Slashdot Mirror


Pepsi Says It'll Use an Artificial Constellation, Hung in the Night Sky Next To the Stars, To Promote an Energy Drink (futurism.com)

A Russian company called StartRocket says it's going to launch a cluster of cubesats into space that will act as an "orbital billboard," projecting enormous advertisements into the night sky like artificial constellations. And its first client, it says, will be PepsiCo -- which will use the system to promote a "campaign against stereotypes and unjustified prejudices against gamers" on behalf of an energy drink called Adrenaline Rush, reports Futurism. From the report: Yeah, the project sounds like an elaborate prank. But Russian PepsiCo spokesperson Olga Mangova confirmed to Futurism that the collaboration is real. "We believe in StartRocket potential," she wrote in an email. "Orbital billboards are the revolution on the market of communications. That's why on behalf of Adrenaline Rush -- PepsiCo Russia energy non-alcoholic drink, which is brand innovator, and supports everything new, and non-standard -- we agreed on this partnership."

173 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. No. Just no. by xSander · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go away. Don't pollute our beautiful skies like that.

    1. Re:No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they do this, I promise never ever to buy anything from Pepsi corporation again.

      Not just polluting the view for everyone in the planet, they would also add more of pointless pace junk which can break useful satellites and therefore harm navigation, communication and scientific research.

    2. Re:No. Just no. by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they do this, I promise never ever to buy anything from Pepsi corporation again.

      Not just polluting the view for everyone in the planet, they would also add more of pointless pace junk which can break useful satellites and therefore harm navigation, communication and scientific research.

      I would join you in the boycott... if I bought anything from Pepsi in the first place. I don't drink soda, or lipton; I almost never eat fast food, so me boycotting KFC and TacoBell, and any other Pepsi owned chains over this won't help.

      I will however sign any petition over banning this, and write to my local representatives asking they put a stop to this if this comes to fruition. This may be a harmless one-off for them, but if it is successful and other companies follow suit the night sky could quickly become a trashland of light pollution... I don't want to start down that trail.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    3. Re:No. Just no. by thermopile · · Score: 5, Informative
      Arthur C. Clarke beat them to this: read the short story called "Watch This Space", where almost exactly this was performed ... by a soda company ... except they did it on the moon. In 1956.

      It was amusing (and pretty good) as a sci-fi short story. It's terrifying as "reality."

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    4. Re:No. Just no. by butchersong · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm in complete agreement with you. Luckily we have a handy list of products to avoid. wiki list of assets

    5. Re:No. Just no. by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      And there's the simple fucking audacity to put that goddam advertising shit right in everyone's faces.

      They do that already with billboards and LED signs, and I think most people don't go outside and look up at night, anyway.

      Now, if they could arrange to get that shit on my ceiling ...

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    6. Re:No. Just no. by AdamFistler · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure screw up the night sky with some gawky advertisement to advertise their new drink aimed at neckbeards. I'm sure Pepsi will be the first company on board when they broadcast ads into your dreams like on Futurama.

    7. Re:No. Just no. by GrumpySteen · · Score: 4, Informative

      You probably buy a lot more stuff from PepsiCo then you realize.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    8. Re:No. Just no. by sidekick2 · · Score: 2

      As if this will just be Pepsi. It will be PepsiCo for 6 mo, until their contract runs out, then Verizon, then Visa, then Amazon. Then we'll have 40 other companies, like CBS Outdoors launching their own cubesat program. Can't wait for the political ads -- to light up the night skies.

    9. Re:No. Just no. by butchersong · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is ultimate result of abandoning things lofty things like beauty and truth as foundations of society and replacing it with what... consumerism? Capitalism? I've spent my whole life as a hard-core republican but lately, the old free market this and libertarian that mantras just leave me feeling empty and dissatisfied.

    10. Re:No. Just no. by SumDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Chair Face Chip-n-Dale!

    11. Re:No. Just no. by supremebob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, man... they own Cheetos? That's it, boycott is over. They can cover up the big dipper with a giant Mt. Dew ad for all I care, I'm not giving those up.

    12. Re: No. Just no. by GoTeam · · Score: 1

      And they own Sting! Does that cover his work when he was still active with The Police?

    13. Re:No. Just no. by alvinrod · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I looked over it and there were some brands on there that I wasn't aware of Pepsi owning (mostly a few of the snack food brands) but I also realized that there isn't a product on that list that a person couldn't get from someone else or just do without entirely. In fact, you'd probably be better off if you never bought products from almost all of those brands to begin with for health reasons.

    14. Re:No. Just no. by backbyter · · Score: 1

      The only thing on the Wiki list I might have to boycott is Dole. I think that's the brand for the bananas that I buy.

    15. Re:No. Just no. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's basically impossible to live an ethical life these days because the world is too integrated and interconnected. Every action can be eventually traced back to some badness of some kind.

      Yes I've been watching The Good Place, but it's probably true.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:No. Just no. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Cobra of GI Joe fame. And Fred Pohl's "Space Merchants" comes to mind.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    17. Re:No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Arthur C. Clarke beat them to this: read the short story called "Watch This Space", where almost exactly this was performed ... by a soda company ... except they did it on the moon. In 1956.

      It was amusing (and pretty good) as a sci-fi short story. It's terrifying as "reality."

      On the bright side the idea for once wasn't from the 1984.

    18. Re:No. Just no. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      In The Tick, Chairface Chippendale tried to carve his name into the moon with a giant laser so it would be visible from earth. He only got as far as "CHA" before The Tick stopped him.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:No. Just no. by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      me boycotting KFC and TacoBell, and any other Pepsi owned chains over this won't help

      No, that won't help, because Pepsi no longer owns any of that. So no need! :D

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    20. Re:No. Just no. by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      It's basically impossible to live an ethical life these days because the world is too integrated and interconnected.

      Ethics is, as ethics does. Seems to me like being integrated and connected would be good for ethics.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    21. Re:No. Just no. by PackMan97 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that Libertarian principles do not say "do whatever you want". Many libertarians are strong environmentalists and believe the principle of non-aggression applies to spewing out unwanted particulates, sound or light (all forms of pollution) is a form of aggression and therefore prohibited. Certainly putting obtrusive displays in the night sky for all to see would fall under that and be prohibited as a form or pollution in any libertarian utopia.

    22. Re:No. Just no. by Solandri · · Score: 1

      The moon isn't so bad - the light pollution is limited to just the moon's surface. This idea of lit cubesats in orbit pollutes a huge swath of the night sky, interfering with astronomy all around the globe. To put it in terms marketers might understand, it's like if someone drew lines across every ad on every medium all across the globe. It's an incredibly disruptive and monumentally bad idea, almost sure to result in government regulation of objects put into space much like the government regulates radio transmissions.

    23. Re:No. Just no. by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 1

      If they do this, I promise never ever to buy anything from Pepsi corporation again.

      Not just polluting the view for everyone in the planet, they would also add more of pointless pace junk which can break useful satellites and therefore harm navigation, communication and scientific research.

      I would join you in the boycott... if I bought anything from Pepsi in the first place.

      Well, you see, that just means you haven't been sufficiently advertised to. Clearly you've demonstrated the need for orbital billboards.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    24. Re:No. Just no. by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      Holy fuck...

    25. Re:No. Just no. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Mountain Dew?! Oh, man, this is going to be tough...

      Granted, I prefer Mello Yello, but it's almost impossible to find in bottles around here.

    26. Re: No. Just no. by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Hahaha...
      Oh boy, this is precious! Sorry, I won't elucidate much but here is the short version.
      There is an excellent book by a modern Russian author called Viktor Pelevin titled "Generation P". It deals mostly with advertising (ha!). The first 3 pages tell us why "P". Because during communism the only western drink that was available in the USSR was.....Pepsi Cola.
      The author wonders why the apparatchiks decided for Pepsi and not Coke (while mentioning that it had to be only one available because in those days only one Truth and one Way was considered).
      BTW, in the Amazon version which I bought to give to friends those few pages were omitted. Apparently the US book market can't have fun with Pepsi or Coke. I'm serious, it is censored (there are few jokes as to why in the US coke won, plus some jibes about evolution and red necks..)
      Man, this news is hilarious. Read the book anyway (in the west the title is Omon Ra).

      Oh yhea, fuck Pepsi and that Russian agency!

    27. Re:No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The first Red Dwarf book had advertisers deliberately sending suns into supernova to spell out sky messages:

      Captain Yvette Richards ran her fingers through the bristles of her crew cut, and craned forward to look at the spectrascope of the sun they were approaching.
      It was perfect. She let out a Texan yelp.
      'We got it!'
      Flight Coordinator Elaine Schuman leaned over her shoulder and peered at the console. 'It's a supergiant?'
      'You betcha!' said Richards, and yelped again.
      'Time to celebrate,' said Schuman.

      Kryten, the service mechanoid, handed round styrofoam cups of dehydrated champagne, and topped them up with water.
      The eight-woman, two-man crew yelped and cheered and partied, while Kryten handed round more champagne and irradiated caviare nibblets, which he'd been saving specially.
      It had taken the crew of Nova 5 six months to find a blue supergiant - a star teetering on the edge of its final phase in the right quadrant of the right galaxy. Another month, and they would have ruined the whole campaign. They certainly felt they had good reason to celebrate.

      Sipping her champagne Kirsty Fantozi, the star demolition engineer, started programming the nebulon missile. It had to explode at just the right moment to trigger off the reaction in the star's core which would push it into supernova stage. A star in supernova would light up the entire galaxy for over a month, giving off more energy than the Earth's sun could in ten billion years. It would be a hell of a bang.

      One undetected bug in Fantozi's programming could ruin everything. Not only did she have to push the star into supernova, she had to time it so the light from the explosion would reach Earth at exactly the right moment. The right moment was the same moment as the light from the other one hundred and twenty-seven supergiants, which were also being induced into supernovae, reached Earth.

      For anyone living on Earth the result would be mindfizzlingly spectacular. One hundred and twenty-eight stars would appear to go supernova simultaneously, burning with such ferocity they would be visible even in daylight.
      And the hundred and twenty-eight supernovae would spell out a message.
      And this would be the message:

      'COKE ADDS LIFE!'

      For five whole weeks, wherever you were on Earth, the huge tattoo would be branded across the day and night skies.
      Honeymooners in Hawaii would stand on the peak of Mauna Kea, gazing at sunsets stamped with the slogan. Commuters in London, stuck in traffic jams, would peer through the grey drizzle and gape at the Cola constellation. The few primitive tribes still untouched by civilisation in the jungles of South America would look up at the heavens, and certainly not think about drinking Pepsi.

      The cost of this single, three-word ad in star writing across the universe would amount to the entire military budget of the USA for the whole of history. So, ridiculous though it was, it was still a marginally more sensible way of blowing trillions of dollarpounds.
      And, the Coke executives were assured by the advertising executives at Saachi, Saachi, Saachi, Saachi, Saachi and Saachi, it would put an end to the Cola war forever. Guaranteed. Pepsi would be buried.

      OK, it wasn't wonderful, ecologically speaking. OK, it involved the destruction of a hundred and twenty-eight stars, which otherwise would have lasted another twenty-five million years or so. OK, when the stars exploded they would gobble up three or four planets in each of their solar systems And, OK, the resulting radiation would last long past the lifetime of our own planet.

      But it sure as hell would sell a lot of cans of a certain fizzy drink Fantozi finished the program and fired the nebulon missile off into the heart of the star. She finished her styrofoam cup of champagne and flicked on her intercom.
      'Let's turn this son-of-a-goit around and go home.'
      The nose cone of Nova 5 slowly swung around to begin the jag back to Earth.

    28. Re:No. Just no. by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I feel your pain but if they do this shit, then it will be cold day in hell before I touch another one.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    29. Re:No. Just no. by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      I don't know what's more surprising.....that list, or the fact that I don't seem to consume any Pepsi products, despite how fucking giant that list is. I thought for sure that I'd consume something, but since the local stores started selling the phenomenal tortilla chips that a local restaurant makes, Tostitos don't show up in my house anymore. That was the only thing on the list that I've had in the last few years.

      I'm starting to realize that I eat a shockingly small amount of processed food, which is a pleasant surprise.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    30. Re:No. Just no. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Half of me worries about a slippery slope of mass sky ads.
      The other half says, "Fun colorful light show, cool!" I'm torn.

    31. Re:No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Red dwarf did the exact same thing right down to it being Pepsi. But instead of cube SATs, they made stars go super Nova.

    32. Re:No. Just no. by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Quaker Oats and on rare occasion cracker jacks are the only things I buy off that list. Not that I eat healthy all the time, Pringles just wasn't on the list (that's proctor&gamble another company that surprisingly makes everything under the sun).

       

    33. Re:No. Just no. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If it's not overdone it's not going to create significant nor long-term distractions. If done occasionally, most will find it "cool". We already have planes and satellites that inadvertently put on light shows, and ad blimps that do it on purpose.

      "Don't do cool things because copy-cats might get carried away" is possibly being overly paranoid. I'm still on the fence.

    34. Re:No. Just no. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      You probably buy a lot more stuff from PepsiCo then you realize.

      No. Checked through the list and it happens I never buy any of that stuff.

    35. Re:No. Just no. by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      Yeah i'm the same way, there's virtually nothing on that list that i've eaten in the last few years. Maybe some quaker instant oats from hotel breakfasts and a couple of bags of stacy's pita chips.

      I don't think of myself as a obsessive about avoiding processed food, we just try to cook a lot and model good habits for our kid. I realize a lot of America eats this on a regular basis, but it's kind of hard to wrap my head around. It definitely feels like there's a weird schism in society around that kind of thing.

    36. Re:No. Just no. by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      If it's not overdone it's not going to create significant nor long-term distractions. If done occasionally, most will find it "cool".

      Just like telephone calls to notify us about interesting sales offers, emails suggesting tablets for erectile disfuncion, and adverts in TV shows? Nothing overdone or distracting, only occasional, very cool, and of course highly useful.

    37. Re:No. Just no. by denzacar · · Score: 1

      It's basically impossible to live an ethical life these days because the world is too integrated and interconnected. Every action can be eventually traced back to some badness of some kind.

      That's exaggerated nonsense.
      Even in Scotland, let alone outside of it where true Scotsmen are REALLY difficult to ferret out.

      You just have to get used to the fact that you can't make sweeping feel-good generalizations and that you need to evaluate each moral or ethical choice on case by case basis, following the best information you got at hand at the moment.
      That's all there is to it.
      That way you can still have a family containing members who happen to not give too much of a fuck about your particular economic boycotting preferences.
      Particularly those of the underage kind who can be really difficult sometimes and who stubbornly refuse to accept that they are at fault for ruining everything for everyone by eating that particular brand of sugary... stuff.

      Downside is that, besides spending time and calories on each choice, you must actually have morals and ethics - you can't rely on those borrowed from other people.
      But it's OK, most of those are sweeping generalizations and cherry-picked nonsense anyway.
      That is when they are not neolithic nonsense masquerading as moral high ground while giving you a carte blanche to stone to death or otherwise murder people you don't like or who happen to have the stuff you'd like for yourself.

      Also, if the ethical and moral responsibility is shareable and transferable, that would mean that it is also dilutable.
      After all, we can't be blamed today for all the shit the first primates did no more than can you personally be blamed for every shady action that someone in your extended human-to-human network did.
      Clearly, individual guilt lessens as one moves away from the source, regardless of the increase in "interconnections and integration".

      Just eat your strawberries, don't actively try to shit all over the place, clean up after yourself a bit and try not to think of the tigers too much.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    38. Re:No. Just no. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's essentially the slippery slope argument. I 100% agree that every big company putting ads in the sky would be a bad thing. But a doing it once won't interrupt my dinner nor my nap.

    39. Re:No. Just no. by Woeful+Countenance · · Score: 2
      Robert Heinlein used the idea of advertising on the moon in The Man Who Sold the Moon (1950). The titular character actually got one person to pay him not to advertise for his competitor and got another to pay him to get to the moon before the Soviet Union could put a giant hammer and sickle on it.

      I suspect this announcement to be some kind of joke or publicity stunt. I would think orbital advertising would piss off too many people to be advantageous. But I could be wrong.

    40. Re:No. Just no. by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many libertarians are strong environmentalists and believe the principle of non-aggression applies to spewing out unwanted particulates, sound or light (all forms of pollution) is a form of aggression and therefore prohibited

      But most aren't. Try mentioning externalities in a Libertarian forum and you'll usually suffer derision and ridicule. Look at libertarian lobbying groups and forums like Reason and their attitude towards, for example, global warming.

      Now, I'm glad _you_ see the light on this, and I like your argument, it makes logical sense and would fit within the proto-libertarian ideology if such a thing were thrashed out into a coherent block. But in practice, environmentalism is seen as this thing the government would have to be involved in, that restricts people from doing what they want. Not hard to see why the people who are attracted to libertarianism reject the logic when it goes in that direction.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    41. Re:No. Just no. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Many libertarians are strong environmentalists and believe the principle of non-aggression applies to spewing out unwanted particulates, sound or light (all forms of pollution) is a form of aggression and therefore prohibited

      But most aren't. Try mentioning externalities in a Libertarian forum and you'll usually suffer derision and ridicule.

      Cite? This isn't my experience, at all. In my experience, libertarians are quite cognizant of externalities. They may disagree with the use of government to internalize them, but tend to look for alternative mechanisms, not ignore or deride the concept.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    42. Re:No. Just no. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      When you say things like patriotism, honor, bravery, faith, etc are all risible and worthy only of mockery, what do you have left?

      --
      -Styopa
    43. Re:No. Just no. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I agree and somewhat disagree.

      I think part of it is what your parents modeled for you (which you're addressing, so kudos), part of it is time and money, but a good deal of the blame lies on companies like Pepsi.

      The things on this list exist to fill an immediate need for a very short period of time, while causing that same immediate need shortly afterwards.

      I don't snack much because I tend to eat good portions of protein, fat, and fiber, with minimal refined carbs and added sugar. That fills me up, and I'm quite happy going 4-6 hours without something to eat. But replace that with some of the items on this list, and I'm suddenly going to need food a lot earlier. And what product is going to fill the instant need to eat? Yet more shit on this list.

      It's hard to take the time to cook good food when you're starving, and there's a snack at hand. When the availability of these things is almost universal, the advertising is universal, and eating them creates a vicious cycle where you suddenly need more, I can see how people can fall into this trap.

      Pretty much anybody can learn to cook amazing food, but they need the time and money to do it. (And access to ingredients, which you'd think is a given, but the US really does have serious food deserts.) If you want to learn to cook, there are 3-4 TV channels and probably a million youtube videos, and another couple million blog posts and websites. It's easier now than every to learn to cook.

      But making that a habit is hard, and it's hard to give up the snacks that Pepsi and others make available on every corner, in every building, and advertise constantly. It's almost like you need to go cold-turkey to try to break the very well understood science of hunger and food craving that they're relying on to keep people coming back for more.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    44. Re:No. Just no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ahem: there is no ethical consumption under capitalism. All capitalist products are the result of exploitation at one level or another. Welcome to the right side, comrade.

      Now downvote me to hell and try to forget any of this was ever said.

      Captcha: backbone

    45. Re: No. Just no. by TimMD909 · · Score: 1

      It's actually a false flag operation by Coca-Cola funded by BigChemTrail Corp. Brilliant, if you ask me... If I'm wrong, then I'd have to stop drinking Mt Dew which obviously isn't going to happen. Therefore, I must be right (even though I'm left handed). Right?

    46. Re:No. Just no. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Occasionally sunlight reflects off of various flat panels and they briefly glint brightly in the sky. I've seen it a few times.

    47. Re:No. Just no. by neoRUR · · Score: 1

      Well it's not as bad as Hot Black Desiato sending his space ship into a sun to go super Nova to promote one of his Disaster Area metal band tours.
      From HHGTTG

    48. Re: No. Just no. by Potor · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is use paper bags, or bring your own, and, presto! - you're ethical!

    49. Re:No. Just no. by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I really haven't found that free-market libertarian ideals leave me "empty" in the slightest... They're still, IMO, the single best and most just way to encourage people to be productive, and to reward that productivity.

      Consumerism is only an issue to the extent individuals ALLOW it to be. For example? If Pepsi goes through with this and the bulk of the comments and stories written about it after the fact are negative? They're probably not going to do it again. Successful marketing doesn't involve angering your target audience.

      Furthermore -- if these orbiting billboards disrupt astronomy around the globe, it won't take long before there's push-back against the Russian company responsible for putting up the satellites in the first place.

      This is one of those problems that solves itself. This is just another of MANY attempts to do something new and attention-getting to market products or services, and it won't be financially viable if the majority expresses a strong dislike for it.

    50. Re:No. Just no. by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      In Buddhism the question is simply; Did you see, know, or suspect that it was immoral? Then you fully share the responsibility.

    51. Re:No. Just no. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I don't have a TV, soda, or trademarked oats, but I do have a razor with 5 blades.

      Yes. Yes it is a Gillette. Thank you.

    52. Re: No. Just no. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The unabomber manifesto was _insane_. Have you read it? It had nothing to do with libertarianism, rather it was violently paleo.

      He was once very smart, but had untreated schizophrenia for decades. The average schizophrenic episode kills enough brain cells to cost the sufferer about 1 IQ point, it's a physical disease. But he remembered being smart, so treated his thoughts as being useful.

      By the time he was 'manifestoing' his IQ was room temperature at best. But reporters are _stupid_, anything they don't understand is 'genius'. The unabomber manifesto is a towering structure of fallacies built on other fallacies. He completely lost the thread on the first page.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    53. Re: No. Just no. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      His first fatality was a computer store owner. He wounded a police officer, a secretary, two graduate students, a research assistant, professors in engineering, psychology, and computer science, a geneticist, twelve airline passengers, and the president of United Airlines. He also murdered an advertising executive and a timber industry lobbyist. Sort of random, wouldn't you say?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski

    54. Re:No. Just no. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 2

      This is one of those problems that solves itself. This is just another of MANY attempts to do something new and attention-getting to market products or services, and it won't be financially viable if the majority expresses a strong dislike for it.

      Sure. Because spam and scams are so popular with a majority of the population; that's why they have become so prevalent.

    55. Re:No. Just no. by yakumo.unr · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more.

    56. Re: No. Just no. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And mammals rule now because somebody let dinosaurs play with fireworks despite all the warnings.

    57. Re:No. Just no. by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I suspect the orbits wouldn't last long and they'd burn up within a couple of years. But even so, I'm HIGHLY skeptical that a clump of cubesats are going to be visible enough for this to be viable.

      Oh, and there aren't any *unjustified* prejudices against gamers.

    58. Re:No. Just no. by chaotixx · · Score: 1

      In Buddhism the question is simply; Did you see, know, or suspect that it was immoral? Then you fully share the responsibility.

      So ignorance is bliss.

  2. You can hear the Astronomers screaming by sacdelta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And on a personal note, if I ever needed a reason to boycott PepsiCo products, there it is.

    --

    Brought to you by: "Al"toids - the curiously weird mint.

    1. Re:You can hear the Astronomers screaming by Type44Q · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And on a personal note, if I ever needed a reason to boycott PepsiCo products, there it is.

      Boycott every fucking thing they make just for thinking that this might be a good idea.

    2. Re:You can hear the Astronomers screaming by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Company promoters say a lot of things. I don't think they'll do it.

    3. Re:You can hear the Astronomers screaming by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That they consider something like that is enough.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:You can hear the Astronomers screaming by AdamFistler · · Score: 1

      Just say no to Neckbeard cola! As if Mountain Dew and Doritos didn't have a big enough share of the neck beard market, now comes this 'gamer' cola to market further to neck beards and ruin the nights sky worse than a neck beard ruins the night of poor waitress who waits their table. Next if Pepsi can get into selling anime porn and fedoras they would be all set with the neck beard set.

    5. Re:You can hear the Astronomers screaming by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't think they CAN do it. At least not for any length of time. A constellation of satellites big enough to make some recognizable 2D pattern from the ground would be on decently different orbits. The satellites would have to maneuver constantly to maintain formation. So you could put one of these up, but it wouldn't stay there long.

    6. Re: You can hear the Astronomers screaming by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No, they're talking about a constellation of cube sats that make some recognizable image (like the Pepsi logo maybe). Presumably you'd use something shiny, rather than LEDs, but that's not the problem.

      Any two initially co-orbiting objects will be in slightly different orbits, and so will be drawn apart (possibly after being initially pushed together). To make a logo recognizable from the ground, you'd have to have your satellites at significant distances from each other. The ones spread over the N-S direction, would actually be in orbits with different inclinations. In order to maintain formation, they'd have to more or less continuously thrust. The limiting factor would be the amount of on-board propellant.

      You could get around this problem by having one big satellite, but it would have to be *really* big in order to show any kind of structure from the ground.

  3. Bring in India! by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear space organization in India, There is a new target for you. Please fire at will. A space billboard already is space junk.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  4. We don't need this... by ctilsie242 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A number of years ago, France was looking at doing something similar, using a number of large Mylar ballons, so they could celebrate an anniversery as the satellite passed overhead, which would glow brightly. This was finally nixed when astronomers made mention that this would destroy their equipment, as it would be difficult to plan for this object to go overhead, and its brightness would fry sensitive photocells.

    Again, someone trying a project like this. The fewer items in space, the better. With countries starting to shoot down satellites, it is only a matter of time before the Kessler Syndrome rears its ugly head, and getting past low earth orbit would be impossible.

    1. Re:We don't need this... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      getting past low earth orbit would be impossible.

      Not impossible. Merely challenging. You can engineer a lot of things, design to resist damage from space junk. The problem is it adds cost and mass making it much more expensive. But if you are determined you can always make it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:We don't need this... by BKDotCom · · Score: 1

      You might want to have a word with SpaceX
      https://fcc.report/IBFS/SES-LI...

    3. Re:We don't need this... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      4 inch steel panels would stop most bullets.

      Of course, a composite design would be lighter and you don't need to be bullet proof, just damage resistant.

      Idiots are determined to be idiots. Doesn't mean they add value because of sheer will.

      You may wish to search online for the term 'self awareness'.

    4. Re:We don't need this... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Relevance?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:We don't need this... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the worst case. Pretty much all orbits are west to east, so all the stuff will be moving in roughly that direction. It's not going to hit you at 7000 mph. The bigger pieces can be tracked on radar. The smaller stuff, well yeah it's going to hit hard but it's less mass.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:We don't need this... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      4-inch steel panels would sttop most bullets - but where would they transfer the momentum ? If your tank is standing / moving on the ground, your 4-inch steel panels just need to spread the impact of the bullets, and transfer momentum to the body of the tank. Body is standing on the ground with a lot of frictional force in most horizontal directions. For the vertical component of the impact of the bullet - compressive and tensile strength of the tank is enormous - supported by the hardness of the ground in the one direction, and gravity with hundred ton-weight force in the other direction.

      When an object is trying to leave the earth / travelling around the earth all of these advantages vanish, or get drastically reduced. It gets billions of times lower friction from the atmosphere. Nothing extra to protect it in the vertical direction. It would surely keep getting misdirected significantly.

      100 ton tank would barely get misdirected by pico-radians with a 30 g bullet at 1200 km / h. 100 ton satellite, while being much rarer than 100 ton tank and much more expensive to launch than usual size of satellites - would get misdirected by multiple tens of milli-radians with 30 g debris at 1200 km / h.

      So, engineers would come up with a constantly steering design. Which might be more expensive than a design that fights the space debris back - detect using radar / optical / heat sensing : and shoot incoming debris using laser.

      Naysayers will almost never win against engineers in the long term - but this is just an enormous cost increase for any space faring for no good reason.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    7. Re:We don't need this... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Statement: "You can engineer a lot of things, design to resist damage from space junk. The problem is it adds cost and mass making it much more expensive."
      Challenge: "Care to elaborate a bit more as to the bulletproof material you're going to make our space shuttles out of?"
      My response stating the obvious: "4 inch steel panels would stop most bullets."

      I didn't need to mention the cost, someone else had already highlighted that issue.

    8. Re:We don't need this... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Oh, agreed, a collision imparts kinetic energy that needs to be countered or movement will result.

      Even deflecting the bulk of the energy away leaves a residual that will suffice to impact the orbit. That's the real challenge, even disregarding cost.

  5. satire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "campaign against stereotypes and unjustified prejudices against gamers"

    This is clearly satire... r-right?

  6. Astronomer Boycott by pefisher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This might not go over as well as they think. People are kind of tired of corporations thinking they own everything. I can imagine children interested in science finding it offensive rather that cool. Pepsi has a lot of different products that could be boycotted. I run a planetarium, and I can imagine the shows I could do on light pollution, having a great big orbting billboard to point to as an example of BAD. Right now, everybody has too many bright lights. Nobody's head stands head and shoulders above the rest as offensive. But when Pepsi puts their name on a billboard, I have a bad guy to memorialize forever. It'd be terrible, but it'd be great for Pepsi to bring a whole world of opinion down upon their head as enemies of the night sky.

    1. Re:Astronomer Boycott by Jason+Levine · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've been to planetarium shows where they highlight light pollution. The closest one to me does a "night sky" routine where they darken the sky and make it look like night. Then, they note that we live in an urban area so light pollution limits how many stars we can see. They keep the position the same, but pretend that we've removed all light pollution. Suddenly, it's extremely dark and there's a TON of stars in the sky. Having grown up in suburban and urban places all my life and no matter how many times I see it, I'm always amazed at how many stars appear when you remove light pollution.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Astronomer Boycott by geekmux · · Score: 1

      This might not go over as well as they think. People are kind of tired of corporations thinking they own everything. I can imagine children interested in science finding it offensive rather that cool.

      When was the last time you offended a child?

      Actual children don't get offended. That only happens when they grow up and act like bigger children in their pursuit of being perpetually offended in the name of social justice, or some nonsensical shit.

      Pepsi has a lot of different products that could be boycotted. I run a planetarium, and I can imagine the shows I could do on light pollution, having a great big orbting billboard to point to as an example of BAD. Right now, everybody has too many bright lights. Nobody's head stands head and shoulders above the rest as offensive. But when Pepsi puts their name on a billboard, I have a bad guy to memorialize forever. It'd be terrible, but it'd be great for Pepsi to bring a whole world of opinion down upon their head as enemies of the night sky.

      Less than 5% of Pepsi customers will even expend the effort to do the research to find all of the products they own in order to enact a boycott. And less than a single percent of them will actually get off their lazy ass and do it. End result? Zero impact.

      You grossly overestimate the give-a-shit factor on this by an order of magnitude or seven. It's hard trying to reach people when they have a 15-second attention span. "Outrage" will be forgotten about before the evening news.

    3. Re:Astronomer Boycott by sjames · · Score: 1

      Fine, file individual suits in small claims court.

    4. Re:Astronomer Boycott by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Fine, file individual suits in small claims court.

      Find enough people who give a shit enough to expend that effort first.

    5. Re:Astronomer Boycott by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      True. My experience in cities is you can barely see any stars. In Chicago, at least, I'd joke "the airplanes are bright tonight" because that was mostly what you'd see, plus maybe a couple of planets and at most a dozen other stars. I've got to wonder if this ad would be bright enough to even be noticeable to city dwellers. If not, that'd be a big waste of advertising dollars, putting up a constellation that could only be seen in rural parts, by people who aren't inside watching TV.

  7. Wasn't there a SciFi novel ... by rnturn · · Score: 2

    ... or a short story about this published about 50-60 years ago? I'm drawing a blank (and all my old scifi novels are in storage) but it involved billboards in space or ads on the moon or some such idea.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    1. Re:Wasn't there a SciFi novel ... by dromgodis · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:Wasn't there a SciFi novel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      This reminds me of the Red Dwarf novel 'Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers' (1989). The Coca-Cola company sends the spaceship Nova 5 on a mission to induce a simultaneous supernova in 128 supergiant stars, creating a five-week-long message in the sky visible even in daylight, reading "COKE ADDS LIFE!", and thereby crushing rival Pepsi...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacecraft_in_Red_Dwarf#Nova_5

    3. Re:Wasn't there a SciFi novel ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Watch This Space", Arthur C Clarke, 1956. And it was even a soda company doing it, too.

  8. Joke's on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With all the tall buildings and smog I can't see the sky anyway

  9. People that live in Cities can't see that crap by DalM · · Score: 1

    This is the absolute dumbest idea. The absolute dumbest. Beyond the absurd expense, beyond the stupid risk of debris, only people living in the darkest skies will be able to see it if they wanted to.

    1. Re:People that live in Cities can't see that crap by dromgodis · · Score: 1

      There are contenders to the title: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/te...

    2. Re:People that live in Cities can't see that crap by DalM · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm going to disagree. At least that, while definitely stupid and generally awful, would at least possibly do the job it was designed to do.

      This advertising stunt, won't be seen by a single person on the ground. For one, the majority of people live in cities and our skies are too bright as it is. And even if you live in the darkest skies, you would have to know exactly when to look for the ad passing you by to see it. There is a 95% chance you would miss it even if you went significantly out of your way to go find it.

    3. Re:People that live in Cities can't see that crap by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This is the absolute dumbest idea. The absolute dumbest.

      VP Darth Cheney proposed covering the moon with mirrors. To light the Earth at night. To reduce crime by preventing dark streets.

  10. Re:Dystopian cyberpunk future, here we come by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Or have the rocket "land" on PepsiCo's headquarters.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  11. No for Public Safety by zuckie13 · · Score: 1

    This could interfere with celestial navigation. What do I do if suddenly a part of a pepsi can is now the brightest thing in the sky? When the solar flares take out the GPS satellites, we're all in trouble now.....

    1. Re:No for Public Safety by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      They will move very fast, so celestial navigation should not be a problem.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  12. Re:Dystopian cyberpunk future, here we come by Type44Q · · Score: 1

    Fuck that; their target needs to be a certain office building or these "brilliant ideas" are ar risk of continuing.

  13. oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't we have ads in the 20th century?

    Well, sure, but not in our stars. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines and movies and at ball games, on buses and milk cartons and T-shirts and bananas and written on the sky. But not in stars. No siree!

  14. I read that book by fat+man's+underwear · · Score: 1

    Wasn't it The Merchants of Venus by Fred Pohl?

    Anyone have a can of Coffiest they can lend me?

  15. This has been done in Red Dwarf novel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "In the novel Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers, Nova 5 is an American vessel owned by "The Coca-Cola Company" which was sent on a mission to induce the supernova of 128 super giant stars in order to create a five-week-long message in the sky visible even in daylight, reading "COKE ADDS LIFE!" Kryten causes Nova 5 to crash after cleaning the sensitive computer terminals with soapy water. After the Red Dwarf crew finds the wreck it is brought aboard and repaired in order to utilize its Duality Jump engine, which could get the crew back to Earth within three months. However, although the ship is successfully repaired, circumstances prevent them from ever going through with it. "

    https://reddwarf.fandom.com/wiki/Nova_5

  16. Awesome... by orlanz · · Score: 2

    It's going to get hacked... and images of penises, Nazi, Mohammed, and shit will rain from the heavens.

    It will be a good fun year... or month...

  17. Any good part to this? by Bobrick · · Score: 1

    So basically pollute the sky with a freaking advertisement... and it's against prejudices towards gamers. Why the fuck should this happen?

    1. Re: Any good part to this? by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Corporations have a history of using drugs (in this case: caffine and sugar) and propaganda aimed at niave youthful sentiment to create lifelong loyal consumers.

    2. Re:Any good part to this? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Ackshurely it's about ethics in astronomy...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  18. To stop making fun of gaming nerds... by geekmux · · Score: 1

    ...you go off and do one of the nerdiest things in human history?

    Oh yeah. That'll keep Ogre at bay.

  19. Is there a way to block this ad? by propheth · · Score: 1

    My family does not drink artificially infused sugar water. Do we have to watch it? Or the mug of a hell bound presidential candidate.

  20. Yes, do it! by EvilSS · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'd love to see this. It's a pretty neat technological achievement if it works. So yea, I say do it. Show the world what it's capable of so we can all see it. I think it would be pretty damn neat to see.


    Then ban the shit out of it at the international level and force them to de-orbit their sats, so we don't have to ever see it again. Once was plenty.

    --
    I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    1. Re:Yes, do it! by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      Let's hope you don't hold the same opinion about our weapons of mass destruction.

      Worked pretty well so far. You cranky we haven't nuked anyone since WWII?

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
  21. deep space pictures by Tomahawk · · Score: 2

    Looks like the next black hole we are going to image is going to look like the pepsi swirl logo...

  22. adblock by levi.c.smith · · Score: 1

    Great.. now im gonna have to figure out how to Ad-Block SPACE! (Pops open UBlock Origin Umbrella)

  23. Re:No. Just no. - astronomers beware! by ripvlan · · Score: 1

    Billboards are illegal in my state - outlawed back in the 1970's. How will these laws stand up against the out-law space region?

    This is the ultimate in light pollution preventing astronomers from seeing the night sky. As a person with a small backyard telescope it might be interesting to view them. But for those multi-hour images I just hope these don't drift into my view. It'd be like that annoying mime at the park who keep trying to photo-bomb.

  24. Old joke by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suddenly a joke from the space race era gets new merits:

    "What if the Russians get to the moon first?"
    "They'll probably paint it red."
    "So we have to hurry!"
    "Relax. If they do, just send up a crew with loads of white paint and have them write "Coca Cola" across"

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. When Seen By The Few Tribes Left In The World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All hail the new God.

  26. A short story by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They looked on the beautiful night sky, pointing out to each other the constellations they knew, admiring the band of the Milky Way as it swept across the inky night sky.

    But all go things must come to an end, they had to get up early to polish the shipping drones for tomorrows run. They stood up, and removed the augmented reality goggles.

    Looking up again, one of them thought he could maybe see Orion peeking out from behind the neon cup-o-noodles constellation and northen lighting shading effects, but then it was gone as the remaining colors of the night sky washed over his eyes competing for attention.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  27. Remove PepsiCo from academia by k2r · · Score: 1

    If this happens we'll have to make sure to completely remove PepsiCo from all universities (not only those with faculties of astronomy), all colleges and all highschools and schools.

  28. Then... by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    Some anti-capitalist or anti-western will take it out in some way and be very disappointed at the lack of negative reaction from the "west" or most capitalists. In fact we will be able to see who is most in the pockets of the crazies by how loud they howl.

    What treaties or international treaties would be broken by whoever takes out those things? Which country could do it? As India can, I suspect Pakistan is working on it. They have a track record of working with North Korea. Perhaps they see Iran as someone to cooperate with and so on.

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  29. Um, did they actually by Sqreater · · Score: 1

    Did they actually say NEXT to the stars??

    --
    E Proelio Veritas.
  30. A bad idea, so just make it bigger by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I won't accept this horrible insult to nature unless is supports 4K resolution with HDMI support. I wanna play video games on a giant screen in the sky!!!!

    Seriously though, reading the article is sounds more like a joke. But academically, I'd love to see how the science for this could work.

  31. Do You One Better by ememisya · · Score: 1

    Why not shadow a full moon in such a way that you draw the Coca Cola logo on it. You're walking with your lover's hand in yours on a beautiful moonlit night along the beach. You stop, hold her hands, gaze at the moon and there she is, "Coca Cola written on the face of it." You crack open a bottle of Coke and forget all about each other. Go home, get some Cheetos.

  32. Pepsi Should Hear from All of Us by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    This kind of shit should not be allowed...

    http://astronomy.com/news/2019...

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  33. Re:You know this is a joke, right? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    You know you're a moron, and so is the idiot who modded you up.
    http://astronomy.com/news/2019...

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  34. I Love Pepsi, But by kackle · · Score: 1

    (Boycott) Me too!

  35. Heinlein even called the company, sort of. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 4, Informative

    In _The Man Who Sold The Moon_ the idea was to go to the (thinly disguised) Coca Cooa company and sell them the rights to turn the moon into a billboard - a giant bottle cap - by launching small rockets to spread soot to selectively darken the surface.

    But the idea was not to actually DO it. It was to NOT do it, and build an ad campaign on how it had bought the rights in order to head off one of its rivals (7 up, also thinly disguised as "6+"). The 7up/6+ logo would be easily readable from Earth, but the Coca Cola / (whatever he called it) was too "busy" to be clear.

    7up was independent at the time. But it's now owned by PepsiCo.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  36. Pepsi marketing on such a roll by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

    Between this and that commercial with a Kardashian-Jenner they really get what most people want

  37. Idea has come up many times before by gmiller123456 · · Score: 1

    I've heard this idea was being explored many times before, but it's never materialized. I think a CEO hears about the idea and gets excited over it, but the economics usually mean a lot of billboards and other ads will reach more eyes for less money.

    Firstly, these work by reflecting sunlight. That means it will only be visible at night, but only when the satellite is still in sunlight and hasn't entered Earth's shadow yet. Then it's only visible to people with good horizons, or where it's passing very high overhead and people just happen to be looking up.

    And the biggest problem is that these have a very large surface area which increases the atmospheric drag. So the orbit will decay a lot faster, with pretty much no options for any control after the ad is unfolded.

    So, it's probably not going to happen this time either.

    The opposition to it is also a bit overblown. The ods that you will ever see it are pretty slim, let alone have your view obstructed by it. All of the other ads spewing light neadlessly into the atmosphere are a much bigger problem for astronomers.

  38. Ban by SuperDre · · Score: 1

    There should be a ban on advertisement methods like this. This is going too far. There's already too much junk hanging around our planet, and with systems like this one can also make it harder to navigate without tools.

    1. Re:Ban by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If they really do it they'll probably get fined by most of the countries they do business in.

  39. Will be hacked almost immediately by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    They do this, it'll become Target Number One for every hacker and hacking organization on the planet, like an Eagle Scout Merit Badge for hackers. Just imagine it: a giant ASCII penis in your night sky. Or "KILL {insert country leader name here}". Political propaganda.

    Overall? Worst idea EVER. This is graffitti on a cosmic scale. Should not be allowed.

    1. Re:Will be hacked almost immediately by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      This week's new favorite phrase: "like an Eagle Scout Merit Badge for hackers".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    2. Re:Will be hacked almost immediately by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      How is it that most of you ACs can put together (more-or-less?) coherent sentences here on Slashdot, yet be so completely incompetent when it comes to reading comprehension? Are you using some half-assed AI to correct your spelling and grammar? Would the uncorrected post look like LEET-speak? Did you start working at the Jiffy Lube after you dropped out of grammar school, is that the problem? How do you even work a computer being this dumb?

  40. empty and dissatisfied? by White+Yeti · · Score: 1

    The sky told me Pepsico has a solution for you.

  41. This a violation of US law by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/us...

    This is already illegal, in the US. I wonder where this company is based and we can just charge, and try in absence their executives.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:This a violation of US law by green1 · · Score: 1

      Two problems:
      1) US law doesn't apply to space launches performed outside of the US.
      2) US law rarely applies to any corporation that has more than a few million dollars lying around.

    2. Re:This a violation of US law by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They have a US presence so US law probably does apply to them. They need FAA clearance to actually do it. It won't really happen.

    3. Re:This a violation of US law by green1 · · Score: 1

      Pepsi isn't doing the launch. So laws regarding it won't apply to them.

      Also see point 2 above.

    4. Re:This a violation of US law by green1 · · Score: 1

      FAA clearance is only required for us launches.

  42. Boycotting PEPSICO by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    You pull some shit like this, you loose this customer in perpetuity.

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  43. Great line from the source by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    This startup made an AI read every dystopian fiction novel and is turning its cursed ramblings into business plans.

    --
    Nope, no sig
  44. Reminds me of reading the Red Dwarf novels by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Red Dwarf books. (source: https://reddwarf.fandom.com/wi...)

    "In the novel Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers, Nova 5 is an American vessel owned by "The Coca-Cola Company" which was sent on a mission to induce the supernova of 128 super giant stars in order to create a five-week-long message in the sky visible even in daylight, reading "COKE ADDS LIFE!" Kryten causes Nova 5 to crash after cleaning the sensitive computer terminals with soapy water. After the Red Dwarf crew finds the wreck it is brought aboard and repaired in order to utilize its Duality Jump engine, which could get the crew back to Earth within three months. However, although the ship is successfully repaired, circumstances prevent them from ever going through with it."

    --
    John_Chalisque
  45. wtf? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    fuuuuuuck theeem!

    --

    -pyrrho

  46. Wankarrius by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    The 7-year-old in me is hoping hackers re-shape the constellation into a giant you-know-what.

  47. Paraphrased Futurama by DaFallus · · Score: 2

    Leela: Didn't you have ads in the 20th century?
    Fry: Well sure, but not in our dreams. Only on TV and radio. And in magazines. And movies. And at ball games and on buses and milk cartons and t-shirts and written in the sky. But not in dreams. No siree!

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  48. Why not? by barakn · · Score: 1

    Light at night, especially blue light, messes up circadian rhythms and has been implicated in sleep disruption, diabetes, and cancer. Imagine putting up an advertising constellation only to be sued by every woman with breast cancer and every man with prostate cancer. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub...
    Those lawsuits would certainly hurt the bottom line. Is there blue in Pepsi's logo?

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:Why not? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > Is there blue in Pepsi's logo?

      That's a rhetorical question, I'm sure.

      Anyway, great idea, let's get class action status. Where do I sign?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  49. "Orbital billboards are the revolution" by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, no they're not. Hard no. Absolutely, positively, no.

    But hey, there's a bright side. It'll give us a way to test anti-satellite defenses.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  50. Dilbert warned us. by xisco · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone else of a certain Dilbert episode?

    --

    --
    Francisco
    São Paulo / Brazil
    1. Re:Dilbert warned us. by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

      It was also an episode The Orville - If the Stars Should Appear.
      One cataclysm later and people will be sacrificing their children to the great flying Pepsi in the sky.

      --
      Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  51. Red Dwarf by Immolo · · Score: 1

    Wasn't this prophesied in the Red Dwarf books with the same company? Been a while since I've read them but I'm sure this was part of the story that lead to the Earth being voted to be the space dump for the entire solar system.

  52. this sounds familiar by roc97007 · · Score: 1
    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  53. Think of the astrological possibilities! by Woeful+Countenance · · Score: 1

    "I was born on the cusp of Pepsi and Verizon, with Taco Bell in retrograde."

  54. I expect more, Slashdot by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 4, Informative

    I expected better from Slashdot. You're getting trolled, folks. The dimmest object you can see with the naked eye is magnitude +6. Those are only visible in very dark rural areas. In big city suburbs, the best you can see with the naked eye is magnitude +4. A cubesat's reflected sunlight magnitude is typically +10 or +11. Cubesats are only barely visible to a very large telescope when illuminated solely with sunlight.

    Now if each cubesat is an active light emitter, that's a whole different thing. Let's say it's primarily solar powered. Let's further say Pepsi spends $BIG_NUM on 44% efficient multi-junction solar cells. If 3 of the 6 faces of the cube are solar cells, that's 300 square centimeters of solar cell. Solar irradiance outside atmosphere is 1367 watts per square meter. 300 square centimeters is 0.03 square meters. 1367 * 0.03 * 0.44 = 18.04 watts. Let's say the other 3 faces of the cube are LEDs. 18 watts of LEDs from Amazon gets you 1260 lumens. 1260 lumens from 0.03 square meters is 42,000 lux. That's like a tiny spot of direct sunlight as seen from Earth. That's pretty good, though the angle at which it's visible is limited by altitude and it having only 3 illuminated faces. There's no image whatsoever. It's just a bright spot.

    These are all best case numbers, of course. In reality the three faces of the cube won't operate at maximum efficiency since they can't all face the sun directly at once, and in LEO they don't see sunlight at all for half their orbit, etc etc. Still, if they worked at it, it could be pretty obnoxious.

    1. Re:I expect more, Slashdot by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't seem to appreciate that they can fold out solar panels, they're not limited to the sides of a cube. Also they could collect power all day and store it in a battery, and only run the LEDs for a short time.

      Also you would not have multiple surfaces illuminated.

      As for the time out of sunlight at low Earth orbit, it can be as low as zero, and in practice these are already popular orbits.

      Your numbers are not best case, they're lower than worst case.

    2. Re:I expect more, Slashdot by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 1

      I can see plenty of man made objects, satellites, the ISS when it flies by... So I think this is not only possible but inevitable with the shitty capitalist model. But heck, doesn't even have to be for profit. Russia or the USA could put something up there for propaganda. Play your jingoistic cards right and the public might even end up justifying it!

      --
      -
    3. Re:I expect more, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how somebody has the energy to write an essay as a response to something he was too lazy to even read. It took me roughly ten seconds of reading to see the relevant bit: "plans to project huge ads into the night sky using cubesats with Mylar sails that’ll reflect sunlight back down to Earth". You can pack a lot of mylar into a cubesat.

    4. Re:I expect more, Slashdot by Woeful+Countenance · · Score: 1

      The sail doesn't have to be equally reflective on its whole surface. It could have a picture on it or shaped holes in it.

  55. Not how orbits work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised no one has pointed out that you can't put a bunch of satellites into orbit and have them maintain a formation. The only way to maintain formation in orbit without constantly using some kind of propulsion is to have all objects in an identical orbit, line astern. So maybe the ads will be in morse code?

  56. It's bad enough they are playing ads at the gas pumps now.

    Can there be no space free of ads?

    1. Re:urk by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Yikes! That is scary.

      I'm glad I'm in a State where you're not allowed to pump your own gas. That isn't even a thing here.

  57. You're living in the past, dude by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

    I would join you in the boycott... if I bought anything from Pepsi in the first place. I don't drink soda, or lipton; I almost never eat fast food, so me boycotting KFC and TacoBell, and any other Pepsi owned chains over this won't help.

    Pepsi hasn't owned KFC, Taco Bell or Pizza Hut (you forgot them) since 1997. I can't get mod points very often here, yet people have thrown you enough to get you up to a score of 5 for basically being ignorant of history. So that's what it takes to get modded up around here. Very interesting.

    1. Re:You're living in the past, dude by jjbenz · · Score: 1

      I think they owned KFC, Taco Bell, and Pizza Hut just long enough to ruin those brands.

    2. Re:You're living in the past, dude by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      Pepsi hasn't owned KFC, Taco Bell or Pizza Hut (you forgot them) since 1997.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  58. Defacement sats by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Should get coke to pitch in and launch some additional cube sats to deface the Pepsi constellation and establish a defacement foundation dedicated to defacement of all similar advertising campaigns by anyone else contemplating this.

  59. Re:This will be killed. by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    Now, that doesn't mean some other brand that cares less about its image won't do the same thing. GoDaddy sounds like a good candidate.

    A Danika Patrick constellation? That's a lot of cubesats.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  60. "Next To the Stars" by David+Gould · · Score: 2

    I'm just still trying to figure out WTF "Next To the Stars" is supposed to mean.

    --
    David Gould
    main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    1. Re:"Next To the Stars" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      If they do put this next to the stars, the problem will solve itself within milliseconds.

  61. Just out of curiosity, why? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I mean, this really isn't that far out there. In the 60s there were Senate hearings over advertising to children where experts made it clear that kids couldn't tell adverts from actual programming, but they were brushed aside. There's all the smoking adverts too, not just to kids but the outright lies to adults. Or the tricks used by marketers to make Diamond engagement rings seem like a thousand year old tradition when they invented it themselves in the 30s. Oh, and Santa Claus was made up to sell Coke.

    I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not sure if this should be the straw that breaks the camel's back. It's seems pretty par for the course. I suppose you could say it's harder to avoid, but to be honest I'm not an astronomy nerd and can't remember the last time I went stargazing.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  62. Are You A Bit? by Zorro · · Score: 1

    Life isn't all YES or NO answers.

    Pepsi Satellites NO!

    Flaming Hot Cheetos YES!

  63. DO NOT WANT by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Keep your craptastic advertising out of our skies, you fucking maggots.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  64. what a waste by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    Hey pepsi, how about using that money and lower your prices!!! the best advertising is having the lowest prices.

  65. piss off pepsi by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    get the heck off my sky

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  66. Re:Putin sucks by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    "Who has the pee-pee tape?"

  67. Space Force, ready for action! by edi_guy · · Score: 1

    Time to launch the ad blocker hyper sonic missiles.

  68. Mad Mike to the rescue! by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

    So, I've heard there is a guy building a home made rocket to go to space. Since flatearthers pay the bills he promises to prove Earth is flat.

    So, how about we chip in, so he would knock this shit down while he's at it?

    --
    What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
  69. Military is unaware by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Scramble the jets boys, we're under attack.

    99 red balloons.