Ahh, so he has to fill out the Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Exemption Request form, stand in queue at the local magistrate's office.
Then upon 7 fortnights, if the request is granted, he must then fill out the Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Information Request form, again in a queue this time at the Council offices.
Should this form be approved, following a 600 pound sterling filing fee, then he can go on to contract a Solicitor. The Solicitor files a Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Action form with the local Constable....
If the Constable finds wrong doing, the Constable then files a Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Investigation and the Solicitor can have a Barrister take all the above forms, signed in triplicate to stand in queue at the local magistrates office....
Global temps cooled and stayed there for 40 years during the post-WW2 economic boom. When carbon dioxide emissions were rising, and atmospheric co2 was rising, temps decreased.
I can go on... the warming-at-altitude problem. Greenhouse-based warming is supposed to heat the mid troposphere faster than the surface. But that's not what is happening. The troposphere is warming much slower than the surface.
The 2500 IPCC scientists who are "all in agreement"? Yeah, quite a few of those aren't scientists. And quite a few scientists didn't agree but got counted anyway.
I'm not saying AGW is impossible. It sure as hell isn't an undisputed fact. And guys like you frothing at the mouth... is that "sticking it to the man"? Toeing the AGW line is so NOT punk rock.
Man... you are like my right wing friends when I tell them Palin is a mistake. They freak the fuck out just like you did now.
AGW might just be bullshit. It was better when we dealt with pollution. I'd bet if we met in person, and compared our "carbon footprints", recycling, energy usage... probably by any metric I would be more "green" than you. But you spout your nonsense about heads up asses because, what, I think the AGW hypothesis has some problems? You have been SOLD the AGW line, and now you bark at me like your masters told you to. "Burn the heretic!"
You are no different than Bill O'Reilly railing against net neutrality because his boss owns NewsCorp.
It was better when we talked about pollution. Air and water quality, acid rain, ozone, etc. Now you all put your eggs in one basket with AGW. As the AGW hypothesis is shown to be flawed.... it makes the rest of the environmental movement look like liars.
And there are many problems with the AGW hypothesis.
Maybe if we by carbon credits from Al Gore's carbon trading firm, those islands will come back with unicorns and triple-rainbows.
Aside from the media, liberal politicians, and moonbats.... not everyone agrees on the AGW hypothesis. Raise all the "awareness" you want, the sun's not listening. http://stagevu.com/video/nhljdfsznpkc
For fucks sake, you argue like a kid. Like everything's a dichotomy.
If you take money from the rich and give it to the poor, that is fundamentally wrong. If you take it from the middle class to give to the corporations, that is fundamentally wrong.
If all groups agree to contribute towards the creation of common property (roads, armed forces), then that is part of the social contract formulated among free people. But why should upper-middle class pay a greater percentage of their earnings toward roads than the lower-middle class? Do rich people wear out roads faster? Do the cops spend more or less of their budget year dealing with rich or poor people?
There are problems with the Bush tax cuts, since there are rich people paying nothing. Everyone should pay in their share to the social contract, but NO ONE should be cashing out.
Obama, et al, really do think your money belongs to them first. To be doled out as they see fit. It's YOUR money, you just agree to let them have a portion to support the social contract.
I listen to people like you, a good chunk of slashdotland....it's like the Enlightenment never happened. Like Rousseau, Voltaire, and Jefferson didn't get thru to y'all the importance of government as a social contract and consent of the governed.
the basis of this free nation is the limited government to secure life, liberty, and property. you take such a casual stance with respect to loss of liberty.
Name one appointee
Van Jones.
The red scare was nonsense even when it was happening.
Except that the Soviet Union actually WAS attempting to infiltrate public institutions and influence US actions thru the entire cold war. Man, even NPR talked about that.
However, anyone who think it is okay to take property from group A and give it to group B is a communist. You can't take it from group A unless you believe property is yours to take.... held in common.
And to be honest, quite a few of Obamas appointees and czars are self-described communists.
The problem is that carriers do not want you to have a general-purpose computer on their networks. They want to be able to sell you each. individual. application. The last thing they want is the end-user installing software, so they take steps to disable functionality. They want you to have a pseudo-smartphone, it looks neat, costs a lot, racks up the data charges...but isn't a general-purpose computer.
This is at odds with what we all thought Android promised us: a real OS for our tiny computers that would let us treat the carrier like any other ISP.
You won't be saving anything. The loss of a $40k-75k/year co-pilot will save the company $40k-75k/year. Spread that out over all the passengers/year. You really think Ryan Air will pass those savings on to you in the form of a couple bucks? They won't.
The coin-operated bathroom idea wasn't designed to pass savings on to the customer either.
I don't much care for Beck. He's too much a mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch. And he is too over-the-top.
But the democrat party relies on race baiting to get minorities in their corner. It's not race baiting for race baiting's benefit: it's just a means to an end (power).
I happen to believe in limited government, individual liberty, and property rights.... I could care less what color you are.
Hmmm... I have a small pickup, but we mostly drive the Prius (not a 'statement', I just like the car). I have a pistol and a rifle, but with the price of ammo these days I don't get to go shooting that much.
I went to Iraq for a year with the Army National Guard...and have been in the military for over 14 years.
I'm the hard-core conservative who believes in habitat conservation. I'm a militant recycler with military experience. I'm the pro-property rights, limited government white male who thinks gays are ok, deforestation is bad, and AGW is possible.
Hows your stereotypes going so far? To be fair, you did change it already once.
Slashdot Mirror
As an American who has never actually been to the UK, I was just hoping i got some of the terminology right.
US courts never pass up a good lawsuit.
Ahh, so he has to fill out the Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Exemption Request form, stand in queue at the local magistrate's office.
Then upon 7 fortnights, if the request is granted, he must then fill out the Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Information Request form, again in a queue this time at the Council offices.
Should this form be approved, following a 600 pound sterling filing fee, then he can go on to contract a Solicitor. The Solicitor files a Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Action form with the local Constable....
If the Constable finds wrong doing, the Constable then files a Data Protection Act Stolen Dog Investigation and the Solicitor can have a Barrister take all the above forms, signed in triplicate to stand in queue at the local magistrates office....
The US already has a transparent UAV in development.
O rly?
Aside from that, you really believe that academia is never predisposed to a particular agenda or ideology?
[citation needed]
Global temps cooled and stayed there for 40 years during the post-WW2 economic boom. When carbon dioxide emissions were rising, and atmospheric co2 was rising, temps decreased.
I can go on... the warming-at-altitude problem. Greenhouse-based warming is supposed to heat the mid troposphere faster than the surface. But that's not what is happening. The troposphere is warming much slower than the surface.
The 2500 IPCC scientists who are "all in agreement"? Yeah, quite a few of those aren't scientists. And quite a few scientists didn't agree but got counted anyway.
I'm not saying AGW is impossible. It sure as hell isn't an undisputed fact. And guys like you frothing at the mouth... is that "sticking it to the man"? Toeing the AGW line is so NOT punk rock.
Man... you are like my right wing friends when I tell them Palin is a mistake. They freak the fuck out just like you did now.
AGW might just be bullshit. It was better when we dealt with pollution. I'd bet if we met in person, and compared our "carbon footprints", recycling, energy usage... probably by any metric I would be more "green" than you. But you spout your nonsense about heads up asses because, what, I think the AGW hypothesis has some problems? You have been SOLD the AGW line, and now you bark at me like your masters told you to. "Burn the heretic!"
You are no different than Bill O'Reilly railing against net neutrality because his boss owns NewsCorp.
It was better when we talked about pollution. Air and water quality, acid rain, ozone, etc. Now you all put your eggs in one basket with AGW. As the AGW hypothesis is shown to be flawed.... it makes the rest of the environmental movement look like liars.
And there are many problems with the AGW hypothesis.
Maybe if we by carbon credits from Al Gore's carbon trading firm, those islands will come back with unicorns and triple-rainbows.
Aside from the media, liberal politicians, and moonbats.... not everyone agrees on the AGW hypothesis.
Raise all the "awareness" you want, the sun's not listening.
http://stagevu.com/video/nhljdfsznpkc
Which is why Africa is doing so w... wait. What?
For fucks sake, you argue like a kid. Like everything's a dichotomy.
