It's actually good. Not perfect by any stretch, but good. WP9 will probably be caught up on features and have new stuff to boot.
Most of the people ragging on it are either people who reflexively hate MS or people who used WP7 early on and dont' realize that things change.
When people talk about getting new phones I always recomend they give it a try, if you dont' like it that's fine, but don't just dismiss it out of hand, try it out and see if you like it.
Considering the target of the AWB is a class of weapons that is rarely used in crime it'sobviously not about reducing gun crime. In the FBI statistics rifles as a whole (not even just "assault weapons") are ahead of only "other guns", behind shotguns and WELL behind handguns. Yet the ban will almost exclusively affect rifles.
If it actually IS about gun crime then the people making the laws are utterly incompetent and therefore shouldn't be allowed to make the laws anyway.
Suing people is big business. It costs more to defend yoruself then to settle and porn companies in particular delight in threatening people with public lawsuits to scare them into settling regardless of evidence.
I'm not goign to take a side on whether or not it's safe. But there's a perfectly reasonable reason to avoid that. Two in fact.
1: Monitoring which foods are and aren't GMO will cost money that they'd rather not spend. 2: there's a lot of people who (correctly or incorrectly) fear GMO and thus sales would drop.
I had a customer who's name on their account which we are required to gather to get access to the account) was "fuck you". It was amusing because neither he nor his girlfriend (who the account belonged to) knew that, so I had to send them their account on the computer to find out. Their reaction was quite funny.
It's not a production problem, it hasn't been a production problem since the Middle Ages (if even then), it's always been a distribution problem. Not just with the infrastructure, but also with the fact that the people in those areas don't have the money to make shipping to them economically worthwhile. make no mistake, if they had the money to pay for the food the infrastructure issues would be worked around quickly.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure
Not all accounts. Try WP8 before you dismiss it, you may not like it, but it is absolutely worth a look.
It's actually good. Not perfect by any stretch, but good. WP9 will probably be caught up on features and have new stuff to boot.
Most of the people ragging on it are either people who reflexively hate MS or people who used WP7 early on and dont' realize that things change.
When people talk about getting new phones I always recomend they give it a try, if you dont' like it that's fine, but don't just dismiss it out of hand, try it out and see if you like it.
That would be so, so sweet.
Silly. It's by the coporations of the corporations for the corporations. You need to the get the new revision of the handbook.
Last I heard there were people willing to loan the government money at NEGATIVE interest.
So an iPod Nano with a wrist-strap?
Considering the target of the AWB is a class of weapons that is rarely used in crime it'sobviously not about reducing gun crime. In the FBI statistics rifles as a whole (not even just "assault weapons") are ahead of only "other guns", behind shotguns and WELL behind handguns. Yet the ban will almost exclusively affect rifles. If it actually IS about gun crime then the people making the laws are utterly incompetent and therefore shouldn't be allowed to make the laws anyway.
Suing people is big business. It costs more to defend yoruself then to settle and porn companies in particular delight in threatening people with public lawsuits to scare them into settling regardless of evidence.
You're expecting someone to read and undertand an article?
I'm not goign to take a side on whether or not it's safe. But there's a perfectly reasonable reason to avoid that. Two in fact.
1: Monitoring which foods are and aren't GMO will cost money that they'd rather not spend.
2: there's a lot of people who (correctly or incorrectly) fear GMO and thus sales would drop.
Actually there's plenty of food in the world. The poblem is that large parts of it can't pay enough for us to bother getting it to them.
Before Mad Cow disease was there any known health issues with feeding cows cow brain?
That's racist
My points expired yesterday
;.;
I have actually had a hamburger that had a slice of ham on it, it was pretty good. IIRC the place was called Zip's in Spokane, WA.
I had a customer who's name on their account which we are required to gather to get access to the account) was "fuck you". It was amusing because neither he nor his girlfriend (who the account belonged to) knew that, so I had to send them their account on the computer to find out. Their reaction was quite funny.
Truth.
It's not a production problem, it hasn't been a production problem since the Middle Ages (if even then), it's always been a distribution problem. Not just with the infrastructure, but also with the fact that the people in those areas don't have the money to make shipping to them economically worthwhile. make no mistake, if they had the money to pay for the food the infrastructure issues would be worked around quickly.
I wouldn't be surprised
"flatulent middle aged coke-snorting stripper"
Damn it, I didn't need any more fetishes!
You can also have someone else write it for you.
The assumption is that being in a relationship will be less depressing. It may be true for some people, but not for everyone.
I've heard this before and I'm not surprised
All but three countries in the world have done it. Are you saying we're unable to cope with an issue that nearly every country has managed to handle?
No. But we should do something smart to help the entire population.
More expensive than not switching?