It would make your Macbook hotter, bulkier, more expensive, and way less reliable to try to recover the TINY amount of electricity that you can recover from a heat source like a CPU.
Suppose we have a 100 pixel x 100 pixel image of anything. A dog, for example.
Now, pretend we were writing an algorithm to, when given a random pixel position, predict the color of a adjacent pixel x.
I would first perform a blurring operation on the entire image, because individually, each individual pixel contains only the information...for that particular pixel.
Blur (average) the image by a few pixels in every direction, and we've removed a few pixels worth of overall inaccuracy in the prediction routine.
Weather is those individual pixels from the original image.
Climate is that blurred version that we made, for predicting the individual pixels.
"Distrust scientists because they were once wrong, therefore they will always be."
Note that no one is forecasting the weather two days ahead of time for your exact perceptions of "local"
Also, note that what "the media" tell you about - well, basically anything - will be as polarized and simplified as possible. We all know this.
"There is evidence to suggest a risk of more violent hurricanes this year." said by someone, somewhere = "OMG BAD YEAR DEATH DESTRUCTION TUNE IN AT TEN FOR DETAILS!"
Slashdot Mirror
Butbutbut the money!
I resemble that, you insensitive clod!
You forgot the hardcoded support for Swedish keyboard layout, only.
RTFA:
KDE 4's framework is cross-platform.
They plan to release this on Windows as well.
DON'T SUPPORT DRAM WITH YOUR DOLLARS!
Fine, I'll go buy some SRAM instead - that comes in stick form, right?
None of those things you quote in your post are necessary anymore.
And as for your last statement, http://wubi-installer.org/ - no partitioning, and it's a real installation.
You're a dollar naughtier than most!
Whoa whoa whoa, what's lemonparty?
/off to GIS
And penisbird?
Oh. Oh God. Oh God no!
It would make your Macbook hotter, bulkier, more expensive, and way less reliable to try to recover the TINY amount of electricity that you can recover from a heat source like a CPU.
That's why.
You are completely correct.
I would, however, love a "magic" laptop that simply runs for its entire life. No charging.
That would be QUITE useful.
But I'll take the 32-hour battery, like you said.
I wish I had modpoints.
+++
That console owners wouldn't have much fun getting owned by people that are playing with kb/mouse - so it also makes sense.
:(
On the other hand,
I can't wait to see ads for hookers and blow on my computer screen.
I mean - more ads for hookers and blow.
Note that Renderman is a standard renderer - you probably thought every Pixar movie was raytraced, didn't you?
In cars, however, they did use quite a bit of rt'ing for the chrome, etc.
Asstunnels.
I, horse-and-buggy manufacturer, am being put out of business by those damn dirty car manufacturers!
People will imagine things - it's amazing how much control over our own well-being our brains have.
Because I can do this.
"If we can hit that bull's-eye, the rest of the dominoes will fall like a house of cards...Checkmate."
Will douchebags everywhere create apparent conflicts where there aren't any?
...anisotropic filtering.
Yeah, there's no way anyone anywhere could be annoyed by advertising.
Unless they're hippies.
Asshat.
Water is kept on space rocks, because of radiation.
Right.
Lemme try this instead...
Suppose we have a 100 pixel x 100 pixel image of anything. A dog, for example.
Now, pretend we were writing an algorithm to, when given a random pixel position, predict the color of a adjacent pixel x.
I would first perform a blurring operation on the entire image, because individually, each individual pixel contains only the information...for that particular pixel.
Blur (average) the image by a few pixels in every direction, and we've removed a few pixels worth of overall inaccuracy in the prediction routine.
Weather is those individual pixels from the original image.
Climate is that blurred version that we made, for predicting the individual pixels.
"Distrust scientists because they were once wrong, therefore they will always be." Note that no one is forecasting the weather two days ahead of time for your exact perceptions of "local" Also, note that what "the media" tell you about - well, basically anything - will be as polarized and simplified as possible. We all know this. "There is evidence to suggest a risk of more violent hurricanes this year." said by someone, somewhere = "OMG BAD YEAR DEATH DESTRUCTION TUNE IN AT TEN FOR DETAILS!"