When authorities do get legal ability to shoot down drones, it seems in practice very difficult to do. Small moving target like back in the days of multiple rapid fire machine guns and flak artillery. Maybe CalFire can get a few of these to add to their fleet of vehicles,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
It's interesting from an employment perspective -- as more and more companies outsource everything, they have less control over who sees their data, and potentially have more people with axes to grind, or who could just make a quick buck more easily than an insider could. So the question is, if this blackmail thing becomes a trend, will companies stop completely trusting their contractors?
I made a similar comment about the OPM hack, someone replied to my comment, "you have been reading too much science fiction." Though it still sounds reasonable that outsourcing reduces direct costs but they also give up control. Getting back to original story, if the hack was an inside job then it doesn't matter what security measures are put in place.
Maybe not as much as it is now but I remember in 1970s there was discussion about greenhouse gases i.e. CO2 and Venus as an example. It was also when NASA flew Pioneer Venus (I was thinking we have been ignoring that planet). Of course there was no internet in form we know now where anyone can post whatever. Though we have datasets by NASA, NOAA, EPA (though most don't have the training to interpret these sets) we also have all kinds of sites that offer proof that climate change is/isn't (take your pick depending on what political party you are member of).
There was a program about 2000s, a clip of Al Gore talking about global warming. One of the commentators said he was the best spokesman for this phenomena, and also the worst. I think that was the tipping point as Gore is a lightning rod of criticism from the far right. I wonder it might have been better if he kept his mouth shut. There has been noticeable changes in the environment, long droughts in places that need water, and floods in places with too much water, rising sea levels (really, there are many places with large construction projects to alleviate flooding).
what is SJW? I know I know, it is something everybody knows and I don't. I guess I'm too lazy to google it (like most stuff I get contradictory descriptions or links to hotrussianbabes and gogetbids) or read through tons of drivel to find were somebody actually spelled it out.
hey you forgot to mention we will be on Mars 20 years from now and we will have fusion power plants in 10 years (been said for past 50 years). And we're 15% into the 21st century, where's the flying cars? oh wait we have a few of those roadable airplanes.
We have the worst traffic in the country - maybe second only to LA - even after all the new roads are built. Commute times are horrible.
Speaking of traffic, there are times in Silicon Valley where traffic is really bad. Alrighty so lets create alternatives to roads and cars. Talking with someone (who is very pro uber) the other day who had compelling argument against high speed rail (very expensive and slow compared to airlines), against cabs (it's driven by lobbyists who are convincing govts to outlaw uber), and busses (most underutilized and made prohibitively expensive by the unions). I was thinking, "well crap, we will never get alternative transportations to the car or the airplane with this mode of thinking that shoots down any alternates (with exception of unobtainium concepts)."
Commerce whether it be transportation or high speed internet (which I've read Seattle is poor at both) is important. Kind of like logistics for military forces. Might have the best of the best but if not a good logistics infrastructure (all that boring stuff like food, water, fuel) then only good for parades.
who just doesn't get it? I casually read reddit like I do slashdot though lots more stuff on reddit (too much, I can't keep up with it all). It seems interesting stuff there but a huge time pit to read and digest it all. Plus have to filter out usual BS.
I was hoping to find a subreddit on specific technical subjects where I can find useful information like in the usenet days.
For past 50 years, Mars has been 20 years away. In 60s, they say people will be on Mars in the 80s. In 80s, they say people will be on Mars in the 00s. Well it's 2010s and they say people will be on Mars in 2030s. Cmon you all, don't you see a pattern here?
Was almost believable until you said "key sites" and facebook/twitter in the same sentence.
I know of some people will go nutzoid if their social media site goes down for a lengthly period of time. Really. They will get very angry or agitated and they will be a burden during a crisis when others are trying to mitigate the situation. Reminds me of what this guy who went through a escape and evasion course in the Army said remember the "threes." You can't survive no more than 3 hours without shelter, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food (i.e. first get out of extreme environment of cold or heat, then look for water before looking for food). Nowadays replace shelter with Facebook/Twitter/etc.
well I am getting really tired of this two-party, two-modes of thinking, NFL style mentality. This concept of only two teams like football, you are either with one or the the other (no other choices). And like football, you can only cheer or boo but really have no idea what their game plans are (you see them huddle before the play but that's it). The whole concept of multiple voices and combining different options of running societies is so mysterious for most people. And like football there is only two tiers of people: Rich and poor. You are either in one or the other. SF illustrates this as housing is very expensive, or there is the Tenderloin.
