Slashdot Mirror


User: SomeJoel

SomeJoel's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
333
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 333

  1. Re:Little different on From Slaying Dragons To Dictators · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know if I'd consider setting up a good Proxy server as "Slaying a Dictator".

    I think that's actually part of a big chain quest so that you can get keyed along with a large group of people to then slay the dictator.

    You must first reach exalted with several factions, including "UN" and at least a few of the "U.S. Military" subfactions. Otherwise you can't even zone in.

  2. Re:R'ing TFA? Heresy! on Ray Kurzweil Does Not Understand the Brain · · Score: 1

    They had to read it, since the summary was crap.

    If it makes you feel any better, I didn't read it.

  3. Re:Narrow? on Having Too Much Information Can Narrow Your Focus · · Score: 1

    You know, I wasn't sure either, so I looked it up on Wikipedia. That was hard to understand, so I googled it and got this answer from Answers.com. But that left me even more confused, like wondering why that entry would be filed under "Sports Science and Medicine". I then looked for a book on google books to aid my understanding. And apparently a narrow focus is a necessity for good business, as well as "animals in the wild". This was especially disconcerting because I didn't even know animals cared at ALL about good business.

    All in all, I just don't know what to think about it anymore.

  4. Re:1 in 50 people wrote a book on Counting the World's Books · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suspect that most books have been written recently and their writers are still alive.

    And I suspect that you are full of crap.

  5. Re:Seriously... on Counting the World's Books · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who cares? Does it matter?

    Does anything?

  6. Re:8 or 9-place estimate on Counting the World's Books · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But 130 million can't possibly be right! We better assign some false precision to make our estimate believable. Significant digits are for science teachers and marriage counselors!

  7. Re:My eyes! on ReCAPTCHA.net Now Vulnerable to Algorithmic Attack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Judging from the other replies, meta-humor is a little hard for you guys...

    It works wonders though. For instance, the next time someone is talking about "the force" or jedis and such, tell them "Get a life, Star Trek sucks!". You'll find the reaction much more interesting than if you correctly identify the franchise.

  8. Re:My eyes! on ReCAPTCHA.net Now Vulnerable to Algorithmic Attack · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did you not learn when I explained this yesterday? The quote is: "My eyes! The goggles do nothing!". There is no "they", nor is there any bad pronunciation. Indeed, it is correctly articulated and enunciated, with an accent.

    Easy there champ, nobody appreciates a Family Guy nerd correcting everyone's quotes.

  9. Re:how are victory margins relevant to chess? on Chess Ratings — Move Over Elo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sorry, but... You can't checkmate with only a king and a bishop.

    The hell you can't. It turns out, your opponent has pieces too! Have you ever even played chess?

  10. Re:Of course they can on Denials Aside, Feds Storing Body Scan Images · · Score: 1

    Who in their right mind would want Kevin Smith's body scan image?

    Kevin Smith.

  11. Re:Meanwhile, in the intergalactic NOC on X-Ray Burst Temporarily Blinds NASA Satellite · · Score: 1

    You mean the whole universe is on a LAN?! Explains much.

  12. Re:RUN!! on X-Ray Burst Temporarily Blinds NASA Satellite · · Score: 1

    I think there has been at least a dozen horror and apocalyptic films that have started with this exact event.

    Considering this event happened five billion years ago, there's a good possibility it's more than a dozen.

    I don't see how that has anything to do with anything.

  13. Re:No Surprise... on Liberal Watchdog Questions White House Gmail Use · · Score: 1

    Well, you could vote for a 3rd party... Except that until an instant runoff system is implemented this is in effect not voting at all. An instant runoff system wouldn't benefit anybody currently in power. That, of course, means it will never be implemented. Both parties in the U.S. 2-party system are bad and the subtleties between them are getting harder and harder to see.

  14. Re:Good. on ASCAP Declares War On Free Culture, EFF · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I see it now. Well played, impaledsunset, well played.

  15. Re:Good. on ASCAP Declares War On Free Culture, EFF · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    that artists should not have the choice of licensing their works under a copyleft license.

    You're saying that if "Artist A" wants to release her own works under a Creative Commons license, she must be stealing from "Artist B", who works so hard for a living. I am going to have to disagree, Mr. Troll.

  16. Re:Most impressive and important pattern? on First Self-Replicating Creature Spawned In Conway's Game of Life · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    In fact, this is arguably the single most impressive and important pattern ever devised.

    Really? Not the universal Turing machine pattern, or the pattern that emulates the game of life itself? Those both seem more impressive to me.

    Well, he did say "arguably", which is arguably the worst weasel word in the history of mankind.

  17. Re:Too much work on Digitally Filtering Out the Drone of the World Cup · · Score: 5, Funny

    The human brain is actually pretty good at filtering out noise if you give it a chance.

    Well, that and progressive hearing loss.

  18. Fusion Reactor... Crisis?! on ITER Fusion Reactor Enters Existential Crisis · · Score: 3, Funny

    That sounds terrifying. Then I read that it is just going to go unfunded. Not quite as interesting. Well played, headline writer, well played.

  19. Re:What's wrong with this? on New York Times Bans Use of Word "Tweet" · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Onion wrote about FourSquare, not Twitter.

  20. Re:He's right on New York Times Bans Use of Word "Tweet" · · Score: 1

    The word "tweet" might lead future historians to believe people went around making bird noises.

    We could only hope that is what they infer. It is so much more elegant than the truth. "omg u r so ded lol"

  21. Re:How did the US government miss this? on McDonald's, Cadmium, and Thermo Electron Niton Guns · · Score: 4, Informative

    A two trillion dollar budget, and still they miss this.

    It used to be that public safety was the number one purpose and concern of the government. I guess poisoning children is less important now than making sure those with political power get bailed out. Children don't vote, after all. Well, except maybe in Chicago.

    They probably missed it because it isn't above any established standard. The glasses were voluntarily recalled because a tougher standard may be pending. CNN has a poorly edited story about it.

  22. Re:I'm betting on McDonald's, Cadmium, and Thermo Electron Niton Guns · · Score: 5, Informative

    The glasses were made in China.

    I'd take that bet. Because they were made in New Jersey. (ARC International, based in Millville, N.J.)

  23. Bigger problem is editing on Yahoo Faces Questions After Discovery Of Comment Replication · · Score: 1

    I don't know who the drunks are that write and edit the Yahoo and CNN "news" stories, but they usually have more spelling and grammar errors than a 2nd grade book report.

  24. Re:Looks like I WIN! on Hints of Life Found On Saturn's Moon Titan · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I was in Jr. High, my science class had an assignment where we had to make-up a life form, based on the planet chosen's conditions and mine was Saturn. Of course my design was completely ridiculous, but the idea was pretty much close to what they're saying about Hydrogen consumption. This is pretty cool...I *heart* Saturn. "Pro'lly 'cuz it gots money with all them rings it has!" lol =P

    So what grade did you get on that project last year?

  25. Re:It could be that... on Caffeine Addicts Get No Additional Perk, Only a Return To Baseline · · Score: 1

    Never let facts get in the way of valuable research.