Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Buys Rights To Stream Chinese Sci-Fi Blockbuster 'The Wandering Earth' (npr.org)

An anonymous reader writes from a report via NPR: Netflix announced this week that it has acquired the rights to stream Chinese sci-fi blockbuster "The Wandering Earth," which has already grossed more than $600 million globally and hit number two in the all-time Chinese box office rankings since it was released in theaters Feb. 5. Netflix will translate the movie into 28 languages and release it in more than 190 countries. The movie, based on a short story by Hugo award winner Liu Cixin (author of "Three Body Problem" and "Ball Lighting") is set in a distant future in which the earth is about to be devoured by the sun. Using propulsive engines, humans turn earth into a spaceship and try to launch it out of the solar system and the planet is saved by a Chinese hero (rather than American ones as typically seen in Hollywood sci-fi movies.)

For China's film industry, the release marks a major milestone. "Filmmakers in China see science fiction as a holy grail," Raymond Zhou, an independent critic, told The New York Times. "It's like the coming-of-age of the industry." Two sci-fi movies, "The Wandering Earth" and "Crazy Alien," which is also inspired by Liu's work, topped this Chinese New Year movie season. Inkoo Kang wrote at Slate that the film "understands what American blockbusters are still loath to admit: Responding to climate change will pose infrastructural challenges on a massive order and require drastic measures on a planetary scale. Perhaps it takes a country like China, which is accustomed to a manic rate of construction and grandness of organizational possibility, to seriously consider how dramatically humanity will have to reimagine our ways of life to survive such a catastrophic force."

214 comments

  1. seems to me by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We could have made movies out of Niven novels at any time in the last three decades with similar "big engineering sci-fi wow" scenarios. A World Out Of Time springs to mind.
    I've read Three Body Problem and found it terse and unremarkable. I must be getting too old to "get" new stuff, or read so much all I see is recycled ideas.

    --
    Mostly random stuff.
    1. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thee Body Problem and its sequels are brimming with great ideas. Name one other occurrence of the equivalent to Sophons?

    2. Re:seems to me by drinkypoo · · Score: 3

      We could have made movies out of Niven novels at any time in the last three decades with similar "big engineering sci-fi wow" scenarios. A World Out Of Time springs to mind.

      Nah. Warm up with Integral Trees, that can just be one movie, no need to do any sequels, and concepts from all the books can be used. Then do a fairly faithful Ringworld, and sequels. Gotta think along the lines of what's going to look good.

      Speaking of Sci-Fi movie adaptations that haven't been made, the thing I'd actually most like to see is the Mote in God's Eye, etc. I mean, that and Stephenson's books, but I still can't see those not being mangled to hell.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:seems to me by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Numerous novels invoke deus ex machina under the guise of pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo. James P Hogan's Entoverse posits a universe-spanning computer network that communicates by some sort of sub-atomic phenomena.
      Maybe it was a ten dimensional post-biological sapient parallel universe that became conscious. This is all trite nonsense. To me, I've read all this shit before.
      It's just meaningless prattle.
      At least Rudy Rucker's "ware" books were hilarious. He had conscious beings that could encrypt themselves as some sort of particle that would materialize on Earth and had multi-dimensional time and could see forwards and backwards in time at the same time. Or whatever.
      It's all the same.
      Look, I just invented a 12 dimensional computer that's as small as a quark.
      See, it's one dimension bigger and one particle smaller.
      How is this interesting or a great idea? It's sophomoric.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    4. Re:seems to me by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      Most of Niven's works are just "wow big thing" mind experiments. But A World Out Of Time starts in the present day and actually has a character you can sort of connect with. It progresses slowly enough at first to get a handle on what's going on.
      I think that's necessary to making a movie.

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    5. Re: seems to me by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      Second vote for the Mote. Would make for an incredible film. Would also love to see Destiny's Road brought to the screen by a competent director. Though I suspect that the Man-Kzin wars series would be more up Hollywood's alley.

    6. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, we need to see an alien that looks like an elephant being stepped ceremonially as an act of submission to guarantee the source material isn't being disrespected

    7. Re:seems to me by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Most of Niven's works are just "wow big thing" mind experiments. But A World Out Of Time starts in the present day and actually has a character you can sort of connect with.

      The Integral Trees had a main protagonist, but you could follow any of the characters from the series reasonably. Maybe the dude who wears the suit makes the most sense. Ringworld has Louis Wu, I had no trouble putting myself in his shoes. In fact, now I want to reread Ringworld.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:seems to me by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was a pretty good roast, I enjoyed it. Better than your response, anyways.

    9. Re:seems to me by Aighearach · · Score: 3

      Integral Trees was a romantic comedy, I'm truly surprised it hasn't become a blockbuster yet.

      I guess they're scared to do romantic comedies that can be confused with sci-fi because of Heartbeeps. But that was their own fault; the trailer made it look like a sci-fi movie!

    10. Re:seems to me by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everything I don't like is deus-ex-machina

      Yeah, heard that one before. Guess what it's not?

      If you've decide ahead of time there's nothing new under the sun, you're not going to like anything. Sounds like an unpleasant way to go through life.

      Three-Body problem was his first book, IIRC, and he didn't get the hang of writing characters in a compelling way until towards the end. What he did start, and improved throughout the series, is great perspectives on how humanity would react to certain new technologies and new events that make us realize how small we are. All from a perspective very different from American and British writers.

      The technology in these books makes a solid attempt at not being science fantasy, but the technology isn't really the point of these books, or of non-schlocky SF in general. Good stories are about people, and how they are changed by events.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here we go, the Canadian cdreimer

    12. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      “Footfall” would also make for a great Hollywood SF blockbuster. But I bet they’d somehow screw that one up as well with lectures about climate change and toxic masculinity.

    13. Re:seems to me by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2

      This movie has been done already a few times, it's just that in the Hollywood versions, the Chinese guy who wants to kill billions in the name of his extreme environmentalist views is played as the villain, not the hero.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    14. Re:seems to me by AHuxley · · Score: 0

      Its content safe for Communists to watch.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:seems to me by dwywit · · Score: 1

      " Gotta think along the lines of what's going to look good."

      I think a planet-scale fusion pulse motor would look pretty good, but it just wouldn't work on anything less than a 55,000" screen.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    16. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole concept sounds like a great idea for a chinese movie.

      strapping propulsion on a planet itself sounds as hard scifi as an elevator through the earth sounds..

      like, it don't see how its an unique chinese angle to throw out any sense.

    17. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree that it is a new book problem.
      His "the dark forest" book makes the mistake of starting in the current time, and is simply boring and displays a seriously warped world view (US and Russia the big space powers and maybe the EU but totally not China - WTF?) bad examples (Afghanistan I think?) of the US toppling other governments (does he not know they did militarily overthrow actual democratic governments??).
      It got a lot better, but how seriously can you take an author so boldly displaying utter ignorance and possibly bias? (ok, the latter most authors are good at, so maybe it's fair enough)

    18. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does he not know they did militarily overthrow actual democratic governments

      Yeah they totally overthrew the democratic government of Germany, the fuckers.

    19. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is the aliens need to be far-left LGBT extremists or Hollywood won't produce it. China doesn't have Democratic Party so they're free to make great movies.

    20. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, I don't think it was at that point, plus there was a war going on.
      I admit I was more thinking of questionable involvements in Panama and Honduras, but that I seem to have misremembered some facts.
      Still, surely Iraq would have been a better example than Afghanistan? The latter was far more countries than just the US.

    21. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is, that Yes. three body problem is garbage.

      But his later works are better?

      But instead of saying that, you're pretending that your vapid pseudo-intellectual commentary has value?

    22. Re:seems to me by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 2

      +4 interesting comments... You?

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    23. Re:seems to me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Niven's works tend to focus on the practical implications of hard sci-fi concepts, such as unmanaged ring-world societies or how humans could live on integral trees. No-one has really managed to bring that sort of thing to the screen so far. It's difficult to do that much world-building in a 2 hour movie, so maybe a miniseries would be a better option.

      It's going to be hard though, especially these days when we have reached a kind of CGI saturation where it's difficult to make anything look actually impressive any more.

      Well, the the other issue with Ringworld is the amount of casual sex in it, which is somewhat important to the plot. It's not so much the depiction of sex on screen, it's the way it is portrayed as a mixture of consequence/risk free fun and currency that the main character participates in without any apparent second thought.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    24. Re:seems to me by Danathar · · Score: 1

      You must hate a huge swath of scifi.....

    25. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, I just invented a 12 dimensional computer that's as small as a quark.
      See, it's one dimension bigger and one particle smaller.

      Moore's Law at its finest!

    26. Re:seems to me by Toad-san · · Score: 1

      And the "Rings" series doesn't come to mind?

      Or how about the Kzin?

    27. Re:seems to me by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      all I see is recycled ideas.

      Including this one; Stanley Schmidt did it back in the 1970s with his "Lifeboat Earth" series of novels.

    28. Re:seems to me by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      More recently Passengers, which was supposed to be a romantic movie but ended up being creepy. Both sci-fi fans and romance fans were disappointed.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Creimer gave $71 to Second Harvest Food Bank to stick it to VOX Media and The Verge. #SomethingPositive

    30. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does a working poor afford 71$ to spare
      you should make a video about living frugally chris
      because you have managed to survive despite everything being stacked against you

    31. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      creimer lives in california
      we certainly hope there isn't another one on this planet
      especially not in the same hemisphere
      the tilt of the axis might change and the seasons with it

    32. Re:seems to me by syn3rg · · Score: 2

      Attaching propulsion to planets has been done before: Cities in Flight, James Blish, 1955-1962.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    33. Re:seems to me by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If we're gonna put stuff in other dimensions, we might as well make the second chronicles of Amber. Obv the first ones are better, but the second ones matter less so we should start with them, and if audiences get interested, then make the first ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sci fi doesn't play well with merkins - most of you are too fucking thick for it.

    35. Re:seems to me by lgw · · Score: 1

      If you're going to complain about a work, complain about the aspects of the work that are the actual problem. Otherwise you just make yourself look stupid. This is what made the Red Letter Media takedown of the Star Wars prequels compelling to a large audience: pointing out the actual problems correctly.

      But Three-Body Problem wasn't a total loss. It sort-of works as a mystery about how the universe works. It's a non-great book in a good trilogy. Fairly common with new authors.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    36. Re:seems to me by Tom · · Score: 2

      In a good story, the technology (or magic, or deities or whatever) is just a metaphor to transport meaning. It is there to serve a purpose to the storytelling. SciFi is still Fiction, not an academic paper written in narrative form.

      The main difference is that Science Fiction tries to not jus use technology, but use it in believable ways. If your story requires FTL travel, you invent a way that doesn't flat out break or ignore the laws of physics, but elegantly circumvents them, shyly dodges through loopholes or expands upon them with a fictional expansion the way Einstein expanded upon Newton.

      It's not the number of dimensions, it's what that means, which consequences it brings to your story. If you have FTL travel, does it have downsides? What happens to causality? How does it affect trade and cultures - which is all something we can take from human history, where changes in travel have also had lasting affects on nations. With a SciFi story you can put humanity into the position of the Indians without stepping on political correctness feet - what would happen to our culture if a superior space-faring race would visit us, start to trade with us, and begin to colonize the solar system?

      SciFi isn't told for the purpose of the technolgy that is part of the story.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    37. Re:seems to me by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to do that much world-building in a 2 hour movie, so maybe a miniseries would be a better option.

      In a movie, that stuff is the background. You can explain it along the way, or with some dramatic scenes.

      Well, the the other issue with Ringworld is the amount of casual sex in it, which is somewhat important to the plot. It's not so much the depiction of sex on screen, it's the way it is portrayed as a mixture of consequence/risk free fun and currency that the main character participates in without any apparent second thought.

      It'd be hard to make in China, but Hollywood should be able to manage it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:seems to me by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I think "creepy" is something of an understatement.

    39. Re:seems to me by gawdonblue · · Score: 1

      Integral Trees was a romantic comedy

      Starring Molly Ringworld.

    40. Re:seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, there is nothing new under the sun. A Bible author said that a couple thousand years ago (at least). You make some good points, but so does the OP and I share his weariness. Maybe it's just fatigue setting in over decades of the hype machine. Maybe it's time to go back and read all the really old stuff. I am sure thinking about ditching everything electronic for a good old detox.

    41. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US is the biggest aggressor on the planet. A lot of people don't mind because it is "their side". But the reality is the US needs to be taken down a peg or two.

    42. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was awful.

    43. Re: seems to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He took a loan against 5 years of his YouTube income.

  2. nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    which leads to wars...

    Stop with the limited geographical borders BS

    You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry....

    GET OVER IT

    1. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't be stupid. Nationalism is merely the radical idea that my nation has a good thing going and should be protected from those who wish to change that.

    2. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid. Nationalism leads to hate of others which leads to wars...

      Stop with the limited geographical borders BS.

      You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry....

      GET OVER IT

    3. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry...."
      Well then you should be able to make it wherever you are and shouldn't have to cross any borders, particularly those you aren't supposed to.

    4. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you tits not notice that anon is just reposting his answers? No, of course not, because you are all quite possibly the same person. Fuck my life, why am I even posting here? I guess it would have been nice if the summary hadn't spoilered the predictable plot?

    5. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid. Nationalism leads to hate of others which leads to wars...

      Stop with the limited geographical borders BS.

      You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry....

      GET OVER IT.

    6. Re:nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just extremist. It does not work!

    7. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well its also a way to sell something as new when it really isn't.

      like, come on, 2000ad anyone? however chinese movies don't need to stick into anything like physics in the slightest. world is a magical place to them. even in fantasy historical pattern movies.

      coincidentally if you want to sell an idea of a perpetual motion device i suggest you try the chinese..

    8. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah your crew is trying to redefine the word to mean that but the reality remains that nationalism has by definition a strong component of "my nation advances by tearing down others"

    9. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's the lefties that try to redefine nationalism as anything they don't like, so they get to call everyone else nazis.

    10. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a fucking dictionary retard.

    11. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid. Nationalism leads to hate of others which leads to wars...

      Stop with the limited geographical borders BS.

      You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry....

        GET OVER IT

    12. Re: nationalism leads to hate of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid. Nationalism leads to hate of others which leads to wars...

      Stop with the limited geographical borders BS.

      You are not better or worse than anyone else due to the place you where born or your ancestry....

            GET OVER IT

  3. Wandering you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of that movie where the solar system is saved from a wandering black hole by pushing jupiter into it...

    Saving the earth from a catastrophic force... laughable.

    1. Re: Wandering you say... by rworne · · Score: 1

      See the old movie "Gorath". An interesting Japanese flick where the earth is moved with giant rockets to avoid a planetary collision.

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    2. Re: Wandering you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the energy required is so vast that whats the point? compared to just taking a small chunk.

      I mean, wouldn't they basically need to use most of the other planets in the solar system as fuel?

    3. Re: Wandering you say... by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I remember seeing it when I was a kid. And it was the first thing that came to mind after hearing about this Chinese movie.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    4. Re:Wandering you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For this reason, God sends them a powerful delusion(operation of wandering)(planet) so that they will believe the lie.

      Mystery Red of the Great American Eclipse
      It has blood on it!
      ABCNews: Eclipse makes pendulum wander
      Sun researchers find strange eclipse reading

  4. "Riiiight!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is not sci-fi. with their organization skillz and ability to put personal gains on the back burner for a better society as a whole, all that is required is to plant 1 billion tree seedlings in china at the same time.
    thanks to newtons law of action = reaction the growing seedling will push the earth in one direction thru their roots whilst growing up and away. so if you time it right, you can totally push earth into a higher orbit.
    ^_^

  5. dubbed like anime? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    dubbed like anime?

    1. Re:dubbed like anime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dubbed anime is for plebs.

  6. Re: Yes we should all be as environmentally aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My thoughts, too. They have virtually made propaganda and lies into an artform. We are their economic butt monkey, and Silicon Valley loves their loose ethics, it's that simple.

  7. Occupy Mars by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

    This is why we need to colonize Mars, so when the sun swells into a red giant, we can survive the earth being devoured. Mars funding needs to be a top priority, before it is too late.

    1. Re:Occupy Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be stupid.

    2. Re:Occupy Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume humans will be around on earth in 7.6 billion years. I'd say we're lucky if we last for another 1000 years, let alone a billion.

    3. Re:Occupy Mars by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 2

      - I'm no scientist (at least in this domain), but I guess that when the earth gets eaten by the sun, mars would become quite hot. Wo what's the point getting there ? - as read in some other comments, I doubt there will be any human at the time. Which reminds me something said by Bill Nye I think, something like : we will never go to mars and teraform it, because we are not able to take care of our own planet.

      --
      Totof
    4. Re:Occupy Mars by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is why we need to colonize Mars, so when the sun swells into a red giant, we can survive the earth being devoured. Mars funding needs to be a top priority, before it is too late.

      A few billion years ago, "we" were single celled organisms. Likewise, a few billion years from now, "we" will be a completely different species, in the unlikely event that our genetic line still exists then. Why should we care about this remotely related species, when we don't even care about animals going extinct today, who are much closer related to us ?

      And "too late" is a huge joke. We've only been making rockets for a century. We can easily spend the next million years perfecting them before attempting to settle on Mars. Either we will get more advanced, making the job easier, or civilization will collapse, saving us a lot of wasted effort. Win-win.

    5. Re:Occupy Mars by quenda · · Score: 1

      And "too late" is a huge joke.

      Oh dear. You tripped over the answer and still did not see it.
      In other words, wwwoooossshhh!!!

    6. Re:Occupy Mars by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Oh dear. You tripped over the answer and still did not see it.

      That's because most people who say that are completely serious.

    7. Re:Occupy Mars by quenda · · Score: 1

      That's because most people who say that are completely serious.

      Poe's law in action? But that equally says I could be the one mistaken :)

    8. Re:Occupy Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - I'm no scientist (at least in this domain), but I guess that when the earth gets eaten by the sun, mars would become quite hot. Wo what's the point getting there ?
      - as read in some other comments, I doubt there will be any human at the time. Which reminds me something said by Bill Nye I think, something like : we will never go to mars and teraform it, because we are not able to take care of our own planet.

      Correction: We are less willing to experiment with our own planet. There's probably some counter to global warming that we could implement right now, but the problem is that we're too concerned that there might be bad side effects. On Mars you can hardly make it worse, so it's a completely different scenario there.

    9. Re:Occupy Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we will never go to mars and teraform it, because we are not able to take care of our own planet.

      Besides pedantic drivel, that actually sounds like a good reason to look into colonizing Mars.

    10. Re:Occupy Mars by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why should we care about this remotely related species, when we don't even care about animals going extinct today, who are much closer related to us ?

      Because there is no "we". The human race does not act as one, does not make rational decisions based on some overall plan or guiding principal.

      Given how humans nearly screwed up this planet and can't really be trusted not to completely break it somehow, those of us with a bit of vision and desire to see humanity survive should make an effort to get to Mars and live up there.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  8. Does the Chinese hero get any action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're always portrayed as asexual in Hollywood...

    1. Re:Does the Chinese hero get any action? by quenda · · Score: 1

      They're always portrayed as asexual in Hollywood...

      You mean the Marvell/DC movies? That is a legacy of the comic books, and Comics Code Authority, more than Hollywood.

    2. Re:Does the Chinese hero get any action? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over 50% accurate...

  9. It's sci-fi for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth doesn't have enough matter to produce a propulsive force large enough to get it out of our solar system. Even with a massive solar sail.

    1. Re:It's sci-fi for a reason by jostage · · Score: 1

      But the spacecraft can't support that long flight time. I believe that the future world can reach this level.

    2. Re:It's sci-fi for a reason by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Antimatter....

      --
      Good-bye
  10. Re: Yes we should all be as environmentally aware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy your Extinction Event.

  11. Chinese hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and the planet is saved by a Chinese hero (rather than American ones as typically seen in Hollywood sci-fi movies.)

    (or Indian ones as typically seen in Bollywood movies)
    (or Japanese ones as typically seen in Japanese movies)
    (or French ones as typically seen in French movies)
    (or Nigerian ones as typically seen in Nigerian movies)
    (etc)

    1. Re: Chinese hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What I found amusing is that the poster felt the need to point that out. As if we would all be shocked by the notion that a film from country x has a protagonist from country x. I can't wait for these soppy cunts to really start singing China's praises only to find out they're chucking Muslim villages into re-education camps. My God their SJW heads will explode.

    2. Re: Chinese hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...only to find out they're chucking Muslim villages into re-education camps"

      You write as if you feel that is a bad thing....

    3. Re: Chinese hero by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Remember, in 2012 the Chinese were the ones who built the arks that were going to save humanity. And in The Martian Matt Damon would have died without the Chinese's help.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Chinese hero by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 0

      and the planet is saved by a Chinese hero (rather than American ones as typically seen in Hollywood sci-fi movies.)

      (or Indian ones as typically seen in Bollywood movies) (or Japanese ones as typically seen in Japanese movies) (or French ones as typically seen in French movies) (or Nigerian ones as typically seen in Nigerian movies) (etc)

      Well, yeah ... sure ... but those are OK. Because Americans suck!!!

      (Well, I mean Americans other than me and my friends. But all the rest of them suck!!!!)

    5. Re:Chinese hero by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 2

      Well, it sucks seeing the same multi-million dollar faces in every fucking movies and all of the stories been distorted on some crazy success formula that always has to have an happy ending.
      Pretty much all Hollywood movies seem some crazy variation or juxtaposition of old movies.
      And about the same "multi-million" omnipresent faces....is there such shortage of talented people in the states?....meh.

      TLDR Some foreign shit seems better because of are tired of seeing the same "Hollywood winning formula" and the same fuckers in pretty much all movies. Some change is refreshing.
      TLDR2 "The Wandering Earth" is done in all the imitating glory of Holywood garbage, just not the same usual idiots.

    6. Re:Chinese hero by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Missing the point. How many Bollywood movies get a big western release with promotion on major networks? How many native English speakers are even willing to put up with subtitles?

      The last big French sci-fi epic was in English, to make sure it reached a wide enough audience to cover the production costs. The best Japanese movies tend to be re-made in English with the setting changed to the west, e.g. The Ring or Seven Samurai or Godzilla. Nigerian films don't even register.

      China could potentially change that. The money is there to rival Hollywood, and will keep growing as their home market does. Just like Hollywood tries to tailor their movies to a Chinese audience (like the random Chinese cities and kung fu experts in Transformers, or Donnie Yen in Rogue 1), the Chinese are thinking about how they can sell to western audiences now.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re: Chinese hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real national treasure that Matt Damon. Putting himself in so much danger all for us!

    8. Re:Chinese hero by maxbuzz · · Score: 0

      Thank you
      Very well said

    9. Re:Chinese hero by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How many Bollywood movies get a big western release with promotion on major networks? How many native English speakers are even willing to put up with subtitles?

      As cheap as most of those movies seem to be to make, they ought to be able to shoot the dialogue scenes twice, once in English, and then overdub them... the point being to get the lip motions right, not to do anything with the practical audio. Their pronunciation can be poor. Apparently this is something that's actually being done now. Or maybe they could just use deepfake technology to change the mouth motions :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Chinese hero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So watch something else or, better yet, turn off your TV.

      I don't like most format radio, I find something else to listen to. What a concept!

    11. Re: Chinese hero by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      When the Chinese are a funder for the movie, then they make sure there is a positive Chinese angle in it.

    12. Re:Chinese hero by denzacar · · Score: 1

      As cheap as most of those movies seem to be to make, they ought to be able to shoot the dialogue scenes twice

      Even at the cost of a Bollywood movie it still costs AT LEAST TWICE AS MUCH to film the same movie twice.

      and then overdub them... the point being to get the lip motions right, not to do anything with the practical audio. Their pronunciation can be poor.

      Dubbing costs money too. Bollywood "blockbusters" have budgets comparable to episodes of TV shows in US.
      And if you're dubbing INTO English - now you're paying American actors American salaries to dub something that no one wants to watch.
      Not because of dubbing but because of cultural differences.
      Hell, Americans remake British shows and redub British cartoons with voices done by stars whose names and voices Americans recognize.

      Also... Most of the stuff that works great in India would only register as weird or as cheap melodrama in the USA. Or most anywhere.
      Tropes are different. Cultural references are different. Language of the cinema is different. Think bright colors and all that singing and dancing.
      At best, Indian movies come off as over-the-top tearjerkers - at worst a movie comes off as comical when it should be a moving melodrama.
      Plus, it's perfectly normal for an Indian movie to be 3-4 hours long.

      There's simply no market for those movies outside of their culture.
      Unless you're selling them to a very niche market of Indophiles or people who've migrated from India elsewhere.
      And that market may be a tricky thing to determine - with India being a country with 30-120 "major" and over 1500 "minor" languages, spread across some 2000 ethnic groups.
      It might end up like trying to market a Hungarian movie to Germans - "Cause that's what you Europans watch, right?"

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    13. Re:Chinese hero by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Even at the cost of a Bollywood movie it still costs AT LEAST TWICE AS MUCH to film the same movie twice.

      What? First, it's only some scenes. Second, even if it was all the scenes, it still wouldn't double the cost.

      And if you're dubbing INTO English - now you're paying American actors American salaries to dub something that no one wants to watch.

      If no one wants to watch it, you wouldn't bother. And you don't have to pay Americans. You just need English speakers. In fact, it would be weirder if you used Americans.

      Also... Most of the stuff that works great in India would only register as weird or as cheap melodrama in the USA. Or most anywhere.

      People watch a lot of weird shit full of cheap melodrama here.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Chinese hero by denzacar · · Score: 1

      What? First, it's only some scenes. Second, even if it was all the scenes, it still wouldn't double the cost.

      Only all the scenes of people talking. And all the cover scenes. And all the scenes to recut the movie so it makes sense to non-Indians.

      If no one wants to watch it, you wouldn't bother. And you don't have to pay Americans. You just need English speakers. In fact, it would be weirder if you used Americans.

      That's a catch-22.
      If you want to show it, just to see if anyone wants to watch it - you must already have filmed it.

      Also... Indians speak English. With an accent.
      You're not dubbing it so lazy Americans don't have to read. You're dubbing it cause it sounds weird and confusing for those Americans.
      It's like American... but it's like how Mexicans talk. Only not exactly. More like how Apu talks. Only that's funny and this isn't.

      And dubbing it in non-American you're just asking for trouble.
      There's a reason British actors are THE go-to for villains, with their weird, non-American, "English".

      People watch a lot of weird shit full of cheap melodrama here.

      Not like this.

      India only got electrified last year. For certain values of "electrified".
      Needless to say... their movies are made for a different kind of an audience.
      And... Indian stories are... different.
      So are their family comedies.
      Can you even tell the genre of this one?

      All three movies are recent commercial and critical successes. All ranging around $3-4.5 million to make, and raking in around $15-30 million.
      Just releasing them in US theaters would cost more. Cause they would be competing for theater screens with Hollywood movies.
      While their entire take is less than a budget of a black and white indie. As in independent.

      Best they could hope for would be some kind of a digital Netflix-like distribution, hoping for their audience to stumble onto them or be pushed by algorithms.
      But that would have happened already, had there been a market for those movies.
      Maybe if more Indians migrate to US and they grow to be 1 or 2 percent of the population?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  12. Oh OFC Slashdot Reads Like Douglas Adams by Crashmarik · · Score: 0

    understands what American blockbusters are still loath to admit: Responding to climate change will pose infrastructural challenges on a massive order and require drastic measures on a planetary scale. Perhaps it takes a country like China, which is accustomed to a manic rate of construction and grandness of organizational possibility, to seriously consider how dramatically humanity will have to reimagine our ways of life to survive such a catastrophic force."

    vs HitchHiker's guide to the Galaxy

    The Golgafrinchans realised that were three types of beings on the planet of Golgafrincham: the leaders (or thinkers), the workers (or doers), and the middlemen.
    The leaders contained the artists and "achievers". The workers were the people who "did all the actual work", and who made and did things. The middle management was comprised of hairdressers, lawyers, telephone sanitisers, and other such "worthless jobs."
    The three classes of Golgafrinchans, as seen in Episode 6 of the TV series.
    The group of leaders built a ship and convinced the middlemen to leave Golgafrincham by telling them several different reasons, including: that the planet was going to crash into the sun (or perhaps the moon was going to crash into the planet), that the planet was being invaded by a gigantic swarm of twelve foot piranha bees, and that "the entire planet was in imminent danger of being eaten by an enormous mutant star goat."

    Be sure to sanitize the telephones before you all go wouldn't want a plague to break out here.

    1. Re:Oh OFC Slashdot Reads Like Douglas Adams by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      I like THHGTTG, but I always wondered why "telephone sanitizers" didn't fall into the "workers" category.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  13. Perfect for the Censors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sci-Fi allows to handle sensitive topics in the current Chinese society in a way that doesn't concern the conservative censorship, just like it did here in the other side of the world. As a sci-fi fan I can't wait to see what they transfer to the film next, and if they experiment with the deeper characterization and emotional motives than is the tradition in the Chinese movies.

    1. Re:Perfect for the Censors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      three
      two
      one ...
      and...
      CENSORED !

      you had to point it out and make it visible to them
      didn't ya.

    2. Re:Perfect for the Censors by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      In Taiwan people are free to enjoy different US, South Korean and Japanese sci fi plots.
      Where content is a product of imagination, freedom and creativity.
      Communist China has real controls over content, politics, what any approved sci fi movie can do and show.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Perfect for the Censors by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      I would think science fiction would pose a greater risk unless you always had a strong and benevolent government that could stand in for the party. I'd think the censors would particularly object to stories set in the future in which there was no discernible institution like the party. I can see the first question the censor ask is why are you promoting a future without the party?

      I would think that movies set in the distant past, before the party, would be easiest for censors, especially if they managed to portray the antagonists as enemies of the party. Probably followed by dramas set in any time frame where the dramatic themes have no political content and a driven by family dynamics, romance, etc. Although even then you probably have to mindful of the party's specific perspectives on things like sexual morality.

    4. Re:Perfect for the Censors by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Nope. The ROC/PRC have their head up their asses.

      = Banned Science Fiction Movies =

      * Back To The Future, Reason: Time Travel
      * World War Z, Reason: Zombies and starring Brad Pitt
      * Mad Max: Fury Road, Reason: Unknown, allegedly Dystopian theme

      Also note Doom 3 was trimmed because its 3 hour run time was too long !?!?

      = Banned Fantasy Movies =

      * Babe: Pig in the City, Reason: Live action animals with speech. WTF?!?!
      * Frankenstein, Reason: superstitious films
      * Alice in Wonderland, Reason: superstitious films
      * Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, Reason: spirits swarming around
      * Noah, Reason: depiction of prophets
      * Crimson Peak, Reason: allegedly ghosts and supernatural elements
      * Ghostbusters (2016), Reason: ghosts and supernatural elements
      * Suicide Squad, Reason: Violence
      * Deadpool, Reason: Violence, nudity, graphic language

      They also have a hard on for removing anything depicting homosexuality.

      The ROC/PRC censors are basically fucking idiots.

      /sarcasm Only in China are people too stupid to tell the difference reality and fiction!

      --
      Censorship is NOT the solution. It is precisely the problem.

    5. Re:Perfect for the Censors by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Is "The Wandering Earth" from China or Taiwan?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    6. Re:Perfect for the Censors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the Party doesn't realize that as they remove the competing messages from the consciousness of the population, they make the population increasingly sensitive to the competing messages, and by extension, increase volatility and a change of revolution. We Europeans have some experiences about that from the 19th century. One small passage of an opera referencing to the censored La Marseillaise in a roundabout way was enough to push Belgians to the barricades, for example.

    7. Re:Perfect for the Censors by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Yup. In other words:

      What you resist, persists

      By drawing attention to these issues they are ironically making people MORE aware of their stupidity.

    8. Re:Perfect for the Censors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babe: Pig in the City, Reason: Live action animals with speech. WTF?!?

      The Animal Farm reference must have been too much for the communist censor. They are still sore over Orwell's satire of Russian revolution.

      Back To The Future, Reason: Time Travel

      Historical materialism and the eventual progression to communism doesn't make sense in the world with time travel. So no time travel for anybody.

  14. thoughts on the movie by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know if anyone else saw the movie and would like to discuss it here. I watched it about 2 weeks ago in the theater.

    I was pretty impressed with the first opening scene, and the final scene where the dad [plot spoiler, etc]. Those scenes had the music, pacing, narrative that seemed like it was to the quality and emotional sophistication of like Ridley Scott or someone similar.

    However, much of the middle of the movie was low brow explosions, unbelievable story line, and cheap humor like it came out of the ass of Michael Bay or something. Such a schizophrenic movie production. Worth streaming though I think.

    1. Re:thoughts on the movie by jostage · · Score: 1

      Sounds great!

    2. Re:thoughts on the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, much of the middle of the movie was low brow explosions, unbelievable story line, and cheap humor like it came out of the ass of Michael Bay or something.

      Much like the changes Hollywood productions have gone through these days, then? Which, according to some, happened to make US movies appeal better to the vast Chinese market.

    3. Re:thoughts on the movie by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The total control Communism has over all content will do that to the parts of a movie between the opening scene and the final scene.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:thoughts on the movie by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      like it came out of the ass of Michael Bay or something

      So it's gonna make Netflix rich?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:thoughts on the movie by Stan42 · · Score: 1

      Well, I might give it a shot then, thanks !

  15. 1999 by AncalagonTotof · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of Space: 1999, where the moon got ejected from its orbit after the explosion of nuclear waster stored on its surface.

    --
    Totof
    1. Re:1999 by quenda · · Score: 2

      Yes, equally plausible. I guess "no studio ever went broke underestimating the intelligence or taste of the American public".
      And it turns out the same applies to China. (Perhaps just not to Chinese migrants in America?)

  16. Need a robot revolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... consider how dramatically humanity will have to re-imagine our ways of life ...

    No, it takes a dictator to realize this isn't a peasants-only problem: That wealth will not guarantee another disposable employee to supply the scarce, overpriced food, water and fuel still remaining on a overheating planet.

    This has been in the public consciousness for 35 years but politicians still don't have an action plan: We've just exited a decade of total dishonesty about the problem. The US still votes for war heroes and "tough-on"-criminals legislation, not policies that make the world a healthy, co-operative living space. Many US allies show the same not-a-real-problem mentality and laziness towards change.

    As long as it's cheaper to make new goods than recycle, change will be near impossible. Worse, the cost of recycling begins at the point of consumption. When it's not economically viable to separate food scraps from plastic scraps, separate daily dirt and grease from plastic bits, we are rewarding the have-it-now mentality of modern manufacturing.

    Maybe, we do need a robot revolution: Their job will be picking-up our garbage and disassembling it.

    1. Re:Need a robot revolution by UglyMike · · Score: 1

      I could go for that. In fact, wouldn't it be a nice idea to have one of those $1.000.000 prizes for creating a more-or-less self-contained garbage dump cleanup 'mechanism'? A bit like Wall-e on steroids? Little robots that sift through garbage, other 'robots'/machines to clean it if necessary and sort it. Include some disassembling robot machines that can handle GSMs, TVs, computers, refrigirators etc. These complex elements could also be collected from the dump for processing elsewhere. No need to have everything in one place. Even a partial solution would already be nicer that what happens with the garbage now. (a bit like that ocean cleanup boom they designed for the Pacific Garbage Patch. Sure, it is not perfect. Far from. But it sure is better than just ignoring the problem like we humans seem to be fond of doing...)

  17. Would love to see Ringworld by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't remember Integral Trees well enough to opine on its suitability as a movie, but I've wanted a Ringworld movie for quite some time...

    Are there any movies that have even had that concept, or a Dyson sphere in it? I can't think of any. Seems like there must have been some movie that had something on that scale, even if just in passing...

    Mote in God's Eye would be really great as well. So much you could mine from classic SF.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Would love to see Ringworld by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are there any movies that have even had that concept, or a Dyson sphere in it? I can't think of any. Seems like there must have been some movie that had something on that scale, even if just in passing...

      I haven't seen the HALO movie, so I don't know if they put the thing in there, but the games certainly are set on a ringworld.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Would love to see Ringworld by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The first Halo game is set on a ring, but it's a much smaller one - it's a tiny little ring in orbit around a gas giant. The Ringworld ring is approximately two AU in diameter.

    3. Re:Would love to see Ringworld by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Yes there was a Star Trek TNG episode called 'Relics' where Scotty was frozen in a transporter that crashed into a Dyson Sphere. Was a good episode.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://memory-alpha.fandom.co...

    4. Re:Would love to see Ringworld by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I remember that also (was pretty good) but I was thinking more specifically of movies...

      Although I can't even think of any other TV examples which is surprising. It's such a great concept it's amazing no-one has built more around it.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Would love to see Ringworld by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      I can't recall any movies with a Dyson Sphere in them, but Star Trek: the Next Generation did an episode ("Relics", Season 6, Episode 4) that had one.

  18. Like Space: 1999 ??? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Space: 1999 it was the moon that was blasting around the universion. As sci-fi shows went, the acting and plots were ok, but I could never get over the utter stupidity of the premise. No, you are not going to drive around the universe on a planet.

    On the Earth, just think what happens to the oceans when you accelerate. *slosh*

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by skovnymfe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just change the gravitational constant of the universe. Easy.

    2. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have it on very good authority that the gravitational constant can not be changed. At best, it would merely cause the computer to produce more erroneous results, then an immediate collision with Mars. To really get our planet moving, the only real problem is availability of propellant, to which the only real solution is to let gravity re-capture all expelled propellant, then extract it from the atmosphere, then reprocess it for use with the planetary rockets.

      And no: I will not say what my authority is.

    3. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by jostage · · Score: 1

      This is a science fiction movie, not a scientific documentary.

    4. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Sun would go red giant only in 5 billion years. Pretty sure if human society exists by that time it would be absolutely unrecognizable.

    5. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by mentil · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it'd fit on a flash drive by that point.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    6. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The odds are quite high that some catastrophic event would happen well before then, resetting human advancement. Either driven by humans or accident.

    7. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by umghhh · · Score: 1

      I agree that from certain perspective we (as a human race) had some advancement to report. But the gains of Enlightenment are under serious threat, at least in the West with all the gonad science crossed with marxism overwhelming every possible branch of life including science. There are some exceptions but there does not seem to be a possibility to escape.

    8. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I know, it's so stupid to think you'd travel around the universe in a planet. If you were a real pro, you'd launch the entire solar system in the direction you want to go. That way, you bring a nice power source with you.

    9. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shut up, Q.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    10. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      For some reason Gerry Anderson productions often used the trope of having characters who should have been experts act completely clueless for the sake of exposition. That and scientific illiteracy were hallmarks of their work.

      Nevertheless they were quite entertaining and the production values were generally pretty high. Personally UFO was my favourite, followed by Captain Scarlet which had the best premise for a kids show ever.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Tom · · Score: 1

      On the Earth, just think what happens to the oceans when you accelerate. *slosh*

      The dramatic changes of the entire process are actually a major theme in the story. It's not a story about Earth flying around in the universe and it just somehow one day started. The largest segment of the story is about how it was done and which massive changes to the ecosystem, the human society and the planet this includes.

      Liu Cixin thinks big in his stories, and you can't appreciate just how big until you've read them. He's a true SciFi author, not a "soap opera, just set in space" or "western movie with a space theme" one.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    12. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Personally UFO was my favourite

      I ended up watching a few of those recently on Youtube. A fun watch overall, if the typical Gerry Anderson ignoring logic as you say. Also, the constant pronunciation of UFO as "YouFo" always made me smile.

    13. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the Earth, just think what happens to the oceans when you accelerate.

      Amm... isn't earth already accelerating? (going in orbit around the sun? :-)

    14. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by jostage · · Score: 1

      The problem is perfectly explained in the movie, don't worry, give you an interesting answer.

    15. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by jostage · · Score: 1

      The "ocean" problem is perfectly explained in the movie, don't worry, give you an interesting answer.

    16. Re:Like Space: 1999 ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What drove me crazy was the leader of the moon base was always right, while everyone else was telling his plans were going to fail.

      After proving himself right three or four times in a row, don;t you think the other should shut-up and at-least listen to him first before assuming his plan would fail. Which they never do.

  19. ridiculous plot premise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The premise is so ridiculous, so I'll give it miss

  20. sci-fi movie by jostage · · Score: 2

    In the eyes of the public, scientists are often not good sci-fi movie audiences, they will pay too much attention to the scientific details in the film, and can not enjoy the story. But I want to defend this sentence. Apart from the cinema, how many opportunities does the scientist have to observe a future world? What's more, only good science fiction movies can lead people to think about the scientific problems behind them. The crappy science fiction movies are just crappy movies, and "Wandering Earth" is undoubtedly an interesting film that will cause scientists to think. But we need to know that it is a very bold and imaginative idea to remove the whole earth as a spaceship when the entire human crisis is facing, although from a scientific point of view, human capabilities in the foreseeable period. can not achieve. But film as an art, it is not entirely a complete reproduction of life or science, so although this film contains many unscientific imaginations, we still need to applaud. Science is the driving force for human progress, and imagination has pointed the way for human progress.

