If your teens would prefer gaming indoors, alone (Well online with hundreds of people who they are interacting with) as opposed to going out to the movies (Nothing more social going into a big dark room to sit down to watch a movie, and told be quite) meeting friends for burgers (Nothing wholesome like connecting friendship with the injection of fatty foods. ) or any of the other ways that teens build camaraderie. (camaraderie?!? For teens they are so self absorbed that they never even listen to their friends they all just talk about themselves in turn. Their enemies are the ones who actually listen to them and use what they say against them. )
Well there is still solar collection when it is cloudy. There is very few times where it rains so hard that it is like night outside. While it may produce a lower output that could affect the cost calculation. However night is probably factored into the cost, with storage of excess.
Our primitive mind designed for a world where we are constantly under attack or will need to attack others, is the product of 500 millions years of evolution. Our higher brain functionally only 2 or 3 million years. So yes in term of making quick decision our primitive brain kicks in. We use it while driving, and every day living. That is why magicians are able to pull off their tricks on us. They get the primitive brain distracted on something else while they do something else. The higher human brain is much slower however it will try to process more information. Such as the question to the volunteers of this study if they want to do it or not. There is no immediate danger there is no pressure of instant response they can stand back and think about it. Factor in what rewards would they get, what are the risks, what trade offs from the action will occur. That is free will. However if someone tried to get volunteers and is a natural sales man would apply pressure on them to make a decision far more quickly. Because they will avoid them trying to think about it, they will keep their minds occupied with idle chit-chat, and implying the positive images of what will happen. The study shows our primitive mind makes a lot of decisions for us. But nothing about free will.
There is a difference between Anger and Hate. Sanders is not saying get rid of the Millionaires, but make sure they are playing on fairer ground, and the fact that they seem to have extra advantages, causes anger. However he is not touting kicking out the Millionaires. Trump on the other hand is campaigning on kicking out people and excluding people not because of any rational slight, but because these people are different and scary.
I am not a Trump support and will not be voting for him in any election. However Facebook should stay away from trying to shut him down as the institution. For one this guy is fueled by hate. So an active attempt to stop him, will just fall under his narrative, sure he will lie if needed, but if there is truth on his side, he will use it to his full advantage. The problem is silencing such people is only effective for a short time, but their anger will just build up further. It is better to have them out in the public and hopefully get pounced from a strong majority vote, to show that they are not indeed the silent majority, but actually just a vocal minority. The more you can show you are playing by the rules. The more power you have if pointed as unfair.
So you found a way to move upward in life, you use this found skill to escape the lower class and ignore them, vs using the ability of your new found status to help out such people.
I hate sounding preachy, but you shouldn't use wealth to give yourself some moral superiority.
To be fair, for most homes, they can be broken into rather easily. There is undoubtedly a door or window which is unlocked, or a Lock that isn't properly set up so you can open it with a credit card. Even with alarms, if the person gets overzealous with their home security people are too use to hearing the alarm, So the crook can go in get stuff and out until the neighbor complain about the noise.
Locking your doors is really just saying, I am not home and please don't come in.
The home security industry really just plays on people's fear about getting broken into than actually offering any real benefit.
The problem is not two sided. We as a culture, would much rather ignore the problems of the poor than face them. This argument "I don't want to see poor people" are Coded in a lot of different ways. "Worried about property values", "Maintain community values", "Allow our children to safely play outside"... But it really comes down to the fact that we don't want to see poor people. Because they can be scary because there isn't much for them to lose. And we may emotionally feel bad for them, and we don't want to feel bad.
So you have the time and resources to run a full source code audit on the OS. (You might as well build from source all those components, just in case the source code that you review isn't the same what is in the binary.)
The problem is we need Government and Corporations to do work that we don't have the resources to do yourself, now the problem is how can we trust them? Because I really don't want to spend 18 hours a day maintaining my personal infrastructure just to survive. I much rather focus on what I am good at and offer these services to others, where in turn I get different services in return. But perhaps the people I am helping out cannot fully supply everything that I need for my survival. So let's use commonly recognized notes which I can exchange with others to help manage.
So I would need a corporation to reassure me about privacy, I will also need a government to reassure me about the corporation's evaluation. Because I don't have the time and resources to do it myself.
"meat hammer" for tenderizing poor quality meat. Marinades do little, that add flavor though. Smoking and slow cooking tenderizes the meat too.
However cuts such as the Tenderloin are tender because that muscle doesn't get worked much. Also fish have tender meat because they don't battle with gravity like terrestrial animals do.
It would make sense that manufactured meat could be healthier and tastier than meat slaughtered from animals. Quality meat comes from animals which are Happy and Healthy (Who should only have one bad day in their life) (Less toxins from stress), and live a rather passive life without much exercise (more tender meat). This is hard combination to perform. Lab Grown meat can be grown without stressing an animal and exercising it. creating a good quality meat without the bad stuff.
The problem with Apple is you can't get a device speced for what you need. I Still don't need a glowing keyboard, or a high resolution video camera. I would love a system with the general specs of a Mac mini, but cheaper that is bigger and fatter.
Apple was never the leader in features. In terms of the competitors Apple always tends to be in the middle of the road. Even the original iPhone which set the cell phone industry 2 years to redesign their phone, still was a rather modest device in terms of features, And you could do more with say a Blackberry.
Apple at its best will come with a new idea for a new way to use a product, however they don't seem to go crazy on features. Apple at its worse is still rather decent quality product that looks good, but you have no use for.
Well I would be happy with just full color. It would be nice to have Wall paper that you can program different colors and designs on the fly. Where you can be delightfully tacky one day. And refined and simplistic the next.
IE Gots its majority, because it booted and ran faster than Netscape (By cheating by integrating it in the OS) Firefox got some traction in the mid 00's Due to a bunch of security issues in IE. However Firefox goals of a Small Lightweight quickly become bloated, so IE once again reasserted it dominance. Google Chrome, Had a bunch of things going for it. 1. It nagged users who used IE to switch. 2. It installed without Admin access 3. It was fast 4. It supported the web standards well. 5. No major security issues.
Google Glass, Apple Watch. The only successful wearable is the FitBit. However for the FitBit they buyers of it already fit a demographic so they wouldn't learn much more from that particular data.
Perhaps they need to focus on how to much such devices useful to the common person, before marketers can find ways to exploit it.
So you should just give them lottery tickets. If you are not already an upper elite, you are just going to be dedicated as a minion. Often the one who will get the blame for whatever bad behavior the social elite perform.
But we got global warming to combat that. Those crazy Baby Boomers, they weren't being the selfish, greedy, and close minded group that we thought, they were just planning ahead for our future.
Where would you steer them? I can't really think of a sector of the economy that can be adversely affected from the following factors... Outsourcing, Automation, Obsolescence, Overly high regulation, Political interests to discredit you, Already saturated so the pay stinks, and/or extremely dangerous.
Computer Science and working in IT is just as risky as working in any other sector. Just as long as you work around the Outsourcing problem, you can become the factor causing the Automation, and Obsolescence.
However more to the point. Having Computer Science Education doesn't mean that kids need to go into a Computer Science field, but enter their field with a degree of understanding and respect towards the discipline. Realizing what is hard to do and what is easy is a good skill to have. In my professional life, I had numerous encounters with customers and managers who either say. Such process is impossible for a computer to do, while it has a lot of steps each step is logical (or sometimes just can be skipped) allowing for a quicky program that solved hours of laborious man hours. Then you get the seemingly simple request which is very easy to explain, and train a person to do. While for a computer it is a difficult tasks and the chances of failure are higher than the acceptable limit.
Computer Science is a discipline which is a subset of Math which focuses on the study of computation, and process workflow. You see many of these concepts being taught in other disciplines under different names, such as a MBA class in Business Operations which focuses heavily on performance algorithms, where instead of writing a program we look at a business process and find how to improve it.
Linux will win the desktop market once the desktop market is relegated obsolete. I am not discrediting Linux here. Just the fact that when Microsoft and Apple leave the desktop market, it is because there isn't much money in there because desktops would be obsolete. Probably relegated to more of a work station role than a Personal PC or Desktop. It would be a tool for engineers, architects and developers. Not a tool for every worker and person out there. This change isn't a bad thing, Linux can really shine with the more serious work needed by a workstation that Microsoft and Apple really don't care to focus on. You can tell that with putting the Windows 8/10 UI in Windows server 2012 (I DON'T NEED A FREAKING TOUCH UI FOR MY SERVER) Windows and OS X are more or less holding out until Tablets and mobile devices get to a point where they can run the bigger OS's and not the stripped down ones they are using now.
Slashdot Mirror
If your teens would prefer gaming indoors, alone (Well online with hundreds of people who they are interacting with)
as opposed to going out to the movies (Nothing more social going into a big dark room to sit down to watch a movie, and told be quite)
meeting friends for burgers (Nothing wholesome like connecting friendship with the injection of fatty foods. )
or any of the other ways that teens build camaraderie. (camaraderie?!? For teens they are so self absorbed that they never even listen to their friends they all just talk about themselves in turn. Their enemies are the ones who actually listen to them and use what they say against them. )
Well there is still solar collection when it is cloudy. There is very few times where it rains so hard that it is like night outside. While it may produce a lower output that could affect the cost calculation. However night is probably factored into the cost, with storage of excess.
Our primitive mind designed for a world where we are constantly under attack or will need to attack others, is the product of 500 millions years of evolution. Our higher brain functionally only 2 or 3 million years. So yes in term of making quick decision our primitive brain kicks in. We use it while driving, and every day living. That is why magicians are able to pull off their tricks on us. They get the primitive brain distracted on something else while they do something else. The higher human brain is much slower however it will try to process more information. Such as the question to the volunteers of this study if they want to do it or not. There is no immediate danger there is no pressure of instant response they can stand back and think about it. Factor in what rewards would they get, what are the risks, what trade offs from the action will occur. That is free will. However if someone tried to get volunteers and is a natural sales man would apply pressure on them to make a decision far more quickly. Because they will avoid them trying to think about it, they will keep their minds occupied with idle chit-chat, and implying the positive images of what will happen.
The study shows our primitive mind makes a lot of decisions for us. But nothing about free will.
There is a difference between Anger and Hate.
Sanders is not saying get rid of the Millionaires, but make sure they are playing on fairer ground, and the fact that they seem to have extra advantages, causes anger. However he is not touting kicking out the Millionaires.
Trump on the other hand is campaigning on kicking out people and excluding people not because of any rational slight, but because these people are different and scary.
I am not a Trump support and will not be voting for him in any election. However Facebook should stay away from trying to shut him down as the institution.
For one this guy is fueled by hate. So an active attempt to stop him, will just fall under his narrative, sure he will lie if needed, but if there is truth on his side, he will use it to his full advantage.
The problem is silencing such people is only effective for a short time, but their anger will just build up further. It is better to have them out in the public and hopefully get pounced from a strong majority vote, to show that they are not indeed the silent majority, but actually just a vocal minority. The more you can show you are playing by the rules. The more power you have if pointed as unfair.
You couldn't install Apps on the original iPhone. Jobs pushed HTM5 Web Apps for the job.
Chances are you will find a more isolated place in the Americas than in Europe.
But does the cat care enough about you to go thru the effort?
Or just glare at the burglar if he eyed the food dish.
Not much if you are away from your home.
So you found a way to move upward in life, you use this found skill to escape the lower class and ignore them, vs using the ability of your new found status to help out such people.
I hate sounding preachy, but you shouldn't use wealth to give yourself some moral superiority.
To be fair, for most homes, they can be broken into rather easily. There is undoubtedly a door or window which is unlocked, or a Lock that isn't properly set up so you can open it with a credit card. Even with alarms, if the person gets overzealous with their home security people are too use to hearing the alarm, So the crook can go in get stuff and out until the neighbor complain about the noise.
Locking your doors is really just saying, I am not home and please don't come in.
The home security industry really just plays on people's fear about getting broken into than actually offering any real benefit.
The problem is not two sided. We as a culture, would much rather ignore the problems of the poor than face them.
This argument "I don't want to see poor people" are Coded in a lot of different ways.
"Worried about property values", "Maintain community values", "Allow our children to safely play outside"...
But it really comes down to the fact that we don't want to see poor people. Because they can be scary because there isn't much for them to lose. And we may emotionally feel bad for them, and we don't want to feel bad.
So you have the time and resources to run a full source code audit on the OS. (You might as well build from source all those components, just in case the source code that you review isn't the same what is in the binary.)
The problem is we need Government and Corporations to do work that we don't have the resources to do yourself, now the problem is how can we trust them? Because I really don't want to spend 18 hours a day maintaining my personal infrastructure just to survive. I much rather focus on what I am good at and offer these services to others, where in turn I get different services in return. But perhaps the people I am helping out cannot fully supply everything that I need for my survival. So let's use commonly recognized notes which I can exchange with others to help manage.
So I would need a corporation to reassure me about privacy, I will also need a government to reassure me about the corporation's evaluation. Because I don't have the time and resources to do it myself.
"meat hammer" for tenderizing poor quality meat.
Marinades do little, that add flavor though.
Smoking and slow cooking tenderizes the meat too.
However cuts such as the Tenderloin are tender because that muscle doesn't get worked much.
Also fish have tender meat because they don't battle with gravity like terrestrial animals do.
It would make sense that manufactured meat could be healthier and tastier than meat slaughtered from animals.
Quality meat comes from animals which are Happy and Healthy (Who should only have one bad day in their life) (Less toxins from stress), and live a rather passive life without much exercise (more tender meat). This is hard combination to perform. Lab Grown meat can be grown without stressing an animal and exercising it. creating a good quality meat without the bad stuff.
The problem with Apple is you can't get a device speced for what you need. I Still don't need a glowing keyboard, or a high resolution video camera.
I would love a system with the general specs of a Mac mini, but cheaper that is bigger and fatter.
Apple was never the leader in features.
In terms of the competitors Apple always tends to be in the middle of the road. Even the original iPhone which set the cell phone industry 2 years to redesign their phone, still was a rather modest device in terms of features, And you could do more with say a Blackberry.
Apple at its best will come with a new idea for a new way to use a product, however they don't seem to go crazy on features. Apple at its worse is still rather decent quality product that looks good, but you have no use for.
Well I would be happy with just full color.
It would be nice to have Wall paper that you can program different colors and designs on the fly. Where you can be delightfully tacky one day. And refined and simplistic the next.
UI, performance, standards compliance.
There is no love for second best.
IE Gots its majority, because it booted and ran faster than Netscape (By cheating by integrating it in the OS)
Firefox got some traction in the mid 00's Due to a bunch of security issues in IE. However Firefox goals of a Small Lightweight quickly become bloated, so IE once again reasserted it dominance.
Google Chrome, Had a bunch of things going for it.
1. It nagged users who used IE to switch.
2. It installed without Admin access
3. It was fast
4. It supported the web standards well.
5. No major security issues.
Google Glass, Apple Watch. The only successful wearable is the FitBit. However for the FitBit they buyers of it already fit a demographic so they wouldn't learn much more from that particular data.
Perhaps they need to focus on how to much such devices useful to the common person, before marketers can find ways to exploit it.
So you should just give them lottery tickets.
If you are not already an upper elite, you are just going to be dedicated as a minion. Often the one who will get the blame for whatever bad behavior the social elite perform.
But we got global warming to combat that.
Those crazy Baby Boomers, they weren't being the selfish, greedy, and close minded group that we thought, they were just planning ahead for our future.
Where would you steer them? I can't really think of a sector of the economy that can be adversely affected from the following factors...
Outsourcing, Automation, Obsolescence, Overly high regulation, Political interests to discredit you, Already saturated so the pay stinks, and/or extremely dangerous.
Computer Science and working in IT is just as risky as working in any other sector. Just as long as you work around the Outsourcing problem, you can become the factor causing the Automation, and Obsolescence.
However more to the point. Having Computer Science Education doesn't mean that kids need to go into a Computer Science field, but enter their field with a degree of understanding and respect towards the discipline. Realizing what is hard to do and what is easy is a good skill to have. In my professional life, I had numerous encounters with customers and managers who either say. Such process is impossible for a computer to do, while it has a lot of steps each step is logical (or sometimes just can be skipped) allowing for a quicky program that solved hours of laborious man hours. Then you get the seemingly simple request which is very easy to explain, and train a person to do. While for a computer it is a difficult tasks and the chances of failure are higher than the acceptable limit.
Computer Science is a discipline which is a subset of Math which focuses on the study of computation, and process workflow. You see many of these concepts being taught in other disciplines under different names, such as a MBA class in Business Operations which focuses heavily on performance algorithms, where instead of writing a program we look at a business process and find how to improve it.
Linux will win the desktop market once the desktop market is relegated obsolete.
I am not discrediting Linux here. Just the fact that when Microsoft and Apple leave the desktop market, it is because there isn't much money in there because desktops would be obsolete. Probably relegated to more of a work station role than a Personal PC or Desktop.
It would be a tool for engineers, architects and developers. Not a tool for every worker and person out there. This change isn't a bad thing, Linux can really shine with the more serious work needed by a workstation that Microsoft and Apple really don't care to focus on. You can tell that with putting the Windows 8/10 UI in Windows server 2012 (I DON'T NEED A FREAKING TOUCH UI FOR MY SERVER) Windows and OS X are more or less holding out until Tablets and mobile devices get to a point where they can run the bigger OS's and not the stripped down ones they are using now.