Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSDCon 99

xlogan writes "I received my FreeBSD 99 catalog in the mail today from Walnut Creek and The FreeBSD Mall and it included a little brochure about FreeBSDCon '99. Hope I can get work to pay for the trip ;-) "

91 comments

  1. Re:It's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but why only FreeBSD? Shouldn't Net/OpenBSD be included too?

  2. Sysinstall does not handle Vinun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    After you do your default install, you got to delve into partioning, counting cylingers, editing the raw disklable etc.

    Vinum == Volume manager, lets you stripe/concatenate several disks.

  3. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, the BSD-is-dead trolls have been around much longer than the Wintrolls.

  4. BSD rulez, Linux sux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I had to say that to restore the cosmic balance in this thread.

  5. Re:It's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot more FreeBSD users than Net/OpenBSD users. But a ''*BSD con'' would really be nice. The Linux people have no RedHatCon, DebianCon, SlackCon , so why should the BSD people have seperate conventions?

  6. Re:other BSDs there as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's a pity :( i hope the other BSD people are at least welcome!

  7. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. People shouldn't bash other OSes only because their own OS is better. OpenBSD has even integrated cod from Linus Torvalds himself (the i386 math emulation)

  8. Re: Just gave up on FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on, the OpenBSD installation is easy. You only need a calculator, to enter the right cyl.-numbers, that's all. Installing Minix from hand can be problematic

  9. Re:Another sign of BSD fragmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only _/*ONE*/_ Linux kernel, but there are 3 different BSD Kernel

  10. Re:other BSDs there as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone cares to look carefully, it will become obvious that this is not a convention in a true sense but more of an "infomercial" sponsered by Walnut Creek. In addition to Walnut Creek, one of the sponsers is FreeBSD Mall. Despite the name, this FreeBSD Mall is a front for Walnut Creek CDROM. They are one and the same company! It is a deceptive ruse used to fake some interest in a product which has failed to attract much of a following. I don't know about you, but I hate being lied to by slick hucksters. The convention is really an oversized booth devoted to Walnut Creek CDROM. It shouldn't be construed as a convention in ... well ... the convetional sense.

  11. Re:It's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anybody really cares to look carefully, it will become obvious that this is not a convention in the true sense but a deceptive "infomercial" sponsered by Walnut Creek CDROM. In addition to Walnut Creek, one of the sponsers is FreeBSD Mall. Despite the name, this FreeBSD Mall is a front for Walnut Creek CDROM. They are one and the same company! It is a deceptive ruse used to fake some interest in a product which has failed to attract much of a following otherwise. The ``convention'' is really an oversized booth devoted to Walnut Creek CDROM. But Walnut Creek is no stranger to deception. For starters, it's not even located in Walnut Creek! Why the lies? This non-event shouldn't be construed as a convention in ... well ... the convetional sense.

  12. Re:Icons tell us many things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what does the shark logo of OpenVMS tell us?
    That they'll eat up the competition?

  13. Re:Daemons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Are they gonna have daemons caged up there? Yes, in grey boxes. I guess, there will be a lot of inet-, portmap-, update-, nfs-, nfsio-, mount-, http-, name-, dhcp- ... daemons. :-).

  14. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by mvw · · Score: 1
    I still have a Slackware machine for cdparanoia, but that's about all it gets used for.

    Things are arranged for cdparanoia IV getting ported to FreeBSD as well. Monty is aiming for a more portable design than the present one.

    More in a few weeks! :)

  15. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. The only reason you see anti-BSD stuff is because of the anti-Linux stuff that BSD advocates started posting first.

  16. Proof? by razzmataz · · Score: 1

    Where is it?

    --
    Ungh
    1. Re:Proof? by Nermal · · Score: 1

      I don't know about on /. but how about

      http://www.spatula.net/proc/index.src
      and any log of more than five minutes talk on #freebsd?

    2. Re:Proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough, children.

    3. Re:Proof? by razzmataz · · Score: 1

      Not that I lean one way or another, this doesn't prove that the BSD folx started it first.

      --
      Ungh
  17. Cola..... by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

    So go down to 5 Points and cry in your beer........wish I was stll there.

  18. Mascots by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

    Chuck would bbq Tux's ass and have him for Sunday dinner.

  19. Icons tell us many things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Apple with its rainbow flag icon, the first openly les/bi/gay/other Operating Sytem.

    BSD the chuck taylors on the little guy sure look All-American, but the horns and tails reveal a different story: this OS is for Satanists !

    Linux By Communists for Communists. Look at any picture of a penguin colony. See any private property there? No way, just row on row of identical looking birds who walk funny. They walk alike and they talk alike.

    Be one blue letter. one red letter. Be: for people who don't know what they are! Or maybe just have a fixation with Calvin Klein "fragrance" ads.

    OS/2 Paul Rand's round logo resembles a rubber stamp as well as old-timey pricetags. And it was no coincidence that the product sold thereunder was too expensive and old and based on old technology from an old company too old to invent new wonders like talking paperclips and used by people so unhip and old that the only place it caught on was the old folks home. Go Granpa!.

    Windows Approved for use in the home and office by God and Walt Disney and the Trilateral Commission, this operating system gives users the freedom to create specially formatted text and data documents that they can exchange with other users who are also in the club. They can do all this while resetting their desktop events to key .wav files downloaded form fart.com or running AOL in the background, or otherwise receiving approved Internet content via Internet Explorer. To symbolize the limitless possibilities of the Windows enduser experience and the robustness and security of the underlying software, an appropriate and familiar object was worked into a banner-like icon, setting Windows users apart as a nation favored by the Creator to receive many benefits and dominion over the Earth.

    10 out of 10 marketing execs agree: if you're not running Windows, there's something really wrong with you!

  20. Just gave up on FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Partitioning disks (esp for vinum) was just too hard.

    Call me stupid. Maybe the braincells for counting cylinders and directly editing disk labels died int the 80's

    So appalled by the lack of coherent online info on this subject that I went to the bookstore and read the partitioning section of the "Complete FreeBSD". A little better than the online support but not much.

    Finally gave up, started from scratch had a Linux 90GB IDE Samba server up and running in about an hour or so (using multidisk/raidtools and 4 IBM 25"gb" drives)

    Sure FreeBSD may be nicer (especially like all the automatic security/system reports), but my users don't know the difference.

    That said, once you get a freebsd system up and running it IS one of the best server OS's out there.......

    1. Re:Just gave up on FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't worry about it. For all practical purposes Freebsd is dead. The company that markets it is up for sale. The CD business is very bad and Freebsd is one of the first casualties. By this time next year, Freebsd will be a distant memory.

    2. Re: Just gave up on FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, if you had problems with OpenBSD installation, I could understand it, or even offer help.

      Installing FreeBSD in its default configuration is so trivial that even a three-year-old can find the ``A'' key on the keyboard. If you couln't, go get a job at McDonald's.

    3. Re:Just gave up on FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried using sysinstall? Are you sure it was FreeBSD you tried? I found it very easy to install... about comparable in time and effort to installing windows NT 4.0, and a lot easier than even Red Hat linux. Including the partitioning...

  21. Animosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, so much negativity here. I'll assume that the guy accusing FreeBSD of having an ego (my pair of scissors has an ego, talk about tough to deal with) is one guy posting the same wittless babble repeatedly. I wish I had that much spare time on my hands.

    At any rate, people join mass movements to be free from freedom. Blend in with a cause, be average. Perhaps we should do away with ACs and force people that want to post to take responsibilty for themselves. I'll be the first to admit, as a FreeBSD user, that Linux articles get a good deal of "Linux Sux" garbage posted by ACs too. If I was a betting man, which I am, I would wager to say that quality of posts would increase 10 fold at least if everyone had to login to post.

    just my thoughts on dickless weanies.
    DWRM

    PS Yes I know it's fairly off topic, so I'll say "neat, I wish I could attend but unfortunately I cant :("

    1. Re:Animosity by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      That was cute.

      Now realize that most lamers wouldn't take the time to set up a registered account to get their kicks. That would require an e-mail address to use, some time....

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    2. Re:Animosity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      idiot.
      doing away with anonymous accounts solves NOTHING
      so what, i come in here and register as "dummy02" with the email as dummy02@hotmail.com.
      does that make me any less anonymous? nope
      think before you post

  22. Counting words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we are at this: *BSD have much less "fuck"s and "shit"s and other bad words in their source codes. Last time I counted them (find -exec grep|wc), I only found some in the gnu part of the source tree (kernel+userland). BTW #1: Does anybody know if the number of "fuck"s in the linux kernel have increased over the time? Or did someone started "cleaning up"? BTW #2: I could imagin that the word "fuck" in a text qualifies it as "porn" in some states of the US (Hey, the *beep* it on TV there!). Thus Linux may be illegal for some minors in the states! :-).

    1. Re:Counting words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know for a fact the Linux kernel is going to have major problems in Australia come March of next year. You won't be able to download the latest kernel patch because it will likely contain one of the words on the "forbidden list". Hate to say it, but commercial Unix does not have this problem facing it!

    2. Re:Counting words... by simm_s · · Score: 1

      Oh I think coders can make a program to replace "bad" words with less vulgar words! Many commercial UNIces are unispired relative to Linux.

  23. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That snob attitude of yours and the NetBSD crowd deserve each other.
    Want to switch to BSD? Be our guest and good riddens to you.

  24. hrm by DWRM · · Score: 1

    hrm, network went down and I think it screwed up the post. ranting on ACs and then ended up posted as an AC :(

    --
    http://www.freebsd.org
  25. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, on the other hand, use my Slackware CDs for the same think I use my Win NT Server CDs for:

    beer coasters.

    Most Linux distributions are good. All three *BSDs are good. Slackware just sucks.

  26. The few. by Pinback · · Score: 1

    The two NetBSD users and the three OpenBSD users are welcome to attend.

    No one will mind.

  27. WC has supported many. by Pinback · · Score: 1

    WC has supported a few of the Linux dists as well. FTP.cdrom.com has done quite a bit to make the whole open source thing work.

    Soemone has to pay the bills.

  28. Re:Another sign of BSD fragmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy.. you sound like a pinko or a hippie, I'm not sure which.
    How about you go somewhere nice and quiet, away from your keyboard, and let your mind relax.
    Linux really *is* a CultOS, and comments like yours reinforce that in my mind. The "Joy of Tux" and "Linux lovefest", indeed. Sounds just like something out of Jonestown.

  29. $395? good lord thats a lot of money.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and here i thought something called freebsd might have a con thatd be preaty cheap... mabey even free.. oh well, whats in a name anyway.....

  30. Freebsd ripoff. They will steal you money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the calculation McKusick is charging 1400 x 40. That is 56 thousand dollars just to hear him drone on about code which he stole from US Air Force programmers. Yeah I know it all. I'm a veteran and I was there. He was a yellow coward who hid behind deferments during the war.

  31. Daemons by Entity42 · · Score: 1

    Are they gonna have daemons caged up there?

    --
    To err is human,
    To really screw up, you need a computer!
    1. Re:Daemons by Yarn · · Score: 1

      not caged, kept within a pentagram

      --
      -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  32. Re:It's about time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed!!!

    Don't forgat that a fair ammount of source code gets traded back and forth between the Linux & *BSD folks. I frimly believe that the *BSD folks deserve better PR than they have gotten.

    Besides, there is plenty of room for everything which is not M$. So show you support, at least mention *BSD when advocating Linux!!!

  33. McKusick Seminar by csg · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that Kirk McKusick is teaching a class on BSD Unix for the first two days. It's an extra $400 or so, but well worth it.

    Looks to be very cool.

    1. Re:McKusick Seminar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      typical white bastard overpriced lame lecture by a momma's boy.

  34. damnit by PHroD · · Score: 0

    i move from the bay area to columbia, sc, and ALL the great cons happen like the minute i move *GRRR*


    "There is no spoon" - Neo, The Matrix

    1. Re:damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, are you in luck! I miss Columbia so much. I grew up at Five Points and later lived up on Bull Street. The best thing about Columbia is the fact that there are no faggots. The "bay area" is a magnet for faggots. ASAP I will be back in Columbia with the normal people.

  35. It's about time! by afeinberg · · Score: 1

    Jonathan Hubbard and the rest of the gang should be rather pleased with themselves. With a miniscule amount of support and publicity compared to Linux, the FreeBSD team has done a superlative job in creating an OS that, for the x86 platform, is hands down one of the best. While Linux is the media darling, we shouldn't forget the efforts of the Free/Net/OpenBSD teams, as all of them have a niche. Besides, the FreeBSD daemon is just about as cute as tux, and is alot more sinister looking. They deserve a show of their own!
    Andrew G. Feinberg

    1. Re:It's about time! by howardjp · · Score: 1

      Isn't that Jordan Hubbard? Otherwise, yes, I wish I could afford to go.

  36. Nothing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    compared to most linux zealots. BTW look at FreeBSD's tcp/ip stack and SMP support before you open your mouth.

  37. BSD SMP support by rjreb · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to decide whether to load FreeBSD onto a dual 266 but a lot of what I've read says that the 2.2.x kernel is better for SMP.

    Any clarification please.

    --
    Pork is not a verb
    1. Re:BSD SMP support by agshekeloh · · Score: 1

      The SMP support in FreeBSD 3x is a little clunky.

      If you have a network-heavy application, the IP stack more than makes up the difference.

      The SMP issues are being attacked in FreeBSD-current, and will be backported to -stable when possible. Check the freebsd-hackers mailing list archives for the gory details of the SMP discussions.

      FWIW, I have a dual-processor 3.2-stable box, and it just flies.

    2. Re:BSD SMP support by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2
      I've been trying to decide whether to load FreeBSD onto a dual 266 but a lot of what I've read says that the 2.2.x kernel is better for SMP.

      It all depends on your workload. The FreeBSD VM system is probably still superior to the Linux one (though Linux has seen a lot of improvements), which in many cases will make FreeBSD run faster than Linux, with or without SMP. For compilation benchmarks on an SMP system (and those may or may not be relevant for your workload), FreeBSD beat Linux easily in the last benchmark I saw.

      For a threaded CPU-bound program, I would expect Linux to beat FreeBSD (though I've not tested the case). There are some scheduler changes that have just gone into FreeBSD-current (if I read my commit logs right) that should avoid cache trashing; this should give a clear speedup. We've also recently been looking at other SMP-related improvements (but none have entered the tree for a long time).

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  38. other BSDs there as well? by StormCrow99 · · Score: 1

    Will OpenBSD and NetBSD be there as well, or is this purely a FreeBSD thing?

    1. Re:other BSDs there as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FreeBSD only.

  39. Try both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See what works best for you. Thats the real test.

  40. OS Embassies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, I remember seeing these guys at LinuxWorld! I wonder... is someone also gonna set up a lonely little Linux booth at FreeBSD 99? :-P

  41. You horrible troll^H^H^H^H^Hdem^H^H^Haemon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pingu will crush you with his flippers

  42. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Nermal · · Score: 1

    Actually, and I'm a fan of both OSes, I've seen a lot more mindless Linux bashing from FreeBSD people than mindless BSD bashing from Linux people. I used to hang out in #freebsd on EfNet but got sick of it because every single day involved some stupid "You use LinSUCKS? Eww!" argument.

    My .02: Both sides need to just calm down and accept that both OSes have plusses and minuses but are overall about the best things out there.

  43. Truly silly suggestion by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1

    If there's ever an convention or expo for both the Linux and *BSD crowds, I think that they ought to have a wresting match between a guy in a Tux costume and a guy in a BSD daemon costume. I don't think it's that much sillier than a paintball fight between vi and emacs partisans (which actually was an event at a Linux convention), and it would give people a chance to laugh at themselves.

  44. Re:Not worth it by simm_s · · Score: 1

    Whoa, BSD shows up in 1772 lines in linux kernel source code? I'm impressed Linux is looking more like BSD!!

  45. Somebody please do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's funny!

  46. How to use Vinum for the lazy and hopeless. by Alfred+Perlstein · · Score: 1

    you just need to run "disklabel -e "
    then make a "clone of the 'c' partition called 'e', make the FStype 'vinum'

    run vinum and simply:

    'stripe e e e'

    It's really not _that_ bad.

    --
    - Alfred Perlstein - Programmer and Administrator, Wintelcom.
  47. Another sign of BSD fragmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did anyone notice that this is a FreeBSD event? It's not called BSDCON. Here is a sad example of the degree of animosity and fragmentation between the various BSD factions. The BSD sects should be working at least to make the system calls compatible between each other's kernel. But such a task is impossible when they can't even agree to meet in a unified BSD convention. Instead each BSD sect holds it own invitation only grudge match. Where there should be dialog, we find a continuation of the policies that have relegated BSD to second class status.

    This event will only serve to drive a deeper wedge into the BSD [dysfunctional] family. Contrast the exclusionary FreeBSD approach to the inclusive Linux approach where all variants of Linux meet under Tux's Big Tent. Red Hat, Caldera, Suse, et al routinely gather in a Linux lovefest, celebrating the Joy of Tux, without regard to race, creed, or national origin. Shame on the BSD honchos for their inability to bury the hatchet and put away old grudges.

    1. Re:Another sign of BSD fragmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Linux is beter than BSD, whoohoo, look at me, my OS is better thatn yours, wheee!

    2. Re:Another sign of BSD fragmentation by howardjp · · Score: 1

      So should they also include other systems like SunOS, Solaris, AIX, SCO, Linux, DEC UNIX, MacOS, and others derived from BSD?

  48. Smoking from the wrong end of the pipe? by Alfred+Perlstein · · Score: 1

    Please look at the last graph at:

    http://www.emsphone.com/stats/freebsd.html

    Just something actually tangible. The growth is actually pretty astounding.

    I'm not sure if i'm more confused by your definition of 'shrinking' or why _every_ FreeBSD related post on slashdot turns into an OS holy-war.

    I just wanted to thank CmdrTaco for the forum to share FreeBSD related news.

    Oh, and my company is paying for my FreeBSDCON experiance! w00p!

    --
    - Alfred Perlstein - Programmer and Administrator, Wintelcom.
    1. Re:Smoking from the wrong end of the pipe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not sure if i'm more confused by your definition of 'shrinking' or why _every_ FreeBSD related post on slashdot turns into an OS holy-war.

      Linux users are extremely insecure. They're afraid of BSD, MacOS X and BeOS because these are better than Linux.

  49. U bsd lamerz sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bsd sux, d00dz. L1nUx 0wwnz j00.
    i'm 3l337 h4x0R d00d, g0tt4 uSe L1nUx.
    w4ssup t0 477 tr4dErZ and h4x0rz

  50. freebsd is dying a painful death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is so sad but i will be the first to admit that freebsd is not going to survive. i started using freebsd five years ago and every year i kept hearing promises. these promises have never panned out. there are no more applications for freebsd now that five years ago. i like freebsd but the leaders tell lies. i do not like lies. it is a lie to say that freebsd is more than a curiosity. there are no applications. no no. i do not want emulation. there are no REAL bsd applications. they lie. i will soon be retired so it doesn't matter. i am sick of computers anyway.

  51. Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Syslevel · · Score: 1

    Judging from the ignorant anti-BSD ranting that seems to go on anytime Slashdot has a BSD-related article, I am ever more and more glad that I'm migrating away from Linux to NetBSD. I still have a Slackware machine for cdparanoia, but that's about all it gets used for.

    Eventually we will come to pity the mature forward-thinking people in the Linux community who have to put up with all these children.

    1. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, all you forward-looking, paradigm-shaping, buzzword-spouting, y2k-compliant egotistical lemurs can leave because nobody will miss you.

    2. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by RatDawg · · Score: 1

      It's sad that far too many people feel that in order to support Linux they must trash *BSD. They seem to believe that only their OS preference is worthy of mention. This is the same attitude that Microsoft has.

      People, grow up!

    3. Re:Pity for the Victims of the Children's Crusade by dangermouse · · Score: 1

      I still have a Slackware machine

      Damn right you do.

      for cdparanoia, but that's about all it gets used for.

      Awwww, dammit.

      Just need a hard drive, and my FreeBSD system will be up and open for play time...

      --Logan
      Slackware Core Team

  52. Re:Not worth it by Tim+Fraser · · Score: 1

    Even if all the *BSD operating systems disappeared tomorrow, BSD would not be dead. Try grepping for 'BSD' in your Linux kernel source.

  53. Re:bsd.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drugs are good, you straight-edged loser.

  54. Re:Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey luser, i dont have linux source.
    LINUX SUCKS DONKEY DOO

  55. xbilly by aZid · · Score: 1

    Nigga.... Puhleez.
    Xlogan is a wanker. He's sitting 15 feet away from me. Should I throw something at him?

    --
    Unca Sid
    1. Re:xbilly by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1

      He controls your destiny.
      He's a part of who you are.
      Your next raise depends on him...
      Go give him a hug.


      But wait a minute, my camera is in the car...

  56. McKusick class sold out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The extremely informative and very economically priced two-day class that Kirk is presenting is, unfortunately, sold out. You can, of course, take his regular class for a mere $1500.oo. That's 15 three-hour sessions.

  57. FreeBSD problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anyone looks carefully, it will become obvious that this is not a convention in a true sense but more of an "infomercial" sponsered by Walnut Creek. In addition to Walnut Creek, one of the sponsers is FreeBSD Mall. Despite the name, this FreeBSD Mall is a front for Walnut Creek CDROM. They are one and the same company! It is a deceptive ruse used to fake some interest in a product which has failed to attract much of a following. The convention is really an oversized booth devoted to Walnut Creek CDROM. It shouldn't be construed as a convention in ... well ... the convetional sense.

    1. Re:FreeBSD problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you've been already? How was it?

  58. Re:Pity for Mickeysoft Astroturfers. by Syslevel · · Score: 1

    No, the real pity is that people think that criticizing Linux is only something a "pro-Microsoft" person would do. It has nothing to do with Microsoft. It's only been recently that forces have come on the scene who think that Linux is a club to beat Microsoft with.

    We aren't all Windows refugees, ya know. I for one use a wide variety of operating systems, including BeOS, OS/2, NetBSD, Slackware Linux, and yes, Microsoft.

  59. Fragmentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. When people for linuxworld, they assume linux is one OS, ignoring the idiosynchracies of each distribution. The BSD family presents themselves as different operating systems, while linux folk just speak of linux as if the linux kernel makes all the distros the same OS. This puts up an illusion masking differences between distros: packaging mechanisms, administration tools, c libraries (I mean really, if you want to develop for the "Linux OS" do you have to distribute both libc and glibc versions). BSD is a family of OSes, but not the same operating system. Linux, on the other hand tries to claim that there is a "Linux OS" while there are probably more incompatibilities between distributions than between any of the three free BSD's. And, all BSD's have very similar packaging mechanisms, upgrade procedures, development models, and overall "look and feel".

  60. Is freebsd dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people have said freebsd is dead. But a better word would be ``shrinking'' as in shrinking market share (reported by IDC audit). Like the man who walks halfway to the door, and halfway again, ad infinitum, freebsd keeps drawing closer to that final curtain, without ever quite reaching it completely.

  61. Not doing default. Installing vinum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    BSD has one of the best default installs, no problems with partitioning just dedicate all your disks etc. Very slick.

    Now try to install Vinum using different partitions on the same IDE disks you installed your FreeBSD partitions on.

    Then come back and make an intelligent comment.

  62. Re:bsd.... by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

    Two of the best things to come from there are LSD and Unix. I tend to prefer the former. :)

  63. Re:bsd.... by SyntheticTruth · · Score: 1

    Yeah, well...Bezerkeley is a helluva lot better and fun to be around than some boring places. Like, let's say, the West Michigan area around Holland and Grand Haven. I recommend a visit, for FreeBSD or not, just to experience the place.

  64. Re:Not worth it by STEPta25 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I don't really have much to say about this. *BSD is very much alive. It's doing well, could be better, but it's still there, and looks like it's here to stay for a while.

    ----------
    Have FreeBSD questions?

    --

    ----------
    Have FreeBSD questions?
    http://balambiris.ne.mediaone.net
  65. Pity for Mickeysoft Astroturfers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad that far too many people feel that in order to support Microsoft they must trash Linux. They seem to believe that only their OS preference is worthy of mention. This is the same attitude that *BSD has.

  66. Are you sure? by antizeus · · Score: 1
    While I haven't been around here very long and may very well have failed to notice any historical tendency towards BSD-bashing, something tells me that the people who are doing so right now are the same dickless wonders who have been posting lame-ass shit about Linux lately.

    Apparently now that Slashdot is getting exposure in the mainstream media, every pointy-headed cretin with a computer has been drawn here to try to spoil things. This is an unfortunate indication of the state of our species' gene pool.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE