Slashdot Mirror


Indian Moon Mission Launched

hackerdownunder writes "India's maiden lunar mission (Chandrayaan-1) got off to a flying start today. Describing the launch as 'perfect and precise,' the chairman of the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO), G Madhavan Nair, said that it would be 14 days before the satellite would enter into lunar orbit. Chandrayaan carries eleven payloads: five designed and developed in India, three from the European Space Agency, one from Bulgaria and two from NASA."

305 comments

  1. How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Third World is exploring space, developing scientists and engineers, and developing their economies.

    Here in the US, we're developing our military, discouraging the study of science and engineering, discouraging all rational thought (God did it!), spending resources on some nebulous terrorist threat the will come some day (or so we're told), and developing industries based on chance and moving money around.

    I wonder which society has better long term prospects for its people, economy, and Government?

    1. Re:How things are turning out. by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      India still also has a huge problem with poverty. There's still disease, unclean water, etc.

      My parents spent a month there visiting friends and despite how quickly they're building up there are still many problems that need resolving. Maybe the moon mission is a good idea in some eyes, just as we are spending money on building weapons both of us should be putting it towards building schools, hospitals, and getting average Joe six pack health insurance so he can take care of that knee that has been bothering him.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. All the Indian and Chinese grad students are right here in the States; we're competing with their home countries for their talents and winning. This is what makes America the best; we get the best from the whole world to come here. I read that Harvard and MIT are so rich they're going to give scholarships to the best high schoolers from anywhere in the world to come here. Exactly what we need, IMHO. Let the stay-behinds work in call centers and script monkey jobs and whatever, and fair play to them, it's probably a decent job over there. But we must do even more - everything we can to get the best from there over here!

    3. Re:How things are turning out. by xNukEx · · Score: 1

      you could just as easily say that about many of the already-built up countries,america for instance. We have many people in urban areas that really dont deserve the position thier in.

    4. Re:How things are turning out. by dspolleke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      India is not / no longer part of the third world. Wake up and smell the coffee. It is Asia that is going to rule the world this century. China and India are both in a race into space, both large players in the world economy (outsourcing of technical staff to india, industry to China). Besides, India and China have 1 billion+ innhabitants each so a third of the world population is living there.. Where America fails to deliver payload to the ISS (where Russia is succeeding) Asia is quickly catching up. The whole world should turn their economy towards renewable energy and towards Asia instead of Oil and America. As european i don't understand where the american arrogance (and ignorance) comes from.. No flamebait intended

    5. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh, I agreed 100% until you had to bring religion into it. Science and religion are completely compatible. Look at the history of science. Modern science an the scientific method itself was founded by strong theists. For the Theist Scientist, the "God did it" argument against research will be met by the reply "So what? God did everything. Science is the study of discovering what God did because in the discovery we can understand the mind of God. Research is a form of worship."

    6. Re:How things are turning out. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The moon shot is one way to address the poverty. There is a huge market to launch payloads into the orbit. If India uses the prestige created by the moonshot to grab a significant stake in that market that will bring in money and pay for the infrastructure projects.

      The idea that India should focus on poverty first and eschew other areas has shackled the country for many decades. Nehru and his daughter followed that philosophy. Grandson Rajiv broke out in 1984 but was very naive and reversed himself by 1988. It took Narasimha Rao and his finance minister Manmohan Singh to really put India on the right path. BJP govt instilled the country with some pride. India has to become the world leader in a few areas and then use the wealth it generates to alleviate the poverty.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    7. Re:How things are turning out. by olman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone might even go as far as to say that investing in high tech will create jobs that will pay (through taxes) for all the feel good social services.

      You know. Give a man unemployment pay and you feed him for a month. Teach a man to design radiation hardened telecom transceivers and you feed him (and 100 others) for life.

    8. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe the plummer doesn't need no stinkin' health insurance! Especially not paid for by the government. Even though he and his parents have been on welfare a couple of times, doesn't mean we shouldn't scrap these damn "safety nets" and cut the damn taxes and healthcare. I'm sure Joe wouldn't have minded being on the streets with no home, no health insurace, and no prospects - after all, it's the American way!

      BTW this was snark, for the sarcasm impaired...

    9. Re:How things are turning out. by xNukEx · · Score: 1

      Being a youth in this time and country Ive wondered about the same. I really dont get it, I guess its somthing in the water so-to-speak.

    10. Re:How things are turning out. by ashraya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Whats with morons bringing up the poverty side of things everytime a scientific achievement of India is brought up? Yes there is poverty and Homeless in India. I see hobos in the UK too. There are more people in that country, so the ratio of Hobos is more. Whats to be appreciated is this - With the kind of pressure that a democratic government faces, imagine the budget pressures an organization like ISRO has? Even NASA is buckling because of budget cuts. If ISRO can achieve things despite poverty, despite such tight budgets, its a much bigger achievement! Remember, this is not China we are talking about where scientific progress can sometimes come at the cost of the people. India is a democracy - Lives are being improved. I used to live in whats a slum - in my childhood. Millions like me got a chance to improve because of an education system, flawed as it is, that is cheap. Dont deride the scientific achievements in face of other difficulties the country faces. The country thrives despite adversity, and sometimes because of adversity!

    11. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...and then use the wealth it generates to alleviate the poverty.

      Almost sounds like "trickle down" Reaganomics.

      Hopefully India will do a better job of it.

    12. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not only did you use the wrong "their", but you misspelled it.

    13. Re:How things are turning out. by bheer · · Score: 1

      > Here in the US, we're developing our military

      Yup, but the military (and offshoots like the DARPA) gives us a lot of very cool technology.

      Look, I respect what the Indians and Chinese are doing, more power to them, let's get some competition into space-faring.

      But it's also true that they're essentially using 40-year old tech. Like it or not, public money will only come your way if you're doing cool new stuff, not just going to the moon again and again without anything concrete to show for it. Which is why I hope NASA gets its Mars mission underway soon.

    14. Re:How things are turning out. by ashtophoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes its true that there are many opportunities in Asia now, let me talk specifically about India. The population may help in some respects but its a big problem as well. Most of India's population is in rural areas and is still quite poor. I think 8 yrs before America wasn't looked at as badly as it is now, was it? Some bad decisions (by politicians and by Americans by electing those politicians+Wall St and whatever else) marred America's view and economy. But that doesn't mean it isn't still a great country. I am sure American will bounce back and my faith in America comes not from the politicians but from the hard-working and sincere American people (and Yes there are quite a few). Not to undermine that India is going to do well nonetheless since the youth in India are waking up now, but there's still a lot of inertia. To put things in some perspective, I am an Indian who's been in the US since a while.

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
    15. Re:How things are turning out. by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So you're essentially saying:

      "We can pay them to come and be smart on our behalf because we have lots of money."

      I could use economic phrases like "unsustainable trade deficit" or anthropological terms like "secondary loyalty", but something tells me that you'd need to hire someone to say something smart back.

      If you want to know how well America's long term policy is serving it, look at the historical trend in US national (public and private) debt vis a vis its trading partners. Those figures will say far more about the first world's long term sustainability than I could hope to here.

      --
      I hate printers.
    16. Re:How things are turning out. by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Like it or not, poverty will always be a talking point when large amounts of money are being spent. This will continue until it is fixed.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    17. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      India still also has a huge problem with poverty. There's still disease, unclean water, etc.

      From my limited understanding, that has to do with the Indian Caste System, and doesn't represent the overall economic well being of India.

      The only cure for the poverty in India is a social revolution similar to the one in the US during the 1960s.

    18. Re:How things are turning out. by MrNaz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I am a Muslim, I fully agree with your uncommonly succinct and eloquent expression of this concept. I only wish more non-theists could understand this point rather than blindly (dogmatically!) disregarding religion as incompatible with modern scientific investigation.

      --
      I hate printers.
    19. Re:How things are turning out. by partenon · · Score: 5, Informative

      India is not / no longer part of the third world.

      I agree with everything you said, excepted the quote above. India *is* part of the Third World in all the definitions I know:

      - Not aligned with either the West or East in Cold War
      - Not a country with high HDI (Human Development Index)
      - Is a "developing country"

      But maybe you have another definition for it?

      --
      ilex paraguariensis for all
    20. Re:How things are turning out. by nic.stage · · Score: 1

      In an admittedly extreme and roundabout way, you could say that projects like this are akin to spending money on school. Research findings will help everyone (In India and elsewhere) learn more about space. I have to agree that putting these things in contrast with where 1st world countries are spending their money is startling. It makes you wonder what smaller countries would do if they had the money that countries like america have. If they spent it like america does I really don't think the earth would exist anymore.

    21. Re:How things are turning out. by dspolleke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've read about india's rural area's. If only one person "escapes" from poverty the entire village benefits of it. It was a news story a few months ago about a preteen girl that turned tricks and by her first trick she was able to build her family a brick house..(how regrettable it is that she chose prostitution as a way out it WAS a way out and she chose to do so herself) But there are numerous stories. If one "peasant" starts working as a clerk for an multinational he does not only funds his village school but also inspires his neighbours to escape from poverty. India and China are the world fastest growing economies.. And about that flamebait rating.. No flamebait intended..

    22. Re:How things are turning out. by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Depends how you do it, if your goal is to encourage people to set up companies and generate wealth/jobs then it's great, if your goal is to let your friends make a killing exploiting the poor then it's much much worse.

    23. Re:How things are turning out. by trongey · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...Give a man unemployment pay and you feed him for a month. Teach a man to design radiation hardened telecom transceivers and you feed him (and 100 others) for life.

      Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll spend his days in a boat, drinking beer and getting sunburned.

      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
    24. Re:How things are turning out. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Uh, maybe the reality is that the more people accept science, the less they are theists. I think theists tend to not understand that concept.

      Science and god are opposites. The whole god concept has only been around a few thousand years, and yet the planet has existed for millions (and we are certainly not the oldest planet in the galaxy, as there is empirical evidence to back that up). If you believe some "being" in some form or another that cannot be scientifically explained at all is a reason for our planet's existence, then I have a bridge I would like to sell to you.

      Of course, if you like to believe in magical sky wizards, please go ahead, but don't dare bring your beliefs on anyone else in the world. They are your personal beliefs and you should be entitled to that, but not to bring that upon other people.

    25. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is, the Indian economy has much more Government control and regulation than the US, so rather than just hoping that the market will work it out, they can directly intervene in the trickling down process. Whether this will happen or not is another matter, of course.

    26. Re:How things are turning out. by JohnnyKrisma · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you're really comparing the poor in this country are living in anywhere near the same conditions as the poor in India or many many other countries on the planet you should travel more. When's the last time your neighbor got Cholera?

    27. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting to me how people use anything and everything as a soap box for their views.
      - No one in the US discourages science and engineering, we just have a flawed, patchwork education system. It isn't difficult to reconcile religious and scientific views, but everyone just defends "their side" automatically, without any real thought.
      -In what way is China's scientific progress at the cost of its people? That doesn't even make sense. Their farmers are worse off than ours, but they aren't starving or anything. Other than that, they have homes, kids, cars and TV, just like us. Don't make it sound like their government is using slave labor deep in some deadly "mine of science". They do most things the same way as us, just with better roads and education (and more pollution, granted).
      To the subject at hand! - go India! maybe this will encourage everyone else to get back into pushing the envelope, and stop sitting on our collective hands! :)

    28. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are wrong. About 90 to 95% of IIT graduates are deciding to stay in India to start their careers. Even among tier 2 and tier 3 engineering institutions I noticed top candidates preferring NOT to come to USA. With rising US college fees, and declining(or stagnating) US salaries Indian youth will quickly see that USA doesn't offer them the best path.

    29. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are your personal beliefs and you should be entitled to that, but not to bring that upon other people.

      Then why are you telling people what you believe? Shouldn't you keep YOUR beliefs quiet?

    30. Re:How things are turning out. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And 40 million Americans have no healthcare, so what.

    31. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything you said, excepted the quote above. India *is* part of the Third World in all the definitions I know:

      - Not aligned with either the West or East in Cold War

      Wow, I had no idea that was part of the definition of third world.

      I guess I've never really thought about the specifics of the origin of the term.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    32. Re:How things are turning out. by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      And in 40 years they'll be thinking the same thing about Zimbabwe.

    33. Re:How things are turning out. by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

      That is true, as in the words of Aurobindo Ghosh, "One man's perfection can still change the world".

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
    34. Re:How things are turning out. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here in the US, we're developing our military,

      Are you really trying to separate India's civilian rocketry program from their defense spending?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:How things are turning out. by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder which society has better long term prospects for its people, economy, and Government?

      So are you saying rather than complaining about the US and stating we're moving to Canada we should say "That's it! I'm moving to India!"?

      Doesn't have the same ring to it

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    36. Re:How things are turning out. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      You are not proposing free education, the third tenant of the welfare state, are you?

    37. Re:How things are turning out. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is one definition more: The Old World (Europa) and the New World (Americas), with the third world being the rest. Still India fits though.

    38. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I am a Muslim, I fully agree with your uncommonly succinct and eloquent expression of this concept. I only wish more non-theists could understand this point rather than blindly (dogmatically!) disregarding religion as incompatible with modern scientific investigation.

      Well, it cuts both ways. The theists sometimes dismiss scientific evidence on the basis that it is incompatible with their beliefs in what god did, and what we're supposed to be able to do with it.

      Some people coming from the theist point of view treat science as evil or irrelevant because it can come up with some items which might contradict a rigid, theism based world view -- take, evolution for instance. Among people who need to believe in the literal interpretation of Genesis, the idea of evolution and fossils runs contrary to that. The notion that life could have occurred on another planet in a vast universe seems to cause some people some consternation as they want to believe that we are singularly unique and special.

      Generally, I agree with you. It is entirely possible to maintain religious beliefs in the face of science (even in tandem with science) as long as you don't allow your beliefs to override the science. You just need to keep perspective on what issues are best answered by science, and which are best answered by religion.

      Me, I think the questions best addressed by theism are largely in a different domain than the ones defined by science. As long as you don't try to pretend the science is irrelevant or untrue, religion is completely compatible with science. Religion speaks to things that are basically beyond what science can intelligently speak to.

      Sometimes, however, religion is incompatible with science. And, when that happens, you get people defending positions which aren't in line with objective, rational thought. Physical events are not really in the scope of theism, rejecting the reality of physical events because it doesn't match your theism is where the problems arise.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    39. Re:How things are turning out. by ramon_omar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Show a man to a fire and he'll be warm for the night. Set that man on fire and he'll be warm the rest of his life.

    40. Re:How things are turning out. by deepestblue · · Score: 1

      I've never heard that one before - is that your own? Sure, the New World is America, but the Old World is everything that was known prior, which includes India, of course. Do you have a reference for your definition?

    41. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US of course, Dummy.

    42. Re:How things are turning out. by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Poverty itself isn't the problem, it's inherited poverty that's the problem.

      "Fair" doesn't mean "everyone succeeds"
      "Fair" means everyone gets a decent chance to succeed and those who get things right do succeed more.
      You can still get unlucky on a fair dice role and be screwed.

      "Unfair" only kicks in when you go for multiple generations and players start with less chips and the game loaded against them.

      Problem is that almost no societies are fair, they either remove the ability of those capable of doing well from benefiting from it for the sake of the losers or alternatively screw the kids of people who've done badly for the benefit of the winners of the last round and their kids.

    43. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Science and god are opposites. ... Of course, if you like to believe in magical sky wizards, please go ahead, but don't dare bring your beliefs on anyone else in the world. They are your personal beliefs and you should be entitled to that, but not to bring that upon other people.

      I think you're being a little "black and white" on this topic.

      Science and god aren't opposites. It's not either science or god. Science and god speak to completely different endeavors and areas of human interest. Science attempts to explain the physical phenomenon around us. Religion contemplates mans place in the universe, his role in it, and the "meaning" of our actions and lives.

      Science tells us the big bang happened. If you don't believe in the big bang, that's your problem. However, there's nothing that stops you from believing in the big bang, and the notion that god was the prime force behind it -- essentially, creationism but on a much huger scale than typically explained by religions.

      There are many educated, intelligent people, who are completely capable of believing that god exists and not have to worry about any incompatibility in these two beliefs. It's the belief that either science or religion are true and there's no room for them to coexist which is the problem.

      At present, science can't disprove the notion of god. In fact, god and all that implies takes over where science ends. Believing that some divine power caused the big bang isn't irrational, it just requires a leap of faith. That leap of faith, however, doesn't need to be at odds with science. I know astrophysicists who accept all of the physics on face value and still believe that, ultimately, god is out there. Their belief doesn't in any way affect their objectivity behind what the science tells us -- their religion supports their spirituality and morality, and their science allows them to investigate physical reality.

      And, before anyone accuses me of defending the concept of religion from the perspective of a religious person -- I was raised protestant, spent about 20 years being an atheist, and now buddhism informs my morality and world view, but I don't actually believe in a god per se. But, I don't believe that all people who do believe are a bunch of crazy wing nuts who are gullible idiots.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    44. Re:How things are turning out. by Klaus_1250 · · Score: 1

      Science attempts to explain the physical phenomenon around us. Religion contemplates mans place in the universe, his role in it, and the "meaning" of our actions and lives.

      That depends on the religion in question. Many religions are founded on the attribution of unexplained physical phenomenons to a supreme being, e.g. God. It is how they derive their authority and succumb people into belief. The way you view religion is too smart and sophisticated (no pun intended).

      --
      It only takes one man to change the Wisdom of the Crowd to Tyranny of the Masses.
    45. Re:How things are turning out. by pkphilip · · Score: 4, Informative

      BJP govt instilled the country with some pride.

      BJP is a fascist party with deep seated animosity towards anyone who is not an hindu. During the BJP regime, they and their supporting parties unleashed some of the worst atrocities against minorities in India.

      To state that they have somehow instilled pride in the Indians is like saying that the Nazi party instilled pride in the Germans. That is to say that we (Indians) don't need that kind of pride. Thank you very much.

      Also your claim that the moon shot will address poverty comes from the same school of thought that believes in the discredited "trickle down" theory of development which essentially says that if you continue to pamper the rich that the money will somehow magically reach the poor.

      We know how well that has turned out. The wage disparity between the rich and the poor has never been more stark. The poor are poorer (google farmer suicides in India) and the rich are richer (google new Indian billionaires).

      I am fully in support of the Indian space programme and the wonderful work that ISRO is doing, but let us not kid ourselves - the moon mission has nothing whatsoever to do with mitigating poverty.

    46. Re:How things are turning out. by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The scientific method and religion remain at odds.

      It is possible to apply the scientific method selectively, as most religious folk do, generally within their own fields of expertise, while denying the truth exposed through the scientific method. This is a clear example of cognitive dissonance.

      For instance most Abrahamic religions have within their core doctrine that the earth was created 6000 years ago, which may have sounded believable 2000 years ago, but which by today's standards is truly arcane. The concept of Gods word blindly forces this reality upon billions of people.

      In short, there are probably not that many religious anthropologists, geneticists, and astrophysicists, while the sciences that do not investigate the evidence, like computer science, or medicine for instance are more likely to have proportionately more religious practitioners in their ranks.

      --
      Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    47. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.

    48. Re:How things are turning out. by TheAmit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To compare the BJP to Nazi germany is a little extreme. They are pretty much as right wing as any other right wing parties in democracies through the world. Why do people fail to see the commercial side of the deal here Havent we heard of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antrix_Corporation essentially this is a TD hoping that we capture a larger share of the satellite launch market. Its current revenue is already 660 crores. ISRO hopes to get a larger share of the pie.

    49. Re:How things are turning out. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Not part of the Third World? Which is it then - allied with the Soviets in the Second World or allied with the US in the First? :P

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    50. Re:How things are turning out. by fork_daemon · · Score: 1

      wonder who invented those terms, especially since India was known even to ancient Romans and Greeks.

    51. Re:How things are turning out. by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you diminish your fish market share.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    52. Re:How things are turning out. by philspear · · Score: 1

      The first paragraph there references the term's origins in the cold war.

      I was under the impression it started off as that and was now that "3rd world" meant underdeveloped, like wiki says, but that was an adaptation. Initially it seems to be like the "First person, third person" perspective, with the US and nato allies being first person, because when we talked, the first person "we" meant first world countries. I guess 2nd world countries would be the communist bloc, although I've never heard that term actually used. And then 3rd world would be everyone not involved, directly anyway, many of which happened to be poor countries.

    53. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not really a leap of faith. As Sherlock Holmes used to say, "Watson, as I have said, whenever all other possibilities have been ruled out, the improbable, however unlikely, must be the truth. I must say that this case is surely singular in all my experience, however."

      There are many explanations for the Big Bang, but as far as the physics go, once you include entropy and the fact that whatever started the Big Bang must have been here an infinite time ago, they all require that a first Big Bang happened.

      So the deterministic state machine description doesn't solve the problem. It just pushes back a finite time ago.

      So what started that first Big Bang? If it were a random event with probability p like a black hole that was waiting to erupt since the beginning of time, then no matter how small p is, it should have happened an infinite time ago.

      So it could not be a random event can't the cause. Combining the random and deterministic models together only pushes the Original Big Bang further back in time a finite time. So
      a stochastic process. can't be the cause.

      That leaves one other option, an agent of free will. Now different religions ascribe different attributes to that agent of free will. Stoics and other deists postulate that that agent has just enough free will to start the process and get it going to create rational matter called life (this is needed since if we are not rational, how do we know anything is true?). Spiritualists postulate that we are more than matter and have their own reasons. Theists postulate that the agent of free will, called God, is more involved and have their own reasons for believing this (even if it's the Sherlock Holmes reason). But Soren Kierkegaard did a huge disservice to both science and religion when he coined the term "leap of faith". That term lead atheists to conclude religion is irrational and it lead some religions and denominations to conclude that science is against the will of God.

      But faith (at least in the Abrahamic faiths) if you look at the original Greek and Hebrew means "I believe this because I've tested it out, so it is a trustworthy postulate". It doesn't mean "I believe it because my parents did". It actually condemns this sort of "lazy faith". It also doesn't mean, "The world is an illusion so anything that science tells you is a deception." That's Gnosticism and was condemned by all mainstream Abrahamic faiths.

      Science is good. As far as the Abrahamic faiths, it's all but commanded. It is more than just figuring out the mind of God. It's worship.

    54. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is not / no longer part of the third world.

      I agree with everything you said, excepted the quote above. India *is* part of the Third World in all the definitions I know:

      - Not aligned with either the West or East in Cold War - Not a country with high HDI (Human Development Index) - Is a "developing country"

      But maybe you have another definition for it?

      I thought - The cold war was over in 1990's when USSR split. - Even China is a developing country by all standards. > Not a country with high HDI (Human Development Index) "Agree perfectly with you on this point." But then look at the other side of the story: Just before 18th century India had a literacy rate of 50-60%. After 200 years of British rule when they left in 1947 just above 2% of Indians were literate. In 2008 literacy rate lies around 67% in India (and above 95% in cities) and improving (in leaps and bounds). Regarding health-care I am afraid to say but I don't like the US system either. It's too materialistic, and unless you are dying it takes hours to get even basic medical care (unless you are willing to spend a load of cash) I am currently at Carnegie Mellon doing my PhD, and find more than 50% graduates to be Indians. I have heard MIT has a decent number too. I have also heard that 2 years back Indians constituted just 5%. I come from a place in India which had no water and no roads 10 years back. Now it's a posh locality. I graduated from a university which grew out of an area which was a jungle and in 5 years became one of the top notch IT destinations of the world. So much so that I find Pittsburgh boring and static these days. Under-developed agreed...but there has been a change and something so strong which will lead me back to India irrespective of the much advanced lifestyle of the US. I was earning a decent amount of cash in Bangalore after I graduated. Most of my masters education was free. I even had a start-up which although did not go well, gave me a taste of entrepreneurship. I find it was easier to get capital and VC-funding there in Hyderabad or Bangalore than here in Pittsburgh. The point here is different; it is not that by launching a satellite India did something amazing. US did that some 30-40 years ago. But the fact that a country can shed its image of a "place of snake charmers", and move up the ladder under all the constraints is something which is inspiring. Africa suffered the same things, and could never rise up. Probably lack of education and institutions played the role.

    55. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Jesus fucking Christ, you couldn't be more wrong. This opposed to the Congress and other regional parties who shamelessly exploit the caste and religion divides? India has a majority of Hindus, and face it or not, it's because of that majority that we have a secular country. Try doing that with a Muslim majority.

      It's bloody time that one stopped this religious conversion and my Dog over your Dog bullshit and concentrated on what's needed to improve the lot of the country.

      The only good administration that the country had was the Narasimha Rao administration. The rest is just fluff.

      Nehru fucking blew India's seat in the UNSC. Imagine the perks we'd have had with it.

      Perks of space exploration: remote sensing, agriculture development, mining and resource utilization optimization, satcom, spying, national security. Get a sense in before you post.

    56. Re:How things are turning out. by kipman725 · · Score: 1

      you don't see HOBOS in the uk you see tramps...

    57. Re:How things are turning out. by niiler · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, people never seem to complain when the government buys expensive airplanes. The Indian airforce decided in 2005 to upgrade its aging planes and buy 126 new multi-role fighter jets. If we use an estimate from this contract, in 2003 dollars this comes out to 126*$72.9 million per plane = $1.2 billion for the upgrade, approximately. Here, we're presuming that if they didn't choose F-16s, whatever they chose was of a commensurate cost. By contrast, the space mission which has many indirect benefits (as pointed out by other /. readers) for India only costs $100 million in *today's* dollars. Now I know that militaries need to keep current with the latest, greatest hardware, but the contrast in cost is striking. It seems that people love to pick on space programs as if they are the only other source of funding for poverty programs when there are clearly other contenders for the expenditures.

    58. Re:How things are turning out. by niiler · · Score: 1

      Whoops, thats $9.2 billion for the cost. I read the result out of the wrong calculation window. I am such a nerd.

    59. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Bullshit.

      The BJP is not a "fascist" party. It is definitely a right-wing party but by no means "fascist". And I'm not even sure what you mean by "unleashed atrocities against minorities". Do you have anything to back that up?

      Don't forget that ALL parties in India play the caste and religion card. All the Congress does is pander to minority groups during election time and go back on their promises.

    60. Re:How things are turning out. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      I think the US, more than India, is developing India's scientists and engineers, at least at the higher education level.

      discouraging all rational thought (God did it!)

      I agree that we are increasingly discouraging rational thought. That discouragement comes from people on both sides of religion. It is polarization and animosity between ideologies, whether political, religious, philosophical, or anything else, that discourages rationality. I don't know how you intended what you said, but the implication is that you consider thought about God, or attributing causes to God, to be irrational, a priori.

      Knowledge and rationality comes in in many forms and by many paths. For people with a knowledge of God to be confronted with a statement like the above, is simply to encourage them to respond, "if that's what rational thought is, then I want nothing to do with it." In other words, you're doing the thing you're complaining about.

    61. Re:How things are turning out. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      Let me give you one line that sums up why you are incorrect:

      Of course that there is no evidence for God's existence is not necessarily evidence for God's nonexistence, though it might be if we had reason for thinking that if God existed there would be evidence for this.

      This all boils back to the same basic philosophy, empiricism vs rationalism or just straight agnosticism vs atheism .

      The big issue here, is how plausible you, yes you personally, find the idea that "god" or whatever you define as "god" to have been able to create our planet, all other concepts and things being equal. To me, I find it implausible. This is the real grey area. The grey area is not science or god, the real grey area is implausible or not.

    62. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not really a leap of faith. As Sherlock Holmes used to say, "Watson, as I have said, whenever all other possibilities have been ruled out, the improbable, however unlikely, must be the truth. I must say that this case is surely singular in all my experience, however."
      ..
      So what started that first Big Bang? If it were a random event with probability p like a black hole that was waiting to erupt since the beginning of time, then no matter how small p is, it should have happened an infinite time ago.

      So it could not be a random event can't the cause. Combining the random and deterministic models together only pushes the Original Big Bang further back in time a finite time. So a stochastic process. can't be the cause.

      That leaves one other option, an agent of free will.

      Whoa!!! This kind of fucked up thinking is why so many science-minded people look down on religious people. An agent of free will isn't a sole remaining "improbable, however unlikely" scenario. It's just one of a billion trillion totally made up things that you can pull out of your ass without having any observations that would even lead you to suspect it. That doesn't make it wrong, but holy shit dude, don't say it isn't a leap of faith.

    63. Re:How things are turning out. by niiler · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And yet the space program here in the US generated a number of clearly documented benefits to society and the economy. According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Budget">wikipedia:

      Other statistics and confirmation that "Space pays" may also be found in the 1976 Chase Econometrics Associates, Inc. reports ("The Economic Impact of NASA R&D Spending: Preliminary Executive Summary.", April 1975. Also: "Relative Impact of NASA Expenditure on the Economy.", March 18, 1975) and backed by the 1989 Chapman Research report, which examined just 259 non-space applications of NASA technology during an eight year period (1976-1984) and found more than:

      • $21.6 billion in sales and benefits;
      • 352,000 (mostly skilled) jobs created or saved,and;
      • $355 million in federal corporate income taxes

      Now, that said, it doesn't mean that the Indian program will be nearly as successful. But it does point out that these benefits are real and have been documented. Since some of the benefits are jobs creation, this can go towards benefiting people other than the upper class.

    64. Re:How things are turning out. by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Still, the conditions there have a perhaps unconscious effect on the way they do things. Take for example this picture of the astronauts on the rocket, before it was tilted up into the vertical position.

    65. Re:How things are turning out. by oneTheory · · Score: 0, Redundant

      My favorite is:

      "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."

    66. Re:How things are turning out. by eatfastnoodle · · Score: 1

      Space program is inseparable from military use. I actually think military spending is going to be one of only a few bright spots in the US that actually are conductive to the advancement of science.

    67. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet here you are imposing your belief that science and religion are opposites on others. It has to work both ways, you know.

      If you want to believe that such his the case, possibly based entirely on the semitic belief systems (really who cares about all of those belief systems which view the creation of the universe as a naturally occurring sequence of events, the jews/christians/muslims say the big invisible man in the sky did, all just lump everyone else in with them, because I'm smart, and rational!) That's your personal belief, go ahead and believe what you want, but don't impose it on anyone else in this world, especially not while demanded they do you a courtessy you refuse to offer, yourself.

       

    68. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Give a fish a man and it will eat for weeks.

    69. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not entirely sure of their ideals of governance, so I don't if the term "fascist" technically applies, but "unleashed atrocities against minorities" definitely does. I should qualify that, however. It relates to the RSS element of the BJP, not necessarily the BJP itself:

      Extremist Hindu attacks on Christian Indians

      "Gauri Prasad Rath, the president of the VHP in Orissa, said: 'I do not condemn the violence against Christians. I condemn the killing of Hindu sage Swami Laxmananda Saraswati ... Christians killed him.'"

      This absurdity despite the fact that evidence points towards Maoist extremists, who have, in fact, claimed responsibility for the killing.

      India is going to continue to have serious social and political problems until they get past their caste history.

    70. Re:How things are turning out. by oneTheory · · Score: 2

      Can poverty be "fixed"? For whatever reason some people are just not ambitious. Some don't want better than what they have and some don't think they can achieve better. Apathy sets in. Everyone knows someone who just don't seem motivated despite being intelligent.

      I spoke with a guy last night who said he's been homeless for 15 years. He said his wife and kid were killed by a drunk driver. Now he drinks and lives on the street and basically just lives to forget. He seemed very smart, coherent, and personable. He was no unkempt. I have no doubt that he could do many types of interesting and decent-paying jobs but for some reason he doesn't.

      I'd like to understand this better, but it seems that until you "fix" human nature you won't "fix" poverty.

    71. Re:How things are turning out. by TheWingThing · · Score: 2, Informative

      ISRO generates Rs.1.5 to the economy for every Rs.1 that it uses in funding. This is the immediate return alone. The sustained returns (improvement in education and agriculture through remote sensing), and commercial application of its inventions are not included in this figure. The goal of ISRO is to promote space research to benefit as much of the population as possible.

      ISRO is also selling commercial launch and remote sensing and imagery services through it's commercial division - Antirix corp which is making a profit.

      More references:
      http://www.isro.org/citizencharter.htm
      http://www.isro.org/international.htm
      http://www.isro.org/commercial.htm
      http://www.isro.org/rrssc/img_ser.htm
      http://www.isro.org/training_facilities.htm

    72. Re:How things are turning out. by Tiber · · Score: 1

      I, for one, cannot wait for a new era of SPACE WELFARE.

    73. Re:How things are turning out. by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are applying a very, very limited definition of religion, almost to the point of being a straw man attack. Personally, I don't believe that God created man in his image, or built the planet Earth, or even caused the big bang. I don't believe that God reaches down and cures people's cancer overnight, or that he causes hurricanes and earthquakes to punish those who anger him. I'm not at all convinced that he does or ever has put holy words into the minds of prophets, or inspired any book that holds the answers to life's mysteries.

      But I do believe in a higher power. It's not a logical belief, I have no proof or even anecdotal evidence. For all I know it is a curious perversion of brain chemistry or just something that has been engrained into me from my youth. I don't let it rule my morality, my morality is defined very simply as 'do unto others...'. It certainly doesn't change the way I see and understand science. It doesn't affect my life, or anyone elses, in any negative way.

      I often go to read creationist websites, simply to be prepaired with counter-arguments if someone tries to defend creationism as science. One of the most common themes is that science is attacking religion just as much as religion is attacking science. Now, when religion is encroaching on science, science has every right to fight back using evidence, fact, and logic. But when those who would defend science continue attacking religion beyond the area that science speaks, how is that any different?

      The point is, religious views don't have to constrain science. Gregor Mendel was a monk when he discovered the laws of genetic inheritence. Charles Darwin saw no conflict between the 'Origin of the Species' and the christian religion. Copernicus was a Catholic Cleric for most of his life, including when he published 'On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres'.

    74. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Name *one* another possibility.

      Science is based on the concept of a working hypothesis. There are essentially three classes of working hypotheses:
      (1) The universe was always here.
      (2) The universe is some for of cycle or tree-like expansion.
      (3) The universe started to exist a finite time ago.

      The first has been soundly refuted by science. All working models of (2) including the cyclic and multiverse and inflation models end up becoming (3) once you work out the math. They may be true, but they don't explain how the metauniverse (or first universe) started a finite time ago.

      So what started the metauniverse? It cannot be a random process with probability P. Work out the math. No matter how small P is, P time a long enough time would mean that the metauniverse started a finite time ago. That process cannot have been with us since the beginning of time, since it would collapse into (1), which is false. So it must have started a finite time ago. So what started that process?

      Randomness doesn't get you there. Determinism doesn't seem to get you there either. That leaves only one other possibility, an agent of free will. From the Big Bang, we can deduce no other attribute of the free agent, but you can determine some likely attributes based on the creation itself, in much the say way that anyone looking at a large series of paintings by a single artist can be able to learn something about the artist.

      Don't just dismiss this with a lazy hand wave and say "there are billions of other possibilities". You are a rational being, so please reply as one.

      What other options exist? Please outline your logic as I have (twice).

    75. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Of course that there is no evidence for God's existence is not necessarily evidence for God's nonexistence, though it might be if we had reason for thinking that if God existed there would be evidence for this.

      No evidence for existence doesn't imply non-existence. That is true.

      Then you say (I think) ... that if god existed, and if we expected there to be evidence that he existed, our expectation of evidence being unfulfilled, we can then turn that into evidence of non existence of god. I think that's what you say, but I'm not sure.

      I certainly don't accept that your one line statement has coherently summed up why I'm wrong. It sums up why you think I'm wrong, but I wouldn't call it a compelling argument.

      See, from a scientific and logical point of view, you can't really say anything about the existence or non-existence of god. There is simply no measure of evidence which would conclusively establish either proposition as true. Science basically says that once you're outside of a reality you can play what if with, you're no longer playing with science.

      By its very nature, any entity which would be capable of creating the universe as we know it would be outside of the realm of what we'd be able to know. So, speculating on what happens outside of the reality that we can understand and know is ... well, speculating. At that point, pretty much any form of speculation is essentially equally valid -- flying spaghetti monster? Sure, why not??

      The big issue here, is how plausible you, yes you personally, find the idea that "god" or whatever you define as "god" to have been able to create our planet, all other concepts and things being equal. To me, I find it implausible.

      Dude, I find reality implausible. That doesn't mean I find it impossible to believe in or reject that it exists, however odd or unlikely it may seem.

      Here is what I personally believe ...

      I believe that if such a being as god existed who could create the entire universe, that being would be so vast and profound that we could never really have a hope of forming a concept which would encompass that entity. I believe at that point that it's likely the universe would continue working within the physical rules which dictated its behavior, and planets and life would be a side effect that that universe. I don't think I can form an intelligent position on what god would be doing in the meantime, or what his opinions would be on the matter. :-P

      I believe that there is absolutely zero objective evidence which could definitely establish the existence or non existence of such a being. I don't think we'd be capable of seriously evaluating this evidence anyway as it would be way more than our wee brains can possibly grasp.

      I'm not advocating for the belief in a god, since I don't believe in god. I'm advocating for the belief in the belief in god.

      Personally, I view it as a modified version of Pascal's Wager. I found that atheism lead to dark places without answers, and theism ignores the answers we have because those don't match what they believe. Personally, if your world view includes what we know to be scientifically true, and if you choose to believe in god, there is essentially no net harm to anyone else. The intangible personal benefits you may or may not receive are entirely your own business.

      I choose to try to live my life as if there were greater consequences than a life which is merely ugly, brutish, and short. I can't accept the rigid morality of a church and an enduring "soul", and I can't accept the consequences of a system where what we do has no "big picture" implications and therefore morality is optional and a sign of weakness.

      I fall into the camp of "neither this nor that". The Buddhist

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    76. Re:How things are turning out. by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Science and god are opposites. The whole god concept has only been around a few thousand years

      Not really; Science is the "How", and god is the "Why".

      Also, although the oldest living religion (Hinduism) is estimated to have only been around 5000 years, I'm quite sure that religion as a concept has been longer, indeed Hinduism is believed to have evolved by absorbing pre-existing tribal religions. I'd bet my bottom dollar that religion and certainly spiritualism has been around since close to the dawn of Human civilization (admittedly still only a short period on geological timescales).

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    77. Re:How things are turning out. by slmdmd · · Score: 1
      Consider Ocean and wave. So many waves rise and fall due to various factors but for simplicity let us consider the factor is wind disturbance. So because of the disturbance a wave is born and rises up and then falls and dies. It produces action on the shore and because of that action there is reaction(s), one of the reaction is that the next wave will be either big or small. Lets name these waves A and B. Say the wave asks the question "who am I". The answer to that should be "you are the ocean" but the problem is who will answer who. The ocean will answer the wave, while the ocean tries to answer - the wave is already dead and the wave B is in existence now. Also, A was not constant, it was dynamically changing. A1, A2, A3...An. n=nth second. There never really was A but the Ocean it self. So should the Ocean answer Ocean? Wave it self is the ocean but the question arised because it thought that it is separate than the ocean. So the word "Wave" was born.

      In life we all are like the wave, multiple waves, John, Tim, Harry etc.. We do action and there definitely is reaction.(newton's third law) But we should not be bothered, it is pointless and useless. The question only exists when there is a thought which says "I am wave A and not the ocean" - "I am John and not the Universe". You know your self, if you know how you are running your own body? If you don't, then you are an illusion.

    78. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could have a discussion all day long on this topic, but GP has a point: if there's no empirical difference, why believe in a God in the first place? Granted it doesn't harm you, but what inspiration is there other than tradition to reach out toward a higher creator source that has no possible impact on your current life?

      While I think you were on to something declaring GP's view as too narrow, I don't think you went the right way with it. Religion is more than whether or not there is a supreme being. Religion is a source of culture, and a set of ideas and inspirational stories meant to guide you through asking yourself what sort of way of living is right for you. To discount religion as mere superstition is to discount the real improvements people have made in their lives just by having something to hold on to.

    79. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      People are not created with equal intelligence. A meritocracy is about as fair as a hereditary class system, and the belief otherwise is the great lie of late C20.

      The divide between rich and poor is greater because we have gone from negligible to minor class mobility - by those of exceptional talent - and the rest are convinced that they, too, can chase the dream. Every published success hides a thousand quiet failures.

      Those who believe that meritocracy produces a reasonable state of affairs are like the survivors who had prayed that they would be saved as their plane was crashing. Those who prayed yet died have no voice to recount their tale.

    80. Re:How things are turning out. by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I talked like an ass today, and have only noticed in retrospect. I will try to answer another day when my head is not in my ass. My apologies to you, and the other poster.

    81. Re:How things are turning out. by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Whats with morons bringing up the poverty side of things everytime a scientific achievement of India is brought up? ...

      Not just about India. There are blockheads everywhere. If you develop a cure for cancer, these same morons would admonish you for not spending the effort to cure diabetes instead.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    82. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. I talked like an ass today, and have only noticed in retrospect. I will try to answer another day when my head is not in my ass. My apologies to you, and the other poster.

      *laugh* It's a topic which often inspires such a response. Don't let it get you down. :-P

      No harm no foul.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    83. Re:How things are turning out. by TempeTerra · · Score: 1

      For instance most Abrahamic religions have within their core doctrine that the earth was created 6000 years ago, which may have sounded believable 2000 years ago, but which by today's standards is truly arcane.

      I'm not an expert, but I'm pretty sure that's thoroughly wrong. The 6000 year old earth, or young earth creationism more broadly, is a fringe belief within Christianity. Catholics, for instance, won't have anything to do with it. The 6000 years number came from a Christian theologian a couple of hundred years ago (too lazy to get a reference, even from google. It's been a long day) who added up the generations listed in the bible since Adam and Eve. It relies on the bible being literally true, which is itself a fringe belief most prominent in American evangelical Christians and it's a ripe target for anyone who wants to ridicule weirdo religious beliefs (which I'm not accusing you of btw) so it's a belief that gets a lot of press. I would be extremely surprised if there is anyone (trolls aside) reading slashdot who seriously believes that the Earth is 6000 years old because the bible says so.

      I have no idea what Jews or Muslims think about it, probably not much since they have their own religious scholars and don't need to borrow from Christianity.

      I don't mean to make any remark about the rest of your post, I just wanted to correct the point.

      --
      .evom ton seod gis eht
    84. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India's learning how to roll their own in that category as well. It's not all that bad for the money either, the LCA and MCA seem to be reasonably comparable to the F-16 and its Russian/Chinese counterparts.

    85. Re:How things are turning out. by fyoder · · Score: 1

      Only science as religion has any interest in competing with other religions. Science properly understood has absolutely nothing to do with religion, no relationship, not opposed, not in harmony, not interested since its realm is the demonstrable. Science is an incredible tool whose power is derived precisely from the constraints which keep it from ever being a religion, except when misconstrued by fools.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    86. Re:How things are turning out. by powerslave12r · · Score: 1

      Cartman : "That dollar gets me a chocolate milk at lunch, What? do you want me to get a regular milk for 10c!"

      --
      Real men read Slashdot articles at -1, bottom up.
    87. Re:How things are turning out. by Touvan · · Score: 1

      The space program in the U.S. went hand in glove with a whole host of other governmental programs - including a lot of work in education and other infrustructure.

      It's not a surprise that these programs had benefits. When you spend money on enriching the population of a country (as the U.S. did before the 1980s) the population enriches the country.

      Enriching the rich is fruitless, since there is only so much a few people can do with increasing wealth. the 400 or so families that control 90% of the wealth in the U.S. simply can't spend their money that fast, and now are now spending even less of it.

      That said, the space program was never about enriching the population, though that was a clear benefit. I believe that these kinds of projects will always be beneficial to any society that implements them - that includes India - even if they don't immediately address more pressing concerns.

    88. Re:How things are turning out. by turgid · · Score: 1

      "My underpants are on fire (give me 200 quid)" - Radio 1 Rap Show ca. 1999.

    89. Re:How things are turning out. by mapexvenus · · Score: 1

      The Third World is exploring space, developing scientists and engineers, and developing their economies.

      Here in the US, we're developing our military, discouraging the study of science and engineering, discouraging all rational thought (God did it!), spending resources on some nebulous terrorist threat the will come some day (or so we're told), and developing industries based on chance and moving money around.

      I wonder which society has better long term prospects for its people, economy, and Government?

      Just curious: How do you classify a country as 'third world'? For that matter, how do you classify a country as 'First world', and is there even a 'second world', and if so what criteria does a nation have to meet (or not meet) to fit into this category???

    90. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stay in rural india......never..not in my last 36 years.

    91. Re:How things are turning out. by khallow · · Score: 1

      The divide between rich and poor is greater because we have gone from negligible to minor class mobility - by those of exceptional talent - and the rest are convinced that they, too, can chase the dream. Every published success hides a thousand quiet failures.

      Who's "we"? This is not the situation in the US, for example. Plenty of counterexamples to your claim above. And the failure rate is much better than you imply. Every success has something like 3-10 failures behind it, a good rate, depending on the field. Further, multiple failures are not penalized.

    92. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qoute from Wikipedia

      "For the most part, Third World did not include China. Politically, the Third World emerged at the Bandung Conference (1955), which established the Non-Aligned Movement. Numerically, the Third World dominates the United Nations, but is so culturally and economically diverse that its political cohesion is hypothetical, as most Third World nations in Euroasia and Latin America have rich, growing and prosperous economies. The petroleum-rich countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, etc) and the new industrial countries (including China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Thailand, Malaysia, and the Philippines), as well as rapidly growing countries (eg. Russia, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Egypt) have little if anything in common with poor countries (eg. Afghanistan, Haiti, Chad, Somalia)."

    93. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "....don't dare bring your beliefs on anyone else in the world. They are your personal beliefs and you should be entitled to that, but not to bring that upon other people."

      Regrettably, unless you are living in a society where advertising is prohibited and especially if you live / visit in the US, you will be subject to people selling you all kinds of stuff-- soda pop, bubble gum and religion. Jesus "Great Commission" to his disciples 2000 years ago http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Commission is to go out into the world and spread his teachings to all the world. This includes POETMATT.

      Of course if you are referring to someone requiring you to accept Christ lest they cut your hand off, your complaint, in my view is entirely valid. If you are cross because someone gave you a tract or causally said to you after you awoke from a drug induced stupor "Yo dude yew need jEsUS, then maybe you're overreacting.

    94. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was how it was taught to me in grade school in the 70s. "Third world" referred to developing countries with lots of starving babies in Africa Asia and South America, but recent decolonization and a late start into industrialization was also part of the meaning. So places like India were 3rd world, but China was not. There was no 1st or 2nd world, just new and old and the cold war was never discussed in context with the term.

       

    95. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the earth was created 6000 years ago"

      Of course you realize that this oddball belief is only considered literal by a small number of Christians. The true purpose of continuously bringing it up is that it's a tool used by non-theist agitators who are attempting to drive a wedge between reasonable people of non-faith and the faithful.

      Sort of like that teaching back in the 60's about a tiny Eskimo subculture that placed their old an infirm out on the ice and set them adrift when they were too old to contribute. Repeat that story enough times to enough people and it's eventually perceived as reality--its something ALL Eskimos and other northern Native American tribes routinely did.

    96. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, then where did God come from?

      My wild guess is that the FSM created him.

      --Jeremy

    97. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought God did do it all, that's what I was told.

    98. Re:How things are turning out. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I think you need to look up the definition of First World.
      India doesn't meat th criteria..of course another 8 years like that last an neither will the US.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    99. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "BJP is a fascist party with deep seated animosity towards anyone who is not an hindu".....

      are you stupid or just uneducated ? I do not think you even understand India at its fundamental level. Just being Indian does not qualify you to be a judge.

    100. Re:How things are turning out. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "I have no proof or even anecdotal evidence."
      Therefore not science. In fact, it is at odds qith science.

      Not the Scientists can't believe, only that their belief is not science.

      "Personally, I don't believe that God created man in his image, or built the planet Earth, or even caused the big bang. I don't believe that God reaches down and cures people's cancer overnight, or that he causes hurricanes and earthquakes to punish those who anger him. I'm not at all convinced that he does or ever has put holy words into the minds of prophets, or inspired any book that holds the answers to life's mysteries."

      Sounds like you need to come out of the Atheist closet~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    101. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't answer my question, but your question is easy. He was always there.

      If you look at the logic above, it starts with the assumption that *something* was always there.
      It tried to define that something as an impersonal metauniverse which was governed completely by a combination of random and deterministic processes.
      It failed, leaving only the agent of free will option.

      There are only four options:
      (1) There was some form of metauniverse from the beginning of time that gave rise to our own universe. This was ruled out.
      (2) There was an free will agent from the beginning of time that gave rise to our own universe.
      (3) The universe *and* all physical laws just sprang into existence for absolutely no reason out of complete nothing by no-one...in other words, a spontaneous miracle can create any thing at any time for no reason.
      (4) The universe is a figment of your imagination.

      I forgot the two option in my original post mostly because they are options both theists nor atheists laugh at.
      If option (3) true, then there's no reason why another spontaneous miracle such leprechauns or FSMs as can't just pop into existence and that a new physical law called Alchemy can't just pop into existence which allows lead to turn into Gold and Gold into cheese.
      And if option (4) is true, you're just talking to yourself and everything you think you know is just BS.

    102. Re:How things are turning out. by XchristX · · Score: 1

      BJP is a fascist party

      Not at all. They are center-right, not far-right or far-left. The real "fascists" in India are those like the Congress Party/Communist party combine who engage in forced censorship (google Salman Rushdie, Taslima Nasreen, Ram Swarup), appease militant Islamists for the sake of Muslim votes (google Mohammed Afzal, National Development Front), organize pogroms against poor Hindus and Tibetan Buddhists (google Morichjhanpi massacre, Nanoor massacre, Nandigram massacre), distort/revise our history (like Nazi holocaust deniers in the west) to remove the vast atrocities inflicted on Hindus by Muslims throughout the centuries and intentionally sell our country down the river to people who seek it's destruction (google Naxalites, regarded as India's biggest security threat and heavily funded by Chinese Communists).

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    103. Re:How things are turning out. by JohnnyKrisma · · Score: 1

      And you're representative of the poorest folks in India? I didn't realize they posted here. My mistake. I spent 8 months in Honduras and I can tell you I've seen homeless people here in the U.S. looking better than many of those folks who did have to worry about cholera, tapeworms, malaria, and simply surviving. Not everyone of course, but it wasn't unusual.

    104. Re:How things are turning out. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      India is not / no longer part of the third world. Wake up and smell the coffee.

      Yes, it undoubtedly is. You may have had too much of that "coffee" there.

      It is Asia that is going to rule the world this century.

      I see no evidence for that, and I'm willing to bet I know a hell of a lot more about the situation than you do.

      China and India are both in a race into space, both large players in the world economy (outsourcing of technical staff to india, industry to China).

      A space race that is more than 50 years behind their western counterparts... They can have a steam locomotive race if they want to, but that's not going to give them one-up on anybody. Meanwhile, the US is gradually ramping up to send manned spacecraft to Mars...

      Economically, China has done a very good job at keeping wages low, and using their cheap labor to produce cheap junk. That doesn't necessarily translate in being able to transition to high quality, high priced, high tech, products. They've issued huge subsidies to get things going, but their economy tends to fall flat when the government money gets pulled out.

      Don't bother mentioning Japan... The fact that they've done well is certainly NOT an indication that just any other country can follow in their footsteps. I can list dozens of OTHER Asian countries that have been producing cheap junk for the west for decades, and haven't been able to make the jump to high tech.

      Besides, India and China have 1 billion+ innhabitants each so a third of the world population is living there..

      Population has NEVER been an indicator of economic success.

      The whole world should turn their economy towards renewable energy and towards Asia instead of Oil and America.

      Renewable energy, and Asia are both buzz-words, not very firmly based in fact.

      With renewables, only solar power has real potential. Wind, biodiesel/ethanol, and the like are obvious dead-ends which only make a bit of money with heavy subsidies and short-term economic situations. Solar power is likely to dominate in the next century, but it's an open questions whether subsidizing such technology will prove to substantially hasten developments. ie. When fuel prices rise, solar power is a natural alternative, driven by natural market forces. Forcing the roll-out while uneconomical may cost more than the benefits it provides.

      And it's interesting that you're endorsing Asia & renewables in the same breath, since the two seem to be the antithesis of one another. Besides, you could have said the same things at any time, for the entirety of the past half century... But the US and fossil fuels are still here, in force.

      As european i don't understand where the american arrogance (and ignorance) comes from.. No flamebait intended

      First of all, you're just assuming those who disagree with you are arrogant and ignorant... while it's just as possible that YOU are the one who is ignorant.

      Secondly, I sincerely doubt a substantial number of people in the US have any sense of self-superiority at all... There's plenty of fear of the growing dominance of China by average Americans, and a general ignorance of the place of America on the world stage. It's hard for people to be arrogant when they are mostly ignorant to the fact they are even part of the top world power.

      However, if you'd like some objective reasons for potential continued US economic dominance, that's fairly easy (though, of course, subjective).

      Only Airbus has been able to provide any competition at all to US aerospace, and it's not been a great competitor at that...
      For aerospace and industrial turbines, GE, Pratt-Whitney, and others continue to heavily out-compete their (very few) competitors around the globe.
      Heavy industry and construction equipment continues

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    105. Re:How things are turning out. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      And 40 million Americans have no healthcare, so what.

      HeathINSURANCE is NOT interchangeable with healthcare. Healthcare is easily accessible to anyone in the US, though they'll have to pay for it.

      And everyone in the US is entitled to life-saving medical care, even if they don't have ANY money to pay for it. It's only non-urgent medical needs that a significant number of Americans will find difficult to pay for if they end up requiring it.

      Of course the system should be fixed, but it's not remotely as bleak of a picture as you paint. It's most certainly not comparable with a 3rd world country.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    106. Re:How things are turning out. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Ever been to Mississippi? How about Tennessee or West Virgina (is that a pair of bangoes that I hear?)? How about west Texas? Or New Mexico? How about South Side of Chicago? Parts of Oklahoma? Watts? Harlem? Well, I have not been to Watts or Harlem, but I have visited the others and believe me, there are parts that are similar to Mexico and India.

      America (and EU) have LOADS to admire, but we all have our share of garbage.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    107. Re:How things are turning out. by forceman130 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked the US had two rovers and a science lab on the surface of Mars, along with several Mars orbiters, several around the outer planets, and a couple about the leave the solar system. What part of that is not exploring space? Also, you can debate the merits of military spending and the trickle down effect, but it supports a lot of scientists and engineers. We do suck at teaching math and science though.

      --
      Wow, a 7 digit ID - let that be a lesson in the perils of procrastination.
    108. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazis killed millions of innocent civilians. You are comparing the BJP to the Nazi party. Are you then saying that BJP has killed millions of innocent civilians too? If not, why are you making this daft comparision?

    109. Re:How things are turning out. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Here in the US, we're developing our military

      Not even a win there. It's being increasingly privatised and there are a variety of spooks upsetting the chain of command as well. The good news is that unless you end up with Pesident Palin I think things will slowly get better. However you'll find out exactly how deep a hole you are actually in once Bush is gone and nobody is hiding the problems with mindless cheerleading.

    110. Re:How things are turning out. by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      You are mistaking religion for philosophy. Very dangerous mistake.

    111. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another day at Slashdot hanging with the "I hate America" crowd.

      Seriously every article is just full of bashing America, some people just must hate living here.

    112. Re:How things are turning out. by shawb · · Score: 1

      Honestly, GP doesn't sound like an atheist to me. This statement fits pretty squarely in the deist camp. The phrasing of his statement presupposes the existence of God, but rejects the idea of a personal god that intercedes with human events.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    113. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure how much you have first hand information on BJP govt and comparing with Nazi's.

      This is not correct. The timing was good, Indian economy was raising and able to generate money. BJP govt was honest enough in putting back on infrastructure and other long term areas.

      About the other issues. Tell me a govt which does not have a day where it could not satisfy everyone.

    114. Re:How things are turning out. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      You are mistaking religion for philosophy. Very dangerous mistake.

      No, I'm giving religion the benefit of the doubt.

      However, your point that it might be misplaced is well taken. ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    115. Re:How things are turning out. by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1

      Also your claim that the moon shot will address poverty comes from the same school of thought that believes in the discredited "trickle down" theory of development which essentially says that if you continue to pamper the rich that the money will somehow magically reach the poor.

      Technological development (like the moon shot) has nothing to do with trickle down economics (tax cuts for the rich). As a matter of fact, India's space research has thrown up quite a few benefits. See this New Scientist article for a few specifics. I remember reading about how their research into manufacturing solid fuel translated to a cheaper process for making fertiliser and how manufacturing technologies for the high-tech casings and motors "trickled down" to safer pumps/vehicles. Can't find that article on the web though - my google-fu is failing me.

    116. Re:How things are turning out. by ghostunit · · Score: 1

      Religion is dogmatic, which stands opposite to any genuine search for truth. Philosophy is to try to understand the nature of things using the mind and whatever else we have as humans when science meets its limits.

      Certainly, there may incididentally be some philosophy contained in a religion's teachings, but whatever findings may be had from (for example) reading Jesus' parables are not inherent to the religion itself, but to philosophy. I tell you with certainty, mistaking religion with philosophy is truly intellectually dangerous, and can set back your understanding for years, if not your entire life.

    117. Re:How things are turning out. by pkphilip · · Score: 1

      Read up on the Gujarat violence. BJP used the same argument that the Nazi's used ("spontaneous reaction" to the atrocities committed by the Zionists) to target muslims.

      Also read up on the recent violence in Orissa. If you still have the time read up on BJP's good friends - the Bajrang Dal, VHP, the Hindu Munani, Shiv Sena, RSS etc..

      Every single time they attack the minorities they use the same lame excuses to justify the attack - they are only "reacting" to the attacks from the minorities..

    118. Re:How things are turning out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BJP is a fascist party with deep seated animosity towards anyone who is not an hindu.

      BJP is a right-wing conservative party like Republican party that you have in US. There are many such conservative parties all over the world. Compared to many it is still pretty moderate. There is no way you can compare it with Nazi. If so, then all republican presidents are like Hitler, which is no where near truth. So get your facts right before you pollute this thread with your politics of hatred.

  2. Only $ 80 Mn by ami.one · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At around Rs. 400 Crore / USD 80 Million, it must be the cheapest unmanned moon mission and.... 1st post

  3. mission control transcript by retech · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This is Chandrayaan-1 we have a problem."

    "You have reached mission control. Your call is very important to us. Please hold and the next available representative will be with you shortly."

    "This is Chandrayaan-1 we are losing thrust and are off course."

    "Remember, mission control is here for you. Have you heard about our latest service pack upgrades and special licensing agreements? Press one now if you'd like to hear more. If not, continue holding and your call will be answered in the order recieved. Thank you for calling mission control!"

    1. Re:mission control transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you forgot, "Sorry, we cannot cross sheep reblacement barts without a major credit card"

    2. Re:mission control transcript by No-Cool-Nickname · · Score: 2, Funny

      'Thees ess Bahb. I am bery glad to be helping you today. I understand that you are habbing a problem with your thrusters?'

      -Yes. Thruster 2 failed and we are .9% off course, we anticipate impact with the moon surface in 13 hours. We have attempted a manual restart and noted the ignition coil of thruster 2 had failed.

      'Mmmm. Have you attempted to restart the thrusters?'

      -Yes, dammit. I attempted a manual restart and the ignition coil has failed.

      'Hmmm. Uh-huh. Could we attempt a manual restart of the thruster now?'

      -We could but the DAMN IGNITION COIL has failed!!!

      'Yes. I understand. So go ahead and restart the thruster, using the manual restart. To initiate a manual restart, press the manual...'

      -OK, OK, OK. I did it. It still failed.

      '...restart button on the engine control panel. The manual restart will fire the ignition coil in approximately 30 seconds.'

      -THE IGNITION COIL HAS FAILED!!!

      'So how is the weather there?'

      -WTF?!!?! I'M IN SPACE. It's cold, and black, and I am hurdling at a big rock.

      'Yes, it does not get very cold here. I am in Bangalor, India.'

      -Listen Bijay. This is Sandeep. We had lunch in the cafeteria together two days ago. Set down the script and help me restart this thrust.

      'Mmmmm. Did the thruster restart?'

    3. Re:mission control transcript by IchNiSan · · Score: 1

      Please hold, I have to open a ticket to escalate this case. Do you have a pen? Hello, Hello?....

    4. Re:mission control transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is Chandrayaan-1 we have a problem."

      "You have reached mission control. Your call is very important to us. Please hold and the next available representative will be with you shortly."

      "This is Chandrayaan-1 we are losing thrust and are off course."

      "Remember, mission control is here for you. Have you heard about our latest service pack upgrades and special licensing agreements? Press one now if you'd like to hear more. If not, continue holding and your call will be answered in the order recieved. Thank you for calling mission control!"

      This is Ecostar, transfering you call to Chandrayan-1 because your call is too costly for us but important for us.

    5. Re:mission control transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capital L Lame. Aren't you guys sick of these jokes? yuck.

    6. Re:mission control transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is Chandrayaan-1 we have a problem."

      "You have reached mission control. Your call is very important to us. Please hold and the next available representative will be with you shortly."

      "This is Chandrayaan-1 we are losing thrust and are off course."

      "Remember, mission control is here for you. Have you heard about our latest service pack upgrades and special licensing agreements? Press one now if you'd like to hear more. If not, continue holding and your call will be answered in the order recieved. Thank you for calling mission control!"

      Dude, Chandrayaan is unmanned and it hasn't yet learned to make useless calls because it is bored :). Go back to calling 1800 FLOWERS.

    7. Re:mission control transcript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1980 wants its L back.

  4. Re:f1r5t m00nlanding by martin_henry · · Score: 5, Funny

    About 18.2 minutes later, ISRO Chairman G Madhavan Nair declared the launch successful which sent over a 1000 space scientists into a bout of jubilation. ( Watch )

    Yeah that party sounds like it would be 'off the hook'!

    --
    www.purevolume.com/martyd
  5. Giant interplanetary call centre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can envisage the giant interplanetary call centre they're planning to build now. Something like this, but in space.

    "Please to hold!"

  6. Great - More to know about moon but what about by slmdmd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Our current knowledge of moon is infinitely superior than the knowledge of our own ocean. They say, Grass is always greener on the other side or may be it is the quest to build more powerful missiles in the guise of moon missions. Not blaming India, six others did that too.

    1. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      To be fair, trying to explore space is a lot simpler than trying to explore the ocean. Under the sea, you have all the same problems of trying to maintain life in an airtight box, but that box is under significantly higher pressures, visiblity is a lot poorer, and there are a lot more things to run into. That's not to say that space exploration is easy, or even easier (especially on long trips), just that there are more unresolved engineering challenges to properly exploring the sea. And to be blunt, there's a lot less on the moon to analyse than there is down here.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      may be it is the quest to build more powerful missiles in the guise of moon missions. Not blaming India, six others did that too.

      Well, no. Evidence is that the rocket scientists in Russia and the USA built ICBM's because they could use them to launch things into space, and then spent a lot of time trying to convince their political masters that the OTHER side was about to start launching things into space, and so they should too.

      In other words, it wasn't space shots -> icbms, it was the other way around.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by hcdejong · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not that old chestnut again.
      We've had 6 manned missions and a few probes to the moon, all commissioned by a handful of governments. Our oceans are being surveyed constantly, by both satellites and survey ships (including submersibles) sponsored by governments, research establishments and commercial operators alike.
      The moon missions just generate more publicity (ignoring the outliers like Jacques Cousteau).

    4. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by ryanguill · · Score: 1

      Our current knowledge of moon is infinitely superior than the knowledge of our own ocean.

      [citation needed]

    5. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how naive. you already have perfected the art of launching ballistic missiles, and with accuracy. so how does launching rockets which has to dodge issues like gravity, or placing satellite into orbits help making a missile which does not need anything else than taking off and landing with a thud ? even an ICBM hasnt got much to do with gravity defying stunts or placing payloads into orbit. star wars is way far away, and no one's as yet got any kind of an idea remotely about it.

      typical stupid thinking. spy satellites, oh yet, cheaper satellite navigation, communication, satellite tv, etc etc... you name it, plenty of aplication.

      but, building missiles, lmfao

    6. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, it wasn't space shots -> icbms, it was the other way around.

      1.Space shots
      2.ICBMs
      3.Profit?

    7. Re:Great - More to know about moon but what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Appears like some people out here think that they are representing some nation which is all time thinking for the universal citizen. CRAP!
      Remember India has not invaded any country in the past 200yrs.. and every step taken by the worlds one and only democracy (the largest democary) is always for its people.

  7. Nice to see... by linuxg0d · · Score: 0

    ... India is finally catching up to the rest of the world.

    1. Re:Nice to see... by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      You have a fairly narrow view of the rest of the world. "To date only three countries have sent missions to the moon -- the United States, Russia and Japan." - http://archives.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/08/13/india.moon/index.html

    2. Re:Nice to see... by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      I regret I posted from an old article. As of yesterday: "U.S., Russia, the European Space Agency, Japan and China" - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2008/10/21/7155516-ap.html

  8. PROGRESS!!!.... maybe. by xNukEx · · Score: 1

    Its pretty great to see other countries add something to the spacey happenings on our rock.

    1. Re:PROGRESS!!!.... maybe. by Wiarumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The reason why I think this is progress is because India is a developing country. Their situation may be insightful due to their perspective on the situation. The materials they use, the way they manage it, the funding, the management, etc. Consider it a huge, multi million dollar case study for the world. Another example of this, the Tata Nano, is a revolutionary vehicle IMHO due to the audience it appeals to - developing countries. Another one I'm waiting on is mobile devices. These will, in many ways, will drive innovation (probably not compete) in developed countries.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  9. you forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US exports its financial crisis to other countries.

  10. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been there too and it is real poverty, not the "I don't have a flat screen TV" poverty that we have in the united states

  11. Outsourcing. by bigattichouse · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am extremely happy that space missions are gaining importance on the world stage, as I see living offworld as the key to human survival in the long run.

    Part of me wonders if the trend in outsourcing provided the economic base and not too small a technological leg up that India needed to succeed. I realize they have an amazing (and selective) university system that makes many of ours silly by comparison, but I wonder if our "American Spirit" had no small part in enabling this. I wonder if what we have to offer the world has more to do with that spirit than any other tangible asset.

    This then would give us some clues to our role in the world as our "empire" fades during this next century. We are to become the skunkworks for the world.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Outsourcing. by ILoveCrack83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, in the nineties maybe. And you might get this spirit back through a future president. For now though, I feel like the world is a bit fed up with the USA trying to be the World's Knight in Shining Armor of Morale. It's also a bit weird: Everybody has guns and violence is abundant on television, but God forbid (pun intended) that a breast is shown on tv.

    2. Re:Outsourcing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I realize they have an amazing (and selective) university system that makes many of ours silly by comparison,

      WTF No!!!!! The Engineering programs in most universities outside of select good ones like BITS, NITs and IITs is deplorable at best. The undergrad programmes just get the bare minimum done in terms of imparting wisdom and a hands-on approach to the students.

      Why do you think the guys here in US are constantly moaning about the lack of quality in the work that had been outsourced to India? Doesn't that speak volumes about the kind of skillset, workers that are being employed by those firms possess?

  12. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by dspolleke · · Score: 1

    A sad truth but the United States of America is now reaching for mars while millions in the nation are still dying from hunger and live in seriously abject poverty. And I mean real poverty.

  13. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Piyush+Srivastava · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But also take into account that the cost of the mission is a really tiny fraction of what the Indian Government spends on Poverty Alleviation programs. Also, ISRO's programs have also had an enormous role to play in some of these objectives, specially by providing weather forecasting and communication facilities. In other words, any criticism of India's space program on the basis of its other economic or social problems does not seem to hold water.

  14. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it makes you that sad, why don't you change your comfortable western lifestyle and feed a few hungry people. If you're not prepared to do that, it doesn't make you sad, you don't give a damn. Then stop judging others. You have no idea how stupid you look sitting behind your desk shouting 'Oh look at all those hungry people, someone feed them'.

  15. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by VJ42 · · Score: 1

    A sad truth but India is now reaching for the moon while millions in the nation (just recently been there) are still dying from hunger and live in seriously abject poverty. And I mean real poverty.

    Long term this is a money maker for India; there's a huge market for commercial satellite launches and other payloads; by going to the Moon India is showing that they're serious contenders in that market "We've been to the Moon, getting your satellite into orbit is easy compared to that. It'll cost you $xx million that's $x million cheaper than NASA or ESA".

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  16. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So? What are you trying to say? That India should wait until their problems are all solved? And for the rest of the world to move on?

    And did you know that India is now a serious emerging player in the satellite launch market? If money is all you understand, please be informed that they will MAKE more money than they have spent on this mission. The reputation that the Indian Space Research Organization will gain from this will get them more launch orders. And that means more money.

    And don't forget the technological spinoffs that will help make them better. And they have said they will share this knowledge with other industries.

    I was watching the launch today, and they interviewed school kids about what they thought, and you know what? There's a whole horde of young people that have been inspired to pursue careers in space science, just because of this. The intangible benefits are far too many to enumerate here.

    Grow up, man.

  17. Why moon? by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

    I am just a bit disappointed they chose to do a moon mission. US landed on the moon in 1969. Choosing something different, even a Mars mission or something feasible but on the same scale, even if it took another 5-10 yrs would probably be better from the morale/enthusiasm perspective of the country since it wouldn't be outdated.

    --
    Life is about being a Phoenix!
    1. Re:Why moon? by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they need to take a step at a time to get the funding. They may well do a Mars mission in the next decade, but if they had asked for 15+ years funding before any visible results were seen it would be hard to justify to the electorate.

    2. Re:Why moon? by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And don't forget doing a single 15-year project means you're going to put 15 years worth of mistakes into a single project, which means the project will most probably fail after all the hype and fanfare.

      It is much more sensible to go in small steps first, so that any problems will be solved before the big project.

    3. Re:Why moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it clear? They are going to moon to remove that American flag! :-)

    4. Re:Why moon? by adityapk · · Score: 0

      ISRO is sending the satellite to the moon for very pragmatic reasons - They're looking for Helium-3 and Uranium on the moon and investigating what it would take to bring them back to earth to power India's nuclear reactors. http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/India-Moon-Mission-Chandrayaan-1-To-Investigate-Helium-3-Future-Fuel/Article/200810315125699?f=rss

    5. Re:Why moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you any idea at all how much more complicated and expensive it is to go to Mars rather than the moon?

      I'd like to see you when you get kids:

      "Yeah, Jimmy learnt to walk two months ago, but then again, Billy next door has been walking for a year already, so that's old hat. I was really hoping Jimmy would start with pole-vaulting or something."

  18. Re:MOD PARENT OFFTOPIC by MrNaz · · Score: 1

    Obama is a messiah? I thought he just liked to dress like that.

    --
    I hate printers.
  19. Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by sanman2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    India's economy has turned around due to technology outsourcing to India by the rest of the world. This outsourcing started happening when Indians began showing the outside world that Indians aren't just the hungry clamouring mobs always shown on TV. As the world realized this, they began to see value in sending work to India. By accomplishing things like Chandrayaan, or building the Tata Nano, etc, Indians demonstrate to the world their talents and abilities, which increases the world's willingness to trade and work with India, creating jobs and economic growth in the country. Some Indians commenting here are unfortunately the backward navel-gazing types, who will never understand the basis for economic growth and alleviation of poverty. They still think in the most primitive backward terms about how to bring development, prosperity and relief to the masses. The lost opportunities and economic stagnation of the past 50 years under the social welfare state show how such narrow mindsets can wreak havoc on a country. The answer lies in Indians showing each other and the world how to be achievers, instead of just beggars forever clamouring with their palms outstretched.

    1. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by HungryHobo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cut down version of the above:

      They made it easier for companies to outsource to india and invested in education so they had something to sell(labour).

    2. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Jerrry · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "India's economy has turned around due to technology outsourcing to India by the rest of the world. This outsourcing started happening when Indians began showing the outside world that Indians aren't just the hungry clamouring mobs always shown on TV. As the world realized this, they began to see value in sending work to India."

      Nope. We began outsourcing to India because labor rates there are so much lower than in the U.S., not because of some perceived technological advantage. Pure economics. Very shorted sighted--a practice that will come back to bite the U.S. in the ass big time in the future.

      As the Indian standard of living increases and salaries go up, then we'll just find another country with cheaper labor and move our outsourcing there instead.

      As for the Indian moon mission: yawn... Ho hum... Been there, done that. Forty years ago.

    3. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by pkphilip · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Some Indians commenting here are unfortunately the backward navel-gazing types, who will never understand the basis for economic growth and alleviation of poverty. They still think in the most primitive backward terms about how to bring development, prosperity and relief to the masses. The lost opportunities and economic stagnation of the past 50 years under the social welfare state show how such narrow mindsets can wreak havoc on a country. The answer lies in Indians showing each other and the world how to be achievers, instead of just beggars forever clamouring with their palms outstretched.

      Ha! the wonderful belief that free market capitalism will solve all the worlds problems and mitigate poverty!

      Do you really think that private corporations with no compulsions other than "shareholder value" will consider the good of the poor?

      Just take a deep breath and look around you. Free market capitalism has failed spectacularly and the market is gone crying back to the governments to bail them out.

      In the last couple of weeks, the US government and the Fed has purchased stake in pretty much all the major banks. The EU is doing the same for the European banks. The Indian government is brazing itself to save the "Public Sector" banks.

      GM and other auto majors have already asked for their bailout. The telecom companies will follow suit.

      What do you term this other than socialism? where do you think the money is going when people withdraw funds from the private banks? All the money is headed in the direction of government bonds or are being placed in accounts with nationalised banks.

      Let me know if there is something that I missed in all this then perhaps I will drink that old "free market" capitalism koolaid again.

    4. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      Like what Nehru and Indira did and screwed up country with their semi-socialist policies and garibi-hatao bullshit. It did more harm to India putting it centuries backward. India is just starting to go in right direction from 2 decades. Lets see where India stands after next 10 years.

    5. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by vu2lid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The lost opportunities and economic stagnation of the past 50 years under the social welfare state show how such narrow mindsets can wreak havoc on a country.

      This (often repeated) story about "lost opportunities during first 50 years of India" etc is a myth. It shows a lack of understanding of post independence history of India.

      When India became independent there were groups of politicians who repeatedly argued against setting up of national laboratories and research institutions that exist in India right now. They argued that there is no need to "waste" money in those for a country like India, since one can always buy things from outside. If India had followed that approach it would be society with significant problems with poverty and related social tensions right now (If you need proof just look at the state of development of society in the country which is neighbor to India, which became independent during the same time).

      It is ridiculous to not to notice significant success of poverty reduction and increase in living standard in a complex society like India without creating major social tensions (if you do not know - famines with repeated crop failures were common in pre-independence India). A lot of the credit for this goes to development of strong independent research and industrial base during the early stages (Indian space program is a part of this).

    6. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by wiz_80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ha! the wonderful belief that free market capitalism will solve all the worlds problems and mitigate poverty!

      Do you really think that private corporations with no compulsions other than "shareholder value" will consider the good of the poor?

      The private corporations don't have to care. That's the point of capitalism. The whole thing is based on the idea that if you have something I want and I have something you want, we negotiate until we find some mutually beneficial exchange which leaves us both better off. The crucial point is that I am only worried about my own well-being.

      Do you really think that you and I would be better off if we sent our two things in to some central government committee, which would evaluate how much they were worth, how much we needed them, and how much we deserved, then take a cut to fund the system before handing us our Fair Share? I would much rather deal directly, TYVM.

      That many large corporations (such as my employer) make correspondingly large donations to charity is also something to bear in mind, but the point is that it's not required, and the system ensures that there are advantages anyway.

      The problems that we are seeing now are due to some misguided attempts to mess with the workings of the system. It's complex, with all sorts of feedback, and most of its failure modes are quite spectacularly nasty for those affected. I just hope They can reboot it in time: http://newsbiscuit.com/article/world-leader-agree-rescue-plan-turn-all-the-computers-off-and-then-turn-them-back-on-again-382

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    7. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      This has the tones of whats-his-face's plan. You know, that whole invest in education stuff. Oh yeah, OBAMA08!

    8. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      As for the Indian moon mission: yawn... Ho hum... Been there, done that. Forty years ago.

      And we haven't been back in a while. If India is smart they will figure out how to colonize the large rock. I here there's crude oil under the surface. At the very least you have a giant rock you can do whatever you want with as long as it stays mostly in tact and in the same orbit without affecting the hunk of rock we live on.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    9. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Linux007 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Wrong. Indian IT exports(including BPO, Engineering Services, R&D, Software Products) is currently at $40 billion(source - http://www.nasscom.in/upload/5216/IT%20Industry%20Factsheet-Aug%202008.pdf). Indian GDP is around $1.1 trillion. Indian IT exports constitutes just about 3.5% of India's total production. Indian IT firms got excessive media attention, that is the reason foreigners think like this. Also, there are many sectors in India, which are growing faster than IT exports sector.

    10. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by mrslacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Crude oil? From which fossils?

    11. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? Have you read his sig?

      Justin Dearing http://plane-disaster.sf.net/ MS Access and SQLite database editor.

      ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    12. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The private corporations don't have to care. That's the point of capitalism. The whole thing is based on the idea that if you have something I want and I have something you want, we negotiate until we find some mutually beneficial exchange which leaves us both better off. The crucial point is that I am only worried about my own well-being.

      What about the young, the old, the poor, the sick and the crippled who have nothing you want (goods, services, money) but need food, shelter and medicine?

      Should your precious Free Market remove them from the face of the earth?

      When you grow old and/or sick, and your savings are rendered worthless when the great Free Market has one of its funny turns, should you remove yourself from the face of the earth, or should the Free Market do it as you lie down and starve to death?

    13. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by ljgshkg · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, every decision that everyone makes determines what your next "outcome" will be. If I "get sick, and savings are rendered worthless when the great Free Market has one of its funny turns" like you said, I can only blame on myself. Nobody else is responsible for my own decision to jump into it.

      Sure, some people really have no chance because of sickness since they're born. But, at least in cities where there are reasonable education system, most people do have their chance. If they make the decision not to work themselves up, then I see that as their decision, and they deserves to stay in that condition.

      Helping others may be a plus. But nevertheness, nobody is responsible for other people's life or decision that hurt themselves. The most natural side of fairness is, I don't need your help, and don't ask for my help.

    14. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      And also, most people's health problem in modern societies are control or avoidable. Doing some exercise, sleeping in natural hours, eat a bit more healthily and avoid to get fat, don't smoke, etc. You name it.

      If those people who don't care about these get sick, why should I spend my money to help them. Again, one is responsible for their own doing.

    15. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Justin Dearing http://plane-disaster.sf.net/ MS Access and SQLite database editor.

      What are you implying?

      Apparently its one of Saturn's moons that they believe has crud oil. Regardless, there might be something useful to mine and if not you have a lower gravity than earth platform for launching craft to go elsewhere.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    16. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by khallow · · Score: 1

      What about the young, the old, the poor, the sick and the crippled who have nothing you want (goods, services, money) but need food, shelter and medicine?

      Why do you think this is a legimate problem? Most of the above can do things someone wants.

    17. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have all of the answers. Great philosophers have been seeking them since ancient times.

    18. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      When you grow old and/or sick, and your savings are rendered worthless when the great Free Market has one of its funny turns, should you remove yourself from the face of the earth, or should the Free Market do it as you lie down and starve to death?

      That's a good question. Should life become too miserable, I have every intention of "removing myself from the face of the earth". It's one of the reasons I have chosen not to reproduce; it's nice to have the option of saying, "screw you guys" and checking out without having to worry about leaving dependents behind.

      If the world or my existence became so brutal that it would force me to live under highly undignified or relentlessly painfully circumstances, you can be DAMN sure I'll not stick around to willingly experience it.

      "One should die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly." - Friedrich Nietzsche

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    19. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by rhyder128k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously god put some oil there when He made the moon.

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    20. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by ITJC68 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah right.. more like spread the wealth you mean... LMAO. Didn't work in the USSR it will not work in the USA.

    21. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Jerrry · · Score: 2, Informative

      "And we haven't been back in a while."

      Need I remind you that the current Indian mission isn't a manned mission. While it's true the U.S. hasn't had a manned lunar mission in 36 years, we've launched unmanned lunar missions much more recently (Clementine and Lunar Prospector come to mind).

    22. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      If the world or my existence became so brutal that it would force me to live under highly undignified or relentlessly painfully circumstances, you can be DAMN sure I'll not stick around to willingly experience it.

      What if it's unbearable simply because the Free Market makes it unbearable, as opposed to a painful, lingering death caused by a disease? That was my point.

      If you lost your home, your job and your money, and had no food or shelter, would you kill yourself? How more explicit need I be?

    23. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by mrslacker · · Score: 3, Informative

      I guess you didn't get the clue the first time round and/or are too lazy to do research.

      Crude oil (theories otherwise and evidence for non-organic alternatives notwithstanding) comes from organic materials, i.e. fossil fuels. And whist it's possibly that one of Saturn's moons does have life and might supposedly have reserves of fossil fuels, there's zero evidence for that. What you're thinking of is Titan and its methane seas:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_geological_features_on_Titan

      Yes, methane on Earth generally comes from organic sources (e.g. cows), but it occurs otherwise.

      Disclaimer: I'm not an expert on fuels by any means; by all means correct me where appropriate.

    24. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by susano_otter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What about the young, the old, the poor, the sick and the crippled who have nothing you want (goods, services, money) but need food, shelter and medicine?

      Ah, but they do have something I want, and that you want, too: Human dignity worth preserving.

      Which brings us right back to the original question: What's a better way of getting what you want? Finding someone who needs your help, and helping them? Or referring them to a government bureaucracy that decides who needs help and how much, and takes your money for that purpose? Are you really convinced that the government does a better job of spending your charity dollars than you would?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    25. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      Are you really convinced that the government does a better job of spending your charity dollars than you would?

      Yes, because it can ensure that those in need get at least a bare minimum necessary for a dignified life, and do so free of prejudice.

      Private charity relies on personal whim and is subject to prejudice (racial, religious, political discrimination). It guarantees nothing, and is often done to assuage personal guilt when the donor is faced with a particular situation (e.g. unwashed beggar in the street, Salvation Army collector at the door).

      The unseen needy get forgotten.

    26. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      The unseen needy get forgotten.

      Not by everybody, obviously. You haven't forgotten them.

      Yes, because it can ensure that those in need get at least a bare minimum necessary for a dignified life, and do so free of prejudice.

      Really? Government bureaucracies can ensure this? They can guarantee this for you, better than you can for yourself?

      Private charity relies on personal whim and is subject to prejudice (racial, religious, political discrimination). It guarantees nothing, and is often done to assuage personal guilt when the donor is faced with a particular situation (e.g. unwashed beggar in the street, Salvation Army collector at the door).

      Really? You're honestly telling me that you're some kind of bigoted, guilt-ridden jerk, who cares about the needy so little that you need good-hearted charity worker to shame you, and a government bureaucracy to force you, to do the good things you wish you had the strength to do on your own (say, the way that Salvation Army collector does)?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    27. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel so much better knowing that you have the solution for poverty.
      Now we have to tell the governments to hand their economic systems to you and the actual recession will be solved
      Wow

    28. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Finally my time to shine! Classic-Liberal-Arts-Education--attack!!

      *assumes most arrogant manner possible*

      From my experience, most if not all of the "Great Philosophers" sought nothing more than to make a living out of "seeking". If they were to actually discover "the answers", wouldn't that have put them out of a job? Not much profit in The Truth once it's out there. Oh, sure, there are Book Deals, sculpture/painting/photo ops, and the Ancient Greek Walk-n-Talk Show circuit, but will that really pay the bills for the rest of your life?

      If you ask me, they had greater motivation to confuse their students/listeners with rhetoric and abstract thought experiments than to actually discover The Truth...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    29. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government bureaucracies have been proven to provide a better base level of care than just relying on charities in the rest of the first world countries...

      They often have a lower % of administration costs also.

      And as to this: "Are you really convinced that the government does a better job of spending your charity
      dollars than you would?"

      Yes, very much so... Have you even looked at charity funding inequalities? "Popular" issues such as breast cancer are taking such a large % of the charity dollars that other charities are now dangerously underfunded. How can any one person be expected to know which issue currently requires funding the most to meet that problem's needs?

    30. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What's a better way of getting what you want? Finding someone who needs your help, and helping them? Or referring them to a government bureaucracy that decides who needs help and how much, and takes your money for that purpose? Are you really convinced that the government does a better job of spending your charity dollars than you would?

      The government is not some abstract soulless entity. The government consists of the people, and is set up by the people in the name of those people to solve large-scale problems that requires coordination. In a sense, the government is the people.

      And, yes, I do believe that well-organized spending of charity dollars is better than when everyone does it on its own at a whim.

    31. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      This is silly, old age is hardly a surprise and any rational person prepares for it with savings for instance. A large family with many children can also be seen as insurance for the old age. If you stayed single and spent all your money on expensive toys then you really have no-one to blame but yourself.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    32. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't get the clue the first time round and/or are too lazy to do research.

      I'm well aware that its generally accepted that our crude oil is fossil fuel. Regardless, I have declared that argument null and void. I thought I read somewhere that there was oil on the moon (and btw I called it crude oil because I felt the term fossil fuel was inappropiate).

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    33. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't get the clue the first time round and/or are too lazy to do research.

      I mean what does my signature have to do with my ignorance of how crude oil is formed?

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    34. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      "And we haven't been back in a while."

      Need I remind you that the current Indian mission isn't a manned mission. While it's true the U.S. hasn't had a manned lunar mission in 36 years, we've launched unmanned lunar missions much more recently (Clementine and Lunar Prospector come to mind).

      Yeah, but its been so long since a manned mission that if India lands a man on the moon it would make us (I am a US citizen) look bad.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    35. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by toiletsalmon · · Score: 1

      Why should I help you just because I saw you get hit by a bus? My time is money, so why should I spend my money on YOU when you obviously WANTED to get hit by that bus.

      I, like any respectable human being, am in complete control of myself and the world around me. Anything unfortunate that happens to ANYONE can surely be attributed to them being deficient in some manner. You just weren't fast/strong/smart enough to move out of the way of that bus. After all, one IS responsible for one's own doing...or not-doing as it were .

      Now pull yourself from under that bus and get your act together. Lazy bum....

    36. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      There is a saying: "Hard cases make bad law". The idea is that the law should be made for the most common case, and exceptions dealt with as such.

      In particular, the economy should be set up in order to function as an economy. Attempts to mess with it will hinder its efficiency as an economy.

      My personal plan is to work hard, earn money, save it, use some of it to take care of my parents should they need my help, use some of it to educate the children I plan to have, save some against my own old age, and spend the rest on goods and services, thus sending the wheel around again. I don't plan to aid my parents or educate my children less because the omnipotent benevolent State claims to be doing it for me.

      In fact, an argument could be made that I am worse off because of those attempts to provide services for me. My taxes are used to pay for education which is sub-par, so I then need to pay again for my childrens' private education, and pay tax on what I pay. My taxes are also used to fun horrific conditions in hospitals, so if my parents need some sort of assistance once they are no longer working, I will have to pay for private care, and then pay tax on what I pay for that.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    37. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      There is a book called "Scratch Beginnings: Me, $25, and the Search for the American Dream". The author set out with nothing but twenty-five bucks in his pocket, and set himself the goal of getting a job within a year, moving from the homeless shelter into normal accomodation, owning a car, and having some savings. He is a graduate, but chose to work unskilled jobs, just to make it a real example.

      What would be interesting would be trying it somewhere that has more of a welfare state than the USA. Here in Europe, the guy who painted my house was an immigrant who was in the process of working himself up from basically owning the clothes he stood up in to owning his own successful business employing several other people, so it can work here too.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    38. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. See you at the polls!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    39. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      A large family with many children can also be seen as insurance for the old age.

      Why should the family support you? Shouldn't they all play their part as perfect components in the great Free Market as you did before them?

    40. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      Work, work, work, work, work ... and more work.

      We humans are more than work.

    41. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think that's a good role for the government. All these people who have nothing to offer should be allowed to die if they refuse to contribute anything, but if society isn't efficiently finding them a way to be productive and contribute, that might be a good thing for government to do: to have a jobs program, for instance, that matches up these people and allows them to contribute something.

      IMO, everyone has something to contribute, although many need to be shown how. Even handicapped people can contribute something; when I worked at Intel, I saw many people there in wheelchairs, blind, etc. You don't need to be able to walk to use a computer, for instance.

      No one should be provided a free hand-out. And any decent person would not want one, when there's something that they could do to contribute. But we as a society need to be better in finding ways for the jobless to contribute.

    42. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough. See you at the polls!

      Where you'll vote for McCain, thereby making the things *you yourself* cite as problems even worse.
      Of course, he's on "your team" so magically, even though it'll only lead to even bigger government, it's ok as long as it's a Repugnicunt doing the robbing and theiving.

      Ignorant fools like yourself are the greatest problem facing this nation. Politics aren't sports, and if you're as deeply ignorant of basic simple facts (like that the Republicans are the biggest big government party) as you've repeatedly proven yourself to be then please for the love of anything decent, do something right for your country for once in your life and stay home on election day.

       

    43. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      So we are all cows to be milked and slaughtered when our udders run dry?

      I would rather not "contribute" to your Great Free Market in the hope of receiving some of your grudging charity.

      I predict that you will soon become an Evangelical Christian, or similar religious fundamentalist. You will develop something you will call compassion, but it will be limited to those in your group.

    44. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So you think you should be able to leach off of society, providing nothing at all, and getting food, shelter, etc. for free? What kind of society would we have if everyone acted like that?

      And what the hell does this have to do with evangelical Christianity? I think you have serious mental problems.

    45. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As Churchill once said, "the best argument against democracy is a 5-minute conversation with the average voter."

      Ignorant fools are a problem for every representative democracy. In ours (USA), they're either going to vote for the war-mongering idiot McCain who will start a war with Iran and wreck our economy, or the empty suit Obama who's in the pocket of the RIAA/MPAA who will raise taxes (despite his claims on the campaign trail) and wreck our economy.

      If voters were highly intelligent and thoughtful, we wouldn't have ANY of these candidates. We'd have great, uncorrupt leaders. But that's not going to happen, so claiming people like the OP is "ruining" things by voting for one of two equally bad candidates is really a silly claim.

    46. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It was no oil. It was some predecessor material. Something that could be made into oil, but that it worthless. Unfortunately trough a sensationalist headline people thought it's oil.

      And I am implying that MS Access "is a piece of shit, and so is your face!"(TM). :D
      Same thing for SQLite, because it is no real database.

      And he said "editor", not "developer". That description fits someone who inputs data to Access tables / form fields.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    47. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I am implying that MS Access "is a piece of shit, and so is your face!"(TM). :D Same thing for SQLite, because it is no real database.

      And he said "editor", not "developer". That description fits someone who inputs data to Access tables / form fields.

      Ok there buddy. A few counter points for you. First of all if you read the home page for PlaneDisaster.NET, or though about the name, you would realize I have no grat love for JetSQL (the database engine MS access uses). However, it comes preinstalled on all windows machines. Its also good enough for a small dataset edited by a local workstation. That and syncing wors well with PocketPCs via Pocket access.

      Finally, the program is an editor developed by a developer (myself) and used by at least one developer (myself again).

      Now in the one instance I developed an application that stored its data in an mdb file, it made complete sense to do it that way considering all constraints present. When I wrote a website from the ground up that was more "traditional" in its requirements I used php for the application code and stored the data in a postgres database with lots of foreign keys and triggers. Different tools for different tasks.

      Now if you really wish to check my credentials as a programmer, you will find my other open source contributions on my ohloh profile. I don't believe any of them are data related. However, if you want an example MS-SQL database from a talk I gave demonstrating advanced RDBMS features I can provide that as well.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    48. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by turgid · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was trying to be insulting since insults are all the rage round here.

      I was trying to make the point that your simplistic black-and-white reasoning was very similar to that of religious fundamentalists and political extremists.

    49. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Darby · · Score: 1

      Claiming that McCain and Obama are *equally* bad is ridiculous and puts you squarely in the "part of the problem" category.

      Of course Obama will have to raise taxes. That's what happens when the Republicans go on one of their crazy drunken spending sprees.

      Bush is just following along in Reagan's footsteps. Bush I was forced *by Reagan's disastrous voodoo economics* to raise taxes to pay the bills Reagan ran up on credit.

      Bush followed pretty much identical policies as Reagan across the board with the same results.

      Raising taxes isn't a bad thing in and of itself. Spending at levels requiring it is a bad thing. Obama will spend less than Bush did if history is any guide. Democrats spend a lot and tax to pay for it. Republican spend *a lot more* and put it on the credit card at interest.
      So raising taxes to cover the current Republican spending spree is just standard MO.

      I suppose you think Reagan and Bush's bills will be paid with fairy dust and unicorn farts?

      McCain has nothing to offer except for having been Bush's lapdog over the last 8 years after having lost to Bush after Bush sold him as a coward (this coming from a deserter even) who had a black baby.

      Now after disgracing himself by kissing the ass of such a scumbag McCain wants to keep leading us on down the same path that the sane people knew was a disaster when Reagan was pulling the same fucking scam.

      There's no fucking way Obama could be as bad even if he wanted to. He doesn't have the sycophantic lockstep goosestepping among his party that's come to define the Republican party.

      The Republican party believes in big fascist government and theocracy and that's it given the evidence of the last 30 years. We fought that shit in WW2, and not only did we elect the son and a grandson of man who betrayed America to the Nazis in WW2, but we're continuing even farther down that right wing path.

      A vote for McCain is a piss in the face of everybody who fought the Nazis. Just like voting Reagan Bush or Bush was.

    50. Re:Old-Fashioned Navel-Gazing by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, the Republicans are fascists, and the Democrats are socialists (and really corrupt ones at that). They're both bad. You can argue all you want about who's "less bad", but that's not going to make me want to vote for someone who's bad.

      Voting for the lesser of two evils is stupid. All you're going to get is evil. Why don't we try voting for someone good instead, for a change?

  20. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then how are you going to help those poor people? Give them free money and food so they'll continue to do nothing and further your poverty problem?

    How about actually setting up a sensible education system, then a sensible industrial sector, and then a sensible R&D sector for future industries; so that people can be productive and build wealth for your country?

    Doesn't that sound a lot like what India is trying to do?

  21. But Wait... by bmwEnthusiast · · Score: 0

    7-11 is already the biggest chain on this planet, will i really be able to get a big gulp when i visit the moon the first time?

  22. Hope they are smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    If their rocket engineering is anything like their software engineering, they will probably blow themselves up or end up in Nevada and think it's the moon.

    1. Re:Hope they are smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The joke is now on you mate. So much for blabbering morons.

  23. It's economics 101 by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    And the Indians are very good economists. Trickle down doesn't work, but what does work is moving the economy upwards in the tech chain. First you mine resources. Then you process what you mine. Then you make widgets. Then you put widgets together. Then you write the software to control the widget assemblies. Then you invent new things that need widget assemblies and software.

    A country like Australia works because the population is tiny and the extraction of resources is large, but even so they have developed a high tech industry. Germany has most of its industrial base far up the food chain, Switzerland even more so. Mexico makes cars, cars are made in the UK regions, but the UK industrial heartland is more interested in the R&D around Formula 1 racing because the value added is better. The US has tried to take the process a stage further with banking and intellectual property, which requires few reources but has a high value added; unfortunately as we are seeing this value added, because it has so little real asset behind it, is extremely vulnerable to fashion and obsolescence.

    The Indians know all of this. The faster they can move their industry up the chain, the more they can spend on getting the peasants past a 500BCE living standard.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:It's economics 101 by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      and intellectual property, which requires few reources but has a high value added;

            No no no! That would be high LAWYER added. But who said lawyers add value to anything except themselves?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:It's economics 101 by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

      Sooooo...where does the money to do all that come from? Is the Indian government providing money for mining, widget-making, and software, or is that coming from private industry which has the freedom to use its own money as it sees fit for investment?

  24. Indian flag before Chinese on moon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have the Chinese put a flag on the moon till now, or is India beating them to it?

  25. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So India should stop all technological advances until poverty is rooted out?

  26. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    *cough* Appalachia in 1969 *cough*

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  27. Back to the Moon shot.... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny
    I thought this space shot was for a much simpler reason...

    First Quickie Mart on the moon!!!

    Thank you...come again....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  28. NASA Projects conspiracy...er, links... by Amigori · · Score: 1

    To start the fire of the moonlanding conspiracy flame war (that will inevitably start somewhere in this thread), here goes -

    The two NASA instruments are designed to layover images and data readings where the landers and equipment are or are thought to be. Whether through some fancy electronic trickery/photoshop, or they built a scale model that hangs in front of the lenses at adjustable distances, or some other kooky theory. [sidebar] Perhaps the ISRO could snap a few photos of the sites in question to prove, yes or no, that we've been there and end this conspiracy.[/sidebar]

    The actual projects by NASA are the Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M^3), here, and the Mini Synthetic Aperture Radar (Mini-SAR), here.

    Congratulations to the ISRO! This really is a great achievement. Plus, my ulterior motive being that I hope to see a Space Race reignited.

    --
    "The quality of life is determined by its activites."--Aristotle
  29. I know who you were aiming at by Shivetya · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    but really it just gets old to hear this same tired line. It also is very easy to exaggerate issues so they appear as if everyone who could be bad is being bad but that is far from the truth. The last part about developing industries on the chance of making money is directly the fault of the Congress preventing oversight into Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. Hell they are resisting now investigations into those two companies and only those two until AFTER the election - why is that?

    As for the rational thought comment, ever wonder why it gets so highlighted in papers when it occurs? BECAUSE IT IS SO RARE. If it were common then the papers and such would rate it to page three if that. The fact is that the most likely interference into education (read public schools and college) comes from religions claiming to be discriminated against because school falls on the wrong day, pork is served, or cheer leaders show some leg.

    The only thing discouraging science and engineering in the US is the public school system because its too hard and therefor not fair. We had an interview in the local paper recently where they talked about reducing the math test requirements because it wasn't "fair". Some have suggested the rigorous testing was "racist". How do you expect ANY education system to operate under the fear of being branded racist? Then top it off with the fact that some tenured teachers aren't worth squat but are untouchable means if our kid gets a good math teacher we chalk it up to luck.

    The US is exploring space, we are just far past the mundane stuff. Mundane meaning landing on things we can see with the naked eye. We have put probes on planets other countries aren't even considering. Would that be a waste in your book because no one else is doing it? When it comes to the military, well our science and space exploration go hand in hand with technical innovations. Please don't tell me you do understand that this launch mechanism India developed can be easily adapted to deliver payloads anywhere on Earth as well. Its not like they have great relations with Pakistan and I do believe if we were not buying off both there have been some really rotten incidents already.

    Frankly I am quite fine with the terrorist threat remaining nebulous, it was all too real a few years back.

    Which society is better long term, the US is thank you. For every failing I can attribute to the US I can usually find them elsewhere as well. It just comes down to who is trying to score the points as to when its important or not.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  30. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Notquitecajun · · Score: 1

    Define "poverty" and "hunger," please, so we know which definitions you're working with.

  31. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    google is your friend search usa hunger or usa poverty

  32. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look who's talking. There are poor people, not bankrupt people living off their plastic cards, neither war mongering governments with zero or near zero knowledge economists.

  33. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And I mean real poverty."

    No, seriously, with the exception of maybe a few exceptional areas, Americans in poverty do not face anywhere near the poverty that many Indians face.

  34. India needs to be poor by ghoul · · Score: 1

    If people in India become rich how will all the NGOs and Church groups who raise money based on sad looking photographs survive? The typical business model is for every 10 dollars raised spend a dollar on some unproductive charity in India and pocket the other 9 dollars and lead a lifestyle even most Americans cant dream of. The whole third world charity industry probably employs more people in the US than heavy manufacturing. If India becomes non-poor all these average Joe Six packs would be worrying about their next meal and not their health insurance.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:India needs to be poor by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      If people in India become rich how will all the NGOs and Church groups who raise money based on sad looking photographs survive?

      They'll be replaced by a child in Pakistan, or Darfur, or any of the many countries that need help. There will never be a point in which someone doesn't need help, even if it escalates from just having clean water and food to schools and hospitals.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  35. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Notquitecajun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just about all of those studies are rather vague in their definitions, and appear to stretch some things. Here's the problem - a VAST majority of people in this country eat enough, have jobs, and can be educated. Period. There's an EASY formula to follow - graduate high school, don't get pregnant before marriage, and hold a job for two years. You WON'T be poor and you WON'T go hungry. This is a social/motivation/parenting problem, NOT a money problem in America.

  36. Braindrain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering that the best of India's talents from IITs and likes of it are in the US working for the Microsofts, Googles and NASAs, this is indeed a big achievement. This will be a motivation for atleast a few of them to go back and work in the development of their own country.

  37. awesome by motang · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is one huge leap forward for India!

  38. That's because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the United States is in decline, not unlike the Roman Empire.

    I, for one, welcome our new, enlightened, "3rd-world", "barbarian" overlords.

  39. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    in fact, that's one of the aims of ISRO - building a sound ecosystem around space research - which has a good potential for science students who are interested in specialised science. right about now everyone's heading into call centers, BPO units, medical transcription units, code monkey outfits, and some real software work. so many intellectuals and good scientists are absorbed from mainstream science into sweat shops which pay very well by indian standards , and something which typical scientific organisations can't pay.

    how then do you attract scientists who need a decent standard of living, a decent salary, and some real exciting work... like space research and rocket science.

  40. Indian Moon Mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    India has a Moon?

    1. Re:Indian Moon Mission by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Sri Lanka.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Indian Moon Mission by l0cust · · Score: 1

      Fuckin' LOL!

      --
      Politicians and Pedophiles: Two groups of exploitive bastards who are most dangerous when they're thinking of children.
  41. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not US or UK related poverty (no flat screen, not enough Ketchup)

    Yeah, all them food kitchens in the US, serving up flat screens and ketchup.

  42. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by cb_is_cool · · Score: 1

    I live in Appalachia now and it's still only the innovative or at least motivated people who get ahead. The majority in my area are lazy and leech off the system.

    --
    cb_is_cool knows where his towel is.
  43. Finally! by jger_13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We'll be able to get slurpees on the moon.

  44. mark parent "shortsighted" by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 2, Informative

    India's space program is different from those in US and other "developed" countries. India has always focused on the practical uses of space science. Communication, weather forecasts, delivering payloads etc. (instead of sending probes to pluto)

    Elsewhere "space programs came as spinoffs of military programs, so the things the space program was expected to deliver were things that could be used in defense," says S.K. Das, a former ISRO official.

  45. Lest we forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To people complaining about India trying to go to the moon when there is a lot of poverty around:

    http://www.gilscottheron.com/lywhitey.html

    A rat done bit my sister Nell.
    (with Whitey on the moon)
    Her face and arms began to swell.
    (and Whitey's on the moon)
    I can't pay no doctor bill.
    (but Whitey's on the moon)
    Ten years from now I'll be payin' still.
    (while Whitey's on the moon)
    The man jus' upped my rent las' night.
    ('cause Whitey's on the moon)
    No hot water, no toilets, no lights.
    (but Whitey's on the moon)

  46. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by palemantle · · Score: 1

    Mod the parent up someone.
    I'd like to add the 'tangible' benefits (as in moolah) are being seen already and that the publicity, derided as it in some quarters, will only add to more 'customers' and more 'business'.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7199736.stm

  47. Great - Lets all dance !! by unity100 · · Score: 0, Troll

    bangerereshi marahiri marirniyaaaaaaaaa huuuu * hands and arms swirling *

    they dance for everything in bollywood. i cant imagine how much dancing is going to go into the forthcoming sci-fi films they are gonna make.

  48. wrong by unity100 · · Score: 4, Informative

    you have failed to create social welfare state. europe has succeeded.

    you sound like a holistic economist, even a neocon republican. those days are at an end.

    this recent crisis have shown us how dangerous unwatched, ungoverned, unregulated capitalism can be. entire world economy brought down by a handful of rogue megacorporations juggling funds in united states.

    that wont happen again.

    1. Re:wrong by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      this recent crisis have shown us how dangerous unwatched, ungoverned, unregulated capitalism can be. entire world economy brought down by a handful of rogue megacorporations juggling funds in united states.

      It might take a hundred years but it will happen again. The root of the problem is some small groups got too powerful. The same can happen to governments, corporations, NGOs, religions, or even a national association of knitting circles.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    2. Re:wrong by jcnnghm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The collapse was caused by the creation of GSEs, and the subsequent congressional pressure on those GSEs to ensure loans could be make to poor people that couldn't afford to pay them back. Essentially Fannie and Freddy said, make a bad loan, and we'll buy it from you, because we think those people deserve loans. Without government regulation, the loans would have never been issued in the first place. Your pontificating about socialist wet dreams and rogue megacorporations is unwarranted.

      Only an idiot incapable of taking care of themselves would want to live in a social welfare state.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:wrong by Deadplant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only an idiot incapable of taking care of themselves would want to live in a social welfare state.

      really? how's that murder rate working out for you?

    4. Re:wrong by jcnnghm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The murder rate doesn't bother me, even a little. It's confined to the areas occupied by the dregs of society, if they kill each other off, it's one less thing I'll be asked to pay for.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    5. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, your amazing level of humanity astounds me..

      How did you become so selfish and greedy? Was it genetics? social conditioning? or an abnormality in the brain?

      Most people in the areas affected by this violence just had the misfortune to be born in the area and can't afford to get out of it despite working harder than you ever have, in a number of low paying jobs because they never received a decent education.

      You pathetic excuse for a human!

    6. Re:wrong by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's confined to the areas occupied by the dregs of society, if they kill each other off, it's one less thing I'll be asked to pay for.

      And thus, it is conclusively proved that the parent poster is a Libertarian (with the capital "L", since he's very proud of it, too).

    7. Re:wrong by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      It looks like you don't have the right understanding for what led to the collapse. See Barry Ritholtz's detailed explanation for how the mess was created.

      Stop spreading someone else's talking points around. It does not reflect well on you when it turns out that those talking points are wrong.

    8. Re:wrong by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      Wow, a left-wing typepad blog? Really, that's the best you could come up with. It had to be the big, bad capitalists. We need more government to run things efficiently.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:wrong by MightyDrunken · · Score: 1

      Are "the dregs of society" born that way, or made? Putting it another way, if you were born in one of those areas with the same quality of life they had, would you be just like them? I think the latter is most likely. Therefore you should try to prevent the situation from arising in the first place. Best for everyone.

  49. curb my enthusiasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Congratulations to India.

    But as an outside observer, a moonshot seems like a 3-pointer while you are being blown out 65-22 (update 65-25) in a basketball game.

    One step at a time for sure, but India seems to lag in many key areas.

  50. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PSLV-XL itself costs only 80 crore rupee (800 million rupees) or less than 20 million USD

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $16.36 million

  51. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US we are going the other direction. We are becoming socialist, buying banks and if OBAMA gets elected, may be giving out even more -- remember, tax the rich and give to the poor!

  52. Blow up the moon by sadwings · · Score: 0, Troll

    Going there is so 20th century. Unless they blow it up, it's !news.

  53. 14 days is kind of slow by peter303 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nasa missions took three days. But life support was important.

    The slowest moon mission was an ESA moon mission that took 14 months to reach the moon via ion-drive. It cost very little in fuel.

    1. Re:14 days is kind of slow by ypctx · · Score: 1

      Yeah but that was the period of $170 bbl oil prices, so ESA refused to stop by any orbital gas stations and instead used the reentry parachute as an ion sail. Cheap bastards.

  54. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by infinite9 · · Score: 1

    Then how are you going to help those poor people? Give them free money and food so they'll continue to do nothing and further your poverty problem?

    Please make sure you feed them while teaching them to feed themselves.

    --
    Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
  55. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    ...while millions in the nation are still dying from hunger

    Millions? Really? Show us one article or citation on this. Just one.

  56. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Moon to India: "Thank you! Please Come Again!"

  57. 800+ million people are poor in India by jawahar · · Score: 1

    "Poverty is still there, 80% of the population live on 20 rupees (25p) a day, according to a survey, but a large well off group has also emerged. Some 250 million are reckoned to be very well off, many of them very rich." http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6946800.stm

  58. Another outsourcing industry started by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    India showcased its low-cost space technology. Project cost only $79 million, considerably less than the Chinese and Japanese probes. Now world can outsource space projects to India. Another outsourcing industry started :)

    This project also shows India's partnership with 14 other countries and sharing data and technology together.

  59. India is Democracy and NOT Meritocracy like Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or else India would have never got Independence from British.

    Govt must implement Reservations in Temples, Judiciary and in Defense services.

    A) 50% of Temple/Judges/Defense Staff must be from OBC communities.
    B) 35% Temple/Judges/Defense Staff must be from Dalits and Tribals.
    C) Remaining Temple/Judges/Defense Staff must be from other castes.

    Otherwise India will disintegrate into 3000+ separate Kingdoms.

  60. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "Give them free money and food so they'll continue to do nothing and further your poverty problem?"
    of jeez, not that Republican myth again.
    Most people on welfare are either currently working, or will be working again.

    Very, very few 'live' on welfare.
    Yes, we need to improve are education, etc.. however that would involve paying more taxes *SHOCKGASP*

    Why peple think they can cut taxes and not cut services is beyond me.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  61. NO. and please dont comment without researching by unity100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it first.

    1.000.000 people unable to pay for their mortgages nets to a loss around $300 bn, if the houses were bought from $600 k by the bank and their values now $300 k.

    thats only 1/3 of the cash us had prepared for its banks, its also around 1/10 of the cash that europe has provided.

    you see, the funds provided had already covered approx 20 times that loss, if you count in what japan, korea and other nations have readied.

    you should have understood by now that this is nothing related to unpaid mortgages or poor people, or fannie mae freddie mac. this is the bullshit that republican bastards are feeding you to get off the hook.

    the real problem is this :

    banks are allowed to lend approx 10 times the total assets they have. because its logical - money turns slow, so it doesnt create a problem. its all valid liquidity wise. this ratio is a healthy ratio and its checked by government regulation.

    but, due to the lawless environment republicans and holistic economists have created by yelping 'hands off business' 'government out' 'government bad for economy, youll cost jobs to people', government regulation was totally hampered in that sector since reagan era.

    then what happened ? in this unregulated environment, some bastards realized this ; if they show those mortgages as assets, and then create DERIVATIVE assets over them (called hedge funds in general because they accept all kinds of 'assets'), they can sell/trade those assets !!!

    and they proceeded to do that. they created assets linked to those mortgage assets, then started trading them. attracted investors. those funds have inflated in value, disproportionately. imagine the funds value becoming $ 20 trillion instead of the mortgage value of $ 200 bn. this is round one.

    in round two, they went further. they showed those DERIVATIVES as assets. meaning, despite they had $200 bn worth of mortgage assets, they now had $20 trillion worth of hedge funds/investments tied to those mortgages !! and they started lending by showing their total assets as $20 trillion plus $200 bn !!! see the point ? they started lending money THEY DONT HAVE !

    see the issue now ?!

    someone should have stepped in, checked their books and said 'hey, you dont have that much assets. what you are showing me as assets are actually derivative papers tied to OTHER assets. these are NOT real, and they are OVERvalued !!' and stopped them in their tracks.

    but noone did. because a lot of poodles were yelping 'hands off economy !!'. so it went like this, those banks lent to countries, governments, megacorporations, traded those investment funds SO widely around the world that every bank in the world got infested by those funds.

    then it was discovered. and today we are here.

    1. Re:NO. and please dont comment without researching by unity100 · · Score: 1

      make $200 bn value of the mortgages $600 bn btw. i used the wrong number. $200 bn would be loss of a house bought by bank for the people from $600, but had to sell it because of nonpayment for $300.

    2. Re:NO. and please dont comment without researching by forceman130 · · Score: 1

      Wow, there's a lot wrong with that rant. Try reading some in-depth analysis of the problem before posting a bunch of bunk - try the Economist, Financial Times, or Wall Street Journal for a start. Also, for the past two years the Democrats have controlled both houses of Congress - has anyone asked Barney Frank or Chris Dodd why their Banking Committees didn't ask any of these questions, if it was so obvious?

      --
      Wow, a 7 digit ID - let that be a lesson in the perils of procrastination.
    3. Re:NO. and please dont comment without researching by unity100 · · Score: 1

      if there is a lot wrong with that rant, you tell what is wrong with it. you dont throw a mccain/palin like 'its wrong do research' bait and hope it will stick.

      first, the damage was long done in the last 6 years of republican administration.

      second, one politician should be stupid to come up and fight against this, while poodles were yelling 'hey youll cost people jobs, do you hate america - let businesses be'.

      everyone saw what happened with jobs in the end. but apparently you didnt.

  62. yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

    the taxes they dont pay for social welfare state, they pay while getting stabbed in the butt and giving away their wallet. or paying for the increased police & security expenses.

    what a stupidity !! instead of paying out taxes in at the start and totally reducing crime, they rather not pay it and then pay it in the forms of security expenses and risks, AND have also increased crime rate as a free gift in the package !

  63. Vibrant competitor, contentlink, CAN be disabled. by argent · · Score: 1

    Now there's a second annoying hover-pop-up advertiser, Contentlink, used by Times of India (and I'm sure many others).

    At least Contentlink lets you disable their popups. Click on the (?) and look near the bottom of the page for the link to disable them.

  64. Re:f1r5t m00nlanding by ypctx · · Score: 1

    launch successful which sent over a 1000 space scientists

    All India's 1000 space scientists sent to space together! Space exploration the India way, baby! And don't come back until you work it out pals!

  65. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by tuxicle · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that sound a lot like what India is trying to do?

    Also, it gives the ISRO sufficient prominence that a greater fraction of fresh graduates would consider a career there.

  66. Blaming the poor for multi-billion financial mess? by dbIII · · Score: 1

    The collapse was caused by the creation of GSEs, and the subsequent congressional pressure on those GSEs to ensure loans could be make to poor people that couldn't afford to pay them back

    Wow! You are merely gullible but whoever started this rumor is some truly sick and evil sociopath. I suggest paying attention a little more so such things like Enron, the housing bubble and the last five years do not slip past unnoticed.

    The whole world has been nervously watching this develop for years. I suggest reading something from outside of the USA for a view that is less skewed by PR money.

  67. Re:India is Democracy and NOT Meritocracy like Tai by XchristX · · Score: 1

    I agree as far as temples and defense staff are concerned, and I believe that the Temple act already allows for some of this. Not so sure about Judges. The judiciary should be selected strictly on the basis of merit, not on ethnic affiliations. Else we will have judges who are biased in favor of their communities.

    Otherwise India will disintegrate into 3000+ separate Kingdoms.

    That danger is far more likely to be realized by the China-backed Maoists and Pakistan-backed Islamic militants than by legislative wrongdoings.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  68. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can ask the same question
    what are you doing for the US recent homeless during this financial crisis?

    i can ask
    how about to develop sensible financial sector which don't need any bailout(LOL)?

    Also i heard that American is not doing good in science and maths nowadays?

    one more thing, is US stop spending on NASA despite of this financial crisis and homeless people army(AGAIN LOL)??

    Friend, its easy to blame someone else, why you don't look at your self??

  69. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by thetsguy · · Score: 0

    This shows how ignorant you are...go and do some research before posting. Indian Goverment school provides free lunch to their students. So, India does take care that they feed people while teaching them to feed themselves.

  70. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by ashraya · · Score: 1

    Guys
    Dont forget India is feeding the poor by their space missions. They now take contracts to put satellites in place for other countries, and make money off it. Most of the research is based on that money. And someday, there will be profits from there that will feed the poor!
    Does that make you happy?

  71. confined my butt by unity100 · · Score: 1

    there is no border for crime. no confines either. eventually as the situation deteriorates enterprising criminals will reach towards your neighborhood and places you go. then youll get either kidnapped for ransom or stabbed in the butt. that will be the point you feel the invisible hand of the free market.

  72. no no he is nothing by unity100 · · Score: 1

    dont label this behaviour with elaborate names like libertarian, conservative etc and legalize the behaviour in some way.

    what he is basically saying that 'dont take my money, let the society crash down for all i care'.

    this is plain out, basic self centeredness and greed, accompanied by a high measure of ignorance and lack of understanding. also, ingratefulness.

    he makes use of all the benefits being a society brings, but he doesnt want to spare any of his resources to make sure that society keeps functioning, so he can enjoy those benefits.

    this is stupid, ignorant, self centered all at the same time. its like shooting yourself in the foot despite you are so wanting to go jogging.

    1. Re:no no he is nothing by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Sorry. I can't help lashing out because I was a "libertarian" like that myself in the past, and I'm so utterly disgusted with my own egotistic views back then that I attack them on sight in others, too.

      Still, my point holds. All "libertarians" I knew on the Net in that period had very similar views, and topical communities and forums were also full of it. I'm not saying that all of them are like that - far from it - and even back then I've seen quite a few sensible minarchists. But they were still the minority, and a much more quiet one at that.

  73. Re:Reaching the Moon while milllions go Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India, like China, is advancing on the backs of their poorest citizens. MILLIONS of people living in the most vile and disgusting conditions, neglected by a society that encourages ABUSE of your fellow man. These people have no morals or values, they have no sense of right and wrong. The ONLY way for a civilization to truly advance and progress is if they embrace the same values that have been so successful in the western world.. RESPECT for your fellow man, Education for your children, FREEDOM to persue a better life, LAWS that declare equality on the most basic human levels, COMMUNITIES that lift up and support all the diversities within them.

    THEN they can worry about gallivanting around the solar system on their curry propelled rockets.

  74. Rajiv Gandhi by jawahar · · Score: 1

    Rajiv Gandhi was the visionary who decided that India should invest in IT education http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajiv_Gandhi