Happened to me twice when I was a kid in the 80's. I took the chain guard off my little Huffy because I thought it looked stupid. I was going slow both times it happened so I didn't wreck that badly, but I had a friend who was going about 20 mph when it happened to him on a nice hot asphalt road. There's something to be said for using your own skin as an ablative braking device...ouch!
Define fixed? I expect most hardcore environmentalists would define "fixed" as eliminating most industry and minimizing argriculture. Now, how would you propose maintaining a rapidly growing population of 6 billion (and growing) without industry? And how would you keep the existing power structures happy so they don't bury you? It can't be done.
I'm all for establishing colonies on the moon and Mars, but the idea that we need to do this now because of an inevitable meteor strike is not terribly realistic. Given a worst case scenario like a gigantic comet hitting the earth and setting everything ablaze...with dust blocking out the sun for decades, and a new ice age, etc... Humans would still be able to survive in very small self sustaining shelters, similar to the places where people would be living on the moon and Mars. If we're using a some kind of mass extinction event as justification, then it's still easier to survive on an utterly lifeless and devastated Earth than it is to survive on the Moon or Mars. If for no other reason than we have an near endless supply of oxygen and water and dirt that is suitable to growing food.
Wow, I got modded off topic for answering one of the questions in the summary. It was even an apt answer considering Tolkien was essentially a luddite.
Talk about disappearing civil liberties, but this country might have well reverted to monarchy rule. It would really be tough to call it a democracy any longer.
Come on, it's not that bad. We get a whole new monarch in a year and a half.
Look at it this way. For your normal single player game, you buy the game and play it on your computer. That's it.
With an MMO, you buy the game, connect to a large network for of servers with thousands of other players. Someone has to pay for all of these servers. Someone has to play the staff to maintain them. Someone has to pay for the bandwidth so you can talk to them. Someone has to maintain the game...there's an army of developers that continue to work on the game after it's release...somebody has to pay their salaries.
So why would a $50 multiplayer game be worth the same as a $50 single player game?
Well, if not for those really deadly weapons you might be typing that post in German, or Japanese. Not that I'm an overly militant person or anything. But weapons have their place. I just wish we weren't putting them in the hands of total idiot.
I don't think you'll have to worry about that. A weapon with such perfect accuracy would allow some crazy person to sit a mile away popping little cauterized holes through people's heads with ease. And the police wouldn't be able to do a thing about it as the beam (unless I'm mistaken) would be practically invisible. I don't think any government would sell something like that to its citizens.
The Integral Trees by Larry Niven is a great book for helping students conceptualize celestial mechanics. It's about a primitive society of humans (descendants of a mutineer space travelers) living inside of a vast zero-g ecosystem that are suddenly displaced by an small ecological disaster. Along their way they discover other societies who have adapted to varied living conditions throughout the world. Quite an interesting book.
Not necessarily. I find my creativity is greatly enhanced when I'm depressed. Unfortunately, It's harder to put that creativity to work when I'm depressed.
LOL, I love how a contentless post like this gets modded up insightful. Insightful how? You haven't listed any good reasons why returning to the moon is worth it. How about this...it's better than giving the money to defense contractors for more stealth bombers.
Consider the direct cost of moving all the world's coastal cities to higher ground.
Consider what's going to happen when the world's current breadbaskets turn to deserts, and some of the present day's have-not countries find themselves sitting on the new best farmland. Consider the cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Cutting emissions is surely the safest way to manage it. (And for those of you still denying that its anthropogenic, it hardly matters. We have the need and the power to do something about it, and it's past time we got started.) Agreed. It's about time we stopped polluting our atmosphere and start building more nuclear power plants.
If a moon base is premature, it's more to do with solving problems here on earth first - let's spend money fixing earth before we start trashing other planets/moons.
This is far more ambitious than a Mars colony. Seems unlikely we will ever overcome all of the environmental problems that come with industrialization. And it's only going to get worse as the population continues to climb. Seems silly to curb technological developments in aerospace just so we can undertake the futile task of creating a totally green industrial infrastructure. It just won't happen.
Slashdot Mirror
Happened to me twice when I was a kid in the 80's. I took the chain guard off my little Huffy because I thought it looked stupid. I was going slow both times it happened so I didn't wreck that badly, but I had a friend who was going about 20 mph when it happened to him on a nice hot asphalt road. There's something to be said for using your own skin as an ablative braking device...ouch!
Anyone who really wants to get into the country need only sail up to either the pacific or atlantic coast somewhere and jump overboard.
Nonsense. God just put all this carbon here 6000 years ago to test our faith.
Define fixed? I expect most hardcore environmentalists would define "fixed" as eliminating most industry and minimizing argriculture. Now, how would you propose maintaining a rapidly growing population of 6 billion (and growing) without industry? And how would you keep the existing power structures happy so they don't bury you? It can't be done.
I'm all for establishing colonies on the moon and Mars, but the idea that we need to do this now because of an inevitable meteor strike is not terribly realistic. Given a worst case scenario like a gigantic comet hitting the earth and setting everything ablaze...with dust blocking out the sun for decades, and a new ice age, etc... Humans would still be able to survive in very small self sustaining shelters, similar to the places where people would be living on the moon and Mars. If we're using a some kind of mass extinction event as justification, then it's still easier to survive on an utterly lifeless and devastated Earth than it is to survive on the Moon or Mars. If for no other reason than we have an near endless supply of oxygen and water and dirt that is suitable to growing food.
It was EBay. A few months ago Ebay banned sales of all virtual property.
Wow, I got modded off topic for answering one of the questions in the summary. It was even an apt answer considering Tolkien was essentially a luddite.
He would have said turn off the computer, go outside and get some exercise.
Awesome.
Come on, it's not that bad. We get a whole new monarch in a year and a half.
And this is different from the book how?
Look at it this way. For your normal single player game, you buy the game and play it on your computer. That's it. With an MMO, you buy the game, connect to a large network for of servers with thousands of other players. Someone has to pay for all of these servers. Someone has to play the staff to maintain them. Someone has to pay for the bandwidth so you can talk to them. Someone has to maintain the game...there's an army of developers that continue to work on the game after it's release...somebody has to pay their salaries. So why would a $50 multiplayer game be worth the same as a $50 single player game?
So you're saying that a golf cart with a few scientific instruments on it can do more research than a base manned with scientists?
Programming was fun when I was kid. It became un-fun when I started doing it for money. How about they fix that?
Well, if not for those really deadly weapons you might be typing that post in German, or Japanese. Not that I'm an overly militant person or anything. But weapons have their place. I just wish we weren't putting them in the hands of total idiot.
I don't think you'll have to worry about that. A weapon with such perfect accuracy would allow some crazy person to sit a mile away popping little cauterized holes through people's heads with ease. And the police wouldn't be able to do a thing about it as the beam (unless I'm mistaken) would be practically invisible. I don't think any government would sell something like that to its citizens.
Ack! It's quiet... Q-U-I-E-T. Not quite.
It is my firm belief that the good content will ultimately prevail over the bad.
The Integral Trees by Larry Niven is a great book for helping students conceptualize celestial mechanics. It's about a primitive society of humans (descendants of a mutineer space travelers) living inside of a vast zero-g ecosystem that are suddenly displaced by an small ecological disaster. Along their way they discover other societies who have adapted to varied living conditions throughout the world. Quite an interesting book.
Not necessarily. I find my creativity is greatly enhanced when I'm depressed. Unfortunately, It's harder to put that creativity to work when I'm depressed.
...only outlaws will have porn.
Tell that to the Iraqis