There's a concept of "weak" AI and "strong" AI. Then there's the modern concept of "AI", which is fake AI. But it sells.
I'm actually working on a blockchain-based strong AI system. I'm already seeing great results but I can't currently afford to scale. With a decent chunk of change I could have an adaptable, resilient, and distributed advanced AI system based on blockchain technology that would be suited to, fundamentally, any computational task.
Meanwhile, Level 3 — a major ISP — told Mashable that a "configuration error" caused a 90 minute service disruption.
"On Monday, Nov. 6, our network experienced a service disruption affecting some customers with IP-based services," wrote the spokesperson via email. "The disruption was caused by a configuration error. We know how important these services are to our customers. Our technicians were able to restore service within approximately 90 minutes."
That doesn't even show data for today. Nor does it show any unusual attacks. Look at the bandwidth being used compared to attacks in October or September. There's a handy little timeline chart just below the map.
My statement ("That map doesn't show live data, nor does it show an unusual attack happening now or recently.") is completely correct.
Further, none of your links show evidence of any attack, they show spikes in reports of downtime. In fact, the only actual reporting on this issue leads back to a statement from Level 3 blaming a configuration issue. This is from YOUR OWN FUCKING LINK in your other post:
Meanwhile, Level 3 — a major ISP — told Mashable that a "configuration error" caused a 90 minute service disruption.
"On Monday, Nov. 6, our network experienced a service disruption affecting some customers with IP-based services," wrote the spokesperson via email. "The disruption was caused by a configuration error. We know how important these services are to our customers. Our technicians were able to restore service within approximately 90 minutes."
I find it to be pretty awful, really. Tolkien just prattles on and on and on and on about a bunch of hyperbolic shit. Every location and creature is described in extreme detail only to be outdone by the next that's more fantastical, more evil, more ancient, a taller mountain inside a deeper pit, etc.. And here's a fucking song for no reason. And Hobbit food? It's like the scene in Forest Gump describing different types of shrimp, but it's not funny, nor is it interesting. It's just filler.
Some nerds call this shit "world building". I call it Tolkien loving the smell of his own farts.
Do you know how the Primaries work in the USA? How do you rig primaries? They are run by the states.
Voting is run by the states. The candidates and campaigns and everything else including and plain ol' deciding whether or not to go along with the vote, is run by the party. Why do you think Hillary "won" all those instances where they kicked out Bernie supporters or pretended not to hear them when anything came up that was to be decided by voice?
The DNC rigged their primaries for Hillary. I don't agree with Bernie's crazy views or policy, but I would have voted for him over Trump, and he would have won the election over Trump.
The DNC torpedoed itself in its attempt to stage a coronation for Hillary. The fact that any voter is loyal to the DNC after that is worrying. It's almost a one party system now.
Hinting that your co-workers are biologically predisposed to be worse at their jobs, even if some aren't... is crossing a line.
Who "hinted" that? Certainly not James Damore. Further, which line, exactly? Please define it. Please cite where it is defined. Please also define and cite all other such "lines" not to be crossed.
"There is nothing in the constitution that says you have a right to a particular job."
There is also absolutely nothing in the Constitution to the right of "Free Speech", only that under the First Amendment, the Federal Government, and this later applied to some lower forms, could not infringe it. Google is not part of the Government. There are those that may wish it were, but as for now, they can infringe all they like as long as they violate no other Laws in the process. Sucks to use Company resources to criticize the Company, and then get miffed to being called on it. He could possibly gotten away with it, if he had included his spiel in his annual Christmas letter, sent out at his own expense, from whatever Mancave he currently resides in, to whatever Peoplecaves they currently reside in.
This same separation of Powers applies to the 2nd Amendment. If Google decides that employees cannot bring Guns on their property, that is entirely within their rights. The 2nd Amendment does not apply, and if somebody insists on bringing a gun in, all Google has to do is call the Cops, say that there is a crazy employee waving a gun around, and things won't end well for crazy employee. The same applies to the last Republican Convention. It was declared a "No Gun Zone" because, as a private venue, Quicken loans Arena forbade them. (Much to the relief of certain Republicans, I'm sure.) Those who bray loudest about their Free Speech are those most likely to have no knowledge about it.