Exactly. You have to have a house for a charging station, and unless you are very wealthy or bought one in 20th century, you ain't gonna get a house in Silicon Valley. For me living in a condo, EV is only a spectator item for me. There may be some fortunate people in townhouses where they can have charging stations, my garage simply does not have that infrastructure. Other than that EVs are good for typical cars as 95% of my driving is within 100 miles range per day.
I imagine must take André Borschberg discipline to concentrate on flying and make a good landing after all this time. Then be able get a hot shower and a good meal while sitting at the table!
take it as a personal act of blasphemy if you try to cancel.
What if you don't pay the bill? I would think they'd simply disconnect or do they send goons to garnish your wages?
Overall in the big picture it seems less people are watching television as many viewers spend time in front of the computer or on their phones. But yet broadcasters seem to still be raking in the big bucks, my perception is they replace all their video equipment every three years (and some of that stuff is ***expensive*** but where does the old stuff go? I'd love to get one of those HD cameras).
ugh, I'm getting more tempted to cut comcast but where I'm situated there is not much option for OTA. Network TV sucks, but I tune into NDT's Startalk. PBS is nice (I donate money to help further the cause), I need to evaluate if I can receive them OTA. TCM seems to be repeating same stuff over and over, occasionally they will show obscure movies (i.e. George Raft story that also starred Barrie Chase, Julie London, and Jayne Mansfield).
For highspeed internet and where I'm at it seems only option is Xfinity (no DSL in my area). Which most of us scream about lack of choices, and the other thread of state govts prohibiting local cities from establishing their own ISPs. I noticed city of Santa Clara (I don't live in that area) has free wifi which seems to work much better than Google in Mountain View (which is worse than dialup).
The more clever candidates on the right will figure out quickly that it's now in their best interest to just shut up about gay marriage and to focus on a part of their platform that's less toxic to young voters.
I somehow have this feeling they will still be making a stink about same sex marriages. i.e. Candidates on the right still making a stink about ACA even after numerous SCOTUS rulings.
from http://www.projectrho.com/publ...
quote:
I'll believe in people settling Mars at about the same time I see people setting the Gobi Desert. The Gobi Desert is about a thousand times as hospitable as Mars and five hundred times cheaper and easier to reach. Nobody ever writes "Gobi Desert Opera" because, well, it's just kind of plonkingly obvious that there's no good reason to go there and live. It's ugly, it's inhospitable and there's no way to make it pay. Mars is just the same, really. We just romanticize it because it's so hard to reach.
end quote.
but if those HDs fail I am toast. I've copied some of the files to other sources. They seem to be running pretty good after all these years in addition to a couple older laptops. It's just backing up is tedious (and yes I read the post about HD failure 5 minutes after, "I'll back up later, too busy right now."). I've tried to connect external drives but getting the PCs to recognize them is difficult. All these devices are not connected to internet (and have never crashed since I've left them offline). There is option of going to NSA as they "backup everything" but my legacy systems are not connected to internet and NSA systems are like cockroach traps (can go in, but never come out). Reminds me regarding backup systems, can you get your files from it? Many companies have routine backup networks but it's horribly bureaucratic trying to get information from the backup HDs.
Let's say polls were way off resulting in newspapers with headline errors. But the printed newspaper has gone wayside along with all those "hard to reach" people on landlines. However there is the internet. I did a screen grab of news website a week or two after the 2012 election that has a Romney infotainment article on the side, "we're confident we will win this election."
Yes, Solar Max was the first to be repaired. And there were some other satellites that were retrieved and brought back.
