Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Stops Selling eBooks, Will Refund Customers For Previous Purchases (theverge.com)

Starting today, Microsoft is ending all ebook sales in its Microsoft Store for Windows PCs. "Previously purchased ebooks will be removed from users' libraries in early July," reports The Verge. "Even free ones will be deleted. The company will offer full refunds to users for any books they've purchased or preordered." From the report: Microsoft's "official reason," according to ZDNet, is that this move is part of a strategy to help streamline the focus of the Microsoft Store. It seems that the company no longer has an interest in trying to compete with Amazon, Apple Books, and Google Play Books. It's a bit hard to imagine why anyone would go with Microsoft over those options anyway.

If you have purchased ebooks from Microsoft, you can continue accessing them through the Edge browser until everything vanishes in July. After that, customers can expect to automatically receive a refund. According to a newly published Microsoft Store FAQ, "refund processing for eligible customers start rolling out automatically in early July 2019 to your original payment method." If your original payment method is no longer valid (or if you used a gift card), you'll receive a credit back to your Microsoft account to use online at the Microsoft Store. Microsoft will also offer an additional $25 credit (to your Microsoft account) if you annotated or marked up any ebook that you purchased from the Microsoft Store prior to today, April 2nd.
Liliputing reminds us that "if you pay for eBooks, music, movies, video games, or any other content from a store that uses DRM, then you aren't really buying those digital items so much as paying a license fee for the rights to access them... a right that can be revoked if the company decides to remove a title from your device unexpectedly or if a company shuts down a server that would normally handle the digital rights management features."

You can find DRM-free eBooks at some online stores including Smashwords and Kobo (by browsing the DRM-free selection), or from publisher websites including Angry Robot, and Baen.

131 comments

  1. Welcome to the Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Curated by Clippy.

    Users, feel free to convert all your ebooks now.

    1. Re: Welcome to the Library of Alexandria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plays for sure.... part two

      You had to write to a CD then rip the CD to recover those. Probably not much you can do for ripped ebooks

  2. Arrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can find DRM free ebooks at many locations.

    1. Re:Arrrr by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you can also find DRM-free books at Amazon. Look for "Simultaneous Device Usage: Unlimited" in the ebook details. It's up to the publisher whether to enable DRM or not on a per book basis on Amazon. Even with it on, book pirates have it stripped off within minutes of publication, so more and more publishers are choosing to disable it.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:Arrrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never purchase anything with DRM attached ... ever. If DRM free is not offered then ... Arrrrr

    3. Re:Arrrr by Cederic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, I published DRM free on Amazon (and others). I doubt it made any difference to sales either.

  3. Books by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't own anything in the digital world.
    Stop renting and look for real books nobody can remove.
    Invest in real paper books and enjoy reading.
    Music next?
    Games next?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      So what's your problem with digital books that are in PDF?

      There's nothing wrong with digital books, as long as they in a format that you can take with you and put on whatever device is convenient.

      How will a remote company delete my pdfs when they don't control what devices they are installed on?

    2. Re:Books by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      And yet the ebooks people expected to use are now gone.
      The problem is the ebook, the DRM, the OS.
      Who wants to risk an OS and brand that will remove digital content?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Books by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Anyone who is defending DRM needs to learn more about it. The whole purpose of DRM is to do stuff like this, it is not just copy protection. Even the so-called "good guys" like Valve can turn around to screw over their users this way.

    4. Re:Books by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      PDF is a terrible format for ebooks. It constrains the formatting to a 'layout' that is size defined.

    5. Re:Books by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I had a technical PDF that required getting certificates periodicly in order to read it. It was absurd that it had protection in the first place, but the added effort to request continued access was just extra abuse that was unnecessary. So print it out, delete the PDF, and continue.

      That said, Adobe is definitely putting this stuff into PDF.

    6. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Or... print it to a PDF printer, and have the portability of the PDF with none of the DRM.

    7. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That is the general idea... and depending on the types of content that one reads, that can be easily preferred.

    8. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      How does a watermark on a PDF allow a company to delete content that you've paid for when they don't control what devices you copy the PDF to?

    9. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I'm not making excuses for what Microsoft is doing here... I'm saying that digital books are not necessarily inherently bad in that respect because digital formats exist where neither the publisher nor the operating system provider has any control over what devices you might copy the content to.

    10. Re:Books by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Quite correct the digital distribution method is generally fine. This is all down to a dick company, M$, that considers customers wallets and nothing more, to be emptied and abused, just don't give a shit, as long as they can legally get away with it. Consider this when buying anything from M$, you time, your investment, you as a person, a customer to be valued, not from them, a wallet to be lied to and emptied. You can bet they never advertised, we can cancel this order post purchase at any time and not give you your money back but force you to rent another licence fee on another digital product, even if there is nothing in our shit store you want, ha ha, you are now a M$ store investor with zero returns. You buy it with cash, they take it back and give a zero interest deposit in the M$ Store BANK, interesting business model.

      Create a digital store, sell stuff cheap, cancel the sales and keep the money and tell people but they can buy anything from the digital store, with nothing worth buying in the store and everything hugely overpriced 10,000% profit margins, the all new M$ Digital Bank store front. Your saying that is legal, wow.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    11. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You can bet they never advertised, we can cancel this order post purchase at any time and not give you your money back...

      Sure, except that MS *IS* refunding purchases

      It's probably still annoying as fuck for people that depended on the content, but at least they are getting their money back.

    12. Re:Books by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not just Microsoft, it's anyone who rents content to you. Had an interesting discussion with a friend a few months ago where he talked about all the content he'd bought from a well-known streaming service. I corrected him to tell him he'd rented it, not bought it. Even after multiple iterations of explanation, he still couldn't quite grasp that since it was held on someone else's servers and they could change their ToS any time they felt like it, all of his content was rented, not bought.

      Silly thing was he'd actually already been burned by this service when they decided to withdraw access to content he'd paid for. I've not got it via BT, which doesn't have these problems. Arguably it's OK since he's paid for it, he just had to go to an illegal pirate site to get the copy he legally paid for.

    13. Re: Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went on a VMWare course. The material was online. It was supposed to be available for a lifetime. It is no longer there.

      Hard copy dead tree it is next time even if I have to print it myself.

    14. Re:Books by Excelcia · · Score: 2

      You don't own anything in the digital world. Stop renting and look for real books nobody can remove.

      This isn't quite true. People just need to insist on ownership. We are guilty of allowing commercial interests to lull us with making it easy at the cost of ownership.

      Invest a little time, make an effort to learn a little, and exercise some self reliance. It is still possible to have all the benefits of digital books with very little of the drawbacks. Sure, it's great to hold, touch, and experience a real book. Some of my books will never be digital. But there is also something to be said to carrying around an entire library on reader. And an e-ink display is just hands down better than any phone or tablet.

      I highly recommend a Kobo reader in conjunction with Calibre e-book manager. It's not difficult to buy books off, say, Amazon and pull them into Calibre. A plugin strips off the Digital Restrictions Management and I can easily convert it to e-pub and load it on my reader. I have access to the myriad of free books. Once it's in Calibre, no one can take it away from me. And I know if I decide to ditch my Kobo for some other hardware, that Calibre will likely support it. It's my future-proof e-book library. I can also move my library to my phone - while I don't like to do a /lot/ of reading on my phone, it is nice to have books there in case I go somewhere without my reader.

    15. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this marked insightful? It's not the digitization of books or the offering of them for download that's the problem, but this poster makes it sound like it is. The problem is DRM. Period. By the way, if you buy your games on Steam, you also get DRM, and the "we can take it back any time we want" that goes with it. Buy your games from a DRM-free store, like gog, and this won't happen.

    16. Re:Books by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Recall the "Pulls Purchased E-Book Copies of 1984 and Animal Farm" in July 2009?
      https://yro.slashdot.org/story...
      That was the hint of what ebook control would be like.
      Now we see the reality of just what control the operating system provider has over ebooks in 2019 :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    17. Re:Books by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Quite correct the digital distribution method is generally fine."
      Until the ebooks are gone in the real world .

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    18. Re:Books by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Removing DRM is not allowed.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    19. Re:Books by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re 'People just need to insist on ownership. "
      That worked out well when paying for ebooks :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    20. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Then why are you allowed to print it?

    21. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It seems to have escaped your attention that I was talking about using digital formats that nobody else controls what devices you install the books on, and nobody can decide you no longer have a right to read it.

    22. Re:Books by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Sure, except that MS *IS* refunding purchases

      What about interest? Basically what is happening here is you have provided M$ with a interest free loan here. It is not what it was supposed to be, but it is essentially what happened here. I say if they are going to force a refund on a product, they need to provide the refund with far market interest rate.

      But more importantly, you should be able to say "no."

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    23. Re: Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is, not everybody has unlimited space to store all of those physical books. Or the desire to carry them around.

        Non-DRM'd eBooks in a standard widely used format is the way to go, and at least I can carry far more books and not break my back doing so.

    24. Re:Books by tsa · · Score: 1

      Using M$ instead of MS is childish. Every company is there to make money.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    25. Re:Books by tsa · · Score: 1

      Does that stop you from trying?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    26. Re:Books by tsa · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend a Kobo reader in conjunction with Calibre e-book manager. It's not difficult to buy books off, say, Amazon and pull them into Calibre. A plugin strips off the Digital Restrictions Management and I can easily convert it to e-pub and load it on my reader. I have access to the myriad of free books. Once it's in Calibre, no one can take it away from me. And I know if I decide to ditch my Kobo for some other hardware, that Calibre will likely support it. It's my future-proof e-book library. I can also move my library to my phone - while I don't like to do a /lot/ of reading on my phone, it is nice to have books there in case I go somewhere without my reader.

      I also do this, but with my Amazon Kindle. You can switch its wifi off or never enter a password to make sure Amazon doesn’t remove stuff from it.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    27. Re:Books by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I doubt Microsoft is getting refunded the royalties from the faux-sales of those books. The publishers aren't going to claw back years of royalties from authors and repay them to Microsoft just because Microsoft decided it wants out of the eBook business.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    28. Re:Books by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Riiight..../looks at USB drive filled with GOG .EXE installers and game manual PDFs/....really not too worried, nope.

      And sadly when it comes to games there is a reason to support DRM in some situations...namely douchebag cheating scumbags in PVP focused games. Nothing will kill a game quicker than those that busted their ass to learn the game and get good at it constantly getting owned by garbage players using wallhacks, auto-aim hacks, and other cheats. And before anybody says "run your own servers"? That is fine if you want to only play a game with a couple of friends, when you want to play against hundreds to thousands of players worldwide? Yeah that strategy ain't gonna work.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    29. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will a remote company delete my pdfs when they don't control what devices they are installed on?

      It is conceivable that e-books could one day be detected like a virus, to be removed (and reported) by the OS.

    30. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Can you give any plausible reason why a desktop or mobile OS would erase all files utilizing a common format like PDF?

    31. Re:Books by Zak3056 · · Score: 2

      Basically what is happening here is you have provided M$ with a interest free loan here. It is not what it was supposed to be, but it is essentially what happened here.

      Not in the least. Microsoft held your money and in return you got access to the books that you would have otherwise purchased elsewhere. No one has suffered any harm here (except the people who made annotations, THAT really sucks).

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    32. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your argument is also a bit childish though.
      "MS" has a lot more meanings, M$ does not (to that degree at least), so it is objectively the better identifier.

    33. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM and anti-cheat really are not the same at all.
      You can have DRM that does not prevent cheating at all (by ONLY validating the license check part of the code and not care about the rest for example).
      You can have anti-cheat with no DRM at all (for example, server-side checks, manual reviews etc. - though depending on game enforcement like bans can be hard without DRM).

    34. Re:Books by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      Why would you expect DRM to have any significant overlap with cheat detection/prevention?

    35. Re:Books by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I download ebooks then remove DRM if present, fuck "renting". This is Slashdot so no one here has an excuse for not knowing how to use calibre.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    36. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By whom? Is this a legal restriction you're talking about? What is the penalty for a user who removes DRM from his own legal ebook?

    37. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS is probably paying a reduced monthly or annual subscription rate, which is why they need to delete the copies since they want to stop paying.

    38. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, Project Gutenberg ebooks?

      I suppose drive thru RPG counts, too - AFAIK they provide a PDF to download when you buy something there.

      OTOH, I don't think most ebooks are available as downloadable PDFs. All in all, I give AHuxley an 8/10 for an insightful point about renting vs. buying when DRM is involved and mark-t a 7/10 for bringing up a technical exception to that landscape.

    39. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant. The parent was talking about DRM, not watermarks.

    40. Re:Books by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      It's not just Microsoft, it's anyone who rents content to you. Had an interesting discussion with a friend a few months ago where he talked about all the content he'd bought from a well-known streaming service. I corrected him to tell him he'd rented it, not bought it. Even after multiple iterations of explanation, he still couldn't quite grasp that since it was held on someone else's servers and they could change their ToS any time they felt like it, all of his content was rented, not bought.

      Silly thing was he'd actually already been burned by this service when they decided to withdraw access to content he'd paid for.

      And I can't believe you're attempting to help the corporation brainwash your friend.

      That is exactly what the corporations want, because it (a) puts all the power in their hands and (b) exonerates them of wrongdoing and punitive penalties for stealing the content he purchased.

      YES, they can turn it off at any time. NO, that doesn't not mean that they have a unencumbered right do to so and can do so without penalty. It's corporate shills, intentional or otherwise, that convince people to give up their rights in favor of the company by not even trying to fight it.

      What you should be doing is convincing your friend to push for not just reimbursement but also punitive damages for the material they already took away, as a sale had happened, and attempting to redefine a common-use term to be something completely different in the fine print of terms and conditions is something our legal system should protect us against. Go to small claims court and get a default judgement against them when they don't bother to send a lawyer, or more likely a settlement from their legal department because it's cheaper than sending a lawyer.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    41. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Isn't a digital watermark a form of DRM?

    42. Re:Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are PDF readers which have reflow (is that the word?) functionality.

    43. Re:Books by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It's funny you should mention drivethrurpg, because that is actually the bulk of my own personal experience with ebooks, and that distribution method is what I was referring to.

  4. Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by o_ferguson · · Score: 1, Insightful
    PHRACK is pleased to announce our Corporate Library 2019 torrent. It's been two years since we first released this resource and the library has grown considerably (through hook and crook) since then. While the initial library containing everything from 1985 to 2017 was roughly 13GB uncompressed, the compressed version of the new library (1985-2019) weighs in at 78.4GB (under 100GB decompressed.)

    I say "compressed" because the library is now too large to create a torrent file from its unpacked directory and file structure. For that reason, this edition of the library is being released as a compressed archive (regular .rar format, not a renamed .ace file ;P) What's new?

    @ Many more hacking and programming e-books in most categories.

    @ Tons of new .MIL instruction manuals from the USA D0D, and added CANADA ARMED FORCES manuals for the first time as well.

    @ O'Reilly cookbooks for most popular platforms.

    @ Charles Preston Black History Month Archive. Charles had to take this important archive off Google Drive in February because of DRM bullshit. We replicate it here for posterity. It’s in the /anarchy/survival section.

    @ That insane 2000-page Q-anon PDF, and a PDF of the Captain Crunch autobiography.

    @ Complete DEFCON and Black Hat conference rips: every year, every presentation PDF, all the code, and audio from almost every presentation, all in one place for easy search or AI training. Also CCC magazine in German.

    @ The Magnitsky Act: Behind the Scenes (2016.) This German film has been banned in the west and is desperately important watching for anyone who wants to understand the current state of the world and why we are in a new, artificial cold war.

    @ An entirely new Russian section, with programming and hacking books in Russian, as well as many and various documents relating to Russian hacking and meme warfare.

    @ LinkedIn ICE archives: Scraped list of all ICE profiles from LinkedIn, for future war crimes prosecution.

    @ The Beto O'Rourk cDc .txt archive: Everything Psychedelic Warlord published via cDc.

    @ NZ shooter video, manifesto, social media scrapes and related content. This material is all in the /occult/kek section, in an additional .rar shell so nobody access it by accident. It's also prefaced by the excellent four-part series "The Kek Wars," ( https://www.ecosophia.net/the-... ) which provides important historical context for any future researcher using our archive to study government occlusion of information in the Trump era.

    The full file list is available at: https://drive.google.com/open?...

    Magnet link for the entire library:

    magnet:?xt=urn:btih:4cd4c3031bfc7abc3f8efb7348884b4d2c155d00&dn=Phrack+Corporate+Library+2019

    --
    - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
    1. Re:Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, are you trying to emulate a blockchain? Loads of this stuff should be in separate torrents, its a total mishmash of unrelated shit.

    2. Re:Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Any modern client will allow you to choose which files you are interested in.

    3. Re:Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by o_ferguson · · Score: 2

      Because the file list is literally too long to make a torrent from it. It exceeds the limits of the tech.

      --
      - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
    4. Re:Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kinda sad that the once great PHRACK has fallen to the level of conspiracy theory bullshit. There's some good stuff in there but go they really need to make one giant 76GB torrent with all the conspiracy stuff mixed in?

      Also security focused zine using RAR, LOL.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Phrack Corporate Library always DRM-free. by o_ferguson · · Score: 1
      For the record, this isn't Phrack Magazine Issue #70. This is the corporate library, which is an archive Phrack maintains for its writing staff. Phrack (if you read issue #1) has always been a tripartite magazine covering Hacking, Phreaking and Anarchy. Unlike, say, 2600, Phrack is not solely a hacker magazine. Hence, we maintain an Anarchy archive, which includes, among other sections, a Conspiracy and Occult section. If you want a pure "hacking" torrent there are lots of them out there, but none of them are as comprehensive as this one.

      Feel free to break this library down into as many individual torrents as you want, guy. The point is that 100% of these resources (mainly books) are DRM-free ebooks that won't expire and will display on any platform with a reader.

      --
      - In Soviet Korea, only old people loose all their bases to Natalie Portman's petrified hot grits overlords.
  5. Kobo sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Overpriced and misleading kindle wannabe. Kind of shit you would expect from a Walmart partner.

    1. Re:Kobo sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also worth noting (on topic) the only DRM free stuff they have is what they scraped from gutenberg.org, and are trying to sell for a buck or two.

    2. Re:Kobo sucks by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I just use calibre and my phone (fbreader if your curious). I can read wherever I want, and listen to the books with TTS if I'm driving.

  6. Just like they did with Music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot trust Microsoft for media licensing (books/music/video/etc) they do this every time. What a joke. There should be laws that require companies to setup a minimum requirement to provide continued support for digital purchases - much like they regulate banks to ensure they don't fail.

    1. Re: Just like they did with Music... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easier just to ban DRM or at least refuse to spend tax dollars enforcing or investigating it. As an alternate, don't buy shit with DRM. Torrent it, rent and rip it via digital camera. I copied all my textbooks that way. Not to steal them... I bought them. I did it to avoid having to carry the weight. 3500 jpgs and a laptop weights a lot less than a laptop and 5-7 textbooks.

      Fiddled with my Kodak digital camera to get the best resolution/compression/focus/lighting for about an hour, then ripped each book in under an hour using a $20 remote clicker to avoid the vibration of a physical button blurring my images.
      Getting an OCRed text searchable PDF from those JPGs was just an added bonus.

    2. Re:Just like they did with Music... by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Yep, they totally fucked over everyone who bought a WMV/HD disc(*) back around 2006. Sometime around 2012, they shut down the DRM server, and all the discs became fucking useless and unplayable. And they didn't even have the goddamn decency to offer their WMV/HD victims refunds.

      ---

      (*)WMV/HD was Microsoft's short-lived attempt to preempt and hijack BOTH HD-DVD and Blu-Ray by promoting a third format based on VC1 that would have enabled DVD manufacturers to cheaply add the ability to play back HD content from normal single and double-layer DVD media. Officially, Microsoft promoted it as a "connect your laptop to your new HDTV now, and buy a future WMV-HD DVD player later" standard, but there's still disagreement about whether Microsoft genuinely intended to hijack the future HD optical-disc standard, or whether they were just using it as a bargaining chip to force Sony's hand and get them to agree to make VC-1 one of Blu-Ray's mandatory supported codecs. Microsoft already had HD-DVD in the bag, but Blu-Ray's consortium balked until Microsoft agreed to let them bundle it in players for free and charge higher royalties per-disc. Ultimately, it was moot... VC-1 is superior to h.264 and MPEG-2 at lower bitrates, but it now costs more to pay the higher royalties and use VC-1 to allow your content to use a single-layer disc than it does to just use a higher bitrate with a cheaper codec and a dual-layer disc instead.

    3. Re:Just like they did with Music... by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Sounds like that content was PlaysForSure!

  7. Hu? Apple? Gutenberg? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    You also find DRM free books in Apples iBooks store or on gutenberg.org or obooko.com etc.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    1. Re:Hu? Apple? Gutenberg? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      iBooks requires a hardware dongle that I am not interested in.

    2. Re:Hu? Apple? Gutenberg? by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Yep. A lot of Amazon Kindle content is DRM-free also, but not all. My books are all DRM-free, but there's no obvious flag in the sales page details (you have to interpret what it means by unlimited devices, lending enabled, etc).

      Calibre is a pretty good program for both converting ebooks between formats and managing your collection.

      --
      -- Alastair
  8. Back in the old days... by BitterOak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in the old days, when a bookstore closed, it meant you couldn't buy any more books there. But nothing happened to the books you already bought. Now when a bookstore closes, all your books disappear in a puff of smoke. Isn't progress wonderful?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Back in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tradeoffs, but this isn't really the same thing.
      When that bookstore closed you keep the books, the store keeps you money.

      If the books go away but the money comes back.

      Inconvenient, but you got your money back.

    2. Re: Back in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure because a refund covers what was lost. Maybe if books were for entertainment, a refund would be double the value of the book. However, books are also reference materials, knowledge. A refund doesn't replace the book that was lost. Good thing this happened as early as it did, it would be irreplaceable if the book was out of print (including not being sold as an ebook) and hard to find used in traditional paper format due to the popularity of ebooks.

    3. Re:Back in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loaned some old SF books to my brothers while they were in Florida and I live in Canada.

      Without asking my mom later threw those books away without asking me.

      So I tried replacing those books. Turns out most were out of print, so I could not buy them, most were not available on EBay or Amazon. And since I am in Canada and some were translated French and German books I could not even find the books in a language I could read (English), any pointers were for the non-English books. I was only able to get about one fifth of the books again. Just getting the money does not help.

      E.C.P.

    4. Re:Back in the old days... by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      I hope you got better brothers after that. In retrospect were there any tells that they might destroy your property?

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    5. Re:Back in the old days... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you do the sensible thing and back up your purchases after stripping the DRM out of them? It is easy enough to do.

      In other words, quit bitching about your eBooks being DRMed and just simply fucking get rid of the protection. NOTHING IS STOPPING YOU!!!

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Back in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tradeoffs, but this isn't really the same thing.
      When that bookstore closed you keep the books, the store keeps you money.

      If the books go away but the money comes back.

      Inconvenient, but you got your money back.

      In this case, because M$ is stuffed full of cash it got from charging retards for shit software. If it was a company that went bust, where would the money come from to pay you back?

    7. Re:Back in the old days... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Which DRM was on his paper books, and how would he have stripped it?

      How would you recommend he backs up the books too, especially without dismantling them?

      I find your passion enthusing but remain nonetheless confused.

    8. Re:Back in the old days... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I could have sworn he was talking about ebooks there. Either that, or I replied to the wrong post. Oops my bad. There did seem to be more than a few small handfuls of posters complaining throughout the entire discussion about their ebooks being DRMed, instead of them doing something about it.

      Oh well, not the first time I derp posted; and I am sure it won't be the last. :p

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    9. Re:Back in the old days... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      And looking over the thread, yep. Pretty sure it was just a reply to the wrong reply was all.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    10. Re:Back in the old days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the old days, when a bookstore closed, it meant you couldn't buy any more books there. But nothing happened to the books you already bought. Now when a bookstore closes, all your books disappear in a puff of smoke. Isn't progress wonderful?

      Then maybe people will start to realize the digital economy isn't geared for their benefit, but for the seller.

      The solution is to not buy this crap, because you have no guarantee someone won't decide later on that the thing you paid for is still yours.

      Digital purchases basically strip you of your right of first sale, and ensures someone can decide to take it away from you.

      Screw that, I won't pay money for a digital copy of anything.

    11. Re:Back in the old days... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have tons of content which doesn't have any DRM. I've never paid more than a few pence for any ebook which does have DRM. The DRM on all the ebooks I've paid anything for is supposedly trivial to break, but since none of it is important, I haven't bothered.

      On the other hand, if civilization falls and somehow doesn't set everything on fire, my various devices will eventually die due to battery failure of one kind or another, or some kind of wear.

      On the gripping hand, I don't have room for all the books I could ever wish to own.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Newer != better by sursurrus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Giant evil corporations hate simple traditional things that work well for cheap or free.

    Water is a good example. Companies spend billions trying to convince you that it's boring, even publishing junk science about "overhydration" and how juice, tea, gatorade, etc all 'count' towards the 8 glasses of water a day target. Now that we basically view Soda as poison marketed to children they've pushed back with flavored zero calorie water that is nowhere as healthy as the real thing.

    I thought Kindle and its clones were the height of folly when they came out, and my opinon hasn't changed. Books are durable, tangible, random-access, and have worked well for humanity since the invention of the printing press. A fucking evil corporation looks at books and identifies the key problem: they persist long after the original purchase. A book can sit on a shelf for 20 years until someone else picks it up.

    Enter the DRM - ereader model. You now 'license' the right to use the book - tying yourself both to the DRM and the platform. When you die, or more likely the device breaks, the book is gone. It cannot be given to a friend, passed down to children, donated to a library or traded via a book swap. That contributes to scarcity, under classical economics, and drives up the price and profit. This is total bullshit - but what's worse is the army of softheaded media brainwashed idiots out there suggesting that paper is somehow 'archaic' and that there are 'benefits' to ereaders. Fuck that noise!

    Now we see the end result of that folly. Your entire Microshit library can be erased at the touch of a button. THEY, not you, control the terms of the refund. Why shouldn't they pay you in cash instead of forcing you to take some kind of chickenshit microsoft store credit? Did you not in fact pay in real money? And I marvel at the decision that all the notes and markings you may have taken in your entire library are worth the grand sum of $25! They, not you, decided that. They wrote the terms of the licensing agreement, forcing binding arbitration and preventing a class action lawsuit (my best guess but fitting the overwhelming pattern of large evil corporations).

    It's time for people to wake up. It's time for shiny new products that we don't actually need to die on day 1. It's time to realize that anyone talking about the advantages of eReaders and Kindle is 100% a softheaded idiot who should be loudly and publicly castigated.

    1. Re:Newer != better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure people agreed to all of this when they read the terms and conditions.

    2. Re: Newer != better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are confused. Kindles, or digital epaper readers in general, are wonderful. I have a few kindles. I load them with different things, like the data pads from STNG. One has tech stuff, another programming, both have a bunch if novels and my main 32GB one all of the above and a bunch of other stuff.

      One kindle lets me carry, what, the equivalent of 32,000 novels? What's wrong with that?

      Your complaints about DRM are another thing. Most of my books were purchased in physical form. Take a paper stack cutter and chop off the spine of a paperback, then feed the sheets to an adf scanner and Presto ChangeO you have a text searchable pdf. I've got a thousand SciFi/ fantasy pulp novels from library and ebay bulk sales that aren't available for sale as ebooks.

      Takes about five minutes for a 300 page novel on a decent adf home office scanner. Great busy work for interns at this point, but you can two or more of them at the same time if you are going to do it all day. I knew I was moving a year before I did, so I fed the automatic document feeder while ripping my movie collection. Seven minutes to rip a DVD, five for a light novel, fifteen for a high res photo mag with text ocr. Multitasked it while watching tv.

      So yeah, drm, boo. Strip it with calibre. EBooks are often over priced. But readers? May as well bitch about lamps that let people read at night.

    3. Re:Newer != better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . It's time to realize that anyone talking about the advantages of eReaders and Kindle is 100% a softheaded idiot who should be loudly and publicly castigated.

      Perhaps. But if you want a gift for your favourite submarine crewmember, a Kindle or other eReader loaded with dozens of good books will go a very long way.

      They have gigantic advantages in terms of space and weight, both of which are highly restricted on submarines.

      So call me 100% softheaded now.

      AC

    4. Re:Newer != better by gshegosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, thanks for calling me a softheaded idiot, but I'll reply anyway.

      While I do agree with your criticism of DRM, I personally much prefer using e-reader than paper books. There are a lot of advantages such as possibility to have thousands of books with me all the time or searching them. Even some "corporate" features are convenient such as possibility to sync notes, bookmarks and current reading position between different devices.

      Having said that, I do not trust Amazon or anyone and am afraid of them doing exactly what Microsoft is doing. This is why I try to buy e-books that are DRM-free and those that aren't - I break the DRM and store unprotected files on my infrastructure. There is nothing wrong with moving from paper to electronic books. There are things wrong with business models for electronic books and DRM. We should focus our criticism in my opinion and not throw away all the new toys.

    5. Re:Newer != better by Cederic · · Score: 1

      It's time to realize that anyone talking about the advantages of eReaders and Kindle is 100% a softheaded idiot who should be loudly and publicly castigated.

      I took 4000 books on holiday with me. None of them had DRM.

      Now admittedly I only read a dozen of them, but I had the choices. I'm too lazy to remove/reload the books I don't want to read right now.

      Seems to me the softheaded idiot is the one that thinks eReaders and Kindle require DRM. Consider yourself castigated.

    6. Re:Newer != better by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      As long as all my books rest in my calibre library, they are safe. No DRM and access from anywhere. I can pull up my library on any browser and it caches the book locally so I can read in an excellent e-reader web application.

      I usually just pull the copy to my phone and read it in my phone app, but it's nice to have options.

  10. It ain't just digital. by segin · · Score: 1

    Even when you buy physical books, due to the nature of copyright laws in basically every country that has them, you aren't really buying those physical items so much as paying a license fee for the rights to access the data encoded on them.

    There are some extremely far-reaching consequences of this that most people fail to realize or think don't apply because of some matter of physicality (which doesn't matter one iota in the eyes of the law.)

    1. Re:It ain't just digital. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even when you buy physical books, due to the nature of copyright laws in basically every country that has them, you aren't really buying those physical items so much as paying a license fee for the rights to access the data encoded on them.

      If I buy a copy of War & Peace, I can copy it to my heart's content. Your statement is only true for works still under copyright.. There are thousands? of books/texts that are no longer encumbered by copyright.

    2. Re:It ain't just digital. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      lolz, right when the company recalls your rights your paper book vanishes... oh wait no it doesn't and you can even sell or give it to someone else.

    3. Re:It ain't just digital. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Not really. First Sale Doctrine applies. If I buy a physical copy of a book, I can give or sell it to somebody else, but then I won't have it any more. It's even legal to "edit" the book by marking it up or cutting and pasting and then to sell that modified physical copy.

      Some textbook publishers have gone to some great lengths to get around this, everything from trying to ban the import of used copies from other countries, to publishing new "editions" with almost nothing changed but the end-of-chapter questions or links to a website they can make obsolete annually.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:It ain't just digital. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If I buy a physical copy of a book, I can give or sell it to somebody else, but then I won't have it any more.

      My guess is that that's legal for electronic books too. I mean, it is for software..

  11. Microsoft treats you just as SLAVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America- the only industrialised nation to have a population evil enough to accept widespread use of slavery- sometimes allowed slave 'marriage'- 'cept when Microsoft, I mean 'master' wanted to sell off the slaves, the 'marriage' became null and void.

    A 'freeman' can own a thing. A slave can never own anything- his/her master really have all ownership rights. And when those 'married' slaves were split up and sold on to different new masters, sometimes they received 'compensation' just as Microsoft is offering to the sheeple that never owned their ebooks.

    Yet no new law removed the FIRST SALE doctrine that ensured your records, books, tapes etc were yours to keep FOREVER. This new slave doctrine re:media from the new tech corporations has been introduced under the covers- propagandised by foul outlets like slashdot.

    Licensed goods always existed- but the definition was a service you paid for that represented a fixed duration and maybe support. Ebooks are NOT a service- not 'licensed' under any concept of sale recognised by law. They are taken away from the slaves that held them because the corporations can. And legal remedies are missing since the current law-makers are in the pockets of the owners of the tech giants.

    Anyone who pays for media that can be removed at any moment by 'master' is an idiot that deserves everything they get.

    1. Re:Microsoft treats you just as SLAVES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Anyone who pays for media that can be removed at any moment by 'master' is an idiot that deserves everything they get."


      What, refunds?

  12. HEY MICROSOFT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    While you are cleaning up in there,
    please delete Windows 10 also and
    refund my Windows 7 Pro.
    Thanks a lot!

    1. Re:HEY MICROSOFT by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 0

      LOL. Please mod +1 Funny!

  13. PlaysForSure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like PlaysForSure all over again. Don't trust DRM ever!

  14. I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have any ebooks from Microsoft, but I don't see why they think they can just revert a sale. Can the buyer decide after months or years to give a book back for a full refund? No? Then neither can Microsoft.

    1. Re:I would sue. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Conditions of sale.

      Unless there is a law that says otherwise, anything they put in there is valid.

    2. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Sue for what, exactly? The only thing you would be eligible for is financial compensation, and that would not exceed whatever you paid for the material.

      And guess what, they are refunding that.... so, I'm not sure you'd have anything to sue for.

    3. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose you buy a house and three years later the seller regrets his decision to sell you the house. He decides to take it from you and give you your money back. Do you think the only thing you would be eligible for is financial compensation? What would you sue for?

    4. Re:I would sue. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Sue for what, exactly? The only thing you would be eligible for is financial compensation, and that would not exceed whatever you paid for the material.

      Well, you could sue for the cost of replacement. Which (due to inflation) is likely to be higher than the initial purchase price, especially if you timed purchases for sales.

    5. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Not exactly the same thing. Real estate typically climbs in value.

    6. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not exactly the same thing. It's called an analogy. The price is irrelevant. Would you accept being kicked out of your house because the seller from three years ago decides he doesn't want you to have it after all, even if it's worth exactly the same as when you bought it?

    7. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      As I said, houses climb in value... you could reasonably expect to be compensated for the current *value* of the home. On the matter at hand, if you can make a case for how a book has increased in value since it was purchased, and in particular, sufficiently enough that the use you had gotten from it in the interim would not measure up to that increase (which in general would otherwise just keep pace with regular inflation), then you'd have a point.

    8. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the point. There is more to a house (and an ebook) than it's monetary value. People buy stuff because they value it more than the money they pay. Would you really let someone kick you out of your house because they regret selling it to you? Even assuming that the house is not worth more than when I bought it, I would not let them take it back. It's my house. What if I can't find another one nearby and would have to accept a longer commute? What if my children grew up in this house and would have to leave their neighborhood friends? What if I just like this house? The monetary value is irrelevant. They sold it and whether they can have it back or not is not their decision. What if I made hardware purchasing decisions based on compatibility with the ebook store? What if I have made notes associated with these particular ebooks? What if I just like having the ebooks? They sold them and whether they can have them back is not their decision to make.

    9. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      They sold them and whether they can have them back is not their decision to make.

      Since they are actually doing it, I think you are mistaken about that.

      But good luck convincing a judge of your view if you really want to sue them even after you got your money back.

    10. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that the gold standard now? If a company is doing it, it's probably legal?

    11. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If a company is doing it, then it's their decision, by definition. Legality is a matter for a judge to determine.

      As I said.. if you think you can convince a judge that they owe you more compensation than your money back, you're welcome to try.

      Personally, I do not believe that any increase in the value of an electronic book, if any, is likely to exceed the value of the use that a person got out of using the book before it was removed from their library.

      It's still a dick move by MS, but personally, I'd avoid using digital formats where the publisher has this kind of ability in the first place. As it happens, such formats exist today, and probably aren't going anywhere, And to the matter of this particular case, I wouldn't be overly inclined to complain about them not having the right to take something away when I haven't gone to any extra effort to ensure that they can't..

    12. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's fascinating that "no, Microsoft, you can't take the book away" doesn't even appear on your radar.

    13. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Why should it? It's manifestly obvious that they can take it away with any digital format that permits it.

      Don't want it to happen? Don't use that digital format in the first place... otherwise, it's just a ticking time bomb that may or may not go off in your lifetime.

    14. Re:I would sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should it? Because one-sidedly taking something back that you sold is stealing, which is still technically frowned-upon by the law.

    15. Re:I would sue. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Because one-sidedly taking something back that you sold is stealing

      It's not one-sided... they are refunding the purchase.

      But honestly, I have no sympathy.... as I said, using digital formats that enable a publisher to revoke your permissions to access content you paid for is just setting things up for that exact situation to happen someday, and all you can do is hope that it won't happen before you won't miss the content.

  15. Authors by vlad30 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are they also taking the money back from authors ? or compensating them for lost sales as very few knew this existed.

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    1. Re:Authors by EvilSS · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are they also taking the money back from authors ? or compensating them for lost sales as very few knew this existed.

      I'm sure they are just going to write off the $3.50 paid out to the author from the one person who bought that one book on sale that one time. ever.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  16. My problem was Edge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My problem was Edge.

    Seriously, they required you to sign into your account that you purchased the books with, which contained your credit card information. And what are the odds that it was also your email address for that account as well? And what did they have you sign into? The web browser itself! Not just a web page, but THE web browser. Later, the operating system itself making the web browser always logged in! I didn't even bother trying to setup a second Microsoft account, given the local account wouldn't work, I seriously doubted a second Microsoft Azure AD for Home users would have fared any better.

    GOOD RIDDANCE!

  17. yet another DRM clusterfuck by epine · · Score: 1

    Contrary to popular opinion, it's not "free" to download a "free" book. These sorry punters probably had to wade around in a Microsoft-designed web site, filtering the chaff from the dross. (Bargain tables generally only contain chaff and dross, but sometimes hours of hard prospecting pays off with a big score, that almost feels too good to be true.)

    On my Kobo, I even have a few books which I marked up with local annotations (though none with DRM). Poof goes your own work if you were suckered into that, too.

    A typical Microsoft half-effort toward making their discarded customers whole.

  18. How about interest, or a inflation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An E-Book does not wear like a physical one if I read it, or leave it in full sunlight on a shelf.

    Therefore, it does not lose value. Maybe I haven't even looked at it yet, for lack of time - I would guess that even 5..10% of the physical books on my shelf are yet unread.

    However, the price of a typical E-Book is subject to normal Inflation, since Editors and Authors cost of living rises with inflation.
    Therefore, even if I get a refund, I lose the accrued inflation between the date of purchase and the date of the refund.

    As a minimum, Microsoft should be required to refund the additional compunded inflation rate!

  19. Destroying history by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Even electronic books burn pretty well. Never mind fiction, it's coming to the point where even historical and technical books can be swept away at any time.

    What we really need is a new law that declares all digital products with DRM as rentals. No more of this "you can use it until you can't" nonsense. If the company wants to sell something as a lease/rental, they have to guarantee the minimum amount of time you're allowed to use it. How long a rental lasts factors into how much it's worth, and I'm sick of being told to buy stuff that costs $50 but could disappear either 5 years from now or tomorrow. It's clearly obvious that a company doesn't have to go out of business for licenses to expire, and they don't even bother to specify the support period. This needs to stop.

    Unsurprisingly, much of the Windows7 documentation and help files have been deleted from Microsoft's site, and replaced with ads for Windows10. The future looks pretty bleak for anyone who needs to support legacy systems, even assuming the software itself can still work without activation.

    1. Re:Destroying history by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Watermarking is a form of DRM.. but it doesn't turn the product into a rental.

      I have dozens of watermarked documents on my home computer and tablet. I can copy watermarked documents to any device I want... as often as I want, and the watermark doesn't interfere with usage... the only purpose that it serves is that if I were to distribute a watermarked document, it could be traced to my purchase, and I might be held accountable for that.

  20. Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon ate Microsoft's lunch before the bag was even placed in it's backpack.

      It was a somewhat valiant effort, but it's hard to go up against a company that sells sub $100 Android tablets focused on eBooks.

  21. I guess I can't read my *.LIT e-books anymore by kriston · · Score: 1

    I guess I can't read my *.LIT e-books anymore.

    Wait, I haven't been able to read them since they discontinued Microsoft Reader in 2012. All those e-books I used on my WinCE and Pocket PCs, and later on my Windows PC are now unreadable.

    Wait, I didn't notice.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:I guess I can't read my *.LIT e-books anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guess I can't read my *.LIT e-books anymore.

      Wait, I haven't been able to read them since they discontinued Microsoft Reader in 2012. All those e-books I used on my WinCE and Pocket PCs, and later on my Windows PC are now unreadable.

      Wait, I didn't notice.

      You can convert them with Calibre to any other supported format. The same applies to many other rare/dying formats.

  22. Microsoft is almost dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is almost dead.
    Sooner than I thought.

  23. Think Amazon 2029 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2029, expect Amazon to do the same and erase all popular fiction ebooks published 2000 - 2010 due to some large licensing issue with the publishers.

    Amazon will have a business incentive to remove tens of thousands of listings for e-books which it sells 1 or 2 copies every year.

    Not just a MS with a tiny fraction of the number of users, but tens of millions of users with hundreds of millions of purchased *rented* books.

  24. Can you print these E-books? by BECoole · · Score: 1

    I've never used a MS E-Book. Can you print them? If so, I'd use a print-to-pdf utility to back the e-books up.

  25. Is there a workaround? [Re:Welcome to the Library] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    There ought to be some workaround to prevent MS from remotely deleting material that you have them already downloaded. I don't know the mechanism they are using for DRM (never used the Microsoft books thing), but most DRMs have a workaround of one kind or another.

    (I'm not even sure how this is even legal, but I guess if you're as big as Microsoft, you do what you want and pay lawyers to make it legal. Did the original "purchase" have small print saying "warning! You're not actually buying this product, you're just buying the rights to read it as long as we choose to make it available."?)

    https://www.ghacks.net/2019/04/02/microsoft-is-shutting-down-books-in-microsoft-store/

    https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/02/microsoft-store-removes-e-books/

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  26. Your time costs microsoft nothing. [Re:Books] by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    No one has suffered any harm here (except the people who made annotations, THAT really sucks).

    NO.

    If it took zero time and zero effort to find a book, purchase it, and load it on your machine, that might be true.

    But, no. For nobody to "suffer any harm", they would need to replace the books on your machine with a copy that you can read that is downloaded from some different service.

    If they're making you do the work of finding a copy somwhere else and buying it, that is free labor that they are not paying for. You already did that labor once, now they are telling you to do it again.

    but your time costs microsoft nothing.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  27. Don't casually accept theft of digital property by Blue23 · · Score: 1

    "if you pay for eBooks, music, movies, video games, or any other content from a store that uses DRM, then you aren't really buying those digital items so much as paying a license fee for the rights to access them... a right that can be revoked if the company decides to remove a title from your device unexpectedly or if a company shuts down a server that would normally handle the digital rights management features."

    That is bullcrap that the companies do their best to get you to accept.

    If you wish to license me something, list it as "License this eBook". If you list it as "Buy this eBook", then I will push that the action taken on my part was a purchase, which should supersede any terms and conditions because there is a clear and common use definition of the word "buy" in a retail transaction which they are in breach of.

    If I do markup in a book, then in addition there is theft of some sort going on if a company pulls the license.

    Do not accept companies redefining these things to put all of the power in their hands.

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    1. Re:Don't casually accept theft of digital property by SoftwareArtist · · Score: 1

      This is so true. Companies want you to think if they say one thing in big print where you're sure to see it, and something else in tiny print somewhere you'll never see it, the tiny print cancels out the big print. It doesn't. If they give you a "Buy" button and you click it to buy something, that means you bought it. Not rented. Bought.

      What Microsoft is doing is just stealing, plain and simple. If I sell you something, I can't come back years later and say, "Hey, I've changed my mind about selling you that. I'm taking it back whether you like it or not. But don't worry, I'm giving you a refund in the form of credit you can use at my store." They should be sued into the ground for doing this, and those responsible should go to jail. That's what happens to normal people when they steal.

      --
      "I'm too busy to research this and form an educated opinion, but I do have time to tell everyone my uninformed opinion."
  28. Software non-freedom remains the root issue. by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    This isn't quite true. People just need to insist on ownership. We are guilty of allowing commercial interests to lull us with making it easy at the cost of ownership.

    There are plenty of gratis programs that implement limitations which work against the user over which the user has no control. There used to be a small program for detecting the "click of death" which was said to signal an imminent failure in an Iomega Zip drive (which were once much more popular). The program was written in assembly by a self-described security researcher and the user was allowed to download and run only the compiled executable for Windows but the program cost no money. That program had code in it that checked the date and would not run the program's main function if the program ran after a certain date. Had that program been free software (software the user is free to run, inspect, share, and modify) one could still make use of its routines today across operating systems. This might still be handy to people trying to retrieve data from Zip disks, for example. But the program was proprietary and carried a proprietary dependency (ran only on a proprietary OS).

    So this teaches us that DRM (digital restrictions management) is a direct outcome of the power of a proprietor. The commercial factors are side issues; if we had free software to read the books, play the media, and do other things we could use them instead of the proprietary software each DRM implementation depends on and we could let commercial organizations sell us copies of free software and provide support and improved code at a fee. I'd happily pay for commercial support for free software I sometimes need fixed or improved. The real enemy is software non-freedom. And we need to speak out against those who claim that strongly copylefted free software will kill people (as automobile manufacturers have told people).

  29. Advantages of the Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though the lesson will probably be ignored, this is a good example why “cloud” based services, except for certain specific use cases, are generally a bad idea. I have some academic reference materials in digital format from the turn of the century that run just fine despite the fact that the company that produced them is now defunct because they are completely run and stored on my local machine.