Nah, you're dumb.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Congress cannot limit speech. This is applied to basically all government entities at lower levels, as it explicitly references the "freedom of speech", and the Constitution and its amendments are written in such a way that shit not granted to the feds is reserved for the states and the people. Thus, people have freedom of speech, and no one can limit it. Google can fire you for saying shit they don't like, but they can't stop you from saying it.
In this case, there are other laws in place, which is why the guy is suing. He complained about Google's practices being unfair with regards to protected classes. His firing was obvious retaliation. Whether or not his budget lawyer will prevail against the Goog remains to be seen, but he clearly should. It's no different than a company firing you for trying to unionize, strike, report unsafe working conditions, report illegal activity (such as that which he indirectly accused Google of), refuse to engage in illegal activity, etc.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Again, this is a right of the people. No one can legally strip you of that right. Can Google fire you for bringing guns onto their property? Maybe. But if "their" property is public (owned by the public, funded by the public, or generally accessible to the public, etc.) they cannot rightfully stop you from bringing guns onto that property. If it really is their private property, they can. But the parking lot or the adjacent street or the cafe that gives free meals to employees and sells meals to the general public? Nope.
Guess what - you can carry a rifle on your back and walk around your neighborhood and no one can legally do shit to stop you.
If you think otherwise, you're wrong. If you want it to be otherwise, get that constitutional convention going.
No, retard. Are you so chronically unemployed / underemployed that you've never taken the HR training on this topic?
Hostile work environments and harassment (sexual or otherwise) only come up when there's a pattern of harmful behavior or there's an isolated incident that is flagrant or egregious. The main difference between harassment and hostile work environments is that harassment is targeted at an individual or group. And being mean, insensitive, foul-mouthed, insulting, etc. almost never counts as creating a hostile work environment. Being that way can count as harassment, however, if you're only being that way to certain people and are treating others normally. That targeting is what makes it harassment.
But please continue to flap your fucking gums about shit you clearly know nothing about.
Yes, which is exactly why it makes no fucking sense that the PS4 Pro doesn't play UHD BluRays. For the PS4 it makes sense since the UHD BR spec wasn't finalized yet. They were also more concerned about keeping costs down than they were for the PS3. But by the time the PS4 was being worked on, it was clear that the PS4 had beaten the shit out of the Xbox One in terms of sales. So instead of taking advantage of their lead to make a better system and push UHD BluRays, they sat on their ass. The Xbox One S and the Xbox One X both play UHD BluRays. I'm assuming the PS5 or whatever they call their next shit will do it, but we likely won't hear shit about that until next year.
It's probably somewhat inflated by places that more or less expect returns, which is probably any place selling clothing. For example, my wife will order shoes online, and then generally return two-thirds, because they don't fit properly.
Is that 1//3 of each shoe, 2/3 of one shoe, or 2/3 of both shoes?
I can't use a pink female genitalia shaving machine on my beard.
Why not? As long as it's the same size and shape, it'll work fine. (The Venus razors for shaving your legs are the same as the Gillette Fusion razors, for example. They just come encased in a giant block of fragranced lube.)
I am aware of how ARM works. I was not comparing things in the ARM area. Just design work in general.
And Google has not made any major changes to Google Earth since buying it from Keyhole. They've iterated. Which is fine. But it's not going to change the fact that they saw it and bought it.
Slashdot Mirror
There's a concept of "weak" AI and "strong" AI. Then there's the modern concept of "AI", which is fake AI. But it sells.
I'm actually working on a blockchain-based strong AI system. I'm already seeing great results but I can't currently afford to scale. With a decent chunk of change I could have an adaptable, resilient, and distributed advanced AI system based on blockchain technology that would be suited to, fundamentally, any computational task.
If anyone wants to invest, just let me know.
Don't worry, he's confused too.
