Slashdot Mirror


Dell Alienware Area-51m Packs Desktop Hardware Into Powerful, Upgradeable Laptop (hothardware.com)

MojoKid writes: Dell just unveiled its latest desktop-replacement class notebook, the new Alienware Area-51m. Unlike most other notebooks, however, the Area-51m is actually packing an array of desktop-class hardware. Intel's Core i9-9900K is an available CPU option, for example, and NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 2080 will be offered in the machine as well. The Area-51m also supports up to 64GB of RAM via quad SO-DIMM slots, multiple NVMe M.2 solid state drives and a SATA drive can be installed, and numerous 17.3" display options will be available as well, including a 144Hz IPS G-SYNC model. The Alienware Area-51m is also upgradeable, thanks to the use of socketed desktop processors and a custom GPU module. The machine will be available starting January 29th in two color options, Lunar Light and Dark Side of the Moon.

89 comments

  1. 90 WHr battery by vchoy · · Score: 2

    which probably equates to a good uninterruptible power supply (UPS), giving about 30mins to 1 hour of battery time if this bad boy runs at full overclocked and full power speeds.

    1. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh good Lord!

      You're talking for sure about creimy the mountain! LOL!

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      https://ibb.co/gVad65

    2. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow!

      His wife is a tree growing off his shoulder?

      Amazing! I guess I am going to go smoke my high school diploma...

    3. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with the hyphen? Why did you write "New-York", twice, but "Las Vegas" didn't need a hyphen?

    4. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      which probably equates to a good uninterruptible power supply (UPS), giving about 30mins to 1 hour of battery time if this bad boy runs at full overclocked and full power speeds.

      Then don't run it at full overclocked full power speed.

      Sometimes it is nice to have the capacity to make heavy calculations but that doesn't need that you have to use it.
      If the power consumption you get while typing in your text editor of choice is the same as a lower end laptop then there isn't really a downside to being able to use more power when needed.

    5. Re:90 WHr battery by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting thirty minutes out of it - the i9-9900K sucks down 95W all by itself.

    6. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed! I have an Alienware 13 R3 and I can stretch the battery ~9h when I don't have to be analysis Illumina data and fitting maths models to data. When I do it... it's nice to have the power without having to queue in the HPC server :o)

    7. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 9900K+GTX 2080 idle power consumption is 25W. Under full load the CPU+GPU draws 250+225W, giving you roughly 9 minutes before the OS sends you into hibernation; less if you turn on the screen.

    8. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, 95W is the TDP. It consumes more power than is lost to heat (and you need to chill the system as well). A system with a 9900K using only a CPU stress test reaches 250W for the power delivered to the CPU package alone (if you give it good enough cooling to maintain turbo boost).

    9. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an msi laptop with 8th gen i7 and gtx 1070, both desktop class versions. unless it's plugged in it can't run at full performance. Battery cannot pump enough power to feed both gpu and cpu at full load. It runs at approx %70 performance at max on battery compared to plugged in. It comes with 2 different power bricks, one small, smaller than regular laptop power bricks, and one about 4 times larger than that which is about the size of quarter of a psu. Under heavy load small power brick does not charge, or charges veeery slowly(may be %3 in 1hr). I even saw that when both cpu and gpu are heavily loaded you even lose about %1-2 battery every 15 mins with small power brick. When you plug the large one though, you pretty much get a desktop pc in laptop form.

    10. Re:90 WHr battery by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Icelake is such a new series of Intel parts, only the vanguard CPUs were released (in december(?)). There are modifications to those CPUs soon to be released, including an ultra-power efficient laptop CPU version of the i9-9900. You'd probably want to buy the laptop with an previous generation CPU like an i7-8850H, (which has a "cruising" wattage of 45W, but still 6 cores!), confident that when the Icelake low power CPUs come out, you can upgrade to them. Or even wait for the generation after Icelake, but that's "gambling" that the CPU socket will stay the same. Allowing socketed parts is something of a gimmick to me, but it suddenly makes a Dell laptop intriguing. Frankly, I care more that the GPU can be replaced.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    11. Re:90 WHr battery by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      When you plug the large one though, you pretty much get a desktop pc in laptop form.

