Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Moving Xbox Ad Was the Best Thing About the Super Bowl (cnet.com)

Mark Serrels, writing for CNET: Super Bowl 53 has come and gone and, for me at least, there was one clear highlight. This Microsoft commercial. [...] Essentially a commercial for Microsoft's Xbox Adaptive Controller, this ad follows up on an earlier ad from the Christmas period, which highlights young kids with limited mobility playing video games. It's incredible.

It tells the story of kids with limited mobility and their love for video games. All kids love video games and if you're a person with limited mobility, video games can often provide a pathway to experiences that are often difficult in the real world. But in some cases, particular types of limited mobility can make even the games themselves difficult to play -- which is where the Xbox Adaptive Controller comes in.
Further reading: Xbox wire; and Why Xbox spent a year designing the Adaptive Controller packaging.

132 comments

  1. Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This was an entertaining game dominated by the defenses of two really good football teams. I'm sorry that you dorks are incapable of appreciating that most people aren't enterained by World of Warcraft or stupid TV shows about space travel 300 years in the future.

    1. Re:Idiots by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed, it's not often you get to see a good defensive battle anymore.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look, I think the disdain people hold for sports is completely moronic, but not only is your disdain as bad, you need to check your numbers. Most people aren't entertained by football, either. TV shows about space trvael 300 years in the future, MMORPGs, and football, regularly pull 10s of millions of people to participate.

    3. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As if watching a bunch of muscle-heads fight over a ball is somehow a higher class of entertainment.

      At least with video games, you are making the tactical decisions yourself.

    4. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone seems pretty butthurt that less people care about watching a game of hand egg then they used to. The NFL's viewer numbers bave been dropping for years. Good riddance.

    5. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Two good defenses does not a "good defensive battle" make. The Rams' offense spent most of the game looking like they could've been shut down by a high school team.

    6. Re: Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I be entertained by watching a bunch of people I dont know playing a game I don't play?

    7. Re: Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because much that is great about the world came from the minds of the writers, thinkers, poets and inventors.

      From guys running at each other for no reason? Not so much.

    8. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no for most of the it is a boring piece of televised shit that is normally relegated to late time slots (if shown at all), but it does have some amusingly good ads. Most of the world really don't give a shit about American football let alone whether it was a good game or not.

    9. Re:Idiots by mukinrestak · · Score: 2

      Given the US-centric nature of US football vs the international appeal of video games and stupid space shows, I'd be willing to bet that more people care about Superman 64, Lexx, or Cleopatra 2525 than the Super Bowl.

    10. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Super Bowl 53 had about 110 MILLION live viewers. In the United States alone.

      I seriously doubt more people care about a failed game or minor tv shows, despite your prejudices against something you don't like.

    11. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, 110 million in the US alone. And maybe another 10 million in the rest of the world. I'm an american and even I realize that outside of the US, almost nobody gives a damn about football. You want to see some numbers, check out soccer.

    12. Re:Idiots by tepples · · Score: 0

      Yet the U.S. audience alone for the Super Bowl outweighs the international audience for some other forms of entertainment.

    13. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was an entertaining game dominated by the defenses of two really good football teams. I'm sorry that you dorks are incapable of appreciating that most people aren't enterained by World of Warcraft or stupid TV shows about space travel 300 years in the future.

      So are you saying sports is much better entertainment because the actors only follow a rulebook and not a script (that we know of)?

    14. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. audience for my YouTube channel featuring cats outweighs the NFL's U.S. audience, what's your point?

    15. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dorks" lol, what is this, 1980 and you're the king of cool?

      I think you need to jump back in your car, hit 88mph and return to the era you came from, Biff.

    16. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is an opinion piece up entitled "The Worst Super Bowl Ever". The author even looks like Comic Book Guy.

      https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/opinions/super-bowl-pearlman/index.html

    17. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ecause the actors only follow a rulebook

      Only when they aren't under arrest for domestic violence, criminal trespass, B&E, or any litany of felonies that they choose to commit.

    18. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get the whole "bread and circuses" theme for pseudo-gladiatorial exhibitions, although I could probably do without it be so overt. I can even hang with the dog-whistled pan-sexualism over-layed with sado-masochism dipped in machismo because, hey, I like the cheerleaders too. I can even deal with our nation's rich-elite shoving their political views down our throats and coating the whole spectacle with nationalistic-jingoism.

      All I want to know is, why anyone actually cares who wins?

    19. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, it is not disdain for the sports, it is disdain for the sportsfans, making this huge fuss about "my team" this and "my team" that.

      If you enjoy playing sports, great. If you enjoy watching others play sports, I do not get it but you do you. I am sure there are plenty of things I enjoy as entertainment that others do not get. But when you make it personal, that is where the trouble comes from.

    20. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The population of the US is only 310 million including children. Do you actually believe that 110 million number? News flash....big business lies. That number would carry the assumption that ALL members of a household are gathered about the TV 1050's style. More likely people are recording and watching so there is a double count...including all members of the household 1950's style. Clearly there is some double counting of views. Complete rubbish.

      Before the fall of bullfighting, it had more spectators than US football. Soccer and cricket currently dwarf US football.

      Also please back your assertion about more people caring. Many people watch for half time commercials. Set the DVR and fast forward through the game. Football viewers are decreasing when the money is discussed.

      A single youtuber gets more views over the course of a year than the superbowl;. Some get more in a month.

    21. Re:Idiots by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      US Population :: 325.7 million (2017).
      The rest of your premise is likely about as accurate.

  2. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And yet the game was still far more worthwhile than all 700+ bullshit Star Track episodes.

  3. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh. Everyone knows Star Wars is better.

  4. Missed It by dcw3 · · Score: 2

    I just wanted to say that Maroon 5 sucked live, even though I like all the songs they played. Other than the eye candy for the ladies, it was one of the most forgettable halftimes in memory.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
    1. Re: Missed It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed! It was all over his face that he knew he sounded like crap. For the eye candy... he looked like trailer trash with his shirt off.

    2. Re:Missed It by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This is one thing I don't get. I mean, you have this testosterone loaded sport where allegedly grown up men headbutt repeatedly, and while allegedly the goal is to move some sort of egg shaped object it seems to me that it's more about who gets to kill whom in the most appealing way...

      and then you have a halftime act that's always, without fail, some pussy pop group. How does this fit in there?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Missed It by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      It's all about the revenue...how many eyeballs can the show attract. A lot of folks watch just for the commercials, which have gotten worse in the last few years. I think a lot of women watch the SB who normally don't watch football under other circumstances...it's a party.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re: Missed It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      in fairness, trailer trash is usually not nearly so ripped...

  5. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not since Star Wars: The Last Jedi. That one basically killed the franchise.

  6. Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, the new generation doesn't give a shit about football.

    1. Re:Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean American hand egg? Football is played with feet and without a bunch of gear on.

    2. Re: Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No that's soccer genius. Futbol for the monolinguists.

      Football and rugby are whole other games. They are like soccer but without the crappy acting of feigned insta-death the moment so much as a butterfly farts on someone playing.

      The hits are harder and the short pants wearing crowd with pencil thick arms and legs don't last long. Even the cheerleaders are tougher than they are, and they wear high heels....

    3. Re: Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Ameritard but football as a term existed long before American hand egg was invented.

    4. Re: Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, let him dream. Need to have something to keep the rotting carasses of Europe and the banana republics of South America going, even if it's delusions of adequacy.

    5. Re:Two teams jacking each others off by lgw · · Score: 1

      You mean American hand egg? Football is played with feet and without a bunch of gear on.

      Hundreds of games with different rules have been played with feet and balls over the centuries. The particular rules set that's popular today was called "soccer" at the English school where it was invented. Of all the kinds of football, the kind called "soccer" is the most popular.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Two teams jacking each others off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the football played with feet. You mean that really boring game called soccer?

  7. Wrong by atomicalgebra · · Score: 2

    The best commercial was the mountain killing the bud knight.

    1. Re:Wrong by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The best commercial was the mountain killing the bud knight.

      Kind of reminds me of this.

    2. Re:Wrong by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      How much did they pay you to be in that ad?

    3. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they have paid someone when you did it for free?

    4. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You paid them to be in it There's a wall bill waiting for you next.

  8. Lumpy milk by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    The worst ad was the lumpy milk ad. Nobody wanted to eat snacks after that. The co's with food ads should sue them.

    1. Re:Lumpy milk by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And the award for dumbest post goes to: YOU! Congratulations on being an absolute moron.

      May you drink lumpy milk.

    2. Re:Lumpy milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on being an absolute moron.

      Said the AC to his mirror.

    3. Re:Lumpy milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lumpy milk was the best ad this year. 2nd place goes to Harrison Ford's dog.

      p.s. At least the Bud Knight is dead now, so we don't have to watch him again.

    4. Re:Lumpy milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did?

  9. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft realizes that there is a market for controllers that are more accessible. And they decide it is lucrative enough to be worth the RnD investment.

    Then they make a commercial with a select group of that target audience saying that they like the product.

    And we are supposed to be moved? We are supposed to feel like Microsoft is some benevolent force acting out of altruism for the disadvantaged?

    They are after money, and are using commercials like this to make it. And that's all.

    1. Re: So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They realised that their exclusives aren't helping them not get outsold two to one against the competition, and their old kinect gimmick didn't work out, so they're basically trying anything at this point in the hopes of accidentally finding a winner.

    2. Re: So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. A lot of companies will develop these sorts of technologies even if the market isn't there because it gives them good press. Then they run it up the flagpole, helping them shed bad PR, such as appearing like an unfeeling, monopolistic behemoth.

      Also, in these cases of altruism, whenever anyone claims that so-and-so company is just money-grabbing and not altruistic, I ask whether they would be able to identify when a company actually is being altruistic. Some companies do good things because they're not completely evil (I work for one).

  10. Robot obsession? by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    At least 3 co's featured robots or androids (lower-case) in their ads. The child-bot was featured twice, and creepy both times. Hawking insurance I think.

    Another bot ad was a big cellphone telecom, I forgot which; and a 3rd was somebody worried about a robot taking his job during a bad dream. I think it was hawking a home security system. It had a dumb catch-line along the lines of: "You have enough worries outside, at least make your home secure."

    1. Re:Robot obsession? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      And one of those worries was Alexa/Google always listening. And they were selling an IoT security system.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Robot obsession? by lgw · · Score: 1

      At least 3 co's featured robots or androids (lower-case) in their ads. The child-bot was featured twice, and creepy both times. Hawking insurance I think.

      Another bot ad was a big cellphone telecom, I forgot which; and a 3rd was somebody worried about a robot taking his job during a bad dream. I think it was hawking a home security system.

      Sounds like it's time for a return of Old Glory Robot Insurance.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Robot obsession? by supremebob · · Score: 1

      I think that one of the child bot ads were hocking TurboTax, but I'm not sure of that. It wasn't exactly all that memorable.

      I kinda wish that the Game Of Thrones dragon would have showed up and burned a few more of these commercials. It would have made the entire Super Bowl more interesting.

    4. Re:Robot obsession? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I think that one of the child bot ads were hocking TurboTax, but I'm not sure of that. It wasn't exactly all that memorable.

      The "child-bot" couldn't be a TurboTax online real-person CPA because it didn't have the emotions necessary. As if CPAs were supposed to be really emotional while reviewing your tax return.

      I thought the Alexa ad with failed integration attempts was funny. The electric toothbrush that played a podcast in someone's mouth, and Harrison Ford's dog ordering a pallet load of dog food (and sausages and gravy ...) was prescient of where Amazon will be trying to put Alexa over time.

    5. Re:Robot obsession? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's time for a return of Old Glory Robot Insurance.

      There's a nice racket ready to be exploited: robot insurance. I need a break from my meteor insurance business anyhow.

      [Sig] Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.

      Um, that begs the question: How are capitalistic totalitarians better?

  11. Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded sister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars does not even qualify. It's fantasy. Something retards watch, who are too stupid to face the real world, and still believe in Santa and gods and fairies and pixie dust... excuse me, I meant midichlorians.

    I'm not saying anything but TNG was thaat good, but at least it qualified.

  12. This is why JavaScript remains off by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not correct, highlights a very minority opinion, and belongs on the toilet paper of some insufferable blogger's tackily decorated rental mobile home.

    1. Re:This is why JavaScript remains off by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      What he said.

      It was sappy. Sure, it is great that some kid gets to play minecraft with the other kids. But let's get real. It wasn't even the best commercial about some sappy, tug-at-your-heartstrings topic.

      And this was the year of the overdone, sappy commercial.

      So no, not the best thing about the superbowl. Not even close.

    2. Re:This is why JavaScript remains off by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true cunt.

      I know I tried to endorse the GNU Kind Communications guidelines, but... AC is right.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  13. Re:Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded sis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek was full of fantasy:

    Ghosts (called "anaphasic beings")
    Gods (called "The Q")
    Teleportation (called "beaming")
    Telekenesis (called "tractor beams")
    Elves (called "Vulcans")
    Time travel (gimme a break, that is about as fantasy as it gets!)
    Faster than light travel (science says this is impossible, therefore it is fantasy)

    You get the picture.

    The distinction between "science fiction" and "fantasy" is completely arbitrary. Science fiction is just a stylized subset of fantasy.

  14. U.S. football damages lives. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Idiots" and "a bunch of muscle-heads fight over a ball..."

    Football ... leads all other sports in the number of injuries sustained. Quoting:

    "In 2007, more than 920,000 athletes under the age of 18 were treated in emergency rooms, doctors' offices, and clinics for football-related injuries, according to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission."

    1. Re:U.S. football damages lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be fun at Super Bowl parties.

    2. Re:U.S. football damages lives. by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least people care about football athletes. Try cheerleading if you really want to feel expendable.

    3. Re: U.S. football damages lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its your fun at party's

    4. Re:U.S. football damages lives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least people care about football athletes. Try cheerleading if you really want to feel expendable.

      Hey, not fair! I, for one, care about cheerleaders!!!

    5. Re:U.S. football damages lives. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Why do they insist on all the armour that makes injuries worse? Rugby isn't great but it's not nearly as bad as American Football.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. 17 years too late by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 0

    if you ask me, Microsoft could have build this 17 years ago when they introduced the XBox. But I guess Microsoft had other priorities at the time.

    1. Re:17 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      And Sony could have built it 23 years ago when they introduced the playstation. And Nintendo could have built it 36 years ago when they introduced the NES. Here's an idea: let's celebrate the people who actually *did* fucking build it instead of bitching about how they hypothetically could have done it earlier.

      Pro-tip: the alternative, where we attack companies who do something good because they didn't do it quicker/cheaper/better, leads inexorably toward a world where companies never bother doing anything good. It's like trying to teach your dog to sit on command, but refusing to give him a treat if he doesn't do it on the first try.

    2. Re:17 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The controller is much more advanced than you give it credit for. Those disks are more like touch zones then large buttons, slots in the back allow the user to assign physical buttons of a long list of designs (or use your own), it just has to send a signal for on and no signal for off. There is a small amount of self learning where you tell it you meant to push button A vs button B and it changes the zones.

      The amount of engineering is much higher than you give it credit and would not have been reasonable till about 10 years ago based on existing consumer technology.

    3. Re:17 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'll be blunt: I know literally nothing about the controller.

      What I do know, and what I hoped to express in my previous post, is that it is beyond ridiculous to criticize a company that has done something so wonderful because they didn't do it earlier, as the OP did.

      My goal wasn't to trivialize Microsoft's work on this controller, but to call out the reductionist logic expressed by the OP. I applaud MS for doing this work, and I consider it a serious achievement in gaming accessibility regardless of how easy or difficult it was as an engineering project.

    4. Re:17 years too late by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting technology, It's also somewhat deceitful. Gross motor control with shoulders and leg muscles, instead of finger muscles, cannot be expected to be as fast and delicately controlled as finger movements. I'm delighted that these children, and adults, can play: I'd not expect it to work well for the various "button mashers" or twitch driven 8 button combo combat games.

    5. Re:17 years too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just other priorities, they actively blocked third party controller from connecting to the Xbox360 so that you had to buy official Microsoft controller. Also each new console generation tends to require a new controller and will not properly support the older one, despite console gamepads having been pretty much the same since the Dualshock back in Playstation1 days. It's nice that they build the adaptive controller, but they are essentially solving a problem they created themselves. I wouldn't be too surprised if they dropped support for it by the time XBoxOne2 comes out. Little blips of Microsoft doing good things don't tend to last for long.

    6. Re:17 years too late by Higaran · · Score: 2

      Dude, go play fortnight or what ever the game of the week is and there is probably a bunch of kids using this thing to totally own your ass.

    7. Re:17 years too late by Merk42 · · Score: 2

      This is Slashdot, Microsoft can never do the right thing!

  16. How much would this cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a few engineers spend a few years designing it. Use some 3D Printing, and a specialty shop in Shenzhen. Reuse the electronics. It won't be optimized for cost or performance, but a mediocre controller will be a lot better than no controller.

    1. Re:How much would this cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox Adaptive Controller cost $100 USD when it was released in September.

  17. Re:Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Once the jock-sniffers become cripples they will need something to do ...

  18. Frank Castle by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Two franchises I really dislike held no interest for me. The owner of the Rams is a disgusting shithead who thinks the world owes him money and I'm sick to death of Tom Brady and the entire Patriots Nation If it had been the Texans or the Bears or any one of a dozen other teams, I might have tuned in, but nah.

    Instead, I watched 2 episodes of Punisher Season 2 and then THE AUTOPSY OF JANE DOE, which is a motherfucker of a movie. Highly recommended.

    Two movies you gotta watch are MANDY (on the Shudder Network) and THE AUTOPSY OF JANE DOE.

    If you're a Prime Member, you can watch MANDY for free, but you have to subscribe to the Shudder Network via Amazon Prime for a free trial and then you can cancel immediately after the movie if you want. But do try to see MANDY. It's Nicolas Cage's finest role and the most psychedelic horror movie I've seen in ages.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Frank Castle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And nobody cares. Fuck off.

    2. Re:Frank Castle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares whether or not anybody cares.

    3. Re:Frank Castle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares that nobody cares whether or not anybody cares. Does that make me a fucking care bare? or a bare care bear?

  19. Re: Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded si by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek predicted the Irish unification of 2024.

  20. if that is the price of keeping Slashdot around by Escogido · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm fine with it. by this time and age I am quite capable of telling a slashdot ad article by myself, and I trained myself to ignore ads in many forms where I can't turn them off. I come here for the comments sections as well as I'm sure many others also do anyways, so if a Microsoft product story sparks some insightful conversation - sure why not?

  21. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Star Wars peaked early, specifically in that episode where Picard used the Tardis to help Frodo escape from the Cylons so he could save Princess Leia from Thanos.

  22. Re: Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded si by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Was that the William Shatner ST universe, or the Chris Pine ST universe?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  23. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The adaptive controller is the best thing Microsoft has done since debug.exe. They are right to toot their horn about it; it is pretty much pure good.

  24. An advert was the highlight? by The123king · · Score: 3, Funny

    Super Bowl 53 has come and gone and, for me at least, there was one clear highlight. This Microsoft commercial.

    I guess the game of Handegg was pretty uninspiring then.

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
    1. Re:An advert was the highlight? by barc0001 · · Score: 2

      > I guess the game of Handegg was pretty uninspiring then.

      Pretty much yep. It was like the football equivalent of watching a 90s era NHL game against the New Jersey Devils playing their patented neutral zone trap bullshit.

    2. Re:An advert was the highlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a smarmy divegrass fan?

  25. Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it? by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The controller, I mean?

    Since I've been creating input devices for people who cannot use "normal" ones for one reason or another for many years now, I'm curious. How close are they to actually providing an interface that offers a comparable accessibility to people with reduced mobility or fine motor skills? What sorts of input do they already provide?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. Defensive games boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well the highlights are few for this Super Bowl. Was not a Offensive shootout and that makes for boring game play. The commercials were horrible, the half times was a cobbled together mess and this Super Bowl will go down as one of the most forgettable ones. Unless you were a defensive fan, you were obviously not impressed.

  27. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jar-Jar killed star wars. Disney just put the last nail to its coffin instead of pulling it out from the bottom of the well.

  28. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd expect to see one at a GameStation near you pretty soon. I'd be very curious to hear about your work. How, for example, do you deal with the "smoothing" problem? With differentiating between small muscle or neurological impulses and the significant signal that people actually want action for, as quickly as possible, without waiting too long to accumulate a valid signal? I'm looking at https://www.sciencedirect.com/..., which gives a good detailed analysis of the problem. The necessary delay to accumulate a reliable signal is roughly 200 milliseconds. That is fairly slow for a reactive "twitch" combat game.

    Is it comparable to the delay of electro-mechanical devices you've used? I'm quite curious if you've seen limits to response time with your techniques, or to hear what basic mechanical or electrical designs you use. With some luck, if they're continuing with this project, perhaps they would provide some funding or consulting work for children their design does not quite work for.

  29. Wow3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't give a flying fuck for american super bowl or their football, but this Microsoft initiative is damn cool!

  30. Blowin in the wind by archer,+the · · Score: 1

    I liked Budweiser's commercial best. It gave me a little hope that humanity isn't going to completely screw itself over.

    1. Re:Blowin in the wind by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Budweiser still has enough money for super bowl ads, and you have hope for humanity? I thought that was one of the seven signs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by Dracolytch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They're really nice: The controller base looks and feels very solidly built. The stand-out bits are that it has USB, so you can plug in some existing devices, but more importantly every button and trigger has a 3.5mm plug associated with it, so that you can attach any custom pedal/button/switch/lever/etc for which you can hack in a 3.5mm jack.

    This is good for games, but it's also good as the core for other types of customized input arrangements.

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  32. Re:Slashdot = Microsft Sponsor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Evil Micro$oft making their products available for children with disabilities, the nerve!!

  33. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I only dabble but I've found that some simple filters can help. For example, real PacMan machines use a joystick with a 4 way gate on it, that is the stick physically can't be moved into the diagonal positions. It's up, down, left and right only.

    Such things are fairly uncommon for computers and games consoles. I build an adaptor for a friend to use an old Amiga joystick on his PC, but he found that PacMan on MAME didn't play very well. I fixed it by making the adaptor ignore diagonals. Trickier than it sounds, because the stick can still move to the corners, but I found that if it always switches to the "new" direction and and ignores the old (e.g. right to up/right corner produces up only) it felt natural.

    PacMan is ideal for this kind of thing because although it has some "twitch" elements, you can actually buffer inputs heavily, e.g. you can push to take a corner long before you reach the corner and the game will be fine with it.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  34. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The Star Trek Franchise died years ago. Just no one realized it yet. I would say Insurrection Stopped it, and Nemesis failed the rebound.
    The JJ Trek, was the attempt to finish off the game.

    With the dead franchise, CBS needed to keep its copyright, so they made Discovery out of their asses, as a hope there would be enough Star Trek fans, gullible enough to buy CBS all access.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  35. Re:Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded sis by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    The key rule for Science Fiction is that you should only break one law of physics.
    Star Trek kinda merged all the Science fiction tropes together, this wasn't that big of deal, until people started to put the Star Trek Universe connected into so sort of Canonical set of events.

    Oddly enough until Deep Space 9, with its over reaching story arc. Star Trek didn't worry too much about canon. They would do a temporary solving of the problem at hand, then run off to a new place not worrying about the consequences of their actions, and never looking back. So sure they can travel in time in one episode, and the next episode say it is impossible, and if the writers were very clever, they would give a tech-tech explanation on why it doesn't work this time (something about quantum).

    But with DS9, the remaining seasons of TNG, and Voyager, and Enterprise. Everything needed to start to fit together somehow. This which worked for DS9, hurt the other shows.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  36. Re:Jock sniffers are the worsr... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    How are sports fans any different then other Nerd culture events?
    Strong opinions on things that do not affect them... Check
    Wear funny costumes... Check
    Trying to explain away or recon events that they didn't expect... Check
    Spend a lot of time, trying to play out different scenarios of their selected group... Check

    Sports Fans are just as much Nerds as the rest of us.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  37. Respectifully disagree by neo-mkrey · · Score: 3

    The best thing about the Super Bowl was the Bud Light/Game of Thrones crossover ad.

    1. Re:Respectifully disagree by antdude · · Score: 1

      I prefer NFL's 100 Year game: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.... However, SB's ads are getting worse every year IMO. Or am I the only one?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  38. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow.

    This is Slashdot, man. You gotta know your science fiction better than that.

    It peaked when Buck Rogers stole the Galactica to save the Minbari from Battlefield Earth.

    Picard was like, three years later.

  39. virtue signal harder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another worthless virtue signalling dumbass

  40. Missed opportunity. by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    The kid should have been shown killing someone at in Fortnite and then a cut screen of Ninja screaming hacker. It's not like he was afraid to cash in do silly cameos.

    1. Re:Missed opportunity. by Cytotoxic · · Score: 2

      I like your version better. Less sappy. More relevant to the youth audience. And it could have real emotion instead of the staged emotion of "look at the poor handicapped kid".

      Heck, if you wanted you could even do it for real... have the kid play Ninja with a bunch of his friends watching, and then when he finally gets a kill against Ninja they would all go crazy. Then it wouldn't feel so heavy-handed. Of course the real target audience probably wasn't gamers or parents of kids with special needs that could benefit from the controller. The audience was probably potential Microsoft investors - looking to create a little brand good will with the almost-PSA ad.

      Hey, Microsoft - if you adopt his idea, don't forget to kick some cash toward sunking2. It's a good idea for an ad.

  41. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would totally read the ever-loving fsck out of that fanfiction.

  42. Not pictured in the commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Owen calling me a *** ****** and teabagging my corpse.

  43. Re:Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soccer (European football) - Riots in the stadiums and in the streets after games.
    American Football - Thousands of drunk fans sitting out in the freezing cold half naked and covered in paint
    All major sports everywhere - siphon off civic funds (which could be used for streets/schools/sewers) to build giant arenas that make millionaires richer.

    Science fiction culture - sneered at and ridiculed by your so-called "sports nerds" for generations, usually with the tacit (and sometimes explicit) support of authorities.

    Yeah. Sports "nerds" are just like us.

  44. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure beats the Microsoft Easy Ball.

  45. Re: Jock sniffers are the worsr... by lgw · · Score: 1

    The most recent ST movie was actually OK. Felt like a long episode of a real ST TV show, which made it head and shoulders above the last 6 or so movies.

    But yeah, ST, like SW, is dead until the culture wars are behind us. And maybe forever - nothing stopping a new franchise from being good. The Expanse shows there's still some creativity left in the world.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  46. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, not even fucking close.

  47. We don't watch for one reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the Russians do invade this country at that particular moment, us so-called "dorks" will be ready.

    We been target-practicing without crosshairs and no aimbots, thankyouverymuch

    But how they got in our pajamas, I don't know.

  48. Really? Manipulative and scummy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You built a controller for people that cant use a controller? Awesome. Now you advertise it in a emotionally manipulative way as a celebration of how awesome you think you are because you built it? shitty. Im looking at you too, Verizon, you throttling asshats. Your actions say $$ first, but then when you get busted its heart-wrenching commercials about how they save lives. Blarg.

  49. It got me... by racerex · · Score: 1

    Admittedly I found this moving too. I love seeing how video games touch the lives of so many people and in so many ways these days. I've been around since the beginning and video games have been a part of my life since the days of Pac-Man and Space Invaders. I've become what I am today in many ways because of them including a career that has helped to provide for my family and put a roof over head and food in our mouths. MS scored some points with me when I saw this... and I loved seeing how enthusiastic that little boy was about games in general too!

  50. I'm still mad about the Kinect by TheCastro1689 · · Score: 1

    It used to be able to control my whole xbox, the tv, netflix, hulu etc. Now it can barely pause the DVR. They talk about accessibility, but they kill off their voice controls almost completely.

  51. Re:Jock sniffers are the worsr... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Funny

    An ad played during a jock-sniffing contest is now news for nerds?

    My kingdom for a way of giving wedgies online.

  52. Re: Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded si by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Star Trek predicted the Irish unification of 2024.

    And that starships would have ashtrays.

  53. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    It's a really good controller hub device, it doesn't solve the outrageous cost of large clickable buttons or mouth-sticks, but it's definitely well thought out with more expansion than you'll probably need.
    See:
    In the lab with Xbox's new Adaptive Controller, and
    Xbox Adaptive Controller is now out -- and we go hand, foot, fingers, and elbows-on

  54. Re:Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded sis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek is for idiots who want to think they're smart.

    While I'm at it, how's that Mensa investment club going? :-D

    Oh, and Asimov's laws of robotics are more fictional than Santa Clause.

  55. Re:Star Wars is fantasy. Aka sci-fi's retarded sis by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough until Deep Space 9, with its over reaching story arc. Star Trek didn't worry too much about canon. They would do a temporary solving of the problem at hand, then run off to a new place not worrying about the consequences of their actions, and never looking back.

    That's what I really love about The Wrath of Khan. When he started working on that movie, Nicholas Meyer went back and watched the entire run of TOS. And one of the things that struck him was how, in those completely self-contained episodes, Kirk and crew were always able to cheat death with no real consequences, and no decisions from any previous episodes ever came back to bite them in the ass (or were ever even mentioned again). So he set about creating the ultimate critique of that, a movie where Kirk's propensity to just move on and seemingly completely forget about his past decisions (and obligations) came back to bite him hard--a movie in which Kirk finally faced real consequences that he couldn't just last-minute cheat his way out of. A lot of people miss that essential element of STII completely, and think of it as just an exciting revenge story. But there is a lot more depth to that movie than most (even most Trek fans) appreciate.

    Of course, STIII (cursed be its name) completely undid all those important consequences in STII. And that was truly tragic, IMHO. But that was Paramount's fault there.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  56. Re:Let's maybe talk about what belongs on /. of it by Megane · · Score: 1

    Who are "they"? The real point of this controller is that it is a first-party controller with 1/8" jacks for everything. That separates the common part of a controller from the plethora of different controllers needed for a variety of disabilities. This means that the guts of the controller interface don't need to be duplicated in every specific unique custom controller, which are usually quite pricey because of low volume. $100 is cheap for something designed to have shit plugged into it. Also, if there is any kind of DRM in the controller (extra controllers are a lucrative market for console manufacturers, encouraging making them hard to replicate without a license), custom controllers become more difficult and expensive, often requiring a gutted retail controller be wedged in somewhere.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }