Slashdot Mirror


Several Popular Apps Share Data With Facebook Without User Consent (ft.com)

Some of the most popular apps for Android smartphones, including Skyscanner, TripAdvisor and MyFitnessPal, are transmitting data to Facebook without the consent of users in a potential breach of EU regulations. From a report: In a study of 34 popular Android apps, the campaign group Privacy International found that at least 20 of them send certain data to Facebook the second that they are opened on a phone, before users can be asked for permission. Information sent instantly included the app's name, the user's unique ID with Google, and the number of times the app was opened and closed since being downloaded. Some, such as travel site Kayak, later sent detailed information about people's flight searches to Facebook, including travel dates, whether the user had children and which flights and destinations they had searched for. European law on data-sharing changed in May with the introduction of General Data Protection Regulation and mobile apps are required to have the explicit consent of users before collecting their personal information.

71 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. I doubt anyone really cares by mschaffer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once people get over their knee-jerk sense of outrage (if there is any), I doubt anyone will even uninstall these apps from their phones.

    1. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by mrwireless · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Give it time. Over the years people will start to understand how the data driven business model really works. That profiling is not just about personalised ads, but equally about handling you as a risk, which often means denying you opportunities such as jobs or cheap insurance. The real businessmodel of these companies is the continuous background check.

      In a few years the 'data is the new oil' narative will backfire on Silicon Valley, as the 'data as a pollutant' metaphor will become all to apt. This comparison will then lead us to ask: what is the data version of global warming?

      It's Social Cooling.

    2. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      means denying you opportunities such as jobs or cheap insurance.

      You need to look at the other side of the coin. For everyone denied an opportunity, someone else gets one. So if you have good credit, no medical problems, etc., then you should benefit from having your data widely shared.

    3. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Until the Bastille is stormed, absolutely.

    4. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by Tailhook · · Score: 2

      I can't figure out why people install all this junk in the first place.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by found404 · · Score: 1

      It's not that they don't care. It's that they don't know except in general terms. I'm fairly out of touch... with Main Stream News. I live in my own bubble (fav sites, fave news, on demand streams).

      Over the last couple of days (as I do on occasion), I venture into the ad-crazed world of TV media. Except for the usual sports, local highlights, brain-warping political onslaught... nothing on Facebook. Zilch! Not on Free TV, not on Free Radio. It's like I stepped back 20 years.

      This news might be big on some tech sites and certain social networks but... Big Media won't sell it unless there's a political angle. Afterall, their online dollars come from ad-tracking surveillance.

    6. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have already this happen. A few years ago when I was working for a different employer, I had a friend of mine take a picture of me in a store's humidor. The pictures went on Facebook. Less than a week later, I got a demand from my health insurance company to take a physical with bloodwork or pay smoker's rates.

      Already, location data from apps has been uses to spy on Tesla and other firms, tracking where employees are in the building. With tensions getting greater between nations, a person's location can potentially make or break a military initiative.

    7. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      How can you be sure the stuff stored on you is accurate?

      It is still a wash. For everyone hurt, someone else is helped.

      It is trivial to fuck someone over with their credit score if you don't like them by creating a dummy offshore organization, and then sending reports to Equfax, Experion, and Transunion about debts not paid

      This has absolutely nothing to do with "apps" sharing data. Credit agencies have been around for decades. False information there can be a problem, but that has nothing to do with TFA.

      Also, the credit agencies don't accept information from "dummy offshore organizations", and it is not at all "trivial" to submit information to be included in someone's report.

    8. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      No. The US is similar in that a contract must have some measure of being "equitable" and you cannot agree to illegal acts.. etc. I dunno how the Europeans handle contracts, but I'd image that whatever the differences we aren't that far off.

    9. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would say SV people do "get" it. A lot of them know that their products are nightmares when it comes to security. But they don't care. To them, security is a cost center. Even more, if some scenario of every device they have has some major vulnerability, the top brass just short their stock, make the announcement, and all go to the local shipwright for new yachts from the money made from the fallout of the announcement.