      ...ah, just realize that cooling is an issue. The laptop CPU will "throttle down" once it's accumulated enough heat.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    12. Re:90 WHr battery by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      These systems really shouldn't be called Laptops but Mobile Workstations. I have a High End Performance Laptop myself, and the battery on it is about as good as a UPS. I Keep it plugged in most of the time, and unplug it with enough power to get to the next spot, (That is when I am running it on full). If I cripple it, with switching to Integrated Video and 1080p resolution, then I can get a normal laptop time of 4-6 hours of usage. But running on full power is is only about 30 minutes.

      Much like how we have UltraBooks, Laptops, we should classify these suckers as mobile workstations.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re: 90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your math sucks.

    14. Re:90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is Groot?

    15. Re:90 WHr battery by torkus · · Score: 1

      You assume there's enough thermal mass in the laptop to make that relevant. While the laptop does clock in around 9 pounds, it's unlikely the cooling system would take very long at full power to reach equilibrium. So either they designed enough heat rejection capability or your permanently throttled in any high utilization situation.

      Keep in mind the RTX 2080 sucks down more than twice the TDP of the CPU (215w vs 95w) so CPU waste heat isn't the main problem anyhow.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    16. Re: 90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the system would consume more power Ptot than what is lost as heat Ph, where would that difference Ptot-Ph go to ?

      I can see some being emitted as light by the display, hear some emitted as acoustic waves, 'electrosense' some transmitted as RF by WiFi and Bluetooth and feel the air ejected by the fans, but what happens to the rest ?

      Answer: there is barely any, because Ptot is very close to Ph.

    17. Re: 90 WHr battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably Russian, because New York is hyphenated in Russian.

  2. (paid?) avertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't this have the banner color indicating it is an advertisement?

    1. Re:(paid?) avertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cause creimy the mountain bought Slashdot for 3 pennies, duh!

  3. What the fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the slashvertising all that's left now? And why would it be worth advertising that you cram desktop parts into a laptop when it's just going to thermal throttle itself all day long anyway? What about the idiots in Florida who will buy this boat?

    1. Re:What the fuck by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Those idiots in florida probably already have a good boat, this might make a good anchor tho...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  4. Missing Detail... by Ambvai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a rather notable tidbit I didn't see in this article that I saw from another: "Alienware is using its proprietary Dell Graphics Form Factor (DGFF) cards for GPUs in the Area-51m, and since neither Nvidia nor AMD has promised that they’ll make future chips compatible with that format, Alienware can’t promise future upgrades either."

    1. Re:Missing Detail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not nvidia and the graphics chips that you have to worry about for upgrading later on.

      it's dell and the vendor that makes these proprietary cards using the standard 'off the shelf' desktop gpu.

      they're desktop chips. the form factor is probably just a smaller physical card designed to fit the confined space with different and compact connector but still delivering pcie x16 (as such a thing would be the easiest and cheapest to develop and manufacture).

      buyer beware. dell has let other proprietary shit rot in hell before.

    2. Re:Missing Detail... by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      There's a rather notable tidbit I didn't see in this article that I saw from another: "Alienware is using its proprietary Dell Graphics Form Factor (DGFF) cards for GPUs in the Area-51m, and since neither Nvidia nor AMD has promised that theyâ(TM)ll make future chips compatible with that format, Alienware canâ(TM)t promise future upgrades either."

      Not to mention there WAS an interchangable GPU formfactor out there - it's called MXM. It's designed for laptops and both nVidia and AMD supported it, as did a few laptop manufacturers at the time (including Dell).

      Instead, it just died because no one used it in a while.

  5. Hey look! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An advertisement!

  6. Additional Missing Details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Starting price of $2,549.
    Screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
    No nipples.

    It's really sad older laptops had better vertical resolutions and input controls. Thus this machine won't tempt me to upgrade from my aging frankinpad (a type of modded thinkpad). There's a market need not being met...

    1. Re:Additional Missing Details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you can still see nipples at that resolution. A friend told me ....

    2. Re: Additional Missing Details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, sure. If two is enough for you. How vanilla.

    3. Re: Additional Missing Details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the Thinkpad version ;)

    4. Re:Additional Missing Details... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      For a gaming machine with a 17 inch screen, 1080p is fine. If they were targeting it as a portable workstation I would agree, but for games it makes a lot of sense. Wide screen with high refresh and acceptable resolution is fine.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    5. Re: Additional Missing Details... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Thinkpads have the best keyboards & pointer sticks, but Lenovo never uses anything but Quadro graphics cards (hence, my other comment in this article re Dell happily using non-Quadros). For 97% of likely users, Quadro cards suck... mega-expensive, and crippled performance.

    6. Re:Additional Missing Details... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Screen resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.

      From what I understand, panel availability is the main problem. I believe that as of this moment, there's exactly one company that manufactures 17.3" panels with higher resolution than 1920x1080. The panels are 2560x1440 (not 3840x2160), are limited to 60hz, and apparently are known for having poor contrast & saturation.

      I think part of the problem is also that nobody wants to go to the trouble of making a display capable of 2160p120, but making one capable of 1080p120 and 2160p30 without requiring yet another major overhaul of HDMI 2.x would require having some kind of agreed-upon standard for frame-packing (whereby you send 3840x2160@30fps as four 1920x1080 frames in a row at 120fps, and display 1080p120 by doubling each pixel to 2x2) that didn't exist back when that currently-available 17.3" panel was designed and went to manufacturing. I think the mess between FreeSync and Gsync compounded it, since historically Nvidia wouldn't allow licensees to support both standards, and refused to support FreeSync with their own cards in the hope that it could make Gsync the One Official Standard everyone else was forced to license from them. Now that VESA has apparently given Nvidia "the finger" by making FreeSync the officially-blessed standard for TVs, and Nvidia itself is apparently going to start supporting Freesync output, that might change in the near future.

      Another issue with 2560x1440 panels: they suck for displaying natively 1080p content because every pixel HAS to be partially-scaled. With 3840x2160, 1080p can neatly scale 2:1 without losing sharpness (unless you WANT to do smoothing), and 720p has enough oversampling when scaled up to 3840x2160 to make Nyquist happy and avoid the really bad higher-order artifacts seen when scaling 1920x1080 up to 2560x1440.

      Personally, I wish someone would just take the next step up and make a laptop that uses a 22" 3840x2160 display. AFAIK, "22" panels that support Gsync and 120+Hz framerates already exist... it would be too big to USE on an airplane, but then again, I'm pretty sure even 17.3" is too big to fit on a tray table without encroaching into the space of whomever is sitting next to you... and I think 22" panels are *just* small enough to fit into an enclosure that fits within the airline-defined maximum dimensions for carry-on baggage. It obviously wouldn't be a "laptop", so much as an "easily-luggable mobile workstation".

      God forbid, if they went THAT big, they could probably even design its enclosure to BE the size of an airline-approved carry-on suitcase & have it support ATX-type components. I remember seeing something like that ~15 years ago, but unfortunately the company that manufactured it refused to sell the cases + monitors as separate components, and only sold them as complete (and HORRIFYINGLY expensive) systems (something like $8,000 for the cheapest one). The market for "AirTX"-formfactor cases might be small, but as long as it supported normal-formfactor motherboards, cards, etc, it wouldn't really MATTER... people would just buy the case-monitor combo, add everything else themselves, and evolve the system in a Ship of Theseus manner over the next 10 years by keeping the case, monitor, snap-on keyboard, etc, and replacing the other components as they became obsolete or wore out.

      My personal fantasy: AirTX with three monitors, arranged like shutters over a window... a ~22" 3840x2160 main landscape-orientation display, flanked by a pair of portrait-orientation displays that were somewhere between 1440x2160 and 1600x2160 (attached with hinges so that when closed, the screens of the flanking displays faced the main screen). Add a range of keyboard options that includes model-M buckling-spring, Cherry blue/green/clear/black/red/brown switches, and Thinkpad-like scissor switches (all with two pointer sticks... one between the GHB keys, and one below the spacebar for thumb use, configurable so that one or both can be used for mouse-control, with one optionally used as a fau

  7. That you can upgrade doesn't matter. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    The worthwhile upgrades will be on another socket and chipset anyways. It will be interesting for like the 2nd or 3rd potato gamer owner down the line though.

    Also - laptops have had tried to have standards for upgrading gpu for like 16 years now with little success - availability of an upgrade when you would want it is very unlikely.

    It does offer more cpu options though. But that's about it. who cares? there's several laptops now with 2080 if you want that.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:That you can upgrade doesn't matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, exactly this. Also, Alienware has tried this BS before, and they never released any new upgrades for the supposedly upgradeable GPU. I have an alienware desktop and I love it, but I'll probably never buy another Alienware laptop.

  8. Ugh. It doesn't have a pointer stick. by Miamicanes · · Score: 0

    Damn it, someone finally came out with a laptop that has good specs, a G-sync 144hz display, and a RTX videocard that ISN'T a Quadro... then ruined it by using a keyboard that doesn't have a pointer stick. :-(

  9. Why only 1TB? by darkain · · Score: 2

    Why is this thing capped at only 1TB of storage? That's how much I have in my 7 year old 10" netbook that I upgraded. The laptop in the article is a fucking beast, there are 5TB SFF drives now, why don't those work?

    1. Re:Why only 1TB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they wanted the battery to last more than 5 minutes? and the price to only hurt a lot not to give you crippling depression that its not obtainable.

    2. Re:Why only 1TB? by turp182 · · Score: 1

      That's just default options, you can add more storage. My Alienware (2 years old) is at 1.5TB with 2 M.2 slots still available.

      And the processor and graphics are desktop components.

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    3. Re: Why only 1TB? by Type44Q · · Score: 1
      So you're fucking stupid.

      Noted.

  10. this "news item" was the last straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and now slashdot is getting blocked on my computer.

    1. Re: this "news item" was the last straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares, dumbass.

    2. Re: this "news item" was the last straw by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      That's my line, dumbass!

  11. Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will be obsolete in less than 6 months.

    1. Re:Who cares by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The video card _might_ be upgradable...

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  12. Pft.. "Laptop" by GrBear · · Score: 1

    For those that have liquid cooled laps of steel I guess. For everyone else, it's an expensive slim portable desktop computer.

    1. Re:Pft.. "Laptop" by Tough+Love · · Score: 2

      Dell has shipped desktop replacement laptops before that thermal throttle down to the performance of a much more modest processor. I have one.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  13. "Ads for Nerds" by rcharbon · · Score: 1

    'Nuff sed.

  14. Why both with NVMe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother with NVMe on an Intel CPU? There are insufficient PCIe lanes to operate them.

    1. Re:Why both with NVMe? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      if you cut or and switcher to the cpu X16 shared with video card there are the lanes.

  15. Obvious slashvertisement is obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *click*

  16. MXM GPUs where not really that changeable by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    MXM GPUs where not really that changeable and this seems to be the same way with the custom to the system cooling setup.

  17. Alienware tried the upgradable video before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Years ago I bought an alienware because the job I had refused to replace the faulty sony vaio they gave me. The alienware had a replaceable video card, as far as I know no replacement cards were ever made. The video was a joke, it overheated at settings well below what the specs on the card should be able to handle. Beyond that alienware had made a very poor design choice on the LCD backlight switch would would stay stuck down after the screen was opened. Alienware also refused to let anyone send their laptops in for repair even if they were willing to pay for it. They did honor extended warranties but that was it, if you hadn't bought the extended warranty you couldn't pay them to repair it. The reason I think for this was they had a new model coming out that they wanted to ramp up production for.

  18. No they didn't by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

    They put it into a "laptop". With huge "finger doing the air quotes thing" around that word.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  19. how do they manage the heat? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    isn't the reason I need a big case with big fans all about cooling?

    Do they throttle this?

    Does it sound like I'm clinging to the chain link fence on Mako beach as the jet engine wash blows over me?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:how do they manage the heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm according to The Verge, it runs the processor at a full 165W (most laptops throttle the cpu at 95W) and according to Dell it is "whisper quiet... when doing ordinary tasks".

      Intriguing. Now I'm puzzled what ATX cases are for.

    2. Re:how do they manage the heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mobile gpu is claimed to run at 90% of a desktop when overclocked.

    3. Re:how do they manage the heat? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Now I'm puzzled what ATX cases are for

      Honestly, for modern computers, a full-size mid-tower case is gross overkill, even for gamers. Nowadays, if a graphics card (or cards) generates lots of heat, it just sucks in air from the outside and blows it directly outside without involving the case's interior ambient airflow. Ditto for CPUs. In the past, case airflow in high-performance systems was mostly due to 10kRPM and 15kRPM hard drive arrays, which are now basically moot -- we use SSDs for things that used to use 10k/15k hard drives, and use slow drives for bulk storage that spend most of their time spun down anyway (usually, with their 50-200 gigabytes of most recently-used blocks cached to SSD for both performance and to let them remain spun-down).

      Form-factor wise, we're still stuck with "shoe box" form factor and microATX size if you want to be able to use normal cards and external drives without worrying about half-height cards, riser cards, and laptop-formfactor optical drives, but there's a world of difference size-wise between a compact microATX case the size of two stacked shoe boxes and a traditional mid-tower case that was common 20 years ago.

      IMHO, the biggest reason why we've never been able to evolve much smaller is because Intel is no longer sufficiently dominant to unilaterally dictate standards anymore, and getting a CONSORTIUM of companies with opposing interests to agree about ANYTHING has historically proven to be a nearly lost cause... at best, you end up with standards that either require implementing "the kitchen sink" to accommodate 5 original conflicting standards, or you end up with a standard nobody actually uses.

      Back in the late 90s, Intel dictated several new form factors... only ATX caught on. We now have a few semi-informal conventions for CONNECTORS inside a laptop (like mPCIe, which is used by discrete laptop graphics cards and internal WLAN cards, and the various standards for internal SSD cards), but no OFFICIAL vendor-agnostic standards for form factor, bolt placement, heat-removal, physical access to the outside world, etc. Laptop optical drives seem to have settled down into one of two form factors, including the placement of USB3.0 and mPCIe/mSATA ports for them to plug into, but getting a true thirdparty drive to work in a given laptop still involves a bit of bezel-related surgery (even in cases where the drive is designed to be semi-easily removable and swappable).

      The main problem with graphics cards is that there's no official standard governing the interface + physical form factor + thermal profile, so there's no official standard for card manufacturers to advertise compatibility with, nor an official standard for mobile workstation vendors to advertise compatibility with. At best, you're stuck buying parts online with your fingers crossed, knowing there's a good chance you'll end up having to sell it at a loss on eBay when it ultimately doesn't fit or work.

    4. Re:how do they manage the heat? by kriston · · Score: 1

      BTX could have been a contender. It was efficient, quiet, and good, especially after designers got around the trace length problems with AMD CPUs.

      The cooling intake on the front of the case was a game changer for me. Unfortunately all the new enthusiast cases have intakes on the top, sides, and (gasp), the bottom, sucking dust in from all directions and inviting catastrophic destruction from spilled liquids.

      --

      Kriston

  20. MMM....not quite by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    The implication from the summary "packs desktop hardware into upgradeable laptop" while TECHNICALLY accurate is misleading, in my view.

    It implies strongly that the laptop is using desktop-components to be upgradeable. It isn't.

    It has a swappable module that contains desktop-caliber graphics modules...not like the bog-standard video card you could buy from Microcenter. Certainly, these modules have to be crafted and sold to you solely by Alienware. At Alienware prices.

    This is expected to retail for $2549 but that's going to be the bottom-end, bare bones system. You can easily get a gaming system of that caliber for $300-$400 less at Sager, and you're not buying into 'upgradeability' that is going to be a premium price, either.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:MMM....not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine a laptop that holds a 2.5-slot three-fan video card? It'd be a briefcase.

    2. Re:MMM....not quite by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      This one is nearly NINE POUNDS.
      It IS a briefcase.

      --
      -Styopa
  21. Dimensions by nickovs · · Score: 1

    At 410 mm (16.1") wide, 402 mm (15.8") deep, 43mm (1.7") thick and, according to the product page, and average weight of 4.4 Kg (9.7 lb), the term "laptop" seems to be a bit of a stretch. Perhaps "transportable" might be a better term.

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
    1. Re:Dimensions by Red_Forman · · Score: 1

      Still a lot lighter than a Commodore SX-64, which weighs 10.5 kg (23lb).

    2. Re:Dimensions by nickovs · · Score: 1

      Still a lot lighter than a Commodore SX-64, which weighs 10.5 kg (23lb).

      Or indeed the Osborne 1 at 10.7kg, which I'm old enough to remember being impressed by (and not just for it's impressive "mass to screen area" ratio!)

      --
      If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  22. Sad, just sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right.
    Let's put some of the hottest high-end compooter hardware in, but in a laptop form factor, so you've got power, but you only have a lilbitty lappy screen to view it. That, folks, is an excellent example of sad.
        People, if you're gonna spend all that money on your machine, put it in an -adult- compooter, not some cheezy laptop. Shitty pointing devices, teeny lil screens, pathetic keyboards, and teeny lil screens. Oh, you want a 4k display in it? Suuuure, OK. You'll never see the benefit on a lappy screen, but hey, we'll take all the $ you're willing to hand over, dumbass.

  23. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commercial

  24. hair dryer by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 1

    Cool. 300 watts. Huge heat blower in the back. You can even dry your hair with it or blow away fellow coffee shop guys yacking on the phone opposite to you. Nice is the small form factor graphics cards. Maybe that technology will also transfer to desktops.

  25. An answer in search of a question? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    This laptop weighs almost 9 pounds and has a price starting over $2,500. Who exactly is the target market here? It doesn't seem that it would be very practical for anyone at that point. I'm surprised it isn't sold with Porsche, Lamborghini, or Bugatti logos on it.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:An answer in search of a question? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised it isn't sold with Porsche, Lamborghini, or Bugatti logos on it.

      I am too. It could really drive down the sale price of the laptop with corporate sponsorship.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re:An answer in search of a question? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised it isn't sold with Porsche, Lamborghini, or Bugatti logos on it.

      I am too. It could really drive down the sale price of the laptop with corporate sponsorship.

      I was referring more to how those three luxury / performance car companies (and many others of course) have become "lifestyle brands" more than anything now. You can easily find Porsche branded t-shirts, Lamborghini branded wallets, Bugatti branded sunglasses, etc at every store in town. The brands represent luxury and excess even for people who cannot afford their products, or more so they represent excessive spending for those who buy only the branded trinkets. A laptop that is an excessive luxury item would fit well within that sphere.

      In fact people pay extra to have some ordinary item sold with the logo of an expensive company.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:An answer in search of a question? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      College students who want a minimally-compromised gaming system they can easily lug to their parents house for weekend visits and holidays?

      Kids in high school who want a computer they can easily haul over to a friend's house?

      People whose jobs require "travel" in the sense of "living in some city besides the one where you officially live, for days, weeks or months at a time... but not LITERALLY living out of a suitcase and running through airport terminals every day"?

      People whose jobs involve "real" content-creation work that a mere laptop is inadequate for, but still want to have some degree of luggability so they can do demos outside of their office without the risk of having it not work properly on a lesser computer (or the need to waste hours ensuring that the demo DOES work properly on a lesser, more portable computer, making sure they give themselves enough time to fix whatever doesn't work if it DOESN'T work properly on the other computer)?

    4. Re:An answer in search of a question? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      People who want a bunch of computing resources, can't/don't want to operate it remotely and don't work in a fixed location.

      It's a lot more conviniant to grab a big laptop from the back of your car and set it up on a desk at a temporary work location then to do the same with a desktop and it's associated collection of perhiperals and cables.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:An answer in search of a question? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      College students who want a minimally-compromised gaming system they can easily lug to their parents house for weekend visits and holidays?

      Kids in high school who want a computer they can easily haul over to a friend's house?

      Those are two cases of especially spoiled kids you describe, there. Do they drive daddy's Jag to these events?

      People whose jobs require "travel" in the sense of "living in some city besides the one where you officially live, for days, weeks or months at a time... but not LITERALLY living out of a suitcase and running through airport terminals every day"?

      Those people would likely find the ~9 pound weight of this system to be a bigger hindrance than the benefit they would get from it. Road warriors tend to focus more on weight than GPU performance.

      People whose jobs involve "real" content-creation work that a mere laptop is inadequate for, but still want to have some degree of luggability so they can do demos outside of their office without the risk of having it not work properly on a lesser computer (or the need to waste hours ensuring that the demo DOES work properly on a lesser, more portable computer, making sure they give themselves enough time to fix whatever doesn't work if it DOESN'T work properly on the other computer)?

      Competent content creators know how to display their content on systems that are not on the bleeding edge of performance. If they need to render something they have access to other more sensible hardware for doing that, and they know how to get those results into a format that a more reasonable laptop can handle for demos.

      Basically, we're seeing here an expensive toy for spoiled children.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    6. Re:An answer in search of a question? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I thought I was just piling on the snark. NASCAR is a ridiculously expensive sport. The teams make money by the companies you mentioned putting logos on the cars. Frankly, I think only an antarctic, jungle, or desert scientist that "really" needed to crush ridiculous numbers in a short period of time, in remote locations, could possibly consider getting a 9lb, power sucking monstrosity. Anyone else would really have to consider themselves f--king stupid.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  26. Do they still burn out in 2-3 years by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    the reason replaceable desktop grade graphics never caught on in gaming laptops wasn't just the proprietary form factors it was that if you did even moderate gaming then after a few years the heat made the PCB warp and the memory chips came loose. Then you could bake it for 10 minutes and then throw it up on ebay since it would work for the 2-4 weeks their guarantee lasted.

    There was some standardization around replaceable cards but they were still expensive as heck because of fewer sales and the added cost of miniaturization.

    I know nVidia & ATI have improved desktop PCI-E card's reliability (I've got a 760 that's going on 4 years old while the last 2 cards barely got 18 months), but I'm skeptical they can do the same in that tight a space and match full on desktop support. Something's gotta give. Either the chip throttles (like they do in those Gigabyte "Brick" small form factor PCs) or PCB warping.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  27. Who's Buying This by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I really have to wonder who's buying these machines. They are quite expensive for the specs. I understand the need for portability, but you could easily build something that fit into a briefcase or two for good portability while still keeping the cost more affordable and getting much better performance. It's not like you can really plan them unplugged anyway. Most of them required dual external power supplies and don't get more than an hour unplugged, if that. We used to have LAN parties just fine when all we had were CRTs and Full size towers. It's not like you actually can use most of these machines as you would a normal laptop, so you might as well stop trying to make a laptop form factor machine and just go for something that can be moved easily.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  28. Noise level by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    It probably sounds like a 1U server when running too.

  29. Sounds awesome, but by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    90Wh battery?

    Should run the cooling fans for oh, about 2 hours. :p

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    1. Re:Sounds awesome, but by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Most "gaming laptops" can only run for about an hour on battery, unless you throttle them way back. Yes, gaming still requires wires!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  30. And the bad capacitors are... FREE! by RandCraw · · Score: 1

    Trusting Dell hardware is like trusting Facebook anti-malware. Once customers can't trust you not to deliberately and repeatedly screw them, your brand name has been permanently poisoned and the kiss of death *should* follow.

    Regardless of the wishes of the many, for me, Dell is forever dead.

    It's a shame Alienware too was lost to the Dark Side of Dell.

    1. Re:And the bad capacitors are... FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dell has been dead to me ever since they took over the title of cheapest and crappiest hardware and software from e-machines and Gateway! Sorry Dell, I am NEVER gonna buy your throw-away hardware that is designed to only last a few days past the warranty period! I hate planned obsolescence, and Dell has been the KING of planned obsolescence for more than a decade now! Same reason that I won't buy a so called "smart" phone! Not only does the "smart" phone's hardware spy on you, so do most if not all of the apps! And on top of that, you are expected to buy a new "smart" phone every year or two!!

    2. Re: And the bad capacitors are... FREE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have had much different experiences than I have.

      Dell is the best out there for long lived computers. I'm using a number of 10 year old Dell laptops without any problems...

  31. yippeee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a vulnerable cpu with a backdoor and some slaveware pos GPU. fuck off with your bullshit.

  32. Included desktop hardware by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    An actual desk. Four legs unfold from the bottom of the laptop ... Pretty fancy if you ask me.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  33. Clevo by Retron · · Score: 1

    ...and the same stuff will be available in a Clevo chassis for much less than Dell are charging.

    I use one of Clevo's previous generation machines with an i7-6700K and a GTX 1080, with a 17" 4K screen. It's absolutely gorgeous, even if it does weigh half a ton!

    The price of that was something like £1000 (~$1270) less than the big-brands were charging.

    (And yes, you're lucky to get an hour out of it on battery, even just surfing the Web. It's designed to be plugged in, perhaps in an airport lounge or a hotel rather than used on the bus!)

    My next laptop will be another desktop-replacement from Clevo. Once you've experienced the power of a desktop CPU in a laptop, as opposed to the constantly-throttling, castrasted "H" series chips, you won't want to go back

    1. Re:Clevo by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I have an older Clevo, the D900T. Other vendors sold it as the M7700.

      Weighed a ton but an absolute beast back in the day. Still going strong now for general office stuff and games from that era.

      Wish I'd bought more memory though.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  34. Still a Dull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what, it's still a Dull.