Except they're not. They send you to the card issuer's website or, more commonly, the website of a company that the card issuer has contracted to do the verification.
So in other words, for all intents and purposes, you need to have your content in an iTunes library on your computer. Setting up an Apache installation just to stream your media library and having to dump the metadata into an XML file, especially if you acquire new media regularly, doesn't sound very practical.
Maybe not in the US where different networks use incompatible/mostly incompatible technologies/frequencies, but one of the main benefits to not being locked into a 2 year contract is exactly that - you've got the freedom to change provider or in other words your current provider hasn't got you over a barrel.
Ultimately though, the total cost of ownership (cost for phone + ongoing service cost), at least in the UK, is comparable. The networks aren't discounting anything - the phone cost is rolled into the monthly bill which, combined with the contact, is basically the network giving you a 18 month/2 year loan for the cost of the phone.
It does seem to be needlessly complicated though. What is the point of the standard HDMI cables? Surely the cost difference between standard and high speed can't be enough to justify two different versions, so it seems to exist for artificial market segmentation.
You can still have an SD TV, or only have a SD signal, like the majority of the UK population do - you're still paying for broadcasts you can't (with your current setup) receive.
If your ADSL modem/router fails, you can go to the store and get a replacement anyway. You don't need one from your ISP (you probably don't want one from your ISP either, they're normally the cheapest, most basic ones they could buy in bulk).
Then they could have approached Adobe with this information, or even publicly announce that applications created using Flash weren't compliant with the SDK. No need for a blanket ban on any application not originally written in one of a couple of languages that Apple approves of.
But Adblock only works when the minority are using it. If ad blocking was performed by the majority of web users, then much of the content of the Internet would cease to exist, at least no financial cost form.
It's different mainly because Google doesn't get the ad views (and potential hits/revenue) which is the reason they offer a search engine in the first place.
You mean ISO 29500 (Office Open XML)? You forget that the Microsoft has a standard for office documents as well. Mandating the use of one isn't going to change much apart from possibly forcing departments to upgrade to the latest version of MS Office.
If you have a Intel Mac you can still run Windows on it through Boot Camp. Even a full copy of Windows is going to be cheaper than the most of the individual components, let alone the full suite.
Pervasive DRM seems to me to be self defeating. If you are making it harder for people who legitimately purchased content to actually make use of it, you're only going to drive people to the alternatives - ie piracy.
Slashdot Mirror
They'd already laid off 30% of their staff only 18 months ago. Facebook has around 2000 employees, and AFAIK they're bigger than Myspace ever was.
Except they're not. They send you to the card issuer's website or, more commonly, the website of a company that the card issuer has contracted to do the verification.
So in other words, for all intents and purposes, you need to have your content in an iTunes library on your computer. Setting up an Apache installation just to stream your media library and having to dump the metadata into an XML file, especially if you acquire new media regularly, doesn't sound very practical.
Maybe not in the US where different networks use incompatible/mostly incompatible technologies/frequencies, but one of the main benefits to not being locked into a 2 year contract is exactly that - you've got the freedom to change provider or in other words your current provider hasn't got you over a barrel.
Ultimately though, the total cost of ownership (cost for phone + ongoing service cost), at least in the UK, is comparable. The networks aren't discounting anything - the phone cost is rolled into the monthly bill which, combined with the contact, is basically the network giving you a 18 month/2 year loan for the cost of the phone.
Considering Mozilla rely on Google for revenue, pissing them off probably wouldn't be in their own best interest.
Wikipedia would seem to suggest that those people are right.
It does seem to be needlessly complicated though. What is the point of the standard HDMI cables? Surely the cost difference between standard and high speed can't be enough to justify two different versions, so it seems to exist for artificial market segmentation.
I think your memory may be faulty.
You can still have an SD TV, or only have a SD signal, like the majority of the UK population do - you're still paying for broadcasts you can't (with your current setup) receive.
External SATA USB 2.5" drives can transfer data & power over a single cable, as long as enough power is supplied through a single USB port.
Then why is it proposing ending Saturday deliveries to cut its budget deficit?
Five different shows where the timeslot argument was used:1 2 3 4 5
Someone even used the same example of Lost as in the comments for this story.
If your ADSL modem/router fails, you can go to the store and get a replacement anyway. You don't need one from your ISP (you probably don't want one from your ISP either, they're normally the cheapest, most basic ones they could buy in bulk).
Because of course everybody is going to rush out and replace them immediately.
Extensions were not added to Firefox until version 2.0. Extensions were never an original design goal.
You might want to go back and check that. I've just downloaded Firefox 1.0 and it does support extensions.
Isn't a public web server implicit authorisation?
It's not so much a lack of multithreading as Apple not publishing those APIs or approving applications which use them.
Then they could have approached Adobe with this information, or even publicly announce that applications created using Flash weren't compliant with the SDK. No need for a blanket ban on any application not originally written in one of a couple of languages that Apple approves of.
But Adblock only works when the minority are using it. If ad blocking was performed by the majority of web users, then much of the content of the Internet would cease to exist, at least no financial cost form.
It's different mainly because Google doesn't get the ad views (and potential hits/revenue) which is the reason they offer a search engine in the first place.
No doubt forcing you to buy higher price chips if you want VT. That seems like getting it to me.
I'm not trying to enter the argument either way, but I would imagine the average person doesn't know that Flash doesn't work.
You mean ISO 29500 (Office Open XML)? You forget that the Microsoft has a standard for office documents as well. Mandating the use of one isn't going to change much apart from possibly forcing departments to upgrade to the latest version of MS Office.
If you have a Intel Mac you can still run Windows on it through Boot Camp. Even a full copy of Windows is going to be cheaper than the most of the individual components, let alone the full suite.
Pervasive DRM seems to me to be self defeating. If you are making it harder for people who legitimately purchased content to actually make use of it, you're only going to drive people to the alternatives - ie piracy.