That is so 2008. For finding work it isn't too hard to expect to have interviews via Skype (or other video services). Also it is cheaper to have VoIP phones than a LAN Line or a Cell Phone.
However the real issue comes down to the fact that we Want a Government controlled infrastructure of the internet as our current providers are expensive and often have bad habits. But we need to be trusted that the Government will not spy on us, and keep up with technology. 4mbs back 10 years ago, would be plenty, Today it is actually good enough for one person, for basic tasks, but shortly it would be too slow. Being that today our average web page size is the same as downling DOOM which if any of you remember the 2400 bps days, such a download took 3 hours.
Blocking opposing views is wrong. If they are lies or dangerous, make sure you have a proper rebuttal ready but just don't block it. Crazy Liberal Views are just as bad and dangerous. And if you stop and listen to even the Crazy views you find that both sides are feeling that there is some force that is disempowering them. The Conservatives thinks it is the government who are making laws that hinders our freedoms. The Liberals thinks it is the company's who combine low pay with expensive products that prevents us to get ahead.
Both sides see that there are people with power to control us and get the feeling the games is stacked against them.
The computer has one job, and it does it will. You don't need a faster computer if it does what you need fast enough. Especially figuring out how many times a program is just sleeping.
Oddly enough Linux and Debian in particular are not that popular for standard desktop usages. But Linux and Debian tend to find their way into servers and appliances.
The problem was the SSN was never meant for identification. It was just a number that the government used to track your Social Security benefits. Being that it was unique as for one SSN per Person, and most citizens have one it became your identity.
However to carry are RSA phob for my life to prove my identity is kinda worrisome as well.
While making it a life style helps make it sustainable. However as the parent pointed out. Even minor issues would cause me to put on my weight again. I had a bad headache last week and missed a gym session and for the rest of the week I was still fairly weak. I put on 2 lbs from that lapse, and will take me two weeks or so to burn it off.
Well I guess all those people with drug addictions and mental issues are all right than, because they are not fat, and don't abuse their bodies, oh how about this current tattoo fad? Getting needles injecting dye into your skin sells isn't abusing your body?
Our body is far more primitive than the culture we live in getting fat isn't abuse, but a survival mechanism. The problem is our life style never experience what our body is preparing for. Stresses say to your primitive body, I am getting stress hormones, I guess you are having trouble finding food, I will store reserves as fat for later. Sugary high calorie food, you must be at the end of the growing season, get prepare for fall and winter.
Diets do work, however the point is that you will not get to average weight, and you will be living a much harder lifestyle to maintain what you had lost. If it is abuse like you said, you should still approach it with a bit more compassion as most people are suffering from other problems where they feel the urges to do things that lead to weight gain.
Tumblr/Reddit as your sources?!? That is showing fine levels of research there. Perhaps you finished it off with watching some Fox News.
As someone who has successfully lost over 50 lbs and had kept it off for years. Who goes to the Gym 5 days a week, and watches my food intake carefully, However I am still over the recommended BMI. Sure I can run faster than most people, and I am stronger, and have much better insurance, I have the pulse and blood pressure of an athlete but medically I am still obease. I have dedicated a lot of time to this, and I am well aware how hard it is to lose weight, and I am not tolerating trolls to make it harder for others to choose a healthy lifestyle because they are afraid of such judgmental people. Who hide behind their trolling as (Giving them a kick to change) helpful. Overweight people are well aware of their looks, and health concerns far more than you are. And you know what the biggest excuse not to join a gym is? It is I will need to lose some weight first before I can join a Gym otherwise they are afraid of getting mocked by dumb ass comments like that.
Fat Acceptance isn't gluttony acceptance, but treating people of different sizes like normal human beings, and not some underclass that you can insult.
and Genetic predisposition, environmental stresses, social stresses, physical activity, food availability, income, self worth...
Many Many Factors. Like what is popular today if something is too complex we ignores the complexities and focus on one area and yell at scream at each other over why our simple solution which addresses one area is so much better than your simple solution which addresses and other area.
The tried and true "Diet and Exercise" does work, however it rarely ever get people down to a healthy BMI, But it usually gets their weight down where they have health benefits from it, however culture is fixated on fat shaming so even if someone does everything right they are still considered fat and not worthy to enter civilized society.
Oh just realize that sometimes innovation doesn't mean it is going to be toxic or net bad to the population. For every DDT they are hundreds of of safe and helpful inventions out there.
I like the Idea of the 3D Printer. However for the normal consumer what you can make with them isn't worth the price. In theory I would be able to 3d print replacements parts for many devices. Fix a broken key on your keyboard, Cell Phone Case, Random Decorations... However the cost of few thousand dollars with the cost of consumables, over a period you expect to use the device say 10 years, you will probably make a couple hundred dollars worth of material.
Now I am not saying 3D printers are useless, they make more sense in Maker shops where they can be used over a long time, as well making objects that are hard to create in low volumes in other ways.
The problem is people are always thinking progress need to equate to a practical consumer level solution.
Many times the process of doing it just because you can, comes up with many side effect results. I am wondering if the lessons learned to make an airplane fly around the world with solar, can have factors brought to the next generation fuel planes that are more efficient.
There are a bunch of people who are trying to get into Europe. Once they do they will settle and create jobs. We all just need to get past our racism to realize that.
Those who can stand on their own would be the ones with the most money in the bank. So it would be the older established companies, vs. the newer companies who are spending a lot of money in R&D.
The subsidies allow such companies to be competitive with the big names who have money to sell at a loss until their competition is dead.
If you think subsidies are unfair, realize the big companies have the ability to change the rules.
1. Affordable Reusable space flight means less cost per flight saving you tax money. 2. Technology to automatically land a space craft back can be adapted towards self driving cars, machine operations, and other areas where humans cannot react fast enough or would be too much of a dangerous situation to do so. 3. Earth is a limited quantity. A future in space travel will help insure our survival. 4. Knowing what we don't know and finding new questions to ask is how we progress.
Well it would depend. If you take a flight you may be able to safely take a snap going at faster speeds. Or you are taking a train.
I think the Trophy system wasn't to encourage risky behavior but to explore the world in different ways. Taking a plain or train, vs just sitting at home and taking selfies all the time.
Granted if I were to design a medical device I would probably just use a stripped down version of Linux that just does what it needs to do. Windows, OS X, and Linux with a full distribution on such a device is adding extra complexity where it isn't needed. That is why a lot of these devices are still running off of DOS.
The coded application should be the star of the device not the OS which had to be configured to get out of the way,
Such a device should only have port 22 for Administration and updates, and whatever port needed to receive HL7. A Virus shouldn't have any clear path into such a device as it should be locked down.
If a more moderate republican candidate Kasich, Rubio, Bush actually became the nominee, they would have a good chance against Clinton. after 8 years of a democrat statistics shows after a two term president the next president is usually of an other party. The sitting duck president usually gains lower approval ratings mostly because he isn't trying to win the next election so will do things his way more than what the general public will vote for.
However Trump and Cruze are too far off for the general population.
I wouldn't say it is a sure thing. Trump has a good set of strong supporters and also a good set of people who wouldn't want him just as strong. Clinton has a more tipid set of supporters and also a good set of people who really do not want her.
A vote for Clinton would be more of a vote against Trump than a vote for Clinton.
Clinton (IMO and the country) cannot afford just coasting with high numbers. Because if her supporters and the trump detractors just fail to vote due to disgust of both options. A lot turnout may mean the strong trump supporters get the majority vote, despite what the polling is.
Well the fact that the universe seems to have limited matter vs infinite void. Means that there is 0% chance that matter exists in the universe. However there is...
While I am not going to say that there was an intelligence behind it. However if the universe is limited in size, there seems to be a contradiction in the nature of the universe.
The local journalists have done the majority of legwork to get the news out. Then the big news sites repeat it and make the big bucks.
That is so 2008.
For finding work it isn't too hard to expect to have interviews via Skype (or other video services). Also it is cheaper to have VoIP phones than a LAN Line or a Cell Phone.
However the real issue comes down to the fact that we Want a Government controlled infrastructure of the internet as our current providers are expensive and often have bad habits. But we need to be trusted that the Government will not spy on us, and keep up with technology.
4mbs back 10 years ago, would be plenty, Today it is actually good enough for one person, for basic tasks, but shortly it would be too slow.
Being that today our average web page size is the same as downling DOOM which if any of you remember the 2400 bps days, such a download took 3 hours.
However the problem is BMI is used by Insurance Companies the the Government.
Blocking opposing views is wrong.
If they are lies or dangerous, make sure you have a proper rebuttal ready but just don't block it.
Crazy Liberal Views are just as bad and dangerous. And if you stop and listen to even the Crazy views you find that both sides are feeling that there is some force that is disempowering them. The Conservatives thinks it is the government who are making laws that hinders our freedoms. The Liberals thinks it is the company's who combine low pay with expensive products that prevents us to get ahead.
Both sides see that there are people with power to control us and get the feeling the games is stacked against them.
The computer has one job, and it does it will. You don't need a faster computer if it does what you need fast enough. Especially figuring out how many times a program is just sleeping.
Oddly enough Linux and Debian in particular are not that popular for standard desktop usages. But Linux and Debian tend to find their way into servers and appliances.
The problem was the SSN was never meant for identification. It was just a number that the government used to track your Social Security benefits.
Being that it was unique as for one SSN per Person, and most citizens have one it became your identity.
However to carry are RSA phob for my life to prove my identity is kinda worrisome as well.
While making it a life style helps make it sustainable. However as the parent pointed out. Even minor issues would cause me to put on my weight again.
I had a bad headache last week and missed a gym session and for the rest of the week I was still fairly weak. I put on 2 lbs from that lapse, and will take me two weeks or so to burn it off.
Well I guess all those people with drug addictions and mental issues are all right than, because they are not fat, and don't abuse their bodies, oh how about this current tattoo fad? Getting needles injecting dye into your skin sells isn't abusing your body?
Our body is far more primitive than the culture we live in getting fat isn't abuse, but a survival mechanism. The problem is our life style never experience what our body is preparing for. Stresses say to your primitive body, I am getting stress hormones, I guess you are having trouble finding food, I will store reserves as fat for later. Sugary high calorie food, you must be at the end of the growing season, get prepare for fall and winter.
Diets do work, however the point is that you will not get to average weight, and you will be living a much harder lifestyle to maintain what you had lost. If it is abuse like you said, you should still approach it with a bit more compassion as most people are suffering from other problems where they feel the urges to do things that lead to weight gain.
Tumblr/Reddit as your sources?!? That is showing fine levels of research there. Perhaps you finished it off with watching some Fox News.
As someone who has successfully lost over 50 lbs and had kept it off for years. Who goes to the Gym 5 days a week, and watches my food intake carefully, However I am still over the recommended BMI. Sure I can run faster than most people, and I am stronger, and have much better insurance, I have the pulse and blood pressure of an athlete but medically I am still obease.
I have dedicated a lot of time to this, and I am well aware how hard it is to lose weight, and I am not tolerating trolls to make it harder for others to choose a healthy lifestyle because they are afraid of such judgmental people. Who hide behind their trolling as (Giving them a kick to change) helpful. Overweight people are well aware of their looks, and health concerns far more than you are. And you know what the biggest excuse not to join a gym is? It is I will need to lose some weight first before I can join a Gym otherwise they are afraid of getting mocked by dumb ass comments like that.
Fat Acceptance isn't gluttony acceptance, but treating people of different sizes like normal human beings, and not some underclass that you can insult.
and Genetic predisposition, environmental stresses, social stresses, physical activity, food availability, income, self worth...
Many Many Factors. Like what is popular today if something is too complex we ignores the complexities and focus on one area and yell at scream at each other over why our simple solution which addresses one area is so much better than your simple solution which addresses and other area.
The tried and true "Diet and Exercise" does work, however it rarely ever get people down to a healthy BMI, But it usually gets their weight down where they have health benefits from it, however culture is fixated on fat shaming so even if someone does everything right they are still considered fat and not worthy to enter civilized society.
Oh just realize that sometimes innovation doesn't mean it is going to be toxic or net bad to the population.
For every DDT they are hundreds of of safe and helpful inventions out there.
I like the Idea of the 3D Printer. However for the normal consumer what you can make with them isn't worth the price.
In theory I would be able to 3d print replacements parts for many devices. Fix a broken key on your keyboard, Cell Phone Case, Random Decorations...
However the cost of few thousand dollars with the cost of consumables, over a period you expect to use the device say 10 years, you will probably make a couple hundred dollars worth of material.
Now I am not saying 3D printers are useless, they make more sense in Maker shops where they can be used over a long time, as well making objects that are hard to create in low volumes in other ways.
The problem is people are always thinking progress need to equate to a practical consumer level solution.
Many times the process of doing it just because you can, comes up with many side effect results.
I am wondering if the lessons learned to make an airplane fly around the world with solar, can have factors brought to the next generation fuel planes that are more efficient.
There are a bunch of people who are trying to get into Europe. Once they do they will settle and create jobs. We all just need to get past our racism to realize that.
Those who can stand on their own would be the ones with the most money in the bank.
So it would be the older established companies, vs. the newer companies who are spending a lot of money in R&D.
The subsidies allow such companies to be competitive with the big names who have money to sell at a loss until their competition is dead.
If you think subsidies are unfair, realize the big companies have the ability to change the rules.
Well YouTube for the iphone app at least does allow you to change your settings.
but 720p is a lot for a lot of mobile stuff.
1. Affordable Reusable space flight means less cost per flight saving you tax money.
2. Technology to automatically land a space craft back can be adapted towards self driving cars, machine operations, and other areas where humans cannot react fast enough or would be too much of a dangerous situation to do so.
3. Earth is a limited quantity. A future in space travel will help insure our survival.
4. Knowing what we don't know and finding new questions to ask is how we progress.
Because you don't mathematically exists I will just take it as part of a deranged imagination.
Well it would depend. If you take a flight you may be able to safely take a snap going at faster speeds. Or you are taking a train.
I think the Trophy system wasn't to encourage risky behavior but to explore the world in different ways. Taking a plain or train, vs just sitting at home and taking selfies all the time.
A lowering in currency rates, could also mean a big windfall, if they invest a lot into it, and the Euro improves.
Granted if I were to design a medical device I would probably just use a stripped down version of Linux that just does what it needs to do.
Windows, OS X, and Linux with a full distribution on such a device is adding extra complexity where it isn't needed.
That is why a lot of these devices are still running off of DOS.
The coded application should be the star of the device not the OS which had to be configured to get out of the way,
Such a device should only have port 22 for Administration and updates, and whatever port needed to receive HL7. A Virus shouldn't have any clear path into such a device as it should be locked down.
Why would being a gamer mean that you would actually be any good at administering a computer?
Most people in the office use computers all day, and still had no idea that you can Ctrl-C to copy selected text.
If a more moderate republican candidate Kasich, Rubio, Bush actually became the nominee, they would have a good chance against Clinton.
after 8 years of a democrat statistics shows after a two term president the next president is usually of an other party. The sitting duck president usually gains lower approval ratings mostly because he isn't trying to win the next election so will do things his way more than what the general public will vote for.
However Trump and Cruze are too far off for the general population.
I wouldn't say it is a sure thing.
Trump has a good set of strong supporters and also a good set of people who wouldn't want him just as strong.
Clinton has a more tipid set of supporters and also a good set of people who really do not want her.
A vote for Clinton would be more of a vote against Trump than a vote for Clinton.
Clinton (IMO and the country) cannot afford just coasting with high numbers. Because if her supporters and the trump detractors just fail to vote due to disgust of both options. A lot turnout may mean the strong trump supporters get the majority vote, despite what the polling is.
Well the fact that the universe seems to have limited matter vs infinite void. Means that there is 0% chance that matter exists in the universe. However there is...
While I am not going to say that there was an intelligence behind it. However if the universe is limited in size, there seems to be a contradiction in the nature of the universe.