Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak on "Winners and Duds of the Millennium"

erikaaboe wrote to us with yet-another-end-of-year round-up. This time around Dvorak has taken a look at the past year. Winners include Linux, dot-com millionaires, while WinCE and DIVX are flops. Interesting commentary on the dot-com millionaries though.

297 comments

  1. startup employees enjoy life too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you can have your cake and eat it too - i did.

    why do people assume that if you're getting rich that you don't have a life?

    people need to deal with the fact that its not a zero-sum game - those who have the guts to risk it on a great start-up may end up being wealthy AND happy, if they play their cards right.

    not to sound catty, but so many programmers i know, who missed out on great chances to be rich, rationalize it by telling me they're happy and i'm not.

    1. Re:startup employees enjoy life too by Ark · · Score: 1

      why do people assume that if you're getting rich that you don't have a life?

      The original poster had talked about 16 hour, sleep-under-the-desk start up people. That just doesn't seem like something I'd enjoy. Maybe you do.

      I wasn't trying to talk for everyone, mostly just for me. For me, 16 hours a day, sleep under the desk sounds like pure hell. No time to enjoy anything, just to work.

      Maybe you can have a life and get rich, but not in the context of the original posters question.

  2. Re: The Gregorian calendar 3rd Millennium=1/1/2001 by eggplant · · Score: 1
    In the Gregorian calendar, the Third Millennium and the 21st Century begin on 1 Jan 2001. If you are starting the Third Millennium on 1 Jan 2000, you are using something other than the Gregorian calendar. Don't take my word for it, check with the experts:

    the United States Naval Observatory

    the Royal Greenwich Observatory

    It matters because you cannot arbitrarily drop years from centuries or millennia and still have a functional calendar everyone can use. We have thousands of books of history based on each century encompassing years 1-100 inclusive. If you decide the 20th Century ends at the end of 1999, then which past century loses the year? (Only 1999 years have passed in the Gregorian calendar.)

    If you change something like the method that time is measured or counted by, without unilaterally implementing it as a standard, you cause pervasive problems. As far as i am aware, there has been no world-wide agreement or even a Papal Bull from the Vatican (who created the Gregorian calendar) to short the 20th Century one year.

  3. Re:say what? by dar · · Score: 1

    Mr. Dvorak thinks that either Bill Gates or Steve Jobs should have been Person of the Year in Time?


    He was being sarcastic.

    --
    My other Slashdot ID is much lower.
  4. Re:He had good points about Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sun did a 180 degree turn 2 years ago when they realized Java was too slow for GUI applications...

    Well, I'm about to find out. My new year/century/millennium resolution is to learn Java. I've down-loaded the latest JDK from Sun, the Forte'/Sun NetBeans IDE and Inprise's JBuilder IDE. Bought two books and am studying even now.

    I plan to develop and deploy a couple of "test the water" cross-platform Enterprise apps based on Java and MySQL.

    We'll see.

  5. Re:Lets not forget about games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're one of the few people on Slashdot that has the penis to use your real name. Most people here who are 'real' just go by their Hobbit-character handle like a bunch of kids on a BBS. Thats assuming, of course, your real name is Andrew Schaefer. No way any of us can know for sure.

  6. Re:Dvorak vs. Qwerty by uncleda · · Score: 1

    Want to play with some one's head? Switch their KB properties to LEFT-HANDED Dvorak!

    We have over 1500 PCs and servers. Not ONE KB other than straight or MS "wave" qwerty.
    Of 20 IS/IT folks I asked, only one other had even heard of a Dvorak board.
    How did that other Dvorak ever have enough juice to get it in as an option in Win?? or *nix anyway?

    --
    "The impossible just takes longer."
  7. I completely agree by extrasolar · · Score: 2

    Every first person shooter is almost the same. Go and shoot everything you see. What fun can there be in that?

    And can someone explain to me the difference between Quake 1 and Quake 3? What more monsters and better hardware acceleration? You pay money for this?

    Ayee. No wonder the gaming industry makes so much money.

  8. Re:Windows CE a flop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes I am with you there... it is not the first time this dude (if he is ONE dude) appears.

    Usually comes up in discussions that have to do with Java and Linux (the two only things that make MS employee shit in there pants).

    I never realized the palm, like Java and Linux is another market standard MS doesn't not own.

    sig hell indeed

  9. Re:startups by LL · · Score: 1

    In this world, you get paid for
    a) time
    b) task
    c) talent

    Time spent is aasy to measure, task-based performance requires some management competence (hah) in defining specifications and quality, and creative talent is more a wild-card in that you can't always predict the outcome.

    Now in a risk adverse commercial environment (despite what capital vultures ... errr ... venturers say, their job is to load up with bear on the best bets), guess which renumeration scheme is favored? Human nature is perverse in that if you make a task look easy (think of an experienced TV repairman coming in, taking one look and replacing the exact part that failed), you tend to underappreciate it. You can see the "effortless" basket scoring or the clever hack but how many people realise the years or decades of training that led to it?

    LL

  10. Re:Windows CE a flop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing worse than a linux zealot is a microsoft zealot... sheesh.. at least the linux zealots have a cause to fight for... the ms zealots... well.. it just beats the hell out of me. Unless of course you subscribe to the conspiracy theory, in which case you would be a MS employee or an MS plant here on slashdot to try to make the case for those oppresive monopolistic bastards from seattle.

    sieg heil little buddy...

  11. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I contracted at Yahoo.

    Yahoo is almost all java, servlets to be precise.

  12. Can you read? by mdvkng · · Score: 1

    The desktop is considered to be the only viable thing by people who are only aware of the desktop. Anything more complex than the desktop (anything else) is too complicated for them to consider.

    I _am_ in the real world, and the real world runs on servers, not desktops. Desktops are only access points.

    Linux' (and *BSD and Unix in general) success has been on _servers_, it is only because people liek Dvorak are aware of its existence that it is being considered for a clickety-clicky role - the only thing that matters to them.

    Somebody _tried_ to make servers clickety clicky, it was called NT. Instead of making servers easier to manage it made for badly managed servers.

    Maybe it's time for "corporate America" to realise that there is more to computers than desktops. But then again, in "corporate America" the lowest common denominator tends to rule.

    Your response is evidence of this blindness.

    -M

    1. Re:Can you read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with the NT statement. I worked at a very large worldwide company and saw the NT servers behave just as well as the UNIX ones. Both had problems due to badly coded apps, not the OSes themselves. These boxes (Dell servers) actually bounced less than the HP, NCR, Sun, and IBM ones. The big problem with Linux, as told to me by a Systems Architect, is the lack of anyone to sue. If NT loses their terabytes of data, they jump Microsoft. If Solaris does it, they jump Sun. The same with HP, NCR, and IBM. If a Linux server was to corrupt a multi-terabyte database, who do they sue to recover their millions of dollars in lost data and time? That, in a nutshell, is why Linux is not making headway into the corporate market.

  13. Re:java is better than Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Like it or not, Java is the defacto standard for web applications development.

    No, thats just what Sun would want you to believe.

    And as for "using Java", I've usedit since version 0.9, so I can tell you I've probably dug deeper into its disgusting bowels than you would care to.

  14. Re:say what? by hndrcks · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Hitler _was_ Time's Man of the Year back in '36 (I think that year is right....)

    I agree that innovation isn't the deciding factor in "Man of the Year" - making; rather it's _influence_ on the world. Gates has certainly influenced the world! Good or bad, you decide.
    Hey - how about Alan Greenspan (Fed Chair) for Man of the Decade? Makes sense to me...

    I think Time's selection of Bezos is more of the dot-com millionaire hype, as printed matter tries to assert validity in the Internet age.

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
  15. If java is a failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how come I make $400k/year contracting in java???

    I have got so much demand, recruiter calling me every other day and I don't have more friends to send them too... And this is in NYC... I can imagine what it is in Silicon Valley.

    You don't believe me??? try www.dice.com and see for yourselves.

    matt b.

    1. Re:If java is a failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have got so much demand, recruiter calling me every other day and I don't have more friends to send them too...

      Shit...send them to me.

  16. WinCE not a faillure by Betcour · · Score: 1

    Sure it doesn't have the marketshare Bill was hoping to get, but for some specific task it is still the only kid in the block. PalmOS is more efficient for basic work (scheduling/notes/etc..) but when you want to make some specific apps or a little color/sound, there's nothing else that a good WinCE thing. Try making a good custom database with pictures on a palm V and its 2 MB of memory.... beside, having a stripped down Win32 API also helps porting.

  17. Re:You code monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Around me I see NOTHING but java and it has taken over the web world for server programming.

    Where? What sites? Enough BS, tell me what major sites are generated entirely with Java on the server side.

  18. C++ has won the API war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know a little about java multithreaded servers. I know they run out of memory or the JVM crashes after at most 2 days of straight operation. This in contrast to my C++ multithreaded DB-connected servers that have been running for 6 months straight. I know that java cannot perform asynchronous IO unless you use 2 threads per socket. This forces your Java server to have at most 500 concurrent socket connections. You run out of threads long before the equivalent C++ server that checks IO on thousands of sockets via select() and using a thread pool. I know that java's core classes are needlessly over-synchronized (including String and StringBuffer) which penalizes performance by at least 20%. I know that Java thrashes the shit out of the heap due to the fact that every little object must be heap allocated. I know that a typical Java application needs four times as much in-process memory as an equivalent C++ program. I could keep going. Sure, C++ may take a little discipline and a little longer to write, but in the end you get a more solid and robust server that can run 10X as long in production (if not more). Use your brain - not your heart when talking about the usefulness of a programming language.

    1. Re:C++ has won the API war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, grep synchornized String.java >> synchronized(buffer) { This is part of the constructor that takes a string buffer. >>needlessly over-synchronized (including String >>and StringBuffer) Just String buffer and not String. String is immutable so it does not need to be synchronized.

    2. Re:C++ has won the API war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java's String class is indeed immutable - and grossly inefficient as result. Avoid it at all costs! Too bad almost all AWT and Swing methods demand it as an argument. I can _hear_ the heap thrashing when it is used! StringBuffer is an almost equally poor alternative due to the synchronization overhead. You've got to roll your own classes to get any decent performance out of Java - the built-in core classes are designed for idiots - and only idiots can live with their poor performance!

  19. Re:startups by pieguy · · Score: 3

    One of the things that I learned in my Industrial Engineering days is that people who work long hard hours every week are less productive in absolute terms. That is, they accomplish less work than people who put in a productive 40 hours per week. This isn't because they work less as they get tired, it's because more of their work is rework and the productivity of rework is always zero. Think how much programming time is spent fixing bugs that shouldn't have occurred in the first place. Now....I haven't meant a manager yet that believed that. I've always noticed that the hard workers who spend 70 hour weeks fixing the code that they didn't get right the first, second or third time generally have bright futures.
    ------------------------------------

    --
    ------------------------------------
    knout (n) - A leather scourge used for flogging
  20. Re:Lets not forget about games by Biff+Cool · · Score: 1
    Actually I am looking forward to Oni (in fact it's the only game I'm looking forward to). I've been told Halo is cool but it's still an FPS to me. I'm sure it'll be a good one but that's kinda like a good Yugo.

    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.

    --

    Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
    -- H. L. Mencken

  21. Actually, this might be hard to do... by rhedin · · Score: 1

    Most commercial licenses (like NT) explicitly tell you that it isn't designed to work in life-critical areas like managing a nuclear power plant, hospital life support equipment, etc.

    Of course, they'd probably settle anyway, just to try to avoid the bad press ("NT kills premature babies on incubator!" what a PR nightmare that would be)

  22. What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please, someone name a major site generated end-to-end with Java. I'll even settle for static html generated with Java.

    Name specific sites or quit telling me "Java is taking over the web".

    Oh, and don't come back with javalobby.org, I mean a real site.

    1. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats bullshit. you are completely full of shit.

    2. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then whats your name? i can tell you authoritatively that you are utterly full of shit. yahoo uses apache.

    3. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Yahoo use Java back end servers? Does Amazon? Does eBay? (Please don't mention the silly little price tracker applets on the client side that suck up all my machine's memory and CPU)

    4. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK i've had enough of you...

      If that is the best argument that you can come up with when people tell you facts that go against your little world, please go die!!!

      I am sick and tired of baseless claims, two people on this thread have said "this major site uses servlets" and you want to sue them? SO PUT UP OR SHUT UP YOU BRAINLESS PIECE OF SHIT.

    5. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can tell you authoritatively that you are utterly full of shit. yahoo uses apache.

      You are cute, but you just showed us you really don't know what servlets are, do you?

      Do everyone on this thread a favor, before wasting more bandwidth, and go to java-apache and look for the jserv section.

      btw I don't know if the yahoo claim is true, all I can tell you that at the startup I work at we use apache/java for our clients. So I would not be surprised if it was, whatever it's irrelevant. The hottest game in apache land right now is "Jakarta" the program to add servlet/JSP/EJB to apache, go learn java and help them out.

      Jon Steiner, not AC

    6. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah, a number of people have mentioned that yahoo "uses servelets to generate almost their entire site" which is total and complete bullshit.

      until you come up with an actual fact that isn't horseshit, shut up.

    7. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this has nothing to do with "who knows java" (by the way, i've used it since v0.9), but more to do with everyone in here who is telling me things that i know for a fact are absolute and total bullshit, like "yahoo's entire site is servelets!".

      i knew i'd get some far-fetched bullshit enaswers, but that takes the cake.

    8. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by phidipides · · Score: 1

      I'm under NDA, so I can't comment on specific sites I've worked on, but anyone using ATG Dynamo (Kodak, BMG I think) is running Java to generate their site. IBM WebSphere is moving to act as a JSP engine. And I thought I heard that BroadVision was moving to a Java model, although I could be wrong. Most B2B solutions are also Java applications (WebSphere, Extricity). I guess none of this would be end to end since there is always something in the pipeline that isn't Java, but the vast majority of these solutions utilize a mostly Java architecture.

    9. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by phidipides · · Score: 2

      http://www.atg.com/c ustomers/driven_by_dynamo/driven_main.html

      Dynamo is just an app server, so you can say that the database and the web server is not Java. However, all page generation is done by the product using JavaBeans and JSP. A partial list of their customers is linked above, and it includes BMG, AT&T Customer Service, JCrew, and Sony Online Entertainment.

      This is just one product that allows Java to be used for page generation -- take a look around, and you'll find that there are literally dozens. And before you say you meant a custom solution utilizing Java, no major company that I know of wants to build their own app server -- the investment would be huge with no real benefit. Yes, Yahoo and eBay do use custom solutions, but eBay is having all kinds of problems and many of Yahoo's services are now delivered via packaged solutions.

    10. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chill out man, all the guy is saying is that servlets are used on Apache and that's it. As far as I can tell the previous posts says "some servlets on Yahoo".

      The fact that you showed you did not know that is not very important, honestly, just makes me take what you say with a grain of salt now.

      But please take it easy now, have a good new year and learn java (i mean really, and please stop with this "I know it since 0.9" non-sense, you showed true colors ;-) and who knows you might like it.

      In any case, again take it easy, nobody really cares. If you like VB, good for you, if you make a living out of C++ good for you, who cares?

      peace love and good (java anyone?) code.

    11. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo has some games that are Java, and an applet for viewing your stock portfolio in 3d, but thats pretty much it.

    12. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please elaborate wrt to yahoo.

