Slashdot Mirror


An Amphibian Fungus Has Become 'The Most Deadly Pathogen Known To Science'

"On Thursday, 41 scientists published the first worldwide analysis of a fungal outbreak that's been wiping out frogs for decades," The New York Times reports. The outbreak has caused more than 500 species of amphibians to decline significantly (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source), making it "the most deadly pathogen known to science." From the report: Scientists first noticed in the 1970s that some frog populations were declining quickly; by the 1980s, some species appeared to be extinct. The losses were puzzling, because the frogs were living in pristine habitats, unharmed by pollution or deforestation. In the late 1990s, researchers discovered that frogs in both Australia and Panama were infected with a deadly fungus, which they named Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis -- Bd, for short. The fungus turned up in other countries, but studies of its DNA suggest that Bd originated on the Korean Peninsula. In Asia, amphibians seem impervious to Bd, but when it got to other parts of the world â" probably via the international trade in pet amphibians -- the pathogen reached hundreds of vulnerable species.

Amphibians are infected with Bd by contact with other animals or by spores floating in the water. The fungus invades skin cells and multiplies. An infected frog's skin will start to peel away as the animal grows sluggish. Before it dies, a frog may manage to hop its way to a new stream or pond, spreading the fungus further. The fungus thrives in cool, moist conditions. As a result, frogs that live in cloud forests on mountainsides have been hit particularly hard. Big frogs are at a greater risk, too, possibly because they don't multiply as quickly as small ones. [The lead author of the new study and his colleagues] identified 501 species in decline, far greater than the previous estimate of 200. Certain factors once thought to account for the decimation of frog populations -- like climate change and deforestation -- are not the greatest threats, the scientists found.
The study has been published in the journal Science.

36 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. Australia, are you noting this? by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Here is finally something you could introduce to get rid of those pesky cane toads! I foresee no problems whatsoever. :-)

  2. Pepe sheds a tear for his buddies by thesjaakspoiler · · Score: 1

    But internet memes never die. https://imgflip.com/memetempla...

  3. Wow by r2kordmaa · · Score: 2

    A pathogen that affects entire class of animals, wow, just wow. That's an equivalent of a disease that affected all mammals indiscriminately, I didn't think such a thing was possible.

    1. Re:Wow by Gilgaron · · Score: 5, Informative

      Fungi are bigger and more like us than viruses and bacteria are. So instead of being dependent on specific protein binding sites like a virus is, they can mechanically invade tissue like a parasitic worm could. They may have plant-like lifecycles but they have to find exogenous energy sources as animals do, so that's why so many consume detritus or are parasites.

    2. Re:Wow by RockDoctor · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not sure if you're trying to play for laughs, but ... it's not just a question of individual protein binding sites for getting into a cell (as you say, is important for virii and some bacteria). In order to mechanically invade a tissue (e.g., skin - your biggest organ), an organism needs at some point to adhere one cell wall onto another from which it can get the anchorage to drive pseudopods or whole filaments into the structure.

      Different tissues have different adhesions proteins - that's how, for example, your eyelids can stick together but not stick to your eyeball - and the precise proteins vary from one species to another. But they do form families of related proteins, more closely related in more closely related species. (If I recall correctly, some of the first evidence that whales were more closely related to hippopotamuses than any other animals came from the proteins on the surfaces of their respective blood cells which would coagulate with each other. Yes, those troublesome blood groups are the result of adhesion proteins.)

      Oddly, it's a complicated subject. A few tens of thousands of species, each one with a few hundreds of relevant protein families, the mutual interactions of any with any being potentially significant.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    3. Re:Wow by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      This isn't killing all frogs, just ones that are susceptible. As the article stated:

      In Asia, amphibians seem impervious to Bd

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    4. Re:Wow by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Those are the reservoir species, so he's noting that it is affecting the whole clade. Additionally, absence of mortality doesn't mean absence of morbidity.

    5. Re:Wow by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Just as an FYI, the plural of virus is viruses, not virii (which is not even a word).

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Wow by kevmeister · · Score: 1

      Rabies comes damned close!

      --
      Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
    7. Re:Wow by r2kordmaa · · Score: 1

      2 clades even, salamanders too

    8. Re:Wow by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      You, obviously, know more about this than I. I had to look up the word "clade". Thanks!

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    9. Re:Wow by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      A pathogen that affects entire class of animals, wow, just wow. That's an equivalent of a disease that affected all mammals indiscriminately, I didn't think such a thing was possible.

      Rabies...

    10. Re:Wow by r2kordmaa · · Score: 1

      Huh, never thought of rabies that way. But yes, you and kevmeister are right, rabies does affect pretty much all mammals. Thanks for pointing it out to me.

  4. Re:not related to GW???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems like you are triggered already.

  5. Hope springs eternal... by DanDD · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... perhaps this pathogen can be engineered to infect only politicians.

    --
    "Every time I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race." - H. G. Wells
    1. Re:Hope springs eternal... by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      You're obviously a racist. Lawyers and politicians ARE the same species. Just like, due to the cross breading, journalists now are.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    2. Re:Hope springs eternal... by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      The only problem with your plan is that political speciation is a Real Thing; you manage to erradicate all the politicians, more will spontaneously emerge from the rest of the population. It becomes a never-ending game of Whack-A-Mole -- at least until there are no more homo sapiens left.

  6. Obligatory Plague Inc. Evolved comment by raatti · · Score: 1

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Megabrutal Fungus viral strategy. Maybe related ;-)

  7. Re:not related to GW???? by stealth_finger · · Score: 1, Funny

    how could this be? Maybe at least Putin's fault or white male supremacy? C'mon give us something to be outraged about.

    They already told you

    Bd originated on the Korean Peninsula

    So it's one to drop at Kim's feet.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  8. Out of Control. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    The spawning of this fungus has been toadaly out of control. We should always remember just how bad a pathogen can be to a species. Never froget about it.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    1. Re:Out of Control. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Your mastery of the English Language is ribbeting!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  9. Re:not related to GW???? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The fungus spread is due to it being an invasive species being spread by human global trade. So it is still our fault.
    Global Climate change may also have an effect on this as well. As many amphibian are already stressed from changes in their climate, meaning they are less likely to handle the Fungus and other stresses as well.

    The biggest problem is that with our exponential advancements in science and engineering over the last 150 years, we have created changes in our environment at an unprecedented rate where the earths natural balances cannot keep up. The problems are far more complex then Stop Driving Cars, and put up solar cells, also just feeling guilty on what is happening isn't helpful either. However denying the problems exist isn't helpful as well, because the problem is from mankind and we need to work out a balanced solution that will moderate the amount of long term damage we do for short term benefit.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  10. Ban International Pet Trade!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "probably via the international trade in pet amphibians"

    Who knows how many other diseases & invasive species gained access to whole (Western) World (& still do) because of international pet trade!!!
    & not to mention, how much of those pets get horrible treatment/suffering of all kinds!!!

    How about banning ALL INTERNATIONAL PET TRADE globally/completely/absolutely???

    1. Re:Ban International Pet Trade!!! by tquasar · · Score: 1

      Yeah that'll work. Like banning all the international drug trade.

    2. Re:Ban International Pet Trade!!! by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

      In most cases having an exotic pet is ok - but only if you're willing to keep it contained and destroy it when it's time.

      It's that last part that gets forgotten, however. They'd prefer to just "let 'em go", etc. They'll take their exotic turtle that's too big now and dump it in an irrigation ditch. No harm, no foul, right? That kind of stupidity usually works out (the animal doesn't survive out of its element), but not always. It played a role in burmese pythons getting into the Florida everglades. Two morons (Shakespeare fans) in New York City released an invasive bird species into the western hemisphere on an artistic whim. Dumb, dumb, dumb... I'm waiting for king cobras to show up in the Deep South, scurrying through the kudzu vines...

  11. Re:not related to GW???? by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    I would recommend that you get your education in science from more reputable sources then Cable TV

    The problem with these sources is that they are trying to stay interesting all the time. So when they actually report on Science it is often on the far off Hypothesis of the week. The Hypothesis process of the scientific method can be wrong, and usually incomplete. But it is the question that is asked, that requires further research to say yes this is a good idea, or no this is a stupid idea.

    In terms of the new Ice Age 40 years ago, this was based on smog blocking out the sun, We had improvements in many parts of the world to reduce smog, so this was reduced... However during the recent Olympics in China. They found that the weather had gotten noticeably warmer when the Chinese Government Stopped Smog for the days during the Olympics.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  12. weakened immune system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't there some indication that the bees, bats, and frogs are all dying because of pesticides? The actual agent of destruction, in this case a fungus, taking advantage of a weakened immune system?

  13. Re: Climate Change by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

    I guess you missed the part that this is an invasive species.

    --
    If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
    Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  14. Re:not related to GW???? by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Which raises a question. Why doesn't Kim have it, with his close resemblance to a frog?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  15. the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought they found a cure 4 years ago!

    https://phys.org/news/2015-11-chytrid-scientists-method-killer-fungus.html

  16. This is deep sh*t by whitroth · · Score: 1

    I mean, other than the idiot teenagers and the anti-science supporters of the GOP, everyone knows that frogs and toads are the canary in the coal mine... and this means we are in seriously deep sh*t.

    Interesting question: any chance that this is someone's test gene editing gone horribly wrong?

    1. Re:This is deep sh*t by Alyks · · Score: 1

      I mean, other than the idiot teenagers and the anti-science supporters of the GOP, everyone knows that frogs and toads are the canary in the coal mine... and this means we are in seriously deep sh*t.

      I have no idea how true this is, but perhaps the climate and pollution, etc. not being as significant of factors as this disease means the idea that frogs are an indicator of environmental health isn't as true anymore?

  17. Wrong by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Even the summary says that its affecting frogs in pristine environment, with no pesticides and long before global warming was a real concern.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong by Jzanu · · Score: 1

      Global warming has been a major concern since the 1800s and Svante Arrhenius proved the heat trapping effect of carbon released by burning fossil fuel. Its accumulation as more fossil fuel is burned is well documented in later works by multiple other scientists.

  18. So we're not to blame by Solandri · · Score: 1

    At least not directly (we're probably transporting the fungus around the globe). That contradicts what I've heard said or implied in numerous documentaries and papers for decades - the top suspects were usually pesticides, or climate change, or habitat loss. It's interesting to go back to a 2008 slashdot article on the topic and see how many people jumped on the global warming and habitat loss bandwagon. The correct cause (the fungus) was even mentioned, but only modded up to a +4. Oh well, at least the top-modded main post is warning people not to jump to conclusions.

  19. Re:But we were told Global Warming was to blame... by mcswell · · Score: 1

    In fact, it sounds like global warming could help kill off the fungus, making it better for the amphibians: "The fungus thrives in cool, moist conditions."