No, it's not automatic. Windows can automatically assign different processes (executables) to different threads but that's about the limit to "automatic" cpu load distribution. Beyond that, the individual processes are responsible for their own load distribution. I don't know much about Cockos Reaper or why music production would be especially costly in terms of CPU usage. Typically programs for rendering high resolution graphics or video editing or scientific calculations are designed to take advantage of as many processors as you have. Other applications and games, not so much. But like I said, it depends.
Well, all of the benchmarks seem to put Ryzen 7's a little slower than the best i7s on Game FPS/thread performance. But those games and programs that can take advantage of the additional threads will naturally stomp on i7 since there's twice as many threads available. So that's how I rationalized my purchase. No, I'm not getting the best game performance. But it's not that far behind either.
After a single day's "outpouring" of support the resurrect paint but after a decade of outpouring hate for the direction Windows is going, it just keeps getting worse.
live mosquitoes, all male, all incapable of producing offspring.
The kind of control you're attempting simply is... it's not possible. If there is one thing the history of evolution has taught us it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free, it expands to new territories and crashes through barriers, painfully, maybe even dangerously, but, uh... well, there it is.
We simply can't stop competing long enough to cooperate and we've not actually invented anything with which to do this.
Sure we have. Humans naturally organize themselves into small tribes. We've invented all sorts things to organize human into massive nation states. Most of the things we invent nowadays help keep us organized and passive enough to keep the nation state alive.
Indeed. Working in a factory, fulfilling my 2.3 child obligation to society, and dying of cancer in my 40's due to the hazardous chemicals my employer exposed me to throughout my career sounds like a much more worthwhile goal.
The problem is NOT that we don't have room -- the problem is that we as a species are so stupid, short-sighted, and greedy-as-fuck to figure out a way to make room for everyone.
So then, we don't actually have room for 36 billion people...for the reasons I just quoted, right?
If your goal is to prevent the destruction of habitable worlds, doesn't it make the most sense for us to go there and ensure no other intelligent species evolve and destroy the planet with industry?
Slashdot Mirror
And Obama outright asked the people to turn in names of people
Oooohh...why didn't you say so in the first place. If the democrats are doing it too it must be okay.
No, it's not automatic. Windows can automatically assign different processes (executables) to different threads but that's about the limit to "automatic" cpu load distribution. Beyond that, the individual processes are responsible for their own load distribution. I don't know much about Cockos Reaper or why music production would be especially costly in terms of CPU usage. Typically programs for rendering high resolution graphics or video editing or scientific calculations are designed to take advantage of as many processors as you have. Other applications and games, not so much. But like I said, it depends.
Well, all of the benchmarks seem to put Ryzen 7's a little slower than the best i7s on Game FPS/thread performance. But those games and programs that can take advantage of the additional threads will naturally stomp on i7 since there's twice as many threads available. So that's how I rationalized my purchase. No, I'm not getting the best game performance. But it's not that far behind either.
You would prefer more google internal politics articles?
But about what you'd expect for two Ryzen 7's.
Sorry Intel, but I can't not read that as Coffee Cake CPU.
So 'edit' is the euphemism we're using for genetic engineering now?
This has been the case for the past 20 years.
After a single day's "outpouring" of support the resurrect paint but after a decade of outpouring hate for the direction Windows is going, it just keeps getting worse.
Yeah, no. That's not going to hack it on our system.
On Jan 19 2038 our system will totally cease functioning. Literally nothing work.
You do realize I was quoting a movie as a joke, right? Well, I guess you didn't. It was a joke. I thought that was obvious.
live mosquitoes, all male, all incapable of producing offspring. The kind of control you're attempting simply is... it's not possible. If there is one thing the history of evolution has taught us it's that life will not be contained. Life breaks free, it expands to new territories and crashes through barriers, painfully, maybe even dangerously, but, uh... well, there it is.
Great. Now I'm going to have to listen to my elderly father go on (again) about how we've invented the Ansible.
We are all just humans. Humans fight each other. Evolution has demanded this of us. Things are completely normal.
It seems some people only learn by digging through their own shit.
Except, they're not learning.
We simply can't stop competing long enough to cooperate and we've not actually invented anything with which to do this.
Sure we have. Humans naturally organize themselves into small tribes. We've invented all sorts things to organize human into massive nation states. Most of the things we invent nowadays help keep us organized and passive enough to keep the nation state alive.
I am familiar with The Population Bomb. Why is this relevant? He's one dude who was wrong. Why is this a legitimate argument about anything?
Yes. Blanket the Earth in humans! I can't imagine anything awesomer.
OR you could work to improve things here on Earth, rather than dreaming about leaving it.
OR you could realize the futility of changing the will of billions of selfish humans and escape.
Indeed. Working in a factory, fulfilling my 2.3 child obligation to society, and dying of cancer in my 40's due to the hazardous chemicals my employer exposed me to throughout my career sounds like a much more worthwhile goal.
The problem is NOT that we don't have room -- the problem is that we as a species are so stupid, short-sighted, and greedy-as-fuck to figure out a way to make room for everyone.
So then, we don't actually have room for 36 billion people...for the reasons I just quoted, right?
If your goal is to prevent the destruction of habitable worlds, doesn't it make the most sense for us to go there and ensure no other intelligent species evolve and destroy the planet with industry?
It also might be time for diet.
Yes, but the satisfaction gained expending a missile for this purpose makes it worthwhile.