Slashdot Mirror


Why Huawei Gives the US and Its Allies Security Nightmares (technologyreview.com)

Perhaps the most insightful piece that sums up why the U.S. and its allies are apprehensive of using Huawei's products. Six reasons, we are just highlighting the pointers, click on the source story to read the description:
1. There could be "kill switches" in Huawei equipment.
2. ... That even close inspections miss.
3. Back doors could be used for data snooping.
4. The rollout of 5G wireless networks will make everything worse.
5. Chinese firms will ship tech to countries in defiance of a US trade embargo.
6. Huawei isn't as immune to Chinese government influence as it claims to be.

57 of 346 comments (clear)

  1. More reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    7. It's competition to US products.
    8. People with Huawei equipment can be spied upon by the Chinese government and not as easily by the US government.

    1. Re:More reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What US products? We have systematically destroyed 99% of our production capacity for the components that go into cell phones by allowing corporations to fire everyone and move production to other countries which allow workers to be so badly treated that they're slaves in all but name only.

      The only part the USA plays in making a cell phone is some manufacturers assembling the parts here in order to get an "Assembled in the USA" label. We can't make enough of the components for any cell phone to qualify as "Made in the USA".

    2. Re: More reasons by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Informative

      Basically everywhere except in China since in China ownership of a company shall be Chinese.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:More reasons by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 4, Informative

      0. We know for a fact that the government backdoors the shit out of any tech made under their roof, because we do it, Intel actually got caught doing it in leaks over a half a decade ago, and they still do it. It's like giving up the ability to spy on your slaves to your next-largest competitor, you just don't do that.

    4. Re:More reasons by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Instead of speculation why not find out?

      Huawei will let governments inspect their code and publish known good firmware hashes. Does Cisco?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:More reasons by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are not "slaves in all but name only". The working conditions are pretty good in a lot of those Chinese factories, the workers make enough money to send home to their rural families, and despite the sensationalist claims, suicide rates are roughly equivalent to the non-factory worker population. I would say that it is far more likely that your vegetables were picked by someone in the USA that is functionally a slave or that your clothes are made by some child in a sweatshop than your phone is made by a "slave". Indeed, one of the reasons why the work has moved to China is the presence of so much SKILLED labour all concentrated in one place.

      China isn’t perfect, the factories often try to get away with shit, not everyone there is acting in good faith...but I could say exactly the same thing about a lot of places in North America. I think the real fear here is that despite everything, we AREN'T any better than the Chinese, and it offends our moral sensibilities that we might not have any moral high ground to stand on when it comes to workers and their rights.

    6. Re: More reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Number 8 there is the big one.

      The US could not care less about the actual hardware security, they just want access to the equipment no matter where it is.

      Huawei has systematically refused to provide that access

      So, the US advocates against people using them "for security reasons"

    7. Re:More reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      While we certainly aren't better in some ways, in others we currently still are. While our government may currently be run by people who can be generously termed jackasses, at least they aren't yet able to censor us and their isn't a great firewall of the US like there is in China. Oh, and you can call our POTUS a jackass and not end up in prison.

    8. Re:More reasons by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Prison? Try "re-education camp" if you're low enough on totem pole, and "being the star of televised execution" if you're high enough.

      Seriously, this is never in the news in the West for propagandistic reasons, but televised executions of higher ups that were in some kind of opposition to Xi's policies and rising of his cult of personality have been ongoing for quite a few years now in China.

    9. Re: More reasons by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      The USA government also cancelled a contract AT&T had with Huawei where they would retail their smartphones. Huawei is currently the #2 smartphone vendor in the world, #1 is Samsung, #3 is Apple (used to be #2 last year).

      Huawei also competes with Cisco and Juniper in router equipment.

  2. I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every point made here is just as true from the other side too. I know China is investing heavily in developing high-end microprocessor designs and manufacturing capability, but shouldn't it make strategic sense for them to also spend as much money as it takes to purge their country of Microsoft? Windows Update could be easily repurposed for espionage, and even if the US government doesn't control it yet, they could surely do so if they situation was desperate enough. I'd expect China to be throwing huge piles of money into transitioning away from Windows entirely for all military and government functions, and all major companies too. They even tried with Red Flag Linux, and that ended badly. China is striving for hardware manufacturing capability, but seems to be unconcerned over software.

    1. Re:I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh it has.

      The Chinese government still thinks they're clever for stealing US tech.

      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1455559/CIA-plot-led-to-huge-blast-in-Siberian-gas-pipeline.html

      That's just a hint of what goes on.

      The reason the US government doesn't steal foreign tech and give it to US companies is because they know it's an attack vector like a flash drive labeled honeymoon left in a bank parking lot.

    2. Re:I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by markdavis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >"I'd expect China to be throwing huge piles of money into transitioning away from Windows entirely for all military and government functions, and all major companies too. They even tried with Red Flag Linux, and that ended badly."

      You are correct that they shouldn't trust closed US software/hardware (yet we probably shouldn't either). Although their attempt with using Linux didn't end "badly", it just ended because for whatever reason, they decided not to pursue it. At the time, it was probably less about security than a bluff to try and force Microsoft to lower prices and/or include certain "features", coupled with their unwillingness to port their applications to the platform. Actually, it could have been a huge win for them had they continued the process.

    3. Re:I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. And that tells me exactly what the US government expects to be to do to a "US made" phone.

    4. Re:I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

      They even tried with Red Flag Linux, and that ended badly. China is striving for hardware manufacturing capability, but seems to be unconcerned over software.

      I suspect it didn't end badly: the Chinese probably got full access to Windows source code and they negotiated a deal with Microsoft, so that Windows Updates were controlled by the Chinese side, so that Microsoft couldn't push backdoors at will.

      A win-win situation for all the involved parties: Microsoft still can sell Windows to China, the Chinese can still run all their win32 software without any compatibility issues.

    5. Re:I'm surprised it doesn't go the other way. by hackingbear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason the US government doesn't steal foreign tech

      Except the US government has done exactly that:

      The report recommends “a multi-pronged, systematic effort to gather open source and proprietary information through overt means, clandestine penetration (through physical and cyber means), and counterintelligence” (emphasis added). In particular, the DNI’s report envisions “cyber operations” to penetrate “covert centers of innovation” such as R&D facilities.

      The level of American hypocrisy makes me vomit every day.

  3. US govt propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's why we are to be afraid. Guess what, your mobile mandatory location identifying device (as required by US law) is a leash.

    1. Re:US govt propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All popular computer applications are spyware now. Everything is data-mining you as much as possible. It's part of society. The correct thing to do is ditch everything and start from scratch. Build a new internet, new protocols, that use mandatory encryption for every action. The military already does that, but civilians are stuck with the shitty version of the internet.

    2. Re: US govt propaganda by fortfive · · Score: 2

      This is the real point. Folks like us (well me, anyway, i don't know about all you zombies) are just a resource for which governments and big corporations are competing.

    3. Re: US govt propaganda by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Appears so! Quite a food fight there. I wonder if the bug was ever reopened... Talk about security nightmares...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  4. Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and it by getuid() · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. There most likely are "kill switches" in $USBRAND equipment.

    2. ... That even close inspections miss.

    3. Back doors are already being used for data snooping.

    4. The rollout of 5G wireless networks will make everything worse.

    5. US firms will ship tech to countries wherever the fuck they want regardless of anything else.

    6. $USBRAND isn't immune to US government influence, period.

    I fail to see a problem with Huawei in particular.

  5. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    pretty much, everyone in the intelligence industry worry about the stuff they are doing to other countries being done back.

    Look at what they are saying that other places are likely doing, and you get a pretty good list of what they are doing to other places.

  6. The real reason by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

    7. Huawei phones lack the backdoors that allow the US intelligence community to spy on its own people.

    That's it, really. They don't trust us, not at all. You really have to wonder why? Why do they feel the need to spy on us and know what we're thinking? Our elected government made this illegal, and the intelligence community promptly broke the law and lied about it.

    On March 12, 2013, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told Congress that intel officials were not collecting mass data on tens of millions of Americans. NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden soon revealed material that proved Clapper's testimony false: The government had been gathering and storing data from ordinary Americans' phone records, email and Internet use.

    They don't feel any obligation to us at all. It's OK if they break the laws we passed with our elected government and lie to our faces - they don't feel safe if we can keep secrets from them. Fuck democracy, they have wars to start. If we all started buying Huawei they would feel very unsafe indeed.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:The real reason by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I had never heard of Huawei until I moved back to Costa Rica earlier this year. I was basically GIVEN two of their phones by the local phone company - they're that cheap. And they're pretty good. I don't use them because I still have my Samsung but I had a look at them. Given what they offer (a lot) for what they cost (almost nothing), I can understand why the US cell phone market is shaking in its boots. This is not so much about spying and 100% about the oligopolies making sure they don't lose market share. Anyway, I have 2 spare phones.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:The real reason by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The US intelligence community is not elected. They have gone rogue and are not under the control of the democratically elected government. "This is like a spy novel.".

      These are the same people who lied us into Iraq. In what possible way are they trustworthy?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:The real reason by dryeo · · Score: 2

      The repressive totalitarian regime can be trusted to act like a repressive totalitarian regime. Democratically elected governments change course regularly, one day you're their friend, the next they're putting tariffs on you for national security reasons while being all chummy with some of those repressive totalitarian governments.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    4. Re:The real reason by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Bullshit, before the war the CIA assessment was leaked to the public.

      It was purely one of the elected branches that was lying, and they control all the parts of the intelligence community that make public statements. The actual intelligence documents are only provided to different parts of government, not to the public; and Congress leaked it so people would know the Truth. It was only because of our un-elected intelligence community that we found out the truth!

      My advice, stop reading so many spy novels, and your world will look less like one.

  7. Could, could be and so on is the best we have? by bogaboga · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I set it's a bunch of "possibilities"...

    "Could be"..."Could" and so on...

    Chinese firms will ship tech to countries in defiance of a US trade embargo.

    Why should foreign entity obey US law is I may ask?

    . Huawei isn't as immune to Chinese government influence as it claims to be

    Let's remember we have the NSA that has done more or less the same, even in defiance of US law...

    1. Re:Could, could be and so on is the best we have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Chinese firms will ship tech to countries in defiance of a US trade embargo.

      Why should foreign entity obey US law is I may ask?

      They don't have to obey US law. However, the US is within its rights to say that it will not allow US trade with a firm that breaks its embargo. These days almost every non-trivial item has components that are built/designed/licenced by US firms. So you can trade with, e.g. Iran, but your firm will no longer be able to get supplies of US components, software, equipment, etc. and the US will refuse to trade with you or any of your suppliers. Which pretty much means you're screwed if you trade with a country that the US has embargoed. It's harsh but well within the norms of embargoes. (I'm from the UK and have no dog in this fight.)

  8. Re:happened in India by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a nice piece of fake news, on par with the oft told story about the Soviet "peace" tractors that allegedly "destroyed" a million-strong Chinese invasion force in the 60s with megalasers from low Earth orbit.

    I'm sure, however, that had such a thing as you described happened, it would have received ample coverage by the Indian press.

    Care to find some links?

  9. None of this matters by dnaumov · · Score: 2

    Huawei / Chinese meddling is not in any way more or less suspect than Cisco / US meddling. Everybody is a suspect. Why would/should it be otherwise?

  10. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA an by getuid() · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you're the average American (or European, for that matter), you're living paycheck to paycheck, your perspective of retiring at the end of your useful shelf life (~65, give or take) is practically zero, your children's chance of a useful education is degrading (...if you're European; it's already essentially zero of you're US), and the only perspective your offspring have in their life is to live through & possibly, maybe, try to clean up the mess the big winners of your generation are creating for all of us.

    In that case, China is not your primary enemy. Your own government is, together (or better: led by?) those who Have. That's what you should be worrying about primarily.

  11. Chinese Food Security Nightmares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. There could be "poison" in Chinese food.
    2. ... That even close inspections miss.
    3. Chinese waiters could be used for snooping.
    4. The rollout of Chinese restaurants will make everything worse.
    5. Chinese restaurants will ship food to countries in defiance of a US trade embargo.
    6. P.F. Changs isn't as immune to Chinese government influence as it claims to be.

  12. Cisco = Huawei by stooo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cisco does exactly the same.

    --
    aaaaaaa
  13. So basically it comes down to by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "could"

    There could be all that stuff in products from other countries, too. Heck, even American products could have these things. Maybe America should just stop trading with everyone and jump incestuously in bed with itself, and hope its own manufacturers are completely honest and transparent, just as they have turned out to be so far in history...

    Could indeed... Or maybe you should do it the old fashioned way, and actually find the person guilty before executing them.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  14. DIY by DaMattster · · Score: 2

    Probably the best way to keep your network security is to neither use Chinese nor US Branded equipment. Instead, employ a little do it yourself mentality. I built my own and it's powered by OpenBSD. Still no guarantee but it's a lot more secure than all of the shitty stuff out there.

  15. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    3. Back doors are already being used for data snooping.

    Hell, FRONT doors are already being used for data snooping. Well you clicked "I agree", right?

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  16. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And still absolutely nobody has asked themselves how Turkey happened to end up with audio recordings of the Kashoggi murder... While everyone was busy saying "oh dear that's terrible", I was thinking "lol they're going to have to change the bugs in the Saudi consulate now".

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  17. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    American ally

    I believe the word you are looking for is "vassal". There are no more American allies. An ally is assumed to have some degree of independence and usually has equal status. A vassal, on the other hand, is one who never disagrees and always does as they are told. Kind of like that person we all know at work who is a complete idiot and yet somehow is always the boss's favorite and always gets promoted. That isn't the boss' friend - that IS your boss and if you cross him/her/it, you will find out pretty sharpish who is going to be transferred/fired. Hint - it's not them.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  18. The golden age of espionage by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 2

    When you think about it, nowadays you cannot trust any high-tech gadget/piece of equipment unless you 100% control each step of its development and production which is quite expensive and complicated for companies/governments however if you are an end user you have to treat everything as compromised by default and work from there. You might feel quite unnerving and powerless but that's what it is.

  19. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking as someone from western Europe, the problem with Huawei is that in geopolitical terms China is not an ally by any stretch of the imagination. The USA are. If there's any serious trouble, we do not have to worry about the USA shutting us off unless they decide at some point that we are no longer allies. The biggest worry is that equipment from the US has some backdoor (installed on behest of the government or whatever) that the Chinese can exploit.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  20. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by Sique · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't know about you, but here around (Austria), the news were full of speculation that Turkey hesitated to publish said recordings because it would give away the places of the turkish bugs in the Saudi Arabian embassy.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  21. Why can't human made mechienes be tested by humans by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    There seems to be a lack of interest in actually testing systems to see if the meet national security guidelines. Believe it or not these things are not black-boxes if people open up the cases, put them in Faraday cages. Monitor what its out put it, and traffic to see where things go, what ports are open....
    You can take the chips off the board and be sure they are doing what the specs say they should be doing.
    In case of Flash software, you can demand the source review it, and compile it at your country and flash it onto a device.

    I know policy makers don't want to use specialists because they are these crazy egg heads who think they know it all, and will often go against their best instincts. But for national security, you probably should trust those people who have studied this stuff and understand the going on. Vs saying it it too technical let ban it.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  22. 6 reasons? by Daralantan · · Score: 2

    Why are 1 and 2 the same reason broken up into two? And 4 doesn't really have anything to do with Huawei.

  23. Re: Cisco routers. by vtcodger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you ask me, the Europeans would have to be crazy to allow themselves to be overly dependent on any of the US, Russia, North Africa, or the Middle East for fuel to keep warm in Winter. But they are capable of figuring that our for themselves I think.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  24. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/cisco-backdoor-hardcoded-accounts-software,37480.html

    Kinda says it all...

  25. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA an by Talla · · Score: 4, Informative

    So no, the US are definitely no more allies of Europe than China is.

    You have no sense of proportion. China lives by completely different rules. They have no respect for freedom of speech or democracy, quite the opposite, and they don't care if other countries do. The US has its flaws, but I'll take a flawed democracy over an oppressing dictatorship any day.

    And beyond ecinomics... well, if you're European, it's not like China is out to burn your home, rape your wife, kill your dog. They're on a different hemisphere for chrissake, there's noting to gain for them from indaving another, regardless of whether that's Europe or US. (FWIW, the only country that has a habit of doing that post-WW2, regularly, is the US.)

    No, maybe they'll just destroy all your infrastructure that's connected to the internet, including telecommuncations, power supply, and everything else that's needed in a modern society. Japan's being in a different hemisphere didn't stop them from starting an all out war with the US. If the western countries tries to do the right thing and stop China from taking areas from smaller countries in Asia then a war is not an impossibility. I assume you know that China is already doing that by creating artificial islands with military bases.

  26. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA an by ffkom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it's not like China is out to burn your home, rape your wife, kill your dog. They're on a different hemisphere for chrissake, there's noting to gain for them from indaving another, regardless of whether that's Europe or US. (FWIW, the only country that has a habit of doing that post-WW2, regularly, is the US.)

    While I agree with your statement that the US has a nasty habit of invading foreign countries, China did a similar thing to Tibet "post-WW2".

    Also, Russia shares the US habit of invading foreign countries, as demonstrated for example in Afghanistan and the Ukraine.

    So, the basic lesson is: Don't trust any equipment that was manufactured or shipped through one of these aggressive nations.

  27. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA an by Sique · · Score: 2

    Are you talking about User ID 14 in the Hicom 300/HiPath 4000? ;)

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  28. There's Deauthorization on Windows, Too. by BrendaEM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am not making excuses for Huawei, and we shouldn't make them for Microsoft, either. A few months ago, my computer was one of the many that de-authorized by Microsoft because of the bug in their servers, only for a day, but Windows 10 appears to have a kill switch.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  29. Re: Cisco routers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    LOL the USSR didn't buy that software, they stole it. And yes, the software was booby trapped by the CIA, who deliberately fed one of Russia's spies falty software, but it didn't do anything that you mention here. The software was built for industrial sabotage on a spectacular scale:

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1455559/CIA-plot-led-to-huge-blast-in-Siberian-gas-pipeline.html

    The USSR was all about stolen technology, and this is just one example of them taking more than they thought they were taking. Another one I recall was plans for a nuclear bomb that wouldn't actually work.

  30. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA a by getuid() · · Score: 2

    The US has secret courts, gag orders, national security letters, prison camps outside of court's reach, and the largest per-person incarceration rate in the world.

    Go on, make my day, tell me more about Hungary. I've been there. Recently.

  31. Re:Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA and by rilister · · Score: 2

    "isn't immune to US government influence" is a gross understatement (I assume you were being ironic!). We know that US companies up and down the stack have been clandestinely legally compelled to compromise user security in favor of national security goals.

    Software: NSA-designed Ecliptic Curve encryption algorithm adopted by companies (RSA, Microsoft, Cisco) despite widespread suspicion that they were designed with backdoors: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ...and then all the stuff Snowden exposed. Heck, even all of these 'transparency reports' are admissions that the government is forcing US companies to do things that they would prefer not too.

    Meanwhile, the US have quite a history of computer hardware sabotage:
    Deliberately faulty processors designed to destroy oil pipeline, resulting in huge explosion:
    https://www.wired.com/2004/03/...
    "Every microchip they stole would run fine for 10 million cycles, and then it would go into some other mode. It wouldn't break down, it would start delivering false signals and go to a different logic... It was a huge explosion. The Air Force thought it was a 3-kiloton blast."

    so, yes, we should assume that Huawei is just as vulnerable to state manipulation and exploitation as any similar US company.

    --
    'This writing business. Pencils and what-not. Over-rated if you ask me. Silly stuff. Nothing in it' - Eeyore
  32. Re: Cisco routers. by Luckyo · · Score: 2

    There's no deflection here. He's merely pointing out the obvious. Your "discussion" is hinged on the childish assumption that "US has engaged in unconscionable business dealings" is somehow relevant to the discussion, as if there are other partners who don't.

    When factor exists to same or greater level for everyone else involved, it becomes largely irrelevant.

  33. Re: Why [cisco|intel|...$USBRAND] gives $NOTUSA a by Talla · · Score: 2

    Don't talk to me about "Freedom of speech" while you have people like Assange bullied and prosecuted for what they said.

    Again, no sense of proportions. You have Assange, I raise you one million Chinese Uyghurs being incarcerated in "re-education camps" in China for their religious beliefs.

  34. Re: Cisco routers. by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 2

    There is no "obvious" here. The talking point that Europe is "overly dependent" on Russian gas is just that - a talking point. The fact is that Russia is at least as much dependent on European money and tech that it gets in exchange for its gas, and that the gas trade has done much more for improving the strategic safety of Europe than, for example, the US military presence.

  35. Re: Cisco routers. by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

    Either the Nord Stream 2 pipeline is built or the German economy will tumble. As will the economy of the Netherlands. Even the UK will be impacted. You know why? Because the natural gas wells in the Netherlands are drying up. As is North Sea gas. There will be a capacity deficit in the near future, like the next 5 years unless Nord Stream 2 is built. The alternative for the Germans, I guess, is burning coal. Since Germany has been closing all their nuclear reactors.

    If you think the Germans will take the hit and lose economic competitiveness to satisfy some nebulous USA natural gas interests they have another thing coming. Fact is the USA does not even have the capacity to supply that demand over the next 5 years. To build those facilities, even if they were financed, would take at least a decade and it would still be more expensive than Russian gas.