POD isn't really about self publishing, even though it lends itself well to it. It's about books always being "in print", no matter how obscure or small the demand.
It's your opinion that a man who is not only prescient of possible futures but able to choose which among them become real is, by ALL rights, not a prophet? *boggle* Erm. Picking a very narrow definition of prophet, are you? Such as "a person that the God Of Abraham reveals stuff for public consumption to"?
Most important of all to this argument is that, despite all the movies, Romans and Greeks did not use slaves to row galleys. The practice began in the Renaissance.
Anyone else remember the dramatic claims of special chips that would "soon" allow insane levels of compression in data storage using fractal algorithms? 135 times compression, back when Stacker was was the app that saved your bacon when you ran low on disk space? That's the sort of thing I thought of when I read the headline.
A simple RoTFA would clarify it. The RIAA per se didn't get the settlements, EMI, Universal Music and Warner Music did. The people complaining they are not getting any of it are the managers of various high profile artists, such as the Rolling Stones, Korn, Christina Aguilera, The Eagles, Van Halen, REO Speedwagon and Seal.
Might as well correct myself. Latter. And to cut even more hairs, a radio studio counts as a studio performance, even transmitted live. Perhaps "in concert" is the term best used.
It goes a little beyond having associated numerical values. Using letters of the alphabet was the way numerical values were recorded. The "methodology" is to sum the numerical values of the letters in a string. That's it. When you have a word and you're giving it a value, it is always the sum, never equations. Hebrew numerals are very much like early Roman numerals (ie before transpositions were introduced), only with every letter having a value instead of a handful.
My family is another example. My identical twin uncles were one of each.
This also excludes fetal exposure... if the twins were in the same womb, one would expect the same influence to have the same effect. Which is not to say a change couldn't happen while a fetus, just that it wasn't something both were exposed to.
You can sue me of course for any reason you'd like, but I didn't give advice, I explained why people do that. I never said it works, nor that you should do it.
Slashdot Mirror
POD isn't really about self publishing, even though it lends itself well to it. It's about books always being "in print", no matter how obscure or small the demand.
It's your opinion that a man who is not only prescient of possible futures but able to choose which among them become real is, by ALL rights, not a prophet? *boggle* Erm. Picking a very narrow definition of prophet, are you? Such as "a person that the God Of Abraham reveals stuff for public consumption to"?
Most important of all to this argument is that, despite all the movies, Romans and Greeks did not use slaves to row galleys. The practice began in the Renaissance.
This whole thing reminds me of the old Steve Jackson game Killer.
It also reminds me that I lost my copy in a flood 12 years ago and how bitter that made me feel.
And then it motivated me to see if I could find anything related on the net, and I see it's back in print.
http://www.sjgames.com/killer/
Thanks Slashdot! I feel a lot better!
That's not a legal status, it is a taxability status. Establishing your tax free eligibility doesn't make you a church or not.
They do talk about religion. The summary just doesn't mention it.
Anyone else remember the dramatic claims of special chips that would "soon" allow insane levels of compression in data storage using fractal algorithms? 135 times compression, back when Stacker was was the app that saved your bacon when you ran low on disk space? That's the sort of thing I thought of when I read the headline.
I am making a MINT selling them, thanks for asking!
A simple RoTFA would clarify it. The RIAA per se didn't get the settlements, EMI, Universal Music and Warner Music did. The people complaining they are not getting any of it are the managers of various high profile artists, such as the Rolling Stones, Korn, Christina Aguilera, The Eagles, Van Halen, REO Speedwagon and Seal.
In other languages, yes, in English, that is not the common parlance. Such nomenclature, in English, evaluates as true but is not the usage.
By hiring a sailor to make a proper job of tying them all the same!
I do! Phil Foglio for the win!
He said the thought something was plausible. He didn't proclaim any truth.
Might as well correct myself. Latter. And to cut even more hairs, a radio studio counts as a studio performance, even transmitted live. Perhaps "in concert" is the term best used.
A recording of a live performance, as opposed to a studio recording. Lots of the later, only this one of the former.
It goes a little beyond having associated numerical values. Using letters of the alphabet was the way numerical values were recorded. The "methodology" is to sum the numerical values of the letters in a string. That's it. When you have a word and you're giving it a value, it is always the sum, never equations. Hebrew numerals are very much like early Roman numerals (ie before transpositions were introduced), only with every letter having a value instead of a handful.
My family is another example. My identical twin uncles were one of each. This also excludes fetal exposure... if the twins were in the same womb, one would expect the same influence to have the same effect. Which is not to say a change couldn't happen while a fetus, just that it wasn't something both were exposed to.
"It like someone either forgot to pay that judge off!"
There, fixed that for ya!
They might as well have asked to subpoena records of every eyeball that saw a particular billboard ad.
You can sue me of course for any reason you'd like, but I didn't give advice, I explained why people do that. I never said it works, nor that you should do it.
Stating that you are not a lawyer is to prevent yourself from being charged with practicing law without a license.
Fortunately, a copy is not stolen property, laws appertaining to theft are not applicable.
With all the junk passing for off topic first posts lately, it's kind of a pleasure just to see a plain old, old-school one for once.
Unlawful, actually. Not illegal.
Even so, the licensure Google gave would presumably require open device adherance, thus fulfilling the parent's desire for satisfaction.