Slashdot Mirror


The Internet, Divided Between the US and China, Has Become a Battleground (wsj.com)

The global internet is splitting in two. From a report: One side, championed in China, is a digital landscape where mobile payments have replaced cash. Smartphones are the devices that matter, and users can shop, chat, bank and surf the web with one app. The downsides: The government reigns absolute, and it is watching -- you may have to communicate with friends in code. And don't expect to access Google or Facebook.

On the other side, in much of the world, the internet is open to all. Users can say what they want, mostly, and web developers can roll out pretty much anything. People accustomed to China's version complain this other internet can seem clunky. You must toggle among apps to chat, shop, bank and surf the web. Some websites still don't seem to be designed with smartphones in mind. The two zones are beginning to clash with the advent of the superfast new generation of mobile technology called 5G.

China aims to be the biggest provider of gear underlying the networks, and along with that it is pushing client countries to adopt its approach to the web -- essentially urging some to use versions of the "Great Firewall" that Beijing uses to control its internet and contain the West's influence. Battles are popping up around the world as Chinese tech giants try to use their market power at home to expand abroad, something they've largely failed to do so far. Some Silicon Valley executives worry the divergence risks giving Chinese companies an advantage in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, partly because they face fewer restrictions over privacy and data protection.
Further reading: Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt Predicts the Internet Will Split in Two By 2028 -- and One Part Will Be Led By China.

176 comments

  1. With or without China's urging... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... I expect the Internet world to segment into Internet countries. The Internet, as we know it today, will be a relic in 20 years.

    1. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, the powers that be try to wrestle control away from the people and to governments and lobbies.

      Russia recently had their "disconnect from the rest of the world" test.
      China has its Great Firewall.
      The EU soon gets filters and Internet-"light" as to not run afoul of copyrights.
      In the US it's more driven by private companies that separate between what they deem acceptable and what not.

      We had a good run.

    2. Re:With or without China's urging... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The internet was great while it lasted.

      If you want to have something like that, I guess you have to do it yourself in the future.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes. In fact, that is true going backwards too: the internet we knew 30 years ago is a relic, and what have today is a poor imitation with much less control for users and much more control for multinationals and authoritarian governments.

      That trend shows no sign of slowing down.

    4. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet we knew 30 years ago is DEAD, long live the Internet!

    5. Re:With or without China's urging... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Downgraded due to "overrated?" Wow.

    6. Re:With or without China's urging... by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Internet, as we know it today, will be a relic in 20 years.

      That will obviously be true regardless. However, I think the early internet will resurface and some censorship-free platform, at least in countries that don't just ban all encrypted packets not to a whitelisted endpoint. Perhaps something like a v2 of Freenet, with its technical problems addressed. Something with no servers to take down. Hiding from large governments is hard - impossible if they just effectively ban encryption - but we could at least be free from corporate oversight, on a platform optimized for privacy over business.

      For now people are happy with VPNs, but with the rise of corporate censorship and the ever-increasing political power of content distribution corporations, I don't think that's stable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry friend. I got downvoted into he ground the other day for criticizing mass surveillance. Among tech people that isn't controversial at all, so I don't know who does this.

      Could be paid government shills, but Occum's razor it's probably just boot-licking citizens, who follow tow the media line, and don't really understand tech issues.

      This cancer has spread to all corners of the internet, /. HN Ars reddit

    8. Re:With or without China's urging... by jon3k · · Score: 1

      It pretty much is already de facto segmented by language and local norms. I don't know about you, but I use zero Chinese, Russian, Iranian, etc websites now. But segmented how, exactly? As in, no longer using one global IP address space? Or some interconnectivity, but using firewalls to filter traffic? Or literally physically separated from the internet?

    9. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100% Correct.

      It's why we all need to stand AGAINST the use of crypto currencies, because a bank or government has control over the ledger and will know your purchase history.

      Anybody that is tired of big corporations and government of being in control of the Internet need to be working hard to develop "Internet 3". Which is defined as the following.

      1. A Mesh network, so corporations and government can't control the communications.
      2. P2P encrypted
      3. Hypernet supported (It can exist on top of the Internet 1 or 2 beyond the control of government or corporations because it's encapsulated)
      4. No DNS. This MUST be ciompletely eliminated or replaced with a Encrypted or perhaps a Blockchain DNS so only a web site owner can delist or change their data. This is to make sure big corporations and government can't de-list any sites.
      5. No DHCP. Same reason as above; to make sure big corporations and government can't effectively de-list any sites.
      6. Full options for Anonymous activity. So governments and corporations can't oppress individuals or free speech.

    10. Re:With or without China's urging... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      You don't have to speak Russian to use shady VPN services to conceal yourself when you want it. One thing the citizens of each country can agree upon: We may not like the other countries politics, but our government's having 0 good relations, and our citizens being able to connect to one another, might be valuable in bypassing each of our governments various totalitarian excesses (just make sure the crime you commit on that foreign VPN isn't being committed in that foreign country).

    11. Re: With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad fact is that because we did not impose an internet drivers license when we had a chance back in the day, the new crop of idiots have decided to impose one on us, and because they are more numerous and aggressive they will get their way.

      If we ever get a shot at this again we have to make damn sure that the next iteration will remember this, and consider that maybe elitism has its place in ensuring that power structures stay out of the hands of petty tyrants.

    12. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use about zero EU website not in my country or UK for that matter. My Hungarian and Bulgarian and Polish and Portuguese etc. are not up to snuff.

      Now, countries have official means for communication to an external audience, more or less disguised as a news agency, in English and sometimes other languages. China has xinhua.net which I think is a real news site, maybe you sometimes came across links to it. Russia has several I guess but I want to mention TASS : formerly-Soviet-now-Russian military news agency. Get it from the horse's mouth. It's actually very factual, due to being full of diplomatic and official statements "Foreign Minister X said this", "Head of State Y said that...", "Country Z will not attend the conference on...". Iran has Press TV which does kind of this but perhaps more polemic, less factual, somewhat comical at times with lower quality news.
      Well, I guess I'm done with mainstream media which is full of lies and propaganda anyway, so maybe I could do a similar thing and get stories from the like of voa, npr and france24.

    13. Re:With or without China's urging... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      It'll happen. It's already happening. But it won't be a mass-access thing - it'll be something users need to actively seek out and educate themselves on in order to gain access. Almost all users will be happy to use FacebookNet, because it does what they want: They can do the social media thing, look things up, chat to friends, check the news, contact their bank, buy goods, etc. It'll just be the minority who want to sneak over to the bad side of town, into that lawless realm.

    14. Re: With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elitism and a critical mass of tech enthusiasts is all that was holding everything together.

      Something like the 1996 Web blackout protest could never happen today, and I doubt we could even pull off another anti-SOPA.
      It's amazing to think that we collectively rejected and broke out of the corporate walled gardens onto the open web. Only for the corporate walled gardens to win decisively just a few decades later.

    15. Re:With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good analysis of deep problems of the current Internet: https://cryptome.org/2019/02/elbar.pdf

    16. Re: With or without China's urging... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any resources for those of us interested to be involved?

      Also, how do you escape the taint of Chicom or other BigGov meddling into the hardware supply chain?

    17. Re:With or without China's urging... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      Only VPNs that specialize in geo-unblocking are useful for this. Most VPNs are just too easy to detect and block. The VPN has to actually be willing to engage in a cat and mouse game which is no doubt expensive. I think it won't be too long before the arms race escalates enough that the sorts of servers most VPNs use now will be useless. Only genuine consumer ISP IP addresses will be accepted by the 1/3 of the internet that geoblocks. I can only hope that at least some VPNs will be able to make a deal with ISPs for some of their addresses so that VPN blocking tech truly won't be able to tell the difference.

      A lot of the internet is already off limits in many poor countries if you don't use a VPN. It has become common practice it seems to basically just whitelist rich North American and European and Asian countries and just geoblock everyone else. A truly sad turn of events. I just noticed that any web site that uses Amazon AWS requires a VPN for me to download from or browse and of course there is no warning message. It just fails silently.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  2. Haha you fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Don't fool yourself for a moment. Every world government outside of China aspires to the Chinese model - that the Internet is a tool of the panopticon. Every government on this planet is self-serving, hungry for more power and control, and is literally TERRIFIED of a free People. NO EXCEPTIONS.

  3. This is stupid by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is just stupid. What does the speed of wireless networks have to do with ANY of the other aspects in the story at all? At 4G I am not bandwidth bound. I can stream video at a far higher resolution than needed for a 4" screen. It has no impact on shopping, messaging, banking, etc. Further, what does the network have to do with the apps that communicate over that network? We tried AOL once. It had everything this story talked about in one unified place and interface. It sucked. It went away because that's how our markets work. People use what they want to use, which is typically based on what gives them what they want and the way they want it.

    The fact that China will be producing networking 5G networking gear is... inconsequential. I'm sure there are many, many products created in China that are sold at tremendous volume that the West does not buy nor care to buy. No one here is going to buy 5G hardware with built in Chinese Government Approved and Controlled AI to restrict communication just because they make a lot of them or use them there.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No one here is going to buy 5G hardware with built in Chinese Government Approved and Controlled AI to restrict communication just because they make a lot of them or use them there.

      Yeah, instead we'll just buy United States Government approved and backdoored chips to execute US corporate AI that monitors and analyzes our thoughts and movements for the powers that be to utilize and profit from in any way they see fit.

      Seems like hardly any difference between the two, except the US govt can put you in jail or do other things to you that the Chinese gov't can't do without somehow getting you to visit China first.

    2. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can tell the US government to go to hell in public. Try that in China, and your organs will be hitting the market that week.

    3. Re: This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's relevant because mobile data networks in other places couldn't handle the load if suddenly everyone was using mobile data for everything. Part of building new infrastructure for 5g is upping the load to keep up with increasing bandwidth usage, which could shift views about how we use the internet by making China's model seem more feasible elsewhere.

    4. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can stream video at a far higher resolution than needed for a 4" screen.

      Hi Grandpa!

      You may not have noticed, but 4" screens are o-o-old. The phablets we used to make fun of back when 4" was considered large have taken over. "Phones" with screens approaching (if not exceeding) 7" are common. And they have insanely high-res screens. The kids streaming video to these devices won't be satisfied with something as low-res as full-HD; it's got to be quad-HD or UHD or whatever the highest-res they can get is. Never mind that you're unlikely to be able to see a significant difference between UHD and SD on a screen that small, they paid for all those pixels so need to justify them.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I see a cloud that needs shouting at.

    5. Re:This is stupid by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      AOL didn't go away. It is still used by the less computer literate for just the reason you mention. I has everything in one place.

    6. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enjoy being blackmailed to betray your country/employer for foreign interests.
      At least the US government is obligated to give you a trial before it ruins your life.

    7. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, this is the most important thing.. to speak to a wall :) what's the point to "tell the US goverment" if they don't listen?

    8. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If mobile technologies were originally invented in China as a concept and developed into culturally induced products, the impact would be like that of the American fast food. However, 5G is an international set of standards that is serving many needs, many of those not related to Chinese culture. The network manufacturers, Chinese or not, have to include the various needs of the local market anyway, so that the local service providers can fulfill the requirements of the telecommunication and intelligence officials with the products.

      The Chinese need for exposing themselves to extensive data collection and control is little bit similar to the early stock exchange experiments in China. The black swan has not yet casts its shadow over the technologically optimistic citizens, but it is only a matter of time. The historical European aversion to data collection has been passed on at least partially to the US, but the quote shows were the concerns lie:

      Some Silicon Valley executives worry the divergence risks giving Chinese companies an advantage in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, partly because they face fewer restrictions over privacy and data protection.

      The rights and security of the citizens and human beings are not the concern here, short-term profit is.

    9. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means you can organize protests that maybe they will listen to. In China, you won't go to jail for it, you'll just disappear.

    10. Re:This is stupid by budsetr · · Score: 1

      Wait...but that means..OMG, China is AOL! This adds so much depth to You've Got Mail. A story of two unlikely Chinese lovers: one a traditionalist bookstore owner, the other a Communist Party corporate overlord.

    11. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least the US government is obligated to give you a trial before it ruins your life.

      No they don't, and in fact haven't since 9/11. You do know what indefinite detention is ? It isn't applied only for Guantanamo prisoners that are tortured.
      It is also applied to US citizens in the US mainland. People held in jail for several years without having their day on court. It happens to people all over the country. Even in liberal bastions like New York city.

    12. Re:This is stupid by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      No one here is going to buy 5G hardware with built in Chinese Government Approved and Controlled AI to restrict communication just because they make a lot of them or use them there.

      Sure, no one here will but telecom companies that gets a deep discount (because it's subsidized) on the 5G hardware totally will. Do you really think businesses are above this?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    13. Re:This is stupid by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They won't listen in the U.S. either. You won't be disappeared, but you will be pepper sprayed.

      But the point is if you are an American living in the U.S., a Chinese government back door and spying is less dangerous to you than a U.S. government back door and spying.

      The converse is also true.

    14. Re:This is stupid by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The problem, or not problem but interesting fact is: you don't grasp how backyard you are.
      America has internet everywhere (more or less?), but broadband only where it "pays off".
      The stories that "this city" or "that town" sill has no broadband, fibre, DSL - you name it - are all over /.

      But your country is doing nothing about it, because: private business.

      In China perhaps 80% of the rural population has no internet or is stuck with DSL.

      Everything they build up now there will be G5.

      Guess what kind of connectivity they will have in 10 years? G6 and fibres.
      In 20 years, G7 or G8 and fibres.

      And your country will still be stuck in the middle ages of "the internet".

      Must really suck to live in corporate USA as some call it.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    15. Re: This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your answer is to let the govt control everything?

    16. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5G will probably be cheaper than 4G - a few years down the road - like 4G is cheaper than 3G. More megabytes per dollar. At worst nothing will change much but it will be used for web page bloat.
      You will be able to get a 13" fanless Windoze laptop with a 5G modem and 1GB/s SSD, so you can download 3GB of Windoze updates while riding the bus without you realizing or caring about it.
      Maybe you're doing much of the same already with a Samsung etc. flagship and high volume data plan, but many people still are using some Android 4 or 5 piece of shit with little or no "data", because that's cheaper than spending hundreds/thousands to get that smug 4G HD unlimited shit.

      Further, what does the network have to do with the apps that communicate over that network? We tried AOL once. It had everything this story talked about in one unified place and interface. It sucked. It went away because that's how our markets work.

      That's why we know better and we run failbook, google and/or amazon or iOS. Oh wait...
      But granted we can say no to using that shit - till now..

    17. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually not that bad and when it is I can bitch about the country anytime i want. I am sure those in China can do the same...... right?

    18. Re:This is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teachers have had a fair bit of luck getting pay increases after striking and protesting. Try that in China.

    19. Re:This is stupid by sjames · · Score: 1

      The Feds don't pay teacher salaries.

    20. Re:This is stupid by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      If your country is part of the 5 eyes group then no, no you won't get that hardware in telecos.

      See TPG in Australia. They have pulled out of the 5g rollout here because huawei hardware was blocked on security grounds.

    21. Re:This is stupid by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      This is just stupid. What does the speed of wireless networks have to do with ANY of the other aspects in the story at all? At 4G I am not bandwidth bound. I can stream video at a far higher resolution than needed for a 4" screen. It has no impact on shopping, messaging, banking, etc. Further, what does the network have to do with the apps that communicate over that network? We tried AOL once. It had everything this story talked about in one unified place and interface. It sucked. It went away because that's how our markets work. People use what they want to use, which is typically based on what gives them what they want and the way they want it.

      Yes, you are not consuming state sponsored and approved and paid for publicity messages, especially downloading at a rate the government deems necessary. And you see to require a lot more of it, so you need to upgrade 5G where ambient speed exures you're seeing party messaging allt h time.

    22. Re:This is stupid by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      If your country is part of the 5 eyes group then no, no you won't get that hardware in telecos.

      I certainly hope you are right because we have fucking idiots in charge. They ZTE off the hook and tried to pay to make a FoxConn factory.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    23. Re:This is stupid by _merlin · · Score: 1

      I can tell you've never been to China. Get two people together over a beer or a coffee in Shanghai and the first thing they'll start talking about is all the ways they think the government is fucking them over.

    24. Re:This is stupid by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      A close friend of mine owns a specialist telco. The hoops that they have to jump through for hardware compliance are significant.

      The concern is less about whether a foreign country can snoop on data than a foreign country could bring down the network by changing settings in the core networking equipment. While it is possible to isolate an internal network device, a core switch has to have its management interface accessible, and it is there that the risk is perceived.

    25. Re:This is stupid by strikethree · · Score: 1

      But the point is if you are an American living in the U.S., a Chinese government back door and spying is less dangerous to you than a U.S. government back door and spying.

      That is exactly why I have a Huawei smart phone. If there is going to be a backdoor, I want the organization that has access to it to not have any direct control over my life. China doesn't care about me. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    26. Re:This is stupid by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Honest question. Would they do it in a room full of people? Would they post it in WeChat or QQ?

  4. It depends on where your history lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China has historically been a Technocracy, ruled by a small group of technocrats who apply logic to their decision making, while the West has risen from theocracy, where a small group of religious leaders have made decisions

    This has changed slightly in the West since The Enlightenment, but the remnants of theocratic rule still taint western decision making based on fear of former power structures.

    The West needs to get its game together or be beaten badly in world markets by cultures who hew to technocracy.

    1. Re:It depends on where your history lies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should review the history of China and Europe as well? The technocratic rule was a feature of only the recent presidencies. Most of the time since the Revolution and the civil war China has been ruled by ideology as strong as any functional theocracy. Notice the word functional here. The Cultural Revolution and the worship of Mao could be good counter examples, meanwhile.

      In the West like most other places the tribal leader, the king, the emperor was the sovereign, relatively speaking with the exceptions. The Church had the power over family law and influence over kingdoms, peoples and cultures, moving on to the middle ages. The way the religion tainted the decision making was through the religiosity of the people and the rulers themselves. It's really hard to understand the effect of religion to the minds of the people of that time from the modern perspective. The rest was power games, wars and greed. Little bit like in China and its centuries of wars before the first emperor.

      Superstition has a firm place in the Chinese culture of today, which also influences the decision making cross the Chinese societies. Just like it has had the effect on the Western legislation and sometimes imposed on other cultures by the process of colonization and missionary activities. Power hungry people call those effects 'values' sometimes.

    2. Re:It depends on where your history lies... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      The freedom to mention:
      Tiananmen square protests in 1989.
      Share a cartoon bear.
      That Taiwan is real China.

      Thats the difference between the freedom of the USA and the control of the Communist party.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. not designed for smartphones by Megane · · Score: 2

    Some websites still don't seem to be designed with smartphones in mind.

    #secondworldproblems

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:not designed for smartphones by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah-not-this-crap-again.jpg

      First world = the USA and its allies (back when they pulled their weight and weren't useless freeloaders). Second world = the USSR and its satellites. Third world = everyone else.

      The second world ceased to exist around 1991. No, China isn't a part of it, they broke with the Soviets in the 1960s.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:not designed for smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said schle or i agree with your US centric terminology?

    3. Re:not designed for smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give up grandad, your moldy cold war definitions aren't relevant.

      3rd world = Shithole countries with no healthcare, and crumbling infrastructure like USA.

      1st world = Countries with functioning social democracy.

    4. Re:not designed for smartphones by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is the US version of the mantra.

      First world: the developed word around 1950, that included USSR (and others).
      Second world, poorer countries mostly agriculture, less industrial development.
      Third world, poorly developed lacking infrastructure, starvations, dictatorships, usually no industries.
      Fourth world: even worth.

      Your "definition" never was an established one, and it is not the one the creators of the terms defined.

      I wonder why one of your age in our times still/silly reiterates that myth. Political orientation or blocks never where a metric for defining if one is a first world or a second world country.

      If that was the case, we only had first world now and China. Or do you consider Russia an "opponent" (why you consider China an opponent is beyond me anyway).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    5. Re:not designed for smartphones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is you who is spouting the myth. The phrase "third world" has its orgins in a speech about Russian moves in Africa, etc. and all those countries looking to whoever they think will help them the most. The definitions of first, second, and third world is fixed immortal, and no country can change is type.

      But the whole thing is obsolete and should be torn down as meaningless drivel. The USSR is gone.

    6. Re:not designed for smartphones by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      This is literally what First World, Second World, and Third World mean. There was no such fourth world. All terms were in common usage - except Second World which ceased to exist thirty years ago. This led people unfamiliar with the terms, but nonetheless hearing "first world" and "third world" erroneously concluded that "second world" must be some kind of intermediate step. It is not, it refers to the Soviet bloc. I wish you all the best in your ongoing battle with reality. Yours respectfully, a logical person.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:not designed for smartphones by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      This is literally what First World, Second World, and Third World mean.
      No it is not, I explained what it means in my previous post.

      There was no such fourth world.
      Yes there was, e.g. Somalia and Ethiopia belonged to the fourth world, now they are third world, Ethiopia even approaching "developing nation" status.

      Your definition is a retarded american redefinition of the original terms, and was never used anywhere outside of the US. I doubt it was the standard in the us anyway.

      It is not, it refers to the Soviet bloc. It never did :D It referred to countries changing from mainly agrarian to industrialized countries, which overlaps partly obviously with the former eastern block.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:not designed for smartphones by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You are literally wrong. There was no such concept of fourth world. Third World was unaligned countries, India and so forth. These terms are in common usage and for you to invent new ones is utterly retarded. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... "The Second World is a term that was used during the Cold War to refer to the industrial socialist states that were under the influence of the Soviet Union."

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  6. In the end, China wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the inevitable conclusion.

    Here's why: most people in the west don't have the first fucking clue what is at stake, or what they are doing when they use online services that aspire to the Chinese model of top-down central control.

    The internet is less free than it was in the 1980's, and it will be less free yet in the future as governments clamp down, and people happily cooperate as long as the next meme or dancing squirrel pops up on their screen. "I have nothing to hide". "I'm happy for the government to keep the internet safe for me."

    The genie is being put back in the bottle. That is something not many predicted could happen, back in the 1980's, but happening it is.

    It's the death of a thousand cuts, and China understands that better than anyone. They just have to exert pressure over enough time, makes sure enough tiny little decisions all go their way to add up to the result they want.

    No, we have lost the internet. The only chance is to start anew, and somehow (?) try to prevent the same fate from befalling the new thing.

    1. Re:In the end, China wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, the internet in the US has ALWAYS had government control at the very center of it.

      They kept a low profile and didn't show their hand, but any assumption of a 'free' internet in the good old days is just bleary-eyed sentimentalism

  7. Not all the West... by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe much of the West is a theocracy, but the U.S. government was explicitly designed with the concept of separation of church and state - we may be unique in that regard.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And, ironically, people vote their religion more in the US than in much of the rest of the civilized world's representative governments.

    2. Re:Not all the West... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Separation of state and legacy religions perhaps, but not between state and the new god called capitalism.

      In the same way that older governments promoted one religion in a way that screwed everyone, modern governments often promote capitalism in a way that screws everyone. America is probably the worst example, with politics dominated by corporate interests and corporate money.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compared to the left where EMOTION outweighs any amount of factual information...

    4. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is non religious but has far right support because religion isnâ(TM)t everything.

    5. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, Belief is an Emotion that is driven by your 'lizard brain'

      The Left supports Rational approaches that actively seek to reduce the impact of emotions.

      Just so ya know...

    6. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe much of the West is a theocracy, but the U.S. government was explicitly designed with the concept of separation of church and state - we may be unique in that regard.

      Explain that to the schools that are forced to teach backwards ideas like intelligent design as if it were based in fact rather than fantasy at the expense of teaching actual, fact-based science. Explain that to the places where teaching any form of contraception but the rhythm method is heretical, where teenagers are not allowed access to proper sex education and protection. Explain that to places where abortion is discouraged by killing people and firebombing clinics, assuming clinics are even allowed to open in the first place. Explain that to homosexuals who still have to live in the shadows or face ostracism and physical abuse. (Sure, things are improving, but glacially slowly.)

      The U.S. may pay lip service to the separation of church and state, but in practice the church holds plenty of sway over the state.

    7. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rational approaches like what?
      Chopping a 3 year old's dick off because he once played with a doll?

    8. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're saying that particular trait is confined to the political left?

      Better not answer that question actually. If you say "no" you're admitting your post was meaningless, and if you say "yes" you'll be a prime example of the thing you're saying the right doesn't do.

    9. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump has the support of Evangelists BECAUSE he has towed their line and packed the courts with religious people

    10. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The religious right is the very definition of belief (aka emotion) outweighing factual information. We've had several R leaders bragging about choosing their gut over sound logical reasoning. R's are the one's questioning overwhelmingly agreed upon scientific principles like evolution and climate change.

      We have right wing media because conservatives like Nixon and Ailes couldn't deal with actual criticism and needed a friendly propaganda driven narrative to get away with their massively corrupt enterprises. Its not surprising that the right is claiming fake news, they created it both figuratively and literally.

    11. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On one hand you've got people worried that people from enemy countries may need to be vetted before being given unconditional citizenship and free roam of the country.
      On the other hand you've got people who say that "if you *feel* like a woman, then you *are* a woman, physiology and genetics be damned".
      Anybody who still thinks the left is more rational than the right is guaranteed a boomer who doesn't know the shit they get up to these days

    12. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Nixon
      Anon, please, that was over 100 years ago, nobody from that era is even alive anymore, and they're certainly not relevant

    13. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, right, "in god we trust", "put your han on the bible and repeat after me" etc. etc.

    14. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An AC troll deciding to be blindly ignorant when forced to face the failings of the right wing propaganda movement that they support!!!

      OMG! what a sad, sad surprise ;/

    15. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An out of touch boomer who still thinks it's the 60's!!!
      What a surprise ;/

    16. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really ? That's funny, being from France my education tells me differently. You guys let creationists into your schools, and "planned parenthood" into your medical system. You don't get to feel smug about separating church and state until you've actually achieved it.

      It's also funny how, in response to "the West should pull itself together", you immediately begin by stating how special you are, and how it doesn't concern you, which just goes to prove the original assertion further.

      How uniquely American of you to manage to be so wrong, while still managing to slightly insult your allies and feel proud about it. C'est très Trump, tout ça.

    17. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. What a load of nonsense.

    18. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and right wing AC troll resorts to ad hominems, how unsurprising

    19. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rational approaches like protecting minorities from historical abuse by white people or stopping rowing gangs of raping men from abusing women.

    20. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey grandpa, your COBOL code finally compiled what are you doing still reading /. ?!

      Your pension is worthless, your 401K is non-existent, you are upside-down on mortgage ever since 2009, and medical bills are piling up. You will die at the keyboard, writing shitty code for a company that treats you like shit, working 80 hours a day including holidays. Your kids won't speak to you, and your wife would sleep with everyone else but you, but you are too poor to afford divorce.

    21. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe much of the West is a theocracy, but the U.S. government was explicitly designed with the concept of separation of church and state - we may be unique in that regard.

      Then would you care to explain to me why the fundamentalist christians are running the loony bin at all levels of government ? Separation of state and church is so quaint. It died 4 decades ago with saint Ronnie. All you have today is separation of state and church in words only. But words account for jack squat.

    22. Re:Not all the West... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      we may be unique in that regard.
      Sure ... how dumb are you actually?

      Has someone hacked your account?

      Half your posts make sense.

      The other half is beyond nonsense.

      Name me a a secular state which's population is more than 905 muslim? Wow, you can't. You fail.
      Show me a single european nation that is not secular ... good luck.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the right-wing AC troll demonstrates PROJECTION (look it up, I'm not gonna link it for your lazy butt)

    24. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shows poor reasoning skills when the only reason someone can think of for not killing helpless humans is religion.

    25. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How're those yellow vests working out for you?

    26. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is the same fate for you as well.

      Welcome to America buddy.

    27. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump got the job because the Republican Party has no vetting process. AOC could win the Republican nomination if older.

    28. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a single european nation that is not secular ... good luck.

      Vatican City. What do I win?

    29. Re:Not all the West... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more complicated than that. The US government was designed by a lot of people, with a need to appease a lot of interests, so most of the constitution is some sort of compromise for the time. The constitution does prohibit the government from either prohibiting free exercise of respecting an establishment thereof, but throughout most of US history it was very common for government agencies and officials to openly endorse Christianity - and no-one minded, because when 95%+ of the country are Christian, who is going to object? So long as they avoided endorsing any particular denomination, all went well. It's only in the last century that serious disputes arose because the country became more religiously diverse.

    30. Re:Not all the West... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The US Federal Government was designed to stay out of the way of the individual States having their own individual religions.
      Read the 1st amendment, it only banned Congress, not the States, from enacting certain laws infringing on speech and religion.
      Now look at current US politics, where religion plays a large part, larger then many (most?) western nations. I'm only aware of one Canadian politician who stated his religious believes whereas almost every American politician asserts their religion, and it is very hard for a non-Christian sect politician to get elected and it was a big deal when a Catholic got elected back in 1960. You have become more accepting of Jews though and it is mostly tradition rather then law that makes the USA a religious based country.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    31. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously how can anybody be this stupid. I would suggest you take a class on critical thinking but i doubt you are capable of learning anything.

    32. Re:Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from historical abuse? Meanwhile Clinton was fine with street lynching of blacks in Libya, remember that.
      I grew up in Western Europe in the 90s, when anti-racism had become the default position and the message was simpler, everyone is equal / race doesn't matter. Though in the US there was probably some "affirmative action" shit already.

      stopping rowing gangs of raping men from abusing women

      Police and judicial system deal with that and have been for centuries before twatter and SJW.
      I hate the whole hypocrisy of this system, barefaced yet hardly ever seen for what it is, like a naked emperor situation. How can you be anti-racist and racist against whites? Anti-antisemite and russophobic? Feminist and pro-war. Pro human rights and pro-war. Speak what's on your mind whenever, but we'll doxx you and blacklist you.

    33. Re:Not all the West... by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      A large segment of or population flat out disagrees with that assertion. If it grows, it will eventually become the reality as far as case law is concerned.

    34. Re: Not all the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another repubtard screaming "mahhhhh rights" While dealing with a public company. Idiots.

    35. Re:Not all the West... by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Especially that new religion, endemic mostly to the US and Canada, that doesn't identify as a religion. Its core tenets are racism, privileges and invented genders, it's extremely vile towards unbelievers, and it has taken over quite a few state and city governments.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    36. Re: Not all the West... by SETY · · Score: 1

      Thatâ(TM)s only on paper. In reality he USA is probably more of a theocracy than most (all?) western nations today. Even trump goes to church for show, otherwise you are unelectable.

  8. buzzword compliant by bigdavex · · Score: 2

    Some Silicon Valley executives worry the divergence risks giving Chinese companies an advantage in new technologies such as artificial intelligence, partly because they face fewer restrictions over privacy and data protection.

    Umm, yeah, and block chain.

    --
    -Dave
  9. Flip-flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The downsides (in the US): "Google and Facebook reign absolute, and they are watching -- you may have to communicate with friends in code."

    1. Re: Flip-flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the difference is in America you can CHOOSE not to use them.

      You choosing to use them knowing they track you, is ON YOU!!! That's the freedoms we have in America. Do something stupid all you want, but stay away from us.

    2. Re: Flip-flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're aware that Facebook and Google create "generic" profiles of you even if you don't use their services?

      They both have agreements with other sites you visit and use cookies, analytics scripts, and statistical data to observe your browsing habits. There's a good chance they could pull up your "generic" profile and find out your real identity within minutes.

  10. Paywall Articles Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, no, you can't work around this one just by opening a private browsing window.

    If there's a trick to it, that's not it.

  11. One app to rule them all? by hackertourist · · Score: 2

    No thanks! I don't want my banking app to do anything else!

    And websites designed "with smartphones in mind" tend to stink on a desktop. I really don't want my experience to be dumbed down to the lowest common denominator.

    1. Re:One app to rule them all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And websites designed "with smartphones in mind" tend to stink on a desktop.

      I find that websites designed with crazy ajax, json and iframes suck on both desktops and on smartphones.

      By comparison amazon's website just plain works with any browser I've tried. Why? Probably because amazon noticed that if their website doesn't work with the user's web browser, the user WON'T BUY ANYTHING.

      So many website designers (or their managers) want the latest *shiny* instead of taking a step back and thinking about what is the business purpose of the website.

  12. Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In China it is just a matter of time before citizenship will be defined by having a verifiable digital signature implanted in all people. That way the government can more carefully categorized and pigeon hole people. China has always been a society based upon a bureaucratic hierarchy, hell even the core elements of Taoism preach this.

    If any country mandates implanted "digital citizenship" chips it will happen in China first. I am glad that I will not live long enough to see this inevitability because the dehumanization of the human race is not something I want to witness, my parents paid the price of having to kill off millions of Nazi morons. I don't want to be around when the same thing is necessary to rid the world of zombie implanted digital humans.

    1. Re:Just a matter of time by Megane · · Score: 1

      hell even the core elements of Taoism preach this.

      I'm pretty sure that's Confucianism. People seem to get them confused as much as they do patents, copyrights, and trademarks.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have people in the US on their knees, BEGGING for a social credit score system, just because it means that there wouldn't be as much a need for civil/criminal courts... just a lowering of a score, and removal of privileges like passports, ability to drive, etc.

      I can see China and India having this done first, because their social systems are already stratified. If you are not Han or Brahman caste, you are gutterslime. Then, it will be done by repressive societies just because... you will see this in most Muslim countries, then countries like Venezuela. However, because this is an efficient way to classify people, it will spread to "freer" societies, especially ones like the UK with royals, or the US where you have celebrities (which most Americans consider royals).

      I wouldn't be surprised to see a place like Verichip mandating implants in less than five years, especially if the economy hits the shitter and wars or other pissing contests start happening, so the population begs for an illusion of safety, offering any rights remaining for that.

    3. Re: Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just as Stalin predicted. Capitalists have paid the Chinese for the ropes they will be hanged upon. For the chains they will be shackled in.

      Iâ(TM)m disgusted by the choices of the boomers who made this deal with the devil.

    4. Re: Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boomers are so retarded, they're still bogged down in 20th century capitalism vs communism, and state-planning vs privatization.
      They're 100% blind to state-monopoly power, which is universal to every country.

      Boomers are useless and can't be allies ever. They should just die.

    5. Re: Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citation needed. Where are these people that wish to live like the Chinese? Please do show us. Because I've never met one in 35 years.

    6. Re: Just a matter of time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is just as Stalin predicted. Capitalists have paid the Chinese for the ropes they will be hanged upon. For the chains they will be shackled in.

      Iâ(TM)m disgusted by the choices of the boomers who made this deal with the devil.

      Nixon was not exactly a baby boomer. He was however very much loved by corporate America because he was the first US president to see the potential of destroying the American labor movement by getting into bed with Communism for the sake of cheap labor. The end result was that to compete with the Chinese the US had to create a cheap labor situation with Mexico. Thus the so called North American Free Trade agreement happened.

      The end result has been an alienation of a large enough portion of the working class of Americans to allow the election of a moron who's schtick is playing on discontent within society instead of being a leader. I have no doubt that when he fired people on the apprentice he got a hardon, such is the nature of alpha males within the human species. If we get over this insanity without a nuclear war we will have done quite well.

      Being a boomer born in the early 1950's who hated the military industrial complex and all it represents, leaving this planet without having caused another world war will be a rather astonishing feat. My only regret is not living long enough to see a change in how we treat the environment which sustains and created the human race in the first place.

  13. "You must toggle among apps" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because the alternative is, y'know.

    Monopoly.

  14. Google is used in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are businesses with legit licenses from the government that get to use VPNs to access Google Suite and other associated content for their employees.

    So China may block Google for consumer level, but it does exist legally for businesses.

  15. That's not at all the case by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Informative

    The right wing is hardly religious at all any more. If you want to look for modern day puritanism you have to look to the left, who are busy shutting down sex workers and decreeing women dress modestly, and do not allow people to voice open options on anything not approved of by the priests of the left...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The right wing is hardly religious at all any more.

      It's fascinating to observe the absolute and unmitigated bullshit you continue to post here.
      Good Job Ken, keep it up!

    2. Re:That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because the Vatican is now full of butt-fucking fags!

    3. Re:That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm right wing, but I'm also Atheist, so he was completely correct in his statement.

    4. Re:That's not at all the case by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      No, that sounds like a fair description of the right too. On the particular issues you mention,it can be hard to tell them apart at times.

    5. Re:That's not at all the case by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      See, exactly! While liberals are puckered up so tight nothing will fit. Partial proof is in declining birth rates in strongly liberal areas.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re: That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm left wing, but an atheist. He is completely wrong in his assessment.

    7. Re: That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, so there are no threats to womens right to have abortions. No overt religious agenda on that one... right?

    8. Re:That's not at all the case by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      You are one slimy little shit.
      You know damn well modesty regulations and laws come from the conservative side of the spectrum. In fact, you know you're full of shit on every point you made.
      You're just trying to replace reality with a convenient interpretation because you thrive on the confusion. You're a sycophant. I hope you aren't long for this world.

    9. Re: That's not at all the case by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Great, so there are no threats to womens right to have abortions.

      Only from over-reaching Democrats who decided killing babies after birth is just fine. Until that point there was no danger no.

      No overt religious agenda on that one... right?

      Religion seriously has nothing to do with abortion, it's a purely moral issue that exists outside of religion.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    10. Re: That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a load of this child molester defending the catholic LOL.

    11. Re: That's not at all the case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. A lying, child molester repubtard.

      We have the trifecta boys.

  16. China is incompatible with a free world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a brief flash of time when we hoped the Internet would allow people to freely communicate.

    Then the authoritarian regimes figured out that the people that run the Internet are not bullet proof and that people can be coerced at every level from hardware manufacturers on up to network operators to do whatever the government wants.

    1. Re:China is incompatible with a free world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a brief flash of time when we hoped the Internet would allow people to freely communicate.

      Then they did. Proving once again humanity wasn't ready for this awesome technology.

  17. China vs the Terrorist Murder Capital of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I would rather stay on the Chinese side of the internet, if such a thing happens. Have your every move, opinion, and comment tracked and analyzed by a paranoid country with state-sponsored terrorist organizations such as CIA? Fuck no.

    When China starts dropping bombs and murdering civilians and people around the world like America has been doing for several decades, then I might reconsider again. But so far, they are the most peaceful super power to ever have existed -- the historical record dictates this, not people's opinion.

  18. Author is smoking crack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story look like the author's a raving lunatic high on something who rambles from one topic to the next without actually finishing a thought.

    China breaking off into their own Internet solves the major problem of China having BGP routers on the Internet. Plus it'll free up a ton of IPv4 space that IANA can allocate elsewhere. They should totally do it. In about 20-ish years, their technology will hilariously look like Russia when they were deep in the middle of the Cold War. Russia's still recovering 50 years later from their poor decisions throughout that disastrous mess in humorously embarrassingly ways even stumbling over themselves in a race back into a new Cold War because idiots run that country. It'll be awesome.

  19. China basically has by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America Online

  20. Totalitarian Dictatorship by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China is a Communist Totalitarian Dictatorship with a thin veneer of capitalism.

    Never forget that. Never be surprised at the atrocious things it does.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Totalitarian Dictatorship by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They aren't even that communist. Lots of public-private partnerships though.

    2. Re:Totalitarian Dictatorship by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Make no mistake, EVERY company is beholden to the government in one way or another. Any consequential company undoubtedly has government representatives embedded.

      You are just being fooled by that thin veneer.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Totalitarian Dictatorship by aybiss · · Score: 1

      How is that different to how the US works? Mind your own thin veneer before you worry about everyone else's.

      --
      It's OK Bender, there's no such thing as 2.
    4. Re:Totalitarian Dictatorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the U.S., the government is a wholly owned subsidiary of the largest corporations.

    5. Re:Totalitarian Dictatorship by dcooper_db9 · · Score: 1

      No, China's totalitarian government would have collapsed if it hadn't abandoned communism. In the long run communism is simply not a viable economic system, but capitalism is not freedom. Capitalism is a socialist economic system that is entirely compatible with authoritarian government.

      --
      I do not block ads. I do block third party scripts.
  21. Users can say what they want, mostly, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On 4chan maybe... Try questioning current PC ideology in regards to gender and see how free you are to say what you want. I know... I know... I'm an evil person for thinking that most of them are just people with mental health problems that need help.... SHAME ON ME.

  22. Internet is not the only thing it wants to control by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    All mosques must fly Chinese flag along with any religious flags they choose to fly. All imams must be approved by the government.

    All bishops in all churches must be state approved. Vatican is ok with this arrangement it seems

    All Buddhist monastery lamas must be state approved. It has disrupted the centuries old tradition of Panchan lama finding the reincarnation of the Dalai lama and Dalai lama finding the reincarnation of Panchan lama. The current Dalai lama is in exile. Old Panchan lama is dead, replaced by government approved lama. They did not permit current Dalai lamas emissaries into China looking for the reincarnate. So Chinese government will identify the next Dalai lama once the current one dies.

    Now, internet? Why would anyone think China will accept an international control of the internet?

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. Pretty sure the EU has the Internet by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, it was designed to be segmentable.

    Just block stuff from countries that host hackers

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  24. Re: It really wasnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The internet turned whole generations into morans that know nothing unless they have their phone.

  25. Do Not Want. by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    The Internet in many ways is already turning into a shithole even without it being like in China; if the Internet as a whole went the way China would have it, then I'd yank it out of the wall and forget about it, it wouldn't be worth having anymore.

    1. Re:Do Not Want. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many of us are working really hard on Internet 3

  26. Re: It really wasnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lame troll / 10

  27. More US siliness about 5G by Antiocheian · · Score: 1

    "China aims to be the biggest provider of gear underlying the networks, and along with that it is pushing client countries to adopt its approach to the web -- essentially urging some to use versions of the "Great Firewall" that Beijing uses to control its internet and contain the West's influence."

    Pure nonsense, nowhere does China try to urge anyone to use its firewall.

    "Users can say what they want, mostly, and web developers can roll out pretty much anything."

    Laughable considering how gab.com was no-platformed for allowing "pretty much anything".

  28. The internet is a modern day, real life Tower of B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are seeing in real time the true reasons for the collapse of the Tower of Babel.

  29. Not my experience. by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Turns out the Chinese people are exactly like you and I. They use more than just smartphones... lol

    --
    [($)]
  30. You're a moronic know-nothing faggot Ken Doll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will always be consequences for your lies and propaganda nazi faggot Ken Doll until you die.

  31. oops, you're 'merkin, sowwy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couple of 'merkins.

  32. Obama gave it away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that it was president Obama that gave away control of the root servers to other countries. And as we said then, THIS is the very reason for it and here we are.

    Under complete control of others. ANYTIME somebody tries to assert control over anything, it leads to this eventually. That's why crypto currencies are always a bad thing.

    1. Re:Obama gave it away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that it was president Obama that gave away control of the root servers to other countries. And as we said then, THIS is the very reason for it and here we are.

      This is one thing. Something having to do with centralized servers; a broken model.

      That's why crypto currencies are always a bad thing.

      This is a totally different beast. It is a promising concept [decentralization], which can indeed save the Internet.

  33. Re:Internet is not the only thing it wants to cont by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    No worries, the next Dalai Lama will be identified. And most certainly not by Chinese officials.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  34. Funny by sjames · · Score: 1

    I love how the SV guys try to slip in a permission slip to violate privacy and be careless with our data. Perhaps THAT is why things fall behind. We don't have mobile payments because the banks are too busy fighting over whose fee will reign supreme.

    It's all a totalitarian play, the only difference is who gets to be the God Emperor.

  35. Re: It really wasnt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe you meant morons...I don't know what a moran is.

  36. Re:China vs the Terrorist Murder Capital of the wo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah you're right China limits itself to wholesale murder of their own citizens and the citizens of the countries, like Tibet, that they have conquered. That's so much better.

  37. Western Internet free for all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people have been banned (or shadow banned) from twitter, patreon, facebook, and youtube for wrong think (e.g. freedom of speech and other right wing ideas).

    1. Re: Western Internet free for all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are free to use another service asshole. They down owe you a platform.

      Maybe if your right wing ideas weren't so racist and vile they wouldn't be banned? Ever think about that instead of wahhhhh my rights and playing the fucking victim all the time. You guys keep posting the same bullshit that's been proven wrong over and over.

      In America you have choices. In China, your choices are what China says they are. That's the difference. In America if you don't want to use twitter you DONT HAVE TO! In China, you either use it or your social score gets fucked because what are you trying to hide?

      TLDR: you are a repubtard idiot who doesn't know the difference between govt controlled and owned, and capitalism. One day you will learn.

  38. Re:Internet is not the only thing it wants to cont by kbahey · · Score: 1

    And there is a massive push by the Chinese government to 're-educate' the ethnic Uyghur Muslims in western China, at an unprecedented scale.

  39. Re: It really wasnt. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    it's in the same dictionary as 'whoooooosh' i think

  40. Say thank you by gDLL · · Score: 1

    Say thank you that it's not the other way arround. If the state would diktate corporate interests you would be China. I like your kidney.... can I has it?

  41. glacially slow ? by gDLL · · Score: 1

    glacially slow is far better than black vans, son. Which is what we had in the 50s. Kiss the next dollar bill you see, it means you got freedom.

  42. Re: It really wasnt. by quenda · · Score: 1

    I believe you meant morons...I don't know what a moran is.

    Get a Brain, AC!

  43. Re: Internet is not the only thing it wants to con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remind me again why BDS isn't targeting China

  44. Disconnect China, Iran, and Russia by Nocturrne · · Score: 1

    We need a secure and anonymous internet where all traffic and content are encrypted and no bulk surveillance or government manipulation are possible or allowed. If the evil dictators cannot accept this, they do not deserve to be connected to the rest of the world - disconnect them. In reality, the internet is already fragmented anyways. Disconnecting the evil dictatorships would help to reduce the hacking and massive spam currently tainting our internet.

    1. Re:Disconnect China, Iran, and Russia by DamnOregonian · · Score: 1

      We would, but their citizens are worth too much money to our megacorps.

    2. Re:Disconnect China, Iran, and Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a secure and anonymous internet where all traffic and content are encrypted and no bulk surveillance or government manipulation are possible or allowed. If the evil dictators cannot accept this, they do not deserve to be connected to the rest of the world - disconnect them.

      Let's start by disconnecting those American bastards.

  45. finger print, retina scan, voice print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expect Microsoft and others to push the following to interact with any connected device:

    - Fingerprint scan
    - Retina scan
    - Voice print scan
    - Facial scan

    It'll be sold a convenience and security as well as a 100% way to track everything you do and every thing you purchase since there will be no paper currency.

    A dash of Big Data, a dollop of Machine Learning and you are now proud owner of a social ranking score. So free social ranking score fixers will sell you on doing government approved community service, going to the right businesses, avoiding bad areas of town, supporting big government favored causes, ...

  46. Of course the NSA isn't watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the NSA isn't watching so the Chinese Government spying on its Citizens is hugely different to what is happening elsewhere.

  47. 5G E by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    the superfast new generation of mobile technology called 5G.

    "5G E is better. It has more E." - AT&T.

  48. Re: all talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is to invest in and maintain such infrastructure? It's not as easy and cheap as a pirate radio. https://startyourownisp.com/

  49. Everything outside of China is just the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of the world doesn't exist.

  50. One App ?? by MadMaverick9 · · Score: 1

    One side, championed in China, is a digital landscape where mobile payments have replaced cash. Smartphones are the devices that matter, and users can shop, chat, bank and surf the web with one app.

    Sounds like Genisys.

    1. Re:One App ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Sounds like Genisys.

      Turn it on again!

  51. Rommance of the networks by MariusBoo · · Score: 1

    The internet long united, must divide; long divided, must unite. Thus it has ever been.