      There is absolutely zero incentive for privacy and security in most industry sectors. Especially IoT where an IoT company benefits from devices that can't be upgraded, as customers will happily buy a new 1.0.1 device because their 1.0 device can get them pwned, and it can't be fixed or firmware updates.

    10. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That's not how it works. The "victim" contests the negative report and it is then up to the credit reporter to prove their negative report is legit. In fact many people with legitimate credit issues get their records cleared this way since the reporting party often doesn't respond in time.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what bizarre world you live in, but everywhere I have lived the number of appropriate weight people far outweighs the clearly out of shape ones. I think you have been reading too many magazine articles and failing to observe the people around you.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the idea that there is conservation of opportunity built into the system? Maybe you meant "while many will be denied an opportunity a few will gain one"?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    13. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what bizarre world you live in, but everywhere I have lived the number of appropriate weight people far outweighs the clearly out of shape ones.

      I am guessing that you live in a urban area, and not in the rural south or Appalachia. I am also guessing that you don't shop at Walmart.

      More than 60% of Americans are overweight, and more than 30% are obese, with a BMI of 30 or higher.

      The fattest states are Mississippi and West Virginia.

      The skinniest are Hawaii and Colorado.

    14. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      So you are guessing that my data isn't falsely weighted to create the appearance that you are correct? I concede that is true.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, those poor companies.

      Do you really want to blame the consumer / the masses?

      When a company prays on weaknesses such as FOMO & loneliness, such as the dopamine hits of "views" and "likes", such as influencing the flow of information such as political ads while at the same time having large lobbying budgets... Do you really want to blame each individual consumer?

    16. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The thing is, with the GDPR you must give the user the option to use the service without data sharing if it is feasible to do so. And that must be the default setting. Also, the data must be stored within the EU and each third party the data is shared with must appear where you agree. If you add a new party, there must be new consent. You also need the name of the contact in EU responsible for the data (to easily sue him/her).

    17. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by plopez · · Score: 1

      You're assuming you won't be wrongly singled out. Basically you're standing on Darwin's door mat screaming "take me! Take me!"

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    18. Re: I doubt anyone really cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What does petitioning God have to do with your comment?

    19. Re:I doubt anyone really cares by chrish · · Score: 1

      I'm planning a trip, and I was going to install Kayak to see how well that works... well, now I'm not going to use Kayak as a result of this.

      *shrug* They won't notice because I'll never be part of their analytics (unless Google ends up shipping them a list of what apps I have installed on my phone, then they'll be able to see which airline(s) I use).

      --
      - chrish
  2. wow by jjeffries · · Score: 1

    wow no way gasp i'm super surprised oh my stars garters amen

  3. The list... by Known+Nutter · · Score: 5, Informative

    Calorie Counter - MyFitnessPal
    Duolingo: Learn Languages Free
    Family Locator - GPS Tracker
    Indeed Job Search
    Instant Heart Rate: HR Monitor & Pulse Checker
    KAYAK Flights, Hotels & Cars
    King James Bible (KJV) Free
    Muslim Pro - Prayer Times, Azan, Quran & Qibla
    My Talking Tom / My Talking Hank etc
    Period Tracker Clue: Period & Ovulation Calculator
    Qibla Connect® Find Direction- Prayer, Azan, Quran
    Shazam
    Skyscanner - Cheap Flights, Hotels and Car Rental (Ad Personalisation = Off)
    Skyscanner - Cheap Flights, Hotels and Car Rental (Ad Personalisation = On)
    Spotify Music
    Super-Bright LED Flashlight
    The Weather Channel: Local Forecast & Weather Maps
    TripAdvisor Hotels Flights Restaurants Attractions
    VK (vkontakte)
    Yelp
    Salatuk (Prayer time)

    Bible - Audio, Daily Verse, Study & Offline, Free
    BMI Calculator & Weight Loss Tracker
    Candy Crush Saga
    Clean Master - Antivirus, Cleaner & Booster
    Dropbox
    HP ePrint (No Longer in Google Play Store)
    Opera Browser
    Period Tracker, My Calendar
    Phone Tracker By Number
    Security Master - Antivirus, VPN, AppLock, Booster
    Skater Boy
    Speedtest by Ookla
    WeChat

    --
    Beware of the Leopard.
    1. Re:The list... by Freshly+Exhumed · · Score: 2

      Thanks for the list in simple, easy to read text without the crud. The FT article seems to be paywalled.

      --
      I deny that I have not avoided attaining the opposite of that which I do not want.
    2. Re:The list... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      security master - LOL!

      we were asked to install wechat at work (for talking to our chinese co-workers; its a chinese owned company) and when I saw the list of privs it wanted, I refused. I was one of the few who did not install this crap on my phone. now, looks like I made the right call.

      also, a flashlight app?? this shit should be illegal, punishable by real jail time. this crap has got to stop!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:The list... by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Funny how I don't seem have any of these installed, or in my library. Maybe minimal app selection hygiene is important if one cares about privacy?

    4. Re:The list... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny how I don't seem have any of these installed, or in my library. Maybe minimal app selection hygiene is important if one cares about privacy?

      Agreed. I'm very careful about what apps I install, plus, (as you mentioned above) My phone is rooted, and I have AFWall installed. I also turn off both data and WiFi unless I'm explicitly using them.

      Having said that, we shouldn't have to jump through hoops like this to guard our privacy. Privacy should be a basic right, and it should be the default state of all our devices, OS's, and applications / programs. Privacy should NOT be the exclusive province of a) the rich and b) vigilant, technically informed people like us. As at least one other poster has said, corporate privacy violations ought to be against the law, and penalties ought to be severe - TOS be damned. That privacy invasion is not just the norm, but a common business model, is proof of how far civilization has declined. What we now call democracy is simply a bread-and-circuses cover story for the corporatocracy that in fact prevails everywhere.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    5. Re:The list... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Funny how I don't seem have any of these installed, or in my library. Maybe minimal app selection hygiene is important if one cares about privacy?

      I had HP ePrint installed previously, so I could print to my HP printer. Speedtest is a highly common app. Candy Crush is a respected game series. Duolingo is also highly respected. Most of the rest is just fly by night crap, but all of those are pretty major.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:The list... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nice. I use Spotify, Dropbox, Speedtest (useful to test WiFi in rental properties), Shazam... but on iOS. Do those apps running on iPhones also send data to FB?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    7. Re:The list... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      speedtest? really? fuck you ookla.

      Speedtest has been malware for a number of years now.

    8. Re:The list... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Candy Crush is a respected game series.

      Candy Crush is a product of Zynga.

    9. Re:The list... by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      Legislation is the outcome of political pressure.

      In the absence of a public political mechanism to consider the risks in advance, enough people have to be on the receiving end of the problem so that their costs are high enough for them to be willing to do work to create such pressure. Usually that happens long after an industry is established, and has moved into profitable and arrogant mode of operations, where it can comfortably allocate resources for lobbying against public effort.

      So, you may need to wait a bit before legislation will do for you half of what reasonable personal hygiene habits can.

    10. Re:The list... by gravewax · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the list. Dropbox and Speedtest both removed from my phone and life for that matter, though to be fair dropbox has been dead for ages just never gotten around to uninstalling.

    11. Re:The list... by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      also, a flashlight app?? this shit should be illegal, punishable by real jail time. this crap has got to stop!

      That's why we have 80,000 pages of laws... How about "education"? Making shit illegal does not make it go away... (Drugs / Pyramid Schemes / Con Games).. Education is the most effective way to get rid of scams.

    12. Re:The list... by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 3, Informative

      Calorie Counter - MyFitnessPal Duolingo: Learn Languages Free Family Locator - GPS Tracker Indeed Job Search Instant Heart Rate: HR Monitor & Pulse Checker KAYAK Flights, Hotels & Cars King James Bible (KJV) Free Muslim Pro - Prayer Times, Azan, Quran & Qibla My Talking Tom / My Talking Hank etc Period Tracker Clue: Period & Ovulation Calculator Qibla Connect® Find Direction- Prayer, Azan, Quran Shazam Skyscanner - Cheap Flights, Hotels and Car Rental (Ad Personalisation = Off) Skyscanner - Cheap Flights, Hotels and Car Rental (Ad Personalisation = On) Spotify Music Super-Bright LED Flashlight The Weather Channel: Local Forecast & Weather Maps TripAdvisor Hotels Flights Restaurants Attractions VK (vkontakte) Yelp Salatuk (Prayer time)

      Bible - Audio, Daily Verse, Study & Offline, Free BMI Calculator & Weight Loss Tracker Candy Crush Saga Clean Master - Antivirus, Cleaner & Booster Dropbox HP ePrint (No Longer in Google Play Store) Opera Browser Period Tracker, My Calendar Phone Tracker By Number Security Master - Antivirus, VPN, AppLock, Booster Skater Boy Speedtest by Ookla WeChat

      According to the article, the list of offending apps stopped at Salatuk. The rest, starting from Bible up to wechat do not or no longer share infos to facebook

    13. Re:The list... by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      Your cut and paste list include the apps that DO NOT transmit data on startup (everything after the space break). That aside, why is approriate for a print driver to send data to FB ever?!?!? (the HP eprint app) Orany of the rest of these, really...

      "We also tested the following apps but they don’t transmit data to graph.facebook.com the moment the app is opened, in the most recent iteration of our analysis (December 2018)"

  4. People should be installing by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    firewalls on their android devices to block outgoing connections (especially to bookface)

    NetGuard, AFWall+ (requires root)...

    1. Re:People should be installing by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      You do realize most of these apps are using basic OS functionality - the Linux ip filtering and the VPN stack - to manage connections, right, nerd?

  5. Better headline by ChoGGi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems a better headline would be more along the lines of: Free apps make their money one way or the other.

  6. They don't care because it's in a EULA by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think one of the most effective privacy regs we could have would be a law that requires a plain English explanation of what data is sold or transferred to third parties, including wholly-owned subsidiaries that are operating as a separate company (ex WhatsApp and Facebook).

    No legalese, something that a person with a GED or high school degree should be able to read like this:

    "Location Data

    While your phone's location services are turned on, we will collect the GPS data related to your movements. We will use that to target you with more appropriate ads, services and products. We sell this data to Facebook, Twitter and Amazon. Other purchasers may be added later to this list."

    If it were spelled out in those terms, a lot more people would notice and care.

    1. Re:They don't care because it's in a EULA by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More people might notice and perhaps understand, but I don't know if they'd care. They'll look at it and conclude that they trust those companies enough that they're not concerned. What they won't understand is that those companies are buying all kinds of other data and aggregating it (and then perhaps selling that aggregated data in turn) such that they have far more information about a person than that person might consider possible.

    2. Re:They don't care because it's in a EULA by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      If it were spelled out in those terms, a lot more people would notice and care.

      Sure.

      This app, Facebook, collects absolute NO DATA WHATSOEVER on you, your phone, your car, or your bank account.

      Minor note in <tiny print>: This legally binding notice might be ever-so-slightly changed or updated when you're not actively looking at this legal text. See: Reversible Schrodinger's cat. Be Seeing You!

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    3. Re: They don't care because it's in a EULA by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The end user negotiates terms by agreeing or disagreeing to use the service. The idea that each user of Facebook, Twitter, Tinder and all the rest should be able to have a customized TOS is an idea one would only have if they had no idea what the phrase "it doesn't scale" means.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    4. Re: They don't care because it's in a EULA by gravewax · · Score: 3, Informative

      GDPR is defined by location AND citizenship, it is most definitely NOT confined to the physical continent of Europe. You can do transactions completely external to Europe that can send your company into a GDPR legal mess.

  7. The more we learn about Facebook... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the worse Facebook looks.

    1. Re:The more we learn about Facebook... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

      ... so you suddenly became woke. ...

