Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Will Now Pester Windows 7 Users To Upgrade To Windows 10 With Pop-ups (betanews.com)

Mark Wilson writes: Anyone who is still using Windows 7 doesn't have much longer until the operating system is no longer supported by Microsoft. Come January 14, 2020 only those enterprise customers who are willing to pay for Extended Security Updates will receive any kind of support. Microsoft has already done a lot to encourage Windows 7 diehards to make the move to Windows 10, and now it is stepping things up a gear. Throughout 2019, the company will show pop-up notifications in Windows 7 about making the switch to the latest version of Windows.

140 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. The company will, but I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because I turned off updates years ago.

    1. Re:The company will, but I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They try, but I'm letting the "You May Be A Victim" message stay as a badge of honor.

      I am the victim; I have a Windows box after all. I'm not about to pay the mugger to rape me too.

    2. Re:The company will, but I won't by supremebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't remember the Windows XP update warning messages being all that effective, either. I just disabled them, and then hacked my Windows XP box into thinking that it was a POSReady 2009 system to get another 5 years worth of updates.

      POSReady 7 still gets updates until 2021. I wonder if that same registry hack will still work...

    3. Re:The company will, but I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I also run Windows XP with POS registry hack for updates but the problem is that most software has stopped supporting XP. So I had to move to 7. It was painful because OS takes so much more space than XP. I only run Windows on VMs so I'm not that concerned about vulnerabilities. I always restore from clean snapshot.

      Never noticed any nagging on XP but that's probably because I blacklisted the MS patches that added this awesome "feature". It will probably be similar in Windows 7.

    4. Re:The company will, but I won't by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Because I turned off updates years ago.

      Popup dialog decorated with Clippy says:

      Hey, it looks like you haven't yet upgraded to Windows 10! I'm from Microsoft and I'm here to help you!

      To automatically upgrade to Windows 10 do any one of the following:
      * Click Yes, I want to upgrade!
      * Click No, I do not want to upgrade
      * Click the X to close this popup
      * Immediately pull the computer's power cord from the electrical outlet to have Windows 10 automatically installed at the next reboot -- for your convenience!

      With Windows 10, nothing can go wrong. Nothing can go wrong. Nothing can go. thing can go wrong. go wrong.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    5. Re:The company will, but I won't by exomondo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      macOS is just as bad, it does exactly the same thing if you don't upgrade. Periodically popping up a notification in the top right hand screen which, unlike most notifications that display there, you can't simply hit "Dismiss", the only options are "Install" and "Details", the latter opens up the update in the App Store program.

    6. Re: The company will, but I won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MacOS isnâ(TM)t that bad. Office 365 with its daily fucking nagging to turn on auto updates reminds me how much I hate the Microsoft Windows experience. Sorry, taking away your execute permissions... I got burnt by the Office update in December which totally broke message drag and drop in Outlook. Microsoft support had no solution and ignored multiple requests to give me the installer for the previous version that worked. So no, I will not auto update if the current version is working for me. Continuous deployment is a broken fad that leads to bad experiences and a lower average quality of software.

    7. Re:The company will, but I won't by nukenerd · · Score: 2

      Because I turned off updates years ago.

      So did I. I can cope with malware and hackers better than I can cope with Microsoft.

    8. Re:The company will, but I won't by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      It has the "Remind me" Option. Yes, it does suck that the most you can defer it is "Remind me tomorrow"; but it does only ask once per day, and is happy to be dismissed like that forever.

      No, that's for general updates, not for the OS update which only has the options to either "Install" or "Details". Perhaps 10.9 doesn't have it but certainly that is how 10.12 behaves.

    9. Re:The company will, but I won't by exomondo · · Score: 1

      2009 just called and solved your problem for you... go to Preferences in the App Store and untick: Automatically check for updates.

      But I don't want to disable updates. I just don't want to upgrade the OS, if there's a setting for that somewhere it's not clear and it's certainly not presented simply like normal updates are where you can just dismiss and say 'remind me at X time'.

    10. Re:The company will, but I won't by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ClassicShell is free.

      --
      No sig today...
    11. Re:The company will, but I won't by mathew7 · · Score: 1

      but the problem is that most software has stopped supporting XP. So I had to move to 7.

      These are my concerns also. The Windows I actively use is just for games (7....tried 10 after release and reverted due to forced updates). But I expect the installers (and even games themselfes) to start not working.
      PS: I still have 2 laptops and 1 tablet with W10, but I use them less than 1h/month....and that is to do the updates before leaving somewhere. I actually use them with Ubuntu flavors.

    12. Re:The company will, but I won't by mathew7 · · Score: 1

      yes it nags you endlessly.

      I see this on Android also (well, at least Sony's Android), but I am still confident that it DOES NOT DOWNLOAD without my permission. Wasn't W10 "free" upgrade problematic? Like, in the latst "free" months, when you got the popup, it already downloaded 3GB? Another difference to Android is that the update checking is actually CPU hog (checking which updates are installed or not).
      So if I just start my PC and immediately start a game, it would download and install while gaming (disclaimer: this happened to me in the 1st month of W10 release....I did not experience this later by NOT USING W10).
      I don't mind updating critical components (like kernel, firewall) which COULD be very small (at most 2-5MB). But my problem is that they force updates like (example) Paint or Edge, which I actually don't use (yes, I know Edge is critical update for many non-tech people). The point is that I am not allowed to choose what updates to install and when (+ we saw what MS considered critical with the "free" upgrades). Maybe I need my PC to work during a critical week or month. Besindes interrupting my workflow, the risk or being exploited is smaller than getting a bad update.

    13. Re:The company will, but I won't by mathew7 · · Score: 1

      WHEN games stop running under W7....W8.1 is planned (already have the license...but too lazy to reinstall).
      Hopefully, by the time W8.1 gets the same treatment, my games would run under linux (go Valve go....)
      Oh! yeah!...I also did not update W7 since installing it (last year, when I got my 8700K and worked around the "new CPUs" constraint).

    14. Re:The company will, but I won't by Camarillo+Brillo · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute....Am I to understand that Microstuff actually provided support for Windows 7? Hmmm, I would have never thought of asking them for help. Its worked well for almost 10 years now with no crashes, or security issues for me. I don't see any great loss in MS dropping support.

    15. Re:The company will, but I won't by bobby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't remember the Windows XP update warning messages being all that effective, either. I just disabled them, and then hacked my Windows XP box into thinking that it was a POSReady 2009 system to get another 5 years worth of updates.

      Not sure about 2014, but XP _still_ gets lots of updates. If they keep this up, someday it might be a complete mature product!

    16. Re:The company will, but I won't by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      The point is that I am not allowed to choose what updates to install and when

      But if the choice were left to people like you, things wouldn't get tested for the enterprise users.

  2. Sounds like a lawsuit by Rockoon · · Score: 2

    Maybe not in America, but pretty sure this will be considered illegal in the E.U.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
    1. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Maybe not in America, but pretty sure this will be considered illegal in the E.U.

      Curious, when exactly did they outlaw pop-ups, marketing, or advertising in the EU?

    2. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It should be illegal everywhere. Forcing someone to buy into a product they don't want is known as 'theft'

    3. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      It should be illegal everywhere. Forcing someone to buy into a product they don't want is known as 'theft'

      Unless they use deceptive popups that are hard to cancel again, it's not forcing anyone. Of course, I wouldn't put that past them, especially given history...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to notify users that the product is no longer in support and you may no longer receive vital security updates?

      For a company even the size of Microsoft, how long should we expect them to keep maintaining old software for? Should there be a team of developers being paid to make sure MSDOS 1.0 is updated and patched? GWBASIC 1.9 With NVidia Support?

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In windows XP case Microsoft sneaked in their adware as software update. I do not recall if it was critical update or security content.
      That has to be illegal.

    6. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      Even in the EU if you are using Windows, your obvious level of masochism is considered to be sufficient demonstration of consent enough to allow Microsoft to abuse you in whatever way it deems is in its corporate interests.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    7. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Also known as "marketing".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Time cost money, it is illegal to spend the end users time with uncalled advertisements, think free to air TV supported by ads, you have to accept them prior, so criminal act, they are stealing your time with their ad. Personally M$ and slimey worthless cunts and the only upgrade I am considering from Windows 7, is playstation 5 and a Linux box, with a switch for the monitor. M$ can quite literally ESAD.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    9. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      10 SCREEN 230
      20 CAMERA 255, 255, 10, 0, 0
      30 LINE 10, 10, 10, 1080, 1080, 1080, 3368703

      Your right it would be Epic.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Sounds like a lawsuit by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      The reason why you have more damage with the random faulty update, then with a security vulnerability, is because you are getting these updates. Your system isn't at risk from the targeted hacker, but from those scripts that in general try to attack as many systems at the same time. Even with a firewall, you are one miss-click from a google search to going to a bad site, that may have that vulnerability effected.

      Heck I once setup a honeypot on my home network just to see what crap is going on all the time, and they are lame attempts to get into your system every minute. Basically looking for an old version of IIS to be running or just an XP box floating around.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  3. There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Z80a · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Release another good windows.
    Worked wonders with windows XP.

    1. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or allow Professional users to disable telemetry and turn off automatic updates instead of keeping it to inaccessible Enterprise licenses. Some of us need the stability of planned rollouts but aren't large enough to get Enterprise licensing yet and the telemetry is a no-go for many professionals.

    2. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Release another good windows.

      Exactly.

      Windows 10 is useless garbage. Endless bugs, glitches, inconsistencies and a horrifically bad UI.

    3. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by gweihir · · Score: 2

      I do not think Microsoft has that skill anymore...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by ctilsie242 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just wish MS would release Windows 10 LTSB/LTSC as a standalone OS. No telemetry, no Candy Crush. Just does its job.

    5. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Z80a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't consider an OS that comes bundled with malware as a good OS.

    6. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by dryeo · · Score: 2

      Windows XP was hated when released with its Fischer Price interface and took a few service packs to be liked.
      Maybe in a decade or two we'll be wishing for a good Windows like 10.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    7. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly, release Win10 LTSC as a standalone OS instead of keeping it to inaccessible Enterprise licenses.

    8. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Windows XP was hated when released with its Fischer Price interface and took a few service packs to be liked.

      That was some serious My First Windows shit, but at least you could turn it off and just go back to the Windows 95 interface.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No it didn't. What worked wonders for XP is the same thing that worked wonders for previous versions of windows: IT was moving at pace and your 2 year old computer was a slow dog that needed upgrading. People got XP predominantly via OEM licenses, something that doesn't happen as much these days where a 5 year old computer is actually quite sufficient for most tasks.

    10. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      They never did. It took them roughly 7 years to get XP to a reasonable state, and that still required heavy modification to remove BS services that no one needed or wanted. Unless, of course, you wanted to do something like print to an HP inkjet/scanner combo that required an external security and some other module that no one outside of the military required.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    11. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Windows XP was hated when released with its Fischer Price interface and took a few service packs to be liked.

      That was some serious My First Windows shit, but at least you could turn it off and just go back to the Windows 95 interface.

      Um, not that I recall. The FP interface was there to stay, more or less.

      Then your recollection is wrong. It was literally a pulldown in the display preferences.

      It's been so long I don't remember the specifics of the UI, other than going back to 95/98 or 2K is butt ugly utilitarian.

      First you complain about the candy coating, then you complain about the simple interface that preceded it. It looks to me like you just want to complain.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    12. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Jason1729 · · Score: 2

      But whenever they release a good windows like XP or 7, people stay on it for 10 years until MS forces them off of it. There's no money in it for MS when people hold onto software that long. It's a lot more profitable when they produce garbage that people can't wait to "upgrade" from right away. Windows 7 is probably the last good windows we will ever see.

    13. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's still a significant amount of useful Windows-only software out there. The lock-in effect is growing weaker as other platforms develop competitors and particularly as online services displace desktop software for a lot of users, but it's still there.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    14. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by PPH · · Score: 1

      Maybe in a decade or two we'll be wishing for a good Windows like 10.

      Windows 37 (or whatever it is by then) will have to be pretty abysmal for people to start thinking that Windows 10 was 'good'.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    15. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by chispito · · Score: 1

      Release another good windows. Worked wonders with windows XP.

      I like Windows 10 more than Windows 7.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    16. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by dryeo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I'm sure Microsoft can deliver that.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    17. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Release another good windows.

      Exactly.

      Windows 10 is useless garbage.

      No it isn't, but it's fugly, has a completely shit start menu, insists on installing candy crush and it's full of "telemetry".

      Microsoft would gain more converts by fixing those few things than by nagging.

      --
      No sig today...
    18. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      They're already doing it. Windows 10 users wake up every few months to a message along the lines of, "We've added new features to Windows while you were asleep! Aren't we awesome!!"

      --
      No sig today...
    19. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Windows 7 is probably the last good windows we will ever see.

      Yep, that's my feeling too. Win7 had everything I needed and little else, it was perfect for 99.9% of what I need to do on a daily basis. So of course they had to shitcan it.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    20. Re: There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      On XP I liked Luna Element

    21. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      But whenever they release a good windows like XP or 7, people stay on it for 10 years until MS forces them off of it. There's no money in it for MS when people hold onto software that long. ...

      I think the solution is quite simple, and it gives them yearly revenue. Just make it a service to receive updates. If they changed me $20 or $30 a year to get security updates and bug fixes for Windows 7, I'd be on that and I believe a LOT of others would too. That way, I get stability and an up to date OS, and they get revenue -- a win-win.

    22. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      You clearly have forgotten all other version of MS, they ALL had some pretty signification issues at one point or another.

      Windows 10 is pretty good, most of the "problems" seem more intentional than accidental in that they are simply part of the MS future business plan more than anything else. Now you might disagree with what that plan is or what it means to you, but there is always Year of the Linux Desktop for you.... [sarcasm]

      I mean XP was strong, but only because it was superseding ME and 98 before that so if ever there was bad examples to compare to. Also they merged it with NT which was already a very stable and power platform. Windows 7 if anyone cares to recall was an unmitigated disaster when it was first released for the first year or two, largely because they rushed it out and didn't give hardware folks enough specs or time to develop any drivers for the thing. I remember being like great install Windows 7 and all your hardware fails, then eventually every time you had to re-install the thing you would have to visit every hardware website contained in your computer to independently and install all your drivers one at a time.

      So yeah, I'm not sure if it is nostalgia or what, but people have a pretty short memory of how shitty MS Windows was in various iterations at times... Only XP was the best, or Windows 7 forevar! I'll not even speak of 8 with no start menu and the whole forced apps bs. I'd say that XP was the best with the least issues, however as mentioned that's largely because what came before was terrible, and even then it was the first version with the old "you must register your computer with MS first before install" product activation bs which was pretty horrific the first time around. Replace some random hardware, re-register your OS, etc... I remember it would occasionally fail to authenticate and users were forced to physically call Microsoft and talk to someone to manually register your OS. Can you imagine that today? HA! Anyway it's all perspective.

    23. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Not just professionals. But more than that, the fact that they sent out the first version of Windows 10 configured to automatically send you wireless passwords to every one in any contact list it could find is the kill. Yes they eventually disabled that, but that still made it out the door. It was default behavior.

      The idea is to be like Android, ChromeOS or iOS, where the vendor is the systems administrator and you get to be fat, dumb & happy. With that move alone MS proved (like Google) that they can not be trusted to make basic security decisions. Yes, most users can't either, but I've never had anyone mass mail their passwords to everyone they knew before.

      And no that's not the only problem with MS but it is enough to disqualify MS from ever putting their computer (they administer it) on my home network.

    24. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 is pretty good, most of the "problems" seem more intentional than accidental in that they are simply part of the MS future business plan more than anything else.

      That doesn't make it better. You find deliberate, unrepentant malfeasance to be preferable to accidental, incompetent negligence?

    25. Re: There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Jetstream · · Score: 1

      Mandriva? That's been dead for years.

      Not totally. It has either been revived by someone or there is a new distro based on it. I forget which, but I see updates fairly often on Distrowatch.

    26. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by Jetstream · · Score: 1
      Since the new IE/Edge is based on Chrome, obviously the next Windows will be based on Chrome OS.

      Won't that be fun?

    27. Re:There is a quite easy way to kill win7 by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      No, however there is a difference. You can't say something is "broken" or "buggy" when it was designed to specifically be that way. You may not like it, and it may annoy you, but as the saying goes, that's a feature not a bug.

  4. HTPC by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Has Windows Media Center, with CableCard support, been added back to Win10? No? Then eff off.

    1. Re:HTPC by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      Try https://www.nextpvr.com/ what I wound up using for Windows 10

    2. Re:HTPC by Guyle · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work if they're encrypted channels. Currently WMC is the only easy turnkey solution for watching and recording encrypted channels requiring a CableCARD. The new HDHomeRun software "kinda" works, but it's not exactly living room friendly to use. I have two PCs running Windows 8.1 w/media pack for this sole purpose that'll never get upgraded unless a) it's added back to Windows 10, b) something better finally comes along, or c) it finally breaks for good. I'm fixing to firewall them from everything but what access I need to update the program guide and disable updates just to prevent any shenanigans like this from happening.

  5. "The most secure Windows ever." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >In a blog post, Microsoft's corporate vice president, Matt Barlow, explains that the end of support for Windows 7 means there will be no more updates issued to most people, and this is why it is important to upgrade to "the most secure Windows ever".

    Perhaps if people switch to Windows 10, all their files and documents won't get deleted after the odd small update. /s

  6. Security by forkfail · · Score: 1

    So, at least some of us try to train folks not to click on popups that they don't understand or expect, as often that enables permissions for malware.

    Now, MS is going to make an eminently spoofable popup as part of their release?

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    Check your premises.
  7. Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by crgrace · · Score: 1

    I'm a Mac user since 1987 and a PC user as well since about 1998. Also a Unix user since 1993 (Linux from about 1997).

    For decades Mac was miles ahead of Windows in usability, ease-of-use, and "just working". Sadly, this is no longer the case and now I will have to upgrade to Win10 kicking and screaming. Windows 7 is a quite nice system. I know how to use it by now and it doesn't have any terrible problems.

    I don't want to go to Win 10 and deal with the telemetry and the ads and so on (or have to waste my time learning to defeat them). I wish I could go all in with MacOS but for the last 5 years or so it goes downhill with each release. It is bloated, getting slow, starting to crash, and always asking for my iCloud credentials.

    It's frustrating. I don't really have a good solution at this point. Linux is out, because of specific software packages I use that do not support Linux. I use Linux at work but it isn't appropriate for my home use.

    Oh well. Guess I'll learn to deal with Windows 10.

    1. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by demon+driver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linux is out, because of specific software packages I use that do not support Linux.

      May I ask which ones? I ask because that was what I thought until the end of 2017, when out of sheer frustration with the idea of having to move to Windows 10 in the foreseeable future I just gave Linux a try. The plan was to resort to Wine and/or a Windows 7 VM for those Windows applications I really cannot do without yet. I wasn't too optimistic, I saw a less-than-fifty-percent chance for it working out well. But it did. A few weeks later, all machines in the household (the other inhabitant had been very sympathetic to the plan, too) had been converted to Linux as the only or primary OS, and we have never looked back. There's just one thing I've been asking myself once or twice – why did I wait that long?

    2. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2

      Depending on the software packages, you can go with Linux, and use something like KVM, Virtualbox, or VMWare Workstation to run a VM of Windows 10 for the applications which require that.

    3. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by MrLogic17 · · Score: 2

      >Sadly, this is no longer the case and now I will have to upgrade to Win10 kicking and screaming

      Why? I'm staying on Windows 7 until I have no choice.
      What's dragging you to 10? Are you *sure* you have no choice?

    4. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 2

      May I ask which ones?

      Not the OP, but one of the major grievances I have with Wine is trying to use is Genetica 4.0, which does not work in Wine. Genetica is no longer being actively developed, as far as I know, so I expect there will be no plans to ever port it to Linux either.

      I played around a little with Substance Designer, which does work on Linux, but I found it was nowhere near as intuitive to use as Genetica, which had dozens upon dozens of different wizards for designing different material types. With Substance designer, I have to do almost everything from scratch so despite being what seems like it may very well be a technically superior product, it is simply not as useful.

    5. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So he still has to pay MSFT for a copy of Windows 10, deal with the hassle of VMs, then why on earth would he want to run Linux if he has already having to pay and use Windows daily since Linux won't run the software he requires to be productive?

      This whole notion is as silly as telling someone who requires a truck for work they should get a subcompact and when they point out the compact won't actually do the job they need a vehicle for telling them to get a subcompact AND a truck, deal with the extra insurance and maintenance, simply because you like compacts. Wouldn't a better idea be to push Linux devs to stop being so hostile to companies that actually have to get paid for the software because their software simply wouldn't work under the Linux Blessed Trinity of selling hardware, support, or eBegging?

      But Good Lord we can't have that, what compromise and cooperation instead of pushing the narrative? In 2019? That just won't do, instead Linux users should act like paying MSFT for a copy of Windows, dealing with the BS and hassle of VMs is a perfectly sane and rational idea that 99.995% of the population won't reject out of hand as being totally whack-a-doodle...and people wonder why MSFT can release an OS as buggy and nasty as Windows 10 and Linux never gains any share.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how that's a selling point for Linux.... leaving aside that this would still require me to own Windows, in terms of workflow, there is no difference between using a virtual box and just owning a whole separate computer that might be networked with it, with the down side is that the virtual box takes up a lot of system resources on the Linux workstation while running while a separate computer would not.

    7. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Are they still doing that? I thought Blizzard had smartened up after they were found to be in the wrong and had to start giving refunds to some of the players they they found they had wrongfully banned.

    8. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by steveb3210 · · Score: 1

      Slower hasn't been my experience - at least in the last two updates.

      I updated my mom's 2011 MacBook Air with the release before Mojave and it actually got faster...

      I can't say I've noticed any slowdown with Mojave either.

    9. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1
      I'm guessing you haven't been a mac user in 10 years. That's ok - the real "upgrade" road for Win7 users is macOS or Linux. Yes, that means new hardware for one case, but you probably were going to need new hardware anyways for Win10's next release or two to not suffer some arbitrary performance hit (suspected, just wait - it will happen) macOS definitely hasn't gotten more bloated, or not anywhere near the level you seem to think. The downloads have varied over the past few releases:
      • 10.10 5.73GB
      • 10.11 5.8GB
      • 10.12 4.78GB
      • 10.13 5.21GB
      • 10.14 6.03GB

      Hmm, that doesn't seem like it's going bloat, rather a major shrinkage and then some growth again, especially considering the variety of things that were added over the releases.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    10. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      I have never got this sort of comment. To put it another way

      I am not sure that is a selling point for VHS....I am not sure that is a selling point for DVD...etc..It's content, not format. Use Virtualbox to make your content available. The number of times you are actually going to use it is probably minuscule and if you really really need it. It's still there.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    11. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't see what I said.... I said that if one is going to use a virtual box, why wouldn't they just use a whole different computer? It takes up just as much resources as a virtual box does, after all. And suggesting that they use a different operating system (which is what they are doing when they are using virtual box) is not going to be any kind of selling point for the operating system that virtual box might be running on.

    12. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You can a free version of Win7 from Microsoft that works fine in VirtualBox, which is what I did.

      I don't use it much, but every once in a while.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    13. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      tell that to the io scheduler on the mac mini siting on the corner of my desk.

      the built in bloat crap just regularly goes haywire and makes all disk access super slow.

      like an indexer wouldn't be bad, if it didn't hog all the resources and so on. or the weird thing thats supposed to help the home back functionality.

      anyway, remember when microsoft said that you had only 1 month left for a free upgrade, like 2 years ago?... shouldn't speaking horseshit be illegal for a publicly traded company?

      seriously 4 gigabytes for osx in 2019 is not enough to open 1 goddamned tab on safari and have it work decently. that does sound like bloat, yes?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 1

      In terms of workflow, it's the same as two computers. In particular, you still need to have both OS's, and sharing data between the virtualbox and the underlying OS is not any different than sharing data between two physical workstations on the same network.

      Dual booting is even worse, because it becomes impossible to switch rapidly between them without completely stopping everything that you are doing in one mode to switch to the other.

      The difference in expense compared to inconvenience and reduction in productivity of not using a single OS system is, IMO, comparatively minor. In the end, it's cheaper and more reliable to just have two whole computers networked together instead of virtual box. It's cheaper yet to have a single computer running a single OS.... but as I said above, some software does not work in Wine, so a single OS isn't workable where such software is part of a person's workflow unless that OS is Windows.

    15. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by mark-t · · Score: 1

      In terms of workflow, using a virtualbox has no real advantages over a separate computer, and is perhaps more convenient only than dual booting.

      The cheapest solution is to have one OS and not two, but since you need a second one with virtual box anyways, you might as well have it on a separate computer where it can't possibly touch your other one, and even better, doesn't take away any RAM or CPU resources away from it either, as Virtualbox often would (typically using 100% of a single core, even when nothing is happening in the virtual box) As for network security, that's what hardware firewalls are for. In case you haven't realized it, I've always been talking about *professional* computer use here, not casual home user stuff or what the average person is necessary liable to already happen to have laying around.

      My point is that Wine isn't suitable for everything, and I even named one program that I really do use which I sincerely wish would work under Wine but doesn't, and probably isn't ever going to. Where multiple computers may already exist, it is no less inconvenient to a workflow to install a new version of windows on a virtual box on a Linux machine and install the software on that virtual box than it is to just install it on a separate windows box on the same network.

      And of course, as I also said, the only really competitive software to the example I gave that *does* work on Linux isn't anywhere nearly as easy or intuitive to use... but the above poster asked for an example of a program that didn't work under Wine, so I thought I'd oblige with one.

    16. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Without knowing what you've got running there or what is on it, I can still call your statement a pile of bullshit. So I will call bullshit.

      Why is your statement bullshit? Because I have 12 minis dating back to the mid 2009 mini that are all running OSX fine. The 2009 is even running 10.11 right now, but it won't be upgraded to 10.14 because, well, it can't be. The rest are running 10.12+, and there's no grinding, slow access, or anything.

      That said, I did have a 2014 MBP that I had to install a plain OSX version into for 10.12 instead of upgrading, primarily because I'd upgraded and migrated the account I used from a PowerBook running 10.3 all the way through to 10.10 on that machine via 3 other machines. It was having some challenges with 10.10 and the cruft that had built up over 7 years and multiple architectures. Clean install with a quick data copy, and my account was 90% back and clean. Machine runs fine to this day on 10.14.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    17. Re:Too bad MacOS isn't broken beyond repair by toddestan · · Score: 1

      One other option would be install Windows 8.1 and Classic Shell, and use that until 2023 when Microsoft pulls the rug out from under Windows 8. It's a fair bit better than Windows 10, though you still have the telemetry backported to it, though to be fair unless you disabled Windows Update in Windows 7 some time ago, you also have been dealing with telemetry.

      It actually wouldn't surprise me if Windows 8.1 sees a minor uptick in users early next year.

  8. Good luck with that by xack · · Score: 3, Interesting

    China still has 10% market share for Windows XP. There will still be substantial Windows 7 usage in the 2030s. Businesses wih critical workloads that can’t be rebooted all he time for “updates” means that 7 isn’t going anywhere.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by RickyShade · · Score: 1

      Businesses wih critical workloads that can’t be rebooted all he time for “updates”

      Well, I hope businesses can find competent techs that know how to disable automatic updating/rebooting.

  9. Will it still do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...if I don't allow the update that makes it do this?

    Hmmmmm.

  10. Another "upgrade" to block by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Clearly, MS does not have the maturity to responsibly decide what to install and what not.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  11. No good reason to kill Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm happy with Windows 7.

    NOTHING in Windows 10 is an improvement. Do not need, did not ask for, do not want.

    Just charge Windows 7 users an ongoing annual maintenance license and keep patching it. And otherwise leave us alone until our hardware dies in it's own good time.

    1. Re:No good reason to kill Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not just maintain a Windows "Classic" product, based on Win XP/7, with modest updates to APIs and security? For people who just want to run applications and now App Stores, telemetry or getting absorbed into the black hole of "teh social".

  12. Re:Good for them. by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

    w0ho shit out a new OS every couple of months and wipe their hands of it. Leaving end users to flail about desperately trying to figure out what to do.

    You just described Windows 10. At least twice a year you get to experience the joy of getting fucked by a new mandatory update.

  13. Re:Good for them. by Moryath · · Score: 1
    Then they should re-enable the free upgrade mode.

    Also, "SJW freetards"? Really? No wonder you posted as an anonymous coward, you must be a real blast at parties.

    This is where the party ends / I can't stand here listening / to you and your racist friend...

  14. Fuck You Microsoft. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft doesn't respect your time, space, or money. Fuck 'em.

    The community needs to send a letter to MS:

    Dear Microsoft,

    Here is a fucking clue-stick:

    1. It is NOT your fucking machine regardless of how much of your software we run on it.

    2. Instead of nagging people to upgrade to your latest spyware how about you produce a better replacement with the option to disable all your Telemetry shit? Oh, wait, that would involve work. /sarcasm

    1. Re:Fuck You Microsoft. by ChromeAeonuim · · Score: 2

      Microsoft hears you, they just don't care.

    2. Re:Fuck You Microsoft. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Implying that people actually give a crap about telemetry? Here's a factbomb for your cluestick: MS doesn't care about 100 or so vocal Slashdot users. The vast majority of users who haven't upgraded couldn't give 2 shits about telemetry.Windows 10 not working on their hardware on the other hand is something people care about, Windows 10 interrupting them is what they care about, moving of their cheese is something that they care about.

    3. Re:Fuck You Microsoft. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      So what to use instead?
      MacOS where you can pay 5 times the price for 1/5th the hardware, soldered ram, and soldered SSD? No way.
      Linux where you need a hobbyist's devotion to work as part time netadmin on your home computer to keep everything running smoothly? Please,I just want to enjoy using my computer...I'll suffer though a Mac before that option.

  15. Microsoft can keep windows 10... by blahplusplus · · Score: 2

    ... the thing is a drm ridden piece of spying garbage. The fucking "service agreement" gives them absolute authority to invade your computer. A giant wtf. Anyone with any clue of the great evil of windows 10 wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole.

    To think it only took the stupid and ignorant masses getting internet to allow corporations to steal software and force drm on the planet and the entire world bent over and forked over their money. A Fucking dystopia brought to by the average citizien moron who can't make rational purchasing decisions.

    1. Re:Microsoft can keep windows 10... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      So you've never read the service agreement for previous versions of Windows then.

    2. Re:Microsoft can keep windows 10... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      So you've never read the service agreement for previous versions of Windows then.

      Except you seem to not realize that Windows 10 is designed to feed all of your information to microsoft. To gather data on everything you've ever done. Windows 7 does not have that awful feature. Sorry to tell ya and I can forcefully disconnect win7 from the corporate hive mind and still have a functioning computer. Good luck on future versions of windows.

    3. Re:Microsoft can keep windows 10... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand the dynamics of political power in capitalist society and all the software we've already invested in being wiped out by microsoft politically engineering the internet putting drm in everything because the population cannot defend itself from these attacks.

      The gullible vote with your dollars free market ideology you subscribe to is 100% bullshit. You can't hold accountable a giant mega corporation that has billions of dollars when you are 100 miles away from it and expect to influence their behavior with your not buying their software.

      The whole ideology behind it is bankrupt and this has been studied. The modern software landscape is market for lemons.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  16. Car analogy by kaur · · Score: 1

    I bought it.
    I own it.
    I drive it as I like, traffic laws permitting.

    How can the factory decide where it will drive?

    1. Re:Car analogy by jythie · · Score: 1

      Heh, within that analogy, could you imagine the outrage if computers had to have yearly inspections in order to remain internet legal?

    2. Re:Car analogy by Virtucon · · Score: 2

      you leased it.
      we don't want you having it anymore.
      you agreed to this when we first met and we can change those rules as we see fit.
      don't make us brick you.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:Car analogy by Major_Disorder · · Score: 1

      Heh, within that analogy, could you imagine the outrage if computers had to have yearly inspections in order to remain internet legal?

      It could get some of the Spyware/Malware/Virus infested wrecks off of the information superhighway. :)
      But someone would probably tack on an "Approved OS only" list, so I would prefer governments stay away from attempting to regulate technology that they do not understand. (Most old men are just not qualified.) (Written by a 50YO white guy.)

      --
      First law of people: People are generally stupid.
  17. MacOS need better hardware NOT super thin hardware by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    MacOS need better hardware NOT super thin hardware.

    Also an real pro system with PCI-E slots not just pci-e X4 TB.

  18. Re:Popups for who? by tepples · · Score: 1

    For the common man, phones and tablets are going to take over.

    Once programming enters the high school curriculum of "the common man", how will this be practical on "phones and tablets"? Will students who own only a phone have to buy a tablet and a keyboard?

  19. Re: Good for them. by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Really? The last time I tried upgrading a version of Ubuntu, it totally hosed my laptop. The install got so screwed up that couldn't even boot into the GUI after the upgrade.

  20. ReactOS by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 2

    We have software that doesn't work on Windows 10, works great in Windows 7, and as I just discovered works on ReactOS. Anyone else in this situation may want to take a look at https://www.reactos.org/

    --
    I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
    1. Re: ReactOS by Picodon · · Score: 1

      I might have considered it if was not managed by a Russian foundation running with the blessing (or more) from the Russian government.
      But to each his own, I guess...

  21. If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by toejam13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many of my complaints about Windows 10 are absent in the enterprise branch and long-term servicing branch of Windows 10. The problem is that the cost of obtaining legal copies of those branches for personal use is ridiculously high. So I continue to use Windows 7 Ultimate, even if it means sticking with my aging PC and having to resort to tricks to keep the updates coming (remember the point-of-sales trick for XP?).

    If people could install Windows 10 and have it look and act somewhat similar to Windows 7 without having to resort to exotic editions, registry hacks, or third-party tools, I think a lot of people would finally jump ship, even if they had to pay extra for those features. I sure would.

    I say this as someone who just this week had to roll their own installation DVD in order to install Windows 7 on a new NVMe SSD. So I am set for a while longer.

    1. Re:If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you tried 8.1+ClassicShell? Looks and acts like Win 7 (or XP if you prefer) but with better hardware support and faster boot times, updates are rock solid, and it took less than 3 minutes to turn off any phone home BS and in the 2 years I've been running it it never once has turned back on. I have to say its been a hell of a workstation OS, as good as XP X64 was back in the day, even win 7 wasn't this rock solid and hassle free.

      I deal with enough customers with Win 10 to know its a "do NOT want" for me, the updates are buggy as fuck, every patch you have to go through tons of settings as MSFT might just decide to reset everything back to default (because "fuck you 10 Home and Pro user you are a beta tester for our REAL customers and a source for data mining" seems to be their mantra for Win 10 these days) and it generally seems less stable than Vista RTM. 8.1 OTOH has been a treat, not a single crash, it even handled a dying GPU without crashing, and never gets in the way of what I'm doing.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sorry but the differences between Windows 10 Pro and Enterprise are the differences that only Slashdot users and tech heads salivate about. The overwhelming vast majority of the world doesn't give a shit about telemetry, or selecting exact updates to install and having access to Windows 10 enterprise doesn't change the big problems: Windows 10 is different, it has different requirements, different interface, different way of operating, and people don't like their cheese moved.

      MS isn't targeting a bunch of nerds with nag alerts.

    3. Re:If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      overwhelming vast majority of the world doesn't give a shit about telemetry

      My own view it would be rather foolish to assume the only group of people who care about privacy are those who know the difference between a bit and a byte.

      The more likely explanation is others don't see it, don't understand it or are unaware of what's happening.

      or selecting exact updates to install

      They care when their work is lost because windows decided to install an update. They care when a botched updates break their systems and or software. They care when their settings get all screwed up.

      Windows 10 is different, it has different requirements, different interface, different way of operating, and people don't like their cheese moved.

      An abacus is different, it has different requirements, different interface, different way of operating and people don't like their cheese moved. Unfalsifiable statements have amazing versatility.

    4. Re:If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      It has been forked as Open Shell.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    5. Re:If only W10 Pro was more like W10 Enterprise... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Isn't Open Shell for Win 10 users? Because as I said Win10 is a DO NOT WANT and the version of Classic Shell hosted by Ninite seems to work rock solid on 8.1 with the latest patches.

      I mean sure it SAYS 7-10 but if they are trying to keep it working on the constantly moving alpha build that is Win 10 I can imagine its probably buggy as fuck and the whole reason I'm sticking with 8.1 is I want a super stable system. Last thing I want is to deal with my shell crashing while I'm in the middle of work, especially since Classic Shell has never had so much as a single hiccup since being installed 2 years ago, can you say the same of Open Shell?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  22. offer upgrade for free again... by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and I might consider it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:offer upgrade for free again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and I might consider it.

      Have you tried? Last I read -- not that long ago -- upgrading for free still worked fine. I'm not prepared to infect* my computer with Win10, but there's nothing stopping you from trying.

      *If it looks like a duck, moves like a duck, quacks like a duck...

