Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 Users Who Installed January Update Report Network Issues; Some Say the Update Has Also Incorrectly Flagged Their OS License as 'Not Genuine' (itpro.co.uk)

Some Windows 7 admins are feeling the pain of Microsoft's latest updates in this week's Patch Tuesday releases. From a report: Users who've installed this Tuesday's KB4480970 cumulative January update have been complaining of network connectivity issues on those devices based on a network that uses the SMBv2 file sharing protocol. Microsoft released its update to fix several identified vulnerabilities, including a remote execution flaw in PowerShell and to add robustness against side-channel attacks like those targeting the Meltdown and Spectre flaws. But a number of users immediately complained of networking issues, with Microsoft confirming there are now three known problems with the January patch. The other issues comprise an authentication error, and a file-sharing issue affecting some user accounts. ZDNet adds: Regarding the 'Not Genuine' Windows 7 error, Microsoft confirms that "some users are reporting the KMS Activation error, 'Not Genuine', 0xc004f200 on Windows 7 devices". "We are aware of this incident and are presently investigating it. We will provide an update when available," writes Microsoft on both KB4480960 and KB4480970.

131 comments

  1. Just patches? by omnichad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These "patches"are getting to be almost as complex as the feature updates. Why would security updates be changing so much? Even mitigating a complex attack shouldn't require a registry hack to fix broken functionality.

    Looks like Home and Pro users are guinea pigs for more than just the semi annual updates now. How did this even make it out of testing?

    1. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They all have been secretly enlisted as microsoft windows insiders.

    2. Re:Just patches? by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think MS just does not care anymore about ordinary users. Sure, they are incompetent and their products never were good, but what is recently happening with win7 and win10 is way beyond that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Just patches? by fizzer06 · · Score: 2
      Over two years ago, MS started breaking Windows 7 with "security updates" that were really just preparing the OS for an upgrade. I was able to roll back the updates and even disabled future updates, but that poses security issues.

      I let it upgrade to Windows 10 to see how that looked.

      So Linux it is. Using Mint Cinnamon and don't care what happens in the MS world anymore.

    4. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Linux it is. Using Mint Cinnamon and don't care what happens in the MS world anymore.

      Yet here you are, commenting on an article about what's happening in the MS world.

    5. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's windows 7, not 10 you fucking moron.

    6. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but-but-but he's here to show he was right all along and everybody should be doing the same!

    7. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gave up on Windows 7 as soon as the NSA vault 7 exploits were released to the wild. Installed Ubuntu the very next day. With all the mainstream apps moving to Android and Chromium, plus all the mature open source software available today, there is really nothing stopping me from leaving Windows, so why not?

      Even my dad has given up on Windows after being forcefully "upgraded" from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 and back. Microsoft needs to get their head in the game. Their ship is sinking fast and the mice are jumping off...

      Thank God they don't make nuclear reactors like they make OS's. Oh wait... Bill Gates is trying to get into that business? F*KKKKKK

    8. Re:Just patches? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      These "patches"are getting to be almost as complex as the feature updates. Why would security updates be changing so much? Even mitigating a complex attack shouldn't require a registry hack to fix broken functionality.

      Looks like Home and Pro users are guinea pigs for more than just the semi annual updates now. How did this even make it out of testing?

      Windows is a complex tangled mess of code. A lot of it has to do with a lot of backwards compatibility. including backwards compatibility to things that they shouldn't be making compatible (e.g., private interfaces).

      Some companies, like Apple, give you a "tough luck" attitude if you use private interfaces. It's why software breaks between OS revisions, and even between OS updates - if your program is digging deep within the OS and making calls it shouldn't, there you go. Though at times, Apple has broken published interfaces - mostly because the documentation said one thing, and API did another, and Apple fixed the bug so the API matches the documentation, breaking every app calling that API since they worked around the bug.

      Microsoft chooses not to do this (since it would mean things would break constantly - it's shocking the number of shortcuts developers make). The problem is, if they change a private API, there's no knowing what would break. Sure, they test against reasonable configurations, but if some network driver decided it needed to dig deep and now Microsoft patches that API, it would break.

    9. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ads and sponsored 'apps'?

      They must all be up your ass cuz they certainly canna be found anywhere else ...

    10. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Linux it is. Using Mint Cinnamon and don't care what happens in the MS world anymore.

      Yet here you are, commenting on an article about what's happening in the MS world.

      I don't allow anything MS in the house, but I do keep up on all things.

    11. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy it's a good thing they wrapped every fucking update into one file so you have to get the random shit to get the security updates, eh?

    12. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not bugs, to M$ they are features! Its far from a secret that M$ wants everyone not yet using Windows 10 to switch to Windows 10. They just don't get that there are some people that don't want to be spied upon by M$, and are not willing to give M$ control of their computers! M$ has been trying to break Windows 7 and 8 via "security" patches since Windows 10 was in development. They just don't get that some of us will NEVER let the Windows 10 SPY-VIRUS within 100 feet of our computers! I was dual booting Windows 7 and Linux (because of just a couple of programs) when M$ started trying to include spyware in the Windows 7 updates...Thats when I ditched Windows altogether and haven't looked back! Linux lets me do whatever I want and need to do with my computer without the M$ spying and without their attempted vendor lock-in! I know that M$ says that you have some control on the information that they steal from your computer, but that just an M$ PR LIE! no matter what settings you alter, no matter how you hack the registry, M$ is still bound and determined to steal every bit of private information that they can from your computer! They make money selling that information to advertisers...why do you think that they gave the Windows 10 SPY_VIRUS away free for over a year, and tricked many users (and forced installs without user permission in some cases) into downgrading to Windows 10? The collection and selling of peoples private information is now one of the biggest businesses in the world, and M$ (like everyone else these days!) wants in on as much of the $$$$$$$ to be made from selling user info as they can get!!!

    13. Re: Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole problem with Windows is that Gates is no longer involved.

    14. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think MS just does not care anymore about ordinary users. Sure, they are incompetent and their products never were good, but what is recently happening with win7 and win10 is way beyond that.

      Anti-Male departments/divisions within certain LEAs have enlisted the assistance of Microsoft in conducting global-scale fishing expeditions.

    15. Re: Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ordinary users are moving on from MS OSs too

    16. Re:Just patches? by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Same here, I recently switched to Mint 19.1 with Cinnamon and I'm never going back.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    17. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck is this nonsense? You incels are pathetic.

    18. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you don't remember Windows ME.

    19. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These patches are M$ telling you to upgrade to their newest product so they have alexa data from you that they can harvest.

    20. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My "sole survivor" W7 has zero network access, for this exact reason. MicroSpank cannot be trusted. You trust the Russians, Chinese and ISIS terrorists before you trust an American corporation.

    21. Re:Just patches? by antdude · · Score: 2

      Lack of QA. MS got rid of their QA dept. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    22. Re: Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Gates a promoter of Common Core?

    23. Re:Just patches? by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      They don't care about their E3 licensed users either. I'm really "glad" I read this; I've got three freshly-imaged PCs with Windows 7 that are now "not genuine" and won't properly validate against our valid KMS server. I've got several that haven't been turned on in awhile; I'll have to check them tomorrow and see what they do...but I have a bad feeling. SLMGR /ato just says they are in the "notification stage", and slui won't do anything except "go online to validate", and the URL it goes to at Microsoft is 404.

    24. Re: Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moved to Mint 2 years ago and never looked back, got my daughter on it too and she loves it. Weâ(TM)re not hardcore gamers so we miss out on nothing, and Office 365 is available in the browser if you really need to use Word et al. I have sworn off Windows for life not because I hate the OS itself (I actually like Windows believe it or not), but because of MSâ(TM)s absurd forced updates and spying, not to mention their horid âoeapp storeâ and potentially embedding ads. Mint and Linux in general is not perfect, but I have learned it and trust it far more than anything, including macOS. MS can go suck a bag of dicks...

    25. Re:Just patches? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Looks like Home and Pro users are guinea pigs for more than just the semi annual updates now. How did this even make it out of testing?

      Microsoft is working towards continuous integration, with builds on every commit, and releases every week or so. That is what an engineer from the Windows team excitedly told me.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    26. Re:Just patches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about the well known and well covered advertising and sponsored apps present in Windows 10. Along with the built-in spyware, they are the biggest reasons most people do not like the crippleware "OS".

    27. Re:Just patches? by Gornkleschnitzer · · Score: 1

      He obviously meant < 10. Just using the < symbol without the HTML entity code makes Slashdot eat it. This has been well known since the dawn of Slashdot.

      Since your language implies you are absolutely certain you're the smart one, you should already know this.

    28. Re:Just patches? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why would security updates be changing so much?

      That depends entirely on the problem right? Does security suck because you left yourself open to a buffer overflow? Or maybe security sucks because your entire protocol or architecture was poorly thought out and you need to change something fundamental and important to fix it.

    29. Re:Just patches? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. I remember. Must be one of the most stupid (or disrespectful to the customer) acts in the software industry a major player has ever done.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  2. Where is the news?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every single update of windows 10 comes with a desactivation bug lately.
    It has to be a feature to sell more licenses which is in beta mode, it will be recognized as official soon or later...

    1. Re:Where is the news?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the second word or in this case second number of the first sentence "7".

    2. Re:Where is the news?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amatuer, 10 is octal for the decimal number 8.

    3. Re:Where is the news?? by Gornkleschnitzer · · Score: 1

      Now if you're counting in septenary, on the other hand...

  3. Microsoft Should Pay These People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I forgot that guinea pigs don't get paid.

  4. NOOOOOOoooo.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not AGAIN.

  5. This is why update strategy was by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    On windows 7 I used to do the following

    Turn off auto updates

    Check for updates by hand

    Only if the update was at least a week old update at a time of my choosing

    Of course when I tried this on windows 10 check for updates is now check for the latest alpha updates and immediately apply them.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I've had Windows 7 install updates without my permission using your strategy.

      My new strategy is to go to Services

      Select Windows Update

      Right click and properties >> Disable

    2. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, my Win10 machine has been setting at "Restart Now" Status: Pending Restart on the first 2019 patch for a week waiting on me to allow it.
      Must be a user issue for you.

    3. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heads up! MS now says that hitting the button opts you into preview builds for the following month!

    4. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The weird bit with that is that even when downloading updates manually from the catalog (as one does by hand), you still have to re-enable the service to install them. So the workflow is download updates -> turn off NIC -> enable service -> install updates -> reboot -> disable service -> enable NIC.

    5. Re:This is why update strategy was by Highdude702 · · Score: 0

      In 21 days it will tell you "I'm restarting in 10 seconds" and then y9u are forced to install updates. Also congrats on having a Windows 10 machine that gets more than a week of uptime. You apparently don't play games or use any of the memleak filled browsers..

    6. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On windows 7 I used to do the following

      Turn off auto updates

      WSUS Offline Update patches your win 7 guder and more selectively than MS patcher:

      http://download.wsusoffline.ne...

    7. Re:This is why update strategy was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only weeks? I only reboot my work computer about every 3-4 months. Same for my home computers.

  6. "Windows Genuine ADVANTAGE" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Deja vu all over again.

    1. Re:"Windows Genuine ADVANTAGE" by syn3rg · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points you Yogi Berra fan, you...

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
  7. Start looking for alternatives if you haven't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The house of cards is coming down. Microsoft has become as unstable and unreliable as a company as Windows used to be, and the incompetence has surged to business-threatening levels.

    Get out ASAP, for your own sake. Denial will not help.

  8. read the patch notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I read the patch notes last night. I saw the long list of known issues and thought, screw that. This 'security rollup' clearly isn't ready for prime time.

  9. Windows 7 Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home users still actually use them and business users still install them without testing? Sorry but Windows 7 exists on my PC only for gaming and all updates are disabled. If I want secure banking I use Linux or a secure PC dedicated for that stuff. Updates mostly are made to break stuff and force the user to upgrade. This is true for many vendors and not just M$.

    1. Re: Windows 7 Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Dumas comment. Even when you think is disabled it somehow manages to download and install. For me noticed that security endpoint says its out of date. The you try to update it and states some windows updates are needed for the update to work.

    2. Re:Windows 7 Updates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep Windows 7 around for gaming? Doesn't the latest DirectX require Windows 10? I would imagine Win7 holdouts being more common in workstations, not gaming rigs.

    3. Re:Windows 7 Updates by o_ferguson · · Score: 0

      I only play Star Wars: The Old Republic, and it runs far better in Win 7 than Win 10, on the same hardware, because the DX version it uses is native, not a legacy build. Plus there's far less system bloat (I just install 7 sp 2 from a USB and turn updates off.)

      --
      - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
    4. Re:Windows 7 Updates by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      DX12 is largely ignored by most gaming companies. Most used is DX11, with second most used being DX9.

    5. Re:Windows 7 Updates by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Some games have DX12 support, but most don't. And those that do have DX12 are new games, and new games aren't as good (just like Hollywood movies). The number of users who can tell the difference between a high quality DX11 and DX12 version of a game is not that large.

    6. Re:Windows 7 Updates by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised, but it seems that gamers tend to hold onto some pretty old stuff. I remember being surprised at how long it took before games finally started shipping on DVDs (instead of multiple CD sets). Heck, Steam only dropped Windows XP support this year. Yes, as in 2019.

      I'd actually be surprised if they are many non-Microsoft owned games that don't target Windows 7.

  10. officially acknowledged by microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All 3 issues have now been officially acknowledged by MS
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4480970/windows-7-update-kb4480970
    1) the shares issues. Workaround, don't use local account with local admin.
    2) the disconnecting NIC issue. Workaround, reinstall NIC
    3) the lost activation issue. Workaround, they don't know.

    Way to go MS!

  11. Sadly, I doubt them ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At this point, it's difficult to distinguish Microsoft's own ineptness where they put out updates that break things, and actively trying to break those systems so people have to upgrade.

    Unfortunately, after many years in the industry, I have learned with Microsoft to never attribute to incompetence what can be attributed to malice.

    My cynical view here is that someone issued a directive to break Windows 7. I could be wrong, but I don't extend the goodwill to Microsoft to assume I am.

  12. Some Say.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really?

  13. Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember the simpler days when things were stable and worked.

    This crap is all just a way to convince people to "upgrade" to Windows 10 and even then, Win10 updates are a crap shoot.

    1. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Win98 SE was your idea of "stable?" I'm guessing you never tried to get more than 64 hours of uptime from it.

    2. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You're remembering wrong. I would still get blue screens every month or two with 98SE. The NT kernel is a lot more stable - even with all the junk getting piled in on top.

    3. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Spamalope · · Score: 2

      I didn't with SE, but your experience was dependent on the quality of your hardware drivers. There were no guard rails there, and lots of drivers that weren't reliable especially when in combination with other iffy drivers. (One can break the rules without symptoms, several breaking the rules shows you why they're there. Vendors don't care when the user doesn't have a way to know they're responsible)

    4. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, then, what about Win 95B? :-p

    5. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      64 hours was fine. The figure you're thinking about is 49 days.

      A 64-hour limit would've been a major issue. A month and a half, however...well, 98 already had enough problems that already made it unlikely you'd ever run it for that long for *that* issue to be a problem.

    6. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which is probably why it took 5 years to notice the problem ...

    7. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the simpler days when things were stable and worked.

      This crap is all just a way to convince people to "upgrade" to Windows 10 and even then, Win10 updates are a crap shoot.

      Windows 98 was stable? More like DOS. Server seems fine as of late but never the desktop.

    8. Re:Win98 SE for the win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have meant DOS 3.3 as the first and last stable MS product. It's been an evolving shit-show ever since.

  14. Remote Desktop Dead by WankerWeasel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Experienced this issue with remote desktop which the update killed. Found others were experiencing the same. Uninstall the update and remote desktop works again.

    1. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by fishscene · · Score: 1

      What operating system? Windows 10? 7? Home/Pro? Which update was the problem? KB4480960 or KB4480970 ? Sorry for being bothersome - someone I know ran in to this issue last night and we were unable to figure out why RDP wasn't working for 1 computer in particular - the best we could do was a solid black display in RDP.

    2. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try disabling NLA requirement on the host machine. Had this happen to me this morning. A nuisance, yes.

    3. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by WankerWeasel · · Score: 4, Informative

      KB4480970 on Windows 7 Professional. Kept getting a message that the connection couldn't be made and it may be because the password expired. Happened when attempting to connect to it from 2 difference devices (another desktop and a smartphone) which both were able to connect to it previously. Heck, I used Remote Desktop to install the update on the remote computer and after the restart to finish the install, it would no longer connect. Had to get out a keyboard and mouse to attach to it, login, and uninstall KB4480970. Now it works fine again.

    4. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by fishscene · · Score: 1

      Thanks mate!

    5. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually this got broken in win10 with KB4483234 also!!

      instead of uninstalling the patches, you can fix it like this:
                    Run gpedit.msc
                    Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System -> Credentials Delegation -> Encryption Oracle Remediation
      Change it to Enable and in Protection level, change back to Vulnerable.

      enjoy! :) (and yes, as a sysadmin, I'm really tired of MS bs patching)

    6. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by Darkk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip! I haven't released the new updates to our enterprise environment yet due to the BS updates the past few months.

      Actually this got broken in win10 with KB4483234 also!!

      instead of uninstalling the patches, you can fix it like this:

                    Run gpedit.msc

                    Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System -> Credentials Delegation -> Encryption Oracle Remediation
      Change it to Enable and in Protection level, change back to Vulnerable.

      enjoy! :) (and yes, as a sysadmin, I'm really tired of MS bs patching)

    7. Re:Remote Desktop Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didnt work for me. Still complains that local security authority cannot be contacted when trying to remote in. The only way to remote is to use the less secure setting on the remote desktop server.

  15. Any fix for slow SMB? by snapsnap · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I copied a 2 GB file, and it took nearly threee weeks. It finally completed and the md5sum checked out, but that's ridiculous. I don't need to access our Windows file share often, but some of my coworkers do. It's driving them nuts.

    1. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Win10 fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Windows Box (a G5 Dual 2.5Ghz Machine w/ 100 GIG of RAM) for about 3 weeks now while it attempts to copy a 2GB file from one folder on the SMB to another folder. 3 weeks. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running Slackware 1.0, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Win10 machine, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

      In addition, during this file transfer, Explorer will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even vi is straining to keep up as I type this.

      I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Windows installs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Win10 that has run faster than its Android counterpart, despite the Arm's faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 2.5 Ghz Dual machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Win10 machine is a superior machine

      Win addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Windows machine over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    2. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by fishscene · · Score: 1

      3 Weeks for 2GB is NOT typical for Windows file transfer. Reach out to your IT support, neighborhood nerd, computer shop, or forums - something is really wrong for it to take that long.

    3. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the update came out yesterday. sounds like you have other issues.

    4. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by fishscene · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with Win 10 and everything to do with something is seriously wrong if it's taking weeks to copy a file..the kind of wrong that can happen to pretty much any OS if files get corrupted, or something wasn't set up right or if something was installed that shouldn't be installed or goofed (like an antivirus goofed up).

    5. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      I copied a 2 GB file, and it took nearly threee weeks. ... some of my coworkers do. It's driving them nuts.

      That's like 2KB/sec, USR modem speed. Install WireShark somewhere (NOT on your production server) and see what the problem is -- something's busted. (like you don't know!)

      Or check out Resilio Sync (was BitTorrent Sync.) It's a freemium product (think business use must pay, but you could set it up to see if it suffices) which will keep specific/all files synced up between users/servers. You can choose exactly which ones, and the users can also sync between themselves without the server.

      Also libre Syncthing just went to "production" v1.0, if you care. it's the same but different, that's all I know.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    6. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Linux fanatics? I installed CentOS on an old laptop and there was no wifi support. How can you argue that people should use Linux when it doesn't even support wifi? Windows has supported wifi since at least Windows 95.

      Win addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Linux machine over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

    7. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL...that is some stale pasta!

    8. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Doke · · Score: 1

      Please do not pester your neighborhood nerd. We're all sick of fixing other people's computers, especially if they're clueless. We recently saw one where the owner had put over 20,000 icons on the desktop, then wondered why it was slow.

    9. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      support / supported are marketting speak for "make money from". So your rant translates as:

      I installed CentOS on an old laptop and there was no wifi [to] make money from. How can you argue that people should use Linux when it doesn't even make money from wifi? Windows has made money from wifi since at least Windows 95.

      Do you understand how absolutely ridiculous you sound?
       

    10. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also a well-known issue. So well known that Microsoft's official documentation states that if you do routine SMB transfers above a 16MiB over an encrypted data channel, you should disable LSO and checksum offloading. The larger the file with those settings enabled, the worse your performance becomes as you send more of the file. In addition, if your NIC isn't up to it or is buggy, disabling RSS, chimney offloading, or NetDMA may also help.

    11. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has supported wifi since at least Windows 95.

      Win addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Linux machine over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.

      Your Windows 95 system supported hardware that didn't exist until 1997? Neat trick!

      I guess to answer your question, we don't use Windows because we don't have a time machine like you do to bring future hardware back in time. We only start writing drivers for Linux once the hardware is invented.

    12. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by BlackOverflow · · Score: 1

      If he's still using a Pentium Pro with Slackware he's most likely the neighborhood nerd.

    13. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by BlackOverflow · · Score: 1

      I copied a 51.8 GB file from one SSD to another last night in about 5 minutes on Win 7.

    14. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go go go!!!! :-)

    15. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From where to where? Your statement makes no sense at all.

    16. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      "I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Windows machine over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems."

      In no particular order, here are several intelligent reasons why I'm still running Windows
      ( Win 7 Ultimate, Updates and Patches disabled because they tend to break more than they fix )

      Wacom MobileStudio Pro 16 Tablet - $2699 Win 10 only
      The entire Adobe CC Suite - $650 / year Win / Mac only
      Sibelius Ultimate - $900 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Cubase Pro - $550 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Capture One Pro - $180 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Keyshot Pro - $2000 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Rhinoceros - $1000 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Zbrush - $895 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Corel Painter - $400 perpetual license Win / Mac only
      Driver that allows my synthesizer ( Yamaha Montage 8 - $4000 ) to talk to Sibelius & Cubase Win / Mac only

      Of all my software, only Maya has a Linux version that I'm aware of.

      So, in answer to your question, the above represents about $13k worth of reasons why I'm still using a Windows based computer.

    17. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are right - windows 10 is a huge pile of steaming dogshit. That's why I use windows 7 and don't bother to update. I just don't browse much or open email attachments and im golden.

    18. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably over a LAN. We've seen copies that slow since about the middle of November, but remote desktoping to the target then pasting copies the file normal speed.

    19. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe "old laptop" has no wifi to begin with? CentOS not a the best choice for a distro either, just sayin. I had to double check a few posts up - someone actually runs slackware - beyond my level of linuxness.

    20. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three weeks - did someone at MS re-use old Vista code?

    21. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, during this file transfer, Explorer will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even vi is straining to keep up as I type this.

      Sounds like a crypto currency miner has invaded your machine.

    22. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sibelius

      Quit Sibelius

    23. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What did you do to break it? Undo that and you have you fix. There's no wide spread issue with SMB speed. Every consider your HDD in your NAS is shitting itself?

    24. Re:Any fix for slow SMB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it Active Desktop (tm), though?

  16. Fine Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every time Windows reboots without explicit user acknowledgement, which invariables causes many problems to the users, Microsoft should pay $1,000 to each user affected by this controlled crash.

    Microsoft completely disrespects its users but because of its past and current monopolistic practices many users are forced to put up with it.

    1. Re: Fine Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      save billing info for your recovery expenses and file for reimbursement in small claims court

  17. samba / smb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the new samba code is painful in Ubuntu 18 (network discovery doesn't work) -- new samba also caused permissions issues on work computers - 2014 or maybe 2015 was probably the best year in computing - since then, change for the sake of changing (and collecting and selling private customer info) has lead to non peaceful operating systems - thankfully I built many offline PCs and VMs based on2015 and earlier OSs where I can peacefully get my work done instead of non-stop researching fixes for broken patches and upgrades

  18. Isn't that standard in a lot of cases? by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    I know I've pulled a random relative's Windows 7 computer out and turned it on after a random amount of time, reinstalled the system with the key on the system, and got it flagged as not genuine.

    I think Microsoft just wants you to call up their activation helpline in these edge cases, for a variety of small reasons. Not the least of which would be subtle pushes to want an upgrade on old systems.

    But for systems you just want as a garage tool system, or something like a Plex or random file server a relative can maintain, there's no real desire for that.

    Ryan Fenton

  19. I hope they have fix by the time I boot up windows by Revek · · Score: 3, Funny

    Should happen sometime in the next six months.

  20. With just a year to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft dosen't really care about Windows 7 anymore, it is mostly used by third world countries and businesses that are too lazy to upgrade their IE only web apps. So Windows 7 isn't a priority for MS. They will throw a bone to Windows 7 in the form of Chrome-Edge but Windows 7 is basically dying, and Microsoft is paying netcraft to confirm it.

  21. "Users who've installed"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the summary meant to say "Users who had their mouths held open and were force fed updates"?

  22. Works for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't updated since they started pushing out the Windows 10 "upgrade assistant."

    1. Re:Works for me by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Same here. I'm running Win7 on 4 systems with updates off.

      Been doing it for a few years. Typically, MS updates either decrease performance or break things (or give you an OS you don't want).

      When I can't use Win7 anymore, it'll be Linux.

  23. RDP fix for win7/8/10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually RDP also broke in win10 with KB4483234 ... (as well as win7)

    instead of uninstalling the patches, you can fix it like this:
                                Run gpedit.msc
                                Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> System -> Credentials Delegation -> Encryption Oracle Remediation
    Change it to Enable and in Protection level, change back to Vulnerable.

    enjoy! :) (and yes, as a sysadmin, I'm really tired of MS bs patching)

  24. Re:I hope they have fix by the time I boot up wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You youngsters always eager to use things right away. When you grow a little common sense will learn that impacience has consequences.

  25. Patches are major for Windows security. Minutes by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > I was able to roll back the updates and even disabled future updates, but that poses security issues.

    Major security issues. If you're not being targeted by the NSA, the vast majority of attacks on Windows machines are taking advantage of known issues that have been addressed via updates. So lacking the updates makes a big difference to security. The "mean time to compromise", how quickly an internet-connected machine is hacked, is under 10 minutes for an unpatched Windows machine.

    1. Re:Patches are major for Windows security. Minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "mean time to compromise", how quickly an internet-connected machine is hacked, is under 10 minutes for an unpatched Windows machine.

      Maybe for non-power users. Who let every JS ad script run by default and open every email attachment without a care. Windows is garbage, but the vast majority of "hacks" are easily prevented with a little caution and knowledge on the user's part. Where that falters is the idiot users who are apathetic to caution and knowledge.

      Plus when you have to worry about the security updates breaking the OS to the point of being useless, or worse, you can't blame the users for disabling the updates. From the end user's perspective the result is the same, the only difference is who's more likely to cause problems. Some random untrusted hacker who has to work for their exploit? Or the OS's creator that it trusts completely and has full access by default?

      It's not an easy choice, but that's the position Windows users have found themselves in. At least the ones who still have the option anyway..... The ones that don't are hosed regardless and have no recourse. (Unless they choose to jump ship to another OS, but that assumes the user has x64 hardware, and that they are willing to relearn everything to get their work done.)

  26. YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you Microsoft! May I have another?

  27. And yet . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet . . . the affected Windows 7 machines are still more useful than their Windows 10 brethren . . .

  28. Just say NO. I did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been continually satisfied and reassured that I disabled all Microsoft updates two years ago when they started to push their BS spyware updates and Lose 10 on users. I use Linux for browsing and network apps so I couldn't care less about MS' crappy patches.

  29. Completely fucked my home network. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least I now know why things that were working (i.e. network sharing) are now COMPLETELY BROKEN AND THAT THE REMEDIAL STEPS TO RESTORE NORMAL SERVICE DON'T FUCKING WORK. Thanks for fucking nothing Microsoft.

    1. Re:Completely fucked my home network. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft has a registry key addition that fixes file and print sharing for this bug. No need to change anything else or restore or back out the updates. Unfortunately because of the incompetent support people it took 8 hours of phone time to get it from them. I did not get a copy of it because they remoted in and ran a quick command line deal and them rebooted my machine. Once it came back everything worked.

  30. Windows = The OS as a service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EVERYTHING is to be a 'service'. Bethesda ruined the insanely popular worlds of Elder Scrolls and Fallout with 'gaming as a service' philosophy. And 'as a service' means the customer is always WRONG.

    Want to download from MS's app store- well that tries to force you to move Windows 10 to an ONLINE account where MS collects all your data, including every keystroke. Don't want to use UWP 'apps' (like every current Win7 user). You like the freedom and quality of win32 programs? Not for much longer.

    ARM based Windows 10 (the 'new' version) doesn't run third party win32 programs, unless wrapped in a UWP container- and then the emulation means performance is a joke. And win32 programs are now BANNED from most Windows 10 shell functions- including file associations, and other 'right mouse button' click menu options.

    Worse, by 'service', all computer companies mean BUGGIER, more difficult to use, more expensive (almost everything is an additional 'microtransaction' whi9ch is anything BUT micro in cost), and ever changing with constant massive downloads before use.

    Sane people want Windows to be just a non-online OS, and leave the user programs to the user's choosing. But MS is trying to revert to the proprietary mainframe ecosystem of the bad old days- the very thing MS et al destroyed in the first place.

    And Linux- well with that disfunctional neo-liberal SJW scumbag in charge, Linux will never ever evolve to replace Windows for ordinary users- it had its chance, but that window has long since closed. The nightmare is a world where Microsoft is the ONLY choice, yet day by day Microsoft gets ever more insane.

  31. Their activation helpline won't help you. by fazig · · Score: 1

    Just yesterday, I was fixing a computer of an acquaintance whose HDD started to make weird clacking noises and would not boot their Windows 7 Pro any more.
    Ordered an SSD, downloaded the latest Win 7 Pro 64 image and created a bootable usb drive. Installation of hard and software went without any issues. Fortunately the new install would recognize the old drive. So I ran ProduKey which found the old key.

    Activation would not work. I called the helpline (which is usual here in Germany for activating OEM Windows, therefore I've lost count of how often I've done this), followed the robocall instructions. It said the key was invalid and let me talk with a technician. The technician with the funny accent then told me that the key was blacklisted and that I should contact the system vendor and hang up.

    Now I know for a fact that their licence was genuine, because we found the original key later. Well, thanks for nothing Microsoft helpline.

    Fortunately acquiring a new, genuine OEM key costs only something like 5€.

  32. Deactivation Ability is National Security Risk by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    The ability to authorized an operating system is clearly a national security risk. Once a operating system is paid for, there should be not allowed way to deauthorize--else or enemies will surly take advantage of it.

    Additionally, this happened with the last update on my machine; is Microsoft testing rolling operating system blackouts?

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  33. Don't update by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    I stopped updating my old Win7 box when an update blasted me off the net and I had to recover with a System Restore point.

    I recently went full time to Linux Mint and I plan on running Win7 in a VM for a few older Windows programs I still have to use.

    Microsoft is, in my opinion, deliberately crashing older versions in order to force people onto Windows 10. That's just never going to happen on any of my computers, never never never.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  34. That's with NO user by raymorris · · Score: 2

    > Maybe for non-power users. Who let every JS ad script run by default and open every email attachment without a care.

    Careless users are a problem, a mostly separate problem. No it is needed. The MTC figure I mentioned is for an unpatched Windows machine simply connected to the internet, with no user doing anything.

    One thing stupid users can do is turn off automatic updates on Windows. Another stupid thing that stupid users can do is enable (or leave enabled) UPnP. Those two combine to virtually guarantee the machine is compromised quite quickly.

    1. Re:That's with NO user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At this point with the crap MS has been pulling trying to force WIn 10 on people, leaving automatic updates on is the stupid thing. Manually check every Tuesday and validate that the "security" update is actually fixing something and not adding telemetry, Win10 pre-install, etc, then install the updates. If you are incapable of remembering to perform one task a week, please give your computer to someone not quite as mentally disabled.

      I agree 100% with the uPnP on anything outside of an isolated LAN.

  35. Billy Bob was head of QA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup - O'll Billy Bob, much as I dislike him, was both CEO and Chief of QA. When he left, all pretense of QA stopped.

  36. Patch Tuesday is once per month by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Manually check every Tuesday ... If you are incapable of remembering to perform one task a week, please give your computer to someone not quite as mentally disabled.

    Patch Tuesday is second Tuesday of the month, not every Tuesday.
    Once or twice a year they do one on a fourth Tuesday.

    You were saying people who are too "mentally disabled" to know when to update Windows shouldn't touch computers? I assume you'll be unable to reply to this since you'll have to "give your computer to someone not quite as mentally disabled."