Slashdot Mirror


Linux Mint 19.2 'Tina' is On the Way, But the Developers Seem Defeated and Depressed (betanews.com)

Brian Fagioli, reporting for BetaNews: Today should be happy times for the Linux Mint community, as we finally learn some new details about the upcoming version 19.2! It will be based on Ubuntu 18.04 and once again feature three desktop environments -- Xfce, Mate, and Cinnamon. We even found out the code name for Linux Mint 19.2 -- "Tina." And yet, it is hard to celebrate. Why? Because the developers seem to be depressed and defeated. They even appear to be a bit disenchanted with Free Software development overall. Clement Lefebvre, leader of the Linux Mint project, shared a very lengthy blog post today, and it really made me sad.

He wrote, "For a team to work, developers need to feel like heroes. They want the same things as users, they are users, they were 'only' users to start with. At some stage they decide to get involved and they start investing time, efforts and emotions into improving our project. What they're looking for the most is support and happiness. They need feedback and information to understand bugs or feature requests and when they're done implementing something, they need to feel like heroes, they literally do, that's part of the reason they're here really."
Upon publication of the article, Jason Hicks, Muffin maintainer and member of the Linux Mint team, corroborated the claims made by others.

114 of 269 comments (clear)

  1. For an immediate cheering up by gweihir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should remove systemd! End the slavery to the misbegotten creation of some misanthropic nil-whits and do things yourself again. Feel the power of your mind at work!

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    1. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Megane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Seconded! The best way to be a hero is to fight the system... er... DEE!

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think I'm beginning to see the problem.

      If you maintain a distro, you are under constant bombardment from complete fucking lunatics who hate systemd.

    3. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because labelling anyone with a valid problem, complaint or criticism as a "complete fucking lunatic" is a great way to engage with your users. In fact, it's the #1 criticism of systemd - its clique of arrogant low quality developers.

    4. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Being on Slashdot, I too had shared the anti-systemd sentiment. All it took to turn me around was watching one Youtube video.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Caution: if you want to continue to happily rant about systemd on Slashdot, don't watch that video! You have been warned!

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    5. Re: For an immediate cheering up by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...And completely sane users who also hate systemd.

    6. Re: For an immediate cheering up by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Doing a distro is tough work, largely thankless. A few grumpy posts appear, and bored journalists start sniffing for blood.

      Dev is tough. Herding devs is double tough. Keeping up a pace like LeFebvre does is a soulful mission. Tie it to the waffling that Ubuntu does, and it's a wonder he's not bald from tearing his hair out.

      Let the Linux-Desktop-Is-Dead crowd crow like they usually do. The rest of us plough ahead.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    7. Re: For an immediate cheering up by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      thirded!

      I am a big mint user and have been for many years.

      but I'm seeing less of a diff from ubuntu, these days. I can install mate (etc) to ubuntu so I don't have to deal with unity anymore and they stopped with their 'lens' crap, so that's one less thing to hate ubuntu over.

      I don't see a lot of diff anymore between mint and ubuntu.

      drop systemd, put some WORK into making it happen and you'll have a brand new following.

      make mint different again ;)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re: For an immediate cheering up by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I believe it is. It just does not mean the same thing as anybody sane would expect ;-)

      The whole thing is one thing: Poettering thinking he should be Linus. Sadly, he is not even remotely in the same class regarding insight and skill. Violating KISS is a beginner's mistake.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Slick_W1lly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I watched that video when it first appeared [somewhere]

      I continue to happily rant about systemd despite the assertations that 'it's all me' from some bsd dude...

      It's not me. It's utter shit. Great for a laptop or some desktop machine I'm sure, but it has no place in a data center server where uptimes are measured in months and no-one sticks a fucking USB stick into your box.

    10. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fourthed!

      Seriously - what did they think was so broken with the old-school rc rigging in the first place? More precisely, what did they think was so broken that they decided a massive obfuscated spaghetti-coded wreck like systemd was somehow necessary?

      I do recall that there were a few things that rc couldn't do, but honestly, there has got to be a better, more elegant way to accomplish such improvements. Build that, and you could change the course of many, many things.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    11. Re: For an immediate cheering up by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      It works in political discussions, so why not?

    12. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Real Linux requires writing shell scripts. If you aren't willing to write a shell script to startup an app at bootup, why are you even here? Systemd just makes shit too easy and well documented for everyone. Now newbs are going to be able to do all the shit we do writing shell scripts. Assholes...

      Digging the sarcasm; should make it more obvious though, especially this early in the morning. ;)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    13. Re: For an immediate cheering up by reanjr · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is you don't understand systemd. If that's your experience with it, I assure you, you're doing it wrong. No system packages come with services that complicated, why do you think your services should be?

      Yes, you need an OCCASIONAL shim. In my experience, this shim is typically fewer than 5 lines, including the shebang.

      Compare to init scripts...

    14. Re: For an immediate cheering up by hardihoot · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I use Gentoo Linux with systemD but Gentoo has the option to use OpenRC.

      --
      A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver --Proverbs 25:11
    15. Re: For an immediate cheering up by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      fwiw, I work on embedded systems where users will NEVER be allowed to login or install stuff to this system. its very static and industrial.

      what is our init system?

      systemd.

      sigh ;(

      it was not done that way because smart guys set our system up. likely, it was LAZY guys who didn't understand enough about what EMBEDDED means.

      we've been stuck with systemd in our embedded system for over 3 years now. I am trying to make it change, but only a handful of us at my company 'get it' and its an uphill battle, for some strange reason.

      systemd may be ok for when users will install random apps and the startup tree needs to be smarter. but who, here, would truly recommend systemd for static embedded systems?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    16. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, the old "you're holding it wrong" gaslight, which I've heard used frequently, most often by people who ironically don't understand systemd themselves. What you don't mention is that any shim shell script (because systemd doesn't really do environment or config files very well) also requires its own temporary file and service as a pre-service to the service, so simple!

