And I didn't think that I could pull on your momma's tits without her shitting all over the floor.
I mean honestly....I've stepped-over better-looking women than that, to go jerk-off in the corner.
Oh and one more thing...Anyone cowardly enough to hack these systems, is just making it easier for the terrorists to exploit our critical infrastructure. (Broadcast television of course).
If I'm sounding like a troll, then let me say this to retort: You're batman.
Thanks for a statement of the bleeding obvious. Everyone knows that locking-down content is utterly futile, in comparison to the provisions of a well-implemented digital rights management system.
On the camelback where I spent most of my days
Chilling out maxing relaxing all cool
And all shooting some kurds outside of the school
When a couple of guys said "I keel you one thousand times in the name of Allah!"...
Little Billy Jackson had to go to the store for his mother to pick up some postage stamps. When he got there, he found the stamp machine out of order, and decided to walk the extra three blocks to the post office. On the way there, he passed a hardware store, a variety store, and a lamp shop. The line was short at the post office and he got his stamps quickly and returned home. His dog, "Spider," bounded out to greet him as his mom waved from the porch. Billy's mother was pleased at the job he did and congratulated him on having enough sense to go to the post office when he found the stamp machine was broken. Billy had a nice dessert that night and went to bed.
The true data storage method is biological. Biologists need to learn how to map the human brain, neuron-by-neuron, with the understanding that it be transformed into an array of little itty bitty switches.
From there, it's just a simple matter of cloning a "farm" of people (bred for large cerebral size, but low body weight for economic reasons). Tubes-in for sustenance, tubes-out for waste. Wires-in for data transfer.
Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! And when each living component has exhausted its lifespan, it can be slaughtered for cheap meat.
Sometimes the saltiness is not the problem. Some women just can't handle the texture.
It also tends to depend on how much red meat and asparagus you've been eating, too. Sometimes it's good to sweeten it up with some diet coke. (The caffeine is a good diuretic, the water dilutes it, and the water-soluble aspartame sweetens it up).
Your mom doesn't care for the saltiness though.
1. Canned Food
2. Solar Panels
3. Gerber Knives
4. Crossbows
5. Wind-a-ble AM/SW radios
6. Water Purification Tablets
7. Synthetic Fibre Parkas
8. Thermal Underclothes
9. First Aid Kits
10.Synthetic Fibre High-Durability Sleeping Bags
That is, once Peak Oil devastates world economy, governments, disease control, and otherwise any form of civilization as we know it.
Enough of this Mars Lander NASA JPL stuff. Our collective efforts (by both governments and science) should instead be devoted entirely to worrying about keeping the lights and heat on instead of this pointless intellectual drivel.
I mean, we need to make some leaps and bounds in terms of energy policy, transportation, and even materials engineering, and in *extremely* short order.
Otherwise, in a couple of billion years from now, some alien probe will be landing on earth, trying to figure out if there was every life over here!
But then again,it might be too late already. In which case, these little events serve as convenient distractions for the populace, benefiting only our present governments, so that we keep buying things like good consumers, as if nothing was wrong.
I must have been using it illegally for years, basically whenever I edited a JPG. Who knew that it was just for porn. ie) Going on a date with Mr. Slick-mittens.
"The server was not secure at all. It indicates that these people that are doing the crime today, they are not security experts, they are not computer science experts."
Uhhh....So someone knocks over a liquor store with a 9 mm. Does that mean that he's a gunsmith or a sharpshooter, or skilled in advanced war-fighting techniques of some kind? No...Chances are he's a just a guy with a gun.
People use whatever they can to take what they want. Film at eleven.
This topic is about as engaging as a trip to the local box factory.
(No, they're not assembled here...They're assembled in Flint, Michigan. And not for anything cool...Only for nails).
They was giving me ten thousand watts a day, you know, and I'm hot to trot! The next woman takes me on's gonna light up like a pinball machine and pay off in silver dollars!
How do we know that it's not doing its job all along? You might document zero security incidents for a particular camera over a particular time period. But you'll never be able to measure the incident avoidance or mitigation (or even count the number of times) the bad shit that it prevented.
Totally Heisenberg.
And I know; we can't hide behind the "what-ifs." But security (and I mean all forms of security) is all like that. You'll never realize a measurable cost-benefit, but there's an inate sense within everybody that it's needed on some level.
The tricky thing is to just not go overboard (as with anything). (The difference between scratching your ass, and tearing it wide open). CCTV is a tool, but that's it.
Policing is a similar matter.
The security systems integrator or security principal in charge of that CCTV installation should share the blame for that incident - By installing a camera that personnel had access to do such peeping with. It's irresponsible. Not to mention a major faux pas in today's era of privacy legislation. (Especially in my neck of the woods - Canada).
You never put a camera in a place like that. And if you have a legitimate business need for CCTV coverage anywhere near such an era, you spec-out a system that has the "prohibited area" feature. That is, you can define a polygonal area of the screen that will always display black - either live and/or for archival purposes. So if Rowdy Roddy Peeper the Security Guard decides he wants to zoom-in on say a hotel room window, all that he'll see is the window frame, flood-filled with black.
They say that in the physical security industry, you must respect everyone and yet trust no one. But I think that you also have to trust your security officers even less. If you give them some kind of power or ability, they'll abuse it because they're human. You gotta have controls in place to detect, deter, and prevent abuse.
Just like a security guard's watchclock. Skip it, and he goes to sleep whenever he can.
CCTV almost never captures what you set out to catch. In many organizations, it's a knee-jerk reaction to some kind of incident. ie) Something got pinched, someone received an ass-kicking, etc.
Even if you do catch it, you'll never be able to identify/recognize/charge/convict the person based on the video image alone. 4CIF at 30 fps is pretty much as good as it gets right now in most feasible installations. All you'll be able to say is, "Subject is hatless...REPEAT...HATLESS!" (And that's even if he's in the frame). The PTZ will just pan around aimlessly on a tour program, or be pointed at the wrong thing.
However, wide-spread deployment of CCTV systems is still not futile; you just usually end up catching something that were never really looking for in the first place. People and vehicular traffic movements, facility useage, or realtime video of an incident in progress that just happens to be going-on in front of the lens. You can establish time frames of entry or exit, or use it to clue-you-in to the right path to finding the real evidence you're looking for.
From a security systems perspective, more CCTV is better, but not to mitigate direct and specific threats. Only general ones.
Or sometimes you just luck-out and with a good booby shot in the atrium of an office building.
Slashdot Mirror
And I didn't think that I could pull on your momma's tits without her shitting all over the floor. I mean honestly....I've stepped-over better-looking women than that, to go jerk-off in the corner.
Oh and one more thing...Anyone cowardly enough to hack these systems, is just making it easier for the terrorists to exploit our critical infrastructure. (Broadcast television of course).
If I'm sounding like a troll, then let me say this to retort: You're batman.
Thanks for a statement of the bleeding obvious. Everyone knows that locking-down content is utterly futile, in comparison to the provisions of a well-implemented digital rights management system.
I'd pay $200 to get the spice channel for making liquid explosion.
...hax0ring da set-top boxes for 2009 DTV sWitChover!
That was uncalled for.
On the camelback where I spent most of my days Chilling out maxing relaxing all cool And all shooting some kurds outside of the school When a couple of guys said "I keel you one thousand times in the name of Allah!" ...
When can I get Bonzai Buddy for Firefox?
If we had some ham, we could have ham-and-eggs, if we had some eggs.
Little Billy Jackson had to go to the store for his mother to pick up some postage stamps. When he got there, he found the stamp machine out of order, and decided to walk the extra three blocks to the post office. On the way there, he passed a hardware store, a variety store, and a lamp shop. The line was short at the post office and he got his stamps quickly and returned home. His dog, "Spider," bounded out to greet him as his mom waved from the porch. Billy's mother was pleased at the job he did and congratulated him on having enough sense to go to the post office when he found the stamp machine was broken. Billy had a nice dessert that night and went to bed.
The true data storage method is biological. Biologists need to learn how to map the human brain, neuron-by-neuron, with the understanding that it be transformed into an array of little itty bitty switches. From there, it's just a simple matter of cloning a "farm" of people (bred for large cerebral size, but low body weight for economic reasons). Tubes-in for sustenance, tubes-out for waste. Wires-in for data transfer. Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! And when each living component has exhausted its lifespan, it can be slaughtered for cheap meat.
Sometimes the saltiness is not the problem. Some women just can't handle the texture.
It also tends to depend on how much red meat and asparagus you've been eating, too. Sometimes it's good to sweeten it up with some diet coke. (The caffeine is a good diuretic, the water dilutes it, and the water-soluble aspartame sweetens it up).
Your mom doesn't care for the saltiness though.
1. Canned Food
2. Solar Panels
3. Gerber Knives
4. Crossbows
5. Wind-a-ble AM/SW radios
6. Water Purification Tablets
7. Synthetic Fibre Parkas
8. Thermal Underclothes
9. First Aid Kits
10.Synthetic Fibre High-Durability Sleeping Bags
That is, once Peak Oil devastates world economy, governments, disease control, and otherwise any form of civilization as we know it.
They know how to live without technology, which is more than one can say about the rest of us. They'll bury us.
Enough of this Mars Lander NASA JPL stuff. Our collective efforts (by both governments and science) should instead be devoted entirely to worrying about keeping the lights and heat on instead of this pointless intellectual drivel.
I mean, we need to make some leaps and bounds in terms of energy policy, transportation, and even materials engineering, and in *extremely* short order.
Otherwise, in a couple of billion years from now, some alien probe will be landing on earth, trying to figure out if there was every life over here!
But then again,it might be too late already. In which case, these little events serve as convenient distractions for the populace, benefiting only our present governments, so that we keep buying things like good consumers, as if nothing was wrong.
I must have been using it illegally for years, basically whenever I edited a JPG. Who knew that it was just for porn. ie) Going on a date with Mr. Slick-mittens.
Everyone's got a camera-phone these days. Fuck that. I want to know when I can get a phone in my camera.
"The server was not secure at all. It indicates that these people that are doing the crime today, they are not security experts, they are not computer science experts." Uhhh....So someone knocks over a liquor store with a 9 mm. Does that mean that he's a gunsmith or a sharpshooter, or skilled in advanced war-fighting techniques of some kind? No...Chances are he's a just a guy with a gun. People use whatever they can to take what they want. Film at eleven.
This topic is about as engaging as a trip to the local box factory. (No, they're not assembled here...They're assembled in Flint, Michigan. And not for anything cool...Only for nails).
He thinks FOSS screwed-over his buddy Vladimir causing his software company to go tits-up, causing him to kill his wife and son. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Pokhilko http://www.rotten.com/library/culture/tetris/ I read it on rotten, so it MUST be true!!
They was giving me ten thousand watts a day, you know, and I'm hot to trot! The next woman takes me on's gonna light up like a pinball machine and pay off in silver dollars!
How do we know that it's not doing its job all along? You might document zero security incidents for a particular camera over a particular time period. But you'll never be able to measure the incident avoidance or mitigation (or even count the number of times) the bad shit that it prevented. Totally Heisenberg. And I know; we can't hide behind the "what-ifs." But security (and I mean all forms of security) is all like that. You'll never realize a measurable cost-benefit, but there's an inate sense within everybody that it's needed on some level. The tricky thing is to just not go overboard (as with anything). (The difference between scratching your ass, and tearing it wide open). CCTV is a tool, but that's it. Policing is a similar matter.
The security systems integrator or security principal in charge of that CCTV installation should share the blame for that incident - By installing a camera that personnel had access to do such peeping with. It's irresponsible. Not to mention a major faux pas in today's era of privacy legislation. (Especially in my neck of the woods - Canada). You never put a camera in a place like that. And if you have a legitimate business need for CCTV coverage anywhere near such an era, you spec-out a system that has the "prohibited area" feature. That is, you can define a polygonal area of the screen that will always display black - either live and/or for archival purposes. So if Rowdy Roddy Peeper the Security Guard decides he wants to zoom-in on say a hotel room window, all that he'll see is the window frame, flood-filled with black. They say that in the physical security industry, you must respect everyone and yet trust no one. But I think that you also have to trust your security officers even less. If you give them some kind of power or ability, they'll abuse it because they're human. You gotta have controls in place to detect, deter, and prevent abuse. Just like a security guard's watchclock. Skip it, and he goes to sleep whenever he can.
CCTV almost never captures what you set out to catch. In many organizations, it's a knee-jerk reaction to some kind of incident. ie) Something got pinched, someone received an ass-kicking, etc. Even if you do catch it, you'll never be able to identify/recognize/charge/convict the person based on the video image alone. 4CIF at 30 fps is pretty much as good as it gets right now in most feasible installations. All you'll be able to say is, "Subject is hatless...REPEAT...HATLESS!" (And that's even if he's in the frame). The PTZ will just pan around aimlessly on a tour program, or be pointed at the wrong thing. However, wide-spread deployment of CCTV systems is still not futile; you just usually end up catching something that were never really looking for in the first place. People and vehicular traffic movements, facility useage, or realtime video of an incident in progress that just happens to be going-on in front of the lens. You can establish time frames of entry or exit, or use it to clue-you-in to the right path to finding the real evidence you're looking for. From a security systems perspective, more CCTV is better, but not to mitigate direct and specific threats. Only general ones. Or sometimes you just luck-out and with a good booby shot in the atrium of an office building.