Slashdot Mirror


How Much Beef Is In Your Burger?

dgharmon writes in with an interesting article about how much (or how little) beef is in a UK burger. "The presence of horsemeat in value beefburgers has caused a furore. But what is usually in the patties? It has been a sobering week for fans of the beefburger. Tesco have used full-page adverts in national newspapers to apologize for selling burgers in the UK that were found to contain 29% horsemeat. Traces of horse DNA were also detected by the Food Standards Agency of Ireland in products sold by Iceland, Lidl, Aldi and Dunnes. But a beefburger rarely contains 100% beef."

709 comments

  1. McDonalds! by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Two all beef patties on a sesame seed bun!" Their commercials say it, it must be true.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have doubts about that one myself. Doesn't it require other incredients to get that taste?

    2. Re:McDonalds! by Dupple · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try the meatballs, they're the dogs bollocks

      --
      Watch those corners
    3. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all beef != 100% beef

    4. Re:McDonalds! by jonnythan · · Score: 4, Funny

      The patties are 100% beef.

    5. Re:McDonalds! by larry+bagina · · Score: 0

      better than a horse cock in your buns!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect 'Angus Beef' is the non-scientific name for the pink slime variant McDonald's uses.

    7. Re:McDonalds! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then what does "all beef" mean? "All" something implies "only" something, thus 100% that something.

    8. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Two all beef patties on a sesame seed bun!" Their commercials say it, it must be true.

      Tesco's are giving double club card points out tomorrow for Fuel and Burger they are calling the deal Fuel & Horses .

    9. Re:McDonalds! by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, the name 'angus beef' has legal protection. Either it's certified angus beef, or it's breaking the law. It's one of the few meat products McD sells which the consumer actually knows what it is.....

    10. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonalds is only allowed to call it all beef meat in the EU, because it doesn't contain enough beef to qualify as beef meat. The rest isn't horse though, it is bone-meal aka red slurry.

    11. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? i can't tell. the product is too small to get a sample from.

    12. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Beef and beef by products. Google 'pink slime' to get the muckraker version. They (McFood) did remove it eventually.

      Anecdote: I was feeding my dogs walmart house brand canned beef dogfood. I then went to TacoBell. As I pulled up to the drivethrough I got hit in the face by the smell of walmart house brand canned beef dogfood. I fed the tacos to the dogs. I haven't been back. That was 12 years ago. I extended it to no 'Yum Foods' brands, nothing to miss.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    13. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yep. Angus beef: A strain of cattle that grows faster then most, ranchers love that. Lately a trademark into which much advertising has been sunk.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:McDonalds! by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      Ahoy there, a fellow British Islander!

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    15. Re:McDonalds! by norpy · · Score: 2

      Breed of cattle you clod

      A strain is something used to describe a virus, not a mammal.

    16. Re:McDonalds! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      No, the name 'angus beef' has legal protection. Either it's certified angus beef, or it's breaking the law. It's one of the few meat products McD sells which the consumer actually knows what it is.....

      I believe U.S. McDonalds imports all their meat from countries outside the U.S. This allows for them to get around U.S.D.A. regulations, also I presume they are able to buy it for a lower cost.

    17. Re:McDonalds! by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Why is it that hard to believe that this has been marked "funny"? Go on with the urban legends what ends up in a mcdonalds patty as long as you want. Take one and let it analyse for fuck sake. It is actually 100 per cent beef. It is frozen beef meat mixed with raw meat beef in a secret percentage.

      Stop listening to all the rubbish you read. Take one fucking burger and let it analyse. This won't cost a fortune. Just do it, take someone with you when buying the burger and let it analyse. Or search for actual, trusted analyses. McDonald's has lots of issues. It is not very healthy, the payment is not too good, too much waste, poor working conditions depending on country and store,... Did I mention the waste? Afterb10 minutes a burger is doomed to be thrown away. Maybe they expand the time against the regulations, but after 20 minutes kept warm it really tastes bad. Same goes for french fries. After 7 minutes they should be thrown away, sold after 15 minutes you get slimy fries.

      The quality of the patty, the bun or the french fries is not one of them.

      Ok - not true for india or burgers with pork or chicken. But for the quarter pounder, the bigmac and the hamburgers and cheseburgers except for india it is true. Maybe somebody comes up with a country were somebody did not made the pattys according to rules. Take your uk, french, german, us and canadian mcd burger and let it analyse. Or ask your local consumer organisation for actual analyses they have done. Parent is fucking right. 100 per cent beef meat.

      Try not to judge because you think you know something. Try to actually know it.

    18. Re:McDonalds! by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Lie. Ask your local consumer organisation for an analysys they have actually done and stop spreading FUD bullshit. Ask someone who works there to het you an ungrilled patty - this can be done with nearly no risk to get caught.

    19. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, whatever meat they may contain, it's not possible they are 100% beef, as they are obviously seasoned with at least salt, probably more. So that 100% beef claim is a prima-facie lie.

      It would probably take a court case just the same, but this claim is probably just as true as their 100% vegetable oil fries turned out to contain beef tallow.

    20. Re:McDonalds! by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Given all the attention recently put on beef, I expect McDonalds to be truthful on their page talking about their meats:

      Do you use American meat?

      We do. All of our chicken comes from our trusted USDA-inspected suppliers in the U.S., like Tyson Foods and Keystone Foods. Our beef and pork products also come from trusted USDA-inspected suppliers, such as Lopez Foods. In order to keep up with demand, a small percentage of our 100% pure beef is imported from USDA-inspected suppliers in Australia and New Zealand

    21. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      They will fire you for taking an uncooked patty out of the store. It is a fireable offense, even if your buddy pays for a burger and you send it out the drive through. All the counts come out right. You're still fired if they catch you.

      That said; do it kid, I did 30 years ago. Those patties are nasty. Grade commercial beef.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    22. Re:McDonalds! by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Beef is graded according to quality - Prime, Choice and Select are the better cuts. Bargain cuts are Standard and Commercial grades. Fast food burgers are made from the garbage meat (utility, cutter and canner). So, yeah, it's cow meat. Just not good quality.

    23. Re:McDonalds! by echnaton192 · · Score: 1

      Yes, fireable offence. But easily done, if not repeated. The analysis of our consumer organisation: http://translate.google.de/translate?twu=1?sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A//www.test.de/Burger-McDonalds-ist-der-Burger-King-1234826-2234826/

      Google for your local one. That said it is also stated that the quality of the chicken burgers is not as good, because there are too many suppliers, some of them with a bad reputation.

      Parent was modded funny for a simply true statement. Spreading FUD does not help when you try to figure out the real problems. There is so much gossip going on with some really stupid conspiracys. For instance, for decades it has been an urban legend that beef for german McD-Burgers came from South America, destroying the environment there. Funny idea, but as the burger does not sell for 5 EUR, simple bullshit, far too expensive.

    24. Re:McDonalds! by Dzimas · · Score: 2

      The guy who cooked up the "100% Angus burger" sales gimmick was brilliant. It's just another breed of dairy cow, although the term somehow suggests quality. The truth is that all the good cuts of beef are sold at premium prices in grocery stores and restaurants. The stuff that's pulverized into fast food burgers is the garbage left over after the good cuts have been stripped. It makes no difference that it's 100% Angus garbage.

    25. Re:McDonalds! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      UK standards are not very good. Hell JTM patties would fit their 'good' hamburger standard. Their lower standard is crap.

      I compared it to US standard and I think I'd avoid McDs or any place that serves burgers in England/EU unless they match or exceed the US standard.

      I'd have no problem with 100% horse meat if it met the US standard.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    26. Re:McDonalds! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That is a good point.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    27. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angus, Limousin, Holstein, Herens, Shetland, Danish Red and dozens of others are simply breeds of cattle. Just remember that you get what you pay for, so it's likely your 100% Angus Beef McBurger is made from the cheapest possible edible meat from an elderly dairy cow. Or perhaps a gristly old bull. They're 100% beef too.

    28. Re:McDonalds! by camperdave · · Score: 1

      "Two all beef patties on a sesame seed bun!" Their commercials say it, it must be true.

      Of course they are! They are patties made by the All Beef Company(TM).

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    29. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here was Taco Bell's response on that whole... thing, after it went around:

      http://gizmodo.com/5743332/taco-bells-angry-because-false-statements-are-being-made-about-its-food

      I believe the suit was dropped right away.

    30. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because it is true. Whatever else McDonalds is or does, it serves you 100% beef.

      What was so funny about this post again?

    31. Re:McDonalds! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Given all the attention recently put on beef, I expect McDonalds to be truthful on their page talking about their meats:

      Do you use American meat?

      We do. All of our chicken comes from our trusted USDA-inspected suppliers in the U.S., like Tyson Foods and Keystone Foods. Our beef and pork products also come from trusted USDA-inspected suppliers, such as Lopez Foods. In order to keep up with demand, a small percentage of our 100% pure beef is imported from USDA-inspected suppliers in Australia and New Zealand

      Thank you for your link, I was educated by it. Good stuff.

    32. Re:McDonalds! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tesco are also getting into trouble with their "health" rating for their burgers. Although they're low in fat, they're very high in Shergar.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    33. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant!

    34. Re:McDonalds! by jandersen · · Score: 1

      The patties are 100% beef.

      Perhaps - but what is 'beef' exactly, other than 'something extracted from a dead cow'? I'd rather eat horse MEAT than 'beef'; or go for the vegetarian option, although it has to be said, that one is rather dire too. In fact, it's better just to stay away.

    35. Re:McDonalds! by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      Perhaps to a pedantic aspie fucknut. But if you borrow some some common sense you'll work out that it'd be impossible to add onions & spices for flavour and egg as a binder.

      Or you could, you know, look up the relevant regulation.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:McDonalds! by craigminah · · Score: 1

      If you put horse meat, a bug, or spit in my burger and I don't know, am not told, and don't get sick, I don't give a crap. Whatever you do, make sure it's cooked properly and comes with delicious fries...

    37. Re:McDonalds! by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      Beef and beef by products. Google 'pink slime' to get the muckraker version. They (McFood) did remove it eventually.

      The travesty with that is that the "pink slime" is real beef. Muscle tissue. Not the highest quality, but that doesn't matter at all in hamburger. Now all the people who processed that beef are out of jobs, and since it's all geting thrown away instead of eaten our beef prices are higher. Good job.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    38. Re:McDonalds! by operagost · · Score: 1

      It is in the USA. Apparently, in the UK you're allowed to lie without consequence. Or I guess, the word "all" means "mostly".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    39. Re:McDonalds! by operagost · · Score: 1

      You're likely to have a better experience with a "100% Angus" not because it's from a black Angus, but because they have other quality standards associated with the mark (like marbling of the meat and physical characteristics of the animal).

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    40. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Anecdotal). I have heard from those working at Taco Bell that the "beef" used there is basically the lowest grade that is fit for human consumption. I am sure that overlaps somewhat with dogfood.

    41. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, overreact much?

      "These two meats smell similar. THEY MUST BE FROM THE EXACT SAME PLACE! SURELY Taco Bell has been able to successfully hide the fact that it's using dogfood from the multitude of health inspections and reviews for over a decade without getting caught. Surely!"

    42. Re:McDonalds! by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      They will fire you for taking an uncooked patty out of the store. It is a fireable offense, even if your buddy pays for a burger and you send it out the drive through. All the counts come out right. You're still fired if they catch you.

      Makes a lot of sense, actually. Because the raw uncooked beef can cause some serious diseases and the last thing anyone ones is to give a customer e. coli or other obnoxious disease (these are easily gotten rid of by proper cooking).

      An uncooked patty has no guarantee that it will be cooked right, so from a food safety and liability issue, letting the uncooked patty out the door should be a firing offense because it's a really dangerous thing to do.

      This is different from the store as the store you expect uncooked meats and are expected to properly cook them. A restaurant or fast food joint, you expected cooked food.

    43. Re:McDonalds! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Beef fat is a perfectly good binder, and the rest is filler.

    44. Re:McDonalds! by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the WalMart dog food has gone down hill lately...

    45. Re:McDonalds! by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      Certified Angus Beef (R) is a trademarked brand of expensive, high quality cuts. Angus beef is simply meat from and Angus cow or bull. Fast food chains do not make burger patties from expensive, marbled meat.

    46. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions, on a sesame seed bun".

    47. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I don't think they are afraid of people eating McFood Tartar.

      They don't want people to see what the 'meat patty' looks like before it is cremated.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    48. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      It was 'beef protein' but had to be pushed down the pipe with gaseous ammonia in order to bring it's bacteria counts down to an acceptable number. Which made it taste like floor cleaner.

      It's back to being used in dog food, where it belongs.

      Finally, I didn't eat that crap anyhow. The beef I eat is the same price.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    49. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Project much? I didn't say they were from the exact same place. But the nose knows.

      I will turn around and walk out of a restaurant that fails the smell test.

      I don't eat _anything_ the nose rejects. No matter how hot she is.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    50. Re:McDonalds! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      It was 'beef protein' but had to be pushed down the pipe with gaseous ammonia in order to bring it's bacteria counts down to an acceptable number. Which made it taste like floor cleaner.

      Yes, and if NY strip steak were shredded to such a fine consistency it would have to be treated the same way. Bacteria grows on all cuts of meat.

      And I call bullshit on your "floor cleaner" observation. Ammonia is volatile and quickly offgasses. You're far more likely to be experiencing the placebo effect than detecting any actual difference in the beef.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    51. Re:McDonalds! by sternci · · Score: 1

      Just so. Angus cattle produce an inferior grade of meat to Herefords, but are used because Angus cattle will fatten on feedlot/corn, where Herefords will not.

    52. Re:McDonalds! by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      You rarely see so much FUD in /. comments, this whole thread being an exception. Angus is not a dairy cow, it's raised for it's beef. And you couldn't be more wrong about "garbage left over after the good cuts have been stripped", unless you are thinking they usually put brisket and fillets in hamburger. There's a reason why it's hamburger is because it's not a choice cut like a rib eye or T-bone.

    53. Re:McDonalds! by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Same thing in Iowa with Amana Beef. It is now a brand, that is supposed to be equated with a certain quality, but it most likely has Mexican and Canadian beef mixed in. Amana Beef used to be 100% from the Amana area of Iowa.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    54. Re:McDonalds! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You realize these little chunks of protein were centrifuged out of melted outer cow fat layer? The same outer layer that is protective of the good parts during the early parts of the slaughter process?

      Nobody would ever deliberately grind good meat as fine as the pink slime is. Even if you did grind meat that fine, bacteria counts are based on initial count and processing temperature. Slimed clean meat, processed cold would not need ammonia treatment.

      Before ammonia evaporates it acts chemically on the protein (and the ecoli), that's the point of using it.

      Do you also believe ludafisk is just fish because all the lye has been removed by repeated washing? Yes I went to ludafisk as a valid analogy to pink slime. It is that gross.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    55. Re:McDonalds! by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      The USDA definition of "beef" is "Meat from full-grown cattle about two years old. “Baby beef” and “calf” are interchangeable terms used to describe young cattle weighing about 700 pounds that have been raised mainly on milk and grass."

      Beef is the meat of an adult cow. Period. Nothing else can be sold as beef.

      McDonald's burger patties are made of 100% beef. That is, they're made of nothing but the meat of adult cows. When cooked, they add a blend of salt and pepper to the patty.

      Here is their legal ingredient statement:
      "100% Beef Patty: 100% Pure USDA Inspected Beef; No Fillers, No Extenders. Prepared with Grill Seasoning (Salt, Black Pepper)."

    56. Re:McDonalds! by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      They are seasoned with salt and pepper at the time of grilling. They are considered an add-on, the way mayonnaise may be.

      Here's the actual McDonald's ingredient statement:

      "100% Beef Patty:100% Pure USDA Inspected Beef; No Fillers, No Extenders. Prepared with Grill Seasoning (Salt, Black Pepper)."

      The patties are, literally, nothing but meat of adult cow.

    57. Re:McDonalds! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      That does make me wonder if there is a better standard in use somewhere in the world. I also wonder if there should be a standard for the nutrition labeling not of what is on a chart somewhere but of what testing confirms per batch of beef, other meats or fruits and vegetables, grains, etc. It would increase the cost of food.

      I suspect there would be some fairly good fights over what testing should be done to prove the nutrition of the end product, what is good nutrition, etc.

      After eating small farm raised eggs by someone who gives a damn, comparing the taste to what I get in the grocery store and seeing the results of testing on them I would like to see that happen.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    58. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats a typo. What you are really getting is certified anus.

    59. Re:McDonalds! by jarlsberg71 · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I Wished I hadn't used my mod points yesterday! I have a small herd of Polled Herefords. And no, they're not dairy cows either. There's HUGE differences.

      --
      E8B8B
    60. Re:McDonalds! by dywolf · · Score: 1

      It is not the "garbage" thats left over. That is both misleading and untrue.

      It's typically one of two things: chuck, or market beef. Chuck is cheapest cut of beef and the one most commonly used for ground. Sirloin is also used, but more expensive. Market beef or market trimmings is not "the garbage". Cuts of beef do not look naturally how we think they look in the store. When I cut a sirloin or Tbone or tenderloin for a customer I remove a pretty fair portion of meat, along with excess fat, because that's "what it's supposed to look like". If the cutting is done in the store or at the butchershop, we can grind it and sell it as "market ground".

      The trimmings from a packing plant however cannot be ground and sold as anything for human consumption. For one, most plants don't do cut preparation. Secondly, for those that do (like Walmart's supplier since they don't cut in store), the seperation from actual market is too great, and the food safety rules prevent it from being used for people.

      So the take away from all this is this: McDonald's ground beef is chuck. So is pretty much every burger sold by any fast food chain, unless otherwise advertised (such as "sirloin burger").

      As for the Angus thing, Angus isnt even anything special, it was already the breed most commonly used for beef. They made everyone believe something old and common was really something new and special...and more expensive. Classic marketing ploy.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    61. Re:McDonalds! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Angus cross is also permissible.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    62. Re:McDonalds! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All 'pink slime' is velvetized ground beef that is processed for texture and looks.

    63. Re:McDonalds! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you're that interested in food standards, why are you going to McDonalds in the first place?

    64. Re:McDonalds! by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      That matters so much.

    65. Re:McDonalds! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      It tastes good. It's in the US. I would prefer going to a juice bar and nibbling on coriander chutney sandwiches and drinking carrot juice but I'm in the Midwest. If I smell like prey I'm in trouble so I get a dollar double as maintenance. I get my juice fix in hidden speakeasys with a good floor show and great meat free food.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  2. none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I eat wild game that I harvest myself.

    1. Re:none by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      I have done this in the past but most people live in cities.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    2. Re:none by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I have done this in the past but most people live in cities.

      Rattus norvegicus is pretty common in the city scape.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:none by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      So is Felis silvestris catus.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:none by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Lets not forget about canis lupus familiaris. I hear those are a delicacy in some parts of the world.

    5. Re:none by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I'm currently raising Kobe dog. Beer fed, massaged. Cats for his entertainment.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! A real jungle out there! May I ask for some Soylent Green to spice up the game?

    7. Re:none by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      "Tax the rat farms!"
      ~ Pratchett

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  3. Oblig by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mmm... unlisted percentages of wheat flour, water, beef fat, soya protein isolate, salt, onion powder, yeast, sugar, barley malt extract, garlic powder, white pepper extract, celery extract and onion extract...

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Oblig by thammoud · · Score: 1

      Would never sprinkle "soya protein isolate" on my burgers anymore. Always thought I added too much

    2. Re:Oblig by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      ...on a sesame seed bun. Catchy!

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    3. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine but the cheapest burgers generally only have 40% beef, which is still pretty low if the rest is only seasoning...

    4. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah there. Salt, onion powder, sugar, garlic powder, white pepper celery extra, onion extract aren't fillers. They are all seasonings, and in relatively minute quantities compared to the actual beef. And they make it taste a whole lot better. Beef fat isn't exactly foreign, 30% of ground beef is naturally fat.

    5. Re:Oblig by mrbester · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the thing though. When you buy a beefburger that isn't 100% beef you aren't expecting the percentage that isn't beef to be from some other animal without that being pointed out on the labelling.

      You buy a pork and beef sausage you expect pork and beef in it. Not ocelot.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    6. Re:Oblig by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Would never sprinkle "soya protein isolate" on my burgers anymore. Always thought I added too much

      The last information I read suggested that it was essentially "horse protein isolate" that was the source of the horse DNA found in the burgers.

    7. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You buy a pork and beef sausage you expect pork and beef in it. Not ocelot.

      Well, I expect the ocelot to get into the sausage the moment I turn my back. Then I shrug, put it on the floor next to his bowl, and cook up some soup for myself.

    8. Re:Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already eat:

      Fish
      Chicken
      Pig = ham
      Cow = beef

      Horse = why not?

  4. i have purchased the affected products. by queazocotal · · Score: 0

    I would purchase them again today.
    Horses are not especially more intelligent than cows.

    1. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably safer, too. Ever hear of mad horse disease?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Plus, all of their horses are 100% horse-fed for that double-horse juiced-in goodness!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by mattsday · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not about the ethics of the animal in question, it's about the promises made by the manufacturer (no mention of horse) and the questions of quality control, correct process and oversight.

      My concern isn't "OMG HORSIES!"

      My concern is "fuck you consumer" as they pump the product full of whatever they think they can get away with to turn a profit.

      --
      Now there's one hoopy frood who really knows where his towel is!
    4. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      I would purchase them again today. Horses are not especially more intelligent than cows.

      What does intelligence have to do with the taste, quality, or safety of meat? By your logic, we should all engage in cannibalism, or if that makes you squeamish, we should eat dolphins and apes.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    5. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

      Except they are. Also, horses are pets. We don't eat humans, and we don't eat our pets. If you are onboard with eating horses, I'm sure you are all for eating cats and dogs too?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    6. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would purchase them again today.
      Horses are not especially more intelligent than cows.

      What does intelligence have to do with the taste, quality, or safety of meat? By your logic, we should all engage in cannibalism, or if that makes you squeamish, we should eat dolphins and apes.

      Read it again, idiot.

    7. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Dogtanian · · Score: 3

      I would purchase them again today. Horses are not especially more intelligent than cows.

      Viewing this though the issue of horsemeat misses the bigger (and more important) question raised. Namely, that if horsemeat was able to end up where it shouldn't have, what other garbage has "accidentally" made its way into these burgers over the years?

      Meat rejected for human consumption (destined for pet food and the like or for destruction) making its way back into the human food chain? Quite likely, this has already been heard of. Other animals? God knows what crap?

      It's not remotely surprising that burgers costing less than 13p each (inc. VAT (*)) would contain any old rubbish. Doesn't mean it's acceptable for anyone to sell that, regardless of the price, but it shouldn't be surprising.

      (*) Sales tax, for the benefit of those outside the UK

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We kill millions of them every single year and toss in the trash while millions of people starve.

      I think this solves two problems.

    9. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, by his logic, we should eat you

    10. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Thank you for saying this. The problem is indeed not the horse meat, but the act of putting 29% (one third!) of it in a burger without the customer knowing.

    11. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by ballpoint · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cats and dogs are carnivores and on top of the food chain where the less than healthy stuff gets concentrated. All herbivores are good to eat, unless they're fed odd diets or medicated.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    12. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Jmc23 · · Score: 2

      Horses are very rarely pets, only for the very rich. They are usually just living tools. Just because you can care about something doesn't mean you can't eat it. Or are you a vegetarian? Anybody who thinks there's any difference between eating a cow and eating a cat or dog has some serious cognitive dissonance going on.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    13. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      no, by his logic, we should eat you

      I'm flattered, but just because I'm smart doesn't mean I would taste very good! That was kind of the point of my comment.

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    14. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      I dunno. There are recipies for cat. And I've heard legends of dogs being eaten, too. Which of course is crazy talk.
      If you breed animals for food then you pay attention to what they eat.
      But if you only have chestnuts then you propably breed pigs. Cats get pretty distracted by small round objects and might starve to death.

      All flippancy aside you are right. This is a huge problem with fish. The big fish that ate all the other fishes also got all the mercury. Yummy.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    15. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by period3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would purchase them again today.
      Horses are not especially more intelligent than cows.

      Horse meat is also very tasty -- I like it better than beef. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to buy where I live. One restaurant offered it, but there was a huge uproar about it and I believe they've now taken it off their menu.

      It's really not fair that I should have to change my diet because of a bunch of loud-mouthed activisits. Either meat is legal or it isn't, and -- except for reasons of public health -- I don't see why some species should be considered 'OK' and others not.

    16. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by godrik · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are more intelligent overall. But more importantly, they are so much more yummy! Where can I buy horsemeat in the US?

    17. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by wulfhere · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think his argument was the opposite, saying that because horses are not that intelligent either, he's not worried about eating them.

      --
      -- Sent from a computer.
    18. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Staving people is a distribution problem. We have the capability to feed every person on the planet to obesity. Distribution and profit keep this from happening.

    19. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you breed animals for food then you pay attention to what they eat.

      Yes, like Mad Cow, which was caused by feeding cow brains to other cows. Very very careful about what they let the cows eat.

    20. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Anybody who thinks there's any difference between eating a cow and eating a cat or dog has some serious cognitive dissonance going on.

      Cows aren't supposed to eat meat. When they do, we get mad cow disease, and other problems. Herbivores fed only plants are "safer" than omnivores. Pigs shouldn't be eaten because they are so full of disease. Cats and dogs would have the same issue, if they were raised for meat.

      Anyone who thinks there's no difference between an herbivore and an omnivore has some serious ignorance going on. So yes, cows are "better" to eat than cats and dogs.

    21. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His logic was that it was fine to eat unintelligent animals. You seem to have misunderstood that, hence the other AC placing you in the safe-to-eat category; ie. considering you unintelligent.

    22. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also concerning the the industry doesn't know how the horse meat came to be in it, which means they have no idea if it was classed as safe for human consumption.

    23. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      um, nobody was talking about quality of meat or bioavailability of what's consumed. As well, if you think pigs are so full of disease you really need to realize we don't live in biblical times anymore. Garbage in, garbage out. Unlike, of course, some humans who can't process context. Feed in some perfectly logical relevant conversation and out comes so random garbage from left field.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    24. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cats and dogs arr carnivores, people don't typically eat them. I am not particular with the reasons behind that, but i can (did?) eat a horse - no problem. Some 100 years ago cheap burgers were 100% horse, nobody squirmed about it. I however stay away from cheap burger because of mass-production chemicals added.

    25. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by xelah · · Score: 1

      There was pig DNA, too, which I'm sure has upset some of the more upsettable people around.....

    26. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      um, nobody was talking about quality of meat or bioavailability of what's consumed.

      Yeah, someone was talking about how "meat is meat" and implied that all meat was the same. I proved that jackass wrong.

    27. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably safer, too. Ever hear of mad horse disease?

      No, but I did know someone who killed his dogs by feeding them horsemeat from a slaughterhouse.

      It turned out someone had drugged up a truckload of horses to make them look better at auction, when they didn't sell, he sold them all to the slaughterhouse by the pound instead. Whatever he used to fire them up for the auction was still in their bodies when they were killed that afternoon, and it was something dogs were sensitive to.

      This was nearly 30 years ago, I don't know what the laws are like today, but back then nobody had done anything illegal. You could drug your own horses with anything that's not actively cruel in it's effects, if you're not defrauding any regulated show or event. Auctions were 'buyer beware', I knew a number of people who would tranquilise hard to handle horses to get them through a sale. And the slaughterhouse was supposed to ask about the likelihood of dangerous drugs being in the horse, but there was no legal penalty for not doing so in that time and place.

      There are channels for producing horse meat for human consumption, I assume there's more controls on what the horse may have in it's system. Not something I know about. But at this point you're trusting a company that's already lied to you about the horse meat being present in the first place to be telling the truth when they say they're sourcing it from a safe supply chain! if they're willing to defraud you with cheaper meat to start with, you think they're not willing to grab the uncontrolled pet quality meat if it looks good enough?

    28. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      That's my problem also, I found it weird reading an article from the BBC about why we hate horsemeat, as if that's what this is about..

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    29. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about the ethics of the animal in question, it's about the promises made by the manufacturer (no mention of horse) and the questions of quality control, correct process and oversight.

      My concern isn't "OMG HORSIES!"

      My concern is "fuck you consumer" as they pump the product full of whatever they think they can get away with to turn a profit.

      I hear there is horse AND cow in my burgers. The industry has gone down a slippery slope ever since they stopped putting 100 percent ham in my hamburgers.

    30. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to this little thing we call "society". I don't have a problem with eating horse meat, either. But of all the crazy taboos and normative social regulations we have, that's pretty low on the list. The next time you hear yourself say the word "should" regarding someone else's behavior, think "horse meat".

    31. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      That's racist

    32. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      Before Mad Cow disease was there any known health issues with feeding cows cow brain?

    33. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      All horses are mad. Batshit freaking crazy. Followed closely by their riders.

    34. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Acapulco · · Score: 1

      I agree with you in that it's not cool to put whatever they think they can as long as its cheap, however I don't understand the upset when we voluntarily (even if some of us might not do it that much, for varying levels of "that much") eat things that are pumped full of artificial color, flavoring, bht, bha and over conservatives, etc etc, which nowadays most food is made with, and manufacturers even tell us about it in the ingredients list!.

      The only kind of better food we could possibly eat, short of growing/breeding your own, is organic stuff, without all that extra industrial slime, however how expensive that is? how much "organic" is it?

      And then we wonder where all that cancer comes from...

      --
      Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
    35. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. If you want to eat something with a face, a horse is a good choice.

    36. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Not going to comment on your mental capacity, but you definitely didn't get the point of the OP's comment, which was objecting to eating animals that were beyond a certain level of intelligence.

      A friend of mine had a rule that he "wouldn't eat animals smarter than his cat". Beef, chicken, lamb, and most seafood were ok, but pigs and oddly but probably correctly octopus were not. Then again that was until he married into a Chinese family and eventually gave up. (Is this vegetarian? Yes, yes, just vegetables. What's that? Oh, that's not meat, that pork is just for flavor...)

    37. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, like Mad Cow, which was caused by feeding cow brains to other cows. Very very careful about what they let the cows eat.

      Are you suggesting that the brains of some cows accidentally fell out of the animals and into the feed trough?

    38. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Try the local 'carnecarea' (Mexican butcher shop). That's where I get goat. It's like lamb only better.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    39. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Cats and dogs are domesticated animals that eat whatever humans feed them. Dogs raised for food (in Korea, for example) have a diet no worse (maybe better) than most cattle. And even the average family dog and house cat eat perfectly safe food that is not "concentrating" poisons.

      Not that I am really interested in eating either of them, but let's not make excuses, the reason is purely psychological.

    40. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. I can't find human meat in any of my local butchers where I live and it's shitting me to tears.

    41. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What horse meat isn't though, and never will be, is beef. It's a product description issue.

    42. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by berashith · · Score: 1

      The disease could have been around forever, but would not have mattered as the cows were wandering around eating grass, not other cow's heads. The feed lot mentality of "protein is protein" and trying to gain as much weight as possible as quickly as possible has produced many side effects, the transfer of mad cow being a fairly obvious one.

    43. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by berashith · · Score: 2

      that price makes the issue obvious. I a ball of paper the same size would cost more, then whatever you are purchasing isnt food.

    44. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't, but not everybody is that squeamish. I've personally eaten dog and donkey, amongst other things, I see no problem with that. Also, it's meat, as long as it isn't diseased and is properly handled there isn't really anything wrong with eating most of those things.

      The only reason why most people don't eat monkeys is that they're too similar to humans.

    45. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All flippancy aside you are right. This is a huge problem with fish. The big fish that ate all the other fishes also got all the mercury. Yummy.

      Which wouldn't be such a problem if we weren't spewing tons of mercury into the atmosphere through our coal-fired power plants which then ends up in the oceans.

    46. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...btu..but... FREE MARKET! ARGH blsjkldgkhalg

    47. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In parts of Japan, horsemeat sashimi is a common dish. It's OK, but I wouldn't go out of my way to seek it out. Other horsemeat dishes are pretty good, though. I had 100% pure horsemeat burger. (or so it was advertised... maybe there'll be an uproar if they are discovered to be filling it with beef. :) )

    48. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea that "pigs are full so of disease"?
      Just because they they are covered in mud doesn't mean that that they are disease-ridden (pigs roll in mud to regulate body temp). And if you are basing it on the smell alone, go visit a ferret farm, pigs smell like roses compared to ferrets

    49. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      there are restaurants (at least in canada) that serve horsemeat, but don't list it on the menu (you have to special-request it)

    50. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by FishTankX · · Score: 1

      Technically I think that's religionist, as my black Muslim friend demonstrates admirably. No specific race has an aversion to food products, only adherents of a given religion, and i'm sure there are countless races under the Islamic banner, and Jews are pretty diverse too. (The Jew I know the best is an adopted Korean American messianic Jewish convert)

    51. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that you cannot legally buy horse meat in the U.S. for human consumption. A few years back, Congress passed a law making it illegal for meat packing plants in the U.S. to export horse meat for human consumption. I believe the law was repealed because it caused a massive increase in abandoned and unwanted horses to the point where animal rescue groups which dealt with horses were overwhelmed and could not provide shelter and food for all of the horses that they were being asked to rescue.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    52. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Ironically enough, pigs are actually best suited to modern factory farming conditions. They can eat all kinds of industrial waste and thrive industrial conditions in a manner that other animals like cows and chickens find difficult. If they re-wrote Leviticus today it would be Beef and Chicken that would be unfit for human consumption.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    53. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Well, then why not eat humans then? . The reasoning is simple. We don't eat members of our own species. Under an extension to that same rule, certain species are close to us for one reason or the other, therefore we don't eat them either. Apes are close to us in intelligence, therefore we don't eat them. Dogs and Horses are highly intelligent, and close to us because they are our pets/working animals, therefore, we don't eat them. If you don't see a difference between eating an animal that we raise for food such as a cow and eating an animal that has been our loyal companion for thousands of years such as dogs, then what difference do you see between eating a cow and a human?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    54. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      THIS. If we where to kill all dogs for food, big fat chinese bastards would get them,and the poor would still be starving.

      We have the technology to feed the entire planet, it's the will to do so we're lacking.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    55. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Where do you get the idea that "pigs are full so of disease"?

      From paying attention to life. Though Wikipedia agrees with me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig#Health_issues

    56. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Pig is still full of disease, pretty much regardless of how it's raised. Cow and chicken is diseased through farming methods. If you don't feed cow to cow, you don't get mad cow. If you give space and good conditions, you don't get salmonella.

    57. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      I don't see any ethical or moral difference between eating a cow and a human, you are consuming something that had awareness, whether it be a little or a lot, it is still awareness. However, I would object based on how I've seen humans feed themselves. That and purpose.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    58. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by thedarknite · · Score: 1

      Other way around. Horse owners/riders are crazier than the horses.

      --
      A game has objectives and is competitive, anything else is just play
    59. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 0

      Obama has admitted to eating dog. As far as I'm concerned, that puts him just the tiniest bit above a cannibal.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    60. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      When was the last time a cow fetched your slippers?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    61. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      I'm sure there's a joke in there about wives.

      But probably around the same time a cat did.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    62. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      In Australia the wild pigs are mostly unsafe to eat due to parasitic worms that can also infest humans. It's pretty easy to keep the worms out of the domestic pigs.

    63. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Transparency, transparency, transparency.

        So they have printed the ingredients to the tin now. Too bad it isn't human readable; p

    64. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, horses are pets.

      Wrong. It's got jack shit to do with that. And horses are not pets, any more than a pig or a goat or a chicken or a cow is.
      Horses are (or rather, were) more useful as work animals than eating animals. Work animals are stringy, tough, and all around nasty because you're using them to work and not usually eating them until they're older.

      We don't eat humans

      Cannibalism is a completely different thing. For one, we are to a certain degree toxic to each other. For another, it's a survival trait common among most social mammals.

      If you are onboard with eating horses, I'm sure you are all for eating cats and dogs too?

      Dogs and cats are apex predators, we don't usually eat them for many of the same reasons why we don't eat work animals. Predators are usually lean and rather hard to catch, the nutritional value only rarely makes up for the time and energy expended in killing them. And frankly speaking, herding cats is basically an oxymoron, and dogs are more valuable to us as work animals than food.
      But just for the record, humans have been eating dog on all continents for all of human history, so quit acting like it's some kind of abnormality.

    65. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Most cats where I live go outside and have a fair amount of rat, mouse, insect, small bird etc. content to their diet. I know mine do. They sometimes leave me a dead half-eaten rat as a present...

    66. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Yup, horses all the way down.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    67. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apes are close to us in intelligence, therefore we don't eat them.

      Never heard of bush meat, honky?

    68. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      So those who don't have horses as pets should have no problem eating horse meat. Note that more than 99.999% of human population does not pet horses, it is expensive, time consuming and useless. Or are you saying other people's pets should not be eaten?

      Cows are nearly the national pet of India. Fish are so common as pets that there is a name for the glass house filled with water to keep them as pets. Fish are also extremely commonly eaten.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    69. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by tapi0 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you're located, but you may find an online store in your region such as this interesting to note, they sold out within days of people finding out about the tainted products in the article
      also, try the water buffalo.

    70. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama has admitted to eating dog. As far as I'm concerned, that puts him just the tiniest bit above a cannibal.

      Really? Were you getting tired enough of beating the 'kenyan-muslim-socialist' horse that you had to find a new way to demonize him?

    71. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by alfredo · · Score: 1

      This is what deregulation is all about. They want to feed you any kind of crap without having any oversight. Without regulation it will be difficult to trace from where the pathogens came.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    72. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by alfredo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the beef industry would not appreciate competition. I'm amazed we can get buffalo.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    73. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by ranton · · Score: 1

      If you don't see a difference between eating an animal that we raise for food such as a cow and eating an animal that has been our loyal companion for thousands of years such as dogs, then what difference do you see between eating a cow and a human?

      I agree with the parent. If you cannot see the difference between a dog and a human, just because we keep dogs as pets, then you really do have some problems.

      The only real reason not to eat dogs, cats, or horses is because we have not been breeding this animals for human consumption. Today's cattle, chicken, etc. bear little resemblence to their wild ancestors. There probably wasn't that much difference between eating a cat and a cow 1000 years ago (other than cows having more meat). But there is a big difference today. As far as I know, the only cultures that still eat animals like cats and dogs are those who are poor enough that throwing away the meat is a bad idea.

      Eating humans, or primates for that matter, is taboo for a number of reasons that are completely different than the arguments used for other animals. Among them are that diseases are more likely to be spread this way, because cross-species diseases like Mad Cow Disease are far more rare than diseases which can pass from human to human.

      It basically just come down to this: If you cannot tell that there is a HUGE difference between eating a dog and eating a human, you either suffer from severe cognitive dissonance or you also have trouble telling the difference between having sex with a dog versus a human.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    74. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know someone who grew up with his farmer parents. He had a pet cow. He said it was very tasty.

      Your definition as to what should and shouldn't be eaten sucks.

    75. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eat things that are pumped full of artificial color, flavoring, bht, bha and over conservatives, etc etc, ...

      I agree. I don't mind eating conservatives, but over conservatives are pushing it just a little too far!

    76. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Well, first, I said house cat. Most domesticated house cats really rarely eat rats, etc. if they are indoors most of the time and you aren't starving them. And second, there is nothing wrong with occasional rats, mice, birds, or insects in their diet anyway, so it's irrelevant.

    77. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Pretty soon, we'll have a problem with how the methane byproducts from all this food and starving people production.

      It's fine and dandy to criticize distribution and profit as the sources of starvation. But this implies that we can comfortably and sustainably support 7+ billion people on this planet. And we're rapidly learning, as we run out of resources, and fill every corner with garbage, and destroy our atmosphere, that we can not sustainably support 7+ billion people on this planet. No matter what humane and saintly model of distribution and ownership is chosen.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    78. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      It's fine and dandy to criticize distribution and profit as the sources of starvation. But this implies that we can comfortably and sustainably support 7+ billion people on this planet. And we're rapidly learning, as we run out of resources, and fill every corner with garbage, and destroy our atmosphere, that we can not sustainably support 7+ billion people on this planet. No matter what humane and saintly model of distribution and ownership is chosen.

      I never mentioned susstainability. I mentioned feeding people. Whether they should exist or not is not relevant to the topic at hand. We can sustain obesity-level food for 10+ billion with existing technology. We choose to produce less than that, and distribute it poorly.

      Go push your Hitler-esque eugenics elsewhere.

    79. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      You are either purposefully or accidentally missing my point. I agree there is a HUGE difference between eating dogs and persons ... just as big as between eating dogs and cows.

      It's all about what we perceive as "our group" and what we feel emotionally attached to.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    80. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Fish are so common as pets that there is a name for the glass house filled with water to keep them as pets. Fish are also extremely commonly eaten.

      Fish is too general, its the equivalent of mammal or bird. The fact that I eat salmon and snapper doesn't mean I'd eat angelfish and neon tetras. The fact that I'd eat chicken and duck doesn't mean I'd eat budgie and parakeet.

      That said I agree with your point. And I have nothing against the idea of people eating horse, or even dog. Though I have little to no desire to do so myself.

    81. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      They way they killed horse meat consumption in the US is a good lesson in US politics:
      They didn't ban consumption. They simply refused to allocate funding for inspection of the slaughterhouses.
      And since you can't sell meat for consumption without it being inspected.....poof, it's not salable

    82. Re:i have purchased the affected products. by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Prion diseases were well known before ; kuru in humans and scrapie in sheep.

      Scrapie has been known about since the 18th century. It's the reason they don't feed ground up sheep to sheep. Kuru and conditions like it are probably one of the reasons there are taboos against cannibalism in most cultures.

  5. Re:Well no by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Informative

    I make burgers out of 100% beef and they are not steak

  6. Tesco's Burgers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought some value burgers from Tesco's yesterday, and they're off!

  7. Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    @Freddie_UK: A woman has been taken to hospital after eating horsemeatburgers. Her condition is said to be stable.
    @BobJWilliams: I expect this only relates to those mini-burgers you have as snacks. You know, the horse d'oeuvres.
    @JohnMoynes: I get all my horsemeat from an independent dodgy butcher.
    @DiamondsIRL: Are you in favour of Horsemeat in your burgers? Yay or Neigh?
    @GBretman: So horsemeat has been found in TescoProducts but a spokesman says It's bollocks
    @pinkyperfection: I had a tesco burger and now I'm feeling a little horse
    @brucel: Those Aldi horse burgers were nice, but I prefer My Lidl Pony
    @PaulLewis: Scientist: "Sir, we've discovered horse meat in your burgers." Tesco boss: "Why the long face?"
    @PensionsMonkey: There was an old woman who swallowed a horse, she'd been to Tesco, of course.
    @elhaydo: Good thing about these horse puns is it's stopped all the sick Jimmy Saddle jokes

    The best #horsemeat Twitter gags following Tesco burger blunder

    1. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so hungry I could eat a horse.

    2. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      MPU, please.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    3. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by robthebloke · · Score: 5, Funny

      I ate some tescos burgers last week, probably wont buy them again, they gave me the trots for days....

    4. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought some of these the other day and already they're off!

      Yeah there have been plenty of horse gags around here this past week. What worries me most about this is that it was picked up by the Irish FSA but not the British until after the FSAI disclosed it (Tesco is British).
      The other worrying thing is what else is going into these burgers that isn't edible.

      Personally I don't mind eating horse/cow/pig meat, but when I pay for something labeled as such, it should be as such.

      P.S. The owner of the main meat factory has a bit of a dodgy history.

    5. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

      The other meme going round on Twitter and others, that the shock is not that the "Value Burgers" contain horse meat, but that they contain any meat at all.

    6. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for you.

    7. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Noctis-Kaban · · Score: 1

      I found some Tesco burgers in the bottom of my freezer, I’m not one to look a gift horse in the mouth.

    8. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by ch0rlt0n · · Score: 1

      I think I had one of their burgers last week too.

      I've still got a bit between my teeth.

    9. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by ls671 · · Score: 1

      I regularly eat 100% horse meat burger and I like it better than beef actually. So as long as it is horse meat, I do not mind.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    10. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness there weren't minced Irishmen in your burgers otherwise you'd have the bogtrots.

    11. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by Art+Challenor · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, there's nothing illegal about horse meat, but you have to label the packages. Given that it's unlikely that anyone who eats these has ever read the packaging, this is just a blunder that could have been avoided ("may contain traces of eye of newt, tail of bat, etc."). Chorizo is another example of a food group where you can either eat it, or read the packaging, but you won't eat it after reading the packaging. There is a fair about of shit (quite literally - fecal matter) in US beef. If the US can reach the level of labeling requirements of the EU, we may all find out how much.

    12. Re:Independent: the best #horsemeat Twitter gags by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      I regularly eat 100% horse meat burger and I like it better than beef actually.

      When I was a kid, and before we had McDonalds and stuff, as far as I knew hamburgers were supposed to be made from horse meat. Did this change somewhere along the line? (Yes, I'm aware that there aren't enough horses in the world to supply the hamburger restaurants of today.)

  8. Horsemeat isn't the problem by davidwr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Deceptive trade practices is the problem.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. I've shouted myself hoarse about them.

    2. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Full ack.

      Horesmeat burgers over here would perhaps be more expensive as it isn't as usual as it was 50 years ago and now something like a speciality.

      --
      bickerdyke
    3. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by dkf · · Score: 1

      Horesmeat burgers over here would perhaps be more expensive as it isn't as usual as it was 50 years ago and now something like a speciality.

      Price depends on the balance of demand and supply; if not so many people want to purchase dobbinburgers then their natural price will tend to be lower.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trade? How about simple matter of fact!

      If industries, particular food industries, don't even have enough ethics and respect to factually state what it is indeed they are selling to market, they have no business operating as a food supplier and should be put out of business. That this happened before, or at least it sounds like it had, and wasn't put to stop by the appropriate Government body, means they are also at fault from the initial instance.

      Being from the US, and knowing a fair amount about the US beef industry, I'm appreciative of what it's become, and how well it is watched. Of course, with any industry there are always the asshats who like to taint the pool, but for the vast majority of players, the industry is very well behaved.

      ps: I'm sure someone will respond with posts about BSE and the possibility of widespread consumption of tained beef. Sorry, but I'm well aware of the facts on that matter, and will promptly rebutt them once you begin spreading disinformation!

    5. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Deceptive trade practices is the problem.

      Properly farmed horse meat would only be a 'truth in labeling' problem, but there are other issues. The horses that have somehow entered the human food chain without following proper administrative procedures may be unfit for consumption in more substantive ways - for example they may be injured racehorses that were pumped full of antibiotics and steroids before the owner gave up and sold the horse to a shady slaughterhouse.

      Also remember that Britain had a major BSE problem not so long ago, and there are supposed to be strict testing procedures (much tougher than those used in the US) to ensure that only young, healthy cows are eaten, that every cow has had all of its movements logged etc. How much confidence can UK consumers have in these procedures if meat that isn't even from cows has got past the controls?

    6. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by Threni · · Score: 5, Funny

      Horse DNA, not meat. Probably just horse semen. Nothing to worry about.

    7. Re:Horsemeat isn't the problem by camperdave · · Score: 1

      "If wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak" - Jayne Cobb.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And you don't have to worry about any of this BS.

    1. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes you just have to worry about malnutrition!

    2. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vegans don't have enough meat in them to make a decent burger.

    3. Re:Go Vegan by Camaro · · Score: 1

      No, vegans just have to worry about all the salmonella and e. coli that seems to be popping up in vegetables these days.

    4. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-vegans eat vegetables too --- either that or die.

      Homo sapiens is not a carnivore, and cannot survive on meat alone. It's not a choice available to you, unless you consider suicide a valid choice.

    5. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the source of samonella on vegetables? Irrigation water contaminated by livestock runoff or contaminated manure used as fertilizer.

    6. Re:Go Vegan by hsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but you die from exhaustion telling everyone you are a vegan. Bad trade off.

    7. Re:Go Vegan by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Quorn burgers may contain trace amounts of unicorn.

    8. Re:Go Vegan by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      But to not swing the pendulum all the way, it should be noted that many people would probably get by just fine with a bit of less meat and at the same time gain a healthier lifestyle.

    9. Re:Go Vegan by megamerican · · Score: 1

      You mean the propaganda campaigns that always turn out to be untrue, such as the bogus claim that organic sprouts were killing people in Europe? When they tested all of the sprouts every test came back negative. That didn't deter the fear mongering propaganda. Why let evidence get in the way of a good conclusion?

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
    10. Re:Go Vegan by jamesh · · Score: 2

      And you don't have to worry about any of this BS.

      What if they put HS in your burgers instead of BS?

      And if you are vegan yourself and not simply offering it up as a suggestion, have you seriously _never_ been served a dish containing meat when you ordering a vegan dish? It's happened to a few vegetarian friends on numerous occasions... I never really saw what the fuss was though... i mean it's got vegetables in it right? ;)

    11. Re:Go Vegan by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes you just have to worry about malnutrition!

      You have to worry more about accidentally ingesting dairy and losing the vegan super powers you gained at vegan academy

    12. Re:Go Vegan by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      The concept of "vegetarian" isn't very well established in Spain. I've been to a restaurant here with a veggie, and it was quite amusing. The waiter first wanted to know whether she ate chicken; and when that avenue of menu ideas was closed down, suggested a ham salad.

    13. Re:Go Vegan by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I remember a big one from a decade or so (apple Juice I believe) that was contaminated by wild deer defecating in the fields. No human-owned animals involved in that one.

    14. Re:Go Vegan by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No, then you have to worry about ANY meat being put into your food.

    15. Re:Go Vegan by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      And the source of samonella on vegetables? Irrigation water contaminated by livestock runoff or contaminated manure used as fertilizer.

      And the source of e. coli on the veggies is illegal farm workers shitting in the rows. I'll bet a dollar you don't want to keep them out.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    16. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, something definitely was killing people in Europe at the time. And the sprouts were the only fresh food that initial test revealed could be the cause. And after the warning was issued and all the sprouts thrown away, the deaths stopped.

    17. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they are probably referring to stories like this:

      http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2013/01/contaminated-lettuce-came-from-lgma-grower/#.UPyUBKFFfLs

      Having lived in farm country here in the US I can tell you how this happens. Large scale farms regularly spray cow manure over their crops. When the instructions say to wash your veggies before eating them, they mean it. It isn't just a waste of time.

    18. Re:Go Vegan by sir-gold · · Score: 2

      Or accidentally ingesting dairy/meat and getting diarrhea because you no longer have the gut bacteria to properly process it. (like that vegan idiot from super-size me who puked from just eating a double-quarter-pounder, and then blamed all his health problem on McDonalds)

    19. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homo sapiens is not a carnivore, and cannot survive on meat alone. It's not a choice available to you, unless you consider suicide a valid choice.

      This seems to suggest you can replace veggies with a chemical. YMMV

    20. Re:Go Vegan by PPH · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the vegans find out that I've been selling my lawn clippings to the trendy salad bars downtown.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you find a creature from vega that you can grind up and form into patties that will pass USDA inspection?

    22. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm played Nethack; I'm willing to die of exhaustion. ;D

    23. Re:Go Vegan by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      A diet consisting of meat, milk, and synthetic supplements can be used by some people for years at a time, but it is neither fatal nor the best option.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    24. Re:Go Vegan by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Umm. That was last year. IIRC two people died and it was traced to some dodgy shipment from Egypt. Before or after that there was an issue with cucumber.
      The threat is very real. Tens of people die from veggie related contamination every year.
      Contrasted by the hundreds of thousands who's deaths could have been prevented by proper nutrition.
      By that measure water is much more lethal than a cucumber somebody took a dump on.

      So wash your hand and wash your cucumber.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    25. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quorn burgers may contain trace amounts of unicorn.

      That would be quadcorn. Different (imaginary) species.

    26. Re:Go Vegan by DarenN · · Score: 1

      Incorrect, you CAN survive on meat alone - just not rabbit. I might not be pleasant, but it's possible.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    27. Re:Go Vegan by DarenN · · Score: 1

      In Galway in Ireland a friend brought his girlfriend home. She was vegetarian, but was served ham. When he pointed out to his mother that the girlfriend didn't eat meat, his mother said "Ah yeah, but sure it's only ham". I think she just could not imagine someone not eating ham.

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    28. Re:Go Vegan by unixisc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As a Hindu, my burgers have no beef. Only chicken and sometimes bacon. However, horse is not verboten, so if I knew that a 'beef' burger was actually 100% horsemeat, as opposed to 29%, I'd have no problems w/ it.

    29. Re:Go Vegan by wildstoo · · Score: 1

      Sounds a lot like the description of Italy in this BBC article called "Where vegetarianism is an exotic illness".

    30. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5 years being a vegan, I'm a regular blood donor and they test me every time, the doctors can't believe a person my size (I'm a chubby guy) has such healthy levels of cholesterol, when I told them I'm a vegan they tell I'm not because I have excellent Iron and B12 levels. They don't argue, they just tell me I'm a liar; somehow they don't concieve a healthy vegan person. Besides I personally know doctors that are vegan and they tell me that they are never taught in school that you need meat, its all tradition and dogma.

    31. Re:Go Vegan by jafac · · Score: 1

      sure, if you want to pay American workers, I'll just ask $20 for that salad, thanks.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    32. Re:Go Vegan by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      sure, if you want to pay American workers, I'll just ask $20 for that salad, thanks.

      Wrong

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    33. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's odd, i'm over 35 years old and other than grains, beans, and potatoes, the only other thing I eat is meat. No vegetables (other than the potatoes), and no fruit other than the rare glass of juice. I'm doing just fine, had a blood work-up recently done and other than being a little low on Potassium, I'm in excellent health. I can't stand the taste let alone the smell of vegetables, disgusting nasty filth. My Grandpa refers to them as "rabbit food" as that's all they're good for.

    34. Re:Go Vegan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He went vegan *after* his experiment, you should watch it again.

  10. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ground beef is still beef. Plus there is a difference between filler junk, and non-beef meat.

  11. A European problem? by Camaro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I don't have numbers at hand, it is my understanding that there are very few horse slaughter facilities in North America. There is a certain horse culture that are very opposed to seeing any horse slaughtered, even for food.

    1. Re:A European problem? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      More of a British problem. The horse losing the race goes into the burgers.

    2. Re:A European problem? by vlm · · Score: 1

      We have plenty of excess horses from wanna be horsey people. Turns out owning a horse is quite expensive...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many products bear the beef name, but contain more pork or other substitute ingredients. Eg. 3% veal and 39% pork, with the remaining part being obscure additions and water.
      It's sad/strange you'd get weird looks after asking for the ingredients list at a fast-food toko..

    4. Re:A European problem? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when it is unlabeled generic value meat they do not care about something they do not know.

      And it is not like we turn them into glue anymore, and it cannot be economical to ship it to the UK. One way of another NA eats its old horses, it just has to be better hidden.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    5. Re:A European problem? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Horse slaughter houses are currently legal in the US (they were banned for a while) but there aren't any so horses get shipped to Mexico instead. There is at least one horse slaughterhouse trying to open up in the US but the USDA is foot-dragging the process.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:A European problem? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's partly because it was made illegal in 2006 or 2007 (indirectly, they defunded the government inspectors of horsemeat so, no inspection, no sale). That caused a lot of horsemeat to be shipped to other countries. However, back in 2011 the horsemeat inspectors got funded again so now you can eat a horse if you are hungry enough.

      FWIW, the absolute best piece of meat I've ever eaten was horse - in the italian part of switzerland, I ordered it as a lark. They served it so rare it was bloody and I could barely take the first bite. But it was amazingly tender and not gamy at all. Better than the best filet mignon. However I've been told my experience is not the norm, the stuff is usually stringy.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:A European problem? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      pet food maybe? It doesn't have to be people eating it...

    8. Re:A European problem? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      In California, it is actually illegal to eat horse. It was voted on in a proposition a few years back.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:A European problem? by alexander_686 · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC, all horse processing plants in the US have been shut down. (They exported most of their product) It has been a disaster.

      A lot of people who own horses are lower middle class families – they can afford the horse until it’s 15 years old (when the vet bills start up) or the economy crashes. They are few takes of these types of free horses and the local animal shelter is normally full.

      In the past they were taken off the knackers. Now – well – where we live there were a rash of horses that were “set free” in the local state park. The rangers rounded them up and had to shoot them (yes, they did try to find homes from them – but see above).

    10. Re:A European problem? by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      They're not that expensive - about 700€/h/y - if you own or can rent sufficient meadowage (I coined that term, didn't I ?) and care for them yourself. If you have to feed them all year round, or worse, stable them elsewhere, then yes, it gets expensive and the horses are none the happier nor healthier.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    11. Re:A European problem? by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Funny

      In California, it is actually illegal to eat horse. It was voted on in a proposition a few years back.

      Neat! Did they also say why? Or was it a spur of the moment thing?

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    12. Re: A European problem? by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you, but veal is beef.

      And most homemade burger or meatloaf recipes call for a mixture of meat for optimum flavor and texture.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    13. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you exclude the biggest cost, they aren't that expensive."

    14. Re:A European problem? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Expensive pet food probably, the reduced regulations, etc. make cheaper alternatives possible the others.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    15. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Race tracks keep phone numbers for "killers". A race horse is worth several hundred dollars to the pet food industry and I'll bet money that some of that meat ends up on your table and also in fast food joints. And that is in the US.
                                The worst I have ever gotten personally was a large rock inside a meatball at a sub sandwich shop. Apparently some salesmen drop by with products that are weighted with things like rocks and sell enough at one shot to take the money and never show up again. Even large super market chains purchase some produce at the back door off of trucks that carry a bargain price of product that looks good. That stuff could come from anywhere and the practice should be stopped.

    16. Re:A European problem? by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't just the horse culture. There is a widespread mental disorder in the US where people have a difficult time differentiating between humans and other animals. It seems to be getting worse as time goes on.

    17. Re: A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Re-read what he said. He knows veal is beef, that is why he said only 3% veal and 39% pork, despite being called beef.

    18. Re:A European problem? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      There was no real good reason as far as I could tell, people just like horses so they voted yes on it. I believe that was the same year medicinal marijuana was legalized, so it didn't get as much press comparatively.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:A European problem? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Actually, they tend to get fed to big cats in zoos and safari parks.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    20. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much a horse culture that objects as a wacko, dingbat culture.

    21. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French, so far as I know, still have horse meat available commercially. I suspect that they would only have a problem with it from the point of view of mislabelling, provided of course the meat was healthy. I beleive the eating of horse goes back to at least the siege of Paris in the 1870's, when even the animals from the zoo got served up.

      Australia had a scandal similar to the current one some years back, when kangaroo meat was finding its way into the burgers. There were some hilarious jokes resulting from that one too.

    22. Re:A European problem? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. They didn't sell decrepit horses for high end human consumption anyway. That horse meat likely just went to zoos, which was a small fraction (10%?) of the production.

      In general, horses are a horrible source of food in terms of input efficiency, since they put on a lot less weight per food consumed than any other meats like pork or beef. The entire US horse slaughtering industry was something like $50M a year before the last few plants closed down. That's in a $150B meat (pork,beef,chicken,etc) industry in the US. I'm not even really an opponent to horse meat on moral grounds or anything, but it's just not a big business.

    23. Re:A European problem? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The horse losing the race goes into the burgers.

      In that case, where's my Rafalca Burger?

    24. Re:A European problem? by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

      They fed an entire horse to a rat. The rat died. So California figured it must cause cancer or something.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    25. Re:A European problem? by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      There was no real good reason as far as I could tell, people just like horses so they voted yes on it. I believe that was the same year medicinal marijuana was legalized, so it didn't get as much press comparatively.

      They were probably worried that somebody with the munchies would eat the star of a "Mr. Ed" remake and cause Hollywood to have to come up with a new idea or two.

    26. Re:A European problem? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Blame urbanisation. People who grow up in cities never get a good look at any animal other than pets - even the local vermin usually stay out of sight. They never witness predation first-hand. They never have to look at an animal and know it is destined for the dinner plate. Meat arrives from outside in unidentifiable shapes, safely divorced from the production process. It results in a very emphathetic relationship with animals, something most rural dwellers would consider soft and naïve.

    27. Re:A European problem? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Not at all –British and American attitudes towards slaughtering/eating horses are very similar. We're not the Belgians you know ;)

    28. Re:A European problem? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      It was not stringy because the chef knew what he was doing. Coincidentally, it was very rare because the chef knew what he was doing. Horse meat has very little fat, and needs to be cooked very little and very fast, or it ends up tough.

    29. Re:A European problem? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's one of those California things. Enough voters can sign a petition to get a proposition on the ballot. Generally there are either a lot of goofy propositions, or ones with very dogy languages full of loopholes or unintended consequences. Actually, it's illegal in the US to eat horse meat (or sell it for consumption that is), in California the law was to prevent selling it overseas as well. I think the proposition started when someone noticed a butcher was exporting them. It doesn't seem there's any prohibition about using horse meat for pet food though, unless there's another law for that.

      Basically, horses here are treated a bit like pets and people get queasy about it the same as if someone watch butchering pets at the pound and shipping the meat somewhere.

    30. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California, it is actually illegal to eat horse. It was voted on in a proposition a few years back.

      Holy cow!

    31. Re:A European problem? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Contact the local Zoo, see if the lions are hungry - unfortunately, most Zoos have more than enough meat for their large cats, for the same reason.

    32. Re:A European problem? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Actually, as with the equally lean heart muscle and similar meats, you have two options. First, as you say, sear it quickly and hot and serve very rare. Second, you can braise it a long time, perhaps with some added bacon or back fat. There is no in between, though - else it really gets stringy and tough.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    33. Re:A European problem? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we are fundamentally disconnected from out food sources. And it's not only the US, I see the same in Europe, at least in parts. The realization that meat isn't springing into existence pre-shrinkwrapped and refrigerated is somewhat missing. For the same reasons, the aversions to offal are rising. Try to reassemble a pig from the parts you find in the supermarket... Whole lot of stuff missing, no?

      I recently moved from a big city to a more rural region of Germany. Can't put it into words how delighted I was to find whole pig's heads at the local butcher. As you said, take away the urbanization, and you'll find people way more connected to their food sources.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    34. Re:A European problem? by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      You're right, but as you say –you need fat for braising it slowly. And would need to add it from another source.

    35. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California, it is actually illegal to eat horse. It was voted on in a proposition a few years back.

      Neat! Did they also say why? Or was it a spur of the moment thing?

      Big shiny round eyes. Gets the environmental idiots worked up in a lather every time. Notice you don't see them crying about snakes, or ugly animals, just the cute ones. Seriously.

      Fact is we don't eat horse because they are not very economical as an eating animal, but are excellent work animals. They're also fairly sociable and culturally we tend to get attached and not think of them as "food". Same type of deal with dogs, although I will note that it's pretty common to see dog prepared in many countries all over the planet even today.

    36. Re:A European problem? by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Well done. The joke, not the pony..... It was still common in South Texas 20 years ago for ranchers to sell old and unwanted horses for shipment to Europe. I think some of it went to feed those welfare-reliant cats at the zoo. Where in the heck are the obligatory, "Where's the beef?" references?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    37. Re:A European problem? by vlm · · Score: 1

      That's remarkably cheap. Stabling around here costs an absolute minimum of about twice that, up to maybe 5 times that.

      Acreage isn't free... one way or another you're paying at least twice that much to "someone" either a professional horse stable or prop tax or mortgage interest or whatever. There is considerable economy of scale WRT horse stabling farm so "doing it yourself" is probably going to cost more overall than just hiring out.

      "Well, we can't afford to pay $150/month for our horse, so we bought a $500K minifarm and being rural we now have a 8 mpg stereotypical truck because the roads are bad, and prop taxes are now over $1000/month, but, hey, at least we aren't paying $150/mo stabling fee anymore"

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    38. Re:A European problem? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've been having a hard time just finding a piece of pig with the skin still on around here. I need a human analog for an experiment. Someone wishes to know what would happen were a person to touch the four-kilovolt capacitor bank I co-own.

    39. Re:A European problem? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      FWIW, the absolute best piece of meat I've ever eaten was horse - in the italian part of switzerland, I ordered it as a lark.

      I'd have thought the absence of feathers and wings was a bit of a giveaway.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re:A European problem? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      You don’t raise horses for the protein – the protein is the result of “End of Life” / recycling / any other euphemism you want to use. And yes, decrepited horses do get sold for high end consumption. IIRC What kicked off the ban was a retired semi famous horses that was sent to France as stakes – and everybody (and by that I mean PETA) was horrified.

      And yes, it is a small market but you don’t need a large one. But a small, well-functioning humane slaughter process then shooting the poor beast in the middle of the field.

    41. Re:A European problem? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Just another piece of unbridled legislation.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    42. Re:A European problem? by Mike+Frett · · Score: 0

      That's disgusting and not Human at all.

    43. Re:A European problem? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Is that 700 euros per hour per year? (24 * 365 * 700)?

      Or 700 euros per horse per year?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    44. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition, there are a lot of rendering works places that won't take them. So even after they die, you have to find a place to bury them. My neighbor just went through this. I'll never understand why people who don't have a need for a horse bother with them.

    45. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite the reverse; the consumption of horse meat is quite widespread on the continent though generally frowned upon in the UK.
      I know I won't be eating any more meat products from Ireland.

    46. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's disgusting and not Human at all.

      It's disgusting because it isn't human meat he was consuming? You, sir, have some fucked up values...

    47. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost; you can cook it sous vide for an exceedingly long time (48-72 hours at 133F) and it will be tender and juicy without the added fat. I do this with super cheap, lean beef cuts semi-regularly - turns out with a slightly odd texture, a ton of flavor, and not at all tough (poor man's prime rib).

    48. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo! My dogs eat mostly horsemeat, with the occasional roo when I go shooting. Sometimes they catch themselves a goanna, I expect they like the flavour.

    49. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1996 if I remember correctly, the same year I registered as a Republican and voted for Bob Dole. I now live in a different state where I don't have to worry about that kind of shite ever passing a vote.

    50. Re:A European problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've eaten it in China, OK but not great, still, it doesn't taste like chicken at least.

    51. Re:A European problem? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      A mod point, a mod point, my kingdom for a mod point!

    52. Re:A European problem? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of evolution? Individuals that favour their own species are more likely to reproduce.

  12. This actually explains something by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 2

    So it was actually called the "Big Mr. Ed Burger" for a reason. I thought the name was the chef who invented it, not the actor that ended up in the first 91 copies. Chalk up one more mystery solved by teh intertubes.

                -Charlie

    1. Re:This actually explains something by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Did they also sell a "Francis the Talking Burger"?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  13. Actually by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually horse meat is pretty good; I like it more than beef, and around here the price is comparable. It's tastier than beef, and also has fewer adverse consequences for your health. Horse meat becomes more tender as the animal ages - unlike cattle - and a rather larger percentage of the animal is good meat (although each horse eats more than cattle yielding similar meat mass). Of course, horses are often though of as companion animals, (disclaimer: I own and ride a horse) and it's not customary to eat any animal you gave a name to. Our horse has a name, and the kids would not tolerate any discussion of eating him...

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Actually by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless you get a horse that has been in the US racing circuit and has been fed steroids, antibiotics and bog knows what for most of it's life. I'd bet that the horsemeat in the British burgers was never tested for same.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Actually by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I would also agree mostly, but I would worry that some of them would of been given some medicine that was not meant to be given to any food animals. As long as that is taken care of, I would also prefer it over the alternatives found in generic value meat.

      But I got to disagree on the names, most of the meat I eat had a name.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    3. Re:Actually by chihowa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the problem is rather less about the actual horse meat and more about deception. If you're buying something labeled 'beef', it's not pleasant to find that it's up to a third 'not-beef'. With that deception also comes the suspicion of further deception. Does the product even meet health standards? Can you believe anything else that's written about the product on the label?

      Then, horse meat is generally cheaper than beef. So charging beef prices for deceptively labeled horse meat is its own valid source of complaint.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    4. Re:Actually by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unless you get a horse that has been in the US racing circuit and has been fed steroids, antibiotics and bog knows what for most of it's life. I'd bet that the horsemeat in the British burgers was never tested for same.

      Inthe EU, every horse is required (by EU law) to have a record of medications given to it in its entire lifetime. In particular, the record must state whether any particular item given would render it "unfit" for human consumption. There are several such medications, but they are not commonly used; all horses I know of would be fit for consumption on that basis. Of course, inspection of the horse's carcase by a veterinarian is required before it is deemed suitable for use as meat, since eating something which had died from certain diseases might be unpleasant, whatever the animal.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:Actually by Teun · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A rather seldom source of meat, that US racing horse :)
      Most horse meat in the EU is from places like Poland and Romania where horses are still in use for (farm)work.

      Personally I find it rather a repulsive waste of resources to leave a horse to die of old age and send the carcass to destruction instead of having it humanely killed by the butcher.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    6. Re:Actually by Gonoff · · Score: 2

      I saw a news article that asked a lot of people what they thought about eating horsemeat. A lot of them were not against the idea. I am not against it either. I have hunted for food and in my past, I did army survival training and some of the things in that are not generally thought of as food.
      What everyone is cross at is horsemeat in the food chain unannounced. I agree with this.

      The virtues or not of horsemeat are an entirely different matter and not the problem. As a civilised country, we have rules about what is in our food. Any cow, sheep, pig etc in the food chain is supposed to be from a farm where certain things are done and other ones are not. If horsemeat is in there, have we perhaps got cow meat from farms that pump them full of growth hormones and other profitable chemicals - like people in the USA are subjected to?

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    7. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      I was also wondering when the news broke.
      How exactly did they save money when horse meat is that expensive? Did they rob a glue factory or what?

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    8. Re:Actually by ballpoint · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Riding and owning horses for over 30 years, I just don't understand where the beef is in not wanting to eat horse meat. Eating your own horses is, well, too psychologically challenging but anonymous meat from a herbivore is fine.

      --
      Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    9. Re:Actually by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously you've never been through the desert on a horse with no name.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    10. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with horse meat in general, but since no-one knows where the horses are coming from and entering the food chain, this is a problem. there are regulations what farmers can feed and medicate their livestock with for human consumption. if these regulations are bypassed for the mystery ingredient horses, then why bother with in the first place?

      At the end of the day, meat processors are greedy fucks who would gladly buy nuclear waste and gradually put it in babyfood in trace amounts if they thought they could make a profit and be sure that no-one would call them up on it.

      "Ah, infant mortality rate can take a couple percent rise for the team. it's economy baby food bought by poor people, who's gonna give a fuck?"

    11. Re:Actually by pswPhD · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have had Horse Steak while in Switzerland. It was very tasty and tasted of, well, horse, and unlike any other meat I've had.
      That said, BEEFburgers should contain beef. If I wanted a horse burger I would buy one.

    12. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a cat that knocked over a spice rack and rolled itsself in salt.
      A bold move for a potentially edible animal.
      If it had been rosemary and laurel leaves too he'd be on toast.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    13. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Yah, I also had my first horse steak in Switzerland. It was quite good, actually.
      Must be some weird EU thing why it's so hard to get over here.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    14. Re:Actually by rockout · · Score: 1

      How do you know that the horse meat in a beef burger isn't tainted with steroids, antibiotics or anything else, when deception is already present in not telling you there's horse meat there in the first place?

      They didn't add the horse meat in because it was more expensive. It was there because it was the cheapest thing possible to add, and who knows where it came from and what its background was.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    15. Re:Actually by gomiam · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't have mattered, because he let the horse run free instead of killing and eating it.

    16. Re:Actually by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      The answer is that you can't believe anything they say. They are proven liars and there is no credibility at all.

    17. Re:Actually by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I would have no problem eating horsemeat either, the same as I have no issue eating pork. The problem is when a burger is labeled "beef" but has horsemeat. I would be just as upset if it had pork instead of beef. If you want to sell horsemeat burgers, call them horsemeat burgers, or just "burgers" and put the horsemeat in the ingredients list like you're supposed to.

    18. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumplings made from donkey are considered the best in China. I tend to agree, but can't help but think of Shrek and Donkey while eating them. "Donkey!"

    19. Re:Actually by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      That's because the desert had turned to sea and there were plenty of fish to eat.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    20. Re:Actually by godrik · · Score: 1

      "Then, horse meat is generally cheaper than beef."
      really? I never found any in the US. And horse meat is ridiculously expensive in france.

    21. Re:Actually by r1348 · · Score: 2

      Hmm not really, here in Italy horse meat is available off the shelf, and in North-East there are even dedicated butcheries. One of Verona's typical dishes is horse stew with polenta, and it's readily available in all local traditional restaurants.
      I think the problem in finding horse meat has more to do with eating habits than with EU regulations.

    22. Re:Actually by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      'Horse DNA' was found, not meat in the real sense, but mechanichally seperated meat. So yes, a glue factory is pretty close to the mark....

    23. Re:Actually by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Agreed. For me, it's the totality of it, not simply that it's horse meat, but that it's just not 100% cow. Tesco shoppers should wonder not just about the 29% horse meat, but also the remaining 71%. Is it 71% beef? Just what constitutes beef? Taco Bell counted 64% tasteless fibers. Also, is the horse meat quality horse meat?

    24. Re:Actually by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      French "cheval" which has been farmed in accordance with EU food regulations is more expensive per kg than beef. They are not going to put that in a Tesco Value beefburger. So who knows where these horses came from.

    25. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse yet, do you actually believe that many companies would not use central nervous system tissue, brain tissue, skin, intestines, eyes, sexual organs and the dead rat on the floor as well? As long as they get away with it they often care less how many people they kill or ruin with a product.
                            You clearly see that in America's relationship to the tobacco industry. We try to educate and warn Americans not to use tobacco but still allow its sale and send huge amounts of tobacco to nations that do not warn anyone of what may befall them. The fact that millions will perish over this practice is not sufficient to get business types to not do it. They are as moral as Ikeman.

    26. Re:Actually by xelah · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Probably. As I understand it, the test only reveals that it was 29% horse DNA, not 29% horse meat. It might be 29% horse meat, or they might, for some reason, have filled it with stuff extracted from horse carcases that has more DNA. I'm not a biologist or food scientist, but how about, say, hydrolyzed protein or collagen. AIUI, hydrolyzed protein will absorb water, giving you more weight with less meat.

    27. Re:Actually by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is rather less about the actual horse meat and more about deception.

      Well, looking at the reader comments on this bit of naval gazing by the BBC there's a fairly rich brew of reasons ranging from sentimentality, to an association with knackers yards and horsemeat being seen as pet food. There's no shortage of people with silly ideas about which animals it is 'right' to eat - but after the Mad Cow Disease debacle (during which ministers fed beef burgers to their kids to prove that they were safe... then decided that, oh dear, maybe they weren't) theres also a lot of sensitivity about accountability and traceability which, as you say, is the sensible concern.

      Personally, I'm relieved and surprised to find that 'value' beef burgers actually contain meat from named mammals. :-)

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    28. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you want to sell horsemeat burgers, call them horsemeat burgers

      Pfft. You think I'm falling for that one? I can't tell you how many times I've bought hamburgers that had no ham in them. I'm not falling for a horse burger, too.

    29. Re:Actually by Genda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If I discovered 30% of the meet in my burger was lobster, I wouldn't be the least bit upset, just confused. I would be equally upset if I had discovered it was 100% beef, but that they used only cow rectums, snouts and bladders to make my hamburger. The issue is the issue of being cheated.

    30. Re:Actually by arkenian · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I had a cousin whose family raised a very nice steer. They named him and everything. Called him 'beef stew'.

    31. Re:Actually by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a taboo in the US, like dog meat.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Actually by master5o1 · · Score: 2

      it's not customary to eat any animal you gave a name to.

      Unfortunately that doesn't stop children living on farms from losing their pet lamb one day only to be fed a delicious roast the next.

      --
      signature is pants
    33. Re:Actually by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah, another Dwarf Fortress player.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    34. Re:Actually by fredgiblet · · Score: 1

      My points expired yesterday

      ;.;

      I have actually had a hamburger that had a slice of ham on it, it was pretty good. IIRC the place was called Zip's in Spokane, WA.

    35. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, we intentionally add steroids and antibiotics to all of our meat. We think of it as seasoning.

    36. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I named my steer "Shit". (Naturally, changing the "t" sound to a "p" when in the company of my mother, or when judged at the fair.)

      That Shit was delicious.

      This hamburger tastes like Shit.

      "Eat shit." "Already did, thanks!"

      Oh, the hilarity went on and on. (I was an easily amused 15 year old.)

    37. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you had a shellfish allergy, you would be more than confused.

      Cow bladders, on the other hand, are offal tasty.

    38. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm allergic to shellfish you insensitive clod...

    39. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...and you surely wouldn't have to worry about Mad Cow Disease. Unless someone actually put beef in your burger.

    40. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never had horse meat that I know of but I choose Bison or Ostrich every time if the choice is there. I travel to Chicago often for work and make it a point to get a Bison steak at Harry Caray's every time I go. It is a little on the small side at only 8oz but I like it better than their NY strip. They recommend medium or less but I get it medium well.

    41. Re:Actually by berashith · · Score: 2

      I keep a shaker on the table with the salt and pepper. I couldnt imagine bacon without a sprinkling of extra antibiotics and steroids.

    42. Re:Actually by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I would be equally upset if I had discovered it was 100% beef, but that they used only cow rectums, snouts and bladders to make my hamburger.

      Nah, save that for the hot dogs. Or McBurgers.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    43. Re:Actually by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would be equally upset if I had discovered it was 100% beef, but that they used only cow rectums, snouts and bladders to make my hamburger.

      That would be totally wrong, labeling a hot dog as a hamburger.

    44. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rainier Wolfcastle: Mein bratwurst has a first name,
      It's F-R-I-T-Z,
      Mein bratwurst has a second name,
      It's S-C-H-N-A-C-K-E-N-P-F-E-F-F-E-R-H-A-U-S-E-N

    45. Re:Actually by smash · · Score: 1

      +1 to that. Having eaten both beef and horse (in Kazakhstan), I quite like horse. However, if you're buying a beef burger, it should be 100% beef.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    46. Re:Actually by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      Probably. As I understand it, the test only reveals that it was 29% horse DNA, not 29% horse meat.

      Actually, it was 29% of the burger patty, by weight, determined to consist of meat containing horse DNA rather than the expected cow DNA.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    47. Re:Actually by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      So you accept that they lied when they said it was beef, but they certainly wouldn't lie about this "beef" being unhealthy. My confidence wouldn't be so high.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    48. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about if you were allergic to lobster?

    49. Re:Actually by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Of course, horses are often though of as companion animals, (disclaimer: I own and ride a horse) and it's not customary to eat any animal you gave a name to.

      Tell that to the 4-H.

    50. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no waste at all, the animal can be rendered for all manner of products ranging from feed and fertilizer to car tires and gelatin. they use everything but the whinny.

    51. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then what about...you know, I'm going going to let someone else make the joke

    52. Re:Actually by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Our horse has a name, and the kids would not tolerate any discussion of eating him...

      I've eaten a burger made from horse with no name
      It felt good to be out of the rain.

    53. Re:Actually by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Interesting. It certainly wasn't cheaper than beef in Switzerland when I was living there. Not even close.

    54. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They believe that horses as well as dog and cats are simply humans in different form. They literally call buying a cat or dog "adopting".

      Some Americans do that, yes. Plenty of Americans also think that's ridiculous. You left that part out.

      Let's say your "survey" was incomplete.

    55. Re:Actually by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

      I agree with the labeling assertion. If you call it Beef then it better, by God, be Beef. If it's got horsemeat in it as well then call it Beef and Horse Meat.

      Like Beef and Turkey Hot Links being called Beef Hot Links. They're packed in "Natural Hog Casings" too so... call em Beef Turkey and Hog Hot Links.

      --
      Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
    56. Re:Actually by azalin · · Score: 1

      If that happens, you probably got a heat stroke from the dessert sun.

    57. Re:Actually by Duncan+Booth · · Score: 1

      The 30% is supposedly dried powdered skin (and I would guess other bits). The point being that it's cheap and soaks up lots of water. It only has to be listed on the ingredients as 'seasoning' so it's not entirely clear that they even broke any rules over labelling.

    58. Re:Actually by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      IMHO the issue is the prices people are actually buying this stuff at. It's an open invitation to get cheated on and as wrong as it is that almost _all_ supermarkets and food chains have raped words like 'fresh' and '100%' and 'healthy' and whatnot it's just plain hypocritical and stupid to expect reasonable meat for prices like the 1 pound for eight beefburgers.

      Or you'll just make animals suffer more for your cheapness by forcing farmers to further reduce quality of life for their livestock under pressure from the huge conglomerates food chains have become.

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    59. Re:Actually by azalin · · Score: 2

      Also Switzerland != EU. While no one in the EU would mind that mistake, a Swiss person would. And a bar full of Swiss, well be prepared to be beaten with Alphorns and have hot molten cheese thrown at you. Also don't brandish any Apple logos, they use Apples for target practice. Did I miss any important stereotypes/cliches?

    60. Re:Actually by awrowe · · Score: 1

      In fact, all the burgers were found to have horse DNA,some of them had pig DNA as well, but the Tesco burgers were found to be 29% horse meat.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    61. Re:Actually by awrowe · · Score: 1

      Fairly sure that a burger made of minced up horse dick won't kill you. I agree though, they do it for as long as they can get away with it, they aren't really interested in the ethics of the situation.

      --
      A.I. Research. The peculiar science in which we know the question and we know the answer, but can't show the working
    62. Re:Actually by amck · · Score: 2

      Most (all?) of the samples had "trace" quantities of horse (and some pig) DNA. But the DNA test is extremely sensitive: it could test positive if the same truck was used to transport cows and horses, not necessarily at the same time, never mind meat. The FSAI scientist in question is on record as saying that if thats all that happened, they would have privately / quietly warned the meat processors to clean up their act.
      But one burger was found to be 29% horse, and hence the scandal. Later tests have since shown more samples showing up with significant quantities of horse meat (no pig, though).

      But the tests were triggered by the Food safety authority being suspicious as to how burgers were being sold below the cost of the market price of the beef that was supposed to go into them ...

      --
      Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist
    63. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only has to be listed on the ingredients as 'seasoning'

      I've never seen the word "seasoning" on a product. "Flavouring", yes.

      Dried skin would count as neither, stop making stuff up.

    64. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Also Switzerland != EU. While no one in the EU would mind that mistake, a Swiss person would. And a bar full of Swiss, well be prepared to be beaten with Alphorns and have hot molten cheese thrown at you. Also don't brandish any Apple logos, they use Apples for target practice. Did I miss any important stereotypes/cliches?

      Yes. The fact that I never claimed that Switzerland isn't a member of the EU. If I did I would be lynched on a daily basis. Or lauded. There are lots of opinions on that. After doing their groceries they wonder if joining the EU wouldn't bring the prices down. Migros is Swiss for highway robbery.

      The Swiss stereotypes amaze me. Good luck getting the Swiss to agree one one. The only thing they agree on is that they are Swiss and that they are special. And that Zürich sucks.
      There's one thing that isn't a stereotype: If an SBB train is more than a minute late it will be anounced by PA in the train station. In Germany it would be more useful to announce that the train is actually on time and you'd better hurry with your cigarette. In the UK it would be noteworthy that the train will eventually arrive. Maybe not now or today, but it will come.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    65. Re:Actually by DrXym · · Score: 2
      Trace amounts of pork / horse are hardly surprising in a meat processing plant. But when the % is nearly 1/3 it suggests some idiot put a consignment in the wrong box or the plant itself has been deliberately palming off horse as beef because it's cheaper. Then that product ends up in Ireland and is mixed into burgers which end up in the UK. Some sources suggest the Netherlands where the contamination originated from has such lax penalties for passing horse off as beef that it's worth the risk to the supplier. But on the flip side, nobody in the food industry would ever trust a supplier like that again, as it would be a commercial death warrant.

      So it could be human error or a deliberate scam. Who knows what the answer is yet and the victims are the consumers and the manufacturers further up the supply chain. What is important is that countries have the tools to identify these sorts of issues. Ireland caught it because they do DNA testing which is something they should be commended for. I doubt every country does it.

      It's not just a EU problem either stories come out of the US especially for seafood of a cheap species being palmed off as an expensive one and the like. Everywhere that expects food quality has to start doing DNA testing to ensure what arrives on the plate is what's on the label / menu.

    66. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Dwarf Fortress?
      That cat's mum and dad were also brother and sister.
      Dumbest cat known to man.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    67. Re:Actually by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Cheap beef burgers are never 100% beef. They contain binders, protein, fat, rusk, onion and other ingredients. So horse DNA might come in through one of those routes. Doesn't mean it was deliberate, at least from the manufacturer's end - they might be mixing stuff up to a recipe and believe in good faith that their suppliers are delivering what they've been contracted to deliver.

    68. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, people ate cats during and after WWII, at least here in Germany, because of scarcity of other meat, it was jokingly referred to as "roof hare" or "roof rabbit". Both my mom and my grandma had eaten cat. :D

    69. Re:Actually by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Here are the ingredients for Tesco Everyday Value Burgers (the ones found with 29% horse in them) - Irish Beef (58%), Onion (12%), Beef Fat, Rusk (Wheat Flour; Salt), Water, Soya Protein Isolate, Salt, Onion Powder, Yeast, Sugar, Pepper Extract, Barley Malt Extract, Garlic Powder, Onion Extract.

      Since the beef is explicitly Irish where the burgers are manufactured, and the contamination occurred in a Dutch supplier, the most likely cause of contamination is the beef fat.

      58% beef is a shockingly low amount of actual meat so clearly the water, rusk, onion and fat are used to bulk it out and make it "juicy".

    70. Re:Actually by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm relieved and surprised to find that 'value' beef burgers actually contain meat from named mammals. :-)

      Trigger, Dobbin... Rex, perhaps?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    71. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mary had a little lamb,
      You've heard this tale before.
      But she passed her plate,
      And had a little more.

    72. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Children that live on farms are under absolutely NO illusions about where their food comes from.

    73. Re:Actually by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine grew up on a farm and once a year his parents would send him enough meat to fill a large freezer. He'd host a meal for around 20 friends, and there would always be a photo of the animal we were eating, plus a biography, at the center of the table. Knowing the animal's name and history might seem macabre to some, but for me it was simply reassuring that the animal on my plate had had been happy and well cared for (well, up to the point where it was killed).

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    74. Re:Actually by Rakhar · · Score: 1

      In the EU, apparently all meat ingredients should be traceable as well. Why don't we just pull up *those* records and...oh wait, that's kind of the point of this whole mess... If horses are mysteriously ending up in consumer grade beef at this rate, I somehow doubt that the people doing it care much for those records either.

    75. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to think outside the horsebox.

      Change its name to burgers, problem solved.

    76. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > it's not customary to eat any animal you gave a name to

      Unless you name her "brisket".

    77. Re:Actually by alfredo · · Score: 1

      If you've ever been downwind from a feedlot, you'd prefer horse meat.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    78. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would be equally upset if I had discovered it was 100% beef, but that they used only cow rectums, snouts and bladders to make my hamburger.

      Time for you to be upset, then. Did you think it was ground chuck in your $0.99 McDouble?

    79. Re:Actually by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      So you accept that they lied when they said it was beef, but they certainly wouldn't lie about this "beef" being unhealthy. My confidence wouldn't be so high.

      What makes you think that meat is unhealthy?

      Let's dig up some research on the matter: http://www.jbc.org/content/87/3/651.full.pdf

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    80. Re:Actually by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is a wide spread mental disorder in the US where people cannot completely differentiate between humans and other animals.

      Ah, yes. Do you mean the one that has a genetic cause?

      Too many X chromosomes.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    81. Re:Actually by jafac · · Score: 1

      I know.

      Dog-beating: not taboo (and none of your business).
      dog-fighting: not taboo. (nudge nudge wink wink).
      dog-abandonment: not taboo.
      Eating dog meat: taboo.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    82. Re:Actually by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      In American English, (And I presume all other forms of English) wide spread does not mean 100%. The people suffering from this affliction do out number those that don't in many parts of the country though. There are also varying severity levels to the disorder.

    83. Re:Actually by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I only wish that it were limited that subgroup. Unfortunately, it is not. It is just more prevalent in that group.

    84. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The virtues or not of horsemeat are an entirely different matter and not the problem. As a civilised country, we have rules about what is in our food.

      More eurofaggot nanny state interference in the free market.

      (roman_mir, modded down again)

    85. Re:Actually by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Human edible horse meat is expensive. Stuff fit only for dog food, not so much.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    86. Re:Actually by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Now I've got that tune stuck in my head.

      Only one cure:
      # The devil went down to Georgia,
      he was looking for a soul to steal.
      He was in a bind, 'cos he was way behind,
      and he was willing to make a deal... /#

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    87. Re:Actually by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      So you accept that they lied when they said it was beef, but they certainly wouldn't lie about this "beef" being unhealthy. My confidence wouldn't be so high.

      What makes you think that meat is unhealthy?

      Let's dig up some research on the matter: http://www.jbc.org/content/87/3/651.full.pdf

      I didn't say that horse meat is unhealthy, I said that horse meat that was illegally sold as beef could very well be uninspected horse meat, which means it could be unhealthy, too.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    88. Re:Actually by evansvillelinux · · Score: 1

      I would be equally upset if I had discovered it was 100% beef, but that they used only cow rectums, snouts and bladders to make my hamburger.

      That would be totally wrong, labeling a hot dog as a hamburger.

      This has to be one of the best posts I've seen on /. in years! Kudos!

      --
      IMHO, IANAL, TINLA, etc...
    89. Re:Actually by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      Oh alright then.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    90. Re:Actually by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Feces fog...

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    91. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a story just the other day about how hard it was to tell the difference between calimari and hog rectum.

      I guess as long as you cook the crap out of it, there wouldn't be a bad flavor

    92. Re:Actually by jhantin · · Score: 1

      Dwarf Fortress?

      Fiendishly, breathtakingly complex world-simulation engine from Bay 12 Games. Comes equipped with "Fortress mode" city simulator, "Adventure mode" Roguelike play, and "Arena mode" battle sandbox. The wiki is pretty much required reading.

      --
      ...when you're writing a game...tweak the difficulty of "Easy" to something [your mother] can cope with. -- onion2k
    93. Re:Actually by alfredo · · Score: 1

      But nothing beats the bouquet of a hog farm in August

      --
      photosMy Photostream
    94. Re:Actually by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine why. I've grown up in the US, and been around horses and cattle. I eat cattle and would happily eat horse. I can't relate to people who put horses in some other category. Of the two species, I find cattle to be the more winsome. Meatballs made from beef or goat are indistinguishable in flavor. I can't taste the difference between beef and deer or moose, or bison either. I'm sure horse would taste the same.

      I think I might be willing to pay a small premium for horse meat just to eat it in front of horse people who tend to be people I don't like.

      --
      ...
    95. Re:Actually by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Forget horse, for shock value I would serve dog burgers at every function until people stopped coming! :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    96. Re:Actually by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it tastes like chicken.

      --
      ...
    97. Re:Actually by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Between beef and deer, there is a large difference in flavor, unless it is prepared in such a way that there is no remnant of the flavor of the meat (tacos, some chili, anything with large amounts of seasoning). If you cut a beef stead and a deer steak and grilled them up without seasoning, pretty much everyone would be able to tell the difference.

      Note that if you had your deer processed into hamburger by a butcher, there is a good chance that beef suet was added to the hamburger to make it taste more like beef. They do this often with other things like elk and bison as well.

      Between beef and elk, there is much less difference. Between beef and bison, there is a difference.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    98. Re:Actually by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      "These are made from organic, free range, heritage breed dogs. Fed only the highest-grade cat meat with absolutely no fillers or antibiotics."

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    99. Re:Actually by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      That's weird, here in the US, I've never bought any "hamburgers" that listed anything other than meat in their ingredients. I'm sure it exists somewhere, but I've never bought it.

    100. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only you just keep arguing on and on, it will make your original statement more correct!

    101. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, some states in the US ban the sale of horses for use in food. At least, I know California passed a law to do so back in '96 or thereabouts.

    102. Re:Actually by DrXym · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to find 100% meat burgers in the UK / Ireland / Europe. It's just the cheap ones which are usually padded out. Sausages are as bad and most UK / Irish ones contain rusk. Probably not as revolting as hot dogs though. Check out this. I expect burger manufacturing is pretty similar, tipping in trimmings and sacks of stuff and stamping out discs of burger. It's easy to see how if a consignment or "beef fat" for example contained horse dna the whole lot would be contaminated.

    103. Re:Actually by azalin · · Score: 1

      Ah the London Underground... I can still remember when the reporters where astonished how cool everybody reacted after the attacks a few years ago. Having been to London a couple of times, I'm not even sure if that many people even realized that anything unusual happened (at first). At least once a week a major connection goes down for some time and nobody cares.
      If you want to see trains done right, go to Japan and be impressed.

    104. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not meat, just semen. Nothing to worry about.

    105. Re:Actually by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      AC may like eating rat turds and growing breasts but I will continue to include monitoring food suppliers as a good use of my tax money.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    106. Re:Actually by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      In my case it was a train between Derby and London.
      On one not so sunny Sunday the train simply didn't arrive. I don't remember if it was a direct connection but I do remember having to book into a hotel and try again on Monday. Had to inform my employer, too that I might be a bit late.

      A radio newsman had an interview with somebody who could offer an explanation of some sort.
      -So why didn't the train arrive?
      -Nobody was driving it?
      -So you were on strike?
      -No, we were not on strike.
      -So why did nobody drive the train.
      -Nobody was assigned to it.
      -Didn't you notice?
      -We noticed.
      -So you were on strike?
      -No, no strike.
      ...and so on. I'm not quite sure what happened apart from nobody picked up Sunday duty and nobody really did care. Apart from the passengers, obviously.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    107. Re:Actually by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      The goat was just goat. I know the guy who did it. It was my goat. The deer was in the form of thin steaks. The moose was hamburger as was the bison. Goat is smaller than beef so the cuts are smaller. As hamburger, I don't taste a difference. Maybe my tongue is broken, but I don't.

      --
      ...
    108. Re:Actually by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I definitely taste a difference, and for roasts and steaks I prefer beef or elk. For hamburger, pretty much anything will do, if it's lean. Deer fat especially doesn't taste very good to me.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    109. Re:Actually by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      They guy also sold me some beef. The beef hamburger was real lean. A pound of it didn't cook down to nothing like fattier hamburg can. The goatburger was the same. And the beef was real cheap. Almost half what you'd pay in the store. If you can get meat in quantity and freeze it it's definately worth it.

      --
      ...
    110. Re:Actually by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My father-in-law raises the beef and bison, we hunt the deer and elk. We do the slaughtering, and two walk-in freezers cover the storage. It's a great setup, and I know exactly where all my meat comes from, and what's in it.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    111. Re:Actually by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Yup, I wish the UK measured how late it's trains were in seconds, like Japan. Instead of which, they don't even concede that they are late until their lateness exceeds 5 minutes.

  14. Re:Well no by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    So nothing in there but beef? How does it all stick together?

  15. Re:Well no by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "If it were 100% beef it would be a steak."

    "Steak" is the way the meat is cut, not what kind of meat it is. There is pork steak, salmon steak, etc.

  16. Absolutely, 100% by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    100%, grass-fed on my acreage with no hormones, steroids, or antibiotics - processed in town by a local processor for $0.60/lb + a $50 kill fee, which includes vacuum packing and freezing.

    1. Re:Absolutely, 100% by davidwr · · Score: 1

      That's a good start, but how do you keep man-made-stuff that's in the air, rain, and bird droppings, watershed-run-off, etc. from getting into the grass the cattle eat and the water they drink?

      --
      Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    2. Re:Absolutely, 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you able to walk with such a large stick up your butt?

    3. Re:Absolutely, 100% by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      I don't. There's only so much you can do, but I live in a rural agrarian place where there are no megafarms, feedlots, or other industrial agriculture (the terrain is not forgiving enough for that in the foothills of the blue ridge mountains).

      My wife is an Environmental Engineer, so she keeps tabs on our soil and water quality and we've never had any problems with contamination.

      Nobody can live in a vacuum, so there is always going to be a small contribution from the rest of humanity, but it's like putting a thimble full of tequila into a swimming pool. Nobody's going to get drunk off of that.

    4. Re:Absolutely, 100% by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about horses or cows?

    5. Re:Absolutely, 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the title of the story is "How much beef is in your burger?" So, tell me what you think he's talking about. What animal does "beef" come from? More simply, what animal makes a sound that sounds most like "mmmoooooooo?"

  17. OMG ponies in my cheezburger! by porjo · · Score: 1

    Hi have no problem with the idea of eating horse meat, but I'd like to know in advance. Advertising your horse burgers as having '100% beef' is hardly fair warning.

    1. Re:OMG ponies in my cheezburger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi have no problem with the idea of eating horse meat, but I'd like to know in advance. Advertising your horse burgers as having '100% beef' is hardly fair warning.

      All our horses are 100% horse-fed for that double-horse "juiced-in" goodness, and Anthony Bourdain approves, and later on joined the Herd.

  18. Re:Well no by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Sawdust. 100% Natural.

    At least that what it seems they use in the US.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  19. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Love keeps it together.

  20. Honesty by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

    I know they put some fillers (soy protein, wheat, water, etc.) and flavoring (onion, celery, etc.) in my hamburger meat. I'm fine with that. But if you're selling me beef burgers, then I want the meat parts to be beef. I have no particular gut reaction against eating horse and it can actually be tasty to mix a little pork into ground beef; I just think they should be honest about what they are selling.

    It just comes down to honesty.

    1. Re:Honesty by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I meant to also include the concept that whatever they are adding (fillers, flavorings, other types of meat) should be labeled as such. Even if it's just a little extra water and some garlic powder, I think they should put that on the label.

      Honesty.

    2. Re:Honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it really isn't their fault, it is the suppliers trying to cut costs.
      Well, it is partially their problem. They should be regularly testing supplies at random to ensure they are of a minimum quality and are what they say they are.
      In the end, even these stores were being ripped off since they were being sold a product that was labelled incorrectly.

      I, too, would be completely fine with the burgers.
      But calling them beef burgers is wrong, even if majority they still are beef, but that majority needs to be huge majority to really have any meaning.

      Hell, I'd rather eat horse meat given it is better overall, even if it does have a slight increase in requirements. (not that much really)
      A horse can live quite happily in the same space as a cow can as well.
      I think one problem would be that a cow can also be used for milking too. (which I am not sure if it is even practised, as in a dairy cow first, then being slaughtered after being raised for a little meat afterwards?)
      I don't think I have ever heard of horse milk being consumed.

      One thing I also wish is for some MRM providers to stop having such low-quality product.
      Fine if you mush down some of the harder products humans don't typically eat, which are fine for consumption, but god damn it, ACTUALLY MUSH IT DOWN!
      I don't want to be chomping on a burger quite happily then suddenly nearly breaking my teeth because there is a hard-ish bit of material!
      I thought it was just a freak accident, it can happen, but was it hell, happened consistently. Stopped getting those burgers pretty soon after that.

    3. Re:Honesty by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Well the ingredients are listed as
      Beef (63%),Onion (10%) ,Wheat Flour ,Water ,Beef Fat ,Soya Protein Isolate ,Salt ,Onion Powder ,Yeast ,Sugar ,Barley Malt Extract ,Garlic Powder ,White Pepper Extract ,Celery Extract ,Onion Extract
      http://www.tesco.com/groceries/Product/Details/?id=264291549

      All that stuff is on the list. No mention of the 29% horsemeat though

    4. Re:Honesty by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't think I have ever heard of horse milk being consumed.

      I think you can buy it in Belgium. And while I've never seen ewe's milk, there's plenty of cheeses made from it.

      I once had a goat milk yoghurt. It didn't taste too bad but it smelled awful. As, in fact, do goats.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:Honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But my hamburger contains NO HAM!!!

    6. Re:Honesty by asliarun · · Score: 1

      I don't think I have ever heard of horse milk being consumed.

      I think you can buy it in Belgium. And while I've never seen ewe's milk, there's plenty of cheeses made from it.

      I once had a goat milk yoghurt. It didn't taste too bad but it smelled awful. As, in fact, do goats.

      You mean it smelt ewe?

  21. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generally speaking, a beef patty that's 100% beef has to be stuck together with fat. In other words it's unhealthy AND pretty tasteless.

  22. Re:Well no by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    Sorry, turning a decent steak into a burger makes no sense without additives. The way to treat a steak is to pocket it and fill it with blue stilton, not slobber it with mayo and red sauce.

  23. This should shock nobody by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

    a beefburger rarely contains 100% beef.

    ... and a hamburger rarely contains 100% ham.

    1. Re:This should shock nobody by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0

      Because Hamburger doesn't come from Ham + Burger, it comes from Hamburg, Germany. It just means anything coming from that location, You stupid illiterate cunt.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    2. Re:This should shock nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    3. Re:This should shock nobody by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Hamburger get's it's name from the town of Hamburg.

    4. Re:This should shock nobody by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people in Hamburg who'd object against being ground up. But they might volunteer a football team.
      The horse thing is pretty harsh but the hamburger thing is out of line!

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    5. Re:This should shock nobody by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If Hamberg isn't made from pig, I'm suing them too.

    6. Re:This should shock nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but Hamburg isn't 100% ham either, there's beef and "eel soup" there!

    7. Re:This should shock nobody by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Hamburger get's it's name from the town of Hamburg.

      Ok, then a Hamburger is a person from Hanburg. Or is food made from Hamburgers.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    8. Re:This should shock nobody by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The rail speed record was once held by a service to Hamberg. It was also called the Hamberger.

    9. Re:This should shock nobody by GNious · · Score: 1

      So it should contain 100% Germans?

    10. Re:This should shock nobody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because there's absolutely no way that he could have been joking, you spastic loud-mouthed git.

    11. Re:This should shock nobody by jafac · · Score: 1

      When in Hamburg, do what the Hamburgers do.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:This should shock nobody by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Sit on my buns?

  24. Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont't get it, meat is meat, and with spices on it'll taste the same. If people get upset by horsemeat, cowmeat , dogmeat or whatever, maybe they shoudln't eat meat at all.

    1. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Dont't get it, meat is meat, and with spices on it'll taste the same. If people get upset by horsemeat, cowmeat , dogmeat or whatever, maybe they shoudln't eat meat at all.

      I don't think problem is so much that people don't think ProteinX is less efficient than ProteinY...

      But, if you're lying about what kind of meet is being sold... then what else are you lying about? How about the health standards? What about the chemicals used in said animal? As much steroids and stuff they put in beef (food-animals) what about animals that might not have been raised for food? What about a racing horse which can have nastier stuff in there.

      Let's put it this way... let's say you find out your casual s*xual partner is lying about some pretty heavy s*x stuff... perhaps about how faithful and/or if they've gone bare-back with someone else just before you met. How much are you gonna trust "It's OK, I've been tested"

    2. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by sjames · · Score: 1

      Because Soylent Green is people!

    3. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dont't get it, meat is meat, and with spices on it'll taste the same. If people get upset by horsemeat, cowmeat , dogmeat or whatever, maybe they shoudln't eat meat at all.

      Wrong. You don't want to eat the meat from an animal that also eats meat. Remember what happened when they fed ground up cows to cows? It doesn't end well.

    4. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by godrik · · Score: 1

      Pigs are omnivorous and they eat all kind of stuff. We still eat them.

    5. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by sir-gold · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than getting anthrax poisoning from cows that fed from overgrazed fields? (anthrax bacteria naturally grows in soil and one of the causes of natural anthrax poisoning in humans is through cows that have ingested this soil)

    6. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by jezwel · · Score: 1

      Pigs are omnivorous and they eat all kind of stuff. We still eat them.

      I eat my beef steaks rare, but pork is always cooked through. Significant difference in the treatment of the meat.

    7. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by jamesh · · Score: 1

      How is this any different than getting anthrax poisoning from cows that fed from overgrazed fields? (anthrax bacteria naturally grows in soil and one of the causes of natural anthrax poisoning in humans is through cows that have ingested this soil)

      Anthrax is nasty, but treatable. Mad cows disease is nastier and untreatable (they can prolong the time until death a bit, i think, but that doesn't count).

    8. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Pigs are omnivorous and they eat all kind of stuff. We still eat them.

      Cows will happily eat meat too if you feed it to them in a form that they can digest. Doesn't mean it's a good idea to feed it to them.

    9. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Cooked through or salted/smoked to buggery.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Horsemeat, cow, dog.. what does it matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont't get it, meat is meat, and with spices on it'll taste the same. If people get upset by horsemeat, cowmeat , dogmeat or whatever, maybe they shoudln't eat meat at all.

      Wrong. You don't want to eat the meat from an animal that also eats meat. Remember what happened when they fed ground up cows to cows? It doesn't end well.

      That's because they were feeding cows to cows. Cannibalism is the source of mad cow, not cows eating meat.

  25. Re:Well no by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    Beef fat.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  26. Pink Slime, anyone? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    In the US awhile back there was a scandal involving something called pink slime which was added to ground "beef". TV news showed this stuff's manufacture out of leftover parts of who knows what. Watching the making or sausage or laws might have been less disgusting. Horse meat might be better than this stuff.

    In the Western US there is also major concern about the round up of wild mustang horses for slaughter for dog food. Maybe some of them ended up in British grocery store raw burger.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
  27. UK only. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe the article was referring to the UK. I don't know what the laws are there, but here in the U.S., a company would be closed down quickly if it were found the meat had been adulterated like that.

    Sure, there was the flap over "pink slime"... but that was still beef, though it was washed in ammonia. I don't think it was the meat people were bitching about so much as the ammonia.

    It should be noted that only one company produced the ammonia-soaked "pink slime", and they don't do it anymore. Other companies process trimmings, too, but they already used other methods to keep the meat bacteria-free.)

    1. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, etc, merely package and sell those burgers. They are buy them from a company that says buys the processed meat from two suppliers, in the Netherlands and in Spain, and turns it into burgers.

      So, somewhere in the Netherlands or in Spain lies the problem.

    2. Re:UK only. by jonbryce · · Score: 2

      It appears the adulteration was done in Holland, and the company that did it will get a €1050 fine.

    3. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't just the ammonia. You must be American to totally not get it.

    4. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably didn't break any laws or regulations. From what the article says, you can label your patty as 'beef' if it contains at least 60% beef in the UK and there is no law against including horse meat. They didn't say it was 100% beef did they?

      I wouldn't be surprised if the situation is similar in the US

    5. Re:UK only. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      People were bitching over the name. Most of them probably didn't know about the ammonia they probably thought it was artificial meat or additives.

    6. Re:UK only. by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It appears the adulteration was done in Holland, and the company that did it will get a €1050 fine.

      The €1050 fine isn't going to be the painful bit. The painful bit will be when Tesco sue the living daylights out of them for supplying a bunch of burgers with "100% Beef!" in big letters on the label.

    7. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much adulteration is done in the Netherlands. It's Dutch plants that (reputedly) inject most of the crap into supermarket chicken to make it heavier. And a while back there as a problem where Dutch plants were repacking fresh meat from elsewhere and resetting the sell-by date as if they were the original packer ... so that it turned up rotten at the retailer.

      I wouldn't buy any meat from the Netherlands if I could avoid it.

    8. Re:UK only. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      I believe the article was referring to the UK. I don't know what the laws are there, but here in the U.S., a company would be closed down quickly if it were found the meat had been adulterated like that.

      Oh boy, you're in for a shock then. Meat (and in general, food) safety in the US is way behind most of the EU countries. Eric Schlossers' excellent book - Fast Food Nation - details the US meat packing industry (from wikipedia's summary):

      In his examination of the meat packing industry, Schlosser finds that it is now dominated by casual, easily exploited immigrant labor and that levels of injury are among the highest of any occupation in the United States. Schlosser discusses his findings on meat packing companies IBP, Inc. and on Kenny Dobbins. Schlosser also recounts the steps involved in meat processing and reveals several hazardous practices unknown to many consumers, such as the practice of rendering dead pigs and horses and chicken manure into cattle feed. Schlosser notes that practices like these were responsible for the spread of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, aka Mad Cow Disease, p. 202-3), as well as for introducing harmful bacteria into the food supply, such as E. coli O157:H7 (ch. 9, "What's In The Meat"). A later section of the book discusses the fast food industry's role in globalization, linking increased obesity in China and Japan with the arrival of fast food. The book also includes a summary of the McLibel Case.

      There is much more material, but this should suffice as a quick summary. The book is a decade old, the problems are current however.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    9. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all. The US slaughterhouses are completely unregulated, so who knows what goes on there.
      I read a couple of horrible books a few years ago describing the hours of working there, the food quality and the general mistreatment of the animals.

    10. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you must be a cunt to think that only someone from a particular geopolitical entity wouldn't understand.

    11. Re:UK only. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ammonia is used, standard procedure, to 'sterilize' (sort of) their equipment in the big operations. Ammonia content does not have to be listed in the ingredients despite its pervasive presence in meat products.

      Also, i find the concept of horse meet in my 100% beef, far less disturbing/concerning, than Pink Slime as an additive. Just read up on the pink slime process if you disagree. At least horse meat is MEAT. Pink slime is just water,protein as a filler.

    12. Re:UK only. by fredklein · · Score: 1

      Sure, there was the flap over "pink slime"... but that was still beef, though it was washed in ammonia. I don't think it was the meat people were bitching about so much as the ammonia.
      It should be noted that only one company produced the ammonia-soaked "pink slime", and they don't do it anymore. Other companies process trimmings, too, but they already used other methods to keep the meat bacteria-free.

      Firstly, the meat is NOT "washed" or "soaked" in "ammonia".

      "Ammonia/ammonium hydroxide is one of a number of processing aids used with meat and poultry in order to ensure the safety of these foods before they are delivered to consumers. The pH enhancement process is an important component of our overall food safety effort. By adding a tiny amount of ammonia (gas) to the beef, we raise the pH in the beef to help kill any harmful bacteria that could possibly be present."

      They use ammonia GAS to raise the PH level so any bacteria are killed. This ammonia combines with the water present in meat to form some Ammonium hydroxide. "Ammonium hydroxide is naturally found in beef, other proteins, and virtually all foods. It is widely used in the processing of numerous foods, such as baked goods, cheeses, gelatins, chocolate, caramels, and puddings."

      Second, if people were just bitching about the "ammonia", then they'd call it "Ammonia Meat", not "Pink Slime". The name "Pink Slime" is a biased term meant to evoke a negative emotional response rather then evoke a logical discussion. It's kinda like the sugar industry calling honey "bee barf", or the chocolate industry calling flowers "dead reproductive organs of plants" around Valentines day.

      Third, it was produced by three companies, BPI, AFA Foods and Cargill. AFA filed for bankruptcy, Cargill significantly cut production, and BPI closed three of its four plants.

      Fourth, as you (correctly) point out- "pink slime" was just... beef. It was little cuts and trimmings that, because it was attached to fat, were difficult to get. So, they heated it up to soften the fat, spun it to separate the denser meat from the less dense fat, then, just in case it had picked up any bacteria during this additional processing, they exposed it to ammonia gas. That's it.

  28. Many companies do it by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    It's like Taco Bell, implying that you're actually getting 100% beef, while instead they say "We start with 100% beef". Of course in the end you only end up with 36% meat, but that's not something they advertise very loudly.

    1. Re:Many companies do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As the 2011 lawsuit against Taco Bell showed, their 'beef' is actually 88% beef. The rest is their 'signature recipe'.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/taco-bell-meat-is-actually-meat-lawsuit-withdrawn/2011/04/19/AFDiEm4D_blog.html

  29. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only eat chickenburgers, you insensitive clod.

  30. Various meats ... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    Interesting how the Brits feel funny eating Horsemeat. Sister-in-law in Vancouver, Canada has served Steak & Kidney pie to local Canucks, who aren't too keen on the ingredients once they hear what they are (well, one of them).

    Maybe we need a slashdot poll on "What sorts of meat are deemed inappropriate to eat in your country?"
    Pork ... "sweetbreads" ... Prairie oysters ... etc etc

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Various meats ... by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      Interesting how the Brits feel funny eating Horsemeat. Sister-in-law in Vancouver, Canada has served Steak & Kidney pie to local Canucks, who aren't too keen on the ingredients once they hear what they are (well, one of them). Maybe we need a slashdot poll on "What sorts of meat are deemed inappropriate to eat in your country?" Pork ... "sweetbreads" ... Prairie oysters ... etc etc

      Squirrel.
      I live in Germany and squirrels are our nemesis.

      Imagine somebody ordering a scw...scph...sqrl...hamster burger. That'd be silly. We might be laughed at.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:Various meats ... by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Soylent Green

    3. Re:Various meats ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Germany horse is eaten in some regions, they make good wurst out of them. I think they draw the line where the rest of continental Europe does (no rodents, predators, reptiles, normal pets)

      In Mexico where I lived for a lot of time, about the only thing that doesn't end up in the pot are rats and mice. There are good recipes for iguana, armadillo, rattlesnake, escamoles (ant eggs), culonas (honeypot ants), chapulines (grasshoppers), tepescuintle (agouti - smaller cousin of the capybara, reputed to be the finest-tasting meat in the world), and of course stray cat and dog end up in any number of taco stands in Mexico City. Horse and donkey are widely consumed.

      The only thing you can't get in Mexico that you CAN get elsewhere is Peru's cuy, a.k.a. the guinea pig. It's sold like roasted chicken at streetside stands in Lima, and it is sadly still on my list of meat to be tasted ;_;

    4. Re:Various meats ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a UK gastropub that tried serving squirrel a year or two back. Ended up being closed down due to threats from rabid bunny-cuddlers.

    5. Re:Various meats ... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Steak and Kidney pie is fine except that kidneys taste horrible. Similarly liver. I guess I just don't like the taste of organs.

    6. Re:Various meats ... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I guess I just don't like the taste of organs.

      // to do: yo mamma joke goes here

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Various meats ... by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Squirrels are often eaten here in the US. I've eaten plenty of them. Just have to watch out for the brains or you can get a relative of mad cow disease.

  31. Soylent Green by thepacketmaster · · Score: 1

    Nuff' said

    --

    --

    Luck is just skill you didn't know you had.

  32. Re:Well no by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Informative

    So nothing in there but beef? How does it all stick together?

    Here is a video of a TV show Heston Blumenthal did in the UK, which demonstrated how you can make a burger using only chunks of sirloin and salt as the binding agent.

    Looks pretty good to me!

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  33. What the hell is wrong with americans? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You buy your burgers premade! I eat burgers frequently, but I make them myself. it would never occur to me to purchase them premade. Just grind the meat, take a bunch of the result, mix it up with some garlic and onions, and a few other species, then pack it gently with your hands, and that's it!

    it's the grease in the meat that keep it together. You don't need anything else.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by lgftsa · · Score: 5, Funny

      and a few other species

      Best Typo Ever!

    2. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      mix it up with some garlic and onions, and a few other species

      Which other species? Horse?

    3. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?

      If you just bought your burgers instead of wasting time making them yourself you might be able to get your Slashdot replies in a little earlier. Either that or do what the rest of us do and use work time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Try putting an egg yolk in to stick them together instead of grease. IMHO tastes much better.

    5. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Given the article topic are you sure it was a typo?

    6. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The "grease" is in the beef you don't add it, but yes an egg mixed into minced topside makes a good burger that doesn't crumble. No need to make the mince yourself here in Australia, minced topside is sold practically everywhere you can buy meat.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you need an egg yoke to hold your burger together you are eating a meatloaf on a bun (you fucking hog).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to add any grease: it's in the animal. You can take a steak, run it through a grinder, and it will form a nice, cohesive patty, with no additions or modifications. If you adulterate your pure ground beef with flour, oats, rice, or other fillers, then it may not have enough structure to hold together. You can add a little milk, egg, or water to turn the flour into a paste and bring it back together, but there's no reason to add such things to a pure meat burger.

    9. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I'm the master of puns, and that was fully intended. That's my story and I'm sticking with it :)

      (Bullshit, it was as accidental as it was hilarious)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    10. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Try putting an egg yolk in to stick them together instead of grease. IMHO tastes much better.

      Egg yolk "instead of" grease? What the hell do you think yolks are made of?

      You DO NOT need to add any binder to a hamburger. All you need is ground beef and seasonings. If you pack the patty tightly and cook it properly, it'll stay together just fine. For fuck's sake, does nobody know how to cook food anymore? We're not talking about some exotic preparation.

    11. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      I don't know how religious you are about beef percentage, but if you use minced meat (even from butchers) it contains little actual beef.

      In Norway, for instance, our liver pate contains exactly 0% liver.
      The information on the packaging is not human readable so nobody cries out about it.

        If it is nutritious and not harmful I don't mind, but information should be available.

    12. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      You buy your burgers premade! I eat burgers frequently, but I make them myself

      Yeah... some of us have other things to do / not enough time / derive no enjoyment from cooking. Why is it every time there is a complaint about food standards there is one pretentious git to tell us we should do it ourselves.

      Your burgers should lovely, you should sell them...

    13. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Why is it every time there is a complaint about food standards there is one pretentious git to tell us we should do it ourselves

      You should see the threads discussing defects in open source code, especially Linux.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    14. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I live in Argentina. We're serious about our meat, that stuff doesn't happen here. 100% of the meat sold in this country comes from animals grown rarely more than 150km away from the place they are sold. We still feed our cows the traditional way: Let them roam freely on the fields, eat grass. And in every block of every city in this country, there's a meat shop that looks like this http://tlloh.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/carniceria.jpg or this http://bimg1.mlstatic.com/carniceria-equipamiento-completo-polleria_MLA-F-3355456136_112012.jpg, with a guy you know behind the counter, who most of the time cuts whatever you want right in front of you. Then we go to another store that looks like this: http://bimg1.mlstatic.com/carniceria-equipamiento-completo-polleria_MLA-F-3355456136_112012.jpg and we get our actually fresh vegetables that are rarely grown more than 100km way from your location. Even the big stores such as walmart incorporate entire sections that look just like that, with actual people behind the counter cutting whatever meat you want in front of you.

      Minced meat is most of the time grinded right before your eyes, and it usually comes in two qualities you can choose from at any store, "Comun" or normal which is the cheapest, usually grinded from cheap cuts and leftovers (all 100% actual cow meat), and "Special" which is grinded from selected cuts (the difference is just the amount of fat in the meat, usually). Most meat stores in Argentina know what the customer wants, and have the entire process visible for you (the back wall is glass, and they prepare the various meat cuts in plain sight, from half a cow (called a "media res") to the counter. It's also common for their refrigerated rooms to have a glass wall facing the public area.

      For the record, 1kg of minced meat ("Comun" or normal) retails for 3.5 dollars, and Special minced meat ~5 dollars. Good steak (fine cuts such as Cuadril or Bife de Chorizo retails ~6 to 9 dollars, but you can get cheaper steaks (Paleta, Roast Beef) for ~4.5 dollars.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    15. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by Card+Zero · · Score: 1

      Peanut butter's not a bad burger binder either.

    16. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by freakmn · · Score: 1

      Whoa, you take your meat so seriously that even your vegetables look like meat! Yum!

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
    17. Re:What the hell is wrong with americans? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      hahaha, wrong link. Still, all I eat lately is meat and tomatoes, and sometimes I skip the tomatoes, so it's not far from truth.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  34. I'm going to be sick! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
    From the linked article:

    "The presence of horsemeat in value beefburgers has caused a furore. But what is usually in the patties? It has been a sobering week for fans of the beefburger. Tesco have used full-page adverts in national newspapers to apologise for selling burgers in the UK that were found to contain 29% horsemeat. Traces of horse DNA were also detected by the Food Standards Agency of Ireland in products sold by Iceland, Lidl, Aldi and Dunnes. But a beefburger rarely contains 100% beef."

    "An eight-pack of Tesco Everyday Value Beefburgers, one of the products cited as potentially containing horse flesh, contains 63% beef, 10% onion and unlisted percentages of wheat flour, water, beef fat, soya protein isolate, salt, onion powder, yeast, sugar, barley malt extract, garlic powder, white pepper extract, celery extract and onion extract. Asda's Smartprice Economy Beefburgers -not among those identified by the Irish testers as containing horse or pig DNA -contain 59% beef along with other ingredients such as rusk, water, stabilisers (diphosphates and triphosphates) and beef fat."

    So the English and the Irish have been unknowingly been eating 'Flicka'?! Ew-w-w!!

    "Both products cost just £1 a box, as do similar frozen burgers sold by Iceland. The Oakhurst 100% Beef Quarter Pounders, sold by Aldi and implicated in the scandal, cost £1.39 for a box of eight."

    That is pretty cheap for eight pattys though. How can an American get these in the U.S.?

    1. Re:I'm going to be sick! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      That is pretty cheap for eight pattys though. How can an American get these in the U.S.?

      Just ask around at your local race course.

    2. Re:I'm going to be sick! by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      "Both products cost just £1 a box, as do similar frozen burgers sold by Iceland. The Oakhurst 100% Beef Quarter Pounders, sold by Aldi and implicated in the scandal, cost £1.39 for a box of eight."

      That is pretty cheap for eight pattys though. How can an American get these in the U.S.?

      Oi! You keep your cheap petrol. So kindly leave us to our ground coagulated offal, hooves and rat nose burgers! For Christmas they even grind some horse's willies into it.
      Could be worse. Could be beef.

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    3. Re:I'm going to be sick! by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      "That is pretty cheap for eight pattys though. How can an American get these in the U.S.?"

      Pony Express.

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    4. Re:I'm going to be sick! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      "Both products cost just £1 a box, as do similar frozen burgers sold by Iceland. The Oakhurst 100% Beef Quarter Pounders, sold by Aldi and implicated in the scandal, cost £1.39 for a box of eight."

      That is pretty cheap for eight pattys though. How can an American get these in the U.S.?

      Oi! You keep your cheap petrol. So kindly leave us to our ground coagulated offal, hooves and rat nose burgers! For Christmas they even grind some horse's willies into it. Could be worse. Could be beef.

      Well, if you aren't going to share your 'offal' burgers with us, we aren't going to share our american hot dogs with you!

      So there.

      --

      And you do not want someone telling you what's 'really' in your hot dog while you're enjoying it (trust me.).

    5. Re:I'm going to be sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't tell me you throw away the snouts and assholes!

    6. Re:I'm going to be sick! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      your local scratch-and-dent off-offbrand food store should have something similar, maybe slightly more expensive. they're mostly offal (and completely awful), slurry (=pink slime), and soy filler. one of my dormmates in college subsisted on them for a few months. they smell like burning shit when cooked. i like burgers quite a bit, but i'd rather eat a tub of beans and tofu than even smell one of those thrice-damned things.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    7. Re:I'm going to be sick! by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      No kidding! When I saw that number I had to do a double take to make sure I didn't misread the amount. That's an absolute steal. That's a fraction of the absolute cheapest preformed patties I've ever seen.

    8. Re:I'm going to be sick! by xaxa · · Score: 1

      This is the product: http://www.tesco.com/groceries/Product/Details/?id=264291549

      It's entirely possible Tesco make no profit on some of their cheapest products. I think by having the "Tesco Everyday Value" product many more people will be happier buying the second-cheapest product ("Tesco"). Without it, they'd still buy the second-cheapest product ("Birds Eye Burgers") and Tesco wouldn't make so much money.

      However, I'd guess WalMart would be a good start.

      WalMart bought Asda a few years ago. For a *really* cheap product, these 32% pork sausages are sure to please.

  35. Re:Well no by sribe · · Score: 1

    Generally speaking, a beef patty that's 100% beef has to be stuck together with fat. In other words it's unhealthy AND pretty tasteless.

    Of course. Because, you know, a beef patty that has no fat is the apex of tastiness. Oh, wait...

  36. Not just burgers... by ChatHuant · · Score: 4, Funny

    They never tell us how much dog is in our hot dogs either :(

    1. Re:Not just burgers... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      That's because they are mostly pig snout and chicken lips.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    2. Re:Not just burgers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never say which part is in there either though I can guess........

  37. Re:Well no by hsmith · · Score: 1

    you do realize, the best tasting steaks/burgers derive a lot of their flavor... from fat...

  38. What The Hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is this doing on Slashdot?

    And why is everyone discussing beef in the comments like it's competely normal for a tech website for nerds to post this stuff...

    ...on the frontpage, no less!

    1. Re:What The Hell? by bfandreas · · Score: 1

      What the hell is this doing on Slashdot?

      And why is everyone discussing beef in the comments like it's competely normal for a tech website for nerds to post this stuff...

      ...on the frontpage, no less!

      So...what's your beef with that?

      --
      20 minutes into the future
    2. Re:What The Hell? by Larryish · · Score: 1

      The editors like to horse around sometimes... roughly 39% of the time, actually.

  39. Re:Well no by anubi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You might be close.

    When I inquired as to why a local fast food restaurant was selling "shakes", not "milkshakes", I found out that they could not sell them as "milk" shakes because there was not enough milk in them. They were selling sweetened sawdust ( aka "cellulose" ).

    OK. It tastes good. Not all that good for you, just sugar and indigestibles, no nutritive content at all from what I can tell. But pleasurable to ingest. OK, at least I know what it is and make my decisions accordingly.

    ( incidentally, their coffee is made with some topping which is completely indigestible to me. I found out during a bout of flu. It all came out, processed, but untouched. Lots of it. I think it was sweetened and foamed Olestra.

    Same with the horse meat. I will consider it no big deal if it is accurately represented on its bill of contents. It can be ground up worms for what I care. If it is biologically compatible with me and it tastes good, I'll go for it.

    Personally, I am far more concerned with pesticide and other biocide remnants in my food. I am far more concerned with genetically modified stuff than things that have been in the food chain since life began. I do not know how well I or others may metabolize sheep designed to put spider silk proteins in their milk or corn designed to make its own pesticide. I guess time will tell.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  40. Re:Real information about meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    posting a picture of some blokes dong going around and around while another blokes meat is shoved up his arse is not a very senstive thing to post to other slashdot readers........UNCOol

  41. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I make burgers out of 100% beef and they are not steak."

    Noses, udders and testicles like all of them then?

  42. farmers keep pigs as pets by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2

    Have you never met an FFA member or gone to a 4H event?

    And we eat pigs (typically the pets even). And rabbits. And fish.

    As to eating cats and dogs, I'm not against it personally.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  43. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er...I think you missed the point there. Parent didn't say anything about have 100% beef and no fat. No beef patty should be 100% beef. If you want that why not have a nice steak instead? Or some beef tartare (though that's generally served with seasonings for the same blandness reason)?

    A good patty will contain lean beef alongside many other ingredients, such as eggs, herbs, breadcrumbs, onions, etc. Beef naturally contains some fat, but a patty that's "100% beef" has to have had extra fat added in to keep it from falling apart. It's not nice and it tastes rubbish.

  44. Re:Real information about meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh man, that takes me back.

    I miss klerck.

  45. Best one I read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm going to tesco for some meatballs.... I heard they're the dogs bollocks

  46. That's a country with low food standards by mordejai · · Score: 2

    But a beefburger rarely contains 100% beef.

    Bullshit. Come to Argentina, and even the cheapest* beef burgers are really 100% beef (and lots of industrial junk of course, but no other meats)

    *: about GBP 0.50 each

    1. Re:That's a country with low food standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it contains "lots of industrial junk" it can't, by definition, be 100% beef. More like 60% beef and other stuff, like onions, rusk, pepper and spices and whatnot.

    2. Re:That's a country with low food standards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Argies are spoiled bastoids ^_~. Ask your compatriots working in Mexico, where the main concern about your meat is that it doesn't make you puke your guts out 3 hours later, whatever animal it came from xD

    3. Re:That's a country with low food standards by Haelyn · · Score: 1
  47. Story on dangers of horsemeat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is disturbing that products labeled 100% beef are not.
    Heard about this story on my NPR station:
    http://www.netnebraska.org/article/news/drugged-horsemeat-us-showing-europe

    American horses not intended for the food supply end up there after being bought and sold many times.
    In essence, what you don't know about the food you eat can hurt you.

  48. Silky Shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not as seldom as it could be: http://www.marketplace.org/topics/world/drugged-american-horsemeat-sold-europe

    1. Re:Silky Shark by icebike · · Score: 2

      Very interesting story. But there are ridiculously large numbers of horses in the US that never see a race track, and aren't used for anything more than the entertainment of spoiled teen age suburban girls, who seem to have an unnatural attraction to horses and ponies.

      There are horse lovers everywhere, my local newspaper was recently full of letters to the editor deploring the selling of horses to slaughter, wanting to make it against the law, and metaphorically equating the horses with children. The letter writers were all female. Again, there is something vaguely creepy about that.

      I've never understood why there are so many horses about. They aren't exactly cheap to keep, you get to ride them less than once a week on average and you end up having to truck them somewhere do to so. Yet I can walk a mile from my house a see a pasture with 5 horses which I've never seen being used for anything. Not eve by the occasional teen age girl. Trotted out for the forth of July parade where everyone dresses like cowboys (mostly cowgirls) in an area that has never had a cowboy tradition.

      Still, on a recent trip I spotted one very large Horse feeding yard just east of Shelby Montana where horses were being gathered for shipment to a Canadian packing plant. Apparently not everyone has an aversion to horse meat.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  49. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meat is meat, life is life (oblig. Laibach lyric). Whether it's a horse, cow, squirrel, dog, favourite vegetable or your next door neighbour - if you enjoy it, eat it - if you don't, then don't. Simples!

    1. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you don't, then don't.

      And if you don't know, then it's fraud. The companies mentioned are very sorry that they got caught.

    2. Re:What's the problem? by Marxdot · · Score: 1

      As has been said repeatedly, the problem is that the burgers are advertised as containing only beef as their constituent meat. Nowhere does it say that they may/definitely do contain bits of horse and pig in them as well.

      Furthermore, this evidence of lax quality assurance and regulation opens the door to some (reasonable) speculation. There may well be parts of these animals that are risky to eat in the affected burgers. Maybe the constituent animals were condemned. Who knows what went on in the production? Those things wouldn't be good at all.

      Maybe you would be satisfied with food producers putting whatever they want into the food and selling it under the guise of some other substance, but not many people seem to be.

      Hopefully some chain will bring out Proper Horseburgers.

    3. Re:What's the problem? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Hopefully some chain will bring out Proper Horseburgers.

      I can see the ads now: "Tesco's horseburgers were less than 30% horse. Our horseburgers are the genuine article, 100% pure horse, no byproducts, no fillers, and certainly no beef!"

  50. Bah, meat's meat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how much is the McGiddyup going for?

  51. Made up scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wasn't a scandal. It was all beef. However, fat rich white women get all emotional because it was "icky" and now we throw away part of the animal intsead, because that's more "ethical"

    1. Re:Made up scandal by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      It was never thrown away to begin with, dumbass. Before it ended up on our dinner tables, it was primarily used in pet foods. It has nothing to do with being ethical, and everything to do with creating a grossly inferior product using the runoff of the animal we are not accustomed to eating and having to chemical treat it just so it doesn't actually kill us when we do eat it.

      There was nothing right about what they were doing, except for their bank accounts, being able to stretch out their original product by that much more while charging us the same price.

      Your post just goes to show what we have come to expect in our daily lives, so much that we outright stick up for the status quo of people screwing everyone over for their own personal gain. Who cares what we eat, right, as long as it doesn't outright kill us? Quality isn't even in our dictionary anymore.

  52. Re:Well no by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "The way to treat a steak is to pocket it and fill it with blue stilton, not slobber it with mayo and red sauce."

    I don't disagree about the mayo and red sauce. But blue stilton? Yuck.

    Farmer: "Hey, Marge! Come look at this cheese. It's been sitting in the cow barn all winter. It's got blue-green sh*t growing all over it. Should we eat it?"

    Marge: "No".

  53. BSE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's not dance around the issue here: If manufacturers are putting horse meat into beef burgers, what's to stop them from using meat from "downer" cows, offal, brains, marrow, spinal tissue, etc?

    Britain narrowly dodged a lethal bullet in the previous BSE scare (and it might still not, if it turns out that the long incubation time for vCJD means that untold millions are still harboring the deadly prions), and now we're back to a similar situation?

    Monstrous! These people should receive life in prison, at the least!

  54. This doesn't make much business sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are fewer horses than cows, they should package up the horse meat as a delicacy and charge 10x.

  55. Re:Well no by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2

    Indeed, part of the reason McDonald's patties taste so horrible is, ironically, that they're too healthy. Years of campaigning by public health groups has led to McDonald's using a ridiculously low fat and sodium content in their burgers, which results in them tasting bland and rubbery.

  56. Re:Well no by Kjella · · Score: 1

    "The uploader has not made this video available in your country."

    I'm so glad there's a Pirate Party running this election...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  57. Not enough people want horses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a certain horse culture that are very opposed to seeing any horse slaughtered, even for food.

    The horse racing industry produces lots of horses, and when they are not good for racing, they sell them. Many race horse owners want the horses to go to good homes, but there are not enough homes to go around. The price of beef might be ~$1500 for a steer. Most steers are raised on a factory farm, and horses are not, so I bet most of the horses sold to slaughterhouses are sold at a loss.

  58. Aldi's Burgers by turgid · · Score: 1

    ...aren't bad, but I prefer My Lidl Pony

    Thank you, fans.

  59. Where do they find all these horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    World cattle population: 1.3 billion
    World pig population: 0.9 billion
    World chicken population: 16.8
    World horse population: 0.06 billion

    If every burger were to be 1/3 horse, the latter number would need to go up a lot. So the burgers in question were 1/3 rare luxury ingredient!

  60. Defining what beef is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do minced lips and assholes qualify as beef?

  61. Re:Well no by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Beef sticks to beef. You don't have to add things to it, you can buy a steak, put it through a grinder, take out the result and make a patty from it. It may be crumbly, but it will stick together sufficiently for a home burger (I don't care if it would get sent back in a restaurant).

  62. Re:Well no by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    When I inquired as to why a local fast food restaurant was selling "shakes", not "milkshakes", I found out that they could not sell them as "milk" shakes because there was not enough milk in them. They were selling sweetened sawdust ( aka "cellulose" ).

    My understanding is that McDonald's shakes are mostly potato starch. I think this is because it's more stable than half-melted ice cream; you can make the shakes quickly and they will have the consistency customers expect. Real ice cream shakes run the risk of liquefying prematurely. The part about them "not containing enough milk" is probably urban legend, though.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  63. Re:Well no by Solarhands · · Score: 1

    So nothing in there but beef? How does it all stick together?

    Is this supposed to be a joke? Because I don't get it. Who has not made a burger with ground beef?

  64. Re:Well no by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    Years of campaigning by public health groups has led to McDonald's using a ridiculously low fat and sodium content in their burgers

    They make their choices based upon the cost of the ingredients and what they're customers demand.

    Period.

    McDonalds does not change the formula of their food because of anything the "public health groups" have done (unless by "public health groups" you mean "doctors"). If anything, the customer demand for lower fat and salt comes from the fact that there are such high levels of obesity and hypertension, and peoples' doctors tell them to avoid fat and salt.

    But if it makes you feel better to think that Michelle Obama made your Big Mac taste bad, I won't try to spoil your fantasy.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  65. The problem is food safety, traceability and BSE by NoNeeeed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Various people have commented that this isn't about the fact it was horse, that it's all about deception or poor food quality.

    Actually it's about food safety, traceability, and the long shadow of BSE.

    After the BSE scandal, the UK and EU introduced some of the strictest standards and processes for the tracking and tracing of meat in the world. These recent cases have demonstrated that these processes do not appear to be working.

    The scandal here is not that supermarkets were selling burgers with horsemeat in, it was that they *didn't know* they were selling horsemeat. In theory they should be able to trace every gram of meat in their burgers.

    Somehow meat of unknown origin was getting into the food chain.

    If we can't prevent horsemeat getting in then we can't prevent infected beef from getting in.

    That's the real scandal, that the world's toughest food traceability system appears not to work properly.

  66. Re:Well no by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    Oh you are so missing out.

  67. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, why would there be a restriction to *any* country by the uploader of a video? I just can't grasp the perverted concept of 'share' that demonstrates.

  68. MST3K quote by servognome · · Score: 1

    Miles O'Beef

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  69. It's just so obvious by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

    The best part of the article is this quote from [Guardian correspondent] Felicity Lawrence:

    "You get what you pay for," wrote Felicity Lawrence in the Guardian.

    "The only surprise about the latest adulteration scandal, in which beefburgers at rock bottom prices turn out to contain horsemeat and traces of pig, is perhaps that they contain meat at all."

    It's just so obvious! The low price should have been a clear tipoff to consumers that the beef advertized as beef wasn't what it seemed.

    I can't wait to hear Felicity's special in-depth report on generic drugs.

  70. Re:Well no by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "Oh you are so missing out."

    No, I am not.

    I've tried that as well as other "blue" cheese variants, and I just don't like them.

    To me, they taste like... well... mold.

  71. Other ingredients by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    Pepper
    Salt
    Some sort of binder - commonly egg
    The new apprentices finger
    A below threshold number of rat droppings, guano and cockroach parts
    Other bits and pieces

    --

    Yay me!

  72. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by englishknnigits · · Score: 2

    Shocking. Hayek strikes again, "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."

    I would have modded you up but I don't currently have any mod points. I decided to post a smug comment that you probably don't agree with instead. :)

  73. 29% is misleading by archshade · · Score: 1

    First off I have never [knowingly] eaten horse meat.

    I do not have a problem with it though. If someone wants to sell me a horse steak or burger (or a burger containing horse) I would try it.

    However the real issue here is the fact that there was nowt in the product description saying there was horse in it that is where the real scandal is. If I buy a burger at the supermarket I expect to be able to read the ingredients and make an informed decision about weather I want to eat it or not. When considered like this the fact that there was pork in the burgers is as bad as the horse.

    There is an issue with eating horse though, the problem lies with the fact that horse is very difficult to trace as most of it comes from the USA where the animals primary function is either racing or a pet, these animals are usually sent north to Canada or south to Mexico and tractability is often lost. OK I have absolutely no problem with eating pets, my grandfather gave me a rabbit to look after which was the prepared and served to me as a pie (I think this was meant to be a life lesson about livestock), I never had a problem with this. The problem is these animals are given (large amounts of) drugs that are really bad for humans, the classic case is Bute which is an anti-inflammatory for horses. Bute is a carcinogen at not suitable for use in humans nor any live stock that will go into the food of humans.

    Having said al that, the suggestion that these burgers have 29% horse meat is as I understand is completely wrong. The findings state that 29% of the DNA is horse. This is probably due to a dried protein (which has a higher density of DNA than meat) that has been made from horse. I believe the protein is used to help stabilise the added water and make it something like a burger. (I only found out about this part today on BBC Radio4's food programme - which I consider a reliable source).

    --
    Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
    1. Re:29% is misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were a Jew or a Muslim, having pork or horse in what should be a kosher/halal dish is no good. Neither pork nor horse is permitted by Jewish or Islamic dietary rules.

    2. Re:29% is misleading by archshade · · Score: 1

      If you were a Jew or a Muslim, having pork or horse in what should be a kosher/halal dish is no good. Neither pork nor horse is permitted by Jewish or Islamic dietary rules.

      Cetainly true but there is some protection to the strict followers of these religions. For meat to be considerd Halal it dosent only have to come from a halal animal but also slaughterd in a specific way which includes a specific method of slaughter and a religious cerimony (Dhabihah), I assume there is somthing close with the preperation of Kosher food. As the entire process from slaughter to preperation need to be run in a halal style and the people running these supply chains are muslims they should have [halal] traceabillity. This will at least help in that the you would of thought the people running these opperations have a respect for there own religious laws, but I suppose money can corrupt enven the faithful.

      --
      Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
  74. I'm a vegetarian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you insensitive clod !

  75. Re:Actually (self correction) by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    Before the spelling pedants arrive:

    s/naval/navel/

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  76. beefburger(TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    problem solved. it is 100% beefburger.

  77. Re:Well no by FreeTherapy · · Score: 1

    If you care about man-made chemicals in your food I would avoid meat altogether:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioaccumulation

    Even stuff that was never intended to end up even in trace amounts in the food chain ends up in it. And the higher you position yourself in the food chain, the higher the quantities of nasty chemicals that keep piling up inside your body.

  78. Now we can say with authority... by Genda · · Score: 1

    Who put the horse in the hors d'oeuvres

  79. Royston Vasey Burger by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    Royston Vasey Burger
    Local Burger for Local People


    No questions will be asked.
    ...until the nosebleeds of course...

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  80. MEAT by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

    I actually RTFA.

    What TFA talked about is "MEAT", and it doesn't really matter *WHICH* type of meat that ends up in the economy burger, as long as it is "MEAT".

    This is totally horrendous.

    And I thought the gomen takes good care of the people !!!

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:MEAT by T-Bone-T · · Score: 2

      That reminds me of the "meat flavored" spaghetti sauce at the store.

    2. Re:MEAT by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      Why is it horrendous? I doubt anyone complained about the flavor.

  81. Re:Well no by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

    Generally speaking, a beef patty that's 100% beef has to be stuck together with fat. In other words it's unhealthy AND pretty tasteless.

    Sure, if you use a definition of "beef" that means "purely muscle matter and absolutely no fat". However, I've never heard such a thing before, but I have commonly heard the term "beef fat", so I don't know where you get that "100% beef" would mean fat-free.

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  82. Re:Well no by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    In the 70s, McDonalds standardized on 17-19% fat in their burger meats. The store I worked at tested it regularly and reported the results. A little black machine you plugged in, filled a cup with thawed meat, turned on, and when the light went out, you removed a vial and noted the level of fat/etc. in the vial. FIll out the report and include it with the weekly paperwork.

    And this was a fanchisee, not a McOpCo store. We came within $5000 of a million in sales that year, failing only, we suspect, because a McOpCo (company-owned, not franchised) store opened after Christmas in the same city, the second one in the area. Darn.

    At that time, there were not many million dollar stores.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  83. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC even the great heston had to try several experiments to get that to actually work!

  84. Re:Well no by mrbester · · Score: 2

    Who were these customers who made McDonald's think a milkshake needs to be of such a consistency that you have to use an industrial suction pump to get it through the straw? I want to go back in time and kick them all in the nuts.

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  85. Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

    re: found out that they could not sell them as "milk" shakes because there was not enough milk in them
    :>(
    Breyer's which used to make real ice cream, has turned from selling 64 ounces of ice-cream into selling 48-ounces of frozen milk and oil and carageenan which can no longer legally be called ICE-CREAM so they sell it as FROZEN DAIRY DESSERT. My mom tells me they used to run commercials about how they only made ice-cream out of pure pure ingerdients and didn't believe me when I told her that she had NOT bought ice-cream.
    .
    I pointed out the ingredients to her, and we went back to the Ralphs in the village and got our money back. We looked at all of the breyer's flavors they had in the freezer at the store and 90% of them now were labeled "Frozen Dessert Product" and NOT labelled as ice-cream. This is serious crap, people, at least for true ice-cream as a religion type people like me. Do Not Encourage these idiots by buying their "Frozen Dessert" products. Only buy real REAL ice-cream.

    1. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still make "Ice Cream" and if you read through the FDA definition of ice cream, it is more about the percentages of milk solids and milk fat and not about the non traditional additional additives like corn syrup etc..

      FDA definition of ice cream:
      http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=135.110

      From the Breyers FAQ

      4) What is a Frozen Dairy Dessert?

      Frozen Dairy Dessert products are made with many of the same high-quality ingredients that are commonly found in Ice Cream â" like fresh milk, cream and sugar â" and offer a great taste and even smoother texture. These products do not fall within the current FDA definition of standardized Ice Cream, so we call them Frozen Dairy Dessert.

      5) Does Frozen Dairy Dessert taste different than Ice Cream? Are there nutritional benefits to Frozen Dairy Dessert when compared to Ice Cream?

      In a national side-by-side taste test, our fans tell us they like the new recipe just as much as the original. Weâ(TM)re confident these new products deliver the great taste Ice Cream fans expect but with any product change itâ(TM)s always possible that you may notice a difference. Frozen Dairy Dessert tends to have less fat than ice cream.

      6) Are there Breyers flavors that are not Frozen Dairy Dessert?

      Many flavors â" which are based off the original recipes that William Breyer himself created 140 years ago â" are Ice Cream, including: Natural Vanilla, Natural Strawberry, Chocolate, French Vanilla, Vanilla/Chocolate/Strawberry, Mint Chocolate Chip, Homemade Vanilla, Coffee, Vanilla/Chocolate, Lactose-Free Vanilla, Triple Chocolate and NASCAR® Checkered Flag.

      7) What is the packaging difference between Ice Cream and Frozen Dairy Dessert? Does the price of Frozen Dairy Dessert products differ from that of Ice Cream?

      All products are clearly labeled as either Ice Cream or Frozen Dairy Dessert. The ingredient and nutritional information may have changed. The suggested retail price for Frozen Dairy Dessert varieties is consistent with the current Ice Cream products.

      8) Why did Breyers make the change to Frozen Dairy Dessert?

      Since 1866, Breyers products have consistently delivered high-quality ingredients, great flavors and smooth creaminess that our fans love, and we remain committed to that Pledge. Our Ice Cream and new Frozen Dairy Dessert varieties continue to use fresh milk, cream and sugar. What distinguishes our Frozen Dairy Dessert from our Ice Cream is that itâ(TM)s blended in a whole new way to create a smoother texture.

    2. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      You do know how to make your own ice cream, right? Buy the whole raw milk, get your vanilla beans and some vodka, the rock salt, fresh strawberries, etc. These days, you don't even have to do the hand cranking thing, just plug in the electric motor to do the cranking for you.

      http://whatscookingamerica.net/Desserts/HomemadeIceCream.htm

      Personally, I ignore that FDA warning at the bottom of the page. You'll note that I mentioned whole raw milk. City dwellers are unlikely to have a source for such milk though.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    3. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by JDevers · · Score: 1

      You don't have to use vodka to make extract when you can just leave the vanilla "bean" innards in the ice cream. Drink the vodka, eat the strawberry or vanilla ice cream.

      I personally like to add eggs to my ice cream (New York versus Philadelphia style...), so I always cook it anyway. Unfortunately in my state, you can only legally buy raw milk directly from the farmer on the dairy premises...so that makes it difficult to buy raw milk anyway.

    4. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

      You missed the point entirely. Despite the tap-dancing Breyer's does on their web site, their "frozen dessert" products do not contain enough milk and milk solids and actual DAIRY content to be legally labelled as ice cream. They must, therefore, be labelled as "Frozen Dessert", because what they are selling is no longer legally meeting the definition of ice-cream. See also the canadian dairy farmer's web site about what ice-cream really is. Please note that I specifically said that 90% of what is avaiable at Ralph's from Breyer's is "frozen dairy dessert". Even though they still make ice-cream, they don't really make that much of it anymore. And their tap-dancing question/answers really just say "we cheaped out so the ice-cream would be smoother and tastier and we cherry-picked focus groups until we found a sub-group that was stupid enough to say that the twigs and mud taste as good as the real thing."
      ;>p
      My original point stands: most of what Breyer's makes in NO LONGER LEGALLY CAPABLE OF BEING LABELLED AS ICE-CREAM, because it is not ice-cream. And my post was in response to another post about a store sellling "shakes" instead of "milk shakes" because what they were shakin' in the yard did NOT have enough milk or dairy in it to be legally called "milk shake". See ya in the yard!

    5. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      You missed the point entirely. Despite the tap-dancing Breyer's does on their web site, their "frozen dessert" products do not contain enough milk and milk solids and actual DAIRY content to be legally labelled as ice cream. They must, therefore, be labelled as "Frozen Dessert", because what they are selling is no longer legally meeting the definition of ice-cream. See also the canadian dairy farmer's web site about what ice-cream really is. Please note that I specifically said that 90% of what is avaiable at Ralph's from Breyer's is "frozen dairy dessert". Even though they still make ice-cream, they don't really make that much of it anymore. And their tap-dancing question/answers really just say "we cheaped out so the ice-cream would be smoother and tastier and we cherry-picked focus groups until we found a sub-group that was stupid enough to say that the twigs and mud taste as good as the real thing."
      ;>p
      My original point stands: most of what Breyer's makes in NO LONGER LEGALLY CAPABLE OF BEING LABELLED AS ICE-CREAM, because it is not ice-cream. And my post was in response to another post about a store sellling "shakes" instead of "milk shakes" because what they were shakin' in the yard did NOT have enough milk or dairy in it to be legally called "milk shake". Hell, if they could get away with calling the chemicals they were selling "ice cream", they certainly would try to call it that. But they can't; they know they can't; their lawyers know they can't: 'cause what they selling 90% of at Ralph's ain't ice-cream. See ya in the yard!

    6. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      Yeppirree, we've got an ice-cream maker device at home. We use it for making the flavors that are hard to find like raspberry ice-cream with real fresh unfrozen raspberries (which is silly 'cause the little suckers will freeze a little when we make the ice-cream freeze, eh?), blueberry, or cashew-raisin-coconut, or home-made mango or lychee nut. You can get lychee nut at double-rainbow up north, and green-tea and such is at the ice-cream places as well as in the specialty aisles. But every now and then, it's fine to get the vanilla and choco-flavos from the store and let them do the work now and again. In those cases, make fresh waffles or crepes at home to eat with 'em!

    7. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I did it once (only once) and was astounded to find that 2 cups of sugar and 2 cups of cream (the fat floating on milk, dunno what Americans call it) produced what seemed to be only 2 cups of stuff to freeze into ice cream. Pretty well a saturated solution of sugar dissolved in fat. Maybe that's why it tastes so good, especially with pistacio nuts in it. A bit of ground up uncooked rice can give you something for it to freeze on and give you a smooth icecream (due to lots of really small ice crystals nucleating on the powdered uncooked rice) without having to stir it while it's freezing (which is about breaking up large ice crystals).

    8. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Two cups of sugar and two of cream?

      My Grandma started with a gallon of milk. She usually made the first gallon of ice cream while all of us were out playing, then as we wandered in, she would start a second batch, keeping secret the fact that there was a gallon already in the freezer. That second batch was hand cranked by all of us kids, and finished off by one of the adults. When it was finished, everyone would get a bowl of goodness, and if there wasn't enough for everyone to get a good sized serving, then that first gallon would come out of the freezer.

      Actually, I think you get a LITTLE more than one gallon of ice cream from a gallon of milk, but it isn't much. Solids dissolving into a liquid simply don't yield much more in volume.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Two cups of sugar and two of cream?

      Just an example since it was equal quantities, and astonishing since cream alone is fairly thick.

    10. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by Bobartig · · Score: 1

      You're right that they make a lot of "frozen dairy dessert," but it seems that the dividing principle is non-icecream toppings. Look at the flavors that are still icecream, and those that are FDD, and you'll see that the FDD flavors are full of flavor ribbons, cookie bits, and other snacky bits. I'll bet a huge deciding factor in their reformulation is that their FDD is easier to work with while adding these types of flavorings, since traditional ice cream must be assembled in a two-step process to add in solid ingredients.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    11. Re:Breyer's Frozen Dessert Product is that way too by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Breyers sucks anyways. If you ever are in the midwest, try BlueBell (stores) or Braums (regional chain) ice cream.

  86. Missing the Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A modern nation in the West is a VERY complicated machine. Ordinary citizens work, vote and pay taxes, and expect that the complications of a modern society are being well handled by experts controlled by their government.

    The quality of drinking water. The quality of the air. The quality of the food in the supermarkets. People have to KNOW that systems are in place and working.

    Food safety, at a governmental level, is something that pre-dates the civilization of Ancient Rome by more than a thousand years. Today, unseen and un-thought about by most people, an army of food inspectors, with the best lab tech modern science can provide, are supposed to be constantly testing all the major bulk supplies of foodstuffs that eventually end up inside citizens.

    These food inspectors are not looking for things like horse flesh per se. They are expected to regularly examine and identify every element within the bulk meat supplies. This even includes DNA tests to ensure that even if beef IS beef, it comes from acceptable animals. The growth of the EU, with insane numbers of new regulations added every year, is supposed to have made this process significantly MORE rigorous.

    And yet... And yet the ENTIRE supply of beef for the supermarket beefburger market (from the cheapest to the most 'upscale') is found to have been contaminated with horse meat for years. This is BEEF we are talking about - beef in the land of MAD COW disease - beef in a land where many still refuse to eat beef because of the whole CJD/BSE thing.

    In the EU, beef is inspected to ensure prion containing parts of the cow do not contaminate the meat. At least that is what we thought- now we know that as soon as the EU signed off on beef herds being BSE-free, they dropped the tests, allowing brain matter and the like to once again contaminate Human beef supplies.

    In China, a scandal like this would mean the hangman's noose, or the firing squad, for significant numbers of responsible business people, inspectors, politicians and civil servants. In the EU and UK, no-one will even get fired over this.

    Laughably, campaigns to coerce people into taking (completely ineffective) flu shots are ran by the self-same people who have deactivated food safety inspections. Trust the government, and take the needle, they say, while allowing criminals to put anything into the food you eat, as if regulation no longer exists. This represents a massive breakdown in our society- a breakdown deliberately manufactured- and a breakdown with no societal pressure to rectify things. Correct science and engineering has been replaced with an army of pro-government shills telling you to shut your yap, and take your medicine.

    If the beef is bad, you know it is only the tip of an iceberg. Dairy, grains, water, will all be suffering the same criminal loss of quality control. In the EU, a massive amount of food warehouses have been built over the last decade, explicitly to create artificial shortages, to enable food prices to be manipulated. The direct consequence of this is that 'fresh' fruit in a UK supermarket usually means fruit that is months old at least. Old food, stored longer than necessary, not only runs the extra risk of contamination and deterioration, but creates the need for criminal methods to disguise the age of the product, when it is finally sold. Meat can be stored for years. Likewise dairy and grain.

    The people who run the 'stock market' in food don't care about quality, or pleasing the customer. These warehouses turn an essential Human resource into a profoundly cynical game. Someone even tried to corner the entire chocolate market in Britain a few years back using the same method. They literally calculated they could control chocolate as De Beers controls the prices of the SEMI-precious stone diamond.

    When food is stored for profit, testing becomes a joke. I mean WHEN do you test? When first entering the warehouse? Sometime during its years of stay? When exiting? We saw the same thing in the US blood business, when the US

  87. This isn't remotely tech news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "News for nerds, stuff that matters"

    1. Re:This isn't remotely tech news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most slashdot readers are fat.

  88. Re:Well no by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    If it were 100% beef it would be a steak.

    You don't have "topside mince" where you live?

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  89. Re:Well no by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    That's how you identify a good burger, it crumbles.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  90. Food adulteration is a BIG problem by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    The issue is that basically nobody is testing the foodstuffs we eat. I live in Europe, but I have little hope that the food I buy contains exactly what it is supposed to contain. And as more and more in the food industry wake up to the fact that nobody is really watching, the quality of food will decline ever more. That olive oil from Greece? The chance that it's actually extra virgin is ZERO - nobody will bother checking for rancidification (caused by hot pressing the oil, instead of cold pressing as extra virgin requires). And that ground Zeylanicum cinnamon you paid so much for? Yep, that's mostly Cassia mixed in, because Cassia costs 10x less.

    There are many more examples, including the methanol poisonings of recent years.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  91. Blame the Ben Bernank! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is that this is yet another product that is being cut with substandard reduced cost components. Robusta beans in coffee blends is another. These are symptoms of substitution which is being done to mask price inflation which is a symptom of currency devaluation

    1. Re:Blame the Ben Bernank! by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with using Robusta in a blend - it tends to add more caffeine.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    2. Re:Blame the Ben Bernank! by bre_dnd · · Score: 1

      And acidity. Nothing wrong with Robusta beans, but you can't sell the resulting product as "Arabica coffee".

  92. Recipie by JBMcB · · Score: 3, Informative

    Go to a butcher shop and have them grind you up some fresh serloin.

    Heat up an iron skillet. Fry up a few rashers of bacon (I like Wright's) until it's nice and crispy. Take the bacon out of the skillet when done.

    Dice up some yellow onion and sautee it in the bacon grease. When done, set aside.

    Form the ground sirloin into thin patties, throw on a little salt and pepper, and cook them in the bacon/onion grease. It will take some trial and error to figure out how to get a good medium using this technique - on my regular sized burner on medium-high heat it takes 2-3 minutes a side. If you want cheese, put a slice of American on a minute or two before you pull them off. The heat from the skillet will melt the cheese onto the burger. You can put on any kind of cheese you like, but American is designed to be melted onto things, so it works out the best.

    When finished, heat up some sesame seed burger buns in the microwave for about twenty seconds. Combine the burger, onion and bacon in the bun. Optionally add mustard - though they are so good I usually don't add anything else.

    You're welcome :)

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Recipie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serloin? Is that a trademark name for horsebeef?

    2. Re:Recipie by bkk_diesel · · Score: 1

      It will take some trial and error to figure out how to get a good medium using this technique - on my regular sized burner on medium-high heat it takes 2-3 minutes a side.

      You're foolish if you eat ground beef at medium instead of well done. I enjoy my steak blue, but you wouldn't catch me eating ground beef anything less then well done. Sure, you may have never been sick from it before, but if you do get sick one day there's a not insignificant chance that you'll end up dead.

  93. Re:Well no by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

    Sorry, turning a decent steak into a burger makes no sense without additives.

    It makes no sense period. You don't use the same cut of meat you'd use to make a great steak to grind for burgers.

  94. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were selling sweetened sawdust ( aka "cellulose" ).

    At least that's on the label. It's lumped under "fiber", and you need a fair bit for proper bowel function. Cellulose is essentially starch with a different bond between the sugars which we cannot digest. It's one of the most common compounds in nature (and the main constituent of "fiber", by definition even), and the major structural component in plants. Given, it's not milk, but it's not horrible for you and it is labeled.

  95. Re:Well no by ExploHD · · Score: 1

    Beef heart is all muscle and no fat. Incredible when smoked for a few hours.

  96. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    100% beef + meat grinder = 100% beef hamburg. What part of that do you not understand?

  97. Re:Well no by RubberDogBone · · Score: 1

    When I inquired as to why a local fast food restaurant was selling "shakes", not "milkshakes", I found out that they could not sell them as "milk" shakes because there was not enough milk in them. They were selling sweetened sawdust ( aka "cellulose" ).

    The situation with Ice Cream is similar to Milkshake versus Shake.

    Many ice cream-type products no longer contain enough of the right ingredients to be called "ice cream" so new labels like "light ice cream" or "frozen dairy product" now appear on packaging.

    This has happened to formerly top tier products like Breyer's which used to contain "Milk, cream, sugar and vanilla" which now contains an array of fillers and modifiers and other ingredients, and is no longer a top-tier brand. As a result, it is no longer legally allowed to call itself ice cream. It's also no longer a full half gallon but some smaller size closer to a quart. But that is a whole other change.

    --
    Sig for hire.
  98. WTF is a Beefburger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some deranged UK version of the American Hamburger?

    Just add:
    -stale wit
    -bizarro-pretentious accents
    -29% horse meat

    jeez

    1. Re:WTF is a Beefburger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how much Ham is in a "Hamburger"?

  99. Re:Well no by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Blue cheese isn't bad, as long as it's nowhere near mayo. The salad dressing is awful. As they say, leave ranch in the fridge for a decade, it turns into blue cheese.

    Putting it into a steak implies overcooking the steak. I kind of like it in a burger (which I'm going to overcook as it's ground).

    The way to treat a steak is salt, black pepper, cayane and garlic. Then sear on a hot fire until the center of the meat is the temperature the steer was walking around. That's 'very rare' if you order. If you're cooking you want it well before it changes from 'natural tit' to 'implant tit' in touch.

    Steak should speak for itself. Cheese, mushrooms etc has no place except as a side.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  100. unsolved mysteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ed the horse found....in 200 burgers on peoples plates

  101. Re:Well no by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

    Love? Love tore me apart.
    Again.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  102. they lost a marketing opportunity by ffflala · · Score: 2

    Too bad they tried to sneak it in. I bet there's a marketing ploy that could make horse meat burgers a profitable commodity. Haven't yet myself, but I'd really like to try horsemeat; some have said it's quite tasty. Personally I'd like to know how it compares to venison, a meat I very much enjoy.

    It would be nice to have more accessible options for red meat than corn fed (or, for a premium, grass-fed) cow. I understand how fat and marbling affects flavor and texture, but it makes sense to me to train yourself to prefer healthier foods. It seems a fair assumption that horse meat will be a lot leaner than cow meat.

    1. Re:they lost a marketing opportunity by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      They could label it as "Mad Cow Safe" if it wasn't tainted with beef...

    2. Re:they lost a marketing opportunity by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Across the pond, we have alligator meat which is one of the healthiest meats around. If you are fortunate to live in Florida, you can find it everywhere. Unfortunately for the rest of us, it cots $20/pound. Oh, and I think you can get Unicorn meat from Ireland.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    3. Re:they lost a marketing opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horse meat is quite unique in my experience, very strong flavor and a bit tougher than beef, though it can be alleviated by proper cooking. Not for everyone, but I do enjoy it once in a while.

    4. Re:they lost a marketing opportunity by alfredo · · Score: 1

      It depends on the cut and the skill of the chef. I've had horse and it was lean but tasty. The best wild meat I've had is feral pig. Buffalo comes in second, venison third, and elk comes in last. The elk was tough. Again, it could have been the cut and how it was prepared that caused the shoe leather texture. Rabbit is good meat. It is very efficient at turning plant matter into protein. Goat is excellent, and so is bullfrog. Bluegill cooked over a camp fire is as good as it gets.

      --
      photosMy Photostream
  103. North American horses are smarter by Richard+Dick+Head · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been around horses in both the US and the UK, and it just seems like the general population of horses in the states are more inquisitive and self-aware than the horses in the UK. The horses I've seen in the UK seem more or less like cows, they just stand there and react bluntly. I've seen a horse in the US 1. do something it knew was "bad" 2. shy away and trot away slowly, looking guilty when the owner approached 3. got even more pitiful when the owner scolded it. Seems more like a smart terrier dog than a cow. I know they sure calculate their surroundings well...if an overweight person tries to approach a US horse they might get visibly nervous or even flee.

    That may explain the difference in attitude between areas. It is hard to feel sorry for an animal that is dense (hence our healthy and unapologetic appetite for cow meat), but a smart animal that you easily develop a relationship with would seem inhumane to use as livestock.

    You know, perhaps cow populations in India may be much more intelligent than the average Western cows, and that may be why they are reluctant to eat them. It'd be worth investigating, certainly.

    1. Re:North American horses are smarter by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

      Yes and this is why we eat pigs and keep dogs ... oh no it isn't because pigs and dogs are generally considered to have about the same level of intelligence ...

      I'm following your train of thought but it just isn't as simple as that. Horses aren't especially bright compared to other livestock, it's just that they have a special relationship with humans because they are individually owned, not as a herd. And of course there's the whole girl-horse romance thing ...

      --

      ---
      "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    2. Re:North American horses are smarter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. Playing dumb is the easiest strategy to get away with stuff on that level. I'd say that UK horses seem to be a notch above US ones in this game.

    3. Re:North American horses are smarter by jafac · · Score: 1

      I've been around a few thoroughbred race-horses (retired) ("owned" by the ill-considered suburbanites. .. upthread) - and I'd agree, (without being able to compare them with UK or other horses) they are amazingly intelligent, and sensitive animals, absolutely every bit as smart as dogs.

      Unless you're fucking rich as hell though, they make terrible pets. They're pretty expensive to maintain (etc). And - the retired race horses have medical problems, they get pretty high-strung, and a little dangerous (not necessarily because they're aggressive, but because they're playful, and strong).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  104. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A good patty will contain lean beef alongside many other ingredients, such as eggs, herbs, breadcrumbs, onions, etc. Beef naturally contains some fat, but a patty that's "100% beef" has to have had extra fat added in to keep it from falling apart. It's not nice and it tastes rubbish.

    No one said 100% lean beef. If you can't grill a tasty burger that is nothing but ground beef, salt, and pepper, you need to let someone else do the cooking.

  105. Re:Well no by russotto · · Score: 1

    So nothing in there but beef? How does it all stick together?

    If you take a sirloin steak and put it in a meat grinder, you can form what comes out into a patty and it sticks together just fine.

  106. Re:Well no by queazocotal · · Score: 1

    Because the uploader was uploading it on behalf of a TV network.
    This was paid for (I presume) by four unskippable ads on the intro, and four unskippable ads in the middle.

  107. Re:Well no by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    Tofu is bland, tasteless and very healthy and low in fat. Basically, food that tastes good to us is bad for us. So if it isn't tofu, it'll kill you somehow.

  108. Re:Well no by russotto · · Score: 1

    It makes no sense period. You don't use the same cut of meat you'd use to make a great steak to grind for burgers.

    Sure you do. If you're cutting up a beef sirloin, you're guaranteed to have some bits left over that are perfectly good meat, but for some reason won't make a good saleable steak (too small, too odd shaped, maybe with a piece of gristle running right through the middle). Take those bits, toss them in the grinder, and you've got good hamburger meat.

  109. That horse meat was probably beef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree. No horse meat isn't good, it's tough. It's like a very poor cut of beef, the same meaty deep notes, but a far grainier texture. It's more like a hard slab of purified beef meat.

    I suspect the restaurant was really selling you beef and pretending its horse meat!

    Just like zebo (African animal of same family as cow) is sold as beef in the UK. Yet buffalo is sold at a premium and called 'buffalo steaks', and it's also from the same family as cow. There's money to be made in buffalo but not zebo.

    But the basic 'yes it's just meat' comment I agree with.

  110. Re:Well no by shoemilk · · Score: 1

    Oblig SImpsons:

    Lou: I went to the McDonald's over in Shelbyville the other day.
    Chief Wiggum: The Mc-what?
    Lou: Yeah, I never heard of it either but they say they have over 2,000 locations in this state alone.
    Eddie: Hmm... Must've sprung up over night.
    Lou: But you know, it's the little differences.
    Chief Wiggum: Example.
    Lou: Well, at a McDonald's you can get a Krusty Burger with cheese. But they don't call it a Krusty Burger with cheese.
    Chief Wiggum: Get out. What do they call it?
    Lou: A "Quarter Pounder" with cheese.
    Chief Wiggum: "Quarter Pounder" with cheese? Well, I can see the cheese but? Do they have Krusty's "Partially Gelatinated, Non-Dairy, Gum-Based Beverages"?
    Lou: Yeah, they call them "shakes."
    Eddie: Huh. "Shakes." You don't know what you're gettin'.

    http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=simpsons%20mcdonalds%20vs%20krusty%20burger&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDAQtwIwAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DiwuSGvfN0T4&ei=oqH8UP9N6u-YBZaugaAE&usg=AFQjCNHgU4AKzw3tDsXO7O4JCnRCt4SuRA&bvm=bv.41248874,d.dGY

  111. Re:Well no by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

    How does it stick? Fat. Beef fat. Muscle tissue and fat all ground together kind of stick together. Extra lean beef ground into ground beef doesn't stick together especially well. For that reason, the butcher actually ADDS BEEF FAT to the mix. It's still 100% beef. Only when he starts adding other ingredients is it no longer 100% beef. Spices, flour, cornmeal, anything that wasn't a natural part of the cow before it was slaughtered causes his ground beef to be less than 100% pure beef.

    The leanest ground beef you will ever buy actually has about ten or fifteen percent fat by volume. Really cheap ground beef might have as much as fifty percent. Visit a butcher shop, watch the butcher making the ground beef. Ask him how much fat is in each grade, and ask him why. You may well get more accurate figures than I'm offering - I've only guessed at the ten or fifteen percent. But, I'm pretty sure of the fifty percent in the really cheap stuff.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  112. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  113. Idiotic Yanks... by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    Hey, Samzenpus, plus editors!

    Ireland is not part of the UK. Unless you lot want to go back to being good little colonists too?

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:Idiotic Yanks... by Faluzeer · · Score: 1

      Hey, Samzenpus, plus editors!

      Ireland is not part of the UK. Unless you lot want to go back to being good little colonists too?

      What is the issue? The summary does not state nor imply that the Republic of Ireland is part of the UK.

      The initial investigation was carried out by inspectors from the Irish government on products that were sold in Ireland. The suppliers were traced, it was found that they supplied meat to the UK. Tesco's were one of the companies that had sourced meats from these suppliers, they placed their ads in the UK after finding out some of the products they sold in the UK had traces of horse-meat in them.

    2. Re:Idiotic Yanks... by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      Did that feel good you knob head? Did you RTFA, which is written by the BBC and also says UK? Northern Ireland is part of the UK BTW.

  114. Re:Well no by sir-gold · · Score: 1

    "Years of campaigning by public health groups [has caused an increase in public awareness of the dangers of high-fat/high-sodium diets and a new tendency for customers to choose "healthier" alternatives such as Subway, this drop in sales] has led to McDonald's using a ridiculously low fat and sodium content in their burgers"

    There is that better?

  115. Re:Well no by martinX · · Score: 1

    It is the feet of God you are smelling.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  116. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might be repeating an urban legend.

    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/food/mcdshake.asp

  117. Re:Well no by JDevers · · Score: 1

    Actually, huge quantities of soy protein isn't that great for people either due to vegetable estrogen analogues and such. A moderate amount is great for you, shouldn't really be the foundation food source though.

  118. tofu high in fat by FishTankX · · Score: 1

    Tofu isn't very low in fat. It derives almost half of it's calories from it.

    http://nutritiondata.self.com/facts/legumes-and-legume-products/4393/2

    88 calories per half cup, 44 from fat.

    I believe you might be referring to it being low in saturated fat, or trans fat. Which would be true. But there's tons of fat in there.

  119. Re:Well no by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

    I do not know how well I or others may metabolize sheep designed to put spider silk proteins in their milk or corn designed to make its own pesticide.

    Pretty well actually. While the sheep isn't for eating, the protein inserted into corn is the same thing that has been used in organic farming for decades to no ill effect. We know how the protein works, there have been a plethora of safety studies, and there has never been a single case of someone being hurt by that kind of corn. Also, 'corn designed to make its own pesticides' describes all corn. Even your non-GMO corn will be chock full of natural insecticides like maysin...plants all make insecticides, how else did you think they defend themselves from insect attack? And talking about things that have been in the food chain since life began then mentioning corn is somewhat ironic. Corn, as a New World crop, is a relatively new addition to the diets of people of European, Asian, and African descent, and far from having been around since time began, it was created by humans from teosinte.

  120. Re:Well no by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    These are modern consumers we're talking about here. They've done their best to make sure they are as far away from the source of their food as possible. They may not even cook. They probably get all of their "food" out of shiny plastic bags. Clearly, most have them have never used a meat grinder.

    Hunk of cow goes in... burgers come out.

    The ground cow has no problem sticking together by itself in the pan or on the plate.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  121. The real issue by Grayhand · · Score: 3, Informative
    "What on earth did you think they put in them? Prime cuts of delicious free-range, organic, rare breed, heritage beef, grass-fed, Eton-educated, humanely slaughtered, dry-aged [beef], hand-ground by fairies...?"

    The point isn't what do you expect but what it "should" contain. The article at makes makes it seem foolish to expect hamburger to be made of beef and you should feel luck it has any meat at all. The fillers and horsemeat aren't about making a cheaper more afordable product as many suggest it's about maximizing profits. I looked it up and if you ground the whole dressed carcass including the expensive cuts it'd only be around $2 a pound not counting grinding costs. The point being they use the absolute worst cuts and even that is too good so they cut it with pink slime and other fillers and even that isn't enough so they add in horse meat. The label needs to reflect the actual ingredients and proportions. If corporations could get away with it they'd sell us beef flavored sawdust and sell it for the same price meat should sell for.

    1. Re:The real issue by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Funny

      The best cuts are sold as cuts, because they are worth more per kilo than ground beef. Of the remainder of the cow, the grindables get turned into ground beef for burgers and the like. The non-grindables are processed into other products, mostly additives.

    2. Re:The real issue by jafac · · Score: 1

      Actually, in china, they sold beef-flavored melamine. They got away with it for a while. Then they got caught. Actual Executives were actually Executed.

      I'd like to see that happen in the West.
      (clarification - I wouldn't like to see melamine-tainted food products; we've got enough food product tainting and business going on already. . . I would like to see criminal punishments that are an actual deterrent to such behavior, rather than being viewed as a 'cost of doing business').

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    3. Re:The real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What on earth did you think they put in them? Prime cuts of delicious free-range, organic, rare breed, heritage beef, grass-fed, Eton-educated, humanely slaughtered, dry-aged [beef], hand-ground by fairies...?"

      The point isn't what do you expect but what it "should" contain. The article at makes makes it seem foolish to expect hamburger to be made of beef and you should feel luck it has any meat at all. The fillers and horsemeat aren't about making a cheaper more afordable product as many suggest it's about maximizing profits. I looked it up and if you ground the whole dressed carcass including the expensive cuts it'd only be around $2 a pound not counting grinding costs. The point being they use the absolute worst cuts and even that is too good so they cut it with pink slime and other fillers and even that isn't enough so they add in horse meat. The label needs to reflect the actual ingredients and proportions. If corporations could get away with it they'd sell us beef flavored sawdust and sell it for the same price meat should sell for.

      I like soy burgers. No meat is actually more expensive though...

  122. Reminds me ... by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... of this.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  123. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes reader, no idea where I put my 6 figure username or the password that came with it...

    So I'll just get straight to it.

    I'm a barista. What on earth do you mean by coffee topping? Are you talking about ice cream toppings used as a coffee flavouring? eg http://www.starbucks.com.au/Caramel-Macchiato.php

  124. Re:Well no by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    "It is the feet of God you are smelling."

    Not quite the same thing. Those are flavored with bacteria. The "bloomy" cheeses are mold.

    Even so... smell is one thing, taste is quite another.

    I'll pass on them both, thanks. Give me a good slice of cheddar, gouda, edam, mozzarella, colby, jack... whatever. As long as it's all cheese, not bacteria or mold.

  125. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Hayek strikes again, "The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."

    Human limitations and fallibility have nothing to do with economics in particular. We only see a tiny fraction of our own tiny corner of the world, and have limited means to process that information, so why would it be otherwise? Unintended consequences are a constant result of everything that we do, starting with getting out of bed in the morning. Does that mean we'd be better off not using the limited faculties that we do have? No, in general they help us. Otherwise we would still be bacteria.

  126. Re:Well no by dbraden · · Score: 1

    What an amazingly small world we live in! Until about four hours ago, I had never heard of Heston Blumenthal. I was researching various ways of cooking pan steaks and stumbled across the same TV episode. And now I run into it again.

    A version viewable in the U.S. is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03h5T_tiyx0&list=PLGmqfGN6mMEk21FbdPNr7Azu0Ia6s_vgo

  127. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by englishknnigits · · Score: 1

    Human limitations and fallibility have nothing to do with economics in particular.

    That is correct and is not contradictory to the quote. The point of the quote is that economics can help show leaders how little they really know about the impacts their policies will have.

    As for the rest, you have presented a false dichotomy. Hayek didn't say that we shouldn't do anything unless we are 100% sure of all of the consequences of that action. He did say that we don't know nearly enough about economics to justify making grand designs to control the economy. This applies equally to many regulatory schemes. The bulk, but not all, of such things are best left to emergent systems that contain local knowledge that are, currently, inaccessible to central planners.

  128. Re:Well no by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    The hidden hypothesis is that the thicker the shake, the higher the ice cream to milk ratio, hence the better the shake.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  129. UK Oblig by ancient_kings · · Score: 1

    Where's the bloody beef?

  130. "What on earth did you think they put in them?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a BEEFburger?, I'm going to go with BEEF. If it includes other meats, they should be listed. It doesn't have to be top sirloin, but if you are going to call it a BEEFburger, it should be some kind of beef, otherwise tit is outright lying.

    But, but, it allows burgers to be produced at a lower cost!, well, then let the public decide. Do they want to pay more for a beefburger, that ACTUALLY IS MADE FROM BEEF, or do they want to buy a cheaper mystery-meat burger?

  131. Update on US Horse meat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Horsemeat has never been popular in the US.... there's just too strong of a cultural memory of the "wild west", cowboys, pioneers, etc and Americans love their horses almost as well as dogs and cats. The small horse slaughter business in the US was finally ended by a law in 2006 which was well-intentioned but had a perverse side-effect: The surplus horses that used to be slaughtered here (with the meat often exported) were instead packed into trucks for a very long unhappy and uncomfortable trip to ...... slaughterhouses in Mexico. Since the new law ultimately spared no horses and removed no horsemeat from the market and actually made life worse for any doomed horses, a new law was recently passed through the Republican House, the Democrat Senate, and signed by president Obama to re-legalize the American horse slaughter industry. In the US, it seems, even the most partisan political hacks can get together to lessen the suffering of some horses.

    Most laws are written by people who mean well, but laws, by their very nature, are blunt instruments which all-too-often have negative side-effects that sometimes are actually worse than what they were intended to fix.

  132. Why is this such a big problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I live we sell horse meat rigth beside veal and ostrich, and it is actually more expensive than most veal. You won't find it on small stores but on larger ones it will be there.

  133. Re:Well no by Waccoon · · Score: 2

    I'm still wondering how yogurt can still be sold as such in the USA. The only true yogurt I know of in my local grocery store is the store brand itself, which is actually made with milk and sugar. All the name brands are made with food starch and gelatin, and they taste more like waxy pudding than yogurt.

  134. partial explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the very popular CA-based burger chains (think giant ping-pong ball) was accused of using meat that was from a supplier who mixed-in horse meat ... the public was shocked and the fast food chain took a PR hit (and almost certainly a financial hit from lost sales). There were probably also other factors. The US has had some rather good food standards laws for many decades (Teddy Roosevelt gave that all a kick-start in the US about a century ago) so people generally feel good about the safety of the food supply and that makes an event like this one a real shock to the public; such jolts often lead to legislation.

  135. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep in mind: many things that are lawful in many other countries (with regard to "tainting" of food) are unlawful in the US. When you say that some "meat product" in the US is only x% beef you leave the impression that it's (100-x)% something gross/dangerous/disgusting; The reality is that the additives are often actually healthier than the meat would have been (often some form of grain). A large amount of the non-beef is grain/veggie based and is acting as a "binder" to hold the ground beef together with a desirable texture, and the rest is usually spices/herbs/preservatives. By law in the US, food ingredients are listed ..... and many Slashdotters may be unaware that the ingredients must be listed in order by % content (1st on list is largest ingredient, last on list is smallest ingredient). Look at the ingredients list of any food you buy in the US and you will see this is true: the ingredients are listed in order by mass, not alphabetical or random, etc

  136. Prime is the worst by r00t · · Score: 1

    That USDA rating system is completely backwards. It gives the nice-sounding names to greasy meat riddled with fat. It gives the bad-sounding names to the leanest (most healthful and least disgusting) meat.

    There is nothing good or desirable about Prime. If you want your meat soft and greasy, you can toss it in a grinder with some butter. Lean meat with a nice chewy texture is much harder to find or fake.

    BTW, the best meat is rabbit. It's pretty much 100% fat-free.

    1. Re:Prime is the worst by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Note, that's not exactly true.

      You really want to avoid products based on "pink slime".

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Prime is the worst by Digit+Machine · · Score: 1

      This is not true at all. Marbled fat in a steak or a roast gives it flavor, juiciness, and tenderness. If you want lean tasteless dry meat, stick with chicken breast.

    3. Re:Prime is the worst by butchersong · · Score: 1

      You don't want a burger made with less that 15-20% fat. It will taste like crap. There is a reason butchers add cow fat to venison when grinding it up. Nothing wrong with fat.

  137. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of course, if you ground-up a resident of the city of Hamburg, the label would be just fine....

    (auf deutsche)

  138. beef is sticky enough by r00t · · Score: 1

    Make the edges thicker than the middle, kind of like a red blood cell. Squish away any cracks that form. Keep it cold before use, then don't try flipping it until it is cooked enough to firm up.

  139. actually.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not eating any animal-that-eats-any-other-animal that is dangerous .... the specifics really do matter:

    The safety problem is: eating an animal that is a cannibal (a situation where the eat-er and the eat-ee are both vulnerable to the same diseases). With mad-cow, for example, cows (naturally herbivores) were being fed processed cow remains ... and in this case it was even more dangerous because the material being thus recycled included nerve tissue and brain tissue (which in a few cases contained the neurological disease often called "mad-cow" disease). Cows not fed the tissues of sick cows do not in fact become sick. Incidentally, human cannibals have often developed health problems because they ate people with diseases and this could be part of basis for the historical taboos against cannibalism (i.e. one tribe noting that neighboring tribes who ate people had lots of odd sicknesses).

    Some people prefer the "gamier" flavor of animals that consume other animals, but most average people prefer the more-subtle flavors of the meat of herbivores (which is why beef, lamb, etc tend to be most-popular and things like bison are good substitutes).

  140. Re:Well no by Dahan · · Score: 1

    All the name brands are made with food starch and gelatin

    Isn't Dannon yogurt readily available where you are? They're a huge international company, and one of the most common brands of yogurt around here (Texas). Their plain yogurt is just milk and yogurt culture.

  141. Re:Well no by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Beef heart is all muscle and no fat. Incredible when smoked for a few hours.

    Do you use a bong or just roll it in paper?

  142. Re:Well no by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Tofu is bland, tasteless

    It's not that if you cover it in sweet chilli sauce and fry it.

    very healthy and low in fat

    Not that either if you fry it :)

  143. This is what's wrong with one American by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Lean beef (like the grass fed topside mince mentioned above) doesn't stick together as well as very fatty beef (US corn fed feedlot beef from every bit of the cow mixed together?) so tends to fall apart without something to bind it together. There's no point getting insulting just because you were not aware of that.
    Personally I don't use lean beef to make patties because of that, I use the two star mince instead of the much leaner five star, but people who care more about fat content go for the lean stuff and need something to stick it together. Even the two star stuff falls apart a bit at times.

  144. Seems to be a translation error by dbIII · · Score: 1

    "I don't eat meat" seems to sound to some Spanish language speakers as "I don't eat beef", hence the offers of chicken and fish etc. Any native speakers wish to elaborate or tell me I've got it wrong?
    I had some veggie friends that went on a ten day cruise along the Pacific coast of Chile on a ship that was BBQ heaven who hit this translation speedbump. I think they were pretty sick of plain peas and carrots by the end of it.

  145. Re:Actually (self correction) by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

    Dude, just when I wanted to comment on the British Seapower and the decline thereof.

    --
    Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  146. Re:Well no by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Black Angus. So it's mostly scotsmen.

  147. Re:Well no by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 1

    Hey, cellulose is technically a sugar - indigestible and good for fiber!

    Even so, I'd prefer a real milkshake. :P

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  148. So, hypocrites any? by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    "Both products cost just £1 a box, as do similar frozen burgers sold by Iceland. The Oakhurst 100% Beef Quarter Pounders, sold by Aldi and implicated in the scandal, cost £1.39 for a box of eight."

    What do you expect for that price? You can't buy cheap and expect quality?

    Buying meat at those prices is just an open invitation to getting conned, one way or the other. Shame on the buyers!

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
  149. Re:Well no by GNious · · Score: 1

    wow - looking at the "food breakdown" poster at MacD shows that eating 1.5 burger gives you a day's worth of sodium... I'd hate to know how much was in it in the past.

    Old Joke: Whats the difference between a regular burger and a veggie-burger at MacD? not much...

  150. Re:Well no by shikaisi · · Score: 1

    I told the guy who served me in a McDonalds in Japan, "This burger tastes rubbery" and he just replied "Thank you velly much"

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  151. Re:Well no by hairyfish · · Score: 1

    Nowhere does it say it is 100% beef, it is made from 100% beef. Take 100% beef, add 100% salt and 100% MSG, and 100% other stuff. You now know how marketing works.

  152. Re:Well no by hairyfish · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what happened to soft serve ice cream that I used to buy as a kid, but I bought one from an ice cream van recently and the thing didn't melt. In the middle of summer, 30 deg it just sat there on the cone in it's original form. It tasted horrible and so carried it around with me, and after 30 minutes it was still there in one piece.

  153. Re:Well no by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

    Nowhere does it say it is 100% beef

    ...except in the summary.

  154. Re:Well no by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

    It's still got bacteria in it, just a different kind - it's called a starter culture.

  155. OK let's get the comments out of the way by andrewbaldwin · · Score: 2

    "What do you put on your burger?" -- "A fiver each way at Aintree!"

    Why do they use horse meat? to save mon-neigh!

    So you got a burger - why the long face?

    I opened the fridge to check the burgers -- and they're off ! (said in the voice of a racing commentator)

    "These must be Viking burgers" -- "why?" --"because they look like a Norse" ...

    What I found amazing is how quickly these spread after the news broke -- I'd heard the first two within 45 minutes of the radio news.

    1. Re:OK let's get the comments out of the way by Inda · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so amazed. Most of the jokes were play on words that have been used a million times before.

      I wouldn't eat any more of those burgers. The last time I did, they gave me the trotts.

      See? The old ones are the best.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  156. DIY Minced Beef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a mincer a couple of months ago after taking notice of what was actually in my 100% beef burgers. Now I just wait until one of the supermarkets have a special deal on steak and I make my own minced beef. It can work out cheaper too. If everyone read what was on the labels of the processed food they bought they'd be shocked at how even simple things can be adulterated by the supermarkets/producers.

  157. Bonfire of the Quangos! by fantomas · · Score: 1

    1. David Cameron and his merry free-market-philosophising pals announce "Bonfire of the Quangos": UK right-wing government makes big show of closing down "unnecessary bureaucracy" in government to save money and reduce "big government". This includes health inspectors visits to slaughterhouses.
    2. Government celebrates cutting jobs, saving tax payers money.
    3. People still want cheap beefburgers.
    4. Invisible hand of the market decides! You want cheap beefburgers, we can get you cheap beefburgers.
    5. Ah. Turns out sacking all the heath inspectors and reducing the number of visits to check up on what's happening in the meat processing industry not such a good idea after all....

  158. Which statistic is wrong? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    What I read, on the BBC site this weekend, was that they said that 29% of the samples were found to have measurable trace amounts of horse DNA in them. Nowhere did I read that the aggregate total of samples were 29% horsemeat.

    Is this the typical example of a grossly distorted Slashdot post, or did the BBC get it wrong?

  159. Re:Well no by heroid1a · · Score: 1

    What a coincidence! I'm a Barrister too! But how did you also get to a be an expert on coffee...?

  160. Re:Well no by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    Does beef fat not count as beef all of a sudden?

    100% beef != 100% beef muscle tissue.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  161. Re:Well no by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Who were these customers who made McDonald's think a milkshake needs to be of such a consistency that you have to use an industrial suction pump to get it through the straw? I want to go back in time and kick them all in the nuts.

    You wish!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  162. Only horses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two words: Soylent Green

  163. Re:Well no by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    Oh chill out and enjoy a Krusty Partially-Gelatinated-Non-Dairy-Gum-Based-Beverage

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  164. Re:Well no by tapi0 · · Score: 1

    why does it need anything else? use a quality meat with the right amount of fat and it will all form together and the proteins will do the binding. Of course, some sort of seasoning can be put in there as well, but a good beef burger can (should?) be made with nothing but meat. egg and/or breadcrumbs are not necessary and usually end up with a dry burger if you're not careful. e.g. http://www.abc.net.au/tv/cookandchef/txt/s2632115.htm

  165. Hot...Legless...Dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 30% is supposedly dried powdered skin ...

    Am I the only one who thought the idea of 'dried powdered skin' hilarious? Nearly spit up my drink when I read it. Not that I disbelieve it, it just sounds funny.

  166. Fuck the pope. No surrender. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Really? I could have sworn "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland" had some Ireland in it. Yup, there it is, just above the monosodium glutamate.

    Shit thick Tim, so you are.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  167. Re:Well no by alfredo · · Score: 1

    Fecal matter from mechanical processing.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  168. Re:Well no by Bobartig · · Score: 1

    Beef is full of protein and fats, which provide enough binding to hold ground meat together after a couple minutes. Try it yourself with some chuck and a food processor.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  169. Re:Well no by Lithdren · · Score: 1

    I worked with a butcher for a number of years after high school, learned a lot of useful stuff from the old bastard (he was and still is one of the most horrible people i've ever met, but that's a different story).

    Ground Chuck, used to be, 80/20. 80% meat, 20% fat. This is pretty good, and most people are happy with it. Ground Round is usually closer to 85/15 or 90/10. Again, good stuff.

    I dont buy ground meat from grocerie stores anymore. Most of them dont give you a meat/fat ratio, and the few that do horrify me...60/40 i've seen. I've never seen a 50/50 but my lord, why bother at that point? You'd be better off scraping deer off the highway for all the taste and flavor you'll get out of that grimy mess of fat.

  170. I have a bridge you may want to buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "every horse is required (by EU law) to have a record of medications given to it in its entire lifetime."

    uh-huh.. We have similar laws in the U.S., but who's keeping track of the meds fed to that horse at the riding stables? Oh, Brownie seems to be a bit sore this morning after the show, let's just give him a few bute (phenylbutazone) or ibuprofen for a few days and see what happens. It's time for teeth floating, let's just give him a 1/4cc of ace (acepromazine, a phenothiazine tranquilizer) to take the edge off, so he doesn't mind having the vet grind off the corners of his molars with a big file. Not to mention periodic worming with all manner of drugs. Or antibiotics given for one reason or another.
    I've ridden competitively in the US for 30 or so years now, and the amount of unreported drug use for even backyard horses is pretty large (although not inhumane or improper, for the most part.. it's just casual and unreported, much like the rider popping a few ibuprofen because their back is sore). Likewise, over the years, I've been in riding stables in England, hanging out in the barn office, etc., and I don't recall seeing complete lists of medications administered, or the grooms/stablehands carefully noting which meds were given, when. There might be a "meds list" for all the horses in the barn to remind folks which horses need which drugs when, and there are companies that will even prepackage them in daily containers.

      In racing, sure.. they're pathologically concerned about it in both countries. It's a firing offense to be found with a syringe in the stables at a track. But everywhere else?

    Compared to most food animals, I suspect horses get a lot less drugs: especially compared to commercial cows, chickens, and pigs. Most of those get stuffed to the eyeballs with antibiotics, etc., because of the huge potential problem in a CAFO.

    None of this probably has any serious human health (or equine health) effects downstream, but to think that every horse has a full and complete list of every medication of any kind administered is like believing that any human has the same. Sure, in the 2 months before slaughter, perhaps you'd know.

    that "carcass inspection".. a) it's looking for gross abnormalities: giant tumors; and things like gangrene and rotting; b) it has very low effectiveness for health purposes. The official standards (in US, EU, and UK) are for things like "smell" and"visual appearance". The carcass has got to be pretty darn bad if you can smell it. You can't smell E.Coli (although you could smell a bad slaughtering job that would lead to E.Coli contamination, I suppose), you can't smell BSE, Kuru, etc.. That whole inspection thing is a holdover from the 19th century, pre "The Jungle", when disreputable companies would go around finding carcasses lying in the streets and grind them up.

  171. Re:Well no by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Salutes, to experience. 60/40 was likely close enough to 50/50 to fool me. On the other hand, the wife has brought home some "hamburger meat" that may well have been 50/50. I could see the fat content as I formed it into a patty, it felt nasty. As it cooked, it shriveled like crazy.

    She still tries to save money on the shopping, but it's been a long time since she brought home meat that was THAT nasty!

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  172. Re:Well no by Bobartig · · Score: 1

    The term Milkshake is regulated, such that you can only put in a limited number of ingredients. It has to consist almost entirely of milk and icecream. Many prepared frozen shake drinks contain non-dairy fats, stabilizers, thickeners, etc so that it can have the desired flavor and texture when put through a shake machine. Actual milkshakes won't have the thick/smooth texture we expect unless they are made recently from icecream which also has retained it's desired texture. This is more difficult than formulating a pre-mix batter which has the flavor and texture of a milkshake when chilled.

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  173. bingo veggies by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Ah,
    the imperfect opportunity for me to get on my high horse and wax lyrical about vegetarianism once again :-)

    Once again veggies miss out on the scandal.
    If you didn't eat meat then maybe the subconcious manages to be more compassionate and, whether you admit it to yourself, more compassionate to people too.
    Really should be a study to quote and back it up other than a load of hearsay though

  174. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you can't say you weren't warned.

  175. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, right? Is there nothing that right-wing Libertarians and Austrian schoolers don't get 100% right?

  176. USDA? by netsentry · · Score: 2

    Given all the attention recently put on beef, I expect McDonalds to be truthful on their page talking about their meats:

    Do you use American meat?

    We do. All of our chicken comes from our trusted USDA-inspected suppliers in the U.S., like Tyson Foods and Keystone Foods. Our beef and pork products also come from trusted USDA-inspected suppliers, such as Lopez Foods. In order to keep up with demand, a small percentage of our 100% pure beef is imported from USDA-inspected suppliers in Australia and New Zealand

    The term USDA-inspected doesn't carry nearly the same power as it did 20 years ago. From allowing meat grinders to create and monitor their own safety plan with no followup corpwatch.org, to allowing chicken farms to do the same foodsafetynews.com, to criminally lax contamination guidelines on pork mercola.com ... this can continue but there are already dozens of documentaries to make these points.

    Big Food will keep telling us our food is safe while pumping us full of the steroid-ridden anemic flesh that so many love.

    1. Re:USDA? by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      I suspected that McDonald's wasn't lieing but they weren't telling the whole truth, either.

  177. Girls and their horses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not all those girls are teens, nor are they all spoiled.

    There are lots of theories as to why girls like horses and ponies (as opposed to say other cuddly pets like bunnies, cats, dogs) One reason is that it gives them a unique sense of empowerment to control a 1000 lb animal. There are relatively few areas where pre-teen and teen girls can exert significant control over something big and potentially dangerous. Where I used to ride, the girls used to ride their horses bareback over to watch an NFL team at summer training camp, and it was interesting to observe that the 300lb lineman was more nervous about being near the horse than the 12 year old 60 pounder sitting on its back.

    I'd guess the peak horse crazy years are actually more like 10-14, before the object of attraction walks on two legs rather than four. A lot of those "unused" horses one sees are an remnant of earlier years, and the increasing time demands of high school, but rather than sell the beloved animal, it gets pastured, or loaned out to someone, or retired. They are a pet at that point, not a "working animal" (hence the impassioned letters to the paper to "save the ponies from slaughter").

    As a parent.. it's an athletic activity that is socially acceptable, has some element of glamour (at least when showing), and is perceived to be unlikely to bring your daughter in contact with a "bad element". More than one parent has buckled to pay for the lessons and/or horse when the alternative is "ok, I guess I can go hang out at the mall". Much better to fork out the $200/month and have your daughter be a barn rat, get a lot of physical activity, learn how to deal with personalities both human and equine, learn about the fundamental subjective nature of beauty competitions (which is what horse shows are, at least for young riders.. they're not out jumping fences or turning around barrels against the clock).

  178. Re:Well no by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    They still have 10g fat and 500mg sodium, that does not seem ridiculously low in fat or sodium.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  179. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by jafac · · Score: 1

    . . . well, next step is North Korean labor-camp prisoner DNA in the burgers. Finally, NK will have a valuable export product.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  180. My little ponies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word you're looking for is pasture. And the killer cost is vet bills. Also saddles and tack, fencing, a horsefloat, an SUV to tow it and visits from the farrier. Not to mention silly hats, membership in the pony club and tuition fees for your little princess. Then there's electric fences, dietary supplements, fines when your little darlings get out and wander the freeway...

  181. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You did guess at the percentage. I come from a family of ranchers where sometimes we have to slaughter an injured bull. The ground beef is so lean that you actually have to add butter when cooking.
    The reason for the high fat content in most ground beefs is that the cattle are fed corn feed before they're slaughtered.

  182. Pink Slime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US company was BPI or Beef Products Incorporated. To this day their bought and paid for FDA insiders have prevented any attempt at forcing retailers to label the pink slime content of their ground beef. It was only the story being broken by ABC news that created the customer backlash that forced 99% of major stores to pull it from their shelves. BPI is now spending millions on a bogus social media campaign to promote its junk science that this shit is somehow healthier or safer than regular beef. It has also sued ABC news under an obscure Illinois law (Illinois is one of the top-3 cattle producing states) and also for defamation simply to try to discourage activists from speaking out against this product. Their main point is that 'beef is beef' and 'pink slime is 100% beef, not tendon or bone" I believe this last claim will bite them in the ass. Readers familiar with a little bit of chemistry might appreciate that technically everything is soluble in everything else, the question is simply one of degree. BPI is used to living in FDA-land, where 5% can be rounded off as zero. I have a feeling when independent scientists do tests, they will in fact find that the heating, centrifuging, and ammonia treatment procedures to extract protein from scrap meat yield a measurable amount of tendon content (the hard, gritty bits anyone who's ever tried pink slime or eaten lots of fast-food encounters). It may be less than 5%, but it destroys the 100% non-tendon beef claim pretty handily.

  183. Re:Well no by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Depends on the cheese. Some of them aren't cultured, they're made with milk and rennet.

  184. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes, a clever joke making light of the fact that I tend a bar whereas you appear before one.

    I make drinks and you make representations.

    I prepare cocktails and you prepare arguments.

    Our jobs are similar.

    We probably have to deal with similar numbers of cranky mofos too.

  185. Re:Well no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you do in America. Well, and France.

  186. Tell your spin story to someone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The travesty with that is that the "pink slime" is real beef. Muscle tissue.

    Pink slime is not all muscle tissue. It is a processed mixture of meat trimmings, connective tissue, and cartilage. When you buy "Ground Beef" in the store, it is supposed to be "take a slab of USDA Choice beef, and grind it". It is not "then mix it with 25% pink slime". Pink slime comes from a steer, but it is not USDA Choice. So this was fraud, plain and simple. Especially since the filler was mixed in right there in the store's back room.

    Now all the people who processed that beef are out of jobs

    Good! Fuckers.

    our beef prices are higher

    Stuff costs money. Film at 11.

  187. Try some proper cheese! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please, dude, try some real cheese.

  188. Re:Well no by batlbot · · Score: 1

    Who were these customers who made McDonald's think a milkshake needs to be of such a consistency that you have to use an industrial suction pump to get it through the straw? I want to go back in time and kick them all in the nuts.

    HA! That's funny as hell; I have had the same thought (about needing the pump, not about the roshambo) for a long time.

  189. Re:The problem is food safety, traceability and BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely they'd be worrying about ESE?

  190. Re:Well no by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Ground meat doesnt need anything to stick it together, UNLESS you add other things in there, and even then only if you go past a certain threshold amount.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  191. PPP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the problem with using a specific currency as a relative value is that it doesn't actually convey purchasing power parity.

    For that, we turn to...oh.

    I'll just leave this here.

  192. Re:Well no by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Customers don't 'demand' anything from big chains, they eat what they're given. That's why they spend billions on advertising.

  193. PLAY AND BECOME IMBECILE: what about Human DNA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INFURIATING: no one tested for Human DNA in hamburguers? A quick search months ago said that McDonalds allows a very small percentage of Human meat in its hamburguers (because of accidents supposedly). BUT, quick numbers for the chain s data outputted it is the equivalent to... FIFTEEN THOUSAND (15,000) people every MONTH ending as Human Beef Meat in Hamburguers. Something to say about it? I sent several emails to gov offices and got no reply. Maybe they were eaten in McDonalds.

  194. 100%, as required by legislation by loufoque · · Score: 1

    My burger is 100% beef since that's what the legislation requires here.