Slashdot Mirror


Airbus Planning Transparent Planes

goG writes "European aircraft manufacturer Airbus has come up with the idea to build a passenger flight with a completely transparent fuselage. The central body of the aircraft will allow passengers to the see the stars above and city lights below. 'The planes of the future will offer an unparalleled, unobstructed view of the wonders of the five continents — where you will be able see the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower through the transparent floor of the aircraft,' Airbus said while unveiling the concept 'The Future By Airbus' earlier this year."

488 comments

  1. This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I dunno about anyone else, but knowing there is something non-transparent and solid around me is about the only thing that makes flying semi-sane for me. ;)

    1. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm with you, man. I'm not afraid of heights, but the idea of experiencing a steep banking turn with a transparent fuselage makes fairly nauseous.

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    2. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Where is the "donotwant" tag?

    3. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by burne · · Score: 1, Informative

      You're ignoring issues with the weight of glass or the strength of polycarbonate.

    4. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You're ignoring issues with the weight of glass or the strength of polycarbonate.

      Because, according to TFA, these new planes will be made of a transparent ceramic. Obviously the Airbus designers are high on something more prosaic. Otherwise they would have realized that the obvious next step is transparent aluminum.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's aluminum ceramics?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a fear of falling (and the more likely to my brain falling is the more the fear kicks in), glass or transparent anything that I'd stand, sit, or other hope to hell is going to support me would give me a full blown panic attack...

      Btw lots of people tell me it's just a fear of heights, except I'm fine on high things that seem solid and unlikely to fall... A cabin on the top of a 'mountain', won't bother me. A thin metal bar on the edge of a bridge 200 feet overlooking the ground (or water) makes me nervous. The transparent flooring on the upper level of a skyscrapper I once visited was another to have me curled up on the floor...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    7. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Shivetya · · Score: 1

      I doubt very much I would like to see through the hull during storms or particularly dicey landings.

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    8. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by EdZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, you don't have a fear of heights, you have a fear of depths.

    9. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1
    10. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Funny

      the idea of experiencing a steep banking turn with a transparent fuselage makes fairly nauseous.

      Don't worry it sounds like it's a self correcting problem...

    11. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by sconeu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Join the club. I'm fine with flying, but I freak out at steep drops that I'm "connected" to. My daughters thought it was hilarious when I lost it at the Grand Canyon, and I was nervous all throughout dinner when we ate at the top of the Stratosphere (not my choice).

      Given that I almost panicked on the Palm Springs aerial tramway, I suspect that I'd go into full-blown panic mode on a plane that did that.

      Airbus may be able to make a plane like this. I doubt that they'll sell many to commercial airlines, due to liability concerns over people with acrophobia. There may be a niche market for sightseeing etc...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by SammyIAm · · Score: 1

      I'm totally with you on the distinction between heights / falling. The Sears Tower (or whatever it's called these days) was fine, and a wonderful sightseeing opportunity. The steps on Quarter Dome (on the way to Half Dome in Yosemite), were absolutely terrifying. Even Half Dome wasn't as bad since there were hand rails (cables) to hold onto.

    13. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally! Transparent Aluminum!

    14. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I don't care too much about heights. I will look all around in a plane, top of transparent lookout on a tower, etc. I've gone pretty fast on a mountain bike down hills, jump down some drop offs and such.

      I don't have a balance problem, but I cannot climb ladders without any level of comfort. So, I'm not afraid of heights, just afraid of climbing ladders .... stepping stool up to about 4 or 5 feet off the ground fine. I'm a young, fit person. From 8 to 10 feet on a ladder, no way even to change a light bulb or paint a ceiling (I'll just get a longer pole for the paint roller!).

    15. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a fear of falling (and the more likely to my brain falling is the more the fear kicks in), glass or transparent anything that I'd stand, sit, or other hope to hell is going to support me would give me a full blown panic attack...

      Truth be told, it scares us too. The main reason we're developing these airplanes is for the youtube videos of people falling asleep on the planes, waking up, looking at the floor, and freaking out.

      sincerely,
      Airbus

    16. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by berzerke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Airbus may be able to make a plane like this. I doubt that they'll sell many to commercial airlines, due to liability concerns over people with acrophobia. There may be a niche market for sightseeing etc...

      I don't know. It might be great for in-flight sales of alcohol and valium like drugs.

    17. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Hylandr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      *Grin*

      I was just thinking the same thing. Give me the seat that faces backwards and a bag of popcorn.

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    18. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Silfax · · Score: 1

      Join the club. I'm fine with flying, but I freak out at steep drops that I'm "connected" to

      Same here, but for me it is edges that do it. I am fine at heights, but get me near the edge and I freak..
      I can't imagine they would sell many of these planes for general aviation purposes, might be ok for some folks, but I think most people would be a bit apprehensive when flying in these.

    19. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by pgillan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is offtopic, but if you can figure out how to edge the wall where it meets the ceiling, let me know. I don't have a problem with ladders, but I have a very large wall in my living room and I can't figure out to get up there to paint it without buying a super tall ladder.

    20. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      what about when flying through a boiling thunderstorm with lighting all around the airframe? That will go down well with the fear to fly crowd.
      Or those all too often - ooops that plane is a bit too close - incidents as it is now most of the people on board can't see that another plane came too close but would totally freak out if the whole plane load saw it.

    21. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a fear of falling (and the more likely to my brain falling is the more the fear kicks in), glass or transparent anything that I'd stand, sit, or other hope to hell is going to support me would give me a full blown panic attack...

      Btw lots of people tell me it's just a fear of heights, except I'm fine on high things that seem solid and unlikely to fall... A cabin on the top of a 'mountain', won't bother me. A thin metal bar on the edge of a bridge 200 feet overlooking the ground (or water) makes me nervous. The transparent flooring on the upper level of a skyscrapper I once visited was another to have me curled up on the floor...

      If that's the case, you should take a visit to the Grand Canyon Skywalk Snopes also describes it if the first source is too dubious.

    22. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Interesting you say that. I do not like standing on the edge at tall buldings, getting a vertigo feeling, but I fly gliders and no matter how high I go I am perfectly happy

      Strange eh?

    23. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by syousef · · Score: 3

      Don't worry. Last time I checked luggage and cargo was not transparent, planes required wiring etc. etc. This is just ill thought out marketing BS.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    24. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by sconeu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, that's a better way of phrasing it. Edges.

      I'm fine inside a skyscraper with a standard vertical window. If it tilts out so that I feel like I'm leaning over the edge, that's the trigger.

      At the G.C., though, i couldn't get within 20 feet of the edge where the observation point was. How that Native American tribe gets people to do the Skywalk thing, I have no idea.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    25. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "I dunno about anyone else, but knowing there is something non-transparent and solid around me is about the only thing that makes flying semi-sane for me. ;)"

      Not. It is *not* knowing there's just a hugh amount of thin air between you and earth what makes it semi-sane for you. Transparent fuselages would take you out of such oblivion.

    26. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by xaositects · · Score: 1

      Willis tower observation level? Man, I had to test that thing a few times with my foot before stepping out on it.

    27. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I'm fine inside a skyscraper with a standard vertical window.

      Spoken like someone who's never done a Ferris Bueller. I did one of those on the World Trade Center observation deck. It was a long fucking way down.

    28. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Pay someone, rent/buy a tall ladder, or put a plain brush on an extension. If it's that far away from your eyes, your edging doesn't have to be all that accurate so long as it's precise.

    29. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      If you're ever in Chicago, the Skydeck 'Ledge' in the Sears Tower is worth the 2-hour wait in line...

      http://www.theskydeck.com/

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    30. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This year, purchased a ticket at the Shanghai World Financial Center for a ride to the top. The top floor is that bridge area. Part of the floor has transparent (thick) tiles about two feet wide running lengthwise in the center.

      I'll never forget when I first stepped on one. I scooted to the side ASAP! For a moment, I had visions of it cracking and me falling right through. After ten minutes or so, I sheepishly started walking on it like any normal tile. Reason being, I wanted to take some nice photos.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    31. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I get more nauseous during turns when I'm in the middle rows of a plane, and all the windows I can see have the shades shut. It's like being blindfolded and spun around.
       

      --
      mod me funny
    32. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by magarity · · Score: 1

      Don't take a ride in a Bell H13 then.

    33. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this marked to negative one? It is an interesting point.

    34. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Do you have a panic attack thinking about tripping and falling when walking in the park? Or is with respect say to tripping and falling off the edge of a building? A high building. I can fall anywhere and I am not afraid of it unless it is from somewhere high. So if you are just afraid of falling, then you are afraid of falling. If you are afraid of falling from somewhere high, then simply put, you are afraid of heights. Stop making it complicated. It isn't.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    35. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've flown on old Bell Huey Helicopters with the doors wide open (I guess the helicopters themselves weren't that old at the time). When the pilot makes a hard turn the whole body goes perpendicular to the ground, and if you are say, on the right side of the helicopter when it is making a right turn, you are stuck to the floor by centrifugal force and are staring straight down at the ground with nothing between you and it but air. A little unnerving at first. And if you happen to be carrying a lot of weight, it is best to hold on to the posts or better yet buckle in to a harness. A buddy of mine almost slid out.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    36. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Given that I've already admitted my fear of heights, why the fuck would you think I'd even attempt to go onto the observation deck?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    37. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by alanshot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not necessarily.

      your brain works in mysterious ways.

      There is an interesting phenomenon that I dont recall the name for. basically the reason you freak in a skyscraper but not in a plane is the fact that there is nothing in your view to "connect" you to the ground.

      when you are in a skyscraper, your brain sees the line of the building to the ground, makes the connection and says "F***! I'm high up!".

      In an aircraft, there isn nothing for your brain to connect the plane to the ground, so you are less prone to that freak out.

      Point of fact: Im DEATHLY afraid of heights. I cant climb a 20' ladder without freaking out. Yet as a skydiving instructor for the past 8 years, I regularly fly (calmly) to altitude sitting on the floor of an airplane by an open cargo door as it climbs to altitude (often with my a** inches from the edge, and my leg dangling outside). from 5' to 14,000 feet I can look out the door calmly and marvel at the view. (but have trouble climbing a 150' firewatch tower in a nearby forest)

        interesting question: what about he baggage in the cargo hold? wont that get in the way of the purty view?

    38. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Don't worry -- if the fuselage is transparent when the plane does anything but fly nice and level, it won't be for very long, airsickness bags or no.

    39. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when there is engine trouble or mechanical failure and the plane starts going down, you can watch yourself hurling toward the ground at 600 miles per hour.

    40. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by davester666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It makes joining the mile-high club that much more interesting...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    41. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know you are joking, but I guess in reality when people look at the floor in such airplanes the only thing they will see is their luggage...

      Now, that might be a good idea so that you can check that the airline is (or is not...) uploading your luggage before take off.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    42. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by halowolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's those shades that keep the blinding light of the sun out of my eyes when flying above the clouds. I imagine only the floor would be transparent one would hope so that passengers could actually enjoy a comfortable flight without worry about having to suffer permanent blindness. The article however has other ideas.

      But reading the article its all about some design concepts that will not see reality without some heavy tech investment into material manufacturing et all. I prefer the holographic projection of the outside option myself so that the sun can be filtered out by a computer, else the fuselage would have to be very smart to keep the big burning ball of fire causing discomfort or harm to passengers.

    43. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      interesting question: what about he baggage in the cargo hold? wont that get in the way of the purty view?

      That was my thought too, and I'm surprised I had to read this far down to find a comment on it. I'm sure they don't plan to put the luggage above the passengers, so it does seem a pretty tough problem. Unless TFS is wrong and they're only planning to make the sides transparent.

    44. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      You'll need transparent luggage, transparent cables and tanks, transparent fuel and transparent cargo to be able to see down.

    45. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could use that clever glass they use in peep shows - it goes totally opaque at the flick of a switch.

      --
      No sig today...
    46. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Joce640k · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wait! I just read the article and they *are* using stripper glass....

      --
      No sig today...
    47. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a look at the video here:

      http://io9.com/5639113/the-scariest-video-you-have-ever-watched-in-the-name-of-science

    48. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Teancum · · Score: 1

      My fear with ladders isn't climbing up but rather how sturdy the ladder itself is. Standard 6 feet or 12 feet ladders aren't too bad, but a 30 foot ladder gets real shaky when you get to the top.

      I once worked as a custodian where I had to climb to the top of the 30 foot ladder, let go of the thing to reach up and additional 3 feet above the ladder to reach for some florescent light bulbs in order to get them changed. They were in a stairwell, which is one of the reasons why they were so high up and you couldn't get a cherry picker into there. In hindsight, it violated several OSHA rules to even suggest that was the procedure for changing those bulbs, but I did it about once a month or so when I was doing that job.

      I've had some ladders break out from under me... I a sort of big guy with a bit of heft on me. That gets real scary when that happens, at least when a rung or two go out from your weight. Some of the things I've had to climb up certainly didn't inspire me in terms of if I would last going up them.

    49. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, maybe you want to face your irrational fears?

    50. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by wrook · · Score: 1

      I always tell people that I don't have an irrational fear of heights. I have a very rational fear of engineers.

    51. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I sense a new genre of porn.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    52. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It's a concept, a thought experiment basically. They asked their engineers to dream up stuff based on current tech (even if that tech is lab-only), and this is what they came up with. Also no glass or PC involved; some transparent ceramics they were thinking of.

      The project leader thinks that these technologies could be implemented by 2050, that's 40 years later!

      Nonetheless it's interesting. Scary, yes sure! I find it scary to step on a glass floor in a high building looking down 100m to the ground. Most people do, naturally. A plane is worse. But also it sounds really really cool.

    53. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Silfax · · Score: 1

      Nothing irrational about it. If I fall, I go *splat* at the end.

      It is a survival instinct.

    54. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      It's a skyscraper with vertical windows. It's just the matter of actually leaning against it. And I've got a fear of those kind of heights too, thankfully mild enough I was able to force myself to do it.

    55. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not afraid of heights either, and I can understand why some people might find such a thing uncomfortable. However, I've flown in a helicopter in the front seat plenty of times with transparent canopy on almost all sides, and over mountainous terrain requiring all kinds of "interesting" maneuvers, including near-90-degree banks and terrain-clinging changes in altitude. Even though I know the chances will be pretty slim that this passenger aircraft idea will be acceptable to the majority of people, all I can say about it is...

      WOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

    56. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by AlecC · · Score: 1

      So-called Transparent Aluminium is nor usually metallic aluminium but actually Transparent Alumina - a ceramic. I e. this is probably exactly what they are talking about,

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    57. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The transparent flooring on the upper level of a skyscrapper I once visited was another to have me curled up on the floor...

      The jokers responsible for things like that should be taken to their own version of Room 101 and be made to let rats nibble their toes, or whatever their private hell is.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    58. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what drugs do to you in vegas

    59. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it's not a ear of falling, it's a fear of landing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    60. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Trams (which from my playing of Return to castle Wolfenstein is I believe what Americans call cable cars) scare the shit out of me. I remember getting off one in Barcelona after one stop and literally hugging/kissing the ground in relief, which my wife somehow found amusing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    61. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think this gets my vote for most purely evil invention of the century, and I don't care if someone invents a new power station that runs on the tears of tortured puppies, I'm not changing my mind.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    62. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude chill
      it will be transparent only a few moments before takeoff
      after that it will turn all brown

    63. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by kinnell · · Score: 1

      At least all the screaming would drown out the engine noise

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    64. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a large antenna tower touristy thing in Japan (Tokyo I think) and one part has a section of floor that is (probably) lexan. You're way high up, probably 250 feet IIRC and you can look down to the ground, standing on the lexan. Didn't bother me at all, thought it was cool.
       
      Climbing a shaky aluminum extension ladder up to my 2nd story gutters? White knuckle time.

    65. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by drewhk · · Score: 1

      They exactly plan something like that:

      "The transparent plane's outer skin would be made of a special futuristic type of ceramic. The push of a button would send electricity flowing through the material, making the main body of the plane see-through,"

    66. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fiberglass is transparent when made correctly. Welcome to the future of composite aircraft, where if so desired, you can actually have a transparent monocoque structure.

      -CompositesResearcher (still prefer to drive because I haven't grown wings yet)

    67. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is marketing bullshit designed to get Airbus in the news. Apart from the entertainment effect of discussing transparent aluminum it isn't news for nerds its news for sheeple.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    68. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, the pucker factor.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    69. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, it's those shades that keep the blinding light of the sun out of my eyes when flying above the clouds. I imagine only the floor would be transparent one would hope so that passengers could actually enjoy a comfortable flight without worry about having to suffer permanent blindness.

      Carefully feel above and below your eyes. Feel those flaps of skin? They're called eyelids. You can close them whenver you want to reduce the level of light that enters your eyes. Try it now. Don't use your fingers, they come with their own muscles. You might need to exercise those muscles if you haven't used them previously.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    70. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 1

      Imagine falling asleep on the plane and then waking up to a see through floor a few thousand feet up in the sky.

    71. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can watch yourself hurling toward the ground

      No kidding! That sounds accurate to me.
      "Uh, Miss? My barf-bag is full."

    72. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      It doesn't bother Wonder Woman.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    73. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      And the transparent lavatories would be hilarious, saving the airline a lot on in flight entertainment.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    74. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by crispylinetta · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I can't even watch the Viewpoint scenes from Assassin's Creed in HD without getting queasy. Standard Def from the low-to-the-ground safety of a bean bag chair, please!

    75. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I hope her patent has expired or Airbus is going to face some legal problems. Or maybe they licensed it... she has been carrying a couple extra golden lassos.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    76. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be spectacular when you travel with the Earths rotation. I try to sleep as much as possible on planes given their comfy accomodations. When I wake up, I may tune into some mindless television programming. Both of those activities seem to have been overlooked. There shouldn't be a shortage of light for reading though.

      Does Airbus expect airlines are going to fly these birds only after dusk? Any post-govt-subsidized airline is not going to see value in this. You may want to short Airbus if they decide to go through with this.

    77. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a better way of phrasing it. Edges.

      I'm fine inside a skyscraper with a standard vertical window. If it tilts out so that I feel like I'm leaning over the edge, that's the trigger.

      At the G.C., though, i couldn't get within 20 feet of the edge where the observation point was. How that Native American tribe gets people to do the Skywalk thing, I have no idea.

      Eh, I like to go on the edges and lean over; what scares you thrills me.
      Bigger plane windows sounds great to me.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    78. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Always buckle . . .

      When I was doing my flight training (in a Cessna 150 - cramped little things) I was practicing turns around a point when the door latch popped open. Now, wind pressure naturally kept the door from really flying wide open, but trust me, it's still unnerving to be sitting at a 45 degree bank (to your side) and know that the seat belt is the only thing keeping you from falling a few thousand feet to your death.

      I'm building a tolerance though. In looking at plane purchases I've actually considered a few that were open-cockpit :).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    79. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      totally agree, something about seeing through the walls, to see something that is "out there" coming at me, would make me cringe more then anything else...of course, also the vertigo you could feel when the plane tilts to one side, and you can REALLY see all the way to the ground.

    80. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      They make specially designed edging rollers that can be used with poles.

      It looks like this kit includes one, but I could not find one on its own online...very odd.

      http://www.homedepot.com/Paint-Brushes-Roller-Covers/h_d1/N-5yc1vZ1xh7Zar6o/R-100677129/h_d2/ProductDisplay?langId=-1&storeId=10051&catalogId=10053

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    81. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      planes required wiring etc. etc.

      We'll just replace that by a couple of 802.11b hotspots. What could possibly go wrong?

    82. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      welcome to the real world... the pain you are feeling is because you haven't used your muscles before.

    83. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not a fear of heights or falling even. It is the fear of hitting the ground at high speed and dying.

    84. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the entire thing is transparent?

      What if I have to drop a duece?

    85. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by In_Awe · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to hear that other peoples' height fears work the same as mine. The height doesn't matter, it's the safety. Super-high place with stable footing and chest-high railing, no problem. Same height with unstable footing or a low or no railing, fear kicks in big time. I'm always amazed by people who can walk right up to the edge of an unguarded cliff and look down without the slightest bit of fear.

    86. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by Kyont · · Score: 1

      How that Native American tribe gets people to do the Skywalk thing, I have no idea.

      In the retail world, it's called "justification of purchase." By the time you've driven 5 hours out of your way into the desolate desert, then paid $82 per person just to get through the gates, you'll be goddamned if you're going to wimp out at the last minute and go home without walking out onto the glass (however tepidly)! More power to the Hualapais for creating a revenue source that doesn't involve gambling.

      Personally, I was able to walk right to the edge of the Canyon and down the trails, but admittedly had a death-grip on my young'uns wrist and/or shirt collar the entire time.

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    87. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Photo voltaic glass might help. You could even wire it so it becomes completely opaque either in it's entirety or in parts. Touch of a button causes a window to appear.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    88. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      this is /.
      You must explain what centrifugal force is (see Centripetal force).

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    89. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      I have a fear of slamming my body into an effectively immovable object. Maybe I am just a scardy cat since I have multiple skull fractures and concussions from doing said activity. Would that be called "Rapid Acceleratiaphobia"?

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    90. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      I can probably manage the task of jumping off a cliff. Just because I can does not mean I should.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    91. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      That is where the invisibility cloak would come in handy. You could also use mirrors, but stay away from using smoke, that would probably cause a bit of panic.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    92. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    93. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Wow, you read the first sentence, it is a start. Try reading the whole thing. Unless you live in the classical era or before, there is no force that pulls things towards to center of a spinning object. If you do live in the classical era, then good job with the time machine.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    94. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      read the article. all things are relative. that is why they mention frame of reference. see pedantic

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    95. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as centrifugal force. you feel disoriented (frame of reference) because you are trying to coordinate what you see with what you feel. Just because Wiki has an entry does not make it a real thing. btw, I was not clear on what I think you read the first line of, I was refering to your Wiki link.

      As far as I know the speed of light is absolute.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
    96. Re:This would scare the hell out of me by chameleon3 · · Score: 1

      There is an interesting phenomenon that I dont recall the name for. basically the reason you freak in a skyscraper but not in a plane is the fact that there is nothing in your view to "connect" you to the ground.

      when you are in a skyscraper, your brain sees the line of the building to the ground, makes the connection and says "F***! I'm high up!".

      In an aircraft, there isn nothing for your brain to connect the plane to the ground, so you are less prone to that freak out.

      I have the same problem-- fine in planes, freaked out at places like the Grand Canyon. Your theory is interesting, but the hot-air balloon thing destroys it (for me, at least). Nothing to connect me to the ground, but Freaked. Me. Out. My personal feeling is that it's due to control. Ironically, I'm fine if (like in planes) I have no bearing on if I fall. But I could manage to make myself fall over the edge of a railing or balloon basket.

      Just a thought-- thanks for your (and others') post! It's nice to know I'm not the only one that has the same height issues.

  2. I for one by KillaGouge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would really love to fly on an aircraft that was designed like this. I enjoy flying and would really love to see everything bellow. The only problem is the baggage compartment, and the routing of the wire, hoses, and conduit.

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
    1. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure that I really want to see what they do in the baggage compartment during the transitions between stops. I might not want my bag back.

    2. Re:I for one by Speare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A thousand other replies followed yours, with every variation of Wonder Woman, transparent cargo, wiring and bathrooms. Congrats on being fastest, or first to get an Insightful mod.

      Personally, I think that temperature regulation and solar dazzle will be a lot harder problem. Already, flying north or south near sunset can have a noticeable impact on cabin temperatures, and everyone slides the blinds closed on the sunward side. What if you don't have those options? You're going to be the ant in the jar, left to sweat it out in the direct sunlight. Such a plane would be suitable only for short excursion use.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    3. Re:I for one by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      The US already has a transparent UAV in development.

    4. Re:I for one by spun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      If you want to see everything bellow, kick everything square in the nuts and it will bellow pretty loudly. If everything is a girl, punch it in the ovaries.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:I for one by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Such a plane would be suitable only for short excursion use.

      Perhaps that is their primary use case. On most trips, there is not a whole lot to see. At least, nothing on the scale of the Eiffel tower or ancient pyramids.

    6. Re:I for one by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      The vomit colored and sticky floor soon after take off is going to be a bit of a problem too.

    7. Re:I for one by ksandom · · Score: 1

      This is illuded to in the article. It sounds like the cabin would be coated in an LCD like material.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    8. Re:I for one by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that Airbus is probably the only aircraft company that sucks more than Boeing at actually getting their new designs in the air.

      It'll be cool when it happens, but Airbus won't be the first to put us in one. They'll be the first to START talking about constructing one, hell maybe even the first to start constructing one.

      History tells us there isn't a chance in hell that Airbus will be the first one in the air with it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:I for one by rhook · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you all missed this part FTFA.

      "walls that become see-through at the touch of a button"

      Sounds a lot like those windows you can make transparent or tinted at the push of a button.

    10. Re:I for one by catmistake · · Score: 1

      And... forgetting where you parked

    11. Re:I for one by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Not the only problem... let's have totally transparent cars on the road, transparent skin, engine, body, everything.

      There would be fewer crashes that way, right?

    12. Re:I for one by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know. I'd like to think coastlines, cloud formations, and more would be just as interesting.

      Right now I can only look out a tiny window, which is not placed at a convenient viewing location (too low and between the seats), and even then most of my view is obscured by the wing. And that's if I get a window seat.

      So, I don't know if I buy that "there is not a whole lot to see." Because I've never been able to look.

    13. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, wonder woman should sue, this must be some sort of infringement

    14. Re:I for one by santiagodraco · · Score: 1

      I'd think they've already thought about this and realize that, believe it or not, we have the technology to polarize and filter transparent materials... so I don't think this will be the kind of problem you think it is.

      In addition if you read the story they are talking about "active" materials that can change transparency based on the "push of a button". Such materials exist today.

      So no, glare and cabin temperatures won't be a problem. There are many materials, most notably those used in the better UV protectant window films, that significantly reduce UV penetration without a commensurate decrease in visible light, and these would also allow for transparency without significant increases in temperature.

      I just hope to live to see and fly in planes such as this if they ever "see the light of day".

    15. Re:I for one by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed.

      Try going up in a hot-air balloon some time. Being able to see all around you, most of the way below, and a good portion of above -- all at once -- from even a few hundred feet off the ground is really spectacular. I'd expect that at airliner altitudes, it would be even more so. Not as much detail visible on the ground, of course, but the scale of the view would be worth it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    16. Re:I for one by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are several Russian companies that suck even more. After them... Well, there aren't a lot of companies putting really new designs in the air, lot like there were 30 years ago when just the US manufacturers included Boeing, McDonnell-Douglas, and Lockheed. Europe had its own set, and the Soviets had a few more. Kind of a shame that the competition isn't like that anymore.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    17. Re:I for one by gnapster · · Score: 1

      Well, the thing is that short, touring trips are the only way I can resolve most of the issues raised (repeatedly) in this thread. If you are taking a short trip and returning to the place from which you departed, then you will have no luggage in teh hold beneath your feet, you do not need to have the seats so crowded together that you see more feet than ground, and there is a reduced need for the transparent lavatory, so the shy traveler can hold it in until landing.

      My point about "not much to see" was with respect to man-made points of interest, which is the selling point that Airbus was pitching. I agree that a birds-eye view of the earth below can be beautiful, but that is not the marketing strategy I read. Airbus representatives speak of “an unparalleled, unobstructed view of the wonders of the five continents – where you will be able see the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower.” But if I am flying (say) from Madrid to Dubai, I will only see pyramids for a few minutes out of a multi-hour flight. If it is Wonders of the World which I seek, it makes more sense to journey to Egypt, then take a guided air tour of the Valley of the Kings, just like I would take an open-top bus tour of London.

      To be fair, the last flight I took was transatlantic, at night. There was not much to see, and I would not have wanted the sunrise shining through transparent walls as I tried to catch what little sleep I was able to get. However, once I was up and had my breakfast on my tray, it would have been very nice to have a better view of the land and sky.

    18. Re:I for one by SlashDev · · Score: 1

      What about in the day time when the sun is shining? What about overhead luggage? What about the bus-like seating where you can't even see your foot, let alone below it?

      --

      TOP DSLR Cameras Reviews of the top DSLRs
    19. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously and what about joining the mile high club in one of these. No Thanks. Also what happens if you need to go to the bathroom a transparent bathroom again no thanks.

    20. Re:I for one by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "On most trips, there is not a whole lot to see."

      Maybe not, but that's not the point. With a non-transparent wall you can't see shit... except the wall. ANYTHING beats starting at the wall/floor/etc. Even if it's just a lot of water, it's still better than staring at the wall.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    21. Re:I for one by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      "Excuse me, I'm trying to sleep. Could you close your window blind?"

    22. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would pay LOTS extra to ride if they really made the whole thing transparent. They can send my luggage on a regular flight. For what they would charge, it can be waiting for me. Drinks should be included though, and clothing be optional.

    23. Re:I for one by tombeard · · Score: 1

      How about we stuff all that, line the seats up in 2 long back to back rows, and let somebody else shuttle our crap. There should be a bit of under seat storage for whatever you cannot live without for a couple of hours. If you think this is horrible then take another flight; I can't imagine a better way to fly unless they could get rid of the cabin all together.

      --
      The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
    24. Re:I for one by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Airbus and Boeing pretty much are the airliner industry though. Nobody else is even trying to make widebody international airliners. There are smaller companies making smaller planes but it could be that those are simply easier to make.

    25. Re:I for one by mtrachtenberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Welcome on board Budget Air's glass glider. As is always the case on Budget Air, bathroom use is completely complimentary. Curtains may be purchased from any flight attendant.

    26. Re:I for one by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Last flight (actually last four flights) I was on had nose cameras. Believe me, there's rarely anything to see, except clouds. Seems the world is a pretty cloudy place.

    27. Re:I for one by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I hate flying, it's scares the shit out of me unless I can look out the window. I think a transparent plane would actually calm me down.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    28. Re:I for one by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>I would really love to fly on an aircraft that was designed like this.

      Ditto. There are times, like when we're flying near lightning storms, that I'd love to be able to see more of the outside.

