If Microsoft had $200 for every time someone predicted the death/replacement of Office over the past few decades...oh, they do. And they are a ridiculously wealthy and successful company.
For purposes of IR camouflage, it is not necessary that the tank's actual heat emission be reduced, but only that the vehicle's IR emission be concealed. This could be done with clever panels employing (just speculating) optical filters, deflectors, or thermoelectrics.
While it is true the tank's excess heat has to go somewhere, its radiation does not necessarily have to be made visible to IR cameras.
Corporations snap their fingers and our federally funded law enforcement agencies jump to their bidding. Do you think you would get the same treatment if someone DDOS'd your personal blog?
Foxconn today introduced their first robot employee replacement. Company executives expect that Marvin, an android with embedded 'personality simulation protocols' will have a 'rousing and positive effect on the morale of our human employees.'
There are several online scenarios where given the option to participate anonymously or with full identity disclosure, I would choose the latter. And this is based on the assertions of the article, that a person behaves in a much more civilized and social manner when one's identity is known and consequences to reputation are on the line.
An example would be a cooperative online game, where lack of anonymity might hedge antisocial behavior (griefing, trolling, etc.) Granted many people pursue online activities specifically for the anonymous escape they can provide. Whatever works for you. There are cases where I would like the option to participate in an online community consisting of people not afraid to hide their real names. (This does not consider the security and privacy implications, that is a different discussion.)
Remember that the internet was not designed to provide anonymity, it is merely one possible byproduct.
Slashdot Mirror
as long as it comes with a 100% ban on personal gun possession.
I not my fault, that's the only spec thing coming out of Asia these days.
Look, if it gets kids reading, mission accomplished.
Your geek cred remains unadjusted. But your "Get off my lawn" cred shot through the ceiling.
If Microsoft had $200 for every time someone predicted the death/replacement of Office over the past few decades...oh, they do. And they are a ridiculously wealthy and successful company.
And don't forget the vastly higher chip density achievable with CRAM.
No refunds.
I'm not gonna spycrab a whole mile. I'm going sniper.
Its the only way to be sure.
If a U.S drone lost control and landed in crowded bazaar in Kabul, would you then want it to blow up as everyone gathered around?
with special guest Roxy Music performing "Both Ends Burning."
These are just prototypes in Google's master plan to synergize Wave, Buzz, and Plus into the ultimate social networking platform:
Google Wuzzlepus.
You're lucky they didn't go with their first choice for the name: "The People's Revolutionary Socialist Office Suite Manifesto Pro".
carry the casket from the stage, a figure pops out.
"And one more thing..."
Our first action will be a swift DDoS blitz of Poland. Don't worry about the French or English, they won't do anything about it.
Step 1: Build "next generation of nuclear power" plants.
Step 2: Profit!!!!!
Step 3: ??????
Step 4: Radioactive waste with 10,000 year half-life safely removed from environment. See step 3.
Step 5: Insure nuclear power plant. See step 3.
For purposes of IR camouflage, it is not necessary that the tank's actual heat emission be reduced, but only that the vehicle's IR emission be concealed. This could be done with clever panels employing (just speculating) optical filters, deflectors, or thermoelectrics.
While it is true the tank's excess heat has to go somewhere, its radiation does not necessarily have to be made visible to IR cameras.
How's that business model working out for ya?
*hides in flame-proof safe*
Yet.
Sincerely,
Wacko Serial Bomber.
Corporations snap their fingers and our federally funded law enforcement agencies jump to their bidding. Do you think you would get the same treatment if someone DDOS'd your personal blog?
Foxconn today introduced their first robot employee replacement. Company executives expect that Marvin, an android with embedded 'personality simulation protocols' will have a 'rousing and positive effect on the morale of our human employees.'
There are several online scenarios where given the option to participate anonymously or with full identity disclosure, I would choose the latter. And this is based on the assertions of the article, that a person behaves in a much more civilized and social manner when one's identity is known and consequences to reputation are on the line.
An example would be a cooperative online game, where lack of anonymity might hedge antisocial behavior (griefing, trolling, etc.) Granted many people pursue online activities specifically for the anonymous escape they can provide. Whatever works for you. There are cases where I would like the option to participate in an online community consisting of people not afraid to hide their real names. (This does not consider the security and privacy implications, that is a different discussion.)
Remember that the internet was not designed to provide anonymity, it is merely one possible byproduct.
NASA better keep a close eye on Curiosity's space modulator. Lapin earthlings have a tendency to steal them, which can cause "delays...delays".
Dependence on cars for commuting and shipping. I hate driving. I hate needing to own a car. I wish I could be free of both.
In the U.S., with the massive entrenched vehicle lobbies and stigma of public transport, this may never happen.
that of all possible career paths, education has the lowest financial incentive? What does this portend for our future?