      Not really. I've critiqued facebook for years. It is just recently that the rest of the world seems to have realized what facebook is about.

  8. I can understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the average person not understanding how this stuff works and the dangers therein, but anyone in IT should have declared Facebook, et al. pariahs long ago. I remember years ago when working as an IT security auditor thinking that I would never join "social media". Many people saw this coming, but people simply don't want to hear about it because it's "free". Everyone in IT understands it's not free. You (metaphorically) are paying for it. In more ways than one.

    I value what little privacy is left over, and as an anecdote, I recently left Fastmail over the Access and Assistance bill. I was a paying customer, but no longer.

    The Security Derangement Complex: Technology Companies And Australia’s Anti-Encryption Law

    In the end, I think people will not be able to trust companies. 99% of people will never encrypt their missives or online content before storing them. That's crazy, despite not having anything to hide. That old chestnut people love to trot out saying, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.", is garbage. We all have things to hide or would prefer to remain under wraps.

    I drive a grey car with no bumper stickers. I wear plain shirts. I don't advertise. I pay cash for booze and tobacco, buy certain things face to face, and generally don't put myself out there for the data miners. My browsing is all done as privately as I can make it. More and more companies are selling, unbeknownst to end users, their data to insurance companies, banks, credit companies, and various governments. We are entering an age where everything is going to be transparent. Those who use encryption that is not "backdoored" will stand out brightly. The cold war between clever end users and the powers that be is coming. VPN/VPS traffic is routinely being deep packet inspected (already a thing) in many places. They are not the panacea people think they are. You cannot trust what you do not control. The Australian AA Bill has really nailed this down for me, and as my only paid account save my ISP, I'm thinking about how to address this in a way that works for me going forward with the friends and family I do communicate with on a regular basis. I'm not paranoid, I just see the patterns being matched around the world with control closing in.

  9. This is probably only scratching the surface by Solandri · · Score: 1

    *IF* you're going to flaunt the law and send info your app collects to Facebook without the phone owner's consent, doing it from the phone is stupid. It allows the phone owner to check on the data your app is transmitting, and catch it sending info to Facebook as TFA did.

    The smart way to do it would be to have your app send the info to you, then you send it to Facebook directly. That way there's no way for the user to detect that you're sharing data with Facebook. I wouldn't at all be surprised if this is what most apps do.

    1. Re:This is probably only scratching the surface by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      What law are you referring to?

  10. Re:Who Cares by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nobody cares. On a rooted Android phone with a privacy guard, firewall and a good blocklist, no app can get or send data anyway.

  11. Worthless, paywalled source. by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nothing good ever came from the Financial Times

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  12. Re:Android sucks, Facebook sucks by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    The price of the phone doesn't matter at all. You can have a great Android device with super-tight privacy almost for free if you learn how to do it. It doesn't even take a lot of work, just a bit of reading and following a few basic steps.

    Sadly, this seems too much work for the average slashdot "nerd" of year 2018.

  13. Laws with no teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There needs to be penalties.

    If CEO's get some jail time this stuff will stop right now!
    There is no motivation to self police.

    They are like "Ooopsie someone made a mistake" "thats against our policy"
    Meanwhile once the cat is out of the bag it's a done deal.
    And if someone doesn't call them out they will keep on with the butt sniffing.

    1. Re:Laws with no teeth by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      There needs to be penalties.

      If CEO's get some jail time this stuff will stop right now!

      What the fuck? Drug dealers get real jail time.. Have drugs gone away? You know how you get someone to not do drugs? You teach them. Show them what drugs can do.. The effects.. etc..

      You know how you get fucked up apps to go away? Teach people about them. Laws don't do anything for prevention. You could arrest every CEO on the planet tomorrow and 5 days later there would be a new batch of shit apps put out with the blessings of a whole new crop of shit CEOs. People are greedy and they'll lie/cheat/steal to get money. The only way you can stop this is to TEACH PEOPLE.

    2. Re: Laws with no teeth by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you blathering about?

  14. Re:Android sucks, Facebook sucks by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    The average person is not particularly technically literate, and is happy to presume that there isn't a problem for them.

    Mostly, they are right, in the same way that driving without signalling or wearing a seatbelt or putting the headlights on in the rain is mostly ok.

  15. Future contributors to EU government coffers? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they will be fined large amounts of money and Facebook as well for accepting the data...

  16. Does your phone listen to your conversations? by MSG · · Score: 1

    I've seen numerous sites "debunk" the idea that your phone listens to your conversations and sends data to advertisers. The problem with every one of them is that they were analyzing the behavior of specific applications, typically the Facebook app. Because Facebook gets data from other application vendors, none of those tests were meaningful.

    Does your phone listen to your conversations? Probably. Could be your laptop/desktop computer, too.

    1. Re:Does your phone listen to your conversations? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Does your phone listen to your conversations? Probably.

      I certainly hope so given wiretapping is a criminal felony offense it would be amazing to pursuit charges and see slime rounded up and carted off to jail.

  17. Good point. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up!

  18. Re:Google by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Everything you do on that smartphone you are sending data to Google you cannot even download "apps" without giving them your name e-mail address and your phone number to go with it.

    There are many downloader sites freely available on the web. You don't need Google play services and associated malware to download software from the Google play store.

  19. Re:Android sucks, Facebook sucks by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    My comment is a response to the baseless OP argument that paying more money is the same thing as caring for your privacy.

    However, there is no need for "technical literacy", just for an average ability to read and follow instructions. The hard technical work has been done and is wrapped in convenient apps that are either free, or cost less than 4-5 bucks.

  20. Re:Want to bet?! by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

    This has been the case for a long time. At least you can deny permissions on Android, or on a rooted Android device, use a utility like XPrivacyLua to allow nosy apps to go slurping all the data they want, as it is fed to it from /dev/urandom.

    Before this, it was commonplace for even a basic fleshlight app to require every permission under the sun, even ACCESS_SUPERUSER, and with Android's all or nothing permission approach, most people just allowed the app to install and start slurping data to its hearts content.

  21. My imitation of "app-man" by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    Only crAPPy crAPPS can crAPP all over your privacy.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:My imitation of "app-man" by Known+Nutter · · Score: 2

      All APPS in your APP machine are crAAPy until you re-APP them into new APPS!

      APPS!!

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
  22. Re: Want to bet?! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I've seen all kinds of cases of bank apps being exploited. Oh wait ... I still have never seen any reports of this happening. I think you mean "even though Android is quite secure and stable and most banks have Android apps that are secure I hate Google so I'm going to pretend that bank accounts are being compromised left and right even though that assertion is ridiculous, since if that were the case banks would be pulling their apps left, right, up and down."

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  23. My take by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

    In this day and age I distrust by default any website which keeps my personal data like name, address, etc. and if I have to use such a website I open a private(incognito) tab in my web browser.

  24. I'm shocked! by plopez · · Score: 1

    Shocked I tell you. And saddened, yes definitely saddened. And shock. Mostly shocked, but also somewhat saddened. Yes that's it, shocked and saddened.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  25. People are still using facebook? by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    If they're still using it after all the s**t in the news lately, they definitely don't care about apps sharing their info. Or their IQ is too low to understand what the problems are. Or both.

  26. Re:Who Cares by sacrilicious · · Score: 1

    On a rooted Android phone with a privacy guard, firewall and a good blocklist, no app can get or send data anyway.

    Note that as long as your phone is talking to cell towers, your location is being catalogued, and those catalogues are being shared/sold.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  27. I had thought this common knowledge by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    Facebook grabs all the data it can, it's really not dependent upon your contacts.
    I don't use Facebook and have it very well blocked with a HOSTS file on my personal Computer.

    I run "Noroot Firewall" on mobile devices. This Christmas a Parrot Drone was gifted, and "FreeFlight mini" software installed
    on a mobile phone; Two packets going to Google and one to Facebook were blocked.

  28. Re:Who Cares by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    This is true of any cellphone, and has nothing to do with Android or Google.