That's not strictly true. "Who's" can mean other things, such as "who has".
The US is already a Third World country w.r.t. its infrastructure
Our infrastructure isn't well maintained, but I take it you've never been to a third world country.
http://random.ytmnsfw.com/ wheeeeeeeeee
No, not unless regular people are allowed to do the same.
Meanwhile, Level 3 — a major ISP — told Mashable that a "configuration error" caused a 90 minute service disruption.
"On Monday, Nov. 6, our network experienced a service disruption affecting some customers with IP-based services," wrote the spokesperson via email. "The disruption was caused by a configuration error. We know how important these services are to our customers. Our technicians were able to restore service within approximately 90 minutes."
You provided this link: http://www.digitalattackmap.co...
That doesn't even show data for today. Nor does it show any unusual attacks. Look at the bandwidth being used compared to attacks in October or September. There's a handy little timeline chart just below the map.
My statement ("That map doesn't show live data, nor does it show an unusual attack happening now or recently.") is completely correct.
Further, none of your links show evidence of any attack, they show spikes in reports of downtime.
In fact, the only actual reporting on this issue leads back to a statement from Level 3 blaming a configuration issue. This is from YOUR OWN FUCKING LINK in your other post:
Meanwhile, Level 3 — a major ISP — told Mashable that a "configuration error" caused a 90 minute service disruption.
"On Monday, Nov. 6, our network experienced a service disruption affecting some customers with IP-based services," wrote the spokesperson via email. "The disruption was caused by a configuration error. We know how important these services are to our customers. Our technicians were able to restore service within approximately 90 minutes."
RETARD!
That map doesn't show live data, nor does it show an unusual attack happening now or recently.
Penis Vagina Rectum
I find it to be pretty awful, really. Tolkien just prattles on and on and on and on about a bunch of hyperbolic shit. Every location and creature is described in extreme detail only to be outdone by the next that's more fantastical, more evil, more ancient, a taller mountain inside a deeper pit, etc.. And here's a fucking song for no reason. And Hobbit food? It's like the scene in Forest Gump describing different types of shrimp, but it's not funny, nor is it interesting. It's just filler.
Some nerds call this shit "world building". I call it Tolkien loving the smell of his own farts.
Gun control will happen when the wealthy fear for their lives.
Do you know how the Primaries work in the USA? How do you rig primaries? They are run by the states.
Voting is run by the states. The candidates and campaigns and everything else including and plain ol' deciding whether or not to go along with the vote, is run by the party. Why do you think Hillary "won" all those instances where they kicked out Bernie supporters or pretended not to hear them when anything came up that was to be decided by voice?
The DNC rigged their primaries for Hillary. I don't agree with Bernie's crazy views or policy, but I would have voted for him over Trump, and he would have won the election over Trump.
The DNC torpedoed itself in its attempt to stage a coronation for Hillary. The fact that any voter is loyal to the DNC after that is worrying. It's almost a one party system now.
http://fallenrave.ytmnd.com/
Hinting that your co-workers are biologically predisposed to be worse at their jobs, even if some aren't... is crossing a line.
Who "hinted" that? Certainly not James Damore.
Further, which line, exactly? Please define it. Please cite where it is defined. Please also define and cite all other such "lines" not to be crossed.
There is pretty much no form of human interaction where anything goes.
Love.
War.
Zombocom.
"There is nothing in the constitution that says you have a right to a particular job."
There is also absolutely nothing in the Constitution to the right of "Free Speech", only that under the First Amendment, the Federal Government, and this later applied to some lower forms, could not infringe it.
Google is not part of the Government. There are those that may wish it were, but as for now, they can infringe all they like as long as they violate no other Laws in the process.
Sucks to use Company resources to criticize the Company, and then get miffed to being called on it.
He could possibly gotten away with it, if he had included his spiel in his annual Christmas letter, sent out at his own expense, from whatever Mancave he currently resides in, to whatever Peoplecaves they currently reside in.
This same separation of Powers applies to the 2nd Amendment. If Google decides that employees cannot bring Guns on their property, that is entirely within their rights. The 2nd Amendment does not apply, and if somebody insists on bringing a gun in, all Google has to do is call the Cops, say that there is a crazy employee waving a gun around, and things won't end well for crazy employee.
The same applies to the last Republican Convention. It was declared a "No Gun Zone" because, as a private venue, Quicken loans Arena forbade them. (Much to the relief of certain Republicans, I'm sure.)
Those who bray loudest about their Free Speech are those most likely to have no knowledge about it.
Nah, you're dumb.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Congress cannot limit speech. This is applied to basically all government entities at lower levels, as it explicitly references the "freedom of speech", and the Constitution and its amendments are written in such a way that shit not granted to the feds is reserved for the states and the people. Thus, people have freedom of speech, and no one can limit it. Google can fire you for saying shit they don't like, but they can't stop you from saying it.
In this case, there are other laws in place, which is why the guy is suing. He complained about Google's practices being unfair with regards to protected classes. His firing was obvious retaliation. Whether or not his budget lawyer will prevail against the Goog remains to be seen, but he clearly should. It's no different than a company firing you for trying to unionize, strike, report unsafe working conditions, report illegal activity (such as that which he indirectly accused Google of), refuse to engage in illegal activity, etc.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Again, this is a right of the people. No one can legally strip you of that right. Can Google fire you for bringing guns onto their property? Maybe. But if "their" property is public (owned by the public, funded by the public, or generally accessible to the public, etc.) they cannot rightfully stop you from bringing guns onto that property. If it really is their private property, they can. But the parking lot or the adjacent street or the cafe that gives free meals to employees and sells meals to the general public? Nope.
Guess what - you can carry a rifle on your back and walk around your neighborhood and no one can legally do shit to stop you.
If you think otherwise, you're wrong. If you want it to be otherwise, get that constitutional convention going.
No, retard. Are you so chronically unemployed / underemployed that you've never taken the HR training on this topic?
Hostile work environments and harassment (sexual or otherwise) only come up when there's a pattern of harmful behavior or there's an isolated incident that is flagrant or egregious. The main difference between harassment and hostile work environments is that harassment is targeted at an individual or group. And being mean, insensitive, foul-mouthed, insulting, etc. almost never counts as creating a hostile work environment. Being that way can count as harassment, however, if you're only being that way to certain people and are treating others normally. That targeting is what makes it harassment.
But please continue to flap your fucking gums about shit you clearly know nothing about.
You did not read it. I'd bet my life on it.
Black Mirror is trash. It's as shallow, tired, and hamfisted as a 15 year old's poetry.
Yes, which is exactly why it makes no fucking sense that the PS4 Pro doesn't play UHD BluRays. For the PS4 it makes sense since the UHD BR spec wasn't finalized yet. They were also more concerned about keeping costs down than they were for the PS3. But by the time the PS4 was being worked on, it was clear that the PS4 had beaten the shit out of the Xbox One in terms of sales. So instead of taking advantage of their lead to make a better system and push UHD BluRays, they sat on their ass. The Xbox One S and the Xbox One X both play UHD BluRays. I'm assuming the PS5 or whatever they call their next shit will do it, but we likely won't hear shit about that until next year.
SHITTY AFFILIATE SPAM LINKS DETECTED
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
It's probably somewhat inflated by places that more or less expect returns, which is probably any place selling clothing. For example, my wife will order shoes online, and then generally return two-thirds, because they don't fit properly.
Is that 1//3 of each shoe, 2/3 of one shoe, or 2/3 of both shoes?
I can't use a pink female genitalia shaving machine on my beard.
Why not? As long as it's the same size and shape, it'll work fine. (The Venus razors for shaving your legs are the same as the Gillette Fusion razors, for example. They just come encased in a giant block of fragranced lube.)
I am aware of how ARM works. I was not comparing things in the ARM area. Just design work in general.
And Google has not made any major changes to Google Earth since buying it from Keyhole. They've iterated. Which is fine. But it's not going to change the fact that they saw it and bought it.