Yup. Back when I did customer support, getting off the phones and into e-mail or chat support was the first step toward the top of the dung heap. But that was a long time ago, back when phone support was still widely done inside the US.
Hate Speech is speech that keeps a minority group down. It's not about being offensive, it actually causes harm.
So the definition of hate speech has nothing to do with accuracy, truth, or facts. How very useful to anyone trying to control the marketplace of ideas.
Wrong. No tax liability has been determined yet; deductions are part of the process. Pre-payments, withholding, etc are only estimates and getting part of those back is not a "gift". The final tax is what you owe the gov't.
By all means, let me just not sign that NCA and miss payments on my house and other obligations to stand against NCAs. How noble! Meanwhile some incompetent schmuck will get the job and the company who would have hired me will never associate with me on any level.
And let's not forget, even unenforceable NCAs can be damaging to the employee. Even though I'm in a state where NCAs are considered "unenforceable" I know of at least 1 job offer I did not get because of a 3 year NCA between current employer and potential employer. See, the potential employer plays for the "NCAs are good" team, doesn't want to rock the boat on current contracts, and has no interest in generating legal liabilities because even if the agreement is "unenforceable" if they get served with papers it already costs them money.
Is he suing the named people for libel and slander? No? Then it's probably true.
Wrong.
Not having undertaken the hideously expensive, soul eating process of filing lawsuits against one or more anonymous accusers is not an indication of guilt.
On the flip side of your shitty logic: did the accusers run to the cops and file charges the very next day? No? Then he's probably innocent.
Both the software engineers and the person driving the car were complete asshats in this situation. What kind of utter moron would think this kind of "feature" in software would be a good thing? What kind of utter moron would be stupid enough to use the feature in this way?
The answer to your first question is "the kind that ask your second question"
...take it for what it is, some are good, some are bad, but on paper they look 10x better. Obviously this is due to contractor placement agencies that inflate resumes. People have admitted to me that their agency put experience on their resume that they never had. But employers don't care because they can be gone tomorrow and a replacement will arrive in 7 days. There's
I'm right there with you - there are some good and some bad, and ON PAPER they look better. As a peer of many such hires my experience is that it is largely lies, stacked against my honest resume. I'm getting co-workers with excellent skill sets and work experience listed, and at first I was very excited at the prospect of learning so much from these gods of modern tech. Then I end up having to explain basic concepts such as schema references in an Oracle query and whatnot. When I'm invited to give technical interviews about 80% of the time I quickly realize the candidate studied for tests and certifications but has very limited real world experience.
I can only conclude that if the typical candidate has so much as logged onto an Oracle RAC system with GoldenGate, RMAN, etc they then add such techs to the list of technologies they have "supported". Then there's the incidents of interviewing one person and a different one shows up for the job. It's a mess.
What market have they cornered? The web is full of online markets. Amazon organizes and works their slaves a little harder to save you a few bucks here and there, but if I can't buy something from them I'll obviously just go elsewhere.
Going to guess they do IT on a budget, let vendors do too much of their planning for them, drag their feet backfilling IT positions, and invest little in training for personnel. And management will never receive proper blame for running such a shop.
Just a wild guess tho.
Wait... if we nuke the developing world to drop their coal usage maybe a minor nuclear winter would offset global warming? And reduce the nuke stockpiles at the same time. Who knew it was so simple.
I did read that the secretary of state considered that the records aren't subject to the Kansas open records act. In my eyes any such avoidance of disclosure means that there's something to hide.
Of course it could just as easily be that they are understaffed and will not take time to comply with requests they don't have to. Or, they have plenty of staff but can't be arsed to stop updating Facebook to comply with requests they don't have to. Any road, the records are in a rotten format that would take a lot of effort to work through to comply with a request they are not required to comply with. So, quite possible they're saying piss off because they can, not because they have nothing to hide.
Maybe. Did you read TFA? They did respond, they just didn't give her what she wants, which they say would be really hard to produce. Yes, they could be full of shit, but that's not a foregone conclusion. Need more data.
You realize being a logical fallacy doesn't automatically make it untrue, right? Or were you just looking for an intellectually lazy means for shutting down an opponent?
If it's a logical fallacy there's nothing to shut down. As for truth, status == NULL.
Slashdot Mirror
Yup. Back when I did customer support, getting off the phones and into e-mail or chat support was the first step toward the top of the dung heap. But that was a long time ago, back when phone support was still widely done inside the US.
Hate Speech is speech that keeps a minority group down. It's not about being offensive, it actually causes harm.
So the definition of hate speech has nothing to do with accuracy, truth, or facts. How very useful to anyone trying to control the marketplace of ideas.
Suggests "Crooked Hillary" after typing in "Crooked". It shows "Lyin' Ted" if you include the apostrophe.
Rules or requirements there aren't enforced or followed are not loopholes. Loopholes are explicit exemptions.
Gotta be a democrat...
...by drug testing the gov't.
Wrong. No tax liability has been determined yet; deductions are part of the process. Pre-payments, withholding, etc are only estimates and getting part of those back is not a "gift". The final tax is what you owe the gov't.
He didn't throw his medals away. He threw away someone else's. He kept his own. Sincerity. Yeah.
I keep location services disabled 98% of the time on my phone, and never use the FaceBook app, but instead use a browser.
But yeah, the average moron is going to download every website app they get offered just because it exists.
By all means, let me just not sign that NCA and miss payments on my house and other obligations to stand against NCAs. How noble! Meanwhile some incompetent schmuck will get the job and the company who would have hired me will never associate with me on any level. And let's not forget, even unenforceable NCAs can be damaging to the employee. Even though I'm in a state where NCAs are considered "unenforceable" I know of at least 1 job offer I did not get because of a 3 year NCA between current employer and potential employer. See, the potential employer plays for the "NCAs are good" team, doesn't want to rock the boat on current contracts, and has no interest in generating legal liabilities because even if the agreement is "unenforceable" if they get served with papers it already costs them money.
Is he suing the named people for libel and slander? No? Then it's probably true.
Wrong.
Not having undertaken the hideously expensive, soul eating process of filing lawsuits against one or more anonymous accusers is not an indication of guilt.
On the flip side of your shitty logic: did the accusers run to the cops and file charges the very next day? No? Then he's probably innocent.
The Repugs aren't exactly enforcing immigration law, either. And so we got Trump as a plausible candidate for next president. Of the US. Incredibly.
If your control was slipping on a decent road with reasonable weather conditions at 80 MPH you should get new tires.
Both the software engineers and the person driving the car were complete asshats in this situation. What kind of utter moron would think this kind of "feature" in software would be a good thing? What kind of utter moron would be stupid enough to use the feature in this way?
The answer to your first question is "the kind that ask your second question"
...take it for what it is, some are good, some are bad, but on paper they look 10x better. Obviously this is due to contractor placement agencies that inflate resumes. People have admitted to me that their agency put experience on their resume that they never had. But employers don't care because they can be gone tomorrow and a replacement will arrive in 7 days. There's
I'm right there with you - there are some good and some bad, and ON PAPER they look better. As a peer of many such hires my experience is that it is largely lies, stacked against my honest resume. I'm getting co-workers with excellent skill sets and work experience listed, and at first I was very excited at the prospect of learning so much from these gods of modern tech. Then I end up having to explain basic concepts such as schema references in an Oracle query and whatnot. When I'm invited to give technical interviews about 80% of the time I quickly realize the candidate studied for tests and certifications but has very limited real world experience.
I can only conclude that if the typical candidate has so much as logged onto an Oracle RAC system with GoldenGate, RMAN, etc they then add such techs to the list of technologies they have "supported". Then there's the incidents of interviewing one person and a different one shows up for the job. It's a mess.
What market have they cornered? The web is full of online markets. Amazon organizes and works their slaves a little harder to save you a few bucks here and there, but if I can't buy something from them I'll obviously just go elsewhere.
Going to guess they do IT on a budget, let vendors do too much of their planning for them, drag their feet backfilling IT positions, and invest little in training for personnel. And management will never receive proper blame for running such a shop. Just a wild guess tho.
Seriously, the causal racism on Slashdot these days is getting way out of hand and really really old (as you probably are)
Seriously, anonymous complaints are white noise.
Roll over and play dead?
Good thing it wasn't up against FO3.
By all means, when you eat at restaurants refer to the waitstaff as "servant". Enjoy your meals.
Wait... if we nuke the developing world to drop their coal usage maybe a minor nuclear winter would offset global warming? And reduce the nuke stockpiles at the same time. Who knew it was so simple.
I did read that the secretary of state considered that the records aren't subject to the Kansas open records act. In my eyes any such avoidance of disclosure means that there's something to hide.
Of course it could just as easily be that they are understaffed and will not take time to comply with requests they don't have to. Or, they have plenty of staff but can't be arsed to stop updating Facebook to comply with requests they don't have to. Any road, the records are in a rotten format that would take a lot of effort to work through to comply with a request they are not required to comply with. So, quite possible they're saying piss off because they can, not because they have nothing to hide.
Maybe. Did you read TFA? They did respond, they just didn't give her what she wants, which they say would be really hard to produce. Yes, they could be full of shit, but that's not a foregone conclusion. Need more data.
You realize being a logical fallacy doesn't automatically make it untrue, right? Or were you just looking for an intellectually lazy means for shutting down an opponent?
If it's a logical fallacy there's nothing to shut down. As for truth, status == NULL.