    13. Re:What sites are generated fully with Java?? by TurkishGeek · · Score: 2

      Yahoo uses Java servlets extensively for some portions of the site. Sun site is completely Java and servlets.
      --

      BluetoothCentral.com
      A site for everything Bluetooth. Coming in January 2000.

      --
      Zigbee Central: A Zigbee weblog
  23. Re:Lets not forget about games by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 1

    I used to use my old BBS handle, but figured that I did not need hide my identity. If you feel the need, I really don't care. I don't have anything to prove to you. No one really gives a rats ass if I use a handle or my real name, so I choose the latter.

  24. umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number that we use to represent years is completely arbitrary. So *what* if some christian sin-vessel was born a few years earlier than people originally thought? They didn't adjust the years, did they? The third thousand-year period since the beginning of The Big Reset in 1 AD will begin on January 1, 2001. *End of story.* The numbers are what they are. What are we, ancient Greeks? Why this need to attach senseless mythology to an arbitrary number? Especially when the number isn't even accurate?

  25. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly don't care what monks screwed 3000 years ago. We live by Georgian Calendar system. But there are many others. Check this link out. http://www.unreality.org/ubb/ Forum13/HTML/001088.html BTW the "popular" is what bugs me. If everyone who sees a cat sais it's a dog but you know it's a cat , are you wrong?

  26. Dvorak.... ZDnet's tabloid psychic by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    Dvorak rated the internet as a fad not too many years ago. He (and ZDNet in general) ignored Linux until recently (and they STILL don't understand it). He's stated, at one time or another, that everything was dead and that everything was hot.

    Dvorak is the computer world's version of a tabloid psychic. Make a zillion predictions and one or two of them is bound to be on target. Nevermind about the rest; people forget.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  27. grrr... by zonker · · Score: 0
    Dvorak.... Icky...


    / k.d / earth trickle / Monkeys vs. Robots Films /

    1. Re:grrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything ZDnet kinda sux huh?

  28. When did the world begin? by ohlaadee · · Score: 1

    Dvorak: "Listen to the pundits, and you'd think the world began when the Web arrived. "

    Didn't it? What did I miss?

    --
    >
  29. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by jmilne · · Score: 2

    Exactly the point. It's stupid to try and have exact accuracy on this point. Exact accuracy demands 1997, which no one will accept, so why not go with the round number, which is the most useful definition?

    *sigh* Your exact accuracy is based on the assumption that the Christian religion is correct. Not only that, but also that the more accurate idea of when Christ was born is also correct. For that matter, we shouldn't have the year start in January, but rather closer to April. And what about that whole "Sabbath is the 7th day of the week" thing? Shouldn't we start the week off on Monday then?

    Of course, that's why many scientists tend to use CE (Common Era) and BCE (Before the Common Era), instead of A.D. (Anno Domini) and B.C. (Before Christ) when they use dates. And in that respect, the Common Era began in 1 CE. This is a lot nicer to people of other religions (and there are a lot more non-Christians out there than Christians), providing an arbitrary break in the calendar.

    As for the start of the millennium, I figure Jan. 1, 2000 is a good date. It will certainly be the first day of a millennium. You know, August 12, 1954 was also the start of a millennium. However, the 3rd Millennium (proper noun) will begin on Jan. 1, 2001. (As will the 21st Century, but no one seems to care about that.)

  30. startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Some of those Silicon Valley startups expect you to work 16 hour days and sleep at work. I know some guys who have beds right above their desks. What do you think? is it worth it?

    1. Re:startups by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Human nature is perverse in that if you make a task look easy (think of an experienced TV repairman coming in, taking one look and replacing the exact part that failed), you tend to underappreciate it. You can see the "effortless" basket scoring or the clever hack but how many people realise the years or decades of training that led to it?

      This reminds me of the story about the retired engineer:

      There was an engineer who had an exceptional gift for fixing all things mechanical. After serving his company loyally for over 30 years, he happily retired. Several years later the company contacted him regarding a seemingly impossible problem they were having with one of their multi-million dollar machines.

      They had tried everything and everyone else to get the machine to work but to no avail. In desperation, they called on the retired engineer who had solved so many of their problems in the past.

      The engineer reluctantly took the challenge. He spent a day studying the huge machine. At the end of the day, he marked a small "x" in chalk on a particular component of the machine and stated, "This is where your problem is."

      The part was replaced and the machine worked perfectly again. The company received a bill for $50,000 from the engineer for his service. They demanded an itemized accounting of his charges.

      The engineer responded briefly:

      • One chalk mark $1
      • Knowing where to put it $49,999

      It was paid in full and the engineer retired again in peace.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    2. Re:startups by michellem · · Score: 2
      Some of those Silicon Valley startups expect you to work 16 hour days and sleep at work. know some guys who have beds right above their desks. What do you think? is it worth it?

      Well, I certainly can't say whether joining a hot Silicon Valley start up and working 16 hours a day for stock options is worth it. I think that really depends on what you want in life. What I can say is that starting one's own company in a place that costs less to live in (Massachusetts), and being one's own boss (and still working 16 hour days) is way worth it. I probably will never be a paper millionaire, but I will have spent time trying to build my own vision. Can't beat that.

    3. Re:startups by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

      If they don't think it's worth it and complain, then they're just dumb... IF you don't want to deal with that sort of work atmosphere, get a different job and forget about the stock options... IF you do want to do that, then you are entitled to the big payoff - should it arrive....

      It's all about what you value most - enjoying your time as it happens, or throwing away a period of your life in hopes that a later era will be much different.

    4. Re:startups by Ark · · Score: 5
      What do you think? is it worth it?


      If I'm really into what I'm doing, it might be worth it. But I see so many people (and many of my friends) working their ass off for what could happen "if we go public and people like us." If they become new paper millionaires, I suppose its worth it, but it seems like a lot of time wasted they could be using to live/enjoy life.


      I work for a company that may or may not go public one day, but its been around for 20 some years. Its not a high glamor job, but I use cool technology, I work about 40-45 hours a week, I get paid well enough to get the toys I need. IMHO, this is more worth it. I'm enjoying my life NOW instead of hoping I enjoy it a few years down the line. I could die in a car accident tomorrow, then where would I be?


      I may be hedonistic here, but carpe diem is pretty much what I live. Life's too short to waste it on something that might not pay off. Maybe this attitude will never make me rich monetarily, but I lead a full life and I'm a happy man.


      And I've got all this wisdom at 24....wonder what the next 80 years will teach me.

    5. Re:startups by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you are doing and how much you stand to gain. I know some people who will definately be rich if they pull off what they are working on, and the only way they will get it done before the competition is to live under their desk. I just can't help but think it would be cool to be able to crash any time of day, though. Remember the Seinfeld episode when George was living under his desk after he had it renovated into a really cool little room? That would be cool.

    6. Re:startups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the pay?

    7. Re:startups by billsf · · Score: 1

      If you have a part in the action it is worth it. For a salary, absolutely not. Therefore if you are working for a startup for peanuts, you just have to get those options! (you work harder too) Bank accounts are just a place for your 'toy money' and nothing else.

      Bill - on my second startup, first one wildly successful.

    8. Re:startups by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1


      I completely agree - it is most important that you enjoy what you do while you do it. The challenge is to do what you love and be successful at it at the same time, whether it is an entrepreneurial venture or working for someone else.

    9. Re:startups by FJ!! · · Score: 1

      We've got this very specific rule in my household: 'Only one of us can work in a startup at any given time.'

      Worth it? The pay-off is so uncertain, and cashing in the paper money is so even more uncertain (I have one friend now who is being sent to a place he doesn't want to go, for work that he doesn't want to do, because he isn't vested yet, management told him to move or quit, and he financed his mega-loft with his paper money) that the work now had better be worth it. You can't eat the future. Not for long.

      --

  31. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    John Dvorak IS a moron. But even an idiot can be correct once in a while. He said so little in this article, and what he said was so obvious, that I have to agree with him for a change.

    By the way, has anybody read "Dvorak Predicts : An Insider's Look at the Computer Industry" lately to see just how wrong John Dvorkak was? Seems like there was little mention of little things like, say, Open Source or the Internet in the book...

  32. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by scumdamn · · Score: 0

    BRAVO! You're hired! Please report to $TECH_RAG tomorrow. Welcome aboard.

  33. Lots of talk.... by Ark · · Score: 4
    Linux. Lots of talk. Lots of hype. Lots of hope.


    Hmm....I think he forgot "lots more users, lots more production servers, a few more paper millionaries, lots more code" and a bunch of other things. Dvorak has never been a friend of Linux, but his spin on this makes it look like Linux was just vaporware instead of something people are using all the time in production, at home, and at play.


    If anything, I'd say the Dot-com millionaires is more hype then anything else.


    He hit the nail on the head with DIVX though.

    1. Re:Lots of talk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I think he's right. There was a lot of talk about it. And there was/is a lot of hype. And there is a lot of hope. Sounds good to me.

    2. Re:Lots of talk.... by storem · · Score: 2
      You forgot one: Lots of distributions. If we look what distributions rose from the ground this year, we see that almost all companies want a piece of the Linux pie.

      My question: Do you run Debian, RedHat, Slackware or Suse (and others), or do we still run Linux? If M$ wants a piece of the pie in the future: do we still accept it as Linux?

      Answer: too many distributions?

    3. Re:Lots of talk.... by C.Lee · · Score: 0

      >So he's right - there is lots of talk and lots of hype - just look at
      >ZDNet and the mainstream press. Witness the VA Linux and Redhat IPOs.
      >There's lots of hope too - Enlightenment and Gnome / KDE desktops are
      >rapidly evolving. ReiserFS, Ext3, and SGI's fs (whose name escapes me
      >at the moment) are all very fast filesystems.


      Ah no. What Dvorak means by lots of talk ect,ect,ect is that he and his fellow Ziff-Davis flacks have little or no influence over the Linux movement in the same fashion they had with OS/2. People are laughing at the stuff coming out of PC Week Labs. Dvorak and the rest of that bunch thought they would be molders and shapers of people's opinions of linux, hence his little snipes at linux with comments like "there is lots of talk and lots of hype"

    4. Re:Lots of talk.... by KaosDG · · Score: 3

      Yup... I found that amusing...
      I guess JCD's just another person who hasn't heard of linux until all the IPO's...
      BTW: My favorite talkback comment:

      Name: Bob Carmody
      Location: Washington DC
      Occupation:
      Linux is in the wrong list! Doesn't linux feel like DOS except with even longer more obscure switches? And it's Unix all over again. Dvorak noted that himself in a column earlier this year.
      Desqview for Linux is right around the corner, I can feel it.

      It's hard enough to get an OS out the door of Microsoft or Apple with a team in one town. How on earth can anything get done with the entire world working on a project?


      This is just too ludicrous to comment on right now.

      --
      "Fuzzy Wuzzy was a bear, Fuzzy Wuzzy had no hair... Fuzzy Wuzzy wasn't fuzzy was he?"
    5. Re:Lots of talk.... by Eric+the+.5b · · Score: 1

      If the guy can't install Linux for that reason, he's definitely never installed NT!

    6. Re:Lots of talk.... by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

      Coincidentally, he's also right. Don't take it as a slam on linux, it's not. What it is is a very short way of saying that linux doesn't have a GUI comparable to windows, that it is still too abrasive to neophyte computer users. I'll also take a personal stab at what linux needs - a decent filesystem. ext2 is slow on file deletions, and when mounted in it's default async mode can cause massive filesystem damage if the system crashes. This is not exactly clearly documented anywhere.

      So he's right - there is lots of talk and lots of hype - just look at ZDNet and the mainstream press. Witness the VA Linux and Redhat IPOs. There's lots of hope too - Enlightenment and Gnome / KDE desktops are rapidly evolving. ReiserFS, Ext3, and SGI's fs (whose name escapes me at the moment) are all very fast filesystems.

    7. Re:Lots of talk.... by mdvkng · · Score: 1

      Ah well, in Dvorak's world, if it ain't a clickety-clicky no brainer desktop oriented thingy, it ain't worth considering.

      After all, we're talking about one of those guys who thought Wintel PCs could, would and were replacing mainframes.

      Servers are out of Dvorak's sight and therefore not on his mind.

      -M

    8. Re:Lots of talk.... by whoop · · Score: 1

      Sounds like that WinNT magazine article a few months back where the author couldn't make it through the install because it was in text mode. And then goes on to say Linux is MSDOS, single-tasking, etc, etc.

  34. Re:Windows CE a flop? by TPx · · Score: 1

    (Remember Beta Vs. VHS? By technology alone Betamax should have won, but do you own a Beta VCR?)

    Still with this urban legend? C'mon people, grow up...

    Beta failed because the tapes were too short. Putting a movie on a beta tape was too expensive compared to VHS, so the market moved to where the software was available.

  35. Dvorak is just...bad by CentrX · · Score: 1

    I decided a long time ago that I wasn't going to read Dvorak articles anymore. But I keep coming back and they keep getting worse and worse. He's just another media fraud that doesn't know a thing.

    Chris Hagar

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by imcsk8 · · Score: 1

      What's the problem with the baggy pants, i use baggy pants and I LIKE TO WEAR BAGGY PANTS and i don't have a reason i just like them

    2. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen to that my brother... I swear I could do what this guy does.. or Rush.. or Dr. Laura...or Jessie Burst... or any of those other big media phonies...

      ahem...

      The Millenium in review, by Mr. Anonumous Coward.

      Well here we are at the end of another millenium and what do we have to show for it. Have we learned anything, or have we just morphed the same problems into a new age. I know you all have to many things to worry about with the whole Y2K crises that will soon be upon us, so I have taken it upon myself to tell you what was important for the last 1000 years. So here it is.. the long awaited Cowards millenium review.

      Cowards thumbs up -> .com IPO's.
      Yep, this was the time to for all of the nerds and geeks to cash in. Just remeber to spend those greenbacks geekboys, it keeps the economy rolling.

      Cowards thumbs down -> Baggie pants.
      I know, I know, it has nothing to do with technology, but I just can't stand all of those people with their pants hanging half way down to there knees. Pull em up boys and girls.

      Cowards thumbs down -> Linux
      Too much window dressing and not enough meat. This Coward likes a big burger in between my buns, so lets work on getting some apps for that kernel, then I'll jump on that bandwagon.

      Cowards thumbs up -> Digital Music
      An underated part of the technology revolution has been the great digital music formats, from CD's to MP3's. I just can't, I just can't, I just can't get enough of that.


      blah blah blah...

    3. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      I actually enjoy his and the Register's commentary on things more than anyone else, specifically because they aren't out to make friends... just to report news and include their own insights. Dvoraks been reporting on this industry for maybe 20 years now... If he really knew/knows nothing, he'd have lost his job and audience years ago...

      Just because he's not pro-linux is not a good enough reason to say he knows nothing...

    4. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by CentrX · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if he knows nothing or not. as long as he helps the higher-ups make money, he's all set. He does this very well by getting /. to link to his stories.

      Chris Hagar

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by scumdamn · · Score: 2

      Dvorak is the Rush Limgaugh of tech rags. He turns out a monthly one-page rant that can't even come close to Pournell (I'd gladly wade through references to "Lucille, my Compaq Presario...") for the little insight Pournell gives compared to Rush^WDvorak's "future of technology" type articles. Blech!

    6. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by phidipides · · Score: 2

      >He's just another media fraud that doesn't know a thing.

      I suppose this posting is flame bait, but this comment has already been moderated UP so I felt like defending Dvorak...

