We wanted to balance the value and the affordability concerns with a responsible price that would ensure access to patients but then we thought, 'you know what? Fuck It! Restoration of vision is a great incentive to pay almost anything we ask.'
Because it's a conflict of interest to allow negative reviews. Business owners represent a greater concentration of capital than employees and therefore are the most likely to be customers, from the perspective of a business offering online services?
Mobile data is paupers" data: the Obamaphone phenomenon does not create new tech innovations. Mobile data is bread-and-circuses tier consumption and consumerism. Creating new tech takes a keyboard at the very least.
Someone should invent tethering then your comment would be little more than a disguised cultural slur from a position of weakness, using a metric of outcome-quality-per-dollar-spent.
Dominos have market forces driving their excellence. Police forces around the world have no such incentive.
If Dominos could stop anyone on the street/pull them over/invade their home and coerce them to accept their pizza service on punishment of death or imprisonment, it's conceivable that they too would become less than they could be.
It's exact the same perceptual phenomenon that caused the Apache helicopter pilots to mistake a journalist's camera for an RPG in the so-called "collateral murder" video.
Is this phenomenon also responsible for the good-old-boys laughing it up as they shot those eight people from a helicopter in the collateral murder video?
The cops were 50+ yards away from the front porch.
"A police officer opened fire, shooting once, after the man quickly raised his hands and appeared to point a weapon at the officers"
Bullshit. Unless that officer was using a pair of binoculars. Stupid, panicky pigs.
I like this meme; many organisations have/reserve the right to escalate to maximum in critical situations. Unfortunately for us, the border between run-of-the-mill and critical is guarded by a criterion which is as subject to misunderstanding as possible. This has the effect of removing the criterion which determines proportionate response; effectively allowing any action to be retroactively justified by the use of the industry-appropriate magic phrase:
eg:
* 'I thought I saw a gun' -> it's ok to unload a clip into someone's back
* 'I thought I smelt gas' -> it's ok to break someone's door down whilst they're on holiday then leave the property unsecured
* Fill in your own examples at will
It is increasingly difficult to sort out the crap, the potential crap, and the legitimate products
Is this a criticism of Amazon's third party marketplace or a reflection of a fact that increasingly, the only 'tangible' difference between 'real' and 'counterfeit' is the intangible 'quality' imbued by being manufactured on behalf of those owning the IP?
Is it possible that in the near future, the counterfeit items will be manufactured to a higher standard than the 'real' ones? If so, would the counterfeiter then simply start a brand of their own and bump up the prices ?
It is increasingly difficult to sort out the crap, the potential crap, and the legitimate products
Is this a criticism of Amazon's third party marketplace or a reflection of a fact that increasingly, the only 'tangible' difference between 'real' and 'counterfeit' is the ephemeral 'quality' imbued by being manufactured on behalf of those owning the IP?
Is it possible that in the near future, the counterfeit items will be manufactured to a higher standard than the 'real' ones? If so, would the counterfeiter then simply start a brand of their own and bump up the prices ?
Slashdot Mirror
Only *approved* fake news will be allowed ^_^
Because it's a conflict of interest to allow negative reviews. Business owners represent a greater concentration of capital than employees and therefore are the most likely to be customers, from the perspective of a business offering online services?
Or they're having a big barbecue at work.
each? I've got a way to go before before I get such value from my unlimited mobile data plan!
Someone should invent tethering then your comment would be little more than a disguised cultural slur from a position of weakness, using a metric of outcome-quality-per-dollar-spent.
Agreed. Your whole comment also applies to the guy that murdered a complete stranger using his own gun.
Dominos have market forces driving their excellence. Police forces around the world have no such incentive.
If Dominos could stop anyone on the street/pull them over/invade their home and coerce them to accept their pizza service on punishment of death or imprisonment, it's conceivable that they too would become less than they could be.
Agreed. Unfortunately, those hired are taken exclusively from the pool of applicants.
Is this phenomenon also responsible for the good-old-boys laughing it up as they shot those eight people from a helicopter in the collateral murder video?
I guess I'm inexperienced but... If I were involved in a murder / hostage situation, answering a ringing doorbell wouldn't seem like the best idea.
Incorrect; donuts are deep fried!
a) omg ROFL wtf are you smoking? OR
b) true dat; just not the general public
I like this meme; many organisations have/reserve the right to escalate to maximum in critical situations. Unfortunately for us, the border between run-of-the-mill and critical is guarded by a criterion which is as subject to misunderstanding as possible. This has the effect of removing the criterion which determines proportionate response; effectively allowing any action to be retroactively justified by the use of the industry-appropriate magic phrase:
eg:
* 'I thought I saw a gun' -> it's ok to unload a clip into someone's back
* 'I thought I smelt gas' -> it's ok to break someone's door down whilst they're on holiday then leave the property unsecured
* Fill in your own examples at will
uhh, ephemeral -> intangible
Is this a criticism of Amazon's third party marketplace or a reflection of a fact that increasingly, the only 'tangible' difference between 'real' and 'counterfeit' is the intangible 'quality' imbued by being manufactured on behalf of those owning the IP?
Is it possible that in the near future, the counterfeit items will be manufactured to a higher standard than the 'real' ones? If so, would the counterfeiter then simply start a brand of their own and bump up the prices ?
Is this a criticism of Amazon's third party marketplace or a reflection of a fact that increasingly, the only 'tangible' difference between 'real' and 'counterfeit' is the ephemeral 'quality' imbued by being manufactured on behalf of those owning the IP?
Is it possible that in the near future, the counterfeit items will be manufactured to a higher standard than the 'real' ones? If so, would the counterfeiter then simply start a brand of their own and bump up the prices ?
I like to think of someone wearing a burka as an inversion of a naked person wearing sunglasses. ymmv.
Nuthin', growing an extra arm and chillin'
Prioritising the user over the advertiser? ^_^
Black Helicopters dispatched to your location. Await airlift.
Russia have already been 'the enemy' within living memory. You're supposed to choose a new one to keep people guessing. Doh!
There's no precedent for it and it's not wanted. This red threat will be stamped out.
Can't the price just be ads? Ad-blockers are apparently great. I'm not sure if there's a McDonalds blocker yet.
There you have it folks, if you don't want to be cooked, fly with Frontier, Hawaiian and Spirit Airways.
Nice ad.
PopQuiz: How do we hit the FCC with a fine for ruining the internet for the whole world?
Strawman - facebook have ads now.