    17. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      It is called vandalism. Sometimes people don't want to have nice things as much as they want to take away nice things from others.

    18. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Where's the Prostate" is the name of my Wham! cover band.

    19. Re: For an immediate cheering up by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      It's been a decade. Get over it

    20. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      You lost. Get over it.

      Systemd is here to stay and there is nothing you can do about it.

      You were wrong. Again.

      Lennart will die eventually. And we're developers. We CAN rip it out and replace it with something else. We already do, in Devuan, so we have a modern distro that isn't rotting that also does not have systemd. Amazing, isn't it? Oh, and you lose, Coward.

    21. Re: For an immediate cheering up by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I too watched "Ben Shapiro DESTROYS sysvinit!"

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    22. Re: For an immediate cheering up by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1, Interesting

      On an embedded system you should not care how/what the init system is.
      You flash the device and thats it ... your uphill battle sounds rather stupid to me.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re: For an immediate cheering up by alexgieg · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Modern uptime for data centers is measured in hours. Sure, the background host OS holding the dozens to thousands of guests may have an uptime of years, but guests that come up and go down all the time are by far the most common use case nowadays. As such, extremely fast boot times should be the modern priority for any distro targeting a dada center, unless it's specifically targeted at the much smaller segment of bate metal machines.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    24. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      SystemD is a step.

      But after moving to all those connected configuration system files and automatically executing batch scripts, it gets tedious. Better to consolidate all those services into one registry. They can also add some error detection if they make it a binary file format with a special editor so it can't get messed up like a plain old text file. That ne be a more powerful shell tool.

    25. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can't tell if satire or not...

    26. Re: For an immediate cheering up by reanjr · · Score: 1

      What are you smoking, dude? I've set up hundreds of systemd services and have almost never had to do that. Systemd doesn't do environment or config files well?

      [Service]
      EnvironmentFile=/my/config
      Environment=FOO=42

      You don't know what you're talking about.

    27. Re: For an immediate cheering up by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Low effort Godwinning is the worst kind of Godwin

    28. Re: For an immediate cheering up by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Apparently. *whoosh* seems to be the sound of the sarcasm going over the head of the troll hunters who modded me down.

    29. Re: For an immediate cheering up by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      The beauty of it is also because I don't need to know anything about systemd. Based on my limited experience, the day2day use, the installation, hardware compatibility is just unmatched, let alone performance vs Windows on the same machine. I have 2 machines for kids, with one on mint and other macos. I think none of them knows what 'linux' is nor they care which machine to use. Thank you guys. Will donate.

    30. Re: For an immediate cheering up by ItsJustAPseudonym · · Score: 1

      Mmmm. I'm detecting a riff on scene from the movie "Shooter".

    31. Re: For an immediate cheering up by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      As opposed to all the other more lightweight managers that do the same thing?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    32. Re: For an immediate cheering up by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You flash the device...with what? The things he has to write? Maybe *that* is why he cares, perhaps?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    33. Re: For an immediate cheering up by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      With a kernel and an image of the software ... why would he need to interfere with systemd? Oh, you mean that single line of text he would need to write in any init system that starts his software, if it is not embedded in the kerner?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    34. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Most embedded systems have their own watchdog methodology, some of it based in hardware even, why do they want some amateur's watchdog implementation? I do wish more embedded Linux systems were better about being embedded instead of just basing off of a third party distro that's just a slightly stripped down version of something larger.

      Ie, you need a kernel, busybox or similar, and only those utilities you need (possibly networking stuff), and your own tasks and kernel mods. I think too many want to take a shortcut of having a thirdparty give them a mediocre solution so that they can meet an early deadline, even though they spend the rest of the project's life complaining that it's too big or slow. The team using embedded linux needs to understand *everything* that's in their system.

    35. Re: For an immediate cheering up by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is the best kind of satire!

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    36. Re: For an immediate cheering up by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Remember, people who grew up on Windows never learned the KISS principle. This means there are indeed developers who will read that and think it's a good idea.

      The advantage of the old init.d was that it was damn simple and everyone was able to understand it, since the goal of understanding everything about your system was vital in the early days of linux, and is still vital in many linux areas (embedded, turnkey, production servers, etc). SystemD came along with the move to make Linux look more like Windows on the desktop, and at the same time making everything simpler for the novice users while making customization and configuring for less common use cases more difficult. It's an attitude where the novice is the primary customer and the expert is the anomaly.

    37. Re: For an immediate cheering up by gweihir · · Score: 1

      What is the issue with init-scripts? I read up on them for like half an hour, and since then I have written the ones I needed and changed others. Never any problems.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    38. Re: For an immediate cheering up by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. We routinely have months of uptime and so do many of our customers. Oh, of course, I know what your issue is! We do not do "toy" computing.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    39. Re: For an immediate cheering up by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      And why would systemd need to interfere with *his* software, for that matter?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    40. Re: For an immediate cheering up by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Oh, of course, I know what your issue is! We do not do "toy" computing.

      It's called "cloud computing", maybe you heard about it? You know, firing up and shutting down guest OS instances as demand increases and decreases? At very slow times you may be running five or ten instances. At peak activity times you may be firing up a new full stack guest OS once per second at several data centers at once. And those guest OS boot ups and shutdowns must be FAST.

      If your application requires a set of servers running non-stop, good for you. Different use cases, different optimizations, different distros.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    41. Re: For an immediate cheering up by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      When the whole purpose of an OS is to provide a persistent application environment and manage services...

      Oh? Who said that's the "whole" purpose of an OS? It'd seem to me that for major players it's most definitely not the case.

      Forgive me, but firing up full stacks based on demand is just stupid. It represents a failure of imagination on the part of server devs.

      It saves tons of money for data center customers, and it generates tons of savings for data center managers, so even if it involves a failure of imagination it most definitely results in a success of economics for all the parties involved.

      Also, it forces good IT practices not because they're nice to have or because they're demanded by upper management, but because they're necessary. When a guest system must be created, recreated and updated in a strictly predictable manner so that all virtual machines run exactly the same, exactly as expected, with the required settings perfectly set, and all of this traceable, there's no space for quick fixes. The source-controlled scripts responsible for doing that provide an extremely useful, and strictly reproducible, overview of what's going on at any point in time.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    42. Re: For an immediate cheering up by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Bro, it is 47 fucking minutes long. I am NOT wasting that much time for a "payoff" that is not likely to occur.

      Yes, systemd solves some problems. Yes, in some ways and from some perspectives, systemd is "better" than other init systems.

      But, systemd is not just an init system and it doesn't play well with others since it is a silo. This is NOT the ideal init system and is so far from the ideal init system that this line of reasoning is a non-starter regardless of any other benefits or positives that systemd has.

      The video you linked is not likely to change my understanding of systemd; therefore, I am not willing to waste 47 minutes only to find out that some guy found some neat and useful shit with systemd.

      It should be noted that I am perfectly fine with you using systemd. Go with your bad self. Don't be surprised when I think you are an ignorant fool for doing so, but I will not stop you from being a fool. I will just laugh as suffer from the issues of yet another blind spot. (the blind spots can't be helped, nobody is omniscient and that is why systemd is the wrong answer to any question other than: what is the EXACT wrong way to do an init system)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    43. Re: For an immediate cheering up by reanjr · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that you suck at building dependable, deterministic systems. That's cool. I prefer to write quality shit.

      What shitty software are you using? Make better choices.

    44. Re: For an immediate cheering up by NicePics13 · · Score: 1

      Comments are disabled for this video.

  2. Take this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To another site. This is a site about tech and....oh wait did you just say Linux?

  3. Indeed they should by Revek · · Score: 4, Funny

    The beatings will continue until moral improves.

    1. Re:Indeed they should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hopefully it's just a morale problem instead of a moral problem.

    2. Re:Indeed they should by lgw · · Score: 1

      The beatings will continue until moral improves.

      I think that's part of their code of conduct.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  4. Mint by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    Do they want a mint ?

  5. I use Mint exclusively now by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I like how mint works so flawlessly, looks clean, and stays out of your way as a desktop. It's just never any surprise when I install it on any of my machines from tiny to large.

    But perhaps the main reason I like it is that it both feels intuitive and the software manager takes a lot of the burdens of installing software and custom widgets that are always a pain to find, install, and maintain in Linux.

    In short if they are not hearing from me it's because I have no complaints or suggestions.

    For me it's the best distribution for getting work done not being a system admin or expert.

    In that regard it reminds me of why I also use Mac OS on all my other computers.

    Don't get me wrong I've worked with the uggly details of main different systems. Centos and Redhat on server farms. DSL and Slack on small underpowered machines. Raspian. as well as Debian and various flavors of ubuntu. None of these are terrible but Linux mint is the most seemless and least confusing interface.

    So I have standardized on it to get work done and not tweak my linux boxes. All my employees use it.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:I use Mint exclusively now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How is Mint any different from installing Cinnamon on some Ubunutu or just using Xubuntu or Ubuntu-Mate? You go and talk about how magical the package manager is, as far as I understand it's just synaptic...which is available on any debian based system. I just don't understand the obsession with Mint, still, now that there is pretty much zero reason to use it when their two desktops are completely upstream and available in any distro pretty much.

    2. Re: I use Mint exclusively now by demon+driver · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes! Coming rather late to the Linux-as-the-primary-desktop-OS party, I started with Ubuntu Mate 16.04 and was quite happy with it and converted all my machines to Linux soon after that, but then found too many unwelcome changes in Ubuntu Mate 18.04 when it came out (which even made it stop working well enough to be usable on some slower machines), then tried a few other Linux distros including other Ubuntu flavours which all were ok somehow but all had something I disliked enough to make me continue the search, then tried Mint 19 with xfce on slower machines and Cinnamon on more recent hardware, and I immediately kept it and now that's where I hope to be staying for the foreseeable future.

      Beside it being arguably one of the best-maintained and most solid distros around, one of the things I find incredibly nice in Mint is that even the different flavours (Cinnamon and xfce in my case) have been successfully made to look and feel very similar, so that changing between machines which user different flavours is really easy on my nerves.

    3. Re: I use Mint exclusively now by Order_66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mint is good for beginners and people moving from windows because a lot of common software is already installed, it also has more visual cues than the standard debian/ubuntu which also helps windows users. Linux mint is more important now than ever before, with support for windows 7 coming to an end soon, and no realistic upgrade for windows 7 users available from Microsoft, linux mint is the next logical choice.

    4. Re: I use Mint exclusively now by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      I'm looking to switch from Ubuntu (18.04) to Mint soon. Ubuntu just seems to have far too many issues, and things that no longer work as well as they used to.

  6. Eh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd phrase it as "developers need to feel like their efforts are appreciated" instead of the "heroes" thing. Feeling like nobody cares about the work you do is fairly disappointing and can demotivate you.

    Adding lengthy, far reaching CoCs can make things worse because you always feel like you'll get slapped by the CoC if you do something wrong. Living in fear of the CoC is not conducive to organic participation.

    I say, put the CoC away!

  7. Millennials learning about FOSS? by reanjr · · Score: 1, Troll

    We see one of these tales of open source developer woe like every other day now. You think maybe it's not open source that's the problem, but the open source developers who have been raised to be told at every turn that they are special, their work is amazing, and everyone would be lost without them?

    If the software suits your personal needs better than when you started hacking on the project, then you are your own personal hero. Why do you need hordes of people telling you how great you are?

  8. Be depressed by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about Linux Mint, but Linux in general is driving a huge part of our economy, but Linux developers aren't rich. They should be. The friggin secretaries at Uber and Lyft are going to be rich and much of their infrastructure runs on Linux. Linux developers are not appreciated enough.

    1. Re:Be depressed by reanjr · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know much about water, but in general it's driving a huge part of the global economy. Public water utilities aren't raking in much profit, and they should be. Water utilities aren't appreciated nearly enough.

    2. Re:Be depressed by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the teaching profession, but education in general is an important part of insuring our nation's future, but teachers aren't paid well. They should be.

    3. Re: Be depressed by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Try literacy, it helps. "Public water utilities" does not include private companies with lucrative monopolistic contracts. It covers municipal water utilities et al.

      Or maybe you just don't know the first thing about what you're talking about, maybe?

  9. Linux Mint is the Greatest Desktop I have Used . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hope some developers are reading. Using an older version, 17.3 Cinnamon.

    I've used a ton, everything from total bootstraps Linux From Scratch to handholding Ubuntu and all that in between, including tangent OSes BSD and Plan9. Linux Mint is where I can forget about the OS and just do work.

    That's about the best compliment I can give. It exceeds commercial OSes like Mac and Windows by a country mile, those are horrid in the meantime and never let me forget them as they try to put me in a straightjacket into their way of bullshit, whether it's procedural or upselling.

    Thank You. I haven't expressed it enough. I will donate a $100 to you guys now because it deserves that a minimum. Use it as you want.

  10. Not that it'll matter much... by sunami88 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just wanted to say I'm a devout Mint 19.1 user. Was a devout 17.x user, as well. I'd dabbled in the Linux world for many years, but it wasn't until Mint 15 or 16 (been a while now) that I finally made the move and dumped Windows. I never looked back. Even Ubuntu in it's heyday saw me dual booting...

    I really love the work these people do. I just hope they get as much satisfaction out of using their tools/programs as I do... If Mint died tomorrow I'm not sure I'd ever find another ~ . Sure you can graft Cinnamon on top of another Unix-like, but there's something about the whole software stack that has made it so I can't even consider another OS as a daily driver.

    For what little it's worth, I'll hoist one to the Mint devs when I get home tonight. Heck, I might even make a donation ;)

    --
    Sex. Drugs, and Unix.
    1. Re:Not that it'll matter much... by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

      make a donation and let them know how much you appreciate them. i do. skin in the game is more than moral support. it depends on the level of involvement. i wish i could be a dev support person on linux mint yet the field and crowd is very tight and getting involved requires a post like this to say, hey.. how can i help? i know you may need a pat on the back, more $ in the coffers, and maybe even some stimulants like free trips and getaways for a week to say, hey, this is all worth it.. if ibm buys redhat, and microsoft buys linux mint... does this all go away, and slashdot is all that remains ?? hmm.. curious minds want to know.. wish my ID was like 5000 but I am pretty new at #753349, yet my bond # is 99, very low in terms of tens of thousands. ;-) you know what i mean..

  11. Obligatory Demolition Man Quote by the_skywise · · Score: 1

    Troubled Guy: I don't know... lately I just don't feel like there's anything special about me.
    Booth: You are an incredibly sensitive man, who inspires joy-joy feelings in all those around you.
    ---
    I get it, I really do - you're losing your passion for your project and that's normal. But if you're not building Mint for yourself or if you feel that other distributions do the job better than maybe its time to move on or find someone who is passionate about it.

  12. Re:"Need to feel like heros"?!?!?! by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Freely writing code. Mint isn't a company, it's an old school-style open source project. And people do it for fun. Part of the fun? Happy users saying happy things happily to you.

    If people start taking them for granted under the "no good deed goes unpunished" doctrine, then I can understand the despondency. Add in the fact that it seems the people have been working really hard whilst having the tiny detail of the entirety of their outside lives intrude, for instance one person talks about now having to juggle a full time job with a very difficult rewrite of their window manager, well - difficult, you know?

    For what it's worth, when I use Linux at home these days it's mostly in VMs and I always go for Mint. So I appreciate the Mint team. I appreciate the cleanness and the fact change is made for good reason, rather than faddish just 'coz, I hope they see this Slashdot article and read it. I hope they see that people like what they're doing, and that they're onto a winner even during the difficult times. The very fact they've taken on this refactoring of Muffin despite the obvious difficulties and tensions it has caused - that's a sign of a team that can do the right thing.

    Thanks.

  13. Re:It is almost like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or maybe idealism drove a bunch of software developers to overwork themselves, and now they are experiencing burnout?

    Or maybe after a while of working for free, one starts to feel like one is being taken advantage of?

    Maybe software development, like any other kind of work, has a few projects that are fun and self-actualizing surrounded by plenty of tedious grudge work necessary to get anything actually working....and people need some concrete incentives to put up with all the grudge work?

    Nah, none of those explanations allow you to sit in moral judgement of people who are laboring on your behalf, in return for nothing from you.

  14. For real: Lighten up. by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a Linux Distro. Seriously. It's not that you had the solution for cancer and then lost it or something.
    I get that FOSS devs live off praise (I do too) but sometimes (most of the time actually) most people couldn't care less.

    Would the world really be a worse place if Mint weren't around? Didn't think so. And I appreciate your work and you deserve respect and laurels, but, seriously, lighten up, it's just a distro. Based on Debian btw. Like a bazillion others.

    Just to put things into perspective: A good friend and a young first mother died last night in Hamburg after a small army of highest profile medical experts fought for 10+ days to save her life after an emergency c-section due to severe acute HELPS-syndrome, after going 100+ blood transfusion, 8+ day long operations and an extra liver flown in from France. The child is alive and well but will grow up without her mom.

    *That's* a tragedy.

    Mint is just a distro.

    And if you're burned out and emotionally exausted from toiling at it (understandable), quit and go find something useful to do. Like, perhaps, taking care of children who lack one or two parents (just suggestion). Oh, and thanks for all the FOSS devs out there making our lives easyer - you *are* heroes.

    My 2 cents. ... And what Seneca has to say to this you can read in my sig.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:For real: Lighten up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If Mint went away tomorrow, there would be a lot of sad people, a lot more than are sad about that woman I just learned about.

    2. Re:For real: Lighten up. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is just one example of a wider problem though. It goes way beyond just Mint.

      Hobby software projects can be fun, but tend to go one of two ways. Everyone loses interest and it dies, or it gets really big and working on it becomes a chore. The only solution anyone has found is to go commercial, to pay people to work on the project.

      Most Linux contributed code is written by people being paid to do so. Kicad was languishing until CERN started pumping in development effort. Ubuntu is a Canonical product. Compilers, Webkit, Firefox, Blender, LibreOffice... I could go on.

      There are counter-examples but there is a definite trend. Maybe Mint should think about becoming a non-profit, and bringing the rewards in-house.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:For real: Lighten up. by virtualXTC · · Score: 2

      It's a Linux Distro. Seriously. It's not that you had the solution for cancer and then lost it or something..

      I do cancer research, and many of us use Mint as a primary desktop as it is easier to install and maintain current versions of the tools we need than the windows (or worse mac) software we need to do our data analysis. Sure my institution might have a expensive licence for a very specific piece of software that is slightly easier to use once you learn it, the problem is I'll have to learn it, and when I leave in 2-3 years to work somewhere else with better resources, they aren't likely to have a license to this same package. So in effect, Mint is helping cure cancer, in the same way your water utility is helping your local brewery brew beer, sure they could truck in the water, but it would make things A LOT more difficult.

  15. Maybe the drugs? by Fuzi719 · · Score: 1

    Depression could be the result of coming down off of "Tina". I'm sure the developers or someone involved knows that "Tina" is a slang for crystal meth?

  16. Re:It is almost like by reanjr · · Score: 1

    If volunteering isn't fun or satisfying, STOP VOLUNTEERING!

  17. Re:Get rid of SystemD by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's not like anyone uses Debian or Fedora or any of their derivative nowadays. Systemd is essentially dead on arrival.

  18. Re:Money grab? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    I think they should put a small 'like' button on the desktop. And if you press it, an automatic tweet to the developers is generated saying that you really like their product, and please make more.

  19. Re:"Need to feel like heros"?!?!?! by reanjr · · Score: 2

    If Mint hackers are doing it to make a desktop they love, then there's no need for users to tell them they're doing good. If Mint hackers are doing it for any other reason, they should get the fuck out. If volunteer work makes you depressed and you continue to volunteer and then go on the web to complain how depressed you are, you deserve any and all shit that comes your way.

  20. It just works by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well precisely because you have to hassle with installing Cinnamon. Then you have to hassle with unsupported tweaks and widgets for cinnamon. Tweaking isn't productive. Linux mint is simple to get working and maintain and customize. Their sofware manager is more of a wizard than synaptics detailed approach, and is in effect far superior to synaptic. But they also have synaptic available too for custom stuff. Personally I find that if I want to sweat the details I'll just go to the command line with Apt-get.

    the obsession with mint is, like apple, it just works. When was the last time anyone said that about Linux?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    1. Re:It just works by Immerman · · Score: 2

      >When was the last time anyone said that about Linux?

      Many moons ago, about pre-tabletized Ubuntu.I believe the moment that really drove it home was setting up the same printer on Mac and Linux - Ubuntu was a matter of plugging it in and clicking "yes" when it asked if I wanted to download and install drivers. MacOS was... considerably more than that.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  21. Good thing their paychecks cleared the bank ... by drnb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In other words, this development cycle wasn't fun and the devs feel too little appreciation in return.

    Good thing their paychecks cleared the bank ... oh wait.

    More seriously, this is the advantage of commercial software and corporate directed FOSS projects. Paychecks are how the non-fun parts get done and projects completed. Getting volunteers to diligently work on the non-fun parts of a project can be a major hurdle to overcome.

    1. Re:Good thing their paychecks cleared the bank ... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      More seriously, this is the advantage of commercial software and corporate directed FOSS projects. Paychecks are how the non-fun parts get done and projects completed. Getting volunteers to diligently work on the non-fun parts of a project can be a major hurdle to overcome.

      It's also a pretty good way to distribute the non-fun bits, unless you have a rock star everybody on the team gets their turn/share of the dreary bits. Most projects have people with passion that'll do what needs doing but they're often overwhelmed by everyone else's leftovers, which can fairly quick get depressive. Like code made by those who make too many positive contributions to turn down but who tend to write code that isn't rock solid or doesn't integrate well and generates a lot of noise. Same goes for users that aren't really trolls or toxic but just inept and need hand-holding because they either haven't read the manual or didn't understand it. Or maybe the documentation isn't really that great.