      While the plane was bouncing around due to the turbulence, we were navigating through canyons of clouds in the air that were lit from within by lightning. Amazingly beautiful. I'd have loved for the whole fuselage to have been clear during that flight.

    29. Re:I for one by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Now there's an idea. Since airlines aren't interested in filling their cargo area with baggage anyway (well, so it seems, though I'm sure they'd prefer that they charge extra and fill their cargo area), time to put in a nice transparent bubble on the belly of the aircraft. Now that's something I would pay extra for.

    30. Re:I for one by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's called Smart Glass.

      Linky

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    31. Re:I for one by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think they should just tow a transparent bubble behind the real plane and, and let those loonies who want to see straight down past their feet to the ground do so in a screaming hell-hole of their own choosing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:I for one by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      From my experience of flying, apart from take off and landing all you get is a nice view of clouds.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:I for one by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      ANYTHING beats starting at the wall/floor/etc

      Try reading or looking at a computer, or failing that just go to sleep.

      ANYTHING beats staring down past your feet at 30,000 feet of nothingness.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:I for one by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I don't think you would want to have me in a "clothing optional" environment. You might be good looking, but a middle-aged and overweight software developer is not something most people would want to see without clothing. Unfortunately that is also the kind of people who typically fly on airplanes too.

    35. Re:I for one by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Go skydiving :-) Best form of flying, IMO :-D When you're under canopy, you have totally unrestricted view under you, unlike a balloon. Sometimes when I'm freefalling, I do nothing, just stay stable and look right down (while keeping an eye on the altimeter, of course!) and enjoy the gorgeous views. Fantastic. And you get to see awesome views like this :-)

    36. Re:I for one by Teancum · · Score: 1

      This might just be the part of the world where you live. I find it amazing to look out windows and generally try to get a window seat whenever I can explicitly to be able to look out the windows during the flight. Of course I live in the middle of the Rocky Mountains where there really are some things to see as you are flying.

      Looking out the window and seeing the entire Grand Canyon in one glance is certainly an experience worth doing, or looking out and seeing mountains that you know are tens of thousands of feet tall and you are easily flying over the top of those mountains. Flying over land at night is to me even more amazing, as each little light shows up like a constellation of stars underneath you. Sometimes you can see elevation differences mapped out by each streetlight.

      Yes, when you fly over countryside that has a solid cloud layer over it make for boring flights, but it isn't always overcast everywhere. Or I suppose that you never really see the sun where you live.

    37. Re:I for one by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1

      Who gets to decide when the walls are see-through? I hate it when I want to rest and the guy controlling the window screen has it open so that the sun is shining directly in my eyes. I'm guessing that the pilot will do exactly what they do now, which is to wait until after takeoff, we've all settled in, and people are drifting off to sleep, and then decide to make the walls transparent and spend 10 minutes explaining crap we already know through a horrendous, screechy speaker at rock concert volumes. Do they take a frigging class in how to be annoying?

      Here's a great idea for improving air travel: make the seats comfortable! It should take them about 40 years to do it, but it will be nice when they do.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    38. Re:I for one by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about fewer crashes, but I'm pretty sure there would be fewer people having sex in cars, except perhaps the real exhibitionist types.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    39. Re:I for one by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      This might just be the part of the world where you live.

      Sydney to Dubai and cloud cover all the time I was over land. Also from London to Dubai to Singapore to Melbourne on the way out. Maybe I was just unlucky with the weather, but pretty certain this isn't a localised regional thing.

      That said, the glimpse I saw through the window coming into Syndey at night made me realise I should have taken a window seat. Big cities are fantastic at night.

    40. Re:I for one by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      4 lietters W-i-F-i

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  3. I wonder... by Mogster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it perchance piloted by Amazonian princesses? If so I'm in

    --
    ACK NAK RST
    1. Re:I wonder... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Uh, this is embarrassing, actually, I'm in the bathroom.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you settle for a Iranian princesses?

    3. Re:I wonder... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I notice you didn't use the invisible sink to wash your hands....

    4. Re:I wonder... by haggus71 · · Score: 1

      OMG! I was thinking the same thing when I first read it! Although at her age, I don't think I would wanna look up Linda Carter's dress anymore.

    5. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, that's just a failing of the actress. Everyone knows Wonder Woman is three thousand years old and doesn't show it.

    6. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it perchance piloted by Amazonian princesses? If so I'm in

      In their satin tights,

      fighting for their rights

      and the ol' red, white, and bluuuuuue!

    7. Re:I wonder... by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Is it perchance piloted by Amazonian princesses? If so I'm in

      Piloted by Linda Clark

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  4. meh.. by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    meh... Wonder Woman has had a transparent plane for nearly 70 years...

    1. Re:meh.. by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1, Redundant

      How does she find it?

    2. Re:meh.. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      How does she find it?

      1. She walks around the hanger until she says "ow".

      2. She throws her underwear around and looks for any pair that sticks to "thin air".

      Or "she finds it very comfortable, and much faster than her invisible dogsled."

    3. Re:meh.. by russotto · · Score: 1

      How does she find it?

      She's f-ing Wonder Woman. Unlike us mere mortals, she always remembers exactly where she parked.

    4. Re:meh.. by M8e · · Score: 1

      She's f-ing Wonder Woman.

      Wonder Woman is fucking Wonder Woman!

  5. An interesting idea by Dakkus · · Score: 1

    Why does this make me think of telescopes and skirts?

    1. Re:An interesting idea by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Well, the next concept is for a double decker, with flight attendants wearing miniskirts and no panties. Lower deck seats cost double.

    2. Re:An interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the Ryanair version - attractive women fly cheaper on the upper deck, men are charged more for the lower deck.

    3. Re:An interesting idea by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny

      The next concept after that is for a double decker, with flight attendants wearing miniskirts and no panties. Upper deck seats cost double.

      ...

      Oh and did i mention that the flight attendants are all male?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    4. Re:An interesting idea by cptdondo · · Score: 1

      Depends on the demographic you want to attract.

    5. Re:An interesting idea by mauhiz · · Score: 0

      Why does that sound like Air Scotland?

    6. Re:An interesting idea by maroberts · · Score: 1

      The next concept after that is for a double decker, with flight attendants wearing miniskirts and no panties. Upper deck seats cost double. ...

      Oh and did i mention that the flight attendants are all male?

      You didn't need to; if the flight attendants were female, the lower deck seats would have cost double

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    7. Re:An interesting idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arg... they're called Kilts ladie... now sit back and enjoy your flight while I play me bagpipes!

  6. Ladies and gentlemen, by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    I would like to introduce our pilot today, Wonder Woman.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  7. Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Commence Star Trek references in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 2

      > Commence Star Trek references in 3... 2... 1...

      How quaint.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    2. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now that airlines are forcing larger passengers to buy double seats, all I can say is:

      "There be whales here!"

      --
      My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    3. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so I eat a bunch. So what?

      I also ate too much LDS back in the 60s. And that isn't a Star Trek reference... I was a very anti religious cannibal in the past and those fucking mormons just kept coming to my front door smelling all nice trying to "deliver" me... Well, I guess in a way they succeeded because, yeah, it was like free delivery.

    4. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ST references: if they focus on transparent aluminum, you're doing it wrong.

      Try, say, Uhura in TOS uniform. Or maybe Yeoman Rand -- after all, you can't see that absurd beehive from below, and the rest of her is put together quite well.

    5. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah st jokes, thats the ticket laddy.

    6. Re:Cue the transparent aluminum jokes by Ian+Alanai · · Score: 1
      You mean, like sapphire (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire)?

      "synthetic sapphire is used for shatter resistant windows in armored vehicles and various military body armor suits"

      --
      Whichever way you look at it, it's true. I'm not.
  8. I hope..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope their blueprints don't include transparent lavatories.

    1. Re:I hope..... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Chuck Berry would like that (last two or three paragraphs).

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  9. Transparent cargo? by KingFrog · · Score: 0

    I rather expect the real effect will be that a transparent fuselage will allow the passengers an hours-long view of their luggage sitting in the cargo hold below their feet.

    1. Re:Transparent cargo? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe they hide that with an invisibility cloak.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Transparent cargo? by localman57 · · Score: 1

      That's what they tell you until you land at ATL. Then it turns out they just lost your luggage.

  10. Buy! Buy! by bobjackiewicz · · Score: 1

    I'm buying shares in the company that makes barf bags. Hellllooooooo retirement!

    1. Re:Buy! Buy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a better view of the horizon should REDUCE airsickness, since the ears and the eyes will both have a sense of motion instead of the eyes seeing a static, unmoving cabin.

  11. it would be awesome, but impossible by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can you make all of the airplane transparent? It's probably not possible with most of it at all, given how many wires, pipes, tubes, insulation, bolts and nuts there are there.

    I would love to fly a fully transparent plane though, completely transparent, that would be super awesome!

    Except that there would be other passengers there to spoil the view, and fuel. That would be weird.

    1. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, there might be other passengers, but at least everyone else could enjoy it when a couple joins the mile high club.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given the size of an average American, do you really want to see any of that?

    3. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I may not want to see it, but Rule 34 would imply that someone does.

      Besides, there are international flights.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by siddesu · · Score: 1

      And more importantly, not how, but why?

      I am sure some people would love it on landing and takeoff, but I see a lot of inconvenience.

      I hate heights, and I like to be able to nap in the dark on some of those long daytime flights, which arrive in the morning.

      Nah, this will be a prototype, the real thing will only have an observation deck :)

    5. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Airbus is a European company :)

    6. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      It's probably not possible with most of it at all, given how many wires, pipes, tubes, insulation, bolts and nuts there are there.

      Yeah, I saw right through this as well.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would find a transparent plane that lets you see all the inner workings far more interesting than a fully transparent one.

    8. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Airplane bathrooms strictly limit the size of mile high club members. You have to be small enough to fit two of you with enough room to get their clothes off enough, put all the bits in the right places, and move enough to call it sex.

      Which brings up a question... what exactly do the people who require two seats do when they have to go to the bathroom?

    9. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      that's just best left to imagination, you really don't want to know, you may think you do, but really you do not.

    10. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by grayshirtninja · · Score: 1

      Nah, this will be a prototype, the real thing will only have an observation deck :)

      This actually makes a lot more sense then a completely transparent plane.

    11. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if it was technically possible, it won't ever happen. As of right now, the cabin crew already urge passengers to close the window shades.

    12. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'm presuming what they really mean is really big windows (eg. most of the passenger compartment roof and walls) but the sales pitch on cocaine came out differently because a magic carpet effect is not enough for them.
      It would be weird having to wear a hat and sunscreen to take a flight somewhere.

    13. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      How can you make all of the airplane transparent?

      You use transparent aluminum, of course. This allows the construction of a see-through wessel. I mean vessel.

    14. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      computer.

      hello, computer.

    15. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, transparent aluminum of course!

    16. Re:it would be awesome, but impossible by RobinEggs · · Score: 1

      Except that there would be other passengers there to spoil the view, and fuel. That would be weird.

      I don't know how much other passengers would spoil the view, but I think fuel generally lives primarily in the wings, and jet-fuel kerosene is transparent in the first place.

  12. Invisible jet? by perbert · · Score: 1

    Would they also require the pilots to dress like Wonder Woman?

    1. Re:Invisible jet? by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hopefully only the female ones.

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  13. Transparent luggage? by DrData99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    And the baggage in the luggage compartment won't affect the view? Really?

    1. Re:Transparent luggage? by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the carpet might also be a problem too.

    2. Re:Transparent luggage? by guardiangod · · Score: 2, Funny

      You fool! We are the baggage! The luggage will be in the passenger compartment. Now down you go!

  14. I hope... by Muckluck · · Score: 2, Funny

    the bathrooms are not transparent. Or maybe I don't...

    --


    --I like turtles...
  15. View of the cargo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a view downward, be that of the cargo?

  16. The Barony Cabin by No+Lucifer · · Score: 1

    Just one step closer to creating Blaine the Mono.

  17. Waste by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    How about solve the current problems of airplanes first? Maybe flight recorder boxes that float, or no box - just send the data real-time to the ground. Maybe whole-plane parachutes? I'd take that before a transparent one any day.

    1. Re:Waste by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe whole-plane parachutes? I'd take that before a transparent one any day.

      They exist; they're just so heavy and so unlikely to be useful that no-one is willing to take the performance hit for installing such a system on an airliner. If I remember correctly, the proposed system I saw some years ago for a 747 required 14 large parachutes spread around the plane.

      Plus you're more likely to scare people off by doing so than gain new passengers; who wants to fly on an airline which is so scared of their planes crashing that they fit parachutes to them?

    2. Re:Waste by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Whole plane parachutes are already a reality on many private planes, just look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plane_parachute the problem is, it just takes too many parachutes to work on something like a 747 or something.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:Waste by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 1

      Plus you're more likely to scare people off by doing so than gain new passengers; who wants to fly on an airline which is so scared of their planes crashing that they fit parachutes to them?

      Right, because knowing that my airline provider DENIES their engineering problems, rather than providing backup systems, is what I really want.

    4. Re:Waste by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Plus you're more likely to scare people off by doing so than gain new passengers; who wants to fly on an airline which is so scared of their planes crashing that they fit parachutes to them?

      Me.

      Bit of a silly argument, that. It's like asking who wants to use a mode of transport that's so scared of their planes crashing that they use air traffic control, radar, preventive maintenance, life jackets, safety briefings before every flight, and a host of other safety measures. Passengers most likely won't even know the chutes are there, they'll be made far more aware of the life jackets and oxygen masks.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:Waste by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You are not the average consumer. The average consumer looks at price first. Sometimes only price.
      The average consumer would stand all the way on a 4 hour flight if it saved them $100.
      The average consumer would fly on a plane serviced and piloted by trained monkeys if it were $200 cheaper.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    6. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about solve the current problems of airplanes first? Maybe flight recorder boxes that float, or no box - just send the data real-time to the ground. Maybe whole-plane parachutes? I'd take that before a transparent one any day.

      Well, flight recorder boxes the float would have one problem, being caught up in the plane itself. It could be done, but I'm just not sure it's viable. You'd add complexity just to get an occasional benefit. Real-time streaming would require a considerable amount of bandwidth and a network of antennas, and you'd still need on site boxes for backup anyway.

      And whole plane parachutes? Most plane crashes are not under circumstances where parachutes would do any good. Running into mountains, electrical lines, or the runaway? What good is a parachute going to do?

    7. Re:Waste by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Passengers most likely won't even know the chutes are there, they'll be made far more aware of the life jackets and oxygen masks.

      If you're not going to advertise the fact that your planes are fitted with parachutes, why would you install them?

    8. Re:Waste by misexistentialist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If price only mattered people would ride donkeys rather than fly. Crash-proof planes would be extremely popular. At least until the first one crashed.

    9. Re:Waste by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Passengers most likely won't even know the chutes are there, they'll be made far more aware of the life jackets and oxygen masks.

      If you're not going to advertise the fact that your planes are fitted with parachutes, why would you install them?

      Same reason they don't advertise the fact that the planes have an ILS, radar, backup electrical systems etc. The point of having them is to save lives in the event of an emergency.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:Waste by syncmaster955 · · Score: 1

      who wants to fly on an airline which is so scared of their planes crashing that they fit parachutes to them?

      Who wants to drive a car whose manufacturer is so scared of the car crashing that they fit it with seat belts, airbags, anti-lock brakes, laminated glass, etc.? I would gladly pay extra fees to be in the parachute plane (hell, catching them deploy in the transparent plane would be a YouTube hit!).

    11. Re:Waste by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Crash-proof planes? Is that like an unsinkable cruise ship?

      I believe there were some shipbuilders working in Belfast in the early 20th century you might want to speak to.

    12. Re:Waste by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      LOL.

      Although actually the whole "unsinkable" thing wasn't really made a big deal of before it sunk. There were a few mentions, but White Star's advertising team were much more concerned with talking about speed and luxury than safety.

  18. Transparent floor? by chaynlynk · · Score: 1

    Unless they make transparent cargo, this is useless.

  19. That will rule for the scared of heights folk. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Oh look 30,000 feet of nothingness below me under this transparent floor.

    1. Re:That will rule for the scared of heights folk. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      They'll probably just fly on the 10-times-cheaper regular planes.

    2. Re:That will rule for the scared of heights folk. by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      I feel like I could handle that better than a roller coaster.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  20. What about people who are afraid of heights? by Inquisitor911 · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see the reactions of people who are afraid of heights when they discover that their plane is totally transparent.

    1. Re:What about people who are afraid of heights? by Dan+Berlin · · Score: 1

      The standard reaction is to take xanax.

  21. Sounds boring as hell by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Any flight over the Atlantic will be a nice view of the ocean for 7 or so hours.

    If you can see around the luggage. How about just making it cheaper and more comfortable. I honestly would take a flight that took 30% longer if it was just more comfortable.

    1. Re:Sounds boring as hell by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Cheaper?! Air fares haven't gone up since the 80s...(yet the price of fuel has, exponentially...)

      And if you want comfortable, go fly on Singapore or Emirates.

    2. Re:Sounds boring as hell by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sadly they do not service the routes I use most often. You are right though that avoiding US airlines is the way to go.

      By cheaper I mean, using modern technology and perhaps flying slower we should be able to use less fuel and perhaps lower costs. I realize the prices have not risen since then, but pretty much everything else has gotten cheaper.

    3. Re:Sounds boring as hell by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Saying we can fly slower assumes planes are flying faster than their optimal fuel to speed ratio and based on what I've read, they already do.

      Seems pretty disingenuous to presume the airlines are not already doing everything they can to keep costs, especially fuel, low, which leads to: but pretty much everything else has gotten cheaper.

      Except fuel. You still need 11,200 gallons to top off a 757.

  22. I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminum by David7 · · Score: 1

    This is highly unlikely to actually happen. As bobjakiewicz noted, it would greatly increase the number of people suffering from motion sickness and other related problems. The only motivation I can think of for this announcement is that Airbus has somehow discovered a type of plastic that weighs less than aluminum but is strong enough to use for an aircraft body.

  23. Or what will actually happen. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Transparent ceramic planes using super-expensive future technology that will take years and years to actually make work! It'll be awesome! You'll be able to see through the plane! Except for the fuel, seats, luggage compartments, probably the floor, A/C ducting, electrical conduit, the bulkhead separating you from the pilot, the bathrooms in the back...

    Or I guess we could just make the windows a little bigger.

    1. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Think about it - there'll be no need when the plane crashes for the pilot to actually announce the fact. The passengers can see the ground rapidly approaching them! It'll save precious seconds so passengers can prepare themselves.

      Or see the nose of the plane that's about to ram into them. Or see the mountain that the pilots are failing to see. Or the water that's rapidly approaching.

      Or the hijacker can quickly verify that you are definitely heading the way they want to go, instead of believing the pilot.

      Oh yeah, and if bits and pieces are coming off the plane, the passengers can helpfully advise the flight crew that the wing or tail seem to be missing. An engine fire will light up the cabin in a nice old-timey camping way.

    2. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1

      Oh don't be a party-pooper. Can't you see that slashdotters just love to shut their eyes really tight and believe all of this crap? Even if everything were transparent, it would presumably have an IOR greater than 1.0, reflectivity, specular reflections, light-interfering textures, etc. It's hard to believe how or why Airbus would put out such a patently ridiculous press release. It's worse even than typical Popular Science or Popular Mechanics foaming-at-the-mouth futurism.

    3. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or I guess we could just make the windows a little bigger."

      Better not.

    4. Re:Or what will actually happen. by warGod3 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, the floors and bottom and top of the cabin would have to be the ones with some kind of plastic. The only thing about that, the landing light lenses and wingtip lenses are made out of plastic and those suffer from cracks and "hazing" all the time. The damage done to the plastic will negate the "wow" factor when the cost to replace all the see-through is passed on to the consumer.

      Here's a couple of for instances: A wingtip lens can cost upwards of $5k on a regional jet. That's maybe two square feet of material. Multiply that, plus factor in the extra thicknesses that would be required to make the aircraft airworthy and you are talking extremely high prices for the possibility of flying on a "see through" plane. Remember, there are environmental factors that would impact viewing.

      As for the routing of conduit, cables, etc. that wouldn't be all that difficult for a manufacturer to do. Vision obstructed by luggage storage? No, not really, the plane would just have the cabin lower into the fuselage (also to allow for thicker plastic for better structural integrity). The baggage would be moved to the back of the plane so as not to obstruct the passenger's view. However, all of this is negated by the expense of materials and the costs to redesign an aircraft simply for the fact that passengers would all have a "view."

      --
      "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
    5. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You won't see as much, but you sure will feel the sun when you're sitting on the tarmac for a few hours because there aren't enough takeoff slots at JFK/ORD/ATL.

    6. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you understate the needed level of sarcasm. You forgot the self cleaning, self morphing seats...
      the original article is nothing but nonsense PR; it is really sad how the teeenagers at /. come out and drool over this stuff

    7. Re:Or what will actually happen. by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why don't they make bigger windows? Even the latest and greatest Airliners still have the same sized windows as 50 years ago. Surely technology has improved enough that we can enjoy a decent view while flying?

    8. Re:Or what will actually happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will be cool, at least until there is engine trouble, or some other mechanical failure, and you're watching yourself hurling toward the ground at 600 miles per hour.

    9. Re:Or what will actually happen. by dlgeek · · Score: 1

      The new 787 that's currently undergoing airworthiness testing has significantly larger windows. I think the 747-8i, which uses a lot of 787 technologies is also supposed to get them.

  24. Transparent by pitterpatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Clear hydraulic fluid in clear lines; transparent aluminum wiring in nylon insulation. What a concept!

    1. Re:Transparent by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      Clearly you're quite mad.

    2. Re:Transparent by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      From that /icle's FA: "This turned the aluminium nearly invisible to extreme ultraviolet radiation."

      Still, I have to admit that it ocurred to me, also :-)

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    3. Re:Transparent by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

      I know. Closest I could come to transparent wiring.

    4. Re:Transparent by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

      Clearly.

  25. Lawsuit! I Smell Lawsuit! by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Hey Airbus, landshark representing Detective Comic is on the phone. They want to discuss your apparent lack of proper licensing...

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  26. See Through Floor? by neoform · · Score: 1

    Yeah, somehow I don't think having the ability to look down and see your feet dangling over the earth from 50,000 feet up will make people enjoy flying more....

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:See Through Floor? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Why not? Rollecoasters switched from a rail-car model to hanging seats a long time ago. I'm kind of surprised the airlines haven't tried that. Lean you into your seat, clamp down the restraining bar, and voom!

      As for all the nontransparent stuff - wires, fuel, baggage, flight data recorders, etc. - put that in the overhead as well. Call it "shade". There's nothing to see up there but the blinding, x-ray spewing solar furnace anyway. The show is down on the ground. If you reeeeeeeealy want to see the stars we'll do a 1-G barrel roll every alternate league and you can see them between your feet, just like you're lying on the hood of your bitchin' camaro out by the levee...

  27. Purple Ether Mollasses ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smilin' Mylan approves !

  28. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by jdastrup · · Score: 1

    Transparent Aluminum. In other news, Airbus has been contracted to transport several humpback whales for unknown reasons.

  29. This begs the question... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Given current airline trends - if we're all crammed together only a few inches apart, will we actually be able to see anything except the stars above? We'll be lucky to see anything but other peoples' feet.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:This begs the question... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Given current trends, you'll be slid into your berth on your back, alternating head-first and feet-first, with someone's feet in your face.

      Just like the original model of human transport that evolved for efficiency and profit without regard to comfort.

      Yes, that's a metaphor: never underestimate the willingness of someone trying to make a buck to turn you into a bean in a sack to be weighed, delivered, and sold.

    2. Re:This begs the question... by v1 · · Score: 1

      I don't even recall being able to see the floor last time I flew. Rows of people's legs to my sides, with a seat in front of me almost overhanging my lap. The whole body of the plane being clear wouldn't have improved my view much besides up, and I see plenty of sky while walking to my destination thankyouverymuch.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  30. screw zero fatality, lets just make them pretty by Dan+Berlin · · Score: 1

    I'll take planes that don't kill everyone when they have issues over pretty and nicer cabins. If you download their presentation it's quite funny: "The engines of the future will have no risk of failure, so can be placed at the rear and remove the need for a vertical tail." What could go wrong?

  31. Awesome by jewishbaconzombies · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now we can scare the bejeezus out of people who are suffering from both Aviatophobia (fear of flying), AND Acrophobia (fear of heights). Give the passengers some double strength espresso and now you've got a show! Woo-ga!

    1. Re:Awesome by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, I guess claustrophobics will like it.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Awesome by reemul · · Score: 1

      You missed the extra special terror for the agoraphobics who are already panicky about traveling in the first place: they're not so limited as the acrophobics, they freak out over all three dimensions.

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
  32. A cheaper solution by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to just put a strategically placed webcam or two and pipe it to the tv built into the seat back?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:A cheaper solution by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Even better, do something like google sky on android phones. As you move the screen it shows you what is outside the plane so you can just see what you want.

    2. Re:A cheaper solution by JazzXP · · Score: 1

      Emirates does this already. The resolution is fairly low though.

  33. Probability zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    H. Sapiens has a built in fear of heights. Take a six month old kid and try to get him to crawl over a pane of glass suspended at a meter's altitude - no go. It's been tested, after reaching a certain age he won't do it. He has figured out the dangers of the Z coordinate.

    Now stuff a hundred people on a plane and repeat the experiment. You'll have people screaming in terror as they fight to reach the exits. However much you rationalize it, fear of heights is built in into the average H. Sapiens brain.

    1. Re:Probability zero by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, that's a test for autism. When the kid encounters a simulated "cliff" he'll look at his mother. If she looks scared, he stops. If she looks unfazed, he proceeds. If he's autistic he has no idea what her expression is so he proceeds regardless.

      So it seems more learned than innate. OTOH, bonking your head a few times should serve just as well to teach you about gravity. Of course, later you can "unlearn" it. Just look at the cliff climbers, sky divers, window washers, astronauts, and acrobats. If they claim to not fear heights, and their actions suggest they don't fear heights, I think it's a safe assumption that, from all practical perspectives, they don't fear heights. Perhaps, subconsciously, there's some lingering fear that nobody can detect, but who cares?

    2. Re:Probability zero by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I have a fear of heights. I also have a very strong will (I know that will come as a shock to those of you who have read my other posts on here). Some years back, I was considering using my will to overcome my fear of heights. At about that time I heard a person I knew who had worked as an Outward Bound counselor (or whatever they call their staff). He was talking about how he had to be careful to remember to connect his safety gear properly because he had no fear of heights (right after climbing out on a cliff face to help someone rapel down it without hooking up his safety gear). I decided that I would not attempt to diminish my fear of heights, since I am already capable of functioning in such circumstances when necessary. Yes, I could get the job done faster when in a precarious position at height if I did not have a fear of heights, but the odds of me not accurately assessing the risks of working in that situation would also go up.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Probability zero by David+Jao · · Score: 1

      H. Sapiens has a built in fear of heights. Take a six month old kid and try to get him to crawl over a pane of glass suspended at a meter's altitude - no go. It's been tested, after reaching a certain age he won't do it. He has figured out the dangers of the Z coordinate.

      Uh, what? Here's an article with a picture of a kid crawling over the glass floor of the CN Tower, suspended at an altitude of over 300 meters.

      I've visited the CN Tower several times, and I can confirm -- the kids have absolutely no fear. It's the adults who are scared to stand on the floor.

  34. Help for airsickness too. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    On really bumpy flights and boat trips for that matter, I get pretty sick. Looking out to the horizon makes me feel much better. It's hard on an aircraft when you're sitting in the aisle seat or in the middle of the center pack on a 777.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  35. B.S. detector fodder by frovingslosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh come on, no way is this going to happen or work. It's not like the plane only holds the passenger compartment, and I can't see going to the effort to give the passengers a good view of the luggage, extra cargo, and distressed pets, which will all block the view, as well as letting the passengers see the condition of the wiring, landing gear and other controls. And even if the airlines really wanted to do this and found a way for all of the extra stuff to not block the view, the thickness of the curved hull would so drastically distort the view that it would not be worth doing.

    It would be far simpler with today's technology to give everyone individual steerable, zoomable access to video cameras. I don't expect that to happen, and I don't believe that Airbus will ever build Wonder Woman's plane, the passenger version.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:B.S. detector fodder by trb · · Score: 1

      It would be far simpler with today's technology to give everyone individual steerable, zoomable access to video cameras. I don't expect that to happen, and I don't believe that Airbus will ever build Wonder Woman's plane, the passenger version.

      Planes already have under-body forward-view video cameras that you can see on your personal seatback display. I had one on a flight from NYC to Hong Kong (over the north pole), and I got to look at solid white clouds for 15 hours, except for takeoff and landing - hearing which noises synched with the landing gear retracting was interesting. Transparent skin seems silly to me.

    2. Re:B.S. detector fodder by slinches · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. The only reason I see to have a transparent plane is maintenance. Once the plane is on the ground and passengers disembark, turn the plane's skin transparent to check the wiring and other systems.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    3. Re:B.S. detector fodder by aitmanga · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Mexico one of the cheap airlines (don't remember if it was Volaris or Interjet) does have a camera at the front of the plane so you can see the take off and landing. Though, regrettably, it's not steerable or zoomable.

      --
      He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious.
  36. Not a great idea... by RafaelAngel · · Score: 1

    The motion sickness would make everyone sick. I get sick just staring at the wing when the pilot is turning. It would just be too disorientating.

  37. actually by KillaGouge · · Score: 1

    Couldn't this be better accomplished by having cameras mounted on the bottom of the plane, and replace the floor with monitors?

    --
    GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social exper
  38. Not necessary. In 10-15 years we'll have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtual private cabins. It will appear like in TFA, but without the crazy transparent fuselages.

    How do I know? I've invented it!

  39. Luckily by 605dave · · Score: 1

    Luckily the barf bags will still be an non-transparent white.

