Warning: Too many connections in/home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 3
Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in/home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 4
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in/home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 4
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in/home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line 13
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in/home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line
14
Warning: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at/home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp:3) in/home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line 17
It seems they put all their money towards the R&D for these neat sounding devices. Too bad they didn't save a few bucks FOR THE BANDWIDTH TO HOST THEIR SERVER!
Odd that Microsoft is simultaneously trying to stop spam sent to Hotmail users, and to make sure that it can send unsolicited commercial email without penalties.
Odd? Hardly. Microsoft feels it is above the standard of most Good Corporate Citizens because they have a monopoly. Remember when MS' updater said no info would be sent back to MS? Well just have a look at what XP is sending back to MS for an example of their power-crazed mindset.
It keeps reminding me that I STILL have to do my taxes, why can't I read slashdot when I get home and can remember it there.
That's why I want to be like RMS. There's no need to do taxes when you haven't a job and eat at soup kitchens. Not to mention the money I'd save on personal hygene products!
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: Los Alamos is dying.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Los Alamos community when
Wired confirmed that Los Alamos seurity was breached yet again, now this time by a reporter with a camera. It's obvious: Los Alamos is collapsing
in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Cold War Nuclear Security Test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Los Alamos's
future. The hand writing is on the wall: Los Alamos faces a bleak future. In fact
there won't be any future at all for Los Alamos because Los Alamos is dying. Things are
looking very bad for Los Alamos. As many of us are already aware, Los Alamos continues
to lose security guards. They have no money. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
There can no longer be any doubt: Los Alamos is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
In its heyday, Los Alamos has thousands of security people. How many
are there today? Let's see, perhaps 50 at best and they are armed with empty holsters and a strand of string protects the facility. This falls in line with the number of Usenet posts regarding Los Alamos.
Due to the financial troubles of the US government and the pending war with Iraq Los Alamos is virutally dead, its corpse to turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that Los Alamos has steadily declined in security. Los Alamos
is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Los Alamos is
to survive at all it will be among nuclear dilettante dabblers and security hangers-on. Los Alamos continues to
decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For
all practical purposes, Los Alamos is dead.
I was going to reply to this regarding how they don't and how the value of their stock is overinflated but then I realized you're another lameass AC and I won't bother with you.
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: BIND is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered BIND community when
Slashdot confirmed that the internet rootservers are starting a small yet noticable shift away from BIND. Usage has already been dropped from one of the root servers with many more likely to follow.
This news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. BIND is collapsing
in complete disarray..
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict BIND's
future. The hand writing is on the wall: BIND faces a bleak future. In fact
there won't be any future at all for BIND because BIND is dying. Things are
looking very bad for BIND. As many of us are already aware, BIND continues
to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
BIND9 is the most endangered of them all, having gained only a small user base out of previous BIND 8 and BIND9 users. There can no longer be any doubt: BIND is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
13 of 13 root servers ran BIND. Now one of them has changed, that's 7.69% of all top level name servers in one fell swoop. Netcraft has never shown such a migration between IIS and Apache . This is consistent with any troubled software losing its users.
The BIND development team is ready to disband, its corpse will be turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that BIND has steadily declined in market share. BIND
is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If BIND is
to survive at all it will be among NS dilettante dabblers. BIND continues to
decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For
all practical purposes, BIND is dead.
Microsoft doesn't make money for them if people use "old" versions of their software. They have to make a newer version, with incompatible formats, to ensure as many people upgrade as possible. It's software extortion.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleagured Itanium community when Slashdot confirmed that Linus thinks Intel dropped the ball with Itanium. Itanium now powers 0.00% or all servers. Coming on the heels of a Netcraft survey which plainly states that Itanium has gained absolutely NO market share. This reenforces what we've known all along: Itanium is collapsing in complete disarray.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Itanium's future. The writing is on the wall: Itanium faces a bleak future, in fact there won't be any future at all because Itanium is dying. Intel has dumped millions into Itanium, red ink flows like a river of blood.
All major surveys show that Itanium has steadily held its ground at 0.00% use while millions of other processors are produced daily. If Itanium is to survive at all it will be among CPU dilettante dabblers and hangers-on. Nothing short of a miracle could save Itaniu, at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Itanium is dead.
Another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered RIAA committee when Slashdot confirmed that support for the Berman Bill was at an all-time low. The Berman Bill is collapsing into complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Slashdot Popular Bill Poll.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict the Berman Bill's future. The handwriting is on the wall: the Berman Bill faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all because the Berman Bill is dying. Things are looking very bad for the Berman Bill. As many of us are already aware, the Berman Bill continues to lose support. Funding has dried up and red in flows like a river of blood.
All major surveys show that the Berman Bill has steadily declined in voter support. The Berman Bill is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If the Berman Bill is to survice at all it will be among RIAA executives and dabblers. The Berman Bill continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, the Berman Bill is dead
The $50 billion should be funding AIDS, Cancer, and Mad Cow disease research.
Nonsense. Homos get AIDS, smokers get Cancer and Mad Cow disease is a Brit thing. So if you're not in any of the above groups you spend the $50 billion on a moon colony. Well.. a moon colony or a monorail around Springfield.
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
Fact: *BSD is dying
Slashdot Mirror
My Apple ][+ doesn't have enough disk space to download this program. Can someone help me out?
I don't think that link is correct:
/home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 3 /home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 4 /home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp on line 4 /home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line 13 /home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line
14 /home/mobilemag/public_html/includes/connect.inc.p hp:3) in /home/mobilemag/public_html/content/content_displa y_top_code.php on line 17
Warning: Too many connections in
Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in
Warning: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at
Nowhere on that page does it mention flat LEDs!
It seems they put all their money towards the R&D for these neat sounding devices. Too bad they didn't save a few bucks FOR THE BANDWIDTH TO HOST THEIR SERVER!
Not a bad try, better man sed though, you missed a couple. ;)
But I won't believe Pioneer 10 is dying until Netcraft confirms it..
Odd that Microsoft is simultaneously trying to stop spam sent to Hotmail users, and to make sure that it can send unsolicited commercial email without penalties.
Odd? Hardly. Microsoft feels it is above the standard of most Good Corporate Citizens because they have a monopoly. Remember when MS' updater said no info would be sent back to MS? Well just have a look at what XP is sending back to MS for an example of their power-crazed mindset.
It keeps reminding me that I STILL have to do my taxes, why can't I read slashdot when I get home and can remember it there.
That's why I want to be like RMS. There's no need to do taxes when you haven't a job and eat at soup kitchens. Not to mention the money I'd save on personal hygene products!
"
Bill: Boy, we sure Microsofted that company, eh Steve?
Steve: You bet Bill, good work!
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: Los Alamos is dying.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Los Alamos community when Wired confirmed that Los Alamos seurity was breached yet again, now this time by a reporter with a camera. It's obvious: Los Alamos is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Cold War Nuclear Security Test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Los Alamos's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Los Alamos faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Los Alamos because Los Alamos is dying. Things are looking very bad for Los Alamos. As many of us are already aware, Los Alamos continues to lose security guards. They have no money. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
There can no longer be any doubt: Los Alamos is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
In its heyday, Los Alamos has thousands of security people. How many are there today? Let's see, perhaps 50 at best and they are armed with empty holsters and a strand of string protects the facility. This falls in line with the number of Usenet posts regarding Los Alamos.
Due to the financial troubles of the US government and the pending war with Iraq Los Alamos is virutally dead, its corpse to turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that Los Alamos has steadily declined in security. Los Alamos is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Los Alamos is to survive at all it will be among nuclear dilettante dabblers and security hangers-on. Los Alamos continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Los Alamos is dead.
Fact: Los Alamos is dying
I was going to reply to this regarding how they don't and how the value of their stock is overinflated but then I realized you're another lameass AC and I won't bother with you.
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: BIND is dying
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered BIND community when Slashdot confirmed that the internet rootservers are starting a small yet noticable shift away from BIND. Usage has already been dropped from one of the root servers with many more likely to follow. This news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. BIND is collapsing in complete disarray..
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict BIND's future. The hand writing is on the wall: BIND faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for BIND because BIND is dying. Things are looking very bad for BIND. As many of us are already aware, BIND continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
BIND9 is the most endangered of them all, having gained only a small user base out of previous BIND 8 and BIND9 users. There can no longer be any doubt: BIND is dying.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
13 of 13 root servers ran BIND. Now one of them has changed, that's 7.69% of all top level name servers in one fell swoop. Netcraft has never shown such a migration between IIS and Apache . This is consistent with any troubled software losing its users.
The BIND development team is ready to disband, its corpse will be turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that BIND has steadily declined in market share. BIND is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If BIND is to survive at all it will be among NS dilettante dabblers. BIND continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, BIND is dead.
!!! MAKE MONEY FAST !!!
Earn as much as $20.00 a month sending out unsolicited email!
Simple: Microsoft shareholders.
Microsoft doesn't make money for them if people use "old" versions of their software. They have to make a newer version, with incompatible formats, to ensure as many people upgrade as possible. It's software extortion.
If an organic computer is vapourware, does it smell like a fart?
Actually that's a good question. I think chipmakers should slow down a bit and enjoy life. Perhaps meet halfway with a 48 bit chip...
Netcraft confirms it: Itanium is dying.
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleagured Itanium community when Slashdot confirmed that Linus thinks Intel dropped the ball with Itanium. Itanium now powers 0.00% or all servers. Coming on the heels of a Netcraft survey which plainly states that Itanium has gained absolutely NO market share. This reenforces what we've known all along: Itanium is collapsing in complete disarray.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict Itanium's future. The writing is on the wall: Itanium faces a bleak future, in fact there won't be any future at all because Itanium is dying. Intel has dumped millions into Itanium, red ink flows like a river of blood.
All major surveys show that Itanium has steadily held its ground at 0.00% use while millions of other processors are produced daily. If Itanium is to survive at all it will be among CPU dilettante dabblers and hangers-on. Nothing short of a miracle could save Itaniu, at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Itanium is dead.
Well.. I didn't find your post overly interesting, but I would have modded it "+1 Babelfish Skills" if there were such an option.
Linux will have a much better corporate future if tomorrows business execs actually learn how to use it.
Nonsense. That was Apple's plan with having Apple ][s and Macs in all the schools. The plan didn't work too well.
Netcraft confirms it: the Berman Bill is dying
Another crippling bombshell hit the beleaguered RIAA committee when Slashdot confirmed that support for the Berman Bill was at an all-time low. The Berman Bill is collapsing into complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Slashdot Popular Bill Poll.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict the Berman Bill's future. The handwriting is on the wall: the Berman Bill faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all because the Berman Bill is dying. Things are looking very bad for the Berman Bill. As many of us are already aware, the Berman Bill continues to lose support. Funding has dried up and red in flows like a river of blood.
All major surveys show that the Berman Bill has steadily declined in voter support. The Berman Bill is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If the Berman Bill is to survice at all it will be among RIAA executives and dabblers. The Berman Bill continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, the Berman Bill is dead
"I am good at scripting." == lame.
"ph34r my l337 skr197x0r sk1llz, f44g0rz." == cool.
The $50 billion should be funding AIDS, Cancer, and Mad Cow disease research.
Nonsense. Homos get AIDS, smokers get Cancer and Mad Cow disease is a Brit thing. So if you're not in any of the above groups you spend the $50 billion on a moon colony. Well.. a moon colony or a monorail around Springfield.
ANyways, the only orginazation which can "die and keep on living" is the government.
You forgot *BSD.
It is official; Netcraft now confirms: *BSD is dying One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last [samag.com] in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test. You don't need to be a Kreskin [amazingkreskin.com] to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying. Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers. OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts. Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house. All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead. Fact: *BSD is dying
Domain Name:MICROBSD.ORG
Created On:20-Jul-2002 12:28:15 UTC
Last Updated On:20-Jul-2002 12:28:20 UTC
Expiration Date:20-Jul-2003 12:28:15 UTC
At least they didn't buy the name for 10 years from NetSol..
Un-fucking-believable.. A "*BSD is dying" troll actually got modded as "Interesting". Methinks some hot place just froze over.