Slashdot Mirror


Electronics Are 'the Fastest-Growing Waste Stream in the World' (vice.com)

Electronic waste is a growing threat to the environment. Thanks to the low cost of manufacturing, it's easier than ever for corporations to pump out millions of laptops, smart phones, internet of things devices, and other electronics. From a report: A new initiative combining the efforts of the United Nations and the World Economic Forum and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development wants to change that. The group formed the Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE), and announced itself at Davos -- a yearly gathering of the world's wealthy elite -- where it released its first report. "E-waste is now the fastest-growing waste stream in the world," PACE's report said. "It is estimated this waste stream reached 48.5 million tonnes in 2018." Most of that waste comes from Europe and the United States and ends up in places like Nigeria and Hong Kong, which suffer the human and economic costs of disposing of the material. "The material value [of e-waste] alone is worth $62.5 billion, three times more than the annual output of the world's silver mines and more than the GDP of most countries," PACE's report [PDF] said.

115 comments

  1. Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets all show how much we care about the environment!

    1. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Plastic straws have a replacement of wax paper straws.

      Being that plastic straws advantages over paper really do not counteract their overall disadvantages. Why do you think there should be so much outrage from banning a hazardous product, when there is an overall useful alternative.

      Or was there some conservative talk show host, who wanted you to get angry about something really minor and wouldn't really affect your live in any noticeable way.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 4, Informative

      another political bigot. I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit. Well bigot, I think paper straws would be great. What I grew up with. While we are at it bigot. How about we bring back a service like the milk man, where used bottles(glass) was picked up and reused. this could be used for milk, soda, and any other heavily used bottles. But then, you are a political bigot. And think only your party of choice can offer solutions.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    3. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plastic straws? Hazardous? Really? BS. They're recyclable (far more than electronic products), don't kill trees (remember why we switched to plastic to begin with?) and, most importantly don't dissolve in fluids like paper straws.
      Plastic Straws amount to a tenth of ONE PERCENT of all the plastic waste being generated and the problem with plastic waste isn't necessarily the waste itself but that its getting dumped into the oceans which is a regulatory problem with handling and not a generation problem per se. (Note the continued red tide around Florida this year which I guarantee is caused by the same dumping problems we're ignoring because we've saved the environment by banning plastic straws... we're doing something!) That you succumb to liberal talk show hosts and piss-poor populist science along with your smarmy virtue signaling is about all I need to know about your "outrage".

    4. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow the libtard on his 7th iPhone feels so smug. Good job.

    5. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      So your counter action of me calling out An Anonymous Coward post as being a partisan political talking head, is then attacking me for being a partisan talking head for the other side.

      I never said "ALL" I was targeting the Anonymous Coward post. But I have experience people who seem to be going off changes to what ever crazy thing that doesn't really negatively effect anyone, for the most part the reason is because some conservative talk show host decided to rant about it.

      I have no problem with such delivery services and refund and recycling services. The key reason why glass delivery of milk was phased out, was mostly due to problems with cleaning the glass bottles safely (my father was in the Milk industry for many decades), People would be using these glass bottles to hold gasoline, and other chemicals, which may not be able to safely washed with the standard methods. It is actually safer to recycle the products by melting them down and reforming them again, then washing and reusing them.

      Not all republicans and not all democrats fit the stereotypes on what they are suppose to be. But the key point is people with political leanings needs to recognize their rage, on if it is actually something important, or just something someone told you was important, and that you woulsn't have cared otherwise.

      I myself is actually rather politically moderate, I often have equal amount of people calling me Liberal and Conservative. But I strongly hate it when people start going on some rant over a small things.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet - you attacked on a partisan basis making an asinine assumption and then doubled down in your defense - STILL not getting to the actual point that the plastic straw ban was vapid and virtue signaling and meaningless and that digital waste is a much bigger, more prevalent and more hazardous problem than plastic straws and yet, will not be banned.
      Why? Because one is virtue signaling "that doesn't really negatively affect anyone" that has no real affect on the waste or pollution and the other requires giving up something YOU care about- getting rid of electronics doesn't really negatively affect anyone in the grand scheme of things either.
      IPhones have only existed for 20 years and the world spun long before that. (and they're made of plastic too!)

    7. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Well, why don't you look at the original post where he referenced Rush in the final sentence. Guess your reading comprehension is like your bravery. None

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    8. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      I attacked on a parasitism basis due to the final sentence commenting that individuals would be upset about the plastic straw because Rush told them to. And I seen the glass bottle idea on cnn or another major media site. Wish the idea was mine, but it isn't. Just thought it was a good idea. Because the plastic bottles are worse then straws as far as pollution.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    9. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

      You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

      So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    10. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      How about we bring back a service like the milk man, where used bottles(glass) was picked up and reused.

      My grocery store does this for certain dairy distributors. The milk bottles have a $2 surcharge on them, making a bottle of milk much more expensive, but when you bring a bottle back on your next visit, you get a $2 credit on your grocery bill.

    11. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Kyr+Arvin · · Score: 1

      And yet - you attacked on a partisan basis making an asinine assumption and then doubled down in your defense - STILL not getting to the actual point that the plastic straw ban was vapid and virtue signaling and meaningless and that digital waste is a much bigger, more prevalent and more hazardous problem than plastic straws and yet, will not be banned.

      The difference is that electronics are far more critical to our society than plastic straws, which are pretty easy to cut out of your life, just like plastic bags.

    12. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

      You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

      So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    13. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

      You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

      So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    14. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Fuck off asshole. Another fucking coward that didn't read the final sentence of the original comment. And bitch, because that's all you are. I offered a more productive way of stooping pollution you cunt. What have you offered to this conversation but your fucking bigotry. And bitch, the only good bigot is a dead one. So bigot, I hope you become a good bigot soon.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    15. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      And plastic bottles, those stupid peanuts used for packing, fast food containers, plastic bags. All of those articles can be replaced with other materials that are bio degradable.
      I actually reuse plastic bags and the plastic containers you get some food out of the freezer section of the supermarket. But yes, they do end up in the trash. So they should be replaced with biodegradable packaging instead.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    16. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

      You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

      So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    17. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by LostOne · · Score: 1

      I'll be willing to come on board on the paper straws side of things when they come up with cost effective straws that don't disintegrate in the drinks and don't screw with the flavour of the drink. (And, yes, they do screw with the flavour, or, at least the ones the local greasy spoon uses do.) Of course, I have a solution to that problem: just don't use a straw.

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    18. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had this exact problem at a bar i went to a few weeks ago where they served their drinks with these paper straws, I could immediately detect a weird taste in the drink. Whatever glue or wax they used to keep the straw together was obviously leeching out into the drink, probably accelerated by the alcohol in the drink which would act as a solvent. As soon as i ditched the straw the drink tasted normal

    19. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn at the number of sockpuppet accounts you must have in order to mod your own shitpost up to 5 informative.

      Maybe you should take some time off /. and try to get laid instead of wasting your life like this.

    20. Re: Time to ban them like plastic straws by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      Dude - stop feeding the trolls.

    21. Re:Time to ban them like plastic straws by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      Only have one coward. Thats why my karma is never the same. Only someone that does the act would know how to do the act. How many accounts you have?

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
  2. REGULATE the CRAPWARE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Make standards, enforce them, include a recycling fee deposit in the price, etc. THERE ARE SOLUTIONS, expecting it to solve itself is lazy Libertarian fantasy faggot shit.

  3. Recycle? by mspohr · · Score: 1

    You would think that some smart person would come up with a way to recycle this junk and reclaim the valuable minerals.
    I guess it's cheaper to exploit miners in third world countries to mine new minerals rather than exploit recyclers in third world countries to reclaim the minerals.

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually most "recycled" electronics ends up on the shores of developing countries where it is burned in fires, polluting the area and people, for pennies-on-dollar rare metal extraction so they can feed themselves barely.

      The whole offshoring/externalizing of wasteful product cycles is why humanity is doomed to its own stupid, cheap plastic machinations. Economic reality dictates we kill ourselves for pennies, so we do that.

    2. Re:Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the epoxies and resins, the solvents needed the dissolve them are very toxic

    3. Re:Recycle? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The problem is the lack of easy recycling options for electronics and batteries. So people will toss them in the trash and figure no one will notice.
      My community has a Single Stream Recycling, granted it isn't as good as separating your products by plastic, glass and paper. And about 2/3 of what I put in the recycle bin, gets put into a landfill anyways. But I am recycling 3 times as much product, so the overall benefit of what is being recycled is much higher.

      To improve the environment we need to make things easy, because the lazy way will often win.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re: Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      George Takei posted a piece on recycled keyboards on his FB page:

      https://www.facebook.com/georgetakeipresents/videos/2138423206471768/

    5. Re:Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the minerals are valuable enough to reclaim, we'll know exactly where to go to mine them (hint: garbage dumps will be full of them)

      Until then, unless we're running out of space for dumps, I fail to see a problem.

      Our future selves will be thankful we've stockpiled all of these valuable resources in these locations. It will be like drilling for oil.

    6. Re:Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you need with plastic, glass, and paper anyway? I switched all my monthly statements to electronic delivery and grow my own vegetables in the garden. Not going to the store means not having any plastic, glass, or paper wrappers to dispose of. Plus, not paying for anything means there's no sales taxes for the gov't to steal from me.

    7. Re: Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumps poison soil and water unless cared for, and caring for them is unprofitable.

    8. Re:Recycle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronics are easy - dump them off at Staples or Best Buy. Staples even takes CRT monitors for free. Most big box stores will also take batteries off your hands. It's not as simple as curbside recycling, but it's not much of a hassle. And let's face it, people who can't be bothered to do that much probably aren't separating out their recycling anyway. They may even be dumping trash in the recycle bin, which could get the entire truckload sent to the landfill. You're never going to win with lazy people unless you eliminate the waste before it gets to them.

  4. And this is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    In some countries you pay a recycling fee up front, when you buy it.

    Those would be the countries that have intelligent governments.

    Not like here in the US where we have brain trusts like Twitler and his minions. And all the nitwits that follow him blindly.

    Go ahead, mod me down, see if I care. You know it's true.

  5. Fastest-growing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Fastest-growing" is one of the worst kinds of rhetorical tricks. I haven't researched this area yet, but obviously one should compare actual numbers with other classes of waste before drawing conclusions.

  6. How much is to planned obsolescence by xack · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows XP being end of life’d despite being offered on netbooks new less than five years before the deadline. Now with Windows 7 being chopped we will have even more junk. Pefectly good 32 bit hardware is being scrapped due to progammers too lazy to optimize ram usage. The situation is worse with MacOS and android with the lack of updates being offered to most devices. Meanhile my “dumb” phone still is functional 10 years later.

    1. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows XP computers are still functional, they're just not getting any more updates. Nothing's forcing you to throw them away.

    2. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Begs the question, why not switch to something besides Windows which you're crying about the artificial limitations of? 32bit boxes still run Linux and with less resource usage.

      The issue with old computers is you can't easily find working RAM or compatible-bus storage hardware without going through junk shops.

    3. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      EBay for RAM. You can get a new 32GB PATA SSD for about 35 bucks if you need PATA storage (the system can't boot from a SATA card).

    4. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the problem lies with the consumers more than the programmers. Many people will buy a new laptop rather than repairing it because they just don't know how simple the issue can be to fix sometimes. This pushes the adoption rate of 64-bit ahead faster than it needs to.
      Meanwhile, the decision to drop 32-bit often comes down business decision as the expense to support 32-bit becomes harder to justify every year while 64-bit becomes more and more ubiquitous. Since users will continue to buy new computers, companies are just cutting costs where it makes sense and keeping up with the market.

      The "perfectly good 32-bit hardware being scrapped" is also due to the average consumer being unaware of the people out there who will happily accept the old hardware to be re-purposed.

    5. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously haven't bought much old ram on Ebay. You're either paying too much or being scammed for flaky chips, legitimately priced working DDR/2 is harder to find every day. Ebay is a sucker's mission these days.

    6. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DDR2 may be getting too old to find reliable sources of, but DDR3 is doing just fine. I bought 8GB of unbuffered/unregistered Micron ECC 1866MHz DDR3 off eBay for cheap and it seems to be working just fine and dandy. Passed memtest86 testing for over 7hrs. It was likely from a decommissioned server pull. Added it to my existing 8GB of RAM for a total of 16GB. I don't get ECC combining it with old non-ECC DDR3, but it still works and I'm happy.

    7. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      DDR2 is still being sold new, warranteed. So is DDR3 for that matter.

    8. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the problem lies with the consumers more than the programmers.

      When Java is the most widely used programming language (second only to JavaScript) and Microsoft keeps dropping support for their old operating systems, I think the problem lies with the programmers. No consumer is going to spend piles of money upgrading their computer if the software would just run fast and smooth on their existing computer.

    9. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DDR3 isn't old yet so of course that's not what we're talking about. DDR-1 and DDR-2 are old, and if you look you'll see they cost MORE than DDR3 per byte, and buying them on Ebay is terrible advice. Just dumb AF.

    10. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like I originally said, a major problem with consumers is that they toss out perfectly good hardware because of a problem that is trivial to fix. (i.e. A dead hard drive, RAM stick, broken screen, etc.) I have seen this first-hand as I have over 8 years of experience in computer & electronics retail. People are throwing away perfectly usable computers every single day just because they don't know of an alternative solution. I honestly believe that this is a larger contribution to electronic waste than programmers updating software to make your device obsolete.

      I don't see how Java and Javascript being the most popular languages has much to do with the amount of e-waste that programmers are generating. Those two languages depend on lower-level software that still has 32-bit support. (JRE and Web Browsers) So the fact that these languages are most popular is a good thing keeping 32-bit systems relevant. As long as Oracle and browser developers support 32-bit themselves...

    11. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My first though when I saw the headline was about the planned obsolescence of "smart" phones! Even if they are not glued shut so that batteries cannot be easily replaced, most companies only offer security and OS updates for a year. Warrantees are also only for a year (some countries require two years or longer). The same thing is true to some extent with other personal electronics devices...non-replaceable batteries, and other ways to try to get people to buy the "new shiny" every year, whether they need it or not.

      Its also true that there are a lot of perfectly functional (and repairable) 32 bit computers out there. These computers may not run the latest games, but for most other uses (especially web browsing), they work just fine.

      All of my computers are off-lease or refurbished Lenovo machines. I have upgraded them all to 8GB of ram, and the two laptops have SSDs.

    12. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2

      Nothing's forcing you to throw them away.

      Exactly right, Anoymous Coward.

      I just threw Neverware's CloudReady operating system onto mine and now they're perfectly functional "Chromebooks."

    13. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by antdude · · Score: 2

      This is why I stop upgrading softwares.I still use my decade old desktop PCs and softwares. They mostly work fine. I care not. I used to upgrade often for gaming, but I game rarely these days.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    14. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Pretty much this.

      As for me and my family, I upcycle those old laptops with Linux/XFCE, throw in a cheap SSD (either SATA or with an mSATA-PATA adapter), and they are now faster and more useful than when new.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    15. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by toddestan · · Score: 1

      People who know I'm into computers and such are often shocked to find out how old my hardware is (my newest computer is now over 7 years old), mostly because whatever they have is fairly new. At this point, I only retire stuff because I get some perfectly good or easily repairable castoff that's a significant upgrade over one of the machines I'm using.

    16. Re:How much is to planned obsolescence by antdude · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I do. I don't really like the newer stuff too.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  7. Non-removable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So many products are essentially disposable because of the built-in non-user removable batteries. How about we outlaw that?

    If I could have bought a genuine battery for my LG Nexus 5 instead of buying another phone, I would have. The only thing wrong with my defunct 2010 MacBook Pro is the battery. Headphones, another great example. How do you replace the batteries in Apple's AirPods? I still own lots of my old game consoles, and play them occasionally, going back to the Sega Mega Drive (Genisis for you US folk). I was gifted a Nintendo Switch, but I doubt that will work in 20+ years like the Mega Drive.

    If we can stop this cancer, and even standardise the batteries, it will solve a lot of e-waste.

    1. Re:Non-removable batteries by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      2010 Macbook Pro? The battery is child's play to replace (~5 min) compared to Crapple's more recent products...

      https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/M...

    2. Re:Non-removable batteries by Big+Boss · · Score: 2

      I agree. On the MBP though, take it to Apple and let them replace it, or DIY. I still run a 2010 MBP. I had the battery going and the mainboard had the graphics chip recall. They replaced the battery for free with the mainboard.

      But yes, sealed in batteries are a really bad idea that needs to go.

    3. Re:Non-removable batteries by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The only thing wrong with my defunct 2010 MacBook Pro is the battery.
      Relatively easy to replace. You probably can do it yourself even.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:Non-removable batteries by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1

      So many products are essentially disposable because of the built-in non-user removable batteries. How about we outlaw that?
      Shoot, its hard to find a affordable lap top any more that has a replacement battery. Forget about phones.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    5. Re:Non-removable batteries by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

      Ding, ding, ding!

      Also, it should be illegal to lock bootloaders, unless the key is provided at the time of sale. That way older devices can be patched against security flaws long after they're no longer in support.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    6. Re:Non-removable batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one asked you, AppleFag. Keep sucking that Tim Cook dick.

    7. Re:Non-removable batteries by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Or if that 95 year old Nobel prize winner can jack up solar, we can buy one rechargable battery and be good for life!

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  8. It's all just littering by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Richer nations using poorer nations as waste dumps is the tragedy of the commons equivalent of that guy throwing his burger wrapper out the car window on the highway because he doesn't want it in his vehicle.

    Tossing your trash out of your immediate line of sight still dirties up the same rock we all live on.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:It's all just littering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that guy throwing his burger wrapper out the car window on the highway

      Hey, at least it's better than him throwing his resulting turds out of the car window.

  9. It's going to be cold at ADX Florence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Trump brings a blanket for his cell when he goes off to Federal prison, not only will it keep his faggot traitor ass warm for the prisoners to fuck, it will muffle the sound of his asshole being opened up to minivan size.

  10. Re:fastest growing waste stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Men" don't spend their days making gayass jokes like ^^, you're somewhere short of that denomination.

  11. Re: fastest growing waste stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly you haven't seen the trickle coming out of an old man's desiccated penis.

  12. Facebook is not a valid link, that's malvertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well too bad, I have FB blocked at the 20-odd IP level. I will not be seeing what Takei has to say about this unless you cut and paste it here. Fuck Facebook, it's an illegitimate thing to link to in 2019.

  13. Apple does this by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Apple accepts any old Apple product, and extracts as much as they can from it. In the last large keynote they did the stated goal was no more mining of materials because they could get what they needed from recycling old devices.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Apple does this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually believe them?

  14. 100% tax by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    100% tax on devices with glued-in batteries that can't be changed by the user in under 10 minutes. Same with soldered-in non-upgradeable storage. Donesky!

    1. Re:100% tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YUP! taxes solve every problem!

    2. Re:100% tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a box full of electronics which are in perfect working order but will never be used again. Routers with a WAN2LAN throughput of less than 30Mbps and a maximum of 802.11g, 100Mbps switches, media player boxes which can't use current codecs, and so on. None of those things have built-in batteries or could be made useful again with more storage. I also have defective LED lamps, old phones with replaceable batteries that I'm not going to replace because the phone is obsolete, and old computers that couldn't run current software on their 32 bit CPUs even if I upgraded the RAM. I have ISDN phones which are hardly useful anymore because ISDN is a dying standard and they've been replaced by DECT phones. I could go on.

      I think a tax on devices with built-in obsolescence could help give some devices a longer useful life, but people are throwing out lots of hardware for other reasons that aren't even objectionable. We need to find a way to deal with that torrent of old electronics. It is mostly not avoidable.

    3. Re:100% tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      old phones with replaceable batteries that I'm not going to replace because the phone is obsolete, and old computers that couldn't run current software on their 32 bit CPUs even if I upgraded the RAM.

      Depending on how obsolete the phones are, give them to a donations store; there's still plenty of people who really only want a phone to make phone calls so as long as that works, it's fine. For the computers with 32-bit CPUs, sell them on ebay; there's still plenty of people who are into "retro" PCs because there's something nostalgic/fun about making the most overpowered system for 2003 (or whatever year). It's also good because it allows people to have an isolated older system specifically for those games without worrying somehow it'll become infected, drivers will break support, or there will be even slowdown because never drivers often can make things worse for older cards.

      I think a tax on devices with built-in obsolescence could help give some devices a longer useful life, but people are throwing out lots of hardware for other reasons that aren't even objectionable. We need to find a way to deal with that torrent of old electronics. It is mostly not avoidable.

      I don't disagree. The point of the GP was to directly combat the built-in obsolescence, though. You can't really do anything about old standards becoming obsolete. You can repurpose some things--netboxes actually make decent retro emulation systems. There's a reason the order is always reduce, reuse, and then recycle. Reduce waste by making it possible to repair or update. Reuse by finding more purposes for something that's outlasted its original function. And recycle electronics, if you can. That last part is the hardest because it's generally not economical, which means you need to subsidize it somehow. So, probably all electronics need taxed and a mechanism of collection needs developed.

    4. Re:100% tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take it to any of the stores that promise to recycle it for you and cross your fingers. No need to keep that stuff around unless it has sentimental value.

    5. Re:100% tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to this is actually moving them to poorer countries that do not have internet infrastructure. Having outdated network is better than having no network. But these routers and switches are mostly closed-source, means advanced auto-config and self-organizing network tools (based on openwrt, ddwrt) cannot be retrofitted onto them. We should buy open source products.

  15. Itsn't it obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't that an obvious conclusion when product companies actively block products from being repaired? And going as far as classifying something as trivial as a battery replacement AS a repair?

    Granted with some devices that are small (Like Bluetooth hands-free sets) making them large enough for a battery replacement is difficult, but with no headphone jack, we're still back to the producing company to point the primary finger at for why this is happening.

  16. design ? by fluffythedestroyer · · Score: 1

    I know its far fetched but what if companies (by rules I guess ? give ideas) maybe if they could use some kind of regular standard on design that way companies could reuse the same equipment or hardware. Less garbage in the end. Its not a perfect solution and I'm sure its going to be a NO from Apple for example since one of their biggest marketing strategy is to be different visually when making phones and laptops...#fuck apple anyways.

  17. Re:fastest growing waste stream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leave Taco Bell out of this.

  18. Re:Facebook is not a valid link, that's malvertisi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah! Fuck Facefook!

  19. But, but... My cellphone... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... is two years old! How will I fit in with such an old "device"?

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  20. The solution is simple. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Everything that is sold needs to be evaluated for to cost of recycling it and then add that cost to the item as a tax. That way, when a recycler spends $X to recycle thrown out object Y then they get that recycling investment money.

    This isn't a complex problem, we just have weak/corrupt politicians stopping us from doing what has to be done.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  21. "Equality" and environmentalism: choose one by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    You have a choice: increase access to the poor and protect the environment. There is no viable market model for a = $100 phone that makes it not a pile of crap that will be unsupported 2 months before it hits the market. If there were, Apple probably would have found it and monetized it.

    People need to get used to the fact that the market forces that open up all of these electronics to people who cannot afford to spend $700 for a phone, $2k for a laptop and such guarantee that it will be a pile of garbage that is designed to be replaced more of than it should be from an environmental perspective. You simply cannot make a super high quality device at that price point using anything resembling current specs.

  22. pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

    You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

    So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    1. Re:pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's it going in your mom's basement, Incel?

    2. Re:pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

      You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

      So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

    3. Re:pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by nightfire-unique · · Score: 2

      Jesus dude. Take your meds.

      .. even if you feel better.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    4. Re:pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah you must be support Fauxcahontis. How's that Cherokee working for you? You are an idiot.

    5. Re: pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The message above was brought to you by the Committee to Reelect Donald Trump in 2020.

      Remember voters - Democrats are deranged, mean-spirited wingnuts whose idea of political debate is hurling childish insults. Compared to Democrats President Trump is grown up, kind hearted, and a serious intellectual.

      Vote TRUMP in 2020 - for common decency!

  23. EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I initially misread the title as Electronic Arts the fastest growing waste...

    Got a little laugh out of that.

  24. Want a real solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A real solution: Standards and Modularity. Modularize and standardize batteries, power supplies, cables, chargers, interfaces, screens, cases, individual components/sub-components and assemblies so they can be reused and used in multiple types of devices. Even screws. Now everything is so proprietary that things can't be reused or used in different systems, so everything becomes waste.

  25. Make unrepairable electronics illegal by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - Non-removable batteries : Illegal
    - Glued RAM/SSD/CPU/...   : Illegal
    - Anything unrepairable   : Illegal !!

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  26. Add electric cars to the list by cyberspittle · · Score: 2

    With Electric batteries having a limited life span (like all of my old smart phones), we should include electric cars, which are basically smart phones on wheels. lol.

    1. Re:Add electric cars to the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just electric cars, all the cars made now are full of e-trash that is obsolete before the car is paid for, assuming it was ever current tech to begin with. I have a 2013 Hyundai Veloster (which is a terrible car for many many reasons), and its absolutely useless center console computer is made from circa 2005 parts and runs Windows CE. It also barely has the hardware to do the very little it does, and all its software is in ROM so you can't even work with it to do anything useful. Is that garbage going to be a selling feature if I ever sell the car? Not a chance. I'm gonna run it into the ground like every car though, but I don't think I'm gonna get 10 years out of this one.

      I absolutely don't want to replace the car, despite hating it, because there's pretty much NOTHING on the market right now that I actually like.

    2. Re:Add electric cars to the list by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Upgrade to something older, with a real transmission and a big old V8. Duh.

      Spend a car payment/month on the old car and in a year or less, you will have nothing left to fix. Bonus, if you selected wisely, your car is now an _appreciating_ asset.

      The best 'investment' I've ever made is my 1960. Ballpark is 1900% ROI in 20 years, thats close to Madoff's fictional ROI. Of course classics are back in 'insane valuation mode', but they have been in that mode for about half of the last 20 years.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Add electric cars to the list by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      a 2013 Hyundai Veloster (which is a terrible car for many many reasons)

      What don't you like about it? I mean, the three doors are kinda wonky...

    4. Re:Add electric cars to the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you can replace most entertainment units in cars then isn't it?

    5. Re:Add electric cars to the list by cyberspittle · · Score: 1

      I really wasn't think of the in car infotainment. I was more thinking of the batteries. Replacing them in a Toyota Prius is over $3,000.00. Now, look at all the Nissan Leaf, Chevy Volt, and Teslas. All those batteries got to go somewhere ... Recycling is a joke. We used to dump crap overseas, but now, they don't want our old cardboard anymore. What a mess!

  27. Why is this a thing? by sirsky · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why is this even a thing? So what? China, Hong Kong, etc. gathers the materials, manufactures it, and sells it in the US. We in the US buy it, use it, and when we're done with it, we send it back. If it's such a problem, they should figure out how to deal with it, since it's all going back from whence it came anyway.

  28. Unservicable electronics ought to be taxed by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

    There should be significant tax penalties for:

    - Non replaceable batteries OR OEM refuses to make available replacement batteries
    - Devices that can't be reasonably easily opened (e.g. require hot air gun to pry away glued-down screen to get into case)
    - Vendor applies warranty void stickers or attempts to void warranty for effecting a repair via replacement of a battery or modular part

    And smaller penalties for:
    - Devices that are not modular (e.g. things like cameras, speakers, etc. soldered to mainboard)
    - Vendor commits to OS security updates and/or critical fixes for less than 3 years

  29. i'd be curious to know.. by zr · · Score: 1

    ..in absolute numbers how environmental footprint of all of electronics industry compares to the footprint of a single full size container cargo or tanker ship.

  30. Disposable Electronics are to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it's cheaper to throw away something instead of repairing it you get a lot of electronics being thrown away.

    When you are unable to fix or upgrade your electronics BY DESIGN you get a lot of electronics being thrown away.

    When you get a mentality that you need to get the latest, greatest "thing" every six or twelve months as a fashion statement you get a lot of electronics being thrown away.

  31. How about a big hole in the ground. by CodeInspired · · Score: 0

    Just dig a big hole in the ground and dump everything there. Charge for disposal. It's what we do with every other waste product and seems to be working out ok. When it's full, build a golf course. Dig another hole next door. If the costs exceed proper disposal, you might see some engineering solutions come forward.

  32. pgmrdlm your lies don't change reality faggot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I guess you think all Republicans don't give a shit." - Yeah, because that's the reality, you sniveling bootlicking lying coward backing a fucking traitor. You are literally the problem to solve. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

    You've eroded any semblance of standards or veritas in your entire party with your constant backpeddling and excuses for bullshit baldfaced lies. You should hang, to be perfectly honest. You are a traitor.

    So yeah, when you pretend it's a Republican priority to get rid of plastic waste, and someone calls you a lying faggot? They're right about you, lying faggot. Deal with it snowflake - or stop lying, one of the two, bitch.

  33. One solution by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

    It should be illegal to manufacture, or import for resale and electronic product into which batteries have been glued.

    If they can't be easily removed and replaced by the end user, then the product shouldn't be allowed into (well, Canada for me), but any "first world" nation.

    --
    A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
  34. take that crap to Best Buy by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    Best Buy will take your obsolete electronics for recycling at all US stores. There is usually a bin at the front door for small items, but larger items can be dropped off at the customer service desk.

    1. Re:take that crap to Best Buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you (all) for the suggestions. I am not in the US. My town arranges for electronics recycling, so I am covered. I collect the stuff because it's easier to just throw it in a box and take it to recycling once a decade or so. My point is, there are lots of electronic devices which have just become obsolete, and not because they had obsolescence built in. With electronics entering everyday items like light bulbs, this is increasingly becoming a problem. Electronics are very difficult to recycle. Mostly the current recyclers just try to extract a few valuable metals, like gold from plated connectors and copper from wires. The rest is destined for a landfill. We need to find a better way.

  35. Lead free solder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if the environmentalists didn't mandate that electronics have lead free solder, and instead mandate compulsory recycling with major fines we would have electronics that didn't end up in the trash after a year or two.

    Lead free solder is right up there with bad capacitors as one of the primary reasons consumer electronics fail. There is a reason the aerospace industry does not accept electronics with lead free solder.

  36. Planned obsolescense = $ for manufacturers by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to do my part...
    https://www.practicalmachinist...

    My 2 step solution: If you're no longer providing reasonably priced support, you must release all tech info so others can. And, if you manufacture it, anyone can dump your product back on your doorstep for you to deal with...

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  37. Stick them in Antarctica, or South China Sea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make an international electronics waste dump, in the South China Sea, or Antarctica. It will cost money to recycle the stuff, and the stuff is willing to sit around, doing nothing. In 50 or a 100 years, someone might invent some cheap electronic waste processing plant, to handle the enormous amount of waste which has accumulated by then.

  38. Reuse is Better than Recycle When Possible by Pauldow · · Score: 1

    One problem I see is that in my town we have an electronic "recycling" bin at the landfill which really just goes to a scrapper. People put their old electronics in there thinking that they're doing such good for the world.

    Unfortunately there's quite a few good items put in there like flat panel TV's that just need a minor repair. I've seen i5 class computers, perfectly good JBL speakers, and lots of laptop power supplied, among a lot of other stuff. Unfortunately, the town makes a few cents per pound, so we're prohibited from actually doing the environment good and reusing the items.

    Of course, no one wants ink-jet printers, or glass tube televisions, especially the 39" Sony. The glass on those is about an inch thick, but there's a lot of usable items going to scrap.

  39. It starts with YOU! by mossweb · · Score: 0

    Only buy things with repairable options (batteries, LCD, connectors, mic, speaker, etc..) Also upgradeable module options. CPU, Storage, I/O. Give me a phone with a CPU module, Phone module, LCD backplane, Battery options chemistry options. Just a thought.

  40. Just as cigarette packs must be labelled... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as a cause of cancer and at the expense of the cigarette companies, companies that make electronics that are not repairable, or that have non-replaceable batteries, or that have designed-in obsolesence should be publicly labelled as "Gross Polluters" (the same label california slaps on some cars).

    This alone would be a rebuke to the snotty obnoxious fake "green" people at places like Apple who not only use the slave labor of a dictatorship, and use raw materials that dictatorship gets by strip mining, but then makes those products non-repairable purely to force them into the trash so the customer base will buy the new model. Modern semiconductors are good for at least 30 years (well, except for flash memory which will die much sooner if hammered with write cycles), but I doubt anydod will have the came cell phone after 20 of those 30 years. Apple and Samsung will see to it that users are drooling over the next model within 2 or 3 years of buying a phone.

  41. Virgin Media should be ashamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virgin Media (UK) should be ashamed.

    I have cable internet, TV and phone from them and the service is pretty good.

    Note that the equiptment (cable modem + seperate Cable TV box) belongs to them, I'm just renting it.

    Recently they required me to have new versions of the Modem and TV box (I didn't request it, it wasn't optional). When they've done this in the past they've provided a return label for the old equipment, you package it up and return it (collection points everywhere in shops etc.). This time - they refer you to some random company on the internet, they don't seem to have any arrangement with them and it's all up to you. This is *their equipment*. It's disgraceful.

  42. Who cares? by strikethree · · Score: 1

    This is a tempest in a teapot. Manufacturers know that survivability requires limited lifetime products. There are only 7 billion people on this planet which means it is very easy to limit your profitability if you can not generate repeat sales.

    This would not normally be a problem. It is the nature of the beast. Where the problem comes in is greed. Sure, that iphone could last for 10 years easily... but, we want MORE money than default attrition would give... so the attrition rate is increased to where your phone will generally only last about two years rather than 10.

    All because of greed, not because of entropy.

    Since we are not going to ever deal with greed in a rational manner, we may as well just get used to having electronic waste build in a geometric fashion.

    Enjoy the ride.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen