In space there is no such thing as "introduce fatal problems through unexpected interactions between issues". The programs are setup in such a manner to not allow that to happen.
Like the strength of the shuttle wing's leading edge, and the weight of falling foam? You'd think they'd have been more careful if they expected that to happen.
Well, if you stick a bomb in your underwear drawer at home, it's not likely to blow me up.
What if it's in an apartment? It could hurt people in the next unit. In fact filling an apartment with explosives is a tactic terrorists have used before.
Clearly we have to have random suspicionless searches of every apartment and any house close enough to the neighbour's house for a bomb to cause damage.
. Imagine a lot more coked up people driving on our roads and highways and walking around neighborhoods.
Who are these people that obey drug laws, but ignore impaired driving laws?
You'd think if the law is keeping them from doing drugs currently, that the law would prevent them from driving were the drugs legal.
In the case of a drug addict morality and fear of punishment don't play any role if he wants a dose.
And this is different than an alcoholic how exactly?
Cheap and legal drugs (like alcohol) mean addicts don't have to commit crimes to get them. They can beg for change like the bums do. $5 should be enough to get anyone high/drunk on their drug of choice.
The crime argument is an argument FOR legalisation, not against it.
You may as well argue that the black market funds terrorism, then advocate that we keep the black market around, It makes no sense.
Yet another reason not to use proprietary plugins. If non-x86 netbooks catch on I think we'll see sites like youtube offering alternative streaming methods, like via HTML5's tag.
Flash is great for vector animation, but it doesn't offer any advantages when it comes to web video.
Sprinklers are generally only useful AFTER something catches on fire, while ashtrays are great at preventing things from catching on fire in the first place.
I'm thinking the ashtrays would be more effective.
Relying only on technical solution without involving employee responsibility and training will fail. It's like, say, giving soldiers the a body armor, helmet, protection glasses, etc. but not providing them with training, explanation of a cause, of tactics, responsibilities, etc.
Not if it's impossible for them to use that equipment in any way other than the way you intended.
Instead one should find a way to cooperate with colleagues, providing them with secure VPN tools and explaining them how to use them right.
Why bother when you make it impossible to use them wrong?
"TBH, I for one am getting sick of the whole patch, upgrade hardware, upgrade drivers cycle of PC gaming just to play a game at a decent framerate without it crashing."
That's the price you pay for playing games that improve in appearance more frequently than every 5 years.
Any security policy that relies on employees voluntarily keeping to an agreement is doomed to fail.
Either make it impossible to access in any way other than intended, or don't do it.
So mister fuckface. tell me HOW you can with your shitty windows and shitty linux and extra shitty BSD capture, compost and edit a TV show or movie without making it look like a 12 year old did it in his basement.
90% of people also think a computer without drivers is as broken and unacceptable as a TV without a remote, yet they use an OS that does not ship with drivers for their hardware.
But this isn't a problem since 90% of computer users don't install their own OS. They let an OEM do it for them, along with the drivers.
Why would a browser be any different?
Slashdot Mirror
It made sense before the editors added an to the headline.
The clit is fun to play with.
In space there is no such thing as "introduce fatal problems through unexpected interactions between issues". The programs are setup in such a manner to not allow that to happen.
Like the strength of the shuttle wing's leading edge, and the weight of falling foam? You'd think they'd have been more careful if they expected that to happen.
How many people that get pulled out of the metal detector line actually get arrested
How many don't have any metal on them? I'd be willing to bet it's lower than 99%.
The reason there haven't been any terrorist attacks is because of the terrorist repelling rock every TSA employee keeps in their pocket.
Well, if you stick a bomb in your underwear drawer at home, it's not likely to blow me up.
What if it's in an apartment? It could hurt people in the next unit. In fact filling an apartment with explosives is a tactic terrorists have used before. Clearly we have to have random suspicionless searches of every apartment and any house close enough to the neighbour's house for a bomb to cause damage.
People don't abuse vicodin. Wait they do. But it's not widespread. Wait, it's more widespread than illegal drug use. Damn, I guess we need to ban it.
. Imagine a lot more coked up people driving on our roads and highways and walking around neighborhoods.
Who are these people that obey drug laws, but ignore impaired driving laws? You'd think if the law is keeping them from doing drugs currently, that the law would prevent them from driving were the drugs legal.
Ask the unborn child if he/she wants to be born, and THEN decide.
Say something if you don't want to be aborted. Nothing? OK, you're the boss.
In the case of a drug addict morality and fear of punishment don't play any role if he wants a dose.
And this is different than an alcoholic how exactly? Cheap and legal drugs (like alcohol) mean addicts don't have to commit crimes to get them. They can beg for change like the bums do. $5 should be enough to get anyone high/drunk on their drug of choice. The crime argument is an argument FOR legalisation, not against it. You may as well argue that the black market funds terrorism, then advocate that we keep the black market around, It makes no sense.
Thank god they didn't loose it while performing "The Merchant of Venice"
If it's not going to make the shuttle safer to fly, why did they bother developing it?
That's why we have courts to rule people incompetent.
Yet another reason not to use proprietary plugins. If non-x86 netbooks catch on I think we'll see sites like youtube offering alternative streaming methods, like via HTML5's tag. Flash is great for vector animation, but it doesn't offer any advantages when it comes to web video.
Sprinklers are generally only useful AFTER something catches on fire, while ashtrays are great at preventing things from catching on fire in the first place. I'm thinking the ashtrays would be more effective.
Relying only on technical solution without involving employee responsibility and training will fail. It's like, say, giving soldiers the a body armor, helmet, protection glasses, etc. but not providing them with training, explanation of a cause, of tactics, responsibilities, etc.
Not if it's impossible for them to use that equipment in any way other than the way you intended.
Instead one should find a way to cooperate with colleagues, providing them with secure VPN tools and explaining them how to use them right.
Why bother when you make it impossible to use them wrong?
"TBH, I for one am getting sick of the whole patch, upgrade hardware, upgrade drivers cycle of PC gaming just to play a game at a decent framerate without it crashing." That's the price you pay for playing games that improve in appearance more frequently than every 5 years.
Any security policy that relies on employees voluntarily keeping to an agreement is doomed to fail. Either make it impossible to access in any way other than intended, or don't do it.
I think he's saying it's sensible to destroy the environment in order to save the environment.
Well, there's always alien.
Maybe if they had ashtrays, there wouldn't have been a fire.
And?
All you do is stop doing your job and wait for everything to crash, then figure out how much money the company lost.
So mister fuckface. tell me HOW you can with your shitty windows and shitty linux and extra shitty BSD capture, compost and edit a TV show or movie without making it look like a 12 year old did it in his basement.
Ask these guys: http://orange.blender.org/
90% of people also think a computer without drivers is as broken and unacceptable as a TV without a remote, yet they use an OS that does not ship with drivers for their hardware. But this isn't a problem since 90% of computer users don't install their own OS. They let an OEM do it for them, along with the drivers. Why would a browser be any different?