Slashdot Mirror


The Dutch Repair Cafe Versus the Throwaway Society

circletimessquare writes "Everyone in the modern world has thrown away at least one thing that was perfectly good except for an easily fixed defect, because it's just easier to buy a new one. In the Netherlands, in the name of social cohesion, and with government and private foundation grants, there is a trend called the Repair Cafe (Dutch). People bring in broken items: a skirt with a hole in it, an iron that no longer steams, and they fix each other's stuff and meet their neighbors. Now that's an idea worth keeping."

368 comments

  1. Doesn't work in the US by DoubleSandwich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people. The same is true for Asians and Australians too. And the American people introvert culture isn't a new thing that came with computers - they did this before geeks too. Sitting in front of TV watching mindless shows and eating TV dinners, alone.

    One great geeky example about Americans making artificial social walls around them is how quick companies were to replace LAN gaming with online gaming so that you could sit alone and not interact with people. I live in asia and when people play games, they go play them with friends to internet cafes. There's a place near me where there is always young guys gaming together. There's a huge cultural difference between US and the rest of the world.

    As the saying goes - "We have the technology, we can build anti-social walls around us!"

    1. Re:Doesn't work in the US by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Informative

      One great geeky example about Americans making artificial social walls around them is how quick companies were to replace LAN gaming with online gaming so that you could sit alone and not interact with people.

      I'm pretty sure that's not why it was done. It was done because it offers you the ability to play with people in either scenario, no matter how far away they were. You get more people in the game and a wider variety of them.

      When you're playing a LAN game in a cafe, you play with your neighbors. The guy across the country can't play with you.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not called soccer, it is called football, since you actually have to use your foot to get the ball somewhere else. What you call football is some form of rugby for sissies to afraid for physical contact.

    3. Re:Doesn't work in the US by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Oh man, that pisses me off so much. Nothing worse than having 4 people in a room gathered around an Xbox, realizing that we can only play games while we hang out if half the people go home and jump online there.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    4. Re:Doesn't work in the US by PPH · · Score: 0

      When you're playing a LAN game in a cafe, you play with your neighbors. The guy across the country can't play with you.

      The OP is Dutch. There's not much difference between across the cafe and across the country in The Netherlands.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is this like the europeans going crazy over soccer and believing nonsense like your national honor hinges on a game?

      people in the US like sports but when i was in europe it's like the whole continent shuts down for the world cup

      What are you smoking? There are over-crazed Nascar, football and basketball fans all around the US as well. As for everything shutting down during the World Cup, I have no idea what you're talking about because I happen to live in Spain and was here during the last one; everything from shops to public transport continued working as usual even during the final, though obviously some deliriously happy people were setting off firecrackers in the street for hours after the game.

    6. Re:Doesn't work in the US by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, No one in Europe or Asia ever used force to get their way.

      I mean, really? Come on.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Doesn't work in the US by GNious · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Couldn't you have posted this while I still had modpoints?!?

      (and: He is right, it is called Football, and the american football is wussyball compared to e.g. aussie rules)

    8. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      The US is mostly made up of crap-hole cities where you don't let your children oputside because of the gangs, stepford wives suburbs where the houses are so far from anything resembling a cafe or other public gathering place that you have to drive, or middle of nowhere farming comunities where the population is so low that only one cafe can exist and it's always full of "grandpa Simpson" types.

      That's why we're so antisocial.

    9. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Exactly. That's why there's never been any wars in Europe, and why Americans don't play sports.......

    10. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people.

      That last phrase tells me that you don't really know Dutch people. The amount of nederlanders who actually uses drugs is really, really small.

      It is NOT part of the national culture to "go to a cafe and get high". Most people are, in fact, really conservative and straight edge. That whole Amsterdam (and other places now) drugs and prostitution thing was only a way to expel drug users and "different people" from smaller cities and neighborhoods. As they have "their own place" now, most citizens (and the police) are not too kind with drug users. It is also not uncommon for people to take matters into their own hands.

      It was a smart decision because before all those tolerance laws those things were just like in the US, where they are forbidden but tolerated outside the law. Meaning: honest middle class people had to "forcibly tolerate" idiots from all sorts while rich people were isolated from these issues.

    11. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Theophany · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Have you seen the way those guys barrel into one another in the NFL? That armour stuff is a necessity.

    12. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, Europeans and Asians tend to compete between each other in good-hearted sports. Americans tend to compete with military, guns and killing people. I think you just understood something wrong along the way, but you never know.

      So.....riots, burning cars, smashed business windows, beatings, people crushed under mob feet, broken stadiums, and temporary marshall law are "good-hearted" sports?

      Really? Last I checked we tend to compete with Football, Basketball, Baseball(world inspiring sport), Soccer, etc. ad nauseum(too many to list). This isn't to say some of these haven't inspired terrible behavior...they have, and I think that was his point.

      Please don't act like you are somehow superior just because you managed to find out how to think like an ignorant southern conservative. Bullshit exists everywhere, and you just proved it. The man made a point about how dedicated Euro fans are, along with some of their rather strange notions about honor being derived from a bunch of overprivileged men kicking a ball around.

      Do us all a favor, stick that comment in the closet long enough for you to turn around and view the mirror.

    13. Re:Doesn't work in the US by KermodeBear · · Score: 0

      Good hearted sports where, in the riots following the game, people are killed, cars are burned, and storefronts are destroyed - even if your team wins.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    14. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Eraesr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people. The same is true for Asians and Australians too. And the American people introvert culture isn't a new thing that came with computers - they did this before geeks too. Sitting in front of TV watching mindless shows and eating TV dinners, alone

      Sounds beautiful, no really. But I live in the Netherlands and you have no idea how wrong you are. For the past 30 years (at least), the Netherlands has been "individualizing" at an alarming rate.

    15. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wussyball? I'd say brain-damageball...

    16. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... In Europe, your national honor depends on a football (aka soccer) game.
      In America, it's only your state or regional honor that depends on a football (aka rugby with pillows) game.
      And considering that our states are the size of their nations, it's completely different.

      Troll harder, you're giving us Yanks a bad rep.

    17. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another slash idiot bashing America, go figure, its what makes this site so child like. Anyway, we used to have this. Its what makes me laugh about the green idiots, their generation gave us this throw away society. From appliances to electronics they used to be made to last and easily repaired, but not anymore in the name of greed.

    18. Re:Doesn't work in the US by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

      I think that US official policy is officially against socialism last I checked so this makes good sense in order that they might keep ahold of their cultural identity.

    19. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen rugby? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8v-qZFVYnc

    20. Re:Doesn't work in the US by jmac_the_man · · Score: 0
      Association football is called that because it is played on foot, as opposed to polo, which is played on horseback.

      Gridiron football derives its name from the fact that the ball was historically 12 inches long.

    21. Re:Doesn't work in the US by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Cart leading the horse. They barrel into each other because they have the armor. If you want to reduce long term brain/body damage injuries to Football players you need to take away their pads.

    22. Re:Doesn't work in the US by alen · · Score: 2

      you just described what happens when the Yankees beat the Red Sox in Boston

    23. Re:Doesn't work in the US by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Handegg.

    24. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amurrikunz iz fat n lazy, I kan haz mod points nAo?

    25. Re:Doesn't work in the US by jo_ham · · Score: 0

      I believe the game the Americans play is called "Hand Egg".

      Seems to make sense.

    26. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Eil · · Score: 2

      That's a nice broad brush you have there. Be a shame if anything were to happen to it...

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people.

      Where exactly did you get the impression that there are no bars, coffee shops, restaurants, user groups, meetups, or hackerspaces in America?

      One great geeky example about Americans making artificial social walls around them is how quick companies were to replace LAN gaming with online gaming so that you could sit alone and not interact with people.

      A truly dizzying line of reasoning... Just because online games happen to exist does not mean nobody organizes LAN parties anymore. And honestly, how is a LAN party a social event? A bunch of gaming nerds cram themselves into a room to stare at their monitors with headphones on? Please.

      Also, your notion that American culture is dominated by introverts is so wrong as to be hilarious. Introverts are routinely shamed simply for being intellectual, creative, shy, or socially awkward. The most popular prime-time sitcom right now in the U.S. is literally nothing but a solid half hour of poking fun at ridiculously stereotyped geek caricatures.

    27. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with ya both. I'm American, an I don't get our game of football at all....It's like this hodge-podge of fucking stupid rules to make something incredibly simple way too complex.

      A bunch of meatheads throwing a ball around and running into each other at it's base, and all of these complex insane technical rules to govern it. I played in highschool and I never fully understood it like the rest of the jarheads seemed too... I just tackled people :D

    28. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes perfect sense, so every sport where you use your legs and some kind of projectile should be renamed to football:
      -handball: football
      -volleyball: football
      -tennis: football
      -golf: football
      -waterpolo: football
      -tabletennis: football
      -badminton: football
      -hockey: football

    29. Re:Doesn't work in the US by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You twits named it soccer, you've just forgotten.

    30. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure your not seeing how the rich Americans do things vs how the rest of the poor world does things. You know poor people tend to cluster together because they can't afford things and have to share? I don't mean this as flame bait just an observation.

    31. Re:Doesn't work in the US by ben_says · · Score: 1

      its actually called foot ball, because you play the game on your feet, as opposed to on a horse. rich games = polo, poor games = ball games played on foot.

    32. Re:Doesn't work in the US by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      Precisely. Also in America we don't have a "repair cafe" but we have something better: Ebay. When something I own breaks, I just list it on ebay as "for parts or repair". There's always some American that enjoys tearing apart broken items. They benefit and I benefit (~$10 cash). It's basically recycling rather than trashing.

      Besides my actual neighbors have NOTHING in common with me. I don't socialize with them because frankly I don't want to. The internet provides a way to connect to people who are miles distant..... sometimes they are close enough to meet in person (Computer User Groups), but most times they are not so I "friend" them online.

      Speaking from an environmental view this is actually a GOOD thing because it's more efficient to connect virtually, rather than burn gallons of gasoline driving to meet up. We should do more of this (example: telecommuting to work) not less in order to reduce our carbon footprint.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    33. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Dishevel · · Score: 2

      That has got to be among one of the stupidest things I have ever seen put down in print.
      1. Good-hearted sports? Soccer fans as a group is the most violent sports fans there are.
      2. American use Military and Guns while the Europeans and Asians use sports? Germany, Italy, Japan. World War II? Ring a bell?
                Americans (Till they started moving toward the European model) competed for 200 years against the world successfully not in war or sports.
      They competed and won with industry, invention and self reliance. As we move toward a more dependent culture we are losing that.

      You can think Europe and Asia are better than America.
      But try not to base on things so patently wrong.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    34. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not called soccer, it is called football, since you actually have to use your foot to get the ball somewhere else. What you call football is some form of rugby for sissies to afraid for physical contact.

      Do a search for "Handegg". :)

    35. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Rui+Lopes · · Score: 1

      Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people. The same is true for Asians and Australians too. And the American people introvert culture isn't a new thing that came with computers - they did this before geeks too. Sitting in front of TV watching mindless shows and eating TV dinners, alone.

      pretty much my experience living in San Francisco (I'm European, btw).

      --
      var sig = function() { sig(); }
    36. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth does the first comment on a story about repairing things during into a troll-fest about sport...and get modded +5 Insightful?

      And to think that you guys say us ACs lower the tone of the place.

    37. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, this site is becoming one massive gay, communist, anti-American circle jerk. The article doesn't have a god-damned thing to do with the United States, and yet some slashtard just has to karma whore by denigrating the US. Seriously, fuck off and die.
      The Dutch are just doing what people in poor countries do; they are fixing things instead of replacing them because they can't afford to. Of course, they're Europeans, so they need a government grant to do what people in other countries (including the US) do on a daily basis without a subsidy.

    38. Re:Doesn't work in the US by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Funny

      Someone decided to cop an attitude and pretend that they're better than everyone else. It just deteriorated from there.

      Kind of like wars and sports rivalries really.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    39. Re:Doesn't work in the US by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

      By that logic rugby players should ditch the mouthguard. Because those things only generate more injuries, right?

    40. Re:Doesn't work in the US by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      You seen football?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1bhrgeUQ_M

      0:58-- dude gets hit so hard his helmet is destroyed.

    41. Re:Doesn't work in the US by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty cool that I use the internet to play games with my friends and families on the other side of the country in order to be less social... Would you also argue that by letting my daughter skype with her grand mother who lives a thousand miles away I am discouraging the relationship?

    42. Re:Doesn't work in the US by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Why waste time watching EU football or US football or AU football when the world is literally falling-apart all around you with banks on the brink of collapse & governments stripping-away the freedom of expression. All watching sports does is enrich the corporations. Maybe it's "escapism" but frankly I'd rather be like the Greeks (trying to solve the problems), and let the sports wait for better times (2020s or 2030s).

      Oh and to comment on the "toughness" of the sport. I don't see EU football players developing Alzheimer-like symptoms at age 40/50, as we frequently see in U.S. football. The american football is so violent the players are literally shortening their lives. It is not a "sissy" sport. In fact it should probably be banned (along with the other athlete-killer: boxing).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    43. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all a great laugh until you become tetraplegic from a collapsed scrum and you have to go to Switzerland for assisted suicide at the age of 23...

      http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/18/11

      In all seriousness, if you need violence to enjoy a sport then you're uncivilised. Let's leave that stuff behind with the ancient Romans and their Colosseum.

    44. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      Good hearted sports where, in the riots following the game, people are killed, cars are burned, and storefronts are destroyed - even if your team wins.

      Welcome to Kanuckistan, where the only thing worse than a hockey riot when the team wins is a hockey riot when the team loses. Hockey riots have been a fact of life for almost 60 years.

      Where daily massive student demonstrations have been going on for more than 3 months, complete with riot squads getting their own tear gas kicked back at them, rubber bullets, simultaneous smoke bombs in the subways, and where the education minister has no credibility after being caught taking campaign donations from the mafia.

      So it's not just the Europeans and Asians.

      In the US, on the other hand, riots are more of a race thing - see the Rodney King beating video, etc.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    45. Re:Doesn't work in the US by ekimminau · · Score: 0

      "Yes, Europeans and Asians tend to compete between each other in good-hearted sports."
      In the immortal words of Indigo Montoya "I do not think this means what you think it means."

      Lets see... Europeans who liked military, guns & killing people....
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_in_Europe

      Asians who liked military, guns & killing people....
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_in_Asia

      vs. North America:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_conflicts_in_North_America

      or just in U.S. History:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_the_United_States

      I think DoubleSandwich needs to be renamed to DoubleSnobSandwich and shut his pie hole.

      --
      Armaments, 2-9-21 And Saint Attila raised the hand grenade up on high, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy hand grenade' N
    46. Re:Doesn't work in the US by operagost · · Score: 1

      Because all the bars/pubs and nightclubs are totally empty in the USA. Yup, no one ever goes anymore. And we totally don't have any chains like Dave & Buster's where adults can eat, drink, laugh, and play games. Maybe we should let people smoke weed.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    47. Re:Doesn't work in the US by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      No, it's called Association Football as opposed to American Football or Rugby Football. Since those are rather long and tedious we tend to shorten them.

      The English gave us soccer via slang : Association -> Assoc. -> soccer. Like Brekkers for breakfast and tener for ten pound note.

      Obviously if one type dominates all the others in some area then "football" is going to be used for it.

    48. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wussyball? I'd say brain-damageball...

      It's called Handegg, you insensitive clods!

    49. Re:Doesn't work in the US by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Maps. Look at them.

      Geography is a bit different. The US is huge, and while plenty of us party and hang out, when you have to drive long distances to do that it requires both effort and expensive petrol.

      Before the internet, hanging out with like-minded folk was do-able if you lived near each other. HOWEVER, if you DIDN'T live near them, you were isolated and, how shall I put it, generally fucked.

      Things are MUCH better now. Piss on the "good old days", all of them. I lived through them and the only good thing was that cannabis was MUCH more tolerated in the 1970s (proof it doesn't cause many social problems given the enormous consumption at the time and since!). If you were polite, the cops would scatter your weed when they confiscated your beer, and send you on your way.
      -------
      Online gaming FACILITATES interaction with MORE people by simplifying logistics. Given the choice between "internet interaction" and "being stuck in Bumphuque with no interaction", I'd take the first thank you very much.

      The internet also allows many young people to escape the Katzian "Hellmouth" of their current situation. It would have been wonderful to have that when I was growing up! There is now an "alternate social topology" where you can escape and avoid your enemies. Be happy you have that option.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    50. Re:Doesn't work in the US by operagost · · Score: 1

      No bars or clubs in San Fran?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    51. Re:Doesn't work in the US by operagost · · Score: 0

      I dunno; it's been a while since I shot any of my friends in the face. I discovered that death resulted in fewer friends. Maybe we'll try baseball from now on.

      You are a stupid prick.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    52. Re:Doesn't work in the US by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>So.....riots, burning cars, smashed business windows, beatings, people crushed under mob feet, broken stadiums, and temporary marshall law are "good-hearted" sports?

      And racism (one black guy quit because he was sick of being called names).
      Search youtube for soccer and racism and watch the vids.
      Good ole Europeans... they are just sooooo much more polite than those hateful americans (not).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    53. Re:Doesn't work in the US by operagost · · Score: 1

      American football is called that because the ball used to be snapped with the foot and field goals used to be worth more than touchdowns. The game has changed a bit in 130 years. Ignorance is not an excuse; if you're going to make inflammatory remarks, do your research. By the way, we call it soccer because in the UK... you know, in Europe... they called it asSOCiation football.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    54. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes because before the snap the quarterback has his 'hand' on the center's 'eggs'!! :-O

    55. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I love how soccer matches and Rugby games all end with everyone in the stands hugging over there in europe. There have never been any riots after or during games.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    56. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally wrong Mr Little-Englander. Historically "soccer" was used in the UK for association football to differentiate it from Rugby football. Over time Rugby football became known as "rugby" and association football "football". Refer to any old newspaper archive match reports, and you'll see "soccer" was the predominant word used for footy, and "football" for rugger.

      Even in the late 1980s, rugby internationals were still referring to their game as "football". But don't let facts influence your ignorance. Keep watching BS on sky1 and being told what to think. Twat!

    57. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Mostly because they are tubs of lard and you have to wear that to deal with an impact from a 450 pound fat ass.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    58. Re:Doesn't work in the US by alaffin · · Score: 1

      Nope. Last I checked a mouthguard didn't really reduce the amount of pain taken in an impact, just the permanent damage it might cause. The plastic and foam shoulder pads allow a football player to hit and bit hit harder by distributing the point of impact. It's similar to boxing gloves allowing boxers to punch harder.

    59. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in the US he would have been lynched and shot too.

    60. Re:Doesn't work in the US by superflippy · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we wouldn't sit at home so much if our houses weren't so far apart from our neighbors' and set along non-walkable roads miles away from communal meeting places. Geez I hate the suburbs.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    61. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Most everyone that is not a rich asshole WANTS the banks to collapse. IF the banks were let to fail back in 2008 a lot of rich assholes would have been taught a lesson and the recovery would have been finished already.

      Let them fail. and I hope Greece says "FUCK YOU" to the banks and does a hard default. It would be the best thing in the world for them to wipe out all the debt.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    62. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Geography is a bit different. The US is huge, and while plenty of us party and hang out, when you have to drive long distances to do that it requires both effort and expensive petrol."

      Mostly because of the american auto industry lobbying against public transportation for decades. the USA could have had a fantastic light rail system next to the heavy rail, but Ford from the beginning convinced leaders that it was a waste of money as everyone will afford cars easily....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    63. Re:Doesn't work in the US by tqk · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the way those guys barrel into one another in the NFL? That armour stuff is a necessity.

      Have you seen the way those /. geeks start out discussing the social merits of Netherlanders vs. $everybody_else, then almost immediately devolve into the relative merits of the various forms of the numerous games oddly all called "football"?

      A*maz*ing!

      FWIW, I can watch EPL, but because of the fans' incessant singing, I can't stand to listen to it. I prefer the Italian Serie A (and baseball). I've played rugby, and I'm never going back there. Aussie football looks really weird from what I've seen of it.

      And I dearly wish I were in Holland right now, just to be around some relatively sane people for a change. I wouldn't even much care if the Nazis were invading; they're not much worse than other stupidity I seem to run across daily, and shivving them in the back with an icepick makes for a rewarding hobby.

      My C$0.02.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    64. Re:Doesn't work in the US by mediocubano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is partially true, but what it looks like is that nobody around here is "handy" any more. People just don't get the practice of tearing things apart and fixing them. I get a lot of enjoyment out of being able to fix things, but many people don't.

      I picked up a huge snowblower that my neighbor was throwing away (his answer? "duhhh doesn't work") and it just needed to have the carburetor cleaned out - total cost was about $10 in parts, and a couple of hours or my time. To top it all off I learned something. I also loved it because I had nothing to lose except some tinkering time - the thing was already broken, so if I made it more broken no big deal. However if I got it working then it was like winning the jackpot. (BTW the thing has enough power to throw snow across the street!)

      Other neighbors had a combo stereo that just didn't work. And they had no clue of what to do. Didn't power on, so I popped the cover off and found the fuse blown. One trip to the hardware store later and I now have a great garage stereo with CD changer and even a remote control!

      I could go on and on about my brother in law and his fixit dis-abilities, but maybe I'll save all of those "no common sense" stories for a book. (It has been a complete blast to fix things for my inlaws, they look at me like I'm some sort of magician or technological priest.)

      Maybe that's what the problem is, either people think their time is too valuable (thanks marketers), or they just don't feel like learning anything. All of this takes common sense and a thirst for knowledge, something that people seem to be really short on any more. They'd rather sit in front of the idiot box for hours, or piss away hours with angry birds.... it is just too easy.

    65. Re:Doesn't work in the US by tqk · · Score: 2

      Cart leading the horse. They barrel into each other because they have the armor. If you want to reduce long term brain/body damage injuries to Football players you need to take away their pads.

      Sorry, but you're the one who's not getting it. Who said anyone wanted to reduce long term brain/body damage? They wear all that armour so that they can show guys the size of small trucks smashing into each other.

      Commercials aired during the halftime show is infinitely more important than your concern. No, I don't understand it either.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    66. Re:Doesn't work in the US by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      And if they wanted to mitigate some of the long term brain damage caused by boxing they'd go back to bare knuckle. Yeah you're going to have some broken wrists/fists but I doubt that you'll have the same severity of brain injuries.

      I'm sure nature has an advantage in making sure we don't permanently damage ourselves in natural fights. I can't imagine what the deer population should be like if when two males went at it one ended up dead instead of just with a few broken antlers.

    67. Re:Doesn't work in the US by tqk · · Score: 1

      Association football is called that because it is played on foot, as opposed to polo, which is played on horseback. Gridiron football derives its name from the fact that the ball was historically 12 inches long.

      There are so many logical disconnects in those statements, you just folded my brain inside out.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    68. Re:Doesn't work in the US by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Wow, you need to go back to school and learn you some history.

    69. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      No, he wouldn't. It depends on where he lives. In the South (namely Florida), yes, your comments has real truth. In other parts of the country, it's just ridiculous.

      Your comment is basically like saying that Germans are all a bunch of losers who can't manage their economy and all want a free welfare ride, super-early retirement with excessive pension, etc., because of what's going on in Greece. Greeks and Germans are the same, right?

    70. Re:Doesn't work in the US by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're soooooo much more enlightened than us!

    71. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      American Football fits American culture extremely well; it makes perfect sense that this sport would arise here and be so popular. The insanely complex technical rules directly mirror our insanely complex legal system, with which we're all so obsessed with. Notice that every other show on TV is about lawyers and courtrooms (the other shows are reality shows, and even some of them are about lawyers and courtrooms).

    72. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

      temporary marshall law

      Temporary what?

      Martial. As in Mars, god of war. Not Marshal or Marital.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    73. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our minds need escapism to be healthy; dwelling on the negative things in the news would just drive us crazy.
      So, to prevent enriching the corporations with my escapism, I get my entertainment by downloading it on BitTorrent.

    74. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I love how soccer matches and Rugby games all end with everyone in the stands hugging over there in europe. There have never been any riots after or during games.

      Well, in the case of Rugby that is what actualy happens. There is no violence associated with Rugby (off the pitch).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    75. Re:Doesn't work in the US by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      Lighten up Francis!

    76. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Europeans and Asians tend to compete between each other in good-hearted sports.

      Good-hearted sports? Sure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_hooliganism

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    77. Re:Doesn't work in the US by fiordhraoi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it was originally called soccer by the British. In the 1860s, there were a number of sports called "football," and so they acquired different names/nicknames. So for example, rugby was generally referred to as Rugby Football. During that time, what is now modern soccer/football was the result of a number of teams getting together and unifying all their varying rules, which they then called "Association Football."

      Now, the nickname of the time was to call rugby "Rugger." Because of this, "Association Football" acquired the nickname of "Assoccer." Which was rapidly replaced with "Soccer."

      As to your class statement, it's not nearly that simple. Both rugby and soccer were originally upper class sports in their organized form. Soccer caught on with the lower economic classes more so than rugby, and it was at this time, nearly 20 years later, that the formal name "Association Football" went a different direction and became simply "football" to your blue collar Brits.

      There is actually a British saying, “Soccer is a gentleman’s game played by ruffians and Rugby is a ruffian’s game played by gentlemen.” That said, your statement about it being called football because it was played on foot rather than mounted is strictly correct, it just doesn't apply to the particular evolution of the modern sport.

    78. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Cart leading the horse. They barrel into each other because they have the armor. If you want to reduce long term brain/body damage injuries to Football players you need to take away their pads.

      You don't know much about the history of American football, do you? American football first started being played in the middle to late 1800s, with the first collegiate game played in 1869. Helmets did not become mandatory in collegiate football until 1939 and 1943 for the NFL. So, the first 70 years of collegiate football was helmetless. Right around the time helmets became mandatory in college, there was an average of 18.6 deaths per year (this number uses data from 1931-1970). People were literally dying on the field, and yet the sport continued to grow in popularity. And those college athletes were not stupid people; most of the first schools to take up football were Ivy League schools. The first recorded use of a helmet was actually in the 1893 Army-Navy game, where a midshipman had a helmet made by a local shoemaker because he was warned he could die if he took another kick to the head.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    79. Re:Doesn't work in the US by catchblue22 · · Score: 2

      As for American football versus rugby, I find rugby more impressive, since all the players have to be able to run and pass. You don't get 450 lb rugby players because they would be useless, coughing up a lung as the play surges ahead of them down the field. And of course there's the lack of padding in rugby, so that the players have to take the full impact of hits.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    80. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Excellent points. Many times, with someone older and broken, I don't really want to repair it myself; I have other things to do with my time (like repair something else that I have more interest in, or build something new, etc.). But if someone else wants to save it from the landfill and repair it and use it, more power to them.

      It's really too bad that Ebay has gotten so bad, however; their fees are atrocious. It used to be a lot better for this type of thing, but it's still usable. For larger items though, Craigslist is the way to go since it's free and larger items are easier to trade locally.

      And you're absolutely right about neighbors. I have zero in common with any of mine, and I think many people are the same way these days. Why limit yourself to the people in your small community or neighborhood, when you can exchange broken items with a few hundred million people in your country, and many more around the world?

    81. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Mod up. These is an excellent description of modern American society. (I'm an American BTW)

    82. Re:Doesn't work in the US by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      Football mixed in with demolition derby? That would be AWESOME!

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    83. Re:Doesn't work in the US by VON-MAN · · Score: 1

      "But I live in the Netherlands"
      yeah, ditto

      But you're just echoing what your granny is saying, and she's just echoing what she's heard on tv.
      Seriously, 30 years worth of individualizing at an alarming rate? That's stupid.

    84. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      American culture is dominated by extroverts who do all their socializing at work, or after work at a bar, and then spend the rest of their free time driving 1-2 hours to and from work (1-2 hours each way) to go home to their spouse and kids that they never spend any time with because they're "too busy".

    85. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The bars and nightclubs are full of the kind of people who would NEVER have any interest in repairing anything, or doing anything with their hands. As for crappy chain restaurants like D&B, I've never seen people in those places meet up with others there whom they don't already know. Americans do go to restaurants, but it's only with people they already know. When they go to bars and nightclubs, it's either so they can "hook up" and find someone for a one-night stand, or so they can get drunk and try to avoid getting busted for DUI on the way home.

    86. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Light rail and other public transit is utterly unworkable in a place where everyone has a largish house and land around it (i.e., subdivisions). People have been moving out of cities and into suburbs since the 50s, and it isn't because of "lobbying" by the auto industry, it's because of various social factors. The availability of the automobile was an integral part of it, since it made it possible, but that's just like how the invention of air conditioning made it feasible for lots of people to live in Phoenix and Las Vegas; it's not like the A/C makers went around bribing people into moving to those cities. Similarly, the auto industry didn't push anyone to move to the suburbs, they just made a product available that enabled the trend, and people took advantage of it so they could escape the city downtowns where they no longer wanted to live.

    87. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I live in a suburbs, and have for some time (ever since I left college really), and I wish my house was set much farther apart from my neighbors'. Why would I want to listen to dogs barking at all hours? Or listen to all kinds of other noise and commotion, or see cops putting police tape around my neighbors' house (a few months ago)? This is what having neighbors in this country gets you: a bunch of rude, inconsiderate people whose habits will make your life miserable. That's why everyone wants to be as far away from them as possible, and why everyone keeps trying to move "up" into the most expensive houses and subdivisions (gated preferably) they can possibly afford, as we saw in the real estate boom recently: richer neighbors means less riff-raff and fewer problems and less noise.

      In places like Netherlands, they probably don't have this urge, because all their neighbors are probably well-mannered, civilized people without a lot of fuck-ups. If all my neighbors were like me, I'd want to live closer to them too. I can only dream of having neighbors that like to tinker with things and don't let their pit bulls run loose all the time.

    88. Re:Doesn't work in the US by whatthef*ck · · Score: 1

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people. The same is true for Asians and Australians too. And the American people introvert culture isn't a new thing that came with computers - they did this before geeks too. Sitting in front of TV watching mindless shows and eating TV dinners, alone.

      Typical "Europe good, U.S. bad!" bullshit you find on Slashdot.

    89. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You find it alarming, but I kinda like it. It's extremely liberating to longer feel compelled to go out there and try to tolerate my brain dead* compatriots. I spend my time with a handful of people I like and the other 16 point whatever million can jump in the IJsselmeer for all I care.
      ________
      *Brain dead? Really? For all intents and purposes yes. When it comes to politics people just repeat the propaganda of their favourite party like tape recorders. Most people have no interesting hobbies, are completely uncultured, interested exclusively in beer, food and the opposite sex (in order of priority).
      I suspect it's no different across our borders though; we're living in a world of robots and always have been. The only difference is that now we can escape them, at least we aren't at work.

    90. Re:Doesn't work in the US by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the lengthy post on etymology. While I have no idea whether or not it's true, I don't care, because it was still interesting. :)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    91. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Kartu · · Score: 1

      ebay.nl sigh. Exactly how is it "better", eh? Not meeting new people.Not helping anyone. Paying atrocious fees to ebay + paypal. Getting scammed.

    92. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Parent post definitely deserves more than 1 rating.

    93. Re:Doesn't work in the US by jbgeek · · Score: 1

      LOL. Generalize much? Maybe this is your experience, but from my experience Americans hang out with each other as much as any other culture. I know it can be ... er ... trendy (?) to bash Americans and American culture (even in many American circles), but if you're going to do it, at least pick something that's true.

    94. Re:Doesn't work in the US by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Well, in the US he would have been lynched and shot too.

      Bullshit. If you look at our football and basketball teams they are almost nothing but blacks, and none of them are lyched or shot in stadiums, even in southern ones. They aren't called names like "nigger" either. That only happens over in Europe during soccer matches..... again search youtube for "soccer" and "racism" and watch the digusting display for yourself.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    95. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And get all the fun neurological conditions later in life because of the repeated knocks, concussions etc...

    96. Re:Doesn't work in the US by rve · · Score: 1

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people.

      It's clear that you've never met any Dutch people, or maybe just one extremely atypical outlier and based your opinion of Dutch people on that.

      Sit at a cafe? Eat at a restaurant? Have a fine wine? Socialize with people? American culture does a lot more of that than Dutch culture. In fact, I get the impression that the Dutch are among the least interested in those sort of thing in the developed world, and Americans among the most.

      A more likely explanation of the difference is that the Dutch tend to be thrifty, bordering on cheap.

    97. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great! For you...some of don't actually enjoying spending our off hours doing the repair work.

      My time IS valuable...and after working 40-50 hours per week, the remainder is even MORE valuable than what my employer pays me for what he/she has used. Time is a finite resource that is absolutely exhaustable. When supply is short, the price goes up.

      That being said, I usually will choose to spend time fixing when the cost analysis works out in that favor. IE: I may decide to put brakes on my car on my own...but generally only if I can do so by saving some money/time in the process. I understand how brakes work. Changing them is not going to enlighten me in any appreciable way.

    98. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      ad nauseum

      Should Latin use "yes" or Latin use "no".

      You Latin use "retarded".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    99. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      you need to go back to school and learn you some history.

      History, i.e. they aren't doing it right now.

      P.S. Perhaps you should "learn you" some grammer?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    100. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who's played both, you're 100% correct.

    101. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I was watching a variant of that (with a bit of medieval tourney thrown in) yesterday.

      The official name for it is "babysitting".

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    102. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Helmets did not become mandatory in collegiate football until 1939 and 1943 for the NFL.

      Hmm. That was kind of just after Gerald Ford was playing, right?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    103. Re:Doesn't work in the US by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Let them fail. and I hope Greece says "FUCK YOU" to the banks and does a hard default. It would be the best thing in the world for them to wipe out all the debt.

      Nobody pointed a gun at them and forced them to borrow it.

      And Greece's creditors aren't all top-hat wearing capitalists with waxed mustaches. There's things like pension funds & insurance companies investing money that ultimately belongs to ordinary members of the public.

      I'd have thought a captain of industry like you would understand that. Or was that last week?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. I'd love something like that. by Tyr07 · · Score: 2

    I'm more than happy to do pc repairs and exchange services with friends, right now one friend helps with mechanical issues with my car and I take care of their computers.

    It's a great idea.

    1. Re:I'd love something like that. by germany-runt · · Score: 1

      I also use the idea of exchanging services and use it whenever possible. I have had some amazing body work done to my cars just for fixing some simple issues on a few computers.

    2. Re:I'd love something like that. by Jiro · · Score: 2

      Exchanging services is barter, which is subject to taxes. Did you pay your taxes?

    3. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost me at "body work"...

    4. Re:I'd love something like that. by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exchanging services is barter, which is subject to taxes. Did you pay your taxes?

      Only idiots would do that.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    5. Re:I'd love something like that. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      How do you tax something without a value?

      Sure, he pays his sales tax! 8% of 0 is still 0.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:I'd love something like that. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While I don't exchange services for automotive work (I do my own) I still help out my next door neighbor with some of his yard work (currently putting in a good retaining wall) and in exchange I get access to his phenomenal collection of tools. I have a lot, but things like spring compressors, professional scan tools (much more functionality than even a high end OBDII reader), gear pullers, compression tester, etc that I don't use very often but are essential for some repairs. I also like the things that people put out just after trash day with free signs on them that if they are still around the next trash day get hauled off. That is how I got my mower, snow blower, trimmer, and compressor. None of them worked when I found them but only required relatively minor fixes. The most complicated one was the snow blower as the carb needed a really good cleaning, new fuel hoses, the engine needed all new gaskets, and a new kill switch. The snow blower was $18 in parts to get working and was by far the most expensive. The mower and trimmer needed a carb cleaning, fuel hoses replaced, and new spark plugs. The compressor had a bad switch.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:I'd love something like that. by germany-runt · · Score: 1

      What is this "tax" thing you speak of?! No cash exchanged so 6% (my state tax) of nothing is still nothing!

    8. Re:I'd love something like that. by GunSheep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At this point friends and family are the only PC's I work on. They at least understand the concept of returning the favor in some way/shape/form. I stopped doing that for anyone else.

    9. Re:I'd love something like that. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Did you really have to come in and say the exact same thing that I just did?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be no cash price, but there is value.
      If there's no value, why are you doing it?
      Oh, you could say that there is no monetary value, just the social value.
      If that's the case why are you fixing things or doing services instead of just hanging around like friends?
      Oh yeah, that's right. Because the services do have value.
      So technically, yes, that's a taxable transaction.
      Now, I doubt you'll need to look over your shoulders for them "revenooers" coming to arrest you for non-payment any more than you have your state tax office coming to you for use taxes on the purchases you made from Amazon.
      But still, it is barter and it is subject to taxes.

    11. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do this when we can at my PC repair shop too

    12. Re:I'd love something like that. by similar_name · · Score: 2

      I know he mentioned sales tax but at least for income tax you are supposed to pay tax on the fair market value. But yeah, who in there right mind would do that. Bartering has value, it's just that a currency representing that value was not exchanged. Currency doesn't have value, it just represents it.

    13. Re:I'd love something like that. by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      How are you supposed to assign a fair cash value to it? Is the government then going to give you tax credits and rebates and subsidies based on it? For example, fix a few computers via barter, and claim not just deductions for expenses, but also subsidies for creating a new hi-tech job (subsidies that in some places are larger than all the taxes combined)?

      Or help someone with their gardening in exchange for that computer fixing and claim farm credits to offset the tax burden? And cheaper fuel for "being a farmer"?

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    14. Re:I'd love something like that. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They exist. Just because something isn't the 'norm' over here doesn't mean it doesn't exist. (And I want to know what % of Dutch use these services).

      Lexington, KY has the BrokeSpoke. A not for profit bike repair shop. You can rent bench time, volunteer or pay an annual fee. You get access to all their tools and knowledge. Craigslist has become a boon for people looking to sell stuff second hand. My entire apartment is furnished with second hand stuff. Be it my surplus projector and printer or my good will 5.1 surround sound system (with real floor speakers).

      I have jeans that I've had for 10 years that I've had to repair at least twice. They fit perfect and often just have minor problems. My dad's riding lawn mower I've gone through and replaced about every bolt on it. I was shocked to see that the manufacturer actually provided full diagrams with part numbers. I found my local mower shop and ordered some odd parts and had it back together in no time.

    15. Re:I'd love something like that. by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I'm more than happy to do pc repairs and exchange services with friends, right now one friend helps with mechanical issues with my car and I take care of their computers.

      It seems to me that the Supremes once ruled that that sort of thing might be a violation of Interstate Commerce laws.

      Also, the IRS tends to have a dim view of that sort of thing, since it smacks of tax avoidance.

      And no, I'm not serious. Quite. The "barter economy" really is something that annoys the crap out of the IRS.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    16. Re:I'd love something like that. by tqk · · Score: 1

      Now, I doubt you'll need to look over your shoulders for them "revenooers" coming to arrest you for non-payment any more than you have your state tax office coming to you for use taxes on the purchases you made from Amazon.

      Hey, they appear willing to fall for that joke where Steve Jobs' salary was a buck a year.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    17. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the Netherlands.

    18. Re:I'd love something like that. by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      There are so many ways to give the IRS a hard time going after that stuff that it's cheaper to let it slip.

    19. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be no cash price, but there is value.
      If there's no value, why are you doing it?

      'Cause I'm a nice guy who likes helping people, then the nice person I helped helps me with something because they too are nice.

      Oh, you could say that there is no monetary value, just the social value.
      If that's the case why are you fixing things or doing services instead of just hanging around like friends?

      Some people like hanging out, but I enjoy fixing things.

      Oh yeah, that's right. Because the services do have value.
      So technically, yes, that's a taxable transaction.

      So, because something has value that means it has to be taxed, so what if I'm a taxi driver by profession, do I have to pay tax when I drive somewhere, that has value to me but I shouldn't pay tax on it, maybe you'll say "that's fine because you are doing it for yourself and not someone else", but then what if I drive my family somewhere, do I pay tax on that? So then what if it was a friend?

    20. Re:I'd love something like that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he did. He went to the local tax office and removed the case from one of their computers. Unfortunately the tax rate is too low to cover putting it back again.

    21. Re:I'd love something like that. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If you live in Germany as your username suggests, you may not be aware of this, but here in the "land of the free" called USA, you're legally obligated to pay taxes on all "income" to the IRS (federal government tax agency). "Income" doesn't only mean money, it means everything that has value that you gain during the year. The tax forms even specifically mention bartered goods and services. For these, you're supposed to determine what the "fair market value" of that good or service is, and add that to your income for the year. No, you don't get to subtract the value of the item you traded (e.g. your computer work you did in exchange), since that's not income; you can only subtract that if you're a business as it'd be a business deduction, and only if it relates directly to your business.

      Now of course, anyone who actually keeps track of these barter exchanges and pays taxes on them is an idiot (or maybe "tool" is a better word).

    22. Re:I'd love something like that. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You don't get to claim deductions for expenses or the work you did in exchange, because you're not a business, this is (presumably) for personal use only. So you are legally required to figure the fair market value of the good or service that your neighbor is giving you in barter, and add that to the income you report on your 1040 form.

      So if you do some gardening in exchange for them fixing your computer, you need to figure out how much it would have cost you to have some overpriced repair shop fix the computer (which would be really expensive if, say, it involved replacing some blown capacitors as electronics technicians are very rare and expensive these days--there aren't a lot of "TV and radio repair" shops any more), and then you need to report that value as income.

      And if you really do this and send money to the IRS for it, you're a moron, just like anyone who actually pays the "use tax" on items they buy on the internet.

    23. Re:I'd love something like that. by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if you exchange a fart the IRS sees it as an opportunity to get more money.

      Greedy ****ers can stay out of my pocket as far as I'm concerned. I understand the profit concept, but exchanging labor / goods, they should back the **** off.
      I'm satisfied with all my work I do where receive money as payment that goverment gets a portion, companies pay taxes, I do to. But really?

      That's like them taxing people who car pool or if you mow your friends lawn.

    24. Re:I'd love something like that. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Traditionally, such barters are paid off in friendly waves. The IRS gets 20% of the friendly wave by tucking all but the middle finger under the thumb and showing the back of the hand.

  3. Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by vawwyakr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We throw away perfectly working pieces of tech. Thing accumulate around the house and just become clutter to be picked up and tossed during a spring cleaning. The problem is that newer tech makes it so that almost no one even wants old laptops and such. Then there is the risk that there is something person stuck somewhere inside and you have to spend extra effort clearing it completely to be safe if you want to give it away. I have an old laptop sitting around that I have run some clean up tools on and I'm still not quite ready to put it up on Freecycle. We really need better recycling programs for old Phones, batteries, etc. People are going to just want something new when the new thing is 100x better than the old thing even if the old thing still works.

    1. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by GNious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a simple solution: Give it away.

      I've got a pile of tech-stuff that I no longer need, but instead of throwing it out, I'll give to anyone who wants/needs it.
      (was surprised to find someone who had never had a DVD player - well, she does now!)

    2. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I generally keep repairing the older stuff as it's sturdier, but I find there comes a point with many electronic or electrical items where the power consumption is far higher that newer models, and at that point I will break down and replace it. Part of my reasoning for repairing things is that it's cost effective, and sometimes I take things a little far. I re-sharpen disposable utility knife blades.

    3. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by operagost · · Score: 1

      No one wants old CRTs or desktop computers. No one... not even thrifty stores, because they can't sell them, and sometimes the PCs have pirated software, viruses, or nasty images or movies on them. They have to recycled to reclaim the metals.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Even the metals aren't worth much. PCBs aren't made with gold any more.

    5. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by GNious · · Score: 1

      I concede that if everyone around you have PCs and flatscreens, then yes, no-one wants them.

      Some schools might take them, some charities .. friends/family/acquaintances in other countries ... I know people whose yearly income equals my quarterly income, and they'd love a free computer, even if it is Pentium-3 or similar.

    6. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "No one wants old CRTs or desktop computers."

      I routinely give and swap both of those off to people who need them.

      I wipe and reload the power fluctations well and they aren't nearly as delicate as LCDs. CRTs were a mature technology.

      "They have to recycled to reclaim the metals."

      That's easy now, too. My scrapper buddies recover the copper from bad CRTs and the rest goes into vehicles headed for the shredder.(Automobile recycling is already set up to handle scrap streams full of glass, lead, and plastic and has been for decades.)

      Steel from PC cases goes in the steel pile.

      Boards and CPUs can be sold for scrap on Ebay. Check it out sometime. People pay a fair amount for CPUs, RAM, and boards we used to throw away, so if you want to recycle that's one way to get a few bucks back. If I were in IT and could arrange to collect a corporate electronic "waste stream" I would be on it like sweat on a fat girl.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    7. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "I wipe and reload the power fluctations well and they aren't nearly as delicate as LCDs. CRTs were a mature technology."

      OOPs, damn touchpad!

      I wipe and reload the PCs in the evenings.

      CRTs tolerate power fluctations well and they aren't nearly as delicate as LCDs. CRTs were a mature technology."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even the metals aren't worth much. PCBs aren't made with gold any more.

      It's actually cheaper to mine recycled electronics for minerals than dig it out of the ground - the amount of stuff you have to sift through is far less, so there's value there.

      It's not just gold - but copper, tantalum, aluminum, etc. All valuable metals and all far cheaper to extract from ground up electronics than digging it out.

    9. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      I kind of liked your first way of saying it more...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    10. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My old Nokia N810 has turned into a rather versatile and effective alarm clock.

    11. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      That's spelled aluminium on this side of the pond you insensitive claude ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    12. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by green1 · · Score: 1

      As much as I'd love to believe you, economics tells me otherwise. Companies want money from you to take your electronics for recycling. Around here it's done in the form of a government levy paid on new electronics purchases to fund the recycling of the old ones. Anything that doesn't have a levy on it, is almost impossible to get rid of for recycling without paying money.
      If it truly were cheaper to mine the materials from the used electronics than from the ground, they'd take them for free (or even pay me for them).

    13. Re:Doesn't even need to have anything wrong at all by Gaffod · · Score: 1

      >I have an old laptop sitting around that I have run some clean up tools on and I'm still not quite ready to put it up on Freecycle.

      I don't understand this. Just run DBAN or some other safe-erase program. Are you afraid of magic forensics which can recover overwritten data?

  4. 1st world problem.... by singhulariti · · Score: 1

    "Everyone in the modern world..."

    NOT everyone, it's a "1st world" problem, the "consuming" economy problem. SELL MORE.

  5. Quality by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Things are generally made extremely cheaply these days, and are not designed for repair, so it does make things a bit more difficult than it used to be. In many cases there are tear-down videos and instructions for things available on the internet, so I think this balances out nicely. It's a great chance to learn how things work and teach other as well. I'd really like to see this done in North America, perhaps as a school fund-raising project or something.

    1. Re:Quality by Bigby · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't forget that you might actually get arrested for repairing something.

    2. Re:Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ?!
      Citation needed, please.

    3. Re:Quality by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Agree on the quality thing but there is still a lot of quality stuff made it is just 3-10x as much as the cheap crap. Tools are where I have had the most experience with this. I will break tools, even the "best ones" like snap-on, because I don't see a problem with putting an 8' steel pipe on the end of a wrench to break a bolt free. The difference is that cheap wrenches and sockets will break when I am just using wrench or ratchet without the pipe, also when good tools fail they don't shatter like the cheap ones do. The good tools also come with a lifetime warranty that doesn't exclude extreme usage while the cheap ones good luck getting a replacement since the company has gone under or changed names even if they have a lifetime warranty. My other big beef is with knife makers it use to be that you could get a really good tool steel pocket knife for $20-$40 now you can still find knives in that price range but they are cheap stainless steel which is either too brittle to not break or too soft to effectively hold an edge. They don't rust but then if you actually took care of your stuff that shouldn't be a problem to begin with.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Quality by yurtinus · · Score: 0

      How this got modded "informative" and the response got modded "troll" absolutely baffles me. There may be instances where repairs to particular devices are disallowed for safety reasons (or regulations per some ridiculous gov't incentives like Cash for Clunkers), but "arrested for repairing something" is one of the more ludicrous things I've heard all month. Particularly when we're in a discussion about *consumer goods*

      If I'm wrong, I'd love to see some examples.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    5. Re:Quality by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      You should really stop breaking your neighbor's wrenches!!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    6. Re:Quality by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I don't need to borrow his wrenches, I have my own expensive ones that I break. The really expensive ones I broke were when I worked at U-Haul when trying to break free rusted on hitch balls. Granted there we would do the pipe over the wrench trick as well which is how we would brake the snap-on sockets or wrench.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  6. What happened to basic conditioning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat after me: Ending is better than mending. The more stitches, the less riches.

  7. I tried it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brought in a broken slashdot. Nobody would fix it :(

  8. I know a broken mobile company from Finland by phonewebcam · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Americans have had a go but just made things worse. Any chance some of this Dutch magic will help?

    1. Re:I know a broken mobile company from Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you work for them, Dutch Magic is banned and there's a screening for Dutch Magic when you join, you're also screened by the secret police("protection police") for background, so if you're a known Dutch Magician it lessens your chances greatly. You'll know in advance when the Dutch Magic screening is going to be done for you so it's not that much of a problem actually - too bad all company parties are strictly "Booze Only Please(We're Finnish)" as will all your social life with company acquaintances.

      Now, think long and hard how they ended up where they are after years of everyone just keeping to their own turf due to a policy of only hiring pussies and only keeping the pussies - no leadership, no balls, no imagination to even fix the obvious flaws from products and next years products being always under a strong somebody others problem field.

    2. Re:I know a broken mobile company from Finland by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

      The largest and best repairs often make things look worse at first.

      I just had my front step replaced. It went from looking like a crumbly front step to looking like a pile of rubble.
      Now it looks like a really nice front step.

      Your Finnish mobile company was probably just really messed up, and the first steps of the repair involve demolishing the biggest problems.

    3. Re:I know a broken mobile company from Finland by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for a Finnish mobile telco, but I can say this: my experience as a sysadmin is that the above holds true almost 100%. You can't make an omelet without a couple broken eggs (and what good are eggs to anyone, anyway?).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  9. What an awful looking site by Notlupus · · Score: 1

    I refuse to browse it for any longer than a second. But I am also man enough to admit I bring my broken clothes to a turkish tailor who fixes them perfectly, I mean you can see the seams and patches, but isn't that what you youngsters are paying extra for anyway? Pre-torn pants?

  10. Ending is Better Than Mending by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 0

    Those silly Dutch. Don't they know that the more stitches, the less riches?
    No wonder everyone thinks they're weird.

  11. Makerspace as Repair Cafe? by Guppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be a great idea for a Makerspace trying to attract more people/funding.

    You've already got tools and a core of tinkerers that know how to fix stuff -- if you could draw in a broader audience from the community, you could make some extra money selling them drinks and munchies, and possibly convert some people to the hobby.

    1. Re:Makerspace as Repair Cafe? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      I've got a vision for something similar for motorcycling. Lots of people travel to my home state to ride. Since it's about 2000 miles through Canada to get to Alaska from pretty much anywhere else in the U.S., and since many of the roads in NW Canada or Alaska are kind of tough on tires, many of those people who arrive here need new tires when they arrive, and/or need to replace tires before they leave. Additionally, lots of people like to add gadgets and accessories to their bikes (known as "farkling" though I quite honestly hate that word for some reason). None of that stuff is difficult to do; I've changed my own tires, added additional storage, installed crashbars and a skidplate, upgraded the lighting and other electrical gadgets, for example (warning -- those are all shameless plugs to my blog ;)

      However, a lot of people are nervous about hacking on their bikes, especially at first. I wasn't too thrilled the first time I had to make a non-reversible mod to my bike (cutting turn signal wires and drilling holes to route the wires somewhere else so I could install the side carrier racks), nor when I had to cut off the grips to install the heated grips (I found out later that I could have used compressed air to remove them without cutting, sigh). A little hand-holding and wisdom from those who have "already been there and done that" can go a long way in such cases, as well as to provide advice on better ways of doing things (why do I need to remove the brake calipers to pull my front wheel?!?! Oh...the rim is too wide to fit between the calipers while they are still installed...)

      If that isn't a compelling enough reason, there are a lot of tools that are too expensive for a single user -- for example, tire balancing equipment, tire stands, engine cranes, etc. Having a collective that splits the cost of $$$ equipment and a garage or warehouse for people to share can make these tools available to the average home mechanic.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    2. Re:Makerspace as Repair Cafe? by plover · · Score: 2

      I have a buddy I used to go riding through the Black Hills with back in the 1980s. He had a Gold Wing that he added every chrome-plated light fixture to that he could find on the aftermarket. It had these chromed spikey posts in the back, with glowing red jeweled tips, lights running along the bags top and bottom, around the crash bars, on the fenders, everywhere. I'm not sure what look he was going for, but we all gave him sh!t for it.

      Anyway, we were driving along, and he honked his horn for some reason, and his bike slowed down! So we pulled over to the side of the road to take a look at it, and his battery was completely flat - honking the horn drew enough extra current that it was screwing up the electrical system to the point where it impacted ignition. And of course there was nowhere near enough current to turn the crank over. Turns out his alternator had nowhere near the capacity required to run all the stupid lights AND charge the battery. He disconnected all his pretty lights, and we had to push-start it so we could continue our journey.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Makerspace as Repair Cafe? by element-o.p. · · Score: 2

      That's why I swapped out the lamps in my driving lights and my tail lights with LEDs -- from ~120 watts to ~20 watts, IIRC. As for why your buddy wanted his bike lit up like the Vegas strip, I'd assume he wanted to make sure he was seen. I ride as if every cager out there is trying to kill me (and from time to time, it certainly seems that way), but knowing that I'm not always at 100%, I try to stack the odds in my favor by being as conspicuous as possible :) Still...sounds like your friend may have overdone it a bit, lol.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Makerspace as Repair Cafe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like this idea! Would be a patron every day

  12. LAN to online-only by naroom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It was done because it offers you the ability to play with people in either scenario, no matter how far away they were.

    No. Local play was replaced by internet play because it was seen as more profitable by the games industry to enforce DRM online.
    If it were truly about adding features, LAN / local play would still be enabled on Starcraft 2, Diablo 3, and Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 games.

    1. Re:LAN to online-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least LAN works in Minecraft.

    2. Re:LAN to online-only by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Internet gaming arose in spite of the Gaming industry, who latter got behind it. DRM was after that.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yep. I'm sure.

      Doom had dial-out support because it was more profitable. You're right. You win the prize. ... or not!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    4. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's OK, his user ID betrays his age. I don't think he was BORN when we first started getting internet gameplay.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      This shouldn't be modded up. This is only correct if you ignore anything before, say, 2004. We've had internet gameplay since DOOM. DRM wasn't even a wet dream yet.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:LAN to online-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Doom's dial-out support replace LAN play?
      He's talking about more recent games, since removing LAN play (or needing to be online to use it) is somewhat recent.

    7. Re:LAN to online-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Local play was replaced by internet play because it was seen as more profitable by the games industry to enforce DRM online

      Subtle difference but local play wasn't replaced by internet play. They existed side by side for quite a while. Local play and the ability to setup your own server on the internet were dropped for DRM reasons relatively recently. Right around the time I stopped playing a lot of online multi-player games. I don't think consoles are a good example because they never really had LAN games or the ability to use your own server.

      Of course if anybody really cared they'd stop supporting those companies and encouraging them. But nobody really does. Too bad 20 years from now no one will get to experience the nostalgia of playing the games of their youth. By then it won't be profitable to keep the servers running. Of course you'll still be able to play things like Quake, Tribes, Unreal, Soldier of Fortune and so on since you can setup your own server for those and play on a LAN or the internet.

    8. Re:LAN to online-only by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      Actually GGP is right... Ask Blizzard why there is no LAN play in SC2... hum..... BTW, check out my UID (not that it means anything)....

    9. Re:LAN to online-only by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Local play was replaced by internet play because it was seen as more profitable by the games industry to enforce DRM online.

      -1 Not insightful.

      Internet (or direct-dial) gaming with long-distance players has existed since the 80s. I used to play an 80s game called Populous with people I met through the BBS or school. Since we couldn't be in the same house, we competed over the network..... long before the term DRM existed.

      As for older games, the central servers were dropped because of lack of interest. Nobody wants to play old games when newer games w/ better graphics have arrived on the scene. It's just like how old consoles (example: PS1) gradually drop from $600 to $25 in the bargain bin, as people lose interest in old graphics.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    10. Re:LAN to online-only by tqk · · Score: 1

      This is only correct if you ignore anything before, say, 2004. We've had internet gameplay since DOOM.

      You kids. :-)

      dict mud ... Historically, MUDs (and their more recent progeny with names of MU-form) derive from a hack by Richard Bartle and Roy Trubshaw on the University of Essex's DEC-10 in the early 1980s

      There's probably evidence for even more historic stuff out there. ASCII based Go gaming goes *way* back.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What I said didn't exclude there being anything prior. I was just establishing the level of bullshit the original poster was at :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:LAN to online-only by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't remember DOOM having internet gameplay, though I remember that being added on later with the open-source engines. DOOM had network gameplay, over a LAN, I believe using IPX for Novell networks. I used to play it in a university lab on a Novell network.

    13. Re:LAN to online-only by guises · · Score: 1

      He said replaced, he didn't say this is the only reason why internet gaming exists. The point is that a number of prominent games have removed the ability to play in a LAN - a feature previously ubiquitous in PC gaming for anything that allowed multiplayer.

      The reason why they've done this has, I think, a little more to it than just DRM. Blizzard, for example, is trying to turn Diablo 3 into a continuous cash stream and by all appearances are likely to succeed, and they can't do that if people are free to play their game how they like. (And all the copycats will drive gaming even further into the dirt. But that's getting off topic.)

    14. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      There was a separate EXE that could be set up to dial or to listen, and would establish a dialup link. There was also facilities for Windows players of Ultimate Doom to play via IP networks.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    15. Re:LAN to online-only by tzanger · · Score: 1

      688 Attack Sub could be played over modems. I made it work in a room with a 50 foot null modem cable. :-)

    16. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Those were the days.

      I remember running a coax cable once so my stepfather and I could play some... can't remember. Some sci-fi 4x strategy game.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:LAN to online-only by tqk · · Score: 1

      I was just establishing the level of bullshit the original poster was at :)

      ACK, but I would categorize it as ignorance, not BS (I try to be charitable first :-). ARPANET started in '68, long before most current /.ers were born.

      Ignorant kids and their dick wars/hormonal imbalances ... "Get off my lawn you brats!" :-)

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    18. Re:LAN to online-only by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod the parent up and the +5 grandparent down, because the grandparent is incorrect. Network (and maybe internet) gaming started with DOOM and internet gaming really took off with Quake. When internet gaming started, there was no DRM in games because ten years earlier, gamers banished DRM by refusing to buy DRMed games. I'm afraid today's youngsters are a little less disciplined, because it's all DRM now with monthly fees for what used to be free.

      It's a pity. It used to be that anybody could run an internet game, that was part of the fun. Coproprate wolves ruin a good thing yet again.

    19. Re:LAN to online-only by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      We've had internet gameplay since DOOM. DRM wasn't even a wet dream yet.

      When DOOM came out, DRM was a cold dead corpse that had died in the mid eighties because everyone refused to buy software that had DRM. Then, like now, all DRM did was piss of paying customers while doing absolutely NOTHING to stem piracy.

      DRM is a fucking zombie, revived from the dead for the express purpose of eating your brains, and the kids these days are too fucking stupid to kill the monster yet again. "Sure, Mr Zombie, you can have my brains. Are they yummie?"

    20. Re:LAN to online-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it should be modded up. Once companies figured out profit models with online DRM, non-online play started to be killed off. Doom having internet play means nothing to his argument. He's saying modern games don't have true LAN (they access company servers first or require internet access for single player!) because the companies are greedy. This is completely true.

      If companies cared more about features, there would be an online play option that didn't touch their official servers.

        And /.'s CAPTCHA says my post is nonsense :(

    21. Re:LAN to online-only by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It is nonsense.

      What is happening now doesn't go back and change what has already happened.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    22. Re:LAN to online-only by kbx911 · · Score: 0

      dude, internet speeds flourished and it was only natural that people would go online instead of just playing LAN. People don't become sK or fnatic by just playing LAN do they? Also if i were to open a Steam Cafe i am pretty sure there will be more people playing online rather than LAN.

    23. Re:LAN to online-only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had cross country game play using graphic systems when I went to college in 1980 - and it was pretty old by then ... the Internet started in what 1950? Might have been 60, but it is over 50 years old....

      Oh, and Al Gore didn't invent it.... Unless he proposed it when he was in diapers!!!

      And those systems you talk about require a host system (server) to connect to... With no money coming in from them .... The company shut them down as they still had to pay to keep them up...

  13. Only in the West by Corson · · Score: 1

    This is a problem that only the heavily industrialized societies have. Travel, discover the world, "get out of your rut, open your mind, there is a whole universe waiting"*. (*Isaac Asimov)

    1. Re:Only in the West by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      It's not so much a "Western" thing as it is an "industrialized" thing. When you don't have the income to buy replacements, you put the effort into repairing and keeping what you have running for as long as possible.

      --
      +1 Disagree
  14. The "throwaway" culture is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real problem is with lifecycle sustainability.

    If raw material sourcing is sustainable, and disposal is as well, then there is no problem with the "throwaway" culture. The "throwaway" culture frees up repairmen to pursue more useful or enjoyable things by using machines to alleviate their burden.

    Technology is a separate issue. As technology gets better and better, why should we spend so much repairing it? The recent advances in reducing power consumption and doing more processing in hardware is a good thing. Getting rid of a several year old computer is like getting a gas guzzling junker off the road.

    The ecological aversion to the "throwaway" culture comes from a time where reuse and repair was seen as necessary to the inherent unsustainable sourcing and landfill disposal. Once those problems are addressed we must reexamine our assumptions about the value of reuse and repair.

    1. Re:The "throwaway" culture is not the problem by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the "spend so much time doing it" seems to really be the point, doing it because there's not that much more fun things to do..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:The "throwaway" culture is not the problem by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Cars produce 16x as much pollution being built as they will over an average lifetime on the road.

      The same is true for most electronics. The arguement about power savings should be becoming less of an issue as nuclear power becomes more popular, unfortunately a few "mistakes and mishaps" and a hell of a lot of marketing have made that less popular.

      Planned obsolescence should be illegal, the three r's of environmentalism are in that order for a reason: reduce, reuse, recycle. Recycle is by far the least efficient, it will be becoming more efficient when technologies like 3D printing come into popular use but until then you do more for the environment by maintaining your equipment or buying two potential used solutions than buying a single new solution.

    3. Re:The "throwaway" culture is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Where did you get that "16x" figure? I am going to have to insist on sources for that one. The worst I've seen is slightly over half of the pollution during manufacture, and about 9% of the energy consumption during manufacture. Even then, I'm somewhat concerned that those numbers are from when cars had shorter usable lifespans and lower efficiency.

      I will agree that planned obsolescence is a horrible, unconscionable thing, and that reduce and reuse are critical ways to address the problem. I'd like to see someone propose how we can properly factor the cost of safe disposal into the cost of products. But I want to talk about these things with real numbers, or we will be discredited as liars or loons.

    4. Re:The "throwaway" culture is not the problem by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, the throwaway culture IS a problem. People used to accumulate wealth. You would save and then become a family with a TV. There was little danger that as soon as next year you would become a family without a TV again. If something did go wrong, you had two chances at lot losing wealth. You could pay a repairman or learn to fix it yourself. The latter didn't require you to have much money and could lead to a better job. Now, you have one chance, buy another one.

  15. Cost by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the cost of repairing something easily fixed is higher than just getting a new one. Two examples: at one point in time certain printers were cheaper to buy again with included ink cartridges than getting separate new ink cartridges, and a pocket calculator actually cost less than the batteries that it needed when the originals ran out.

    1. Re:Cost by berashith · · Score: 1

      the cost of batteries drives me crazy. I have toys for my kids that I know I paid less for than the cost of replacing the batteries. Then the batteries I buy last only a third of the time that the originals did. I guess having children means you should instantly find a wholesale supply of watch batteries, and hope that you can use 10,000 or so during the first few years.

    2. Re:Cost by jonwil · · Score: 1

      My digital camera (entry level Canon Point & Shoot) had a failed USB port and after asking a few repair places (one hole-in-the-wall place that just did repairs and a couple of high-high-end camera shops that sold the kind of camera gear you would only buy if you were making a living from photography) and they all said it wasnt worth fixing.

      Ended up asking for (and getting) a newer better Canon P&S as an xmas present.

      On the other hand, if my smartphone phone died, I would do everything possible to get it fixed before I went for a replacement (because a suitable replacement would cost a lot of money)

    3. Re:Cost by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what Hong Kong mail order is for. Any domestic per-piece, pre-carded flat cell is going to cost a fortune.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Cost by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Try a local "Dollar" type store. Mine carries LR44s and some other type at 10/$1.00, the same cell that costs over $3.00 each at target.

      Also, never buy a device that could take AA or AAA but instead takes button cells. Eschew those button cell flashlights, if you around, you can find a good penlight that takes one AAA.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    5. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm "waiting" for my Epson Stylus C88 to either die or degrade, at which point I'm going to get a color laser MFP. From 2004 to 2007, I was a sysadmin in charge of 100+ HP LaserJets made between 1993 and 2007, and I only ever had to junk three of them for being beyond repair. I even did two fuser replacements on a 2100 and 3380, where the fusers are supposedly "only" to be replaced by HP factory authorized personnel.

      Black, $160; color, $230; black MFP, $210; color MFP, $350. At these price points, I no longer recommend any sort of inkjet printer to anyone, even for consumer use (with the glaring exception of large-format printers, which are a completely different animal). Heck, if I was going to college right now, even living in a dorm, I'd still get a laser printer of MFP.

    6. Re:Cost by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      After decades of always trying to fix broken appliances, if it seemed at all possible, I have virtually given up. Looking back I can point to few successes, in most cases the money spent on repair efforts was wasted. There are a number of reasons I can identify - with short product cycles the unavailability of parts, and extortionate cost of parts when available, the fact that many "planned obsolescence" products are in fact NOT easy to fix without access to expensive tools and skills if at all, electronics that cannot be serviced, etc.

      The last time I successfully rescued a product from the scrap heap was a recently purchased clothes washer, cost $1000, that had a circuit board goon the fritz not long after the warranty ran out - repair cost $500 for the board that cost maybe $5 to make. It beat buying a new washer, but I can't say I felt "good" about the repair experience.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    7. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, stop buying toys powered by single coin cells? There are rechargeable coin cells in a small selection of sizes, both NiMH/NiCd and Li-ion, but they're rarely a particularly suitable choice -- but almost anything powered with real batteries has a simple rechargeable option.

      There's some toys with 3xLR44 or such, and for those, there's a Lithium-ion cell (I wanna say 10180, but I'm not sure) that can frequently be adapted with a little tweaking of the battery holder -- you replace the whole stack with one cell. But ultimately, dicking around with coin cells (even if you buy them cheap -- only proles buy batteries at retail stores) is a losing game, and you chould just say no to crappy toys that need them.

    8. Re:Cost by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's because the replacement batteries are vastly overpriced. It's obvious that the manufacturer isn't taking a loss on the batteries it comes with.

  16. In the US replacement is cheaper by Ameryll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a sad fact of life that in the U.S. it is often cheaper to replace something than it is to repair it. With electronics you have the added penalty that you're often repairing something that's now slower than the replacement.

    A sign of our times

    I was babysitting a 5 year old in high school and she had this alphabet book of professions. U = upholsterer. She asked me what that was. I told her it was someone who repaired or replaced the fabric on your couch. She asked me why you didn't throw it out and get a new one. That it didn't even occur to her that someone might want to try to fix something rather than just dump it in a landfill somewhere really struck me.

    1. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by berashith · · Score: 2

      I worked with man who had grown up fairly poorly in India. He was absolutely shocked when he had a dent or hole in his garage door, that someone wouldnt come out with a welder and some scrap metal who could do a decent repair of the damage. The only fix available was to throw the entire thing away and replace it. The talent or interest just isnt there in the US.

    2. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder what they can use when Upholsterers completely out... Urologist and Union Thug is all that comes to mind.

    3. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by fl!ptop · · Score: 2

      U = upholsterer. She asked me what that was. I told her it was someone who repaired or replaced the fabric on your couch. She asked me why you didn't throw it out and get a new one.

      I recently inherited my Dad's couch, which was originally purchased in 1965 and has been reupholstered 4 times. I'll never get rid of it.

      Of course, the piece-of-crap "modern" couch my wife bought 7 years ago that I thought was the most uncomfortable thing ever was burned at last year's bonfire party.....

      --
      When you recognize love in another and realize how precious it is, everything else seems so insignificant.
    4. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Uranium miner?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Undertaker, perhaps.

    6. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by martyros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, the piece-of-crap "modern" couch my wife bought 7 years ago that I thought was the most uncomfortable thing ever was burned at last year's bonfire party.....

      ...thus contributing to "survivor bias", reinforcing the future's views that things made in the 2000's are a heck of a lot better than the things made in 2045.

      Not saying the new couch wasn't crap; just saying, you didn't see couches of that quality made in 1965 because they were all burned by 1972. :-)

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    7. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife and I have a couch and two recliners that we bought in 2008, and we learned after buying them that our cat loves their texture and has shredded all three of them in certain places. As cats have a shorter lifespan than humans, my wife has said that when our cat no longer walks the Earth, she wants to get the three pieces re-upholstered. Any good upholstered furniture (i.e., from a furniture store instead of Walmart) can typically be re-upholstered.

    8. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I just had my own garage door serviced. I'm sure you could find a repairman for your garage door if you really looked. In some places, you can find a welder just by going into the country side and paying attention.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      It's not just "survivor bias". How often can you recall ANY couch being destroyed? I tried to take apart a Basset once because we couldn't get any charity to take it away from a 2nd story apartment. The thing was old and abused and it still took a lot of dedicated effort with a hatchet to get it apart.

      I've seen and used a lot of old hand-me-down furniture. Never seen anything just fall apart until I bought something recently at a discount furniture retailer. A toddler destroyed the thing within 6 months.

      Never seen anything like that ever despite growing up in the sort of household that would likely buy the cheap crap out of necessity.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      It's a sad fact of life that in the U.S. it is often cheaper to replace something than it is to repair it. With electronics you have the added penalty that you're often repairing something that's now slower than the replacement.

      Actually, this is a happy fact -- it means that our productivity, the value of our time, has increased relative to the goods we consume. So while my grandmother used to knit together socks with holes in them, for my mother, this was no longer a sensible use of her time; this wasn't because socks were less valuable but because her time and skills were far more valuable than her mother's (of course, not due to any intrinsic difference in aptitude but rather opportunity to be educated in a technical field due to changing social mores regarding women). This strikes me as a fantastic thing -- that this repair was a waste of time because of how much more she was really capable of.

      This is related to the fact that repair is a skilled job, one has to understand the system well enough to be able to diagnose what's wrong and make a determination of whether it's worth fixing. Assembly, meanwhile, is an unskilled job that can be "thought through" once, written in an SOP, and then requires only unskilled labor. So when you lament that it's cheaper to buy a new one, you are lamenting the productivity of skilled labor -- a very bad position if you ask me. Repair is expensive because we have better use for people with technical aptitude than working on individual units!

      Finally, I want to note that this line of reasoning has no bearing on tinkering for its own sake. I still assemble and repair my own computers despite knowing for a clear fact that it makes no sense. Heck, I grow vegetables in a garden (well, used to) despite it being ridiculously inefficient. But I'm glad as fuck that my labor is so productive that I could buy a computer or vegetables for far less input than doing it myself.

    11. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The talent or interest just isnt there in the US.

      Well, first, he probably didn't look very hard. There are plenty of people who will do things like that, the best way to find them in my experience is to call you local junkyards -- if they don't have someone, they'll know someone who'd be willing to do it.

      The other issue is that our labor costs are very high. This is what really drives the throw-it-away culture here. We buy things that are made with cheap overseas labor... which is why repairing them using costly local labor is not price-competitive, usually.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by berashith · · Score: 1

      true, i worded it wrong. The talent is there, but the price to kindle the interest is higher than just replacing the entire unit.

    13. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've seen one sofa destroyed by repeated floppings of a very heavy person eventually buckling a spring, but the main cause of upholtery-ruining in my experience is pets. Cats, if given the choice between a scratching post and a satisfyingly smooth fake-leather couch, go for the latter.

    14. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is a happy fact -- it means that our productivity, the value of our time, has increased relative to the goods we consume.

      From an economic point of view, it's great.

      From an environmental point of view, we're going to run out of resources pretty damn quick at this rate, or at least get to the point where resources are so limited that they, rather than labor, become the limiting factor in our output. Fortunately, you and I will still probably be dead and buried well before we get to that point.

    15. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      I recently damaged a cover for one of the cushions that you sit on on a couch - I went back to the retailer who was still selling the couch and had it in their showroom. I asked to buy some replacement covers - they replied that replacement covers are not available! I said so if you damage a cushion then you are expected to throw the whole thing away? yes. I asked dont you think thats a real waste of the planets resources - they couldnt care less. I will never shop their again. I have to say I dont like the couch that much but when I replace it I plan on dumping it out the front of the store late at night. now I only buy from stores that can also supply replacement parts - its amazing how many that dont though.

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    16. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by Pebby · · Score: 1

      I was babysitting a 5 year old in high school

      5 years old and in high school... were you babysitting for Stephen Hawking's family?

    17. Re:In the US replacement is cheaper by arose · · Score: 1

      I've seen and used a lot of old hand-me-down furniture. Never seen anything just fall apart until I bought something recently at a discount furniture retailer.

      Did you not listen to GP at all? The furniture that did fall apart wasn't handed down because it fell apart.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  17. Mass production by Hentes · · Score: 1

    Creating a new item on an assembly line is generally cheaper than trying to repair it.

    1. Re:Mass production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it also uses more natural resources, and trashing the broken item generates waste.

    2. Re:Mass production by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      Creating a new item on an assembly line is generally cheaper than trying to repair it.

      Not exactly. If you consider the amount of energy, resources and environmental impact that goes int into producing a toaster:

      Steel parts: mine ore, haul ore, melt it (blast furnace), machining
      Plastic parts: crude oil, refining, pelletizing, melting, extrusion and molding.

      In the end, you need to package and ship everything to a warehouse, then ship it to a store or directly to a customer which takes fuel and produces more greenhouse gas. A simple repair eliminates all of this. People just don't consider the big picture because most of them can't see past the shelf in Walmart.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    3. Re:Mass production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this argument is that the surplus device was already manufactured, regardless of whether or not you needed a replacement. So, no matter what, the energy/resources/environmental impact of your small repair just adds its own [incredibly tiny] amount of cost/damage on top of that.

    4. Re:Mass production by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Well let me tell you: the bill for a repair of something like a toaster is usually higher than the cost of a new one.

      That's simply what I, the end user, the one actually trying to get myself a working toaster, have to pay for getting a working toaster after the existing toaster breaks.

      Now of course repair has less environmental impact and so; but those costs are not reflected in the amount of money that is coming out of my wallet. And, as most people, I go for the cheapest option. Having a new toaster instead of a refurbished toaster is a nice extra.

    5. Re:Mass production by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      It's not that they can't see past the shelf in Walmart; it's that the price tag on the shelf in Walmart says $15.99 and the repairman says, "$50 per hour, one hour minimum."

      I'm not saying you're wrong, mind you -- I prefer to repair than replace when possible -- but do the math. If it's going to cost three times as much to repair an item than to buy a newer, less power-hungry, more powerful device, guess which choice most people will make, most of the time?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    6. Re:Mass production by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Another thing about the steel is that it needs coating. Usually 3-4 coats of highly toxic liquids that are disposed of immediately afterwards.

    7. Re:Mass production by couchslug · · Score: 1

      If you pay retail for the repairs. The economics of repairing things yourself have worked out nicely for me and many others.

      I don't buy new furniture, and have some very nice furniture. I don't buy new vehicles, and have low operation and maintenance costs because I do all my own maintenance except alignment and machine shop work. I don't pay people to work on my home or renovate it. I don't pay anyone to work on my computers or appliances. I have fun, enjoy more granular control of my "stuff", and save stoopid money even though I buy commercial-grade tools and equipment.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    8. Re:Mass production by arose · · Score: 1

      Also, a repaired toaster is still mostly an old toaster, and as such is more likely to fail with another problem. There is a certain amount of repairs that will push the old toaster over the resource limit of making a new one from scratch. Environmental costs for repeated repairs as compared to replacing the first time include repeated trips to the repairman, the shipping of parts (often small quantities or even single pieces, compare to a container load of turnkey toasters), manufacturing of parts that may never be used, increased electricity consumption due to old/failing parts, etc. If the environmental costs of repairs exceed those of a new toaster faster than the new one fails, it is still better to buy the new one.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    9. Re:Mass production by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The problem is: how am I, an end-user, not having a degree in environmental issues or anything, to judge this?

      The solution I have set for myself: if it's cheaper, it's generally more environmentally friendly overall. This goes wrong with hidden costs (pollution caused in production or as waste is usually not charged in the price) but it's the only measure that I have, unless it's known beforehand that the more expensive product is the more environmentally friendly option. And overall it's a quite reasonable measure I think, based on the idea that all economic activity causes some environmental impact, and more activity causes more impact but also asks for more money.

      Save energy by switching of your lights: saves money (lower power bills). Saves the environment too.

      Use rechargeable batteries instead of single use: saves money overall, and is said to be more environmentally friendly (less overall pollution).

      Drive a more efficient car: ditto. Save fuel cost, save money, save the environment.

      Repair or replace? Cost is again a primary consideration. But repairs are relatively expensive as they require a lot of specialised manpower, which is really expensive. Someone has to come to your home, look at the thing, figure out what's wrong, and then fix it.

      But back to the old toaster: a toaster lives for say five years. If after five years something small breaks, and you can fix it to make it live another two extra years, that's 40% of environmental impact of making a new toaster saved (you have to buy your next one two years later than you otherwise would), at a cost of maybe 10% extra total impact to do the repair. But it's a bit of a gamble - how much investment in repair is worth the longer lifespan? How much are you going to get out of it? But well if repairs are cheap, why not just try that first.

    10. Re:Mass production by arose · · Score: 1

      Even a cheap repair can turn out costly environmentally. As you said, it's tough to pick the right one as an end user. Sometimes it's easy, e.g. resoling otherwise intact leather shoes. Sometimes it's a crapshot, e.g. has the toaster reached EOL and this just happened to be the first thing to go?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    11. Re:Mass production by Hentes · · Score: 1

      If you do it yourself, you pay for it with your time. Your examples are good, those are things that were designed for longterm use, thus repairing them is a possibility. But most stuff isn't like that.

    12. Re:Mass production by sjames · · Score: 1

      Only because the item was designed to be irreparable or at the very least not designed to be repairable.

  18. Nothing new by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

    The dutch are insanely thrifty people. Americans and wasteful people in general have a lot to learn from them

    No, I'm not dutch.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dutch abroad are at least as ill-behaved and wasteful as any German tourist

    2. Re:Nothing new by tqk · · Score: 1

      The dutch are insanely thrifty people.

      I thought that was the Scots.

      Yes, I am a Scot. I don't consider thriftiness a character flaw. I make things go until they explode via molecular failure. No apologies. :-)

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
  19. Something Similar in Germany by ryzvonusef · · Score: 3, Informative

    I remember a slashdotter telling about something similar in germany, where you can come into a shop where the rent you the tools, and you fix the stuff there and then. It also acted as an edutainment, with people coming in to watch and learn.

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    1. Re:Something Similar in Germany by PPH · · Score: 2

      Its been done here in the USA as well. Tom and Ray Magliozzi, hosts of the Car Talk radio show on NPR had (have?) a do-it-yourself garage in Cambridge, Mass. that rents workspace and tools to people who fix their own cars.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Something Similar in Germany by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That's great and all. If you're within a 10 mile bubble around that specific location, sure.

      The US is pretty damn big.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:Something Similar in Germany by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's nice, but the thing I remember was less cars and more like take some spare wood, borrow a drill there, screw the pieces together and voila, a cranky stool.

      It was about making and repairing "hardware" rather than electric, IIRC.

      If only remember the name of the darn shop, I could google it up.

      BTW, you Americans just love tinkering with your cars, don't you? :P Like every tv show I see, there is at least one guy with a 60's or 70's car constantly repairing it, why not just sell the damn thing and buy something made this millennium?

      (Though I got to admit, those old cars are damn sweet sight, but I, for one, couldn't be bother with the constant repairs, they are too harsh a mistress to please :p)

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    4. Re:Something Similar in Germany by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Most people don't like to tinker with their cars and those that do with their own collector cars do so mostly for the enjoyment of doing it. For example I have a 1968 MG Midget that I am doing a full restoration on. I am not doing to to make money, as I will probably come out in the hole by a lot, but because I like cars especially small ones. Also old cars are much simpler to tinker with than a modern one where everything is computer controlled and there is a lot that one can do with them. With mine I want to see how much power one of those little 4 cylinder A-series engines can actually produce. Couple that to a very light, short wheel base, rear wheel drive vehicle with some modern components (5 speed manual transmission, posi rear end, coil over suspension) and hopefully I will have a car that will make you shit your pants when riding in it.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Something Similar in Germany by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Depends on the car and your goals for it. Most "car tinkerers" have a project car that is basically a hobby of theirs - with a separate (modern and reliable) daily driver. Of course, a significant number of the "car tinkerers" never actually finish repairing their car and end up selling the basket case to the next tinkerer anyhow...

      All that said, with the proper work up-front, the old cars can still be plenty reliable. "Constantly repairing" means you did it wrong the first time!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    6. Re:Something Similar in Germany by tqk · · Score: 1

      I remember a slashdotter telling about something similar in germany, where you can come into a shop where [they] rent you the tools, and you fix the stuff there and then. It also acted as an edutainment, with people coming in to watch and learn.

      I'd happily pay admission to get into that sort of venue. That'd be fascinating entertainment for me.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Something Similar in Germany by tqk · · Score: 1

      OT, sorry. Please tell me how to email you personally? I have questions I'd like to bounce off you and hear your opinion (wrt your specialty, politics, philosophy, ...). Non-spam & etc., honest.

      Carry on. Whenever; no hurry. Thanks.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    8. Re:Something Similar in Germany by tqk · · Score: 1

      The US is pretty damn big.

      That's the second time in this thread I've read a boast like that from you guys. Do you even realize how sparsely populated Wyoming or Idaho or Oregon are? I love all three of them for being so damned empty! I've heard Nevada and Utah's even worse (better?). New York, Boston, Seattle, LA, and Washington may be full, but there's a lot of "uninhabitable" places in the US where mortals don't bother to try to settle. Even Minnesota's looking crowded to me these days.

      The Nederlanders make use of every damned scrap of their territory, to the point of stealing some of it from an ocean. The US just ignores *lots* of its territory.

      Don't get me started on Alaska.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:Something Similar in Germany by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Population density doesn't matter. I'm talking strictly size.

      If you have to travel 100 miles to get something repaired, it might not be worth it. What does it matter if you actually see anyone while you traverse it?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Something Similar in Germany by tqk · · Score: 1

      If you have to travel 100 miles to get something repaired, it might not be worth it.

      Agreed.

      What does it matter if you actually see anyone while you traverse it?

      You might want to reconsider that one. I like solitude, but interesting people are often a better alternative. It's why we're here, after all.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:Something Similar in Germany by PPH · · Score: 1

      BTW, you Americans just love tinkering with your cars, don't you? :P Like every tv show I see, there is at least one guy with a 60's or 70's car constantly repairing it, why not just sell the damn thing and buy something made this millennium?

      Because that's what the subject of this article is about. Why trade it in if you can fix it?

      And most of the 60's and 70's cars that are maintained this way are in some ways collectible. Sure, they may lack some of the modern amenities. But that's what makes them so special.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    12. Re:Something Similar in Germany by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Um, my point was that it's fine that one city has this. That might work in a tiny country. But it's not going to work when there are hundreds of miles between.

      Then you mentioned that population density thing as if you were reacting to a, well, penis measuring contest if you will. But I wasn't, and I pointed that out by saying that it doesn't matter, only the physical distance. ... and now you latch on to that? What the heck, man?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    13. Re:Something Similar in Germany by tqk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, crap. No sweat. I'm easily confused (often). Add Scotch, and weird !@#$ happens. "My bad," as the kids say.

      For some reason, I got really focussed on my time driving through Idaho and eastern Oregon. CSI's Nevada desert scenes could be shot there and nobody'd know the difference. Little roadside bars with rattlesnake skins nailed to the hitching posts and everything. Pretty spooky for a Canuck to run into that sort of thing so far north.

      Sorry for the noise.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Something Similar in Germany by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      Hmm, not quite the same. The subject is about buying something new, and then later, fixing it if it gets old and spoilt instead of just throwing it away.

      I was talking about how people in America (are far as I can ascertain from their media, so take this with a grain of salt) actually go out and buy 60's and 70's cars, which are already *old and busted*, not because they lack money to buy new ones, but simply because they like the cars of those era.

      And then spend the rest of their lives fixing and maintaining them.:P

      I understand they are special, but people there don't seem to buy them for a special purpose of keeping them for show, but to actually use them as their daily ride, which means you have to keep on doing the routine maintenance forever. I would have thought these cars wouldn't be worth the extra cost and hassle.

      But I guess the fixing is part of the fun for them. I think Japanese and European cars (of a similar age) just don't carry the same feeling. No one likes maintaining and repairing those :p

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  20. Superbowl? by wijnands · · Score: 1

    Isn't that the same thing?

  21. Some things are easier to repair than others by sandytaru · · Score: 2

    A missing button, a broken vase, a bent prong on a plug - sure. But most of the things we throw out are broken beyond repair. A white shirt with a large coffee stain that won't bleach out is pretty much over and done as a shirt, and can safely be downgraded to "wipe rag." The last pair of jeans I gave up on had an inseam that had split right down the middle. Even with a patch, even with me re-sewing the seam, they were still structurally degraded. Ever have a seam split in public? It's pretty embarrassing. That said, I didn't actually throw the jeans away - I cut the panels free and saved the scraps without holes in them for quilting.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You're not throwing them away, so you're already ahead. Wipe rag? How many people would just toss it, and not even consider a wipe rag?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by confused+one · · Score: 1

      White shirt with coffee stain becomes a black shirt with a dye soak. Have one like that myself

    3. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just glue all the broken and torn crap together, throw some paint of random colors on it, and call it "art". Usually it's my commentary on "wasteful, decadent Western consumer kultur".
      -signed
      A hipster commie douchebag

    4. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      I do the same, eventually they do get tossed, but my progression is:
      Nice cloths
      Fix the car/work in the garden cloths
      Car washing rags
      Garage rags for cleaning up parts and spills
      Trash can
      By the time they make it to car washing rags they are basically lint free which is nice and by the time they make it down to garage rags they are a one time use item as they are in really bad shape.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    5. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For jeans, darning might be better than patching. See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wtb5gqT7f44

    6. Re:Some things are easier to repair than others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some things are designed to not be fixed. More profit for the manufacturer if you have to buy a new vacumm/sweeper than one with replaceable batteries.

  22. The Soft Bigotry of Low Expectations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shows you that you can get people to do in the name of imaginary thrift if either given a government subsidy, or the opportunity to feel superior to someone else (i.e., Americans.) Better yet, both!

  23. Not at all true by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people.

    I've lived in America and the Netherlands, Americans do that just as much as the Dutch. Go into any large city and visit bars and restaurants, you'll find them plenty crowded with people socializing.

    What is somewhat true is that the Dutch watch less TV, but they do other things around the house too.

    People in general are social and like to go out. People with families stay in more because it's harder to go out with children. That does not really change much across cultures.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not at all true by Razgorov+Prikazka · · Score: 0

      >> What is somewhat true is that the Dutch watch less TV, but they do other things around the house too.

      True... just look at the TV shows here in the Netherlands... rubbish... all of them... The last nice one was aired in 1956...
      The English have QI (Quite Interesting) which is a great show, and of course Top Gear which is also of quite a decent level. And of course the BBC broadcasts plenty of high quality documentary's and comedy shows.
      The Americans have HBO (Eastbound and Down, Game of thrones) and TBBT.
      Both of them have shows that I am not interested in at all, but never the less, there is some good shit going on there. Here not so much.

      But I have to get of now, I have to eat at a friends place and then hit for the bar... It's Friday night you know!!! :-)

      --
      rm -rf --no-preserve-root / ...and let /dev/null sort them out...
    2. Re:Not at all true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When American population just sits at home watching TV or playing video games, Europeans and especially Dutch tend to spend time together. Sit at cafes getting high, eat at a restaurant and have some fine wine, and socialize with people.

      I've lived in America and the Netherlands, Americans do that just as much as the Dutch. Go into any large city and visit bars and restaurants, you'll find them plenty crowded with people socializing.

      What is somewhat true is that the Dutch watch less TV, but they do other things around the house too.

      People in general are social and like to go out. People with families stay in more because it's harder to go out with children. That does not really change much across cultures.

      I've lived in the Netherlands (I am Dutch) and now live in Canada. Canada is similar to the US in a lot of ways, starting with the distances being MUCH larger in general and the population density being a lot lower than in the Netherlands. I used to be able to visit any amount of friends or bars by just walking or cycling five minutes. *In general* (outside the major city centers of course), 'going out' or visting people in Canada or the US is a bigger deal than in the Netherlands. In Canada right now, I need to get in my car, drive for 15 minutes, before I hit the first bar. So now I'm much more likely to sit on my porch and have a beer instead.

    3. Re:Not at all true by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "What is somewhat true is that the Dutch watch less TV, but they do other things around the house too."

      Mostly because Dutch TV really sucks. Have you watched it? It makes some of the more lame BBC programs look Brilliant.

      And their news drones on, at least have the women topless for gods sake.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Not at all true by Kartu · · Score: 1

      I have watched it. Not only do they have Discovery, National Geo and so on in Dutch, but are pretty good at English and often German, so they don't really need Dutch Broadcast to watch TV.

  24. Gets to be nearly impossible by cdrguru · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take for instance an electric iron. It might just be clogged up from hard water deposits that could be removed with some solution like CLR or LimeAway. The problem is, in order to get to the parts that are clogged you have to deal with sonic welding, adhesives and fasteners that were designed to be one-way. The only way to disassemble the unit is to break it and glue it back together, which is not very elegant nor safe when dealing with mains current plus heating elements.

    Same thing goes for about 90% of small electric appliances today. They are not designed to be repairable.

    Most of this is not so much cultural as others have pointed out but it all comes down to the cost of labor. At one time in the US decorative scrollwork in homes was hand-carved. The craftsman doing the work made maybe $0.25 a day which for the time wasn't all that bad but it was by no means extravagant. It would be comparable to what any common laborer would get paid or someone clerking in a store.

    Today, to have someone skilled in wood carving come to your home and do some work would be easily $200 an hour. An experienced technician wouldn't be getting that individually, but you can figure a company in the business of appliance repair is going to be charging at least $100 an hour. Which makes a $30 electric iron absurd to even consider repairing - it would cost $30 for someone to spend 20 minutes on it. Even larger appliances begin to reach the point where it makes no sense to repair them simply because of the cost of labor. Why spend $200 to fix a washing machine that cost $250 to replace?

    Where things get really confused is in the 1800s and early 1900s the US saw significant immigration from Europe of craftsmen and skilled workers. Someone that spent 20 years making fine furniture would come to the US and could find immediate work basically doing the same sort of thing for at least as much money if not more. Today, we have huge low-skill immigration which skews the wage scale in interesting ways. In some parts of the country it is cheaper to hire more people (immigrant labor) using hand tools to do a job than it is to use power tools or other modern assists with fewer people. This only works in low-skill areas, though. If the US had a huge number of immigrants coming in that were skilled electronics technicians or computer programmers it would be quite different.

    What we have now is it is cheaper to hire five people to use hand tools to do landscaping work than one person with a power mower. But it is also cheaper to replace a $800 TV than it is to bring it to a technician to look at it because his labor is incredibly expensive. The US today is a confused mess of labor rates that will end up sorting itself out in the end, but likely as not things will shift to the low end of the scale.

    1. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      What we have now is it is cheaper to hire five people to use hand tools to do landscaping work than one person with a power mower.

      - that is because the investment capital is not there. Tools require actual investment capital - somebody overproducing and under-consuming, that difference is what makes savings and investment capital, that then can be used to make somebody more productive (get a tool, get a better tool, design a better process, all these things make somebody more productive but require an investment).

      In USA with all the money counterfeiting, fake interest rates, insane regulations and taxes, there is no real investment capital left. Whatever comes out of the Fed's helicopter shoot is not real money, so it's used to gamble (people don't gamble with real investments, but if it's not real and there is a search for return, which is very hard to come by in a negative return territory, then people take insane risks - thus various bubbles and strange IPOs, etc., but that's the point of the Fed, to create this environment).

      But it is also cheaper to replace a $800 TV than it is to bring it to a technician to look at it because his labor is incredibly expensive.

      - OTOH the consumer products are subsidised to the point of 52 or 54 already Billion USD/month by the foreigners (that's the trade deficit per month).

      With this in mind, you can easily see why the productive tools are expensive and hard to come by, while consumer goods are relatively cheap, and since the productivity of the people in USA is very very very low given the absent investment capital, their real earnings are also very low, and so it's cheaper to hire people for manual labour than to acquire various productive tools, because there is are no investments.

      The fake interest rates set by the Fed, which allows monetising the debt and other forms of subsidies and fake money is driving savings and investment capital elsewhere, that's the basic problem.

    2. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by Lisias · · Score: 1

      On the monetary point of view, you are right.

      On the ambiental point of view, they are right.

      One big mistake, in my humble opinion, on the product's cost chain, is the absense of the cost of disposal. Virtually no product has this cost attached to it at the selling point - and this end up with the government taking the hit of this cost, using our tax dollars to fund it.

      It's expensive to throw things away. Some things takes centuries until it ceases to prejudice the environment where they were disposed. Someone, somewhere, somewhen will have to *pay* for cleaning all this mess.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    3. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some parts of the country it is cheaper to hire more people (immigrant labor) using hand tools to do a job than it is to use power tools or other modern assists with fewer people.

      Part of that is because labor is variable cost while machines are fixed cost. You can always fire half your guys but you can't fire half your bulldozers. Once you buy the machines, you've incurred that cost.

    4. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Repair difficulty is one of those positive-feedback symptoms of a throwaway culture. In a culture that expects things to be repaired things are designed for it to be easy to do so, *especially* for the most common failure modes (heck even today most cheap vacuum cleaners make it easy to replace the drive belt). Yes, it often adds a bit to the up-front cost, but rarely more than a few dollars and you'd make that back the first time you fix it. Personally I've begun looking at all new purchases with repair in mind - it can be hard to tell at a glance, but weight, good apparent build quality, and obvious screws holding the shell together are good indicators. Stay away from anything that's glued or snapped together, a near-certain sign that it's riddled with design compromises in favor of cheap and easy assembly and will be a nightmare to repair.

      Electronics are their own little nightmare - circuit boards are virtually impossible to repair, too many tiny, heat sensitive components that don't fail in an obvious manner. Repairs could be made cheaper by breaking down large circuit boards into modular components, or even just standardizing them within a product line (there's not really much reason for the electronics in a 50" TV to be any different than in a 20" TV of the same resolution), but I suspect we won't see much movement in that direction unless/until repairability becomes the norm in mechanical and electrical products and people start getting annoyed that their electronics can't be similarly repaired.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    5. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could be mistaken, but I the argument you're making is exactly where a north-american equivelant to the dutch repair cafe would shine.

      For a lot of repairs... given the vast majority of things I've fixed around the house, since I like to tinker with things... does not NEED a $200/hour repairman. If you have someone who's handy working with whatever field of work, and the repair needed is just cleaning some pipes or gluing some panels or soldering a wire or something, then going somewhere where a lot of people have combined knowledge and tools would be ideal.

      After reading about this, if I had access to a group-use type area on a constant, free basis (since I'm not about to rent a separate apartment, or rent a covered table area in a park once a week since that'd cost an arm and a leg), I'd totally start one of these. I imagine it'd start very slowly, but I'd show up there every week with whatever tools and random supplies I have, and maybe make chainmail or work on fixing up an old typewriter or something until others start showing up.

      In fact, I think I'll start looking around for free viable places to try something like this out this weekend... see what I can get rolling.

    6. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Compounding this issue is that people these days simply don't carry out their own basic repairs anymore. How many people do you know change their own oil, replace a busted faucet, or even sew back on a missing button? A great deal of these $200 washing machine repairs may simply be a matter of replacing a belt or other minor part. Something you see different about this generation of people is they don't attempt to repair their own stuff. Getting out a screwdriver to crack open an appliance and just seeing what could be amiss in there is a mental hurdle that a depressing number of my friends simply can't get over.

      This leads me on a tangent: you know who doesn't have that issue? That huge population of "low-skill" immigrants. In that population are going to be great mechanics, great body shop guys, great woodworkers. They also aren't going to have any huge company overhead and don't need to charge that $100 an hour to come and fix your washer.

      Beyond this, the labor isn't even that expensive. That on-site technician you paid $200 to the Geek Squad to come and fix your computer? He *might* be making $15 an hour. The rest is overhead to support the organization above him.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    7. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Take for instance an electric iron. It might just be clogged up from hard water deposits that could be removed with some solution like CLR or LimeAway. The problem is, in order to get to the parts that are clogged you have to deal with sonic welding, adhesives and fasteners that were designed to be one-way. The only way to disassemble the unit is to break it and glue it back together, which is not very elegant nor safe when dealing with mains current plus heating elements.

      The problem is, if you actually have a clue, you'd realize that you don't need to disassemble an iron (or a coffee maker, which is how I know this) to clean hard-water deposits. Instead, you fill it with vinegar and let that run through the internals a couple of times. The vinegar (acetic acid) dissolves the hard-water deposits and flushes them out. I used this technique on my shower drain last week, in fact. The point of TFA (well, TFS at least, since I'll admit I didn't RTFA yet) is that a lot of things are easily repairable, and with on-line resources like wiki-how or instructables, and real-world resources like the Dutch repair cafe, it's not that difficult to learn how to perform some of these repairs yourself.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    8. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by u64 · · Score: 1

      Your wrong in many cases where the repair is trivial and easy.
      Your right, in many other cases it's not worth it money-wise. But there's additional benefits of repair.
      o Exploring new stuff.
      o Improving your existing skills.
      o Socialize with other people. IRL!
      o Just the *attempt* at helping someone is highly valuable.

    9. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Same thing goes for about 90% of small electric appliances today. They are not designed to be repairable.

      Bullshit. They've not just side-stepped designing things for repair-ability, they've gone out of their way to make things un-repairable (or, at the very least, a huge minefield of "haha, gotcha, it's not that easy! go buy something new!")

      A good example of this are some of the older (ie, at least not current generation) Apple laptops. To do something as trivial as get to the hard drive to replace it, you'd have to take out something like the following:

      * a half dozen cosmetic fasteners, which were broken by their removal
      * 6 screws of type "a" with torx heads
      * 8 screws of thread type "b" with security heads
      * 3 screws of type "c", which happened to be philips
      * 2 screws of type "d" which look a LOT like type "a" but will crossthread and cause problems in the "a" hole (or vice versa)
      * two clasps, one of which requires something almost entirely different and unrelated to be removed first, just due to how they ducted wires

      In essence, they were designed to have to be taken apart completely just to repair something relatively trival. At the same time, a Thinkpad laptop could have the hard drive completely removed (down to OEM disk) with 3 screws, or replaced with one (which could be removed with a strong fingernail, sometimes).

      Most of this is not so much cultural as others have pointed out but it all comes down to the cost of labor.

      If it takes 3+ hours to disassemble the device, and even longer to reassemble? Yeah, of course it's a disposable device. The story is different when it's almost as trivial as preparing a DVD for an evening movie...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Gets to be nearly impossible by sjames · · Score: 1

      Overhead costs for running a small business are a big problem as well. The guy doing those $200/hr repairs is only making $30/hr. The rest goes to the landlord, the tax accountant, and the insurance company.

  25. Will the skills fit the demand? by notdotcom.com · · Score: 1

    This seems like a great idea, but does anyone else see the possibility that the repairs will be vastly slanted to a handful of products that are 1) plentiful 2) expensive to replace, and 3) have inexpensive parts?

    I can see a cafe that has a line out the door for people want to get their iPhone glass or batteries replaced, or their laptop hard drive swapped out while the person who can repair shoes, sew (a skirt with a hole in it), carve wood, machine parts, or repair a mechanical device (iron which no longer steams) sits reletively idle.

    --
    Grandpa: My Homer is not a communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a communist, but he is not a porn star.
    1. Re:Will the skills fit the demand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not seeing a problem with that, offhand. Who's to say that the one or two people fixing iphones is being forced to work nonstop. Could just be the area that I live, but people in a casual social setting aren't going to start making unfair demands on people who are freely giving their time. The iphone repairer can just as easily say 'fuck off' if someone starts screaming at them to fix their stuff immediately. Or just leave entirely, and then the other people wanting repairs will ostracize the impatient asshole who ruined the iphone repairs for everyone. Iphone repair guy fixes a few, goes and has a coke, relaxes a bit, goes back for more if he wants, etc. If you don't get it fixed today... oh well, life goes on. It's not like you're going there with the guarantee of it being fixed. You're crossing your fingers, and just as importantly going there to both socialize, and offer your abilities as well.

      As for the shoe repair guy with nobody there? So he sits back and reads a book, socializes, perhaps he can tinker with other things, perhaps he sees someone wearing mangly shoes and offers to fix them in general, whatever. Going into there with the absolute sole purpose of leaving with something repaired is entirely the wrong attitude to have. I see it more as a gathering of like-minded individuals, where socializing and having fun are the main objectives, and a side-effect is that a lot of stuff gets worked on or fixed in the meantime.

  26. Netherlands vs. West Virginia by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Netherlands (41543 km^2) could fit in the U.S. state of West Virginia (62755 km^2). Think "across Europe" rather than "across the Netherlands". In the United States, latency between the west and east coasts might kill you. And there are still some areas that aren't populated densely enough to support DSL, cable, or fiber; the round-trip to a geostationary satellite will kill you harder.

    1. Re:Netherlands vs. West Virginia by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Latency is actually not that bad.

      I have a group of friends, we routinely play online together. Myself and one are here on the US east coast. One's out in Western Canada. The others are all over Europe.

      Worst pings I've ever seen have been about 150ms, and we can still play just fine. It's usually the jump through the Atlantic that adds about 110ms to this, as they get the same when we host (and we have about 40 between ourselves on this side).

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  27. Would never work until we kill all the lawyers... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you repair some electrical device for someone else, and at some point down the line it starts a fire or electrocutes someone, you could easily be held liable here in the US, whether your repair had anything to do with it or not. And half-assed repairs done by well-meaning but untrained people are just BEGGING for trouble. From the NYT article (emphasis mine):

    When Mr. van den Akker put the iron back together, two parts were left over â" no matter, he said, they were probably not that important. He plugged the frayed cord into a socket. A green light went on. Rusty water poured out. Finally, it began to steam.

    Actual repair shops carry insurance for such eventualities, but random folks at a "repair cafe" wouldn't.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  28. Improvements to alternatives by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Complementary to your comment, we have a lot of tech that was created so long ago that it's terribly inefficient and should best be retired. Consider an old machine with an Athlon 1200 CPU, drawing 330 watts of power while an Intel i5-2400 based machine draws only 75 watts. Consider an old hard drive that draws 30 watts to spin at idle, compared to a modern drive that uses 8 watts to do the same, or a SSDD that draws 0.14 watts. Or consider a CRT monitor drawing 120W compared to a newer LCD that draws 22W.

    Yes, I get that obviously there are things that people can't afford to replace today, and when repairing them for free is an option, it'll happen. But these old devices still cost them tremendously on their electric bills. I believe the Dutch pay somewhere around $0.40/kWh, meaning that an old PC there would cost over $4 per day to run, compared to a new efficient machine that would cost less than $1 per day. And that new machine would certainly have better performance, more capabilities, and likely better security (not that I want to get into a big debate about it, but running Windows 7 and IE 9 instead of XP and IE 6 would be a big improvement for most home user's security.)

    Some working things should be retired.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Improvements to alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider an old machine with an Athlon 1200 CPU, drawing 330 watts of power while an Intel i5-2400 based machine draws only 75 watts. Consider an old hard drive that draws 30 watts to spin at idle, compared to a modern drive that uses 8 watts to do the same, or a SSDD that draws 0.14 watts. Or consider a CRT monitor drawing 120W compared to a newer LCD that draws 22W.

      Okay. I've considered them.

      I'm only spending $0.08/kWh. It costs less than $1/day to run my old power-sucking Athlon computer that has all the performance I need. And that's if I leave the monitor on and encode video 24/7. In reality, I almost never pull even 200 watts and often have the machine powered down. It isn't cost effective to upgrade simply for energy savings.

    2. Re:Improvements to alternatives by plover · · Score: 1

      Good. I'm glad you have a solution that works for you, so it definitely makes sense for you to keep it up. There is nothing wrong with that approach.

      --
      John
    3. Re:Improvements to alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree ss long as we are mindful to take into account the energy and emissions used to create the replacement.

    4. Re:Improvements to alternatives by plover · · Score: 1

      I would agree ss long as we are mindful to take into account the energy and emissions used to create the replacement.

      That's actually already mostly* accounted for in the cost of the new goods. The manufacturers will add their costs of energy, raw materials, labor, and whatever else into the sale price of the unit. (If they don't, they make no money!) Plus, consider that manufacturing costs are incurred only one-time. If smelting the bauxite to make the aluminum frame takes X kilowatt hours per kilogram (I have no idea how much it really takes) the manufacturer of the aluminum will recoup all those expenses when they sell the material to the case maker. And the case maker will get back their additional electrical costs and machinery costs when they sell me the case.

      Unlike the fixed material cost, operational costs are ongoing. If you look at your computer usage, and can predict that you will continue to use a computer in the same way for at least another year, and you have an old computer that already costs $1200/year in electricity to run, and a new computer would cost you only $400/year in electricity, as long as the sum of everything that goes into replacing it is less than $800, it's a net gain with a Return On Investment of less than 12 months.

      There's a lot of "if" in the above conclusion, of course. You could suddenly move to a region with much cheaper electric rates, cutting the predicted electrical costs from $1200 to $400. You might start shutting off your computer when you're not using it, saving $800 per year in electricity. You could buy the replacement on credit, and lose your job before paying off the whole amount. All these scenarios leave you with less benefit than had you kept the old machine. Predicting the future always carries a level of uncertainty.

      * By "mostly", I mean that mining and manufacturing using cheap labor in countries with few enforced pollution regulations represent only the cost to you today. The costs to society are as yet unaccounted for, but as long as we remain greedy and continually demand cheap goods, those countries will continue to sell them at unsustainably low prices, trading polluted skies and rivers for dollars. They'll have hard decisions to make in the near future: continue to pollute and risk fomenting a revolution (as happened in France in 1798), or regulate and drive up costs. But that doesn't actually factor into the equation of "should I repair or replace this computer today?"

      --
      John
    5. Re:Improvements to alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD 1200: Minimum/Typical/Maximum power dissipation 5 Watt (Stop Grant mode) / 58.9 Watt / 65.7 Watt
      i5-2400: Max TDP 95 W

      Old machines did not use 330W. The CPU's were 20-70 watt, the graphics cards used to be connected to an AGP slot limited at about 40 watt and even though the loss in the power supply were quite a bit higher than today, a high end system would perhaps draw 150 watt at best. Today, that number is about 400 watt. Also, my Dell 24" monitors draws 90 watt while my 19" CRT only uses 60 watt and my Dell 30" uses about 150 watt.

    6. Re:Improvements to alternatives by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Replacing working computers because of electric power efficiency usually doesn't work out, despite what people here like to proclaim. First, an old Athlon system doesn't use nearly that much power, try about half that for one that is nicely loaded by 2001 standards. Secondly, most people don't run their computers 24/7. If that old Athlon system (which runs probably 100-120W or so in reality) is only runs a few hours a day, it's going to take a long long time for the savings to buy you something like an Atom system or one of those AMD A350's. In most cases people are better off to keep using that old Athlon or P4 so long as it does what they need and it still works, and to learn to turn it off when they don't need it.

    7. Re:Improvements to alternatives by plover · · Score: 1

      When you're paying American electric rates, it's definitely harder to justify. But when you're paying up to seven times as much for European electricity (I have a rural Minnesota relative paying $0.05/kWh, and I know the published rates in England are $0.38/kWh) it can make a much bigger difference.

      --
      John
  29. Rather Have Stuff Repaired by Professionals by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I don't really want to take a chance on having my iron or clothes or computer repaired by my hobbyist neighbor. I'd rather have them repaired correctly by somebody who does those repairs professionally all the time, while also having the side effect of keeping those repair people in business.

    1. Re:Rather Have Stuff Repaired by Professionals by Skapare · · Score: 2

      There aren't enough of them to cover all the diverse things that might need repair for this to be a practical business model anymore, at least for most things. Bicycles and cars are notable classes of exceptions.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Rather Have Stuff Repaired by Professionals by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      You aren't going to pay a professional more than the value of a computer or appliance to have it fixed. You're going to replace it. The "hobbyist neighbor" simply provides a middle ground where you might get it repaired on the cheap. Nobody should try to repair anything of great value or importance in this way

      --
      +1 Disagree
    3. Re:Rather Have Stuff Repaired by Professionals by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      ...and I'd rather learn how to do it myself as a way to relax from my day job. I'm not willing to fix other people's stuff though, as that carries too much liability.

    4. Re:Rather Have Stuff Repaired by Professionals by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sorry, they're already long out of business. You can either throw it away or let the neighbor have a go at it.

  30. Re:Bullshit by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    For your own use, no. But if you sell or even give away something you've repaired, which turns out to be dangerous, at the very least you face civil liability - and possibly criminal negligence, in addition to whatever penalties come from violating safety standards in your jurisdiction. Even if your repair is perfectly safe and to a professional standards, many countries require certification to work on anything using mains electricity, and if you're not certified (Which a hobbyist is unlikely to be) it can still be an offense to give away something you have repaired yourself.

  31. For some definitions of great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a great place to meet poor people.

  32. id love to spend more time by nimbius · · Score: 2

    socializing with my friends, but the truth is after two jobs and 14 hours of work im too tired. my second job, customer service, makes me cranky and irritable by the time i get home and honestly ive spent so much time sitting under fluorescent lights and talking to people about their medical bills id rather stay in anyway.
    on the weekends i normally get stuck with TPS reporting, and its not like i can duck out of that because im a salaried employee. besides, this is building equity. i hope.
    sometimes on holidays i get off, christmas or the occasional tuesday morning im not working at the baltimization plant, i go to this cafe down the street. the cafe i go to has lots of people in it, but the unspoken rule is that we all have to be quiet and we have to drink their coffee to use the wireless for exactly one hour. I mean, nobody is doing any meaningful work at a cafe its all mostly facebook and minecraft but the possibility still exists that someone is working out a spreadsheet on their ipad and so we're all quiet.
    wednesday when i go back to work and realize i also picked up a bartending shift to help pay down my college loans and the loan for the dental work i had done, i get a chance to socialize with people that are drunk. so i guess that counts. by 4 am though im still tired.
    ive tried planning things with my friends, but they spend most of their time at work too.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:id love to spend more time by yurtinus · · Score: 2

      Hoping this is tongue in cheek, but really you're doing it wrong. Salaried people willing to put in obscene hours greatly distorts the job market. Doing the work of two people for the price of one means that not only are you working yourself to death, but somebody else is sitting there unemployed.

      That, and you need to find a better cafe - it sounds like the one you patronize kinda sucks ;)

      --
      +1 Disagree
    2. Re:id love to spend more time by sjames · · Score: 1

      I'm more or less of the opinion he exaggerated for satire, but there is truth behind the exaggeration. Part of the problem isn't that salaried workers are willing to work excess hours, but those other unemployed people are ready and waiting to replace him if he doesn't do it anyway (he will suddenly become "just not a team player" in his "right to work" state).

      That's why in a year of record corporate profits, all we hear is how the economy is still down. They WANT the economy to be down because it's outrageously profitable for them.

  33. Typical socialistic moronic european idea! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    What? Help each other? Avoid buying the new and shiny things? Continue to use things even after there is a perfectly good reason to throw them away? Go through extraordinary lengths like actually lugging stuff out and meet actual other human beings and fix each other's gadgets for free? What kind of anti-corporate attitude is that? No wonder job creators are fleeing Europe. What is the big point in having a society or government or laws if it does not create more profits for the big banks and corporations? Let europe rot its way from socialism to communism. Yoo Es Yay! Yoo Es Yay! Yoo Es Yay! Yoo Es Yay! Yoo Es Yay!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Typical socialistic moronic european idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah because that is totally what people are talking about when they dissent against Socialism and Communism.

      As if the USSR was just some neighborhood repair cafe

    2. Re:Typical socialistic moronic european idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me of the moronic daily newspaper here, The Vancouver Sun Newspaper in Vancouver, Canada. They print* an article every Christmas time about how it is better to go out shopping on Boxing Day than it is to spend a day with your family or even helping poor people. The article goes on and on about how it is better for you and better for the poor people and better for the country if you buy, Buy, BUY. They imply that spending time with your family or helping the poor is actually selfish and nonproductive.

      You might wonder what madness has overtaken the editorial staff at the newspaper. Nobody knows. Heck, the editors don't even sign their editorials because "the editorials printed here reflect the views of the owner". Gutless! Needless to say, nobody I know has any respect for the editors or the paper.

      *They don't actually print a new article. Each year they just reprint the same article over and over. I know because I collect them! I think it is done just for all the advertisers in their paper. It certainly can't be for the benefit of the readers.

    3. Re:Typical socialistic moronic european idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think the lesson here is, when the Big Capitalists stop practicing capitalism, and start enforcing the corporate collective, that a barter economy emerges. For instance, I wouldn't be surprised if many of the people attending this "cafe" are motivated (partly) by a desire not to have their expenditures tracked by the corporate collective. I would.

      Plus, the fact the market is now flooded with items which appear to be designed to break quickly (entrenching an economy based on high turnover), it is not surprising that excellent, old machinery would become desirable, worth fixing & keeping. I know when I need something stout - a tool for instance - I'll hit up flea markets & garage sales first, then I'll consider building it myself. If I must, I'll purchase new, but not before considering if I can live without it, because I just know this POS is going to break after two, maybe three uses. Even a lot of the high end stuff is now built poorly.

  34. Re:Bullshit by Bigby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://raisedonhoecakes.com/ROH/2012/04/12/your-son-has-been-arrested-for-being-able-to-fix-a-lacrosse-stick/

    Try and fix certain electronics governed by the FCC. There are other things that are made less functional to conform to regulations.

    I fixed my custom DVR by delivering the feed over Component video and re-encoding it. I'm sure that's illegal too...

  35. The grass is always greener... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    This comes off as another one of these "Europeans are great and Americans suck" articles. I know plenty of Americans, who are averse to throwing away old stuff. And if we're going to start comparing societies and their inclination to throw away perfectly good stuff I suggest visiting Asia.

    It's also really easy to promote social cohesion when 95% of the population is of a single nationality. Institute a program like this and the odds are high people will participate. It's easy to conduct social engineering when you know how the population will respond. The United States, with a considerably larger variety of ethnic groups is far more unpredictable. Chances are high that a program like this would flop on a national or even regional level. This is the sort of thing that would only work at a community level, and even then it's not a guarantee.

    1. Re:The grass is always greener... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US and most of the world, it's not a "social program". It's just something people do. Why Europeans need a subsidy and a high horse to do it is a mystery to me. What about Habitat for Humanity? Is building and repairing homes for poor people not "green" or "caring" enough for slashtards?

    2. Re:The grass is always greener... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Ethnic_groups_in_the_Netherlands

      netherlands is a hub for different nationalities.. always been.

      you would think that promoting this kind of stuff would be easy in a walled garden community in usa.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:The grass is always greener... by Rising+Ape · · Score: 1

      It's also really easy to promote social cohesion when 95% of the population is of a single nationality.

      That does assume that people won't just find different ways of dividing themselves intro groups - social class, for example, or geographic regions. Just because people are of a single race (a poorly defined concept anyway) or nationality doesn't mean they'll all think the same way.

    4. Re:The grass is always greener... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      In US I think you will easily have >95% US nationality among residents. Same in Netherlands.

      What you are talking about is ethnicity. Netherlands is almost 80% ethnic Dutch, the other 20% of many different ethnicities of which at least 12% non-Caucasians. Many of whom are Dutch born and should be considered Dutch for that sake; when you talk to them you won't hear any foreign accent for example.

      The US is not that radically different, Wikipedia lists it as over 72% white. Now of course there is not such a thing as "ethnic USAian" or whatever you could call that, the US is one big melting pot of immigrants mostly from Europe. So I'll have to stick to the number of "whites" there.

      Now when I am in Netherlands with my Chinese wife, people will simply address her in Dutch (she doesn't speak Dutch). Even though she's obviously Chinese. And then they're often surprised to learn she's not a Dutch really!

      This is a stark contrast with the situation in Hong Kong. People will always address me (caucasian) in English. Even when their English is really poor and, in fact, far worse than my Chinese. They just don't expect any westerner to speak any Chinese. Even those that live here for over a decade. Indeed many westerners don't bother to learn the language, at all, which I think is not good.

  36. Not everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone in the modern world has thrown away at least one thing that was perfectly good except for an easily fixed defect, because it's just easier to buy a new one.

    Not if it's an easily fixed defect, I haven't. Not even it it's a moderately difficult defect. Only if it's totally irreparable, or if the required components are more expensive than a new one, will I throw it out. (Sometimes not even then, since I oftentimes cannot get equivalent quality or performance at any price.)

  37. LAN vs online by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, I think that the rise of internet gaming VS LAN gaming has several factors, few of them due to being antisocial. I still do LAN game but play online as well at times
    The bad...
    a) Convenience: Pack up your oversized gaming PC, monitor etc. Drag them to somebody's house, possibly popping a few vertebra hauling crap around. Plug into power for 3 daisy-chained power bars and an ethernet cable that is just a bit too short. Pop a few breakers until you figure out who plugs in where. After an hour you might actually get things ready to play.

    b) Availability: Try and figure out what you're all going to play. Six of us want to play Shooter Game X, but Bob only wants to play RTS's. Everyone finally agrees on game Y, except John who doesn't have it and needs to install/download. By the time John installs, everyone else has played up and is moving on to another game

    c) Play games on a LAN that still need an internet connection. Lag occurs. People get dropped, and even though you're all trying to play with only those in your room, hackerKid239 joins the game and headshots every one of you within 2.5 seconds whilst insulting your mom

    d) Several makes of various shapes and sizes drinking, eating greasy food, and fit into a small poorly ventilated room. 'nuff said

    The good...
    a) Social: You get to visit with your buds, have a few drinks perhaps etc. While loading you can trade funny youtube clips or photoshopped pictures of Bob's wife
    b) Private LAN games: For games that actually allow it, being able to play with your buds and *NOT* hackerKid239 is fun
    c) Trading: Although arguments over what to play may arise, you get to see what other cool games people in your group have. Rather than spending 5h downloading, buy the game in steam and then snag the install files from a USB drive being passed around

  38. DMCA means you cannot repair an item by tekrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because to repair an item, you would have to first reverse engineer the item to understand how it works. This is specifically prohibited by the DMCA, and you could face a civil lawsuit, criminal penalties and jail time/fines.

    In the USA it is ILLEGAL to understand how a product works. You're not allowed to fix stuff, only to consume, and obey.

    Remember what country you live in folks, we're just trying to protect you. Now, please strip naked so you can board the subway.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:DMCA means you cannot repair an item by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      ...That didn't take long.

      The problem with posts like this is you might get people to believe this crap. I won't say there aren't issues with the DMCA, but find me one solid example where an individual faced a lawsuit for repairing their own devices.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    2. Re:DMCA means you cannot repair an item by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that would only be true if the device contained some specific anti circumvention mechanism.

      Am I wrong?

  39. cheap non-repairable stuff by confused+one · · Score: 1

    A lot of items made for sale in the U.S. can not be economically repaired. Welded plastic components that can't be dis-assembled to gain access to the interior. Components that press together with an impossible to separate interference fit or spring retainer that is not designed to be removed. Cheap parts designed to be disposable. They're everywhere.

  40. Simple, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are not americans.

  41. It does work, but not in a business sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At home I've got 3 lcd tvs (two 32-inch and one 42-inch) that I use as monitors on computers. They were all retrieved from the garbage and repaired. A few bad solder joints was the only issue, or in one case it also required taking 2 bad TVs and swapping boards to figure out which were good and which were bad (i.e. 2 bad TVs == 1 Frankenstein'ed good TV). As a fun exercise at home, it's fine, but there's no way it would pay as a business. Not even at minimum wage. Still, I've gotten several hundred dollars worth of gear for almost nothing (it makes a *sweet* LAN party setup), and diverted equipment that would otherwise been on its way to the landfill.

  42. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy fix. Lawyers are not allowed to participate in any recycling/repairing/sharing schemes. That is all.

  43. Monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 1998, I paid $400 for a Sony 200ES 17" CRT monitor. In fall 2000, I was loading it into my roommate's car after a LAN party, and smooshed one of the front-panel buttons. I took it to a local Sony-authorized repair shop called "Lou's TV", and $50 later, the button was working like new. I considered that $50 well-spent, and the monitor went on to serve me until 2009, when the image was getting so fuzzy it was causing eyestrain.

  44. Introvert culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I almost fell out of my chair laughing. American culture doesn't just "prefer" extroverts; it idolizes them. Take it from a genuine introvert with 37 years of first-hand experience. In the American way of life, introverts are stepped on, spit on, taken advantage of, and generally considered to be "worth less" than a fun and lively extrovert. Extroverts have a HUGE advantage in the US, not just with financial success, but life in general.

    To put this another way, you could ask the average American why so many Americans are fat, lazy and unmotivated, and you'd probably get a straight face and an honest answer. But if you ask why the average American is so "introverted" or "unsocial", you'd be met with genuine surprise, if not downright anger.

  45. Obsolete computers - how do you "fix" them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I build my own boxes with best-of-breed parts. They last a long time. In theory, I can repair individual parts. But I still have to keep throwing them out. Even the power supply changes connectors from one motherboard to the next and I can't even use old power supplies. (And I have to have several spare power supplies, just in case one blows and I need to get back up and running immediately. So I trash twice as many when they're obsolete.) Disk drives are so cheaply made I'm afraid to reuse them and put new ones in new machines, since the clock is ticking on their 5-year lifespan. You can't fix disk drives. When you need multiple virtual machines at the same time, that old P3 isn't going to cut it. I had some old IDE DVD drives, but had to get SATA for newer motherboards. I have a basement full of USB thumb drives that are obsolete. I keep the 256MB one just to remind me how fast things change, since I discarded all my floppy disks a few years ago when I finally threw out my low-resolution Mavica camera for a modern one that uses flash memory. I don't actually fix anything at all, I just throw out obsolete stuff. Even if I could somehow keep the Mavica going, where would I get floppy disks and the obsolete batteries it used? I'd love to fix things and keep them working, I really would, but I don't see how.

  46. Re:OB Philip K Dick reference by chooks · · Score: 2

    Philip K dick had a story where this was essentially part of the plot line -- a man from the past arrives in the future and is able to actually...fix things (The Variable Man)

    In one scene, children are playing with a toy and it gets broken. The main character starts to fix it and the kids are wondering what he is doing and why he doesn't just throw it out and get a new one.

    The book is free on Project Gutenburg here

    --
    -- The Genesis project? What's that?
  47. The trouble with repairability by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a hobby, I repair old Teletype machines, from the 1920s and 1930s. These machines were designed for a long life of nearly continuous operation and to be repairable. I have 70 and 80 year old machines running. Everything unscrews (and every screw has a lock nut), everything is interchangeable, and all parts can be reached without dismantling too much. The detailed repair manuals still exist. If one of these machines hasn't been seriously damaged and has all the parts, it's usually repairable. This is as good as it gets in repairability.

    The price of this is weight, bulk, and routine maintenance. The frame is cast steel. A printer weighs about 75 pounds, about twice the weight of an electric typewriter. There are over 500 oiling points to be oiled annually, plus about 50 points that require greasing. Every few years of operation, a full cleaning is required. This involves removing the two electrical parts, the motor and the selector electromagnet, and soaking the entire machine in solvent. Western Union did this to their machines routinely.

    Then there are adjustments. There are spring tensions and clearances to be adjusted. A spring scale and a feather gauge are required. After any part replacement, there are adjustments to be performed according to the manual.

    Nobody would put up with that bulk, weight, and maintenance today to get a machine capable of decades of operation. That is the price of repairability.

    1. Re:The trouble with repairability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing with ShopSmiths. The older ones (10er) are great, highly repairable, using common bearing types and it all comes apart with a few Allen wrenches.
      They are heavy, but I wish I'd known to look for one when I was about 12 years old.

      Drill press, sander, table saw, lathe, horizontal boring machine. All in one unit.

      The newer Mark V ones have variable speed and are a little more complicated to service, but still not really difficult.
      Both models are heavy, can't really be moved by one person unless they are on rollers. But they are really wonderful, and worth repairing if you find one cheap.

    2. Re:The trouble with repairability by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true.

      Take something like, oh, an AK47 or SKS rifle. They're repairable and reliable. You can stick gravel down the barrel and clean it out by pissing on it (metaphorically speaking). There are instances of the design which have likely seen continual service since shortly after that time (in the 1960s, there about). They are still the preferred arm of choice by many people and nations.

      Another counter-example would be the 'simple' diesel vehicles of yester-year (eg. Mercedes 300D, Chevy 6.2 Detroits, stuff with Cummins). They're meant to last forever, and for the most part, they do. The engines run many more miles than the odometers usually go. (I've got a friend with a Cummins that has seen over 1.2 million miles of operation without a rebuild, for instance).

      Only 'slightly' larger than today's smartphones (most of that bulk due to an AA battery compartment and wasted space) is the original Nintendo Game Boy. I have one which has never needed to be repaired, but it has been run over by a truck, thrown, stepped on, and god knows what else - by roughly a dozen children at this point, continuously, for the better part of 2 decades. I have repaired or replaced the buttons on other gameboys for people, and I have cleaned the metal contacts ('fixing') thoroughly for people before as well.

      I've fixed many other smaller, newer things of quality. Repairability has nothing to do with bulk, weight, or what have you (by necessity). Resilience is a big part of it (as with the gameboy I've got and well designed diesel engines). In the case of most modern things which fail or break, it's not so much that they weren't made to be repairable, it's that they were designed to break. There is a HUGE difference between the two. "Repairability" is being able to replace the commonly failed or damaged parts of the whole to maintain longevity. Not only is it unlikely you're able to do that on a modern product, but it's likely that they've got 'seals' on the product which, upon their removal, will render the product broken and unusable after 'repair'. (Rivets stronger than the material they bind where screws or clips would be fine comes to mind.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  48. Repair Cafes in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm part of a group in the San Francisco Bay area that regularly runs Fixit Clinics. You can see a bit about what we do on our Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/fixitclinic. We've been doing this for a couple of years now. There have been around 25 events, mostly in the Bay Area, but some in other places (MIT in Cambridge MA, Knoxville TN). I think that a lot of the comments here are missing some important points.

    We don't fix stuff for people. We are Fixit Coaches. We give them encouragement and advice, and lend them tools so they can fix it themselves. We try to teach people to work safely, and educate them about the function of safety related aspects of the devices they are working on.

    We also don't seem to have any problem getting people to come to the clinics and fix things. Americans, especially kids, but people of all ages, love to take things apart and see what's inside, and how they work. If they actually fix it, then the look of pride on their faces when they see it work again is worth far more than any argument about how it would have been cheaper, faster, better to get a new one. People like to do things with their hands, and see concrete results of what they did. All they usually need is a bit of encouragement to get them past the "No user serviceable components inside" label.

    People have emotional attachments to their stuff. I'll never forget the young woman who brought in a 50's style toaster that used to belong to her grandmother. She was so happy when she got it working again. Kids bring in broken toys that they love, but don't work any more. It just isn't the same as getting a new one.

    Most repairs are pretty simple. Broken wires or solder joints, dirt or corrosion on switch contacts, etc. The hard part is usually getting the case open. We teach people to solder, so they can use that skill again. We point out to people the way products are held together, and how some are "designed for repair" and some are not. Hopefully, the next time they buy something they might notice, that this one is screwed together, but that one is glued. Which will be easier to keep working in the long run?

    I hope that some of you will visit a Fixit Clinic or similar gathering someday, or even start one of your own (we can help you to get started, just post a message to our Facebook page). We'd love to see you and your broken stuff.

    -steve

    1. Re:Repair Cafes in America by Berl · · Score: 1

      Sort of new to Slashdot, so I see it has my post list as "by Anonymous Coward". So, just to be clear, this was not written by Mr. Coward, but by me, Steve Berl.

  49. This is not new in the US... by lourd_baltimore · · Score: 1

    There are already some efforts in place around the USA, you just have to _look_ find them. I remember the the Velocipede Bike Project in Baltimore. Plenty of tools and advice to fix your bike from what I remember so long as you mind all the damn hipsters. Also, support your local Tool-Lending Library!

  50. Re:Bullshit by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    I ran into a few good tellings-off too. Due to some mental health issues, I felt compelled to repair things at school. I couldn't leave something broken, so I always had a few tools on me. Screwdrivers, multitool, tape, glue. The only reason I didn't get expelled was that the school had a unit specialising in supporting students with such issues, and the teachers there were willing to argue strongly on my behalf.

  51. Throwaway society by lajoyce · · Score: 2

    This is a very cool idea, and there are plenty of things that are fixable, but it doesn't help that corporate interest favors products that are not repairable. There is much more money to be made when you can convince or force consumers to buy new. A throwaway society consists of those who buy the throwaways, and those who sell the throwaways.

  52. Second hand shops as well by mpol · · Score: 2

    While this repair cafe is a single cafe in the country, there's a whole community of second hand shops called Kringloopwinkels. I my town of 116.000 people there are about 9 shops like that. The one I worked at was the biggest, with 2 physical shops and more than 1.000.000 Euro sales. They employ about 85 people, of whom maybe 45 or 50 have a paid job.
    It's quite a big business, and even with a recession it's a growing business.

    --

    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    1. Re:Second hand shops as well by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      In times of recession, such shops usually do better as people look for ways to save costs.

      And those shops are just lovely to browse around. You never know what you're going to find. Lots of crap, but sometimes really cool stuff for really low prices.

    2. Re:Second hand shops as well by VON-MAN · · Score: 2

      "While this repair cafe is a single cafe in the country"
      Nope: http://repaircafe.nl/netwerk/

      And there happens to be one in _my_ hometown, pleasant surprise!

  53. Re:Bullshit by operagost · · Score: 1

    They must pre-chew the food for their students and mouth feed it to them like little birds in Maryland. I mean, they should probably ban scissors too, right?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  54. Re:Would never work until we kill all the lawyers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't blame this totally on the lawyers. Too many people in the US are looking to sue. Everyone is a victim - nothing is their fault or just bad luck, I've been wronged and someone needs to pay me.

  55. Or intentionally made unrepairable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electric fans are relatively inexpensive, but they're also very easy to repair - or rather maintain. (No problems if not stupid about it - not pulling wires apart or scraping insulation and the obvious unplugging first). Usually the motor gums up with dust after a while of being used for a year or so. Very easy to make working again by cleaning with some alcohol wipes and putting some general purpose lubricant in the bearing cups on the split phase motor and turning by hand a few times.

    The basic maintenance technique works on anything dating back to 1940s (have a "Zero" brand fan that still works, but isn't "kid safe") to models from the mid 1990's. But then the manufacturers had to go and mess that up.

    The problem is they started changing the screws from phillips or flathead on the newer fans to custom patterns that are impossible to remove. And yes, I've tried the screwdriver kits with the custom tips, but the socket on the damn driver that works with those won't fit in the hole those PITA screws are in. So although it would be possible to turn the screw with the weird triangle pattern, it's impossible to reach the screw.

    1. Re:Or intentionally made unrepairable by leftover · · Score: 2

      Just sacrifice the weirdo screws. Use metal tube, small enough to go down the hole and long enough to grip above the surface, for each screw. Mix a blob of epoxy putty and put a small cylindrical bead of it in each tube end. Put tubes in holes, ram the epoxy bead to form it to the screw top and to the inside of the tube. Go have a beer. When you come back, grab the tube top with any convenient pliers and turn the screws out. To reassemble, replace the screws with something standard.
       

      --
      Bent, folded, spindled, and mutilated.
    2. Re:Or intentionally made unrepairable by plover · · Score: 2

      I often will use a Dremel to grind straight slots in uncooperative screw heads so I can use a regular flat blade screwdriver to remove them. This generally works well for stripped Philips head screws, too. And I've made specialty screwdrivers (triangles, two-pronged, etc.) by grinding the needed custom tips onto small pieces of barstock, but the soft metal generally isn't as durable as I need it to be. I have a few cases where I made those tools using a sacrificial screwdriver as the starting blank, but grinding the case-hardened tips usually results in a weak tool anyway.

      I never thought about using epoxy to get at an otherwise inaccessible screw! And using a tube to contain the epoxy, preventing damage to the product itself, well, that's just amazingly clever! Thank you so much!

      --
      John
  56. especially on a barter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seriously, what moron does that. where does it end? if I open a door for someone, should that person count that as a "doorman service" on his taxes? seriously at some point this taxing of EVERYTHING has to end

  57. litigiousness by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    So if a plug on a toaster is replaced backwards and someone gets shocked, the plug-replacer gets sued. What if the seam of repaired clothing splits during a presentation, losing the account? Sued?

    1. Re:litigiousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn in your nerd card for not knowing how a toaster works.

  58. Minimum wage by tepples · · Score: 1

    How are you supposed to assign a fair cash value to it?

    One at least has to assign a value for services that doesn't break existing minimum wage laws.

    1. Re:Minimum wage by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      How are you supposed to assign a fair cash value to it?

      One at least has to assign a value for services that doesn't break existing minimum wage laws.

      You would think so, but it's not the case. There is nothing that prevents an independent contractor (the barterer) from offering a service below minimum wage, or even free.

      Just go on kijiji or any of those rent-a-coder sites and look at how many people are quite willing to work for well under the minimum wage to "build their portfolio."

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
  59. Have they licensed the patent from Sesame Street? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hear Louis and Maria are extremely aggressive in protecting their "Fix It Shop" intellectual property.

  60. Affluent society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't agree with this hoarder mentality that throwing something away is bad. We throw things away because people's time has become more valuable (so repair is expensive) while things have become less valuable because we can produce them without using many resources (so production is cheap). Those are both great things. The opposite of "throwaway society" is "third world country".

  61. John Candy by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    "I'll wash the People's truck!!"

  62. Constant Comparisons to the US by doston · · Score: 2

    In the US you've got a society that's designed from the ground up to benefit big business. The US is also unquestionably the most powerful country on earth and (practically) owns the world. The US is also one of the most open societies in the world and one of the largest, geographically. The predominant school of thought among social engineers and social planners in the US, is that the population must be highly indoctrinated (and the US population IS higly indoctrinated). The Netherlands really only compares to the US in the openness of its society. Given those facts, you can't compare the US and Dutch people. If you think those facts shouldn't affect people's socilization, you're just not giving the subject enough thought. One example, and this will be a tad controversial; there's a reason the Netherlands enjoy ten political parties and the US has only two (that are basically the same party); What the people of the Netherlands think doesn't matter outside of the Netherlands. What the people in the US think matters a lot.

  63. Actually it is by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Even if everything was 100% recyclable there's would still be a considerable energy cost associated with doing so, if you can repair something instead of replacing it then you save all that energy. You also save money, which ideally means you can afford to buy higher-quality things to begin with, which will generally last longer and be even easier to repair. Compare a $100 dollar appliance(or shoe, or...) with a $20 version. Assuming it's not just a "glamour" product, odds are that the $100 version will be considerably more durable, well-designed, and just generally pleasant to use. And it will probably last at least 5x as long as the cheap version, potentially much longer if properly cared for and repaired. In the face of that the only reason to get the cheap version is if you can't afford the good version, or don't plan to use it enough that quality will be an issue.

    You have a point with (some) tech stuff, if something is old enough that there's been major upgrades/efficiency improvements since it was created you might be better off replacing it. Then again there's plenty of people who, for example, just want a computer to get online for email and web browsing - a 5-10 year old computer may be plenty fast enough to handle that, especially if running say a streamlined version of Linux. Since there haven't really been any major efficiency improvements in that time period it wouldn't really make sense to replace it.

    As for freeing up repairmen for more useful/enoyable things... like what? As manufacturing, agriculture, and even sales and banking are becoming increasingly automated there's ever fewer jobs available in the "useful" areas of the economy, and you're not going to convince me that flipping burgers or scrubbing floors are more enjoyable. We've got a major shift in economic realities coming now that the brief window of "perpetual growth" that characterized the last 150 years since the industrial revolution is coming to an end - I'd say repair is one of the areas that will stand to benefit from the change.

    All of which ignores the fact that the article is actually talking about a social club of people who enjoy fixing things getting together with people who have things they'd like fixed in order to talk and tinker. It doesn't sound like there's any money changing hands, just people doing something they enjoy to give back to the community. Personally I think it sounds like a more worthy way to spend time than a sewing circle, book club, church social, or night at the bar.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  64. Remember Brave New World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ending is better than mending!

  65. noooo... by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 1

    Only poor people would do that. Rich people don't pay taxes, they collect them.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
    1. Re:noooo... by russotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Only poor people would do that. Rich people don't pay taxes, they collect them.

      Poor people barter informally (and don't consider reporting it) and work for cash "under the table". They're rarely caught. Rich people have loopholes written for them. Only those in the middle have to pay. If a plumber barters for services an electrician, the IRS will never find out. If a lawyer does with his accountant, BAM!

      (I guess the distinction is more blue-collar verus white than poor versus middle; plenty of plumbers have more money than plenty of accountants)

  66. Re:Would never work until we kill all the lawyers. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    Replying to emphasize AC co-poster's point: This isn't a lawyer problem, this is a people problem.

    If you gave a stranger your laptop and bought him lunch and a beer to fix it - and despite his best efforts he not only failed to, but it ended up worse off than it was before - would you try to hold him responsible? For a lot of people, that answer is "yes." Those people should seek professional repair services and pay the premium for that. I repair computers and devices all the time for family and friends and I'm shocked if I don't have one or two tiny little screws left over. They know this going into it and accept the risk because their machine didn't work before anyway and would not have paid to have it properly repaired to begin with. A repair cafe like this would work *if* the people coming in are already on the assumption that what they have is a total loss, and they're making a small gamble that they might get it going again for cheap.

    --
    +1 Disagree
  67. Good for them, take on this disposable culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing what people throw out.

    I just recently acquired a perfectly serviceable PC that a local business was literally throwing away (recycling, but still). It was one of 20-something PCs ... THAT THEY WERE THROWING AWAY!

    2+ GHz dual core, 2GB of RAM, absolutely nothing wrong with it, runs nice and quiet. They removed the hard drive, for obvious reasons, but that's fine, I've got plenty lying around. It's now a more-than-capable personal web server for myself.

    My last two phones were perfectly functional second-hand buys I got from my brother. He wanted a shiny new iPhone.

    My 5-year-old laptop still runs well because I spent the extra money to buy the business-line model instead of the cheap-piece-of-crap "home user" model at half the price with similar performance but cheap components. I'd have probably needed to be replace that one twice by now. It amazes me (but doesn't surprise me) that standard PC warranties are only 1 year. We're actually expected to buy a new PC, install software, restore data and so on every year? I saved time, money AND headaches by spending more money at the start.

    Given the choice, most people will buy the cheap crap because it's cheap and gives them instant gratification. Then, they pay me to troubleshoot it and tell them that it's broken a week after the warranty has expired... and then go out to buy a new piece of crap that will do the same thing. Amazing.

    We dug ourselves into this shit-pit of piss-poor quality, for the most part. We demand more product for less money and end up paying for it in the long run (with time *and* money) when quality suffers because of it. Even when given the choice of quality, most will choose to save a little money now instead of saving more later, because, hey, who has time for patience anymore, right?

    What a pathetic, lazy, disposable culture we've become.

  68. time = money = resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    repairing things might seem like a way to save resources, but the time/money spent repairing something that was cheaper to replace, could have been used to save resources in some other more cost effective way.

    Economists are absolutely correct when they say "tax externalities and let the market figure out the rest".

    Nothing against these people and their hobby, but it is just a hobby, and a very doubtful use of taxpayer funding.

  69. Tragedy of the Commons by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    "People bring in broken items: a skirt with a hole in it, an iron that no longer steams, and they fix each other's stuff and meet their neighbors. Now that's an idea worth keeping."

    Special case of Tragedy of the Commons coming up ......

    There are people who will do the repairing, and others who will sit back and let them do it.

    I have always been a repairer and saver. I hate throwing stuff away that can be repaired - partly because older stuff is often much better. Eg I'm using an IBM At keyboard right now, 20(?) years old that I have taken to pieces to clean at least 5 times. I have repaired huge amounts of stuff over the years - cars, PCs, washing machines, furniture and I have built up a vast arrray of tools and stock of metals, fasteners, timber, electrical components etc.

    However I have never met anyone else remotely into repairing things at this level. I have done plenty of repairs for "friends", and things like designing their kitchens, with, I am afraid to say, little thanks (let alone a returned favour), maybe because they have no idea of the work and knowledge involved. Or maybe they are just self-centred. I feel that they regard me in the same light as the Eloi would regard a Morlock. In fact I believe I am the prototype Morlock.

    From :- http://www.shmoop.com/time-machine-hg-wells/plot-analysis.html

    The Eloi are pretty and the Morlocks are not
    The Eloi are dumb and the Morlocks are not
    The Eloi wear clothes, the Morlocks do not
    The Eloi eat fruit, the Morlocks seriously do not.
    Perhaps most important, the Morlocks work and the Eloi do not.

    Now I only repair things for the immediate family.

  70. economics: opportunity cost by swell · · Score: 1

    So the power cord on your toaster is faulty. Easy fix, right? You steal a cord from your broken radio, get out your soldering gun and have at it. No radio? The hardware store can give you a cord at much lower cost than a new toaster.

    New toaster $25. Cost to repair $4. Easy math, right? Let's forget that your radio cord can't handle the wattage of the toaster and it starts a fire that burns the house down.

    Instead, focus on time. You took 3 hours to fix the toaster. Your job pays you $42/hr plus benefits worth $18. Your time is worth $60/hr, so the toaster repair cost you $180!

    Of course you only work 8 hours/day, 5 days/wk, $2400/wk which is actually 188 hours. Your average for those hours is $12.77/hour, so the repair cost $38.30- about double the cost of a new toaster. Now you have an old crumby toaster that will work a while longer and you've messed up the kitchen table and pissed off your wife.

    Is there nothing better that you could have done with that time? Mother's day is Sunday this week. Spend the $38 on flowers and buy a new toaster.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
    1. Re:economics: opportunity cost by nukenerd · · Score: 1

      Seeing that your comment is addressed to "you", in reading it I take that to mean "me". I am perfectly capable of chosing a power cord appropriate for the load, thanks.

      Let's forget that your radio cord can't handle the wattage of the toaster and it starts a fire that burns the house down.

      Don't cords have fuses in the plug in your neck of the woods? Oh, in the USA perhaps they don't.

      As for time, three hours to change a toaster cord? What else are you doing at the same time?

      And in your calcs you forgot to include the time to go out and buy a new toaster. Though in a large city (Bristol, UK) I would need to travel 10 miles to the main retail park here, through traffic, or 2 miles into the centre through very heavy traffic and then spend ages trying to park - I would probably have to park a mile away and walk the rest. The whole expedition could easily be getting on for three hours.

      For obtaining a power cord, a lifetime of saving things like power cords from otherwise scrapped things means I can source one at home.

      Actually, time is the only thing the human race HAS got in plenty. Several billion years to go before the sun finally blows up I understand. OTOH the resources like the copper in power leads will run out if a generation or two with people like you tossing it away.

    2. Re:economics: opportunity cost by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      So the power cord on your toaster is faulty. Easy fix, right? You steal a cord from your broken radio, get out your soldering gun and have at it. No radio? The hardware store can give you a cord at much lower cost than a new toaster.

      New toaster $25. Cost to repair $4. Easy math, right? Let's forget that your radio cord can't handle the wattage of the toaster and it starts a fire that burns the house down.

      Instead, focus on time. You took 3 hours to fix the toaster. Your job pays you $42/hr plus benefits worth $18. Your time is worth $60/hr, so the toaster repair cost you $180!

      Of course you only work 8 hours/day, 5 days/wk, $2400/wk which is actually 188 hours. Your average for those hours is $12.77/hour, so the repair cost $38.30- about double the cost of a new toaster. Now you have an old crumby toaster that will work a while longer and you've messed up the kitchen table and pissed off your wife.

      Is there nothing better that you could have done with that time? Mother's day is Sunday this week. Spend the $38 on flowers and buy a new toaster.

      Last weekend, I took in a damaged Onkyo stereo receiver. The headphone jack was missing, and the switch for the "B" speaker set was stuck ON. I didn't even repair it -- I promptly hooked it up to the living room TV to replace a cheap-to-middling receiver from the late 1970s. I hooked the main speakers to the "B" posts since there's no need to turn them off, and if someone wants to watch TV with headphones (which we sometimes do), well, the TV has a headphone jack of its own and the amplifier need not even be used. For some reason, it did not want to pull in FM reception using a splitter on the TV's rabbit ears and I had to run a second antenna. We HAVE a 5.1 system, but the wires and satellites have been deemed too ugly and too prone to accidental tripping so it sits in the box unused.

      I decided to put it to use as is because there was nothing wrong with it that wasn't trivial to work around, and this particular unit sells for $170 NEW, with free shipping. Still, that is $170 NOT spent, and money saved is better than money earned because it has no paper trail (and thus no taxes).

      The prior weekend, we repaired a 30-year-old alarm clock whose buttons had long since stopped working (it was being used only as a radio but is fully functional now) and cleaned up an equally old toaster oven and put it back into service. It's not like a newer toaster oven is going to convert electricity to heat any more efficiently than an old one! I can see a point to replacing a refrigerator or a washing machine or a dryer or a dishwasher or even a stove (pilotless does save gas), but a toaster oven?

      I'll ditch really old computers. Generally I will dump them when even the poorest of my friends and acquaintances have something better, and I have no practical use for them myself (even as backup). Those who have nothing will take what they can get.

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  71. Re:I'd love something like that, I do these things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do this to my stuff and anyone who knows me, I find it cheaper to replace or pay for a component to fix something that really has years of life or service left in it. I have fixed PC motherboards, power supplies, even cooling fans that stopped working.

    DIsh Washers, rebuilt car/truck engines, fixed old stereo head units, you name it if I can find the problem and components I can fix it. I can build a car, motorcycle, and house from the ground up, which is actually what I love doing.

    People are surprised how easy it is to find and fix things, you count in the internet with disassemble instructions or just troubleshooting instructions it is alot easier and cheaper to fix something then to throw money at a new item when it may not be necessary to buy a new item. There are things that cannot be fixed usually electronic devices that had some faulty components (recalls) or something went completely hay wire with the entire circuit, but people should try this themselves.

    I have already come to the conclusion that Slashdot users already do this for the most part.

  72. Creative Reuse Workhouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like your emphasis on Thirst for Knowledge. Be it noted the philosopher Gurdjieff earned a living traveling around as a fix-it man.

    A possible US title for this idea might be CREATIVE REUSE WORKHOUSE. In Chicago Ken Dunn of the Resource Center (without much encouragement-- the first buildiing was seized and destroyed by the University of Illinois/Chicago expansion program in 2001) instituted a Creative Reuse Warehouse where artists, inventors, parents, teachers could find used goods worth buying (cheap) for reuse purposes. It's hard to make any money at that and the Resource Center has had to survive mainly through their recycling activities, so some volunteers are forming a Workhouse adjunct where (1) salvaged materials and objects (especially wood) will be (2) arranged, organized, (3) repaired, remanufactured, (4) remarketed, donated to the RC for resale, etc., and (5) repairpersons, retailers, reusers suitably instructed to make this happen.

    Special tip: experience shows the most important priority is to have enough SHELVING so that every item can be located (among others of its kind) by purchasers, retailers etc. (and the shelving, of course, made exclusively from salvaged, trimmed, sanded lumber).

  73. Ignore by asvravi · · Score: 1

    Posting to remove unintentional mod.