a movie about The Simpsons. You know what would awesome stunt casting? Usher as O.J., and Luis Guzman as Nicole, and Jonathan Lipnicki as Mark Furhman.
the added scenes also messed up the flow of the movie, because certain scenes were edited so things happen on specific musical cues, but with new footage added, the synchronization is all off. It's not just the visuals that were messed with.
an anonymous coward already echoed the sentiment that I have, mainly that a rating of 5 is not descriptive at all. Why not standardize a scale for all slashdot book ratings? This would help clear up confusion.
1) There is the ever-popular 0-10 2) A star rating (0-4 for movies, 0-5 for music), with a possible adjective afterwards (A must have, worthless, etc.) 3) The letter scale (F-A+) 4) Or even the Glengarry Glen Ross scale, where a book could only have 1 of 3 ratings (Cadillac, steak knives, you're fired)
Any of these would be preferable than just a number
me this is the first *real* use of the Internet in a meaningful way
Well the Blair Witch Project, back in 1999 used an internet-based marketing approach to rack up 140 million dollars. Not only that, it set the standard for how movies are marketed online.
Just because this is about entertainment and art and not politics doesn't make it less real. There's a lot of money in movies.
Wow! That's it? That's the entire review? No offense slashdot editors, but this is pretty insubstantial. Hell, a Gene Shalit movie review is more insightful. Why not just a link to download the new KDE?
I use a typewriter almost everyday at work. Typing purchase orders requires a typewriter, since ours are carbon paper based.
And I find that feeding an envelope or a label into the typewriter is much easier than setting up the printer to print one address. It may not be elegant, but it's simple
Of course, I can't surf slashdot from a typewriter.
Typically, a swarm bot is a collection of simple robots (s-bots) that self-organize according to algorithms inspired by the bridge-building and task-allocation activities of ants
So they've created artificially intelligent managers. Well I guess this is better than the real thing.
Slashdot Mirror
it had evolved into a yacht
they've made enough money long time ago
So exactly how much money is enough money? I want to know, in case I ever end up making that much, so I can just sit back and never make any more.
Mixing the beatles with Jay-Z is like mixing wine and bleach.
Kobe Bryant's wife just got really pissed at him again.
Talk amongst yourselves. I'll give you a topic.
Ebooks Neither E Nor Books
discuss!
hell, I bet Medusa would turn to stone if she saw the code.
a movie about The Simpsons. You know what would awesome stunt casting? Usher as O.J., and Luis Guzman as Nicole, and Jonathan Lipnicki as Mark Furhman.
I try to hide the evidence after I tamper with my digits. The hamper is a good hiding place.
Thank you. I'll be here till im modded down.
There is a lot more I could say about the book but because I don't want to spoil anything
IBM stands for International Business Machines. Ok, I just gave away the ending. sorry.
just wear an atheletic supporter and forget...oh. This was under the linux topic. nevermind.
the added scenes also messed up the flow of the movie, because certain scenes were edited so things happen on specific musical cues, but with new footage added, the synchronization is all off. It's not just the visuals that were messed with.
but not strong enough to resist buying dvd versions of movies I already have on vhs.
then whoever said "always bet on black" lost some serious cash
an anonymous coward already echoed the sentiment that I have, mainly that a rating of 5 is not descriptive at all. Why not standardize a scale for all slashdot book ratings? This would help clear up confusion.
1) There is the ever-popular 0-10
2) A star rating (0-4 for movies, 0-5 for music), with a possible adjective afterwards (A must have, worthless, etc.)
3) The letter scale (F-A+)
4) Or even the Glengarry Glen Ross scale, where a book could only have 1 of 3 ratings (Cadillac, steak knives, you're fired)
Any of these would be preferable than just a number
All office assistant's I know are sleepy, dopey, and grumpy. But most assuredly not happy.
me this is the first *real* use of the Internet in a meaningful way
Well the Blair Witch Project, back in 1999 used an internet-based marketing approach to rack up 140 million dollars. Not only that, it set the standard for how movies are marketed online.
Just because this is about entertainment and art and not politics doesn't make it less real. There's a lot of money in movies.
at RIT, we had a saying:
"girls are like parking spaces. All the good ones are taken or handicapped"
ah, another graduate of Bob Flanagan University
virginity tester
"sorry boss, haven't found one yet today. I'll look harder"
also quote possibly tied for the shortest title
I thought this book was going to be about getting rich quickly by investing in precious metals.
Wow! That's it? That's the entire review? No offense slashdot editors, but this is pretty insubstantial. Hell, a Gene Shalit movie review is more insightful. Why not just a link to download the new KDE?
Damn, there goes my already diminishing karma.
Evreyone behind a desk is vulnerable to being offshored.
Two guys standing around in an office
1: My job is safe! I'm a temp, and I only work part of the time
2: In that case, they'll replace you with a copy machine.
one of the top bands right now in the german rap scene
Kind of like being the best kickboxer in Belgium
I use a typewriter almost everyday at work. Typing purchase orders requires a typewriter, since ours are carbon paper based.
And I find that feeding an envelope or a label into the typewriter is much easier than setting up the printer to print one address. It may not be elegant, but it's simple
Of course, I can't surf slashdot from a typewriter.
Typically, a swarm bot is a collection of simple robots (s-bots) that self-organize according to algorithms inspired by the bridge-building and task-allocation activities of ants
So they've created artificially intelligent managers. Well I guess this is better than the real thing.