I couldn't agree more. However I recognise the problem that intelligent people are the minority of our society and as a result it is important for NASA to engage public interest or the funding can dry up when the "people" are no longer interested.
I propose "NASA Dumb-ass Digest" to run as a 1 Hour weekly episode that can be crafted for the dumb masses with all 168hours footage fitted into a single episode. Meanwhile the intellectually superior can continue watching our NASA TV the way we prefer. This seems like a win-win situation to me, we get NASA tv and NASA gets more public support.
Have they tried educating rather than penalising? Strange as it may see, most of us respond positively to scientific fact rather than an impersonal fine. Who can say why this takes place?
No, apparently religious primitives still make up a majority of the worlds population.
You'd be very surprised how even a very complex password can be cracked with a dictionary attack, including "P@$sW0rD!".
What about: C5&}+6@.lf2^?5Im^j~~+:VBYWe>EPohr@j)R\cwVeb/tqrm,CQDGNk)4p2X=7{;12$?Kvppgx?OWd5*eR,APZxgX^g[/\Xi_t>mwL;tCu_wvIVV{F;V'h:QGOA.o__WU6K7-v'`&&"BbbdkpFs*0I0u$eB$L$m9^vM_P>1nALd%>rbNW`uCnCF'f{][uANt`a6N`n>fKS~c;Y6-!rKS4Mzom0GFOP_-{,&@X52lym:ttAFaR"Kc"oMRQ*^-(fKA;UT/[XXdV+aHO!&Lmk?9h'"D%zp]l\g1G{k$$9tw@w!gFTXoi>cwiW-c'KfG
No, because when you peer into something your eye adapts for the darkness so the person would need to be peering into something of equal darkness as you kill them so the eye stays at the optimal configuration. Otherwise the scan will differ enough to fail.
Also the eye may dilate as you kill them which will also fuck the result.
Slashdot Mirror
But surely they could throw in a few Tie Fighters.
I have ADD and NASA TV can capture my attention for hours.
Then by definition, you do not have Attention Deficit Disorder.
How would you know?
I couldn't agree more. However I recognise the problem that intelligent people are the minority of our society and as a result it is important for NASA to engage public interest or the funding can dry up when the "people" are no longer interested.
I propose "NASA Dumb-ass Digest" to run as a 1 Hour weekly episode that can be crafted for the dumb masses with all 168hours footage fitted into a single episode. Meanwhile the intellectually superior can continue watching our NASA TV the way we prefer. This seems like a win-win situation to me, we get NASA tv and NASA gets more public support.
$11 an hour shouldn't even be legal.
Of course they don't understand freedom, they feel the need to be lead like sheep.
Will Charles Darwin be the end boss?
People know not to trust what they read online.
That's why smart people enter the email address LAST, especially when alcohol is involved.
I thought 9/11 was a JENGA promotion. http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/9/11
Unfortunatly I have to agree with the censor on this one. However it doesn't excuse only 3hrs notice.
.com is NOT a United States domain name. .us is the united states.
Just more clueless idiots posting fallacies.
Here in Australia it's the religious people who are the biggest supporters of censorship. I wonder why?
Have they tried educating rather than penalising? Strange as it may see, most of us respond positively to scientific fact rather than an impersonal fine. Who can say why this takes place?
No, apparently religious primitives still make up a majority of the worlds population.
Better hope Smith isn't representing you in Roberts court.
Obviously they don't want to got this far and at this point its not that important.
Tell that to the MPAA
Is it even possible for anyone to find out all the possible illegal uses of technolgies like cloud computing?
Yes, because it's exactly the same as regular computing.
Alternatively you can just terminate the instance. Far easier than disconnecting a physical machine.
Have fun remembering that off the top of your head.
That's ok ill post it on my blog for easy retrieval.
Hmmmmm....
Surly only someone with a valuable retina would hide.
You'd be very surprised how even a very complex password can be cracked with a dictionary attack, including "P@$sW0rD!".
What about: C5&}+6@.lf2^?5Im^j~~+:VBYWe>EPohr@j)R\cwVeb/tqrm,CQDGNk)4p2X=7{;12$?Kvppgx?OWd5*eR,APZxgX^g[/\Xi_t>mwL;tCu_wvIVV{F;V'h:QGOA.o__WU6K7-v'`&&"BbbdkpFs*0I0u$eB$L$m9^vM_P>1nALd%>rbNW`uCnCF'f{][uANt`a6N`n>fKS~c;Y6-!rKS4Mzom0GFOP_-{,&@X52lym:ttAFaR"Kc"oMRQ*^-(fKA;UT/[XXdV+aHO!&Lmk?9h'"D%zp]l\g1G{k$$9tw@w!gFTXoi>cwiW-c'KfG
Voice of experience, is that you?
What's Demolition Man?
You sound like a salesman, "for only $34 you can be sure that your network is secure".
No, because when you peer into something your eye adapts for the darkness so the person would need to be peering into something of equal darkness as you kill them so the eye stays at the optimal configuration. Otherwise the scan will differ enough to fail.
Also the eye may dilate as you kill them which will also fuck the result.
In that case ill change my computer name to something other than "Dan-PC"