If you say so. Of course, in My Uncle Oswald, Dahl refers to the head of the penis as a snozzberry... But you go ahead and have fun with that... if that's your thing.
It's even worse with a neuralizer. At least with a laser, they'll stop once they injure someone. With a neuralizer, you warn, "Remember what happened last time," and they just look at you blankly before setting it off again.
P.S. Be really sure you don't forget to wear sunglasses when you bring one of these into work.
The resources devoted to being able to regenerate could be used to avoid injury, instead. Even if you heal quickly and from grievous injuries, it's better not to get hurt in the first place--especially if the lack of regeneration means you're better able to avoid mishaps that would kill you instantly.
What about when these anonymous people know your real identity and threaten to act against you in real life? Is it overreacting to take it seriously then? Would it make you nervous if they included pictures of you going about your daily routine? How about if they edited in crosshairs centered on you? Are you sure they were edited in? Maybe you wouldn't believe someone is actually serious about doing you bodily harm; would the same pictures of your cat or something else you care about make you worry?
Yes, it was very wise of you to ignore random idiots yelling "You suck!" in forums when you were little. But, please, don't assume that's what online bullying is all about.
How is this short sightedness on NASA's part? They're low on plutonium and have to conserve it for specific missions. Since they aren't able to produce their own plutonium, just what do you suggest they do instead?
It may not cause you problems now, but you should be concerned if it's shown that Wikipedia is open to corruption and private agendas. Today they may be misusing their power to slander each other and take money from the foundation, but maybe future members of the 'inner circle' will start molding the site to show bias toward their religious beliefs such as creationism or pro-life stances--or perhaps they'll make some big corporations look better in return for 'considerations'.
Well, I found 48 listed phone numbers for Einsteins in NY alone, and there are probably quite a few more in the world... But you said next Einstein, which implies the person isn't one yet. I think we can safely assume that any soon-to-be Einsteins in the womb are not reading Slashdot at the moment, but that still leaves us with minors old enough to read who will be adopted by an Einstein and women who will marry into the family and take the last name.
So, I think we can conclude that there are a good handful of people who could meet your condition, but I have to confess I'm not really sure why they'd be so much better suited to comment on the subject...
Oh, yes, if the authorities get a realistic-sounding call about an armed, crazed gunman holding me and my family hostage in my home, I would feel so much better knowing they're sending a single officer to politely inquire instead of a SWAT team. Because if it's a false alarm, no harm done, and if it isn't--well, I'm sure a single police officer showing up on the doorstep couldn't make the situaton with that crazed gunman any worse.
Yes, having a SWAT team sent to the home of an unsuspecting family is bad and someone might get hurt, but if the officers are well-trained, people probably won't. I know that's not much comfort if something does go wrong, but I think I'd rather live with that than the results of them not taking a real situation seriously.
Certainly an almighty being could do that, but then I'd feel more like I was in some teenager's ant farm than under the protection of some loving divine.
Actually, I consider our reality to be more like a giant game of The Sims, which is why I have a smoke detector in every room and never go into the swimming pool.
What I want to know is how much one could get per hour as a professional "warm butt"--and what sort of requirements for participation there may or may not be.
I'd suggest being extremely cautious in answering any such job postings so as to avoid any unfortunate misunderstandings about the nature of the job and just what it entails. So to speak.
Note to self: if ever thinking of getting involved in litigation, seed potential keywords into an email spam generating engine of some kind. "All emails with terms (keyword)? Certainly - here's 8G of text for you to read..."
Yes, that should show what a reasonable person you are and make the judge like you more.
It probably doesn't take more than a few hours to "evaluate" a security issue. If you want to throw out a half-assed patch that may very well break other things or make the problem works, that is.
I see lots of people coming down on Opera, saying they're just whining and that it's ridiculous for them expect Mozilla to hold off on fixing their browser until they could fix their own... but maybe they're just peeved that instead of telling them about the exploits they were working on earlier, Mozilla waited until the day before they publicly released the details.
Slashdot Mirror
If you say so. Of course, in My Uncle Oswald, Dahl refers to the head of the penis as a snozzberry... But you go ahead and have fun with that ... if that's your thing.
It's even worse with a neuralizer. At least with a laser, they'll stop once they injure someone. With a neuralizer, you warn, "Remember what happened last time," and they just look at you blankly before setting it off again.
P.S. Be really sure you don't forget to wear sunglasses when you bring one of these into work.
The resources devoted to being able to regenerate could be used to avoid injury, instead. Even if you heal quickly and from grievous injuries, it's better not to get hurt in the first place--especially if the lack of regeneration means you're better able to avoid mishaps that would kill you instantly.
Without more resources committed to research, how will these technologies ever become significantly better than they are now?
Switching to a new bowser wont add any benefit to his internet tasks
But it might stop that pesky Mario from barging into his castle and stealing Princess Peach back.
The emails would still be marked unread in Gmail if they've been accessed via POP.
So, basically, the status quo will be maintained?
Give us an update when you've finally had a chance to put your beliefs into practice.
What about when these anonymous people know your real identity and threaten to act against you in real life? Is it overreacting to take it seriously then? Would it make you nervous if they included pictures of you going about your daily routine? How about if they edited in crosshairs centered on you? Are you sure they were edited in? Maybe you wouldn't believe someone is actually serious about doing you bodily harm; would the same pictures of your cat or something else you care about make you worry?
Yes, it was very wise of you to ignore random idiots yelling "You suck!" in forums when you were little. But, please, don't assume that's what online bullying is all about.
How is this short sightedness on NASA's part? They're low on plutonium and have to conserve it for specific missions. Since they aren't able to produce their own plutonium, just what do you suggest they do instead?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
That's ok; that's not a pencil sharpener, either.
It may not cause you problems now, but you should be concerned if it's shown that Wikipedia is open to corruption and private agendas. Today they may be misusing their power to slander each other and take money from the foundation, but maybe future members of the 'inner circle' will start molding the site to show bias toward their religious beliefs such as creationism or pro-life stances--or perhaps they'll make some big corporations look better in return for 'considerations'.
Or in other words, "None of us is as dumb as all of us." Courtesy of Despair.com
A life insurance policy where the beneficiary is the insured person? How ... useful.
Well, I found 48 listed phone numbers for Einsteins in NY alone, and there are probably quite a few more in the world... But you said next Einstein, which implies the person isn't one yet. I think we can safely assume that any soon-to-be Einsteins in the womb are not reading Slashdot at the moment, but that still leaves us with minors old enough to read who will be adopted by an Einstein and women who will marry into the family and take the last name.
So, I think we can conclude that there are a good handful of people who could meet your condition, but I have to confess I'm not really sure why they'd be so much better suited to comment on the subject...
Oh, yes, if the authorities get a realistic-sounding call about an armed, crazed gunman holding me and my family hostage in my home, I would feel so much better knowing they're sending a single officer to politely inquire instead of a SWAT team. Because if it's a false alarm, no harm done, and if it isn't--well, I'm sure a single police officer showing up on the doorstep couldn't make the situaton with that crazed gunman any worse.
Yes, having a SWAT team sent to the home of an unsuspecting family is bad and someone might get hurt, but if the officers are well-trained, people probably won't. I know that's not much comfort if something does go wrong, but I think I'd rather live with that than the results of them not taking a real situation seriously.
Yes, heaven forbid he live with the consequences of his actions to torment and endanger innocent people.
Certainly an almighty being could do that, but then I'd feel more like I was in some teenager's ant farm than under the protection of some loving divine.
Actually, I consider our reality to be more like a giant game of The Sims, which is why I have a smoke detector in every room and never go into the swimming pool.
When two cars collide, does a bigger and better car appear from the wreckage?
That would be so cool!
What I want to know is how much one could get per hour as a professional "warm butt"--and what sort of requirements for participation there may or may not be.
I'd suggest being extremely cautious in answering any such job postings so as to avoid any unfortunate misunderstandings about the nature of the job and just what it entails. So to speak.
Note to self: if ever thinking of getting involved in litigation, seed potential keywords into an email spam generating engine of some kind. "All emails with terms (keyword)? Certainly - here's 8G of text for you to read..."
Yes, that should show what a reasonable person you are and make the judge like you more.
Just wait until someone wants to bring his beloved durian aboard.
The problem is that religious fools require absolute certainty in everything but religion.
No, they require absolute certainty in everything, but they're willing to accept what they've been told by their religious books and leaders on faith.
It probably doesn't take more than a few hours to "evaluate" a security issue. If you want to throw out a half-assed patch that may very well break other things or make the problem works, that is.
I see lots of people coming down on Opera, saying they're just whining and that it's ridiculous for them expect Mozilla to hold off on fixing their browser until they could fix their own... but maybe they're just peeved that instead of telling them about the exploits they were working on earlier, Mozilla waited until the day before they publicly released the details.