    1. Re:sci-fi movie by jostage · · Score: 1

      Some people use their limited vision to look at the problem, which is the most ridiculous. At present, it cannot be done at the level of human beings, but it does not mean that the future world cannot do it. Thank you.

  21. American movies are childish and pretentious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    And they're full of the usual old clichés; "Are we really doing this?", "You GOTTA be kidding me!", "What... just... happened?", and other childish pretentions, all to make Americans look like the coolest heroes on the planet. It appeals to the American intellect and that's why it's made that way I suppose.

    It'll be interesting to see a more serious big movie, and I'm happy China (and also India) are starting to step into the global movie industry.

    But, be prepared for lots of petty American hate and racism. Nothing hurts the massive, sensitive American ego as much as other countries achieving grand things.

    1. Re:American movies are childish and pretentious by jostage · · Score: 1

      Why is there no "like" button here? Give you a "like"~

  22. Roadside Picnic by mentil · · Score: 1

    This Liu Cixin sounds like the brothers Strugatsky of China.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  23. Re:GNAA pumping white asses full of nigger cum, FE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you guys write some new ad copy? Steve Jobs isn't even alive anymore.

  24. Re: Yes we should all be as environmentally aware by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    You mean exactly as the US have? I think the US is much better at telling lies and pushing propaganda into the world.. So before starting pointing fingers, look to yourself.

  25. Blockbuster? Firecracker of extreme force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember what used to be a blockbuster. Looked like a cube, wrapped in twine, loaded with TNT... or maybe black powder. Used to pay a mark for those babies. Lost of few eyes and fingers and toes with those babies. Motherfuckin T.N.T. It's Dyn-o-mite! babies.

  26. Remake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was an old sci-fi about the struggle to build giant thrusters in Antarctica to push the earth out of the way of life killing asteroid.
    Forgot the name though.

  27. Feersum Endjinn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who aren't satisfied with moving the Earth can still read Feersum Enjinn by Iain M. Banks (or at least the parts that aren't a mix of gibberish and Cockney) in which someone has left the residents of a cyber-feudalistic Earth a way to move their solar system.

    Moving a solar system naturally starts from moving the star, and in the story Banks tells, only the activation of the process is depicted. The end result will take a while to accomplish.

  28. Would'a thunk it? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the planet is saved by a Chinese hero (rather than American ones as typically seen in Hollywood sci-fi movies.

    What a novel notion - a Chinese SF thriller would have a Chinese hero, unlike American SF thrillers, which have...American heroes....

    Yeah, we're supposed to be really surprised that Chinese movies have Chinese heroes, and be really appalled that American movies have American heroes.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    1. Re:Would'a thunk it? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we're supposed to be really surprised that Chinese movies have Chinese heroes, and be really appalled that American movies have American heroes.

      Won't anyone think of the inclusivity? The alert has been sent to Brie Larson, and she's on the job to right this injustice!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Would'a thunk it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. The SJW crowd will make sure that American heroes are completely unacceptable within the next year or two even in America.

    3. Re:Would'a thunk it? by jostage · · Score: 1

      Hi, if you have seen this movie, you will not say that this is the story of "saving the world by a Chinese hero." In fact, this is the story of the world's human beings to save the world. Don't be fooled by someone with ulterior motives.

  29. climate change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come to think of it this one explanation is acceptable tho - sun changes its radiation volume and this causes problems. The rest of it is I am afraid not so clear cut. But hey - who am I little worm to question the green religion? If I am allowed to continue I may even claim reproductive organs are not a cultural construct but a real thing....

  30. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Text block of the post was great until it tried to associate "global warming" with "flying into the sun"

    Idiots

  31. I always took it more as chernobyl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The nuclear stockpile on the moon went critical, causing an initial explosion that propelled them out of orbit. Following that the ion fountain remaining from the nuclear waste continued to propel the moon out of the solar system where it eventually ran across all sorts of other strange phenomena.

    Really it was just taking the lost in space plot and providing it to a whole base's worth of people helping to cut down on actor costs and allow the possibility of replacing cast members as required.

  32. Watched the trailer by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    Just watched the trailer and I still have no idea what it is about. From some scenes it seems like the earth is some sort of spaceship (even more ridiculous than the campy Space: 1999), but in most of the trailer everything looks like very near-future. Plus the effects seemed uneven between trailer scenes, so I don't know what to expect there either. Not sure if its worth a watch, perhaps stick with what Chinese cinema does best (comedic fantasy stuff like the 2013 Journey to the West?).

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Watched the trailer by jostage · · Score: 1

      If you don't know what it is, go to the cinema.

    2. Re:Watched the trailer by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      I only go to the cinema when I know what it is and I think that there's a decent chance I would like it. Trailers sometimes help me decide, this one just perplexed me.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  33. Saw The Movie and Read the Book by DumbSwede · · Score: 3, Informative

    The book is much better, unfolds on a more realistic time scale, has a much more believable twist leading to people being unfairly persecuted. Totally hated the Hydrogen explosion at Jupiter saving the Earth in the movie.That said a great first try by China at a big budget Sci-Fi, as good or better than the average American big budget Sci-Fi. Not China's 2001, more like China's Armageddon.

    Please China don't mess up The Three Body Problem (they've already shelved one failed attempt). Despite a comment in another thread. The Three Body Problem is the best Sci-Fi trilogy I've read in 40 years. The book Wandering Earth pails to insignificance compared to TTBP.

    1. Re:Saw The Movie and Read the Book by Tom · · Score: 1

      It may have been because I read The Wandering Earth in a collection of short stories that is titled the same and after reading about halfway through without realizing that there are more, entirely different stories to follow I was going "what the heck is going to happen in the rest of this book??!?!" but I really, really loved it. I also loved Three Body to death, and seconded, it's right up there with the superstars of SciFi and above most of them. But Wandering Earth is just blowing you away with its massive scale and fearlessness. Three Body goes to a higher scale but only at the very end, where it's much less shocking and blowing you away.

      I'm so much looking forward to a movie. Can't imagine how to turn some of the things into visuals, but if it comes out, I'll definitely watch it, no matter what the critics say.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  34. Urghh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate sci fi movies try to make a plot when I know the physics behind it makes it impossible. No, you're not going to ever move the Earth's orbit.

  35. Not that good of a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw this movie at the local theatre. It's really not that good of a sci-fi movie.

    To start the storyline is totally ridiculous. A rip-off of Space 1999 (and 2001) but with Earth instead of the moon and the a bunch of relatively small engines (that apparently need no fuel) used for propulsion.

  36. Will not watch by TigerPlish · · Score: 0

    Will not watch. Just like I try to boycott films which have Chinese financial backing.

    Hurt them where they really feel it. If an American company takes Chinese money to make a movie, I will not see it.

    That simple. I'm done.

    My next phone will be a refurb, I will not take the First Hit for no phone company.

    Hurt. Them.

    I just bought a whistle for dog training. Went with Acme (UK), not HJN WGOW (or whatever made-up name shows up on amazon) I would've bought USA but couldn't find a single one.

