I agree wholeheartedly. Authoritarian hell holes like Scandinavia, Western Europe have far more unequal participation of men vs women in software development than egalitarian utopias like India and China.
Men are identical to women, period. Genetics and chromosomes are two hoaxes on the flat earth made by God in 6 days 6000 years ago. Free will, my ass!
Hosting facilities aren't without cost. Amazon charges real money for EC2, S3, and CloudFront.
I didn't say hosting facilities are without cost. I just said users don't get fuel / packing material / poor man's toilet paper by misusing these services. Any benefit they derive from DOSing the service provider is not real.
Free internet news service , only subsidized by advertisements is infinitely more viable than free newspapers only subsidized by advertisements in the last century due to these extra motivations to abuse the service.
For one thing, how did "the paper newspapers of the previous century" solve it? And to what extent would those solutions continue to apply? Individual publishers back then didn't have to compete with interest-based ad networks for advertisers' money.
This is their problem - the same problem existed in those days and they needed to deal with an order of magnitude lower economic activity than today, so your naming an extra competitor doesn't really mean anything. I never said I had the answers, this is why I am not in an online newspaper business.
You are naming a problem that always existed and still exists today - somehow gels with the bad reputation millenials get about facing any problem and giving up immediately.
People as narrow minded as you might not classify non-DNA "life" as life even if it were right in front of you.
If another mechanisms was more viable for the basis of life, then why have none displaced DNA on earth, despite 4 billion years of opportunities?
Because everywhere is not earth. Everything doesn't work well everywhere.
When we find life elsewhere in the Universe, I think it is very likely it will be DNA based.
Earth doesn't have much else you recognize as "life" that is not DNA based, and you are too unimaginative to think of anything else. This does not mean anything about likelihood of life elsewhere. Again - everywhere is not earth.
You yourself have done it in the same diagram - the label text is also supposed to overlap if the sections are overlapping. E.g. the text "Men's Rights Movements" overlaps multiple sections. NOW I am not sure if that is what you intended, but it makes some sense.
Anything slightly more complex (which your diagram probably is), and an outside legend describing the sections works well - 2 common ways :
1. Using arrows to describe the innermost sections 2. All innermost sections are of unique colors and a tabular legend shows which color describes which innermost section. This is a middle finger to color blind people, but dot/line/square patterns are way more confusing for others.
This is the model of print newspapers, print magazines, and pay television. Neither subscription revenue alone nor advertising revenue alone is enough
Not only the combination as the summation of the revenues, but the "synergy" too. The price of newspaper stops people from using it to make toilet paper, fireplace fuel, packing material etc. I have used newspapers to wipe wounds while camping - once you tightly wrinkle the newspaper by compressing in a ball and straighten it again multiple times, it works reasonably well.
Online doesn't have newsprint expenses, and their "consumers" also lack the motivation to make secondary usage of their services.
Does this mean that you propose to eliminate the intermediary ad network or ad exchange? If so, how would you expect a smaller site to afford to hire ad sales personnel in order to find advertisers and sell ad space directly to them?
This problem is identical to the one the paper newspapers of the previous century, right ?
So the blue set means Misogyny as well as Masculinism ? And yet overlaps with Feminism ?
Misandry is not mutually exclusive with MRA ? You mean to point out the cases where a person is an "activist" for some rights for men but hates men in other senses ? If it is such a nuanced worldview, with strong positions in either field, applying either MRA or misandry labels appears inconsistent.
Is this diagram about actual concepts, or about how people confuse each other with inconsistent usages of words and you want to contribute to the confusion ?
So you are essentially a kind of troll ? Deviate from the subject as long as possible, and then when the other person will have none of it, you run away ?
I suspected most SJWS like you were like that, but I wanted to give one a benefit of doubt. Doesn't seem to allay my suspicions at all.
Given the present situation, yes, no provably illegal collusion is necessary because there were, in recent memory, monopoly encouraging laws in most places. So corporate culture can be said to have developed with assumptions that include no competition. Companies could also plausibly claim that they just haven't gotten around to actually competing yet, as competing had become legal recently.