    2. Re:offer upgrade for free again... by Pitawg · · Score: 1

      Nothing has been free from MS. 10 is the slurpiest thief they have made. They are starting a campaign now to steal more of past customers' future days with this harassment of the most definite NOs they have yet to receive.

      With this move, the last VMs of mine will be deleted, as even my coding for a MS Shop is completely done from linux now. No more MS, not for work, nor games. Even their domains fail to translate on my net.

    3. Re:offer upgrade for free again... by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

      You can upgrade for free. I've done it for several people in the last year.

      They don't advertise it broadly because they do not want small companies to migrate to Windows Home edition to save money on upgrading, but you can upgrade Home edition for free using the installer.

      https://www.microsoft.com/en-u...

      If it doesn't accept your serial number in Windows 7, then you can just reverse the upgrade back.

  23. Microsoft is EXTREMELY poorly-managed. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    My understanding: Microsoft is an EXTREMELY poorly-managed company. I think much more attention should be given to that.

    Microsoft trash talks Windows 10 LTSC -- again (Dec. 5, 2018)

    Microsoft scrambles to limit PR damage over abusive AI bot Tay. (Nov. 30, 2017)

    Guess what country sued Microsoft over abusive user data collection! -- Brazil (Apr. 28, 2018) Bad adjective: "beloved" Windows 10.

    Apparently the present worsening management began with Ballmer-osis: Microsoft Is Filled With Abusive Managers And Overworked Employees, Says Tell-All Book (May 23, 2012)

    But Microsoft was always abusive, apparently: 'Crush Them': An Oral History of the Lawsuit That Upended Silicon Valley. (May 18, 2018)

    Bill Gates still runs Microsoft: Two years ago, during a Jan. 17, 2017 discussion with Charlie Rose, Bill Gates said he spends "15 percent" of his time managing Microsoft. I interpreted that to mean that Gates is still extremely involved and very influential. Did Gates want the mess that is Windows 10?

    From the transcript at that Charlie Rose web page:

    08:42
    "Bill Gates: I'm there about 15 percent of the time. And I get to work just on the R and D part, brainstorming with people, thinking, OK, how are we going to take this artificial intelligence and make it understand, help you use your time better. It's a very exciting time in software. There's five companies that are, you know, in a really strong position. Microsoft is leading in some really cool stuff so --"

    It seems obvious that Bill Gates still has a huge amount of overall influence on the management of Microsoft, even if he mostly focuses on other subjects.

    Lately, Windows users are not allowed to know what Windows updates actually do. In the past, for example, users were pushed to Windows 10, without giving their permission. So, now Windows 7 customers will be paying for updates that may be abusive.

    Some of the many stories about Windows 10 indicate deliberate abuse of customers:

    Windows 10 is possibly the worst spyware ever made. "Buried in the service agreement is permission to poke through everything on your PC." (Aug. 4, 2015)

    Microsoft's Intolerable Windows 10 Aggression (May 27, 2016)

    Microsoft is infesting Windows 10 with annoying ads (March 17, 2017)

    Microsoft, stop sabotaging Windows 10. (March 21, 2017)

  24. Re:Popups for who? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Most of us left are downloading security only updates at best and carefully monitoring what W7 is doing. After GWX everyone is super wary of this behavior. Businesses are going to have their own update servers and/or pay the extension.

    The only way 7 is going to obsolete is vendors dropping support in their software. After that we move to windows 8.1 for 4 more years. That leaves at least 5 years for microsoft to unscrew itself or equivalent software to finally release on linux. For the common man, phones and tablets are going to take over.

    A good strategy, but I'd like to make a suggestion. Having gone through the Windows 7 -> Windows 8.1 process, and the Windows 7 -> Windows 10 process, I'd really suggest the latter. Windows 8.1 is pants, and the less you touch it, the more you'll be happy.

    The reason we didn't go from 8.1 -> 10, is that we had so much trouble with 8.1 that we ended up doing recovery installs back to 7. A couple years later, when 10 became stable, we did some testing and realized that it was less of a risk to go directly to 10 and completely bypass 8.

    Your mileage may vary, but those were our conclusions.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  25. Time to disable MS patches again by sinij · · Score: 1

    Will they ever learn that nagware will just get people to turn off updates?

  26. Why no class action lawsuits? by Nocturrne · · Score: 1

    Lawyers must be foaming at the mouth with excitement. Why haven't we seen any big lawsuits about the forced loss of privacy and no options to buy a private non-spyware version?

  27. Like I said on the free Win7 update promise. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Suddenly you will find yourself on a Windows 10 machine.

  28. Re:No one wants Windows 10. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Not sure why the USB driver comment. I have Win 7 and it handles USBs with no problem.

  29. Support older video hardware by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    I tried upgrading my mother's PC to Windows 10.

    It could only operate the display in hideously eye-hurting unreadable "not the right resolution for the LCD monitor" mode, because Microsoft did not support the on-motherboard graphics and there was no driver update. So I rolled it back to 7.

    She's gone over to the iFruit side now, she is happily using her iPad while sitting in her easy chair, and has no interest in the PC any more, so it'll probably remain at 7 forever.

    1. Re:Support older video hardware by toejam13 · · Score: 1

      If the motherboard's on-board video relied on an old-school XDDM-style video driver, Windows 7 is the last OS version to support that driver model. In Windows 8 and later, only WDDM-style drivers can be used.

  30. Re: No one wants Windows 10. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Why will Win 7 be dead soon? If you don't do any updates to it, it will continue running as is. Now, some new software may not support it but all your current software will continue to do so.

  31. Stop it! by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    If someone hasn't updated to Windows 10 by now, they will never upgrade. Hell, even I have a few Windows 7 holdbacks I have no intention of upgrading, ever.

    Just stop. There is absolutely no point in turning Windows 7 into nagware.

  32. So, MS are writing drivers for older Nvidia GPUs? by YuppieScum · · Score: 1

    The laptop I'm using right now is running Windows 7, but is unsupported by Windows 10 as NVidia don't provide a driver for the GeForce Go 7400 GPU it contains.

    In addition, HP, the "makers" of this machine, have chosen to hide the links to all the drivers they host, so I'm boned if I need to reinstall... unless I can remember all the SP numbers for the audio drivers, etc and pull them direct from their site.

    Over the years, it's had an SSD to replace the old HDD, a new WiFi card to get 5GHz and "n" (and a patched BIOS to circumvent the stupid "whitelist"), and the RAM is maxed out

    Do I now want to spend a chunk of money on a new laptop when this one works, and does everything I need it to do, just because MS and/or HP have decided it's time I did, to support their bottom line?

    No, especially as everything "affordable" nowadays appears to have cheap-and-nasty calculator keys, not a *real* keyboard.

    Get off my lawn.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.
  33. Re:MacOS need better hardware NOT super thin hardw by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    and I agree with this - although the new mini is a welcome step in the right direction, the pro desktop is missing.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  34. Maybe at first... by Kargan · · Score: 1

    ...but I give it no more than a day before the information is out on how to disable them, which update to remove or which registry key to alter.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  35. I remember when they first let Win7 and 8 upgrade by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    I remember back then they were like: "Do it now or lose your chance to upgrade!"

    Now it's just: "DO IT NOW"

  36. POs, for one by DogDude · · Score: 1

    How about a decent, usable, PCI-compliant point of sale system?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  37. This reminds me ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... of Childhood's End. Where the Overlords come down and sell humanity on a new, higher level of consciousness. And then at the end, they have to destroy the Earth. To keep humanity from reinstalling the old version, I guess.

    Oh yeah. And there's that bit about Microsoft, er I mean the Overlords actually being the devil.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. Re:MacOS need better hardware NOT super thin hardw by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    that is not the point also end users don't really want to deal with having to redo Hackintosh stuff for each mac os update.

    Apple is missing the market. People will buy $1,499 apple desktop with stuff that non apple price is $1000-$1100. they may even sell a few $1899 gamer systems.

    Also missing is the $2500+ workstation systems.

  39. Re:No one wants Windows 10. by scdeimos · · Score: 1

    USB 3 support?

  40. I'll Miss The Games by ewhac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some of us remember the jaw-dropping arrogance and hubris Micros~1 demonstrated with their Get Windows 10 (GWX) initiative:

    • The new icon in the systray that was an advertisement, and couldn't be disabled (unless you knew the exact KB numbers to uninstall),
    • The pop-up windows nagging you to take the upgrade before it was "too late,"
    • Downloading a multi-gigabyte hairball containing the update to your system drive -- without your knowledge or consent -- "just in case" you finally said yes,
    • Turning your PC into a Bittorrent node to distribute the update to other PCs, because why should Micros~1 pay for their own bandwidth when they can leech off everyone else's,
    • Using maliciously confusing prompts to trick people into accepting the upgrade, even -- and especially -- after they'd already explicitly said No several times,
    • The upgrades that failed,
    • The rollbacks that failed,
    • The machines that Win10 just plain didn't, and never would, support,
    • Arrogating all system administration to themselves, and still constantly fscking it up,
    • The promises and features that, to the surprise of no one who's been paying the slightest attention for the last 35 years, were never delivered -- shitty security, shitty performance, shitty UI, system updates that could break the machine at any given time, and device driver updates that never worked.

    So I guess my question to Micros~1 is: What in your brain-worm-infested minds do you imagine has induced us to change our opinions on this matter? You are every bit as incompetent and every bit as untrustworthy as you were five years ago, ten years ago, 20 years ago...

    Windows exists in my house solely to play games. If you feel you can't handle that duty any longer without completely fscking over my machine, then I guess I'll have to learn to live with just NetHack.

    TL;DR: The Answer Is No.

  41. Wow, that sounds annoying as hell! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Sure glad I'm using Ubuntu. :-)

  42. People still update Win7? by buck-yar · · Score: 1

    I thought most anyone not wanting 10 stopped updating windows 7 after the change from individual KBs to rollups.

  43. On the positive note by dmt0 · · Score: 1

    A few more people will stop using IE, as the big blue E icon that they call "Internet" will now launch a fairly modern Edge browser.

  44. Too late by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Too late, I ditched Win7 for Linux Mint a while ago and I'm never going back.

    I liked Win7- it was everything I needed and not much else. But the shaky updates and the constant push to upgrade upgrade upgrade upgrade were wearing on me.

    The final straw was an 'update' that blasted me off the net and nothing I could do would fix it. I finally had to roll back to a save point, and that was that- no more updates.

    So yeah, MS finally pissed me off enough to bail. Linux Mint is good, fairly well done and perfectly usable. Finding replacement programs took a little work, and transferring my data was a bit more, but it was worth it in the end.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  45. Microsoft set to abandon half its customers by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    In 9 months. Should be fun to watch.

  46. I say ease up - it's a valid reason by gosand · · Score: 1

    Linux is out, because of specific software packages I use that do not support Linux.

    May I ask which ones? I ask because that was what I thought until the end of 2017, when out of sheer frustration with the idea of having to move to Windows 10 in the foreseeable future I just gave Linux a try. The plan was to resort to Wine and/or a Windows 7 VM for those Windows applications I really cannot do without yet. I wasn't too optimistic, I saw a less-than-fifty-percent chance for it working out well. But it did. A few weeks later, all machines in the household (the other inhabitant had been very sympathetic to the plan, too) had been converted to Linux as the only or primary OS, and we have never looked back. There's just one thing I've been asking myself once or twice – why did I wait that long?

    Let's be real for a second. I have no doubts that there are software packages that people use that are not supported on Linux. Some may have viable alternatives, but some might not. And if there are alternatives - they may not be good enough or similar enough to make people want to switch. That is just life!

    I am not in the camp that says Linux is better than Windows (or Mac) for everything. It's just not that simple. There is no need to be so completely polarized, where one thing has to be completely right, and one thing has to be completely wrong.

    And full disclosure: I have been Linux only at home since 1999. My wife and kids run Win7. It all mostly works out fine. My wife uses Quicken to manage our budget. My kids play many games that are Windows-only. They could switch, but why? Win7 is fine. I run Linux because it fits my brain, and the way I do things. I run the media server on my machine, I have scripts that do all kinds of things, from downloading and chopping up podcasts to listen to on my commute, to photo editing, to general bash scripting. I use fetchmail to consolidate my email and alpine to read it for crying out loud! I use Windows at work, but I also run lots of open-source and Linuxy stuff (gitbash, msys64) to get some things done much more efficiently.

    As in life, it doesn't have to be us vs. them all the time. Do what works for you, and if it gets to the point where it's not working, try something else.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  47. Re: Good for them. by jythie · · Score: 1

    Since we use CentOS as opposed to RHEL, I can only comment on my experiences with the OS I actually use.