    --
    Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
  40. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  41. Note to wannabe nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This actually does beg for a question, which has absolutely nothing to do with circular reasoning by arguing from your principle assumptions to your principle assumptions, which is what petito principii (seeking the principles) means when it's properly translated from Latin (and quite possibly the Greek it was likely originally described in).

    Quit ranting about your mistranslated bullshit and let us keep our English words "beg" and "question" meaning what they mean in English, not what some centuries old vulgar thought they meant in Latin.

    1. Re:Note to wannabe nazis by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Quit ranting about your mistranslated bullshit and let us keep our English words "beg" and "question" meaning what they mean in English, not what some centuries old vulgar thought they meant in Latin.

      (Offtopic, I know)

      You might have had a leg to stand on with your argument, until your rant here. Even if we ignore the fallacy, as you request, you're wrong because the english word "beg" is still not appropriate in this context. There are definitions of "ask" that mean "beg", but not vice versa. The closest contextual match would be similar to the verb "to request" which makes no sense.

      Looks like the "Wannabe Nazis" got you anyway, AC. Better luck next time.

  42. So, Safety?? by Earl+The+Squirrel · · Score: 1

    Let's see, how frequently do airplanes have to use the following FAA rule:

    1. Practice the "see and avoid" concept at all times regardless of whether the operation is conducted under Instrument (IFR) or Visual (VFR) Flight Rules.

    (from http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/tracon/anchorage/pilots_info/mca/ )

    I'm thinking FAA would frown on this type of plane simply because of the potential safety issue...

    "Hey, did you see that big transparent plane over their thru the fog?"

    1. Re:So, Safety?? by ksandom · · Score: 1

      I pondered this also, but I'd imagine it would only be sections that are transparent. There'd be a lot where it just wouldn't be feasible like the cargo bay. The article talks about the "central body of the aircraft". So I guess the nose and tail will be opaque? If so, they could compensate with extra lights for example.

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    2. Re:So, Safety?? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Guess you and most of the rest of slashdot have never heard of glass bottom boats.

      You don't make EVERYTHING transparent, you can't.

      You make certain areas transparent to provide large viewports. The floor is a good example, as is the roof.

      They aren't going to make a transparent airplane, if you believe slashdot headlines you're an idiot. They're going to make a plane with bigger windows, bigger than anything we've seen in a plane to date ... but still just a window.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  43. New requirements by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In the future, you'll no longer be able to check any luggage or have carryons. Also, you will fly naked on the transparent plane. Enjoy!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:New requirements by DrData99 · · Score: 1

      That should enable the elimination of TSA completely! A Win-Win!

    2. Re:New requirements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, they would need to be drugged too before TSA would even consider to give way...but it would all be for nothing because some latest intelligence report would say that the terrorists have some drug that would make them wake up way earlier and some skillz to untie them selves.

    3. Re:New requirements by rsborg · · Score: 1

      That should enable the elimination of TSA completely! A Win-Win!

      No, as long as there is money to be made in the fear industry, TSA will still be around... all it takes is something like that body-bomb scene from The Dark Knight and the flying-in-the-buff in a transparent plane will be worse than ever... think body cavity search.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  44. Should offer a good view of stars by yeremein · · Score: 1

    On a couple of flights, I've tried to catch a glimpse of the stars through the window--far above city lights, with less atmosphere to look through, I'd think it'd be a pretty good view. The placement of the window makes it very difficult to look "up", however--not to mention the blinking light on the wing and all the interior lights preventing any sort of dark adaptation.

    A plane with a transparent fuselage should solve two of these problems by permitting a line of sight that doesn't require craning your neck and is angled away from the wingtip light. It'd still be tricky to block out other local lights, but maybe possible...

  45. No they are not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They asked for wild concept ideas for air travel circa 2050, this was one of them. They have no plans for it.

    Typical slashdot.

  46. more likely an "AAAAUUUGGHHHHH!" plane by swschrad · · Score: 1

    nothing like looking down on takeoff, folks, to make you wonder what you're up to.

    except maybe seeing the runway lights coming at ya from 50 feet.

    or watching a tire disintegrate on the landing gear.

    "for your pleasure, we offer earphones for $5, soft drinks for $2, pillows for $4, and clock-stopping horse-pill tranquilizers for $25. please don't mob the stewards as they make their way down the mffff THUMP THUMP GIMME THAT!"

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  47. Anyone planning planes with adequate seat room? by sdnick · · Score: 1

    Or are we all going to keep on pretending that this is 1960, and that the average American man is still about 5'7 and weighs around 150 lbs?

    1. Re:Anyone planning planes with adequate seat room? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      As a man who is about those dimensions I can tell you that airline seats are not comfortable for me either.

  48. Wonder Woman will not be happy by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    if this becomes common.

  49. Deja vu all over again... by cptdondo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember the concepts for the 747... Piano lounge upstairs with a bar. Private cabins. Luxurious accomodations.

    Didn't take long for the 747 to become a large cattle car. Any bets on how long the luxury will last?

    1. Re:Deja vu all over again... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I remember the concepts for the 747... Piano lounge upstairs with a bar. Private cabins. Luxurious accomodations.

      How much were you prepared to pay for that?

      Didn't take long for the 747 to become a large cattle car.

      How important is price in your choice of airline?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Deja vu all over again... by mbone · · Score: 1

      Fly first class on long-haul airlines (like Singapore). You'll see these things. (Even Virgin Atlantic has a working bar in Upper Class.) It'll cost you (or your company), but you'll see them.

    3. Re:Deja vu all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      How much were you prepared to pay for that?

      No more than the guy sitting next to me.

      Imagine a restaurant where the prices were constantly changing and, if you happened to order your meal at the wrong time, you could end up paying 2-5 times as much for the same meal as the the guy at the next table. Pretty soon everyone in the restaurant would be obsessing about the price to the exclusion of all other considerations.

      For years the airlines have been playing crazy games with ticket prices and now they have only themselves to blame for the public obsession with ticket prices to the exclusion of all other considerations.

    4. Re:Deja vu all over again... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It does exist. It belongs to John Travolta.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    5. Re:Deja vu all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to fly on the A380. Some are very decked out... If you have the money you can look at the following links for details.

      http://www.emirates.com/english/flying/our_fleet/emirates_a380/emirates_a380.aspx

      http://www.emirates.com/english/flying/our_fleet/emirates_a380/first_class/shower_spa.aspx?intcid=Refresh_in_the_Shower_Spa_onboard_our_A380_D_185_tcm233-349607

      and

      http://www.emirates.com/english/flying/our_fleet/emirates_a380/first_class/first_class.aspx

    6. Re:Deja vu all over again... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's kind of how Emirates do the first class cabin of the A380 today - proper lounge, with a bar, plenty of space to walk around etc.

    7. Re:Deja vu all over again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the concepts for the 747... Piano lounge upstairs with a bar. Private cabins. Luxurious accomodations.

      Didn't take long for the 747 to become a large cattle car. Any bets on how long the luxury will last?

      It changed name to A380.

    8. Re:Deja vu all over again... by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Then the price of jet fuel went up and the only way the plane made sense was as an overstuffed bus.

    9. Re:Deja vu all over again... by cbope · · Score: 1

      How important is price in your choice of airline?

      For the vast majority of airline passengers, this is THE major factor in determining with whom and when they fly. And increasingly due to the budget airlines, this also determines from where and to where, they fly.

      Luxury air travel is fine for the (likely) less than 1% that can afford it, but the reality is most of us will never get to enjoy it.

    10. Re:Deja vu all over again... by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      Imagine a 3 star restaurant where people can get a price they can afford by booking in time yet where more well off people can just drop by at any time.

  50. Better serve some Quaaludes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    To me this sounds awesome, a super wonder-womanish invisible plane streaking through the sky where you can watch the world below and the sky above.

    For those already nervous about air travel, it sounds like a recipe for a Grade A Freakout. So if they do extend the small portal you can look through currently, then I hope they provide some way to block it off too...

    Not to mention, if you've even been inside of a plane on a hot day with the sun coming in - even the small windows they have add a huge amount of heat to a plane. Just think of a transparent plane out for an hour or two on a Houston tarmac!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Better serve some Quaaludes by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You know, it seems like every single comment I've read has made some allusion to puking, heat, fear of flying or otherwise assuming the transparent plane would be transparent all the time. I realize this place has somehow developed a culture of not reading the article, but did nobody even go see if they had a picture?

    2. Re:Better serve some Quaaludes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Well first of all, when I responded my complaint was unique! But I can understand the flood of other responses.

      did nobody even go see if they had a picture

      Linking to Slashdot actually lowers your traffic for a month because of so many people actively avoiding it than they would have visited otherwise.

      It's not a culture - it's a CULT! :-)

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  51. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Do they also build warp drives into their planes, and offer flights around the sun?

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  52. Heights? by ksandom · · Score: 1

    I love the concept of this, but I can't see my mum going for it!

    --
    Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
  53. It's too much like a Stephen King novel by websters · · Score: 1

    Bigger windows that can still be covered will be fine, thanks. All I thought of when I read this was Blaine the Mono

  54. Far more likely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that we'll be given display glasses that project a view "through" the fuselage (and all the baggage, passengers, fuel, etc, that others are pointing out as problematic.) Basically what they're doing in the F-35, but a few decades of advances in cheap display, camera, and compute tech should make something like that pretty economical.

  55. They can't even sell the planes they have by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    and now they want to make transparent planes. Bah just another marketing gimmick from company that can barely sell the bloated A-330's that have been sieged with cost over runs and failing sales (not to mention canceled orders). Yeah I could supply refences to my claim but I'm at work and I don't feel like it. that's what Google is for). Nothing to see here people move along.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    1. Re:They can't even sell the planes they have by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That is what happens when there are only two competitors both kept alive by government handouts. Boeing still does not have the 787 ready to ship.

    2. Re:They can't even sell the planes they have by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      I sure wish the government would give me a handout. If you can't produce a product in this country without a subsidy from the government how do you expect to get by when the money dries up?

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  56. "negating the need for windows" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    FTA: "...additional functionality that provides transparency on command, negating the need for windows."

    Oh, thank fuck. Does that mean I can finally ditch the last vestiges of it living in wine and a sometimes-booted VirtualBox installation?

  57. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

    This is highly unlikely to actually happen. As bobjakiewicz noted, it would greatly increase the number of people suffering from motion sickness and other related problems.

    Huh? I thought motion sickness was caused by being moved while deprived of the visual cue of what's causing the motion, hence sea sickness when you're in the cabin but not feeling so bad once you go out on deck and look at the horizon. Alternatively, you might not be moving at all but you might be getting visual cues that make you think you are, and when your ears don't pick up on the motion that they're expecting based on what the eyes are saying, you get nauseous, like I used to get when looking at the overdone shaky camera work of NYPD Blue.

      I would have thought that better awareness of the external surroundings would make you less prone to motion sickness, not more.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  58. It will be made off by Kakao · · Score: 1

    something that does not yet exist! Just wait a minute until I project my own plane with any unimaginable material and you will see what a wonder!

    --
    2011. The year Gnome decided Linux will never be on the desktop.
  59. Underpants salesman by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 4, Funny

    I figured out what step 2 is!

    Sell underpants to passengers who freak out when they can see the ground 30,000 feet directly below them.

    1. Re:Underpants salesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't make the underpants transparent too!

  60. Re:OMG YES! by sycodon · · Score: 5, Funny

    "see the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower through the transparent floor of the aircraft"

    Vomit is transparent?

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  61. Just the Ceiling, And I'm In by JRR006 · · Score: 1

    Ductwork, wiring, and so forth would still be a problem, but on nighttime transatlantic flights when they dim the interior lighting, I would think a transparent ceiling and a sky full of stars would be lovely, especially if you're feeling claustrophobic. Afraid of heights, though, so I don't think I could handle transparent walls or floors.

  62. Since the fuselage is built out of imaginary stuff by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...we can posit imaginary transparent stuff for the wire, hoses, and conduit as well. We can even imagine that we can tailor its refractive index so that it truly appears "invisible", not just "clear".

  63. Airplane of the Future and the TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be neat but the airplane of the future in the USA will be required by the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) to have the fuselage completely blacked out, the route kept secret, and the passengers given knock-out gas.

  64. Blaine the Mono? by TravisBy · · Score: 1

    Did anyone have Stephen King's novel The Wasteland screaming at them when they read the title? For those uninformed, Blaine the Mono, in the particular cabin the protagonists were in had a "projected" view. Every wall [including floor and ceiling] were just big screens, that had the possibility to project the outside, the Taj Ma Hall, or the inside of your colon. I wonder if big LCDs would be cheaper than researching all of this new technology. This would also give the ability to... you know, turn it off [or turn on a nicer looking scene for those afraid of super-earth].

  65. Re:Since the fuselage is built out of imaginary st by EdZ · · Score: 1

    Or just stick a handful of cameras outside, and give passengers who want to look around an HMD.

  66. Everything? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hope the toilet compartment isn't going to be transparent too.

  67. Sound Proofing in Coach (Economy Class)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'd trade all the transparent planes in the sky for a break from the screaming kids and the kicks from the seat behind.
    Maybe instead of Sky Marshals we could have proper Nannies instead. They'd be more use.

  68. TSA would love that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then they can make all the passengers fly naked too chained to their seats. They get their clothes back when they reach their destination.

  69. What if I'd like to take a nap? by JimWise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be a bit tough to close the shade on something like this to keep the sun off your face when you wanted to take a nap since it could be coming in from any angle. The first handful of times on a transparent flight, night or day, would be quite an experience, but sadly just like normal flight today the novelty would eventually dissipate.

  70. _Everything_ Transparent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Transparent heads might make that cross-country trip seem shorter. Or longer. Not sure. Hmmm....

  71. Sorry, we had it first by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
    Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We will be contacting both Airbus and Detective Comics shortly over infringement of the look and feel of our hull design.

    Sincerely,
    General Counsel
    General Products

  72. Excuse me, Stewerdess, by aoeu · · Score: 1

    but what are all those SNAKES doing in the . . .

    --
    All your database are belong to U.S.
  73. Augmented Reality by Dorsch · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be easier and cheaper to design augmented reality visions and software and put them into regular airplanes?

    At least this would let all passengers chose if they want to feel like being shot through the air at 900 KMH...

  74. General Products by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait, tomorrow Airbus will announce it is changing its name to "General Products", then the fun will really start....

    1. Re:General Products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to go to the BATHROOM in this plane!

    2. Re:General Products by TA · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's supposed to be a General Products hull they could install an automatic stasis unit as well. Wouldn't be so bad:
      ("Warning: Nearing impact." ..discontinuity..)

  75. Hey George by mysidia · · Score: 1

    <Co-Pilot> Hey, George... the radar says there's a plane there, think we should pull up?
    <Pilot> Don't be silly, Marv, look out there, see out the window, no plane there.
    <Co-Pilot> Oh, I see... just a bunch of birds.. they kinda almost look like people. We can take them
    <Pilot> I'll aim for the one that almost looks like a stewardess...

    ... 15 minutes later...

    <Reporter> We bring you live to the scene of this terrible accident, it seems a local crop dusting craft.. has collided with "something invisible that noone's figured out what is".

    <Reporting> In other news, Invisible Airbus flight 999 disappeared without a trace, we are still searching for the whereabouts of her crew and 50 passengers; more on this at the top of the hour, stay tuned...

  76. Reminded me of De Havilland Comet by manofyunk · · Score: 1

    They had crashes that were traced to structural failure of the airframe. The windows shape supposedly caused the fatigue.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Comet

    I would think that lcd projection onto the ceiling of the cabin would provide a similar experience if tied to a camera mounted on the airframe.

    --
    Byte me, Doughboy!!!
  77. It's A Climate Of FEAR by Gaian-Orlanthii · · Score: 1
    FEAR!!

    If you can't handle it, then don't get onto the flying tube with the underpaid sleep-deprived pilot, the degraded, overworked and underappreciated flight staff, the constricted passengers breathing each others' recycled air and the authoritarian tazer-happy goon who wouldn't let you bring your toddler's baby food onboard doubling as the air marshall. All that and the knowledge that this is a secondhand aircraft carrying only enough fuel to remain within safety guidelines.

    On the other hand, you only live once, right? I see an opportunity here to experience something like a rollercoaster YOU COULD ACTUALLY DIE IN - only it's flying!

    You get to see the aircraft almost smash into the ground at 200KPH RIGHT UNDER YOUR FEET and if you're the one who sees flame coming out of the wheel assembly on the way in, you'll get to know about it before everyone else.

    I love this idea.

  78. Niven not Star Trek by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think they've been reading Niven not Star Trek. In particular it sounds like they are going after the General Products #3 hull.

    1. Re:Niven not Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm happy that I'm not the only person to come to that conclusion.

  79. Seriously by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Aside from all the obvious jokes - won't this make life hell for the air traffic controllers?

  80. Transparency? What could possibly go wrong? by macraig · · Score: 1

    Nearly invisible airplanes... now what could possibly go wrong with that? Pilots don't really need to see things out the cockpit these days anyway, right?

    Obama's transparency this ain't.

  81. Safety? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't part of commercial air safety the idea that pilots should be able to SEE other planes, and take appropriate measures to avoid collisions (at least when the weather is such as to allow VFR flying)?

    And how exactly are takeoffs and landings going to work at busy airports?

  82. What you can see by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    This way, the clean-up crew at the gate can instantly see where they need to bring the barf-bucket to.

    And those of us amateur astronomers with good 'scopes and optical object-tracking software can get upskirt shots from 35,000 feet below.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
  83. Airbus, from Boeing by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Dear Airbus:
    Look at all the grief we've had with something simple, like composites. This is stuff that has been around for decades, and we are still having problems making an aircraft out of it.

    You are talking about things that haven't even been invented yet, let alone approved by the various aviation agencies of the world, or even built into a prototype.

    So, in closing: you go! You spend all your money on that, and let us know how that works out for you.

    Love,

    Boeing.

    1. Re:Airbus, from Boeing by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      LMFAO couldn't have said it better. See below post about engineering sniffing airplane glue. Looks like marketing is in on that too.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  84. I see you when you're peeing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope the lavatory doesn't become transparent at the touch of a button too...

  85. No generalproducts tag? by kindbud · · Score: 1

    What kind of nerd site is this anyway?

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  86. "the wonders of the five continents" by Saberwind · · Score: 1

    Someone failed geography.

    1. North America
    2. South America
    3. Africa
    4. Europe
    5. Asia
    6. Australia
    7. Antarctica

  87. Do I cut the red wire or the blue? by westlake · · Score: 1

    Clear hydraulic fluid in clear lines; transparent aluminum wiring in nylon insulation. What a concept!

    Color coding to insure proper connections. What a concept!

    1. Re:Do I cut the red wire or the blue? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      nylon insulation comes in many colors.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  88. Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by haruchai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Toronto's CN Tower has a glass floor, about a 1/4 mile above street level and there are many, many people who can't muster the nerve to walk out on it.
      I can only imagine how relaxing it'll be for Joe Sixpack to have an unrestricted view of a flock of geese flying into the engine before all goes hurtling to that most
    welcoming of places we call Terra Firma.

    Not to mention just how much more gruesome plane crashes will be since anyone within visual range will have a lovely view of the innards, both the planes and the
    dead or dying passengers.

    Good plan, Mr Airbus Man.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think the aesthetics of a plane crash are very high up on the list of design considerations (nor should they be).

    2. Re:Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Toronto's CN Tower has a glass floor, about a 1/4 mile above street level and there are many, many people who can't muster the nerve to walk out on it.

      Then again, there are others who won't hesitate to make a point of jumping on it. Sometimes in a small group at the same time. I've said for a while now, they should loosen the top layer (the "scuff plate") of one of the panels on April Fool's so there's some give when people jump on it.

    3. Re:Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by chichilalescu · · Score: 1

      actually, transparent debris in a crash (even for buildings in earthquakes) is probably the best thing that could come out of this, because you could see where people are.
      I do have to admint, this is the most fictional science fictiony commercial I've heard in a while.

      --
      new sig
    4. Re:Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by haruchai · · Score: 1

      That would be HILARIOUS - you should e-mail that suggestion to the CN Tower Management

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    5. Re:Clearly, ( :-D ) , they haven't a clue by haruchai · · Score: 1

      The transparency of the fuselage requires electricity so it probably wouldn't last long after the plane crashed but your point is taken.
      I suppose rescuers could risk electrifying the wreckage to have a better view of the inside if the current isn't great enough to pose a threat.

      As far as giving passengers a view of the outside, it would probably be more practical to use external cameras that can be projected on the floor and ceiling that to build a whole new (fleet of) plane(s).

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  89. Blaine the Plane by ndelta · · Score: 1

    What is the use of a transparent airplane if a bunch of terrorists can get it to go down just by asking it riddles?

  90. I think by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

    the engineering department has been sniffing too much glue. Build a plane that doesn't fall apart in mid air and the rest will come.

    --
    "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
  91. Transparent in-flight toilets? by ignavus · · Score: 1

    And the transparent pilots cabin ... oh, look, both pilots are asleep!

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  92. It's actually about getting value for money by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's because the airlines are trying to get more value out of their free amenities (earplugs, face masks, toilets and air sickness bags).

    With that screaming, crying, fear-vomit and all.

  93. Pedro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which seat would you like sir ?

    The one on the lower deck beneath that Russian Synchronised swimming team please.

  94. European Heaven and Hell by DieByWire · · Score: 4, Funny

    Airbus engineers once again prove the old adage about European heaven and hell.

    In European heaven, the British are the police, the French are the cooks, the Germans are the engineers, the Italians are the lovers and the Swiss run the government.

    In European hell, the British are the cooks, the French are the engineers, the Germans are the police, the Italians run the government, and the Swiss are the lovers.

    --
    Never shake hands with a man you meet in a fertility clinic.
  95. It's The Future Of Sky-Porn! by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Since it won't be long until the DHS bans clothing from flights for being too dangerous...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  96. AP Newswire, Wichita, KS by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    AP Newswire, Wichita, KS:
    In response to Airbus's announcement that they are working on transparent aircraft, Boeing announced they would be working on a new aircraft themselves.

    "Our aircraft will have seats wide enough for an adult of average build to sit in them without touching their neighbors. They will have armrests that are not shared with the adjacent seats. They will have ample legroom for an adult one standard deviation above average height. The seats will recline without robbing the passenger behind them of space. They will have enough overhead storage for each passenger to have two carry on items without needing to place them in their foot space. They will have enough air conditioning to remain cool when parked on the tarmac in Dallas in the summer. They will have one bathroom for every 30 passengers. They will have multiple soundproofed areas, so a screaming child in one area won't bother the whole aircraft. There will be enough aisle space that passengers will be able to get on or off the aircraft even when other passengers are stowing their baggage. They will have these things not just in first class, but throughout the plane."

    Engineers for the Wichita office of Airbus are quoted as saying "Transparent planes are possible, but that?! PHFFT! Pure FICTION!"

    (and the reason I put this in Wichita is that we actually do have an office of Airbus here as well as Boeing).

  97. The first thing you are going to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... through the transparent floor is that your guitar in the baggage compartment is already broken. Which will probably spoil the enjoyment.

  98. CN Tower Has A Glass Floor Section by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

    For a junior version, step on the glass floor section of the observation deck of the CN Tower. I imagine they have to clean that glass more often than the windows.

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  99. Mostly boring by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    "The planes of the future will offer an unparalleled, unobstructed view of the wonders of the five continents -- where you will be able see the pyramids or the Eiffel Tower through the transparent floor of the aircraft"

    That's fine - during the .000001% of the flight spent near the Pyramids or the Eiffel Tower and at a low enough altitude to make them out. That view of the Atlantic while crossing it isn't going to be too impressive though.

  100. General Products? by Tmack · · Score: 1
    They team up with puppeteers and get some general products #2 or #3 hulls?

    Maybe they could get some stasis fields for them too...

    niven should be proud

    -T

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  101. Why wait for the future? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I can get a pretty good approximation of that view right now with a good hit of acid.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  102. Will it be called the Airbus Solar Oven? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if it comes with a UV rating

  103. My guess: The engineers got wasted... by jkyrlach · · Score: 1

    and then went on a STNG marathon... The next morning, they had nothing prepared so they just pulling the fragments out of their ass that had gotten lodged there from the previous night's activities... it's not like any of the suits would have recognized the OBVIOUS references to the show. I mean, what engineer would add awesome holographic projectors AND clear ceilings? Just project the milky way and be done with it. I guess promising just to upgrade the in-flight movie was not futurgery enough for them. On a related note: you don't need fancy ceramics to create the illusion of transparent. There's technology currently available to make pretty good invisible cloaks.I would just use that.

  104. Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of money...they should be putting their money into designing a plane like they had on the movie Soul Plane.

  105. Right... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    The joys of hundreds of passengers vomiting at once as they are exposed to real-time visual confirmation of aircraft motion in storms, stunned by lightning strikes, and get to see the wings nearly brush the ground on landing. What a great plan.

    In other news, Wonder Woman sues, and the puppeteers prepare a formal complaint to be submitted indirectly.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:Right... by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Informative

      Puppeteer should be capitalized, as it is a proper noun in this context- it's not some puppeteers, it's the Peirson's Puppeteers that are complaining.

      (And usig an a Android tablet to post with sucks.)

    2. Re:Right... by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's all right. If they confront me about it, I'll just yell "boo" and we won't see them again for a century...

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    3. Re:Right... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      Hey man, we need that first quantum hyperdrive, preferably BEFORE the Kzinti get here, OK? The Puppeteers send a representative to chastise you, you thank them and open trade relations, m'kay?

      Don't make me open this can of Tree Of Life on you!

    4. Re:Right... by JesterJosh · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of too. Are they growing the hull atom by atom and applying a force field via tiny reactor? Puppeteers might not have grounds to sue then.

    5. Re:Right... by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      Go ahead. That's when you'll find out that (a) I switched your TOL with some dirty old yams, and (b) I know where the funny bone is in your bulbous, nasty elbow joint.

      Protector... what a great book. I need to read that again. I've only read it like ten times, clearly not treating myself right. Wonder if Amazon's got it for my Kindle reader app... [wanders off]... cr*p. Audio and physical only. Guess I'll have to go back to paper for an evening.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    6. Re:Right... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Spelling aside, would it not in fact be General Products corporation (admittedly Puppeteer owned) doing the complaining?

  106. So all we need now is... by waimate · · Score: 1

    So all we need now is transparent baggage.

  107. Re:OMG YES! by monkeySauce · · Score: 3, Funny

    Depends on the in-flight meal. So I guess it's Jello or nothing on the transparent plane.

  108. an easier way? by mathfeel · · Score: 1

    Put up some high-def camera on the bottom of the plane and just project the image on the floor of the passengers who don't mind looking down?

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  109. screen by mikeskup · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it make more sense to point cameras everywhere, and then display it on a screen, if you wish to see it.........

    --
    locked out of this slashdot account for 10+ years... Im back
  110. Lavs? by Amlothi · · Score: 1

    Will the lavatory compartment be transparent too?

    --
    ~A~
  111. everybody sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, I am offended at the comments on here. The impossible to the invisible luggage. Are we not dreamers and engineers on this site? think of how easy it would be to mount cameras on the underbelly of the plane and give someone a "virtual" transparent floor. Yes, Airbus is reaching with their dreams, but we don't have to be so cynical.

  112. How about the scorching sun/sunlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple problem which results in almost everyone currently pulling down the sun screens.

  113. Really? by ben2umbc · · Score: 1

    I don't know if the whole plane needs to be transparent, but I'd settle for transparent doors on the lavatories and cockpit. Oh boy do I love the word cockpit.

  114. How visible from the outside? by Amlothi · · Score: 1

    Everyone is focused on the view from inside the plane, but what about from the outside. Wouldn't this make the planes harder to see while in flight?

    I know that we have neat technology like radar to track the planes, but what if that fails and pilots aren't able to see other planes around them clearly?

    Similarly, if you use this technology for small tourist planes (which seems to me to be a better idea) don't most of those planes follow visual flight rules? IANAP, so perhaps someone can correct me if I'm wrong.

    Furthermore, would this increase the incidence of "bird strikes" if the birds aren't able to see the plane coming?

    --
    ~A~
  115. Meanwhile in Japan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work intensifies to develop lenses that will let you take a picture up a skirt of a passenger on a plane at cruising height from the ground.

  116. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by warGod3 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that. Floor panels aren't made of aluminum as is. It is currently a fairly cheap composite. The problem is that on the planes with which I work, there are usually up to 15 floor panels. Not to mention seat rails to keep the seats attached to the floor. Add in all the fun kinds of damage that is done by feet moving across the floor, sodas spilled on the floor, dropping of luggage, etc.

    --
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
  117. Uh huh... sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In reality, all you'll be able to see is the purple haze from whatever the engineers got into...

    I'm still waiting for bridges made of glass (check out old PM issues). Those won't FREAK anybody out either!

  118. Transparent Fuselage by hackus · · Score: 1

    I get ready to board the plan and see it is transparent.....:

    "Oh Hell no. Mmmm mmmmm."

    I then walk off. ;-)

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  119. Re:Since the fuselage is built out of imaginary st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In that spirit, it will also fully block harmful radiation.

  120. Re:OMG YES! by Jakester2K · · Score: 1

    Uh... WHAT inflight meal????

  121. OT: so sue me by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who'd like to see somebody like Jeff Dunham do a Pierson's Puppeteer at a con? Actually, it would be better with two puppeteers - one for each head.

    And mods - yes, I am off topic, that's why I didn't add my Karma bonus. Bite me.

  122. Just what I was thinking of. by crovira · · Score: 1

    Or better yet, what a wonderful way to discover that being up at 35,000 feet induces uncontrolled sphincter contractions.

    Great way to come face to feces with acrophobia and agoraphobia... :-)

    Pee and poop flung about the passenger compartment as you scream like a monkey at the "Sandoz factory"*.

    The smell alone would get you fellow passengers to throw you out the invisible hatch while you flail your arms trying to pull an invisible rip chord.

    WEEEeeee!!!!

    * Sandoz used to run a facility in Montréal, Québec, Canada in the 1950s where they experimented with Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for the C.I.A. (See Project MK-ULTRA [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA ] for more info.)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Just what I was thinking of. by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, what a wonderful way to discover that being up at 35,000 feet induces uncontrolled sphincter contractions.

      Actually, anything above about 3,500-4,000 feet doesn't feel high anymore. Everything is so small and far away that it becomes just background. During freefall skydiving from 15k down to 3.5k everything is just "really effin' far". At about 3.5k things start to change and you get a sense of the earth approaching from below. Suddenly you are "up high" whereas above this level you are just flying in open space with no real sense of distance or motion.

      So with that in mind I could see agoraphobia being a big problem with truly transparent 360 degree views, much more so than acrophobia.

  123. A flying tanning bed... by mevets · · Score: 1

    Light is kinda strong up there, might be a bit tough to get people to agree on how much light is too much, but hats off to the wacky idea squad.

    Was there a bumper crop in France this year, or did they confiscate the Roma's weed before booting them out?

  124. Horrible pun BTW. But the avionics and by crovira · · Score: 1

    the engine and flight surface controls can all be run through a few fiber-optic cables each barely thicker than a human hair.

    You could even employ HUD technology (which is already see-through) and only have the landing gear, wing tanks and engines (flight and control surfaces) opaque.

    It COULD be done to some extent ... but why?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Horrible pun BTW. But the avionics and by Moridin42 · · Score: 1

      This ignores all the passengers, seating, and baggage. None of which would be transparent. And which would be blocking most of your view.

      Although.. transparent baggage. That would be nice. We could get rid of TSA. They wouldn't have to do security theatre anymore because you clearly can't see the horrible terrorizing instruments of terrifying terror. And thus you feel safe.

      --
      I don't expect morality, equality, consistency, or justice from the law. I expect only legality.
  125. Glass planes? by justinjstark · · Score: 1

    Future terrorists will just have to bring rocks. :-)

  126. Painted ransparent planes by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Everyone here seems to be seeing only the increased view a transparent fuselage would provide. There may be another benefit: less weak points. Every time you make a hole in your fuselage, such as for a window, you are increasing the number of potential weak points. Imagine now the whole fuselage being one transparent piece, you reduce this problem. Anywhere you don't want people seeing out can simply be painted over.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Painted ransparent planes by TheLink · · Score: 1

      How about replacing the tiny windows with decent cameras and screens?

      No need for transparent planes and cargo etc.

      --
    2. Re:Painted ransparent planes by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      It would use too much power, causing the aircraft to burn mor efuel, making cutting into the airlines profits.

    3. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The weakpoints what window holes are causing would demand that there is no skeleton in the fuselage but it is just aluminium and blastic.

      We all should know that every passenger jet has a big strong skeleton. It is aready needed for different floors and to have strong body/wings connection (what btw, is the weakest point in the whole plane). There is no such material what can be as strong as titanium and other metal materials for the skeleton and still offer a 90% invisibility like a glass and plastic.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boeing_747_Le_Bourget_FRA_002.jpg

      As you can see, the fuselag frames and stringers are very much filling the whole space. Skin is just small portition of the fuselag.
      But the back part is littlebit different thing. There it would be easy to replace the skin with transparent material, but still you would have frames etc there.

      The skin itself does not make so big difference for the weakpoints, it is everywhere else. Thats why airplanes windows are so small that you can fit them between frames and stringers. Causing no weakpoints. And the plastic used them is so thik that you can not even benetrate them with 9mm gun (9mm is designed with strong stop power, but very weak penetration power, so you can use it in hostage situations inside easily, without worring does it make a whole to a wall. It does penetrate tables, light wooden doors or hollow metallic doors).

      And what Boing really is doing, is to make the upper part of the fuselag transparent. From floor level to middle where is going to be a strong string from back to the front. And where the cables, lights and other stuff will be places, like passengers handbacks and backpacks and so on.

      So only partically you can add a transparent parts to fuselag, not the whole fuselag.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Airbus_A340_Intérieur_Fuselage_Arrière.JPG

    4. Re:Painted ransparent planes by N+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about replacing the tiny windows with decent cameras and screens?

      Some years ago, one airline my parents flew on had a camera looking forwards and down from the nose of the plane. You could get a (better than?) pilot's view of the take-off and landing.

    5. Re:Painted ransparent planes by mcvos · · Score: 1

      A camera is not the same as seeing it with your own eyes. I would love larger windows in planes. A completely transparent hull might be a bit too much, though.

    6. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Emirates airliners have a camera in the front (pilot view) and another one at the bottom to give view of the ground below. The bottom one zooms to more than 1 (ground features appear much larger than with what we see trhough the window). The seat display allows selection of the camera to view. I travelled several times on this airline and the bottom camera becomes nauseating after a few minutes because of the fast motion of big objects (housetops, trees) etc. They should reduce the zoom level to make it comfortable.

    7. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

      Yep. The stress raising properties of the windows lead to the Comet disaster. With a transparent fuselage, you could spot any cracks before they get too large.

    8. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, how do they find damage to the fuselage after hitting birds or other stuff when flying or when on the ground?

    9. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article mentions that the fuselage would be made out of a ceramic which is only transparent when electricity flows through it... so basically you don't have to do anything to "paint" it... and if you want part of it transparent you build it in such a way that you can selectively pass electricity through that part.

      Of course that just leaves me hoping I'm not using the bathroom when the plane is struck by lightning...

    10. Re:Painted ransparent planes by Pamplona+Slowpoke · · Score: 1

      There is no such material what can be as strong as titanium and other metal materials for the skeleton and still offer a 90% invisibility like a glass and plastic.

      Just wait until Scotty has to come save the whales.

  127. Wonderwoman by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    will be your captain today.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  128. Oh, hell to the "no!" by smchris · · Score: 1

    Just the hysteria. Nothing else to add.

  129. The ultimate in annoyance by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

    Great, now the asshole on the cellphone next to me is going to lean over me to look through the transparent aisle of the floor as he describes the view to the person on the other end of his call.

    In all seriousness, I'd find transparent planes cool, but I'm willing to bet that relatively few people would want to fly on them. A surprising number of people are very anxious about air travel. (Personally, I find flying relaxing. It's getting through the security checkpoints in the airport while hoping not to be the guy selected for a random full GI tract search that worries me.)

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  130. You've got to be kidding me. by loshwomp · · Score: 1

    All I want is a camera on the front of the plane, pointing straight forward, with the view on my screen. Add a few more cameras so I can pan around, look straight down, etc., and I'm way more than happy.

    Transparent planes? You've got to be kidding me. It's like they got the engineers together to design the most outrageously complicated solution without thinking to hard about the problem in the first place. They could get 95% of the results for much less cost using technology available today.

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding me. by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      On a recent SAS flight (Copenhagen to Frankfurt, small Airbus) they had a downward facing camera that displayed on the video monitors. First time I've ever seen it. It was rather nice - but the excitement fades quickly if you are over clouds or ocean.

      A transparent airplane would be great fun - but even if were practical (which I doubt) I don't think passengers would be willing to pay enough more to fly on it.

      Most of the high value passengers in Business and First are frequent fliers for whom the excitement of flying has largely worn off.

      That said, if they built a transparent airplane and the costs weren't ridiculous I'd fly on it, but then I'd pay them to throw in a barrel roll as well.

  131. As long as he doesn't make the evening news, by crovira · · Score: 1

    the average person is taking off his shoes, carrying liquids in less that 5 oz. containers, walking through full body scanners, subjecting him/her-self to indignities, tiny seats and spending hours locked in a flying tube, eating bad peanuts, drinking bad soda (should s/he be unfortunate enough to be flying at meal-time, s/he will be subjected to a meal where the serving tray may be as nutritious and flavorful as the white "mystery meat" on it,) reading in-flight magazines and the airline's shopping mall catalog.

    Most of the flight is controlled by "Otto" the pilot and the take-off and landing are shakily barely controlled by the poor schmucks in the front of the thrown cigar tube trying to not screw up the check list or discover a new species of bird with a fondness for jet engine intakes.

    The other riders are either boring, bored, or insane, rude, hostile or, worse, they earnestly want to tell you all about their dull-as-dishwater lives, husbands or wives or kids and won't shut their yaps. (I've flown enough that I take the train everywhere now because I don't want to have to strangle the screaming baby two rows back who's barely legal army wife mother has never heard in all her sixteen years on this planet of discipline, now SHUT THE FUCK UP THE WHOLE SORRY LOT OF YA!)

    Flying is for poor people who's time isn't worth waiting for and neither are they.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  132. What bunch of wimps by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

    People don't get any more seasick on a glass-bottomed boat. Where's your spirit of adventure? You never heard of barf bags? Especially at night it be incredible viewing. This is about the only thing that would get me on an airplane these days.

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  133. So how do you dim that sun? by dingleberrie · · Score: 1

    That video player embedded in the seat in front of me better be really good in bright light.

  134. Why do I get the feeling by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

    that passengers will be hoping their barf bags aren't transparent.

  135. Can we have transparent toilet lines? by Eclipse-now · · Score: 1

    Just think of the health benefits of being able to scan your poohs as you watch your business stream down the sewer lines to containers. It might not be 'shiny', but every time you flush will be an adventure in medicine!

  136. good for competition by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a joint statement, the chief executives of British Rail, Société Nationale des Chemins de Français, Deutsche Bahn, Österreichische Bundesbahnen, Ferrovie dello Stato, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Schweizerische Bundesbahnen, Renfe Operadora, Norges Statsbaner, and several other European rail companies applauded the idea, saying it would help to increase competition in the market for European travel.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:good for competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Société Nationale des Chemins de *Fer* Français

    2. Re:good for competition by Rou7_beh · · Score: 1

      It's "Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer" !

  137. Solar power by lemmis_86 · · Score: 1

    Booorinng. Make the solar powered airplanes already! Who would actually want to see the chemtrails :)

  138. It's just a possibility. Not seriously considered by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    The transparent plane is just an example of what could be possible. I doubt they'd do this (except perhaps as a gimmick/tech demonstrator). The idea seems that they could us a single composite structure, and by making it transparent they could eliminate the need for weakening the design by cutting holes in it. I imagine if they did make a plane like this they'd actually paint the thing.

    Still, you would have the advantage of larger windows and ceiling windows.

  139. Disgusting concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooo, we get to see the dirt, grime and chewing gum stuck to the floor or is it to be made of some unknown self cleaning, never scuffed and ever pristine material.

      Mike Wilcox

  140. Idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "transparent" idea will not fly...

  141. Re:Transparency? What could possibly go wrong? by mixmasta · · Score: 1

    A shame, I came in to post that subject line. ;)

    --
    #6495ED - cornflower blue
  142. Re:OMG YES! by MiniMike · · Score: 1

    Speaking of seeing things, isn't going to the bathroom on an airplane bad enough already? Now you will get the additional joy of having everybody in the air and ground watching you fumble around your undersized invisible box like some type of constipated mime. Yeah, I can't wait.

  143. Electrochromic, even better by kanweg · · Score: 1

    With an electrochromic floor, you can make it appear opaque and only when the passengers are in the air you can turn it off (on, whatever) to make it transparent. For 1 April you can make a fake crack appear and make it progressively larger. Now that is what I call on board entertainment.

    Making a crack appear could help condition passengers such that when a real crack appears in a plane, people don't shout and panick and all. Or it could be used to contain terrorists. Let them try to cross the chasm to the cockpit.

    Bert

  144. You won't see anything anyway by gullevek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What do you want to see at the bottom? Boxes and boxes and more boxes ... and on the top. cables, cables and more cables. See-through-fuselage-my-ass I say.

    I see this more a too early 1st April joke ... Unless they magically add some lights, call buttons, etc and make the floor where the seats are connected and the boxes and the boxes contents (aka luggage) transparent there won't be anything more to see anyway.

    --
    "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  145. Glass Bottomed Boomer? by dogzdik · · Score: 0

    Yay!!!! - Upskirt photos at 30,000 feet.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

  146. Excuse me, but could you... oh never mind! by jimngo · · Score: 1

    I guess you no longer have any reason to ask the guy sitting in the window seat to pull down the shade so you can sleep.

  147. Re:Transparency? What could possibly go wrong? by macraig · · Score: 1

    I was channeling what you were thinking.

  148. "looking up is nearly as scary as looking down" by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    -- david byrne

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  149. New opportunities for airspotters! by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    With transparent fuselages, now they will have the opportunity of looking under the skirts of the passengers...

  150. Re:OMG YES! by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

    You must be from the US where they don't serve meals anymore. My question is, what about the long flights over the pond where you have multiple sunrises in one flight. Makes sleeping a bitch.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  151. Flight of the Navigator by philwebs · · Score: 1

    Prior art......

  152. Floor material properties (Re:OMG YES!) by beh · · Score: 1

    On the positive - not just Nasa will have 'Vomit Comets' afterwards... Competition is good! ;-)

    On a more serious note - I do think that some people might actually barf, piss in their pants, ...

    Most transparent surfaces that I could think of right now have one thing in common - their surface is smooth.
    Now, a smooth, wet floor in the plane - what could possibly go wrong? Say, trying to safely get out of the plane again, without slipping on a wet slippery floor?

    The other thing - airlines are trying to cut costs - a transparent floor only really works if it's really CLEAN. Airbus wants airlines to spend more on ongoing cleaning efforts? (Having seen some planes, this might not be entirely bad, though).

  153. Flight attendants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can it be Flight attendants with transparent dress nao?

  154. Including the lavatory??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Including the lavatory???

  155. Ya Right!!! by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    I can imagine all those borderline acrophobics freaking out about 10 secs after the plane leaves the ground. Unless, like one previous poster, the floor and the ceiling are covered with boxes and cables, etc.. Airbus' head of research and technology, Axel Krein must not have taken into account that many people may not be too keen on being constantly reminded that they sitting in a "glass" airplane 30,000 feet in the air - especially when they're flying over the ocean with no land in site. Talk about feeling like a canary in a coal mine!

  156. parasols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will there be room for 500 parasols when the sun is strong?

    Tj

  157. You poor guy by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    A slashdot nerd AND a trainspotter. The only man in history to have a negative amount of sex :p

    Anyway, first time I got on an aircraft I already became a convert to rail travel. Nobody ever told me airliners CREAK! Used to trains where the fuselage/body is a solid bit of steel that does NOT twist and shake and rattle.

    Anyway, has anyone given a thought to the people on the ground. I do not want to see upskirt shots or Ryan Air passengers.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You poor guy by treeves · · Score: 1

      In my experience it seems that Airbus jets creak, rattle, vibrate, and shake more than Boeing jets, too.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  158. Vommit resistant? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    The plane would only be transparent so long as the vomit doesn't chew through it.

  159. Seriously, Airbus guys ... by jopet · · Score: 1

    how much of your billion dollar EU subsidies are you spending on dope?

  160. That gives me e great idea by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    That gives me e great idea. Fully reclining seats and nudist sunbathing flights.

    1. Re:That gives me e great idea by Stele · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, have you SEEN most nudists and/or airline passengers? No thanks!

  161. Couple of things to consider by Canapial · · Score: 1

    - A 10-hour transatlantic flight at night. [Assuming it's all like Wonder Woman's invisible jet) all you'd see is people sitting down and flashing lights at the tip of the wings. Like some ill-conceived postmodern disco. Good luck with your nap. I don't wanna say there was recreational drug use at Airbus HQ, but someone down there likes Pink Floyd a lot. Seriously though, you can't do that with a couple of cameras and some HD tv's inside the plane? Hey kinda tacky, but sure gets an amen from the DIY crew!

  162. Oh, I can see clearly now by cheros · · Score: 1

    (with apologies to various artists over the years)..

    Thankfully you can switch it off, plenty of people with a fear of heights - or wearing skirts..

    It would be cool if you could check if they had actually managed to get your luggage on board, but I believe that's sometimes not even in the same plane.

    However, I care less for this idea than I care for places like Heathrow to sort out their luggage problems. The last time I flew into London it took me less than 5 minutes to get through passport control, and then a FULL HOUR to wait for my luggage: No, I'm not kidding. A whole hour, partly because the belt that it was arriving on had probably the most flawed design I have ever seen in well over 20 years of flying. That was the last time I flew into London without having my luggage above my head - I rather buy a shirt locally.

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  163. can get nasty by batistuta · · Score: 1

    Yeah... let's make the waste containers for the toilets also transparent. Then wait for the stewardess to say "enjoy your meal."

  164. Safe in a Thunderstorm? by PrayingWolf · · Score: 1

    I just hope these transparent planes are offer lighting protection, as in Faraday cages, we don't want another AF-447, 'nuff said.

  165. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Absolutely! That is the point that most of the posters here seem to be completely missing. Note that they're saying "we could" do this as opposed to "we will". It's an observation about technical possibilities, not commercially likely ideas. Like the Boeing 787, they're explaining that they could make a plane primarily out of composites (although they appear to be suggesting clear plastic rather than carbon fibre).

  166. Upskirt shots of hostess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...made by airport workers during landing?

  167. They forgot the sun by TA · · Score: 1

    I fly all the time in my job. Look around in an airplane the next time you fly. Notice what people are doing? They close the window shutters as soon as they're airborne, at least when there are clouds. The reason? You fly above the clouds, and the light from the white clouds gets intense. If the sun is on your side of the aircraft it gets even worse.

    A transparent fuselage would be a nightmare, except for night-time flying. But how often do you do fly at night, except for intercontinental flights?

    To me the whole sounds like a joke, which it probably is.

  168. Glare...? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I often have to take sunglasses on board during daytime flights -- the bright sunlight gives me a cracking headache, even with just the small windows. Increasing the light reaching the interior isn't going to make that any better...

    HAL.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  169. Am I really the only one who thinks this is by lundstrj · · Score: 1

    frikkin' awesome!?

  170. Delta Wing Aircraft by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    This might be related with creating Delta-wing passengers aircrafts (where the whole aircraft is a flat and delta-shapped wing). When looking into this, one of the problems that Airbus and Boeing found for those versus the traditional cigarrete-tube-with-wings ones is that in a delta wing, most passengers do not sit anywhere near windows, and that is ennerving to people.

    A (semi-)transparent fuselage would be able to solve this.

    That still leaves the second problem, which is that no airports in the world have docking bays appropriate for delta-wing aircraft.

    1. Re:Delta Wing Aircraft by billyswong · · Score: 1

      Now that's a plausible explanation of the transparent fuselage idea. Just like usually people won't want a transparent bus roof, a transparent roof for the plane is also not that good an idea to passengers. However, some transparency for the roof of aisles may not be bad, especially for delta wing aircrafts.

      I think what this idea mostly ends up is just bigger windows for planes, like those of air-conditioned buses.

  171. Ceramic? How flexible is that? by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    I thought that one of the advantages of using metal for airplanes is that it flexes. There are a lot of stresses placed on an aircraft in flight, and flexing allows those forces to be dissipated. I'm sure everyone who's been in a commercial jet has marveled at how much the wings move. Ceramics are (AFAIK) stiffer. They don't bend, they break. Perhaps Airbus is planning on using flexelain (flexible porcelain) which has yet to be developed, since I just made it up.

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  172. COOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the bathroom transparent too?

  173. Anti-viagra by bushwahd · · Score: 1

    "If you experience an erection that lasts for more than 4 hours, climb aboard. We'll fix that for ya."

  174. how did they know by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    about my secret desire to be wonder woman?

  175. Geekgasm! by RichiH · · Score: 1

    Lots of people pointed out wires, fuel tanks, baggage, travellers who are afraid enough as it is etc.

    But I have to say this:

    GEEKGASM!

    Do want. I would need to fly alone as my gf would never ever join me but what the heck. Worth it! 50% mark-up on the price? Still, I will go!

  176. Suntan by Araghorn · · Score: 1

    Better stock up on some SPF 100 before the flight.

  177. One positive for all of the Perv's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think of all of the upskirt pictures that can come outta this.

  178. Oh my Wonder Woman by HotGarbage · · Score: 1

    Marketing BS, I agree. Are we trying to make Wonder Woman's invisible jet a reality?

    --
    Decaffeinated coffee is kinda like kissing your sister.
  179. Infrequent flyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will probably have to equip every seat with the toilet because half of the passengers won't be able to make it to the lavatory once they see empty space around the aircraft ;)

  180. Re:OMG YES! by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    You must be from the US where they don't serve meals anymore.

    Oh, they still serve meals, for about $10 USD.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  181. Re:OMG YES! by hedge49 · · Score: 1

    When the 747 was first put in service for commercial flights, there were lower deck seats that faced forward, and which had a spectacularly intimate view of landing and takeoff runways. These seats were quickly and universally removed, or the windows permanently replaced with non-transparent aluminum. The problem wasn't vomiting so much as screaming uncontrollably and leaving skidmarks down the aisle during landings. But I don't guess Boeing cares much if Airbus makes the same mistake. At least in Boeing's case, the affected group was a small subset of passengers.

  182. Sunburn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned this. I'm a white guy, a very white guy. I sunburn in about 15 minutes in the sun. I wear SPF 50 and in about 4 hours I burn or become very sensitive to the touch and feel very nauseous . UV rays at 30,000 feet have got to be intense. If I flew from east coast USA to west coast USA, even fully lathered up in sunscreen, I would be a medical emergency before getting to the west coast. The only possible way would be in the dead of night.

    Nathan

  183. Tell you what Airbus... by Syberz · · Score: 1

    How about making a plane where I have room for my legs without having to sell an organ in order to afford it?

    Get that done, then we can talk about transparent planes, ok?

    Oh, and while you're at it, work on getting us some palatable food too.

    --
    ~Syberz
  184. Sigh... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    Hyperdrive technology was sold by the Outsiders to the Human colony of We Made It, in 2409. He can yell "boo" at the Puppeteers all day long.

    1. Re:Sigh... by Nathanbp · · Score: 1

      But the Outsiders only went to We Made It because of a Puppeteer deployed starseed lure.

    2. Re:Sigh... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      "But the Outsiders only went to We Made It because of a Puppeteer deployed starseed lure."

      You beat me to it.

      SO, the Puppeteers have hyperdrive, and so if they show up, open trading relations, so we don't have to wait for the Outsiders.

      Offer to go to the galactic core, or do a close orbit around a neutron star in a GP3, or whatever, but get that hyperdrive.

      (besides, who knows if they don't already have second quantum yet? Sure, they told Beowulf they just developed it, but for all we know they'd been sitting on it for centuries, too afraid to build it.).

  185. You have to fly naked however... by tekrat · · Score: 1

    Transparent airplane? I guess that makes sense given security. After all, they are scanning, probing, looking at our internal organs before we board the plane. No one can stow away anymore, you can't hide a bomb. Is the bathroom transparent too? I mean, we might as well fly naked at this point.

    Any don't bring any luggage onto your transparent plane as it'll block the view. Unless your luggage is transparent, which security would prefer. And can we see all the way into the transparent cockpit? There's just about nothing about this that makes the least bit of sense. I call bullshit.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  186. On reconsideration... by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    Really hard to see the inflight movie when sun is streaming in over your shoulder.

    Presumably, they make an exception for the bathrooms?

    If the hull doesn't block UV you could work on your tan on the way to Mexico.

    Maintenance will be more interesting. Hard enough now with extensive colour coding. (The aircraft repair industry can employ color blind techs!)

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  187. Re:OMG YES! by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

    Last flight I was on, spent 4 hours in a plane, and all they had to gave me were peanuts...

    --
    Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
  188. Hal of Justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Wonder Woman can have her plane now and a movie can be made featuring her.

  189. CN Tower and windows by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

    I'd rather see the windows turn into a long and relatively high window running the length of the plane.

    The CN Tower in Toronto, Ontario has a very thick glass for a floor over a small section so you can look strait down. You can walk over it safely with no problems, but it freaks the hell out of most people. When I went to visit it I had no problems but my 3 friends wouldn't go within a foot of the glass part of the floor. The vast majority of the other visitors reacted the same way, they'd lean over to take a quick look and then move away never setting foot on the glass.

    --

    Bah!
  190. Interior lighting will be a problem... by spidey3 · · Score: 1

    As anyone who has spent night hours in a room will lots of windows will tell you, lighting the interior of an all-transparent plane is going to be difficult. This is because most interior lighting is indirect and diffuse. Recessed ceiling fixtures light the floor, up-lights light the ceiling, and wall-washers keep the walls bright. Current planes are mostly lit by indirect ceiling lights and wall washers. Only the reading lights provide direct illumination - which is very inefficient, and straining on the eyes. If walls and ceiling are transparent, indirect lighting of this sort of lighting becomes impossible. In the absence of opaque, light reflective walls [or shades of some kind], the photons just stream out of the room [plane] after only one chance of striking something needing illumination. This is why many establishments with large window walls close shades at sunset -- so that the shades reflect light back into the room.

    And while in a terrestrial environment this might only be an efficiency / comfort issue, in a plane it is a safety issue. Efficient and effective lighting will be key when flight staff need to take action in the event of a cabin emergency.

    Spidey!!!

  191. Great Hera! by He+Who+Waits · · Score: 1

    What, two pages of comments and not one about Wonder Woman? What has happened to the /. I knew and loved?

  192. Bad experience for all by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you but most of my flights are during the day. Having the sun in my face for 2-4 hours at a time is not something I would enjoy... unless of course I could lay back and work on my tan in my speedos. Which is something the other passengers will not enjoy. ~:-)B

  193. Reminds me of when I was a kid... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... and we had the ol' Vista Cruiser. (Looking down wasn't possible, though, nor would it have been very interesting.)

    Just a few random thoughts:

    * Wouldn't a transparent floor in a plane give the passengers an exciting view of not so much the Eiffel Tower, the Pyramids, or the Taj Mahal, but ... the luggage?

    * Forget being able to see the stars at night. I think it'd be even better to fly at night when there are thunderstorms along the flight path. That would be an E-ticket ride.

    * I have to wonder how the materials they plan on using for this are going to wear. Any scratches on the transparent portion are going to be difficult to deal with. Imagine the additional maintenance costs of having to polish the fuselage in order for the paying customers to be able to see the stars. Imagine the complaints from the customers when they can't see the stars because the carrier skimped on maintenance and the transparent material isn't so, uh, transparent.

    * How will the carriers protect the passengers from the sun when flying during the day? You can get one hell of a sunburn when sitting next to a plexiglas window on a plane. I wonder what precautions they'll take to prevent that and reduce the passengers' increased risk of skin cancer? (One hopes that this magical material provides excellent UV protection.)

    * Ever been to a restaurant and asked the management or that couple sitting next to the window to close the blinds because the sun was shining in your face and blinding you? Now think that request going unheeded in a close environment where many of the people have been drinking.

    * Interiors made of plant fibres? One wonders if the interior will go up like flash paper in the event of a crash.

    "We told our engineers to give their imaginations free rein."

    Did you tell them to take drugs before they started brainstorming? 'cuz it seems that they did.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  194. Computer? ... Computer? by jasonq · · Score: 0

    Time to fire up my Mac Classic, that transparent aluminium won't design itself you know!

  195. Yahoo answersWhy do aeroplanes have small windows? by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    From Asker:

    Pressurized aircraft, such as commercial jet airliners, have small windows because it's easier to build a small window that resists air pressure than it is to build a large window. The mechanical stress on the window rises quickly as the size of the window increases.

    Another reason for small windows is that it causes pressure to be lost a little less quickly if the window fails, although depressurization happens pretty fast either way. A small window is also less likely to cause other structural damage if it blows out, compared to a large window.

    The higher the pressure difference that the aircraft is designed to handle, the smaller the windows tend to be. The pilots have large windows in front of them, but they are extremely expensive and difficult to produce, since they must resist a lot of pressure (as well as impact from things like birds).

    Aircraft that are not pressurized can have windows of any size. Many small private aircraft have large windows, since they don't need to resist any pressures. Indeed, in unpressurized aircraft you can even open a window or door in flight, if you want. However, if the airplane flies really high, everyone inside needs to wear an oxygen mask.

    From Jimmbbo:

    At 35,000 feet, the pressure on all parts of the fuselage is about 1150 lb per square foot...

    Each 1.5 foot x 1 foot window will have about 1700 pounds of pressure pushing from inside to the out.

    A 2 x 2 foot window would have 4600 lb.

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  196. Someone's Frying BALONEY..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    I call "BS" on this article for 2 reasons:

    1. Whenever someone announces such bombastic claims like this, the claim is almost NEVER true. A prime example would be the announcement by a researcher of making "Plastic Water". What was missed was that a bunch of chemicals were added to the water, which makes the claim no more remarkable than making Jell-O. With regards to Airbus, it's a cool goal to work towards, but I'll bet THOUSANDS that the fuselage is transparent IN PLACES, but not in others, and using a system of cameras and projectors may SEEM to make the fuselage transparent, but does not ACTUALLY make the fuselage transparent. Just another publicity grab to me.

    2. Whenever SlashDot posts articles like these, any well-seasoned SlashDot reader already knows that the headline is almost always bullshit, since they will have plenty of experience reading articles with blatantly misleading headlines.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  197. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by David7 · · Score: 1

    Motion sickness can also be caused by receiving a visual cue of motion without the accompanying sensation of motion. This is why some people get nauseous when trying to play first person shooters. An airplane ride is usually exceptionally smooth, except for periods of turbulence. If you couple that with a visual cue of motion, via a transparent floor, I would imagine you would see an increase in motion sickness.

  198. Re:I guess plastic floors are cheaper than aluminu by aquila.solo · · Score: 1

    I'm offering circumsolar flights as we speak! It's a bit on the leisurely side--takes about 365 days to complete the trip--but the views are great, plenty of leg room, and you can bring as much luggage as you want.







    Oh, and I take PayPal!

  199. No Eiffel Tower anyway by christophe · · Score: 1

    You won't be able to see the Eiffel Tower or any bit of Paris through the floor. Flying above Paris is forbidden, seeing the Eiffel Tower this way means the plane might be shot down very soon.

    --
    Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
  200. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It took me about 2 seconds of reading this to think of why this is a horrible idea... you know those plastic doors you can slide over the window? To keep that blaring sun from burning your eyes out. That would be pretty hard if the plane was transparent...