarios came to pass, then you discovered you're stuck being persecuted here because every other country figured asylum was a bunch crap too.

    63. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that it's *single white US-born men* that receive the most social welfare benefits, right? Because there are so many more of them and their participation rates when eligible dwarf other groups. Look it up, you obnoxious conservitard.

      But I guess you won't let shit like facts get in the way of your jackbooted border policy

    64. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, because the wall would be useless for keeping people out? It's one, small physical obstacle. I mean, seriously, have you people heard of ladders? Ropes? Shovels? Pickaxes (or hacksaws for beautiful “steel slat barriers”)? Over, under, or through, just a little basic human ingenuity will do it. Maybe that's the problem. Maybe you don't think of foreigners as human. To you they're just dumb animals who can be penned in/out like cattle. News for you: they're actual human beings, with all the capabilities and ingenuity that implies. Oh, also, most illegals come here by plane. The first lady certainly did. A wall wouldn't have kept her from coming here on a tourist visa and working illegally (and presumably evading taxes, as well). It wouldn't have stopped the majority of the illegal aliens that Donald Trump has employed or directly trafficked into the country himself.

      So what's the point? Some sort of symbolic gesture to say you don't want immigrants (I left the "illegal" off that, because, let's face it, you people claim to only want to stop illegal immigration, but most of what you actually do is attempt to curb legal immigration and make things harder on legal aliens)? Some sort of symbolic gesture to try to claim that you have a big penis? What do you people think you're going to get out of wasting $100 billion on a wall?

    65. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then watch the price of EVERYTHING rise and the quality drop, once you replace them with high paid, unionized, lazy 'Murcan workers.

      Shit, for all that extra money, I'd rather pay an undocumented migrant, AND his healthcare. Hell, it may be another mouth to feed, another house to build, more clothes to sew, but hell, that just means more jobs have been created.

      Nah, I'd rather it stay the way it is: We help them have a better life, and they inarguably help our economy.

      No wall needed.

    66. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "experise", LOL.

      Yet he spelled the word correctly earlier in the same sentence.

    67. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be hard to live in many parts of the Bay Area on $40k/yr. That's what around $2500/month after taxes? A 2-bed apartment rents for $2800+ in most parts of Silicon Valley, split that with a roommate and you're still spending more than half your take home on rent alone. I'm not saying people don't do it, but it's seems pretty tough.

      Certified tradesmen making $80k/yr? If you want a family I hope your spouse also has a job. It'd be tough to raise children here on a single income.

    68. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, so you're on holiday in Egypt and posting on slashdot? How sad is your life? When I was at the TT this summer you can be damn sure none of it was spent on slashdot. Slashdot is what I do at work when I'm trying to avoid working. When I'm on holiday I go do things that I can't do anywhere else.

    69. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you need a serious attitude adjustment, gulag-apologist AC.

    70. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow is that an OBVIOUS lie! You Corporate Progressive nazi assholes sure do hate the American working class.

    71. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean I didn't attend higher education because I got a masters degree without taking out any loans? Not going to say it was easy, I did have to work 3 jobs at one point while doing my undergrad to make ends meet, but I avoided loans. Finished my masters 3 years ago, so it's not like I was doing school before things got stupid expensive either. I was paying 6K a semester for part time and in state doing my masters while I worked a full time job as a developer.

    72. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richie rich Corporate Progressives like you are happy to see your open countrymen starve just so you can have cheap maids and gardeners.

      Remember: when you see an angry mob with pitchforks - run! They are coming for YOU.

    73. Re: Not news. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Most illegals use stolen identities, hence the trope that they pay taxes (actually their employers do, not them) but don't get anything out.

      Trying to figure out who is illegal is a months long process per person and then there are leftists that will sue you for discrimination for even cooperating with the government and the illegal will disappear with another stolen identity.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    74. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      $52,720*0.3= $15,816

      $15,816/2000= $7.91/hour

    75. Re: Not news. by dasunt · · Score: 1

      And those that want the wall are fucking stupid. Audit the employers and fine them for 50k per illegal on the first two offenses, and then take their business license on the third offense.

      I've mentioned a similar plan, but with all of the company's workers (and their families) gaining US residency.

      That makes whistle-blowing all but certain.

    76. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On what planet is a starting electrician only making $10/hr?

      What is the wage of a starting student with no part time job?

      A more reasonable comparison would be an 5th electrician vs. newly college graduate - taking into consideration both the lack of income for 4 years and debt.
      Maybe even scale that out over the rest of the employment lifetime.

      Also possibly factor in the job availability as well, along with the number of people that spend more than 4 years - and possibly those that drop out.

      Not saying I'm for either side of the debate - just saying that the argument itself was flawed.

    77. Re: Not news. by ixidor · · Score: 1

      not to say they can't get credential that can pass muster, but .... most will not be able to get credentials that can pass e-verify.

    78. Re:Not news. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      So, you've decided that you are going to raise children.

      My goal as a father was to raise adults. That is, I wanted to prepare my children to make a place for themselves in society where they contributed as much to that society as they took.

      It is sad that you are happy to foist your ill prepared brats off on the rest of us.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    79. Re:Not news. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well, my 'ill prepared brats' are certified life guards, and are already finding ways to support themselves on the youtube economy and they aren't even out of grade school. I call that job well done; since there won't be much else left. What the world doesn't need is people who are bitter and commit suicide, or even worse, take out people around them because they are miserable in their lives. Also what the world doesn't need is less sense housing; nothing wrong with the kids living in the family home like they do in much of the world.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    80. Re:Not news. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      less dense*

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    81. Re:Not news. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      It's not art when you're spending 6 hours a day lying on the floor with someone's sink goo dripping on your forehead. That's just hard work. Yes, the type you do is art. I don't imagine you will be plumbing that hard.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    82. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Went to a trade High School and took IT. Had a co-op job before graduating that I continued at for two years afterwards before hopping to the next job, and while others from my HS who abandoned their trades and went to college were jobless when they graduated from college at the peak of the Recession, I already had 4+ years experience and many opportunities available. Had to work hard, figure out my value, continue to grow my skills, but by my early 30s was being paid 6-figures, had a house, new car, maxing my 401k, and never had the student debt my wife is still paying off and she earns almost half what I do even though she has a masters degree. I sit now as a senior engineer in software, in a place with huge job security and while having a CS/CE degree would be nice, I know it was timing, hard work, and luck combined that got me where I am - got experience before the recession hit, went into a high-demand field, and continued learning and growing to build my value. Education can hopefully help stack the deck more in your favor but doesnâ(TM)t guarantee anything.

    83. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing the same easy tasks all day suddenly gets more appealing after dealing with manager type people and their pet projects.

    84. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An electrician is not an electrical engineer. I knew an electrician, smart guy, but he said it was the brainiest of the construction trades, he wasn't designing circuit boards though I wouldn't have been surprised if he knew his way around a breadboard. The problem with trades/technician work is that the good ones start out high compared to the educational investment and then pretty much just stay there because they consider you to be an interchangeable tool moreso than engineers. On the bright side it's easy to be a technician and then use your experience and comfortable money situation to get yourself into an engineering position.

      >I didn't realise we had got to the point where office workers make 250k+
      It's a nice paycheck for managers and directors with engineering backgrounds. Also principal software architects, senior developers, non-skiddy penetration testers. There are hacker scene kids 5 years out of no-name college making that money. (not at my company)
      We have an EngOps manager, no tech degree (maybe no degree) making 100k after 2 years as entry level support.

      I should mention our pay is openly considered low for the industry but they make up for it by being chill as fuck and leaving us alone.

    85. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Your bottom end tradesmen like painters or labourers, well yea, anyone can do that, but they're relatively low paying to begin with.

      I could have made 80k with 4 years of experience as a laborer and painter on a cargo ship. I choose to take much lower pay at an entry level tech job. I can tell you that the guys they get to do most residential work are well below my standards of work. It's not something you get good at without some raging prick pointing out every single tiny flaw in your work until your work is flawless. Not really a lifestyle that's my cup of tea.

    86. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of the trades are useful to artists. Plus there are benefits to being exposed to a little bit of rough living. The trap is that most people can't stop when they've had their fill and your co-workers will drag you down with their poverty can't-do thinking.

      My time doing manual labor gave me hunger to pursue more meaningful work. The discipline I learned made college a breeze compared to the other students who struggled to actually sit down and do their coursework.

    87. Re:Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here we see why so many kids are snowflakes. Parents who want to shield them from reality their whole lives. Dear God, what happens when your kids have kids? Will your kids be able to support them when you kick off? Or will they live on welfare?

    88. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those that want the wall are fucking stupid. Audit the employers and fine them for 50k per illegal on the first two offenses, and then take their business license on the third offense.

      Problem fucking solved; multi-billion dollar wall not needed.

      As long as anchor babies are a thing those who want the wall are actually quite clued in. Now if we're willing to join almost every other country on Earth and not have anchor babies, as well as harsh enforcement of labor laws, then we can talk about not needing a wall. 11 million people is most definitely an invasion.

    89. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      What is this e-verify thing you speak of? Is it some sort of voterID? I've never heard of it. Or is it something you just made up?

    90. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      The only thing that i will respond to from your trash post is this

      I left the "illegal" off that, because, let's face it, you people claim to only want to stop illegal immigration, but most of what you actually do is attempt to curb legal immigration and make things harder on legal aliens

      I have many friends and co-workers that I like a lot, and would bend over backwards for who are immigrants.. They happened to have come here legally. I'm sure I'm from a neighborhood you would look down upon because of financial status. I have known tons of illegal immigrants. There is normally a huge difference between the two. But you can keep living your luscious life in your majority white neighborhoods. And you can keep calling me racist. It will not change the truth at all. You know where you stand, you know where I stand.

    91. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story bro.

    92. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      "lets be more like europe" except you want open borders and no voter ID. kill yourself fascist cuck.

    93. Re: Not news. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      That raging prick was my father. He may have had his problems during my raising me, but at least he taught me a good trade and beat integrity into me.

    94. Re: Not news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem easily solved. Move to the real world. Sorry, it wonâ(TM)t be 72 degrees every fucking day, but youâ(TM)ll have a job and a roof over your head.

    95. Re:Not news. by lgw · · Score: 1

      FFS man, have your kids do something, anything useful to society, not some pointless BS that only makes themselves happy. Being of use to others it the key to psychological well-being. If your kids are living at home at 25, you have failed as a parent and they have failed as human beings (there might still be time for them at that point).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    96. Re:Not news. by lgw · · Score: 1

      So your argument is "working class people love America, and are therefore bad"? Man, GTFO.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    97. Re:Not news. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Errr no. Stop being so senselessly offended by everyone by reading deeply into shit until you find something that doesn't exist.

      My argument (actually just a side comment really, but whatever) is that working class people in Europe (and white collar workers too) find American nationalism funny (nothing to do with working class). I still remember when one of our sites in NL rolled out new overalls, they were bought from an American company and they asked if the site wanted the Dutch flag on it. Everyone was like, huh? WTF? Why? Flags are to symbolise you graduated high-school and to wave around during football games and on kings day. Why would you want one at work?

    98. Re:Not news. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Discover the difference between patriotism and nationalism. If America was big on nationalism, you'd know, because overalls in NL would have American flags on them.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    99. Re:Not news. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That makes it no less strange. Also are you saying America is not big on nationalism? Are you just blanking out this entire presidency and hoping in 2 years that it was all a bad dream?

    100. Re:Not news. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      If someone pays for it, then it's useful to them.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  2. It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The housing prices are so high that you can't live there with a low-wage job. People just move to somewhere else.

    1. Re:It's housing stupid..... by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Kinda hard when you are putting most of your money to your day to day life.
      Takes some money to move around.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    2. Re: It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use your tax refund and GTFO. Low income earners typically over pay on their taxes and receive a significant rebate.

    3. Re: It's housing stupid..... by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Nope. If it wasn't for the $20 I take out each check, I wouldn't get a return.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    4. Re:It's housing stupid..... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Moving is expensive when you're an adult with a 20 years worth of "things." If you just graduating high school and there are not jobs in your community town - moving is dirt cheap load your crap into the car and go some places where you can get hired.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    5. Re:It's housing stupid..... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      That's why you don't accumulate "things" and/or end up holding a giant Craigslist sale a week before a move. Other than a few sentimental items and my personal data on a few hard disks, I could sell everything tomorrow, move across the country or abroad, and not feel any loss.

    6. Re: It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you giving the gov't an interest-free loan in the first place? Set your exemptions so you don't get a refund and use your money now.

    7. Re: It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you can't be expected to give up your collection of waifu pillows or heaven forfend buy new IKEA furniture instead of paying three times it's worth to be moved.

      20 years is shit unless you're a materialistic cunt.

    8. Re:It's housing stupid..... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The housing prices are so high that you can't live there with a low-wage job.

      There are ways to live cheaply in Silicon Valley. I live in San Jose, and the house next to mine has 3 bedrooms with 22 Filipinos living in it. They have bunks stacked three high, and an RV parked in the driveway.

      If you are working 80 hours a week, you aren't home much anyway.

    9. Re: It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $20/paycheck...if he gets a paycheck every two weeks he's sacrificing like $3 there in interest.

    10. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      One of those sentimental things in my case is my grandmother's piano that I inherited at age 26. And yes, both I and one of my kids play it.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    11. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Pascoea · · Score: 2

      There's a difference between sentimentality and practicality. Sure, I could sell/donate/trash my entire house worth of "stuff", move across the country, and re-buy everything that I need when I get there. But it's generally not practical, especially if there are more people involved, like a spouse and children.

      Even getting rid of the non-necessities, which I'll admit I have a bunch of, still leaves a shit ton of "stuff". As I get older I have found that what I consider a non-necessity has changed as well. Is a nice big quality bed a necessity? Probably not for a single 20 year old, but it sure as hell is for a married (almost) 40 year old...

      Then, talking about hobbies. As an adult, I need to do things besides work to keep my sanity. Whether it's gaming, woodworking, electronics, auto repair. All of those things require "stuff" to do. Yes, none of it is particularly sentimental, but I would take an absolute bath if I were to sell/donate all of it and replace it at my new destination. Not to mention all of the effort it would take to do so.

      I stand pretty firmly in the camp of the GP. Moving as a 20 year old is WAY easier than it is as an "older" adult. I've moved a few times, it sucks more and more every time I do it.

    12. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not so bad since we moved to flat-screens, streaming-video, and ebooks. Hoarding books and plastic discs can make moving harder than it needs to be.

      Books, CDs, DVDs, and large TVs were my big hassle when moving in the past.

    13. Re:It's housing stupid..... by NormalVisual · · Score: 2

      Moving is expensive even if you don't have 20 years' worth of stuff. For a lot of places, you'll need a security deposit, first month's rent, possibly last month's rent, and deposits for utilities and such in addition to the actual expenses related to the move itself (truck, packing materials, etc.). You might get your security deposit back if you took care of your current place, but I've fought with more than one landlord about deductions even though the place was exactly as I received it. You need to have all of that money up front, and preferably a job lined up wherever it is you want to go. You also need to have the time to do it, which is time that you're not working/getting paid. Then on top of that, if the new job pays in arrears, you might need a couple of weeks' worth of money to live off of until the first paycheck comes in. For a lot of us, this isn't too much of a problem, but there are a lot of people that just don't have that kind of cash on-hand.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    14. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      So people aren't allowed to have things now. Remind me again what is the point of working?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    15. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      We have around three bookshelves of books we would not be willing to give away. Electronic books aren't a substitute for the real thing, and we have every set because we make sure we bought it when the price was right. So yes, we have things like real books because that is the only economical way to do it.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    16. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      We found out that the place we moved from held onto the money from the sale for three months but the place we moved to needed the money right away. We had to pay for interest on that money for that period of time. We also found out that there were extra taxes on our new house.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    17. Re:It's housing stupid..... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      You're allowed to have "things", just don't bitch when they tie you down. Do you own them or do they own you?

    18. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Highdude702 · · Score: 2

      Ship it, with the money from other items sold deemed less important than grandma's piano.

    19. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      whats not economical about having 1000 books on one small device you can take anywhere.

    20. Re:It's housing stupid..... by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Takes some money to move around.

      Not if you're willing to make tough choices.

      Sell all your shit other than what you can toss in a big-ass backpack and hit the road. Hitchhike. Bus ticket. Walk.

      Get where you're going. Hostel and shelter as necessary until you get a job and a place to live and go from there.

    21. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Like I said, they aren't a substitute for being able to turn pages.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    22. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the low end of rent within 2 hours of those places is $2,500 a month for a shitty one-bed apartment, and the high end of these low wage jobs is $1,500 a month, it causes some issues. It's not economically feasible to work those jobs and afford even a shitty place to stay. It's not all "day to day life" spending that's the primary cause of problems here, it's the high cost of living. When those jobs don't pay enough for someone to live in even the shittiest of apartments within 2 hours of the place of employment, then we end up with these types of problems.

    23. Re:It's housing stupid..... by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      The housing prices are so high that you can't live there with a low-wage job. People just move to somewhere else.

      Yes. And even if you could theoretically afford it, why bother? What's the point to working if you just give everything away in rent, taxes, debt/mortgage payments. That's basically just indentured servitude by other means.

    24. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      So, if I understand correctly. You don't like it because you cant feel the pages turning? Why not hack an e-reader or w/e and some haptic feedback sensors, and ... well this is /. I hope you see where I'm going with this.. I still don't understand where economics come into play. Sounds like a personal preference issue. In which case as the new norm around here, don't be a snowflake.

      Anyways, if there are a lot of people like you you may be able to make some money if you hack together a prototype ebook reader with some haptic sense for feel. You could be bought out by Amazon for a few billion for that I would expect.

    25. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, I know a lot of book readers.. and I don't read books. I noticed a lot of them weren't using e-readers despite the fact that they had them. Including my own family, who continued to buy real books. The explanation I got is that an e-reader makes it too difficult to leaf through the pages to find a previous spot... say you know Tom talked to Alice somewhere around chapter 5 but you need to read the conversation over again.... Too hard with an e-reader to find that, so most readers I know go with the real book.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    26. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like excuses. I have never used an e-reader, and I only read books while incarcerated(fortunately its been a while since I read a book) But I cant see there not being a search function, or bookmarking, or I mean, tons of other things that would make "flipping around" easier. And if there isn't those options... Once again perfect opportunity.

    27. Re:It's housing stupid..... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Most ereaders don't have a good search function. Search on the 'main character name' and you're bound to find a lot of hits, and how do you set a bookmark if you don't know what you'll want to go back to?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    28. Re:It's housing stupid..... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      sounds like when you make this e-reader you need to implement a good search function. maybe something like parse the book when its first put on the device and index everything. it don't matter to me, i'm just trying to give you ideas to be more conserving of the trees so we don't have to cut down so many. no sense having a forest on a shelf when you can have it all on a lil bit of silicon.

  3. I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some of my friends that went to college are unemployed while I didn't go and I work in government IT.

    I take public transit. A local bus take me down the street to pick up the express bus, the express bus drops me off in Palo Alto, and a local bus take me down the street to my job. An hour each way. Driving through Palo Alto during rush hour is insane. Since I work in government I.T., I start work at 7:00AM.

    1. Re:I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow tell us more

    2. Re:I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they charge you for two seats? Did you make a Youtube video on the topic? Do you have an Amazon referral link to a book on the topic?

      Is there maybe some reason you've worked in IT for 20 years in Silicon Valley and only make $50k a year? Maybe because all you know how to do is how to set up laptops to connect to Access Points? How does it feel to make $50k and take the bus while the Google engineers that don't know where the power button is make thrice that?

    3. Re:I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does it feel to make $50k and take the bus while the Google engineers that don't know where the power button is make thrice that?

      Contractors have to pay extra to ride the Google bus but it is generally cheaper than public transit if you live in walking distance of a G-stop. Riding the Google bus is no different than riding public transit except the WiFi is much faster. Since Silicon Valley is meritocracy and not a plutocracy, no one gives a shit about how much money you make on the bus or in the office.

    4. Re:I believe it! by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Riding on any bus is a shit life, if you ask me.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can take a nap, read a book or continue work while on the bus. Or you can drive your own car and wonder why you have anger management issues.

    6. Re:I believe it! by Highdude702 · · Score: 3, Funny

      fuck you, you need to STFU before I do to you what I did to the guy that cut me off last week!

    7. Re:I believe it! by novakyu · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's your fault for getting cut off. If there's less than 1 car length between your car and the car in front of you, no one can cut you off (or at least in the case of accident, they'll be at fault).

      It's called defensive driving.

    8. Re:I believe it! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      hahahaha. Way to turn "defensive driving" on its head. I'm using this line from now on. :)

    9. Re:I believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is such an amazing piece of rhetoric.

  4. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the bay area the population is keen on intelligence. 3.6% is not very much. I feel certain it is on its way down just like the rest of the country

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In the bay area the population is keen on intelligence.

      That's the claim but judging by the business ideas and quality software that comes out of there I'm dubious.

  5. There is a reason for it by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Low wage jobs are dead end jobs without future. No pay raises, no bonuses, most if the pay health care don't pay enough to cover the high deductibles and high copays of the coverage provided.

    Low wage jobs are a dead end and everyone knows it. Who wants to be stuck in a dead end job never earning more money?

    It is why the trades are suffering so. Everyone needs HVAC or plumber. However those jobs are basically mean food stamps for life unless you are the owner.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is why the trades are suffering so. Everyone needs HVAC or plumber. However those jobs are basically mean food stamps for life unless you are the owner.

      No, the trades are suffering because everyone was told that college was the way to go, not because they don't pay well. Note that I am not saying that they do pay well, only that pay / lack of pay is not why they are suffering.

    2. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's silly. HVAC and plumbers earn well into the 6-figures with minimal experience. They won't be automated either.

    3. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 2

      You think the average plumber or HVAC guy is on food stamps? Holy fuck do you have some disconnect.

    4. Re:There is a reason for it by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Who are these people making 6 figures.
      Owners of a company? Some overpriced part of the country?
      My dad only makes 50k a year for having 30 years exp. It was the best paying he found and he got a company truck.
      Brother only makes 23k a year as a tile layer.
      Also, I have a bare minimum of electrical exp and would make at best 12 an hour.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    5. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trades are suffering because guidance counselors get strung up by the heels for suggesting that a student should consider something other than college by parents convinced that their kid will never make it without a degree in something. That, and most high school graduates come out with little to no experience with hands-on work and know that college is usually a 4-6 year party with a couple classes in between that also usually means access to cushy jobs later. What 18 year old would look at the choice between 4-6 years of drinking/smoking dope and a headfirst dive into manual labor and pick the latter?

    6. Re:There is a reason for it by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      50K a year isn't a lot anyway but its not awful in large parts of the county either; especially if you get to use someone else's vehicle and presumably fuel to commute to work.

      That should put roof over you head and food on the table anyway.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    7. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They do pay well. Maybe not in comparison to other jobs in the Bay Area, but that's something those commies up there will have to deal with on their own. Once it's too expensive to live there, for trades people, the programmers and other IT goobers will find the cost of repairs is going to shoot up. You pay for the labor and you pay for the commute to get to the labor. Supply and Demand... If your supply of plumbers is zero and the demand is greater than zero....

      In areas outside of Silicon Valley a plumber can still earn a very comfortable living. The prospects look even better for continued wage growth as the amount of people becoming plumbers is dwindling. Plumbing is one of those jobs that will be around forever.. If the available pool continues to shrink the wages will continue to rise in response. Same thing is happening with electricians.. A friend with a construction company said his average pay for electricians is about $45/hour right now. I know that doesn't sound like a whole lot to a Bay Area person but in the regular world that's pretty damn good. The median income for CA is $60,336/yearly. $45/hour puts you at about $93,600/year. That's over 50% higher than the median. So basically, anywhere besides San Fran, you're earning a very good living.

      When things go awry a competent plumber is a whole lot more important, at that moment, than just about any tech type job.. If your shit won't go down the toilet, fixing that becomes about the most important job in the world...

    8. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Move south. They can't find enough workers. If you can pass a drug test even the most menial job at any of the plants pays $25/hr to start. My favorite example is "hole watch". Whenever they dig a hole for construction, etc, safety rules dictate they pay someone to stand by it to make sure nobody falls in it. I'm not making that up. Starting pay is $25/hr. You won't stay in that job for long before one of the other superintendents or foremen grab you up to train for a skilled trade, because #1 you passed the drug test, #2 you went through the safety classes to be allowed in the plant. Second favorite example is "fire watch". Another $25/hr entry level job to stand in one spot, look around and sound an alarm if the place catches on fire.

      Both of those open any number of doors. Unlimited overtime. On-the-job training and experience in very high-demand fields.

      I know a 20 y.o. diesel mechanic that cleared $220k in 2018 and just bought his 3rd property. He's not even old enough to drink. But by all means, go into massive debt to earn a degree in general studies and then spend the next 40 years paying back that loan.

    9. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it could be "over priced part of the country" however if you live in a poorer part of the country you could probably live on that 50k same as 90k. heck i know handymen that charge 45$/hour and have too much work to handle?!!!

    10. Re:There is a reason for it by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this really surprise anyone? You have a bunch of self entitled millennials that have lied sheltered life and been fed a bunch of bullshit by these professors about how life should be. The come out of this indoctrination not having a clue how the real world actually works and with some bullshit degree in liberal arts. Where they think they are entitled to a job in whatever bullshit degree they got.

      Then when reality sets in and its ether get a job waiting tables or starve they start bitch'n about some mythical fantasy about being entitled to something called a "living wage." Not realizing at the same time they have brought in low skilled undocumented workers that take the jobs that they think are beneath them and do turn them in to a "living wage." The undocumented do this by not living beyond the means the job provides.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    11. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's $93K if you work 40 hours/week with no administrative overhead (unpaid time arranging jobs, lots of driving, etc.) But by the nature of the job you don't.

    12. Re:There is a reason for it by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      The money was nice but Jesus Christ fire watch is the most boring job there is.

    13. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 2

      Spot on. Good to see there are still folks out there with common sense.

      I feel for the kids getting those degrees who are also shouldering huge student loan debts because they were convinced that "learn now / pay later" is a reasonable path.. Back in the day you paid as you went.. Or you paid upfront if your parents had set up a college fund. i.e. when you left college you had either no debt at all or just a little bit (last semester owed maybe).

      Right off the bat a person with a student loan is at a disadvantage.. They need a higher wage to break even than someone with the exact same degree who isn't dragging around $100K in debt. This makes them less able to compete for jobs.. As an employer (not now, but in the past) given a choice between two identical candidates, I'd hire the one who accepted the lowest wage.. That's not going to be the guy with the huge loans..

      That isn't being cheap either, as I'm sure someone is going to accuse. The person with the huge loan is going to constantly be looking for higher paying jobs. Thus to hire them, even at the standard wage for a field, is highly risky. The risk that they will bounce makes training them a gamble at best.. They simply need more money to be comfortable than a person doing the same job who isn't making interest payments on his education.

    14. Re:There is a reason for it by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

      of you think the trades are a way to be living on food stamps call a plumber next time your Toilet is backed up. or you could look at https://www.payscale.com/resea... and that is for a Plumber who is not self employed, my father made six figures as a pipe fitter

    15. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The median income for CA is $60,336/yearly.

      Bay area median is much higher. From one article in 2017:
      In the San Francisco metro area, where Salesforce, Oracle and Facebook are among the major employers, median income was estimated at $96,677 in 2016 compared with $88,518 in 2015, according to the new statistics. Were the Census Bureau to include Santa Clara County, home to Apple and Google, the numbers would be even higher: Median income in that smaller census division rose about $9,000 over the past year to $110,040.

    16. Re:There is a reason for it by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need a union. 80k/year + benefits for any of the crafts I worked with, Boilermakers, Electricians, Pipefitters. (Once you get out of the apprenticeship, but even starting out is about 40k/year with some benefits.) Easily into the 6 figures if you were willing to work overtime. This was in North Dakota. Mileage may vary around the country.

    17. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite example is "hole watch". Whenever they dig a hole for construction, etc, safety rules dictate they pay someone to stand by it to make sure nobody falls in it. I'm not making that up.

      You don't place a Hole Watch to keep people from falling in, that's what caution tape and barriers are for. The Hole Watch is there while people are working in the hole so that in the event that there is a collapse there is guaranteed to be at least one person there capable of summoning help and then assisting in the rescue.

      Second favorite example is "fire watch". Another $25/hr entry level job to stand in one spot, look around and sound an alarm if the place catches on fire.

      Also very important when you're surrounded by pipes and vessels full of flammable material: the guys doing the hot work are too busy focusing on their jobs to be looking over their shoulders all the time to see if anything caught fire behind them and welding/grinding work can still cause a fire an hour later until the metal has cooled down enough that it's safe to leave the area unintended.

      You people who don't take this stuff seriously are the reason why we have so many rules and regulations nowadays. Plus the owners got tired of idiots accidentally blowing up the plant because they just had to have a smoke while standing right next to barrels of oil.

    18. Re:There is a reason for it by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who was in the trades had their bodies give out on them around 55 or so. So sure, go into the trades, but don't plan on a healthy and vibrant retirement.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    19. Re:There is a reason for it by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No, but I don't see them driving new vehicles around either.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    20. Re:There is a reason for it by slazzy · · Score: 1

      I always joked they must have jobs for a "hole looker" seeing guys stand around not doing anything but look in the hole. I never knew it was a real job! Makes sense from a safety standpoint though.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    21. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you like to keep blaming the younger generation for things that you should have prevented? Not "could have", "should have".

      The succeeding generation's problems are also a product of the first. Thanks for not doing your responsibility and just blaming younger people who can't have the same "benefits" and "hard work" as you did.

      What you think of their "entitlement" might have been the same old "hard work" you boast so hard about.

    22. Re:There is a reason for it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > Low wage jobs are dead end jobs without future

      When I was much younger, I certainly worked various low wage jobs. They kept food in the house and the utilities running while I studied or built up some resources to move. If I may, "the future" for such jobs is something to develop on your personal time, not in the workplace, though there are some useful skills to learn even in the lowest wage work.

    23. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the sheltered and deranged Boomer that has the narcissism to blame future generations for the problems they created for everyone that followed them.

    24. Re:There is a reason for it by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Then when reality sets in and its ether get a job waiting tables or starve they start bitch'n about some mythical fantasy about being entitled to something called a "living wage."

      This is an American problem. If you have a degree and are willing to travel you will be earning a living wage. Even if you are waiting tables you'll be earning a living wage.

    25. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move south.

      Quick, before they put up a wall!

    26. Re:There is a reason for it by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      It should be noted though that a better hourly rate doesn't necessarily mean better earnings overall. Probably the largest perk of an office job over many trades is that the work is consistent. I know that in the last 16 years I have only had one year where I had any weeks where I was paid for less than 40 hours of work. Not that office jobs are immune to work shortages. A friend of mine quit his steady old bank job to work as a contractor with a higher pay rate, only to find out his new job disappeared after six months.

    27. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that's because they're practical, intelligent and don't need to impress the neighbours by zipping around in a Mercedes that'll depreciate faster than a condom?

      People in trades drive cars that work and are reliable, not flashy shit that's meant to signal to others how much of an uncharitable douchebag you are with your money.

    28. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      That is a good point. And for the most part you are absolutely correct. The trades can be subject to a feast/famine situation. But, from what I've seen that mostly hits the guys in the new construction/renovation fields.. A generalized plumber will have fairly steady work doing repairs/maintenance if the density of plumbers in an area isn't too high.

      I think we might both agree that if the public's rejection of the trades, as good jobs, continues and the available pool of talent shrinks the wages and demand for the remaining people will continue to rise. There's a balance. The simple fact is that most people won't or cannot fix their own lines when the shit starts backup up. :)

    29. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      That should have ended as "when the shit starts to back up". Dunno wtf happened there.....

    30. Re:There is a reason for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point!! I have heard this HVAC meme at least a million times and I was jealous thinking I wasted so much time. Where are their million dollar homes? I sometimes see it from tradesmen who have a small business with a dozen workers. Never seen it from a guy without employees.

      Aside from business owners the only other tradesmen I encounter traveling outside of north america are in the oil industry, contracting for the military, or in the nautical trades.

      I see wealthy tradesmen show off their 70 inch 4k OLEDs in their large country homes. I've never seen them pulling out of a mansion in a porche.

    31. Re:There is a reason for it by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      A lot of those "benefits" and "hard work" you think the older generations owe you came about because of war. To create the post war economy that you millennials think you are "entitled" to came about because millions of people died.

      Millennials are living in a relative age of peace. You may not think you are, but you are. You know nothing of the hard times earlier generations had. None of you have faced conscription into the armed forces. None of you have faced war time shortages or rationing.

      My generation was also grew up in a age of relative peace but where close enough to know of people that died in Vietnam. Even though that war was a generation before my time.

      Every generation has been handed down what came before. Problem with millennials is they seem to like to bitch and whine about it more than any generation before. At least the hippies that I like to bitch so much about knew what they where about and made something of themselves. I don't agree with them on everything but at least they where honest in their bitch'n.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    32. Re:There is a reason for it by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      The succeeding generation's problems are also a product of the first. Thanks for not doing your responsibility and just blaming younger people who can't have the same "benefits" and "hard work" as you did.

      Spoken exactly like the entitled little cunt you are. I mean that seriously. You decry the preceding generation as this terrible thing. The same generation that extended your worthless lifespan. Two generations.. Two generations ago the average human lifespan on this mudball was 40. Forty years you ungrateful asshole.

      Sixty years ago (3 generations) you died from most serious diseases and illnesses. Antibiotics were here, but they were new. Not everybody... most people had no hope of access to them. Certainly not globally and probably not nationally. If you got a serious cut and it got really infected you just died. Most of the shit we have cures for today (Type 2 diabetes, etc) had no cure back then. If you got them you died...

      Half the people you see in a given day will make it to 76. That's 36 more years of life than just two generations ago. That is a massive increase. That's almost 50% more living.

      But keep bitching about the previous generations and how they contributed nothing.. cunt

  6. Not just the Bay Area. by BitterOak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's true just about everywhere. The old saying "More learnin', less earnin'," is truer now than it ever was.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is just the Bay Area.

      From the article:

      Experts suggested the Bay Area’s backwards numbers, which run counter to the national trend, could be the result of too-few lower-wage workers, many of whom have been driven out by skyrocketing housing prices and the rising cost of living.

    2. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      This is an inversion of unemployment rate, not an inversion of average income.

      I doubt this is caused by an excess of demand for unskilled workers (waiters, dish washers, burger flippers, etc). It's probably caused by a shortage of unskilled workers. If housing prices have risen so much that it's impossible for unskilled workers to afford to live in those areas, then there won't be enough of them to fill all the jobs requiring little or no skills. The solution is either to build more housing to lower home prices, or offer higher wages for unskilled jobs (which would seem like it could cause an income inversion, but it can't really since it's the skilled workers paying for the goods and services the unskilled workers are providing which creates those unskilled jobs - skilled workers cannot pay more than they make).

    3. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The old saying "More learnin', less earnin'," is truer now than it ever was.

      Not on average. On average those with degrees earn more. What may be true is that you "specialize" yourself such that opportunities are location and/or time-specific. Trends and change will toss you around more.

      After the dot-com bust in 2001, I couldn't find dev work in CA because it was flooded with ex-webbers who worked for peanuts just to survive. I took out of state gigs for legacy software like dBASE & FoxPro to survive. I don't take IT booms for granted. Be Prepared.

      You have to we willing to move or work away from home if your can't find decent local work. An co's don't value loyalty: they hire and fire on a whim based on market and fads. The new economy is not family-friendly, which could be why birth rates are down.

      And learn to tolerate shitty weather; there's often more opportunities there because candidates hate snow or humidity.

    4. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There's another option: Improve transport so that unskilled workers can commute in from further away. The unskilled workers won't like it, because no-one likes spending three hours a day commuting, but it'll keep wages low which is what a lot of people want.

    5. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by fyzikapan · · Score: 1

      With improved transit you don't need to commute three hours.

      Or we could *gasp* build more housing...

    6. Re:Not just the Bay Area. by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's called observer bias. The idea that dropping out and learning a trade is a road to riches is just daft and ignores the realities of trade industries:

      Those who make it big:
      - Run their own business, and don't play with a welding machine or a socket outlet.
      - Work for a major company as staff on a large plant often in the middle of bumshart nowhere, and are lucky to have gotten this competitive and sought after role.

      Those who you *think* have made it big:
      - The guy who charges you $80/h labour while you ignore the fact that he wastes half the day driving between jobs and will not be fully booked.
      - The guy who is loaded in cash today but can't make ends meet tomorrow because the majority of trade based industries are peak and trough cycles.

      And above all: You're looking in the bay area and extrapolating. Sorry to burst your bubble, but unless you have a useless degree in golf course management or art critiquing you'll pretty much find work anywhere in the world.

  7. This is a pretty well known trend by rsilvergun · · Score: 0
    we've been replacing high skill, high pay manufacturing jobs with low skill, low wage service sector jobs. This is largely due to automation and process improvements (about 86% of it, with the other 14% being due to outsourcing and cheap work visas).

    We're producing more with less workers, leaving more money at the top for the (literal) capitalists who own everything. Combine that with a lack of worker solidarity and a general war on the working class and yeah, folks are pretty boned.

    On the plus side at least that shmuck in TFA is honest:

    'I'm looking for low-wage, entry-level workers".

    But let's face it, what he's really doing is posturing for more H2-Bs. He's gonna get 'em too. The President & Congress just doubled the allotment for next year.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is a pretty well known trend by raymorris · · Score: 1

      More specifically, John Kelly, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security had that decision to make and refused to increase it under quite a bit of pressure from Congresscritters such as Senator Heidi Heitkamp (Democrat, North Dakota). As Heitkamp kept up the pressure, Kelly eventually capitulated ad raised the cap. Not doubled, but increased it.

  8. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pay more. This is a breakdown where employers aren’t willing to accept the supply demand curve they’re living in. If they could just bring themselves to pay a living wage, people with enough self respect and power to refuse working for less than a living wage would be happy to work for them.

  9. hmmm... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Would be interested to know if those counties are still "backwards" when U-6 unemployment is used instead of U-3. Maybe.

  10. Try Paying More by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you cannot find employees at a given pay rate, then you are paying too little, plain and simple.

  11. do you know judge wapner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Palo Alto city IT department == rain man

    1. Re:do you know judge wapner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pretty sure they got outsourced to h1bs

  12. Stupid statistic... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    The high-school grads that couldn't get a job without a college degree probably ended up going to college (which you can do relatively cheaply in CA thanks to socially liberal policies) and working work-study jobs (no longer unemployed).

    It's not that "college education causes unemployment", it's that the high-school grads that aren't able to get a long-term job with only an HS education typically continue their education, thus removing themselves from the "HS grads only" group.

    1. Re:Stupid statistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always remember that all statistics are like this. The reason you gave for this one's stupidity is just one of many.

    2. Re:Stupid statistic... by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "It's not that "college education causes unemployment", it's that the high-school grads that aren't able to get a long-term job with only an HS education typically continue their education, thus removing themselves from the "HS grads only" group."

      The situation is not even remotely close to either of the two scenarios you describe. The only reason why you'd even mention these two is if you are either completely ignorant in regards to California's rental and housing markets or are just not thinking at all. Service level employees are being chased out of the state in mass due to high living costs, all of which are tied to massively high property values and rents.

      I own a 2 bedroom condo in the Sonoma County mentioned in the article that would sell for will over $200k if I chose to sell it. This is the price of a solid family home (that you don't have to pay condo dues on) in most of the rest of the country. Meanwhile, the average rent on a place like this is right around $2k ( https://www.rentcafe.com/avera... ). How would some one making $12 an hour afford $1000 a month to rent a place with a roommate? Their monthly before taxes income would be less than 2 grand. After taxes I'd wager that would get them about $500 a month for everything else in their lives after rent. This in an area where "everything else" is more expensive due to the aforementioned problem.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  13. Why print this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is sighting unemployment at 3.5%? Isn't 4% considered full employment? Wow we gotta complain about everything. Why was this even printed?

  14. Alternative Explanation: Indians with H-1B Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an alternative explanation. Specifically, the supply of labor by Indians (from South Asia) with H-1B visas is greater than the supply of labor by Hispanic illegal aliens, relative to the number of job openings for skilled labor and unskilled labor, respectively.

    In 2016, Donald Trump promised to immediately suspend the program for H-1B visas upon his becoming president. He broke his promise.

    There is more information about this issue.

  15. Where away? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    The article is sighting unemployment at 3.5%?

    Fine off the starboard bow, Cap'n!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  16. Alternative Explanation: Indians with H-1B Visas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an alternative explanation. Specifically, the supply of labor by Indians (from South Asia) with H-1B visas is greater than the supply of labor by Hispanic illegal aliens, relative to the number of job openings for skilled labor and unskilled labor, respectively.

    In 2016, Donald Trump promised to immediately suspend the program for H-1B visas upon his becoming president. He broke his promise.

    There is more information about this issue.

  17. Sure, there are jobs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but most of them don't pay anything close to a living wage in the Valley, or enough to bother commuting 100+ miles twice a day. Nothing wrong with having a job, but spending all day dealing with yuppie engineers and project managers and then not having enough to eat and sleeping in a car... why bother?

    I wouldn't want to contribute to a statistic like that.

  18. Not Surprising by jpaine619 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not really surprised by this.. We have a glut of college educated people out there. Hiring those people for fields other than what they earned their degree in is.. risky at best.. If the job they are seeking, at the moment, is not what they have a degree in you can be fairly sure they are going to bounce when a more appropriate job comes along.

    That means you're potentially wasting the training you may have to provide. Sure, you might get lucky and they stick around long enough that the training was still a good investment but your gain would be their loss, and that's not an ideal situation either.

    The term for this phenomenon is "over qualified". Hiring a guy with a master's in math theory to do plumbing isn't gonna work out in the long term. That guy wants to do mathy stuff and he'll punch out the second he can. I don't fault him for that, of course, but if you're the potential employer that's a problem. Better to just spend the time training the guy with no degree who actually wants to be a plumber. Sure he might go work elsewhere for better wages, but that's at least something you can compensate for (pay more). No reasonable amount of $$ is going to make a math guy happy being a plumber.

    1. Re:Not Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an illiterate.

    2. Re:Not Surprising by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Pot.Kettle.Black

  19. Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The trend is starkest in Sonoma County

    Sonoma County is rural. Of course there are more jobs for people without degrees. You don't need that masters in CS degree to pick fucking grapes.

    I'm not sure this phenomenon has anything to do with the value of a college education, or the number of H1B visas. It might just be a highly localized issue. Let's keep reading...

    Statewide, workers with a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 6.2 percent, nearly double the 3.5 percent rate of those with a bachelor's or higher.

    See what I mean?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Hold the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, wouldn't those with college degrees be more likely to come from affluent families/be more able to wait for something to come along?

    2. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I live in Sonoma County, it's not that rural. This has nothing to do with what you're going on about and everything to do with sky high rents. It's $2k for a 2 bedroom place here. What service level worker can afford that even with a roommate?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    3. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I live in Sonoma County, it's not that rural.

      The primary industries of Sonoma County are agriculture and hospitality. You don't need a college degree to clean a room in a bed & breakfast or to bus tables. Emerging industries in Sonoma County are manufacturing craft beverages, specialty foods and outdoor recreation.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 2

      I have no interest in even looking up data on what you're telling me because nothing you're saying refutes my high rent and property value rebuttal

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    5. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I have no interest in even looking up data on what you're telling me because nothing you're saying refutes my high rent and property value rebuttal

      You think $2k a month is high for a 2 bedroom place? That's about what it would cost you in Houston, less than Chicago, much less than New York. Do you think those places only have college-educated people living there?

      Rents are on the high end throughout California, and yet, if you read the last line of the summary:

      Statewide, workers with a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 6.2 percent, nearly double the 3.5 percent rate of those with a bachelor's or higher.

      High rents don't keep people from working. They don't keep people without college education from working. In my high-rent area on the Central Coast, my neighbor on one side is an auto mechanic and my neighbor across the street is a plumber. Neither has a college degree. Both own their own homes.

      You're looking for a reason to say that California sucks for some reason. Here's a news flash: rents are too goddamn high all over the US.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Hold the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rental market in Santa Rosa is still absolutely completely upended from the loss of 4k homes in the fires last year. The market is completely different (i.e. more expensive) as a result. Many families are still doubled up in homes because there are NO rentals in Santa Rosa. This affects Sonoma County as a whole. I grew up there, and my folks continued to live in Fountaingrove until the 2AM fires came through.

      Even still, $2k a month is really not bad for a 2 BR house. Where I now live in CA, rent is at least 2500/mo for a 1 BR apartment. To anybody that lives in the technical parts of the state, Sonoma County is absolutely rural. Aside from OCLI and Keysight (due to old HP HQ there) etc., and SRJC, all the technical draw is to other areas which /starts/ at Petaluma.

    7. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "You think $2k a month is high for a 2 bedroom place? That's about what it would cost you in Houston, less than Chicago, much less than New York. Do you think those places only have college-educated people living there?"

      It is most certainly high for an area outside of a major urban area. First you claim Sonoma County is rural and then you proceed to compare it to other major urban areas. You can't have both my friend. 2k for a 2 bedroom in suburbia is indeed high.

      "High rents don't keep people from working."

      When did I ever say that? What high rents do is keep lower end workers from living in an area. An unemployment rate of .2% for non-high school educated workers (our rate here) is absurd and a gross distortion of the local economy.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    8. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "You're looking for a reason to say that California sucks for some reason. Here's a news flash: rents are too goddamn high all over the US."

      Oh you mother fucker, you went there and I missed it in my original post. I'm California born a raised, proud as fuck, and have plenty of Leftist creds to boot. That doesn't mean our growth policies in many of our communities aren't bullshit. So called "leftists" routinely vote for zoning laws that punish their working classes. Over a million dollars for a single family house in the valley? Multiple families living in a single family home because that's all they can afford? That's where my community North of SF is headed and I hate it because it all stems from arrogance.

      No proper Leftist can look at California housing prices and suggest we should maintain the anti growth policies most of our communities have had for far too long. You're just being California liberal-lite-fashionable if you think the working class can enjoy a proper level of living under our current coastal growth policies. The valley should have been building upwards in the realm of 20-30 story buildings 2 or 3 decades ago but they refused. Then the Bay Area was invaded and they refused to build enough. Now, North of the Bay all of the refugees are piling up and no one wants to build up either and so people are fleeing even farther away and my people suffer.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    9. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That's where my community North of SF is headed

      Sounds like a local problem to me. Here on the Central Coast, rents are still pretty reasonable. I mean, what is it worth to live in a paradise?

      It's not that different from Chicago, and I don't have to heat the place.

      You're just being California liberal-lite-fashionable if you think the working class can enjoy a proper level of living under our current coastal growth policies.

      I'm willing to discuss any reasonable suggestion for killing off billionaires. Is that "liberal-lite"?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    10. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Sounds like a local problem to me. "

      As I clearly articulated it's a local matter that has spilled over onto another locality that has then spilled over to another locality and probably several others too boot. It's all communities refusing to solve their local issues, sure but it's becoming a statewide problem.

      "I'm willing to discuss any reasonable suggestion for killing off billionaires. Is that "liberal-lite"?"

      No, that's you're probably lying or are a psychopath. Regardless, killing billionaires does nothing meaningful in the context of this discussion.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    11. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Regardless, killing billionaires does nothing meaningful in the context of this discussion.

      I disagree. You don't have to kill them all. Just make an example of a few watch the rest become a lot more reasonable.

      But like the proverbial mule, first you have to get their attention.

      It's not government policy that's causing the housing problems up there. It's corporate policy and income inequality.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      I feel like I'm talking to the anarcho-punks I ran with in my youth. It's great you have naive dreams of impossible scenarios. Meanwhile California needs proper growth guidance and it is *absolutely* government policy that is causing the housing problems here. It's a very clear problem of supply and demand. Any Leftist that truly wants to properly serve their community needs to acknowledge the free market. When there is a housing shortage no governance will solve that problem that does not create the needed housing to fulfill the housing shortage.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    13. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Any Leftist that truly wants to properly serve their community needs to acknowledge the free market.

      You sound like the young libertarians that used to fail my classes back in the day. They read some bad Ayn Rand fan fiction and stayed intellectual freshmen.

      There is no such thing as a free market. One has never existed, and they are in fact impossible. You shouldn't have stopped learning after reading Atlas Shrugged.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    14. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Simple supply and demand economics is more what I'm getting at when I use the term. The patterns of supply and demand and their effect on the prices of goods, services and the like are easily observable in any economic system on the planet and when supply isn't increasing to meet increasing demand in an economy it often means something is holding back supply. This could be from a resource or labor shortage or it could be from more artificial mechanisms like government or monopolistic practices.

      As this pertains to the discussion at hand, local city governments throughout Northern California have restricted housing growth in the face of a supply shortage. Of course a small family home is 600k around where I live and over a million in the valley. They're scarce commodities and are priced accordingly.

      I mean, do you have an explanation that makes more sense as to why prices are the way they are in a lot of California? Maybe something that doesn't involve "killing billionaires"?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    15. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Simple supply and demand economics is more what I'm getting at when I use the term.

      There is no such thing as "simple supply and demand economics". If there was, you wouldn't see the price of gasoline go up when supply is increasing. Or the price of education or health care going up precipitously even though there's never been more supply.

      The "laws of economics" are not laws. They are false axioms used to push an agenda that keeps people poor and in servitude.

      As this pertains to the discussion at hand, local city governments throughout Northern California have restricted housing growth in the face of a supply shortage. Of course a small family home is 600k around where I live and over a million in the valley. They're scarce commodities and are priced accordingly.

      I mean, do you have an explanation that makes more sense as to why prices are the way they are in a lot of California? Maybe something that doesn't involve "killing billionaires"?

      Well, I just gave you the simplest, most direct solution. Prices are high because of corporate concentration, which led to a high concentration of high-paying jobs in a certain area. People like to live close to work, and if you put a lot of money in one area, there will be more competition for something in finite supply. It has also led to a concentration of billionaires. Thin the herd and the pressure goes down. Not the best solution maybe, but as I said, the most direct.

      Loosening zoning laws and zero-growth laws won't solve the problem. First, because the rich people who live there don't want those laws loosened except for themselves, if they want to build a new house for example. They don't want poor folks moving in around them and going to their kids' school. So what you get is a further concentration of wealth and kids going to private schools and poorer areas not having the tax base to support schools.

      I prefer a combination of low-growth policies, with strict rent controls. And of course, a few billionaire heads on pikes just to raise everyone's morale. Not the billionaires morale, of course, but fuck them. They're the reason we're in this mess in the first place.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    16. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Well, I just gave you the simplest, most direct solution. Prices are high because of corporate concentration, which led to a high concentration of high-paying jobs in a certain area. People like to live close to work, and if you put a lot of money in one area, there will be more competition for something in finite supply. It has also led to a concentration of billionaires. Thin the herd and the pressure goes down. Not the best solution maybe, but as I said, the most direct."

      By your own account there was a housing shortage and so prices went up. Thank you for validating my point.

      "Loosening zoning laws and zero-growth laws won't solve the problem. First, because the rich people who live there don't want those laws loosened except for themselves, if they want to build a new house for example. They don't want poor folks moving in around them and going to their kids' school. So what you get is a further concentration of wealth and kids going to private schools and poorer areas not having the tax base to support schools."

      How does rich people won't vote for them mean loosening zoning laws won't work? That makes no sense, whatsoever.

      "I prefer a combination of low-growth policies, with strict rent controls. And of course, a few billionaire heads on pikes just to raise everyone's morale. Not the billionaires morale, of course, but fuck them. They're the reason we're in this mess in the first place."

      Rent controls are brilliant for those who get them. Meanwhile, developers are discouraged from building because they mess with their profit margins. A high rent area will also typically have high land values. Why would some one dump the massive sum of money buying a develop-able piece of property in the valley if you can't charge a rent that is inline with your costs? In fact, rental supply actually dropped in the few years following the institution of rent control in SF. "Landlords treated by rent control reduce rental housing supplies by 15% by selling to owner-occupants and
      redeveloping buildings." ( https://web.stanford.edu/~diam...)

      After that, I have no idea what your, "low-growth policies" are so I can't really comment on them but they do sound suspiciously nebulous.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    17. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Oh, oh! I missed quoting the best part to quote from that research paper. "Thus, while rent control prevents displacement of incumbent renters in the short run, the lost rental housing supply likely drove up market rents in the long run, ultimately undermining the goals of the law"

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    18. Re:Hold the phone by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh, oh! I missed quoting the best part to quote from that research paper. "Thus, while rent control prevents displacement of incumbent renters in the short run, the lost rental housing supply likely drove up market rents in the long run, ultimately undermining the goals of the law"

      The rent control laws in SF were never very strict. You can still raise rents as much as you want, but you have to give 60 days notice. Well, thanks for nothing. And there's loopholes for condos and single family dwellings, so all the apartments just because condos.

      No, it's not rent controls that have caused the housing crisis in the Bay Area.

      I'm still think my billionaire-abatement plan is the best, but it's your community, so do as you will.

      We have a virtual zero-growth policy down here on the Central Coast, and it has worked just fine, thanks. But it wouldn't be for you, because we do our best to keep out the libertarian jackoffs.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "No, it's not rent controls that have caused the housing crisis in the Bay Area."

      Wow, you haven't been listening to me at all. I have never said that was the root cause. The root cause I have said over and over again is housing shortage which rent control merely contributes to. In fact I would say it's not even a primary contributor but it most certainly doesn't help.

      "We have a virtual zero-growth policy down here on the Central Coast, and it has worked just fine, thanks. "

      And when other communities poor growth planning finally makes it over to your doorstep I hope for the sake of your lower class your community doesn't stick to those. When it spilled over into my community North of SF nothing was done and now we're well on our way to slum style multiple families living in a single family home. Some community actually has to step and solve the housing shortage problem. It could have been mine if our "Leftists" actually cared about the working class.

      "But it wouldn't be for you, because we do our best to keep out the libertarian jackoffs."

      Put false labels on me all you want. It only illustrates your weak reasoning.

      Socialized medicine - financially proven, effective, good on the morality scale to boot (moral and finical gains)
      Social security - effectiveness proven (although under funded) as people are generally poor at long term financial planning or lack the means to save (moral gains, small finacial)
      Poverty abatement programs - reduces crime (financial gain) and suffering (moral). Increases upward mobility potential of lower class. General net benefit when done correctly (moral and financial)
      Rehabilitation as opposed to mass incarceration - Strong rehabilitation shows strong rate of crime reduction. Mass incarceration has not shown this (moral and financial gains)
      Low income housing - Good in the context of poverty abatement. Not a solution to massive housing shortage (moral gain)
      Rent control - Significant evidence it exacerbates housing shortages for anyone not lucky enough to get it. Short sighted and naive in addressing housing shortages. (small moral gain offset be exacerbation of a typically greater problem, net financial loss)

      Maybe I'm not as fashionably Left as you are but I guess I'm just a Leftist that likes things that work.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    20. Re:Hold the phone by skam240 · · Score: 1

      The more I think back on this the more I'm bothered by the stance of supposed leftist on slashdot.

      How is a leftist a libertarian for simply acknowledging simple supply and demand economics? The lack of acknowledgement of free market economics is exactly why the Soviet Union failed and why Venezuela and North Korea are failing. Meanwhile, China's growth has been entirely driven by their embrace of a free market (more of their economy is privately owned than publicly. Hardly communist).

      The ideology wars are over for any intelligent person. A hybrid economy is what clearly works and what that means for the Left is that we need to acknowledge how money works. Price controls simply do not work, we've seen this proven over and over again.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  20. Re:Alternative Explanation: Indians with H-1B Visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Possibly. But it does bring up a good point. Labor markets are incredibly complicated, and comparing two different markets to one another without some form of control is nonsensical.

    If you wanted to do a proper comparison, you'd want to compare to another tech-sector in another similar city, but that doesn't have a crazy housing market like SF. Then you'd at least get a sense of whether this is related to housing costs.

  21. Um... my kid's in college right now by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    for Nursing. All told it's going to cost me about $140k for 4 years (tuition, books, room, board, the car I had to buy her because it's physically impossible to take a bus from her morning classes to her clinicals in time, etc). Starting salary will be between $50-$70k/yr depending on the job she takes and where she takes it.

    A trade pays $9/hr to start, $15/hr after a few years and then tops out at $25/hr. I did a stint as an electrician's apprentice so I'm pretty familiar (cut those numbers by about 30% for inflation and you know where I was at). You're gonna top out around $50k/yr, which is where my kid _starts_. Over 40-60 years of work that will add up fast. Not to mention she will have much, much better benefits.

    Heck, if you're a teacher in it for the money you can start around $40k/yr as long as you're willing to move and/or commute to a wealthy district (the way districts are funded means if you want to teach in a poor neighborhood because you grew up there plan on getting shafted).

    I see a lot of folks saying a degree ain't worth it, but it always seems to be the kind of folks who don't want to pay for kids to go to school. It's expensive as hell ($140k in my case and I'm cutting corners) so I get where they're coming from, but this is why our country gets flooded with H1-Bs. It lets the companies go to Congress and say "Well, we wanted to hire American, but we just can't find anyone with the _skills_ we need".

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      As a bonus, she won't be underemployed/unemployed all of her life. People who have access to higher education and don't take it (and do something useful with it) are missing out. There are billions on this planet that would leap at the chance.

    2. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your starting pay numbers for trade work are off by an order of magnitude. Perhaps those were starting rates in 1990 but not today.

    3. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to break it to you, but a starting nurse does not make that kind of money. After a few years and another degree, she will though and it's always an in demand job.
      However, the hours and pressure placed on her are going to make it very likely she will quit after a few years. Regardless of where she works, she will find that they do not have enough fellow workers to cover everything they need to do and the nurse to patient ratio is unsafe, making her feel guilty for not working even harder. She'll be lucky to get her charting done, even long after her shift is over.
      Good luck.

    4. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an electrician I make 80k a year PLUS two pensions when I retire. If I traveled to where there was big jobs with overtime I could easily make $120k. Or I could work in the south for $15/hr doing the same stuff. Nursing probably has a more steady demand cycle, but I bet in the city I work the median electrician makes quite a bit more than the median nurse.

    5. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Um... my kid's in college right now for Nursing. (...) You're gonna top out around $50k/yr, which is where my kid _starts_. Over 40-60 years of work that will add up fast.

      Well, you also have to remember that those who go straight to work have already been paid for several years before she gets her first paycheck and if that had been a loan she'd also be paying interest eating away at the higher pay and making the same money in fewer years puts you in a higher tax bracket. Sure, higher education pays off eventually but the break-even period is often considerable and so many families can't really afford to look that far ahead. I'm closing in on 40 now and it's really the 20 years ahead of me that makes the big difference in lifetime pay, not the last 20 years. Plus in a desk job it's usually a lot more feasible to work longer should I want/need that.

      I'm curious to see you picking nursing and teaching as examples though. Here in Norway they're the worst if you're looking to max your income, in fact they're struggling to match those who only finish high school because the career path sucks while even being a retail clerk you can graduate up to store manager and such. Medicine, economics, engineering and law bring in the big bucks, trade skills pay noticeably above average while soft sciences go in a big lump around the center - they don't seem to lose anything by taking an education but they're not really earning anything either. And by medicine I mean doctors, they do get paid very well. Everyone else in healthcare, not so much.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get flooded with H1Bs no matter what. They will conveniently be unable to find the people with the "skills" they need no matter who is available.

    7. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      I see a lot of folks saying a degree ain't worth it, but it always seems to be the kind of folks who don't want to pay for kids to go to school. It's expensive as hell ($140k in my case and I'm cutting corners) so I get where they're coming from, but this is why our country gets flooded with H1-Bs. It lets the companies go to Congress and say "Well, we wanted to hire American, but we just can't find anyone with the _skills_ we need".

      No, that's not why our country gets flooded with H1-Bs. A degree doesn't in any way ensure that you have "skills" in C# or C++ or Java.

      Our country gets flooded with H1-Bs because RINOs like the H1B pay rate and Democrats like the votes from the H1B and their extended family that they bring along.

    8. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Master electricians don't top out at $50k, they can easily fetch $25-35/h and up to $100/h as a (sub)contractor.

      Blue collar labor has some upwards mobility for those that are smart enough.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you might want to talk to some actual working-in-hospitals nurses. Around here the nurses aren't unionized and they are frankly treated like crap, get used to 12 hour days. I have friends and family who are nurses, some of them are/were in world renowned shock-trauma centers. They aren't salaried, and the hospital rules they have to follow are a lot of BS. To make matters worse the hospital techs are union, and generally lazy and impossible to get rid of the bad ones, so that makes the nurses jobs even tougher. One nurse I know has topped out her pay after 20 years at around 86k. That's all. I don't have a degree and I'm closing on 6 figures. Do not let your kid take a non-union nursing job.

    10. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A trade pays $9/hr to start, $15/hr after a few years and then tops out at $25/hr

      LOL WUT

      I tried my hand as an electrician's helper, not even an APPRENTICE, 10 years ago. I earned $16 an hour for that back then, and that was in a relatively small city.

      If you get paid $9/hr to do even apprentice level trade work, you are not in a first world country.

      My dad was a plumber, the trade people laugh at. I did his taxes in 2000, the last year he worked before retiring. $115k for the year.

      > I did a stint as an electrician's apprentice so I'm pretty familiar (cut those numbers by about 30% for inflation and you know where I was at). You're gonna top out around $50k/yr, which is where my kid _starts_.

      LOL where?

      Here's the average where I am:

      https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/180626/t001a-eng.htm

      $44 per hour. PER HOUR.

      There are literally only 5 occupations above that in the entire country for earnings (all of which would generally require a degree, though not necessarily).

      Being in the top 10 categories for wage earners is pretty damn good.

    11. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      My sister became a nurse with a few years of community college - I'm pretty sure it didn't cost her 140k.

    12. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you also have to remember that those who go straight to work have already been paid for several years before she gets her first paycheck and if that had been a loan she'd also be paying interest eating away at the higher pay and making the same money in fewer years puts you in a higher tax bracket. Sure, higher education pays off eventually but the break-even period is often considerable and so many families can't really afford to look that far ahead.

      You're forgetting that she could have gotten her nursing degree for much less. Single moms manage to climb the ladder CNA->LPN->RN all the time so a person with support and no child to take care of is going to do even better. More likely he's rich and she doesn't qualify for much on FAFSA and he's sending her to a respected out of state college on day 1. Which is fine if you have the money.

      If he was rich and didn't have the extra cash to send her to school she could get a LPN while at home, work in the state with her college until she's 24 and then wrap up her nursing program once she qualifies for full fafsa but that would leave her graduating at 26 best case scenario.

      Anyone who manages to get their living expenses paid can easily go to college while in the coast guard reserve if they qualify. Probably knocking out a 4 year degree by the time they're 22 if they're lucky and 24 if shit happens. There are many paths a person can take to get an education cheaply but most of them are slower than just getting dad to pony up the cash.

    13. Re:Um... my kid's in college right now by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Yeah it'd be under 50k here to become a nurse, and they can make six figures with enough overtime. Teaching pays pretty well, too.

  22. No hopers by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    If you only have a high school education, you're almost bound to leave an area that's so expensive to live in, because you have ZERO chance of a high paying job. But if you have a degree, you've got some chance of being able to grab one, so you will not give up so quickly. Therefore unemployment among the educated will be higher.

  23. Duh! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Entry-level workers CAN'T AFFORD TO LIVE THERE! Of course there aren't enough of them, the only ones available are the ones still living with their parents!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  24. We have enough college kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of them are majoring in useless subjects anyway. What we need are more unskilled people with 9th-grade educations. There are a huge number of burger-flipping jobs available in my area that can't be filled. It's gotten so bad that businesses (mom-and-pops, mostly) are folding because they either can't find help or they can't afford the help that is available. Some of these joints were only able to operate because of the ready availability of cheap labor: without it, they aren't viable: you can only raise the price of a burger so high before people start expecting Kobe beef.

  25. You were mislead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Largely by our former President, who told you, 'A college degree is the new high school diploma.' . That was a scam (college is big business and indoctrination ground, you see). A college degree has never, ever been a 'guarantee' of anything whatsoever. Your success in life does and always has depended on YOU. Additionally, unless you are referring to the legitmately poor, nobody gives a crap what is happening to people in the Bay.

    1. Re:You were mislead by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Going to need some skill and merit to make the top %.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:You were mislead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A college degree is supposed to be about learning and the pursuit of knowledge, not employment. If the former leads to the latter then good for you, but never assume the former *guarantees* anything.

  26. Re:There is a reason for it; in short, "The...' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World doesn't owe you a Living"

    Perhaps that is true; if so, what -if anything- do you owe the world and ...why?

    the CAPTCHA for this AC post is 'collapse' ; for some reason it seems oddly ...apropos.

  27. The most important question not asked... by negated · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...what do these unemployable graduates have degrees in?

    Something useful that is a marketable skill that would lead to a decent job or a graduate degree in interpretive dance theory?

  28. On a Brighter Note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of those people are a part of the 1.5 billion dollars of student debt that is going to become the next financial crisis. Was is worth it? Probably not. They were all suckered into the academia complex. Educated, perhaps. But in the end they are dupes.

  29. They're not REALLY looking for people to hire ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're looking for more people to hire at a wage which is at or likely below the market clearing wage: ie they want to hire more people but not rate wages. You know employers are serious about hiring when they raise wages to get what they want. Until then, they're just looking to capture more rents.

  30. Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by skam240 · · Score: 1

    Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing.

      There is nothing in the Bay Area that is remotely close to being a "slum". The 3 bedroom house is worth at least $1.5M.

    2. Re:Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "The 3 bedroom house is worth at least $1.5M."

      And it's being run like slum housing. By your own account it has 3 bedrooms but yet 22 people sleep there.

      Don't delude yourself. This is the very illustration of the American Dream unraveling and it's not even something that isn't easily preventable. It's ignorant and self centered city planning that is the core of the problem. No one who owns property want's a 20 story residential building in silicon valley because they want to hold on to their precious property values. Meanwhile, their bottom 50% suffer terribly and the US loses out on what could be the formation of another major city. I mean, imagine if New York city, with all of its economic value it provides our country, wouldn't let anyone build above 3 stories during its formative period.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    3. Re: Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sitting in NYC right now (vac) and live in sunnyvale. Population density in Manhatten has to be orders of magnitude greater than the valley, in terms of people per square mile. Rents here are EVEN HIGHER than the valley, and you bet there are N bedroom apartments with 4N or more ppl living in them. You cannot build your way out of a "housing crisis". The valley can bulldoze all the single family homes and build 50 storey towers everywhere, and rents/prices will NOT go down. Quality of life will, and developers will take in money, but housing costs won't decrease. It works like building moar highways to fix the traffic problem. NYC is the existence proof of that.

    4. Re:Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting the house, car, and cell phone you "deserve" along with a bunch of really important "stuff" is a great way to land in a poverty cycle.
      Then again I'd hate for slum living to be the new norm, making a few early sacrifices in exchange for having mobility and a financial safety net is smart. I don't know how many people I met in my younger years paying a half days work or more for their cell phone, an entire day's pay on cable and internet, 25% or more of their income on their car and then 30% on their apartment.

      Doesn't exactly put you in a position where you can quit and explore other opportunities, survive a layoff, or think about taking classes. Just enough left over to feed yourself and drink away the stress. Most of those people are still doing the same things they were when I left them behind. I've offered to mentor them up to a better life but it's always met with excuses.

      I think about them often when I travel. I'm looking at weird shit and meeting interesting people. Or when I leave work early because my pussy hurts and I know that somewhere they're working through the grind same as before, maybe with an extra 1k/year for every year we've been apart.

      But hey they were cool with their brand new economy cars, moto razors and first generation iPhones (free nights and weekends!).

    5. Re:Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing. by bkmoore · · Score: 1

      Nice, so live adjacent to slum housing.

      There is nothing in the Bay Area that is remotely close to being a "slum". The 3 bedroom house is worth at least $1.5M.

      What makes the home worth $1.5M? Location, that's it. The structure could be a total wreck, and the land on which it sits, would still be worth 1.5M. Ancient Rome had slums too, and I'm sure many sat on valuable real estate.

  31. Reason : H1B1. Cheap labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The H1B1 visa program was a way to bring in cheap labour to replace more expensive American workers and it has worked!

  32. Good point by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Informative

    A lot of guys I knew in the trade were laid off 2-3 months out of the year doing odd jobs to get by. The company I worked for kept us year round and found busy work, but they could only do that because they had a nice business contract. Most tradesmen have lean months and a tough time throughout the year as a result. The huge cutback on infrastructure spending and, as a result, construction hasn't helped matters either.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  33. 3.3 to 3.6 percent unemployment is practically 0% by RobinH · · Score: 1

    Historically 3.3 or 3.6% unemployment is as close to full employment as you can get. Those last 3.3 or 3.6% that are still unemployed are mostly just unemployable. In the middle of 2018 there were more jobs than people looking for jobs in the US (the first time in history). I tried to hire an electrician and a plumber this year, and I could tell it was hard to get hold of anyone. They'd just ghost your, or you had to know someone personally to get them to come. If you're in the bay area with lots of people crowded in, there'd be a huge demand for things like plumbers, electricians, or even just general laborers slugging concrete around. Not so much for paper pushers. As ever though, if you can solve someone else's problems, you'll always be employable.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  34. Sorry, but who the hell says that? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I'm 41 and I've never heard that phrase in my life. Hell, if you google the phrase you mostly find articles telling you how valuable a college degree is (with a few that mention it's less valuable if you grew up poor, but it's still more valuable than hitting the workforce after high school).

    Maybe if you grew up in the 70s with a big, Unionized manufacturing plant down the street, but that was almost 50 years ago. Those days are gone. The only thing left to kids without degrees is Walmart, $18/hr jobs in HVAC and if you're lucky Daddy's money when he dies.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Sorry, but who the hell says that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard that phrase in my life..

      I can't imagine why. It's perfectly cromulent.

      Well, as they say, "Old sayin', higher payin'."

  35. Aptitude and Geekieness by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    You need them both. I think that some people get into computers, but their only interest is money. They have no natural talent, because their only interest in computers happens on Friday, on the way to the bank.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  36. Well duh. by plopez · · Score: 1

    Who wants low wages. Pay people and they will come. Just like in public education.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  37. Lies, damn lies and statistics by djinn6 · · Score: 1

    This statistic is seriously flawed. It only counts those who can afford to stay despite being unemployed, which is unlikely if you worked at very low-wage job and had little or no savings.

  38. Not everyone is an artist, and that's okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plumbing and electrical are not an art, they are a craft. That you don't know the difference between artistry and craftsmanship makes me wonder if you are all that serious about being an artist. There is nothing wrong with craftsmanship and pride in your work. But at the same time you must realize that even poorly constructed art can be very good art that speaks to the viewer.

    What is it that you express when you finish up a junction box? The futility of human existence?

  39. Um... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    If Bay Area counties are paying college grads less or jobs are harder to find then...maybe consider leaving the Bay Area? ...not sure it takes a college degree to figure that out?

    --
    -Styopa
  40. NIMBY by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Turns out that if you want to get your venti half-caff low-fat caramel vanilla latte every morning, you're going to have to put up with people who live on coffee shop wages living in the same area code. Who knew?

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
    1. Re:NIMBY by skam240 · · Score: 1

      It's almost like working class people are our equals. Who knew!?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  41. Re:There is a reason for it; in short, "The...' by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    World doesn't owe you a Living"

    Perhaps that is true; if so, what -if anything- do you owe the world and ...why?

    Absolutely nothing. You are free to find a place to be alone, ask for and offer nothing to anyone. How does that affect the fact that the world owes you nothing?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  42. College grads and "College Grads". by Chas · · Score: 0

    Get out with a degree in engineering? CompSci? Law? Accounting? Something actually useful?
    You can get (or create) a job.

    Intersectional Dance Theory?
    Lesbian Basket Weaving?
    Art Appreciation?
    Anything with the word "Studies" (code for "For Dummies") in it?

    Yeah. You're going to have trouble getting a job (and holding it), even in Starschmucks or McWendysBurgerCastle.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  43. Death of the American Dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..for white people. Welcome to the party pal!

  44. Stop getting 4 year degrees by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    In WORTHLESS subjects....ancient languages, underwater basketweaving bla bla bla. Get a 2 year trade school degree. You'll be LESS in debt, and probably make more money than these "entry level" jobs in the first place. But...NO, can't do that. Kids are told from their youth, you have to have a four year degree. So, everyone goes for a four year degree, colleges & universities gouge them and they end up 50-100k or more IN DEBT and can't pay it back.