Whats with morons bringing up the poverty side of things everytime a scientific achievement of India is brought up?...
Not just about India. There are blockheads everywhere. If you develop a cure for cancer, these same morons would admonish you for not spending the effort to cure diabetes instead.
Australia, eh?! Come back when you have a real country. I mean, Canada laugh at your ass. That's the Canada with maple syrup. You know, the bunch that think ham is bacon.
I suspect it's how Sarah Palin jokes are strung together that is the new medium. they're ubiquitous and cannot be stopped by any force known to mankind.
Yep. Our only hope is the womankind.
Come to think of it, man, that's true in so many ways.
How about the developing countries lacking potable water supply? P&G manages to sell its share of soaps, shampoos, whatnot in many such markets, I think.
Thank you. It's good to hear important and useful innovation from corporate sector for a change. Disturbing that it was not viable in the marketplace, however...
Fools!!! Don't you see? LHC turns on, financial blackhole appears out of nowhere and sucks our banks dry! It's just like in the movies - it's the damned physicists, both at CERN and Wall St. Blood's on your hands, you cretins!
You are such an Einstein that you can't bring up a single legit criticism of Krugman's trade theory, for which the prize was awarded, while calling him an assclown?
Your primitive brain reveals itself by your allusions to "you left" vs. "we" ("right" I'm guessing), "socialist" vs. (presumably) "capitalist". Have fun in your linear universe. Hotbed of something alright.
Krugman explained there is more to trade than simple comparative advantage - Japan and Germany don't make and sell cars the world over because engines grow on tree in their soil. That's the work cited for prize.
Who's the assclown? You, citing intellectually decaying National Review (just hounded out a Buckley, didn't it, any sane one left there?), or Krugman for liking science fiction.
Slashdot Mirror
And you wonder why some of us mock social sciences.
And more addictive. On a second thought, you're right.
Opiates have medical uses, but heroin is pretty difficult to argue for.
Not just about India. There are blockheads everywhere. If you develop a cure for cancer, these same morons would admonish you for not spending the effort to cure diabetes instead.
Let's not get carried away with LoC. Bag of tortilla (BoT) is the better unit for kernel.
"Even 2+2 is 4 only if everyone agrees". Sum like that.
Don't fall for that. That's a Taiwanese astroturfer. There is no domestic american wind immersion pc.
The super burrito lunch is a weapon of creativity destruction.
Ok, yeah, it's bad form to reply yoself and all, but, all you Muslims and Jews, you have NO IDEA what you're missing!
Pork, it's what MEAT SHOULD BE.
Damn. Tell us more of your "bacon".
Australia, eh?! Come back when you have a real country. I mean, Canada laugh at your ass. That's the Canada with maple syrup. You know, the bunch that think ham is bacon.
"where you're going, drums... don't stop."
Yep. Our only hope is the womankind.
Come to think of it, man, that's true in so many ways.
How about the developing countries lacking potable water supply? P&G manages to sell its share of soaps, shampoos, whatnot in many such markets, I think.
Depends on tax and shipping charge.
Thank you. It's good to hear important and useful innovation from corporate sector for a change. Disturbing that it was not viable in the marketplace, however...
Fools!!! Don't you see? LHC turns on, financial blackhole appears out of nowhere and sucks our banks dry! It's just like in the movies - it's the damned physicists, both at CERN and Wall St. Blood's on your hands, you cretins!
I don't know what this guy/gal is responding to, but it's insightful all the same. Why can't you mods get it right?!
Hah, I don't think you're all that far off in social sciences. Key seems to be wrapping it in an accepted formalism.
Good luck - there are plenty obvious "facts" and it's a nice chunk of cash.
You are such an Einstein that you can't bring up a single legit criticism of Krugman's trade theory, for which the prize was awarded, while calling him an assclown?
Your primitive brain reveals itself by your allusions to "you left" vs. "we" ("right" I'm guessing), "socialist" vs. (presumably) "capitalist". Have fun in your linear universe. Hotbed of something alright.
Krugman explained there is more to trade than simple comparative advantage - Japan and Germany don't make and sell cars the world over because engines grow on tree in their soil. That's the work cited for prize.
Who's the assclown? You, citing intellectually decaying National Review (just hounded out a Buckley, didn't it, any sane one left there?), or Krugman for liking science fiction.
Economics, a fine scholarly field, is not a science, as much as some economists would like to pretend with their crude algebra and stats.
Ethics is sex with 'es' strapped on... this an English thing?
You can hear the "get off my lawn!!"
Looks perverted to me - two ugly cars humping.