Never having had the competition prohibiting laws in the first place, in large parts of the country, is one way to get more companies providing internet services. In the absence of a time machine, you'll need to wait for corporate culture to change, new companies appear on the scene, large companies changing ownership structures significantly etc. Entropy, in other words should eventually do the trick, eventually. Eventually = in the limit ( time) t tends to infinity.
Someone, somewhere, maybe around Halloween, would leak evidence of illegal collusion, and law enforcement could swoop in. Government can rectify its mistakes from the past. Iff, the grammar of the people does nor change to expressing companies in the singular. Once grammar has changed, the battle is lost. Because grammar fights against entropy for centuries, corrupting our way of thinking.
Why do you need the water off the planet ? It is coming from the planet, in the form of ice, it can remain on the planet in a dam, or a giant water bowl above ground.
Actually no one cares about ocean water drowning cities where poor people live, so something specific to the few cities with the most money would be cheaper still until they migrate to higher ground on reclaimed higher land.
Although it seems quite safe assuming that the reality language1 vs. language1+more-things-on-top is associated with the first language being quicker, I cannot tell it for sure because I have never done a proper benchmark. So, it is extremely likely (according to basic objective common sense) that C is faster than C++ in these scenarios, but I cannot tell it for sure
This basic objective common sense works when you consider both compile time and run time. C++ compilation might take longer, but it is no where close to necessary that the executable is less quicker than that of C.
Of course, reasonable coding in both C and C++ is assumed.
Why don't you bet on yourself ? In many fields, requiring degrees has become the norm. If you start a business in one of those fields and follow your recommendations of hiring non-degree holders, you could compete the shit out of all your competitors.
NoScript is awesome. But... a major software running code (javascript , sometimes java, flash too) from random places on the internet (not only websites, advertisements that sneak in), poorly sandboxed, has the privileges to update itself ?
In spite of NoScript, this craziness stands on its own. Your kids are a much lower security threat and you have prevented them from updating the browser and allowed a larger threat to update the browser.
. In fact the strongest argument against FPTP is 'it is unfair to anyone but the first and second parties and this makes it hard for a third party to take over from them'.
Wow, you wrote so much but couldn't read the mechanism section of the page your are linking to ? All this happens due the voters and parties thinking nobody other than first and second most popular teams stands a chance. Because if the voters vote for a third party, their vote is "wasted".
Which is bullshit in the first place. It is extremely rare for a vote to be not wasted.
Or at least Adobe doesn't have enough DBAs. Otherwisse the DBA would keep waiting for someone coming to talk to them, and declining would mean they are out of the job.
Not that DBA is the ideal person to query a database in this context, and not even that database is the best solution for this problem, but DBAs declining requests clearly means there are not enough of them.
FPTP is just an excuse. Americans have an irrational fear of having "wasted" a vote. A huge majority of all votes in the world are wasted, just go and vote rather than making so many states lose their voices on the basis of being a "non-swing" state.
Yeah, i fully agree. I just hope that the GGP post meant "sense and experience" in a way that doesn't mean directly relying on our imperfect sensory inputs.
A crude example : our senses cannot be relied upon to detect the temperature of an object, but mostly can be relied upon to read a thermometer. Ultimately, sensory input was used, but through a proxy that makes better use of our sensory abilities.
But I am dissecting what a third party meant, a hopeless endeavour at best.
Slashdot Mirror
I agree wholeheartedly. Authoritarian hell holes like Scandinavia, Western Europe have far more unequal participation of men vs women in software development than egalitarian utopias like India and China.
Men are identical to women, period. Genetics and chromosomes are two hoaxes on the flat earth made by God in 6 days 6000 years ago. Free will, my ass!
Social justice is different from (and almost opposite to) social justice warriors.
https://www.urbandictionary.co...
But you will not qualify your statement that it is your particular place which has less than average fossil fuel electricity generation ?
OK. Will you qualify this before making the blanket claims ?
Ok, until it is banned , will you stop yourself from making CO2 arguments about cars that cars that directly burn fossil fuel ?
Hosting facilities aren't without cost. Amazon charges real money for EC2, S3, and CloudFront.
I didn't say hosting facilities are without cost. I just said users don't get fuel / packing material / poor man's toilet paper by misusing these services. Any benefit they derive from DOSing the service provider is not real.
Free internet news service , only subsidized by advertisements is infinitely more viable than free newspapers only subsidized by advertisements in the last century due to these extra motivations to abuse the service.
For one thing, how did "the paper newspapers of the previous century" solve it? And to what extent would those solutions continue to apply? Individual publishers back then didn't have to compete with interest-based ad networks for advertisers' money.
This is their problem - the same problem existed in those days and they needed to deal with an order of magnitude lower economic activity than today, so your naming an extra competitor doesn't really mean anything. I never said I had the answers, this is why I am not in an online newspaper business.
You are naming a problem that always existed and still exists today - somehow gels with the bad reputation millenials get about facing any problem and giving up immediately.
People as narrow minded as you might not classify non-DNA "life" as life even if it were right in front of you.
If another mechanisms was more viable for the basis of life, then why have none displaced DNA on earth, despite 4 billion years of opportunities?
Because everywhere is not earth. Everything doesn't work well everywhere.
When we find life elsewhere in the Universe, I think it is very likely it will be DNA based.
Earth doesn't have much else you recognize as "life" that is not DNA based, and you are too unimaginative to think of anything else. This does not mean anything about likelihood of life elsewhere. Again - everywhere is not earth.
You yourself have done it in the same diagram - the label text is also supposed to overlap if the sections are overlapping. E.g. the text "Men's Rights Movements" overlaps multiple sections. NOW I am not sure if that is what you intended, but it makes some sense.
Anything slightly more complex (which your diagram probably is), and an outside legend describing the sections works well - 2 common ways :
1. Using arrows to describe the innermost sections
2. All innermost sections are of unique colors and a tabular legend shows which color describes which innermost section. This is a middle finger to color blind people, but dot/line/square patterns are way more confusing for others.
Misogyny and masculism is written in the same section.
You do understand by "logging in", you are being tracked even better than websites track you for advertising to you , right ?
This is the model of print newspapers, print magazines, and pay television. Neither subscription revenue alone nor advertising revenue alone is enough
Not only the combination as the summation of the revenues, but the "synergy" too. The price of newspaper stops people from using it to make toilet paper, fireplace fuel, packing material etc. I have used newspapers to wipe wounds while camping - once you tightly wrinkle the newspaper by compressing in a ball and straighten it again multiple times, it works reasonably well.
Online doesn't have newsprint expenses, and their "consumers" also lack the motivation to make secondary usage of their services.
Does this mean that you propose to eliminate the intermediary ad network or ad exchange? If so, how would you expect a smaller site to afford to hire ad sales personnel in order to find advertisers and sell ad space directly to them?
This problem is identical to the one the paper newspapers of the previous century, right ?
So the blue set means Misogyny as well as Masculinism ? And yet overlaps with Feminism ?
Misandry is not mutually exclusive with MRA ? You mean to point out the cases where a person is an "activist" for some rights for men but hates men in other senses ? If it is such a nuanced worldview, with strong positions in either field, applying either MRA or misandry labels appears inconsistent.
Is this diagram about actual concepts, or about how people confuse each other with inconsistent usages of words and you want to contribute to the confusion ?
So you are essentially a kind of troll ? Deviate from the subject as long as possible, and then when the other person will have none of it, you run away ?
I suspected most SJWS like you were like that, but I wanted to give one a benefit of doubt. Doesn't seem to allay my suspicions at all.
Given the present situation, yes, no provably illegal collusion is necessary because there were, in recent memory, monopoly encouraging laws in most places. So corporate culture can be said to have developed with assumptions that include no competition. Companies could also plausibly claim that they just haven't gotten around to actually competing yet, as competing had become legal recently.
Never having had the competition prohibiting laws in the first place, in large parts of the country, is one way to get more companies providing internet services. In the absence of a time machine, you'll need to wait for corporate culture to change, new companies appear on the scene, large companies changing ownership structures significantly etc. Entropy, in other words should eventually do the trick, eventually. Eventually = in the limit ( time) t tends to infinity.
Someone, somewhere, maybe around Halloween, would leak evidence of illegal collusion, and law enforcement could swoop in. Government can rectify its mistakes from the past. Iff, the grammar of the people does nor change to expressing companies in the singular. Once grammar has changed, the battle is lost. Because grammar fights against entropy for centuries, corrupting our way of thinking.
Trying to compete with the cable company and the phone company is expensive
Why is "company" in the singular in so many places above ? That too prefixed with "the" ?
Why do you need the water off the planet ? It is coming from the planet, in the form of ice, it can remain on the planet in a dam, or a giant water bowl above ground.
Actually no one cares about ocean water drowning cities where poor people live, so something specific to the few cities with the most money would be cheaper still until they migrate to higher ground on reclaimed higher land.
Although it seems quite safe assuming that the reality language1 vs. language1+more-things-on-top is associated with the first language being quicker, I cannot tell it for sure because I have never done a proper benchmark. So, it is extremely likely (according to basic objective common sense) that C is faster than C++ in these scenarios, but I cannot tell it for sure
This basic objective common sense works when you consider both compile time and run time. C++ compilation might take longer, but it is no where close to necessary that the executable is less quicker than that of C.
Of course, reasonable coding in both C and C++ is assumed.
Why don't you bet on yourself ? In many fields, requiring degrees has become the norm. If you start a business in one of those fields and follow your recommendations of hiring non-degree holders, you could compete the shit out of all your competitors.
These are good points, what Musk says should be possible, but
It has 8 giant pins in what appear to be a 2x4 arrangement, with ground...
One additional engineering requirement would be the cooling of the battery while being charged. You have any ideas how they might be planning that ?
Even much smaller batteries charged at a much lower rate heat up quite nicely.
NoScript is awesome. But ... a major software running code (javascript , sometimes java, flash too) from random places on the internet (not only websites, advertisements that sneak in), poorly sandboxed, has the privileges to update itself ?
In spite of NoScript, this craziness stands on its own. Your kids are a much lower security threat and you have prevented them from updating the browser and allowed a larger threat to update the browser.
. In fact the strongest argument against FPTP is 'it is unfair to anyone but the first and second parties and this makes it hard for a third party to take over from them'.
Wow, you wrote so much but couldn't read the mechanism section of the page your are linking to ? All this happens due the voters and parties thinking nobody other than first and second most popular teams stands a chance. Because if the voters vote for a third party, their vote is "wasted".
Which is bullshit in the first place. It is extremely rare for a vote to be not wasted.
Contradiction :
Adobe has DBAs
Go talk to the DBA. The DBA declines the request
Or at least Adobe doesn't have enough DBAs. Otherwisse the DBA would keep waiting for someone coming to talk to them, and declining would mean they are out of the job.
Not that DBA is the ideal person to query a database in this context, and not even that database is the best solution for this problem, but DBAs declining requests clearly means there are not enough of them.
FPTP is just an excuse. Americans have an irrational fear of having "wasted" a vote. A huge majority of all votes in the world are wasted, just go and vote rather than making so many states lose their voices on the basis of being a "non-swing" state.
but it could destroy the company if the customers decide its a reason for them not to buy your clothes.
Maybe I don't know enough about US markets. Did this ever happen ?
Yeah, i fully agree. I just hope that the GGP post meant "sense and experience" in a way that doesn't mean directly relying on our imperfect sensory inputs.
A crude example : our senses cannot be relied upon to detect the temperature of an object, but mostly can be relied upon to read a thermometer. Ultimately, sensory input was used, but through a proxy that makes better use of our sensory abilities.
But I am dissecting what a third party meant, a hopeless endeavour at best.