Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP Dies Final Death As Embedded POSReady 2009 Reaches End of Life (techrepublic.com)

New submitter intensivevocoder shares a report from TechRepublic: Extended support for Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 -- the last supported version of Windows based on Windows XP -- ended on April 9, 2019, marking the final end of the Windows NT 5.1 product line after 17 years, 7 months, and 16 days. Counting this edition, Windows XP is the longest-lived version of Windows ever -- a record which is unlikely to be beaten.

Despite the nominal end of support for Windows XP five years ago, the existence of POSReady 2009 allowed users to receive security updates on Windows XP Home and Professional SP3 through the use of a registry hack. Microsoft dissuaded users from doing this, stating that they "do not fully protect Windows XP customers," though no attempt was apparently made to prevent users from using this hack. With POSReady reaching the end of support, the flow of these security updates will likewise come to an end.

144 comments

  1. Amusing summary by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that most people on Slashdot know POS really stands for "Point of Sale". But I found it amusing to read through the whole summary with "Windows" and "POS" lumped together multiple time leading the read to their own inner dialogue as to meaning...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Amusing summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      POS == POS.

      I was buying drinks at a theatre and the hostess was having trouble with her system trying to figure out what to charge me. I softly suggested, "There's a reason they call it a POS, isn't there?" She laughed. I paid.

    2. Re: Amusing summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any questions?
      Yes, but I'm just curious about everything so you might not want to hear any.
      POS POS
      My POS IS a POS
      Vampire Bytes

    3. Re: Amusing summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Burma Shave!

    4. Re:Amusing summary by Askmum · · Score: 0

      No idea that was what it meant. I'll just say it out loud, POS combined with Windows always translates as piece of shit to me.
      Having said that, I'd never think I would say this, but in the light of Windows 10, XP actually was not that big of a POS.

    5. Re:Amusing summary by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I remember once reading that Windows had the POS market locked up. I THINK the writer meant Point Of Sale, but I wasn't completely sure.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:Amusing summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that most people on Slashdot know POS really stands for "Point of Sale". But I found it amusing to read through the whole summary with "Windows" and "POS" lumped together multiple time leading the read to their own inner dialogue as to meaning...

      Huh I thought it was POSIX compliant.

  2. So many possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Embedded POSReady".... I don't even know where to start...I guess I'll start with Embedded POS.

    1. Re:So many possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iFanboi much ...

    2. Re: So many possibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows timeline-
      Dos branch-1,2,3,3.1,3.11,95,98,98se
      Hybrid branch-me,xp

      There was no windows 99 and windows 2000 was the original pro, a NT based os. Assuming that you're the real senior editor and not some troll get your shit together beau

    3. Re: So many possibilities by kenh · · Score: 1

      When was the last time Apple released an os update for your10 year old laptop?

      That the hardware still boots is a testament to the hardware, not the OS.

      Shockingly I can go to the local goodwill computer store, pick up a 10 yr old windows laptop running XP and it will still boot -what does that prove?

      MS supported XP for 17 years, how long does Apple support an OS X release?

      --
      Ken
    4. Re: So many possibilities by bobby · · Score: 1

      MS supported XP for 17 years, how long does Apple support an OS X release?

      Warranty + 1 minute

    5. Re: So many possibilities by Retron · · Score: 1

      Your timeline is a bit out.

      The DOS-based line included everything up to WfW 3.11 (or 3.2 in China), 95, 98 and ME, albeit MS went to some lengths to stop you booting into real mode with ME.

      The NT line started in 1992 with NT 3.1, then went through 4, 2000 (Workstation was renamed to Pro), XP, Vista and so on.

  3. Death? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why would this amount to 'death'? If I had, for an example, a LabView system on my bench that ran on Windows XP, it wouldn't need to 'die' because it isn't networked to any other systems. There are lots of pieces of test equipment that embed various versions of Windows in them. At a previous job we had Unholtz-Dicke shaker tables. One had a Windows XP host, the other had a Windows 2000 host. They worked fine. They will continue to work fine.

    1. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Networking isn't the only concern. Do they have USB ports? I would not be surprised if they were already vulnerable to malware on a USB stick that could be used to exfiltrate any data on the device, or brick the device with ransomware, and without security updates new, less detectible methods will eventually be found

    2. Re:Death? by alaskana98 · · Score: 2

      All good points, and what you say is definitely true. I would add though, that this is definitely a case of 'security through security' and such an attack would be highly unlikely on such a lab system. And besides, even on an updated system there are countless ways to hack such a system. If someone (determined, talented and with a sufficiently large bankroll wants to get in, they will get in).

    3. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have an old laptop that I (very) occasionally use that runs xp. It hasn't seen a network in years (that would be asking for trouble) but it still runs just fine: in fact, it has outlived two other laptops that I've owned.

    4. Re:Death? by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Technology never dies, as long as someone is using it.
      However a Dead technology means there is no more support or new products from its licensed company.

      We still have MS Dos 3.0 systems fully functioning and used for business.
      There are still people making games for legacy systems such as the Commodore 64

      But they are dead technology too, because there is no official point of support.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re: Death? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I actually updated an XP computer yesterday with the PoS hack

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Death? by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      in fact, it has outlived two other laptops that I've owned.

      Which says more about the hardware than the operating system...

    7. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. I just recently updated New Moon on my XP box. Today I'm reading Slashdot, doing email, working on my HTML editor and editing graphics. And I never get interrupted by forced updates. A lot of software companies still support XP. Just not Microsoft.

      Security risk? No. Security risk is running script and Flash without restriction.

    8. Re:Death? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Why would this amount to 'death'? If I had, for an example, a LabView system on my bench that ran on Windows XP, it wouldn't need to 'die' because it isn't networked to any other systems. There are lots of pieces of test equipment that embed various versions of Windows in them. At a previous job we had Unholtz-Dicke shaker tables. One had a Windows XP host, the other had a Windows 2000 host. They worked fine. They will continue to work fine.

      Young people today (*) probably can't imagine a device that doesn't have 24/7 access to the internet.

      (*) who need to get off my lawn

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    9. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only we could find a word for something that was dead and decaying, but still functioning in some fashion.

    10. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Luckily, the Commodore 64 doesn't need any support.

    11. Re:Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "death", to the simpleton(s) that wrote the copy, means that while they'll run fine as-is you won't be able to keep-ahead of all the crap that you would encounter on the internet. - because (redundancy alert!) they're so young/stupid they think nothing CAN run successfully without "bein' on da net".

      I've got a lab here, running about a dozen machines variously running XP some with packs 2 and most with 3, a win7, a 2000, and a couple of 8s and nobody has any problems. To make sure it STAYS that way (and infection-free) I SLA'ed a bunch of plugs to block the USBs because the unused ones are not needed and I remove temptation to plug in a stick to look at pics/etc instead of working. and there's one MacPro (1,1) running 10.7.5 with two ethernets on it when I need to "connect to the 'verse" to up/download/etc..

      FYI: I'm running LabVIEW 2012 on one of the XP/3's with the application builder so when needed I can spin-off a modified VI (as an EXE) to anyone in "my world" without needing more than one serial number. And BigMac, with Apache, is running enough of a web server that everyone can 'see' each other in a central repository. Company IT won't let me connect any of my 'mongrel flock' to the business' network, so we do it our own way.

    12. Re:Death? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Air gap is not a complete security solution. There are must be a way manufacturer setup to update the system and it's only a matter of time until someone plugs an infected media into it.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  4. So... by msauve · · Score: 0

    MS gives a big FU to anyone who foolishly built a system on their OS. Let that be a lesson.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:So... by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Meanwhile, the oldest Linux kernel still supported is 3.16, first released in 2014. It won't even get to 6 years before being abandoned.

    2. Re:So... by msauve · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "the oldest Linux kernel still supported is 3.16, first released in 2014.

      Come back when MS releases source code for the OS, so users can maintain it when they don't.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come back when Red Shat - oh, I'm sorry, IBM - and Shitbuntu stop dropping support for older versions at a rate that outspeeds Microsoft by far.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You must be really strong, constantly moving the goalposts and all.

    5. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because so many Linux users maintain their OS themselves.

    6. Re:So... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu 18.04 will be supported for 10 years or until 2028.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    7. Re:So... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes, and so what?

      It's much easier to migrate to a new Linux kernel than it is to migrate from Windows XP.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a single user who is capable of supporting the linux kernel by themselves.

    9. Re:So... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I can run my code from University days in the newest Linux. Heck, Linux still supports a.out binaries from 92!

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come back when you find somebody willing to maintain your Linux 2.6-based distro!

      dom

    11. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like 10 years for RHEL, same as most older Windows versions? Like the fact Windows releases come out in six month intervals now?

    12. Re:So... by sad_ · · Score: 2

      if you really need support for a linux kernel older than that (why?).
      you could hire a developer to maintain it for you, costing less then it costs to buy extended support from MS.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    13. Re:So... by johnsie · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu won't even exist as a desktop OS in 2018. Shuttleworth has been pulling the plug piece by piece for a while now.

    14. Re:So... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      Actually that one has reversed in favor of Linux.

      Support for feature updates in Win10 is only 3 years for Home/Professional now. The LTSB branch may be different, I'm not sure about the exact timeframes here.

      Ubuntu LTS and Red Hat offer longer support. 5 years in case of Ubuntu, 10 for Red Hat.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    15. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New kernel? Yes. New distro? Prepare to get fucked, hard.

    16. Re:So... by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      And what is the oldest XP actually supported; Service Pack 3 - release 2008 - so 9 years. Not all the different really. Next question is SP3 really even supported or would support just tell you to apply various KBs to a theoretically supported system until it was at the patch level they actually support?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    17. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can I borrow your time machine?

    18. Re:So... by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MS gives a big FU to anyone who foolishly built a system on their OS. Let that be a lesson.

      Lesson learnt. 19 years of support for their software, clearly the absolute best in the OS industry. I can't find a Linux, BSD, Apple, or any other OS that still has that original version supported.

    19. Re:So... by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Almost assuredly the vast majority of users of Linux OS cannot and do not ever maintain the kernel and are not capable of doing so. What good are sticks and dry grass if one doesn't know how to employ them to make fire? Just because you CAN make fire doesn't mean the person who needs it knows how and in many cases they may not fucking care how to make it. They just want to be warm. That is what a lot of open source advocates can't seem to grasp.

    20. Re:So... by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      No, the oldest XP that (until yesterday) that was supported was Windows Embedded POSReady 2009. The one in TFS, and the whole point of the article!

    21. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Heck, Linux still supports a.out binaries from 92!

      Support for a.out was dropped just recently, in Linux 5.0

    22. Re: So... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they only supported WinXP for 17 years - compare that to something like Ubuntu LTS with its 5 years of support...oh, wait?

      --
      Ken
    23. Re: So... by kenh · · Score: 1

      I can still run my FORTRAN programs (written before Linus Torvoldsbought his 80386 computer) from college on MVS, so what?

      --
      Ken
    24. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously FH! Given the recent systemd debacle, all I can think is that Trogre has no professional experience with supporting anything on any operating system for any reasonable time window. Many of Window's problems such as its ridiculous default 260 character path length are the result of MS bending over backwards to keep existing 3rd party code working. Windows 10 is riddled with 20 years of this backwards compatible garbage. The fact is that you can take most programs that ran on Windows 3.11 and run them on Windows 10. Try taking an AT&T System V binary from the same time period and running it on Linux.

    25. Re:So... by supremebob · · Score: 1

      I'd love to hear the thought process behind this one, considering that Ubuntu seems to be the only commercial Linux manufacturer actually invested in supporting the desktop releases. Red Hat and SuSE seem to be happy with slapping a copy of Gnome and LibreOffice on the server version.

    26. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ubuntu now also offers an additional 5 years paid "Extended Security Maintence" period, giving 10 years support for LTS versions.

    27. Re: So... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The fact is that you can take most programs that ran on Windows 3.11 and run them on Windows 10

      Only if you restrict yourself to 4GB of RAM and use 32-bit Windows 10. That software is 16-bit and can't run when the CPU is in 64-bit mode.

    28. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS didn't support the original version of XP for 19 years. POSReady was released in 2009. So 10 years support. Still better than Apple of course.

    29. Re:So... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Almost assuredly the vast majority of users of Linux OS cannot and do not ever maintain the kernel and are not capable of doing so. What good are sticks and dry grass if one doesn't know how to employ them to make fire? Just because you CAN make fire doesn't mean the person who needs it knows how and in many cases they may not fucking care how to make it. They just want to be warm. That is what a lot of open source advocates can't seem to grasp.

      Most people only do a few things themselves, the question is whether you have a choice of venue. They don't repair their own car, but they care if they can take it to a third party mechanic or if you need first party service and first party parts and it runs on first party gas. There's a helluva lot of people in the server space that has figured this out. The problem is more that of cost distribution, if you download it for free 99%+ will only generate bug reports, feature requests, requests for documentation/explanation/assistance and whatnot. If you try to charge them for support up front almost nobody would sign up. If you start charging them professional developer rates + overhead that's disproportional to what they get for a COTS license. And that's why they feel they can't actually go anywhere else anyway, because they're not a big enough fish.

      Imagine you have a stream of bugs/feature requests. First you have to triage and make sure it's well defined, then make an estimate. Then you have to ask for money to fix it and usually they'll say no or haggle. Already here you've probably wasted enough time that any fix is >$100 just to break even. Then you have to actually write the code and tests/documentation, get it reviewed/merged and then you got billing disputes and paying taxes and... there's a reason open source projects prefer a tip jar, even if they don't get much it's not worth chasing contracts/bug bounties that only give beer money. But a tip jar isn't really freedom, it's just putting money in a lottery machine hoping they'll take care of your pet problem.

      Meanwhile COTS companies take all those $20 licenses by the thousands and get developers to fix the common problems and things that are just clunky and generate a lot of noise. You're paying into a pool where a lot of things have been fixed and are being fixed, even though they might never get around to your issue. Yes that sucks sometimes but the average person just isn't ready to pay the hundreds if not thousands to dollars to get someone to look at this issue and fix it because you're the one who want it fixed. I write custom software for work, I know my own paycheck and there's very little I personally would want fixed that badly.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    30. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ain't about users supporting it numb nuts. It's about developers having the options. You know, the people who code.

    31. Re: So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Unless you have /home on the same disk as / then it's pretty easy to update. If you want the same apps it's more difficult, but it wouldn't take someone very long (and maybe someone has done it) to do a the_list=$(yum list installed | some_filtering) and then apt install $the_list

    32. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone could take the kernel and support it. You can't take the Windows XP kernel and support it without paying a lot of money for it. If Microsoft goes out of business and XP isn't part of the deal for any sale of assets then it dies totally.

    33. Re:So... by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 1

      LTSB/LTSC has 10 years of support from the date of release, so the 1607 LTSB release runs out in October of 2026.

      http://aka.ms/lifecycle is where all of this lives. The search keywords are LTSB (for the old releases) and LTSC (for the new release).

      Grumbling about the name change is recommended. I did.

    34. Re:So... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yes, and so what?

      It's much easier to migrate to a new Linux kernel than it is to migrate from Windows XP.

      I challenge you to upgrade from 2.4.x series kernel (Released at the same time as Windows XP) to a modern kernel. You'll be begging for a windows 10 upgrade screen by the time you have a bash prompt and realised nothing else is working.

    35. Re:So... by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Win10 LTSB tracks the same as Windows Server. Not coincidentally, the Windows Server lines are based on LTSB Win10 codebases. Windows Server 2016 under the hood is Windows 10 1607 which had an LTSB version and Windows Server 2019 is basically the server version of Windows 10 1809. The Win10 LTSB versions are supported for 5 years of "mainstream" support (performance fixes and enhancements) and 10 years of "extended" support (security and bug fixes only).

      I'm fairly sure though that you can only access the LTSB version with a volume licensing agreement. It's meant for slow-moving businesses, not home users.

  5. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a version of Win98 that is stripped down for embedded use that still runs just fine.

    1. Re:Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it MS-DOS 7.10? :)
      I never heard of embedded win 9x (you can use a 3rd party program to remove Internet Explorer, or use the system utility in control panel to remove accessories, games, wallpapers)

      If you copy over the DOS of Win 98 to another drive (e.g. format D: /s) you get raw DOS that flashes the startup windows logo for an instant.

      I did like Win 98 very much. it's what you get by bashing CP/M, Mac OS and Amiga together : 70s microcomputer underpinnings, desktop metaphor and preemptive multitasking. There was only one user : the user, as long as he didn't install spyware.

    2. Re:Exactly by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      We have an Intravascular Ultrasound machine that we bought new in 2008. We were looking to replace it next year because, according to the vendor, it runs Windows 98 and it doesn't have an interface for our reporting systems. (An interface is required for use with our electronic medical record.)

      Up until now we used it without any interface with any of our systems. The only output it gave (besides it's screen) was that it would burn CDs and had a dedicated thermal printer for 3x5" still images.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    3. Re:Exactly by jason-eric · · Score: 1

      This gives me nostalgia for my VIC20 and C64. There were never any OS updates. Nice. If only Windows shipped on a ROM cartridge.

      --
      United States
    4. Re:Exactly by bobby · · Score: 1

      This is a cool challenge. I've worked in medical diagnostics as a sysop (in the 90s). One of my many tasks was networking live diagnostic machines, including DOS, 95, and 98 based.

      I have many ideas but I'm not sure of the FDA or whatever regulations about making changes. And the first thing would be to "image" the hard disk, if you have admin access...

      Is this machine otherwise in good working order and you'd rather not replace it?

    5. Re:Exactly by bobby · · Score: 1

      And I just realized I'm not far from you geographically.

    6. Re:Exactly by Scoth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Commodore 64 had at least three different versions of its underlying ROM, and upgrades were a thing. It was a whole different ball of wax back then, but they existed.

    7. Re:Exactly by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      It's Win98. There's no admin. ;-)

      The system works perfectly fine. There's no way anyone would think of giving approval for non-vendor software on the system. Period.

      So we'll dump it and get a new box, probably by the end of the year. Hopefully the next one will last more than 10 years, but I'm skeptical.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  6. xp vm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I built some 'forever' xp virtual machines, so it will never die

  7. Bricked? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    Are you overwriting the bios? Then it's not fucking bricked. Being XP era you could probably remove the eeprom and flash it yourself.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re: Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any other complaints? I have my own litany

    2. Re: Bricked? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      Yes. Linux ruined scroll bars. Clicking in the blank area no longer advances a single page. Now it moves that far down so when you have a 1000 page pdf it makes scrolling one page at a time annoying. Also they copied the Windows collapsible design and keep making the grey colors closer and closer. Soon the bar and the background will be the same color and invisible.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    3. Re: Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckwit, Linux didn't ruin scroll bars, instead it gives you options regarding how you want them to behave.

      Yeah, and it gives you no less than three different ways to do it, some of which work on some systems but not others, and none of which are made available through the UI, forcing you to change arcane settings in a config file or set environment variables from the command line. Why? Because most of the people working on the most common Linux UIs don't have the first fucking clue how to do UI design.

      Maybe you need to learn a little bit about social interaction. You might start to understand why Linux is not now and will never be popular on the desktop.

    4. Re: Bricked? by stridebird · · Score: 1

      Aint no scroll bars in linux, sunshine.

    5. Re: Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow I didn't know about that feature actually. I've tested it in the browser and OS versions I'm using right now and it works as you say i.e. clicking in the scroll bar does page up and down.

      It's a niche thing or something I might have forgotten 15 years ago (on Windoze) when we all got scroll wheels.
      It should be especially useful on laptop but what I do there is : if it's a laptop with no keypad, I make sure this is a laptop that can do page up/down without pressing the Fn key (major issue with very small ones there, unless it'd be a very rare one with two Fn keys).
      If the laptop has a keypad I leave num lock off so that the keypad can be used to scroll.

    6. Re: Bricked? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So they're configured in a terrible state by default then. I've been using Linux since 1996. Your reply shows why Linux will never be a viable desktop OS.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    7. Re: Bricked? by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu 18.04 then. Copies every new Windows feature.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    8. Re: Bricked? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu 18.04 then. Copies every new Windows feature.

      So we went from all Linux to Ubuntu, which isn't even the most popular version.

      Linux is a completely viable desktop. And I've never understood the "famous cigarettes" BS. Being the most popular is something important for fans of Kim Kardashian, it shouldn't be a metric for computer users.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re: Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is not an OS for lazy or stupid users.

      Windows XP still works fine considering it is M$ trash.

      If you hook a winblows box to the internet, you get what you deserve.

      Lack of support from M$ is a good thing.

    10. Re: Bricked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using Linux as my desktop OS, on and off, for over 20 years. I had no idea it was non-viable. Thank you for letting me know, I will switch to Windows immediately.

  8. Windows 10 forever by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought Microsoft was just going to continue to enhance Windows 10 forever. That will certainly blow by the record set by XP.

    1. Re: Windows 10 forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they say but eventually it would be ridiculous.

      Someone paid good money for a "Windows 10" disk from the store under the presupposition that it would be supported until EOL. In a few years from now, it would take weeks to download and install all the updates necessary to make it modern "Windows 10."

      The fact that there already are "Windows 10 + Anniversary Update" shows that this idea of having Win 10 last decades just isn't realistic or you'll have to say "oh I'm running Windows 10 + Anniversary Update + 2020 Uber-Additions + 2021 Ultimate + ..."

    2. Re: Windows 10 forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been working for another major OS with the number ten in its name for 19 years now.

    3. Re: Windows 10 forever by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Has it?

      There's been a few comparability breaking hardware changes that make me highly skeptical you could have continually updated a system that long.

      Off the top of my head G5 -> x86 -> "x86-64

      I wouldn't be shocked if there were some motherboard firmware changes required for the newest version since the first 64 bit x86 hardware too.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Windows 10 forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, read the Windows 10 licenses, ToS, etc.

      Support is tied to the hardware. If you buy a PC from a vendor, MS only supports Windows on that device for as long as the manufacturer has bought into support.
      If Dell only pays 3 years of support, MS can and will shut you out of updates. See what they did to certain Intel and AMD CPUs - blocking them from Windows updates for no fucking reason. And MS's terms leave it open for them to say it's not just Dell, but Intel/AMD that has to pony up for support.

      Oh, sure, you can run Windows 10 version 1809 or whatever, but once support for that ends you'll be fucked unless your device (be it the Intel/AMD CPU or the Dell box itself, which MS knows about due to the embedded license key presented by the firmware) supports version 1909 or whatever the fuck it's gonna be.

      They pulled similar scamola with Windows 8.1. Oh, it's a new OS. Oh, it's a free update. Oh, it's not a service pack. All designed to kill off support for 8/8.1 sooner by having their cake and eating it too. (MS typically kills support off for the old version soon after a new SP is released, but they also have to extend support when a new SP is released by at least 12 months, and sometimes up to 3 years. It's why 7 never got an SP2 despite needing one so badly Windows Update straight up fails 3 or 4 times on a fresh install of 7 SP1 because there are too many updates for the service to check through.)

      Windows will be full-on subscription ware within 2 years.

    5. Re:Windows 10 forever by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      I suspect MS will eventually drop that under some pretext. Because supporting Win10 forever without selling licenses won't bring revenue.

      Maybe some bullshit about new hardware being not compatible, they are already doing that with Windows 7.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    6. Re:Windows 10 forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The retail version of Windows 10 (FPP) is perpetually licensed and has an extended support lifecycle until 2025. That means anyone who paid for a boxed copy is covered until 2025 for security updates at a minimum. Windows 10 LTSB 2016 can't become subscription ware as it is licensed with a 10 year fixed lifecycle and Windows 10 LTSC 2019 also cannot be since that's covered until 2029.

      You're more likely to find Microsoft replacing Windows 10 with their latest Windows Core OS open-source project and charging for ancillary services like MDM, Active Directory, OpenID, e-mail and such with support from the Azure cloud. Even if people opt-out of the cloud, Microsoft can simply pass on savings to cloud customers without providing any requisite reduction in cost to users wanting on-premises under the Client Access License (CAL) or Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA) pricing models. Heck, Microsoft's Azure services already wreck small IT support providers in terms of overall costs even given how cheap SPLA prices currently are! In the future, it may no longer be economically sane to pay 3rd parties for support when Microsoft can do it cheaper and often better.

      Remember that Microsoft already won the e-mail war, with small businesses being routinely migrated to the platform, despite the repeated outages 365 has suffered! Also, ask yourself this: How many other services offer 100GB inboxes with full indexing, repeated anti-malware scanning, per-tenant encryption (with optional per-message encryption) and unlimited fully-searchable archiving?

      Microsoft don't need to play dirty with Windows to win, in fact, open-sourcing appears to be their game plan to shutting down competition currently!

    7. Re:Windows 10 forever by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I thought Microsoft was just going to continue to enhance Windows 10 forever. That will certainly blow by the record set by XP.

      You misunderstand. Windows 10 Home and Pro editions effectively are only serviced for 18 months before being EOL'd. At that point it is not possible to get any security updates for it.

      Windows 10 1709 Home and Pro officially was EOL'd yesterday. No more security releases will be given to that version and you will be forced to install the feature if you want to receive patches for any future discovered security issues.

    8. Re:Windows 10 forever by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That already exists. For instance if you don't have enough free space to install a feature update and you're running Windows 10 1709 Home / Pro then as of yesterday you've been EOL'd and aren't getting security updates even if Windows Update is running.

    9. Re:Windows 10 forever by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I suspect MS will eventually drop that under some pretext. Because supporting Win10 forever without selling licenses won't bring revenue.

      Maybe some bullshit about new hardware being not compatible, they are already doing that with Windows 7.

      Well, every new PC running Windows needs a new license, so I don't see how Microsoft will not get new license sales. I mean, PCs get cycled in and out all the time, and generally speaking, the new PC comes with a new Windows license already paid for. So even if MIcrosoft supported Windows 10 forever, as long as new PCs are sold, they get their money. And old PCs means licenses they no longer have to support.

      Sure there's probably a few people with retail copies of Windows 10 that have the ability to migrate between PCs, but those sales are puny compared to OEM PC sales.

  9. WinXP is *MUCH BETTER* than Win10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Believe it or not, XP is much better than Windows 10.

    At the very least, XP does not spy on the users.

    1. Re: WinXP is *MUCH BETTER* than Win10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does, but to a much lesser extent.

    2. Re:WinXP is *MUCH BETTER* than Win10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES! I have all the privacy I need with my 2 XP machines, I've NEVER patched them (except for the SP-3 patch) and . . . amazing . . . I've never been hacked. Take THAT, kiddies!

    3. Re:WinXP is *MUCH BETTER* than Win10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're on something if you believe that, Windows XP had plenty of "problems" :p

      * Scheduled log uploads including user identifiable data such as hostnames, usernames etc. via CEIP, which users would be tricked into opting in on

      * Content-aware advertising baked into the MSN Messenger platform... unless you used Windows Messenger to communicate on MSN

      * Windows Media Player had a unique ID which would be used to identify individual users to content providers for licensing and tracking purposes

      * Windows Malware Removal Tool every month would take things like process lists and any detections and send the logs to MS

      * Microsoft Office from that era (Office 2007+) included telemetry data as part of "recommended" settings, which included uploading portions of document text to improve grammar checking, regardless of any personal data included, and the downloading of a troubleshooting file which would run MS-written scripts against the software to "fix problems"

      * Troubleshooting via Help and Support service in later service packs would also collect telemetry data similar to CEIP opt in and send it to MS in order to "improve the service"

      * Crashes would send error reports including memory dumps to Microsoft servers, admittedly the default asked whether or not to Send Report, but wouldn't tell the user exactly what was in the report...

      These problems are not to any real lesser extent than Windows 10, it's just that Microsoft have been way more open in explaining that data is being collected due to modern revelations, whereas clearly no-one cared back in 2001...

  10. Re:Time for class action lawsuit (OH!) by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    ALSO, this should include everyone who has ever gotten a copy of XP, “free” with a new computer.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  11. Functionally forever by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Has it?

    There's been a few comparability breaking hardware changes that make me highly skeptical you could have continually updated a system that long.

    Off the top of my head G5 -> x86 -> "x86-64

    I wouldn't be shocked if there were some motherboard firmware changes required for the newest version since the first 64 bit x86 hardware too.

    It may not be forever, but functionally forever. Imagine at what point the limitations imposed by 64-bit computing will necessitate switching to 128 bit.

    The 8 bit era lasted a while, until production capacity for memory chips made them cheap enough to make people maxing out their installed RAM a real problem. Enter 16 bit computing with the Intel 80286 chip. (Yes, I know it wasn't their first, but it was the first mass-adopted.) That lasted a little while before the Intel 80386 took things, IIRC, into the 32 bit era, which lasted a couple decades. (I could be wrong on the numbers; it's been a while since I’ve thought about these things.)

    In fact, Apple still hasn’t, as far as I know, made good on their threat yet to release an OS that doesn’t have the capability of running 32-bit binaries, though that day is nigh. I think Windows 10 still can run the lower bit-width software, though as I don’t USE Windows anymore... I cannot say for sure.

    We might see 128 bit processors and memory addresses in our lifetime, but unless there is some quantum-leap in digital electronic technology that takes us as far beyond current technology as the transistor did beyond the vacuum tube, I’m not holding my breath.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
    1. Re:Functionally forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Time for a big compatibility rant:

      32-bit Windows 10 can still run most 16-bit Windows 3.0 binaries no problem out of the box. 64-bit Windows can run 32-bit binaries no problem with stuff dating as far back as Windows 95 working just fine. The community has adapted winevdm to work on Windows (otvdm) for running 16-bit binaries on 64-bit Windows 7 and above transparently, however, compatibility requires a bit of Wine-style work like nabbing old 16-bit DLLs for otvdm to work as it’s still early days. I can run the Windows 3.1 Control Panel and change the actual wallpaper in Windows 10 using it. That is how backwards compatible Windows is. For reference, Office 97 still works on 64-bit Windows 10 in 2019 without issues - yet StarOffice binaries for Linux fail on modern Linux distros.

      On Linux, the kernel team do a fantastic job of keeping userland compatibility but the distribution-maintained userland compatibility sucks donkeys. Simple commands like head and tail have compatibility broken by the GNU project for scripting, leading old video games like Unreal Tournament failing to install without environment variable changes and hacks. Likewise, commands keep changing for the heck of it, as do the interfaces for system configuration. A group policy written for Windows 2000 will still mostly work for Windows 10. A mandatory sabayon policy for RHEL 5 does not work in RHEL 7 a few years later and with some settings having no equivalents, meaning one can’t lock down the desktop GUI any more. Likewise, a Software Restriction Policy in Windows XP will still work on Windows 10, yet SELinux backwards compatibility gets repeatedly changed in incompatible ways (first, more modularity, then boolean name changes, then removal of some policy enforcement breaking custom modules....), this means system administrators often don’t bother locking down Linux systems as much as they should outside of what is spoon fed by the distribution default policy set.

      Audio: try RealPlayer for Windows.(even in Wine), then try RealPlayer for Linux. One stack retained full backwards compatibility for standard audio features, the other fubared a lot of proprietary apps.

      Graphics: Try running original Quake 3 Arena binaries on Linux so that you can have PunkBuster and such, then try on Windows. One OS works around the buffer overflow caused by OpenGL Extension count, the other leaves the user SOL.

      Networking: The RPC layer for networking allows one to use tools like Computer Management on Windows XP to maintain Windows 10 and vice-versa, ditto for the registry without needing to remote on and run commands directly on the host. 18 years of both forwards and backwards compatibility in Windows case.

      I could go on but it’s safe to say Linux does not have anywhere near decent backwards compatibility. Not because of the kernel but because of distributions and developers not putting in the extra work to maintain backwards compatibility.

    2. Re:Functionally forever by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I was replying to:

      t has been working for another major OS with the number ten in its name for 19 years now.

      Is your argument that OS X has been smoothly upgrading over that entire time?

      It looks like the oldest version of OS X supported (Sierra) won't run on hardware from before 2009.

      The current version on hardware before 2012.

      It's about equivalent to Windows and not one smooth incremental update over time just because they didn't increment the fist number.

      On the software compatability side it's much worse.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  12. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to the display on the drive through at my local Jack in the Box. It's running some ancient embedded Windows shit. And it's been stuck on a failed check disk screen (the ol' blue and yellow one) for weeks, at around 37% or so, throwing an error I didn't even know existed (something about reaching the max size that version of checkdisk can check, and to run the check within Windows instead, I believe).

    Their automated ordering kiosks used embedded XP, but they ripped those out a few years ago because they never worked right (BSOD half the time, their staff didn't know how to take an order from them in their existing system the other half of the time).

    1. Re:Bullshit by omnichad · · Score: 1

      throwing an error I didn't even know existed (something about reaching the max size that version of checkdisk can check, and to run the check within Windows instead, I believe).

      Probably a hard drive over 32GB on FAT32 upgraded when the last hard drive died. And that drive probably had to be formatted on another newer computer. The last time I replaced a hard drive in a computer that old, I just stuck a CF card on an IDE adapter to get a smaller capacity and make life easier.

    2. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlikely that chkdsk would fail on > 32GB, USB hard drives were a thing back then as was running 98SE on a big drive.
      This 32GB limit was perhaps a coup to force adoption of Exfat on memory cards and mobile devices - MS still is collecting royalties.
      To this day some Chinese etc. devices may pretend they only support up to 32GB memory cards, but if you put one with a 64GB or 128GB fat32 volume it will work.
      I downloaded a ~100KB program back then called.. fat32format, so there was no big need to use another computer.

      Oh well, might have been another issue in that case..
      Life was good when I had 98SE on a 120GB drive plus another drive (and two optical drives on the other IDE ribbon for good measure)

  13. WinXP is unsupported, not dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing you can call dead at this point is possibly the Windows 3 series.

  14. Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by dargaud · · Score: 1
    ...but still works fine. I give training courses in some arcane industrial language under Windows XP. In 2019. Why ? Because I set up the entire environment in a virtual machine and then ship the VM to my customers before the course. This way everything just works when we start the course.

    Why don't I use Win10 ? Well, I tried but the smallest VM I could produce is 60Gb, instead of 17Gb with XP. Try and send that via ftp... And other reasons is that I hate Win10 and also that many of the hardware drivers necessary in an industrial environment just won't install easily or at all due to tons of obscure 'security' settings that just get in the way. I know we've been complaining forever about the shitty security of Windows, but when they actually tighten shit up, it gets right in the way. And honestly, it's not like they've improved anything useful between XP and 10... I can't find a SINGLE thing that I would say: "That's nice, I wouldn't want to go without".

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by johnsie · · Score: 2

      Shitty IT guys and programmers always come up with wild reasons to try and excuse bad practices. It's usually because they don't have the intelligence to find a way to do things correctly. Your example of why you "need to" use bad practices is no different. This is furthered by the fact that you say "it's not like they've improved anything useful between XP and 10". The whole security model on 10 is improved, memory management has been improved so that it can handle larger amounts on memory during processing, the device driver system on 10 is automated. There are lots of improvements. You've clearly no idea what is going on under the hood and you're just looking for a way to excuse shoddy practices.

    2. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      And honestly, it's not like they've improved anything useful between XP and 10... I can't find a SINGLE thing that I would say: "That's nice, I wouldn't want to go without".

      64 bit support, unless you count XP 64bit. Which was technically there but somehow did not get not significant market share.

      Recently, however, MS destroys more in terms of usability than they improve in the underlying kernel and services. I keep reading about how Windows 8 is somewhat better technologically, and I don't even doubt that. But the abysmal GUI turns it all to shit :-(

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    3. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      many of the hardware drivers necessary in an industrial environment just won't install easily

      That's the vendor's problem, not Microsoft's. It is not hard at all to sign up for MSDN and get pre-release access to the OS.

      It's especially common in industrial and medical equipment, but that doesn't change the facts: the vendor has cheap, lazy, shitty development practices.

      I know we've been complaining forever about the shitty security of Windows, but when they actually tighten shit up, it gets right in the way.

      It's impossible to improve security without disrupting some use cases. The best approach is to be as transparent as possible: announce design goals early, provide early access to developers, communicate changes frequently, and test internally as often as possible.

      Ultimately, third party developers are responsible for complying with the OS security model. Since closed source software is typical on Windows, there is often a clear legal line that limits who can fix things.

      I remember the nightmare that was SELinux back when it first came out. Security headaches are not a uniquely-Windows problem.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    4. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by flippy · · Score: 1

      It's not always "shoddy practices" of the end user. Sometimes, you're stuck with legacy hardware (manufacturing environments are particularly susceptible to this) and/or software. In those cases, the user is at the mercy of the vendor - and before anyone says "well, you shouldn't have picked that vendor", sometimes there really is no reasonable alternative.

      While there have been plenty of "under the hood" improvements between XP and Win10, as a general-purpose OS, I despise Win10. The user interface is an absolute nightmare for anyone who started with a previous version of Windows.

      A few years back, I had to get my mother a computer, and wound up giving her my old Macbook pro. When, just last month, we needed to get her a new machine (the MBP I had given her was almost 10 years old, btw - an excellent lifespan for a machine), I was ecstatic when she said she wanted to stay with Mac rather than going back to Windows. I hated the idea of having to try to teach her the Win10 interface. It would have taken me days.

      Windows or Mac, I don't care what you use (I use both) and I'm not going to make judgments on which is better - but PLEASE, Microsoft, stop radically changing the UI. It's a nightmare for those of us who wind up having to teach the new UI and how to work with it to others.

    5. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does win 10 pe have support for drivers. I downloaded an image of win10pe 32bit which is only 1GB mainly because of the other 3rd party programs included in the image. It has Chrome, VLC, and various utilities.

    6. Re:Dead ? No, it just smells that way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth I think you can give the Mate desktop to Windows users or just computer users (they don't know or care) and they seemingly don't ask any question. They can find the wifi network list in the bottom right or top right.
      My mom got main Ubuntu instead. Well, I never used it but she likes it. Thankfully this is a thick business laptop, old but powerful and quiet running so it doesn't suffer overheating and noise from the waste of CPU and GPU due to piping everything to an OpenGL window manager. That's a bit like having a Macbook pro I guess.

  15. Internet Explorer 8 is dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know (but I never used the product), Windows POSReady 2009 allowed Internet Explorer 8 to be installed.
    Does this mean that Internet Explorer 8 is now finally entering the unsupported realm?
    I must give it to Microsoft, they do support previous versions of their web browsers. Unlike Google with Chrome, which just releases a new version every month but never patches an older version.
    Firefox treads the middle ground with both a rapid-release branch (with explicit support for the previous version for a week or so) and an ESR branch.

    1. Re:Internet Explorer 8 is dead? by Merk42 · · Score: 1

      The only version of Internet Explorer Microsoft even supports anymore is IE11, and that's only through security updates.

  16. Is it dead or just mostly dead? by thogard · · Score: 1

    Are there options for paid support like there were for general release of XP? If so, it isn't dead yet.

  17. Your OS is a POS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  18. I miss Windows XP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure I made fun of it's default interface like a lot of other people as well as the standard Microsoft bashing. However compared to Windows 10 I felt like I was more in control of my computer and more importantly the look and feel didn't require third party updates out of the box to help keep me sane and my mother from being confused as to how the UI was designed. It even had a skin out of the box that made it look like Windows 2K/3.1 which really simplified things and helped the OS get out of the way more when it needed to.

  19. Let's see a show of hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people are still holding on to Windows for Workgroups 3.11?

    1. Re:Let's see a show of hands... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      I still have a machine that runs it. Need it to convert old legal documents when necessary. It's a dual boot Windows 3.11 and Windows 98 machine. I could virtualize them, but the machine has a 5 1/4 floppy which is often necessary.

    2. Re:Let's see a show of hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still have a machine that runs it. Need it to convert old legal documents when necessary. It's a dual boot Windows 3.11 and Windows 98 machine. I could virtualize them, but the machine has a 5 1/4 floppy which is often necessary.

      Hey dumbass, neither of those are Windows XP. Those are both completely different.

    3. Re:Let's see a show of hands... by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the post I responded to asked who held onto Windows for Workgroups 3.11.

    4. Re:Let's see a show of hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you consider reading the whole thread? Or do you have a habit of responding to single posts without context?

      Dumbass.

  20. You can upgrade Linux 0.01 by DrYak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Meanwhile, the oldest Linux kernel still supported is 3.16, first released in 2014.

    If your server is still running Linux kernel 0.01 you are completely allowed (thanks to the copyleft GPL it is licensed under) to upgrade all the way to the current 5.1-rc4.

    If your marchine is running Windows XP (and don't get me about Windows 2.0 or MS-DOS 2.0), you're hosed. You can't get updates for that version, and you need to buy a new "upgrade license" to get something newer. (though from time to time some of these upgrade are free).

    From the point of view of how Windows is handled, Linux is a single product which only differs by build numbers.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:You can upgrade Linux 0.01 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the $200 or so for an upgrade license is the problem here...

    2. Re:You can upgrade Linux 0.01 by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      You ignored the most important part while focusing on the numbers. The process of upgrading will make the cost of buying a license look like a laughable rounding error.

      You'll likely have more luck getting Windows 10 running on whatever is currently running windows XP, than you have getting Linux 5.1 running on what was on 0.01. The specialism required to upgrade a Windows XP system to a Windows 10 system is nothing compared to finding someone who has the expertise to know how that 0.01 system even runs. Though to be fair it's a silly assumption anyway since Windows XP was only EOL'd in 2014 so you're only looking for 5 years of expertise and would be comparing 5.16 to a 2.4.x series kernel which from there to a 5.1 kernel is actually a big technical jump.

      But even the ability to get the software running at all is nothing compared to the testing your specialist application needs to go through on the new version of either system. You do have a specialist application right? I mean you're not using a Windows XP machine or a Linux 2.4 machine as your home desktop on the internet are you?

      Either way I'm willing to offer you a 100% free Windows upgrade license when you employ my services to help you actually go through the migration, seeing how the license seems to be your only concern. This will work out well for me since I see a sucker who doesn't understand upgrade processes that I can take to the cleaners.

    3. Re:You can upgrade Linux 0.01 by PingSpike · · Score: 1

      Its perhaps worth noting that while XP's update lifecycle was very nice, Windows 10 seems to only bother to support feature updates for 18 months now at which point its time to upgrade again to receive further updates.

  21. Amiga OS survives another version of Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Death to the PC.

    Captcha: seconded

  22. Re:Time for class action lawsuit by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Not only is that legally impossible; it's also a a terrible idea.

    Microsoft publishes their support lifecycle, and anyone can find out exactly how long their software will be supported. Occasionally they extend it (as was the case with XP), but they are not obligated to do so.

    If treating the end of support like a drop-dead date makes their OS an unappealing purchase... then don't buy it.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  23. Killing off popular things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First Clippy, then MSN Messenger and now Windows XP. Is nothing sacred anymore, Microsoft?

  24. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use an old pirated XP box to roam the internet. Newer been hacked, you only need some 3rd party firewall and different plugins for pale moon. No fucking updates.

  25. Microsoft is still offering XP on its servers... by Desert+Tripper · · Score: 3, Informative

    They say it's dead, but you can still download a free, fully functional 32-bit version of XP encased in a virtual machine (Windows Virtual PC) from Microsoft's web site! It's called "Windows XP Mode."

  26. Imaginary Harm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, like Microsoft is the only software company or organization, ever, to deprecate a version.

    *Rolls Eyes*

  27. Healthcare, last bastion of obsolete tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, I worked connecting more than 50 external EMRs to our pharmacy. We could totally write a custom interface to get your info into a reporting system. We had to do this for multiple daisy chained HL7 systems connecting to a PLC robotic dispenser. Its absolutely doable as a shitty stovepipe that will one day cause problems :)

  28. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Registry hack please.

  29. why the fucking dyke video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is from guys to guys, fuck you all

  30. Re:Microsoft is still offering XP on its servers.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Offering something for download doesn't mean it's not dead in technological terms.

  31. Fuck people who abuse their moderation privileges. by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    ALSO, this should include everyone who has ever gotten a copy of XP, “free” with a new computer.

    To whatever moron rated this "Flamebait":

    It's not, you fucking MICROSHILL.

    WE FUCKING PAID FOR MICROSOFT'S GODDAMNED, NON-SECURE-BY-DESIGN, DELIBERATELY BROKEN, INTENTIONALLY INFERIOR, SHITTY SOFTWARE, IN REAL ACTUAL MONEY, MOTHERFUCKER!

    Microsoft ROBBED every customer it's ever had. It's entire leadership from inception to today should be in FUCKING PRISON

    It's not flame-bait to say so. It's a valid, legitimate opinion, shared by many; likely it's shared by MOST of the F/L-OSS community, much of the GNU and Linux communities, pretty much any and everyone who has been fucked over by goddamned motherfucking MICROSOFT, which means at this point, if you live indoors, and not in a fucking cave, probably you too. Statistically speaking.

    So fuck you, whoever you are, you useless, paid-off, dickless piece of shit.

    NOW THIS, MAYBE, IS FLAMEBAIT. The original was not. Now you know the difference.

    (There should be an official mechanism on slashdot for protesting or appealing moderators who abuse their privileges. Because anyone who thought the original post was flame-bait doesn't know what the fuck flame-bait IS.)

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  32. Re:Time for class action lawsuit by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    Not only is that legally impossible; it's also a a terrible idea.

    Microsoft publishes their support lifecycle, and anyone can find out exactly how long their software will be supported. Occasionally they extend it (as was the case with XP), but they are not obligated to do so.

    If treating the end of support like a drop-dead date makes their OS an unappealing purchase... then don't buy it.

    When about a 50 million people were compelled to buy Microsoft Windows because it came with their computer, were they made aware of this?

    No. This was NOT published anywhere where decades of victims of MS Highway Robbery could have seen it. And “don’t buy it” isn’t an option when every computer maker has been illegally strong armed into including their shitware as a requirement to sell...

    Look. MS was successful sued over this. Their malfeasance was proven in a court of law on numerous occasions. But thanks, it seems to governmental corruption or incompetence or a combination of the two, Microfuck was NOT broken up the way they should have been, the way Standard Oil and Ma Bell were.

    Your pro-corporate “hey, take it or leave it” attitude ignores the fact that things weren’t always as they are now,

    Microsoft had, through practices demonstrated in court to be not only anticompetitive but illegally so, made itself the only game in town.

    Your argument would be like telling someone living in LA in the 80s that if you don’t like having to own a car, just get to work some other way.

    There are no houses you can afford walking distance to work. The place you work is in LA, so relocating to another town or state isn’t an option. There’s no public transport either TO where in the LA metroplex where you work nor one in the suburbs where you live. Bicycling is not an option because in that time and place, bike lanes were a new idea and not everywhere HAD them.

    You simply had to own a car if you wanted to have that job and weren’t conveniently already filthy stinking RICH. SO when someone says, you don’t HAVE to own a car... it’s really pretty laughable.

    Sure. Just hitchhike to work. Or walk 7 hours each way twice daily. Carpool (before that was a thing...) which means invent carpooling, basically... also be lucky enough to HAVE someone near enough to you...

    Having a Wintel computer (that’s actually what they were called, from WINDOWS and Intel) in the 80s or 90s or even early 00s was ESSENTIAL for a LOT of things and MS parasitically FED off everyone basically.

    There wasn’t a legally usable free alternative then, certainly not one anyone was writing software for. BSD wasn’t really a thing yet, UNIX was still proprietary, Apple’s Mac OS was a joke that only worked on Apple’s overpriced computers which mostly people weren’t writing software for either... and Linux (and GNU) wasn’t a thing yet either.

    There were no iPads or iPods nor iPhones or iFads or iBlads or even iVlads (what Putin uses). You kids nowadays are spoiled. And you don’t even know it.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.