Perhaps signal using background noise or something. But to my way of thinking, the "lie about the codec trick" just isn't steganography as any reasonable attempt to decode the signal without knowing the secret would just result in a decoding failure. I think that goes for the sample rate example too.
But like bitcoin, the ownership could be easily established. I could establish that the song I'm playing actually does belong to me (or not as the case may be). I could see there being three formats of song available from, say Apple...
+ Apple Ecosystem; songs only play on i-somethings
+ Open ecosystem,; songs in mp3 format
+ Trade-able ecosystem, songs in "bitcoin" format
With different prices for each version. The online trading markets then would only accept the latter form.
Get a stack of cheap MSP430 Dev kits, read "MSP430 State Machine Programming" by Tom Baugh, and arrange to teach a bunch of kids how to control motors, lights etc. for whatever robotic / art / fun project they want to pursue. There's plenty of challenge to be had in teaching the subject well, and a world of difference between doing a good job and a ppor one.
Well that's my concern in a nutshell. That this huge address space will be fragmented to the point where it will be unable to cope with demand for the next generation of networks, not a rehash of the internet that we know and love, but a new world with new and radically different requirements. It's all well and good having a new system that does a much better job of what we do today, but suppose I want a network for each item of clothing I wear, or each particle in my intelligent dust cloud.
I would like to think that the first class was about learning a language (possibly for a mix of CS and non-CS majors) and that the second class was about learning concepts that were highlighted well by snippets of code from many languages. The second class being attended only by people majoring in CS. In fact, the fist class should probably not have been categorized as CS at all.
I'm up for running a STEM club, even one with competitive admissions (say we limit the club to 10 students from each grade). The question keeps coming around to what is fun enough and can be done safely enough to engage the participants. It would help me enormously if there were similar support arrangements for "STEM coaches" as there were for, say, soccer coaches, whereby the coaches can be trained and insured to allow them to do the more adventurous activities and fixtures/meetings can be arranged between teams. Sport is definitely not risk-free and needs leagues and qualified coaches etc. and yet these things have been overcome in a way that a coach in, say, rocketry could not readily achieve.
I don't think many people outside of slashdot believe that the purpose of patents is to encourage disclosure. I'm sure that most politicians and businessmen believe that their value is in creating barriers to competition. Whether they would say that out loud is another issue..
Yes, but by and large one or two kids will satisfy that urge. Generally one has to be mentally impaired or religious to sire seven kids in a developed nation.
Now combine it with the George Clooney goat killing method. The DHS could simply step to one side and glower at the bad guys as they make their way to the terminal, telepathically forcing terrorists to simply die on the spot. I think they could demonstrate about the same success rate as the current, more invasive program we have today.
or not telling yourself ? There must be something more. Your old company would get by without you, I'm sure they could phone you for help on occasions if they really got into a bind. This is an opportunity for the junior developers to perhaps progress a little to fill your shoes. After all there is no greater motivator that actually being responsible for something. There must be some other factor that gives you pause, something that it not as nebulous as "loyalty". Are you worried about spilling details to a competitor ?
You think they are being inefficient because you don't understand the constraints; in particular any carpeted are of floor is "red hot lava" and sofas are bouncy, allowing "slingshot" style trajectories that would be the envied by NASA. If your children are not human, what does that make you ?
Slashdot Mirror
That there is uncertainty in the amplitude of the wave function too ?
cheaper yet, stick a toothpick in each eye and simply use the keyboard.
Perhaps signal using background noise or something. But to my way of thinking, the "lie about the codec trick" just isn't steganography as any reasonable attempt to decode the signal without knowing the secret would just result in a decoding failure. I think that goes for the sample rate example too.
Yes,
But like bitcoin, the ownership could be easily established. I could establish that the song I'm playing actually does belong to me (or not as the case may be). I could see there being three formats of song available from, say Apple...
+ Apple Ecosystem; songs only play on i-somethings
+ Open ecosystem,; songs in mp3 format
+ Trade-able ecosystem, songs in "bitcoin" format
With different prices for each version. The online trading markets then would only accept the latter form.
I don't think you'd say that if you had ever used the BB browser. It's awful.
Get a stack of cheap MSP430 Dev kits, read "MSP430 State Machine Programming" by Tom Baugh, and arrange to teach a bunch of kids how to control motors, lights etc. for whatever robotic / art / fun project they want to pursue. There's plenty of challenge to be had in teaching the subject well, and a world of difference between doing a good job and a ppor one.
Well that's my concern in a nutshell. That this huge address space will be fragmented to the point where it will be unable to cope with demand for the next generation of networks, not a rehash of the internet that we know and love, but a new world with new and radically different requirements. It's all well and good having a new system that does a much better job of what we do today, but suppose I want a network for each item of clothing I wear, or each particle in my intelligent dust cloud.
until every light switch and toaster has its own /64
I just googled valedictorians and changed my name to match by deed poll.
Surely all it needs for VTOL is a very long extendable nose wheel.
I would like to think that the first class was about learning a language (possibly for a mix of CS and non-CS majors) and that the second class was about learning concepts that were highlighted well by snippets of code from many languages. The second class being attended only by people majoring in CS. In fact, the fist class should probably not have been categorized as CS at all.
I'm up for running a STEM club, even one with competitive admissions (say we limit the club to 10 students from each grade). The question keeps coming around to what is fun enough and can be done safely enough to engage the participants. It would help me enormously if there were similar support arrangements for "STEM coaches" as there were for, say, soccer coaches, whereby the coaches can be trained and insured to allow them to do the more adventurous activities and fixtures/meetings can be arranged between teams. Sport is definitely not risk-free and needs leagues and qualified coaches etc. and yet these things have been overcome in a way that a coach in, say, rocketry could not readily achieve.
Yeah, switch to Tuna instead...
Perhaps big enough to include a CCD imaging sensor, a printer and a paper tray. It would make a cool digital conversion.
I don't think many people outside of slashdot believe that the purpose of patents is to encourage disclosure. I'm sure that most politicians and businessmen believe that their value is in creating barriers to competition. Whether they would say that out loud is another issue..
No, that just contaminates the soylent green with lead.
Just replace it, like a worn out hip.
Yes, but by and large one or two kids will satisfy that urge. Generally one has to be mentally impaired or religious to sire seven kids in a developed nation.
I don't think that's true, lots of countries have tax reciprocity agreements whereby you pay the local tax in lieu of US tax.
Now combine it with the George Clooney goat killing method. The DHS could simply step to one side and glower at the bad guys as they make their way to the terminal, telepathically forcing terrorists to simply die on the spot. I think they could demonstrate about the same success rate as the current, more invasive program we have today.
or not telling yourself ?
There must be something more. Your old company would get by without you, I'm sure they could phone you for help on occasions if they really got into a bind. This is an opportunity for the junior developers to perhaps progress a little to fill your shoes. After all there is no greater motivator that actually being responsible for something. There must be some other factor that gives you pause, something that it not as nebulous as "loyalty". Are you worried about spilling details to a competitor ?
Yes, just tie it to the back of white fang, say mush, and watch the spool unreel.
I thought you were going to say that there's no such thing as a reasonable attorney.
You think they are being inefficient because you don't understand the constraints; in particular any carpeted are of floor is "red hot lava" and sofas are bouncy, allowing "slingshot" style trajectories that would be the envied by NASA.
If your children are not human, what does that make you ?
if it had some kind of hypervisor functionality.