But (yes there are always bad excuses) cost of flying Shuttle is far more expensive than the satellite itself. I remember in 1970s/1980s there was lots of talk about space tugs, then poof all such articles disappeared. Later in 1990s in a project management class, instructor mentioned a parametric study on space tugs resulted in energy changes to change orbits from typical 250mile at 28.5 deg Shuttle orbit to get to various satellites will take more energy than to send a spacecraft to the Moon. Shuttle could change orbit inclination but not by much (I think about 1 deg). Damn physics again prevents science fiction becoming reality.
On a side note, Shuttle capable of retrieving satellites was something the Soviets ***did not*** like as their recon birds were ripe for pickings.
On NASAwatch someone posted this insightful comment:
"I blame most of the destination argument on the creation of the Mars underground in the 1980's. Prior to that NASA was focused on using the Shuttle for industrialization in LEO with projects like demonstrating the repair and return of satellites, building structural items in orbit, tethers, etc., all logical starting points for building a Cislunar industrial capability that would have given us the Solar System. NASA didn't even have plans to send robots to Mars. By advocating that we needed to skip the Moon and go rushing off to Mars they started this entire useless destination debate that has paralyzed space policy ever since."
David Morrison of SETI has said only need to nudge it by impacting it with a spacecraft, that will change it's trajectory [of course need to do it way ahead before impact, and careful calculations]. Other than that, sounds like excuse to keep some A or H bombs lying around. And of course using them on a NEO is very dramatic, add Bruce Willis and you have a classic (there was another asteroid movie that came out same time, it has been forgotten). Plus ever since the movie "Marooned," a common movie plot of problem solved are secret USAF spaceships (as illustrated by SensitiveMale).
The look of absolute horror on his face when he asked "Why would you want to see that?" is something I have not forgotten.
I've noticed veterans that have been in combat rarely talk about it. When they do, a common theme is how chaotic it was. And those who talk a lot about battles and firefights were never in one.
I wonder how often fibers are cut by a backhoe to lay other utilities but didn't do proper homework prior to digging a trench. Or if some of these intentional cuts were actually accidental (or removing old fibers but mistakenly took out the ones still in service). Kind of like the old phrase of stupidity over malicious the likely cause or something like that.
Slashdot Mirror
When authorities do get legal ability to shoot down drones, it seems in practice very difficult to do. Small moving target like back in the days of multiple rapid fire machine guns and flak artillery. Maybe CalFire can get a few of these to add to their fleet of vehicles, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...
It's interesting from an employment perspective -- as more and more companies outsource everything, they have less control over who sees their data, and potentially have more people with axes to grind, or who could just make a quick buck more easily than an insider could. So the question is, if this blackmail thing becomes a trend, will companies stop completely trusting their contractors?
I made a similar comment about the OPM hack, someone replied to my comment, "you have been reading too much science fiction." Though it still sounds reasonable that outsourcing reduces direct costs but they also give up control. Getting back to original story, if the hack was an inside job then it doesn't matter what security measures are put in place.
Maybe not as much as it is now but I remember in 1970s there was discussion about greenhouse gases i.e. CO2 and Venus as an example. It was also when NASA flew Pioneer Venus (I was thinking we have been ignoring that planet). Of course there was no internet in form we know now where anyone can post whatever. Though we have datasets by NASA, NOAA, EPA (though most don't have the training to interpret these sets) we also have all kinds of sites that offer proof that climate change is/isn't (take your pick depending on what political party you are member of).
There was a program about 2000s, a clip of Al Gore talking about global warming. One of the commentators said he was the best spokesman for this phenomena, and also the worst. I think that was the tipping point as Gore is a lightning rod of criticism from the far right. I wonder it might have been better if he kept his mouth shut. There has been noticeable changes in the environment, long droughts in places that need water, and floods in places with too much water, rising sea levels (really, there are many places with large construction projects to alleviate flooding).
what is SJW? I know I know, it is something everybody knows and I don't. I guess I'm too lazy to google it (like most stuff I get contradictory descriptions or links to hotrussianbabes and gogetbids) or read through tons of drivel to find were somebody actually spelled it out.
he gets a boost in star status with NDT, https://www.facebook.com/neild...
At 57, I've been hearing this crap since I was 6.
hey you forgot to mention we will be on Mars 20 years from now and we will have fusion power plants in 10 years (been said for past 50 years). And we're 15% into the 21st century, where's the flying cars? oh wait we have a few of those roadable airplanes.
We have the worst traffic in the country - maybe second only to LA - even after all the new roads are built. Commute times are horrible.
Speaking of traffic, there are times in Silicon Valley where traffic is really bad. Alrighty so lets create alternatives to roads and cars. Talking with someone (who is very pro uber) the other day who had compelling argument against high speed rail (very expensive and slow compared to airlines), against cabs (it's driven by lobbyists who are convincing govts to outlaw uber), and busses (most underutilized and made prohibitively expensive by the unions). I was thinking, "well crap, we will never get alternative transportations to the car or the airplane with this mode of thinking that shoots down any alternates (with exception of unobtainium concepts)."
Commerce whether it be transportation or high speed internet (which I've read Seattle is poor at both) is important. Kind of like logistics for military forces. Might have the best of the best but if not a good logistics infrastructure (all that boring stuff like food, water, fuel) then only good for parades.
I was hoping to find a subreddit on specific technical subjects where I can find useful information like in the usenet days.
For past 50 years, Mars has been 20 years away. In 60s, they say people will be on Mars in the 80s. In 80s, they say people will be on Mars in the 00s. Well it's 2010s and they say people will be on Mars in 2030s. Cmon you all, don't you see a pattern here?
Was almost believable until you said "key sites" and facebook/twitter in the same sentence.
I know of some people will go nutzoid if their social media site goes down for a lengthly period of time. Really. They will get very angry or agitated and they will be a burden during a crisis when others are trying to mitigate the situation. Reminds me of what this guy who went through a escape and evasion course in the Army said remember the "threes." You can't survive no more than 3 hours without shelter, 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food (i.e. first get out of extreme environment of cold or heat, then look for water before looking for food). Nowadays replace shelter with Facebook/Twitter/etc.
well I am getting really tired of this two-party, two-modes of thinking, NFL style mentality. This concept of only two teams like football, you are either with one or the the other (no other choices). And like football, you can only cheer or boo but really have no idea what their game plans are (you see them huddle before the play but that's it). The whole concept of multiple voices and combining different options of running societies is so mysterious for most people. And like football there is only two tiers of people: Rich and poor. You are either in one or the other. SF illustrates this as housing is very expensive, or there is the Tenderloin.
Exactly. You have to have a house for a charging station, and unless you are very wealthy or bought one in 20th century, you ain't gonna get a house in Silicon Valley. For me living in a condo, EV is only a spectator item for me. There may be some fortunate people in townhouses where they can have charging stations, my garage simply does not have that infrastructure. Other than that EVs are good for typical cars as 95% of my driving is within 100 miles range per day.
I imagine must take André Borschberg discipline to concentrate on flying and make a good landing after all this time. Then be able get a hot shower and a good meal while sitting at the table!
take it as a personal act of blasphemy if you try to cancel.
What if you don't pay the bill? I would think they'd simply disconnect or do they send goons to garnish your wages?
Overall in the big picture it seems less people are watching television as many viewers spend time in front of the computer or on their phones. But yet broadcasters seem to still be raking in the big bucks, my perception is they replace all their video equipment every three years (and some of that stuff is ***expensive*** but where does the old stuff go? I'd love to get one of those HD cameras).
ugh, I'm getting more tempted to cut comcast but where I'm situated there is not much option for OTA. Network TV sucks, but I tune into NDT's Startalk. PBS is nice (I donate money to help further the cause), I need to evaluate if I can receive them OTA. TCM seems to be repeating same stuff over and over, occasionally they will show obscure movies (i.e. George Raft story that also starred Barrie Chase, Julie London, and Jayne Mansfield).
For highspeed internet and where I'm at it seems only option is Xfinity (no DSL in my area). Which most of us scream about lack of choices, and the other thread of state govts prohibiting local cities from establishing their own ISPs. I noticed city of Santa Clara (I don't live in that area) has free wifi which seems to work much better than Google in Mountain View (which is worse than dialup).
The more clever candidates on the right will figure out quickly that it's now in their best interest to just shut up about gay marriage and to focus on a part of their platform that's less toxic to young voters.
I somehow have this feeling they will still be making a stink about same sex marriages. i.e. Candidates on the right still making a stink about ACA even after numerous SCOTUS rulings.
as featured in Dick Tracy comics, i.e. what looks like "nuclear powered flying garbage cans?" just asking.
from http://www.projectrho.com/publ...
quote:
I'll believe in people settling Mars at about the same time I see people setting the Gobi Desert. The Gobi Desert is about a thousand times as hospitable as Mars and five hundred times cheaper and easier to reach. Nobody ever writes "Gobi Desert Opera" because, well, it's just kind of plonkingly obvious that there's no good reason to go there and live. It's ugly, it's inhospitable and there's no way to make it pay. Mars is just the same, really. We just romanticize it because it's so hard to reach.
end quote.
but if those HDs fail I am toast. I've copied some of the files to other sources. They seem to be running pretty good after all these years in addition to a couple older laptops. It's just backing up is tedious (and yes I read the post about HD failure 5 minutes after, "I'll back up later, too busy right now."). I've tried to connect external drives but getting the PCs to recognize them is difficult. All these devices are not connected to internet (and have never crashed since I've left them offline). There is option of going to NSA as they "backup everything" but my legacy systems are not connected to internet and NSA systems are like cockroach traps (can go in, but never come out). Reminds me regarding backup systems, can you get your files from it? Many companies have routine backup networks but it's horribly bureaucratic trying to get information from the backup HDs.
Let's say polls were way off resulting in newspapers with headline errors. But the printed newspaper has gone wayside along with all those "hard to reach" people on landlines. However there is the internet. I did a screen grab of news website a week or two after the 2012 election that has a Romney infotainment article on the side, "we're confident we will win this election."
Yes, Solar Max was the first to be repaired. And there were some other satellites that were retrieved and brought back.
But (yes there are always bad excuses) cost of flying Shuttle is far more expensive than the satellite itself. I remember in 1970s/1980s there was lots of talk about space tugs, then poof all such articles disappeared. Later in 1990s in a project management class, instructor mentioned a parametric study on space tugs resulted in energy changes to change orbits from typical 250mile at 28.5 deg Shuttle orbit to get to various satellites will take more energy than to send a spacecraft to the Moon. Shuttle could change orbit inclination but not by much (I think about 1 deg). Damn physics again prevents science fiction becoming reality.
On a side note, Shuttle capable of retrieving satellites was something the Soviets ***did not*** like as their recon birds were ripe for pickings.
On NASAwatch someone posted this insightful comment:
"I blame most of the destination argument on the creation of the Mars underground in the 1980's. Prior to that NASA was focused on using the Shuttle for industrialization in LEO with projects like demonstrating the repair and return of satellites, building structural items in orbit, tethers, etc., all logical starting points for building a Cislunar industrial capability that would have given us the Solar System. NASA didn't even have plans to send robots to Mars. By advocating that we needed to skip the Moon and go rushing off to Mars they started this entire useless destination debate that has paralyzed space policy ever since."
great suggestion
David Morrison of SETI has said only need to nudge it by impacting it with a spacecraft, that will change it's trajectory [of course need to do it way ahead before impact, and careful calculations]. Other than that, sounds like excuse to keep some A or H bombs lying around. And of course using them on a NEO is very dramatic, add Bruce Willis and you have a classic (there was another asteroid movie that came out same time, it has been forgotten). Plus ever since the movie "Marooned," a common movie plot of problem solved are secret USAF spaceships (as illustrated by SensitiveMale).
The look of absolute horror on his face when he asked "Why would you want to see that?" is something I have not forgotten.
I've noticed veterans that have been in combat rarely talk about it. When they do, a common theme is how chaotic it was. And those who talk a lot about battles and firefights were never in one.
I mean this can't happen in real life.
I wonder how often fibers are cut by a backhoe to lay other utilities but didn't do proper homework prior to digging a trench. Or if some of these intentional cuts were actually accidental (or removing old fibers but mistakenly took out the ones still in service). Kind of like the old phrase of stupidity over malicious the likely cause or something like that.