      Do you have any objective facts to back up your statement? Granted, Dvorak is an opinionated bastard who has been wrong a lot, but he's also one of the first to admit that. I've been reading his columns on and off for years, and one thing I've noticed is that he's a guy who has a sense of everything that's going on around him. He doesn't want to tell you what everyone else is saying, he wants to put himself on the line and say what he thinks -- isn't that the kind of attitude that Slashdot normally defends or am I missing something?

      Granted, Dvorak is an inflammatory, highly opinionated, and highly visible target, but" a media fraud who doesn't know a thing"? Is Linux not full of hype right now? Is it not the current hope to knock down Microsoft? What is untrue there? He could have also said that it's a solid OS with great potential, but that's not his style. If you want to attack him, fine, but don't take the easy route of throwing assertions with no backing at him.

      My two cents...

    7. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      He's just another media fraud that doesn't know a thing

      Actually, I think he did a good job of being well-rounded in this case, and was spot on with every item listed. Even rabid slashdotters shouldn't be upset with him: he trashed Microsoft twice, gave good mention to two underdogs (Linux and Apple), and spit on the grave of DIVX. Are you upset just because his comments about Linux we somewhat reserved? You shouldn't be; Linux is still getting to where it needs to be.

    8. Re:Dvorak is just...bad by GPB · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but funny story;

      One day, I was out to dinner with a friend of mine, who happens to be a business acquaintance of Dvorack. All of a sudden, my friend's mobile phone rings, caller id reporting "DVORAK". He ignored it and let it ring to voicemail.

      -B

  36. Lets not forget about games by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 2

    I think that the quick turnaround of game technologies was incredible this year. Unreal Tournament and the Q3 demos let us get hooked on the games, and then all of a sudden they were on the shelves, finished. This is not just a great way to develop their software, but a cool marketing thing as well.

    1. Re:Lets not forget about games by rabidMacBigot() · · Score: 1
      If you think gaming is in a rut, it's because you're looking in the wrong place. id has been making obscene amounts of money from their Quake series, so other game companies look to id as the example of how games should be made. But they haven't done anything new recenly, have they? In fact, when was the last time they've done anything besides a FPS?

      If you're looking for innovation in gaming, you might try Bungie. They're the guys who wrote Myth and Myth II, which basically did something nobody's done before. Ditto for their upcoming projects, Oni and Halo. Cool things there, you might want to check them out and see if they fit your profile of a "new" game.

    2. Re:Lets not forget about games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geuss what? Not only haven't I played a single new game this year I haven't even seen one. Really puts how much they matter into prespective for you I hope. Some people don't use their systems as game machines.

    3. Re:Lets not forget about games by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 1

      And some of us have the balls to use our real names. Should I be ashamed that I have a system I built primarially for gaming? No. Why? Because I like to take a break from productive work and kick back from time to time. That, and I am still a student, which would allude to the fact that I like to goof off. Your not playing any new games should change my perspective? Why? I work with a lot of people every day, and allmost all of them are casual gamers. Even the slashdot folks like to put their own hints for new releases and personal experiences into their articles about loki and game releases. E-mail me and we can talk.

    4. Re:Lets not forget about games by Biff+Cool · · Score: 1

      I think a great way to develop game software would be to make a new game. Every game I've seen has been a rehashing of the same old crap over and over again (yeah yeah Halflife blah blah blah). I now hate 1st person shooters and am getting pretty damn sick of Command and Conquer clones too. I'm pretty sure I could get a quick turn around on a game if I were useing a cookie cutter too.
      </rant>

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.

      --

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
      -- H. L. Mencken

    5. Re:Lets not forget about games by ranton · · Score: 1

      And you better thank all of the people who do use their computers for game machines. Without them you wouldnt have your brand new athlons or 20 GB hard drives.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  37. Re:Sony's not using FireWire on the Vaios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the same. 6 pin connectors provide power to the device from the 1394 bus. 4 pin connectors provide the 1394 interface, but the device has to provide it's own power.

  38. say what? by Oirad · · Score: 2

    Mr. Dvorak thinks that either Bill Gates or Steve Jobs should have been Person of the Year in Time? I mean, c'mon, Jeff Beezos (sorry if spelled wrong) isn't worthy, but in all honesty, he's more worthy than either of those two. *puts on asbestos clothing* At least he did something innovative. To my admittedly limited knowledge, Amazon helped kick off the e-commerce revolution. I still don't agree with his being chosen as Person of the Year, but c'mon, John...Bill Gates or Steve Jobs? You've got to be kidding me...

    1. Re:say what? by jhines · · Score: 1

      It has been a slow year for MS, they haven't had any news stories other than getting hauled into
      court.

      And MS has played catch up, and hasn't hit any homeruns with its e-anything policies.

      Now if/when MS gets broken up, that might make it, but otherwise Bill Gates getting richer just isn't newsworthy.

      The average man in the street has heard of, or has been affected in some way by Amazon, or the rest of them.

    2. Re:say what? by IHateEverybody · · Score: 1


      I'm on Dvorak's side on this one. There have to be a dozen guys in the computer arena that are more deserving of man of the year status than Bezos is and Gates and Jobs are two of them.

      There is nothing unique about Amazon, it just has better PR than other e-commerce companies. There are other e-commerce companies out there that are as old as Amazon, even if they are not as big. Note that I didn't say successful. Amazon has yet to turn a profit, so it can't really be considered successful. Bezos has also done his part to harm e-commerce by jumping on the stupid patent, stupid lawsuit bandwagon.

      Like him or not, Gates managed to turn an operating system into a deadly weapon. This is real influence, even if it is bad. The DoJ lawsuit against Microsoft alone could potentially affect the way we use computers for years to come. (If so, would this make Judge Jackson a man of the year candidate?).

      Jobs took a company that had spent a decade bent on committing corporate suicide and made it stop slashing its wrists long enough to start putting out fast, useful computers.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
    3. Re:say what? by Useless · · Score: 1

      Hey, c'mon, Lets not forget that Steve (and Woz) created the classic arcade game, Breakout!

      --
      "Even Prophets don't know everything"
    4. Re:say what? by ranton · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? What does innovation have to do with being Person of the Year? Bill Gates created the largest and most influential corporations since AT&T, and this doesnt qualify him? I dont like him any more than you do, but that doesnt detract from what he has accomplished. It is very much like Hitler, while I dont condone anything he did you cannot dispute that he was a very influention leader.

      I do agree about Steve Jobs though. He would be in the same calibre as Bill Gates if it wasnt for the fact that he screwed his company over royally. But as it stands he is about as qualified as Bill Clinton for Person of the Year.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
  39. Re:The flop... by sspiff · · Score: 1

    Well said.

    We are all too focused on the "whizbang" aspects of new technology and of course, the potential to make obscene amounts of money. What no one seems to notice that there are social implications, often bad ones. The mainstream public is completely uneducated on these issues since they get there news from the mainstream media, which is completely clueless.

    Folks, this is not a good thing. Technology is not going to solve our basic problems. It is not going to make us all rich. It is no substitute for real life interaction and experience.

    I'm so burned out on the hype, that technology has started to bore me. It might be more fun to trash my TV and computer and go live in a log cabin in the middle of the woods. That would be REAL living , much better than an "e-whatever" simulation.

  40. Re:yes, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Directory Services - Once you are done with your st00p1d (come on, if you're going to pretend to be l33t, g0 4ll th3 w4y) OS wars then you can read up on things such as LDAP and X.500

    There are more to computers than operating systems and games, but don't tell anyone at /.

  41. Understanding heap in Java is critical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't understand how objects are created, you're going to be a worthless Java programmer.

  42. Re:Do Slashdot editors ever _read_ the stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot is a fucking joke.

  43. Re:Do Slashdot posters ever read the stories? by TPx · · Score: 1

    Really funny :)

    The fact that this is an ITALIAN company, selling their product in the ITALIAN market, where you can buy their CE phone in the ITALIAN stores is beside the point, right?

  44. Re:Dvorak has some good points here by mactov · · Score: 1

    Agreed, that #5 should be "cutting the cord" re cell phones and palms. Maybe it should be even higher. Back about July, I began noticing Palm Pilots in the hands of individuals I knew to be rather techno-cautious, maybe even techno-phobic. It's one thing to see geeks with a new tech goodie, it's quite another to see Junior League types turning up with Palm Pilots in their purses. Very, very interesting, I thought, as we exchanged business cards in a most enlightened fashion.

    --
    OK, now what?
  45. Old news: now $900,000 by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The November 1999 medium Palo Alto home purchase
    price was $899,000.

  46. Re:Dvorak: space goof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many issues have two sides, Dovark considers them both.

  47. not based on MS or Linux opinions by CentrX · · Score: 1

    I was not basing my appraisal of him on his Microsoft or Linux opinions. I was also more speaking about his articles in general, not this particular piece. If anything, this makes him even more of a simple media darling, as Linux is the wonderful media darling of the moment. Besides, all he needs to do is get /. to link to him consistently and he's all set.

    Chris Hagar

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  48. I spell it "B-O-Z-O" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Jeff Beezos (sorry if spelled wrong)

    I spell it "Jeff Bozo". I mean honestly, how long does he think it will take him to become the latest high profile exec behind bars pulling what is clearly a scam such as he is?

  49. Re:Insightful? by CentrX · · Score: 1

    I agree, I'm certainly not insightful, but my little comment was also definitely not redundant. If I remember correctly (which I probably don't), I was the first one to post my drivel. But if they keep giving Dvorak airtime, why not me? ;)

    Chris Hagar

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  50. Re:java is a flop? by donglekey · · Score: 1

    actually sun has opened up a lot of java. I forget everything that they did, but I think that they are basically going to manage the standards and let others create implementations of it. I beleive that they also abolished many if not all of their royalty policies so it will open up many opurtunities for some companies.

  51. Re:Not worth is when "average" house cost $800,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Really? I only make $90K/year here in Oregon, and I don't have to spend $500/month for air conditioning... and I've only got 15 acres for my toys, but the acreage is somewhat vertical, so the toys tend to slide off...

    You're correct, standard of living should NOT be measured in terms of absolute dollars, but rather in terms of salary/cost of living well...

  52. Things that should NOT continue next year by whoop · · Score: 1
    What we need is a good list of things that we never want to see in the next year (millennium for those who don't understand numbers :)).

    • Looking at the original ZDNet article, I sure as hell wish these media sites wouldn't put their crap in 50 character wide columns, spread out over 130 pages with more utter crap in columns along the sides. The meat of any web page should be the actual story, not every other stupid feature of the web site. Leave that stuff on the main front page, not every damn page therein.
    • While I'm bitching about the media, don't take every damn story as if you'll get a Pulizer out of it. Every local channel here, for their little blurb on what's to come at the evening news, phrase it like if you don't watch, you'll die. One had, "Find the 10 ways your children could die from items around your house. Story at 10". I just prayed my kids didn't die before the 10 o'clock news. I don't watch much CNN and such, but it wouldn't surprise me if they did it too. Then there's the JFK/Di fiascos. Do we really need 24 hour coverage of "No new news yet?"
    • Next on the list, basing your web page on some plugin like Flash. Most of you focused on the OS detect bit there, but the last thing I want to look at is words flashing all around like crazy. Nothing gets a message through to me like good old fashioned text. As an aside, Netscape, don't compile in the plugin finder util for the Linux version of the browser. I haven't found a single plugin it could find. ;)
    • Stupid catch phrases like, "You go girl," and "Talk to the hand." It's cute once or twice, after that it's overdone.
    • Gap commercials. First the singing, now the dancing. Ack. Please no more!!

    I'll leave out the obvious things like users learning/reading something a little before calling tech support or ask on IRC/Usenet, the media doing actual journalism, blaming everything on global warming, or AC dumb posts becasue those will never go away. :)

    Feel free to add more. It's therapeutic to let it all out before we all die in a blaze of nuclear weapons and script kiddies...
  53. Re:java is a flop? by donglekey · · Score: 1

    actually sun has opened up a lot of java. I forget everything that they did, but I think that they are basically going to manage the standards and let others create implementations of it. I beleive that they also abolished many if not all of their royalty policies so it will open up many oportunities for some companies.

  54. Re:Millenum is finished? by Rhombus · · Score: 1
    Could everyone please just shut the hell up about this? We understand. Honestly. Continually spouting this crap is a lot like telling everyone that the apparent motion of the sun is actually due to the rotation of the earth every time someone mentions sunrises or sunsets.

    I'm telling you now, on behalf of everyone on the planet bright enough to spell "Millennium", we get it. Let it go.

    • (P.S.: this goes for everyone else, too. Enough already.)
  55. Me too but at safeway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the LCD screens were something out of this world.

    I am starting to believe the guys that say that java is everywhere behind the scenes... are other people seeing that as well?

  56. Re:Sony's not using FireWire on the Vaios by MacBastard · · Score: 2

    IEEE-1394 is FireWire AND iLink. Those names are just marketing blather from Apple and Sony, respectively. The license fee for all parties is only $.25 per system.

    The 6-pin and 4-pin ends of a 1394 cable are part of the same spec. The 6-pin ended cables are capable of running bus-powered devices using the 12VDC supplied by the port on the host system, while the 4-pin ended ones are data only. If you use a 6-pin to 4-pin cable, the bus power is ignored. A Sony DV camera w/iLink works great with a G4 or iMac w/FireWire, BTW.

    Hope this clears some things up,
    Marc

    --
    - Semper Ubi Sub Ubi!
  57. Re:Dvorak and Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he knows that, he's just exaggerating to make a point. When someone says something like "everyone has x" do they really mean everyone? Of course not.

  58. Desqview for Linux? When? When?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can I get one? When can I run five different apps in console windows? Huh? Can I get one please? Huh? Can I? Can I?

  59. I ask it again: Can you read? by mdvkng · · Score: 2

    I didn't say NT was crap. I said its "clickety-click" approach to server management made for badly managed servers.

    If your sysadmins aren't draftees from the desktop helpdesk, then NT can indeed be run well and crash much less than NT run by recycled end-users.

    As for the tired old "can't sue Linux" BS, go read your commercial license agreement. You can't sue MS or Sun or HP or any other vendor if you lose your data. Maybe you can sue a VAR but you can't sue the big guys, they have protected themeselves from product liability suits in their product licenses.

    What's the matter, can't you read?

    > That, in a nutshell, is why Linux is not making headway into the corporate market.

    My God it amazes me how out of touch some people are!

    -M

    1. Re:I ask it again: Can you read? by Foogle · · Score: 2
      Well yes and no -- just because it's written in the license, doesn't mean that it's rock-solid. If I ran a hospital, I might have a patient's life depending on a device that ran embedded NT (God forbid). If that machine were to crash and the person were to die, *and* I were able to prove (by reconstructing the circumstances) that it was NT that was at fault, I could easily sue and win a wrongful-death suit against MS. It doesn't matter what their license says

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

  60. Re:Millennial Confusions are a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really great is seeing all those people who just can't shut up about something that nobody cares about...

  61. Re:Wrong by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    Q: If everyone decides that the word "gay" means homosexual, but you refuse to accept it, and continue to believe it only means "happy" is it did originally, are you wrong?

    A: Yes. Language is a non-static, evolving entity. Words mean what society decides they mean. If Century/Millennium means "00", then that's what they mean. Note that there is nothing wrong with this; definitions generally change because they become more useful. In this case, "00" is a more useful definition, and thus it has been adopted.


    ---

  62. Re:Millenum is finished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad YOU get it. But why wouldn't everyone else? BTW I'm bright enought even if I can't spell "Millennium". "Let it go"???? Why? People's ignorance or acceptance of what media sais is what drives me really mad. Russian.

  63. Re: The Gregorian calendar 3rd Millennium=1/1/2001 by drew · · Score: 1

    > If you decide the 20th Century ends at the end of 1999, then which past century loses the year?

    it would obviously have to be this century, because the end of the 19th century was celebrated on dec 31st of the year 1900. 1901 was therefore officially recognized as the beginning of the 20th century. of course now that we've decided that the 20th century gets the shaft, we have to pick which decade of the 20th century only has 9 years....

    --
    If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  64. Re:Not worth is when "average" house cost $800,000 by Midnight+Coder · · Score: 1

    Why be crammed in a city anymore?
    It's a good way get experience. Once I've done that I would like to move to somewhere like Nevada (while retaining roughly the same salary).

    I also have to pay off my student loan so raw $ is important for that.

    BTW I hear 2/3 neighbor's toilets flushing.

  65. They are related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Dvorak is related to the creator of the Dvorak keyboard and has mentioned this before.

  66. Cobol pgrammers make big bucks too, so what??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    your statement is meaningless. i pull in more than twice what you get doing perl, no joke.

    and you know what? there's someone making more than me using some godawful language. its meaningless.

  67. Java has entered a blind spot... by Blackjax · · Score: 1

    When I read comments like the ones Dvorak made on Java I really have to wonder about his accuracy in other areas. He seems to equate Javas obvious failures with the failure of Java itself. Applets, while they have some niche applications, were a flop. JavaOS and the Java based NC were also flops. Why? Because the idea was to force a technology into an area where it really did not fit very well. What does this have to do with Java itself failing? Very little really.

    Java is very good for some things and its use is exploding in those areas. The reason most people seem to think it has failed is that these areas fall into an end user blind spot. People could see applets (and later the lack thereof), but the areas where Java is now primarily being used are not nearly as visible to your average person. Java is now being used for middleware. It lives on the server side these days in the form of servlets and beans. Just because you don't see it does not mean it is not there. The number of Java programmers and the use of Java in development is swiftly growing.

    As for Jini, it is still relatively new and its fate has yet to be determined. For my part I suspect it will catch on, but not in its incarnation as an interface to hardware devices (despite the hype, this is not its only use).

    Ultimately I think it would be far more accurate to say that Sun was a flop this year. The technology they created is prospering, the companies standing in the industry is not.

    As an aside, if you are a Java programmer and are looking for work (in NYC), the company I work for is now hiring. If you're interested send me a resume at: jkeck@finansys.com


  68. Re:FireWire?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have a G3 with a Firewire external hard drive. My friend has a PC with a firewire port and a digital video camera.

    USB was also a bit slow to start after iMacs made it the standard, but it picked up. Firewire is a bit behind USB, but the paths are the same.

    Firewire will be ubiquitous, as will USB.

  69. Dvorak="Dud" by Mickey+Squid · · Score: 0

    Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky... Dvorak.... Icky...

    --
    All you need in this life is ignorance and confidence -- and then success is sure. Mark Twain
  70. Re:startups and Netslaves by jay_rf · · Score: 1

    I am in the middle of getting my BS (a little over it I think) in CS (that little play on acronyms was not intentional) and work for a foriegn owned yet independent american company (I am a CS major so I have no real idea what that means but I am sure it has something to do with taxes) and I make a damn good salary as a UN*X and Linux admin. I am not uncommon (despite what I try to tell myself), I started out in electronics, got into UN*X and here I am. Granted, I spent some time doing some really low paying work, but I have never worked at any place for less than 2 years, I have always paid the bills and I have always liked my job. If one person can do it (especially a joe like me) anyone can do it.

    Do I think busting my balls in SV is worth it? NO. I would prefer to settle into a scenario - gee exactly like the one I have now - where I do support as an admin and spend spare time working cool UN*X stuff I like. Makes more sense to someone like me. As time goes on I will most likely examine changing fields, but always managing to get job A that you like so you can twiddle your thumbs looking for job B is very important. I think that SV is far too volatile for most people and agree that talent is being both exploited and wasted (to a degree) in the green rush.

    --
    " -- ow my brain hurts again -- "
  71. Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could have eliminated all of this argument if we HAD a year 0 (counting 0-999, 100-1999). Why didn't we? In programming, we store 16 items in an array [0.15].

    It would have made things much easier. How many years between 5 and 15? 10. How many years between -5 and 5 (5 B.C. to 5 A.D.)? 9. Does that make sense? NO!

    Too bad we can't define one now - that would renumber this year to 1998. :)

    1. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fortran places sixteen array elements in positions one through sixteen.

      You're welcome to invent a year zero. Just make sure you change the history books to point out that Jerusalem was destroyed during the 0th Century, America's Revolution took place during the 17th Centure, and Hitler rose during the 19th Century.

  72. Zealot is a zealot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, yea im one dude. So I like Anonymous Coward, aparently I'm not the only one.

    Second - zealots suck. period. They provide no rational and only cloud the discusion. But hey, that's just my opinion.

    Third - Why is it that everytime I (or anyone) says anything other than "Linux ownzzzzz ur 4zz" we are called MS zealots. You know, I have actually left two positions in the last 24 months because of the companies blind and ignornat commitment to NT. One where I was arguing for Unix (SCO/AIX combo to be exact), the other of Netware/NDS. I won both technical arguments (in short I WAS RIGHT!), too bad that means that kaka. I am not an MS zealot, Im not even a fan. I use NT when it is the correct tool for the job. That isn't too often, but guess what it does happen. Honestly I am just glad that I am out of the server crap (religious wars NT, Linux, BSD, Netware, OS/2, "real" Unix, etc.) and into networking. Cisco and Nortel, makes me a happy man.


    Fourth - I don't watch x-files...sorry...plant thing makes little sense to me..but in all honesty I just dont believe that Microsoft fears Slashdot...I could be wrong though..

  73. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does your logic make a kilobyte contain 1000 bytes instead of 1024? Just because it's easy to count? heh

  74. Re:Do Slashdot posters ever read the stories? by TPx · · Score: 1

    Uh, no. The Ce phone was announced in February, manufactured during the summer and in the stores by October.

    It's December, now. That is, two months AFTER October...

  75. Sad thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..is, is that people in certian media outlets have been told NOT to tell the correct date by thre sponsers. Because they want to make payola from the hype this year, and they have planes to hype it again next year. I post AC because I work at one of these outlets, and I like my job.

  76. yes, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sig hell, that's funny, are you going to sing It's Christmas Time in Hell next?


    You know the Linux crowd may not like it, but I still believe in directories (NDS) and Java. This means Novell to me. It's pretty damn near impossible to be a MS zealot and rooting for Novell. But that's okay, don't let reality rain on your parade. Don't let the idea that someone could actually say something in favor of Microsoft and not be a flaming idiot zealot sink in. Don't take off the rose-colored glasses, they make the penguin look so sweet.

    When the discussion comes up on Java my only response is that I don't care if it has been sent to a standards board or not.

    Get over yourself.

    jhartzell

    1. Re:yes, indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Believe in directories"? What the hell is a "directory"? Apparently you aren't talking about what you get after a call to mkdir(2). In which case, I must ask why you're using a stoopid name.

  77. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea was started by a a law firm.Isn't that wierd?

  78. Re:You code monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  79. Re: Netslaves by paul.dunne · · Score: 3
    SON OF KATZ!! Just when you thought it was safe to go back on slashdot... (hmm, anyone remember any other Jaws II promo lines?)

    Really, come on, what is this drivel? Workers are exploited, period. Most "geeks", as you call them (and by which I suppose you to mean young introverted males (becuase it is mostly guys, isn't it?) with an interest in technology, particularly computers, bordering on the obssessive) work in well-paid hi-tech jobs, and are a hell of a lot better of than, say, a Uranium miner in South Africa or a textile worker in the Philipines. Yes, they are exploited; of course they are; but have a bit of perspective.

  80. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ..in a couple of years it will be worth a damn, now it is not. Far be it for met to defend that idiot(Dvork), but Sun keeps changing Java's focus, and that is what's hurting it. I can't say what will become of Java, but I think an all class language is not as good as it sounds. The extra 'overhead' from using a class CAN outweigh using a function, especially in 'low level'programing.

    Because of the current attitude of the net I feel the following information is needed. Mostly because people can't take info on face value, so here goes:

    I have programmed in C, C++,VB,Java,Perl/tk, Tcl/tk.

    If I was given a choice, at this moment, what I would use to create a 'GUI' web ap. It would be Perl/Tk. that is my opinion based on MY experience.

    Remeber when you could have a discussion about this and the insightfull, intelligent comments that you could learn from, outnumbered the flames?

  81. Re:What kills me ... by michellem · · Score: 1
    Is that slashdot keeps giving this fool airtime! I am not one to normally criticize slashdot's choices of articles to link to, but links to this guy's idiocy show up here on a fairly regular basis. I've yet to see any content in a single Dvorak column to justify this, particularly in light of slashdot's open-source emphesis.

    Well, I certainly very often disagree with him, and there are times when he is just plain wrong or misinformed, but the truth is, that many people "out there" listen to him, and I get the impression that many people agree with him. So, knowing what he has to say, and getting a feeling for what people are thinking is worth it. Does it make a big difference that /. is giving him airtime? I think it's OK. Besides, I'm not sure there is such a thing as an intelligent anti-open source antagonist.

  82. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If Century/Millennium means "00", then that's what they mean.
    That's a very PC excuse for people who can't do math. Mathematics are not subject to your stupid populist claptrap. The laws of mathematics cannot be argued with. The 12th person to join the jury is the one who finishes it, not who starts the second jury.
  83. Re:Programmer efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And the rest of that Java preamble stuff (or the #include ... int main... equivalent for C) is nothing more than boilerplate that you either import with a couple of editor keystrokes or just link against. If you keep reinventing that wheel you aren't doing your employer any favors productivity-wise, but in and of itself it's no reason to switch to Perl.

    Sure it is. It demosntrates how Java is so absurdly verbose.

    Sun could have really gone places with language design, but I understand why they made it as verbose as they did - the bottom line is that Java is being pushed at the people who use VB, who tend to have very little exposure to alternative languages, and prefer to have things spelled out, even if it is painful.

    Note that I didn't say they were stupid or ignorant...just typically not experienced in alternatives. I have found this to be overwhelmingly true dealing with posters on JavaLobby. They typically haven't seen any Lisp, ML, Scheme, or any of the other wacky an ingenious languages out there.

  84. Re:Millennial Confusions are a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who expects two and two to add up to four tomorrow cares about not letting popular idiocies change math into a voting contest.

  85. thanks, that says it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    not one menaingful site in the list.

    you proved my point for me.

  86. Java is to Eiffel as C++ is to Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Compared to Java, C++ has lots of complicated rules and ways to go wrong that just get in the way of developing most applications.

    C++ has "holes" that allow programmers to violate encapsulation and change types dangerously, with only subtle hints in the code.

    Replace "Java" with "C++" and then "C++" with "Java" in the above statements and you will obtain statements that are equally true.

    GNU Eiffel compiles to Java byte code.

    This anonymous coward is a Sun Certified Java Programmer.

    1. Re:Java is to Eiffel as C++ is to Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replace "Java" with "C++" and then "C++" with "Java" in the above statements and you will obtain statements that are equally true.

      No strictly speaking you will obtain a contradiction ;-) You probably meant replace Java with Eiffel

  87. don't, you'll confuse them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    most java advocates don't even know what a heap is.

    i'm not trying to start a flame war, but i've noticed on javalobby.org in particular, most posters don't even know what dynamic binding is.

    listening to their advocacy is painful.

    1. Re:don't, you'll confuse them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something interesting that we should discuss among adults.

      I am a java professional, not fanatic (started C, wasted some time on C++;-) but I make a decent living out of it and still use some C++ .

      Whereas I don't share most of the fanatism on java, I am always surprised at the fact that C++ and java guys never really communicate. C++ guys will go deep in a feature of their system and know it inside out, even if it is obscure, there is an intellectual challenge in knowing how a heap really works etc etc... when I talk to younger java collegues I realize they talk another language, that of higher level API...They talk of RMI and Referenceable objects they can get from JNDI, they talk of EJB and the web layers on top of it with servlets to talk to their models. I look at these young fellows and I realize you are at once right, i.e. they don't know what a heap is, and at the same time wrong in the sense that "why should they know about it". I am patient enough to survive in both world and as an older guy that has fought other wars in my prime, I am glad to see so much excitement in the web world, and mostly fueled by java. Java is very technology heavy and that is good

      So sometimes "ignorance" is bliss, even more so when the knowledge that replaces it is new and higher level knowledge like what the best java advocates are doing. I have been following an open source group lately called EJBoss, I can't really participate due to lack of time, but you will be surprised at the level of the discussions there, they fly high and at the same time you can tell that some "old timer" advice on basic structures would help a lot, check it out if you have the time.

      Matt b.

    2. Re:don't, you'll confuse them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made some really good points. If you know the underlying structure and implementation of the language you'll be a far better programmer - this holds true even for Java. This is why I generally hire only C++ programmers for Java. If you can handle C++ well, Java is a cakewalk. These Java newbies believe it's the only language in existance - it's really quite comical. They could learn a lot from other languages - even learn more about Java itself. Nothing is more important to an Java program than efficient heap use. Ignore this fact and you will have a pig of a program on your hands.

  88. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You're totally fucked in the head. Religion is irrelevant. Counting numbers are all that count. Please compose bridge sets. That's four per table. When the 12th person walks in, are they part of table 3 or table 4?

    And while we're at it, were you born in the 19th or the 20th century? If you say 20th, but you pretend that the 21st century starts in a few days, then you are an inconsistent idiot.

    LEARN TO FUCKING COUNT, WHY DON'T YOU?

  89. Flop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There are many people making good money writing/maintaining failed/failing technology. SAP/R3 is dyeing, but if you know it you can mak 250.00 an hour.

    I am not saying Java is or isn't dead/dying, but that the money you make is the short sighted way of doing things.

  90. Re:Dvorak's tone is antiMicrosoft, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you may be unaware that there are various interperted lang available for the platform. ie Pocket C and personalJava

  91. where to discuss? by Seth+The+Man · · Score: 1

    Where are we supposed to discuss an article like this, that already has it's own discussion forum?

    On Slashdot?

    On Zdnet?

    I guess it all just ends up on who you want your audience to be (or what your audience's OS is..)

    --
    Screw this shit, I've had it/I ain't no mister cool./I'm a pig, I'm a dog/Excuse me if I drool./stm
  92. Sun insists on killing Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Its actually a half decent syntax, but the internals need work, its still dog slow.

    Sun has driven it into the ground. They won't open it, which is too bad. It'll be just another VB soon.

  93. nouveau riche and lack of taste by Tradewars+Addict · · Score: 1
    of course, it is always easy to put down some one who has more money than you do.

    although it must be also admitted that an education focused purely into high tech might find such nicities as "The Lays of Ancient Rome" as unimportant, or ignorantly read into it a suggestive title where nothing of the sort exists.

    Cluelessness has many guises, and it is probably a wise person who knows their blind spots.

    1. Re:nouveau riche and lack of taste by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      although it must be also admitted that an education focused purely into high tech might find such nicities as "The Lays of Ancient Rome" as unimportant, or ignorantly read into it a suggestive title where nothing of the sort exists.

      Now now, you shouldn't stereotype high tech educations. I recently came out of a 4-year (*laugh*) university with an engineering degree, and one of the requirements for the degree was a full year of humanities. I spent mine on classical literature.

    2. Re:nouveau riche and lack of taste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone should get a real, broadbased educated before going on to science, engineering, or business. Too bad high schools don't do that, or even colleges.

    3. Re:nouveau riche and lack of taste by Tradewars+Addict · · Score: 1
      I was tempted to make it into the "Lays of Ancient Rome Tour"; using it as some sort of basis for a LART, but it got too convoluted.

      but seriously, most high school grads would only see the suggestive interpretation, and make light of it, instead of understanding one of the better bits of writing in the english language.

      and then there are the in-duh-viduals in management or sales.

      :)

  94. FireWire?! by rise · · Score: 2
    Okay, I'll grant that it's slower to make it to consumer devices than many predicted. I'll even grant that for quite a few applications it's overkill.

    That's not the point. FireWire is a high-speed high-bandwidth data transfer technology and it's doing quite well exactly where it was originally aimed: digital content capture/creation. There's a reason the iMacDV has FireWire: content users demanded it. I'm less clear on why they're using iMacs, but what the hey, I'm sure they know what they need better than I do. He's not slamming USB for the time it took to take off, and it's much more consumer oriented and had a much greater push for adoption from MS. Bit of a double standard, that.

    1. Re:FireWire?! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Compaqs are coming with IEE 1394 ports. Don't forget the iLink ports on all those Sony PCs.

      Dvorak is dogging Firewire because Intel is pushing that USB 2.0, and we all know that big D doesn't want to torque off Chipzilla.

      Now that we are talking about Firewire, I want to remind everyone that Linus said about the same thing a few monthes back. I don't want to get flamed, but that seems like a bad case of Not Intented Here. Linux needs to lead the way and jump on the IEE 1394 bandwagon.

      Firewire Hard Drives...like the VSTs are simply dreamy.

      lamz is right, Dvorak needs to give credit where it's due. The iMac is the machine that gave USB life. It was a dead technology until August of 1998.

    2. Re:FireWire?! by storem · · Score: 1

      I dare you the following: I have a Sony VAIO C1X with the famous FireWire (i.Link / whatever). Does anyone actually find a purpose for it - besides it being to to show off your cool new camera?

    3. Re:FireWire?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sony PS2. As usual Dvorak's too busy being a 'tard to see what's coming. Plus linking together external devices via thin FW is much more pleasant than finger-width SCSI.

      =td=

    4. Re:FireWire?! by Mad+Browser · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few firewire hard drives out there...

      --hunter

      --
      RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
    5. Re:FireWire?! by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      Does anyone actually find a purpose for it - besides it being to to show off your cool new camera?

      How about to download that video to your PC? Or are you content to download 120 minutes over a slow serial connection?

      -Brent
    6. Re:FireWire?! by lamz · · Score: 2

      USB ... had a much greater push for adoption from MS.

      Don't forget to give credit where credit is due. How many USB peripherals exist because the iMac was designed with USB as it's only I/O port? Answer: However many iMac coloured USB peripherals you can count on the store shelf.

      Also, I think it's funny that Dvorak's main problem with FireWire is that it only appears on Macs, iMacs, PowerBooks and CamCorders. That's really not a problem for owners of those devices! How can great equipment owned by other people be perceived as a downside for him? This sort of thinking points to why people like to dis Linux--it makes their own system look bad. And isn't his real problem with FireWire the lack of implementation by companies that he supports? Shouldn't he be chastizing Dell/HP/etc for not including great tech like FireWire?


      Mike van Lammeren
      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    7. Re:FireWire?! by J4 · · Score: 1

      Linux needs to lead the way and jump on the IEE 1394 bandwagon.

      Dunno about leading the way, but the kernel that ships with SuSE 6.3 has Firewire rolled in. Just thought I'd mention it.

  95. Too Plug-n-Play For Linux? by Bill+Daras · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the only good reason to keep Firewire off Linux is that it is too easy to use. Plug in a drive and it is automaticaly mounted, self powered and terminated?

    No "real" Linux machine could ever suffer the indignity of such a device! :-)

  96. He had good points about Java by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the killer Java applications Sun boasted about 5 years ago? My fridge and toaster still do not speak JINI. My word processor and spreadsheet is still written in C++. Sun did a 180 degree turn 2 years ago when they realized Java was too slow for GUI applications and then they are now trying to claim the server space. So, is Java just a better perl?

  97. Java and Jini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Although he didn't elaborate on them much, there's no doubt that Java has failed to capture serious developer mindshare.

    After four years of marketing and hype, C/C++ still is the tool of choice for systems/platforms, and Perl is still the king of scripting and CGI.

    Sun never really seemed to recover from the death of applets.

    1. Re:Java and Jini by hey! · · Score: 3

      Applets are dead?

      I think not.

      They're just off the hypesters radar-screen.

      First of all, a lot of things that people used java for were just plain stupid. The problem is like a lot of "hot" technologies, people use them because they're hot, not because they accomplish anything. A lot of web sites are entirely composed of slow loading fluff. The early fervor days were horrible -- people loading a half dozen animated gif and ticker tape applets per page over a 14.4KBaud modem link -- no wonder people hate java! And these stupid applications are better done these days with javascript and animated gifs.

      But, there are terrific applications for applets, so long as you are reasonable about keeping them slim. My favorite is the VNC (the open source remote control utility); you may not know it, but VNC servers also respond to http requests, returning an HTML page with a complete java VNC client (pretty fast load time for something so cool, too). I added this to the open source freethreads discussion forum and voila! shared whiteboard. I put another java applet and voila -- a private chat room. Both these pages load very quickly at 56K.

      Applets for the Internet drive by customer will make a comeback, as high bandwidth consumer connections become more common.



      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Java and Jini by phidipides · · Score: 1

      I'm interested to hear what others are using, but I do almost all web related work, and at least 90% of the programming I've done in the past two years has been Java. It seems like every application server, engine, etc now has Java APIs, and to plug in it's just easier to use Java.

      Granted, I still see a lot of application development being done using C/C++, but with things moving to the web Java provides platform independence and a ton of available libraries. Am I working in some weird micro-universe here or is Java basically taking over the web?

    3. Re:Java and Jini by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to be posting as AC.

      Tom Becker here, I work out of Boston. My friends in Silicon Valley say the same: java is the standard for web application development. As far as taking over the web, it has, at least for the web application backend.

      It is interesting to hear "end-users" go "I don't see java on my toaster or my spreadsheet" when all the professionals in the field are writting the servers in Java.

      Somebody from Microsoft posted on /. a few weeks ago an interesting story. It was that MS was under pressure from their clients to perform as a java middleware VM/OS. I found that interesting as it pointed for the first time that MS was pushing Windows not for DCOM (do you see DCOM, not me!) but as a OS for Java. This is why I found the "java has won the API war" right on target.

      Your micro-universe is rather big ;-) Tom

  98. Re:FireWire?! On almost every cool DV camcorder by TheSync · · Score: 1

    In the video world, Firewire is available in almost every cool DV camcorders, including the Sony VX-1000, the most used DV camcorder for broadcast uses (interviewing people living in trees, or for use in Kosovo without sticking out like a BetaCam would).

  99. Programmer efficiency by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

    The benchmarks I have seen comparing Java Servlets with mod_perl show a similar results - Perl faster at some things and Java faster others - depending on the platform and task.

    What more important for myself and my customers is program productivity. As an illustration:

    Hello world in Java:

    import java.io.*;
    import java.util.*;

    import javax.servlet.*;
    import javax.servlet.http.*;

    public class HelloWorld extends HttpServlet {

    public void doGet (
    HttpServletRequest request, // form variables, etc.
    HttpServletResponse response ) // methods for providing output
    throws ServletException, IOException {
    // set content type of HTTP header
    response.setContentType ( "text/html" );

    // create an output object and send our response
    PrintWriter out = response.getWriter ();
    out.println ( "Hello World\n" +
    "Hello World!" );
    out.close ();
    }
    }


    Hello world in Perl

    #!/usr/local/bin/perl
    print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";

    print "Hello World\n";
    print "Hello World!";



    In practice I use html templates with Perl such as:

    #!/usr/local/bin/perl

    $title = "Hello World";
    $body_str = "Hello World!";

    process_template("hello_world_blue.html");

    where the function process_template reads in the argument file and replaces the embedded strings "$title$" and "$body_str$" with the values of the variables. This way the code is seperate from the presentation and a single code base can be used to call several different sets of templates and provide a different look and feel per template set.

    1. Re:Programmer efficiency by john@iastate.edu · · Score: 1
      So? You can do essentially the same thing in just about any reasonable language. I happen to do the same sort of thing in C:


      subsVar("title", "Hello World");
      subsVar("body_str", "Hellow World!");
      subsOut(stdout, "hello_world_blue.html");

      where ${title} and ${body_str} presumably appear in hello_world_blue.html

      And the rest of that Java preamble stuff (or the #include ... int main... equivalent for C) is nothing more than boilerplate that you either import with a couple of editor keystrokes or just link against. If you keep reinventing that wheel you aren't doing your employer any favors productivity-wise, but in and of itself it's no reason to switch to Perl.

      Before the Perl-Patrol goes berserk on me, yes, their are jobs for which Perl is an (perhaps even the) appropriate tool for the job.

      Anyway, that example doesn't do justice to all the neat things that Java Servlets do for you, but don't believe me, just read the O'Reilly book on them).

      BTW, why the heck can't we use <pre>...</pre> or something! to format code-snippets with reasonable ease!!!!

      --
      Shut up, be happy. The conveniences you demanded are now mandatory. -- Jello Biafra
  100. Apple doesn't own Time. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

    Time Magazine is owned by Time-Warner, the same company that owns CNN.

    Apple is owned by Apple Computers Inc. Steve Jobs has way closer ties to Disney through Pixar than he does Time-Warner.

  101. Like it matters... by Otto · · Score: 1

    The millennium ends this year. No question about it. You are absolutely wrong. Jan 1, 2000 is the beginning of the 3rd millennium.

    Sure. Every day is the beginning of a new millenium. Come to think of it, every day is the end of one too. Ain't that a bitch?

    However, if you say that Jan 1, 2000 is the beginning of the 3rd millenium since Jan 1, 1 AD, then you are in fact wrong.

    More importantly, everyone damn well knows it. It been in the press and the news so much that everyone understands it. It's a simple concept.

    Even more importantly, it's not going to interfere with the party. I'm not celebrating a new millenium, I'm gonna be there for the party, man... Time to kick back and drink myself stupid. I sure won't let the fact that the next millenium is a year later screw up my buzz, that's for sure.

    Oh, and the 1997 thing: Who cares? The majority of the world doesn't believe in Christ, so piss off already.

    Just my $2E-2...

    ---

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  102. I nominate this inanimate carbon rod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    He makes a good point that all of these millenial retrospect top-x lists only focus on the past 100 years -- I was shocked to learn that history of mankind (humankind, sorry PCs) started on Jan 1, 1900.

    According to Dvorak, "Linux: Lots of hype. Lots of hope" ...of I see. So this desktop that I'm typing this message in here doesn't exist? This GNOME desktop I configured is all vaporware? Who that's impressive. I must be running some kind of background process that makes me think I'm connected to the Internet all day since this Linux stuff I thought I was using really doesn't exist. Wow I'm suprised.

    Bill Gates should be Time's Person of the Year? Well, yeah if you believe Microsoft's PR machine that mascot Bill has anything to do with what goes on at Microsoft. You may as well nominate this inanimate carbon rod for being repsonsible for nuclear power.

    1. Re:I nominate this inanimate carbon rod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      According to Dvorak, "Linux: Lots of hype. Lots of hope" ...of I see. So this desktop that I'm typing this message in here doesn't exist? This GNOME desktop I configured is all vaporware? Who that's impressive. I must be running some kind of background process that makes me think I'm connected to the Internet all day since this Linux stuff I thought I was using really doesn't exist. Wow I'm suprised.

      No, not vaporware, but crapware. Linux still sucks for the average non-programmer/non-sysadmin.

    2. Re:I nominate this inanimate carbon rod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "millenial" is not a word.

  103. Re:Dvorak's tone is antiMicrosoft, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uh...dude...Fruity Pebbles is like way overrated. There is just toooo much stuff going on at the same time. It's just not possible to have a positive breakfast experience with all those fruit flavors trying to gain the attention of my taste buds all at the same time. nope...no thanks.

    The mark of a great breakfast cereal is a singleness of purpose.. and for my mind there can only be one that pulled that off...Cocoa Puffs.

  104. Um. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

    3. FireWire. This technology will be the fiasco of the decade if it doesn't appear soon on something other than a Macintosh and a camcorder.

    You mean like the playstation two, or my high-end Dell? Or maybe something like a computer belonging to someone who wants really neato toys? SCSI didn't die either, and that wasn't for lack of competition. Good lord, man, how long do you need to work in an industry to learn that standards that cost an end-user more than a buck fifty american don't spring up overnight?

    BTW, that that camcorder supports FireWire is one of my main reasons for considering buying it. If I can use a FireWire hard drive and camcorder to connect to my PlayStation, which has more than enough graphic horsepower to do realtime video editing, I think I might just be a fairly happy man. 'Specially since I can then just pump it out through S-Video to my S-Video capable VCR, and tape something right cleanly.

    This, of course, after I have enough money to buy myself a disposable razor, but that's another story.

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS
  105. Im confused?!? by mitemouse · · Score: 1

    Why didnt someone tell me that DIVX died? :)
    mitemouse

    :)

  106. Dvorak friggin' annoys me. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1
    He's complaining that Steve "look at my turtleneck" Jobs wasn't picked as Man of the Year, completely ignoring the fact that his smarmy mug has already graced(?) the cover of Time magazine once three months ago, and we were also treated to a lengthy article about Apple's resurrection back in April or thereabouts. I, quite frankly, have had enough of the man, and am beginning to wonder if Time isn't owned at least in some small part by Apple Computer. They seem to have enough ads peppered throughout each and every issue...

    Ohwell.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  107. Java truly speeds up development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, here's a real world case. We use Java everywhere, 100%, on our site. We ban Perl - unmaintainable. We have a complex e-commerce site. From nothing to deloyment, two and half months, with only 4 developers. I know of a sort of competiting site doing things in Perl and CGI. They have more than double of the developers. They have a much simpler business model, much less functionality. Took them three months to finish. And the site is UNMAINTAINABLE and CAN'T BE EXTENDED! They are in the process of scratching the site and re-write it. And what are they going to write it in? Java! Hah. While they are redoing their site, we are applying our model to new additional markets, adding new functionalities. Java is a joy to work with.

    1. Re:Java truly speeds up development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perl is so simple even an idiot can use it. And many do.

      So the fuck what?

    2. Re:Java truly speeds up development by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 1

      Since you're proud of your accomplishment why don't give the url and list those of your alleged competition.

      Then let an unbiased opinion draw conclusions.

      In other words don't make empty claims...

  108. Do Slashdot editors ever _read_ the stories? by Zico · · Score: 3

    Dvorak didn't say that Windows CE was a flop, he said that Windows CE handheld computers were a flop. That's a huge difference, as anyone who read the Slashdot article "386 Based Linux Powered Telephone" can tell you. You know, the one where Slashdot told us of this wonderful phone that supposedly ran Linux, when everyone who actually looked at the company's site could see that it ran Windows CE and that Linux wasn't even mentioned. (Needless to say, another black eye for Slashdot reporting.)

    But hey, don't let simple fact-checking and journalistic integrity get in the way of your anti-Microsoft zealotry, right?

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

    1. Re:Do Slashdot editors ever _read_ the stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blasphemy! Repent now, or be subject to eternal damnation!

  109. More lying anti-Perl FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We ban Perl - unmaintainable.
    Find out whoever hired these ersatz programmers writing unmaintainable Perl code, who, doubtles, shall write shitty code no matter what they turn their hand to. Now, fire that hiring manager's fat ass.

    Next, hire a real programmer--a competent professional instead of a CGI kiddie--who writes real code, be it in Perl or anything else.

    End of problem.

    Until you admit are the idiot who hired a baboon instead of a programmer, you will never fix it.

  110. Dvorak vs. Qwerty by MindStalker · · Score: 1

    Dvorak rules, I can type over 1000 words per minute on it, I just need to see if I can make a beuwulf cluster of them. Oh.. you mean the other Dvorak... sorry. :)

    1. Re:Dvorak vs. Qwerty by technos · · Score: 1

      Or rather, you can for the first 1/650th of a second, then your fingers burst into flame from the air resistance.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  111. MYTH: Windows CE being renamed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is another MYTH. "Windows Powered" is simply the term that is going to be used for ALL devices powered by Windows. The Windows CE name is still the name for the OS.

  112. This will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next version of the development tools for Windows CE will include the ability to produce a single binary for every processor that Windows CE runs on.

  113. Java Co-Proccessors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the things that came out in the MS anti-trust trial is that Ms stopped Intel form including a Java coprocessor on their chips or at least with them.

  114. Dvorak... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1
    ...is an idiot.

    Before you respond, "Takes one to know one," I suggest you read my sig line. :-)

    Zontar The Mindless,

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  115. Roman Numerals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no concept of "zero" in the RN set. Therefore, no 0 year.

  116. Isn't he a bit early for the millennium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish someone in the media knew when the millennium ended...

    1. Re:Isn't he a bit early for the millennium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the end of the millenium
      Which thousand arses' ends are we discussing? Wait. Did you drop an N?
    2. Re:Isn't he a bit early for the millennium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not this again.

      Everybody knows when the millennium ends. We just don't want to wait another year to party.

      Actually, what we really need is a word for the transition from Dec 31, (x*1000)+999 to Jan 1, ((x+1)*1000)+999. Say, the nonennium. So 1999->2000 is the end of the nonennium, while 2000->2001 is the end of the millenium. Say, can I patent this?

      Anonymous Kev

  117. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you are a dumb hick with no culture. I hope you enjoy your go-kart track!

    1. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...you are a dumb hick with no culture. I hope you enjoy your go-kart track!

      *yawn*

      *plonk!*

      *sploosh*

      *ba-WOOSH!*

      Next!

  118. Windows CE a flop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, Windows CE has 30 million installations. I wish I could create a flop like that!

    1. Re:Windows CE a flop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fewer vendors supporting it and Mi*roSof* forced to drop the name (now the devices will be labled powered by windows or some such thing). Yes that is concidered a failure to many.

    2. Re:Windows CE a flop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, it's kinda like when Madonna's album only sold 5 million copies. Not up to her standards, even though most number one albums never come close to it.

      Nevermind that there are still more developments for CE than Palm, but don't let that sway your opinion. Personally I prefer Palm, but CE is far from a failure. The only knock against it is that it failed to become the de facto standard (but how can that be...MS is a monopoly, they release something and it IS the de facto standard. Isn't that what monopoly means?) If MS releases a product that does not absolutely completely dominate the market, the anti MS zealots want to call it a failure.

      jhartzell

    3. Re:Windows CE a flop? by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      but how can that be...MS is a monopoly, they release something and it IS the de facto standard. Isn't that what monopoly means?

      No. Thats what the conventional meaning is. The legal definition is something entirely different.

      CE is a failure IMO (and not because I am a Linux zealot or anything) but because it has not been able to embrace the market in the same way that the Palm has. It tries to do too much, the Palm OS just tries to run a Palm.

      Microsoft is certanly wise in going into this area for continued product growth, but its a NEW area for them, they don't have a monopoly in the handheld market, or for that matter the embedded market either. If WinCE/Windows Powered does not live up to certain expectations it will not become a standard in that area. In new markets it is irrelevant which product is superior, it matters only that one wins. (Remember Beta Vs. VHS? By technology alone Betamax should have won, but do you own a Beta VCR?)

      Thats my story and I am sticking to it.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  119. You mean a C++ baboon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have met so many C++ pompous asses that I fall asleep counting them. I am sick and tired of any programmer believing he is hot shit because he knows some C++ and understands a few features on the language. Like the old fart above going "you would be crazy to ignore the heap problem", reminds of the Dilbert joke where the C++ COM consultant dies when you show him real code ..

  120. Your full of Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "And the site is UNMAINTAINABLE and CAN'T BE EXTENDED!"

    This is not a language issue but a design issue.

    Anyway, I your a full-of-shit AC and you know it.


    1. Re:Your full of Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! mister yo full o bullshit again...
      peek a boo!!

  121. XML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the purpose of XML, to give Java something to do. We're starting to see most of the XML apps written in Java. I hope the landscape changes next year, with XML apps written in other languages. I hate Java!

    1. Re:XML by Zico · · Score: 1

      Heh, and here I thought that the main purpose of XML was to give those long-suffering SGML users and supporters a chance to feel relevant for the first time since the '70s. ;-)

      Cheers,
      ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

      P.S. Yes, I use XML, but it sure feels like déjà vu all over again. :)

  122. Apparently Sony Doesn't Make Computers by Bill+Daras · · Score: 1

    3. FireWire. This technology will be the fiasco of the decade if it doesn't appear soon on something other than a Macintosh and a camcorder.

    Compaq had it on their machines as an option in summer of '98, if I recall correctly. Sony has it standard on the Vaio line, and last time I checked Compaq and Sony didn't make Macs.

    This is just another example of Dvorak bashing something because of platform prejuidce and letting the facts fend for themselves. I am surprised he didn't say USB2 is one of the greatest successes of the past 1,000 years.

    1. Re:Apparently Sony Doesn't Make Computers by Haven · · Score: 2

      Almost All the 51xx and the 52xx presarios have Firewire (all the PIII and K6-3's do), and some of them have 4 USB ports 2 in the back and 2 in the front.

    2. Re:Apparently Sony Doesn't Make Computers by bnenning · · Score: 1

      FireWire is where USB was two years ago. Lots of PCs had USB ports, but nobody made peripherals for them because all PCs had serial ports. The introduction of the iMac did a huge amount to increase the market for USB devices, since the iMac had no legacy serial alternative. FireWire is in a similar situation-until a few months ago it was found only on high-end Macs and a very few PCs, which isn't much of a market. Now that the new iMacs (all but the cheapest config) have FireWire built in (and no SCSI), the demand and supply of FireWire devices should increase substantially over the next year.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  123. If you ignore the heap in Java - you are a baboon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Programmers with your attitude keep me gainfully employed. Keep up the bad work!

  124. Science is missing by Dandre · · Score: 3

    It strikes me that Dvorak missed many of the most important events and/or people of the year by ignoring the advances in technology and science that took place this year. By focusing nearly entirely on the 'biz' side of things, he has a myopic view, especially for importance. Although I'll be the first to admit that the business side of a company is critical, when one looks at the past and attempts to judge importance, inventions and discoveries seem to rank right up there with savvy business dealings.

    What about the first realization of a quantum computer (here)? Or IBM's advances in chip technology? Or any of a number of similar advances that are almost certainly important for the future direction of technology?

    For that matter, I think leaving out the continued successful rise and development of cellular phones and the like is quite a mistake. When he puts network PCs and ubiquitous computing on the 'flop' list, he misses the most successful of the network ed appliances, the cell phone. The important future of cell phones (which I already had some good ideas about) was made utterly clear to me when, on Christmas this year, I ordered a book from Amazon on my new Sanyo-4000 using the mini-browser on the phone. Took about 4 minutes (including searching for a few things), and was amazingly easy.

    Cheers,

    David Andre

    1. Re:Science is missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct sir!

      But the items you point out have more to do with Science at this point. Dvorak is a home PC user, with only the most basic concept of corporate pc requirements.

      Don't get me wrong, I agree with most of what he said. But IBM's quantum computer is so far over his head it's not even funny.

  125. No, its far worse than Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its slower on the server, and its syntax is so verbose that its only useful as a teaching language.

  126. Re:Do Slashdot posters ever read the stories? by technos · · Score: 1

    It is in stores? Gah, my memory must be going. I can still remember the Carter Administration, (which wasn't memorable. Poor peanut farmer my ass!) so it hasn't slipped terribly far. However, I seem to have forgotten where I put my pants, and the name of the young lady next to me, so it definitly isn't what it used to be!!

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  127. OT:Beta-VHS Was Re:Windows CE a flop? by scottgfx · · Score: 1

    >>Beta failed because the tapes were too short.

    After Sony created the BII and BIII speeds, there was pleanty of room to record a couple of movies on a tape. Sony lost more because they only licensed the system to a couple of companys while JVC licensed to anybody. Even at the slowest speeds, Beta had a longer track that produced a greater head to tape speed, resulting in a better picture. Sony was also first to innovate things like "Super Beta", "Beta HiFi", "ED Beta"(Extended Definition). All of these things were followed by VHS-HQ, VHS-HiFi and SuperVHS.

    In or around 1982, Sony took the Beta cassette shell and oxide tape and created a pro/broadcast format called Betacam. What was a L750 Tape that recorded for an hour in BI became a broadcast quality 30Min tape. This was done not only by the faster tape speed, but also from the fact that the Chrominance and Luminance channels were recorded on their own tracks. At about the same time, Panasonic released a format with a similar background. M-Format was based on the VHS cassette and tape path and a standard tape would record for 20 or 30 minutes of component video just like the Betacam. M-Format was a complete flop. In my entire life, I've only seen one M-Format tape deck, and it wasn't being used. In contrast, I've used hundreds of Betacam machines and their offspring. Panasonic went back to the drawing board and created MII. NBC adopted it partialy and a few TV stations bought it. A mild success but they lost too much ground to Betacam.

    OK, For extra credit. From what did Betamax's name come from? Where did the name M-Format come from?

    Scottgfx
    TV and Media slut

    --
    It's mandatory to wash your hands before returning to the land of Dairy Queen.
  128. WinCE's success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hemos screwed up again... Dvorak didn't say WinCE was a flop, he said WinCE handhelds were. He made no mention of cable boxes, the Sega Dreamcast or other WinCE devices.

  129. Correct about SF by termite666 · · Score: 1

    . Dot-com paper millionaires. You have to live in the San Francisco Bay Area to appreciate fully how these folks have changed the way things work. It's amazing what money will do, especially when it falls into the hands of a 20-something with no taste. San Francisco, the capital of dot-com mania, is transforming itself into a menagerie of so-called live/work renovated loft environments. What's interesting to me is that the new construction of live/work housing is fashioned in minimum-security prison style, with cameras, metal gates, cement stairways, and uninspired architecture. 100% True I thought SOMA was a drug in a sci fi book .

  130. Mostly just Hemos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most SlashDot editors are decent, even if hopelessly biased in favor of certain things. Hemos is the only one that's a total disaster.

  131. Re:Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sometimes, if you happen to manufacture disk drives, 1000 bytes = 1 kbyte such that you can market your drive as having more bytes of storage than it really does.

  132. The flop... by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    I would say is this entire year. The so-called revolutions in e-commerce and communication have only lead to breakdowns in our social contacts with one another. I'm not necessarily a Luddite but I think before everyone jumps on the bandwagon of "oh how technology enriches our lives" they ought to take a logical look at how that technology affects them. E-commerce is nice and for the most part quick, but it has many inherent problems. If I'm sitting on my ass ordering WidgetPluses from ewidget.com I may be saving a dollar or two on gas but the ass I'm sitting on is also getting fatter because I never walk anywhere. Woe is to me if I dared think about returned my e-purchase not to mention woe is to me when I get my credit card statement. I'd really rather go to a discount store, outlet mall, or swap meat to find the big deal. I'm exercising, haggling on the price, and paying cash. Another biggie of this year which didn't make Dvorak's list were the mass media website outlet superstore commercial clusterfucks. The Go network is a great example, people are enticed to surf these huge mego-sites because they offer a ton of content, a ton of commercials and a big brand name. It's a matter of choice I suppose but it adds way too much of a commercial presence in a place that a handful of years ago was just for fun. Another point that made this year a giant flop was blatant journalistic sensationalism (big words, wow). Every tiny story was blown way out of preportion, especially when it had to do with schools and any kind of violence. Here in California it's been so bad I can't watch the news anymore. Everything seems to be a tool of the devil in the eyes of the media, they go around acting like evangelical patriots rooting the evil out of every story. No one tells you what happened anymore, no it's all commentary on how good or bad you ought to feel about a particular event. KCAL news I don't think I need to be told when something is "indeed a tragedy". Look at the hubub surrounding Y2K if you're skeptical of this. Back to the point of social contacts breaking down, it seems every business in the world wants to turn everyone into an overweight couch potato. You're sposed to start an e-business, buy everything through e-commerce, enjoy e-entertainment, and when that all gets boring plan an e-vacation by looking at some e-tropical island photos on someone's e-vacation website. Being able to communicate with the rest of the world is great, I get to rant on /. and e-mail my friends I don't get to see every day. But when I start staying home to do some low down e-living please jumpkick me in the face. This year was a flop because everyone seems to be caught up in the digital revolution the same way the Frenchies got caught up in their revolution in the 18th century, they ran around screaming things no one could understand and cut off anyone's heads who got in the way.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:The flop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen, brother. Amen.

  133. What kills me ... by FreeUser · · Score: 3

    Is that slashdot keeps giving this fool airtime! I am not one to normally criticize slashdot's choices of articles to link to, but links to this guy's idiocy show up here on a fairly regular basis. I've yet to see any content in a single Dvorak column to justify this, particularly in light of slashdot's open-source emphesis.

    If slashdot feels the need to have an anti-opensource antagonist, they should at least find an intelligent one to link to (if there is such a thing). The last thing an open-source forum should be doing is encouraging this sort of vapid tripe by increasing its undeserved readership even further by giving it broader exposure.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:What kills me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, we need to sneak opensource in under the radar. We don't hear what anyone on the "outside" of the opensource movement has to say, 'cause they could just prove us wrong.

    2. Re:What kills me ... by technos · · Score: 1

      Have you ever considered that we, the users of /., enjoy Dvorak not for the value of his articles, the depth of his insight, or the wisdom of his Windows ways?

      We enjoy Dvorak simply because of the great flame wars that inevitably ensue from an airing of his mis-opinion.

      And, in the spirit of a Dvorak inspired flame-war, go frag yourself, in the kitchen, with the candlestick.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:What kills me ... by RodStewart · · Score: 1

      what makes him a fool? that he doesnt see linux as a viable destop? i dont either. it just isnt mature enough. i think your mad he doesnt like your os. get over it man.

      --
      "Are you satisfied with fucking?" - Dave Matthews from "Halloween"
  134. Re:Millennial Confusions are a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they can't shut up about it then obviously THEY care. So your statement that nobody cares is wrong. Of course you probably meant a subject that YOU don't care about, and obviously what YOU care about is what really matters.

  135. Myopic computer people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this talk about what is important reminds of a question on the first test I took as a computer science student in 1984: "True or False -- Knowledge of computers is a necessity in today's society." I stopped and thought about it. Nobody in my family knew anything about computers. None of my friends knew anything about computers. None of the people where I worked knew anything about computers. Yet they were all surviving just fine. Furthermore, a large portion of the world didn't even have the opportunity to know about computers, and they were surviving. So I answered, "False." Guess what the makers of the standardized test thought the answer was! It's almost funny the way people can get blinded by their narrow little worlds. Ask a child what the biggest event of the past century was and they'll tell you, "the making of Pokemon cards." And they would be as much right as a lot of these so-called pundits.

  136. it doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it doesn't matter (in this case) because we don't
    know WHEN Jesus was born exactly BECAUSE His
    arrival is of less importance than his resurrection.

    Typical of the world to miss the point entirely.

    And we are not counting His age, but the ARRIVAL
    of a year AFTERWARDS. Like when you start
    your 22nd year on your 21st birthday.
    We do like to celebrate big round numbers, don't
    we? So if we counted the years after our birth,
    we'd celebrate the start of our 10th year I'm sure,
    regardless of whether we'd only completed 9.
    Also, isn't it a bit odd to say "I'm nine" when
    you're a day away from being ten? At least the
    term "10th year" applies logically for the whole
    year! No wonder kids give their age with fractions
    involved.

    And anyway, the year 2000 means a new decade to
    me. I detest the way some people think 1990 was
    part of the 80s, and 1980 itself wasn't!

    +bah!+
    Merry Millennium

  137. Re: Netslaves by Signal+11 · · Score: 1
    Read the book netslaves for some commentary on the state of affairs in Silicon Valley.

    Now, my rant: I think societies treatment of social outcasts has not improved one bit. Instead of geeks being singled out and taunted, often outright ignored by schools... they go off to college and go through alittle culture shock because people care about their ideas and treat them as equals. What a shame that they go off into the workplace with this utopian view that "it's all better now". No, it's not. Many geeks are exploited - paid far less than they should be, minimal benefits, often hired as "temps" or given "excempt" status to limit vacation options and whatnot. They put in 16 hour days - but get paid only for 8.

    No, it isn't worth it. The question is, what are we going to do about it? It's the same in most technically-oriented work environments. Shall we revolt? Pitch our Suns into the river and dump cat5 overboard because of the "Microsoft tax" and the unfair treatment our employers have given us? I don't know. But it was mighty nice imagery, anyway.

  138. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by slim · · Score: 2

    In the words of the tshirt worn by the ne'er-do-well irish geezer on Brookside (a british soap) -- "A new millennium starts every second".

    Can't we celebrate new year 2001, though -- when all this y2k problem nonsense is ovre with?

    Ta.

    --

  139. it doesn't matter because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it doesn't matter (in this case) because we don't
    know WHEN Jesus was born exactly BECAUSE His
    arrival is of less importance than his resurrection.

    Typical of the world to miss the point entirely.

    And we are not counting His age, but the ARRIVAL
    of a year AFTERWARDS. Like when you start
    your 22nd year on your 21st birthday.
    We do like to celebrate big round numbers, don't
    we? So if we counted the years after our birth,
    we'd celebrate the start of our 10th year I'm sure,
    regardless of whether we'd only completed 9.
    Also, isn't it a bit odd to say "I'm nine" when
    you're a day away from being ten? At least the
    term "10th year" applies logically for the whole
    year! No wonder kids give their age with fractions
    involved.

    And anyway, the year 2000 means a new decade to
    me. I detest the way some people think 1990 was
    part of the 80s, and 1980 itself wasn't!

    +Bah!+
    Happy Y2K!

  140. Yahoo? Why not ZDNN? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

    I like the article... it was amusing. But I'm scratching my head here. Why was the Yahoo! version of this story linked instead of the original ZDNN version?

  141. clickety-clicky no brainer desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it won't be considered by the home market OR corporate America as a desktop option until they get "clickety-clicky no brainer desktop".

    Welcome to the real world.

  142. Do Slashdot posters ever read the stories? by technos · · Score: 3

    Dude, you weren't paying attention!

    The new, yet-to-be-released 486 uberphone runs WinCE

    The phone they do produce, based on a 386, runs Linux.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  143. Dvorak's tone is antiMicrosoft, too. by Masker · · Score: 2


    4. Microsoft Windows CE hand-held computers. When will Microsoft and its friends learn that building a lot of little computers around a portable OS that results in incompatibility from machine to machine for various reasons is not the road to success?


    Sounds pretty anti-Microsoft to me. Hemos's take on this statement seems pretty accurate to me.


    The fact is that Microsoft CE is not a good operating system for handheld devices. While the hardware also has problems (like short battery life because most WinCE machines, IMHO, try to do too much (256 Colors, MP3 playing, etc.)), the Windows GUI is just completely out of place in a handheld.

    --

    ---------The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

    1. Re:Dvorak's tone is antiMicrosoft, too. by Crispin+Glover · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but apps are not always cross-processor compatible. For instance, apps that run on a Nino have to be recompiled for an HP Jornada IIRC. This negates any cross-platform appearance that WinCE tries to give. Also it means software developers won't bother with WinCE, opting to design for the (superior and much user-friendlier IMHO) Palm platform instead.

    2. Re:Dvorak's tone is antiMicrosoft, too. by Zico · · Score: 1

      So what should I assume then, that Dvorak just wasn't anti-Microsoft enough for Hemos's tastes? I never attempted to say that Dvorak made a positive statement about Microsoft. Dvorak called Windows CE for handheld computers a flop. Hemos claimed that Dvorak called Windows CE a flop. Do you see why this is wrong? It's like me saying "Yo, Dino Pebbles tastes like crap," and then Hemos coming out with a Slashdot article claiming that I damned the entire Pebbles line of cereal, when in fact, I think Fruity Pebbles clearly lays the smack down on other cereals.

      I hope you now understand the difference, because now that I've made myself hungry, I'm going to lunch.

      Cheers,
      ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  144. He got it right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of talk, lots of hype. That pretty much covers 99% of what Linux is. Don't believe me, just read the /. postings.

    Talk and hype, hype and talk. Deliveries on those promises are years away, if at all.

    Dvork was right. Again.

  145. Re: Netslaves by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 2

    The solution is... uh, don't do it. Revolt against what? Are they chaining you to your desk? It's not as if it isn't a pro-worker environment right now.

    I can just see you during the Great Depression, with your sign out saying, "Hey! I just got out of college! Where's my $70K/year job? Where are my stock options? I thought I was supposed to be a millionaire in my twenties!"

    This perspective brought to you by the Clue Stick. Workers today are so incredibly spoiled.


    ---

  146. "Yet to be released" is out of scope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dvorak is correct. Since you say this uuberphone is yet to be release, it is out of the scope of events in the past year.

  147. Sony's not using FireWire on the Vaios by Zico · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that while the underlying technology of Sony's iLink was IEEE-1394, it uses a different pin layout than FireWire (4-pin vs. 6-pin). I'm actually glad that they called it something else besides FireWire, and not just because it screws Apple out of their screwball "royalty for using the name" fee. Just look at how much confusion there still is about the different types of SCSI -- now think about how much more confusion there would be from one of FireWire/iLink's biggest targets: home users. <shudder>

    FWIW, I'd say that FireWire's been a bust so far when you consider all the hype.

    Cheers,
    ZicoKnows@hotmail.com

  148. No, it is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you are in Management, there is no big payout. Wake up and smell the cofee. It's just like any other job. They will use you and abuse as much as they can. Get as much work for as little money as possible.

    Any network engineer who does that is a fool.

  149. The real winners of 1999 by choctaw · · Score: 2

    Everyone is discussing their "winners of 1999", so I thought I'd add my two cents worth. I know that the focus tends to be on technological advancements that make us all go oooh and ahhh, but here's something for us to keep in mind: WE are the real winners in 1999. Thanks to Linux going even more "mainstream" than before, the Linux gurus that were until recently looked at as wasting their time on an OS that would never go anywhere are suddenly a marketable commodity. People are starting to joing the Linux bandwagon in droves, bringing with them media attention and a newfound focus on Linux from some fairly big name companies. The added support, more applications, increased interest, and sudden desire to find people with Linux skills to work fo r you helps make everyone associated with Linux, from the kernel hackers to vocal and written advocates the real winners of this year, and hopefully it will carry over to the next as well

  150. Not worth is when "average" house cost $800,000!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I may "only" make 65K writing code, but here in Nevada, it lets me live like a king. I've got enough land to build a go-kart race track. I don't hear the neighbor's toilet flush next door. I have room for all the toys I buy. What's the point of a great paying job if all you can afford is a $2500/month studio apt and a Honda Civid (because the parking lots in SF can't accomodate a big comfy SUV). I'm not the one *really* making less. And with the spread of high-speed internet connections, satellite TV, and web stores, living in "the boonies" isn't anywhere as limiting as it used to be. Why be crammed in a city anymore?

  151. They don't make motherboards by Crispin+Glover · · Score: 1

    Compaq and Sony are still a small percentage of OEMs for computer parts. Until Apple lowers their license fee for Firewire and it shows up on motherboards like USB does, it'll be heading down the dark path to oblivion. It's not Dvorak's fault Apple makes greedy business decisions too.

    Firewire is a beautiful technology that could easily unseat SCSI for high speed transfer devices if only Apple would share it.

  152. Yes! Death to Java! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C is still king!

  153. Re: Netslaves by bnenning · · Score: 2

    Since some people are willing to put up with the conditions you describe, it clearly is worth it to them. Maybe they genuinely enjoy what they do, or maybe in their opinion the chance of becoming insanely rich is worth the short-term sacrifice. Whatever their reasons, don't assume they're wrong because you don't agree. There are plenty of jobs out there (like mine) that pay well and don't require 70-hour weeks. But then I won't be making millions in an IPO anytime soon. It's all about tradeoffs.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  154. Insightful? by RTFFoF · · Score: 1

    Just shows you can't get good moderators anymore.

    --
    "Man is not a rational animal. He is a rationalizing one"
  155. Whattadork by Neph · · Score: 1
    Mr. Dvorak thinks that either Bill Gates or Steve Jobs should have been Person of the Year in Time? I mean, c'mon, Jeff Beezos (sorry if spelled wrong) isn't worthy, but in all honesty, he's more worthy than either of those two.

    Not to mention the fact that not ten lines later his "biggest event #3" is "E-commerce shows no signs of stopping."

    Hello? Anybody home?

    Yeesh. I'm seriously beginning to think ZD keeps this guy around either for comedy relief or flamage generation, under the assumption that there's no such thing as bad attention.

    Steve 'Nephtes' Freeland | Okay, so maybe I'm a tiny itty

    1. Re:Whattadork by RodStewart · · Score: 1

      i don't think he thinks that amazon is a failure, just it hasnt turned a profit and microsoft is one of the largest most influentiul corporations in the world. e-commerce may be big this year, but its more of a side issue of what microsoft made the internet: a consumer tool. yes i know microsoft didnt make the internet, but it made it viable to consumers.
      no im a not a microsoft biggot, i dont like microsoft, but their is no doubting their influence on the world.

      --
      "Are you satisfied with fucking?" - Dave Matthews from "Halloween"
  156. You are so correct! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He only listed Linux as #3 on a list of 5. OF THE WINNERS!!! He didn't come out foaming at the mouth screaming that everyone must convert to Linux now, so obisously he's evil, part of the media know-nothings, probably in cahoots with Microsoft (nevermind #1 was pointing out the monopoly).

    Dvorak is one of the few impartial reporters working in the media today. Any media.

    He pointed out a simple truth. At this moment, Linux is more hype that anything. It has potential, but it's certainly not there. Only the most rabid and arrogant, most concieted and ignorant Linux zealot could possibly interpret that Dvorak was not being favorable towards Linux. And to be quiet honest, that rabid ingornace is what is going to kill Linux. Personally I'm so tired of it that it makes me sick.

    jhartzell

  157. Its unslashable and has fewer ads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good enough??

  158. Dvorak: space goof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I remember very recently Dvorak was bitching and complaining about the look of the iBook, and how it wasn't marketed towards aging wannabe Fortune 500 execs... and now Apple is second on his list.

    Sometimes I'd really like to give them man an open handed, forward slap to the head of some kind.

  159. Java has won the API war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, Java was created as a server language and marketed as a client wonder. You bought the hype wich shows how little you know about multithreaded servers.

    Java has quietly taken over the API work, where do you see DCOM for distributed apps?? huh??? I'll even tell you another story. I was working in this startup shop in SV. We rewrote a C++ piece of cow dung a team of 5 clueless developers could not finish. Put them on java and even though they still sucked as developers they finished the job. The really interesting part is that then we looked at what platform to deploy on... Linux? Windows? Windows won because the SUN VM was fastest on Windows. But the moment the LInux VM is good enough... they will switch...get it???? Linux and windows are fighting equal to equal in teh server space thanks to Java. Windows has lost the API war for web development.

  160. Dvorak has some good points here by jht · · Score: 4

    First of all, I do think that Dvorak blows smoke way too often, but he's interesting even when he's been using the ol' crack pipe. At least he has real opinions that were formulated by actual experience, unlike the average smarmy .com reporter who parrots the "corporate line". If ZD had more Dvoraks I'd respect them more.

    That said, I'm right with him on his first four picks for the big events (Linux may be proven to us, but most of the world seems to see it as "the latest Microsoft challenger", and Apple's return from the grave helps ensure that there will always be a "Pepsi" to Microsoft's Coke - regardless of Linux's future), but I don't think .com millionaires have made that much of a splash (other than in a few ZIP codes). Yes, we're conscious of them, but more in the general sense of "hey! People are getting rich selling nothing!" than in the "CmdrTaco is a media mogul" sense. I don't think they were really that significant for the most part - just a side effect of the "Rise Of The Internet".

    No, I think number 5 should have been called "cutting the cord". The explosion of cellular phones, laptop computers, beepers, and Palm handhelds (and the coming 2-way pager boom) has been enormous this past year - cell phones and Palms are everywhere and people have accepted them as a normal part of society. Have any of you Palm people noticed that people don't look at you funny any more when you whip a Palm III out in the middle of a meeting and start taking notes? They're just part of the landscape now, along with the requisite micro-phone from Nokia, Motorola, or Qualcomm. Cellular, and digital/PCS cellular in particular, finally has the size, battery life, and pricing to be everywhere. So much so that the backlash has already started. The coming "no cell phone" railroad cars and restaurants are indicating that cellular is no longer for the so-called "elite" but for everyone.

    As for the flops list - the jury's still out on Firewire. I think 2000 will be the "make or break" year for the technology, at least in the mass-market consumer end of the business. But the new digital camcorders are so cool and so cheap that I think Firewire will be just fine. But it's a niche technology until Intel puts it into PC chipsets. Firewire as standard on Macs, Sonys, and a few other small brands (PC-wise) just isn't enough.

    Java is rapidly becoming "just another language", mainly because of Sun's incompetent stewardship. Soon it'll be thought of as "C++ with garbage collection" unless Sun loosens up the death grip. Stick a fork in Larry Ellison - he's done and doesn't know it yet. Microsoft's going to kill him on the low end and IBM will kill him on the high-end. CE was a dead man walking when it first shipped - as son as it became clear that a CE device would have the battery life of a bad laptop. Give up a hard drive for that? I don't think so. The fundamental crappiness of the Windows interface in a handleld form factor just made it worse.

    And as for DIVX? I've forgotten it already. Although now that DVD's won, they're trying to get the horse back in the barn...

    - -Josh Turiel

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  161. Enough from the zealots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He put Linux on the winner list (which was his first mistake) for christs sake. Does he have to tatoo a penguin on his keister. What he said is true, Linux is more hype that anything. Deal with it.

  162. Re: Firewire on the Mac is sweet by webslacker · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but just because Windows 98 has poor support for IEEE-1394 doesn't say spit about whether the technology's good or not. I've used a VST Firewire hard drive at my office and I must say that is is the sweetest thing to come along in a long time. I plug it in and voila! The hard drive is automatically installed with no SCSI-ID crap to fiddle with, no extra power cable, no nothing. I can copy stuff from my computer to the Firewire HDD and if I pull out the cable while it's copying, it pauses and tells me to please reconnect the drive. I even played a Quicktime movie off the Firewire HDD and it did the same thing when I disconnected it. Plug it back in and it picks up where it left off.

    Sony makes iLink/Firewire CDRW drives, which would probably be nice because as a rule of thumb they say to keep your source drive and your CDRW on separate chains. There's other stuff like printers and speakers that use Firewire, so it's not all just video cameras... although I must say that video editing with Firewire and MiniDV is sweet too.

  163. Just saw Java in use on Sunday by jtseng · · Score: 1

    I went to my friendly neighborbood CompUSA (Columbia, MD) and bought something. While I was waiting I noticed their IBM cash registers were running... Java apps! My jaw almost hit the floor (it did go pretty low). That was the first time I actually saw Java used to make something practical.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  164. Absolutely by GNUs-Not-Good · · Score: 1

    Where you live is at least as important as how much you make.

    Silicon Valley is no place to have any sort of life. The cost of living is just too prohibitive, unless you are a CEO type. I think it is just trendy to say you live out there.

    You Nevada gig sounds fantastic. I hope they don't start moving in on you next.

  165. There is no millenium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As usual, Slashdot disappoints with blatant and obvious and embarrassing spelling errors in a feature article.

    mille + annus = millennium, or a thousand years, as in anniversary and annual and perennial and centennial

    mille + anus = millenium, or a thousand arses, as in anal and analingus and anal-retentive

  166. Uh, yeah they do. by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1
  167. Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    The millennium ends this year. No question about it. You are absolutely wrong. Jan 1, 2000 is the beginning of the 3rd millennium.

    And yes-- everybody knows that there was no year zero. Nobody cares, because 1) zeroes feel psychologically like a milestone, and milestones are about psychology, and 2) the monk screwed up the date of the birth of Christ. Most scholars believe the 3rd M' began around 1997 anyway.

    Bottom line: You can't have it both ways. If you want to be pedantic, then say the millennium has already started. If you don't, then embrace the popular (and sensical) redefinition.


    ---

    1. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The millennium ends this year. No question about it. You are absolutely wrong. Jan 1, 2000 is the beginning of the 3rd millennium. And yes-- everybody knows that there was no year zero. Nobody cares, because 1) zeroes feel psychologically like a milestone, and milestones are about psychology, and 2) the monk screwed up the date of the birth of Christ. Most scholars believe the 3rd M' began around 1997 anyway. Bottom line: You can't have it both ways. If you want to be pedantic, then say the millennium has already started. If you don't, then embrace the popular (and sensical) redefinition.

      No. The Millennium starts in 2001. It may be correct that Christ was born a few years before, but unless our calender system is changed, the Millennium does not begin until 2001. Your argument is incorrect anyway, if the real 3rd Millennium began in 1997, why should we observe it in 2000?
      Just because everyone at school is doing drugs doesn't mean your kid should be doing drugs too. 2001. There.

    2. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by beagle · · Score: 1
      See, I think it's really this feel-good America thing where everyone wants to celebrate the millennium this year. Hey, I'm all for partying (changing all 4 digits of the year is cool, and we should be proud to be living to see it happen) but I can count to 1000. Anyway, wasn't it an even bigger deal last Millennium when they actually ADDED a fourth digit!!

      Here's the way modern-day Americans count Millennia: (stating the last year of each Millennium) 1000, 1999, 2999, etc. :)

      By a similar lack of logic, most modern-day Americans also count centures wrong: (again, listing the last year of each century) 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 1999, 2099, etc. :)

      Contrary to popular belief, the 1900s (as in, 1900-1999) - while being a century (100 years) are not the same as the 20th century, which is indeed 1901-2000.

      Put another way, when I say "count to 1000" why do you stop at 999? You don't get to 1000 until you've actually counted it!

      It's truly sad.

      Beagle

      P.S. I wonder if we'll have Millennium sales and Millennium travel deals next December for those of us who can actually count... hmmm.... regardless, it'll be nice to be able to travel for the New Year next year without worrying about Y2K issues...

    3. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

      Your argument is incorrect anyway, if the real 3rd Millennium began in 1997, why should we observe it in 2000?

      Exactly the point. It's stupid to try and have exact accuracy on this point. Exact accuracy demands 1997, which no one will accept, so why not go with the round number, which is the most useful definition?


      ---

    4. Re:Nope -- exactly on time. You are wrong. by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

      Actually, this debate happens every century, in every country. The pedantics pout, and the normal people accept the useful definition.


      ---

  168. Connection between Java and XML is artificial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can just as effectively use C or Python to work with XML, and once the perl folks get their house in order, it will certainly take over due to its natural text handling abilities.

  169. Apple propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you have no problem with the Linux propaganda. Personally I am so tired of seing Linus in his kaki shorts that it make me sick. The fact that any monthly publication writes about this mediocere OS and it's small "locked in caves" techie installed base must mean that said publications are just part of the Linux conspiracy.

    See how ridiculous you sound? Wakko wouldn't talk like that! Even though you are so wrong regarding Apple, Animaniacs Rock. Maybe we could change the whole discussion over to Yakko Wakka and Dot. At least then it would be interesting and worth reading.

  170. servoclients and clientservile boxen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Client" and "server" are both maya. What is the sound of one computer clientserving?

  171. Re: Get with the times by webslacker · · Score: 1

    Apple changed their royalty policy. They formed a patent pool with Sony, Panasonic, Compaq and a bunch of other companies and made Firewire free for all of them. Anyone not in the pool gets charged a quarter per machine, IIRC.

  172. Re:Not worth is when "average" house cost $800,000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting. Is that a Nevada job, or are you working remotely? Salaried or contract?

  173. Dvorak is dead right by RodStewart · · Score: 1

    complex issues he sums up in simple words. he's right linux has not reached it's full potential and is no where near what it has been hyped as yet. when he says hope, i think he really means hope, he wants oss develepment to succeed, or at least challege microsoft. he's also right in pointing out that bill gates would be a better man of the year than jeff bezos. ecommerce is not really that new, its like catalog shopping on the internet, with a couple bells and whistles in the grand scheme of things i dont believe its that important. but if we are to give a man credit for it, give it to bill gates the man that turned a computer, albeit unintentionally, into a consumer tool. his company if anything made computers accessible to the masses.
    i believe in oss develepment, but if for all the bad things that bill gates and steve jobs have done to the industry, we have to at sometime notice their contribution.
    all men have evil in them, some more than others, these guys lucked out and used their evil for good too. ;)

    --
    "Are you satisfied with fucking?" - Dave Matthews from "Halloween"
    1. Re:Dvorak is dead right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confronting Microsoft is the wrong way to go. There's no reason to make granny use Unix.

  174. missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would I do without Mr. John Dvorak to provide me with a non-stop source of ultra-brown-nosing sound bites to complain about? Here's my side of the story: Mr. Dvorak's "sincerity" is as transparent as the icy, uncaring look in his eyes. Although a thorough discussion of insensitive solipsism is beyond the scope of this letter, debate with him or a search for common ground is both a fruitless exercise and a suicidal strategy. The largest problem, however, is that I doubtlessly maintain that we need to do more to dispense justice. Lastly, I shall return to this point in particular.

  175. Dvorak and Accuracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In one of his recent columns, John C. Dvorak, in his usual uninformed manner, says: "3. FireWire. This technology will be the fiasco of the decade if it doesn't appear soon on something other than a Macintosh and a camcorder." Well, maybe if Mr.Dvorak would take some time out from being a 'pundit' and were to actually research his ill-informed statements, he'd know that FireWire is available on quite a few consumer products, besides Macs and CamCorders. The Replay TV box has FireWire, as do several DVD players so far. There are other FireWire devices as well, like DVD jukeboxes, hard drives, CD-Burners, etc that come in FireWire versions. Of coure, I highly doubt Mr. Dvorak is aware of any of this, since he seems to be too busy watching himself write about how important he thinks he is. Harry

  176. Millenum is finished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you people all over talking about X of the Millenium. The Millenium is not yet finished and the new Millenium starts on January 1, 2001. Duh...

    1. Re:Millenum is finished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither "Millenum" (in your title) nor "Millenium" (in your posting) is a word. The word is "Millennium". The Jesuits would thwap you.

    2. Re:Millenum is finished? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but English is not my native language. Well duh. what a lame excuse. I've been writing this word "Millennium" for so many times already. Well just made a booboo. Russian

  177. DIVX by BMIComp · · Score: 1

    Divx. A failed idea.

    Originally started by Circuit City, this idea was insane. The whole idea, was that you could lease DVD movies from Circuit City, and then, if you liked them, you could purchase them from your home player. Most good ideas, just don't work when executed in the real world. This, wasn't even a good idea to start off with, at least from a consumers point of view.

    First of all, you'd have to goto a circuit city to get a DIVX disc. For some people who live nearby a circuit city, its ok, but otherwise this doesn't work. There was a push by circuit city, to get DIVX into grocery stores... etc, but that didn't work either. Most grocery stores sell movies anyways, so this would be a threat to their business.

    Second, DIVX isn't worth it. You can rent a DIVX disc for more than the cost of renting something from your local movie store. And, they mention this is great because you can buy the movie if you like it. Well, I don't know about you, but if i've just rented a movie and seen in it, i'm not always in a hurry to buy it, seeing i just watched it.

    Also, you pay for DIVX, for the first few days, at ciruit city. Then, you can keep it as long as you want. This, is better than most movies since you have to return them. On the other hand, you can only view it for the time you payed for. Then, you have to pay for it, via CREDIT CARD, on your DIVX player. This, is more of a hassle. If you ask me, renting A DVD is less of a hassle then going to circuit city and having to go through the hassle of the whole DIVX prcoess.

    Not to mention, DIVX does not offer subtitles and any other add-ons.

    I guess, the whole market agrees with me, seeing that DIVX failed, and circuit city discontinued it. This was an attempt by Circuit City to get money. People.... =P

  178. Um...yea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. Linux should have been on the LOSER list.

  179. You code monkeys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am always amused when people talk about Java's failure and rabid monkeys go "hear! hear!" with it. The revolution has gone past mr dvorak.

    Around me I see NOTHING but java and it has taken over the web world for server programming.

    Let's face it, and go buy "teach yourself java in 21 days" shall we?

    --The revolution has not been televised--

  180. not like linux!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, you have to have 7-8 million instalations, divided amoung 20 distros before you can be a weiner like Linux

  181. Cringely vs. Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a battle to the death, which one would win?

    1. Re:Cringely vs. Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Cringely is a capital-F Fraud, so I guess Dvorak wins.

  182. Millennial Confusions are a FEATURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This confusion about what century and millennium that 2000 pertains to is really great. It separates the innumerate from the competent. It makes it easier when it comes time to go shoot all those who can't count.

  183. java is better than Perl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously haven't done any serious work with java.

    I work for a small outfit that does e-commerce work (db, app server the whole 9)

    We use Perl in very specialized situations only. Java covers 90% of our needs and is a superior development environment now. 3 years ago? i don't know..applets? what are applets?.

    Please use the language before posting something as outlandish a claim as "perl is faster than Java".. ouch nonono

    Like it or not, Java is the defacto standard for web applications development.

  184. Lisp Machines, Part Deux??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think that in a few years java will have hardware acceleration, native compilation and will have a whole lot more developers.

    You'll never see prevasive hardware acceleration unless Java is completely opened and standardized.

    Do you think IBM, Dell, Compaq, HP, etc. are going to relinquish control of their hardware to a closed standard?

    No hardware vendor is going to allow itself to be backed into a corner where they have to pay Sun a tax.

    After the Microsoft fiasco, you can be sure that vendors are never going to let someone with a closed standard (like the Win32 API) get them over a barrel.

    As it stands, most of them can't even stomach dealing with Sun's current mangling of Java.

  185. Dvorak's duds list by clevershark · · Score: 1

    I haven't read Dvorak's article yet, but it's incomplete if he doesn't list himself in it. Sadly the once widely-respected columnist started to go after quantity, not quality, when he started writing a number of articles which were famous both for their lack of intelligent content and their propensity to blindly attack Mac users. Sometimes the columns seemed to come forth from a bigot, and not someone whose name once meant something in the industry. I can understand "whoring for eyeballs" from newcomers to the opinion game. When they are produced by people who should know better it just irritates the hell out of me. Then again, the best retort to the various inflammatory anti-Mac nonsense which Dvorak has poured forth is this: the iMac and the "girly" iBook are selling faster than Apple can make them. In your face Johnny! If you want to write a decent article, pro- or anti-Mac, put intelligent observations in it and you won't quite get so much negative press. TAE

    --

    My sig is too lon

  186. You are ALL wrong! Millenium starts in 2048! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And as that's 48 years away (by which time I'll be retired) I'm not going to worry about it.

  187. Who cares!? No one writes code at 75 WPM!!!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I write code. Writing code is slow. Why do I need an optomized keyboard? Anyone coding at 75WPM just hasn't been fired yet.

  188. Carorder.com when it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was trying to buy a van thru carorder.com which appears to be using jsp (at least every page served had a .jsp extension). I tried on several occasions over a period of a week and kept receiving "Server timed out", "Page not available", etc errors as I tried to configure and buy a car. I sent several e-mails to customer service to no avail.

    Perhaps you should ask how many generate with Java and are successful and are cost effective. That would be a much smaller list.

  189. Wrong by Tim+Behrendsen · · Score: 1

    The new Millennium began around 1997, because the monk screwed up the date of Christ. Face it: The true pedantic start is 1997. The popular start is 2000. Whatever it is, it's not 2001.


    ---

  190. One question.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're so overworked and mistreated, how do you find time to post on Slashdot so damn much?

  191. Wow. by Crispin+Glover · · Score: 1

    That must mean I'm wrong. I mean if Asus makes one, who cares if Tyan, ECS, EFA, IWill, Gigabyte, ABIT, MSI, VIA, or any of the others don't. BTW, EFA makes a IEEE-1394 PCI add in board, but no one will buy it because the FireWire hard drives are kept in the Mac section of the store and Billy Bob (who got his free PC yesterday!) doesn't want the expensive card and software when he can get a Snappy for 100 bucks! Seriously though, things will change soon.

  192. java is a flop? by donglekey · · Score: 1

    few things really irritate me, but being a java purist (even more so than linux) I really can't stand java being called a flop, it isn't gone, it hasn't receeded, it is growing and getting more useful and even more universal all the time. I think that java is an incredible key technology that is getting overlooked. I think that in a few years java will have hardware acceleration, native compilation and will have a whole lot more developers. I don't think that there are many non-proprietary programs written in java now, but that will change when programmers find out how easy it is, and there are more JRE (java runtime environments). I seems like such an incredible tool with incredible potential but right now all it is getting used for is applets.