I actually do. From Stanford. And yes I sit at 20:23 at my nice well paying job and answering moronic ANonymous Coward, who can not find their asshole from their nose..
It is strange, but it does happen.. should go home now.. fuck my beautiful girlfriend..
YOu little cunt - when I fucked your mom in the ass, never thought she will get pregnant with such a freak.
(and if you are actually interested in anything - I got Ph.D, nice cushy job that pays a lot, and I do not give a flying fuck about what I post. But you do, you little moron..;)
..stop wasting your time and your company money - hire a good artist/consultant to disign and review colors. There is no magical formulas that can substitute expert human opinion, on what is nice to see.
Color spaces are great for development of the displays and printers - there you have to get down to as few basic parameters as possible. They are useless for designing output of printers and displays..
We pay attention to this jingoistic crap, while..
on
Collateral Damage
·
· Score: 1
..while such nice real geek movies as "Brotherhood of the Wolf" (rocks!!) are being forgotten.
Seriously - forget Arnold - check "Brotherhood" out..
Far more fun is cooking a CD in a microwave.. Try it - set on high for 15 sec.. Loads of fun.
I also immensly enjoyed spilling cofe on my keyboard, dropping my cell phone, and then stepping on it, and cutting my finger when clipping my toenails. I guess I should dedicate a web site to it.
Do theny never learn? Sure, now they do not require you to connect ot the Big Brother, Co. to view it, but who will want this anyway? And how would they handle liability, if it does not play??
The point I was making, is that pure empiricism, experimentation is a goat bzadeh, as you so eloquently put it. One uses the works of academics, whether you realise it or not, its in every library, every piece of algorithms, in your text books, in the words you use. My guess you never actually looked at the research literature on networking - but make yourself a favor. And give the credit where the credit is due.
Mmm.. Of cause that's an old discussion between scientists and engineers, on what is really important, theoretical prediction and analysis, or a working implementation. Being both a scientist and an engineer, I would dare to say: both is very much needed, and whoever came up with the idea should be given proper credit.
When you do your most basic "hacking together", you stand on the shoulders of many very much academicians, even if do not realise it fully. Nothing works just by "brute force" - you use multitude of concepts, from basic like search or hashing or graphs, to advanced once, such as queuing theory and network analysis, carefully designed, analysed and implemented, and only then you add your "observing what worked". Do not dismiss theory, it is jsut as important as implementation..
Satan is shutting down the furnaces of Hell for a first clean-up since the Dante's inspection. He promises that now it will be an annual Hell freeze-over.
.. we can not dismiss th epossibility to extract energy from vacuum - after all the law of energy conservation is only an approximation, and any system we can uild is not really a closed one - we all will have gravitational and other forms of energy flowing through it.
Just realise, that for example, 10,000,000,000 neutrinos pass through our fingernail each second. Do you feel it?
But, of course, this claim is total BS, but it makes for a funny article..;)
Why, instead fo it, we do not invest the cost of B2 bombers program into Fusion research..
If it was a bigger chance of making money for an election contributor - there would have been more troops.
Quit blindly following rhetoriticians and use some critical thinking. They were NOT for humanitarian aid - if they were, they would have been there before SIAD BARRE was thrown out - he was a monster, who created all the famine, but nobody cared, since he was happily throwing any concessions on U.S. companies they wanted.
Once he was removed, they tried to move ini, but finally calculated it is not worth it.. That's a fact - not that it is anything wrong with, IMO. If I could have my way - hell, Mogadishu is in a dire need of a high yield nuke..
You choose one point, that I said "US Special Forces" instead of "Army Special Forces" and attempt to malign everything else.
Nope. It was you, who chose a very common terminology misalignment, between common and exact military term, to demonstrate what you perceived as author incompetense. Which I highlighted as a dubious argument, which it is.
But, I'm done arguing with you.
I am relieved.:) Now you can do some more reading, and clear up your view of the world. Good start of the new day..
Or man.. Go to the google.com and search for "Special Forces".
U.S. Special forces is a common, widely used term describing parts of JSOC. It is not the same as using Army Special Forces, it is not an error, and nitpicking this is stupid and rudiculous.
It is the same as I would dismiss for using common words like depression, or force, or solution, not in their exact psychology, physics, or chemistry meaning.
My point was correct, you missed it completely, and you guys are all funny.
U.S. Army Special forces is a military term, that indeed refers to "Green Berets". OTOH U.S. Special forces, is a common and a widely used term referring to JSOC parts. So the original author was absolutely correct using a phrase about members of "special forces" dying. To nitpick and call it "factual error" and base you counter "arguments" based on this is indeed silly.
Although the Rangers might be classed as Special Operations soldiers, the two groups are NOT synonymous or interchangeable.
Sure, set and a subset are not synonymous or interchangeble. So?
Sorry, you missed. Terminology in the original article was just fine: U.S. Special Forces are not the same as U.S. Army Special forces. You showed this as highlighted evidence of assumed "dubious" facts - but you are totally off with this. Alas. Whatever pose you want to strike - it is rather silly looking
Most of it is heresay, speculation, and non-sense.
Yeah, sure, and you are actually providing true facts. Where? Where?
Why not just say that you jingoistic nerve was ticked off by true facs, that you did not offer a single counter argument to, and you are trying to hide it behind rethoric?
In the same way Army Special Forces are not the same as U.S Special forces - as stated in the article.. blah blah.. You tried to dismiss original post, while your own terminology and reasoning are out of whack, sorry..
Argue what? You did not mention any facts, unlike the original post, just nitpicking and name calling.
Hm.. Yes, I do know that Rangers and Green berets are different organizations.. Both are considered Special operation forces, what you just confirmed. My point was that the original author tried to make a counter-argument (have you read what I responded to?) which was silly..
The fact that Conoco kept the office in Mogadishu throughout the turmoil, big enough to house the embassy and the marines headquarters is not a credible fact? Hm..
Umm.. Check it? There are plenty of references around - and references given do look rather credible.
Credibility has something to do with beliefs. This has nothing to do with you believing it or not - it is just a statement of facts: the way it actually happened. It may be erroneous in the end - but it is not a matter of believe, but of verifying them, hense credibility is not that important. You may not like him - but you can not dismiss facts based on that..
Slashdot Mirror
I actually do. From Stanford. And yes I sit at 20:23 at my nice well paying job and answering moronic ANonymous Coward, who can not find their asshole from their nose..
It is strange, but it does happen.. should go home now.. fuck my beautiful girlfriend..
But you will remain a cowardly moron.
(and if you are actually interested in anything - I got Ph.D, nice cushy job that pays a lot, and I do not give a flying fuck about what I post. But you do, you little moron.. ;)
.and I have enough Karma for a dozen of stupid moronic fucks like you.
I have too much Karma. Fuck moderators.
Color spaces are great for development of the displays and printers - there you have to get down to as few basic parameters as possible. They are useless for designing output of printers and displays..
Seriously - forget Arnold - check "Brotherhood" out..
I also immensly enjoyed spilling cofe on my keyboard, dropping my cell phone, and then stepping on it, and cutting my finger when clipping my toenails. I guess I should dedicate a web site to it.
What is thumbnail? Will 788 x 598 thumbnail of a 800 x 600 go? How would they decide?
Do theny never learn? Sure, now they do not require you to connect ot the Big Brother, Co. to view it, but who will want this anyway? And how would they handle liability, if it does not play??
The point I was making, is that pure empiricism, experimentation is a goat bzadeh, as you so eloquently put it. One uses the works of academics, whether you realise it or not, its in every library, every piece of algorithms, in your text books, in the words you use. My guess you never actually looked at the research literature on networking - but make yourself a favor. And give the credit where the credit is due.
When you do your most basic "hacking together", you stand on the shoulders of many very much academicians, even if do not realise it fully. Nothing works just by "brute force" - you use multitude of concepts, from basic like search or hashing or graphs, to advanced once, such as queuing theory and network analysis, carefully designed, analysed and implemented, and only then you add your "observing what worked". Do not dismiss theory, it is jsut as important as implementation..
I better use my own, 100% natural joystick.. ;)
Satan is shutting down the furnaces of Hell for a first clean-up since the Dante's inspection. He promises that now it will be an annual Hell freeze-over.
You know, now that Microsoft decided to fix all its bugs, I am not afraid of the hell in the future. It is already froze over.. ;)
Just realise, that for example, 10,000,000,000 neutrinos pass through our fingernail each second. Do you feel it?
But, of course, this claim is total BS, but it makes for a funny article.. ;)
Why, instead fo it, we do not invest the cost of B2 bombers program into Fusion research..
If it was a bigger chance of making money for an election contributor - there would have been more troops. Quit blindly following rhetoriticians and use some critical thinking. They were NOT for humanitarian aid - if they were, they would have been there before SIAD BARRE was thrown out - he was a monster, who created all the famine, but nobody cared, since he was happily throwing any concessions on U.S. companies they wanted. Once he was removed, they tried to move ini, but finally calculated it is not worth it.. That's a fact - not that it is anything wrong with, IMO. If I could have my way - hell, Mogadishu is in a dire need of a high yield nuke..
Nope. It was you, who chose a very common terminology misalignment, between common and exact military term, to demonstrate what you perceived as author incompetense. Which I highlighted as a dubious argument, which it is.
But, I'm done arguing with you. I am relieved. :) Now you can do some more reading, and clear up your view of the world. Good start of the new day..
U.S. Special forces is a common, widely used term describing parts of JSOC. It is not the same as using Army Special Forces, it is not an error, and nitpicking this is stupid and rudiculous.
It is the same as I would dismiss for using common words like depression, or force, or solution, not in their exact psychology, physics, or chemistry meaning.
My point was correct, you missed it completely, and you guys are all funny.
Although the Rangers might be classed as Special Operations soldiers, the two groups are NOT synonymous or interchangeable.
Sure, set and a subset are not synonymous or interchangeble. So?
Most of it is heresay, speculation, and non-sense.
Yeah, sure, and you are actually providing true facts. Where? Where?
Why not just say that you jingoistic nerve was ticked off by true facs, that you did not offer a single counter argument to, and you are trying to hide it behind rethoric?
Argue what? You did not mention any facts, unlike the original post, just nitpicking and name calling.
So you are saying what?
The fact that Conoco kept the office in Mogadishu throughout the turmoil, big enough to house the embassy and the marines headquarters is not a credible fact? Hm..
Umm.. Check it? There are plenty of references around - and references given do look rather credible.
Credibility has something to do with beliefs. This has nothing to do with you believing it or not - it is just a statement of facts: the way it actually happened. It may be erroneous in the end - but it is not a matter of believe, but of verifying them, hense credibility is not that important. You may not like him - but you can not dismiss facts based on that..