    HURT THEM

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Will not watch by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Will not watch. Just like I try to boycott films which have Chinese financial backing.[...]
      I just bought a whistle for dog training.

      You sure did! And then you posted it on Slashdot. Tell us more about your dog whistle.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Will not watch by TigerPlish · · Score: 1

      You sure did! And then you posted it on Slashdot. Tell us more about your dog whistle.

      It's not made in china, it's nickel over brass, and I used it as an illustration of what I'm doing to put a scratch, however superficial, on companies who sold out their production to china to make a buck. I'll be using it to help a friend deal with his new Yorkie. But of course, I know you just be trollin', I"m just humoring you.

      That's my point. If one objects to a certain way of doing business, do not support those businesses that do it that way.

      Same with the movies. China-financed? Not interested.

      --
      The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    3. Re:Will not watch by jostage · · Score: 1

      Who do you think you are? "Hurt Them"??? Are you going to laugh at me? You are an adult, and you still feel yourself like a child?? the center of the universe?? Why are you so naive? Hahaha is so funny, hahahahaha.

    4. Re:Will not watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is either brilliant, or so stupid it hurts, depending on you knowledge of Dog whistles so for 1 well played, for 2, well nothing can be said

    5. Re:Will not watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trolling sounded like it was coming from you. Are you claiming you have no idea what "dog whistle" means in this day and age, especially since you were talking about the chanks? I heard it and so did poo-boy. Tell us about your preferred brand of rope and your favorite knots too. Do you find oak or hickory to have the stronger branches?

  37. Scifi is generally very expensive, and risky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scifi is generally very expensive, and thus risky. Now, if you make your universe the right way, are creative, and good with props, scifi can be affordable. Dr. Who was famous for this. The Twilight Zone was also good at it.

    Since it is a foreign studio which has spent the money to make the film, why not spend the money adapting it to the USA? It can be as simple as dubbing the voices, or it can be like Saban's "Power Rangers", take most of the footage, make up a new story, and create new, cheap footage to go along with it.

  38. fuck china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck china. This piece of shit movie will be at least 80% stolen material anyway. The remaining 20% will be chinese original material which is always guaranteed to be hilariously fucking awful.

    1. Re:fuck china by jostage · · Score: 1

      a poor worm living in the world of his own fantasy

    2. Re:fuck china by jostage · · Score: 1

      If there is no evidence, what is the difference between this and fantasy? You like to worry about what you fantasize all day long. Really a poor worm

  39. Chinese films have lots of Americans... by orlanz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but Chinese films have lots of American heroes: Ming-Na Wen, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, etc. We traded them for Bruce Lee! They weren't born here like Arnold, Van Damme, Bruce Willis, or Statham but all are American heroes. Thou some might consider them British due to when the actor was born.

    1. Re:Chinese films have lots of Americans... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Chinese films have lots of American heroes: Ming-Na Wen, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Donnie Yen, etc. We traded them for Bruce Lee! They weren't born here like Arnold, Van Damme, Bruce Willis, or Statham but all are American heroes. Thou some might consider them British due to when the actor was born.

      Mostly White males. That's racist and sexist. BTW, Arnold at least was born in Austria.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    2. Re:Chinese films have lots of Americans... by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Ming-Na Wen is the world's most famous Portuguese action hero.

    3. Re:Chinese films have lots of Americans... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      None of them were born in the US. You sort of missed the joke there.

    4. Re:Chinese films have lots of Americans... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      None of them were born in the US. You sort of missed the joke there.

      Whooshies for me! 8^)

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Chinese films have lots of Americans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't feel bad, it was a terrible attempt at a joke

  40. Finished it for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Perhaps it takes a country like China, which is accustomed to a manic rate of construction and grandness of organizational possibility"

    Along with abysmal human rights, concentration/reducation camps for those who don't believe the party line, horrible pollution, and construction standards so bad that entire buildings tip over, and roads collapse because they were built with trash filler...

    If China tried to save the earth it's likely the (remaining) citizens would have wished they burned in the sun.

  41. Seriously? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
    " and the planet is saved by a Chinese hero (rather than American ones as typically seen in Hollywood sci-fi movies.)"

    What??? Not a strong woman hero? Is there no Chinese Brie Larson available?

    Sigh.... Racism, amirite? Why would they need to take a completely gratuitous snipe there?

    It's a Chinese Sci-Fi movie for crissakes. It would be friggin' weird if the hero wasn't Chinese.

    If we're playing identity politics, Garret Wang very often played the hero in ST-Voyager.

    But of course, American media is consumed with racism and sexism in the guise of anti-sexism and anti-racism.

    Now to the movie - I am pretty stoked to see a Sci-Fi movie from a different culture. It's on my must see list.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Seriously? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Why was the internet up in arms about ScarJo playing the title character of Ghost in the Shell, but nobody seems to mind Rosa Salazar playing the title character in Alita?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  42. Was the video content set there though? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I knew the original game was set on a Ring, but was any of the video content set there? All I can remember was Forward Unto Dawn which I could have sworn was set on a planet. Was there some other movie?

    There's a live action TV show coming out, but for me I was thinking mostly of movies...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. This story has been done before by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    Stanley Schmidt told a very similar sotry in "The Sins of the Fathers", and "Lifeboat Earth"...and, although I haven't read the short story or seen the series described here, I suspect he did a better job of it.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  44. Don't pay for it -- just take it by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    What's good for the goose .....

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  45. The War Against the Chtorr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The War Against the Chtorr is a series I would watch.

    The more I learned about The Three Body Problem, the less I wanted to read/watch it. Seems like a lot of hand-waving introduced as characters make meaningless decisions about the last "mysterious" event or imminent threat.

  46. What a load of bollock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...understands what American blockbusters are still loath to admit: Responding to climate change will pose infrastructural challenges on a massive order and require drastic measures on a planetary scale. Perhaps it takes a country like China, which is accustomed to a manic rate of construction and grandness of organizational possibility, to seriously consider how dramatically humanity will have to reimagine our ways of life to survive such a catastrophic force."

    Really? I though it was just a fucking movie based on a sci-fi writings. Where do you draw that sort of hyperbole?

  47. The world's most boring faggot above me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kendall truly you have zero life and will die an adolescent faggot.

  48. Boycott China by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Boycott Chinese culture, Chinese brands, Chinese fooda

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    1. Re:Boycott China by jostage · · Score: 1

      Caught a racially discriminating patient

  49. Hear Here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been a huge fan of hers. I can't decide if my favorite is Pretty in Pink Noise, Sixteen Candlepower, or The Breakfast Cube.

  50. Let normal people evaluate movies by jostage · · Score: 1

    Obviously, just a movie, there is a bunch of racial discrimination jumping out.

    Some people like a lemon, they can smell a sour smell across the screen.

    A poor pity that has been blinded by hatred.

  51. cry moar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    awwww. Orange Fan Sad?

  52. Is it Rotten Slashdomatoes? by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

    Let's begin movies rating on Slashdot. :)

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  53. nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0