Uh, where's the consumer product? Where can an average consumer go to buy lab-grown "meat"?
If there is no such consumer product widely available, then "Today, cultured meat is a lot of hype and no consumer product." is true, and your claim ("Bullshit.") is bullshit.
I love sites that prevent you from right clicking (Firefox now at least lets you shift+right click to get around it, but how is a normal user to know?). I also loves sites that prevent you from pasting into password fields. Or that open up popup windows with toolbars disabled and no ability to resize or dock it to your main window as a tab.
What the FUCK would a browser let a site dictate the viewport or the user's ability to input data or the user's ability to fucking open a context menu?!
Trump got elected and the actual Nazis are publicly marching again.
You're 35. You don't know what a Nazi march looks like. If your grandparents are alive and old enough, ask them.
All I see is ugly, angry, and powerless rabble bitching at eachother and hating eachother. Just as the 1% wants them to. Bread and circuses? Fuck that, make them be their own circus.
Do you agree that Google should have limits? Or do you think they should provide domain services for ISIS recruitment websites including those that promote violence against others?
Then "open" doesn't mean "open", does it?
With the internet and the TLDs structured as they are, with government involvement in assigning TLDs to nations, giving control to ICANN, propping up telecoms, etc., and the law of the land being free-speech, I'd say certain registrars (.us, and probably.com) should not be able to revoke registration (or increase pricing to target specific domains) if something is not illegal.
If every.com registrar refuses to handle their domain, that effectively means their domain is seized.
What if the post office refused to carry your mail because you mailed out a communist manifesto? What if AT&T refused to give you a land line because you called a politician and told them to ban weasels from your county? What if the power company cut service to your home because you operate a HAM radio and broadcast your own smooth jazz renditions of pop songs?
As usual, leftists want to censor things rather than refute them. The greatest enemy to free speech in the world is leftists. If you can refute someone, speak up and do it, even if the speech is disagreeable, such as white supremacy.
Does Nazi-ism, or running one's car through a crowd, really need any more refutation at this point?
You don't need eye protection any more than you do on a normal day. In fact you need less. Much less.
Take the amount of time you spend staring at the sun on a normal day and compare it to the amount of time you plan to spend staring at the eclipse factored by the average amount of eclipse coverage over that time. A few minutes of staring at an eclipse is nothing compared to about a century of existing on this planet. Unless you're a cave dweller. And like I said, if you're worried about it, use your built in sunglasses by squinting. If you're a pussy, use regular ol' sunglasses that block UV.
I;m not in the path of totality, and I plan to take a break during whatever the peak time is, step outside and look for a bit, say "neat", and then go back to work. I'll let you know how my retinas fare. If you're lucky, I'll be blind and unable to shitpost on Slashdot.
If you're one of those pussies who's afraid of UV light, you're probably not going to be going outside to look at it anyway. Have you never enjoyed a day at the beach? An afternoon picnic? Are you one of those douches who wears dark sunglasses all the time?
You don't need glasses to view the eclipse. The sun will be blocked. It's an eclipse.
Even if you're watching before and after, or you're nowhere near the path of totality, so what? Have you never seen the sun before? Have you never watched a sunset? If it's high in the sky and bright, just squint.
Slashdot Mirror
Uh, where's the consumer product? Where can an average consumer go to buy lab-grown "meat"?
If there is no such consumer product widely available, then "Today, cultured meat is a lot of hype and no consumer product." is true, and your claim ("Bullshit.") is bullshit.
Last time I checked I was Irish and try to eat healthily.
That adverb pleases me greatly.
Do you eat healthily by eating healthy food, or healthful food?
Chimps are not vegan, lol. They even eat eachother's babies.
I have some sharp pointy teeth designed for grabbing and tearing flesh. Meat also tastes good. I'm supposed to eat meat.
Good for them, then.
Margarine is ass and is terrible for you. Butter is great and is pretty good for you.
I love sites that prevent you from right clicking (Firefox now at least lets you shift+right click to get around it, but how is a normal user to know?).
I also loves sites that prevent you from pasting into password fields.
Or that open up popup windows with toolbars disabled and no ability to resize or dock it to your main window as a tab.
What the FUCK would a browser let a site dictate the viewport or the user's ability to input data or the user's ability to fucking open a context menu?!
They'refour
Dodge is a damn fine car. Ran over my wife with a Dodge.
-Young Zeke
Trump got elected and the actual Nazis are publicly marching again.
You're 35. You don't know what a Nazi march looks like. If your grandparents are alive and old enough, ask them.
All I see is ugly, angry, and powerless rabble bitching at eachother and hating eachother. Just as the 1% wants them to. Bread and circuses? Fuck that, make them be their own circus.
Did you curl up into the fetal position, rock back and forth and stammer that out between sobs and wiping away your tears?
Any day now the RUSSIAN PROOF will come out!
Except it was supported by his sources.
Should we allow ISIS to publish their hatred and call to violence as well
Yes.
can we agree that that "free speech" has limits?
No. The moment you limit any speech, you jeopardize all speech.
Open does not mean without limits.
Do you agree that Google should have limits? Or do you think they should provide domain services for ISIS recruitment websites including those that promote violence against others?
Then "open" doesn't mean "open", does it?
With the internet and the TLDs structured as they are, with government involvement in assigning TLDs to nations, giving control to ICANN, propping up telecoms, etc., and the law of the land being free-speech, I'd say certain registrars (.us, and probably .com) should not be able to revoke registration (or increase pricing to target specific domains) if something is not illegal.
If every .com registrar refuses to handle their domain, that effectively means their domain is seized.
What if the post office refused to carry your mail because you mailed out a communist manifesto?
What if AT&T refused to give you a land line because you called a politician and told them to ban weasels from your county?
What if the power company cut service to your home because you operate a HAM radio and broadcast your own smooth jazz renditions of pop songs?
3 months and a year. This competes with the 1070 and 1080, not the 1080 Ti.
In CA, political opinions are a protected class in certain situations.
As usual, leftists want to censor things rather than refute them. The greatest enemy to free speech in the world is leftists. If you can refute someone, speak up and do it, even if the speech is disagreeable, such as white supremacy.
Does Nazi-ism, or running one's car through a crowd, really need any more refutation at this point?
It does if people are becoming Nazis.
Funny, I seem to remember 12+ years of the Bush economy, the Bush war on terror, the Bush Patriot Act, the Bush GITMO, etc.
Nonsense. Businesses should be free to associate with whom they wish.
What if GoDaddy didn't want to host a site for a gay wedding?
You don't need eye protection any more than you do on a normal day. In fact you need less. Much less.
Take the amount of time you spend staring at the sun on a normal day and compare it to the amount of time you plan to spend staring at the eclipse factored by the average amount of eclipse coverage over that time. A few minutes of staring at an eclipse is nothing compared to about a century of existing on this planet. Unless you're a cave dweller. And like I said, if you're worried about it, use your built in sunglasses by squinting. If you're a pussy, use regular ol' sunglasses that block UV.
I;m not in the path of totality, and I plan to take a break during whatever the peak time is, step outside and look for a bit, say "neat", and then go back to work.
I'll let you know how my retinas fare. If you're lucky, I'll be blind and unable to shitpost on Slashdot.
If you're one of those pussies who's afraid of UV light, you're probably not going to be going outside to look at it anyway.
Have you never enjoyed a day at the beach? An afternoon picnic? Are you one of those douches who wears dark sunglasses all the time?
You don't need glasses to view the eclipse. The sun will be blocked. It's an eclipse.
Even if you're watching before and after, or you're nowhere near the path of totality, so what? Have you never seen the sun before? Have you never watched a sunset? If it's high in the sky and bright, just squint.
Mondo 2000 ain't shit.
http://www.zombo.com/ is where it's at.
If someone supports wasting 2000 bytes on trash, they're a fucking millennial mentally, at least.
If the labor board gets involved Google may not have the option to settle.
Satoshi is typically a male name in Japanese.