Slashdot Mirror


Australian Govt Forces Apple, Adobe, Microsoft To Explain Price Hikes

An anonymous reader writes "Live outside the U.S.? Tired of paying huge local price markups on technology products from vendors such as Apple, Microsoft and Adobe? Well, rest easy, the Australian Government is on the case. After months of stonewalling from the vendors, today the Australian Parliament issued subpoenas compelling the three vendors to appear in public and take questions regarding their price hikes on technology products sold in Australia. Finally, we may have some answers for why Adobe, for example, charges up to $1,400 more for the full version of Creative Suite 6 when sold outside the U.S."

371 comments

  1. Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    should bloody well be on that list as well.

    1. Re:Valve / Steam... by Shikaku · · Score: 3, Informative

      No they shouldn't. The producers determine the price for Austrailia if they sell there at all.

    2. Re:Valve / Steam... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I already know the answer. It's the same reason Canadians pay far more for the same items in the US even though our dollar has been at parity for years now.

      There was one scandal where Bombardier, a Canadian company receiving government money, was charging Canadians more for ATVs made in Canada than they charged in the US. So effectively the Canadian government was subsidizing a company to rip-off it's own citizens.

    3. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but Gabe can just swish his hand through the air like Obi Wan and blame EA etc

    4. Re:Valve / Steam... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      And now here's something I hope you'll really enjoy (some dudes rant on the topic):
      http://www.snowandmud.com/just-about-anything-goes-76/canadian-dollar-ski-doo-rip-off-5380.html

    5. Re:Valve / Steam... by green1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You talk about that one scandal as if it's unique, there are MANY examples of us paying more for Canadian made products than the Americans do. There was a news article a year or two ago about a specific model of car that was priced more than $10,000 higher at the Canadian dealership across the street from the factory than it was in Hawaii, and best of all, the excuse given was that the transportation costs in Canada were higher!
      Thing is, the Canadian government has "investigated" this sort of thing many times, including yet another report that came out just last week. Do you think anything will ever change?
      Canadians pay more because... well, because we pay more, that's why!

      On some things we can buy online and get the same price as the rest of the world, but if you just can't do that (some products don't work well that way, and the government makes it illegal to do so with other ones, not to mention the companies that flat out refuse to sell to customers outside the US) then you're just screwed.

    6. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for different reasons but it's not a one way street. Rx anyone?

    7. Re:Valve / Steam... by Wizarth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Valve is mentioned in the article as one that people wanted investigated - but not as one that required a subpoena to provide information. This suggests that Valve voluntarily told them how their pricing works.

      Which, as far as I know, is "We set what price the producer wants us to, or they refuse to sell on Steam at all."

    8. Re:Valve / Steam... by green1 · · Score: 2

      slightly different in that due to our public health care system the governments actually legislate the prices for certain drugs.

    9. Re:Valve / Steam... by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [Steam] producers determine the price for Austrailia if they sell there at all.

      Then these producers should "appear in public and take questions regarding their price hikes".

    10. Re:Valve / Steam... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No they shouldn't. The producers determine the price for Austrailia if they sell there at all.

      This is similar to the philosophy in China. Everyone watches the latest Hollywood movies and uses the latest software. If the price is low enough they may decide to actually buy the legitimate copy instead of the bootleg. It sure is great when the government doesn't get involved... gotta love the free market system :).

    11. Re:Valve / Steam... by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      I tend to think they're fairly honest. I pay about what (when the US dollar currency takes a dive I smile... :) Cheap games! )Americans pay for their games, here in SA. They could really rip us off here (it is south africa they can charge pretty much what they like), but they don't. Add to that the endless specials and I have very little issue with them. Australia seems very different though for all things. People who go over from here are always complaining about the high cost of everything, expecially data/software, which is weird, because it isn't like shipping is a major cost for that sort of stuff...

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    12. Re:Valve / Steam... by definate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Canada and the US share a boarder, so it is somewhat ridiculous for them to charge more in Canada than in Hawaii, that's a fair complaint. However, what I think is even more ridiculous is a car that's made in South Australia, the Pontiac G8 is cheaper to buy in the US than in South Australia. The average price in South Australia is around $50,000 the average price in the US is around $30,000. Remembering that the dollar was at parity or close to parity. This means it was $20,000 cheaper to purchase a car that had been shipped to the US. GM has consistently done this to us, and just about every large company does this to us.

      Valve actually doesn't do it that much, though some game producers that use Steam do.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    13. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada and the US share a boarder...

      Hmmm... boarders can be real trouble. I had one that I just couldn't get rid of...

      Can I suggest you wait till the "boarder" leaves to get food, then burn all his or hers possessions. It worked for me and I'm confident it will work for Canada AND the US!

    14. Re:Valve / Steam... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While I have no love for those companies, I wonder if the answer to your questions isn't going to be obvious (and annoying). It's "known" here in the US, that Europeans are willing to pay more for the same goods, and thus we charge them more for the same goods. Americans are known for choosing to buy cheap crap that will break in a week because it's cheaper, therefore more reliable vendors have to go lower to make the sale. Going to the farthest extreme, the Chinese are known for stealing software, movies, etc. and thus to make a sale there the price has to be very low.

      They call this "market based pricing", and I agree that it is actually quite a destructive practice, but I don't think it's illegal.

    15. Re:Valve / Steam... by Ocker3 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yet Windows 7 is Windows 7, doesn't take much more to sell/support it in the UK/Australia/etc vs in the USA, why does it cost so much more? Delivery is dirt cheap, support can't justify a 200% cost surely!
      It's not like the hardware is made in the USA and shipped to Australia, it's all made in the same Chinese/Asian factories and shipped over the Pacific anyway! Australians buy the same TVs/Computers/Cars (when we can get a decent model on the market) as the USA does. Sure, we're a smaller market, but that cost differences are Immense!

    16. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, just to add to your comment, isn't this the same concept as selling software cheaper in countries that can't afford high prices, like third world countries etc?

    17. Re:Valve / Steam... by hobarrera · · Score: 3, Informative

      Software AND hardware costs about twice the price in third world countries, it DEFINITELY does not cost less.

    18. Re:Valve / Steam... by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      That was confusing until it got to the part where the company was in Quebec. Quebec hates the rest of Canada, news at 11.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    19. Re:Valve / Steam... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      It's not just what people can afford, it's the prices competitors charge as well, which I would guess is related to tax policy, and when/how corporate activity is taxed.

    20. Re:Valve / Steam... by quantumphaze · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And yet if I was to go overseas and buy as many copies of Photoshop as I can fit in my bag, jet back to Oz and resell them it is illegal.

    21. Re:Valve / Steam... by icebraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to be under the misguided belief that costs determine prices. In the real world, that's only rarely true,

      Microsoft, Adobe, etc are not charities like the Raspberry Pi foundation; they adjust their prices in order to maximize their profits.

      In an ideal scenario, competition would lower the prices. There are many reasons why this doesn't happen in this market, but you can thank government-granted monopolies like patents for a big chunk of that - it's kinda hard to compete when you can't even implement FAT on your OS without paying Microsoft.

    22. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada manufactures a lot of cars too and has a similar issue. I guessed it might have to do with poor people being less poor in Canada, bumping up prices across the board.

    23. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most third world actually pay considerably more than the USA. You're probably thinking of second world countries.

    24. Re:Valve / Steam... by Psychotria · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And your misguided belief is that this is "right". Oh, and don't go and reply to me with a lecture on the difference between business and right, or fairness and unfairness, or ideal scenarios, or any other bullshit. Don't go on about shareholders and the company's responsibility to their shareholders, or that it costs more to transmit data to such-and-such-country (that's definite bullshit as far as Adobe et al. are concerned anyway), or that "business is business", or that "businesses exist to maximise profit". All bullshit. Oh, "they're not a charity?" No, of course they're not. That doesn't answer the question though: "If they can make a profit in the US by selling the digital product for $200 [made up price] then why cannot they make a profit for selling it at the same price -- currency adjusted -- in any other country?" Oh, "support" I hear you think. Think again. They are profiteering. No more, no less.

    25. Re:Valve / Steam... by temcat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent insightful. Tax and market conditions do account for some differences, but not that drastic. Often this situation has to do with over-reaching copyright, trademark and other legislation that allows companies to enforce region pricing.

    26. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its, for fuck's sake. How bloody difficult is that to understand?

    27. Re:Valve / Steam... by definate · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    28. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but not more than they hate America.

    29. Re:Valve / Steam... by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      "Willing to pay more" is not the same as "don't have a choice except to pay more". I think that's what this is all about.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    30. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      when you can't even implement FAT on your OS

      I am an American, you insensitive clod!

    31. Re:Valve / Steam... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Those kinds of things are considered "luxuries" and are taxed more and sold at a higher price since you have to be "rich" to need them anyway. Downloadable software has changed my life for the better.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    32. Re:Valve / Steam... by Psychotria · · Score: 2

      Move location? That's a stupid answer. The correct answer is you stand up for what you believe is right. If you don't stand up for what you believe in (i.e. run away to China as you suggest) then you are a coward. Not only are you a coward but you relinquish your right to have an opinion and believe in that opinion strongly enough to fight for it. Nice answer apart from that.

    33. Re:Valve / Steam... by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Why can they sell it to the "poor people" (your words) at a much cheaper price and still make a profit? But if you're "richer" they sell it to you for more. Does that make any sense at all?

    34. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do what we must because we can.

    35. Re:Valve / Steam... by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 1

      there's an easy way to fix that. they're within drone range, so why not introduce some DEMOCRACY to them?

    36. Re:Valve / Steam... by englishstudent · · Score: 1

      I wish I could upvote this.

      --
      We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
    37. Re:Valve / Steam... by kestasjk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm an Australian, and I pay more for technology than people in other parts of the world including the US. This is kind of a pain in the ass, but I have to admit that if it wasn't worth it to me I wouldn't pay. Our currency is really strong at the moment, so in general imports are very cheap and local goods/services are very expensive, and we really pay very little for technology in relative terms.

      I sure wouldn't want other countries which buy our imports to say to us "wait that's not fair; it only costs you guys $40/tonne to export iron ore and we're paying $150/tonne. We're going to get the government involved to try and fight that somehow".
      To that I would say "the value of something is whatever its buyer is willing to pay for it" and we have to be consistent in that.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    38. Re:Valve / Steam... by RazorSharp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are profiteering.

      No shit. No one was claiming otherwise. However, last time I checked the Australian government was pretty conservative and the country is pretty wealthy with an extremely low poverty rate. That makes it a goldmine.

      Laissez-faire has its costs. This is what happens when you charge whatever the market can bear, a market that can handle a heavy load, such as Australia, will get charged a premium. In countries like China, where these companies have to compete with free pirated software and cheap bootleg hardware, prices are bound to be substantially lower (not to mention the fact that China is lacking in economic freedom, so their government would have a much easier time intervening if foreign companies were attempting to gouge their upper class).

      Don't blame these companies for playing by the established rules. Here in America we get fucked by these same companies in a different way: for the most part, they don't pay taxes. But I blame the system that allows them to do it, not the companies themselves. If you think this is "bullshit" then you should take active measures to oppose laissez-faire capitalism -- don't cry like a little girl about it. Don't stonewall your mind to any logical arguments that may oppose your claim of "bullshit," at least make a cogent argument as to why it's bullshit.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    39. Re:Valve / Steam... by c · · Score: 1

      Canada and the US share a boarder, so it is somewhat ridiculous for them to charge more in Canada than in Hawaii, that's a fair complaint.

      Well, sorta. Selling into the Canadian market does actually impose localizations and foreign language requirements. There are going to be some products where the manufacturer wants to recoup the costs of printing instructions, labels, packaging, and whatnot in French for Canadian distribution. Even for software, there is an "English (Canada)" localization (color => colour, etc). Then there's stuff like CSA approvals, etc.

      $10000 more for a car made across the street is stupid. But even when the dollar is at parity, I can see a few cents more for cereal since they don't just crank out an extra 10% of US-marketed product and ship it north.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    40. Re:Valve / Steam... by RazorSharp · · Score: 2

      Why can they sell it to the "poor people" (your words) at a much cheaper price and still make a profit? But if you're "richer" they sell it to you for more. Does that make any sense at all?

      It's no different than here, in America, where you can go into a convenience mart in the ghetto and get the same things you would in a convenience mart in a wealthy neighborhood except much cheaper. When I drive through the ghetto I fill up my tank b/c gas is always cheaper (along with everything else). It's called capitalism. Removing these inequities requires government intervention and there are often negative consequences that go along with that. I'm a socialist but I don't blindly support government intervention in all things -- if I were to do that I'd be the strawman conservatives love to attack.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    41. Re:Valve / Steam... by jodido · · Score: 0

      Actually, prices are higher in "the ghetto".

    42. Re:Valve / Steam... by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      _that_ is the problem.

      Australia can make this a lot easier by changing the rules:

      0) it's totally legal for people to import and re-sell stuff they buy legitimately elsewhere in the world
      1) anyone bringing software in from the USA can easily pay sales tax on it before reselling (no other import duties though)
      2) the manufacturing company isn't allowed to disadvantage the user merely for using software / product in Australia

      #2 is hardest to balance. In the case of Microsoft,
      -refusing to activate windows would not be acceptable.
      -Saying that you have to get customer support on the standard usa numbers in usa times would be acceptable.

    43. Re:Valve / Steam... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      "Illegal" is the definition of things that we as a society judge to be destructive enough to be regulated.

    44. Re:Valve / Steam... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

      Indeed. There wqs a clownish incident in Detroit two years ago where people got all high and mighty, denying Walmart a store (as if government had any interest in that) thus the locals denied themselves a big cost savings outlet. Walmart saves Americans well over $200 billion a year.

      "YEY!!! We stopped them!!!1!11"

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    45. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by profiteering, you mean profit maximization, congratulations, you discovered the obvious. Sure they could probably make a profit, but not as much profit. There's a similar disconnect with drug prices - those used for human and veterinary medicine are priced differently because at the price that would optimize profit for a combined market would price the veterinary usage (or at least most of it) out of the market.

    46. Re:Valve / Steam... by Sique · · Score: 1

      Because the Quebequois speak french, and thus the drones will probably be confused when their positioning system has to deal with abreviations spelled backwards and the date in different notation.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    47. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Australians buy the same TVs/Computers/Cars (when we can get a decent model on the market) as the USA does.

      No, you don't.

      On which side of the road do you drive and where is the steering wheel located?

      Which Analog and Digital broadcasting systems does Australia use, it's most certainly not NTSC/ATSC, so you can't leverage the "we buy the same stuff as Americans" because you don't. You have to have your OWN models specific to a country no where near the other English speaking countries in the middle of a huge ocean.

      And even with digital stuff, you don't use the same spelling as the US and you have a Wacky media rating system that makes no sense.

      So yes, they're going to charge you more...because you're a tiny annoying market. You're damn lucky you're english speakers with a reasonable standard of living or else they'd just ignore you.

    48. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      Only if you start shipping Smarties south of the border.

    49. Re:Valve / Steam... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Sometimes stuff doesn't sell because it is marked too low.

    50. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer to why is "Because they can" and "Because the vast majority of the population doesn't care enough to do anything about it."

      Market unfriendly companies such as banks (do you really think it costs $2 to access your own money from an ATM?), certain computing devices (do you really think locking in where you get your software is worth 35% on all money transactions? do you really think that giving you last year's hardware for this year's prices is worth it?), or ISPs/cellular compaies (throttling without telling you why or when, low bandwidth caps for a large amount of $)

      Big companies see this herd mentality, and say "I want a piece of the profits too!" and they all want a piece of the ignorant pie.

    51. Re:Valve / Steam... by penix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And there is a very high cost to having a Walmart in your town. Low wages, no or poor health benefits shifting the costs to the taxpayer along with the massive tax incentives they receive that other local businesses can't get drive local businesses out of business. Whole towns have been decimated economically by a Walmart moving in. And when they become the only employer a town has, that town will always be at the mercy of Walmart.

      Might I suggest the following for you:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jazb24Q2s94

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    52. Re:Valve / Steam... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Nobody is saying this is right, particularly for goods protected by government monopoly. But it's not against the law, and when it comes to corporations, that's all that matters. You tell a CEO that what he's doing is morally wrong, his lawyer will tell him it's legally OK, and he'll ask what the problem is.

    53. Re:Valve / Steam... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      This is a reality we live with in the US too. If I had a dollar for every time some offshore company offered "design services" for a fraction of what we could do internally, both because labor is cheaper and they get their software licenses for MUCH cheaper (where a software license for some high end software costs almost as much as a headcount), I'd be a rich man.

      I do not agree with the practice. My point is that it's not illegal, you're better off making it illegal first (somehow, and this is something you have to be careful with as I see a lot of unintended consequences), THEN picking on them.

    54. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No? If you think that you must be new here. There are people every day coming out in defense of practices like this.

    55. Re:Valve / Steam... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      In theory no, a judge interprets the law as it is written. Society determines what is destructive and compels its government to pass laws.

      I have a hunch no such laws exist today in Australia, as they do not in the US. Such a law would have to be carefully crafted. I DO agree that this is a problem that needs solving. Market based pricing is absolutely destructive to the 1st world in terms of competitiveness.

    56. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we should stop using government tax money to enforce these private copyrights through the police and allow the citizens to pirate copies in order to force the retail prices down to a level which is Fair, Reasonable And None Discriminatory.

    57. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what I think is even more ridiculous is a car that's made in South Australia, the Pontiac G8 is cheaper to buy in the US than in South Australia. The average price in South Australia is around $50,000 the average price in the US is around $30,000. Remembering that the dollar was at parity or close to parity. This means it was $20,000 cheaper to purchase a car that had been shipped to the US.

      That's just the driving-on-the-wrong-side-of-the-road tax...

      (Captcha: sideways)

    58. Re:Valve / Steam... by sudon't · · Score: 1

      It's the costs involved in shipping bits to Australia on container ships. These ships are often attacked by pirates, who make off with the cargo. If they make it to port safely, they still have to be unloaded at port, then trucked by road train to local Australian servers. Bits may not weigh much individually, but a full shipping container can be quite heavy. Adobe has to recover these costs.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

    59. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bombardier? Please! Try basic things like lumber and drywall. Go price a house (parts) from local Canadian lumber distributor. Then go ahead, drive across the border, and check out US prices. Much cheaper. Few years ago, it was 30% cheaper buying a house (parts) in US and driving across border rather than buying in Canada.

      And here's the kicker. The US prices, those are for Canadian made goods!

      So what do you do? Buy all that stuff in the US (Canadian/US made), then drive it up to the border (get your NAFTA certificate(s), so they don't slam you with duties for things like a house), and there you go, cheaper house or a pool. Even paying their local nonrefundable sales tax makes it much cheaper in the end.

      I always compare prices now for any major purchases. For electronics, the prices don't matter too much anymore, thanks to newegg.ca. But for tools, some appliances, books, etc. it does matter.

    60. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The steering wheel on their Toyotas is on the same side as the Japanese have them. They have to be switched at extra cost for the US market. Ditto all those electrical goods from China that have to be adapted at extra cost for the US market because the US uses 110v in contrast to most of the developed world.

      Nah. When you weigh it all up it is a wash. No reason for the big price hike.

    61. Re:Valve / Steam... by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Not only hardware and software costs more here in Venezuela when doing a simple exchange conversion, but we have to remember that our salaries are way lower than in the US. For example, a samsung galaxy s3 here costs over 2000$ usd, yet minimum wage is 324$ usd a MONTH, which turns out to be 1.35$ usd an HOUR.

    62. Re:Valve / Steam... by tqk · · Score: 1

      Why can they sell it to the "poor people" (your words) at a much cheaper price and still make a profit? But if you're "richer" they sell it to you for more. Does that make any sense at all?

      Think about it. Of course it makes sense. You don't think it's worth the price? Don't buy it. It's as simple as that.

      We all do this all the time. You think Beemers are too expensive? Buy a Yugo. Jello costs $1/box but no-name brand is half the price for pretty much the same stuff? Choose, or do without, or get something else. I often find that the chain store no-name brand stuff is fresher, better, not to mention less expensive. Orville Redenbacker's popcorn is crap, for instance.

      Nobody's holding a gun to your head forcing you to buy anything that you don't think is worth paying the asking price.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    63. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno why he's being modded down, because he's right.

    64. Re:Valve / Steam... by alexo · · Score: 1

      The Toyota Corolla, Matrix, RAV4 and the Lexus RX 350 are all built in Canada but cost less (often significantly so) in the US.

    65. Re:Valve / Steam... by dryeo · · Score: 2

      These companies do the same with the Canadian market (costs are usually 30% higher) where we do have the same standards as America. Usually these companies don't bother to fix their spelling and often measure things in US units.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    66. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got dumber from reading that comment...

    67. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It's not a wash for one reason:

      There are more Americans than Australians, 10x more. And also the Japanese use the same voltage the US does. They also used NTSC.

    68. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      With Canada, it's a combination of exchange rates setting prices (and companies not changing them as the rate changes) and regulation.

    69. Re:Valve / Steam... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      And your misguided belief is that this is "right".

      I have no such belief. I try to avoid morally judging others. But I can assure you that if everyone was like me, Microsoft and Adobe would be bankrupt a long time ago, since I don't give them a single cent.

    70. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        The extra cost if for a team of translators to provide localization.

                "Crikey, [app_name] just shit on its own balls. kill it?"

       

    71. Re:Valve / Steam... by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      They are profiteering. No more, no less.

      Oh, stop. I've got no love for Microsoft, but in this case, I have to agree with them. It's not like we're talking about selling food and water for an inflated price after a disaster. It's just software. If you don't like the price, don't buy it.

      There are plenty of other options. Use Linux. Write your own. Whatever. If people had started doing that ten years ago, when Linux started becoming a little more popular, Linux would be an entirely acceptable alternative, by now, and neither Microsoft nor Apple would be in a position to do any "price gouging." Instead, people complain that it's too hard, and then whine when companies take advantage of them. Sorry, but you won't get any sympathy from me.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    72. Re:Valve / Steam... by green1 · · Score: 1

      If things were a few cents more in Canada I don't think anyone would complain. But most products are SIGNIFICANTLY more, often double. the difference in labelling costs simply doesn't work as an excuse for that.
      Unfortunately the auto corporations have a nice racket going with cars, it's illegal for me to go overseas and purchase a car and bring it home (unless it's over 15 years old) Even cars from the USA have to be on a specific list to be allowed in, and it's the manufacturers themselves that decide what cars are on that list, and what modifications you need to do to them (and who is allowed to do the modifications) to be allowed in to the country. They claim it's due to different safety standards, but the standards are so close that it's obvious those standards are only there to be a trade barrier and not to improve safety in any way.

    73. Re:Valve / Steam... by SeattleGameboy · · Score: 1

      That is a pretty good trick as Pontiac has been out of business since 2010...

    74. Re:Valve / Steam... by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      My favourite example of #2 is when my brother preordered Skyrim from Playasia. Playasia sent him a notice that the game may not be playable from Australia as Bethesda used geo-IP region locking to enforce regional pricing (and Valve are guilty for implementing the code for it). We are talking $55 (including shipping) vs $89 full retail. Playasia offered a refund and we went to EBgames to pay full retail.

      I hope the government restricts the use of geo-IP price discrimination when it comes to online licence validation.

    75. Re:Valve / Steam... by TheEffigy · · Score: 1

      I sure wouldn't want other countries which buy our imports to say to us "wait that's not fair; it only costs you guys $40/tonne to export iron ore and we're paying $150/tonne. We're going to get the government involved to try and fight that somehow".

      They did, it was called the "Free Trade Agreement".

    76. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious, is the sticker price of $50,000? or is that after taxes? I know for a fact that you guys get taxed far more than we do, but I'm wondering if the price differential there is solely a huge markup just because people will pay that. Also, what exactly is the cost of living like? I know that certain areas in America, (California, New York, etc) are ridiculously expensive compared to the south or midwest, and I have to wonder if that might be driving prices up.

    77. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, American arrogance much?

    78. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American, I can say, the real reason we we have never conquered Canada is: Quebec comes with it. Why do you think Canada has fought for years to keep Quebec in Canada? It is because they know -
      Conquer Quebec and non-Quebec Canada = net loss
      Conquer non-Quebec Canada alone = net gain
      Americans don't mention it because they like to be thought of as nice.
      Non-Quebec Canadians don't mention it because they really are nice.
      Quebec Canadians have not figured it out.

    79. Re:Valve / Steam... by definate · · Score: 1

      I used the wrong tenses, should have been "was" cheaper to buy. Google, and my facts still stand.

      This year, or next year, the exact same car is supposed to be released as a Chevrolet SS.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    80. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I have no love for those companies, I wonder if the answer to your questions isn't going to be obvious (and annoying). It's "known" here in the US, that Europeans are willing to pay more for the same goods, and thus we charge them more for the same goods. Americans are known for choosing to buy cheap crap that will break in a week because it's cheaper, therefore more reliable vendors have to go lower to make the sale. Going to the farthest extreme, the Chinese are known for stealing software, movies, etc. and thus to make a sale there the price has to be very low.

      They call this "market based pricing", and I agree that it is actually quite a destructive practice, but I don't think it's illegal.

      In US it is illegal since 1936: Robinson-Patman Act
      Also this article is worth a look: Price Discrimination

      And a quote from a 2001 essay of Paul Graham The Other Road Ahead

      When they can, companies like to do something called price discrimination, which means charging each customer as much as they can afford. [8] Software is particularly suitable for price discrimination, because the marginal cost is close to zero. This is why some software costs more to run on Suns than on Intel boxes: a company that uses Suns is not interested in saving money and can safely be charged more. Piracy is effectively the lowest tier of price discrimination.

    81. Re:Valve / Steam... by definate · · Score: 1

      That price wasn't very specific, here's a better run down of prices Holden Commodores on CarSales.com.au. The *'s mean they're not sure if it's "on road" (meaning it's inclusive of all taxes) or not. I don't think it is. There was a similar ambiguity when I was looking up the US prices.

      The cost of living here is a fair bit more expensive, property is often quite a lot more expensive unless you live quite rurally. Here's a better write up on that on the "Australian forum". Almost every American I've met has complained about the price of things here though.

      Apparently the median household income in the US is $52,762 and in Australia it is $68,640. Though it should be noted this is without considering purchasing power, both are probably measured quite differently, and each is quoted in their local currencies... but it's the best I could find, without going into this more seriously.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    82. Re:Valve / Steam... by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Do you even know what a free trade agreement is?

      There are many free trade agreements, what do you mean "the Free Trade Agreement"? And FTAs are (as the name suggests) intended to promote free trade; how was "the" free trade agreement created in response to market based iron ore pricing? And Australia doesn't have a free trade agreement with China who are our main importers of iron ore.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    83. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Side of road - While you have some point where that left is the less common we're far from alone. Definitely not enough to need our own "special cars" (Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-_and_left-hand_traffic)

      PAL vs NTSC... really not many people are using NTSC. Definitely not enough to need our own "special TV's" (Ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PAL-NTSC-SECAM.svg)

      Spelling - we use British English, along with a fair chunk of the english speaking world outside the US, though we often have to put up with American english on imported products anyway and realistically I don't think there's a single Australian who can't understand American English (Ref http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_English)

      In short while you're right that we don't match up with America saying we have our own special one is far from true - there's more countries in the world than the USA and Australia and plenty of them use the same things as us at a lower price.

      I can understand if companies claim some extra costs in terms of legal requirements, marketting spending differences, shipping costs etc, but let's be honest here - double the price for a piece of completely digital content is not tax and it's not shipping and it's not marketting costs. It's profit margin and it's done because they know they can get away with it here, and I'd say the question the Australian government has is whether this is in fact anticompetitive Price Fixing for the multiple companies to all be charging this premium purely because they know they can get away with it here.

    84. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coopers Pale Ale in the US: http://www.bevmo.com/Shop/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductID=6584

      Coopers Pale Ale in Australia: http://danmurphys.com.au/product/DM_25620/coopers-pale-ale-stubbies

    85. Re:Valve / Steam... by definate · · Score: 1

      WHOAH! NO WAY! Come on Coopers, what the fuck?

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    86. Re:Valve / Steam... by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Well the dollar has been at par for a few years now without prices coming down and our current conservative government has gutted the regulations with the promise that it will be good for business and prices haven't come down.
      The story seems to be that they charge more because they can, much like gas going up 24 cents a liter today compared to Saturday.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    87. Re:Valve / Steam... by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      Really? We drive on the same side of the road as the US... but we do drive on the same side as the UK, Japan, and about 75 other countries... we're you planning on selling to any of them? Also, this is about IT, not automotive products, so your argument is irrelevant. We use funny spelling? So what, most of the time, games from US studios don't have localisation for real english, and that's not even an issue unless you're playing with subtitles... We don't use NTSC/ATSC... conceded... now explain why that matters to EA for PC gaming prices... I'm running on the same CPU, GPU and Monitor standards as the US. It's not like they're implementing the HCF instruction on Intel chips down under, so developing for PCs in Australia is no different from developing for most anywhere else. Got any more bullshit arguments as to why you think a market of 22 million people should be fucked over, or are you done being a corporate apologist?

    88. Re:Valve / Steam... by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1
      And that still doesn't answer my question, so I'll rephrase it:

      What reasonable justification can be given for the same content, on the same servers, developed and distributed in exactly the same fashion for a worldwide market be marked up 50% purely on the basis on geographical location, when there are no extra costs involved with distributing it to that location?

    89. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      but we do drive on the same side as the UK, Japan, and about 75 other countries... we're you planning on selling to any of them?

      Not really. You may have noticed that American cars don't sell well in Japan, and that US Automakers have subsidiaries make specific car models for Europe IN Europe (and other places), they don't send them there. They do the same for Australia which means they can't leverage making the same models everywhere.

      We don't use NTSC/ATSC... conceded... now explain why that matters to EA for PC gaming prices...

      Well, these days many games are cross platform, meaning that involves consoles...and the three console makers are based in two countries....the US and Japan, neither of which were PAL. The biggest producers of games on the planet are STILL the US and Japan. Those two markets...are the big ones. Everyone else gets leftovers, which is a habit that started when the NTSC vs. PAL Thing mattered. They had so make games special for you. PAL-AU packaging and materials and PAL games....and then ship them to the middle of nowhere with a tiny population...there are US states with bigger populations.

      so developing for PCs in Australia is no different from developing for most anywhere else.

      Except for that totally unreasonable rating system requiring changes in the games to allow them to be sold in Australia. That also mattered.

      Got any more bullshit arguments as to why you think a market of 22 million people should be fucked over, or are you done being a corporate apologist?

      22 million? That's it? There are US states with bigger populations. So yeah, extra costs, and a tiny market in the middle of nowhere, they're going to stiff you. Just so you know your situation is similar to how some companies in the US don't do business in certain regions. For example, Piggly Wiggly is Southeast only. So there are US companies that ignore markets in the US....usually because the market already has enough competition.

      As I've said in other threads in regards to media and Australia, you'd have been better off going NTSC when your TV standards were decided...then you've have probably been lumped into the same market as the US and Canada, colloquially called NTSC-U/C You aren't the same DVD region either. From what I see every other region 4 DVD nation is spanish speaking. Why you're in region 4 and not 2 is beyond me...at least you're in Blu-Ray region 2 with the UK, though it would be better if you were in region 1 with North/Central/South America, Southeast Asia, and Korea/Japan. Inertia is really what's keeping the situation going.

    90. Re:Valve / Steam... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      China is the ultimate capitalist paradise. You'd like it there. If you're rich. If not, well, get ready to work twelve hour days and sleep in a room with seven other people for the rest of your life. The worker's paradise. As visualized by Ayn Rand, I guess.

    91. Re:Valve / Steam... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Well done. If profits are all that matter, then corporations are all that matter.

      During the hours of the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, taxis and other cart drivers were charging enormous sums of money to carry people and their goods away from the fire. They would then drive a block or two, and dump the cargo and order people off - and return and repeat. Robbery - free market robbery.

      Until, according to one eyewitness, a passenger pulled a revolver out of his coat, pointed it at the driver, and told him to carry them out, as agreed, or die on the spot. The Free Market died at the instance, and the people got away.

      Not only the vicious lies the drivers told, and got away with, were the evil here. The point is they were charging people hundreds to get away in the first place. A free market paradise, in what Naomi Klein calls the Shock Doctrine mode, will rob you down to the bare bones and dump you on the side of the road, possibly alive if they've no time to finish you off, anytime a fire or a volcano or a tsunami hits. Ask the people in New Orleans who are still trying to get their property back.

      There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Market. In its pure form, those who have money have an overwhelming information advantage over the common schmuck, and will always win more money. We are seeing what happens in a real world experiment in the US right now, when wealth absorption becomes an infinite curve.

      There MUST be a balance between what a goods producer can charge and what a common human can pay, or else we are all mostly be doomed to living in Styrofoam boxes some day, when rents become ten thousand a month for your average studio. That balance cannot be supplied by a free market in the real world, because such a market is impossible. The wealthy control information, prices, costs, media, their own government officials - you can't beat them at that game. They have to be controlled, by force, at some point, because they do not recognize limits. Or science, for that matter. Only immediate advantage.

    92. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that in most cases, base prices of these goods were set BEFORE there were such things as digital downloads.

      PAL vs NTSC... really not many people are using NTSC. Definitely not enough to need our own "special TV's"

      Name the two countries that are the biggest producers of console games on the planet...I'll give you a hint...they're both NTSC. And before digital downloads, they actually had to make the things (for the various TV standards, with region specific packaging) and ship them. And not taking into account the wacky super-restrictive Australian ratings system which sometimes required altering the game to be able to sell it in Australia. Being that Australia is a tiny market in the middle of nowhere, you paid more.

      Same goes for boxed software. Do you think companies like SSI or Brpderbund had manufacturing facilities in Australia? No, they manufactured them in the US, manuals and all...and shipped them....to Australia...in rather small quantities.

      So you paid more...and now that digital is available...the base prices were set pre-digital and rose with inflation

      There's a price to be paid for living the global boondocks....something similar happens in the more rural regions of the US (and Alaska/Hawaii)

      But you are getting stiffed on digital.

    93. Re:Valve / Steam... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      There isn't...but the "base" prices were set pre-digital when things had to be shipped. Digital only is a relatively recent thing, remember..and considering the state of internet service in Australia...something else you Aussies always complain about...you might be better off with physical copies..

    94. Re:Valve / Steam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Australia have a huge tax on autos imported from out of the country? My father in laws Jaguar cost twice the US price.

  2. So obvious.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Printing the instructions upside down costs money silly.

    1. Re:So obvious.. by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Got to localize the instructions. Rooting your computer means something entirely different. Electrocution hazard if the instructions got into the hands of a drunk bloke. What am I saying, they don't read instructions.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:So obvious.. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I actually have a cleaver and above all really cheap solution to this problem. Though it does require a degree of skill in athletics.

    3. Re:So obvious.. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you need to be that athletic to chop up a corporate exec with a cleaver. It's a nice suggestion, though.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:So obvious.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually do flip the cover for games that goto australia.

      http://360.mmgn.com/News/Far-Cry-3-is-backwards-in-Australia-or-t-Z

  3. Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Why? Because fuck you. That's why."

    1. Re:Translate this to legalese: by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Funny

      Please mod +5 informative. This is the actual answer.

    2. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Why? Because fuck you. That's why."

      And I suppose that's the same reason they get their meds for about 10% of what we pay here in the U.S.

    3. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "fuck you" you mean "supply and demand", yes. But I do admit "fuck you" is more appropriate.

    4. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe that's "fuck you mate"

    5. Re:Translate this to legalese: by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is the actual answer.

      No it isn't. The real reason is that Australia has a relatively small population, so the cost of translating all the documentation into Australian is spread across fewer customers.

    6. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Tacticus.v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'll take that into account the first time i see 'colour' in a manual.

    7. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's because half the folks outside the U.S. are ganking this shit via demonoid.com

    8. Re:Translate this to legalese: by GreenTech11 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That'd be because the majority of pharmaceuticals are covered under the Pharmaceutical Benefit System, ie, subsidised by the government as part of free and universal health care. I'm sure that if the Australian government didn't do that, we'd get an especially large "fuck you" from the pharma companies as well.

      As far as media goes, I'm hopeful that something might come of this, it's one thing on physical products (where at least you can put it down to "shipping"), but when buying the exact same software, (or even the same song), costs at least 100% more, then there is no other explanation than price gouging. Particularly galling when most of these countries don't pay much Australian tax on their Australian profits either.

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
    9. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Chrisbie77 · · Score: 2

      Seriously? Surely you jest... It can't be that hard to translate from "American" into written English, since most Australians can read that just fine. Many like myself are bilingual, and can understand "cookies" and "asshole" without confusion.

    10. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just say "ganking"?

      What are you, like twelve years old?

    11. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australian, that would be spelt "you fuckin' idiot!".

    12. Re:Translate this to legalese: by mjwx · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As far as media goes, I'm hopeful that something might come of this, it's one thing on physical products (where at least you can put it down to "shipping"),

      This went out the window when I could import a kitchen from the US paying shipping, taxes and imports for 1/2 of what I paid here (we're talking oven, cooktop, fridge, dishwasher, stone benchtops). Well over A$1000 worth of stuff so no tax free threshold. Still managed to save near to $3000.

      Even with Games/Media. I order DVD box sets from the UK with shipping it costs half of what the same box set costs here.

      Dont even get me started on cars. How can BMW sell a car for $350,000 in Australia when the same model is $100,000 in the UK. Even sans the LCT (Luxury Car Tax), GST (Goods and Services Tax) and import duties, that's still $220,000 base price and the UK price includes their 20% VAT.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:Translate this to legalese: by sapphire+wyvern · · Score: 1

      Impressive. Where did you order your kitchen things?

    14. Re:Translate this to legalese: by teg · · Score: 1

      I'll take that into account the first time i see 'colour' in a manual.

      I wonder how you spell "whoosh" in Australian.

      In Australia, the "whoosh" goes the other way. No wonder it's expensive to localize everything!

    15. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And henceforth the Land of Down Under shalt be known as the Land of Bend Over...

    16. Re:Translate this to legalese: by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      I hope you did not turn those kitchen appliances on yet mate. Since your voltage is double the American, you will get a rather big whoosh...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    17. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Most American appliances can use 120 or 240 without any need for conversion these days - companies make everything all over the world, so it's a lot easier to simply change the power-cords then the transformers and drive electronics.

    18. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      Or he/she could be a wow player...

    19. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are 100% correct. But not politically correct. The truth needs to be dressed up so people will accept the slap in the face and kick in the balls.

    20. Re:Translate this to legalese: by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      And what if they just say "We found that people still buy our shit at this price level". Because that's pretty much the truth of it. What is the government supposed to do about that?

    21. Re:Translate this to legalese: by fatphil · · Score: 1

      But you shouldn't translate "cookie" into "biscuit" - "cookie" should be left as "cookie" in English/Strine/etc. . Cookies are cooked once, but biscuits are, as the "bis-" + "cuire" roots attest, cooked twice.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    22. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 internets sir.

      I'd mod you funny.

    23. Re:Translate this to legalese: by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

      So CD/DVD/BR drives run the other way around as well? Or do they need beefier motors to counterarct the forces they are exposed to?

      --
      The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
    24. Re:Translate this to legalese: by conufsed · · Score: 1

      Change power cords? You know US two pin plugs can fit aussie socket if you *really* force them

    25. Re:Translate this to legalese: by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh, mate.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    26. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not that hard. And don't call me Shirley.

    27. Re:Translate this to legalese: by __Paul__ · · Score: 1

      We still don't call them cookies, no matter how much American baked-goods vendors try to shove the term down our throats.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    28. Re:Translate this to legalese: by fatphil · · Score: 1

      It's supposed to wait for MS to offer a sizeable discount on the s/w for hundreds of thousands of governmental machines, and then forget about this little "misunderstanding" forever.

      --
      Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
    29. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smut peddlers on slashdot?

    30. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Sarten-X · · Score: 2

      Notwithstanding any prior arrangement, agreement, or contract, being made verbally or in written form between the Company and the Customer, wherein the Customer is an occupant of or visitor to the country or continent of the Region, the Company shall have the exclusive right to establish and define the level of compensation required for the limited release of exclusive rights to the copying of the Product, to the maximum extent allowed by law, for any reason or none whatsoever. By accessing the Service provided by or associated with the Product, the Customer renews his or her acknowledgement and acceptance of these terms, effective immediately and effective forever or until the Company elects to void this arrangement and agreement, at which time the Customer must destroy all copies of the Product, with no expectation of compensation by the Company, and relinquish all right to use the Product in any way, including but not limited to regular use, sale, gifting, disassembling, augmenting, altering, or engaging in sexual intercourse therewith, notwithstanding any additional arrangement or agreement with the Company.

      That's why.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    31. Re:Translate this to legalese: by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      The funniest comment I read in a while - thank you^^

    32. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada uses "colour" as well. :)

    33. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you refrain from ordering the sink?

    34. Re:Translate this to legalese: by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      None of you guys get how expensive it is to translate C++ to Australian.

    35. Re:Translate this to legalese: by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The Us are particularly expensive; do you want the price to go even higher? Theyre just barely recouping the costs of translating the code!

    36. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take that into account the first time i see 'colour' in a manual.

      That's what makes it even more expensive...after it gets translated, we have to hire copy-editors to go in and fix all the spelling mistakes made by the translators!

    37. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      How can BMW sell a car for $350,000 in Australia when the same model is $100,000 in the UK.

      I'm not sure I understand what your problem is. If the price is too high, don't buy the car. If everyone did that, BMW would have no choice but to lower the price, if they want to continue to sell cars in Australia.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    38. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have all my time back on my current project that I've wasted managing the word catalog vs. catalogue.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    39. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You DO realise that Australians speak English?
      And no i don't mean bastardised US English, I mean ENGLISH the same way they spoke and spelled in OLD ENGLAND.

      Idiot.

    40. Re:Translate this to legalese: by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Most American appliances can use 120 or 240 without any need for conversion these days - companies make everything all over the world, so it's a lot easier to simply change the power-cords then the transformers and drive electronics.

      This,

      I had compliance tests done by a licensed electrician. Made sure they could take 240v before being connected to the mains (the plug did need to be replaced with an AS3112 plug though).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    41. Re:Translate this to legalese: by mjwx · · Score: 1

      How can BMW sell a car for $350,000 in Australia when the same model is $100,000 in the UK.

      I'm not sure I understand what your problem is. If the price is too high, don't buy the car. If everyone did that, BMW would have no choice but to lower the price, if they want to continue to sell cars in Australia.

      LOL,

      Ahhh, the naivety of youth.

      Why would BMW lower their prices when they have a complete monopoly?

      Answer, they dont. Having a monopoly means there are no market forces forcing them to change.

      Libertarianism does not work in the real world.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    42. Re:Translate this to legalese: by quenda · · Score: 1

      I wonder how you spell "whoosh" in Australian.

      We don't say that. But there is an idiom: "That went right under your head, mate."

    43. Re:Translate this to legalese: by quenda · · Score: 1

      Most American appliances can use 120 or 240 without any need for conversion these days

      Better yet, they sell upside-down fridges to suit the Australian market.
      Dishwashers are easily adapter with counter-rotating washer arms purchased locally.

    44. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does someone else on slashdot actually listen to the smut peddlers? http://smutpeddlers.net/

    45. Re:Translate this to legalese: by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      Why would BMW lower their prices when they have a complete monopoly?

      The only cars you can buy in Australia are BMWs? I'm not sure I believe that.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
  4. bad idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    difference in pricing models like this encourages piracy.

    1. Re:bad idea ? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      uh. replying to undo mistaken negative comment

    2. Re:bad idea ? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Piracy?

      Continued watering down of words. Grey markets perhaps. Not piracy.

      A real pirate would climb up an anchor rope and silently kill every person on the ship. Not unlike a ninja.

      Bunch of pansies living in their parents basement running torrent software. Pirates?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:bad idea ? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      difference in pricing models like this encourages piracy.

      True, and then companies will hike the prices up in the regions with high piracy rates to "compensate", which makes the piracy problem even worse, and you have an ever-escalating cycle.

      But the problem here is price fixing, using protectionist legislation as the method of artificially controlling the prices of products that have a near-monopoly in the market.
      The only real solution to this is to disallow region based controls, and turn the laws around so that it becomes illegal to restrict users based on geography.
      A free market is anti-competitive unless it's free for the buyer as well as the seller.

    4. Re:bad idea ? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      How do you know that's what he meant? I, for one, fully intend to join a ship's crew as soon as possible. Nothing gets results like holding yachters hostage.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    5. Re:bad idea ? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Whoops; forgot the happy emoticon indicating insincerity.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:bad idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A real pirate would climb up an anchor rope and silently kill every person on the ship. Not unlike a ninja.

      So... pirate == ninja. Please finish the rest of the equation!

      Monkey == ?
      Robot == ?
      Zombie == ?

    7. Re:bad idea ? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Why are you being such an underachiever?

      With your knowledge of virology, biology and access to equipment/facilities you should be able to hold an entire COUNTRY hostage.

      Always aim high. There is nothing motivation, drive and access to biological/chemical resources can't achieve!

    8. Re:bad idea ? by Lotana · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me have a go:

      Monkey == Human
      Robot == Overlord
      Zombie == Politician

      What do I win?

    9. Re:bad idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for once again wasting precious time arguing petty semantics when the rest of the real world decided on the use of the term without you! It's arrogant, self-centered thinking like that which will all but guarantee nerd culture remains a marginalized, ignored-at-best subculture thought of only with disdain and theme park-quality stereotypes! Keep up the hard work, and once Son Of SOPA or DMCA 2 come around, the most concern the real world will be able to muster over us is a thorough eye-rolling!

    10. Re:bad idea ? by Trilkin · · Score: 1

      A +1 Funny mod if I had the points, for one thing.

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
    11. Re:bad idea ? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Mumble mumble political statement. Also, that would be immoral.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    12. Re:bad idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Insect == Overlord

    13. Re:bad idea ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A free market ... [is] free for the buyer as well as the seller.

      'Tis why market regulation is necessary when there are clear failures in the market. (I am not making a statement about the Australian software market.) But it's hard to regulate a market when it crosses (international) political borders, and many firms take advantage of that hardness.

    14. Re:bad idea ? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Nuh uh. Hypnotoad == Overlord.

  5. Its because we are an easy mark. by barv · · Score: 1

    With the Oz dollar so high, everything looks ridiculously cheap.

  6. Guitars, TVs, all Consumer Goods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is almost across the board for imported goods sold under regional licenses, look to Fender (banning US/Mexican resellers from shipping to AUS), the costs of TV/Stereo gear etc.

    Some vendor gouging occurs like when we were meant to get cheaper goods due to a 25% import tax being replaced by a 10% sales tax... and prices were stable, but until Aussie consumers stop paying for racism vendors will keep charging for it.

  7. Re:The FED by NFN_NLN · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you print money to pay off debts the currency devalues and it is a no brainer. THe exchange rates are going downhill as the house wants to debate whether to default or not eveyr 3 months.

    Therefore, the Bank of Australia wants a higher percentage to avoid the risk as the dollar is the worlds worst currency right now with the highest risk. ... Well Japan might be tieing the US in this area if the government improves more printing of money.

    So MS responds with the 30% premium to convert dollars to Australias currency by passing it on to the consumer.

    IT also explains why healthcare costs are skyrocketing up with insurnace, food, housing and student loans while incomes decline. All this free money given to rich by low interest rates inflates the money supply.

    Holy shit. It's a real life application of the Chewbacca Defense. This is amazing... :)

  8. No, we're not price gouging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interestingly, one Australian company made the submission that it was cheaper to send an employee business class from Australia to the US to buy a certain piece of software there, stay for a night or two in a hotel, fly back, and pay import and/or GST at customs than it was to get the software locally.

    1. Re:No, we're not price gouging by green1 · · Score: 2

      Don't worry, that won't be the case for long, (and not in a good way) companies would love to make buying something outside your local authorized dealer illegal.

    2. Re:No, we're not price gouging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't worry, that won't be the case for long, (and not in a good way) companies would love to make buying something outside your local authorized dealer illegal.

      It may not be illegal yet, but Adobe has already moved in that direction.

      Adobe closed off their international sales for several weeks while they reviewed their international pricing, right as we needed to bring on more people for a new project. After a few weeks of being told we'd be able to buy more licenses any day now, we sent someone to the US to buy a couple of retail copies so we could at least have new people doing more than just surfing the net. Within 24 hours of installing the US boxed copies we had Adobe on the phone demanding to know why our company was running pirated copies of their software, and threatening to revoke *all* of our licenses if we didn't remove them immediately. Turns out they consider running a US boxed copy in a foreign country as a breach of contract and will cut you off. Eventually they had to admit that we had been trying, continuously, to buy a copy from them, and agreed to let us continue until their online store reopened so we could replace the copies we were running.

    3. Re:No, we're not price gouging by kthreadd · · Score: 2

      They agreed to let you run your legally purchased copies, for a while.

      Wow, god job Adobe.

    4. Re:No, we're not price gouging by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, one Australian company made the submission that it was cheaper to send an employee business class from Australia to the US to buy a certain piece of software there, stay for a night or two in a hotel, fly back, and pay import and/or GST at customs than it was to get the software locally.

      Been there, done that. Used to work for a GIS outfit with a small office in San Diego. Basically 2 guys working out of the spare room in one of their homes. If we wanted to buy some software and didn't need it right now, we'd get them to buy it and post us the box (this was back in 05 when sending 12 gigs was faster via airmail than Internet).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    5. Re:No, we're not price gouging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that's exactly what this action by the government is intending to head off - but first they need to satisfy themselves and the doubters that there is in fact a problem.

      They don't intend to try to force anyone to lower their prices - that would be stupid and they probably don't have the power to do that. But I bet they attempt to do something to make it difficult or impossible for companies to prevent customers from buying their products in whatever market they feel like.

    6. Re:No, we're not price gouging by sd4f · · Score: 1

      With a company like that, i'd be looking for software alternatives, and giving adobe the flick.

  9. Re:The FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop pretending you have a clue about economincs - AUD is TOO strong for our other economic indicators and not directly tied to this issues.

  10. Re:The FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a real life case of idiot-with-a-microphone.

    Chances are he is in fact a billion dollar a day trader though - he clearly shows that level of understanding.

  11. Re:seriosly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're talking about Australia...not the US....although you did miss out the "stupid", "fat" and "poor" bits..apart from that your description of Americans was spot on! Well done.

  12. We all know why ... by mister2au · · Score: 1

    Smaller market = higher overheads

    There are still support, distribution costs and compliance costs associated with having a local operation - only a fully online model alleviates that and even then time zone issues imply potential for increased costs

    To some extent, digital distribution and limited local support brings these costs down - the perfect example is Apple whose products are now more or lineball with US markets thanks to digital distribution of software, useless tech support and enough volume to compare to US stores for sales and basic support overheads.

    High cost, low volume products will always have a premium (or at least an argument to made that this is the case with enough spin even it's not the case in reality) ...

    There is NOTHING this committee can do to prove otherwise !!!

    1. Re:We all know why ... by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      What extra support costs? It's not like they are going to have a local call center... All the calls/emails go to India anyways.

    2. Re:We all know why ... by balsy2001 · · Score: 2

      I think you are right. I would also mention a couple of other reasons: 1) the difference could stem from the need to have extra personnel that work just on regulatory compliance for that country (depending on the business, there may even be ITAR export compliance issues). 2) There is also the currency conversion RISK. You have to price your product high enough above the normal fluctuations to ensure that you don't lose out on currency conversion (this is more than on a daily basis, think like quarterly or yearly). Setting the price sufficiently high prevents having staff to continually evaluate and re-price all your products. This idea affects the United States Mint selling bullion coins directly to the public. They set their prices much higher than the premium on spot gold/silver for bullion to ensure that they don't have to continually re-price and to ensure that they don't get burned.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:We all know why ... by mister2au · · Score: 1

      Depends which "they" you are referring to ???

      Apple and Microsoft certainly have large operations in Australia but would still wouldn't push through many copies of niche products.

      I don't know about Adobe however - they certainly have corporate offices here.

    4. Re:We all know why ... by bloodhawk · · Score: 2

      Their are no local support costs, The companies mentioned use global support operations not local ones so support costs are actually identical to the US. Distribution is mostly digital and where it isn't the cost at worst is a couple of dollars to ship it to a store. A premium can definitely be justified, but it is not remotely possible to justify the premium currently being imposed as anything other than a FUCK YOU.

    5. Re:We all know why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither Apple nor Microsoft have large support centers in Australia. They moved them offshore years ago, they do have local operations for sales and services but they are independently funded and even if subsidised they would not even remotely begin to explain the markup.

    6. Re:We all know why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and these local ops of Microsoft exist to support large corporate customers who pay a mountain of cash for professional services and consulting. Those staff are by no means a cost associated with product development and distribution. Therefore the local staff are by no means a justification to charge more at retail for the product.

      Oh and btw, if you log a support ticket with either Adobe or MS, you pay separately per ticket if you're a consumer. And the support staff are not based in Australia anyway.

      Apple actually does run some support staff here in Sydney, so perhaps they can justify it to an extent.

    7. Re:We all know why ... by mister2au · · Score: 1

      Distribution is mostly digital and where it isn't the cost at worst is a couple of dollars to ship it to a store.

      Most of the software with big differences is commercial stuff sold through distributors, resellers or local sales/marketing staff - it costs money to have that network. And both Microsoft & Apple certainly do have local operations, particularly in the corporate space.

      Now for someone like EA selling games I could understand your argument - but they are not the type of companies in question

    8. Re:We all know why ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adobe price their products to distributors in US Dollars, so the prices that the disties charge the resellers fluctuates on a daily or weekly basis. So, they don't have to hedge anything against forex movements.

      Adobe are also one of the worst offenders for price mismatches, with software often costing half the Aus price on the US online store, only if you are in Aus, you can't check out via the US store.

      In addition, they neatly sidestep the issue of having to add 10% GST by having all Australian purchases processed through Ireland so they also have a 10% head-start on any reseller in the country that is forced by law to charge GST on the sale. Never mind when they're having a promotion on their online store and the retail price (with no GST, mind you) is cheaper than the wholesale price from the local distributors.

      Yes, fuck you very much, Adobe. You suck.

    9. Re:We all know why ... by gabebear · · Score: 1

      Compliance costs... like dealing with subpeonas from Parliament.

  13. Because they can by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    That is the only honest answer that there is. As long as artificial monopolies like 'regions' are tolerated it will only continue. There is no valid reason why software or other companies should be able to use globalism for cheaper labor whilst denying consumers globalism for cheaper products. I don't see how things are going to change until world governments start demanding better treatment though.

    Why are textbooks 1/10th the cost in Indonesia? Why couldn't I buy Top Gear in the US for years when it was available for cheap overseas in the discount bin? Why are Corvette's twice the price in Europe? The list goes on and the answer come back to artificial monopolies charging more because they can. Introduce competition, make grey market imports legal, demand manufacturers honor warranties regardless of the country of origin, allow people to buy software in any country regardless of where they live etc......

    1. Re:Because they can by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "That is the only honest answer that there is. As long as artificial monopolies like 'regions' are tolerated it will only continue. There is no valid reason why software or other companies should be able to use globalism for cheaper labor whilst denying consumers globalism for cheaper products."

      You might find this story interesting.

      I think it was 1992, Texas decided to build another prison, located in New Boston, Tx. A Pennsylvania company won the contract, and part of the contract covered employment of local workers. A journeyman carpenter was supposed to get $13.00 or $13.50/hr.

      When the company started hiring, they were paying $11.00/hr for journeymen craftsmen.

      This obviously violated the contract - but the Pennsylvania company went to court, and successfully argued that because they were working in an "economically depressed" area, that $11.00 was equivalent to the wages stated in the contract. That is, $11.00 in the Texarkana area was equal to the $13.00 or $13.50 in Pittsburgh, Pa.

      There is always some imaginary bullshit excuse for ripping off the locals.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:Because they can by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      One reason why some things cost more in different countries has nothing to do with monopolies. TAXES levied by the country where the foreign product is sold. This is especially common for cars. In China, for example, there are serious taxes on any car imported into the county.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    3. Re:Because they can by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In this case taxes were reduced by 15% but prices continued to increase, so the tax angle is very misleading to the point of outright dishonesty in this case.

    4. Re:Because they can by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      I was just trying to point out that the set of valid reasons for higher prices outside the country of origin isn't null. Doesn't mean that all reasons are good or that there is a reason other than they can.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    5. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sales tax in Australia is 10%, whereas the product is 150% more expensive (in the case of Adobe CS). And in case you haven't noticed most company taxes arent paid in the USA or in Australia or otherwise. These companies game the system using complex transfer arrangements between various tax havens and end up paying taxes in places like Ireland for example.

      The Australian government should do the following to rectify this issue:
      - Legalise all parallel imports: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_import
      - Enforce all consumer licenses in Australia (i.e. Adobe must recognise a US purchased license as valid in Australia)
      - Decriminalise private copyright infringement

    6. Re:Because they can by sd4f · · Score: 1

      I think you hit the nail on the head. We accept stupid american copyright laws, and this is how they treat us, give us price gouging. Clearly there isn't enough competition.

    7. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For online sales, this issue is moot.
      Adobe, for instance, have the orders from the Australian online store processed through a subsidiary in Ireland, so they're not actually adding any tax to the sale.
      This is how, at full RRP, the Adobe online store is instantly 10% cheaper than the RRP from a reseller who has to charge GST on the sale.

      So, Adobe bump up the price for the Aus market, sometimes to double the US price, and then they undercut their resellers (who actually have things like rents and wages to pay to staff in Australia, so therefore higher overheads) by not charging GST on the sale.

      What they're then doing is getting 100% of the pie, instead of selling at, say, RRP-25% to a distributor who marks it up by 5-10% on-selling it to a reseller who then tries to get some margin between wholesale and RRP. And, you can't ever sell it for RRP, as Adobe themselves will undercut you on price.

    8. Re:Because they can by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      " There is no valid reason why software or other companies should be able to use globalism for cheaper labor whilst denying consumers globalism for cheaper products"

      Fucking profound and succint, christ almighty you're on the money.

    9. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...As long as artificial monopolies like 'regions' are tolerated it will only continue....

      Actually - In Australia, 'regions' are illegal, and all DVD players are now required by law to play all regions. There was a big supreme court case over this.
      Not surprised at all that our government is taking the next step. Things like modchips are also legal, since they they effectively circumvent an anti-feature found to be illegal.

      Australia has pretty good law - we ought to, seeing as how we have more government than you'd think we need per capita... Oh well, at least they're putting the extra polish on.
      Case in point: Rights can't be signed away in Australian law: A term in a contract or agreement which infringes on a Right would generally be stricken and voided, but the remaining agreement/contract would still hold. This holds retrospectively even if you didn't know you had such a right when you signed.

        Contrast this to American law: If you've agreed to it, too bad! Even if it infringes upon your own rights. Especially if you didn't even know you had such a right.

      EULA's also have yet to be tested: But by Australian contract law they arn't valid either - they amount to adding terms to a contract (the implicit contract of sale) After the Fact - also not allowed. And since you are under coercion to click "I Agree" otherwise your computer will not work, such a thing is actually quite invalid. (no agreement is valid if made under conditions of coercion - in this case, you'd have to find a way to do things without that piece of software, and this may well prove impossible. Think the "i agree" that you click for DirectX after buying and installing a game. (never mind the clingwrap agreement on the box - these are invalid too - valid contracts must be made to an indentified party, and can't be offered to "anyone".)

      Technically, to be valid, you have to be given the contract to read before paying: Apple actually does this correctly on their iTunes / iphone apps store. But for practically all other software purchases, especially retails ones as in the article, this is basically untested.

      Essentially, EULA's and the sale of "software licenses" has distorted the economy, by circumventing very basic and general (and old!) consumer protection laws, such as "fitness for a particular purpose" and the right of resale etc. Basically, you don't "own" the configuration of your own hardware. This is tantamount to owning an idea. (but let's keep other kinds of "intellectual property" out of this).

      Essentially, "software as a business" is a scam: The world's largest and most long running successful conjob. It's acquired the coverted mantle of legitimacy. Way to go BillyG! And so our global economy is kinda broken this way. But it's nice that a lot of the sheer angst it's caused has ended up creating something awesome: Behold Linux! (and OSS in general): If there weren't so many people frustrated at MSFT's mismanagement of their PC's, not nearly so much genuine international community cooperation would have converged to create these awe-inspiring public works!

      Basically, we already know what the world's creative endeavours would look like when intellectual property law ceases to exist.

      And it is Good.

    10. Re:Because they can by The1stImmortal · · Score: 1

      Exactly this

      As long as governments create and enforce a monopoly on the creation of these kinds of goods through copyright and laws permitting import control of copyrighted goods, then the government has the right and responsibility to interfere when those that monopoly is abused by unfair market manipulation.

      On the other hand, if the government explicitly required grey market imports to be considered as legitimate as the white market, then pricing can set as the publishers please, since they'll always have to compete against their own pricing in other regions

      basically yeah - globalism and international trade is a two way street - they can't have their cake and eat it too

    11. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They would probably do the same between US states (charge New Yorkers more than Dakotans?) but there's probably some federal law against it.

    12. Re:Because they can by djmurdoch · · Score: 1

      Well, no wonder the prices are high. If the manufacturers aren't allowed to rip off the consumers in underhanded ways, they'll just have to do it out in the open.

    13. Re:Because they can by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Why are Corvette's twice the price in Europe?

      Part of it is ripping off Europeans, part of it is because the EU has more stringent safety standards than the US and it costs money to first bring the car up to those standards and then get it certified, all for a much smaller market. We are not just talking about safety standards, but things like ROHS regulations on what materials can be used and the responsibilities the manufacturer has for disposing of them.

      The other stuff is, as you say, pure rip-off though.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Because they can by Liam+Pomfret · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to say that the idea that regions are illegal in Australia is a popular misconception. The Copyright Amendment Act (2006) allows for the modification of DVD players to enable them to play DVDs from different countries, but does does not control the sale of DVD players, require region-free DVD players to be made available, or require an unlock to be made available. There was never a Supreme Court ruling on it. I suspect the Supreme Court case you're thinking of was specifically in relation to the game console chipping issue, but that one simply ruled that the consumers could legally break region coding with modifications (and that if it was impossible to break the region coding without also breaking stuff like the anti-piracy, then it was the console maker's own damn fault for linking the two in the first place).

    15. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrast this to American law: If you've agreed to it, too bad! Even if it infringes upon your own rights. Especially if you didn't even know you had such a right.

      Pride in your country is great and all, but unless you have a damn solid source for this, fuck off.

      Based on the phrase, "American law", I doubt you do. Also, what is considered a "right" is hardly set in stone. I have a right to walk away from your business, unless of course I work there in which case walking away might be "job abandonment" (self termination). Sure, I still have the right to walk away, but their are ramifications. Likewise with speaking bad about your products. Am I a customer or the guy being paid to put them together?

      So, in addition to your source(s), you might want to define your terms.

    16. Re:Because they can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, when I say a right is "hardly set in stone", I should state that our opinions on what constitutes a right varies almost to the point of making the term useless.

      My concept of rights is solid, but it is shared by a somewhat vocal but small minority.

  14. When we move to all digital, we're screwed by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next gen of consoles are going to screw us on digital sales, infact anyone selling movies / games / music digitally in general, I hate to go all tinfoil on you guys but they've proven time and time again, they simply do not care about foreigners.

    If you can charge bob 3$ for the icecream and mary 8$, then do it â" especially if you're the only place selling icecream now. Only bob is America and we're mary.

    To take it to 11 on the tinfoil mode, when things become all digital "they" will have control, full control. EA have already proven just how evil digital control is, go find a GOTY edition of Mass Effect 1 2 or 3. They don't exist. You think you're getting a bargain when you buy Mass Effect 2, a 50$ US PC game for 5$ on a Steam sale? Awesome! (Well you are, it's still good) but the DLC is on THEIR controlled internal store and it's ONLY on their store and do you think the DLC is marked down to 10 or 15% of the original cost like the full game? Ok what about 20%? or 30%? No. Not only is it extremely rarely marked down, when it is, it's a small amount (I think it's been on sale twice, in nearly 3 years)

    The console manufacturers are sadly GOING to region lock us when it's all digital and they WILL charge us more than Americans. Interestingly we probably wouldn't even notice or care if it was 20 years ago and we didn't have American buddies posting on the same forums or links to deals or reddit threads or whatever saying "holy crap, I just got a sweet God of War 4 deal on the PSN store for only 9.99" â" except we'll click the link "not available in your region" or "on special, this week only, 49$ AUD"

    Australians need to be prepared that this whole digital thing IS going to shoot us square in the wallet, then the face. I'd wager good money on this.
    Long story short, region free PS3 took me from being a dodgy pirate to someone really happy to purchase games, I'm happy to pay 20 to 50$ US a game, no qualms - hell the Americans do it, don't you? Except they frequently try to stiff us from 95 to 120$ US a shot,....... it's unreasonable, it's bullshit and unacceptable.

    Even worse is on digital stores online, they detect my IP and the price for a digital product of 1's and 0's is 30 to 100% more. It's _incredibly_ frustrating as almost any foreigner could tell you.
    Long story short? You think this is bad now? Just wait, soon there won't BE steam "gifting" from your American pals, there won't be a US PSN store to log in to with PSN credits you purchased on Amazon, there won't be stores which will ship you foreign region free games. There won't be a G2play where I can buy a cheap key of Diablo or Starcraft cheaper than the Blizzard online store or retail. Why would Blizzard, EA, Ubisoft provide these 3'rd party 'stores' keys to sell?

    Australians, in my opinion we're actually in the peak part of bargains right here, in 2011/2012/2013 and maybe 2014 - we've got fairly cheap international shipping, we're in the mid retail -> digital conversion so everyone is clamouring for our buck. Soon the loopholes will be closed, the infrastructure, policies, design all in place for a single store for companies and bam. Kiss the awesome times we've had goodbye.
    Finally, most stores won't do deals like Valve, they seem to be one of the few with respect for the customer, we're in for a bad time :/

    1. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      Go to the store over Tor. Call it Tor roulette. You'll never know what price they are going to charge or where they will be willing to ship.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to the store over Tor. Call it Tor roulette. You'll never know what price they are going to charge or where they will be willing to ship.

      Yeah, nice theory. Works great until you enter your credit card number and they notice its an Australian card. Then Amazon goes the big "Fuck you! Because... fuck you!" and either charges you boatloads more or refuses to sell you Plants Vs Zombies because it's not for sale outside the US market.

    3. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can configure TOR to only use exit nodes in a region of choice, not much roulette really.

    4. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by arth1 · · Score: 1

      If you can charge bob 3$ for the icecream

      Am I the only one old enough to go into mental arithmetic mode to figure out how much a shilling and three pence was in dollars?

      (About 10 cent, in case anyone wonders.)

    5. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      While your response has some merit and comedy - fact is, for closed platform systems like the PS3 / PS4 / Xbox and so on, we're scewed - not a viable option.

      Even if there is trickery to route through it, I have an Australian credit card and billing address.

    6. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 1

      You're right, they don't care about foreigners. What you fail to see is that they don't care about the locals either. They're not charity. They're charging as much as they think they can get away with. And what they can get away with differs from country to country.

      I'm not saying they are 'evil' for doing that. I'm charging my employer as much as I can get from him. I could live with less but I'd be stupid ask for a lower wage. And I'm pretty sure I couldn't get the same pay in India and that I could ask for more in Canada.

    7. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, nice theory. Works great until you enter your credit card number and they notice its an Australian card.

      So buy a gift card from the USA, and use that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately when you pay by credit card they often require the billing address to match the one your bank has on file, and lock you out at that stage.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by Necroloth · · Score: 1

      Can't you just pay by PayPal?

    10. Re:When we move to all digital, we're screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The next gen of consoles are going to screw us on digital sales

      They're only going to screw you if you choose to let them screw you by buying one.

  15. Build Your own software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called capitalism. Just what does it take to get it through your thick un-American socialist sculls? These companies are merely trying to maximise their profits and are pricing their products in such a way as to accommodate the local markets. Where is the problem in that? If you don't like how Ameicans do things then build your own damn software. Let's just see how that works out for you. You should be lucky that we even bother "selling" it to you anyway for all the good plastic Monopoly money is worth.

    1. Re:Build Your own software by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the problem is that the manufacturer's use globalization to pick and choose the cheapest components, and the cheapest labour form anywhere they can, and then turn around and deny their customer's the same thing by region locking things, writing contracts prohibiting their dealers from selling to people out of country, and all sorts of other BS that they themselves don't have to deal with.

      If "Free Trade" applied to customers as equally as corporations I don't think anyone would have an issue with a company pricing things however they wanted, wherever they wanted. It's the fact that I often am not allowed to pick the cheapest location that bothers me.

    2. Re:Build Your own software by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1

      get it through your thick un-American socialist sculls?

      A winning team

    3. Re:Build Your own software by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      Sounds cool.

      Except, our government is actively engaged in writing treaties to prevent anyone outside the United States having the freedom to do anything other than pay us.

      In short, you're an ethnocentric nationalist who easily justifies anything that screws the outsiders.

      And, you make a nationalist like myself look bad, just by breathing.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Build Your own software by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You should be lucky that we even bother "selling" it to you anyway for all the good plastic Monopoly money is worth.

      ...which was the more than the US' paper money was worth, last time I checked.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:Build Your own software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's the fact that I often am not allowed to pick the cheapest location that bothers me."

      You have a choice of where you live, you can migrate, therefore you may pick the cheapest location.

    6. Re:Build Your own software by green1 · · Score: 1

      You'll notice the company can get the cheapest labour in one country, the cheapest of one part in another, and the cheapest of another part in yet another country, and pay the cheapest taxes in a fourth country. The corporation doesn't have to uproot and move to that country to do that.
      How am I supposed to do the same (buy my medications in Canada, my computer hardware in Hong Kong, my software in the USA, pay my tax in... well wherever that would be... etc)? now some of these things I can have shipped, but some things I can't legally import, even though I can legally buy them here, and the companies can legally import them (for example cars and trucks, or medications)

      The problem is the imbalance of "free trade" where corporations can shop around, but humans can't.

  16. Scandalous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think these companies should be forced to not sell their products in Australia. That will teach them.

    Australian citizens should not be forced to pay for products that they don't want or need.

    1. Re:Scandalous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australian citizens should not be forced to pirate products that they don't want or need to pay for.

      fify

    2. Re:Scandalous! by chronokitsune3233 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Australia and its citizens should switch to GNU/Linux and OpenOffice.org or LibreOffice or KOffice or Google Drive or ... for their laptops, desktops and servers and Android, Blackberry or anything else that isn't a Windows Phone or iPhone for their mobile device needs. As for Adobe products, they'll just have to get used to alternative software like KompoZer for Web pages, GIMP for images, etc. (PDF viewers are common enough nowadays; even Google Chrome has one built into it.)

      Oh, and if their printers, fax machines, etc. don't have instructions for Linux and they can't get them to work any other way, they'll need to buy new accessories like that. You know. Because Australia is an extremely wealthy dictatorship that can ban all of that stuff from Microsoft, Apple and Adobe overnight and reimburse all of its citizens for such a drastic change.

      On second thought, let's see what the corporations say before such measures are initiated.

      --
      I have been a captive in America my entire life. Everybody and everything uses customary units instead of metric.
    3. Re:Scandalous! by sd4f · · Score: 2

      Fuck that, we (australians) are rich, we'll keep on buying (cr)apple stuff and get reamed up the arse, regardless.

      I know what you are saying is the correct thing to do, but the public just won't. I think australian history is a big part of it; we actually have never had to fight for anything, well maybe kill off the natives, but we don't have any great revolutionary tales, nor critical events where australians had to fight for their rights or seriously risk invasion; we also don't really get taught about other nations plights (like the US war of independence, or french revolution) probably so that it doesn't give people ideas, we're just told we're the lucky country and most people are happy little vegemites as a result.

    4. Re:Scandalous! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      French Revolution? What's that?

      CAPTCHA: american

  17. Price Fixing? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yes, because you can ask the soviet union (USSR) how well price fixing works and how it doesn't ever lead to shortages and black markets.

    Come to think of it, you can ask the USA right now how well their price fixing of money is working. Yes let's print $90,000,000,000.00 per month to loan money to ourselves because nobody else in the world thinks we're a responsible borrower who will pay back our debt.

    And honestly it's like Obama says: "Raise the debt ceiling because we have to let the world know that we can definitely pay our debt, if they lend us the money to do it"

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:Price Fixing? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Shortages? May want to leave that part out. Just focus on the black markets. And the pirates. Lots and lots of scurvy-ridden, peg-legged pirates.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    2. Re:Price Fixing? by jkflying · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might want to research your info a bit before you start spewing Fox talking points.

      If you'd bothered to check when a Republican last balanced a budget, you would find that it was in 1957 under Eisenhower. Obama, in his last term, increased the debt/GDP by ~10%. If you look at Reagan and Bush Jr, both of them had terms that increased the debt/GDP by over 25%.

      Don't believe me? Google "which republican president balanced a budget?". You might learn something.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    3. Re:Price Fixing? by dbIII · · Score: 3, Informative

      The really odd thing is a current hard line Republican would see many of Eisenhower's policies as outright commie talk.

    4. Re:Price Fixing? by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Last I heard there were people willing to loan the government money at NEGATIVE interest.

    5. Re:Price Fixing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Australian government doesn't have the power to fix the prices, and they don't want to.

      What they want to do, is force the software vendors to admit in a public forum that the only reason for the price difference is - as a previous commenter stated - "Because Fuck You".

      And then they might pass laws that prevent companies from preventing the consumer from purchasing overseas - similar to how it's fully legal and encouraged to bypass region restrictions on DVDs in Australia.
      But they won't dictate the local price.

    6. Re:Price Fixing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ... how well their price fixing ...

      Aussies don't like price fixing, which hasn't been suggested, and they don't like be 'gahzumped' either. A similar problem happened 25 years ago when people realized that CD cost pennies to make and $20 each to buy. The music industry claimed it was the cost of innovation and something 'for the artists'.

      The sad truth being anti-American politicians don't last very long in Australia, so our pack of officially elected cowards will do absolutely nothing.

    7. Re:Price Fixing? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Eisenhower was very nice.
      Nixon was his only vice.

      Yes, politics has shifted. Starting with Clinton, the democrats have been further to the right than republicans were just a few decades ago.
      I'm sure the pendulum will swing back one day. But I'm not sure it does so before it - in true E. A. Poe fashion - has cut our artery.

    8. Re:Price Fixing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eisenhower was universally seen as a centrist, even in his own time. There was serious talk that he might stand as a Democrat candidate, but he eventually plumped for the GOP.

      And for all the talk of how politics has shifted to the right, that's only true in some domains. In others, it's shifted radically to the left. Can you imagine having a serious national debate on gay marriage, even 20 years ago? Let alone in Eisenhower's day.

    9. Re:Price Fixing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really odd thing is a current hard line Republican would see many of Eisenhower's policies as outright commie talk.

      What's the "odd" part? Other than the fact that the typical "hard line Republican" is indistinguishable from a communist (one with lots of needs and not a lot of ability)? Is it odd that they don't know this? Maybe.

    10. Re:Price Fixing? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      This would be funny if it wasn't tragic. I don't watch fox and I'm not a republican, this is merely your broken model of the universe failing to comprehend something it's been brainwashed not to think about.

      Republican vs. democrat is the invisible cage that keeps you trapped inside your own mind. The illusion of choice.

      Obama is a continuation of bush policy, which is a continuation of clinton policy, which is a continuation of bush policy.

      We haven't had a president who went off script in a long time. Probably since JFK.

      --

      Liberty.

    11. Re:Price Fixing? by jkflying · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't mind me, I don't even live in the US. It's just that your attacks on Obama about the debt ceiling are something which is quite Fox-educated Republicanesque and I'd hate for people to be misinformed. What's happening now in that respect is nothing compared to what has happened in the past, and people didn't seem to have a huge problem with it then, which makes me think the reason it is getting all blown up is because somebody (cough Republicans cough) turned on the fan.

      Personally, I don't think your presidents even have very much power over what their policies are. Perhaps upon inauguration they are shown secret footage of the JFK assassination to get them to toe the line or something, I'm not sure. It seems that each president is given just a little bit of leeway to make changes that will mollify their support base while enraging the opposition, and get stopped hard when they try to do anything bigger. Look at Obama's abject failure when he tried to close down Guantanamo.

      I'd say that Clinton was actually more of a fiscal conservative than anybody else has/had been for quite a while. Hell, he actually balanced his budgets, despite not having the support of Congress. The trouble was that he got rid of the Glass-Steagall Act, which has blown up rather nastily 10 years later with the US banking crisis triggering a global financial crisis.

      But the main policies of taking from the middle classes and giving to the corporations and their rich proprietors just seems to keep on rolling through, I agree.

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    12. Re:Price Fixing? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      True, since 1913 we've always had a spending problem. But the debt issue is worse than ever and here's why:

      1. If interest rates were to rise to historically normal levels, I mean they were 15% in the 80's, the debt is now large enough that all of our money would go to paying the interest on this debt.
      2. The debt is around $150k _per taxpayer_, while the average US _household_ income is $45,018.
      3. As I pointed out in the original post, we now print money to cover 90% of our spending, something which we've *always* financed by selling bonds to the rest of the world. We're spending monopoly money and laying the foundation for a currency collapse that could be as great as the Weimar Republic's.

      Clinton was not a fiscal conservative, he profited by accident from a HUGE tech and housing bubble that was fueled by the federal reserve's printing of money. Good god man, the nasdaq was over 5000 in 1999-2000.

      When you make loans cheaper than they should be and spread money around, it ends up inflating bubbles in places where it should not go. It causes long term spending to bubble in inefficient ways. Then when the bubbles burst, you get a much needed correction.

      Obama's policies are trying to prevent this correction and laying the foundation for the death of the dollar and all american wealth. Yes, he's doing what most of them have always done, but unfortunately there won't be many more after him doing this...

      --

      Liberty.

  18. Re:seriosly by c0lo · · Score: 0

    I mean, I hate those drunk alcoholic loud-mouthed mental patients but that usually doesn't translate into business price points.

    I hate MS, Apple and Adobe too. Unfortunately, I'm not related to them to the degree that would allow me to sign their papers for a forced admission in a mental hospital or rehabilitation clinic.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  19. Here is just one example, check this out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Here is just one example, check this out... by WWJohnBrowningDo · · Score: 1

      8GB for FREE?!? I'll take it!

      What is that anyways?

      Nevermind, even if it's an 8GB anal vibrator I'll still take it.

    2. Re:Here is just one example, check this out... by kizza42 · · Score: 1

      In this case, You're comparing outright prices of a product to those locked into a contract.

  20. You are a rambling mad man by definate · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I need to pretend I am a rambling mad man as a joke amongst friends. The problem is I can never quite pull of something which is coherent enough to actually be said by someone, yet insane enough to actually stand out as this guy is obviously a rambling mad man.

    My go to response used to be some mish-mash of an Allen Ginsberg poem, something like...
    "I passed through universities with radiant eyes hallucinating Arkansas and Blake-light tragedy among the scholars of war, if I was expelled from the academies for crazy & publishing obscene odes on the windows of the skull..."

    It's good, but it's hard to memorise. Like myself, most of my friends have at least some university level economics/finance education, so from now on, I'm just going to memorise your comment, as my go to rambling mad man impersonation.

    In other words, thanks!

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  21. Struth by OhANameWhatName · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The government isn't popular enough, so Gillard ordered a market research report into technology. When she got the results, she picked up an iPad and strolled around the parliament with it for a fortnight. Now she turned to page 2 of the report and launched a very obvious but practically useless 'public questioning'.

    Adobe is going to hear more bitching from their paying customers .. and will probably release the 'Australian Edition' of the software with a free clip-on fuzzy Koala, Apple is going to justify itself with shipping costs and Microsoft is going to re-design it's software pricing for Australian businessees to make it appear cheaper but actually be even more outrageously expensive

    Julia Gillard is going to win the next election because Joe Hockey will take over leadership from Tony Abbott and G comes before H.

    1. Re:Struth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, Joe Hockey is an actual senior politician in Australia and in this context has absolutely nothing to do with Joe Football or Joe Basketball. He also owns joehockey.com and has turned down some very large offers for the domain.

  22. Re:The FED by hedwards · · Score: 1

    It's not really that complicated, as long as you don't have a PhD in economics it's pretty clear. The fact that it's not more commonly known is purely because people are incredibly lazy when it comes to intellectual matters.

  23. Re:The FED by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    someone who trades a billion dollars is not an idiot, he is smart enough to have a billion dollars to toy with at his whim, what do you have?

  24. I know why. by jafac · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . it's because they have to translate their product into a weird foreign language. Right?

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:I know why. by arth1 · · Score: 2

      Surely that's a cost saver. Australian documentation can be condensed to "No worries, mate".

  25. You do have an option by balsy2001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You could stop buying the products. If enough people find the offenses of these companies egregious enough and stop purchasing the products they will change their behavior. You have to be willing to do without it though, not just pirate it, or they will blame the piracy as the reason they are losing business instead of their crappy model.

    --
    GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:You do have an option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or find an open source program that will serve instead of the overpriced commercial software.

    2. Re:You do have an option by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

      Hey... I bet that'll work for the Australians too! Then they can buy from someone else besides Apple, Adobe, Microsoft, etc!

  26. American psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not that non-US prices are higher, it is that US prices are made low. This is because Americans are cheap bastards even though many have lots of money to spend. It is a big market, but one you can only break into at discount prices. On the plus side, it is easier to offload low quality goods to the US. Many companies are learning fast and sending lower QA-scoring product runs to the US, sometime even seperate products for specific low-quality US chains like Walmart. However, if your products are new or susceptible to review, or cheap enough to produce copies like software, you send the quality stuff and lose out on per-unit profit to get a share of American consumerism.

    As a consumer in the long term, I wouldn't try rushing to emulate the US. Sure, you can get bread and cheese there at a super low price, but on the other hand you're likely to end up eating cheeze whiz and wonder bread.

    1. Re:American psychology by N!k0N · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can get bread and cheese there at a super low price, but on the other hand you're likely to end up eating cheeze whiz and wonder bread.

      Not anymore -- Wonder Bread was made (in the States anyway) by Hostess -- they closed down for good last year.

  27. Ratings cost money by tepples · · Score: 1

    It's not just translating documentation. Video games also have to be rated in each country where they're sold, and ratings boards don't tend to give discounts just because their countries are smaller markets.

    1. Re:Ratings cost money by promythyus · · Score: 4, Informative

      You know what, you're right! That $5000 spread across every Australian customer definitely does equate to 50% more per copy!

      http://www.classification.gov.au/Industry/Journey/Pages/CGnonA/Step3.aspx

    2. Re:Ratings cost money by Demanufacture · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They don't just have to pay to get the classification. They have to pay lawyers to do the paperwork, accountants to handle the financials, service and support to handle refunds and disputes, and so on (not to mention the managerial overheads). It wouldn't surprise me if these costs exceeded $1 million.

      Don't get me wrong - I'm not saying that the prices are always justified, and I'm sure that there is a big "because we can" factor as well. As an Australian, I too have been outraged on more than one occasion by the price that we have to pay for goods in comparison with the US. However, my day job (which admittedly involves hardware, not software) has given me an appreciation for the amount of actual effort required before you can start selling something in another country, and the company needs to recoup that cost somehow.

      --
      --- "When you're strange"
    3. Re:Ratings cost money by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      So basically $5000 plus another $10000 in lawyers fee (All the rest are costs that are the same in the US because its *always* the same damn call center anyway)

      So, assuming Australian sales as an linear proportion of US sales (Big assumption, but its almost impossible to find sales figures!) we might get about a million copies of a game sold for a top-selling game, we're talking a couple of cents a copy here. There seems to be another $30 - $50 unaccounted for here!

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    4. Re:Ratings cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pay lawyers

      well, there's your problem.

    5. Re:Ratings cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes, and the costs of filing a patent in the US is $200 because that's the USPTO fee. Real insightful on your part.

    6. Re:Ratings cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and they don't have to get classification in the US and other countries as well?

  28. I wish Germany would do that ... by garry_g · · Score: 1

    Many products cost the US$-price in Euro here ... or even more in Euro than in US$ ... e.g., one of our customers complained about our price for a Fortinet device. They looked up the device on the Internet and found it on some supplier's page ... after converting the prices, it turned out that the street price in the US (including VAT but without state sales tax) was about more than 40% under our wholesale price (without VAT) according to the official price list (and we already get a pretty good rebate on the official prices). Try to explain that to your customers ...

    But then, I reckon with all the lobbying, why would the government bother ... it's just the citizens losing money to an out-of-country company ... :(

    1. Re:I wish Germany would do that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what is the typical VAT in the US?

      I think it's about 0%

    2. Re:I wish Germany would do that ... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Um, what is the typical VAT in the US?

      I think it's about 0%

      you're an idiot. the US equivalent is sales tax.

      and while they're too stupid to mark it on their prices in shops it's still there.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:I wish Germany would do that ... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 0

      I'd consider it smart to keep it at a well-known rate and keep it unbundled from the price. That way, you always know exactly what the government is taking from you.

    4. Re:I wish Germany would do that ... by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      are they too stupid, or do they just think that it is important that people see clearly what portion of their bill is taxes?

      in the UK, the sales tax is marked into the price, so it's kinda invisible. In the USA, you're reminded about it every single time you purchase something.

    5. Re:I wish Germany would do that ... by norpy · · Score: 1

      I think he's trying to say is $[US Price] * [exchange rate] * [What he pays in VAT] = Y

      Where Y is a number more than 40% less than his wholesale price even when including VAT.

  29. Not limited to 'technology' consumer products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they did this for cosmetics. Clinique face cream costs $25 USD and $110 AUD for the exact same product. It is outrageous!! There is one site I know of that will sell it for about $45 (obviously they are there to make money just not parallel import).

    1. Re:Not limited to 'technology' consumer products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a GIRL.... on Slashdot! To the torches and pitchforks! We must drive the girl cooties from our Holy Nerd Empire.

      (looks around)

      I like Lancome family products myself. (Lancome, L'Oreal, Maybelline)

  30. Price gouging invites you to see the world. by Ando031 · · Score: 2

    It is cheaper to fly to the US for some IT week-long training courses, stay the week plus weekend than a similar course attended locally. Cheaper including accomadation, food and flights as my colleague at work has experienced. Maybe we are meant to see the price gouging as opportunities to see the world.

  31. Why is this an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't Adobe charge whatever they want for their products?

  32. Re:The FED by Kryptonian+Jor-El · · Score: 1

    Aww how cute, you think rich people are rich because they're smarter than everyone else. How's 6th grade these days?

    --
    All your 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 are belong to us
  33. Re:The FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    A lower UID, but only new money log in.

    Seriously retards have billions, it doesn't take brains to inherit.

  34. Re:The FED by definate · · Score: 2

    Hi there, I've got a degree in economics, you're wrong. That shit's retarded.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  35. about time by smash · · Score: 1

    It's not just Apple, MS, etc. either.

    We get ripped off on most things here. Rear tyres for my car - US price: $300/each. Local price? $900 each. Computer stuff is generally more expensive in terms of AU vs US dollars by a factor of 1.5 or more. Our dollar is currently above parity...

    Fuel is about $1.50 per litre. A coffee from a cafe is about $5. A subway 11" long sandwich is about $6-7.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:about time by mister2au · · Score: 2

      Tyres at $900 each are obviously at the very premium/niche end of the market - either high-performance or unusual size (or both!) .. I have the same experience ... In fact, that is about as niche as you can get without trying to get Pirellis P-Zeros for your Gallardo (or equiv sports car scenario)

      Sad reality is they just don't sell enough to be economical but instead of not offering them at all, they make them reflective of the actual costs.

      Your typical Commodore/Falcon or small hatchback tyres are basically the same price as the US and recall that we pay substantially higher wages all the way through the supply chain and have higher overheads like property costs for warehouse, transporting tyres, etc

    2. Re:about time by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      $1.50 a litre you say? We pay €1,74 a litre in the Netherlands. The coffee is ridiculously expensive, and we pay your price in euro's for a subway sub, although as in most things, ours are longer.

    3. Re:about time by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      It's not just Apple, MS, etc. either.

      We get ripped off on most things here. Rear tyres for my car - US price: $300/each. Local price? $900 each. Computer stuff is generally more expensive in terms of AU vs US dollars by a factor of 1.5 or more. Our dollar is currently above parity...

      MacBook Pro: US$1199, excluding sales tax. Aus$1349, including 10% sales tax. There's a difference, but not exactly "rip off". And there are additional costs in Australia, for example having to send someone to reply to the Australian parliament. Not exactly free.

    4. Re:about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For ever litre of fuel you pay 38 cents levy. On top of that total price you then pay GST of 10%...so a huge amount of fuel charges are fed taxes.

      My personal opinion is that fuel should be taxed even higher, im still seeing bogans in hummers.

    5. Re:about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got an average mid range set of tyres two weeks ago for 135 per tyre...this dude got some p-zero's for his lambo.

    6. Re:about time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      The reason Apple are getting asked to explain is that songs on the iTunes Music store have a base rate of $0.99 in the US and $1.69 in Aus.

      At the time this pricing was set, it was a slight markup over the prevailing exchange rate - small enough that it wasn't worth complaining about it.
      Now that the AUD has been more than $1.00 USD for over a year, Apple are yet to adjust the pricing.

      Movies are often, but not always, more expensive here.

      Their reasoning is that it can't be changed due to deals with the music labels and movie studios, which I am almost inclined to believe as the prices on apps have dropped to a more reasonable rate - ie, $0.99 apps in the US are $0.99 in AU as well.

    7. Re:about time by smash · · Score: 1

      apple recently dropped their prices as per tfa...

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    8. Re:about time by smash · · Score: 1

      sure, they are premium tyres (265/35r18). but tyres for my bike are 600 a pair as well, and in the us they are 300 for a set.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:about time by smash · · Score: 1

      difference is, we actually export oil and gas....

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  36. Re:simple by smash · · Score: 1

    Except all this shit generally comes from CHINA and we are closer to China than the US is. We export far more per capita than the US does actually.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  37. Why not just ignore the copyright... by PrimaryConsult · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Simply don't enforce any copyright laws against these products until the pricing reaches parity. "Authorize" a local "distributor" to sell it at the cost of the blank media it is distributed on. Make sure businesses are aware that they can get in on this action too, and that any copy acquired in this manner will be free from any future prosecution of copyright infringement. If the companies don't play ball after that, Australia suddenly becomes a much cheaper place to set up a small business... win-win.

    1. Re:Why not just ignore the copyright... by balsy2001 · · Score: 2

      I think you need to go through the WTO to do this above board. The islands in the Caribbean did this over on-line gambling the US unilaterally imposed and got permission to distribute US music without paying royalties as compensation.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:Why not just ignore the copyright... by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Except we can't do that because we jumped at the opportunity to sign all sorts of one-sided trade agreements with the US over the past few years that specifically prohibit this kind of behaviour.

    3. Re:Why not just ignore the copyright... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Details. Just set the maximum copyright infringement damages to the lowest global price, instead of some arbitrary AUS-only price. WTO can't regulate down to that level of detail, that's outside their jurisdiction.

      Of course, that might backfire re. Linux. Violating the GPL wouldn't be enforceable.

  38. Anyone remember the Parallel Imports stuff? by fatmatt_oz · · Score: 1

    This is a repeat of the tactics the music and publishing industries used for decades. CD's used to cost double the price of the equivalent in the US and the release of books and music would be delayed usually by months. I think it was sometime in the 90's that the govt. brought in the parallel import rules, basically cheaper CD's and books could be imported (legally) from overseas if the local distributors didn't bring them in within a reasonable time. Don't quote me on any of this, IANAL and it was a while ago. My point is that the entertainment industry have been doing this to us for a very long time and the govt. has had some impact on these sorts of practices. They just need to act. A lot of the software priced like this is technical and productivity based where there is no alternative and adds to the high cost of doing business in this country. I've got memories of walking into one of the big name brand music stores in Asia 20 years ago and buying the same CD's I could buy at home for $10 when they were $30 in Australia, they were not pirate CDs.

    1. Re:Anyone remember the Parallel Imports stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, I remember by father explaining this to me when i was younger, I think around 1995 maybe even earlier. I recall that the prices came down dramatically after that.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. The above is an obvious joke by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I don't think there has ever been a single bit of software documentation ever produced that has been translated into "Australian".
    Also ratings boards don't charge.

    1. Re:The above is an obvious joke by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      OK, how about this? Australians drive on the wrong side of the road (when they bother to drive on the road at all). Coriolis forces are the other way around in the Southern Hemisphere - you've got to program that back asswardness in everything. That costs money.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:The above is an obvious joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose the DVD drives also spin the other direction there

    3. Re:The above is an obvious joke by Teun · · Score: 2
      As a matter of fact it does.

      But because it's also upside down you don't easily notice the difference.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:The above is an obvious joke by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      I don't think there has ever been a single bit of software documentation ever produced that has been translated into "Australian".

      Maybe not, but the other way around can happen... I have a DVD of the first Mad Max movie, where the default audio track is dubbed to American English.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  41. Re:simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australians are fine with Costs More.

    But they're not fine with "Costs more than getting someone in the USA to purchase it at full retail, and send it via express international postage, plus giving them a hefty commission for their trouble".

    There's sites like AusGameShop that more or less purchase games off the shelf in the UK and sell them to Australians for a fraction of the Australian price...

  42. Except it ain't shipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shipping CAN be cheap, if you use the right shippers. It is often cheaper for me in Europe to get an item made by a Japanese company from Ebay from a Korean seller because Korean mail is relatively cheap, so is Chinese btw. However, having the same item shipped from the US is insanely expensive. Getting the item locally is more expensive EVEN after paying the extra levies for taxes, customs charges and post office charges for handling the custom charges.

    But these shipping costs have next to nothing to do with the real shipping costs (fuel, handling) and more with "get as much money as you can get, then waste it".

    The world would be a better place if every country ran one post office system designed for nothing else but enable everyone in the world to ship to anyone else at just a bit above cost to enable investments. You got to remember for this that Japans and Korea's economic miracles did NOT happen with LARGE companies but with very small ones shipping small samples to anyone they could sell to. That is how Sony/Nintendo etc really got started. It is why shipping from China is dirt cheap, they know they need every export they can get. The first Chinese made phones were of course really iPhones but the second batch, the crap but cheap ones made their way abroad via the post office. Individual western buyers just buying them in China directly. Before you can open your international office, you made a LOT of trips to the post office to deliver orders.

    But the post office and its system of deliver anytime anywhere to anyone is of little use to mega-corps, they just want the luxury of being able to send bulk very cheap through systems that barely have any real coverage and want the post office to magically be able to afford to deliver the remaining packages for the same price in the remotest areas.

    Consider it: It costs nothing more to have a package delivered to the heart of London then it does to the Scottish highlands, population 1. That is real useful if you are a tiny company in an outskirt of Being and got a hot gadget you want to sell.

    And it works more or less. There really is no need for a package to cost that much more just because it is sold in Australia even if you have to ship it individually per post and not per shipping container.

    What is left is: Charge the suckers for everything they got, they will pay.

    And the suckers do. Uptake of open source alternatives isn't higher in Australia so it is only good business sense to charge more. When a slave begs for the whip, give it to him.

  43. Import from the US costs taxes by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    While I don't know about software, hardware is often produced for the US and imported to the Netherlands from there.

    I recently pre-ordered a Leap Motion. It's presale price is $69.99. If you order it from the Netherlands, they take care of any import duties since they ship it from a European warehouse. This hikes the price, including $12 shipping, up to about $96, which boils down to about €70.

    If I were the importer from the US, I'd have to pay duties myself, but only if they intercepted the package. Sadly, I don't get the choice to try and stiff my government. But that is the reason why people tend to order from the US rather than locally.

  44. Usually wholesale resellers take care of this by bestalexguy · · Score: 1

    I used to work for an Italian producer in the lighting sector. We had almost no sales in Switzerland. The Swiss used to buy from a distributor of ours located in the south of Italy, where we sold at lower prices. Mind you, the lamps physically moved south then north again, adding more than 1500 miles in transportation.

  45. Why is this a problem? by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just about the market? Australia has a very strong economy, very high minimum wage rates, average salary is 50k I think....those prices are what the market is willing to pay.

    What has this got to do with the government?

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    1. Re:Why is this a problem? by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      Isn't this just about the market? Australia has a very strong economy, very high minimum wage rates, average salary is 50k I think....those prices are what the market is willing to pay.

      What has this got to do with the government?

      In this part of the world the government's job is to look after the interests of the people. Sometimes, as happenstance, the government actually does its job. It appears that this is one of those tomes.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    2. Re:Why is this a problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "average salary is 50k I think."

      This, or the more generic "Australia has a higher average wage than US, so..." gets brought up every time, and it continues to be false.

      As of 2007, annual median equalised disposable household income (PPP)
      Australia is: US$26,915
      USA is: US$31,111

      Australian (ABS 2007) Median income (PPP): US$43,960
      (ABS 2009 report shows a modest 1.3% increase, mostly due to correcting an error in the 2007 report)
      Median USA household income 2004: $44,389
      Median USA household income 2012: $45,018

      There's is nothing here to justify the often 200% Australian markup.

  46. Unfortunately VMware not on the list by slincolne · · Score: 2
    They also overcharge Australian customers,

    The only thing they did in response was to modify their online web shop so that Australian customers could only see the AU$ price and conceal the US$ prices out of shame.

    :-(

  47. Re:seriosly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Come here and say that, cunt! *hic*

  48. Pretty simple really by Solandri · · Score: 3, Informative

    Historically, the AUD has been worth about 0.75 USD (click on 10 year). It wasn't until the global financial meltdown that the AUD shot up in value to where it surpassed parity with the USD (Australia's economy wasn't hurt as much because they didn't have a housing bubble at the time, though they have one now). If you compare before and after, the AUD increased in value by about 40% against the USD. If you compare the software prices, they too are about 40% higher. Surprise, surprise.

    When companies conduct business internationally, they usually negotiate a fixed exchange rate for a year (or a quarter). It helps insulate their annual financial planning from fluctuations in the currency markets. So when the AUD first shot up, the vendors importing US software still had to pay 1.3 AUD per 1.0 USD, even though 1.3 AUD was now worth closer to 1.4 USD. The next year when they went to negotiate currency exchange prices again, the US companies said "OMG! You want a 40% price cut? You can't be serious!" And the Australian vendors didn't have purchasing power to negotiate a better deal. So year after year they got shafted with prices based on pre-2007 exchange rates. (In the US companies' defense, they probably argued that if the AUD shot up 40% in a year, it could drop 40% the next year, and they weren't willing to take that big a risk and adjust the exchange rate by that large an amount. But it's unconscionable that it's continued for 5 years.)

    1. Re:Pretty simple really by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      It wasn't until the global financial meltdown that the AUD shot up in value to where it surpassed parity with the USD (Australia's economy wasn't hurt as much because they didn't have a housing bubble at the time, though they have one now).

      Uh, what ? Australian house prices have been elevated since the late '80s, and well and truly into bubble territory since the early '00s. This is particularly true of Sydney, but the trend is country-wide.

      The last time Australian housing was cheap (median multiplier 3 or less) was back in the early '80s.

    2. Re:Pretty simple really by Stonefish · · Score: 1

      What a load of toss. US companies price fix with the US price minimised, this is because their government is elected by US citizens. Price fixing by cation or region should be made illegal. nuff said

    3. Re:Pretty simple really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia's economy wasn't hurt as much because they didn't have a housing bubble at the time, though they have one now.

      Bullshit we didn't! It just didn't pop, that's the difference.

    4. Re:Pretty simple really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      OMG! You want a 40% price cut?

      How would it have been a price cut? It would have been 40% less AUD but the same amount in USD.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Pretty simple really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most cases the price difference is considerably more than 40%?

  49. What about Steam Games by crispi · · Score: 1

    Steam games are consistently higher priced - and you can't get round it with VPNs or Paypal - the credit card # proves you're in Australia.

    And it's not like it's priced in Aussie dollars with a mediocre exchange rate - The games are priced on the same store.steampowered.com website in USD dollars.

    So why more expensive now? Ah - because steam games would undercut the price of boxed games in stores.

  50. The voice of the people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The truth is that no individual can stop price gouging by ceasing purchasing products, and nobody (besides the government) is well enough organized to create a persistent protest on the scale required for these producers to take notice. Personally, I feel that if these companies cannot explain their actions, the Australia government should take the extraordinary (and unpopular) action of preventing the companies from trading here (and other countries suffering these issues should do likewise). Between the loss of sales and pressure from resellers, it would be a very short time before these companies came to the table.

  51. Re:The FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests.

  52. Happens to pretty much everything... by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Heck, I know people who are able to get car tires from online US-based shops like tirerack.com, get them shipped to Australia (at great expense due to the size and weight) AND pay a shop to fit them to their car (also costs a fair whack of money) and its STILL cheaper than buying them from the local shop.

    1. Re:Happens to pretty much everything... by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Yup, I use a reshipper to buy physical goods in the usa and ship them to Brisbane. Typicaly even with air freight its still 30% - 60% cheaper. I got a 50 kilo gym shipped, total cost half what it cost in Oz.

  53. Ratings are not free (in Australia) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Level 1
    $1210
    - a detailed written description of gameplay
    - written documentation of contentious material (that may leade to an M rating or higher) on Attachment One of the Computer Games application form

    Level 2
    $890
    - a detailed written description of gameplay
    - a separate recording of any contentious material in the game (that may lead to an M rating or higher), and
    typical gameplay footage

    Demonstrated
    $2460
    - a detailed written description of gameplay
    - a completed Checklist for Demonstrating a Computer Game, and either
      Attachment One of the Computer Games application form, or
    a separate recording of any contentious material and typical gameplay
    (If the Board needs you to demonstrate your game, and you have applied under a different fee, you need to pay the difference between the fees before processing can continue.)

    FROM: http://www.classification.gov.au/Industry/Journey/Pages/CGnonA/Step3.aspx

  54. Basic profit maximsation strategies by DrQwerty · · Score: 1

    There is likely a couple of things occurring: 1) The US is the market where standards are set. Australia is a peripheral market that follows the standards set elsewhere, almost regardless of price. Hence, the price is lower in the US to make sure the product is the standard. Profits are then generated in wealthy peripheral markets where high mark-ups can be established. 2) There is a widespread perception that the Australian dollar is very over valued. Companies may set prices higher in anticipation that the currency will eventually fall in value. 3) The Australian economy is relatively strong compared to the US economy. Hence, there is different set of demand curves in Australia. The Australian government could pass some regulation forcing companies to sell their products in Australia at their lowest global price after adjusting tangible cost differences or not sell at all. This would probably be breach of the US-Australia free trade agreement though...

    1. Re:Basic profit maximsation strategies by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 1

      ...The Australian government should pass some regulation forcing companies to sell their products in Australia at their lowest global price after adjusting tangible cost differences or not sell at all. This would probably be breach of the US-Australia restrictive trade agreement though...

      Sorry, but I really had to fix that for you.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
  55. If you think Australians have it bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    New Zealanders have it worse, i.e. compare windows 8 pro upgrade prices.

    USD $199
    GBP $189 ($298 USD)
    AUD $399 ($410 USD)
    NZD $499 ($415 USD)

    Ok, so it is not that much worse than AU, but when you compare CPI's, NZ pays through the nose for foreign hardware and software.

  56. Same thing with clothes in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same thing applies to clothing as well. For example, a pair of Tommy Hilfiger/Calvin Klein/<insert brand> jeans might be about 50 USD in the US. If you buy them in Europe, you will be paying 120 EUR (=160 USD) for the same pants. This is why I go to the US every year and bring a big empty suitcase. I spend 1500 USD on clothes and I basically get a free two week holiday compared to buying the clothes here in Europe (Finland) at 2-3x the price. How can it cost that much more to ship the pants from <insert poor asian country> to Europe vs US?

  57. Local Middle-men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We sell a specialist electronics product in markets around the world and, up till about three or four years ago, Australia was by far the highest retail priced market we operated in. The reason? They still have a tier based distribution system. With the growth of internet retailing/marketing, most other countries in the world have moved to a single distributor selling direct to customers with possibly a parallel sales network through local stores where useful (think Apple store model).

    But Australia for some reason (probably because it was historically more isolated, yet big enough to sustain an internal market) has been slower to adapt to this change and still typically has a master importer who just send boxes to the regional distributors, who then send the boxes on to the retailers. This is now breaking down and investigations like this will hopefully speed things up.

  58. That is why I don't buy panasonic kit by Alain+Williams · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ten years ago my parents bought me a video camera, they were on holiday in the USA. A few months later it broke. Panasonic UK refused to service it (even if I paid) claiming that it was not one of their products. Basically they were protecting their extra margin because these things were sold at a higher price in the UK than in the USA. This is short termed thinking - I will avoid buying from them ever again.

    Companies like globalisation - they make goods where it is cheapest and sell the same stuff at different prices everywhere. But if we, the consumer, try to do the same they stop it. There is an inbalance of power, large corporates abuse it. We like to think that we live in a free market, we do not.

    1. Re:That is why I don't buy panasonic kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The free market means they are free to charge what they like and you are free to purchase what you like. It doesn't mean you can dictate the price nor that they can dictate that you buy.

      The real problem is you are using a proprietary document format, you've chosen to lock yourself out of the free market.

    2. Re:That is why I don't buy panasonic kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you libertarians. You're so precious. Don't ever change.

  59. There are several reasons for things to cost more. by thogard · · Score: 2

    The Aussie power plug is the most likely case for things to cost more. Anything that can be plugged in need a C-tick which is just like the FCC testing but it requires more paperwork and the standard is very slightly different. Other things have unique standards such as a kitchen faucet has to be certified to the local standard. Many of these standards are voluntary in the US under the UL approval process but are a legal requirement to follow an expensive, unique AS or ASNZ standard.
    Cars have to be crash tested for the local market.

    Local sales and support costs are far higher since local staff costs are much higher than in the US since minimum wage jobs there are often $20 to $30 an hour here. The cost of everything is higher so staff that can demand it, do want far more money. Construction costs are some of the highest in the world.

    Local inflation is driven by a requirement that 9% of all employees money gets dumped into mutual fund like retirement funds that are simply trying to out gamble everyone else and not really invest so they are throwing around money like crazy.

    The real issue is that land prices are hyper inflated and simply insane. The makers of Autocad have an office an hour drive away from down town sitting on land worth 10s of millions yet the same office in a almost rural area in a US city might cost nearly a million dollars. The land prices mean rent is very high and there are examples where the 2rd largest mall in town spent over a billion dollars to upgrade so basic economics say the rent of the smaller stores need to increase by at least $20,000 a month. The Costco built in Melbourne was the most expensive one in the world and far more expensive than the ones they have built in Tokyo.

  60. Shipping to Australia is super expensive by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

    We often buy servers. When it comes to Australia, we know it has to be a lot more expensive. Once, we tried to ask our California-based hardware provider to quote for hardware + shipping, and it was even more expensive than then very high priced local vendor. All that because of huge shipping fees. No wonder...
    Though, this should apply to physical goods only, not to software.

  61. resellinng by sega_sai · · Score: 1

    I think the main reason for the problem is not the companies per se (because I still believe that it's up to the company to setup the prices for the products), but the problem is with the absence of the market of computer programs and music, so you cannot resell them easily. Because if you could, naturally companies would appear who would buy in US and resell them in Australia, with smaller markup then Adobe/MS etc. That would balance the prices everywhere. So I'd say that making the trading/reselling of computer programs possible could be the solution..

  62. Minimum wage? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    Only one other commenter mentioned the minimum wage in AUS, which is $15/hour. That is compared to $7.25/hour in the US.

    I have no idea how the taxes compare and affect the actual "in your pocket" amount after all is said and done, but clearly having a job in AUS would seem to assure you of an income many Americans can only dream of.

    High income/high cost people also get to enjoy more mobility than low income/low cost people with regards to traveling and vacations.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  63. Reason for higher costs? Easy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freight charges. Somebody has to pay for shipping those bits. You know charges for air freight are higher than for sea freight. That's the speed difference. We ship at nearly the speed of light so that's gonna cost.

  64. What about Dell by weegiekev · · Score: 2

    Go to Dell's website. Compare the prices in various regions, incl Aus. The prices in Aus are generally close to double what they are in other regions. Double. Seriously, double. When I worked out in Asia, it was cheaper for us to get someone to buy them elsewhere and fly over with them.

    And before anyone says that tax in Aus is high, and it's expensive to ship to there, that includes any import duties and the cost of the flight.

    On top of all that, you still have to deal with Dell.

  65. Re:There are several reasons for things to cost mo by weegiekev · · Score: 1

    Local staffing and building costs can't explain it all. Dell still have massively inflated prices in Aus, and from what I can see they barely have any local presence. Everything is shipped and operated from out of Malaysia.

  66. What about medicine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an excellent question for the government to get involved in. While they are at it, could they please find out why U. S. consumers pay so much for medicine while the rest of the world gets lower prices?

  67. It was ever thus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Economics 101 - Producers charge what people will pay. Simple. If you don't like the price don't buy it, or buy it some where else where it is being sold cheaper. People think that there is some magical right price. Not so.

  68. Ratings are not free in USA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So your point is what?

  69. This is a joke by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    The assuie government knows full well that US prices don't show tax where as their do so just on that alone their prices should always look 10% higher. I suspect Australian workers get better pay so for physical items at least the staff in the country would likely be more costly.

    I think companies use this knowledge to bump up prices in their favour sometimes and I think the government in this instance is passing the blame so people don't ask what they're getting for that 10%.

  70. Support related costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its because the cost of providing support in Australian English is so much higher than providing support in US English. I mean, have you ever asked an Australian customer to decipher US-English tech support as given by the Indian call center? The Australian-English speaking Indian guy just costs more.

  71. They drop grey import laws. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let people buy from Thailand or whatever and import to Aus.

  72. Re:The FED by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Agreed. However it does take a certain amount of brains and self restraint to hold on to it...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  73. Hmm by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    why Adobe, for example, charges up to $1,400 more for the full version of Creative Suite 6 when sold outside the U.S.

    It has to cope with the disk drives spinning the opposite way and the display origin being bottom left.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  74. Make the competition by englishstudent · · Score: 1

    Instead of paying for photoshop, we should download GIMP and donate the price we would have paid.

    --
    We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
    1. Re:Make the competition by kthreadd · · Score: 1

      Just too bad that Photoshop and GIMP are completely different applications.

  75. Re:There are several reasons for things to cost mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This pretext FAILs for digital downloads like Adobe or iTtunes.
    It fails because futures or hedging only adds interest to spot trade price.
    It fails to explain geographical discrimination if postage is available.
    It fails to explain why ARBITRAGE is not occurring.

     

  76. we're poor by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    They probably charge less in the US because we're so poor.

  77. I spend a lot of $ Au on these companies annually. by jezwel · · Score: 1
    Apple hardware is becoming price comparative, it's iTunes under the hammer there. That could easily be long term contracts so im less worried about it than the other two campanies.

    For the other two companies we are getting reamed for products that are obtained online and supported by a reseller - NOT the manufacturer - with an acceptable margin on their cost price.

    I'd also point out that when you look at the purchasing power of the US $ vs Au $ (eg how many minutes of work is required to buy certain items), in many case we Aussies need to work more than twice as long as a resident of the USA to purchase the same item. The argument that 'Aussies earn more' doesn't hold water when you look at our purchasing power.

  78. Just fix it already by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    Just have your goverment ban discriminatory regional pricing and regional copyright restrictions. Then buy it online at American or Great Britain or Hong Kong prices.

  79. It sucks by 12WTF$ · · Score: 1

    but what do you really expect when you are on the suction end of the US empire wealth pump.

    --
    Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
  80. Retail racism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd be wrong to charge someone more based on the colour of their skin, but not their nationality apparently.

  81. Government Graft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Government Graft.

    Answering stupid questions from a government?

    Paying import taxes?

    Paying 20% higher salaries than elsewhere due to social programs?

    Long distance telephone costs?

    Currency exchange overhead?

    Required interpreters? Australian English is very different from American English.

    Payments to keep the FBI from stealing their servers "in-country?" Sorry - that was New Zealand?

    Add all those things up and that is a 40% added cost, minimum.

  82. Re:The FED by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    I never said they were smarter than everyone else, just said they are not an idiot

    and Aww how cute, did you spend a lot of time coming up with that pointless attempt at an insult?

  83. Isn't this easy? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    If they're compelled to explain the prices, all they've got to do is lay down a quotation from "The Great Train Robbery." I don't see the problem.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  84. The cost of government regulation by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    It's entirely possible that the costs of government regulation are at work here. Assuming that we're talking about physical product and not just an electronic download, there are all manner of import/export regulations that have to be complied with and fees that have to be paid. Granted, Photoshop isn't a controlled product (as far as we know), but take ITAR for example. Yeah, it's supposed to apply to "arms" but in reality every screw and bolt that goes into a controlled item is considered a controlled item even if you can go buy it at Home Depot. Just registering with ITAR costs $2500 a year. The paperwork to export is extensive. Companies have employees dedicated to compliance. They all have to get paid, get benefits, a 401(k), perhaps a pension. All of that costs rather a lot of money. And for what? Denied persons/countries will still find a way to get the stuff they want. So really, all this does is add bureaucrats AKA Ship B people.

  85. Re:The FED by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Thank you for proving my point. It's well established that you can't make money if you're being paid less in interest than you're losing to inflation. In order to make money you need to actually have interest rates marginally higher than inflation. What's more, you can't invest small amounts of money as efficiently as you can large amounts of money leading to the situation that the GGGP was talking about.

    But, then again, why should I assume that a specialty that only recently discovered that not everybody makes purely rational decisions with full knowledge of what they're doing, would understand something that simple.

  86. Google too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear that Google charges 4 times as much to use it for a search in Australia. :-)

  87. "We wanted more money" by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    "And people were willing to pay it."

    What other reason is there?

  88. Buy it from China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just needs the government to call "bullshit" on grey import bans.

  89. It costs that money in the USA too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or don't they sell stuff in the USA?

  90. I don't think it's worth the price. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think it's worth the price. Therefore I will confer with my government so we can negotiate the price that is acceptable.

    What? You're not allowed to NEGOTIATE if you're an individual? When did that become "law"?

    1. Re:I don't think it's worth the price. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      You're allowed to negotiate. You're not allowed to force them to negotiate.

  91. Re:The FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this comment contained even a germ of truth - the price in AUD should be falling relative to the USD, as US-based companies would prefer to hold more of their reserves in a safer currency, therefore they would try to do more business there. The fact that the movement is in the opposite direction means that you're so wrong it hurts.

  92. Re:There are several reasons for things to cost mo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Aussie power plug is the most likely case for things to cost more. Anything that can be plugged in need a C-tick which is just like the FCC testing but it requires more paperwork and the standard is very slightly different. Other things have unique standards such as a kitchen faucet has to be certified to the local standard. Many of these standards are voluntary in the US under the UL approval process but are a legal requirement to follow an expensive, unique AS or ASNZ standard.
    Cars have to be crash tested for the local market."

    These add little to the final price, mostly because in most cases we accept stuff that has been tested to equivalent international standards with little more than a paperwork check. The problem for a lot of products is that the business friendly US makes a lot of these standards as optional, so the testing isn't done. Where as EU products require little to no modification because they already comply. Regardless all of the factors that you mention does not explain the size of the markups that we see here. Particularly for products that don't have any of those issues. (eg: look at the price difference between verisign.com and verisign.com.au SSL certs)

  93. Australia .... Forces ..... ? ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah Ha.

    The mines are not doing their fair share this year regard Guberment Taxes.

    So, Australia Feds then start hitting up the prostitutes like Apple, Oracle, Microsoft et al. for some cum.

    "You make a grown man cry .... you make a dead man cum .... ." ;P

  94. Kill your competition? by englishstudent · · Score: 1

    Why would you even say that? Work for ADOBE much?? While Gimp has a lot to be desired, on a basic level it does the same thing. If you don't believe me- "GIMP is a freely distributed program for such tasks as photo retouching, image composition and image authoring. It can be used as a simple paint program, an expert quality photo retouching program, an online batch processing system, a mass production image renderer, an image format converter, etc. " "Adobe Photoshop is a ...graphics editing program used for image creation, motion graphics editing, and advanced image analysis features." While Adobe Photoshop is far superior in many ways it doesn't have to be that way. "GIMP is expandable and extensible. It is designed to be augmented with plug-ins and extensions to do just about anything."

    --
    We'll never make it.......oh! we made it! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWf3iJjqYCM&list=FL7kKrE4eTs17mQl7eyvJIOg
  95. Price difference same product U.S. vs Whereever by gosgog · · Score: 1

    VOLUME is why.....there are 360 + million people in the U.S., and there is more competition, mostly in manufacturing, plus retailing, so tho' you sell for less, there's a hell of a lot more sales to be made, so plus dollars to be earned. Of course transportation costs are all part of the factor. Now, there's more Chinese and Indians anywhere else in the world, so greater volume. However, under a country (communism) where the Government controls virtually everything, they can to some extent control pricing, but that also creates black market knockoffs! Here in the Philippines, certainly in provincial towns and I'm sure also to some extent in Manila, the vast majority of the general public buying in the computer world, are not paying Microsoft and other software prices, PIRACY thrives! Off course Linux & Ubuntu stuff is free, except hardware, & most of the comes in from China (Family trade thrives here!).