      Perhaps the biggest difference though is that most people find room in their life for making money. If you're busy at work and busy at home and your open source contributions are eating away at precious time you don't have it's the hobby that has to go. If it's your paycheck the hours you put in are what puts food on the table for the rest. I've seen way too many stories where people want to put in the hours, but they don't really have the time but since they have the passion they do it anyway and burn out after a while.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  22. Re:Money grab? by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

    A cron job would be less intrusive

    Good idea. I think we're getting somewhere.

  23. Re:They are depresesed by the success of MX Linux by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    Manjaro is actually #1 right now, Mint #3.

  24. Bummer by imperious_rex · · Score: 1

    Morale problems, especially for volunteers, aren't easy to solve. I wish the Clement and Mint developers all the best and this user certainly appreciates their work on making Mint the fine distro that it is.

    After being a longtime Ubuntu user, the switch to the gawdawful Unity window manager repulsed me. For awhile I got by with Xubuntu, but once I discovered Linux Mint and Cinnamon, I switched immediately and never looked back. I still plan on sticking with Mint, and will upgrade my old 17.2 box to 19.1 sometime this month.

    But having learned my lesson with Ubuntu, it's always good to have a fallback distro in mind just in case one's fav distro takes a turn for the worse. If I had to switch to a non-Mint distro, what would I choose in 2019? Probably Ubuntu MATE. It reminds me of the old GNOME 2 days, and now that MATE is 100% based on GNOME 3.x, it's a fine replacement for Cinnamon. There's growing interest in MX Linux (for what it's worth, its Distrowatch ranking is #2), but until MX includes Cinnamon or MATE as optional window managers, I won't consider it.

  25. Re:They are depresesed by the success of MX Linux by postbigbang · · Score: 1

    MX can be truly fun, the systemd issue aside.

    My problem is the characterization. We're used to this Darwinian success motif pushed by VCs, and so when things don't go so well for a while, it's perceived as blood in the water.

    Debian is my personal preference, but I use Mint here and there. I grew up with init.d, but systemd is only a minor PITA compared to other problems that distros have.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  26. Politics/Religion counterproductive by drnb · · Score: 1

    What. The.Fuck?!?! You're writing code. If you need to "feel like [a hero]" to be successful at that, you have, umm, issues.

    Someone sold them on the notion that they were revolutionaries, part of a movement. The politics/religion of Linux is at work here, unsurprisingly its counterproductive.

    Code because coding interests you, is fun to you.
    Share code with others because they share code with you, nothing more.
    Don't bring political nor religious ideologies into the mix, you'll get farther without it in the end.

  27. Re:Desktop GNU/Linux is likely to remain a dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been using Linux exclusively on my personal desktop systems for nearly 20 years now. For the last several years I use i3 because I realised I stopped using all those extra's that distinguish desktop managers from window managers, and I've disliked overlapping windows since Windows 3.11. What I have now is clean, light and logical and it works like a charm (although it's very different from what most people are used to).

    Not ready for the desktop? Dream on.

  28. Yourself, then silent majority - but not feedback by drnb · · Score: 1

    Amen ... Mint developers using their own product should be evidence enough whether they did a good job or not. They are perfectly capable themselves of judging their work. Feedback is over 10x more likely to be negative than positive, that's just reality, get over it. Accept this and don't take feedback to seriously. Are people using your software or not, after your own opinion, the size of that silent majority is your second point of validation. F*ck the forum whiners, don't take them too seriously. If they point out a legit bug, great. If they offer a useful suggestion, great. But if they are just offering a personal judgement, who the f*ck are they that you should give two sh*ts about their opinion?

  29. Usage **IS** appreciation by drnb · · Score: 1

    It does indeed help to know that your work is appreciated ...

    If they are using your software you are being appreciated.

  30. Show of hands.... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    How many think an AC virtue signalling a donation will actually make it?

  31. Linux Mint is often billed as similar to WIndows by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    So when you appeal to a group of users who just look at an OS as an OS, and not a community, the Linux Mint user base is what you wind up with.

    .
    In order to be widely deployed on desktops, the OS has to be just an OS, not a community cult.

    The question is, can Linux become a widely used desktop OS and still retain a community-oriented user base? Linux Mint's experience seems to suggest the answer is no.

  32. Re:Desktop GNU/Linux is likely to remain a dream by SurenEnfiajyan · · Score: 1
  33. I stopped using mint by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I had been happy with mint for a while... right up until I had to do a presentation and my laptop mysteriously could no longer connect to an external monitor. Every time I tried, it would go into what appeared to be an infinite loop of trying to set the resolution of both built in and external monitors. Didn't matter what I plugged in. Projector. A monitor that had previously worked perfectly fine.

    Luckily I had tested things early enough to quickly install LO on a MBP and was able to do my presentation. I found out afterwards that it was an obscure bug that could be solved by a reboot, but I had no way of knowing that at the time, and I didn't have time to troubleshoot. Regardless, the damage was done, and my trust in Mint being a solid product was shattered, and I won't be installing it again.

    I can sympathize with developer frustrations, and ${DEITY} knows that dealing with the public is damned exhausting, especially when they're Dunning-Krugering up the wazoo. I could go into a long diatribe about the problems I see with OSS software, etc etc, but in the end the product needs to reliably do what it says on the tin, and everything else is moot.

    1. Re:I stopped using mint by fluffythedestroyer · · Score: 2

      First rule of fixing computers. Start by a reboot. Then complain and lose trust in your suppose product. I don't see the problem with your mistrust of Mint when you just have to reboot and it fixes a problem. To me thats not a bug at all.

  34. Works for me by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Mint has been my go-to Linux desktop distro since Ubuntu's default package & DE selection went off the rails into crazytown way back when. A few old computers at the office run it and people who don't know what a Linux is use it without trouble. Looks like success to me!

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  35. Happiness indicated by voluntary use by drnb · · Score: 1

    They don't need hordes. One happy user every now and then can be enough. But when they look around they're greeted by the acerbic FOSS community, or even worse, silence and crickets.

    People voluntarily and silently using your software are often happy users. They are telling you they are happy by using your software. If you need virtual hugs to continue developing software then you likely got into development for the wrong reason. Your primary validation is *your* opinion, your secondary validation are voluntary and active users. Virtual hugs are of far less importance than these two (and other) indicators.

  36. I don't need to feel like a hero by scourfish · · Score: 1

    I just want to get paid and be on a development team that isn't sloppy.

  37. Mint is a great distro by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    I'm dual booting it on iMacs, laptops and using it for ZFS+Samba. Kudos to the dev team! I just wish you'd drop SystemD

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  38. Mouse wheel speed setting missing? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I agree. The mouse wheel sensitivity thing is a strange oversight in the otherwise elegant interface. It's hard to beleive it's not there. Instructions for doing it from the command line exist but they are not simple or something you want to with the finality of command line edits to system resources.

    I haven't found one yet but I bet there might be an add-on widget for cinammon that does this. Anyone know?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  39. Well choice is good by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Just because Ubuntu Mate exists is not a reason to avoid Mint. It's great that people have choices in OS still.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  40. Re:They are depresesed by the success of MX Linux by found404 · · Score: 2

    Had no idea that MX Linux had become so well-known (or increasingly so). Thanks for pointing this out! I'm an ex-Mint user (still love what they've done with the distro and Cinnamon) not because there was anything wrong with it but because of performance issues on my admittedly lower-end (aged) laptop. Went through tons of Live CDs. anti-X drew me in (love lightweight OSes) and it was followed by MX Linux.

    Been on it for about 6 months. I was just looking for a distro that would breathe new life into my laptop. I happened to get one that is a rolling release (so rare in the Linux world), running on top of debian (access to a rich assortment of programs). Did not really consider other aspects like systemd - was just looking for a performance boost.

    Performance has been amazing (at the end of the day... this is the key). Firefox Quantum runs like a champ on a 10+ year old laptop where the chromes fail miserably. Added the FF extension named "h264ify" (plus the usual anti-trackers) and now Youtube Videos don't cause the laptop into meltdown.

    At some point I'm going to have to replace my old non-kiosk laptop (with such a great keyboard, tons of ports, massive hard drive, 16:10 aspect ratio, replaceable components) but not today - all because of MX Linux. I think lots of Linux users are in a similar position as me (running older - tried and true - laptops).

  41. Re:Money grab? by hankwang · · Score: 1

    Calling it a money grab is a bit too strong, but I'd be more willing to donate if they made it more clear what it's used for. (I did donate a few times.)

    It's not clear whether it's a non-profit organization or a company. I have no idea how many person- hours they put in and how much they get paid.

    The donations over 2018 totalled about $140k. Other sources of income are not disclosed. - https://linuxmint.com/donors.p... - Is that a lot or not?

  42. +1 for Mint from me too. It's great as a VM's. by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I run Windows on my laptop. Shocking around here, I know.

    But there are some tasks that work out better on Linux. Ubuntu is brutal in VirtualBox, or at least it was, when I first went down the Mint path. I think I was following a tutorial for Ubuntu, so I ended up trying Mint.

    I still have that VM around and fire it up a few times a year for whatever. Also works pretty well on an ancient laptop I keep around.

  43. Mint Linux, made Linux usable and reliable. by MindPrison · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's of course based on Ubuntu, so credit is due where credit is due.

    But that said, they made it look and feel better, more inclusive bells'n'whistles for life and fun, and of course everyday use. As an old 10+ year slackware user and a big fan of it, I was at some point going "I'm too old for this fixing the boat, compiling this and compiling that" life, and wanted the comfortable life of windows users without the disk trashing, endless registry garbage, and constant threat of viruses, Now - Linux is by far not free from worms, exploits and viruses, but since there's still not that many using it, it has the "Apple effect" of having very little malware to bother your every day life.

    The functionality of Mint Linux is nothing short of amazing. I have boxes that have been going on for years, heck - I just moved my previous Mint linux installation from my older computer to a new one (always updating religiously though), but with completely new hardware, worked straight out of the box, even with the proprietary Nvidia drivers and steam gaming, everything was like before, all installations, years of fun stuff installed - just worked (try that with Windows!)

    Mint Linux put the FUN back in Linux, it's still Linux with all the control you'd ever want over your (and yes, I say YOUR) operating system, but without the control of the "man" and "corporate", you're as free as you want to be, and can have all the fun Windows users are having (without the constant crashes and dish trashes).

    So consider this a small but humble THANK YOU - to the ENTIRE Mint Linux team, every contributor - thanks a million for your efforts, making our lives so comfortable we almost take you for granted, this is just how GOOD a job you did.

    You usually never hear the praise - just all the complaints, once you hear nothing - you can be pretty darn sure your job was insanely well done, because people tend to forget to say "THANKS" when they're just enjoying their experience, but something break? You'll have a queue of complaints, right there at your doorstep.

    So again - THANK YOU!

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  44. Re:Money grab? by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I don't really think it was a money grab. It just really struck me that the whole article complains about not being appreciated with thank yous and how the devs are depressed, and then ends with several sentences about sending money. The strong implication is that monetary compensation would be just as good as thank yous. Which is totally reasonable. But it's an obfuscated way of just saying "give me money". Which is also reasonable to do. But putting it at the tail of begging for sympathy is poor taste.