If you take money from the rich and give it to the poor, that is fundamentally wrong. If you take it from the middle class to give to the corporations, that is fundamentally wrong.
If all groups agree to contribute towards the creation of common property (roads, armed forces), then that is part of the social contract formulated among free people. But why should upper-middle class pay a greater percentage of their earnings toward roads than the lower-middle class? Do rich people wear out roads faster? Do the cops spend more or less of their budget year dealing with rich or poor people?
There are problems with the Bush tax cuts, since there are rich people paying nothing. Everyone should pay in their share to the social contract, but NO ONE should be cashing out.
Obama, et al, really do think your money belongs to them first. To be doled out as they see fit. It's YOUR money, you just agree to let them have a portion to support the social contract.
I listen to people like you, a good chunk of slashdotland....it's like the Enlightenment never happened. Like Rousseau, Voltaire, and Jefferson didn't get thru to y'all the importance of government as a social contract and consent of the governed.
the basis of this free nation is the limited government to secure life, liberty, and property. you take such a casual stance with respect to loss of liberty.
Name one appointee
Van Jones.
The red scare was nonsense even when it was happening.
Except that the Soviet Union actually WAS attempting to infiltrate public institutions and influence US actions thru the entire cold war. Man, even NPR talked about that.
Oh yeah, that. It's not my blog.
However, anyone who think it is okay to take property from group A and give it to group B is a communist. You can't take it from group A unless you believe property is yours to take.... held in common.
And to be honest, quite a few of Obamas appointees and czars are self-described communists.
No native Gopher support?
From my cold, dead hands!
I'm not sure the "I was helping to slashdot it" defense will work out in court, bud.
Then How, oh How, do ISPs manage to survive?
There needs to be a demarc in the phone...what goes on the network is their problem. what goes on the phone is mine.
The problem is that carriers do not want you to have a general-purpose computer on their networks. They want to be able to sell you each. individual. application. The last thing they want is the end-user installing software, so they take steps to disable functionality. They want you to have a pseudo-smartphone, it looks neat, costs a lot, racks up the data charges...but isn't a general-purpose computer.
This is at odds with what we all thought Android promised us: a real OS for our tiny computers that would let us treat the carrier like any other ISP.
Everyone runs faster with a knife in their hands.
As my drill sergeant told me many years ago, "If you ain't cheating, you ain't trying. And if you get caught, you weren't trying hard enough."
Cheating is a part of all cultures.
To be fair, if you generally have problems with anything Google, you'll be lucky to ever make contact with a human to fix it.
Being from Utah, I found the South Park Episode, "All About Mormons" to be a very accurate portrayal.
I just want to know what exactly is added to this presentation by using an avatar on a virtual stage.
People want to bash powerpoint but someone takes up half the video area with superfluous (and bad) VR and no one minds?
They will be engines for removing entropy from a system
Or just shift the entropy around, like a lever trades space for power. Creating said engines will increase entropy too.
I hope you didn't just suggest that you can win the game.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginsberg's_Theorem
save a few bucks.
You won't be saving anything. The loss of a $40k-75k/year co-pilot will save the company $40k-75k/year. Spread that out over all the passengers/year. You really think Ryan Air will pass those savings on to you in the form of a couple bucks? They won't.
The coin-operated bathroom idea wasn't designed to pass savings on to the customer either.
I don't much care for Beck. He's too much a mouthpiece for Rupert Murdoch. And he is too over-the-top.
But the democrat party relies on race baiting to get minorities in their corner. It's not race baiting for race baiting's benefit: it's just a means to an end (power).
I happen to believe in limited government, individual liberty, and property rights.... I could care less what color you are.
Hmmm... I have a small pickup, but we mostly drive the Prius (not a 'statement', I just like the car). I have a pistol and a rifle, but with the price of ammo these days I don't get to go shooting that much.
I went to Iraq for a year with the Army National Guard...and have been in the military for over 14 years.
I'm the hard-core conservative who believes in habitat conservation. I'm a militant recycler with military experience. I'm the pro-property rights, limited government white male who thinks gays are ok, deforestation is bad, and AGW is possible.
Hows your stereotypes going so far? To be fair, you did change it already once.