It is legal. Just have to follow the instructions.
If your first act in a country is breaking its established laws, then you don't deserve to be there. Follow the law, apply for proper Visas, make sure they are valid, and go through proper ports of entry.
... wants any part of your failing, debt ridden dictatorship ? Canada is quite happy setting its own policies without being overridden by an unelected foreign political body it has no direct influence over.
What you miss is that USA too subsidize massively the dairy product
So does Canada, on top of supply management. Most provinces have massive subsidies allocated to any farm entreprise, such as paid for protections in case of harmful disease of cattle and weather phenomenoms.
And then have supply management thrown on top. Let's face, this is "Never Trump" syndrome when the media fail to report on it properly. Before Trump, Canadian media had no qualm pointing out the double protection of Subsidies AND supply management :
The problem with Trump "calling out" other countries, is that he typically doesn't actually have a leg to stand on because he doesn't seem to know anything about anything. Take the Canadian Diary complaint. No-one seems to know where Trump pulled the 300% tariff untruth
Source: Am Canadian. We do tariff dairy, not just from the US, but from everywhere (France cheeses please!) so protect our own dairy farmer through a supply management scheme meant to garantee them to revenue. Welcome to Protectionism, it's ok when we do it, but somehow not when Trump does it. It's hypocritical. Trump is right as far as Dairy is concerned.
So those Russian guys... Indited for interfering with the US election... In a public statement from Mueller's office... Fake news?
I suggest you actually read my post, and then read the indictment, and understand what is actually going on before attempting to push the "Russia!" narrative some more. These 13 guys were indicted over the data we were shown by Congress (Facebook Ads and tweets) and were already known information. The indictment isn't even about the Ads and tweets, so much as about the money transfers and identity theft that occurred behind them.
Sometimes I wonder about the chicken and the egg. Was it progressivism's pathology that came first, or was it actors interested in sowing internal discord in US that actively promote it, such as Russia and Qatar that started it? At least with Russia, it increasingly seems that their expertise lies with exploiting already existing weaknesses, not creating entirely new ones (see - geopolitics of Russia).
If you think so, you're truly living in the post-fact world. The indictment and Rosenstein were clear. The data on the ads was clear. The post by the Facebook VP was clear. Unless you're implying he was lying and that the data is forged.
You are a Russian pawn at this point if you keep pushing for division and hate towards a dully elected President.
The Russians actively prevented the Clinton campaign from going to Wisconssin.
Let's face it, the Clinton campaign was built around the message of "It's all about her and being a woman president". They had no message, didn't bother even bringing their no message to most of America, and basically acted like they were owed the presidency. They got rejected and now are doing what they accused Trump supporters of when Hillary tweeted this :
Or you know, man wanted to tell the truth about get the facts out, and now he's being criticized because the truth doesn't align with the agenda one side wants to push.
People are being used as pawns and acting like tools, not even realising how they are being manipulated.
What ? Stop making stuff up and selectively reading into things. The indictment more than prove the major part of the activity was POST election and that the goal of the operation was not to sway politics to one side in particular, but rather to divide.
AKA : stop giving them what they want and dividing people over this fake narrative of Russian Collusion.
It's already been reported that this guy was trained by supremacists and appears to have been radicalized by them. The chief supremacist confirmed it.
And that was later confirmed to be a hoax, confirming that jumping ahead of the news to be "first to report" is a problem. You wouldn't want to spread fake news now would you ?
Maybe he was more vulnerable to their brainwashing because of existing mental illness, but he's just the latest in a long line of radicalized young men to go on murder sprees.
Maybe we should look into this whole "acceptance" and "ableism" virtual signaling then, and start to treat mental illness as mental illness again, instead of "accepting their differences" and just medicating them into compliance.
The factory doesn't operate fully automated. So when you cut the labor force, and thus labor wages aren't a factor, why pay for transport from China to mainland USA ?
Bring the factory back, and hire locally for jobs that can't be automated (Q&A, control, maintenance).
Oooh I see, it's not that they hate women they just hate women who want equality with men.
Yeah that's sexism.
No, they hate activists that try to push for preferential treatment of women by also silencing disent and men issues. You know, "intersectional 3rd wave feminist of the progressive persuasion".
But I guess sure, to you since you see them as bad actors, you just say they "hate all women", as if even most women are on the boat with the progressive ideology that's cancer.
At least from the most top moderated comments. The study is a biased hack job, and anyone with an ounce of objectivity can see it.
Essentially, they picked 91 sites that they deemed "junk", through 5 criteria (3 of which had to be met). The problem is that they picks do not normalize for traffic and breadth, and they didn't study the actual content being shared. You might not like Breitbart, but it's not much worse than Vox/Mic/Buzzfeed and heck, even CNN, which also met at least 3 of the criteria on their list of "junk". Breitbart is also not all fake and junk. Without bias, it's hard to say they don't get some things correct. And they do offer corrections when they are wrong.
Look at the actual list of sites, it's funny Breitbart is picked (a popular right wing biased site), but not the aforementionned "popular" left sites :
DailyCaller, Breitbart, Hannity (you can not like the guy and his "tick tocks, it annoys everyone)... where are the big left sites ?
So a popular right site gets shared more than a bunch of unknown left sites ? Color me shocked. The study is about how a website with a larger audience gets more interaction on social media. It has nothing to do with their premise.
IE : they set out to prove something, and picked their sample to confirm their own bias. Next time include Vox and Mic and buzzfeed and let's see how balanced this truly is.
They were at a conference. It's pretty hard to hide your gender when you meet people in person, face to face, or stand on a stage.
They were doing a "Women in Open source" talk instead of a "Actual stuff that matters in Open Source" talk. You know that's just asking for a trolling. It's not because they were women, it's because AGAIN they were talking about gender stuff at a con for technical discussion.
But you keep thinking this is about their gender, and not what the talk was about.
Yes we do. My stuff us all under [male first name][lastname] based username. Many people I know do the same.
No you don't. You don't go "As a man in Open source, I feel..." or "I think your misandrist comments are misplaced..." in the body of your communications.
You're the one whining that using your fucking name is "bringing gender into it".
Using their name isn't what causes women to get "hate" or "harassement". That's just ridiculous and everytime it's brought up, no one can even provide proof it's even happening.
In other words, women should hide the fact they're women by careful choice of username whereas men don't have to worry about that.
No. In other words : Men don't bring up they are men and that's why they don't have to worry about.
Women can simply do the same : Stop bringing up Gender as a reason for anything. It's not. Your code is either good or bad. And no, people saying your code is bad is not coded misogynist language for "I hate all women" just because you happen to be a woman that wrote bad code and can't admit it's bad.
This climate is mostly just people like you complaining about it.
Funny, I was going to say this climate is mostly just people like you amplifying non-events into massive drama.
This story is a great example. Genuine complaint, no one tried to blame all men or the open source community or anyone other than the specific perpetrators and the organisers for not tackling it.
This story is a great example. Something as benign and innucuous as people setting a SSID on their phones made the "news". Something that would have safely ended with just ignoring it otherwise.
Yet here you are, trying to make it about you and complaining about some straw misandrist. It's literally just in your head.
Yet here you are, trying to make it about you and complaining about some straw misogynist. It's literally just in your head.
My god, it's like having a combative attitude helps no one.
Slashdot Mirror
It is legal. Just have to follow the instructions.
If your first act in a country is breaking its established laws, then you don't deserve to be there. Follow the law, apply for proper Visas, make sure they are valid, and go through proper ports of entry.
... wants any part of your failing, debt ridden dictatorship ? Canada is quite happy setting its own policies without being overridden by an unelected foreign political body it has no direct influence over.
What you miss is that USA too subsidize massively the dairy product
So does Canada, on top of supply management. Most provinces have massive subsidies allocated to any farm entreprise, such as paid for protections in case of harmful disease of cattle and weather phenomenoms.
And then have supply management thrown on top. Let's face, this is "Never Trump" syndrome when the media fail to report on it properly. Before Trump, Canadian media had no qualm pointing out the double protection of Subsidies AND supply management :
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/taxpayers-oblivious-to-the-cost-of-farm-subsidies/article13055078/
The problem with Trump "calling out" other countries, is that he typically doesn't actually have a leg to stand on because he doesn't seem to know anything about anything. Take the Canadian Diary complaint. No-one seems to know where Trump pulled the 300% tariff untruth
https://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/trade-commerce/tariff-tarif/2018/01-99/ch04-2018-eng.pdf
You're welcome.
Source: Am Canadian. We do tariff dairy, not just from the US, but from everywhere (France cheeses please!) so protect our own dairy farmer through a supply management scheme meant to garantee them to revenue. Welcome to Protectionism, it's ok when we do it, but somehow not when Trump does it. It's hypocritical. Trump is right as far as Dairy is concerned.
"Worst job". "Replying to Tweets".
Sheltered much ?
Try what these guys do : https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
So those Russian guys... Indited for interfering with the US election... In a public statement from Mueller's office... Fake news?
I suggest you actually read my post, and then read the indictment, and understand what is actually going on before attempting to push the "Russia!" narrative some more. These 13 guys were indicted over the data we were shown by Congress (Facebook Ads and tweets) and were already known information. The indictment isn't even about the Ads and tweets, so much as about the money transfers and identity theft that occurred behind them.
Sometimes I wonder about the chicken and the egg. Was it progressivism's pathology that came first, or was it actors interested in sowing internal discord in US that actively promote it, such as Russia and Qatar that started it? At least with Russia, it increasingly seems that their expertise lies with exploiting already existing weaknesses, not creating entirely new ones (see - geopolitics of Russia).
Yuri Bezmenov. Was he a crazy old man after all ?
Your post is the definition of irony
If you think so, you're truly living in the post-fact world. The indictment and Rosenstein were clear. The data on the ads was clear. The post by the Facebook VP was clear. Unless you're implying he was lying and that the data is forged.
You are a Russian pawn at this point if you keep pushing for division and hate towards a dully elected President.
The Russians actively prevented the Clinton campaign from going to Wisconssin.
Let's face it, the Clinton campaign was built around the message of "It's all about her and being a woman president". They had no message, didn't bother even bringing their no message to most of America, and basically acted like they were owed the presidency. They got rejected and now are doing what they accused Trump supporters of when Hillary tweeted this :
https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/790612127996403712?lang=en
Are the Democrats a threat to democracy with their #Resist and #NotmyPresident BS ? Bunch of hypocrites.
So when someone goes up to you and asks you for something and you say "No", you're being used ?
Really stretching that narrative, careful it doesn't break.
Or you know, man wanted to tell the truth about get the facts out, and now he's being criticized because the truth doesn't align with the agenda one side wants to push.
People are being used as pawns and acting like tools, not even realising how they are being manipulated.
What ? Stop making stuff up and selectively reading into things. The indictment more than prove the major part of the activity was POST election and that the goal of the operation was not to sway politics to one side in particular, but rather to divide.
AKA : stop giving them what they want and dividing people over this fake narrative of Russian Collusion.
Literal pedophilia apologists. Trash site is made even trashier.
It's already been reported that this guy was trained by supremacists and appears to have been radicalized by them. The chief supremacist confirmed it.
And that was later confirmed to be a hoax, confirming that jumping ahead of the news to be "first to report" is a problem. You wouldn't want to spread fake news now would you ?
Maybe he was more vulnerable to their brainwashing because of existing mental illness, but he's just the latest in a long line of radicalized young men to go on murder sprees.
Maybe we should look into this whole "acceptance" and "ableism" virtual signaling then, and start to treat mental illness as mental illness again, instead of "accepting their differences" and just medicating them into compliance.
This should cut down on the instances of female gamers with suspiciously low cut tops and suspiciously high camera angles.
Yeah, stop showing those heels off! You'll make yourself unfit to marry!
The factory doesn't operate fully automated. So when you cut the labor force, and thus labor wages aren't a factor, why pay for transport from China to mainland USA ?
Bring the factory back, and hire locally for jobs that can't be automated (Q&A, control, maintenance).
It actually makes TOTAL sense.
Oooh I see, it's not that they hate women they just hate women who want equality with men.
Yeah that's sexism.
No, they hate activists that try to push for preferential treatment of women by also silencing disent and men issues. You know, "intersectional 3rd wave feminist of the progressive persuasion".
But I guess sure, to you since you see them as bad actors, you just say they "hate all women", as if even most women are on the boat with the progressive ideology that's cancer.
At least from the most top moderated comments. The study is a biased hack job, and anyone with an ounce of objectivity can see it.
Essentially, they picked 91 sites that they deemed "junk", through 5 criteria (3 of which had to be met). The problem is that they picks do not normalize for traffic and breadth, and they didn't study the actual content being shared. You might not like Breitbart, but it's not much worse than Vox/Mic/Buzzfeed and heck, even CNN, which also met at least 3 of the criteria on their list of "junk". Breitbart is also not all fake and junk. Without bias, it's hard to say they don't get some things correct. And they do offer corrections when they are wrong.
Look at the actual list of sites, it's funny Breitbart is picked (a popular right wing biased site), but not the aforementionned "popular" left sites :
http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp...
DailyCaller, Breitbart, Hannity (you can not like the guy and his "tick tocks, it annoys everyone)... where are the big left sites ?
So a popular right site gets shared more than a bunch of unknown left sites ? Color me shocked. The study is about how a website with a larger audience gets more interaction on social media. It has nothing to do with their premise.
IE : they set out to prove something, and picked their sample to confirm their own bias. Next time include Vox and Mic and buzzfeed and let's see how balanced this truly is.
They were at a conference. It's pretty hard to hide your gender when you meet people in person, face to face, or stand on a stage.
They were doing a "Women in Open source" talk instead of a "Actual stuff that matters in Open Source" talk. You know that's just asking for a trolling. It's not because they were women, it's because AGAIN they were talking about gender stuff at a con for technical discussion.
But you keep thinking this is about their gender, and not what the talk was about.
Does the law apply equally to men and women? Yes. Check legal.
AHA CHECKMATE! You're wrong.
Men receive on average longer sentences, up to 63% longer sentences and are twice as likely to get convicted (sauce : https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx).
Male privilege is real!
No, it literally is. Attacking women because they're women
Except that's not what happened here ? They didn't attack women because they were women. They attacked women for being feminists.
Is the feminist ideology beyond reproach or criticism ? That's a powerful ideology if it is.
Sometimes it is.
You should have no issues providing evidence then.
Yes we do. My stuff us all under [male first name][lastname] based username. Many people I know do the same.
No you don't. You don't go "As a man in Open source, I feel..." or "I think your misandrist comments are misplaced..." in the body of your communications.
You're the one whining that using your fucking name is "bringing gender into it".
Using their name isn't what causes women to get "hate" or "harassement". That's just ridiculous and everytime it's brought up, no one can even provide proof it's even happening.
It's all in your head.
In other words, women should hide the fact they're women by careful choice of username whereas men don't have to worry about that.
No. In other words : Men don't bring up they are men and that's why they don't have to worry about.
Women can simply do the same : Stop bringing up Gender as a reason for anything. It's not. Your code is either good or bad. And no, people saying your code is bad is not coded misogynist language for "I hate all women" just because you happen to be a woman that wrote bad code and can't admit it's bad.
This climate is mostly just people like you complaining about it.
Funny, I was going to say this climate is mostly just people like you amplifying non-events into massive drama.
This story is a great example. Genuine complaint, no one tried to blame all men or the open source community or anyone other than the specific perpetrators and the organisers for not tackling it.
This story is a great example. Something as benign and innucuous as people setting a SSID on their phones made the "news". Something that would have safely ended with just ignoring it otherwise.
Yet here you are, trying to make it about you and complaining about some straw misandrist. It's literally just in your head.
Yet here you are, trying to make it about you and complaining about some straw misogynist. It's literally just in your head.
My god, it's like having a combative attitude helps no one.