  45. Stirring The Pot by ZipXap · · Score: 1

    This whole article reads like someone trying to stir the pot and create more stress and tension. For shame.

  46. If you want happy users Bring Back Mint KDE! by virtualXTC · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the reason for the huge drop in thankful users was their decision to stop supporting their second most desperate set of users, those running KDE?

    While I understand Gnome 2 users are probably their bread and butter due to their forking into Mate, there are plenty of other stable Debian based distros that provided stable Gnone 3 and Xfce based environments that 'just work'. But just like having an up to date Gnome 2 environment makes people EXTREMELY thankful, there really isn't another Debian based KDE distro that 'just works'. So if you prefer a KDE desktop, sadly, you options are to either deal with broken Debian based KDE distros (such as KDE's own Neon distro), abandon KDE, or move to the RPM based OpenSUSE.

    While it's obvious from the long delays in Mint roll outs of KDE compared to other environments that KDE has never been a real focus of Mint, I can personally attest to how thankful KDE users are to Mint for all their years of support. Thanks guys!

  47. If you think no one cares about you... by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    ...stop paying your bills for a couple months.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  48. I'm very happy at current progress. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    I don't use Mint on my own machine, but I have my mom using Mint on her computer as she is (perhaps overly) worried about viruses and malware and we did not have a Windows license for when I built her last PC anyway. She's on 17.3 still right now, but I maintain a second machine of my own with the current release of Mint to evaluate for when it comes time to update her machine. The main reason I have not is there is no real "upgrade" path on Mint from back then. You still had to reinstall from scratch to move to the next major version. That's a hassle there is no reason to undertake when the system is working fine for her now and still under long-term support.

    One thing I've noticed is that starting with Mint 18 -- Bluetooth audio actually works. Like I tried it on 17.3 and it didn't really function. It lost the headset, didn't output audio, etc. But with 18 it really functioned properly. And following the blog posts since then, I'm been seeing the progress the developers are making in performance enhancements in Mint in my own usage of the new releases. Their work is certainly appreciated, even if I don't crow about is all the time on the forums.

  49. It's a thankless job. by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

    I used to maintain a few FreeBSD ports...Not nearly the scope of maintaining a full distro, but my experience was similar. One thing they didn't get into that was a big problem for me was feeling like I was responsible for the problems created by terrible OSS projects' awful RE practices...Yes, I'm looking at you, OpenArena. When the majority of the work is dealing with people that run terrible projects in order to figure out what's needed to build their terrible software cause they can't be bothered to put that information anywhere themselves---or even have an idea about it when you ask them---that's a problem that really doesn't have a good solution, yet the people packaging/porting software for individual distributions have to deal with.

    See https://slashdot.org/comments.... for back-story of why I'm targeting OpenArena specifically, but know that a *lot* of smaller OSS projects run the same way.

  50. Just make a list. by laxr5rs · · Score: 1

    Make a list of how you would like whichever specific people to think, act and talk about you. I'll throw mine in too. No one ever told me I was necessarily going to "get thanks" for my efforts for anything in my life and for whatever reason, I don't expect it. When I get it, it doesn't matter. I'm fine with it, but I don't need it. I'm already doing what I want to be doing. If it wasn't what I want to be doing then I wouldn't do it. If something in your world isn't pleasing to you and it's possible to change it, then that's what a person can do, if they can do it. But never have I thought that I could somehow hope to get others to have a certain attitude towards what I'm doing. Heroes? You mean like Avenger movies? People in your world are not being good enough to you? I suffer from manic depression. I've clawed my life back from the jaws of destruction on several occasions. I've lost everything a few times and struggled back. People don't pat me on the back for that. Those victories belong to me, at least. If someone else wants to know about them, I'm glad to tell them. Defeated? I suspect that the specter of the full force of the feeling of defeat has not been met by what many of the Mint devs. I'm just guessing, but I'm thinking it's not WWI here. Linux Mint is a fantastic OS, but it's niche. I use Windows. I've used almost all the modern PC (Windows, OS2, Linux, NeXT, etc) and Mac and OSX variants out there. I've been doing this for a long time. I use Windows because I want my hardware to work and I don't want to fight too hard to make it work. I want software that has deeply intuitive UI designs which generally make sense and are not Open Source afterthoughts. If a person chooses to work on Linux Mint, a niche OS for people who frankly are fussy about operating systems, then it would behoove them to expect what a person gets when they work on a niche OS. The fact is, statistically, people aren't paying that much attention to Linux Mint. When it comes to user space, the Linux crowd is the pure, the proud, the isolated. They did something great, and that's not enough? I'm sorry people feel bad. That's never good. But I can't shake the feeling like "everyone needs to get a gold star." But, that's not life. Not everyone gets a gold star - whether or not they'd really like one. I knew someone who lost their wonderful son in their early twenties to a horrible accident. I won't tell you the whole story, but suffice to say, the son _suffered_ before he died. My elderly friend John, telling me this story, said, "I learned something from that." I asked, "what was that?" John looked me in eye with a steel gaze and said, "life ain't fair."

  51. Re:Upgrades? by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

    That was the issue for me, as well.

  52. Mint Just Works by jimcooncat · · Score: 1

    Thank you C. L. and everyone else who provides Linux Mint. I had fun playing distro-hop back in the day, but now I'm only interested in using the computer, not playing with it. For the last few years, Mint MATE has been working so well for me, and my wife and I have been enjoying using it as our OS. Don't be sad, you've done a great thing, and we love the work you've done.

  53. Re:Linux Mint is the Greatest Desktop I have Used by strikethree · · Score: 1

    I could have written what you wrote, except that my 17.3 install will be my last Mint.

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen